Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1985 Mar;49(3):485–491. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.3.485-491.1985

Primary and Bacterial Production in Two Dimictic Indiana Lakes

Charles R Lovell 1,†,*, Allan Konopka 1
PMCID: PMC373536  PMID: 16346742

Abstract

The relationship between primary and bacterial production in two dimictic Indiana lakes with different primary productivities was examined during the summer stratification period in 1982. Primary production rates were calculated from rates of H14CO3 incorporation by natural samples, and bacterial production was calculated from rates of [3H-methyl]thymidine incorporation by natural samples. Both vertical and seasonal distributions of bacterial production in the more productive lake (Little Crooked Lake) were strongly influenced by primary production. A lag of about 2 weeks between a burst in primary production and the subsequent response in bacterial production was observed. The vertical distribution of bacterial production in the water column of the less productive lake (Crooked Lake) was determined by the vertical distribution of primary production, but no clear relationship between seasonal maxima of primary and bacterial production in this lake was observed. High rates of bacterial production in Crooked Lake during May indicate the importance of allochthonous carbon washed in by spring rains. Bacterial production accounted for 30.6 and 31.8% of total (primary plus bacterial) production in Crooked Lake and Little Crooked Lake, respectively, from April through October. High rates of bacterial production during late September and October were observed in both lakes. Calculation of the fraction of bacterial production supported by phytoplankton excretion implies an important role for other mechanisms of supplying carbon, such as phytoplankton autolysis. Several factors affecting the calculation of bacterial production from the thymidine incorporation rates in these lakes were examined.

Full text

PDF
488

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell R. T., Ahlgren G. M., Ahlgren I. Estimating Bacterioplankton Production by Measuring [H]thymidine Incorporation in a Eutrophic Swedish Lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jun;45(6):1709–1721. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1709-1721.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuhrman J. A., Azam F. Bacterioplankton secondary production estimates for coastal waters of british columbia, antarctica, and california. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Jun;39(6):1085–1095. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.6.1085-1095.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Konopka A. Influence of Temperature, Oxygen, and pH on a Metalimnetic Population of Oscillatoria rubescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jul;42(1):102–108. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.1.102-108.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lovell C. R., Konopka A. Seasonal bacterial production in a dimictic lake as measured by increases in cell numbers and thymidine incorporation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Mar;49(3):492–500. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.3.492-500.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lovell C. R., Konopka A. Thymidine incorporation by free-living and particle-bound bacteria in a eutrophic dimictic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Mar;49(3):501–504. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.3.501-504.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pedrós-Alió C., Brock T. D. Assessing biomass and production of bacteria in eutrophic lake mendota, wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jul;44(1):203–218. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.1.203-218.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES