Abstract
There are two schools of thought regarding the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoform active in the vasculature. Using urinary prostacyclin markers some groups have proposed that vascular COX-2 drives prostacyclin release. In contrast, we and others have found that COX-1, not COX-2, is responsible for vascular prostacyclin production. Our experiments have relied on immunoassays to detect the prostacyclin breakdown product, 6-keto-PGF1α and antibodies to detect COX-2 protein. Whilst these are standard approaches, used by many laboratories, antibody-based techniques are inherently indirect and have been criticized as limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. To address this question, we measured production of prostanoids, including 6-keto-PGF1α, by isolated vessels and in the circulation in vivo using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and found values essentially identical to those obtained by immunoassay. In addition, we determined expression from the Cox2 gene using a knockin reporter mouse in which luciferase activity reflects Cox2 gene expression. Using this we confirm the aorta to be essentially devoid of Cox2 driven expression. In contrast, thymus, renal medulla, and regions of the brain and gut expressed substantial levels of luciferase activity, which correlated well with COX-2-dependent prostanoid production. These data are consistent with the conclusion that COX-1 drives vascular prostacyclin release and puts the sparse expression of Cox2 in the vasculature in the context of the rest of the body. In doing so, we have identified the thymus, gut, brain and other tissues as target organs for consideration in developing a new understanding of how COX-2 protects the cardiovascular system.
Introduction
Prostacyclin, a powerful cardioprotective hormone released by the vascular endothelium, inhibits platelet activation, vascular remodeling and atherosclerosis. Consequently, inhibition of prostacyclin release has been associated with an increased risk of heart attacks and strokes [1]. Prostacyclin production results from the consecutive actions first of cyclooxygenase (COX), which converts arachidonic acid to prostaglandin (PG) H2, the precursor of all prostanoids, followed by the action of prostacyclin synthase, which isomerizes PGH2 to mature prostacyclin.
Two COX isoforms exist; COX-1 and COX-2 [2–4]. COX-1 is expressed constitutively in many tissues [5,6]. COX-2 expression, in contrast, is normally sparse in most tissues but is rapidly upregulated by mitogens, cytokines and other stimuli; COX-2 dependent prostanoids contribute to cell proliferation, pain and inflammatory responses [7,8]. Traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen and diclofenac inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2 isoforms. Much of the analgesic and anti-inflammatory benefit of these agents is derived from inhibition of COX-2, whilst concurrent inhibition of COX-1 produces unwanted and potentially life threatening gastrointestinal side effects [9]. Consequently, new COX-2 selective agents such as celecoxib (CelebrexTM) and rofecoxib (VioxxTM) have a reduced incidence of gastrointestinal side effects, while retaining anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy [10]. It is now clear that both traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 selective inhibitors are also associated with a small but definite increase in the risk of atherothrombotic events in man [11], particularly myocardial infarction. These clinical data are consistent with data from animal models demonstrating that either global Cox2 gene deletion or global pharmacologic COX-2 enzyme inhibition produce a pro-atherogenic, pro-thrombotic phenotype [12–15].
With regard to the cardiovascular system and particularly the vascular endothelium, there has been strong debate regarding which COX isoform is predominant and responsible for prostacyclin production. Opinion is divided, with two opposing views. It is currently widely held that COX-2 expression and activity predominates over COX-1 within endothelial cells and consequently is the major driver of vascular prostacyclin production [1,14–16]. Inhibition of COX-2-dependent production of cardioprotective prostacyclin in the cardiovascular endothelium has been proposed to explain the increase in cardiovascular events observed in patients taking both traditional and COX-2-selective NSAIDs [13,16]. This hypothesis is rooted in studies showing that urinary excretion of prostacyclin markers are reduced in human volunteers receiving COX-2 inhibitors [17], mice that have a global Cox2 gene deletion [5,12], and mice that have targeted endothelial and/or vascular smooth muscle Cox2 gene deletions [14]. The suggestion that inhibition of COX-2-dependent vascular prostacyclin synthesis is responsible for the increased cardiovascular events is further supported by the atherothrombotic phenotype of Cox2 [12–14] and prostacyclin receptor [18] knockout mice, consistent with this hypothesis.
Whilst not all investigators find urinary prostacyclin markers to be reduced in global Cox2 gene knock out mice [19], recent data from our group support this idea [5]. However, we found that urinary markers do not to reflect prostanoid formation in the vasculature [5], suggesting instead that they may reflect more localized prostacyclin production, perhaps in the kidney by blood vessels of the vasa recta, where COX-2 is constitutively expressed [20]. Thus, in direct contrast to the commonly accepted hypothesis, work from our group [5] and others [21] demonstrates that COX-1 is the dominant isoform in the vascular endothelium driving prostacyclin production.
Our work and that of others in this area has routinely relied on the use of immunoassays to detect COX products [22–26] and the use of antibodies to detect COX-1 and COX-2 protein expression in tissues [5,14]. Whilst these techniques to measure prostanoids and proteins are standard practice, the use of antibodies for detection of any product is inherently indirect and, as was recently highlighted [16], open to artifact. Primarily based on these two objections, our conclusion that COX-1 drives vascular prostacyclin has been challenged [16].
In addition to the above concerns, we note that our previous studies focus on the role of COX-2 in vascular prostacyclin production; they were not designed to consider other sites of COX-2 expression, or the effect of loss of COX-2 activity on prostanoids other than prostacyclin. In the current study we perform new experiments to directly address these methodological and biological limitations. Firstly, we validate our conclusions regarding prostanoid production, drawn previously from immunoassay studies, by employing liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to assess lipid mediator release both from isolated vessels and in the circulation in vivo, profiling the effect of global Cox2 gene deletion on a range of prostanoid metabolites. Secondly, we employed a reporter mouse in which the luciferase coding region is knocked into the Cox2 gene, and is thus under Cox2 gene regulatory control [27], to directly visualize, quantitate and compare expression from the Cox2 gene in the regions of the vasculature as well as a panel of other tissues. Use of Cox2 promoter driven luciferase expression eliminates the requirement for antibody evaluation of expression from the Cox2 gene. Together these studies support our previous observations that COX-1, not COX-2, drives prostacyclin release in the vasculature, and provide much needed new targets for understanding how COX-2 inhibition might regulate cardiovascular function.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Cox1-/- [28], Cox2-/- [28] and Cox2 fLuc/+ mice [27] were generated as previously described, and back-crossed onto a C57Bl/6J background. Wild-type mice were generated by inter-crossing C57Bl/6 back-crossed Cox1+/- and Cox2+/- mice. All mice used in the study were genotyped before use. Experiments were performed on male and female mice at 10-12 weeks old. Animal procedures were conducted in strict accordance with Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Protocols were subject to local ethical review and approval by the Imperial College Ethical Review Panel (PPL No. 70/7013) or the UCLA Animal Research Committee (Protocol. No. 1999-066-43; luciferase imaging experiments only). All surgical procedures and luciferin treatments were performed under isoflurane anesthesia, taking all appropriate measures to minimize suffering. Ex vivo and in vitro experiments were performed on tissue removed from humanely euthanized animals (see details below).
In vitro COX activity bioassays
Wild-type, Cox1 -/- and Cox2 -/- were euthanized by CO2 narcosis and the vasculature perfused with PBS. Aortic tissue and various solid tissues were carefully dissected into small pieces (~2mm rings for aortic tissue, ~25mm3 for solid organs) and immediately placed into individual wells of 48 or 96 well microtitre plates containing Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (50µM; Sigma, UK) in DMEM (+200mM L-Glutamine; Sigma, UK). Tissues were incubated for 30 mins at 37°C, before collection of the supernatant to measure prostanoid release by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. For studies of relative release by different tissues, prostanoid release was normalized to tissue wet weight.
Circulating prostanoid measurement in vivo
Under isoflurane anesthesia, the right jugular vein and left carotid artery of wild-type, Cox1-/- and Cox2-/- mice were cannulated. After a 20 min stabilization period, bradykinin (100nmol/kg; Tocris Bioscience, UK) was administered intravenously and 0.8ml arterial blood collected 5 mins later in to heparin (10U/ml final; Leo Laboratories, UK). After blood collection, animals were immediately euthanized by cervical dislocation without being allowed to recover from anaesthetic. Plasma was separated from blood by centrifugation and the levels of prostanoids measured by LC-MS/MS.
Bioluminescent imaging
Cox2 fLuc/+ mice were injected intraperitoneally with D-luciferin (125 mg/kg, Xenogen, USA) under light isoflurane anesthesia and 15 mins later euthanized by overdose the same anesthetic. Tissues were rapidly dissected and placed in culture dishes. Bioluminescent emission was recorded over 3 mins, using the IVIS imaging system (Xenogen, USA). Collected photon number and images were analyzed using Living Image software (Xenogen, USA) and quantified as the peak photon release/pixel detected from each tissue.
Luciferase activity
After bioluminescent imaging, tissues were snap frozen for biochemical measurement of luciferase activity using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega, UK). Tissues were dissociated using a Precellys24 bead homogenizer in passive lysis buffer (Promega, UK) and loaded into white 96 well microtitre plates. The time-integrated (10 sec) luminescence of each well was then read, 15 secs after injection of 10X volume of Luciferase Assay Reagent (Promega, UK). Protein concentration of homogenates was determined using the bicinchoninic acid method (Perbio, UK) and used to normalize luciferase activity data.
Prostanoid immunoassays
In some experiments, the stable prostacyclin breakdown product 6-keto-PGF1α was measured using either a competitive immunoassay kit (Cayman Chemical, USA), or where noted and in separate biological samples, by radioimmunoassay using 6-keto-PGF1α antisera (Sigma, UK) and [3H] 6-keto-PGF1α (Amersham Biosciences, UK). PGE2 was measured using a commercially available homogenous time-resolved fluorescence-based immunoassay (Cisbio, France).
Prostanoid measurement by LC-MS/MS
Prostanoids were extracted and analyzed as previously described [29]. Briefly, 400-500 l sample was mixed with 3ml ice-cold 15% methanol (v/v) and PGB2-d4 (40 ng) was added as internal standard. The samples were then acidified to pH 3.0 and the prostanoids were semi-purified using solid phase extraction (Phenomenex, UK). LC-MS/MS of the lipid extract was performed on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray probe and coupled to liquid chromatography (Waters, UK). Analysis of prostanoids was based on MRM assays using the following transitions: 6-keto PGF1α m/z 369>163; PGE2 m/z 351>271; 13, 14-dihydro 15-keto PGE2 m/z 351>333; PGD2: m/z 351>271; TXB2 m/z 369>169; PGF2 α m/z 353>193; PGB2-d4: m/z 337>179. Results are expressed as pg metabolite / ml plasma or culture medium, using calibration lines constructed with commercially available prostanoid standards (Cayman Chemicals, USA).
Results and Discussion
Role of COX-1 and/or COX-2 in prostacyclin release by vessels in vitro; measurement of 6-keto-PGF1α with immunoassays and mass spectrometry
Prostacyclin was discovered in the 1970s as a profoundly active hormone released by the blood vessel wall and readily detectable in experiments in which isolated blood vessels were activated and then mixed with bioassay systems such as platelets. After the structure of prostacyclin was elucidated, its stable breakdown products, including 6-keto-PGF1α, were identified. Antibodies to 6-keto-PGF1α were subsequently raised, and immunoassays were developed [30]. 6-keto-PGF1α immunoassays have since been widely used and have been instrumental in developing and expanding the field of prostacyclin biology. However, because they rely on antibody-antigen reactions, results with immunoassays can be confounded with artifacts, e.g., cross reactivity with related antigens and matrix interactions [16]. Here we measure vascular 6-keto-PGF1α production using two different immunoassays, and validate these measurements with mass spectrometry (Figure 1). In each case, 6-keto-PGF1α release by isolated aorta was readily detectable in tissue from wild-type and COX-2-deficient mice, but was undetectable (<0.2 ng/ml by our LC-MS/MS assay) in tissue from COX-1-deficient mice (Figure 1). Similarly, release of PGE2, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2, PGD2, TXB2 and PGF2α by aortic rings, measured by LC-MS/MS was in each case driven by COX-1 (Table 1).
Table 1. Prostanoid release by isolated aortic rings, measured by LC-MS/MS.
Mediator | Wild-type | Cox1-/- | Cox2-/- |
---|---|---|---|
pg/ml | pg/ml | pg/ml | |
6-keto-PGF1α | 12110 ± 1623 | not detectable | 10870 ± 1614 |
PGE2 | 1217 ± 168 | not detectable | 1011 ± 200 |
13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 | 40 ± 14 | not detectable | 39 ± 14 |
PGD2 | 385 ± 52 | not detectable | 316 ± 65 |
TXB2 | 443 ± 111 | not detectable | 406 ± 61 |
PGF2α | 395 ± 62 | not detectable | 397 ± 63 |
Prostanoid release from Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (50µM)-stimulated aortic rings, measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, was almost abolished by Cox1 gene deletion, but not substantially altered by Cox2 gene deletion. Both the pattern and numerical values of 6-keto-PGF1α levels measured by this method correlate closely with our previous data obtained using enzyme immunoassay. n=4
Using enzyme immunoassay, we performed additional experiments to confirm that 6-keto-PGF1α production and release was partially dependent upon an intact endothelium and that the requirement of COX-1 for prostacyclin release was consistent when vessels were stimulated with a range of biological and experimental endothelium activators (Table S1). These data are entirely consistent with what we [5] and others [21] have recently published.
Although some recent studies have suggested a role for COX-2 in prostacyclin production by vascular cells [14] or vessels [15] in culture, it is important to point out that COX-2 activity is induced quite rapidly when these biological samples are placed in culture [5]. For this reason it is essential that experiments are carried out on fresh vessels and that observations showing COX-2 expression and activity, after even brief culture periods, be interpreted with caution.
Role of COX isoforms in eicosanoid generation in vivo; analysis of circulating 6-keto-PGF1α levels and additional prostanoids by LC-MS/MS
Measuring markers of prostacyclin release from aortic vessels in vitro cannot tell us definitively what happens in the circulation in vivo. We previously demonstrated, using enzyme immunoassay, that both basal and bradykinin stimulated 6-keto-PGF1α plasma levels were unaffected by Cox2 gene deletion, but were greatly reduced by Cox1 gene deletion [5]. Since experimental conditions could selectively influence the formation of 6-keto-PGF1α [31], we have performed similar experiments and measured a panel of prostanoids in plasma by LC-MS/MS. Plasma levels of the prostanoids measured displayed the following rank order: 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 >> PGE2 ≈ 6-keto-PGF1α > TXB2 ≈ PGD2 in bradykinin-treated mice (Figure 2). In each case, plasma prostanoid levels were strongly reduced in Cox1-/- mice, but not altered in Cox2-/- mice. Plasma 6-keto-PGF1α levels measured here by LC-MS/MS (Figure 2) closely matched those we previously reported using enzyme immunoassay measurement, a correlation recently suggested as necessary [16] to provide critical validation for our recent work [5].
Tissue mapping both of expression from the Cox2 gene and of COX-2 bioactivity
Data in this paper, as well as previous work from our own [5] and other laboratories [21] firmly establishes COX-1 as the major COX isoform that drives vascular prostacyclin release in a healthy cardiovascular system. Importantly, this is also true in atherosclerosis; recent data from our group shows that COX-1 drives prostacyclin production even in segments of vessels heavily burdened with atherosclerosis [32]. Nevertheless, whilst COX-2 does not drive prostacyclin production, it clearly does impact on cardiovascular homeostasis; either inhibition of COX-2 activity or global Cox2 gene deletion exacerbate atherosclerosis [13,32,33] and thrombosis [12,15] in mice, and the risk of atherothrombotic events is increased in patients taking drugs that inhibit COX-2 [34]. This conclusion leads to two important questions; (1) ‘if not in the arterial endothelium, where is COX-2 constitutively expressed?’ and (2) ‘how does COX-2 at sites remote from the vascular wall protect the cardiovascular system?’ Looking for COX-2 levels in organs and tissues using traditional immunohistochemical approaches relies on specificity and sensitivity of antibodies, with all the caveats and objections raised previously [16]. Comparison of COX-2 mRNA levels suffers from complications due to variability in extraction procedures, differences in mRNA stability in extracts, and clearly documented differences in transcription/translation coupling across cell types that results in COX-2 mRNA levels that do not reflect COX-2 enzyme activity. Here we have used a luciferase COX-2 reporter mouse (Cox2 fLuc/+) in which the firefly luciferase coding sequence is knocked into the Cox2 gene at the start of site of translation of the endogenous COX-2 protein. Measuring luciferase expression allows rapid and reproducible visualization and quantitation of expression from the Cox2 gene in vivo and ex vivo [27,35,36].
Using bioluminescent imaging of tissue dissected from Cox2 fLuc/+ mice, we first performed a systematic analysis of expression in tissues of the cardiovascular system. We imaged arterial expression in the entire aortic tree, as well as venous expression in the vena cava (Figure 3). As expected from our previous experiments, where COX-2 protein was measured using traditional antibody approaches [5], we found that the aorta was essentially devoid of Cox2 gene expression (Figure 3) when compared to brain as a reference tissue [27]. The exception to this conclusion was the aortic arch and its branches, where low but detectable Cox2 gene expression was found. Whilst this is consistent with the ‘priming’ of NFκB activity [37] and associated genes in this region of the aorta [38], it is important to put into context what this amount of Cox2 gene expression actually means in terms of prostacyclin generation. Work from our previous study showed that prostacyclin release by mouse aortic arch was driven by COX-1, since activity was lost in arch tissue from Cox1-/- mice but was unaffected in arch tissue from Cox2-/- mice [5].
In addition to our observations on arterial and venous luciferase expression in Cox2 fLuc/+ mice, we performed specific sub-structural analysis of Cox2 gene driven luciferase expression for each chamber of the heart (Figure 3), since conflicting results have been reported for the requirement for cardiomyocyte COX-2 expression in cardiac function [39,40]. Cox2 gene expression was also essentially absent in each of the four chambers of the heart (Figure 3). These data on Cox2 gene driven luciferase expression in the vasculature and heart confirm the sparse expression of the Cox2 gene in the major structures of the cardiovascular system and fit precisely with immunohistochemistry and COX activity data both in this study and published recently by our group [5].
With the very low to undetectable levels of Cox2 gene expression in the heart and large vasculature confirmed, we next determined which organs do demonstrate substantial Cox2 gene expression under normal homeostatic conditions. To do this we examined luciferase expression across a bank of organs from Cox2 fLuc/+ mice (Figures 4 and 5) and compared results with those from the aorta. The highest expression level from the Cox2 gene occurred in the vas deferens (Figure 4), a result consistent with observations made by antibody-based methods for COX-2 protein quantification [27]. Substantial luciferase expression from the Cox2 gene was also observed in the cerebral cortex, throughout the gastrointestinal tract, the thymus, and the renal medulla (Figures 4 and 5). Note that expression in each of these tissues was at least 10-fold greater than that in the aorta.
“Quantification” of luciferase activity by optical imaging of excised organs is only semiquantitative, because of light absorption by tissue, light scatter, and variability of luciferin substrate availability in vivo. However, precise quantification can be obtained by preparing tissue extracts and measuring light emission in saturating amounts of luciferin substrate. Quantification of luciferase activity in tissue homogenates from the Cox2 fLuc/+ mouse evaluated in Figure 4 reflected the same general pattern and activity of luciferase expression observed by optical imaging (Figure S1). Once again, in the context of this report, luciferase expression from the Cox2 gene was essentially undetectable in the aorta.
In separate experiments we compared levels of Ca2+ ionophore-stimulated PGE2 release from tissue segments of Cox1-/- mice, using PGE2 release as a first approximation of the relative COX-2 enzymatic activities in these tissues (Figure 5). COX-2-dependent PGE2 formation closely correlated with the pattern of luciferase expression in tissues from Cox2 fLuc/+ mice. COX-2 activity was highest in the thymus, gut, brain and vas deferens. However, consistent with the data in Figure 1, PGE2 was almost completely absent in the aorta. Comparison data for PGE2 production in tissues from wild-type and Cox2 -/- mice are shown in Figure S2. Readers should note the difference in the scales for PGE2 values in Figure 5 versus Figure S2.
Summary and Conclusions
Circulating prostacyclin (6-keto-PGF1α) and other prostanoids can be detected in mouse plasma using LC-MS/MS after bradykinin activation of the endothelium. The production of prostanoids found in the systemic circulation is driven overwhelmingly by COX-1 and not COX-2. The levels of 6-keto-PGF1α measured by LC-MS/MS directly correlate with those we have previously observed by immunoassay, validating our previous observations and providing additional evidence for the absence of extensive COX-2-dependent prostacyclin formation in the circulation in vivo. In agreement, studies using Cox2 fLuc/+ reporter mice clearly demonstrate the absence of Cox2 gene expression in blood vessels, but provide evidence for relatively high levels of constitutive COX-2 expression elsewhere, such as the thymus, brain, kidney and gastrointestinal tract. Taken together, these data not only provide additional confirmation for the absence of COX-2 expression and activity in the vasculature, but provide a systematic analysis of the distribution of Cox2 gene expression throughout the body. We should now look more closely into the role of COX-2 expressed outside major blood vessels in explaining the adverse cardiovascular effects of COX-2 inhibition. This will allow us to move forward the development of novel prostaglandin-targeted therapies both for existing indications such as treatment of arthritis in patients with gastrointestinal compromise, as well as for emerging indications including cancer chemoprevention.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge Ms Ivana Vojnovic for her assistance performing 6-keto-PGF1α radioimmunoassay, Mr. Arthur Catapang for help with molecular imaging studies and Mr Andrew Healey, University of Bradford Analytical Centre for excellent technical support.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by a program grant from the Wellcome Trust (0852551Z108/Z to JAM) and NIH-NCI P50 award CA086306 (to HRH). AKZ is the recipient of an American Society of Hematology Scholar Award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Grosser T, Fries S, FitzGerald GA (2006) Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest 116: 4-15. PubMed: 16395396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kujubu DA, Fletcher BS, Varnum BC, Lim RW, Herschman HR (1991) TIS10, a phorbol ester tumor promoter-inducible mRNA from Swiss 3T3 cells, encodes a novel prostaglandin synthase/cyclooxygenase homologue. J Biol Chem 266: 12866-12872. PubMed: 1712772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Xie WL, Chipman JG, Robertson DL, Erikson RL, Simmons DL (1991) Expression of a mitogen-responsive gene encoding prostaglandin synthase is regulated by mRNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 2692-2696. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.7.2692. PubMed: 1849272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rosen GD, Birkenmeier TM, Raz A, Holtzman MJ (1989) Identification of a cyclooxygenase-related gene and its potential role in prostaglandin formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 164: 1358-1365. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(89)91819-6. PubMed: 2480117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kirkby NS, Lundberg MH, Harrington LS, Leadbeater PD, Milne GL et al. (2012) Cyclooxygenase-1, not cyclooxygenase-2, is responsible for physiological production of prostacyclin in the cardiovascular system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 17597-17602. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209192109. PubMed: 23045674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Langenbach R, Morham SG, Tiano HF, Loftin CD, Ghanayem BI et al. (1997) Disruption of the mouse cyclooxygenase 1 gene. Characteristics of the mutant and areas of future study. Adv Exp Med Biol 407: 87-92. PubMed: 9321936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mitchell JA, Warner TD (2006) COX isoforms in the cardiovascular system: understanding the activities of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 75-86. doi:10.1038/nrd1929. PubMed: 16485347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Herschman HR, Reddy ST, Xie W (1997) Function and regulation of prostaglandin synthase-2. Adv Exp Med Biol 407: 61-66. PubMed: 9321932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wallace JL, Vong L (2008) NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage and the design of GI-sparing NSAIDs. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 9: 1151-1156. PubMed: 18951293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R et al. (2000) Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med 343: 1520-1528, 1522 p following 1528. doi:10.1056/NEJM200011233432103. PubMed; : 11087881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rodriguez LAG, Gonzalez-Perez A, Bueno H, Hwa J (2011) NSAID Use Selectively Increases the Risk of Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials and Observational Studies. PLOS ONE 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cheng Y, Wang M, Yu Y, Lawson J, Funk CD et al. (2006) Cyclooxygenases, microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1, and cardiovascular function. J Clin Invest 116: 1391-1399. doi:10.1172/JCI27540. PubMed: 16614756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fitzgerald DJ, Fitzgerald GA (2013) Historical Lessons in Translational Medicine: Cyclooxygenase Inhibition and P2Y12 Antagonism. Circ Res 112: 174-194. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300271. PubMed: 23287454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yu Y, Ricciotti E, Scalia R, Tang SY, Grant G et al. (2012) Vascular COX-2 modulates blood pressure and thrombosis in mice. Sci Transl Med 4: 132ra154 PubMed: 22553252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Barbieri SS, Amadio P, Gianellini S, Tarantino E, Zacchi E et al. (2012) Cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostacyclin regulates arterial thrombus formation by suppressing tissue factor in a sirtuin-1-dependent-manner. Circulation 126: 1373-1384. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097295. PubMed: 22865892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ricciotti E, Yu Y, Grosser T, Fitzgerald GA (2013) COX-2, the dominant source of prostacyclin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: E183. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219073110. PubMed: 23292931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Catella-Lawson F, McAdam B, Morrison BW, Kapoor S, Kujubu D et al. (1999) Effects of specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 on sodium balance, hemodynamics, and vasoactive eicosanoids. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 735-741. PubMed: 10215647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Egan KM, Lawson JA, Fries S, Koller B, Rader DJ et al. (2004) COX-2-derived prostacyclin confers atheroprotection on female mice. Science 306: 1954-1957. doi:10.1126/science.1103333. PubMed: 15550624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cathcart MC, Tamosiuniene R, Chen G, Neilan TG, Bradford A et al. (2008) Cyclooxygenase-2-linked attenuation of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension and intravascular thrombosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326: 51-58. doi:10.1124/jpet.107.134221. PubMed: 18375790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Adegboyega PA, Ololade O (2004) Immunohistochemical expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in normal kidneys. Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM / official publication of the Society for Applied Immunohistochemistry 12: 71-74 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21. Liu B, Luo W, Zhang Y, Li H, Zhu N et al. (2012) Involvement of cyclo-oxygenase-1-mediated prostacyclin synthesis in the vasoconstrictor activity evoked by ACh in mouse arteries. Exp Physiol 97: 277-289. PubMed: 22080487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Fu JY, Masferrer JL, Seibert K, Raz A, Needleman P (1990) The induction and suppression of prostaglandin H2 synthase (cyclooxygenase) in human monocytes. J Biol Chem 265: 16737-16740. PubMed: 2120205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Patrignani P, Panara MR, Greco A, Fusco O, Natoli C et al. (1994) Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of the cyclooxygenase activity of human blood prostaglandin endoperoxide synthases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271: 1705-1712. PubMed: 7996488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mitchell JA, Akarasereenont P, Thiemermann C, Flower RJ, Vane JR (1993) Selectivity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as inhibitors of constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 11693-11697. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.24.11693. PubMed: 8265610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chan CC, Boyce S, Brideau C, Charleson S, Cromlish W et al. (1999) Rofecoxib [Vioxx, MK-0966; 4-(4'-methylsulfonylphenyl)-3-phenyl-2-(5H)-furanone]: a potent and orally active cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Pharmacological and biochemical profiles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290: 551-560. PubMed: 10411562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Warner TD, Giuliano F, Vojnovic I, Bukasa A, Mitchell JA et al. (1999) Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 7563-7568. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.13.7563. PubMed: 10377455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ishikawa TO, Jain NK, Taketo MM, Herschman HR (2006) Imaging cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) gene expression in living animals with a luciferase knock-in reporter gene. Mol Imaging Biol MIB Off Publ Academy Of Molecular Imaging 8: 171-187. doi:10.1007/s11307-006-0034-7. PubMed: 16557423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Langenbach R, Morham SG, Tiano HF, Loftin CD, Ghanayem BI et al. (1995) Prostaglandin synthase 1 gene disruption in mice reduces arachidonic acid-induced inflammation and indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration. Cell 83: 483-492. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90126-4. PubMed: 8521478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Masoodi M, Nicolaou A (2006) Lipidomic analysis of twenty-seven prostanoids and isoprostanes by liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom RCM 20: 3023-3029. doi:10.1002/rcm.2697. PubMed: 16986207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Salmon JA (1978) A radioimmunoassay for 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha. Prostaglandins 15: 383-397. PubMed: 663275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cottee F, Flower RJ, Moncada S, Salmon JA, Vane JR (1977) Synthesis of 6-keto-PGF1alpha by ram seminal vesicle microsomes. Prostaglandins 14: 413-423. PubMed: 905569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kirkby NS (2012) Deletion of COX-2 augments atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation in ApoE-/-mice, independently of local prostacyclin production. British journal of pharmacology, PA2online Winter BPS meeting [Google Scholar]
- 33. Yu Z, Crichton I, Tang SY, Hui Y, Ricciotti E et al. (2012) Disruption of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway attenuates atherogenesis consequent to COX-2 deletion in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 6727-6732. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115313109. PubMed: 22493243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. McGettigan P, Henry D (2011) Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies. PLOS Med 8: e1001098 PubMed: 21980265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ishikawa TO, Jain N, Herschman HR (2009) Feedback regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 transcription ex vivo and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 378: 534-538. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.11.099. PubMed: 19061862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ishikawa TO, Jain NK, Herschman HR (2010) Cox-2 gene expression in chemically induced skin papillomas cannot predict subsequent tumor fate. Mol Oncol 4: 347-356. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2010.06.004. PubMed: 20599447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cuhlmann S, Van der Heiden K, Saliba D, Tremoleda JL, Khalil M et al. (2011) Disturbed blood flow induces RelA expression via c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1: A novel mode of NF-κB regulation that promotes arterial inflammation. Circ Res 108: 950-959. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233841. PubMed: 21350211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jongstra-Bilen J, Haidari M, Zhu SN, Chen M, Guha D et al. (2006) Low-grade chronic inflammation in regions of the normal mouse arterial intima predisposed to atherosclerosis. J Exp Med 203: 2073-2083. doi:10.1084/jem.20060245. PubMed: 16894012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wang D, Patel VV, Ricciotti E, Zhou R, Levin MD et al. (2009) Cardiomyocyte cyclooxygenase-2 influences cardiac rhythm and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 7548-7552. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805806106. PubMed: 19376970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Papanicolaou KN, Streicher JM, Ishikawa TO, Herschman H, Wang Y et al. (2010) Preserved heart function and maintained response to cardiac stresses in a genetic model of cardiomyocyte-targeted deficiency of cyclooxygenase-2. J Mol Cell Cardiol 49: 196-209. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.04.002. PubMed: 20399788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.