Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Res. 2013 Apr 18;75:15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.04.002

microRNAs as Pharmacological Targets in Endothelial Cell Function and Dysfunction

Aránzazu Chamorro-Jorganes 1,*, Elisa Araldi 1,*, Yajaira Suárez 1
PMCID: PMC3752325  NIHMSID: NIHMS470781  PMID: 23603154

Abstract

Endothelial cell dysfunction is a term which implies the dysregulation of normal endothelial cell functions, including impairment of the barrier functions, control of vascular tone, disturbance of proliferative, migratory and morphogenic capacities of endothelial cells, as well as control of leukocyte trafficking. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs that have emerged as critical regulators of gene expression acting predominantly at the post-transcriptional level. This review summarizes the latest insights in the identification of endothelial-specific miRNAs and their targets, as well as their roles in controlling endothelial cell functions in both autocrine and paracrine manner. In addition, we discuss the therapeutic potential for the treatment of endothelial cell dysfunction and associated vascular pathophysiological conditions.

Keywords: Endothelial cells, microRNAs, vascular disease, microRNA therapeutics, endothelial cell dysfunction

Introduction

The endothelium is the monolayer of endothelial cells (ECs) lining the lumen of blood vessels in every organ system. These cells function as a protective biocompatible barrier between all tissues and the circulating blood[1]. ECs facilitate the bidirectional passage of nutrient substances and active molecules from blood to tissues, but also play a major role in controlling the passage of blood cells themselves. ECs are specially designed and spatially located to detect changes in hemodynamic forces and blood-borne signals. In addition, ECs regulate the release of a number of autocrine and paracrine factors in response to these signals to favor the maintenance of vascular homeostasis[29]. Therefore, normal EC function is critical for all aspects of vascular homeostasis (i.e. control of blood vessel development, growth and differentiation; control of leukocyte trafficking; control of vascular tone; control of vascular barrier; control of platelet function, coagulation and fibrinolysis). These have been reviewed in depth elsewhere [24,68,10].

EC dysfunction disrupts the balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilation and initiates a number of events that trigger EC activation and predispose the vessel wall to increased endothelial permeability, leukocyte adherence, endothelial proliferation, pro-oxidation and thrombosis[5,7,1118]. Perturbations in EC functions have been implicated in several diseases including atherosclerosis, diabetes, tumor metastasis, inflammatory diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) and hypertension[5,12,16,1921]. Importantly, the processes involved in EC activation require integration of the molecular and cellular events induced by both stimulatory and inhibitory signals. These include signal transduction pathways leading to transcriptional regulation of gene expression programs, as well as post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications that fine-tune this response. In this regard, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as critical regulators of gene expression, acting predominantly at the post-transcriptional level[2225].

In the present review we summarize the latest insights in the identification of endothelial-specific miRNAs and their targets, as well as their role in regulating EC functions both in an autocrine and paracrine fashion. In addition, we discuss their therapeutic potential in the treatment of EC dysfunction and associated vascular pathophysiological conditions.

MicroRNA biogenesis and function

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNAs that have emerged as critical regulators of gene expression acting predominantly at the post-transcriptional level[23,25]. According to the miRNA.org data resource, as of April 2013, 1100 miRNAs have been annotated in Homo sapiens and 717 in Mus musculus[26], while MirBase reports 2042 human and 1281 murine miRNAs[27,28]. Canonically these small RNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II from individual miRNA genes, introns of protein coding genes, or polycistronic transcripts as capped and polyadenylated primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNA) [29,30]. Then the pri-miRNA is processed in the nucleus into a ~70-nucleotide precursor hairpin (pre-miRNA) by ribonuclease III (RNase III), called Drosha in cooperation with a dsRNA binding protein, DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 (DGCR8) [31,32]. Additionally, there is a group of intronic miRNAs (miRtrons) that bypass the Drosha pathway and are produced by splicing and debranching[33]. The transport receptor Exportin-5, RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein, exports the pre-miRNAs to the cytoplasm[34], where they are further processed by the RNaseIII enzyme, Dicer, into an approximately 22 nt miRNA/miRNA* duplex[35,36]. Although the miRNA/miRNA* duplex are produced in equal amounts by transcription, the abundance of mature strands is asymmetric at the steady state and it depends on the thermodynamic stability of the 5' end of the miRNA strand[37,38]. Usually the miRNA* strand (or passenger strand) is the least thermodynamically stable and is rapidly degraded, however recent reports have shown that it has well-conserved target recognition sites that are also functional[39,40].

Following processing, the selected miRNAs are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [41,42] which mediates the miRNA binding to the 3' untranslated regions (3' UTR) of target messenger mRNA (mRNA) and negatively regulates gene expression by translational inhibition or target mRNA degradation or a combination of both[41,43,44]. In order to repress the transcript, it is crucial that the nucleotides in position 2–8 of the miRNA (called the seed sequence) are almost perfectly complimentary to regions at the 3'UTR of their target genes[45].

Computational predictions have revealed that 60% of protein-coding genes harbor miRNA target sites in their 3'UTR[46] and that a single miRNA can modulate the expression of hundreds genes. Not only are certain miRNA genes highly conserved in animals, but their target sites in the 3'UTR of genes are also under positive evolutionary selection. MiRNAs are powerful modulators of genetic networks and they do so by acting both in a coherent and incoherent fashion on their target genes[47,48]. MiRNAs, rather than functioning as regulatory on-off switches, often function to modulate or fine-tune cellular phenotypes[24,49,50]. The deregulation of miRNA expression could affect multiple cellular processes. Therefore it is not surprising that miRNAs have been implicated in various processes, from development to ageing[24,49,50]. Additionally, many miRNAs exhibit striking tissue specific expression patterns[5156], suggesting a cell type-specific function[51].

MiRNAs are necessary for development and organogenesis. Loss of Dicer in mice results in embryonic lethality at E7.5 and embryonic stem cells cannot be obtained from Dicer null mutants, suggesting that Dicer is especially important in maintaining the pluripotent status[57,58]. Also Ago loss gives rise to severe developmental defects by E10.5[59]. At E11.5–E14.5 the developing mouse embryo expresses Dicer1 and the Ago proteins only in certain anatomical compartments and in a dynamic fashion, suggesting a further role for miRNAs in organogenesis, as well[60]. Given the essential role of the miRNA processing machinery in development, it is not surprising that miRNAs have been shown to be relevant in vascular development[51] and vascular functions [6167].

Control of blood vessel development, growth and differentiation by endothelial microRNAs

The de novo generation and remodeling of blood vessels is essential for embryonic growth and throughout postnatal life. During adulthood, the endothelium remains essentially quiescent, to fulfill its main function in conducting nutritive blood flow to organs, with turnover rates on the orders of months to years. Rapid changes in EC proliferation rates occurs following activation of endothelium by angiogenic cytokines [6871]. In fact, in the healthy adult, angiogenesis occurs only in select phases of the female reproductive cycle and as a protection mechanism in wound healing/tissue repair and is almost exclusively associated with pathology when angiogenesis is induced by micro-environmental factors such as hypoxia or inflammation[68,70,7275]. ECs play a key role in angiogenesis which is dependent on the proliferation, migration and differentiation of these cells[76].

The pathological processes associated with angiogenesis include diseases as diverse as cancer, macular degeneration, psoriasis, diabetic retinopathy, thrombosis, and inflammatory disorders, including arthritis and atherosclerosis. Moreover, insufficient angiogenesis is characteristic of ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and pre-clampsia[68,69]. The above examples represent the broad array of diseases that are associated with dysfunction of the angiogenic activated EC phenotype.

The first evidence of the importance of miRNAs in vascular development was shown by Yang et al. who generated a Dicer ex1/2 knockout mice, where Dicer was hypomorphic because of the deletion of its first and second exons. However, homozygous embryos died between days E12.5 and E14.5 of impaired vascular formation and maintenance, showing that Dicer was essential for normal vascular development[51]. Interestingly, the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the VEGF receptors, FLT1 and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), was upregulated in mutant embryos while the expression of the angiopoietin receptor, Tie-1, was lower than wild type embryos, suggesting that the impaired angiogenesis was due to the deregulation of these critical angiogenic regulators[51]. In the context of ECs, the knockdown of Dicer in vitro[77] indicated that miRNAs were important for regulating the angiogenic functions of ECs. In fact, the silencing of Dicer modulated the expression of several proteins implicated in the control of vascular tone and angiogenesis (e.g. VEGFR2, TEK/Tie-2, interleukin 8 (IL)-8 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) among others) and impaired EC proliferation and cord formation. Later Kuehbacher et al. showed that the silencing of either Drosha or Dicer negatively regulated the expression of miR-let7a and miR-27b while increased the anti-angiogenic factor thrombospondin-1 (Tsp-1)[78]. In addition, the knockdown of Drosha and Dicer reduced sprout formation[78]. Finally, these results were confirmed in vivo using EC-specific Dicer knockout mice[79].

Although the inactivation of Dicer in the endothelium did not alter vascular development, it reduced the postnatal angiogenic response to multiple stimuli such as exogenous VEGF or in models of tumorigenesis, limb ischemia and wound healing[79].

The aforementioned experimental approaches reveal the consequences of a block in miRNA biogenesis. However, the majority of these studies do not provide information regarding the functions of specific miRNAs. Examples that illustrate the roles of individual miRNAs in blood vessel development, growth and differentiation are presented below and depicted in Fig. 1A.

Fig. 1. Role of miRNAs in endothelial cell phenotype, functions and vascular disease and their direct targets.

Fig. 1

microRNAs involved in: (A) angiogenesis, (B) vascular inflammation and atherosclerotic vascular disease, (C) vascular tone and endothelial cell barrier, (D) secreted microRNAs and biomarkers.

MiR-126 is considered the prototype of an endothelial-specific miRNA. It is highly expressed in vascularized tissues, ECs and hematopoietic stem cells[7984]. Interestingly, the miR-126 gene is located within an intron of the epidermal growth factor-like-domain 7 (EGFL7) gene, also known as Vascular Endothelial-statin (VE-statin), which is mostly expressed in ECs and involved in vascular tubulogenesis[85,86]. In contrast, the host gene EGFL7 is modestly expressed in mature vessels in normal adult tissue and highly expressed in tumor endothelium[85,86]. The role of miR-126 in vascular integrity and angiogenesis was reported by targeted deletion of miR-126 in mice[87,88] and its knockdown in zebrafish[89]. MiR-126 was shown to target sprouty-related protein (SPRED1) and phosphoinositol-3 kinase regulatory subunit 2 (PIK3R2/p85-β), both negative regulators of the VEGF pathway[8789]. Additionally, miR-126 also enhanced Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) signaling through PIK3R2/p85-β repression, implicating that miR-126 is also involved in vessel stabilization and maturation[90]. The miR-126/Egfl7 gene is transcriptionally regulated by Ets-1 and Ets-2 in ECs[82]. Recently, Nicoli et al. described a new mechanism for the regulation of miR-126 by blood flow in zebrafish. In particular, blood flow, through the mechanosensitive transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (KLF2a), induced miR-126 expression, which in turn activated the VEGF pathway[91]. Consistent with the angiogenic properties of miR-126, Van Solingen et al. demonstrated that the use of antagomiR-126 impairs ischemia-induced angiogenesis[92]. Interestingly, the expression of miR-126 has been shown to be downregulated in different cancers acting as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting tumor growth[9397]. Additionally, miR-126 repressed VEGF expression in lung cancer cells[98]. However, it should be considered that miR-126 regulates the EC response to proangiogenic factors (e.g. VEGF and Ang-1) thus promoting angiogenesis. Therefore, further analysis to elucidate the role of miR-126 in tumor vasculature is needed to ascertain whether miR-126 could be a therapeutic tool to target tumor growth and angiogenesis.

As noted above, the relationship between miRNAs and their host gene is especially relevant in miRNAs encoded within an angiogenic host gene. The highly conserved miR-218 is an intronic miRNA encoded within the Slit2 and Slit3 genes[99101]. Slits are secreted glycoproteins, which are the main ligands for Roundabout receptors (Robos). Slit/Robo signaling is mediated by heparan sulfate proteoglicans (HSPG), and regulates axon and vascular guidance. Small et al. reported the relevance of miR-218 in the regulation of Slit/Robo signaling through repression of Robo1, Robo2 and glucuronyl C5-epimerase (GLCE), an enzyme involved in HSPG biosynthesis[101]. Importantly, the silencing of miR-218 resulted in abnormal EC migration and reduced complexity of the retinal vasculature[101]. Recently, Fish et al. reported that Slt2-Robo1-miR-218 signaling is also required during heart development in zebrafish[99].

The miR-17-92 cluster is one of the best-characterized polycistronic miRNAs and is located in intron 3 of the C13orf25 gene (chromosome 13q31.3). MiR-17-92 encodes 6 individual miRNAs: miR-17, miR-18a, miR-19a, miR-20a, miR-19b and miR-92a, which are tightly grouped within an 800 base-pair region[102,103]. The miR-17-92 cluster is involved in cell proliferation, suppresses apoptosis of cancer cells, and induces tumor angiogenesis. The first evidence of the oncogenic role of miR-17-92 was suggested by the amplification of the genomic location corresponding to miR-17-92 in lymphoma and solid tumors[102,104]. MiR-17-92 is regulated at the transcriptional level by the oncogenic transcription factor, c-Myc and its downstream effector E2F that promotes cell cycle progression[105]. MiR-17 and miR-20, which have identical seed sequences, repress E2F1, providing a tight regulation of c-Myc-mediated cellular proliferation. In addition, the miR-17-92 cluster is regulated by the c-Myc homologue MYCN in neuroblastoma, and regulates cell cycle progression and apoptosis through repressing p21 and Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM)[106]. Overexpression of the entire miR-17-92 cluster in Myc-induced tumors increases angiogenesis by a paracrine mechanism[107]. This pro-angiogenic function has been attributed to the downregulation of anti-angiogenic proteins such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and Tsp-1, which are targeted by miR-18 and miR-19[79,107]. In addition, miR-17 also represses the anti-angiogenic factor tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) [108]. These findings were also confirmed in the context of ECs, where the combined inhibition of miR-17, miR-18 and miR-20a reduced proliferation and their overexpression rescued the decreased morphogenic capacity of ECs induced by Dicer silencing[79]. Interestingly, these components of the miR-17-92 cluster (miR-17, miR-18 and miR-20a) were induced upon VEGF treatment[79], therefore indicating that these miRNAs contribute to promote VEGF-induced angiogenic responses. However, in another model system, the overexpression of different components of miR-17-92, in particular miR-17, -18a, -19a, and -20a, impaired sprouting whereas their inhibition increased sprouting in ECs[109]. In this context, miR-17 was shown to negatively regulate the expression of the proangiogenic Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) [109], while miR-19a was shown to modulate cell cycle progression by targeting cyclin D1 (CCND1) in ECs[110]. Additionally, overexpression of the remaining member of the cluster, miR-92a, decreased sprouting in vitro and also induced defects in intersegmental vessel formation in zebrafish[111]. Interestingly, miR-92a overexpression reduced the expression of integrin subunits α5 (ITGα5) and αν (ITGαν) of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) and of mitogen-activated kinase kinase 4 (MKK4) and eNOS in ECs[111].

The miR-106b-25 cluster, which is evolutionarily related to the miR-17-92 cluster, is also involved in angiogenesis. A recent paper from Semo et al. [112] revealed that absence of the cluster in a model of hindlimb ischemia impaired the capacity of restoring normal blood flow and significantly decreased capillary formation. This effect was attributed to the ability of the cluster to inhibit proliferation, migration and viability in ECs. However, the targets of miR-106b-25 responsible for this phenotype were not investigated.

The miR-23-24-27 cluster is expressed in ECs and vascularized tissues and is heavily involved in angiogenesis There are two miR-23-24-27 genes in mammals, an intergenic miR-23a~27a~24-2 cluster (chromosome 9q22) and an intronic 23b~27b~24-1 cluster (chromosome 19p13)[113]. This cluster mediates diverse process, such as proliferation, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and migration[113]. Moreover, miR-23-24-27 has been involved in the regulation of angiogenesis during vascular disorders and ischemic heart disease[114,115], and their role has been elucidated in vitro and in vivo[116]. In particular, miR-23 and miR-27 repress Sprouty2 (SPRY2) and Semaphorin-6A (SEMA6A), which negatively regulate Ras/MAPK signaling and VEGFR2 mediated signaling, respectively[114]. In agreement with these data, Urbich et al. showed that the inhibition of miR-27a and miR-27b impairs sprouting in ECs in vitro and embryonic vessel formation in zebrafish through repression of SEMA6A[117]. Importantly, in a murine model of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization, the administration of locked nucleic acid (LNA)-anti-miR-23/27 increased the expression of SPRY2 and SEMA6A and impaired retinal vascular development[114]. The other member of the cluster, miR-24, is highly expressed in cardiac ECs and its expression increases in cardiac ischemia and in hypoxic conditions[115]. MiR-24 overexpression enhanced endothelial apoptosis and impaired angiogenesis by targeting the transcription factor (GATA2) and the p21-activated kinase (PAK4). MiR-24 overexpression, as well as knockdown of miR-24 targets, hindered vascular development in zebrafish, whereas endogenous inhibition of miR-24 by antagomirs enhanced angiogenesis and cardiac function after myocardial infartion in mice[115]. Interestingly, the expression of several members of the miR-23-24-27 cluster, in particular miR-23b and miR-27, are upregulated by shear stress and correlate with pulsatile shear (PS)-induced EC growth arrest. Furthermore, the inhibition of miR-23b using antagomirs partially rescued PS-induced growth arrest by an increase in the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein[118].

microRNAs regulated by angiogenic factors: extinguishers or igniters?

A fine balance between positive and negative regulators controls angiogenesis[68,72,75,119]. While there are many angiogenic inducers, VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factors (bFGF) are probably the most critical and potent ones. The pro-angiogenic effect of VEGF and bFGF is mediated through the VEGFR2, which is selectively expressed in vascular ECs, or the FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1), respectively[72,120123]. Activation of these receptors stimulates the angiogenic cascade that leads to the degradation of the extracellular matrix, migration to the perivascular space, proliferation and formation of tubes[71,76]. MiRNAs do not only control the angiogenic response, but their expression may also be regulated by pro-angiogenic factors (e.g. as introduced above for the miR-17–92 cluster whose expression is regulated by VEGF to promote the angiogenic response of ECs[79]). Some examples of microRNAs regulated by angiogenic factors can be found below and are illustrated in Fig. 1A.

MiR-16 and miR-424 have been described to be anti-angiogenic miRNAs because of their capability to repress VEGFR2, FGFR1 and VEGF in ECs[124]. Specifically, miR-16 or miR-424 overexpression reduces EC proliferation, migration, and impairs cord formation on matrigel in vitro. Conversely, the endogenous inhibition of miR-16 and miR-424 had opposite effect on these phenotypes. Importantly, lentiviral overexpression of miR-16 reduced blood vessel formation in vivo. Interestingly, miR-16 and miR-424 are intriguing examples of miRNAs whose expression is regulated by proangiogenic factors such as VEGF and bFGF at the transcriptional level[124]. Given their negative effects on angiogenesis, their transcriptional regulation upon angiogenic stimuli provides a negative feedback control of angiogenesis[124].

Another example of a miRNA regulated by pro-angiogenic factors that conversely has an angiogenic phenotype is miR-132. The endothelial miR-132 is an intergenic miRNA (chromosome 17) and its expression is regulated by the transcription factor cAMP response element binding protein (CREB)[125,126]. Annand et al. showed that miR-132 acts as a switch to induce neovascularization by suppressing endothelial p120RasGAP expression, a GTPase activating protein that attenuates p21 Ras activity[127]. MiR-132 expression levels are undetectable in quiescent endothelium while it is highly expressed in endothelium in tumors and hemangiomas[127]. Several pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGF and bFGF, increased the expression of miR-132 through CREB activation in ECs[127]. Overexpression of miR-132 increased proliferation and cord formation in ECs in vitro, whereas anti-miR-132 produced a converse effect that was also observed in vivo by reducing both developmental and pathological angiogenesis[127].

Interestingly, Dentelli et al. showed that interleukin 3 (IL)-3 and bFGF negatively modulated the expression of miR-221/miR-222 in ECs. Several studies have demonstrated that IL-3 and bFGF are released by infiltrated T-lymphocytes in the atherosclerotic plaque, promoting neovascularization[128,129]. STAT5A, a transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation and migration[128], was identified as target for miR-222 [130]. Interestingly, upregulation of STAT5A due to IL-3/bFGF-induced down-regulation of miR-222 controled EC proliferation and migration and therefore facilitated intraplaque neovascularization during atherosclerosis. Moreover, in advanced lesions the authors found an increased proliferation rate of ECs lining vessels, which correlated with a diminished expression of miR-222 [130]. In line with these findings, Poliseno et al. previously reported that miR-221/miR-222 regulated proliferation and migration through the regulation of c-kit in ECs[80]. On the other hand, miR-221 has been shown to inhibit angiogenesis by targeting zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2), a modulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, leading to decreased EC proliferation[131]. Interestingly, miR-221/miR-222 repressed the expression of the transcription factor Ets-1, which regulates genes involved in angiogenesis, inflammation and vascular remodeling[132].

Ischemia and microRNAs

The formation of new blood vessels is an essential component in pathologies such as ischemia, where interrupted blood flow deprives tissues of oxygen and nutrients necessary to maintain their normal functions. In ischemia, lack of oxygen, or hypoxia, is associated with angiogenic stimuli (like expression of VEGF) in an attempt for the cell to maintain tissue homeostasis[133]. In response to ischemia, not only the expression of certain miRNAs is increased, but their upregulation also modulates critical events associated with ischemia-induced angiogenesis (Fig. 1A).

MiR-210, also referred to as hypoxamir, is an intronic miRNA contained within the sequence of the non-protein transcript MIR210HG located on chromosome 11[134] and its expression is induced in hypoxic conditions in a hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α)-dependent manner. Fasanaro et al. showed that hypoxia-induced miR-210 enhanced the development of capillary-like structures and VEGF-induced chemotaxis in ECs[135]. Interestingly, Hu et al. showed that miR-210 promoted angiogenesis and inhibited apoptosis while improving cardiac function in a murine model of myocardial infarction, suggesting that miR-210 might be a promising therapy for ischemic disease[136]. This miRNA exerts its pro-angiogenic and anti-apoptotic effects by downregulating ephrinA3 (EFNA3) [135,136] and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b (PTPN1) [136]. Additionally, the expression of miR-210 is upregulated in atherosclerotic plaques providing a link between this miRNA and EC dysfunction in atherosclerosis[137].

Consistent with the notion of miR-16 being upregulated in response to VEGF, Spinetti et al. reported that patients with critical limb ischemia showed higher levels of miR-16 and miR-15a in proangiogenic circulating cells (PACs), which impair PACs functions[138]. Moreover, Hullinger et al. showed that miR-15 is an important regulator in cardiac ischemic injury using LNA-anti-miR-15 in mice[139]. Notably, targeting of miR-15 reduced infarct size, inhibited cardiac remodeling and enhanced cardiac function in response to ischemic damage, proving that miR-15 might be an interesting potential therapeutic target[139]. Recently, Yin et al. reported that the nuclear receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ) binds directly to the PPRE site in the miR-15 promoter region, repressing its expression[140]. Interestingly, the levels of PPARδ decreased upon oxygen-glucose deprivation in cerebral vascular ECs, an ischemia like insult, increasing EC apoptosis as well as necrotic cell death. In contrast, the activation of PPARδ inhibited the levels of miR-15 and subsequently, increased Bcl2 protein levels resulting in a reduction of caspase 3 activity, of Golgi fragmentation and of cell death in mouse cerebral endothelium after ischemic insult in vitro and in vivo[140]. Targeting miR-15 or pharmacological activation of PPARδ may be a promising therapeutic option to induce apoptosis in stroke-induced vascular damage.

A recent study on miR-503, whose seed region differs in a nucleotide from the canonical seed sequence of the miR-16 family, showed that the miRNA is upregulated in culture conditions mimicking diabetes mellitus and ischemia-associated starvation in ECs[141]. MiR-503 decreased EC proliferation, migration and cord formation by targeting cell division cycle 25 (CDC25A) and cyclin E1 (CCNE1). Furthermore, administration of anti-miR-503 improved blood flow recovery and angiogenesis in diabetic mice with limb ischemia. All these data suggest that the regulation of miR-503 levels could be a therapeutic tool in diabetic patients[141].

Given the complex stimuli in hypoxia, the angiogenic function of certain miRNAs differs compared to normoxia. For instance, miR-424 promotes angiogenesis in hypoxic conditions[142]. Specifically, hypoxia increases the expression of miR-424 by PU.1-dependent transactivation in ECs. MiR-424 was shown to target cullin 2 (CUL2), a scaffolding protein critical for the assembly of the ubiquitin ligase system, which stabilizes HIF-α resulting in increased proliferation and migratory capabilities in ECs[142].

Endothelial progenitor cells and microRNAs

Improvement of neovascularization is a therapeutic option to rescue tissue from critical ischemia [143]. In this regard, circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been suggested to play an important role in maintenance of vascular integrity. Recent work also indicates that miRNAs play a critical role in EPC biology (Fig. 1A). Indeed, Minami et al. showed an increase of miR-221/miR-222 in circulating EPCs isolated from patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or ischemic heart disease. Importantly, the expression levels of miR-221/miR-222 and number of EPCs were negatively correlated in CAD patients. Notably, the expression of miR-221/miR-222 was reduced in EPCs isolated from CAD patients receiving long-term statin therapy whereas the number of EPCs was increased[144]. Recently, a study showed that miR-21 overexpression impaired angiogenesis in ECs and also in a murine model of choroidal neovascularization by targeting the RhoGTPase Rhob[145]. According to this data, the overexpression of miR-21 decreased proliferation and impaired EPC angiogenesis by targeting high-mobility group A2 (Hmga2) in vitro and in vivo[146]. Interestingly, the endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), which is increased in patients with CAD, was shown to induce the expression of miR-21 in angiogenic progenitor cells (APCs). This resulted in increased reactive oxygen species concentrations and impaired nitric oxide bioavailability through an indirect regulation of superoxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2) [147]. Additionally, high ADMA plasma levels and miR-21 expression are correlated in APCs from CAD patients, impairing their migration capacity. Conversely, inhibition of miR-21 in APCs from CAD patients recovered migratory capacity of APCs, suggesting that miR-21 antagonism might be a promising strategy to improve dysfunctional APCs in patients with coronary artery disease[147]. However, other studies reported a pro-angiogenic role of miR-21 in ECs[148] and tumors[149,150].

Endothelial cell senescence and microRNAs

EC senescence plays an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular dysfunction. Several miRNAs have been involved in this process such as miR-217[151] and miR-146[152] (Fig. 1A). In particular, Menghini et al. reported that miR-217 negatively regulated the expression of silent information regulator 1 (SirT1), a NAD+-dependent deacetylase, which prevented stress-induced senescence and mediated angiogenesis through deacetylation of the forkhead transcription factor (FoxO1). Indeed, overexpression of miR-217 in young ECs induced a premature senescent-like phenotype and impaired angiogenesis whereas its inhibition in old ECs reduced senescence and increased angiogenesis[151]. On the other hand, aging, which is associated with an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promotes senescence, decreases the expression of miR-146 in ECs. In particular, Vasa-Nicotera et al. showed that miR-146 negatively regulated the expression of NOX4, the main endothelial isoform of the NADPH oxidases complex[152]. Therefore, overexpression of miR-146 might be a novel therapeutic tool for vascular disorders by targeting the production of ROS and therefore regulating senescence[152].

Control of leukocyte trafficking and inflammation by endothelial miRNAs

Inflammation is an integral part of a wide array of human diseases and it is an essential component of the innate immune response to pathogens and damaged cells. Inflammation is usually defined as the local recruitment and activation of leukocytes[10,14]. In response to pathogens or inflammatory cytokines including IL-1 and TNF-α, ECs get “activated” acquiring new capacities, therefore controlling a multi-step process in which leukocytes first transiently tether to and roll on the EC surface, then adhere more strongly and migrate over the endothelium, and finally squeeze between ECs to emigrate from the intravascular space to the extravascular sites of inflammation[153,154]. In resting conditions, leukocytes do not interact with ECs, because they sequester the proteins responsible for the interaction with leukocytes (e.g. P-selectin and chemokines) within secretory vesicles known as Weibel-Palade bodies[155,156]. In these conditions the expression of other adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin, vascular cell-adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) and intracellular adhesion molecule1 (ICAM1) is suppressed[157,158].

Recent studies have shown that inducible miRNAs also contribute to the regulation of inflammation[159] (Fig. 1B). Specifically, miR-155 and miR-146, as well as miR-132, miR-125b and miR-9, have been shown to be induced in different cell types (e.g. human lung alveolar epithelial cells, macrophages, neutrophils) by a variety of proinflammatory stimuli such as IL-1, TNF, IFN, LPS and Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands [160164]. In the context of ECs, in addition to miR-155 (prototype of TNF-induced miRNA in different cell types), TNF induces the expression of miR-31 and miR-17-3p, among others. Interestingly, E-selectin (E-SELE) and ICAM1 were identified and validated as targets of the TNF-induced miRNAs, miR-31 and miR-17-3p, respectively[165]. Specific antagonism of these TNF-induced miRNAs increased neutrophil adhesion to cultured ECs. Conversely, transfections with mimics of these miRNAs decreased neutrophil adhesion to ECs [165]. MiR-126, a constitutively expressed, but EC-restricted miRNA, has also been involved in vascular inflammation by modulating VCAM-1 expression induced by TNF[81]. However, the expression of this miRNA was affected by TNF treatment[165]. In response to TNF the expression of miR-181b has been shown to be reduced in ECs. MiR-181b regulates the expression of importin-α3 (KPNA4), a protein required for nuclear translocation of NF-kB. As activation of the transcription factor NF-kB is critical for TNF -induced inflammaty responses, miR-181b has been shown to indirectly decrease NF-kB responsive genes, such as VCAM1 and SELE in ECs in vitro and in vivo[166]. Importantly, the overexpression of miR-181b by intravenous delivery reduced the NF-kB pathway and decreased lung injury and mortality in endotoxemic mice while the endogenous inhibition of miR-181b increased the inflammatory phenotype. Consistent with this, the expression of miR-181b is reduced in patients critically ill with sepsis[166]. Altogether, these data suggest that the overexpression of miR-31, miR-17-3p, miR-126 and miR-181b could be an important tool for anti-inflammatory therapy in several pathological conditions including atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis among others.

MiR-10a has been reported to negatively regulate the NF-kB pathway by targeting mitogen-activated kinase kinase kinase 7 (MAP3K7) and β-transducin repeat containing gene (βTRC), two regulators of the proteosomal degradation of IkBα and p65 translocation in ECs[167]. Interestingly, the expression of miR-10a is decreased in athero-susceptible arterial regions while the expression of MAP3K7 and βTRC is upregulated, suggesting that the differential expression of miR-10a could contribute to the regulation of pro-inflammatory endothelial phenotypes in athero-susceptible regions[167].

Angiotensin II (Ang II) can induce the expression of different adhesion molecules and therefore initiate the vascular inflammatory response. A recent study showed that miR-155 and miR-221/222 negatively regulated Ets-1[132], a key transcription factor of endothelial inflammation and angiogenesis. Interestingly, in Ang II stimulated ECs, Ets-1 and several of its downstream genes include VCAM1, MCP1 and FLT1 were upregulated. This effect was partially reversed by overexpression of miR-155 or miR-221/222. In particular, the overexpression of miR-155 and miR-221/222 reduced leucocyte adhesion to ECs, as well as EC migration[132].

Oxidized Low Density Lipoproteins (Ox-LDL) are known to enhance the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, leading to monocyte recruitment into the vessel wall and dysfunction of vascular ECs[168]. MiR-125a/b are highly expressed in vascular ECs and their expression can be modulated by ox-LDL [169]. Ox-LDL-induced apoptosis in ECs is thought to play a critical role in atherosclerosis. Interestingly, miR-365 expression is regulated by ox-LDL in ECs and potentiates ox-LDL-mediated apoptosis by regulating the expression of Bcl-2[170]. Atherosclerotic lesions preferentially originate and develop at arterial sites of curvatures, branches, and bifurcations where complex hemodynamic conditions of disturbed flow are associated with endothelial phenotypes expressing proinflammatory and procoagulant susceptibility[171]. The NF-κB signal transduction pathway has been shown to be primed for activation in regions predisposed to atherosclerotic lesion formation. Conversely, KLF2, KLF4, and nuclear factor erythroid 2–like 2 regulate gene networks that confer atheroprotective properties to the endothelium through an anti-inflammatory/antioxidant and anticoagulant phenotype profile. Fang et al. reported that the upregulation of miR-92a expression inversely correlated with KLF2 and KLF4 expression in athero-susceptible endothelium[172]. Indeed, miR-92 decreased KLF2 and KLF4 expression and knockdown of miR-92a partially suppressed TNF-induced endothelial inflammatory mediators through KLF4 and KLF2, therefore inhibiting TNF-induced leukocyte adhesion to ECs in vitro[172].

Gene expression profiles are dramatically altered when ECs are exposed to laminar shear (LS) or oscillatory shear (OS) stress. LS is known to increase expression of atheroprotective genes including KLF2, KLF4 and eNOS, while OS stimulates inflammation by overexpression of bone morphogenic protein-4 (BMP4) and adhesion molecules [171,173175]. MiRNA microarray analysis of ECs exposed to OS or LS identified 21 miRNAs differentially expressed, including miR-663, which was found to be upregulated in OS. Treatment of ECs with the miR-663 antagonist blocked OS-induced monocyte adhesion, but not apoptosis. In contrast, overexpression of miR-663 increased monocyte adhesion in LS-exposed cells. Potential miR-663 targets included a network of inflammatory genes and transcription factors such as KLF4[176].

Control of barrier function by endothelial microRNAs

ECs form a monolayer, within the blood vessel, by which the cells are linked to each other by different types of adhesive structures or cell-cell junctions (i.e. tight junctions, adherens junctions and gap junctions). This permits a selective barrier to form for the transport of molecules between blood and tissues[177,178]. These adhesive structures, which are involved in the control of the vascular permeability to circulating cells, also needs to be regulated in coordination with the functional requirements of the irrigated organ[179]. Changes in endothelial permeability are associated with redistribution of surface cadherins or occludins, stabilization of focal adhesion bonds and the progressive activation of matrix metalloproteases[180]. Loss of barrier function in pathophysiological situations can lead to extracellular edema. Different stimuli, such as histamine and thrombin, induce a rapid and short-lived increase in vascular permeability while others, like TNF or VEGF, induced a more sustained response. Of interest, most of these agonists are produced in situations of acute or chronic inflammation[181]. Recent work also indicates that microRNAs play an important role in controlling barrier function as described below and depicted in Fig. 1C.

MiR-125b expression has been shown to be transiently induced in ECs stimulated with VEGF. This miRNA inhibited the translation of vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin mRNA. Because miR-125b induction in ECs is transient after VEGF stimulation, prolonged overexpression of miR-125b could result in blood vessel regression due to loss of normal barrier function[181].

Hantaviruses infect human ECs and cause two diseases marked by vascular permeability defects, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS)[182]. Vascular permeability occurs in the absence of EC lysis, suggesting that hantaviruses alter normal EC fluid barrier functions[182]. Andes hantavirus (ANDV) infection of human ECs results in changes in the level of specific EC miRNAs, including miR-155, miR-320, and miR-222[182]. These miRNAs reportedly regulate adherens junction disassembly, cell migration, and cell morphology, which contribute to changes in vascular permeability [61,62,183]. However, other miRNAs were downregulated 3- to 3,400-fold following ANDV infection; these included miR-410, involved in regulating secretion, and miR-218, which is linked to the regulation of EC migration and vascular permeability[182]. In particular, this finding suggests that in ANDV-infected ECs decreased miR-218 levels may enhance VEGF-directed permeability by increasing Robo1 and thereby decreasing Robo4 regulation. Robo4 normally stabilizes the vasculature by counteracting VEGF signaling responses that result in EC hyperpermeability[184,185]. The changes in miR-126, an EC-specific miRNA that regulates vascular integrity by suppressing SPRED1 and PIK3R2 mRNAs[87,89], were also analyzed [182]. While miR-126 levels were only slightly altered, SPRED1 and PIK3R2 mRNA levels were increased 10- and 7-fold, respectively, in ANDV-infected ECs but were unaltered in ECs infected by the nonpathogenic Tula hantavirus. Consistent with increased SPRED1 expression, the level of phospho-cofilin was decreased within ANDV-infected ECs, therefore enhancing adherens junction disassembly responses[182].

Control of vascular tone by endothelial microRNAS

ECs control the secretion of two potent short-lived mediators that influence vascular hemodynamincs in the physiological state and therefore contribute to the regulation of blood pressure and blood flow by releasing vasodilators, such as NO and prostacyclin or prostagladin I2 (PGI2), as well as vasoconstrictors, including ET and platelet activating factor (PAF)[4]. The specific blood-mediators released by ECs vary depending on the vascular bed, but the principal vasorelaxant is NO[9]. NO is generated in ECs by the oxidation of L-Arginine to L-cytruline by eNOS[186,187]. eNOS is a constitutively expressed gene that can be upregulated by increases in shear stress of growth factors, such as VEGF and some drugs, including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins). Conversely, hypoxia, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), TNF and ox-LDL decrease its expression[188]. In addition, eNOS function is also tightly regulated by its subcellular localization, protein-protein interactions and multi-site phosphorylation mostly by the protein kinases AKT and AMPK[186,189]. Regarding the role of miRNAs in regulating vascular tone (Fig. 1C), initial studies, showed that knockdown of Dicer, the enzyme necessary for miRNA maturation, increased eNOS expression in ECs [77]. Transfection of miR-221 and miR-222 mimics partially reversed the increases of eNOS protein attributable to Dicer silencing, suggesting miR-221 and miR-222 may be involved in the control of eNOS expression. However, the effect of these miRNAs on eNOS might be indirect since no predicted binding sites have been found in the eNOS 3' UTR[77]. Recent reports indeed provide evidence that miR-155 downregulated eNOS expression through decreasing eNOS mRNA stability by binding to its 3-UTR[190]. Interestingly, TNF increased miR-155 expression in ECs[165] and knockdown of miR-155 prevented cytokine-induced downregulation of eNOS expression, reduction of NO production, and impairment of endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation[190]. Moreover, the authors found that simvastatin ameliorated TNF-induced endothelial dysfunction via inhibition of miR-155 expression[190].

NO has pleiotropic effects on the vasculature. It causes vascular SMC relaxation, which maintains vasomotor tone, inhibits SMC migration and proliferation and prevents platelet and leukocyte activation and adhesion[4,191193]. Failure of ECs to control these basal functions constitutes “EC dysfunction” leading to vessel constriction, thrombosis and inflammation. Local disturbances in blood flow trigger these undesired effects and explain why diminished NO secretion in regions with disturbed flow, such as arterial branch points, are prone to develop atheromas[194]. Several reports showed that shear stress induced the expression of miR-21 with contrasting effects. In particular, laminar flow increased miR-21 and reduced apoptosis and increased nitric oxide (NO) production by modulating The PI3K/Akt pathway, overall ameliorating EC functions[195]. However, Zhou et al. reported that OS increased miR-21 expression, which repressed peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-α (PPARα), a repressor of activator protein-1 (AP-1) signaling. In particular, AP-1 induced the expression of different adhesion molecules and miR-21 itself. These data showed that OS-induced miR-21 promoted endothelial inflammation[196]. These controversial findings might be explained by the difference in cellular context and, likely, also in the magnitude of upregulation of miR-21 induced by laminar or oscillatory shear stress.

In addition to producing the potent vasodilator NO, ECs also synthesize endothelin-1 (ET-1), one of the most potent vasoconstrictors[197]. ET-1 expression and secretion by ECs is stimulated by hypoxia, shear stress and ischemia. Upon release, it binds to the G-coupled ET-A receptor on vascular SMCs, resulting in an increase in calcium concentration and vascular SMC tone. NO controls the duration of these effects by accelerating the restoration of intracellular basal calcium levels. Therefore, in states of EC dysfunction, such as atherosclerosis, where NO levels are reduced, ET-1 promotes vasoconstriction and SMC proliferation[198]. MiR-125a/b has been involved in the regulation of the potent vasoconstrictor ET-1. Interestingly, an inverse correlation between the levels of miR-125a/b and the precursor protein ET-1 (preproET-1) has been reported in aortas in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats compared to normotensive rats [169]. Due to the relevance of ET-1 in many vascular diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and stroke, targeting of miR-125a/b could provide an important therapeutic approach.

Control of endothelial cell functions by secreted miRNAs

MiRNAs are not only important as cell autonomous modulators of cellular functions, but also in light of their role as mediators of paracrine cell-to-cell communication between cells[199]. Cells can communicate with other cells via multiple mechanisms. Besides passive protein and RNA shedding, cytokines, chemokines, enzymes or hormone secretion, they can release miRNA-protein complexes, lipoproteins containing miRNAs and vesicular particles that contain proteins and RNAs in the extracellular milieu [199].

Increasing evidence has demonstrated that many cell types are able to secrete extracellular microvesicles into the extracellular space that can be uptaken by other cells[200]. Since microvesicles retain surface receptors and ligands typical of their cells of origin, they might preferentially deliver their content to certain cell types. Because of the specificity of their content and of their potential targets, microvesicles can be both markers and mediators of disease[200].

The population of microvesicles is heterogeneous and includes vesicles from different origins. Although the classification of extracellular vesicles is still a matter of debate, it is well accepted to distinguish them based on the cellular process that they originate from[201].

Apoptotic bodies are large vesicles secreted by apoptotic cells and are heterogeneous in size and composition. Usually apoptotic bodies are identified as vesicles of 50–500 nm in diameter[202]. Shedding microvesicles have a diameter of 100–1000 nm and are produced by budding from the extracellular membrane and contain proteins and nucleic acids. Exosomes are around 30–100 nm in diameter and are produced within the endosomal compartment into multivesicular bodies. Exosomes are identified by the presence of tetraspanins (CD63, CD9, CD81) as well as endosomal proteins, such as Alix and Tsg101. They contain RNAs, especially miRNAs, which can be delivered to target cells. Interestingly, exosome protein and RNA composition depends on the activation status of the cell of origin[203], but it does not mirror its composition, as some miRNAs are specifically enriched in exosomes and not in cells. Exosomal proteins might be able to target exosomes to specific cells that have cognate membrane proteins[204].

ECs can both produce extracellular vesicles that target other cells and modify their function, or they can be targets of extracellular vesicles derived from other cells (Fig. 1D).

Human monocytes can secrete microvesicles containing miRNAs that are uptaken by ECs and increase their migratory capabilities. MiR-150 is contained in monocyte-derived microvesicles, both from the monocytic cell line, THP1, and from human peripheral blood monocytes[205]. The miRNA can be transferred to ECs and induce downregulation of c-Myb, which is responsible for the increased migratory capabilities of ECs. Moreover, patients with severe atherosclerosis had circulating microvesicles that were enriched in miR-150 compared to control patients, suggesting that their microvesicles might be either partially responsible for the vascularization of atherosclerotic plaques or might be a marker of it, since they have a higher monocyte infiltration in the lesion[205].

Tumor cells have been shown to produce large amounts of microvesicles. Several reports show that microvesicles have a positive effect on tumor development, by targeting, immune cells and ECs, among others[206,207].

Recent works have provided evidence that cancer-derived microvesicles can regulate EC functions. Cancer stem cells (SCs) have the capacity to initiate tumors from single cells. They are CD105+ cells and can give rise to cells of multiple lineages, like epithelial cells and ECs. Cancer SCs can produce microvesicles that are characterized by the surface expression marker CD105 and, have the ability to prepare the microenvironment to promote tumor growth and angiogenesis. In particular, CD105 microvesicles display enrichment in certain miRNAs, whose main targets are involved in crucial biological processes and likely angiogenic[207].

Zhuang et al. described that the ability of different tumor cell lines (lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, melanoma, glioblastoma, colorectal cancer) to modify EC functions is through microvesicle-derived miRNAs. Among the miRNAs transferred by tumors through microvesicles, they identified miR-9, which activates the JAK/STAT pathway by downregulating suppressor of cytokine signaling 5 (SOCS5) to induce EC migration[208].

Apoptotic bodies produced by ECs during atherosclerosis contain miRNA-126. By targeting the regulator of G protein signaling 16 (Rgs16), an inhibitor of G protein-coupled receptor signaling (GPCR), miR-126 increases the expression of chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), which in turn increases chemokine receptor type 12 (CXCL12) that counteracts apoptosis and recruits progenitor cells in mice with atherosclerosis[209].

EPCs are believed to exert a protective effect in many disease models. It is well accepted that EPCs can secrete paracrine protective factors, but recent studies have shed light on the important role of EPC-derived microvesicles and their miRNA cargo. In fact, the regenerative effects of EPCs in a model of ischemia-reperfusion injury in the kidney as well as hind limb ischemia have also been attributed to EPC's ability to secrete miRNA-containing microvesicles, and specifically miR-126 and miR-296-rich vesicles[210,211]. Those microvesicles could improve capillary rarefaction, glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis in kidney injury and increase capillary density in ischemia. Importantly, the ability of microvesicles to produce a phenotype was lost after treatment with RNase or if they were deprived of miRNAs by silencing of Dicer[210,211].

Upon shear stress, ECs can secrete microvesicles that are able to mediate an atheroprotective effect on VSMCs. Hergenreider et al. induced the production of microvesicles from ECs overexpressing the shear-responsive gene KLF2 or under shear stress. Those microvesicles were enriched in miRNAs, particularly miR-143/145, that mediated an atheroprotective action on smooth muscle cells[212]. Similarly, delivery of miR-143/145-enriched vesicles in ApoE−/− mice fed a high fat diet induced an atheroprotective effect, which was reverted if the microvesicles were depleted of miR-143/145.

Several studies also identified miRNAs in plasma or serum as biomarkers in certain diseases associated with EC function (Fig. 1D). Blood miRNAs are extremely stable to freeze/thaw cycles and RNAse treatment, raising the possibility that these miRNAs could be derived from circulating microvesicles produced by damaged cells[213,214].

Fichtlscherer et al. identified miRNAs dysregulated in patients with coronary artery disease[215]. In particular they found that miR-126, miR-155, and miR-145 were significantly reduced in patients with CAD and diabetes, while miR-17 and miR-92a were downregulated only in CAD patients. However, the origin and functional significance of these circulating miRNAs needs to be further explored.

Type 2 diabetes critically affects some EC functions and impairs postischemic reparative neovascularization. Therefore the study of miRNAs that are both markers and potential therapeutic treatments is of pivotal importance. Zampetaki et al. analyzed microvesicles from patients with type 2 diabetes and confirmed the downregulation of miR-126, as well as of other miRNAs, and among them miR-15a, miR-29b, miR-223, which were associated with an incidence of diabetes mellitus over 10-years[216]. Interestingly, miR-126 abundance in microvesicles produced by ECs treated with high glucose was also decreased compared to controls, suggesting an endothelial origin of the miR-126-depleted microvesicles in diabetic patients that also contribute to EC dysfunction.

In patients with diabetes-induced critical limb ischemia, a miRNA critical in EC function was found to be upregulated in the plasma of patients compared to controls, as well as in their muscles. High D-glucose treatment of ECs, which mimics diabetic conditions, induces the increase in expression of miR-503. This miRNA in turn decreases the angiogenic properties of ECs through repression of cdc25A and CCNE1 (as described above)[141]. Moreover, the anti-angiogenic miR-15 and miR-16 were found to be upregulated in patients with critical limb ischemia, without correlations with type 2 diabetes, further suggesting that circulating miRNAs in diabetes might promote the anti-angiogenic phenotype of ECs[138].

A note of caution should be addressed on the issue of detecting secreted miRNAs in patients. It is well known that diseases profoundly change the miRNA expression in cells. Furthermore, pathologies change the rate of release of miRNAs from different tissues, as well as their stability, profoundly affecting the abundance of miRNAs or other RNAs that are normally used as controls in healthy patients. Therefore common qPCR techniques that involve the normalization of the target miRNA relative expression with control-unchanged miRNAs should be analyzed carefully. Similarly, lack of a normalization control is also an issue for the quantification of microvesicle-derived miRNAs.

Pharmacological potential of microRNAs for endothelial cell dysfunction

Tissue specificity and the capability of coherently targeting multiple pathways are features that make miRNAs research targets of valuable therapeutic interest. MiRNAs could be inhibited, exploiting chemically stable complimentary oligonucleotides[217], or their activity mimicked with so-called mimics[218]. Inhibition of miRNAs might be achieved by chemically stabilized 2'-O-methyl oligonucleotides (or anti-miRs) complimentary to the miRNA of interest[217]. Anti-miRs were first shown to be effective in D. melanogaster and C. elegans, where they were used to inhibit let-7[217]. It is believed that anti-miRs irreversibly bind to the complementary target miRNA and block their processing by the miRISC complex, however the mechanism has not been fully investigated[218,219].

Linking 2'-O-methyl anti-miRs with cholesterol, a process to generate the so-called antago-miRs, increases the cellular uptake and bioavailability in larger animals and their action has been shown to last up to 23 days when delivered by tail vein injection in mice and target most tissues[220]. The effects of anti-miRs and antago-miRs have mostly been elucidated in rodents and only a few reports have extended their studies on animal models closer to humans. For example, miR-33 inhibition by anti-miR in non-human primate African green monkeys was reported to be effective in increasing HDL plasma levels by upregulation of hepatic ABCA1[221]. In addition to anti-miRs and antagomiRs, LNA-modified phosphorothioate oligonucleotide DNAs have been developed to inhibit miRNAs in vitro, as well as in vivo[222,223]. Of note, the therapeutic long-lasting efficacy of LNA-anti-miRs against the liver-specific miR-122 has been demonstrated in African green monkeys, as well as chimpanzees, to decrease plasma cholesterol levels and to prevent replication of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) [224,225]. A clinical trial of LNA-anti-miR-122, called miravirsen, on HCV patients is now in Phase IIa and has so far established the safety, as well the efficacy, of Miravirsen in inhibiting HCV disease progression.

Delivery of a high number of miRNA target sequences that decoy binding sites and reduce the availability of the target miRNA, a strategy called `sponging', has proven to be effective as in knocking down the functionality of miRNAs. Successful sponging of miRNAs in vivo was first reported in bone marrow derived cells that were transduced with lentiviral particle encoding for miR-223 targets and could reconstitute the hematopoietic system of receiving mice[226].

Even though sponging of miRNAs has been successful in mouse models, it has some limitation due to the nature of genetic material transferred, usually bulky plasmids delivered by viral vectors[227]. On the other hand, oligonucleotide-based inhibition is more promising in the light of potential future chemical improvements that might generate more readily delivered, targeted and long-lasting oligonucleotide inhibitors.

The opposite strategy of mimicking miRNA function has been proven to be effective in vivo in various experimental conditions. For example, delivery of miR-16 mimics, which is an anti-oncogenic and anti-angiogenic miRNA as discussed above, suppresses the progression of tumors[228]. Even though studies of miRNA inhibition and overexpression in vivo do not report any long-lasting side effect, it should be kept in mind that miRNA are able to target multiple pathways and generate important off-target effects that could profoundly affect vital cellular functions. Additionally, miRNA targets are not always conserved among species and therefore off-target effects that are not present in other animals might represent a significant problem in humans. Therefore the action of therapeutically interestingly miRNAs has to be extensively investigated in vitro and in vivo, not only in rodents but also in higher-order animals like non-human primates, to confirm the specificity of miRNA interaction with its targets and exclude side effects. Overall, the successful studies in rodents and non-human primates, as well as the preliminary results on clinical trials, show that miRNA inhibition and overexpression is a promising therapeutic tool in diseases and hopefully it will pave the way to human clinical trials of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic miRNAs to cure vascular diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Leigh Goedeke for the editing work on this review manuscript. YS laboratory is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health R01HL105945. EA is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellow.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Fishman AP. Endothelium: A distributed organ of diverse capabilities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;401:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb25702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Arnout J, Hoylaerts MF, Lijnen HR. Haemostasis. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006:1–41. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36028-x_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Bazzoni G, Dejana E. Endothelial cell-to-cell junctions: Molecular organization and role in vascular homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:869–901. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Busse R, Fleming I. Vascular endothelium and blood flow. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006:43–78. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36028-x_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Cines DB, Pollak ES, Buck CA, Loscalzo J, Zimmerman GA, McEver RP, Pober JS, Wick TM, Konkle BA, Schwartz BS, Barnathan ES, McCrae KR, Hug BA, Schmidt AM, Stern DM. Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. Blood. 1998;91:3527–3561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Hall AP. Review of the pericyte during angiogenesis and its role in cancer and diabetic retinopathy. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34:763–775. doi: 10.1080/01926230600936290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Michiels C. Endothelial cell functions. Journal of cellular physiology. 2003;196:430–443. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Minshall RD, Malik AB. Transport across the endothelium: Regulation of endothelial permeability. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006:107–144. doi: 10.1007/3-540-32967-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Moncada S, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide and the vascular endothelium. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006:213–254. doi: 10.1007/3-540-32967-6_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Pober JS, Sessa WC. Evolving functions of endothelial cells in inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:803–815. doi: 10.1038/nri2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;109:III27–32. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131515.03336.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Kolluru GK, Bir SC, Kevil CG. Endothelial dysfunction and diabetes: Effects on angiogenesis, vascular remodeling, and wound healing. Int J Vasc Med. 2012;2012:918267. doi: 10.1155/2012/918267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Pearson JD. Normal endothelial cell function. Lupus. 2000;9:183–188. doi: 10.1191/096120300678828299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Pober JS, Cotran RS. The role of endothelial cells in inflammation. Transplantation. 1990;50:537–544. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199010000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Sumpio BE, Riley JT, Dardik A. Cells in focus: Endothelial cell. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34:1508–1512. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Verma S, Buchanan MR, Anderson TJ. Endothelial function testing as a biomarker of vascular disease. Circulation. 2003;108:2054–2059. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089191.72957.ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Goligorsky MS. Endothelial cell dysfunction: Can't live with it, how to live without it. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;288:F871–880. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00333.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].O'Riordan E, Chen J, Brodsky SV, Smirnova I, Li H, Goligorsky MS. Endothelial cell dysfunction: The syndrome in making. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1654–1658. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Gimbrone MA, Jr., Garcia-Cardena G. Vascular endothelium, hemodynamics, and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nature medicine. 1995;1:27–31. doi: 10.1038/nm0195-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Lerman A, Zeiher AM. Endothelial function: Cardiac events. Circulation. 2005;111:363–368. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153339.27064.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ambros V. The functions of animal micrornas. Nature. 2004;431:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Bartel DP. Micrornas: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Ambros V. Microrna pathways in flies and worms: Growth, death, fat, stress, and timing. Cell. 2003;113:673–676. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00428-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by micrornas: Are the answers in sight? Nature reviews Genetics. 2008;9:102–114. doi: 10.1038/nrg2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. The microrna.Org resource: Targets and expression. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36:D149–153. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ. Mirbase: Tools for microrna genomics. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36:D154–158. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. Mirbase: Integrating microrna annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic acids research. 2011;39:D152–157. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Cai X, Hagedorn CH, Cullen BR. Human micrornas are processed from capped, polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mrnas. RNA. 2004;10:1957–1966. doi: 10.1261/rna.7135204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, Baek SH, Kim VN. Microrna genes are transcribed by rna polymerase ii. The EMBO journal. 2004;23:4051–4060. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Lee Y, Ahn C, Han J, Choi H, Kim J, Yim J, Lee J, Provost P, Radmark O, Kim S, Kim VN. The nuclear rnase iii drosha initiates microrna processing. Nature. 2003;425:415–419. doi: 10.1038/nature01957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Denli AM, Tops BB, Plasterk RH, Ketting RF, Hannon GJ. Processing of primary micrornas by the microprocessor complex. Nature. 2004;432:231–235. doi: 10.1038/nature03049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Ruby JG, Jan CH, Bartel DP. Intronic microrna precursors that bypass drosha processing. Nature. 2007;448:83–86. doi: 10.1038/nature05983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Lund E, Guttinger S, Calado A, Dahlberg JE, Kutay U. Nuclear export of microrna precursors. Science. 2004;303:95–98. doi: 10.1126/science.1090599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Hutvagner G, McLachlan J, Pasquinelli AE, Balint E, Tuschl T, Zamore PD. A cellular function for the rna-interference enzyme dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal rna. Science. 2001;293:834–838. doi: 10.1126/science.1062961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Cullen BR. Transcription and processing of human microrna precursors. Molecular cell. 2004;16:861–865. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Okamura K, Phillips MD, Tyler DM, Duan H, Chou YT, Lai EC. The regulatory activity of microrna* species has substantial influence on microrna and 3' utr evolution. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2008;15:354–363. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Guo L, Lu Z. The fate of mirna* strand through evolutionary analysis: Implication for degradation as merely carrier strand or potential regulatory molecule? PloS one. 2010;5:e11387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Yang JS, Phillips MD, Betel D, Mu P, Ventura A, Siepel AC, Chen KC, Lai EC. Widespread regulatory activity of vertebrate microrna* species. RNA. 2011;17:312–326. doi: 10.1261/rna.2537911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Zhou H, Huang X, Cui H, Luo X, Tang Y, Chen S, Wu L, Shen N. Mir-155 and its star-form partner mir-155* cooperatively regulate type i interferon production by human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Blood. 2010;116:5885–5894. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-280156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Hutvagner G, Zamore PD. A microrna in a multiple-turnover rnai enzyme complex. Science. 2002;297:2056–2060. doi: 10.1126/science.1073827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Mourelatos Z, Dostie J, Paushkin S, Sharma A, Charroux B, Abel L, Rappsilber J, Mann M, Dreyfuss G. Mirnps: A novel class of ribonucleoproteins containing numerous micrornas. Genes & development. 2002;16:720–728. doi: 10.1101/gad.974702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Saxena S, Jonsson ZO, Dutta A. Small rnas with imperfect match to endogenous mrna repress translation. Implications for off-target activity of small inhibitory rna in mammalian cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:44312–44319. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307089200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Valencia-Sanchez MA, Liu J, Hannon GJ, Parker R. Control of translation and mrna degradation by mirnas and sirnas. Genes & development. 2006;20:515–524. doi: 10.1101/gad.1399806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Lai EC. Micro rnas are complementary to 3' utr sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nature genetics. 2002;30:363–364. doi: 10.1038/ng865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Friedman RC, Farh KK-H, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mrnas are conserved targets of micrornas. Genome Res. 2009:92–105. doi: 10.1101/gr.082701.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Hornstein E, Shomron N. Canalization of development by micrornas. Nature genetics. 2006;38(Suppl):S20–24. doi: 10.1038/ng1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Ebert MS, Sharp PA. Roles for micrornas in conferring robustness to biological processes. Cell. 2012:515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Krutzfeldt J, Stoffel M. Micrornas: A new class of regulatory genes affecting metabolism. Cell metabolism. 2006;4:9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Chen CZ, Li L, Lodish HF, Bartel DP. Micrornas modulate hematopoietic lineage differentiation. Science. 2004;303:83–86. doi: 10.1126/science.1091903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Yang WJ, Yang DD, Na S, Sandusky GE, Zhang Q, Zhao G. Dicer is required for embryonic angiogenesis during mouse development. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2005;280:9330–9335. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413394200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Wienholds E, Kloosterman WP, Miska E, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Berezikov E, de Bruijn E, Horvitz HR, Kauppinen S, Plasterk RH. Microrna expression in zebrafish embryonic development. Science. 2005;309:310–311. doi: 10.1126/science.1114519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Poy MN, Eliasson L, Krutzfeldt J, Kuwajima S, Ma X, Macdonald PE, Pfeffer S, Tuschl T, Rajewsky N, Rorsman P, Stoffel M. A pancreatic islet-specific microrna regulates insulin secretion. Nature. 2004;432:226–230. doi: 10.1038/nature03076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Krichevsky AM, Sonntag KC, Isacson O, Kosik KS. Specific micrornas modulate embryonic stem cell-derived neurogenesis. Stem Cells. 2006;24:857–864. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Houbaviy HB, Murray MF, Sharp PA. Embryonic stem cell-specific micrornas. Developmental cell. 2003;5:351–358. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Giraldez AJ, Cinalli RM, Glasner ME, Enright AJ, Thomson JM, Baskerville S, Hammond SM, Bartel DP, Schier AF. Micrornas regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science. 2005;308:833–838. doi: 10.1126/science.1109020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Bernstein E, Kim SY, Carmell MA, Murchison EP, Alcorn H, Li MZ, Mills AA, Elledge SJ, Anderson KV, Hannon GJ. Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nature genetics. 2003;35:215–217. doi: 10.1038/ng1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Lee YS, Nakahara K, Pham JW, Kim K, He Z, Sontheimer EJ, Carthew RW. Distinct roles for drosophila dicer-1 and dicer-2 in the sirna/mirna silencing pathways. Cell. 2004;117:69–81. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00261-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, Song JJ, Hammond SM, Joshua-Tor L, Hannon GJ. Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian rnai. Science. 2004;305:1437–1441. doi: 10.1126/science.1102513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Lu J, Qian J, Chen F, Tang X, Li C, Cardoso WV. Differential expression of components of the microrna machinery during mouse organogenesis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2005;334:319–323. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Fish JE, Srivastava D. Micrornas: Opening a new vein in angiogenesis research. Sci Signal. 2009;2:pe1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.252pe1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Wang S, Olson EN. Angiomirs--key regulators of angiogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Suarez Y, Sessa WC. Micrornas as novel regulators of angiogenesis. Circulation research. 2009;104:442–454. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.191270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Batkai S, Thum T. Micrornas in hypertension: Mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012;14:79–87. doi: 10.1007/s11906-011-0235-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Dangwal S, Thum T. Micrornas in platelet biogenesis and function. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2012;108:599–604. doi: 10.1160/TH12-03-0211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Schober A, Thum T, Zernecke A. Micrornas in vascular biology--metabolism and atherosclerosis. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2012;107:603–604. doi: 10.1160/TH12-02-0122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Thum T, Mayr M. Review focus on the role of microrna in cardiovascular biology and disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;93:543–544. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nature medicine. 2003;9:653–660. doi: 10.1038/nm0603-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature. 2005;438:932–936. doi: 10.1038/nature04478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Coultas L, Chawengsaksophak K, Rossant J. Endothelial cells and vegf in vascular development. Nature. 2005;438:937–945. doi: 10.1038/nature04479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Folkman J. Angiogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:1–18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Ferrara N. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in regulation of physiological angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;280:C1358–1366. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.6.C1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ. Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia: Role of the hif system. Nature medicine. 2003;9:677–684. doi: 10.1038/nm0603-677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Romagnani P, Lasagni L, Annunziato F, Serio M, Romagnani S. Cxc chemokines: The regulatory link between inflammation and angiogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Holash J. Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 2000;407:242–248. doi: 10.1038/35025215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Folkman J. What is the role of endothelial cells in angiogenesis? Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology. 1984;51:601–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Suarez Y, Fernandez-Hernando C, Pober JS, Sessa WC. Dicer dependent micrornas regulate gene expression and functions in human endothelial cells. Circulation research. 2007;100:1164–1173. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000265065.26744.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Kuehbacher A, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Role of dicer and drosha for endothelial microrna expression and angiogenesis. Circulation research. 2007;101:59–68. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.153916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Suarez Y, Fernandez-Hernando C, Yu J, Gerber SA, Harrison KD, Pober JS, Iruela-Arispe ML, Merkenschlager M, Sessa WC. Dicer-dependent endothelial micrornas are necessary for postnatal angiogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:14082–14087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804597105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Poliseno L, Tuccoli A, Mariani L, Evangelista M, Citti L, Woods K, Mercatanti A, Hammond S, Rainaldi G. Micrornas modulate the angiogenic properties of huvecs. Blood. 2006;108:3068–3071. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-012369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Harris TA, Yamakuchi M, Ferlito M, Mendell JT, Lowenstein CJ. Microrna-126 regulates endothelial expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:1516–1521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707493105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Harris TA, Yamakuchi M, Kondo M, Oettgen P, Lowenstein CJ. Ets-1 and ets-2 regulate the expression of microrna-126 in endothelial cells. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2010;30:1990–1997. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.211706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Yalcin A, Meyer J, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Identification of tissue-specific micrornas from mouse. Current biology : CB. 2002;12:735–739. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00809-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Landgraf P, Rusu M, Sheridan R, Sewer A, Iovino N, Aravin A, Pfeffer S, Rice A, Kamphorst AO, Landthaler M, Lin C, Socci ND, Hermida L, Fulci V, Chiaretti S, Foa R, Schliwka J, Fuchs U, Novosel A, Muller RU, Schermer B, Bissels U, Inman J, Phan Q, Chien M, Weir DB, Choksi R, De Vita G, Frezzetti D, Trompeter HI, Hornung V, Teng G, Hartmann G, Palkovits M, Di Lauro R, Wernet P, Macino G, Rogler CE, Nagle JW, Ju J, Papavasiliou FN, Benzing T, Lichter P, Tam W, Brownstein MJ, Bosio A, Borkhardt A, Russo JJ, Sander C, Zavolan M, Tuschl T. A mammalian microrna expression atlas based on small rna library sequencing. Cell. 2007;129:1401–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Fitch MJ, Campagnolo L, Kuhnert F, Stuhlmann H. Egfl7, a novel epidermal growth factor-domain gene expressed in endothelial cells. Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2004;230:316–324. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Parker LH, Schmidt M, Jin SW, Gray AM, Beis D, Pham T, Frantz G, Palmieri S, Hillan K, Stainier DY, De Sauvage FJ, Ye W. The endothelial-cell-derived secreted factor egfl7 regulates vascular tube formation. Nature. 2004;428:754–758. doi: 10.1038/nature02416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Wang S, Aurora AB, Johnson BA, Qi X, McAnally J, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. The endothelial-specific microrna mir-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Developmental cell. 2008;15:261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Kuhnert F, Mancuso MR, Hampton J, Stankunas K, Asano T, Chen CZ, Kuo CJ. Attribution of vascular phenotypes of the murine egfl7 locus to the microrna mir-126. Development. 2008;135:3989–3993. doi: 10.1242/dev.029736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Fish JE, Santoro MM, Morton SU, Yu S, Yeh RF, Wythe JD, Ivey KN, Bruneau BG, Stainier DY, Srivastava D. Mir-126 regulates angiogenic signaling and vascular integrity. Developmental cell. 2008;15:272–284. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Sessa R, Seano G, di Blasio L, Gagliardi PA, Isella C, Medico E, Cotelli F, Bussolino F, Primo L. The mir-126 regulates angiopoietin-1 signaling and vessel maturation by targeting p85beta. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2012;1823:1925–1935. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Nicoli S, Standley C, Walker P, Hurlstone A, Fogarty KE, Lawson ND. Microrna-mediated integration of haemodynamics and vegf signalling during angiogenesis. Nature. 2010;464:1196–1200. doi: 10.1038/nature08889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].van Solingen C, Seghers L, Bijkerk R, Duijs JM, Roeten MK, van Oeveren-Rietdijk AM, Baelde HJ, Monge M, Vos JB, de Boer HC, Quax PH, Rabelink TJ, van Zonneveld AJ. Antagomir-mediated silencing of endothelial cell specific microrna-126 impairs ischemia-induced angiogenesis. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. 2009;13:1577–1585. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00613.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Saito Y, Friedman JM, Chihara Y, Egger G, Chuang JC, Liang G. Epigenetic therapy upregulates the tumor suppressor microrna-126 and its host gene egfl7 in human cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2009;379:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Yanaihara N, Caplen N, Bowman E, Seike M, Kumamoto K, Yi M, Stephens RM, Okamoto A, Yokota J, Tanaka T, Calin GA, Liu CG, Croce CM, Harris CC. Unique microrna molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer cell. 2006;9:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Tavazoie SF, Alarcon C, Oskarsson T, Padua D, Wang Q, Bos PD, Gerald WL, Massague J. Endogenous human micrornas that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2008;451:147–152. doi: 10.1038/nature06487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Miko E, Margitai Z, Czimmerer Z, Varkonyi I, Dezso B, Lanyi A, Bacso Z, Scholtz B. Mir-126 inhibits proliferation of small cell lung cancer cells by targeting slc7a5. FEBS letters. 2011;585:1191–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Hamada S, Satoh K, Fujibuchi W, Hirota M, Kanno A, Unno J, Masamune A, Kikuta K, Kume K, Shimosegawa T. Mir-126 acts as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer cells via the regulation of adam9. Molecular cancer research : MCR. 2012;10:3–10. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Liu B, Peng XC, Zheng XL, Wang J, Qin YW. Mir-126 restoration down-regulate vegf and inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Lung Cancer. 2009;66:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Fish JE, Wythe JD, Xiao T, Bruneau BG, Stainier DY, Srivastava D, Woo S. A slit/mir-218/robo regulatory loop is required during heart tube formation in zebrafish. Development. 2011;138:1409–1419. doi: 10.1242/dev.060046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Tie J, Pan Y, Zhao L, Wu K, Liu J, Sun S, Guo X, Wang B, Gang Y, Zhang Y, Li Q, Qiao T, Zhao Q, Nie Y, Fan D. Mir-218 inhibits invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by targeting the robo1 receptor. PLoS genetics. 2010;6:e1000879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Small EM, Sutherland LB, Rajagopalan KN, Wang S, Olson EN. Microrna-218 regulates vascular patterning by modulation of slit-robo signaling. Circulation research. 2010;107:1336–1344. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.227926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, Hernando-Monge E, Mu D, Goodson S, Powers S, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW, Hannon GJ, Hammond SM. A microrna polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature. 2005;435:828–833. doi: 10.1038/nature03552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Hayashita Y, Osada H, Tatematsu Y, Yamada H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, Yatabe Y, Kawahara K, Sekido Y, Takahashi T. A polycistronic microrna cluster, mir-17-92, is overexpressed in human lung cancers and enhances cell proliferation. Cancer research. 2005;65:9628–9632. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Ota A, Tagawa H, Karnan S, Tsuzuki S, Karpas A, Kira S, Yoshida Y, Seto M. Identification and characterization of a novel gene, c13orf25, as a target for 13q31-q32 amplification in malignant lymphoma. Cancer research. 2004;64:3087–3095. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].O'Donnell KA, Wentzel EA, Zeller KI, Dang CV, Mendell JT. C-myc-regulated micrornas modulate e2f1 expression. Nature. 2005;435:839–843. doi: 10.1038/nature03677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Fontana L, Fiori ME, Albini S, Cifaldi L, Giovinazzi S, Forloni M, Boldrini R, Donfrancesco A, Federici V, Giacomini P, Peschle C, Fruci D. Antagomir-17-5p abolishes the growth of therapy-resistant neuroblastoma through p21 and bim. PloS one. 2008;3:e2236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Dews M, Homayouni A, Yu D, Murphy D, Sevignani C, Wentzel E, Furth EE, Lee WM, Enders GH, Mendell JT, Thomas-Tikhonenko A. Augmentation of tumor angiogenesis by a myc-activated microrna cluster. Nature genetics. 2006;38:1060–1065. doi: 10.1038/ng1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Otsuka M, Zheng M, Hayashi M, Lee JD, Yoshino O, Lin S, Han J. Impaired microrna processing causes corpus luteum insufficiency and infertility in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118:1944–1954. doi: 10.1172/JCI33680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Doebele C, Bonauer A, Fischer A, Scholz A, Reiss Y, Urbich C, Hofmann WK, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Members of the microrna-17-92 cluster exhibit a cell-intrinsic antiangiogenic function in endothelial cells. Blood. 2010;115:4944–4950. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Qin X, Wang X, Wang Y, Tang Z, Cui Q, Xi J, Li YS, Chien S, Wang N. Microrna-19a mediates the suppressive effect of laminar flow on cyclin d1 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:3240–3244. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914882107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Bonauer A, Carmona G, Iwasaki M, Mione M, Koyanagi M, Fischer A, Burchfield J, Fox H, Doebele C, Ohtani K, Chavakis E, Potente M, Tjwa M, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Microrna-92a controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues in mice. Science. 2009;324:1710–1713. doi: 10.1126/science.1174381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Semo J, Sharir R, Afek A, Avivi C, Barshack I, Maysel-Auslender S, Krelin Y, Kain D, Entin-Meer M, Keren G, George J. The 106b~25 microrna cluster is essential for neovascularization after hindlimb ischaemia in mice. European heart journal. 2013 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Chhabra R, Dubey R, Saini N. Cooperative and individualistic functions of the micrornas in the mir-23a~27a~24-2 cluster and its implication in human diseases. Molecular cancer. 2010;9:232. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Zhou Q, Gallagher R, Ufret-Vincenty R, Li X, Olson EN, Wang S. Regulation of angiogenesis and choroidal neovascularization by members of microrna-23~27~24 clusters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:8287–8292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105254108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Fiedler J, Jazbutyte V, Kirchmaier BC, Gupta SK, Lorenzen J, Hartmann D, Galuppo P, Kneitz S, Pena JT, Sohn-Lee C, Loyer X, Soutschek J, Brand T, Tuschl T, Heineke J, Martin U, Schulte-Merker S, Ertl G, Engelhardt S, Bauersachs J, Thum T. Microrna-24 regulates vascularity after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2011;124:720–730. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.039008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Bang C, Fiedler J, Thum T. Cardiovascular importance of the microrna-23/27/24 family. Microcirculation. 2012;19:208–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2011.00153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Urbich C, Kaluza D, Fromel T, Knau A, Bennewitz K, Boon RA, Bonauer A, Doebele C, Boeckel JN, Hergenreider E, Zeiher AM, Kroll J, Fleming I, Dimmeler S. Microrna-27a/b controls endothelial cell repulsion and angiogenesis by targeting semaphorin 6a. Blood. 2012;119:1607–1616. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-373886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Wang KC, Garmire LX, Young A, Nguyen P, Trinh A, Subramaniam S, Wang N, Shyy JY, Li YS, Chien S. Role of microrna-23b in flow-regulation of rb phosphorylation and endothelial cell growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:3234–3239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914825107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Iruela-Arispe ML, Dvorak HF. Angiogenesis: A dynamic balance of stimulators and inhibitors. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 1997;78:672–677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Cross MJ, Claesson-Welsh L. Fgf and vegf function in angiogenesis: Signalling pathways, biological responses and therapeutic inhibition. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2001;22:201–207. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01676-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989;246:1306–1309. doi: 10.1126/science.2479986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J, Claesson-Welsh L. Vegf receptor signalling - in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:359–371. doi: 10.1038/nrm1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Presta M, Dell'Era P, Mitola S, Moroni E, Ronca R, Rusnati M. Fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor system in angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:159–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Chamorro-Jorganes A, Araldi E, Penalva LO, Sandhu D, Fernandez-Hernando C, Suarez Y. Microrna-16 and microrna-424 regulate cell-autonomous angiogenic functions in endothelial cells via targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and fibroblast growth factor receptor-1. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2011;31:2595–2606. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.236521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Nudelman AS, DiRocco DP, Lambert TJ, Garelick MG, Le J, Nathanson NM, orm DR. Neuronal activity rapidly induces transcription of the creb-regulated microrna-132, in vivo. Hippocampus. 2010;20:492–498. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Vo N, Klein ME, Varlamova O, Keller DM, Yamamoto T, Goodman RH, Impey S. A camp-response element binding protein-induced microrna regulates neuronal morphogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:16426–16431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508448102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Anand S, Majeti BK, Acevedo LM, Murphy EA, Mukthavaram R, Scheppke L, Huang M, Shields DJ, Lindquist JN, Lapinski PE, King PD, Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Microrna-132-mediated loss of p120rasgap activates the endothelium to facilitate pathological angiogenesis. Nature medicine. 2010;16:909–914. doi: 10.1038/nm.2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Dentelli P, Del Sorbo L, Rosso A, Molinar A, Garbarino G, Camussi G, Pegoraro L, Brizzi MF. Human il-3 stimulates endothelial cell motility and promotes in vivo new vessel formation. J Immunol. 1999;163:2151–2159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Brogi E, Winkles JA, Underwood R, Clinton SK, Alberts GF, Libby P. Distinct patterns of expression of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in human atheroma and nonatherosclerotic arteries. Association of acidic fgf with plaque microvessels and macrophages. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1993;92:2408–2418. doi: 10.1172/JCI116847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Dentelli P, Rosso A, Orso F, Olgasi C, Taverna D, Brizzi MF. Microrna-222 controls neovascularization by regulating signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a expression. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2010;30:1562–1568. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.206201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Chen Y, Banda M, Speyer CL, Smith JS, Rabson AB, Gorski DH. Regulation of the expression and activity of the antiangiogenic homeobox gene gax/meox2 by zeb2 and microrna-221. Molecular and cellular biology. 2010;30:3902–3913. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01237-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Zhu N, Zhang D, Chen S, Liu X, Lin L, Huang X, Guo Z, Liu J, Wang Y, Yuan W, Qin Y. Endothelial enriched micrornas regulate angiotensin ii-induced endothelial inflammation and migration. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215:286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473:298–307. doi: 10.1038/nature10144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Camps C, Buffa FM, Colella S, Moore J, Sotiriou C, Sheldon H, Harris AL, Gleadle JM, Ragoussis J. Hsa-mir-210 is induced by hypoxia and is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2008;14:1340–1348. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Fasanaro P, D'Alessandra Y, Di Stefano V, Melchionna R, Romani S, Pompilio G, Capogrossi MC, Martelli F. Microrna-210 modulates endothelial cell response to hypoxia and inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinase ligand ephrin-a3. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283:15878–15883. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800731200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Hu S, Huang M, Li Z, Jia F, Ghosh Z, Lijkwan MA, Fasanaro P, Sun N, Wang X, Martelli F, Robbins RC, Wu JC. Microrna-210 as a novel therapy for treatment of ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2010;122:S124–131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Raitoharju E, Lyytikainen LP, Levula M, Oksala N, Mennander A, Tarkka M, Klopp N, Illig T, Kahonen M, Karhunen PJ, Laaksonen R, Lehtimaki T. Mir-21, mir-210, mir-34a, and mir-146a/b are up-regulated in human atherosclerotic plaques in the tampere vascular study. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Spinetti G, Fortunato O, Caporali A, Shantikumar S, Marchetti M, Meloni M, Floris I, Descamps B, Sangalli E, Vono R, Faglia E, Specchia C, Pintus G, Madeddu PR, Emanueli C. Microrna-15a and microrna-16 impair human circulating pro-angiogenic cell (pac) functions and are increased in the pacs and serum of patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation research. 2012 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Hullinger TG, Montgomery RL, Seto AG, Dickinson BA, Semus HM, Lynch JM, Dalby CM, Robinson K, Stack C, Latimer PA, Hare JM, Olson EN, van Rooij E. Inhibition of mir-15 protects against cardiac ischemic injury. Circulation research. 2012;110:71–81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.244442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Yin KJ, Deng Z, Hamblin M, Xiang Y, Huang H, Zhang J, Jiang X, Wang Y, Chen YE. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta regulation of mir-15a in ischemia-induced cerebral vascular endothelial injury. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2010;30:6398–6408. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0780-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Caporali A, Meloni M, Vollenkle C, Bonci D, Sala-Newby GB, Addis R, Spinetti G, Losa S, Masson R, Baker AH, Agami R, le Sage C, Condorelli G, Madeddu P, Martelli F, Emanueli C. Deregulation of microrna-503 contributes to diabetes mellitus-induced impairment of endothelial function and reparative angiogenesis after limb ischemia. Circulation. 2011;123:282–291. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.952325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Ghosh G, Subramanian IV, Adhikari N, Zhang X, Joshi HP, Basi D, Chandrashekhar YS, Hall JL, Roy S, Zeng Y, Ramakrishnan S. Hypoxia-induced microrna-424 expression in human endothelial cells regulates hif-alpha isoforms and promotes angiogenesis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2010;120:4141–4154. doi: 10.1172/JCI42980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Isner JM, Asahara T. Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis as therapeutic strategies for postnatal neovascularization. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1999;103:1231–1236. doi: 10.1172/JCI6889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Minami Y, Satoh M, Maesawa C, Takahashi Y, Tabuchi T, Itoh T, Nakamura M. Effect of atorvastatin on microrna 221 / 222 expression in endothelial progenitor cells obtained from patients with coronary artery disease. European journal of clinical investigation. 2009;39:359–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Sabatel C, Malvaux L, Bovy N, Deroanne C, Lambert V, Gonzalez ML, Colige A, Rakic JM, Noel A, Martial JA, Struman I. Microrna-21 exhibits antiangiogenic function by targeting rhob expression in endothelial cells. PloS one. 2011;6:e16979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Zhu S, Deng S, Ma Q, Zhang T, Jia C, Zhuo D, Yang F, Wei J, Wang L, Dykxhoorn DM, Hare JM, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Dong C. Microrna-10a* and microrna-21 modulate endothelial progenitor cell senescence via suppressing high-mobility group a2. Circulation research. 2013;112:152–164. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.280016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Fleissner F, Jazbutyte V, Fiedler J, Gupta SK, Yin X, Xu Q, Galuppo P, Kneitz S, Mayr M, Ertl G, Bauersachs J, Thum T. Short communication: Asymmetric dimethylarginine impairs angiogenic progenitor cell function in patients with coronary artery disease through a microrna-21-dependent mechanism. Circulation research. 2010;107:138–143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.216770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Guduric-Fuchs J, O'Connor A, Cullen A, Harwood L, Medina RJ, O'Neill CL, Stitt AW, Curtis TM, Simpson DA. Deep sequencing reveals predominant expression of mir-21 amongst the small non-coding rnas in retinal microvascular endothelial cells. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2012;113:2098–2111. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Gaur AB, Holbeck SL, Colburn NH, Israel MA. Downregulation of pdcd4 by mir-21 facilitates glioblastoma proliferation in vivo. Neuro-oncology. 2011;13:580–590. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nor033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Tao J, Lu Q, Wu D, Li P, Xu B, Qing W, Wang M, Zhang Z, Zhang W. Microrna-21 modulates cell proliferation and sensitivity to doxorubicin in bladder cancer cells. Oncology reports. 2011;25:1721–1729. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Menghini R, Casagrande V, Cardellini M, Martelli E, Terrinoni A, Amati F, Vasa-Nicotera M, Ippoliti A, Novelli G, Melino G, Lauro R, Federici M. Microrna 217 modulates endothelial cell senescence via silent information regulator 1. Circulation. 2009;120:1524–1532. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.864629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Vasa-Nicotera M, Chen H, Tucci P, Yang AL, Saintigny G, Menghini R, Mahe C, Agostini M, Knight RA, Melino G, Federici M. Mir-146a is modulated in human endothelial cell with aging. Atherosclerosis. 2011;217:326–330. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Springer TA. Traffic signals on endothelium for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:827–872. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.004143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Butcher EC. Leukocyte-endothelial cell recognition: Three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell. 1991;67:1033–1036. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90279-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Bonfanti R, Furie BC, Furie B, Wagner DD. Padgem (gmp140) is a component of weibel-palade bodies of human endothelial cells. Blood. 1989;73:1109–1112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Middleton J, Neil S, Wintle J, Clark-Lewis I, Moore H, Lam C, Auer M, Hub E, Rot A. Transcytosis and surface presentation of il-8 by venular endothelial cells. Cell. 1997;91:385–395. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80422-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].Bevilacqua MP, Nelson RM, Mannori G, Cecconi O. Endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecules in human disease. Annu Rev Med. 1994;45:361–378. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.45.1.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [158].Pober JS. Endothelial activation: Intracellular signaling pathways. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(Suppl 3):S109–116. doi: 10.1186/ar576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Sonkoly E, Pivarcsi A. Advances in micrornas: Implications for immunity and inflammatory diseases. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. 2009;13:24–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00534.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [160].O'Connell RM, Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Cheng G, Baltimore D. Microrna-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:1604–1609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610731104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].Perry MM, Moschos SA, Williams AE, Shepherd NJ, Larner-Svensson HM, Lindsay MA. Rapid changes in microrna-146a expression negatively regulate the il-1 beta-induced inflammatory response in human lung alveolar epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:5689–5698. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Chang KJ, Baltimore D. Nf-kappab-dependent induction of microrna mir-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:12481–12486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605298103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Tili E, Michaille JJ, Cimino A, Costinean S, Dumitru CD, Adair B, Fabbri M, Alder H, Liu CG, Calin GA, Croce CM. Modulation of mir-155 and mir-125b levels following lipopolysaccharide/tnf-alpha stimulation and their possible roles in regulating the response to endotoxin shock. J Immunol. 2007;179:5082–5089. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Bazzoni F, Rossato M, Fabbri M, Gaudiosi D, Mirolo M, Mori L, Tamassia N, Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Locati M. Induction and regulatory function of mir-9 in human monocytes and neutrophils exposed to proinflammatory signals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:5282–5287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810909106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Suarez Y, Wang C, Manes TD, Pober JS. Cutting edge: Tnf-induced micrornas regulate tnf-induced expression of e-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on human endothelial cells: Feedback control of inflammation. J Immunol. 2010;184:21–25. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Sun X, Icli B, Wara AK, Belkin N, He S, Kobzik L, Hunninghake GM, Vera MP, Blackwell TS, Baron RM, Feinberg MW. Microrna-181b regulates nf-kappab-mediated vascular inflammation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2012;122:1973–1990. doi: 10.1172/JCI61495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Fang Y, Shi C, Manduchi E, Civelek M, Davies PF. Microrna-10a regulation of proinflammatory phenotype in athero-susceptible endothelium in vivo and in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:13450–13455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002120107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].Li D, Mehta JL. Antisense to lox-1 inhibits oxidized ldl-mediated upregulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and monocyte adhesion to human coronary artery endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000;101:2889–2895. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Li D, Yang P, Xiong Q, Song X, Yang X, Liu L, Yuan W, Rui YC. Microrna-125a/b-5p inhibits endothelin-1 expression in vascular endothelial cells. Journal of hypertension. 2010;28:1646–1654. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833a4922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Qin B, Xiao B, Liang D, Xia J, Li Y, Yang H. Micrornas expression in ox-ldl treated huvecs: Mir-365 modulates apoptosis and bcl-2 expression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2011;410:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Hajra L, Evans AI, Chen M, Hyduk SJ, Collins T, Cybulsky MI. The nf-kappa b signal transduction pathway in aortic endothelial cells is primed for activation in regions predisposed to atherosclerotic lesion formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97:9052–9057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].Fang Y, Davies PF. Site-specific microrna-92a regulation of kruppel-like factors 4 and 2 in atherosusceptible endothelium. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2012;32:979–987. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.244053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].McCormick SM, Eskin SG, McIntire LV, Teng CL, Lu CM, Russell CG, Chittur KK. DNA microarray reveals changes in gene expression of shear stressed human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98:8955–8960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.171259298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Dekker RJ, van Soest S, Fontijn RD, Salamanca S, de Groot PG, VanBavel E, Pannekoek H, Horrevoets AJ. Prolonged fluid shear stress induces a distinct set of endothelial cell genes, most specifically lung kruppel-like factor (klf2) Blood. 2002;100:1689–1698. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].Sorescu GP, Sykes M, Weiss D, Platt MO, Saha A, Hwang J, Boyd N, Boo YC, Vega JD, Taylor WR, Jo H. Bone morphogenic protein 4 produced in endothelial cells by oscillatory shear stress stimulates an inflammatory response. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:31128–31135. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300703200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Ni CW, Qiu H, Jo H. Microrna-663 upregulated by oscillatory shear stress plays a role in inflammatory response of endothelial cells. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2011;300:H1762–1769. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00829.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Dejana E, Del Maschio A. Molecular organization and functional regulation of cell to cell junctions in the endothelium. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 1995;74:309–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Schnittler HJ. Structural and functional aspects of intercellular junctions in vascular endothelium. Basic Res Cardiol. 1998;93(Suppl 3):30–39. doi: 10.1007/s003950050205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Baldwin AL, Thurston G. Mechanics of endothelial cell architecture and vascular permeability. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;29:247–278. doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v29.i2.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Alexander JS, Elrod JW. Extracellular matrix, junctional integrity and matrix metalloproteinase interactions in endothelial permeability regulation. J Anat. 2002;200:561–574. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00057.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Dejana E, Corada M, Lampugnani MG. Endothelial cell-to-cell junctions. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 1995;9:910–918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Pepini T, Gorbunova EE, Gavrilovskaya IN, Mackow JE, Mackow ER. Andes virus regulation of cellular micrornas contributes to hantavirus-induced endothelial cell permeability. Journal of virology. 2010;84:11929–11936. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01658-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Nicoloso MS, Spizzo R, Shimizu M, Rossi S, Calin GA. Micrornas--the micro steering wheel of tumour metastases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:293–302. doi: 10.1038/nrc2619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Acevedo LM, Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Robo4 counteracts vegf signaling. Nature medicine. 2008;14:372–373. doi: 10.1038/nm0408-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Jones CA, London NR, Chen H, Park KW, Sauvaget D, Stockton RA, Wythe JD, Suh W, Larrieu-Lahargue F, Mukouyama YS, Lindblom P, Seth P, Frias A, Nishiya N, Ginsberg MH, Gerhardt H, Zhang K, Li DY. Robo4 stabilizes the vascular network by inhibiting pathologic angiogenesis and endothelial hyperpermeability. Nature medicine. 2008;14:448–453. doi: 10.1038/nm1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Sessa WC. Enos at a glance. Journal of cell science. 2004;117:2427–2429. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Stamler JS, Singel DJ, Loscalzo J. Biochemistry of nitric oxide and its redox-activated forms. Science. 1992;258:1898–1902. doi: 10.1126/science.1281928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Govers R, Rabelink TJ. Cellular regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;280:F193–206. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.280.2.F193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Fulton D, Gratton JP, McCabe TJ, Fontana J, Fujio Y, Walsh K, Franke TF, Papapetropoulos A, Sessa WC. Regulation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide production by the protein kinase akt. Nature. 1999;399:597–601. doi: 10.1038/21218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Sun HX, Zeng DY, Li RT, Pang RP, Yang H, Hu YL, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, Huang LY, Tang YB, Yan GJ, Zhou JG. Essential role of microrna-155 in regulating endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation by targeting endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Hypertension. 2012;60:1407–1414. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.197301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Mendelsohn ME, O'Neill S, George D, Loscalzo J. Inhibition of fibrinogen binding to human platelets by s-nitroso-n-acetylcysteine. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1990;265:19028–19034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Jeremy JY, Rowe D, Emsley AM, Newby AC. Nitric oxide and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43:580–594. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(99)00171-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Lefer AM. Nitric oxide: Nature's naturally occurring leukocyte inhibitor. Circulation. 1997;95:553–554. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.3.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Hansson GK, Libby P. The immune response in atherosclerosis: A double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:508–519. doi: 10.1038/nri1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Weber M, Baker MB, Moore JP, Searles CD. Mir-21 is induced in endothelial cells by shear stress and modulates apoptosis and enos activity. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2010;393:643–648. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Zhou J, Wang KC, Wu W, Subramaniam S, Shyy JY, Chiu JJ, Li JY, Chien S. Microrna-21 targets peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-alpha in an autoregulatory loop to modulate flow-induced endothelial inflammation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:10355–10360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107052108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411–415. doi: 10.1038/332411a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Bohm F, Pernow J. The importance of endothelin-1 for vascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;76:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Chen X, Liang H, Zhang J, Zen K, Zhang C-Y. Secreted micrornas: A new form of intercellular communication. Trends in cell biology. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].Mittelbrunn M, Sánchez-Madrid F. Intercellular communication: Diverse structures for exchange of genetic information. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012:328–335. doi: 10.1038/nrm3335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Araldi E, Krämer-Albers E-M, Hoen EN-t, Peinado H, Psonka-Antonczyk KM, Rao P, Niel Gv, Yáñez-Mó M, Nazarenko I. International society for extracellular vesicles: First annual meeting, april 17–21, 2012: Isev-2012. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 2012 doi: 10.3402/jev.v1i0.19995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [202].Mathivanan S, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes: Extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. Journal of proteomics. 2010:1907–1920. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [203].Montecalvo A, Larregina AT, Shufesky WJ, Stolz DB, Sullivan MLG, Karlsson JM, Baty CJ, Gibson GA, Erdos G, Wang Z, Milosevic J, Tkacheva OA, Divito SJ, Jordan R, Lyons-Weiler J, Watkins SC, Morelli AE. Mechanism of transfer of functional micrornas between mouse dendritic cells via exosomes. Blood. 2012:756–766. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-338004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [204].Rana S, Yue S, Stadel D, Zöller M. Toward tailored exosomes: The exosomal tetraspanin web contributes to target cell selection. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012:1574–1584. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [205].Zhang Y, Liu D, Chen X, Li J, Li L, Bian Z, Sun F, Lu J, Yin Y, Cai X, Sun Q, Wang K, Ba Y, Wang Q, Wang D, Yang J, Liu P, Xu T, Yan Q, Zhang J, Zen K, Zhang C-Y. Secreted monocytic mir-150 enhances targeted endothelial cell migration. Mol Cell. 2010:133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [206].Mineo M, Garfield SH, Taverna S, Flugy A, De Leo G, Alessandro R, Kohn EC. Exosomes released by k562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells promote angiogenesis in a src-dependent fashion. Angiogenesis. 2011:33–45. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9241-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [207].Grange C, Tapparo M, Collino F, Vitillo L, Damasco C, Deregibus M-C, Tetta C, Bussolati B, Camussi G. Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate angiogenesis and formation of lung premetastatic niche. Cancer research. 2011:5346–5356. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [208].Zhuang G, Wu X, Jiang Z, Kasman I, Yao J, Guan Y, Oeh J, Modrusan Z, Bais C, Sampath D, Ferrara N. Tumour-secreted mir-9 promotes endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis by activating the jak-stat pathway. The EMBO journal: Nature Publishing Group. 2012:1–11. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [209].Zernecke A, Bidzhekov K, Noels H, Shagdarsuren E, Gan L, Denecke B, Hristov M, Köppel T, Jahantigh MN, Lutgens E, Wang S, Olson EN, Schober A, Weber C. Delivery of microrna-126 by apoptotic bodies induces cxcl12-dependent vascular protection. Sci Signal. 2009:ra81. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [210].Cantaluppi V, Gatti S, Medica D, Figliolini F, Bruno S, Deregibus MC, Sordi A, Biancone L, Tetta C, Camussi G. Microvesicles derived from endothelial progenitor cells protect the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury by microrna-dependent reprogramming of resident renal cells. Kidney …. 2012:412–427. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [211].Ranghino A, Cantaluppi V, Grange C. Endothelial progenitor ... [int j immunopathol pharmacol. 2012 jan-mar] - pubmed - ncbi. International journal …. 2012 doi: 10.1177/039463201202500110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [212].Hergenreider E, Heydt S, Treguer K, Boettger T, Horrevoets AJ, Zeiher AM, Scheffer MP, Frangakis AS, Yin X, Mayr M, Braun T, Urbich C, Boon RA, Dimmeler S. Atheroprotective communication between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells through mirnas. Nature cell biology. 2012;14:249–256. doi: 10.1038/ncb2441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [213].Hunter MP, Ismail N, Zhang X, Aguda BD, Lee EJ, Yu L, Xiao T, Schafer J, Lee M-LT, Schmittgen TD, Nana-Sinkam SP, Jarjoura D, Marsh CB. Detection of microrna expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PloS one: Public Library of Science. 2008:e3694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [214].Skog J, Wurdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer DH, Gainche L, Sena-Esteves M, Curry WT, Jr., Carter BS, Krichevsky AM, Breakefield XO. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport rna and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nature cell biology. 2008;10:1470–1476. doi: 10.1038/ncb1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [215].Fichtlscherer S, De Rosa S, Fox H, Schwietz T, Fischer A, Liebetrau C, Weber M, Hamm CW, Roxe T, Muller-Ardogan M, Bonauer A, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Circulating micrornas in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation research. 2010;107:677–684. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.215566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [216].Zampetaki A, Kiechl S, Drozdov I, Willeit P, Mayr U, Prokopi M, Mayr A, Weger S, Oberhollenzer F, Bonora E, Shah A, Willeit J, Mayr M. Plasma microrna profiling reveals loss of endothelial mir-126 and other micrornas in type 2 diabetes. Circulation research. 2010;107:810–817. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [217].Hutvagner G, Simard MJ, Mello CC, Zamore PD. Sequence-specific inhibition of small rna function. PLoS biology. 2004;2:E98. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [218].van Rooij E, Marshall WS, Olson EN. Toward microrna-based therapeutics for heart disease: The sense in antisense. Circulation research. 2008;103:919–928. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.183426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [219].Bader AG, Brown D, Winkler M. The promise of microrna replacement therapy. Cancer research. 2010;70:7027–7030. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [220].Krutzfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M. Silencing of micrornas in vivo with 'antagomirs'. Nature. 2005;438:685–689. doi: 10.1038/nature04303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [221].Rayner KJ, Esau CC, Hussain FN, McDaniel AL, Marshall SM, van Gils JM, Ray TD, Sheedy FJ, Goedeke L, Liu X, Khatsenko OG, Kaimal V, Lees CJ, Fernandez-Hernando C, Fisher EA, Temel RE, Moore KJ. Inhibition of mir-33a/b in non-human primates raises plasma hdl and lowers vldl triglycerides. Nature. 2011;478:404–407. doi: 10.1038/nature10486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [222].Elmen J, Lindow M, Schutz S, Lawrence M, Petri A, Obad S, Lindholm M, Hedtjarn M, Hansen HF, Berger U, Gullans S, Kearney P, Sarnow P, Straarup EM, Kauppinen S. Lna-mediated microrna silencing in non-human primates. Nature. 2008;452:896–899. doi: 10.1038/nature06783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [223].Worm J, Stenvang J, Petri A, Frederiksen KS, Obad S, Elmen J, Hedtjarn M, Straarup EM, Hansen JB, Kauppinen S. Silencing of microrna-155 in mice during acute inflammatory response leads to derepression of c/ebp beta and down-regulation of g-csf. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37:5784–5792. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [224].Elmen J, Lindow M, Silahtaroglu A, Bak M, Christensen M, Lind-Thomsen A, Hedtjarn M, Hansen JB, Hansen HF, Straarup EM, McCullagh K, Kearney P, Kauppinen S. Antagonism of microrna-122 in mice by systemically administered lna-antimir leads to up-regulation of a large set of predicted target mrnas in the liver. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36:1153–1162. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [225].Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P. Modulation of hepatitis c virus rna abundance by a liver-specific microrna. Science. 2005;309:1577–1581. doi: 10.1126/science.1113329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [226].Gentner B, Schira G, Giustacchini A, Amendola M, Brown BD, Ponzoni M, Naldini L. Stable knockdown of microrna in vivo by lentiviral vectors. Nature methods. 2009;6:63–66. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [227].Ebert MS, Sharp PA. Microrna sponges: Progress and possibilities. RNA. 2010;16:2043–2050. doi: 10.1261/rna.2414110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [228].Takeshita F, Patrawala L, Osaki M, Takahashi RU, Yamamoto Y, Kosaka N, Kawamata M, Kelnar K, Bader AG, Brown D, Ochiya T. Systemic delivery of synthetic microrna-16 inhibits the growth of metastatic prostate tumors via downregulation of multiple cell-cycle genes. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2010;18:181–187. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES