Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Carcinog. 2010 Feb;49(2):183–189. doi: 10.1002/mc.20588

Genetic Variation in MicroRNA Genes and Risk of Oral Premalignant Lesions

Jessica Clague 1, Scott M Lippman 2, Hushan Yang 1, Michelle A T Hildebrandt 1, Yuanqing Ye 1, Jack J Lee 3, Xifeng Wu 1
PMCID: PMC3640857  NIHMSID: NIHMS457139  PMID: 19851984

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to play a key role in oncogenesis and, recently, studies have examined the role miRNAs might play in the risk of premalignant lesions. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the association between miRNA polymorphisms and risk of oral premalignant lesions (OPL). We genotyped 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among 21 miRNA-related genes in a case-control study including 136 OPL patients and 136 matched controls. Patients with at least one variant allele of mir26a-1:rs7372209 had a significantly increased risk of OPL (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.23–3.56). Likewise, patients with at least one variant allele of DICER:rs3742330 had a significantly increased risk of OPL (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.03–4.24). To assess the cumulative effects, we performed a combined unfavorable genotype analysis that included all SNPs showing at least a borderline statistical significance. A significant trend of increased risk of OPL with increasing number of unfavorable genotypes was observed (P for trend <0.0001). This study presents the first epidemiologic evidence supporting that individual as well as combined genotypes of miRNA-related variants may be used to predict the risk of OPL, and may be useful for identifying patients with OPL at high risk for progression to oral cancer.

Keywords: microRNA, Oral premalignant lesions, Cancer risk, Genetic variation, Case-control study

INTRODUCTION

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a group of endogenous, small RNA molecules of about 21–23 nucleotides [1]. Most miRNA genes reside within intergenic or intronic regions of other genes and start off as a 500–3000 base, primary miRNA transcript (pri-miRNA) generated by RNA polymerase II [2]. The pri-miRNA is processed in the nucleus by the microprocessor machinery containing the RNase Drosha and the double-strand RNA binding protein DGCR8 [3]. Hairpin molecules are formed and cleaved by Drosha to form a 60–70-nucleotide precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) [4]. The pre-miRNA is translocated to the cytoplasm through the assistance of Ran-GTPase and Exportin-5 (XP05), where it is further processed by a protein complex that includes DICER, TRBP, AGO1 and AGO2, leading to the production of mature miRNAs [2].

It has been predicted that miRNAs regulate the expression of almost one third of the human genome and are likely to play a key role in human development, cellular differentiation, adaptation to the environment, and host cell interactions with pathogens and oncogenesis [1]. miRNAs may influence tumorigenesis by acting as either oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes [1]. For example, miR-21 is relatively over expressed in glioblastoma multiforme, cervical cancer, breast cancer, and several other solid tumor types and its increased expression appears to contribute to decreased apoptosis in malignant cells [57]. On the other hand, let-7 represses the expression of the RAS oncogenes, thus inhibiting lung tumorigenesis [8]. More recently, studies have suggested that miRNAs might play a role in the development of premalignant lesions [9,10].

Oral leukoplakia, oral submucous fibrosis and erythroplakia are the three major forms of oral premalignant lesions (OPLs) [11]. The development of these lesions, as the result of carcinogenic exposures, may cause simultaneous genetic defects to the upper aerodigestive tract epithelium at different stages of carcinogenesis, and individuals with these lesions are at a high risk for developing oral cancer [1214]. According to our data, during a follow-up of seven years, 31.4% of OPL patients developed cancers in the upper aerodigestive tract and the overall cancer incidence is 5.7% per year [15]. The overall malignant transformation rate of dysplastic lesions depends on the length of follow-up and varies from 11 to 36% [14]. Tobacco chewing, tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking have been identified as major environmental risk factors for OPLs[16]. Currently, the genetic components of OPL risk are still largely unknown.

Previous studies have shown that common genetic polymorphisms in protein-coding genes play a role in oral tumorigenesis [17,18]. Genetic variation in miRNA genes and their biogenesis pathway has the potential to affect the regulation of multiple cellular pathways instrumental in cancer development and susceptibility [1923]. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated the association between polymorphisms in the miRNA biogenesis pathway genes or miRNA genes and risk of OPL, which may be useful for identifying patients with OPL at high risk for progression to oral cancer. Therefore, in this case-control study, we tested whether common sequence variants in miRNA genes and the miRNA biogenesis pathway affect OPL susceptibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population and Epidemiologic Data

A total of 136 OPL patients were identified at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1997 to 2005. The inclusion criteria for cases were the presence of histologically confirmed OPL (leukoplakia and/or erythroplakia). All OPL patients were participants of a chemoprevention trial and only those ages ≥ 18 years were enrolled. Enrollment into the clinical trial also excluded patients with acute intercurrent illnesses or infections and patients who had retinoid or carotenoid therapy within three months prior to study entry. Patients with prior history of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) that had been treated within the preceding two years were also excluded. Furthermore, there were no oral tumors present at the time of the sampling. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect epidemiological data, including demographical information and tobacco use history. Before the subjects were randomized into the chemoprevention trail, blood samples were obtained in heparnized tubes for molecular analyses.

A total of 136 healthy controls who had no history of cancer were recruited from the Kelsey-Seybold clinics, the largest multispecialty managed-care organization consisting of more than 300 physicians and 23 clinics in the Houston metropolitan area. The potential controls were identified by reviewing short survey forms distributed to patients coming to the clinic for annual health check-ups. Controls had no prior history of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) and were frequency matched to the OPL patients by gender, ethnicity, and age (±5 years). Epidemiologic questionnaire data were obtained through in-person interview for the controls. After the interview, participants were asked to donate a blood sample for molecular analysis. Controls were recruited during 1999–2005.

For both cases and controls, written, informed consent was collected from each participant and approval for conducting human subjects research was obtained from the M. D. Anderson and the Kelsey-Seybold Institutional Review Boards. An individual who had never smoked or had smoked less than 100 cigarettes in his or her lifetime was defined as a never smoker. A former smoker was a person who had quit smoking at least one year prior to diagnosis (cases) or who had quit smoking at least one year prior to the interview (controls). A current smoker was someone who was currently smoking or who had stopped less than one year prior to being diagnosed (cases) or interviewed (controls). Current and former smokers were defined as ever smokers.

Selection of Genes and Polymorphisms

We searched the International HapMap Project, dbSNP and miRBase registry databases to identify potentially functional SNPs and haplotype tagging SNPs with a reported minor allele frequency (MAF) of > 0.01 in the Caucasian population. In the case of multiple candidate SNPs within the same haplotype block (defined by r2 > 0.8), only one SNP was included. We identified more than 200 SNPs located within the pri-miRNA transcript but not in pre-miRNAs. Therefore, we only chose SNPs from eight pri-miRNAs whose mature counterparts have been extensively implicated in cancer etiology or clinical outcome. In total, 31 SNPs were selected: 18 SNPs in eight genes in the miRNA biogenesis pathway, five SNPs in five pre-miRNAs and eight SNPs in eight pri-miRNAs (Table 1).

Table 1.

MicroRNA-related genes and polymorphisms evaluated in this study

Gene name Polymorphism Position Nucleotide change Amino acid change
miRNA biogenesis pathway
 DGCR8 rs1640299 3′ UTR T>G
rs3757 3′ UTR G>A
rs417309 3′ UTR G>A
 RAN rs14035 3′ UTR C>T
 DICER rs13078 3′ UTR T>A
rs3742330 3′ UTR A>G
 TRBP rs784567 Promoter C>T
 AGO1 rs595961 Intron 10 A>G
rs636832 Intron 8 G>A
 AGO2 rs4961280 Promoter C>A
 GEMIN4 rs2740348 nsSNP G>C Glu>Gln
rs3744741 nsSNP C>T Arg>Gln
rs4968104 nsSNP T>A Val>Glu
rs7813 nsSNP C>T Arg>Cys
rs910924 Promoter C>T
 GEMIN3 rs197388 Promoter T>A
rs197412 nsSNP T>C Ile>Thr
rs197414 nsSNP C>A Arg>Ser
Pre-miRNAs
 miR-196a-2 rs11614913 Pre-miRNA C>T
 miR-423 rs6505162 Pre-miRNA A>C
 miR-492 rs2289030 Pre-miRNA C>G
 miR-604 rs2368392 Pre-miRNA C>T
 miR-608 rs4919510 Pre-miRNA C>G
Pri-miRNAs
 let7f-2 rs17276588 5′ region G>A
 miR-26a-1 rs7372209 5′ region C>T
 miR-30a rs1358379 5′ region A>G
 miR-30c-1 rs16827546 5′ region C>T
 miR-100 rs1834306 5′ region C>T
 miR-124-1 rs531564 5′ region C>G
 miR-219-1 rs213210 3′ region T>C
 miR-373 rs12983273 5′ region C>T

Abbreviation: nsSNP, nonsynonymous SNP, UTR, untranslated region.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from each participant’s blood sample using the QIAamp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following manufacture’s protocol. Samples were frozen at −80°C until genotyping experiments. All SNPs were genotyped blinded to the case-control status of each sample using the SNPlex assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer. Genotypes were called by GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems) using a template file provided with each custom SNPlex assay. Internal quality controls and negative controls were used to ensure genotyping accuracy, and 5% of all samples were randomly selected and genotyped in duplicate with 100% concordance.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were done using Intercooled STATA software (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX). χ2 analysis was used to assess the differences between cases and controls with regard to categorical variables such as gender and smoking status. Student’s t test was used to test for continuous variables, including age. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested using a goodness-of-fit χ2 analysis. The OPL risks were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using unconditional multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and smoking status, where appropriate. The unfavorable genotype analysis included those SNPs showing at least a borderline statistical significance (P < 0.10) in the main analysis. The unfavorable genotypes were collapsed together and categorized according to the tertiles (low, medium and high risk) of the number of unfavorable genotypes in controls. Using the low-risk group as the reference group, we calculated the ORs and 95% CIs for the medium-risk and hi-risk groups using unconditional multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, and smoking status. All P values were two sided and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered the threshold of statistical significance.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study population

A total of 136 patients with OPL and 136 frequency matched controls by gender, ethnicity, and age (±5 years) were included in this study. As shown in Table 2, cases and controls were perfectly matched on sex (P = 1.00) and ethnicity (P = 1.00), and no significant difference was observed for cases (57.65± 12.91 years) and controls (58.76± 12.48 years) on age (P = 0.47). However, cases were significantly more likely to be current smokers (29.41%) than controls (8.09%, P < 0.001).

Table 2.

Distribution of selected host characteristics by case-control status

Variables Cases, (n = 136)2 Controls, (n = 136)2 P-value3
Age, mean(SD) 57.65(12.91) 58.76(12.48) 0.47
Sex, n (%)1
 Male 81(59.56) 81(59.56)
 Female 55(40.44) 55(40.44) 1.00
Smoking status, n (%)1
 Never 42(30.88) 79(58.09)
 Former 54(39.71) 46(33.82)
 Current & Recent Quitters 40(29.41) 11(8.09) <0.0001
Ethnicity, n (%)1
 White 122 (89.71) 122 (89.71)
 Hispanic 9 (6.62) 9 (6.62)
 Black 5 (3.68) 5 (3.68) 1.00
1

Percentages might not sum to 100% because of rounding.

2

Values might not sum to 136 because of missing data

3

P-value for student’s t-test (continuous variables) or χ2 test (categorical variables).

Risk Associated with Individual SNPs

Among the 31 SNPs, one SNP (rs17276588 in let7f-2) showed departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at significance level 0.05 and was removed from further analysis. Overall, three SNPs were found to be associated with OPL risk (Table 3). For the pri-mRNA SNP rs7372209 in mir26a-1, patients with at least one variant allele had a significantly increased risk of OPL (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.23–3.56). Likewise, patients with at least one variant allele of SNP rs3742330 in DICER had a significantly increased risk of OPL (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.03–4.24). In contrast, individuals with GEMIN3 nonsynonymous rs197412 variant genotypes exhibited a significantly reduced OPL risk (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33–0.99) compared to individuals with wild type genotype. Two additional SNPs, rs784567 in TRBP and rs3744741 in GEMIN4, were found to be borderline significantly associated with OPL risk (P < 0.10).

Table 3.

Selected Genetic Polymorphisms in miRNA Related Pathway and OPL Risk

Gene SNP Genotype Cases Controls OR (95% CI)1 P-value
DICER rs3742330 AA 99 120 Ref
AG + GG 29 16 2.09 (1.03–4.24) 0.040
TRBP rs784567 CC + CT 94 106 Ref
TT 38 28 1.67 (0.92–3.04) 0.092
GEMIN4 rs3744741 CC 102 94 Ref
CT + TT 33 42 0.60 (0.33–1.10) 0.097
GEMIN3 rs197412 TT 54 43 Ref
TC + CC 80 93 0.58 (0.33–0.99) 0.048
miR-26a-1 rs7372209 CC 57 75 Ref
CT + TT 76 57 2.09 (1.23–3.56) 0.007
1

Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and smoking status

Cumulative Effect of Selected SNPs on OPL Risk

We performed an unfavorable genotype analysis for five SNPs that had significant and borderline significant associations with OPL risk (P < 0.10), including rs197412 (TT), rs3742330 (AG + GG), rs3744741 (CC), rs7372209 (CT + TT), rs784567 (TT). Compared to the low-risk group with ≤1 unfavorable genotypes, the OR for the medium risk group with 2 or 3 unfavorable genotypes was 3.52 (95% CI, 1.81–6.84) and the OR increased to over 21 (95% CI, 5.08–89.79) for the high risk group with ≥4 unfavorable genotypes. We observed a significantly increased risk of OPL with increasing number of unfavorable genotypes (P for trend < 0.0001, Table 4).

Table 4.

Cumulative Effect Analysis by the Number of Unfavorable Genotypes1 from miRNA SNPs and OPL Risk

Unfavorable genotypes1 Cases Controls OR (95% CI)2 P-value
Low risk (0~1) 24 53 Ref
Medium risk (2~3) 84 76 3.52 (1.81–6.84) 0.0002
High risk (4~5) 14 3 21.35 (5.08–89.79) <0.0001
P for trend <0.0001
1

Unfavorable genotypes: rs197412(TT), rs3742330(AG + GG), rs3744741(CC), rs7372209(CT + TT), rs784567(TT).

2

OR adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, and smoking status

DISCUSSION

Given the high risk of oral cancer among OPL patients, it is critical that subgroups at high risk of premalignancy development be identified for early oral cancer prevention. In this study, we assessed the effects of 31 SNPs in genes of the miRNA biogenesis pathway, pre-miRNAs and pri-miRNAs on OPL risk. We found that a pri-miRNA SNP in mir26a-1, a SNP in the 3′UTR of DICER, and a nonsynonymous SNP in GEMIN3 were all significantly associated with an altered risk of OPL. We also identified two additional miRNA-related SNPs showing borderline significant associations and showed that the combined unfavorable genotypes of these five selected SNPs had a dramatic affect on OPL risk. To our knowledge this is the first study to provide evidence that common SNPs in miRNAs and their processing pathway might play an important role in the prediction of OPL.

The gene for miR26a-1 is located on chromosome 3p21, a region frequently deleted in several epithelial cancers and down-regulated in lung cancer [2426]. In the current study, the variant allele of rs7372209 in mir26a-1 was associated with a 2.15-fold significantly increased risk of OPL (P = 0.005). Abnormal expression of this miRNA has been found in premalignant colon cancer cells [27] and mutations in miRNA could alter its expression. It is possible, then, that the variant allele of rs7372209 is altering the expression of mir26a-1, either through down regulation or inactivation, and accounting for the increased risk of OPL. Interestingly, our group previously reported the opposite effect of this rs7372209 SNP on risk of bladder cancer risk [20], highlighting the significance of this miRNA in the cancer development process and the need for further investigation in other cancers and premalignant conditions.

In the current study, the variant allele of rs3742330 located in DICER was associated with a 2.09-fold increase in risk of OPL (P = 0.04). DICER plays an important role in the cleavage of pre-miRNAs into their mature form and has previously been implicated in the oncogenic process of several cancers. Lower levels of DICER mRNA expression have been shown to be associated with decreased non-small cell lung [28] and ovarian cancer survival [29]. Likewise, through inhibiting expression of DICER, Kumar et. al. observed increased growth in mouse and human cancer cell lines and more aggressive behavior of the tumor cells when injected into in nude mice [30]. However, Chiosea et. al. [9] observed an opposite effect with up-regulation of DICER in non-invasive precursor lesions of lung adenocarcinoma. This evidence suggests that DICER may have different roles in the tumorigenesis process depending on the stage of cancer development. Interestingly, the significant SNP identified in our study is located within the 3′-UTR of DICER. This region is important for RNA stability, and rs3742330 could cause changes in the stability of DICER transcripts. Future studies examining the functionality of DICER SNPs are warranted to determine if this is the case and to better understand how this SNP modulates risk of OPL.

We observed that individuals with GEMIN3 nonsynonymous rs197412 variant genotypes exhibited a significantly reduced OPL risk (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34–0.99) compared to individuals with wild type genotype. Mourelatos et al. [31] observed the presence of the GEMIN3 protein in a 15S ribonucleoprotein complex containing eIF2C, a member of the AGO protein family important in miRNA processing. Several other miRNAs have also been identified as part of this 15S ribonucleoprotein complex, suggesting that GEMIN proteins may be involved in the processing of miRNA precursors [3133]. Thus, variants such as rs197412 could alter global miRNA homeostasis and have a major effect on cellular signaling pathways. However, studies assessing the functional effect of GEMIN3 rs197412 are needed.

Borderline significant associations with OPL risk also identified two SNPs in TRBP and GEMIN4 (Table 3). Although the results were only borderline significant, these SNPs are of interest because the proteins encoded by these genes are involved in the synthesis and processing of miRNA transcripts that may have a much larger downstream effect. TRBP is an integral component of a DICER complex and has been found to result in significantly impaired miRNA biogenesis [20,34]. We observed a 1.67-fold increase in OPL risk (P = 0.092) for the rare homozygous genotype of the TRBP SNP, rs784567. GEMIN4 is a central component of a macromolecule complex that interacts with the survivor or motor neuron protein and is essential in pre-mRNA splicing and ribonucleoprotein assembly [35]. In our study, we observed a borderline significant 40% decreased risk of OPL for the variant genotype of the GEMIN4 SNP, rs3744741 (P = 0.097).

To gain more power and insight, we used a polygenic approach in which we collapsed all the unfavorable genotypes with at least a borderline significant association to assess their combined effect on OPL risk. Through this strategy, we identified a significant trend between increasing OPL risk and the increasing number of unfavorable genotypes, and reinforced the belief that the development of OPL is a polygenic process and a combined analysis of multiple factors may have a greater ability to characterize populations at highest risk.

Overall, this study presents the first epidemiologic evidence supporting an association between genetic polymorphisms in miRNA-related genes and OPL susceptibility. In this current study, we were unable to determine if these OPL risk alleles were also markers for oral cancer development. Further studies with follow-up of OPL patients will be required to address this question. However, the potential ability to identify patients at the beginning of the carcinogenic processes manifested by OPL is a major strength of the study. There is a possibility that the associations observed in this study were attained by chance, given the loss of significance after multiple comparison adjustments (data not shown). Nevertheless, our results suggest that individual as well as combined genotypes of miRNA-related variants may be used to predict the risk of OPL, and may prove useful for identifying patients with OPL at high risk for progression to oral cancer.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part, by National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants CA106451 and CA097007. J.C. and M.A.T.H. are supported by an NCI Cancer Prevention Fellowship training grant R25T CA57730.

References

  • 1.Boyd SD. Everything you wanted to know about small RNA but were afraid to ask. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology. 2008;88(6):569–578. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nature reviews. 2006;6(4):259–269. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Han J, Lee Y, Yeom KH, et al. Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell. 2006;125(5):887–901. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen K, Song F, Calin G, Wei Q, Hao X, Zhang W. Polymorphisms in MicroRNA Targets: A Gold Mine for Molecular Epidemiology. Carcinogenesis. 2008 doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer research. 2005;65(14):6029–6033. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lui WO, Pourmand N, Patterson BK, Fire A. Patterns of known and novel small RNAs in human cervical cancer. Cancer research. 2007;67(13):6031–6043. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(7):2257–2261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510565103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, et al. RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell. 2005;120(5):635–647. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiosea S, Jelezcova E, Chandran U, et al. Overexpression of Dicer in precursor lesions of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer research. 2007;67(5):2345–2350. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feber A, Xi L, Luketich JD, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles of esophageal cancer. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2008;135(2):255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.055. discussion 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neville BW, Day TA. Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2002;52(4):195–215. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.4.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garcia SB, Park HS, Novelli M, Wright NA. Field cancerization, clonality, and epithelial stem cells: the spread of mutated clones in epithelial sheets. The Journal of pathology. 1999;187(1):61–81. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199901)187:1<61::AID-PATH247>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lind PO. Malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia. Scandinavian journal of dental research. 1987;95(6):449–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1987.tb01959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Silverman S, Jr, Gorsky M, Lozada F. Oral leukoplakia and malignant transformation. A follow-up study of 257 patients. Cancer. 1984;53(3):563–568. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<563::aid-cncr2820530332>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee JJ, Hong WK, Hittelman WN, et al. Predicting cancer development in oral leukoplakia: ten years of translational research. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(5):1702–1710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hashibe M, Mathew B, Kuruvilla B, et al. Chewing tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of erythroplakia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(7):639–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang M, Spitz MR, Gu J, et al. Cyclin D1 gene polymorphism as a risk factor for oral premalignant lesions. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(10):2034–2037. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang Y, Spitz MR, Lee JJ, Huang M, Lippman SM, Wu X. Nucleotide excision repair pathway genes and oral premalignant lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(12):3753–3758. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hu Z, Chen J, Tian T, et al. Genetic variants of miRNA sequences and non-small cell lung cancer survival. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118(7):2600–2608. doi: 10.1172/JCI34934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang H, Dinney CP, Ye Y, Zhu Y, Grossman HB, Wu X. Evaluation of genetic variants in microRNA-related genes and risk of bladder cancer. Cancer research. 2008;68(7):2530–2537. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hu Z, Liang J, Wang Z, et al. Common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs were associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Human mutation. 2008 doi: 10.1002/humu.20837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Horikawa Y, Wood CG, Yang H, et al. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of microRNA Machinery Genes Modify the Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(23):7956–7962. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ye YWK, Gu J, Yang H, Lin J, Ajani JA, Wu X. Genetic variations in microRNA-related genes as novel susceptibility loci for esophageal cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res. 2008;1:460–469. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Diederichs S, Haber DA. Sequence variations of microRNAs in human cancer: alterations in predicted secondary structure do not affect processing. Cancer research. 2006;66(12):6097–6104. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Protopopov A, Kashuba V, Zabarovska VI, et al. An integrated physical and gene map of the 3.5-Mb chromosome 3p21. 3 (AP20) region implicated in major human epithelial malignancies. Cancer research. 2003;63(2):404–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yanaihara N, Caplen N, Bowman E, et al. Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer cell. 2006;9(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Michael MZ, SMOC, van Holst Pellekaan NG, Young GP, James RJ. Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1(12):882–891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karube Y, Tanaka H, Osada H, et al. Reduced expression of Dicer associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Cancer science. 2005;96(2):111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00015.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Merritt WM, Lin YG, Han LY, et al. Dicer, Drosha, and outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;359(25):2641–2650. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar MS, Lu J, Mercer KL, Golub TR, Jacks T. Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nature genetics. 2007;39(5):673–677. doi: 10.1038/ng2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mourelatos Z, Dostie J, Paushkin S, et al. miRNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins containing numerous microRNAs. Genes & development. 2002;16(6):720–728. doi: 10.1101/gad.974702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murashov AK, Chintalgattu V, Islamov RR, et al. RNAi pathway is functional in peripheral nerve axons. Faseb J. 2007;21(3):656–670. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6155com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hutvagner G, Zamore PD. A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science (New York, NY. 2002;297(5589):2056–2060. doi: 10.1126/science.1073827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, et al. TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005;436(7051):740–744. doi: 10.1038/nature03868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shpargel KB, Matera AG. Gemin proteins are required for efficient assembly of Sm-class ribonucleoproteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(48):17372–17377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508947102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES