Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1990 Sep;10(9):4582–4589. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4582

Selection and analysis of galactose metabolic pathway variants of a mouse liver cell line.

K S Zaret 1, K A Stevens 1
PMCID: PMC361046  PMID: 2167434

Abstract

To study the genetic expression and regulation of galactose-metabolizing enzymes, we mutagenized the mouse liver H2.35 cell line and selected for cell clones resistant to the toxic galactose analog, 2-deoxy-D-galactose (2-DOG). One cloned line, designated H12.10, was stably resistant to high levels of 2-DOG and was completely deficient in galactokinase activity. Galactokinase activity and growth sensitivity to 2-DOG could be restored by transfecting H12.10 cells with a plasmid containing the Escherichia coli galactokinase (galK) gene fused to a eucaryotic promoter; thus, the 2-DOG selection could be directed against transfected recombinant constructs in a liver cell line. We also found that H2.35 cells could not utilize galactose as a primary carbon source because of a deficiency in galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase; a variant line of H2.35 cells selected in galactose medium expressed higher levels of uridyltransferase activity. Finally, we found that in all mammalian cell lines tested, galactokinase expression was the same whether the medium contained glucose, galactose, or both sugars. These studies demonstrate differences between mammalian cells and yeast cells in the regulation of gal enzymes, and they define different schemes for obtaining altered expression of genes in the galactose metabolic pathway. The isogenic liver cell lines described here can also serve as model systems for studying galactosemias, which are inherited disorders of galactose metabolism in humans.

Full text

PDF
4589

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abraham H. D., Howell R. R. Human hepatic uridine diphosphate galactose pyrophosphorylase. Its characterization and activity during development. J Biol Chem. 1969 Feb 25;244(4):545–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adhya S. L., Shapiro J. A. The galactose operon of E. coli K-12. I. Structural and pleiotropic mutations of the operon. Genetics. 1969 Jun;62(2):231–247. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aiba H., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 25;256(22):11905–11910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alper M. D., Ames B. N. Positive selection of mutants with deletions of the gal-chl region of the Salmonella chromosome as a screening procedure for mutagens that cause deletions. J Bacteriol. 1975 Jan;121(1):259–266. doi: 10.1128/jb.121.1.259-266.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg P. E., Yu J. K., Popovic Z., Schumperli D., Johansen H., Rosenberg M., Anderson W. F. Differential activation of the mouse beta-globin promoter by enhancers. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;3(7):1246–1254. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.7.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bochner B. R., Ames B. N. Complete analysis of cellular nucleotides by two-dimensional thin layer chromatography. J Biol Chem. 1982 Aug 25;257(16):9759–9769. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borrelli E., Heyman R., Hsi M., Evans R. M. Targeting of an inducible toxic phenotype in animal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7572–7576. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.20.7572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brent R., Ptashne M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):729–736. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colbère-Garapin F., Horodniceanu F., Kourilsky P., Garapin A. C. A new dominant hybrid selective marker for higher eukaryotic cells. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 25;150(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90321-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DOUGLAS H. C., HAWTHORNE D. C. ENZYMATIC EXPRESSION AND GENETIC LINKAGE OF GENES CONTROLLING GALACTOSE UTILIZATION IN SACCHAROMYCES. Genetics. 1964 May;49:837–844. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.5.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dignam J. D., Lebovitz R. M., Roeder R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Mar 11;11(5):1475–1489. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dorn A., Bollekens J., Staub A., Benoist C., Mathis D. A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):863–872. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90513-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knowles B. B., Howe C. C., Aden D. P. Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines secrete the major plasma proteins and hepatitis B surface antigen. Science. 1980 Jul 25;209(4455):497–499. doi: 10.1126/science.6248960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mylin L. M., Bhat J. P., Hopper J. E. Regulated phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of GAL4, a transcriptional activator. Genes Dev. 1989 Aug;3(8):1157–1165. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.8.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Platt T. Toxicity of 2-deoxygalactose to Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells constitutively synthesizing galactose-metabolizing enzymes. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 May;4(5):994–996. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.5.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roberts C. T., Jr, Morse D. E. Genetic regulation of galactokinase in Tetrahymena by cyclic AMP glucose, and epinephrine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1810–1814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schümperli D., Howard B. H., Rosenberg M. Efficient expression of Escherichia coli galactokinase gene in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(2):257–261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shimotohno K., Mizutani S., Temin H. M. Sequence of retrovirus provirus resembles that of bacterial transposable elements. Nature. 1980 Jun 19;285(5766):550–554. doi: 10.1038/285550a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Siminovitch L. On the nature of hereditable variation in cultured somatic cells. Cell. 1976 Jan;7(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90249-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. St John T. P., Davis R. W. The organization and transcription of the galactose gene cluster of Saccharomyces. J Mol Biol. 1981 Oct 25;152(2):285–315. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90244-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Staudt L. M., Singh H., Sen R., Wirth T., Sharp P. A., Baltimore D. A lymphoid-specific protein binding to the octamer motif of immunoglobulin genes. Nature. 1986 Oct 16;323(6089):640–643. doi: 10.1038/323640a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thirion J. P., Banville D., Noel H. Galactokinase mutants of Chinese hamster somatic cells resistant to 2-deoxygalactose. Genetics. 1976 May;83(1):137–147. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wigler M., Pellicer A., Silverstein S., Axel R., Urlaub G., Chasin L. DNA-mediated transfer of the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase locus into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1373–1376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wigler M., Sweet R., Sim G. K., Wold B., Pellicer A., Lacy E., Maniatis T., Silverstein S., Axel R. Transformation of mammalian cells with genes from procaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):777–785. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90093-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zaret K. S., DiPersio C. M., Jackson D. A., Montigny W. J., Weinstat D. L. Conditional enhancement of liver-specific gene transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):9076–9080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. von der Ahe D., Renoir J. M., Buchou T., Baulieu E. E., Beato M. Receptors for glucocorticosteroid and progesterone recognize distinct features of a DNA regulatory element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(9):2817–2821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES