Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1985 Nov;5(11):3035–3040. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.11.3035

Cloning of hexokinase structural genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with regulatory mutations responsible for glucose repression.

K D Entian, F Hilberg, H Opitz, D Mecke
PMCID: PMC369116  PMID: 3018496

Abstract

The regulatory hexokinase PII mutants isolated previously (K.-D. Entian and K.-U. Fröhlich, J. Bacteriol. 158:29-35, 1984) were characterized further. These mutants were defective in glucose repression. The mutation was thought to be in the hexokinase PII structural gene, but it did not affect the catalytic activity of the enzyme. Hence, a regulatory domain for glucose repression was postulated. For further understanding of this regulatory system, the mutationally altered hexokinase PII proteins were isolated from five mutants obtained independently and characterized by their catalytic constants and bisubstrate kinetics. None of these characteristics differed from those of the wild type, so the catalytic center of the mutant enzymes remained unchanged. The only noticeable difference observed was that the in vivo modified form of hexokinase PII, PIIM, which has been described recently (K.-D. Entian and E. Kopetzki, Eur. J. Biochem. 146:657-662, 1985), was absent from one of these mutants. It is possible that the PIIM modification is directly connected with the triggering of glucose repression. To establish with certainty that the mutation is located in the hexokinase PII structural gene, the genes of these mutants were isolated after transforming a hexokinaseless mutant strain and selecting for concomitant complementation of the nuclear function. Unlike hexokinase PII wild-type transformants, glucose repression was not restored in the hexokinase PII mutant transformants. In addition mating experiments with these transformants followed by tetrad analysis of sporulated diploids gave clear evidence of allelism to the hexokinase PII structural gene.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

3038Image
on p.3038

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARNETT J. A., KORNBERG H. L. The utilization by yeasts of acids of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. J Gen Microbiol. 1960 Aug;23:65–82. doi: 10.1099/00221287-23-1-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beggs J. D. Transformation of yeast by a replicating hybrid plasmid. Nature. 1978 Sep 14;275(5676):104–109. doi: 10.1038/275104a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clewell D. B., Helinski D. R. Supercoiled circular DNA-protein complex in Escherichia coli: purification and induced conversion to an opern circular DNA form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Apr;62(4):1159–1166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.4.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DelaFuente G., Lagunas R., Sols A. Induced fit in yeast hexokinase. Eur J Biochem. 1970 Oct;16(2):226–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb01075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DelaFuente G., Sols A. The kinetics of yeast hexokinase in the light of the induced fit involved in the binding of its sugar substrate. Eur J Biochem. 1970 Oct;16(2):234–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb01076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Entian K. D. A carbon catabolite repression mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with elevated hexokinase activity: evidence for regulatory control of hexokinase PII synthesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;184(2):278–282. doi: 10.1007/BF00272917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Entian K. D. A defect in carbon catabolite repression associated with uncontrollable and excessive maltose uptake. Mol Gen Genet. 1980;179(1):169–175. doi: 10.1007/BF00268460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Entian K. D., Fröhlich K. U. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants provide evidence of hexokinase PII as a bifunctional enzyme with catalytic and regulatory domains for triggering carbon catabolite repression. J Bacteriol. 1984 Apr;158(1):29–35. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.1.29-35.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Entian K. D. Genetic and biochemical evidence for hexokinase PII as a key enzyme involved in carbon catabolite repression in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1980;178(3):633–637. doi: 10.1007/BF00337871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Entian K. D., Mecke D. Genetic evidence for a role of hexokinase isozyme PII in carbon catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jan 25;257(2):870–874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Entian K. D., Zimmermann F. K. Glycolytic enzymes and intermediates in carbon catabolite repression mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1980 Jan;177(2):345–350. doi: 10.1007/BF00267449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Entian K. D., Zimmermann F. K. New genes involved in carbon catabolite repression and derepression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1982 Sep;151(3):1123–1128. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.3.1123-1128.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Entian K. D., Zimmermann F. K., Scheel I. A partial defect in carbon catabolite repression in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with reduced hexose phosphyorylation. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Nov 4;156(1):99–105. doi: 10.1007/BF00272258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fröhlich K. U., Entian K. D., Mecke D. Cloning and restriction analysis of the hexokinase PII gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;194(1-2):144–148. doi: 10.1007/BF00383509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GANCEDO C., SALAS M. L., GINER A., SOLS A. RECIPROCAL EFFECTS OF CARBON SOURCES ON THE LEVELS OF AN AMP-SENSITIVE FRUCTOSE-1,6-DIPHOSPHATASE AND PHOSPHOFRUCTOKINASE IN YEAST. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1965 Jun 18;20:15–20. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(65)90944-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gancedo C., Schwerzmann K. Inactivation by glucose of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol. 1976 Sep 1;109(3):221–225. doi: 10.1007/BF00446632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gascón S., Neumann N. P., Lampen J. O. Comparative study of the properties of the purified internal and external invertases from yeast. J Biol Chem. 1968 Apr 10;243(7):1573–1577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Holmes D. S., Quigley M. A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. Anal Biochem. 1981 Jun;114(1):193–197. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90473-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kelly R. B., Cozzarelli N. R., Deutscher M. P., Lehman I. R., Kornberg A. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. XXXII. Replication of duplex deoxyribonucleic acid by polymerase at a single strand break. J Biol Chem. 1970 Jan 10;245(1):39–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kopetzki E., Entian K. D. Purification of yeast hexokinase isoenzymes using affinity chromatography and chromatofocusing. Anal Biochem. 1982 Mar 15;121(1):181–185. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90573-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lobo Z., Maitra P. K. Genetics of yeast hexokinase. Genetics. 1977 Aug;86(4):727–744. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maitra P. K. Glucokinase from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1975;42:25–30. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(75)42087-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mandel M., Higa A. Calcium-dependent bacteriophage DNA infection. J Mol Biol. 1970 Oct 14;53(1):159–162. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nasmyth K. A., Reed S. I. Isolation of genes by complementation in yeast: molecular cloning of a cell-cycle gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2119–2123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.2119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Noat G., Ricard J., Borel M., Got C. Kinetic study of yeast hexokinase. 1. Steady-state kinetics. Eur J Biochem. 1968 Jun;5(1):55–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Polakis E. S., Bartley W. Changes in the enzyme activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during aerobic growth on different carbon sources. Biochem J. 1965 Oct;97(1):284–297. doi: 10.1042/bj0970284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rustum Y. M., Massaro E. J., Barnard E. A. Yeast hexokinase. V. Subunit structure and hybridization of isoenzymes. Biochemistry. 1971 Sep 14;10(19):3509–3516. doi: 10.1021/bi00795a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Struhl K., Stinchcomb D. T., Scherer S., Davis R. W. High-frequency transformation of yeast: autonomous replication of hybrid DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1035–1039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Wijk R., Ouwehand J., van den Bos T., Koningsberger V. V. Induction and catabolite repression of alpha-glucosidase synthesis in protoplasts of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Jul 22;186(1):178–191. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(69)90501-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Witt I., Kronau R., Holzer H. Repression von Alkoholdehydrogenase, Malatdehydrogenase, Isocitratlyase und Malatsynthase in Hefe durch Glucose. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Jun 15;118(3):522–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zimmermann F. K., Kaufmann I., Rasenberger H., Haubetamann P. Genetics of carbon catabolite repression in Saccharomycess cerevisiae: genes involved in the derepression process. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Feb 28;151(1):95–103. doi: 10.1007/BF00446918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zimmermann F. K., Scheel I. Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to carbon catabolite repression. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Jul 7;154(1):75–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00265579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES