Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Apr 14;20(3):636–643. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.80

The Women on the Move Through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) Study: Final 48-Month Results

Lewis H Kuller 1, Kelley K Pettee Gabriel 2, Laura S Kinzel 1, Darcy A Underwood 1, Margaret B Conroy 1,3, Yuefang Chang 1, Rachel H Mackey 1, Daniel Edmundowicz 4, Kim S Tyrrell 1, Alhaji M Buhari 1, Andrea M Kriska 1
PMCID: PMC3623568  NIHMSID: NIHMS447195  PMID: 21494228

Abstract

The Women on the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) study was designed to test whether a nonpharmacological intervention including qualitative and quantitative dietary changes to induce weight loss and increased physical activity levels would reduce blood triglyceride levels and number of low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P). Such decreases in lipoproteins and other risk factors could reduce or slow progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). Study participants were randomized to either the intervention (Lifestyle Change) or assessment (Health Education) group. Most of the intervention ended at the 30-month visit. The last 48-month examination was completed in 9/2008. There was very substantial weight loss and increased exercise during the first 30 months of the trial resulting in significant decreases in CV risk factors. Most of the intervention effect was lost through 48 months. Weight loss was 3.4 kg in Lifestyle Intervention and 0.2 kg in the Health Education at 48 months (P = 0.000). There were no significant changes at 48 months in lipid levels, blood pressure (BP), glucose, insulin, or in the subclinical measures of coronary calcium, carotid intima media thickness, or plaque. There was a significant decrease in long-distance corridor walk time in the Lifestyle vs. Health Education groups. Significant lifestyle changes can be achieved that result in decreases in CV risk factors. Whether such changes reduce CV outcomes is still untested in clinical trials of weight loss or exercise. Long-term maintenance of successful lifestyle changes, weight loss and reduced risk factors is the hurdle for lifestyle interventions attempting to prevent CV and other chronic diseases.

Introduction

The Women on the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) study was designed to test whether a nonpharmacological intervention including qualitative and quantitative dietary changes to induce weight loss and increased physical activity levels would reduce blood triglyceride levels and the number of low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P). Such a decrease in lipoproteins and other risk factors could reduce or slow the progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). Study participants (n = 508) were randomized to either the intervention (Lifestyle Change) or assessment (Health Education) group.

The rationale for this study was based on previous findings from the Healthy Women Study that hormone therapy (HT) (conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) or CEE with medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE + MPA)) resulted in an increase in blood triglyceride levels (1). This increase in triglycerides was directly related to an increase in weight and central obesity, as measured by waist circumference, and was associated with high levels of small LDL-P and total LDL-P (2). Recent studies have reported that both fasting and nonfasting triglyceride levels are risk factors for CVD (3). We previously reported in the Women’s Healthy Lifestyle Project (WHLP) that weight gain could be reduced or prevented from pre- to postmenopause, resulting in lower risk factor levels and progression of carotid intimal medial thickness (IMT) over time (4).

This paper reports the final results at 48 months of the WOMAN study. A detailed study design, rationale, recruitment, and study methods and preliminary results to 18 months have been previously published (513). The results of the first 18 months of the trial showed substantial reduction of risk factors, including 17 lb weight loss and significant decrease in triglycerides 25 mg/dl, insulin 2.4 μU/ml, systolic blood pressure (BP) 7.4 mm Hg and LDL-P 99 nmol/l as compared to the Health Education group (12). An important question was whether these successful short-term changes could be maintained through 48 months.

The study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh institutional review board (#000356) and all subjects gave informed consent. Funding for this study was provided by the NHLBI (grant no. R01 HL066468).

Methods and Procedures

Study participants and design

Recruitment

A total of 96,839 direct mailings were sent to women age 52–62 beginning in 2002. There was a 4% response rate (n = 8,320) and 4,206 were contacted, 978 women attended initial screening and 34.7% (n = 508) postmenopausal women were recruited for the trial (2003–2010). The trial was originally planned for 5 years. However, it took about 1.5 years to complete recruitment for the trial and follow-up was therefore lowered to 4 years (48 months).

Eligible women were between the ages of 52 and 62 years, had a BMI of 25–39.9 kg/m2, waist circumference >80 cm diameter, BP <140/90 mm Hg, with or without antihypertensive therapy, not on lipid-lowering drug therapy, LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) between 100 and 160 mg% and no history of CVD. Participants had an eligibility interview and two additional screening clinic visits before randomization. During the second screening visit, carotid ultrasound, arterial pulse wave velocity, coronary calcium by electron beam tomography and bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were measured. Participants then completed a 3-day food record, which was used by the nutritionist for counseling, the Connor Diet Habit Survey to evaluate eating habits, and a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Physical activity was measured using the past year version of the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ), an interviewer-administered questionnaire (5,14).

Changes in lifestyle and risk factors were measured at baseline, 6, 18, 30, and 48 months. Pulse wave velocity and bone mineral density were repeated at 18 and 48 months and the coronary calcium and carotid ultrasound at 48 months (5).

The CEE+MPA arm of the Women’s Health Initiative was stopped prematurely, within the first 5 months of participant recruitment for the WOMAN study. Accordingly, women who had already been randomized in the WOMAN study were advised to discontinue HT use, whereas women randomized after the publication of the results of Women’s Health Initiative were allowed to enter the trial after discontinuation of HT use.

The WOMAN study, therefore, had three groups of women: those who entered the trial on HT and stayed on it through the trial, mostly on CEE-Alone; those who went off HT after randomization; and women who were on HT before randomization but had stopped by the time of randomization.

Randomized groups

Health Education group

The Health Education group had a series of six seminars during the first year of participation and then several times per year through 36 months. Most of these sessions focused on women’s health and not specifically on CV risk factors.

Lifestyle Change group

The intervention has been previously described. It was built on studies such as the WHLP (15) and the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (16). The intervention was primarily group-based and was facilitated by a multidisciplinary team of nutritionists, exercise physiologists, and psychologists. Contact was frequent throughout the program with 40 visits during the first year and a minimum of 12 monthly visits in year 2 and beyond. The intervention program, however, was stopped because of lack of continued funding for the intervention at ~3 years (36 months). Therefore, the results from baseline to 48 months include a period of time where there was little or no intervention (i.e., 36–48 months).

Dietary goals for the intervention (Lifestyle Change) group were to reduce the saturated fat to <7% of total energy or <10 g/day, reduction in total energy intake to 1,300 cal or 1,500 cal when baseline body weight was >175 lbs to support a 10% loss of weight and a decrease in waist circumference. They were also encouraged to increase the use of foods high in soluble fiber and nutrient-dense, high-volume, low-caloric foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Also, during the first year of the intervention consumption of functional foods such as stanol esther-containing margarines, soy products and n-3 fatty acids from fish were encouraged (5).

At baseline, caloric intake estimated using the FFQ was ~2,000 calories, 33% of calories were from fat, 10.5% from saturated fat, and 10 g/1,000 calories from fiber. This was similar to eating habits of women in the United States and did not differ between the Health Education and Lifestyle Change group (5,12). By 18 months, the amount of fat in the diet had been reduced by 31% in the Life-style Change group and 12% in the Health Education and saturated fat by 36% in Lifestyle Change and 13% in Health Education, all statistically significant. Women reported 14% decrease in total calories in both groups. The FFQ was not repeated after 18 months.

Physical activity was measured by the MAQ which assesses leisure and occupational activities. We focused on the leisure activity estimate as there was little reported occupational activity in our study population. Study participants were asked to identify if they participated in a variety of specific activities, such as walking for exercise, at least 10 times over the past year (12 months). For each activity identified, they were asked which months they had participated in that specific activity over the past year and then estimated the number of times each month and length of time that they spent doing the specific activity. Physical activity levels were calculated as the product of the duration and frequency of each activity (in h/week), weighted by an estimate of the metabolic equivalent (MET) of that activity and summed for all activities performed. Leisure physical activity data were expressed as metabolic equivalent h/week (MET h-week) (14). Baseline median leisure time physical activity based on the MAQ was 11.4 MET · h/week and was similar for the Health Education and Lifestyle Change groups (12).

The physical activity component of the lifestyle intervention began after the first 6 months of group initiation. The physical activity intervention was delayed for the first 6 months because of the very intensive dietary intervention at the beginning of the trial, including frequent sessions, meal preparations, very low saturated and trans fat and calorie intake. A recent comparison of delayed vs. nondelayed physical activity intervention documented no significant differences in weight loss among obese individuals in an intensive intervention similar to the WOMAN study (15). The content was based on the experience with the DPP and previous clinical trials that targeted healthy, middle-aged women (1618). It was a stepped care approach to reach 150 min/week of moderate intensity physical activity as the standard minimum goal for all women. Women who reached the minimum goal were then encouraged to increase to 180 min and then to 240 min/week. Resistance training of large skeletal muscle groups was also encouraged to facilitate beneficial body composition changes and bone health.

CV risk factors

At baseline and 6, 18, 30, and 48 months, total LDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, glucose, and insulin were determined by conventional enzymatic methods. Lipo-protein subclasses were determined by nuclear magnetic spectroscopy.

Coronary artery calcification

An Imatron C-150 Scanner ( Imatron, South San Francisco, CA) was used to obtain 30–40 contiguous 3-mm thick transverse images of the heart. Coronary calcium scores were calculated according to the Agatston method. The electron beam tomography scans from this laboratory had high reproducibility, with an intraclass correlation of 0.99 (19).

Carotid ultrasound

Carotid ultrasound images were taken from the near and far walls of the distal common carotid artery (1 cm proximal to the carotid bulb), and the far walls of the carotid bulb. IMT measures were performed electronically. The mean of all average readings across the eight locations (four on each side) comprises the average IMT. The mean of the maximum reading from each segment was also calculated (20).

Walking performance

The 400-m walk test is a component of the long-distance corridor walk that utilizes a 400-m course consisting of 10 laps along a hallway (40 m/lap) with cones set 20 m apart. Participants were instructed to walk “at a pace that you can maintain for the full 10 laps” and standard encouragement was given at each lap. The 400-m walk test was previously shown to be highly reproducible for women, correlation coefficient 0.95 (confidence limits 0.92, 0.97, P < 0.0001) and significantly associated with measured (P = −0.56; P < 0.001) VO2max in a study including healthy, middle-aged women, and with risk of clinical coronary heart disease and death in older women (13,21).

Statistical methods of analysis

A detailed description of the statistical methods has been published (4). Changes in variables over time were expressed as a difference in values between follow-up and baseline. Depending on normality of distribution, either t-tests or Mann–Whitney tests for comparing continuous variables at baseline, 48-month followup, and change in risk factors over time by randomized group assignment. There was little difference in results by whether analysis based on means or medians (nonparametric tests). Mean differences are shown throughout the paper. There were few women lost to follow-up during the trial and such women were excluded from the analysis. Eight women with coronary calcium score ≥400 Agatston units were excluded from the analysis because they were at very high risk and referred to their physicians for pharmacological therapy for lipid-lowering, antihypertensive therapy, etc. as required by the institutional review board approval for the study. A repeated measure mixed model was used to evaluate average differences across 6-, 18-, 30-, and 48-month visits.

The power calculations have been previously published (5).

Results

Approximately 90% of the participants completed at least part of the 48-month visit, 92% of Health Education and 87% of Lifestyle Change (n.s.). Four hundred twenty-five (84%) had repeat coronary calcium scan, 432 (85%) carotid ultrasound and 401 of 432 (89%) had baseline and repeat LDCW. There were no statistically significant differences between those who completed or did not complete the 48-month visit (Table 1). Among the 52 women who did not complete the 48-month visit, 12 had only a baseline visit and then dropped out, 4 had only their 6 month visit, 2 were deceased, and 7 had moved out of the area.

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics of participants who completed or did not complete the study at 48-month evaluation: 456 completed, 52 not completed

Not completed
Risk factors at baseline Completed 456 (88%) s.d. 52 s.d. Total s.d.
Age (years) 57 3.7 57 3.0 57
Black 11% 13% 11.2
BMI (kg/m2) 31 3.8 30 3.6 30.8 3.8
Waist circumference (cm) 106 11.4 103 9.5 105.9 11.2
SBP (mm Hg) 124 13.43 126 14.3 124.1 16.7
Past year leisure time activity (MET h/week) 15 13.2 18 17.0 15.0 13.6
400 meter walk time (s) 312 40.7 309 34.4 311.4 36.1
HDL-C (mg%) 60 14.5 59 11.2 60.0 14.2
LDL-C (mg%) 128 25.2 128 25.4 128.0 25.2
Triglycerides (mg%) 142 74.4 152 80.5 142.8 75.0
LDL-P (μmol/l) 1,390 303.3 1,431 352.2 1,394.9 308.5
Antihypertensive medication use (%) 23 29 23.6
Hormone therapy use (%) 62 60 60 59.8
Current smoker (%) 5 12 6 6.1

HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-P, low-density lipoprotein particle; MET, metabolic equivalent tasks; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

HT use

A high percentage of participants (i.e., 64%, in the Lifestyle Change and 56% in the Health Education group) were on HT at baseline. By 48 months, 19% (n = 39) in the Lifestyle Change and 19% (n = 43) in the Health Education group were still on some type of HT.

Change in CVD risk factors by randomized group

There was a statistically significant greater weight loss and decrease in waist circumference in the Lifestyle Change as compared to Health Education at all four time periods and significant difference between randomized groups in leisure physical activity levels through 30 months (Table 2). The amount of weight loss was substantially reduced over time.

Table 2.

Change in weight, waist circumference, percent weight change, and physical activity: Lifestyle Change and Health Education at 6, 18, 30, and 48 months

6 Months
18 Months
30 Months
48 Months
N Mean s.d. N Mean s.d. N Mean s.d. N Mean s.d.
Weight change in kg Health Education 223 −1.2 4.3 213 −1.6 5.5 212 −0.4 5.4 230 −0.2 5.6
Lifestyle Change 215 −7.8 4.4 208 −7.8 7.1 208 −5.7 7.5 216 −3.4 7.2
Waist circumference change in cm Health Education 223 −2.4 4.7 213 −3.6 6.3 211 −2.8 6.0 228 −4.3 6.8
Lifestyle Change 215 −8.6a 5.7 208 −9.8a 7.7 207 −8.3a 8.3 215 −7.7a 8.5
≥ 10% Weight loss Health Education 8 9 9 8
Lifestyle Change 47 42 31 21
Leisure timeb physical activity MET h/week Health Education 216 −4.1 14.0 204 0.56 13.0 204 0.02 15.7 223 −0.02 16.1
Lifestyle Change 211 −1.0a 11.1 203 5.9a 10.9 207 4.1a 13.3 210 1.9 12.5

MET, metabolic equivalent tasks.

a

P < 0.05.

b

Physical activity induction began after 6 months.

The goal of the study was a 10% weight loss. At 18 months, 42% of the Lifestyle Change group had at least a 10% weight loss vs. 9% of the Health Education but by 48 months, 21% of the Lifestyle Change, and 8% of the Health Education group had lost >10% of their body weight and 42% of the Lifestyle Change and 19% of the Health Education lost >5% of their body weight. Weight loss and change in waist circumference were both substantially greater at 30 months than at 48 months (Table 2).

At 30 months, the Lifestyle Change group had a significant increase in HDL-C and decreases in insulin, triglycerides, and glucose but not BP, LDL-C, or LDL-P as compared to the Health Education group (Table 3). The only statistically significant changes in risk factors at 48 months between the Lifestyle Change and Health Education groups was that the LDL-C declined more in the Health Education group than Lifestyle Change group (P = 0.03) (Table 3). This was likely due to the increased number of women in the Health Education group that were on lipid-lowering drug therapy. After exclusion of women on lipid-lowering drug therapy at 48 months, 17 (8%) in the Lifestyle Change and 45 (20%) in the Health Education, LDL-C increased 7.5 mg% in the Lifestyle Change and 6.3 mg% in Health Education baseline to 48 months. This increase in LDL-C was due, in part, to stopping of HT after randomization.

Table 3.

Change in risk factors from baseline to 6, 18, 30, and 48 months, total sample excluding women with baseline coronary calcium ≥ 400 (n = 8)

6 Months
18 Months
30 Months
48 Months
LC
HE
LC
HE
LC
HE
LC
HE
Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.)
SBP (mm Hg) −7.2 (13.2)a −2.4 (13.2) −2.4 (1.4) −1.6 (14.5) −1.6 (14.7) 0.4 (14.6) 0.3 (14.8) −0.6 (15.2)
LDL-C (mg%) −1.6 (25.8)a 7.3 (26.8) 3.4 (26.4)a 10.0 (31.7) 0.8 (30.0) 4.5 (36.9) 3.4 (32.0)a −3.2 (33.2)a
HDL-C (mg%) −2.9 (11.0)a −0.1 (10.7) 1.1 (10.1) 1.6 (11.7) 2.2 (11.5)a −0.3 (13.4) 3.1 (11.5) 1.5 (11.8)
Triglycerides (mg%) −25.7 (55.9)a −13.4 (51.5) −19.8 (57.1) −10.4 (51.7) −26.5 (59.3)a −10.1 (54.7) −14.0 (57.1) −9.2 (59.6)
Insulin (μU/ml) −2.6 (4.8)a 0.4 (7.2) −1.4 (5.3)a 0.9 (6.7) −0.3 (5.2)a 2.0 (7.0) −0.3 (5.0) 0.8 (6.6)
Glucose (mg/dl) 1.0 (8.3)a 3.0 (9.2) 1.7 (9.1)a 4.1 (11.0) 4.3 (9.3)a 7.4 (10.8) 7.3 (11.0) 9.8 (17.5)
NMR HDL-P (μmol/l) −2.2 (5.3)a 0.3 (5.1) 0.7 (5.0)a 1.8 (5.6) −0.1 (5.0) 0.4 (5.4) −1.2 (5.6) −0.5 (5.7)
NMR LDL-P (nmol/l) −98.3 (243.3)a −37.9 (247.3) −49.0 (283.8)a 15.7 (297.2) −52.7 (305.3) −51.8 (333.3) −36.3 (322.2) −73.5 (339.2)
NMR small LDL-P (nmol/l) −73.1 (322.5) −56.9 (283.6) −24.0 (377.3) 6.4 (335.5) −78.7 (374.3) −87.4 (406.0) −38.9 (383.9) −55.8 (390.3)

HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-P, LDL particle; MET, metabolic equivalent tasks; NMR, nuclear magnetic spectroscopy; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

a

P < 0.05 for comparison between groups.

A repeat linear mixed model analysis of risk factor changes in Table 3 across all four time periods found that changes in systolic BP (P = 0.048), LDL-C (P = 0.026), triglycerides (P = 0.92), insulin (P = 0.0001), glucose (P = 0.002), and HDL (P = 0.0001) were significant between the Health Education and Lifestyle Change groups. The significant change is driven to a large extent by substantial changes in risk factors during the first 18 months.

Among women not on HT at baseline (n = 152) or on lipid-lowering drugs by 48 months, LDL-C decreased 6.7 mg% in the Lifestyle Change group at 6 months, 5.3 mg% at 30 months and 3.2 mg% at 48 months and increased 3.2 mg in the Health Education group at 6 months, 4.8 mg% at 30 months and decreased 0.7 mg% at 48 months, significant at 6 and 30 months between the two groups (Table 4). We evaluated the relationship of change in weight to risk factor differences baseline to 48 months among the Lifestyle Change women who were not on HT at baseline or on lipid-lowering drug therapy at 48 months, eliminating the confounding of drug therapy. Substantial weight loss through 48 months was associated with major decreases in LDL-C, insulin and glucose and increase in HDL-C (Table 4). The weight loss effect was less consistent for the Health Education group due, in part, to smaller percentage of women who lost substantial weight. There was a substantial increase in HDL-C with weight loss in both groups (P = 0.06, both groups).

Table 4.

Changes in risk factors at 48 months by weight loss, Lifestyle Change, and Health Education groups—not on hormone therapy at baseline or on lipid-lowering drug therapy at 48 months

Lifestyle Change group
N % LDL-C (s.d.)a (mg%) HDL-C (s.d.) (mg%) SBP (s.d.) (mm Hg) Glucose (s.d.)a (mg%) Insulin (s.d.)a (μU/ml)
Weight loss (kg)
 >9.1 9 12 −21.9 (22.0) 6.3 (10.9) −1.6 (14.8) −1.0 (6.3) −4.0 (2.8)
 4.5–8.6 15 21 −10.2 (30.1) 6.3 (9.3) −5.6 (15.5) 2.4 (8.6) −4.0 (5.3)
 4.3–2.3 17 24 5.3 (22.0) 4.9 (7.6) −6.6 (13.6) 6.9 (7.7) − (5.7)
 2.2–0 14 19 −3.1 (22.5) 1.2 (13.8) 3.4 (13.0) 4.7 (6.4) −1.4 (5.0)
Weight gain (kg)
 0.5–17.9 17 24 3.5 (22.2) −3.1 (9.5) 3.3 (13.0) 10.3 (8.7) 1.4 (6.3)
Total 72 100 −3.3 (25.0) 2.7 (10.6) −1.5 (14.3) 5.5 (8.4) −1.3 (5.7)

Health Education group
N % LDL-C (s.d.) (mg%) HDL-C (s.d.) (mg%) SBP (s.d.) (mm Hg) Glucose (s.d.)a (mg%) Insulin (s.d.) (μU/ml)

Weight loss (kg)
 >9.1 6 8 −4.7 (15.8) 8.9 (13.9) −6.7 (12.9) −4.8 (7.7) −6.6 (12.9)
 4.5–8.6 11 14 −1.6 (28.0) 11.3 (16.7) − (11.0) 7.1 (6.9) −1.9 (4.1)
 4.3–2.3 13 16 5.5 (27.0) 2.0 (6.4) − (15.4) 1.9 (7.3) −3.2 (9.7)
 2.2–0 15 20 −13.0 (21.0) 0.4 (12.2) −6.5 (9.6) 3.5 (9.8) −1.3 (6.2)
Weight gain (kg)
 0.5–17.9 33 42 3.8 (21.0) 1.4 (9.5) 1.2 (14.4) 7.2 (9.7) 0.7 (6.3)
Total 78 100 −0.7 (24.0) 3.3 (11.6) −1.2 (13.3) 4.7 (9.3) −1.2 (7.5)

HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

a

P < 0.5 within group difference by weight change.

The 400-m walk was repeated at 30 and 48 months as a measure of effect of physical activity intervention. The 400-m walk time increased 4.8 s (s.d. 39.5) at 30 months in the Health Education group and decreased 2.7 s (s.d. 30.4) in the Lifestyle Change group (P = 0.04). At 48 months, 400-m walk time increased 8.6 s (s.d. 42.0) in the Health Education group and decreased 2.0 s (s.d. 34.0) in the Lifestyle Change group (P = 0.04).

Change in subclinical CVD measures

Among the 129 women who had 0 coronary calcium at baseline, 61% still had 0 coronary calcium, 23% had coronary calcium of 1–5, 4.8% (n = 10) of 5–10 and 11% (n = 23) had scores >10. There was no difference by Lifestyle Change as compared to Health Education. Among women with some coronary calcium at baseline, increases in coronary calcium were similar in the Health Education group and Lifestyle Change group (no significant differences) (Table 5). There was also no evidence of an effect of weight loss on either the development of new coronary calcium or the progression of coronary calcium.

Table 5.

Change in coronary calcium and carotid plaque at 48 months, Lifestyle Change and Health Education (excluding women with coronary calcium ≥ 400 at baseline)

Change
Lifestyle Change
Health Education
Baseline coronary calcium N Mean s.d. Median N Mean s.d. Median
0 100 04 13.0 0 108 04 10 0
1–<5 44 08 23 −1.0 53 08 31 −0.3
5–<10 23 21 57 −5.0 13 18 40 5
≥ 10 33 75 102 53 37 70 142 33
Carotid plaque change to 48 months
Baseline carotid plaque N 0 1 2 3+
0
 Lifestyle Change 146 95 33 10 8
 Health Education 157 119 22 11 5
1
 Lifestyle Change 38 12 12 6 8
 Health Education 33 9 13 5 6
2
 Lifestyle Change 13 3 2 4 4
 Health Education 19 1 2 9 7
3+
 Lifestyle Change 6 0 0 1 5
 Health Education 8 0 0 1 7
Total
 Lifestyle Change 203 110 47 21 25
 Health Education 217 129 37 26 25

At baseline, 203 (72%) of the women had a plaque index of 0, 71 (16.9%) of 1, 32 (7.6%) of 2, 15 (3.3%) of three or more. Among the women with 0 plaque index at baseline, there was no difference in incidence of new plaque in the carotid artery 119 (75.8%) in the Health Education group and 95 (65.1%) in the Lifestyle Change group still had a 0 plaque. Similarly, there was no evidence of a change in plaque in the Lifestyle Change compared to Health Education group for women who had either 1 or 2+ plaque index at baseline (Table 5).

Change in either average or maximal carotid IMT between baseline and 48 months for the Lifestyle Change and Health Education groups was similar. At baseline, mean IMT was 0.728 mm in the Health Education and 0.714 mm in the Lifestyle Change group. At 48 months, the increase in the Health Education group was 0.067 and 0.078 mm in the Lifestyle Change (P = 0.13). Mean maximal wall thickness at baseline was 0.912 mm for the Health Education and 0.901 mm for the Lifestyle Change group and increased 0.091 mm for Health Education and 0.107 mm for the Lifestyle Change group. The results were similar excluding women on lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drug therapy at 48 months.

Discussion

The WOMAN study is one of the few nonpharmacological intervention trials with long-term evaluation of the changes in weight, physical activity, diet, risk factors, and subclinical measurements of CV outcomes (22,23). The intervention was very successful in the short term, up to 6–30 months, but could not be maintained to the 48-month end of trial. The average 3.4 kg at 48 months, significant, was not enough to sustain risk factors changes. Successful long-term weight loss maintenance has been defined as losing at least 10% of initial body weight and keeping it off for at least 1 year. It is estimated that around 20% of overweight or obese persons are successful (22). In the WOMAN study, 31% at 30 and 21% at 48 months of women were successful weight losers (22). Failure to continue the intensive intervention may be the most important reason for the weight regain over time, especially after 30 months. Some of the weight loss effects had disappeared even between 18 and 30 months. It is likely that more frequent contact with participants, i.e., monthly, may be needed to sustain intervention. The lack of sustainability of intensive lifestyle interventions is consistent with other intervention studies (24). Obesity is a chronic condition and like other chronic diseases, i.e., elevated BP, glucose, lipids, may require continued interventions for a lifetime to sustain behavioral changes and weight loss.

There are other possible reasons for weight regain. One hypothesis is that changes in hormones or adipokines secondary to weight loss result in compensatory neural-hormonal changes, increase in hunger and inability to maintain dietary changes (25). A second possibility is that there is more efficient utilization of energy in muscle (26,27) as well as a decrease in lean body mass with weight loss and subsequent reduced metabolic rate. Thus, individuals maintaining the same caloric intake may begin to regain weight as they lose lean body mass.

We have previously reported both bone and muscle loss with weight loss. We have previously reported in the WOMAN study no relationship between blood levels at baseline of ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, and regain of body weight. However, these peripheral measures may be insensitive to potential central nervous system effects (28).

It may be very difficult in an environment with substantial food availability to maintain dietary changes in the long term without very substantial continued behavioral intervention. There also may be substantial differences in eating behavior among populations, such as in the United States, France, Japan, etc. which may contribute both to obesity and the inability to maintain weight loss (29,30). These might include factors such as meal frequency, snack foods, eating out of the home, socialization, and time to eat meals. We are continuing analysis of some of our dietary information to try and see if differences in eating behavior may contribute to the inability to maintain weight loss independent of changes in specific foods. Unfortunately, measurement of total calories and changes in total calories is very difficult using either the FFQ or single or even multiple 24-h recalls. Caloric intake is underestimated by more obese individuals (31).

We hypothesized that weight loss, exercise, and subsequent changes in risk factors would prevent the development of new coronary calcium or reduce the progression among most of the women with low levels of coronary calcium at baseline. There was, however, no difference in the incidence of new coronary calcium between the Lifestyle Change and Health Education groups nor any evidence of a relationship between the amount of weight loss and either the development of new coronary calcium or progression of coronary calcium although the number of women in the study with substantial weight loss is low and therefore the power is limited. Furthermore, the rate of development of new coronary calcium was consistent with previous observations in studies of postmenopausal women. The intervention had no effect on development of new carotid plaque or change in present plaque.

Weight loss resulted in a substantial change in cardiovascular risk factors at 48 months, as shown in Table 4. Unfortunately, only a small percentage of women were able to maintain substantial weight loss. A successful long-term weight loss program could result in effective risk factor changes and possibly decreased CVD.

There are no long-term randomized clinical trials in “healthy” individuals that demonstrate that a physical activity intervention reduces the risk of CVD. Evidence-based observational studies support the benefit of increased physical activity and “fitness” (3234). The long-distance corridor walk was used as an outcome measure rather than repeat maximal or submaximal exercise testing because of costs and greater likelihood of women completing the test. Decreased 400-m walk time was significantly greater in the Lifestyle Change as compared to the Health Education group and was directly related to the amount of reported physical activity and weight loss. Measures of physical function may be more amenable to changes in exercise, weight, etc. and become the primary end point in these trials.

This is one of the longest nonpharmacological weight loss trial in a “healthy population.” The critical unanswered questions are whether weight loss, at least 10% of body weight, can be maintained for a substantial number of overweight and obese adults by nonpharmacological approaches and whether such changes will result in decreased incidence of CVD (35). It will remain extremely difficult to test lifestyle changes and reduced morbidity and mortality until there are improved methods to sustain the interventions for many years. The Look AHEAD trial results (36) may be available in a few years and provides some answers about the benefits of weight loss on CVD and total mortality, at least for diabetics.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contributions of the staff as well as the 508 dedicated participants of the WOMAN study. This research was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contract R01-HL-66846. www.clinicaltrials. gov #NCT00023543. Funding for this study was provided by the NHLBI (grant no. R01 HL066468).

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Kuller LH, Meilahn EN, Gutai JP, et al. In: Korenman SG, editor. Lipoproteins, estrogens and the menopause; The Menopause (Proceedings of the Serono Symposium on the Menopause; March 1989; Napa, CA, Serono Symposia, USA: Norwell, MA. 1990. pp. 179–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mackey RH, Kuller LH, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Lipoprotein subclasses and coronary artery calcium in postmenopausal women from the healthy women study. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:71i–76i. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02636-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Nordestgaard BG. Fasting and nonfasting lipid levels: influence of normal food intake on lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and cardiovascular risk prediction. Circulation. 2008;118:2047–2056. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.804146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wildman RP, Schott LL, Brockwell S, Kuller LH, Sutton-Tyrrell K. A dietary and exercise intervention slows menopause-associated progression of subclinical atherosclerosis as measured by intima-media thickness of the carotid arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:579–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuller LH, Kriska AM, Kinzel LS, et al. The clinical trial of Women On the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:370–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Newman MA, Pettee KK, Storti KL, et al. Monthly variation in physical activity levels in postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:322–327. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181864c05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conroy MB, Simkin-Silverman LR, Pettee KK, et al. Lapses and psychosocial factors related to physical activity in early postmenopause. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1858–1866. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318137388d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pettee KK, Kriska AM, Conroy MB, et al. Discontinuing hormone replacement therapy: attenuating the effect on CVD risk with lifestyle changes. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:483–489. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yankura DJ, Conroy MB, Hess R, et al. Weight regain and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:2259–2265. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wong E, Freiberg M, Tracy R, Kuller L. Epidemiology of cytokines: the Women On the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:443–453. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pettee KK, Kriska AM, Johnson BD, et al. The relationship between physical activity and lipoprotein subclasses in postmenopausal women: the influence of hormone therapy. Menopause. 2007;14:115–122. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000229573.29258.d5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuller LH, Kinzel LS, Pettee KK, et al. Lifestyle intervention and coronary heart disease risk factor changes over 18 months in postmenopausal women: the Women On the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN study) clinical trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15:962–974. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pettee KK, Larouere BM, Kriska AM, et al. Associations among walking performance, physical activity, and subclinical cardiovascular disease. Prev Cardiol. 2007;10:134–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-037x.2007.06173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kriska AM, Knowler WC, LaPorte RE, et al. Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:401–411. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.4.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goodpaster BH, Delany JP, Otto AD, et al. Effects of diet and physical activity interventions on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors in severely obese adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1795–1802. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuller LH, Simkin-Silverman LR, Wing RR, Meilahn EN, Ives DG. Women’s Healthy Lifestyle Project: A randomized clinical trial: results at 54 months. Circulation. 2001;103:32–37. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program outcomes study. Lancet. 2009;374:1677–1686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pereira MA, Kriska AM, Day RD, et al. A randomized walking trial in postmenopausal women: effects on physical activity and health 10 years later. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1695–1701. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.15.1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kuller LH, Matthews KA, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Edmundowicz D, Bunker CH. Coronary and aortic calcification among women 8 years after menopause and their premenopausal risk factors: the healthy women study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:2189–2198. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.9.2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sutton-Tyrrell K, Lassila HC, Meilahn E, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis in premenopausal and postmenopausal women and its association with risk factors measured after menopause. Stroke. 1998;29:1116–1121. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pettee Gabriel KK, Rankin RL, Lee C, et al. Test-retest reliability and validity of the 400-meter walk test in healthy, middle-aged women. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:649–657. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.5.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wing RR, Hill JO. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:323–341. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wadden TA, West DS, Neiberg RH, et al. Look AHEAD Research Group. One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:713–722. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hollis JF, Gullion CM, Stevens VJ, et al. Weight Loss Maintenance Trial Research Group. Weight loss during the intensive intervention phase of the weight-loss maintenance trial. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahima RS, Antwi DA. Brain regulation of appetite and satiety. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37:811–823. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saito M, Okamatsu-Ogura Y, Matsushita M, et al. High incidence of metabolically active brown adipose tissue in healthy adult humans: effects of cold exposure and adiposity. Diabetes. 2009;58:1526–1531. doi: 10.2337/db09-0530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goldsmith R, Joanisse DR, Gallagher D, et al. Effects of experimental weight perturbation on skeletal muscle work efficiency, fuel utilization, and biochemistry in human subjects. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298:R79–R88. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00053.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Soni AC, Conroy MB, Simkin-Sliverman LR, Studenski SA, Kuller LH. Effect of weight loss from lifestyle intervention on appetite hormones in overweight, post-menopausal women (abstract) J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:S172. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rozin P, Kabnick K, Pete E, Fischler C, Shields C. The ecology of eating: smaller portion sizes in France Than in the United States help explain the French paradox. Psychol Sci. 2003;14:450–454. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Azais-Braesco V, Brighenti F, Paoletti R, et al. Healthy food and healthy choices: A new European profile approach. Atherosclerosis Suppl. 2009;10:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sawaya AL, Tucker K, Tsay R, et al. Evaluation of four methods for determining energy intake in young and older women: comparison with doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63:491–499. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/63.4.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oguma Y, Shinoda-Tagawa T. Physical activity decreases cardiovascular disease risk in women: review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF, et al. Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women Take Heart Project. Circulation. 2003;108:1554–1559. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091080.57509.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, et al. Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators. Effect of an intensive exercise intervention strategy on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial: the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES) Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1794–1803. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ingram DD, Mussolino ME. Weight loss from maximum body weight and mortality: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Linked Mortality File. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:1044–1050. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.The Look AHEAD Research Group. Long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Four-year results of the Look AHEAD trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1566–1575. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES