Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1982 Sep;2(9):1052–1063. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1052

Mating-defective ste mutations are suppressed by cell division cycle start mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

J R Shuster
PMCID: PMC369898  PMID: 6757719

Abstract

Temperature-sensitive mutants which arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle have been described for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. One class of these mutants (carrying cdc28, cdc36, cdc37, or cdc39) forms a shmoo morphology at restrictive temperature, characteristic of mating pheromone-arrested wild-type cells. Therefore, one hypothesis to explain the control of cell division by mating factors states that mating pheromones arrest wild-type cells by inactivating one or more of these CDC gene products. A class of mutants (carrying ste4, ste5, ste7, ste11, or ste12) which is insensitive to mating pheromone and sterile has also been described. One possible function of the STE gene products is the inactivation of the CDC gene products in the presence of a mating pheromone. A model incorporating these two hypotheses predicts that such STE gene products will not be required for mating in strains carrying an appropriate cdc lesion. This prediction was tested by assaying the mating abilities of double mutants for all of the pairwise combinations of cdc and ste mutations. Lesions in either cdc36 or cdc39 suppressed the mating defect due to ste4 and ste5. Allele specificity was observed in the suppression of both ste4 and ste5. The results indicate that the CDC36, CDC39, STE4, and STE5 gene products interact functionally or physically or both in the regulation of cell division mediated by the presence or absence of mating pheromones. The cdc36 and cdc39 mutations did not suppress ste7, ste11, or ste12. Lesions in cdc28 or cdc37 did not suppress any of the ste mutations. Other models of CDC and STE gene action which predicted that some of the cdc and ste mutations would be alleles of the same locus were tested. None of the cdc mutations was allelic to the ste mutations and, therefore, these models were eliminated.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Betz R., Duntze W. Purification and partial characterization of a factor, a mating hormone produced by mating-type-a cells from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Apr;95(3):469–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb12986.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Betz R., MacKay V. L., Duntze W. a-Factor from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: partial characterization of a mating hormone produced by cells of mating type a. J Bacteriol. 1977 Nov;132(2):462–472. doi: 10.1128/jb.132.2.462-472.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bücking-Throm E., Duntze W., Hartwell L. H., Manney T. R. Reversible arrest of haploid yeast cells in the initiation of DNA synthesis by a diffusible sex factor. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Jan;76(1):99–110. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90424-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duntze W., MacKay V., Manney T. R. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a diffusible sex factor. Science. 1970 Jun 19;168(3938):1472–1473. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3938.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartwell L. H., Culotti J., Pringle J. R., Reid B. J. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. Science. 1974 Jan 11;183(4120):46–51. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4120.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartwell L. H. Macromolecule synthesis in temperature-sensitive mutants of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1967 May;93(5):1662–1670. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.5.1662-1670.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hartwell L. H. Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae unresponsive to cell division control by polypeptide mating hormone. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):811–822. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnston G. C., Pringle J. R., Hartwell L. H. Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Mar 1;105(1):79–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90154-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kassir Y., Simchen G. Regulation of mating and meiosis in yeast by the mating-type region. Genetics. 1976 Feb;82(2):187–206. doi: 10.1093/genetics/82.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klar A. J., Fogel S., Radin D. N. Switching of a mating-type a mutant allele in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1979 Jul;92(3):759–776. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.3.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindegren C. C., Lindegren G. A New Method for Hybridizing Yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1943 Oct 15;29(10):306–308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.29.10.306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mackay V., Manney T. R. Mutations affecting sexual conjugation and related processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and phenotypic characterization of nonmating mutants. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):255–271. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mackay V., Manney T. R. Mutations affecting sexual conjugation and related processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Genetic analysis of nonmating mutants. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):273–288. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Manney T. R., Woods V. Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to the alpha mating-type factor. Genetics. 1976 Apr;82(4):639–644. doi: 10.1093/genetics/82.4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsumoto K., Adachi Y., Toh-e A., Oshima Y. Function of positive regulatory gene gal4 in the synthesis of galactose pathway enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence that the GAL81 region codes for part of the gal4 protein. J Bacteriol. 1980 Feb;141(2):508–527. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.2.508-527.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mortimer R. K., Hawthorne D. C. Genetic mapping in Saccharomyces. Genetics. 1966 Jan;53(1):165–173. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Perkins D. D. Biochemical Mutants in the Smut Fungus Ustilago Maydis. Genetics. 1949 Sep;34(5):607–626. doi: 10.1093/genetics/34.5.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reed S. I. The selection of S. cerevisiae mutants defective in the start event of cell division. Genetics. 1980 Jul;95(3):561–577. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.3.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reid B. J., Hartwell L. H. Regulation of mating in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1977 Nov;75(2 Pt 1):355–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Skogerson L., McLaughlin C., Wakatama E. Modification of ribosomes in cryptopleurine-resistant mutants of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1973 Nov;116(2):818–822. doi: 10.1128/jb.116.2.818-822.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Strathern J., Hicks J., Herskowitz I. Control of cell type in yeast by the mating type locus. The alpha 1-alpha 2 hypothesis. J Mol Biol. 1981 Apr 15;147(3):357–372. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90488-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Takahashi H., Coppo A., Manzi A., Martire G., Pulitzer J. F. Design of a system of conditional lethal mutations (tab/k/com) affecting protein-protein interactions in bacteriophage T4-infected Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1975 Aug 25;96(4):563–578. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90139-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES