Abstract
Light responses in Drosophila photoreceptors are mediated by two Ca2+ permeable cation channels, transient receptor potential (TRP) and TRP-like (TRPL). Although Ca2+ influx via these channels is critical for amplification, inactivation, and light adaptation, the fractional contribution of Ca2+ to the currents (Pf) has not been measured. We describe a slow (τ ∼ 350 ms) tail current in voltage-clamped light responses and show that it is mediated by electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchange. Assuming a 3Na:1Ca stoichiometry, we derive empirical estimates of Pf by comparing the charge integrals of the exchanger and light-induced currents. For TRPL channels, Pf was ∼17% as predicted by Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) theory. Pf for TRP (29%) and wild-type flies (26%) was higher, but lower than the GHK prediction (45% and 42%). As predicted by GHK theory, Pf for both channels increased with extracellular [Ca2+], and was largely independent of voltage between –100 and –30 mV. A model incorporating intra- and extracellular geometry, ion permeation, diffusion, extrusion, and buffering suggested that the deviation from GHK predictions was largely accounted for by extracellular ionic depletion during the light-induced currents, and the time course of the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current could be used to obtain estimates of cellular Ca2+ buffering capacities.
Introduction
Light activation of fly photoreceptors leads to the opening of two classes of Ca2+ permeable cation channels, transient receptor potential (TRP) and transient receptor potential-like (TRPL), via a G-protein-coupled PLC signaling cascade (1,2–4). Both the channels and upstream signaling elements are localized within the rhabdomere, a rod-like stack of ∼35,000 tightly packed microvilli, 1–2 μm in length and 60 nm in diameter. The Ca2+ influx associated with the light response accounts for virtually all of the light-induced Ca2+ rise in the photoreceptor (5–7) and is proposed to transiently reach near-millimolar levels within individual microvilli in response to single-photon absorptions (8,9). The Ca2+ influx is critical for response amplification, inactivation, and light adaptation, and mediates sequential positive and negative feedback via multiple molecular targets (10–12). These include the light-sensitive channels, which are both positively and negatively regulated by Ca2+ (12–14), and PLC (12,15) and metarhodopsin (16), which are both inhibited by Ca2+ influx. The resulting light response in flies represents the fastest known G-protein-coupled signaling cascade and has a huge dynamic range, from single photon responses (quantum bumps) to full daylight (17,18). This performance, which outstrips that of any vertebrate photoreceptor, has inspired a number of computational models that attempt to account for the light response in terms of the underlying molecular mechanisms (4,19–21).
A key parameter in such models is the amount of Ca2+ that enters into individual microvilli via the light-sensitive channels. This requires knowledge of the fraction of light-induced current (LIC) that is carried by Ca2+, i.e., the fractional Ca2+ current, Pf (22). Pf has never been directly measured, and previous estimates have relied upon theoretical values calculated from relative ionic permeabilities using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) current equation (Eq. 1). However, it is questionable whether the independent mobility of ions, a central assumption of GHK theory (23), holds true for the light-sensitive channels, which show complex permeation and divalent ion block (24–26). In addition, the LIC can be so large that there may be significant changes in ionic gradients during the response.
For technical reasons, standard approaches for measuring Pf (22) are impractical for fly photoreceptors. In this study, we developed a novel (to our knowledge) approach that exploits the native electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (CalX), which extrudes 1 Ca2+ ion for the entry of 3 Na+ ions (27–29). Using whole-cell recordings, we observed a distinct slow aftercurrent in response to bright flashes, which we attribute to electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchange. Under the assumption that this tail current represents the extrusion of Ca2+ that entered through the TRP and/or TRPL channels, we estimated empirical Pf values for TRP and/or TRPL channels from the ratio between the charge carried by the LIC and the exchanger current. Empirical Pf values for TRPL channels closely matched the simple GHK prediction (Pf ∼17%) but were somewhat below the prediction for TRP channels (empirical Pf ∼29%, compared with ∼45% for GHK-Pf). A detailed model incorporating intra- and extracellular geometry, ion permeation, diffusion, extrusion, and buffering suggested that the deviation from the GHK prediction could be largely accounted for by extracellular ionic depletion during the large LIC, and the time course of the Na+/Ca2+ exchange tail current could be used to obtain estimates of cellular Ca2+ buffering capacities.
Materials and Methods
Flies
Flies (Drosophila melanogaster) were reared at 25°C in the dark. The wild-type (WT) strain was Oregon. The mutants used included trp343 and trpl302, null alleles of TRP and TRPL channels, respectively (30,31); calxA, a loss-of-function mutation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (29); and dSK, a deletion of the dSK gene encoding a small-conductance, Ca2+-activated K channel (32).
Whole-cell electrophysiology
Dissociated ommatidia were prepared from newly eclosed flies as described previously (33) and transferred to a recording chamber on an inverted Nikon Diaphot microscope (Nikon, Kingston-upon-Thames, U.K.). The standard bath contained (in mM) 120 NaCl, 5 KCl, 10 N-Tris-(hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-amino-ethanesulphonic acid, 4 MgCl2, 1.5 CaCl2, 25 proline and 5 alanine, pH 7.15. The intracellular pipette solution was 110 Cs gluconate, 15 TEACl, 10 N-Tris-(hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-amino-ethanesulphonic acid 4 Mg-ATP, 2 MgCl2, 1 NAD, and 0.4 Na-GTP, pH 7.15 (adjusted with CsOH). Chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, U.K.). Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were made at room temperature (20°C ± 1°C) at –70 mV unless otherwise stated (including correction for a –10 mV junction potential) using electrodes of resistance ∼10–15 MΩ. Series resistance values were generally <30 MΩ and were compensated to >80%. Data were collected and analyzed using an Axopatch 2D amplifier and pCLAMP9 software (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA). Photoreceptors were stimulated via green-light-emitting diodes, and intensities were calibrated in terms of effectively absorbed photons by counting quantum bumps at low intensities.
Measurement of Pf
Assuming that Ca2+ ions that enter through light-activated channels are all extruded by the CalX exchanger, the fractional Ca2+ current (Pf) can be calculated from the charge ratio of the total LIC and the extruded Ca2+. The onset of the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current is masked by the much larger LIC, and we estimated this hidden component by extrapolating an exponential fit back to the time of the peak response (Fig. 1 B). This would have introduced an error of <5% compared with more sophisticated modeling of the CalX current based on the overall response waveform (Fig. S2 in the Supporting Material). The charge integral of the LIC was calculated by subtracting the estimated CalX charge integral from the charge integral of the entire response. Assuming a stoichiometry of 3 Na+ to 1 Ca2+, the charge integral of the tail current was multiplied by two to correct for the divalency of the extruded Ca2+ ions and divided by the LIC charge integral to obtain an empirical estimate of Pf.
Theoretical fractional currents
In the first instance, we compared the experimentally measured fractional Ca2+ current (Pf) values with theoretical predictions based on ionic permeability ratios using the GHK current equation (Eq. 1), which specifies the current (I) across the membrane carried by ion species S with charge zs:
(1) |
where Em denotes membrane voltage, R is the gas constant, T is temperature (K), and F is the Faraday constant. [S]i and [S]o respectively denote the intra- and extracellular concentrations of ion S, and Ps is its permeability. [Ca2+]i was taken as 160 nM in dark-adapted photoreceptors (7), other values from the experimental solutions. Under physiological conditions, the total LIC is carried by four main cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) (14):
(2) |
Table 1 shows theoretical Pf values for the WT and trp and trpl mutants in a standard bath based on Eq. 1 using published ionic permeability ratios (14,26).
Table 1.
Channels | PCa/PCs | Permeability ratios |
a PK/PCs | Pf (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMg/PCs | PNa/PCs | ||||
TRP (in trpl) | 57.0 | 15.8 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 45.2 |
TRPL (in trp) | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 17.0 |
TRP+TRPL (in WT) | 27.6 | 5.7 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 41.6 |
Permeability ratios (PX/PCs) derived from reversal potential data (14,26). TRP channels were measured in trpl mutants, and TRPL channels were measured in trp mutants. The final column gives the fractional Ca2+ current (Pf) predicted by the GHK current equation (Eq. 1) at –70 mV expressed as the percentage of total LIC. PNa/PK was assumed to be 1.0.
Under the experimental conditions, intracellular K+ was substituted with Cs+; PK was not directly measured due to the large voltage-sensitive K+ currents in Drosophila photoreceptors. However, increasing or decreasing the permeability ratio of K+ by 2-fold had a negligible effect on predicted Pf in otherwise physiological solutions.
Results
Na+/Ca2+ exchange tail current
In whole-cell, voltage-clamped recordings from Drosophila photoreceptors, the responses to brief, intense flashes exhibit a distinct slow, inward tail current of ∼100 pA (Fig. 1 A). Because the photoreceptors express high densities of an NCX electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, encoded by calx (28,29,34,35), we suspected that this tail current was an electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchange current. A slowly inactivating depolarizing afterpotential with similar kinetics was previously reported in intracellular recordings from larger flies and also attributed to electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchange (36,37).
In principle, the charge integral of such an exchange current can be used to estimate the amount of Ca2+ that is extruded from the cell; however, this assumes that there are no other ionic fluxes that might otherwise overlap the putative Na+/Ca2+ exchange current. In fact, the tail current of the photoresponse is normally also associated with a small outward component that develops slowly and decays over several seconds. This current is attributable to a Na+/K+ ATPase (4,37,38) and was completely abolished by 100 μM ouabain (Fig. 1), which we therefore used in all quantitative experiments.
To test more rigorously whether the tail current represents CalX exchanger activity, we examined light responses in calxA loss-of-function mutants. As previously reported (29), photoreceptors from calxA mutants have reduced sensitivity to light and rapid response kinetics resulting from elevated resting cytosolic Ca2+ due to the failure of Ca2+ extrusion via CalX. Importantly, the slow inward tail current was absent in calxA mutants, strongly supporting its identification as the exchanger current (Fig. 1 C).
An alternative explanation for the tail current could be persistent residual activation of the light-sensitive channels. If this were the case, it should show the characteristic pronounced outward rectification and reversal potential (Erev) of the LIC (Erev = +12 mV for TRP and –4 mV for TRPL). By contrast, Na+/Ca2+ exchange currents should show exponential inward rectification (39) and would not be expected to reverse in response to an imposed Ca2+ load (11,40). To measure the current voltage (I-V) relationship of the tail currents, we applied voltage steps at the onset of tail current and subtracted a template recorded in the dark (Fig. 2). For comparison, the I-V relationship of the LIC was also measured in response to continuous dim red light illumination. Consistent with the properties of an exchanger, the tail current was inwardly rectifying (Fig. 2 E) and clearly distinct from the strongly outwardly rectifying LIC (Fig. 2, E and F). Nevertheless, a small residual outward component was detected at depolarized voltages beyond +40 mV, possibly reflecting a residual, late inactivating light-induced component. However, this should not contribute significantly to the inward tail current at −70 mV, primarily because of the outward rectification and also because the kinetics of inactivation of the LIC are much faster at negative potentials due to the increased Ca2+ influx. Another potential contaminant of this current is the SK channel (small-conductance Ca2+-activated K channel), which was recently reported in photoreceptors (32). However, a significant SK contribution can be effectively excluded because the I-V curve of the tail current in sk null mutants (dSK−) was indistinguishable from that in the WT, whereas Pf values determined in dSK− flies were similar to those obtained in the WT (see Figs. 4 and 5).
The peak amplitude and charge integral of the inward tail current increased with flashes of increasing intensity (Fig. 3). The peak amplitudes (∼100 pA) activated in WT and trpl were in line with previous measurements of the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current (11). The peak amplitude of the tail current observed in trp was less than half of those (∼40 pA), as would be expected if TRPL channels had a lower Pf. In all cases, the current decayed with a similar time course, which presumably represents the rate of Ca2+ extrusion via the exchanger (Fig. 3 D). In all cases, the time course was well fitted by a single- or double-exponential time course with a dominant time constant (τ1) of ∼300–400 ms and a minor slower component (τ2 ∼2 s).
Fractional Ca2+ current, Pf
Our method for measuring Pf assumes that all Ca2+ entering the cell through light-sensitive channels is extruded by the CalX exchanger. Having identified the slow inward tail current as a Na+/Ca2+ exchange current, and assuming a stoichiometry of 3 Na+:1 Ca2+, which is generally accepted for NCX exchangers (27,41), we estimated Pf from the ratio between the total charge integral of the LIC and that of the CalX tail current (see Fig. 1 B).
Fig. 4 shows experimentally obtained values of Pf for TRP and/or TRPL channels from the WT and respective channel mutants compared with GHK predictions over a range of intensities. In principle, assuming the amount of Ca2+ extruded by Na+/Ca+ exchange equals the amount light-induced Ca2+ influx (42), Pf might be expected to remain constant with different intensities. However, we found that the empirical Pf values increased slightly with intensity. One factor that might contribute to this is that the exchanger is a low-affinity, high-capacity transporter that is expected to dominate Ca2+ homeostasis when Ca2+ levels are high: with lower Ca2+ levels associated with dimmer flashes, alternative higher-affinity transport and/or Ca2+ buffering mechanisms may prevent some Ca2+ ions from being immediately extruded by CalX exchange, leading to an underestimation of Pf. One such mechanism is sequestration of Ca2+ into smooth endoplasmic reticular (SER) stores by a SER Ca2+-ATPase (43). To exclude this possibility, we measured Pf in trpl flies after applying the SERCA pump inhibitor thapsigargin (10 μM) by puffer pipette. No significant differences were found in the properties of either the light response or the CalX-dependent tail current (Fig. 4 B). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude minor contributions of nonelectrogenic Ca2+ mechanisms (e.g., plasma membrane Ca-ATPase), mitochondrial Ca2+ buffering, or high-affinity buffers that do not release Ca2+ on the timescale of the experiments (although we suggest that these may be less significant at higher intensities, where they are likely to be saturated by the higher Ca2+ concentrations).
The larger light-induced responses at higher intensities are increasingly subject to series resistance error and deteriorating space clamp, which may result in poor voltage-clamp control (see Discussion). As a compromise, therefore, we used Pf values derived from flashes of submaximal intensity (∼17,500 photons, generating responses of <7 nA) from photoreceptors with optimal series compensation (>80%, Rs < 25 MΩ). On this basis, Pf for TRP channels, isolated in trpl mutants, was 29.3 ± 1.9% (mean ± SE, n = 6), which is substantial but still less than the simple GHK prediction of 45.2%. Pf for TRPL channels isolated in trp (16.6 ± 1.9% n = 8) was very close to the theoretical prediction (GHK-Pf = 17.0%). The WT current, which is mediated by both TRP and TRPL channels, yielded Pf values (26.1 ± 1.0%, n = 20) that were again below prediction (GHK-Pf = 41.6%). Pf in dSk null mutants (23.3 ± 1.5%, n = 12) was not significantly different from that in WT (p > 0.05). The results clearly confirm the higher fractional Ca2+ current mediated by TRP channels and support previous studies indicating that the WT LIC is largely carried by TRP under physiological conditions (14,31). Below, we consider the disparity between the empirical measurements and simple GHK predictions for TRP and WT currents by using a detailed modeling approach.
Voltage dependence of Pf
Thus far, Pf values were measured at resting potential (−70 mV); however, in vivo, photoreceptors depolarize in response to light. GHK theory predicts that Pf should vary with the membrane potential because each ion has its own unique reversal potential (Erev). In addition, factors such as voltage-dependent divalent ion block (24) might influence Pf in a less predictable manner. We therefore measured Pf at different holding potentials. GHK theory predicts that Pf values should be almost constant at negative membrane potentials (−110 to −30 mV), but should tend to 100% near 0 mV as Erev of monovalent ions is approached, while Erev for Ca2+ remains positive. Unfortunately, we could not obtain accurate measurements at such positive potentials because the tail current was too small; however, within the range that could be tested, Pf was broadly independent of voltage in all genetic backgrounds, consistent with GHK theory (Fig. 5). This also implies that the high fractional Ca2+ current through the light-sensitive channels is maintained over most of the physiologically significant voltage operating range.
Ca2+ dependence of Pf
Pf is clearly predicted to increase with increasing extracellular Ca2+ concentration. To test this, we varied [Ca2+]o without altering other cation concentrations by perfusing cells for 1–3 min using a puffer pipette before delivering test flashes. As previously reported, light responses in high [Ca2+]o had faster time-to-peak and decay times (Fig. 6 A, inset) due to enhanced positive and negative feedback by Ca2+ (10). The peak amplitude of the exchanger current also significantly increased when [Ca2+]o was raised, saturating above 3 mM at ∼200 pA in WT and TRPL while continuing to increase up to at least 10 mM in trp mutants (Fig. 6 B). We also noted a change in the kinetics of the tail current, which no longer decayed exponentially at higher [Ca2+]o, but was initially ramp-like, probably indicating saturation of the exchanger rate (Fig. 6 A).
The simple GHK model predicts a sigmoidal increase in Pf for both TRP and TRPL channels approaching 100% at high [Ca2+]o. Our Pf measurements also increased in a Ca2+-dependent fashion broadly in line with the GHK model (Fig. 6 C). As before, empirical Pf values closely approximated the GHK predictions for TRPL channels (in trp) across the tested [Ca2+]o range, but were generally below them for TRP channel (in trpl) and the native TRP and TRPL channels (WT).
Modeling of Ca2+ dynamics
Although we confirmed the high fractional Ca2+ contribution to the LIC and the greater Ca2+ influx via TRP channels, we observed significant discrepancies between the empirical Pf values and simple GHK predictions, assuming static ionic concentrations. To explore the basis for this, we extended an earlier model of Ca2+ dynamics (9) that considers the diffusion, influx, and efflux of the ions involved in the light response (Ca2+, Na+, K+, and Mg2+) and takes into account the large local and global changes in extra- and intracellular ionic concentrations. Although the model is detailed, it only aims to reproduce the ionic fluxes in and out of a patch-clamped fly photoreceptor, under the conditions of our experiments, for a bright flash, which effectively produces a quantum bump in each microvillus in the rhabdomere (∼35,000 effective photons). Using the model, we directly calculated estimates of fractional currents and tail currents caused by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, taking into account dynamic changes in ionic concentration (see Supporting Material for details).
To model the concentration changes during the light response, we reduced the photoreceptor cell and extracellular space to a one-dimensional (1D) geometry consisting of a single microvillus connected to a representative section of the cell body, and an extramicrovillar space connected to a representative section of the intraommatidial cavity (Fig. 7). By further compartmentalizing this geometry, we were able to model diffusion, local ionic fluxes, and local Ca2+ buffering. We estimated the currents associated with the TRP and TRPL channels from three representative measurements for WT, trp, and trpl flies by subtracting an estimated exchanger current from the total LIC (Fig. S2). Based on these estimated channel currents, the modeled local ionic concentrations, the measured relative ionic permeabilities, and the GHK equation, we calculated the ionic fluxes through TRP and TRPL channels in and out of the microvillus (Figs. S3 and S4). We subsequently modeled intra- and extracellular diffusion of ions, the extrusion of Ca2+ ions by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (Fig. S3A), and buffering of Ca2+ ions (Figs. S9 and S10). Because we used ouabain in all experiments, the model ignored any reequilibration of Na+ due to Na/K ATPase activity. We also ignored the dynamic reequilibration of Mg2+, about which nothing is known in terms of photoreceptors. The absence of any tail current in calx mutants (Fig. 3) indicates at least that there is no significant electrogenic component.
The ionic fluxes, diffusion, and buffering led to concentration changes in the four compartments (Figs. S5–S8). When the TRP and TRPL channels opened, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ flowed into the cell, leading to a significant increase in the microvillus lumen and a delayed increase in the cell body after diffusion from the microvillus. Because Ca2+ ions are strongly buffered and have a lower diffusion coefficient than the other ions, Ca2+ showed a stronger peak in the microvillus, especially in WT and trpl flies, where influx was particularly high. Conversely, the concentration of Ca2+ ions decreased in the extracellular space, most notably in the extramicrovillar space and more moderately in the intraommatidial cavity. K+ concentrations changed in the opposite direction, but by smaller amounts because K+ has a high diffusion coefficient and its contribution to the LIC is small at −70 mV.
The Ca2+ concentration that is reached in the cell body depends strongly on the buffering power; therefore, we tuned the buffering power so that cell-body Ca2+ levels would peak around 50 μM in WT flies, as was previously measured using Ca2+ indicators (7). After Ca2+ influx, the exchanger extrudes the ions from the microvillus lumen into the extramicrovillar space in a concentration-dependent manner. The exchanger is assumed to saturate at high intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, with the concentration of half-maximal exchanger current tuned to a value of KX = 30 μM. The maximal exchanger rate constant was adjusted to a value that is in agreement with the observed maximal exchanger current of ∼200 pA. Apart from these exchanger parameters, the apparent rate of extrusion is predicted to depend strongly on Ca2+ diffusion from the cell body to the microvillus/rhabdomere, which in turn is strongly influenced by the buffering power. Significantly, the same buffering parameters, which were tuned to reproduce the peak Ca2+ concentration in the cell body, also successfully modeled the time courses of the measured exchanger tail current, as well as Ca2+ concentration time courses previously measured using Ca2+ indicators (44,45).
The measured tail current exhibited a dominant fast component (τ ∼300–400 ms) and a minor slow component (τ ∼2 s). We explored several mechanisms to explain the second slow component, including diffusion from the pipette, mitochondria, and inhibition of the exchanger by intracellular Ca2+. None of these mechanisms seemed to robustly reproduce the slow component in a way that was consistent with other aspects of the measurements. However, adding a low-capacity, moderately high-affinity Ca2+ buffer also gave a slow component and seemed to be in better agreement with other aspects of the measurements.
Tuning of parameters was based on a representative WT measurement obtained in a bath solution containing 1.5 mM Ca2+. We subsequently used the same parameter set for the other simulations, in which we only varied the LIC (which was an input for the simulation); the relative permeabilities corresponding to WT, trp, and trpl flies; and the extracellular Ca2+ concentration. Because the measured integral of the LIC varies with extracellular Ca2+, we scaled the representative LICs for WT, trp, and trpl flies measured in a bath solution containing 1.5 mM Ca2+, with values of 0.6, 0.9, and 0.65 for simulations in which the Ca2+ bath concentration was 0.75, 3, and 10 mM, respectively.
Using the dynamic model, we calculated Pf values for WT, trp, and trpl flies for different extracellular Ca2+ concentrations and compared them with the measured values (Fig. 8 A). In similarity to the measured Pf values, we found that modeled Pf values in trp flies were hardly affected by dynamic changes in ion concentrations; however, for WT and trpl responses, we found that Pf was reduced close to measured values. During the peak of LIC, we predicted shifts in extra- and intracellular ionic concentrations (Figs. S6 and S7), which reduce the ionic gradients across the membrane and hence the driving force for ionic currents. The shifts were most notable in the confined extramicrovillar space and microvillus lumen. Although the gradients for Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ all became smaller, the effect on the more slowly diffusing Ca2+ combined with its large flux in WT and trpl flies was much more pronounced than that observed for Na+ and Mg2+, and this reduced Pf by increasing the relative contribution of Na+ and to some extent Mg2+ compared with Ca2+ (Fig. S4).
Using the same dynamic model, we also calculated the exchanger tail currents for WT, trp, and trpl flies for the different extracellular Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 8, B–D). The peak exchanger current just after LIC was comparable to measured values. We also found that the time course of the measured tail current qualitatively agreed with the modeled tail current for all genetic backgrounds and Ca2+ concentrations, including the ramp-like decay at high extracellular Ca2+ concentrations indicative of exchanger saturation (Figs. 6 A and 8, B and D).
Discussion
In this study, we characterize a light-induced tail current in Drosophila photoreceptors. We show that it is mediated by the CalX electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and exploit its properties to provide quantitative estimates of the fractional contribution of Ca2+ to the LIC (Pf) through TRP and TRPL channels. Our data confirm that Ca2+ influx represents a major component (∼30%) of the LIC and is predominantly mediated by TRP channels, whereas TRPL channels mediate a more modest Ca2+ influx. The voltage and Ca2+ dependence of Pf are broadly in line with predictions of GHK theory, and the Pf for the TRPL channel closely matches that predicted by GHK theory. However, although the Pf of TRP channels (∼30%) was ∼2 times greater than that of TRPL, it was substantially lower than the simple GHK prediction (45%). A detailed model incorporating intra- and extracellular geometry, ion permeation, diffusion, extrusion, and buffering suggested that this deviation from the GHK prediction could be largely accounted for by extracellular ionic depletion during the large LICs.
Methodological considerations
The standard approach for measuring Pf involves loading cells with saturating levels of Ca2+ indicator dyes, which then must be calibrated, ideally using a pure Ca2+ current (22). This approach is impractical for Drosophila photoreceptors because of the huge Ca2+ fluxes, the extreme compartmentalization, and the lack of a pure Ca2+ current control for calibration. We therefore developed an alternative method based on the endogenous Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. This method assumes that all Ca2+ entering the cell is removed by the CalX exchanger during the time course of the tail current. In a strict sense, this is unlikely to be completely true (see below); however, there is a substantial body of evidence implicating the CalX exchanger as the principal mechanism of Ca2+ extrusion in Drosophila photoreceptors (29,42). The rapidity and high efficiency of Na+/Ca2+ exchange has also been demonstrated in Drosophila photoreceptors by a near-instantaneous inward exchange current that can be evoked by photolytic release of caged Ca2+ (11).
The method also assumes that the light-induced rise in Ca2+ is entirely due to Ca2+ influx through TRP and/or TRPL channels, and that other modes of raising cytosolic Ca2+ levels are negligible. This is strongly supported by studies using Ca2+ indicator dyes, in which it was concluded that Ca2+ influx vastly outweighs any release from intracellular stores (5–7,46). We also found that our estimate of Pf was unaffected by first depleting intracellular stores with thapsigargin. This result also excludes significant long-term Ca2+ sequestration by the SERCA pump as a source of error in our measurements.
Intensity dependence of Pf
In our experiments, we observed a slight intensity-dependent rise in Pf values (Fig. 4) that was not necessarily predicted, although a similar intensity-dependent difference between light-induced Ca2+ influx and Na+/Ca2+ exchange-dependent efflux has also been reported in blowfly photoreceptors (37). One possible explanation for the variation of Pf with intensity is a significant contribution of alternative, higher-affinity Ca2+ homeostatic mechanisms (e.g., buffers, stores, mitochondria, transporters) at lower intensities. It is possible that certain Ca2+-buffering/sequestering components have a slower release time constant and that some Ca2+ is not rapidly extruded by Na+/Ca+ exchange, but rather is released on a slower timescale and/or extruded by nonelectrogenic transporters such as the high-affinity plasma membrane Ca-ATPase. A significant contribution from any of these components would lead to an underestimation of Pf. With higher-intensity flashes, the empirical Pf estimate may approach its true value due to a greater proportion of high-affinity sites being occupied or saturated, leading to increased reliance on the low-affinity, high-capacity exchanger.
Another possibility is that the large currents elicited by brighter flashes were inadequately voltage-clamped, owing to series resistance (Rs) errors (maximally 40–50 mV) and/or poor space-clamp conditions. Both GHK theory and direct measurements suggest that the effect of voltage on Pf is minimal at hyperpolarized potentials below −20 mV (Fig. 5); however, Pf is predicted to increase sharply above −20 mV, and we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that voltage-clamp control of some of the largest responses may have deteriorated sufficiently to increase the Pf.
Finally, although the total LIC is smaller at low intensities, the local current density (number of channels activated per photon per microvillus) actually increases. Hence, in principle, local ionic depletion could be higher at low intensities, leading to greater deviation from the GHK prediction (i.e., the Pf value decreases at low intensity). However, this effect would be offset by less global depletion of the overall extracellular space, and the situation cannot be directly modeled by our assumption of a repeating 1D element (which strictly holds only for the case in which each microvillus is activated once).
Modeling Ca2+ influx and extrusion
Our experimentally obtained Pf values closely matched simple GHK predictions for TRPL channels but not for TRP channels. Although this might indicate that the GHK assumptions had been violated for TRP, a detailed model suggested that the discrepancy could be largely explained by extracellular ion depletion. Thus, a computational model that still uses GHK theory but calculates dynamic ionic concentrations by taking into account photoreceptor cell geometry was able to robustly reproduce the observed Pf values and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger tail currents over a range of extracellular Ca2+ concentrations and different genetic backgrounds. Because Ca2+ is a major charge carrier in WT and trpl flies, and also has the lowest diffusion coefficient, it is more strongly depleted in the extracellular space during the peak response than Na+ and Mg2+, resulting in a lower Pf in WT and trpl flies. In trp flies, the contribution of Ca2+ to the total current is lower and hence Ca2+ is less depleted, resulting in only a slightly smaller Pf value.
An essential feature of our model is the inclusion of Ca2+ buffering in the cell body. To obtain a realistic peak Ca2+ (50 μM) in the cell body, Ca2+ must be strongly (90–98%) buffered (without buffering, Ca2+ is expected to reach ∼0.5 mM in the cell body). Apart from controlling cell-body concentrations, buffering also slows down extrusion of Ca2+ and diffusion from the cell body to the rhabdomere. The time constant for free diffusion from the cell body to the rhabdomere is estimated to be approximately = 19 ms, but for buffered Ca2+ this can be ∼200–400 ms and even slower, suggesting that extrusion is partly diffusion limited. Significantly, the latter time constant matches the dominant time constant observed in the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger tail current. In other words, the introduction of a Ca2+ buffer with properties needed to account for measured cell-body Ca2+ concentrations also yields the observed extrusion time constant without further tuning. This interpretation of the effect of buffering on time constants is also consistent with a recent study that reported a similar time constant (∼350 ms) for the increase in cell-body Ca2+ after illumination, which was accelerated to ∼20 ms after genetic knockdown of the major cell-body Ca2+-binding protein calphotin (45).
To account for the maximal exchanger current of ∼200 pA, we modeled the exchanger using a Hill coefficient of one and a concentration of half-maximal exchanger current of KX = 30 μM. Qualitatively, this yielded the correct time course and shape of the exchanger tail current for all extracellular Ca2+ concentrations and genetic backgrounds, including similar saturation characteristics (ramp-like decay) just after the peak currents recorded in high [Ca2+]o (3 and 10 mM; cf. Figs. 6 and 8). The value for KX is higher than the values reported for regulatory and transport binding sites for other organisms (41). However, it is likely that the apparent IC50 values are different from specific binding sites, and, moreover, other ions or regulatory mechanisms may also affect the apparent affinity in vivo. From a physiological viewpoint, a relatively low apparent affinity of the exchanger for intracellular Ca2+ would be beneficial for cells that have to handle large Ca2+ influxes leading to concentration changes in the order of tens of micromolars. In some organisms at least, NCX exchangers can be modulated by [Na+]o, [Na+]i, or [Ca2+]o (41,47). For simplicity, we ignored such regulatory sites because Drosophila CalX has not been fully characterized in this respect, and because these concentrations only undergo only relatively small changes during the light response compared with the massive changes in [Ca]i.
Conclusions
To our knowledge, our results represent the first empirical measurements of the fractional Ca2+ current (Pf) of the light-sensitive channels in Drosophila. Because the TRP channel in particular shows complex permeation properties and divalent ion block, it is unlikely to strictly obey the assumptions (e.g., independent mobility of ions) of GHK theory. Despite this, our results indicate that to a good approximation, the fractional Ca2+ current follows the GHK prediction for both TRP and TRPL. It is only reduced from the simple GHK prediction for the case of TRP channels because of the depletion of Ca2+ ions that occurs during responses to bright flashes. Despite this reduction in Pf, Ca2+ influx is still massive. For example, assuming a single-channel conductance of 8 pS (48), a Pf of 30% represents a flux of ∼600 Ca2+ ions/ms per TRP channel at resting potential. Within the volume of a microvillus (∼3 × 10−18 liter), this represents an unbuffered flux of 350 μM/ms per channel. During the peak responses to the bright flashes used in this study, our model predicts that microvillar Ca2+ will transiently reach ∼0.5 mM in WT and trpl photoreceptors, and ∼0.15 mM in trp (Fig. S6). In response to these bright flashes, each effectively absorbed photon generates an average response of <1 pA. This is much smaller than the normal single-photon response (quantum bump), because the global rise in Ca2+ initiated by bumps with the shortest latencies already attenuates (light adapts) the majority of bumps that arise with longer latencies. Under dim illumination, single quantum bumps have an amplitude of ∼10 pA representing the opening of ∼15 channels in a single microvillus, and we predict that free Ca2+ transiently reaches levels of several millimolars within individual microvilli, as previously proposed (9). Under light-adapted conditions, each effectively absorbed photon may now only activate a single channel for a few milliseconds, but even this would be expected to raise microvillar free Ca2+ transiently well above 10 μM.
Although the model was specifically implemented to provide insight into the Ca2+ fluxes and exchanger currents associated with our bright-flash experiments, successful modeling of the exchanger tail current also provided insight into the cytosolic Ca2+ buffering of the cell body and microvilli. Particularly important are immobile cytosolic buffers, the most significant of which is probably the Ca2+-binding protein calphotin, which is localized in a band at the base of the microvilli (45,49,50). To account for both the measured exchanger time constant and the control of absolute cytosolic Ca2+ in the face of massive Ca2+ influx, the modeling suggests that the buffer (putatively calphotin) should have a relatively low affinity (∼1 mM) and high local concentration (20 mM). Future implementation of the model should provide the framework for gaining a more detailed understanding of Ca2+ homeostasis in microvillar photoreceptors under more physiological conditions, i.e., by considering reequilibration of Na+ via Na/K ATPase in the voltage domain rather than under voltage clamp, and responses to more physiologically relevant illumination.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant BB/G006865/1 to R.C.H. and a doctoral award to B.C.) and the Netherlands Research Organization (NWO-ALW VIDI 864.09.015 to M.P.).
Contributor Information
Marten Postma, Email: M.Postma@uva.nl.
Roger C. Hardie, Email: rch14@cam.ac.uk.
Supporting Material
References
- 1.Katz B., Minke B. Drosophila photoreceptors and signaling mechanisms. Front Cell Neurosci. 2009;3:2. doi: 10.3389/neuro.03.002.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang T., Montell C. Phototransduction and retinal degeneration in Drosophila. Pflugers Arch. 2007;454:821–847. doi: 10.1007/s00424-007-0251-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yau K.W., Hardie R.C. Phototransduction motifs and variations. Cell. 2009;139:246–264. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hardie R.C., Postma M. Phototransduction in microvillar photoreceptors of Drosophila and other invertebrates. In: Albright T.D., Masland R., editors. Academic Press; Oxford: 2008. pp. 77–130. (The Senses—A Comprehensive Reference. Vision I, Vol. 1). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ranganathan R., Bacskai B.J., Zuker C.S. Cytosolic calcium transients: spatial localization and role in Drosophila photoreceptor cell function. Neuron. 1994;13:837–848. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90250-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Peretz A., Suss-Toby E., Minke B. The light response of Drosophila photoreceptors is accompanied by an increase in cellular calcium: effects of specific mutations. Neuron. 1994;12:1257–1267. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90442-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hardie R.C. INDO-1 measurements of absolute resting and light-induced Ca2+ concentration in Drosophila photoreceptors. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:2924–2933. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-09-02924.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oberwinkler J., Stavenga D.G. Calcium transients in the rhabdomeres of dark- and light-adapted fly photoreceptor cells. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:1701–1709. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-05-01701.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Postma M., Oberwinkler J., Stavenga D.G. Does Ca2+ reach millimolar concentrations after single photon absorption in Drosophila photoreceptor microvilli? Biophys. J. 1999;77:1811–1823. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77026-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hardie R.C. Whole-cell recordings of the light-induced current in Drosophila photoreceptors: evidence for feedback by calcium permeating the light sensitive channels. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1991;245:203–210. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hardie R.C. Photolysis of caged Ca2+ facilitates and inactivates but does not directly excite light-sensitive channels in Drosophila photoreceptors. J. Neurosci. 1995;15:889–902. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00889.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gu Y., Oberwinkler J., Hardie R.C. Mechanisms of light adaptation in Drosophila photoreceptors. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:1228–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hardie R.C., Minke B. The trp gene is essential for a light-activated Ca2+ channel in Drosophila photoreceptors. Neuron. 1992;8:643–651. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90086-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reuss H., Mojet M.H., Hardie R.C. In vivo analysis of the drosophila light-sensitive channels, TRP and TRPL. Neuron. 1997;19:1249–1259. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80416-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hardie R.C., Raghu P., Sweeney S.T. Calcium influx via TRP channels is required to maintain PIP2 levels in Drosophila photoreceptors. Neuron. 2001;30:149–159. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00269-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu C.H., Satoh A.K., Hardie R.C. Ca2+-dependent metarhodopsin inactivation mediated by calmodulin and NINAC myosin III. Neuron. 2008;59:778–789. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu C.F., Pak W.L. Light-induced voltage noise in the photoreceptor of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Gen. Physiol. 1978;71:249–268. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.3.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Juusola M., Hardie R.C. Light adaptation in Drosophila photoreceptors: I. Response dynamics and signaling efficiency at 25°C. J. Gen. Physiol. 2001;117:3–25. doi: 10.1085/jgp.117.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pumir A., Graves J., Ranganathan R., Shraiman B.I. Systems analysis of the single photon response in invertebrate photoreceptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:10354–10359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711884105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nikolic K., Loizu J., Toumazou C. A stochastic model of the single photon response in Drosophila photoreceptors. Integr Biol (Camb) 2010;2:354–370. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00031k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Song Z., Postma M., Juusola M. Stochastic, adaptive sampling of information by microvilli in fly photoreceptors. Curr. Biol. 2012;22:1371–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schneggenburger R., Zhou Z., Neher E. Fractional contribution of calcium to the cation current through glutamate receptor channels. Neuron. 1993;11:133–143. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90277-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hille B. Sinauer; Sunderland, MA: 2001. Ionic Channels in Excitable Membranes. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hardie R.C., Mojet M.H. Magnesium-dependent block of the light-activated and trp-dependent conductance in Drosophila photoreceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 1995;74:2590–2599. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parnas M., Katz B., Minke B. Open channel block by Ca2+ underlies the voltage dependence of drosophila TRPL channel. J. Gen. Physiol. 2007;129:17–28. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu C.H., Wang T., Hardie R.C. In vivo identification and manipulation of the Ca2+ selectivity filter in the Drosophila transient receptor potential channel. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:604–615. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4099-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hinata M., Yamamura H., Kimura J. Stoichiometry of Na+-Ca2+ exchange is 3:1 in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. J. Physiol. 2002;545:453–461. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.025866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hryshko L.V., Matsuoka S., Philipson K.D. Anomalous regulation of the Drosophila Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger by Ca2+ J. Gen. Physiol. 1996;108:67–74. doi: 10.1085/jgp.108.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang T., Xu H., Montell C. Light activation, adaptation, and cell survival functions of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger CalX. Neuron. 2005;45:367–378. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Scott K., Sun Y.M., Zuker C.S. Calmodulin regulation of Drosophila light-activated channels and receptor function mediates termination of the light response in vivo. Cell. 1997;91:375–383. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80421-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Niemeyer B.A., Suzuki E., Zuker C.S. The Drosophila light-activated conductance is composed of the two channels TRP and TRPL. Cell. 1996;85:651–659. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81232-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abou Tayoun A.N., Li X., Dolph P.J. The Drosophila SK channel (dSK) contributes to photoreceptor performance by mediating sensitivity control at the first visual network. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:13897–13910. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3134-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hardie R.C., Martin F., Raghu P. Molecular basis of amplification in Drosophila phototransduction: roles for G protein, phospholipase C, and diacylglycerol kinase. Neuron. 2002;36:689–701. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01048-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ruknudin A., Valdivia C., Schulze D.H. Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in Drosophila: cloning, expression, and transport differences. Am. J. Physiol. 1997;273:C257–C265. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.1.C257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schwarz E.M., Benzer S. Calx, a Na-Ca exchanger gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:10249–10254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Minke B., Armon E. Activation of electrogenic Na-Ca exchange by light in fly photoreceptors. Vision Res. 1984;24:109–115. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90095-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gerster U. A quantitative estimate of flash-induced Ca(2+)- and Na(+)-influx and Na+/Ca(2+)-exchange in blowfly Calliphora photoreceptors. Vision Res. 1997;37:2477–2485. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jansonius N.M. Properties of the sodium-pump in the blowfly photoreceptor cell. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1990;167:461–467. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lipp P., Pott L. Voltage dependence of sodium-calcium exchange current in guinea-pig atrial myocytes determined by means of an inhibitor. J. Physiol. 1988;403:355–366. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Niggli E., Lederer W.J. Activation of Na-Ca exchange current by photolysis of “caged calcium”. Biophys. J. 1993;65:882–891. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81105-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blaustein M.P., Lederer W.J. Sodium/calcium exchange: its physiological implications. Physiol. Rev. 1999;79:763–854. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Oberwinkler J., Stavenga D.G. Calcium imaging demonstrates colocalization of calcium influx and extrusion in fly photoreceptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:8578–8583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Walz B. Calcium-sequestering smooth endoplasmic reticulum in retinula cells of the blowfly. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1982;81:240–248. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(82)90079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rosenbaum E.E., Hardie R.C., Colley N.J. Calnexin is essential for rhodopsin maturation, Ca2+ regulation, and photoreceptor cell survival. Neuron. 2006;49:229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Weiss S., Kohn E., Minke B. Compartmentalization and Ca2+ buffering are essential for prevention of light-induced retinal degeneration. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:14696–14708. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2456-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cook B., Minke B. TRP and calcium stores in Drosophila phototransduction. Cell Calcium. 1999;25:161–171. doi: 10.1054/ceca.1998.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weber C.R., Ginsburg K.S., Bers D.M. Allosteric regulation of Na/Ca exchange current by cytosolic Ca in intact cardiac myocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 2001;117:119–131. doi: 10.1085/jgp.117.2.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Henderson S.R., Reuss H., Hardie R.C. Single photon responses in Drosophila photoreceptors and their regulation by Ca2+ J. Physiol. 2000;524:179–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00179.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ballinger D.G., Xue N., Harshman K.D. A Drosophila photoreceptor cell-specific protein, calphotin, binds calcium and contains a leucine zipper. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:1536–1540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Martin J.H., Benzer S., Miller C.A. Calphotin: a Drosophila photoreceptor cell calcium-binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:1531–1535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Suzuki E., Katayama E., Hirosawa K. Structure of photoreceptive membranes of Drosophila compound eyes as studied by quick-freezing electron microscopy. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo) 1993;42:178–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kushmerick M.J., Podolsky R.J. Ionic mobility in muscle cells. Science. 1969;166:1297–1298. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3910.1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Allbritton N.L., Meyer T., Stryer L. Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Science. 1992;258:1812–1815. doi: 10.1126/science.1465619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li Y., Gregory S. Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1974;38:703–714. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Porter J.A., Yu M., Montell C. Dependence of calmodulin localization in the retina on the NINAC unconventional myosin. Science. 1993;262:1038–1042. doi: 10.1126/science.8235618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Maune J.F., Klee C.B., Beckingham K. Ca2+ binding and conformational change in two series of point mutations to the individual Ca(2+)-binding sites of calmodulin. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:5286–5295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Paulsen R., Zinkler D., Delmelle M. Architecture and dynamics of microvillar photoreceptor membranes of a cephalopod. Exp. Eye Res. 1983;36:47–56. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(83)90088-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zinkler D., Bentrop J., Paulsen R. Phospholipids of fly photoreceptor membrane: fatty acid and phosphoinositide metabolism. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1985;78:303. [Google Scholar]
- 59.McLaughlin S., Brown J.E. Diffusion of calcium ions in retinal rods. A theoretical calculation. J. Gen. Physiol. 1981;77:475–487. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.4.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Oberwinkler J. Calcium homeostasis in fly photoreceptor cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2002;514:539–583. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0121-3_32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mojet M.H., Tinbergen J., Stavenga D.G. Receptor potential and light-induced mitochondrial activation in blowfly photoreceptor mutants. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1992;168:305–312. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Peretz A., Sandler C., Minke B. Genetic dissection of light-induced Ca2+ influx into Drosophila photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. 1994;104:1057–1077. doi: 10.1085/jgp.104.6.1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.