Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2013 Jul 24;288(35):25614–25625. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.470492

Notch Signaling in Osteocytes Differentially Regulates Cancellous and Cortical Bone Remodeling*

Ernesto Canalis ‡,§,1, Douglas J Adams , Adele Boskey , Kristen Parker , Lauren Kranz , Stefano Zanotti ‡,§
PMCID: PMC3757222  PMID: 23884415

Background: Notch signaling regulates skeletal development and remodeling.

Results: Activation of Notch preferentially in osteocytes induces osteoprotegerin and Wnt signaling, decreases cancellous bone remodeling, and increases cortical bone formation; as a result, Notch prevents immobilization-induced osteopenia.

Conclusion: In osteocytes, Notch decreases cancellous bone remodeling and enhances cortical bone formation.

Significance: Notch has distinct actions in osteocytes leading to a marked increase in bone mass.

Keywords: Bone, Cell Signaling, Gene Knockout, Notch, Osteocyte, Receptors, Wnt Pathway, Bone Remodeling, Disuse Osteoporosis, Skeletal Architecture

Abstract

Notch receptors play a role in skeletal development and homeostasis, and Notch activation in undifferentiated and mature osteoblasts causes osteopenia. In contrast, Notch activation in osteocytes increases bone mass, but the mechanisms involved and exact functions of Notch are not known. In this study, Notch1 and -2 were inactivated preferentially in osteocytes by mating Notch1/2 conditional mice, where Notch alleles are flanked by loxP sequences, with transgenics expressing Cre directed by the Dmp1 (dentin matrix protein 1) promoter. Notch1/2 conditional null male and female mice exhibited an increase in trabecular bone volume due to an increase in osteoblasts and decrease in osteoclasts. In male null mice, this was followed by an increase in osteoclast number and normalization of bone volume. To activate Notch preferentially in osteocytes, Dmp1-Cre transgenics were crossed with RosaNotch mice, where a loxP-flanked STOP cassette is placed between the Rosa26 promoter and Notch1 intracellular domain sequences. Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice exhibited an increase in trabecular bone volume due to decreased bone resorption and an increase in cortical bone due to increased bone formation. Biomechanical and chemical properties were not affected. Osteoprotegerin mRNA was increased, sclerostin and dickkopf1 mRNA were decreased, and Wnt signaling was enhanced in Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch femurs. Botulinum toxin A-induced muscle paralysis caused pronounced osteopenia in control mice, but bone mass was preserved in mice harboring the Notch activation in osteocytes. In conclusion, Notch plays a unique role in osteocytes, up-regulates osteoprotegerin and Wnt signaling, and differentially regulates trabecular and cortical bone homeostasis.

Introduction

Bone remodeling is a process that results in the coordinated resorption and formation of skeletal tissue carried out in basic multicellular units (13). There, osteoclasts resorb bone, and the cavity formed is filled by osteoblasts with newly synthesized matrix. Osteoblasts are derived from mesenchymal cells, and following their maturation, they may die of apoptosis, become quiescent lining cells, or become entombed in the mineralized matrix of bone as osteocytes (4). These cells with a dendritic morphology rest in lacunae and communicate with osteoblasts, lining cells and other osteocytes, through a canalicular network. Osteocytes play a fundamental role in bone remodeling, and their ablation results in bone loss and microstructural deterioration (5).

Bone is a dynamic tissue that responds to mechanical stress with changes in mass and structure to achieve a balance between stress and load-bearing capacity. Mechanical loading can stimulate new bone formation and prevent bone loss (6, 7). Conversely, unloading of the skeleton or immobilization can enhance bone resorption, reduce bone formation, and increase bone loss and the risk for osteoporotic fractures (810). Osteocytes play a central role in mechanotransduction and respond to mechanical loading by converting extracellular forces into intracellular signals that regulate specific pathways and by communicating the signals to other skeletal cells to regulate skeletal homeostasis (1114).

Notch (Notch1 to -4) are single-pass transmembrane receptors that play a critical role in cell fate decisions (1518). Notch regulates skeletal development and homeostasis and osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation (15, 1922). Notch is activated by Notch-ligand interactions. There are five classic Notch canonical ligands, which are Jagged1 and -2 and Delta-like 1, 3, and 4 (15). Notch-ligand interactions result in the release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD)2 and in its translocation to the nucleus, where it displaces transcriptional repressors and interacts with CSL (for C promoter-binding factor 1, Suppressor of hairless, and Lag-1), termed Rbpjκ in mice, and Mastermind-like (Maml) proteins to regulate transcription (2326). This leads to the induction of Hes1 (hairy enhancer of split 1), Hes5, and Hes7 and Hey1 (Hes-related with YRPW motif 1), Hey2, and HeyL. Skeletal cells express Notch1, Notch2, and low levels of Notch3 transcripts; Notch1 and -2 are considered responsible for the effects of Notch in the skeleton (19, 27). Transgenic expression of the NICD of Notch1 under the control of a 3.6-kilobase (kb) fragment of the Col1a1 (collagen type I α1) promoter causes osteopenia, whereas NICD expression under the control of a 2.3-kb fragment of the same promoter causes the formation of abundant woven bone (20, 21). In accordance with these observations, the inactivation of Notch1 and Notch2 in the developing skeleton causes a transient increase in trabecular bone volume due to enhanced osteoblastic differentiation followed by osteopenia, due to an increase in osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption (19). These and related findings suggest that Notch inhibits both osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation (28).

Recently, we explored the effects of Notch1 in cells of the osteoblastic lineage at various stages of cell differentiation. Activation of Notch in undifferentiated and differentiated osteoblasts caused marked osteopenia. In contrast, activation in osteocytes caused a pronounced increase in bone mass due to a suppression of bone resorption (29). Although the observations indicate a distinct function of Notch in osteocytes, the mechanisms involved and the consequences of the inactivation of Notch1 and Notch2 in osteocytes were not explored. Because of the distinct effect of Notch activation in osteocytes, we postulated that it may protect from the deleterious consequences of immobilization.

The intent of the present study was to define the function of Notch1 and -2 in osteocytes in vivo. To avoid any possible genetic compensation, we studied dual conditional Notch1 and -2 null mice by crossing mice where Notch1 and 2 alleles were targeted with loxP sequences with transgenics expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of the Dmp1 (Dentin matrix protein 1) promoter (Dmp1-Cre) (19, 20). We also extended the characterization of mice expressing the NICD of Notch1 preferentially in osteocytes and explored the protective effect of Notch in a model of paralysis-induced osteopenia. For this purpose, Dmp1-Cre transgenics were crossed with RosaNotch mice, where a loxP-flanked STOP cassette was cloned into the Rosa26 locus upstream of the coding sequence of the Notch1 NICD.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Notch1 and -2 Conditional Mice

Conditional Notch1 and Notch2 mice were provided by F. Radtke (Lausanne, Switzerland) and T. Gridley (Scarborough, ME), respectively (30, 31). For the creation of the Notch1 conditional allele, a region of the Notch1 locus containing the 3.5 kb upstream of the putative transcriptional start site and the first exon was flanked by loxP sequences, so that Cre recombination results in the removal of the Notch1 signal peptide (31). For the creation of the Notch2 conditional allele, exon 3 was flanked by loxP sequences so that Cre recombination leads to a frameshift and consequent truncation of the Notch2 protein (30). Notch1 and Notch2 conditional mice were mated to create dual Notch1loxP/loxP and Notch2loxP/loxP mice in a 129SvJ/C57BL/6 background. To inactivate Notch1 and -2 in osteocytes, transgenic mice expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of an ∼10-kb fragment of the Dmp1 promoter (Dmp1-Cre) in a C57BL/6 genetic background were obtained from J. Feng (Dallas, TX) (32). Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP mice were mated with Dmp1-Cre transgenics to create Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP to cross with Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP mice so that 50% of the progeny would be inactive for both Notch genes (Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1Δ/Δ;Notch2Δ/Δ), and 50% would serve as controls (Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP). Male and female experimental and control littermate mice were compared at 1, 3, and 6 months of age. Genotyping was carried out in tail DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers (Table 1). Deletion of loxP-flanked sequences by the Cre recombinase was documented by PCR in DNA extracted from femurs of 1-month-old mice using specific primers (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Primers used for allele identification by PCR

Allele Strand Sequence 5′–3′ Amplicon size
bp
Genotyping
    Notch1loxP allele Forward CTGACTTAGTAGGGGGAAAAC WT = 300
Reverse AGTGGTCCAGGGTGTGAGTGT LoxP = 350
    Notch2loxP allele Forward GCTCAGCTAGAGTGTTGTTCTTG WT = 400
Reverse TTTGTGGCCGTAACTTTCTCATG LoxP = 500
    Dmp1-Cre transgene Forward CCCGCAGAACCTGAAGATG 534
Reverse GACCCGGCAAAACAGGTAG
    RosaNotch allele Forward GGAGCGGGAGAAATGGATATG WT = 600
Wild type reverse AAAGTCGCTCTGAGTTGTTATTG
RosaNotch reverse GCGAAGAGTTTGTCCTCAACC RosaNotch = 250

loxP recombination
    Notch1loxP Forward CTGACTTAGTAGGGGGAAAAC 370
Reverse TAAAAAGAGACAGCTGCGGAG
    Notch2loxP Forward GCTCAGCTAGAGTGTTGTTCTTG 450
Reverse ATAACGCTAAACGTGCACTGGAG
    RosaNotch STOP Forward TTCGCGGTCTTTCCAGTGG
Reverse absent loxP recombination AGCCTCTGAGCCCAGAAAGC 492
Reverse present loxP recombination GCCGACTGAGTCCTCGCC 296
RosaNotch Mice

RosaNotch mice were created by D. A. Melton (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) and obtained from Jackson Laboratory in a 129SvJ/C57BL/6 genetic background (Bar Harbor, ME) (33, 34). In these mice, the Rosa26 locus is targeted with a DNA construct encoding Notch1 NICD, preceded by a STOP cassette flanked by loxP sites, cloned downstream of the Rosa26 promoter. Expression of NICD from the targeted Rosa26 locus occurs following the excision of the STOP cassette by Cre recombination of loxP sequences (35, 36). To study the activation of Notch1 in osteocytes, homozygous RosaNotch mice were mated with Dmp1-Cre+/− transgenics to create Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch experimental and RosaNotch littermate controls. Male experimental and control mice were compared at 4 and 7 weeks of age. Genotyping of Dmp1-Cre transgenics and RosaNotch mice was carried out by PCR in tail DNA extracts (Table 1). Deletion of the loxP-flanked STOP cassette by the Cre recombinase was documented by PCR in DNA from tibiae using specific primers, and the induction of NICD and Notch target gene expression in femurs was documented by quantitative RT-PCR.

Muscle Immobilization Protocol

The effect of muscle immobilization on the skeleton was tested in 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch and littermate control male mice. For this purpose, control and experimental mice were injected with botulinum toxin A (BtxA) (Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) at a dose of 2 units/100 g of body weight administered in equal amounts in the quadriceps and the triceps surae muscle groups or injected with saline under anesthesia using a ketamine/xylazine mixture intraperitoneally (3740). The contralateral limb was used as an internal control. Experimental and control mice were sacrificed 3 weeks post-BtxA injection, when bone loss following muscle paralysis reaches its nadir (37). The degree of muscle paralysis was assessed 3 days postinjection using the digital abduction scoring test, where the degree of abduction of the digits in the paralyzed limb is assessed and scored using a scale of 0–4, with 0 reflecting normal muscle function and 4 indicating total paralysis (41). All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center.

Microcomputed Tomography (μCT)

Bone microarchitecture of femurs from experimental and control mice was determined using a microcomputed tomography instrument (μCT 40; Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland), which was calibrated weekly using a phantom provided by the manufacturer (42, 43). Femurs were scanned in 70% ethanol at high resolution, energy level of 55 peak kV, intensity of 145 μA, and integration time of 200 ms. A total of 100 slices at midshaft and 160 slices at the distal metaphysis were acquired at an isotropic voxel dimension of 6 μm or 216 μm3 and a slice thickness of 6 μm and chosen for analysis. Trabecular bone volume fraction and microarchitecture were evaluated starting ∼1.0 mm proximal from the femoral condyles. Contours were manually drawn every 10 slices a few voxels away from the endocortical boundary to define the region of interest for analysis. The remaining slice contours were iterated automatically. Trabecular regions were assessed for total volume, bone volume, bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume), trabecular thickness, trabecular number, trabecular separation, connectivity density, and structure model index, using a Gaussian filter (σ = 0.8) and user-defined thresholds (42, 43). For analysis of femoral cortical bone, contours were iterated across 100 slices along the cortical shell of the femoral midshaft, excluding the marrow cavity. Analyses of bone volume/total volume, porosity, cortical thickness, total cross-sectional and cortical bone area, periosteal perimeter, endosteal perimeter, and material density were performed using a Gaussian filter (σ = 0.8) and user-defined thresholds.

Bone Histomorphometric Analysis

Static and dynamic histomorphometry was carried out on experimental and control mice after they were injected with calcein (20 mg/kg) and demeclocycline (50 mg/kg) at an interval of 2 days in 1-month-old or of 5 days in 7-week-old animals. Five-μm longitudinal sections of femurs and cross-sections at the mid-femoral diaphysis were cut on a microtome (Microm, Richards-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) and stained with 0.1% toluidine blue or von Kossa. Static parameters of bone formation and resorption were measured in a defined area between 360 and 2160 μm from the growth plate, using an OsteoMeasure morphometry system (Osteometrics, Atlanta, GA). For dynamic histomorphometry, mineralizing surface per bone surface and mineral apposition rate were measured on unstained sections under ultraviolet light, using a triple diamidino-2-phenylindole/fluorescein/Texas red set long pass filter, and the bone formation rate was calculated. The terminology and units used are those recommended by the Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee of the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (44, 45).

Mechanical Integrity Testing

Fresh frozen femurs from Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null and Notch1/2loxP/loxP controls and from Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch and control mice were thawed and tested in torsion to measure whole bone mechanical properties. The proximal and distal ends were potted in methacrylate, aligning the longitudinal bone axis with the central axis of applied torque. Tissue hydration was maintained with saline-soaked gauze. The non-embedded central 6-mm span of femur diaphysis was tested by securing the potted distal femur in a mated fixture, twisting the proximal potted end in external rotation at 1°/s (Bose Endura Tec 3200, Minnetonka, MN). Applied torque and twist angle were acquired at 10 Hz. Strength and maximum deformation (twist angle) were defined at maximal applied torque. Torsional stiffness was measured in the linear portion of the torque-deformation curve up to 20° of rotational deformation.

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Imaging

The compositional properties of bones from Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null and Notch1/2loxP/loxP controls and from Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch and control littermate mice were mapped in 1–2-μm femoral sections of bones embedded in polymethylmethacrylate by FTIR imaging using a PerkinElmer Spotlight 300 infrared imaging System (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) with a pixel size of 6.25 μm, at a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1, in 256 repeated scans. Three random areas containing either trabecular bone or cortical bone were selected for analysis. Spectra were processed using ISYS software (Spectral Dimensions, Olney, MD), as described (46). In brief, the base-line spectra parameters were normalized to the area of the polymethylmethacrylate peak, the polymethylmethacrylate contribution was subtracted, and the following parameters were calculated for each cortical and trabecular image independently: mineral/matrix ratio, carbonate/phosphate ratio, collagen maturity, crystallinity, and acid phosphate content.

Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA was extracted from femurs following the removal of the bone marrow by centrifugation, and mRNA levels were determined by quantitative RT-PCR (47, 48). For this purpose, equal amounts of RNA were reverse-transcribed using the iScript RT-PCR kit (Bio-Rad), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and amplified in the presence of specific primers (Table 2) and iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) at 60 °C for 45 cycles. Transcript copy number was estimated by comparison with a serial dilution of cDNA for Notch1, Sclerostin (Sost) (both from Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), Hey1, Hey2 (both from T. Iso, Los Angeles, CA), HeyL (from D. Srivastava, Dallas, TX), Opg (osteoprotegerin), Wisp1 (Wnt1-inducible signaling pathway protein) (both from American Type Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA), Tnfsf11 (encoding for Rankl (receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand) (from Source BioScience, Nottingham, UK), and Dkk1 (Dickkopf-related protein 1) (from C. Niehrs, Heidelberg, Germany) (4951). Reactions were conducted in a CFX96 quantitative RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad), and fluorescence was monitored during every PCR cycle at the annealing step. Data were obtained from male mice and are expressed as copy number corrected for Gapdh (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) copy number, estimated by comparison with a serial dilution of cDNA for Gapdh (R. Wu, Ithaca, NY) (52).

TABLE 2.

Primers used for qRT-PCR determinations

The GenBankTM accession number identifies the transcript recognized by primer pairs.

Gene Strand Sequence 5′–3′ GenBankTM accession number
Dkk1 Forward CCCTCCCTTGCGCTGAAGATGAGGAGT NM_010051
Reverse CGCTTTCGGCAAGCCAGAC
Gapdh Forward CCCCTCTGGAAAGCTGTGGCGT NM_008084
Reverse AGCTTCCCGTTCAGCTCTGG
Hey1 Forward ATCTCAACAACTACGCATCCCAGC NM_010423
Reverse GTGTGGGTGATGTCCGAAGG
Hey2 Forward AGCGAGAACAATTACCCTGGGCAC NM_013904
Reverse GGTAGTTGTCGGTGAATTGGACCT
HeyL Forward CAGTAGCCTTTCTGAATTGCGAC NM_013905
Reverse AGCTTGGAGGAGCCCTGTTTC
Notch1 Forward GTGCTCTGATGGACGACAAT NM_008714
Reverse GCTCCTCAAACCGGAACTTC
Opg Forward CAGAAAGGAAATGCAACACATGACAAC NM_008764
Reverse GCCTCTTCACACAGGGTGACATC
Sost Forward AGGAATGATGCCACAGAGGTC NM_024449
Reverse CTGGTTGTTCTCAGGAGGAGGCTC
Tnfsf11 Forward TATAGAATCCTGAGACTCCATGAAAAC NM_011613
Reverse CCCTGAAAGGCTTGTTTCATCC
Wisp1 Forward TCCAGGAGTTAAGTGATTTGCTCA NM_018865
Reverse CATGTTACATGACACTGGGCTTC
Immunohistochemistry

Frozen sections of femurs from 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch and RosaNotch control mice were stained with a murine monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) against β-catenin (clone E-5; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or normal mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at a 1:100 dilution, using a Mouse on Mouse Immunodetection kit for peroxidase, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Staining was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA), and sections were counterstained with methyl green (Sigma-Aldrich).

Immunofluorescence

Frozen sections of femurs from 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch and RosaNotch controls were exposed to rabbit polyclonal anti-Nicd antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) or to normal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at a 1:500 dilution and to goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to fluorophore Alexa 488. Slides were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to label nuclear DNA. The Alexa 488 fluorophore was excited with an argon laser emitting at 488 nm, and the signal was detected with a 505–530-nm band pass emission filter. Images were acquired with a photomultiplier tube using Zeiss ZEN software.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± S.E. Statistical differences were determined by unpaired Student's t test.

RESULTS

Femoral Microarchitecture and Histomorphometry of Dmp1-Cre;Notch1 and -2 Conditional Null Mice

To study the conditional inactivation of Notch preferentially in osteocytes, heterozygous Dmp1-Cre+/− transgenics were mated with Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP mice to create Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP mice to be mated with Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP and generate Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1Δ/Δ;Notch2Δ/Δ experimental and Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP littermate controls. To ensure the validity of the controls, in preliminary experiments, we documented that Dmp1-Cre transgenics and Notch1loxP/loxP;Notch2loxP/loxP mice were not appreciably different from wild type mice by femoral μCT at 1 month of age. Cre-mediated recombination of loxP sequences was documented in femoral extracts from Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1Δ/Δ;Notch2Δ/Δ mice (Fig. 1). The appearance of Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice and their weight were not different from controls.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Validation of loxP recombination, weight, and representative femoral μCT of male and female Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice (filled circles, black bars, and Notch1/2Δ/Δ) and Notch1/2loxP/loxP littermate controls (open circles, white bars, and Control). DNA extracted from femurs of Notch1/2 conditional null and control mice before and following loxP recombination by Cre under the control of the Dmp1 promoter is shown in A. A 470- and 450-bp band is detected for the Notch1 and Notch2 recombined allele, respectively. The weight in g is shown in B. Representative μCT of distal femur of a 3-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mouse and Notch1/2loxP/loxP littermate control is shown in C. Values in B are means ± S.E. (error bars), n = 4–8. *, significantly different from control mice, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

μCT of the distal femur revealed that male and female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice had increased trabecular bone volume at 3 months of age due to an increased number of trabeculae (Table 3 and Fig. 1). The increased bone volume was associated with increased connectivity, and structure model index revealed a tendency toward platelike trabeculae in female mice. The trabecular microarchitectural changes were observed in male and female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice, although they were more pronounced and sustained in female mice. Accordingly, an increase in trabecular bone volume was observed in 3- and 6-month-old female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice, whereas male mice displayed an increase in trabecular bone only at 3 months of age. Total and cortical bone area at the femoral midshaft were increased in 6-month-old female mice, whereas male mice displayed a modest increase in cortical area at 3 months of age. Other cortical bone microarchitecture parameters determined at the femoral midshaft were not changed in 1–6-month-old Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice of either sex except for a small and transient decline in cortical bone volume and higher porosity noted in 3-month-old male mice (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Femoral microarchitecture assessed by μCT of 1-, 3-, and 6-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice and Notch1/2loxP/loxP littermate controls

μCT was performed in distal femurs for trabecular bone and midshaft for cortical bone from 1-, 3-, and 6-month-old male and female Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice (Notch1/2Δ/Δ) and control Notch1/2loxP/loxP littermates (Control). Values are means ± S.E.; n = 4–7. *, significantly different from controls, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

1 month
3 months
6 months
Control Notch1/2Δ/Δ Control Notch1/2Δ/Δ Control Notch1/2Δ/Δ
Males
    Distal femur trabecular bone
        Bone volume/total volume (%) 4.2 ± 0.8 4.0 ± 0.3 7.2 ± 0.4 9.9 ± 0.9* 6.3 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 0.4
        Trabecular separation (μm) 246 ± 19 251 ± 7 237 ± 10 212 ± 6 296 ± 15 290 ± 5
        Trabecular number (1/mm) 4.2 ± 0.3 4.0 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.2 4.7 ± 0.1* 3.4 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.1
        Trabecular thickness (μm) 24 ± 1 25 ± 1 35 ± 1 41 ± 3 39 ± 2 40 ± 3
        Connectivity density (1/mm3) 111 ± 41 93 ± 23 200 ± 21 258 ± 33 119 ± 20 106 ± 12
        Structure model Index 3.2 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1*
        Density of material (mg HA/cm3) 931 ± 7 930 ± 10 974 ± 8 995 ± 13 987 ± 4 991 ± 5
    Femoral midshaft cortical bone
        Bone volume/total volume (%) 89.3 ± 0.1 88.6 ± 0.9 93.8 ± 0.1 90.6 ± 1.4* 94.1 ± 0.2 92.8 ± 0.6
        Porosity (%) 10.7 ± 0.1 11.4 ± 0.9 6.2 ± 0.1 9.4 ± 1.0* 5.9 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.6
        Cortical thickness (μm) 101 ± 3 99 ± 4 179 ± 3 166 ± 8 190 ± 4 177 ± 5
        Total area (mm2) 1.4 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1
        Bone area (mm2) 0.5 ± 0.03 0.5 ± 0.02 0.9 ± 0.03 1.0 ± 0.05* 0.9 ± 0.03 1.0 ± 0.02
        Periosteal perimeter (μm) 4.2 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.1 5.0 ± 0.1 5.2 ± 0.1 4.9 ± 0.1 5.0 ± 0.1
        Endocortical perimeter (mm) 3.4 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.1
        Density of material (mg HA/cm3) 951 ± 4 950 ± 7 1117 ± 7 1121 ± 6 1181 ± 10 1192 ± 11

Females
    Distal femur trabecular bone
        Bone volume/total volume (%) 3.2 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.6* 1.4 ± 0.3 3.7 ± 0.2*
        Trabecular separation (μm) 281 ± 18 333 ± 23 323 ± 11 247 ± 5* 440 ± 24 377 ± 10*
        Trabecular number (1/mm) 3.7 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.1* 2.3 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1*
        Trabecular thickness (μm) 23 ± 0 25 ± 1 34 ± 1 34 ± 1 34 ± 2 37 ± 2
        Connectivity density (1/mm3) 66 ± 27 36 ± 9 61 ± 12 161 ± 29* 14 ± 5 79 ± 10*
        Structure model index 3.1 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1*
        Density of material (mg HA/cm3) 926 ± 4 908 ± 6 988 ± 11 983 ± 10 1009 ± 11 985 ± 12
    Femoral midshaft cortical bone
        Bone volume/total volume (%) 89.7 ± 0.2 88.4 ± 0.7 93.6 ± 0.1 92.9 ± 0.3 94.2 ± 0.2 94.4 ± 0.1
        Porosity (%) 10.3 ± 0.2 11.6 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 0.1 7.1 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.2 5.6 ± 0.1
        Cortical thickness (μm) 103 ± 1 94 ± 3 166 ± 2 155 ± 6 186 ± 6 197 ± 3
        Total area (mm2) 1.5 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1*
        Bone area (mm2) 0.5 ± 0.01 0.5 ± 0.01 0.7 ± 0.02 0.7 ± 0.03 0.8 ± 0.02 0.9 ± 0.02*
        Periosteal perimeter (μm) 4.3 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 0.1*
        Endocortical perimeter (mm) 3.4 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1
        Density of material (mg HA/cm3) 961 ± 2 947 ± 8 1151 ± 8 1133 ± 12 1220 ± 9 1216 ± 7

Bone histomorphometric analysis of femurs from Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice at 3 months of age confirmed the microarchitectural findings (Table 4) and demonstrated increased bone volume/tissue volume secondary to an increase in trabecular number in male and female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice. At 1 month of age, there was an increase in osteoblast number/perimeter and surface and a decrease in osteoclast surface/bone surface in male and female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice. At 3 months of age, the cellular phenotype evolved, and the number of osteoblasts was not different between Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice and littermate controls. In contrast, there was a 1.5-fold significant increase in osteoclast number and eroded surface in male but not in female mice, possibly explaining the sustained increase in trabecular bone volume observed in 6-month-old female but not male Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice (Table 4). Parameters of bone formation were not changed in 1- or 3-month-old male or female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice. Osteoid surface/bone surface was increased 2–3-fold, although the change was statistically significant only in 1-month-old female and 3-month-old male Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice. Although Notch1 and -2 conditional null female mice had an ∼2-fold increase in trabecular bone volume, cortical morphometry was similar to controls (Table 3). Biomechanical testing of 5–6-month-old female Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice revealed only a modest reduction in strength (Table 5). Accordingly, compositional analysis of bones from 3-month-old Notch1 and -2 null mice by FTIR imaging revealed modest changes, including an 11% decrease in carbonate/phosphate ratio in trabecular bone and a 5% decrease in collagen maturity in cortical bone (Table 5).

TABLE 4.

Femoral histomorphometry of 1- and 3-month old Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice and Notch1/2loxP/loxP controls

Bone histomorphometry was performed in distal femurs from 1- and 3-month-old male and female Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice (Notch1/2Δ/Δ) and control Notch1/2loxP/loxP littermates (Control). Values are means ± S.E.; n = 4–7. *, significantly different from controls, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

1 month
3 months
Control Notch1/2Δ/Δ Control Notch1/2Δ/Δ
Males; distal femur trabecular bone
    Bone volume/tissue volume (%) 7.6 ± 1.2 9.2 ± 0.8 7.8 ± 0.8 11.9 ± 0.8*
    Trabecular separation (μm) 449 ± 44 312 ± 20* 405 ± 34 302 ± 15*
    Trabecular number (1/mm) 2.2 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2* 2.4 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2*
    Trabecular thickness (μm) 34 ± 4 31 ± 1 33 ± 3 41 ± 3
    Osteoblast surface/bone surface (%) 24 ± 3 38 ± 2* 13 ± 1 14 ± 1
    Osteoblasts/bone perimeter (1/mm) 26.1 ± 4.1 39.4 ± 2.2* 15.7 ± 1.1 14.8 ± 1.2
    Osteoid surface/bone surface (%) 1.8 ± 0.7 3.8 ± 1.3 1.4 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.6*
    Osteoclast surface/bone surface (%) 14.6 ± 0.5 12.3 ± 0.6* 7.8 ± 0.7 11.3 ± 0.8*
    Osteoclasts/bone perimeter (1/mm) 9.2 ± 0.5 7.9 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.4 7.4 ± 0.5*
    Eroded surface/bone surface (%) 24 ± 1 21 ± 1 13 ± 1 20 ± 2*
    Mineral apposition rate (μm/day) 2.8 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.1
    Mineralizing surface/bone surface (%) 6.8 ± 1.5 6.7 ± 1.6 12.2 ± 2.0 14.0 ± 1.4
    Bone formation rate (μm3/μm2/day) 0.20 ± 0.06 0.20 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.03

Females; distal femur trabecular bone
    Bone volume/tissue volume (%) 6.5 ± 1.1 7.1 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.2 8.2 ± 0.8*
    Trabecular separation (μm) 539 ± 65 424 ± 41 880 ± 52 367 ± 29*
    Trabecular number (1/mm) 1.8 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.2*
    Trabecular thickness (μm) 35 ± 3 32 ± 1 24 ± 2 32 ± 1*
    Osteoblast surface/bone surface (%) 22 ± 3 41 ± 2* 18 ± 1 20 ± 2
    Osteoblasts/bone perimeter (1/mm) 24.6 ± 2.6 46.0 ± 3.0* 19.3 ± 0.8 19.5 ± 1.8
    Osteoid surface/bone surface (%) 2.9 ± 0.9 8.9 ± 1.0* 2.6 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 1.0
    Osteoclast surface/bone surface (%) 15.7 ± 0.7 12.2 ± 0.1* 13.2 ± 0.7 10.9 ± 0.5*
    Osteoclasts/bone perimeter (1/mm) 10.7 ± 0.4 8.3 ± 0.1* 8.9 ± 0.5 7.2 ± 0.3*
    Eroded surface/bone surface (%) 30 ± 1 24 ± 1* 21 ± 1 19 ± 1
    Mineral apposition rate (μm/day) 3.1 ± 0.3 3.7 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.1
    Mineralizing surface/bone surface (%) 10.6 ± 2.2 9.2 ± 1.3 11.8 ± 3.1 9.0 ± 0.5
    Bone formation rate (μm3/μm2/day) 0.34 ± 0.10 0.34 ± 0.05 0.19 ± 0.07 0.17 ± 0.01
TABLE 5.

Biomechanical and chemical properties of Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice and Notch1/2loxP/loxP controls

Biomechanical testing and FTIR imaging (FTIRI) were performed on femurs from 3-month-old. (FTIRI) and 5–6-month-old (mechanical) female Dmp1-Cre+/−;Notch1/2Δ/Δ conditional null mice (Notch1/2Δ/Δ) and control Notch1/2loxP/loxP mice. Values are means ± S.E.; n = 3 for mechanical and n = 6 for chemical properties. *, significantly different from controls, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test; # p < 0.06.

graphic file with name zbc040136076t005.jpg

Femoral Microarchitecture and Histomorphometry of Dmp1-Cre;RosaNotch Mice

The general skeletal phenotype of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice expressing Notch preferentially in osteocytes was described in a previous report from this laboratory and demonstrated no sexual dimorphism (29). Therefore, the experiments we describe in the RosaNotch model were conducted in male mice. In agreement with the former study, femoral μCT of newly created mice revealed that 1-month-old male Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice had a 3-fold increase in trabecular bone volume/tissue volume due to an increase in trabecular number and had a 9-fold increase in connectivity and a 1.5-fold increase in total cross-sectional and 3.5-fold increase in cortical bone area when compared with control mice (Table 6). Histomorphometric analysis of these newly created mice confirmed the increase in trabecular bone volume and revealed decreased osteoclast number and eroded surface and no changes in osteoblast number (Table 6). Calcein and demeclocycline labels were diffuse, and only a few areas of cancellous bone from Dmp1-Cre;RosaNotch mice contained well defined condensed labels; these were used to estimate bone formation, which was suppressed by 75% (p < 0.05). A detailed analysis of the cortical bone revealed that cortical thickness was increased by 3-fold and the periosteal perimeter was increased, whereas the endocortical perimeter was decreased in Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice when compared with RosaNotch littermates. Histomorphometric analysis of the cortical bone revealed a 3-fold increase in the number of osteoblasts on the endocortical surface (Fig. 2), whereas the number of osteoclasts was not changed (not shown). Due to technical reasons, it was difficult to identify and quantify with certainty the cells present on the periosteal surface following the analysis of either methacrylate or paraffin-embedded sections. Mineral apposition rate was increased in both the endocortical and periosteal surfaces of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice when compared with RosaNotch controls. The decrease in endocortical and increase in periosteal perimeter, in conjunction with an increase in mineral apposition rate in Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice, is consistent with an increase in bone formation at cortical sites. This effect contrasts with the decrease in bone resorption observed in cancellous bone. Although trabecular bone volume and cortical thickness were increased in Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice, their biomechanical properties were not different from those of RosaNotch control mice possibly because the cortical bone had increased porosity and a trabecular appearance on μCT. Similarly, the chemical properties were not different from those of control littermates (Table 6).

TABLE 6.

Femoral microarchitecture, assessed by μCT, histomorphometry, and biomechanical and chemical properties of 1-month-old male conditional Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice and RosaNotch controls

μCT, bone histomorphometry, biomechanical testing, and FTIR imaging (FTIRI) were performed on femurs from 1-month-old male Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice (Notch) and control RosaNotch littermates (Control). Values are means ± S.E.; n = 4–6. *, significantly different from controls, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

graphic file with name zbc040136076t006.jpg

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Representative calcein/demeclocycline labeling of mid-diaphysis femoral sections from 1-month-old male Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch conditional mice (Notch) and control RosaNotch littermates (Control) examined under fluorescence microscopy (final magnification, ×400). Bar graphs depict the number of osteoblasts (N.Ob) on endocortical perimeter (Ec.Pm) and mineral apposition rate (MAR) in endocortical (Ec) and periosteal (Ps) surfaces of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch (black bars) and RosaNotch littermate controls (white bars). Values are means ± S.E. (error bars); n = 4–7. *, significantly different from control mice, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

Mechanisms Operational in Dmp1-Cre;RosaNotch Mice

To explore mechanisms that may explain the phenotype of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice, femurs were analyzed for changes in gene expression. Transcript levels for the Notch1 NICD and its target genes Hey1, Hey2, and HeyL were increased in femurs of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice, confirming activation of Notch signaling in skeletal cells (Fig. 3). Immunofluorescence demonstrated Notch1 NICD expression in the bone marrow and femurs of control mice and an increased expression in femurs of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice, although the cells overexpressing Notch1 NICD were difficult to identify with certainty and included osteocytes as well as other cells present in the bone structure. Notch activation caused a 3-fold increase in Opg and a lesser increase (2–2.5-fold) in Rankl expression. Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice exhibited a marked suppression of Sost, the gene encoding for the Wnt antagonist sclerostin, a 60% decrease in Dkk1 mRNA, and an increase in the Wnt target gene Wisp1. In accordance with the suppression of the Wnt antagonists and induction of Wisp1, immunohistochemistry of femoral sections from 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch male mice revealed increased β-catenin expression in comparison with controls, confirming activation of Wnt/β-catenin canonical signaling. Most of the increased β-catenin staining was observed in osteocytes, although some staining was noted in other skeletal cells and in the bone marrow space.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Top, Nicd, Hey1, Hey2, HeyL, osteoprotegerin (Opg), Rankl (Tnfsf11), sclerostin (Sost), Dkk1, and Wnt1-inducible signaling pathway protein 1 (Wisp1) mRNA levels in femoral extracts from 1-month Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch male mice (black bars) and control RosaNotch littermates (white bars). mRNA levels are expressed as copy number corrected for Gapdh and controls normalized to 1. Values are means ± S.E. (error bars), n = 4–8. Middle, representative immunofluorescence of Nicd (green fluorescence) in femoral sections of 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch (Notch) and control RosaNotch littermates (Control) exposed to anti-Nicd or normal IgG and counterstained with DAPI (blue fluorescence). The dashed line outlines the border of the bone marrow to the left and the cortical bone to the right. Bottom panel, representative immunohistochemistry of β-catenin (brown granules) in femoral sections of 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch (Notch) and control RosaNotch littermates (Control) exposed to anti-β-catenin or normal IgG. *, significantly different from control mice, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

Effects of Immobilization on the Skeleton of Dmp1-Cre;RosaNotch Mice

To test whether the preferential Notch activation in osteocytes and consequent induction of Opg and up-regulation of Wnt signaling protected the skeleton from the bone loss that occurs during immobilization, the quadriceps and triceps surae muscle groups of 1-month-old Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch male mice and sex-matched littermate controls were injected with BtxA or saline. Mice were sacrificed 3 weeks later, the known nadir of the effect of BtxA-induced immobilization on bone mass (37). Muscle paralysis was confirmed by the digital abduction test, and saline-injected mice scored 0, whereas Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch and RosaNotch controls injected with BtxA scored (means ± S.E.; n = 5–6) 3.6 ± 0.4 and 3.5 ± 0.5, respectively, confirming adequate paralysis (41). μCT and histomorphometric analysis revealed a 65–70% decrease in femoral trabecular bone volume in control RosaNotch mice secondary to a decrease in trabecular number and thickness and a 20% decrease in cortical bone area (Table 7 and Fig. 4). Connectivity density was markedly decreased, and structure model index revealed a tendency toward rod-like trabeculae. There were no changes in osteoblast number or bone formation, but there was an increase in osteoclast number and a not statistically significant 15% increase in eroded surface. Confirming the phenotype observed in 1-month-old mice, saline-injected Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice exhibited a marked increase in trabecular bone volume compared with RosaNotch controls (Table 7). Dmp1-Cre;RosaNotch mice exhibited trabecularization of the cortex at mid-diaphysis so that it was not possible to discern cortical from cancellous bone, and the tissue filled the entire section so that there was little if any bone marrow cavity space (Fig. 4A, middle). In contrast to the results observed in control mice, BtxA-induced paralysis did not cause a loss of trabecular bone in Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice, so that their trabecular bone volume, microarchitecture, and histomorphometric parameters were not different from those of limbs of the Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice injected with saline. These observations confirm that BtxA-induced immobilization causes bone loss and indicate that activation of Notch in osteocytes can prevent the osteopenia induced by paralysis.

TABLE 7.

Effect of botulinum toxin A-induced immobilization on femoral microarchitecture assessed by μCT and histomorphometry in 7-week-old male conditional Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice and controls

μCT and bone histomorphometry were performed on femurs from 7-week-old male Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice (Notch) and control littermates, injected with saline or BtxA. Values are means ± S.E.; n = 5–6. *, significantly different between saline and BtxA injection, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

graphic file with name zbc040136076t007.jpg

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

A, representative μCT of the distal femur (top), cross-sectional μCT images of the femoral midshaft (middle), and histological sections of distal femur stained with von Kossa (bottom; magnification, 40×) of 7-week-old male Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch conditional mice (Notch) and control RosaNotch littermates following the intramuscular injection of saline or BtxA. B, the selected μCT parameters bone volume/total volume (BV/TV); connectivity density (Conn.D), and cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and the histomorphometric parameters osteoclasts/bone perimeter (N.Oc/BPm), eroded surface/bone surface (ES/BS), and osteoblasts/bone perimeter (N.Ob/BPm) are shown for 7-week-old control (left) and Dmp1-Cre;RosaNotch (right) mice receiving an intramuscular injection of saline (white bars) or BtxA (black bars). Values are means ± S.E. (error bars); n = 5–6. *, significantly different from saline-injected mice, p < 0.05 by unpaired t test.

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate that the inactivation of Notch1 and -2 preferentially in osteocytes causes an increase in cancellous bone volume, but despite the fact that cortical bone is rich in osteocytes, Notch inactivation had modest consequences in this skeletal compartment. There is no apparent explanation for this finding, particularly in light of the marked skeletal phenotype observed when Notch is activated in osteocytes (29). The phenotype of mice harboring a Notch1 and -2 inactivation could be attributed to an initial increase in the number of osteoblasts and a decrease in osteoclast number. It is of interest that there was a late increase in osteoclast number and eroded surface observed only in male Notch1 and -2 conditional null mice, explaining the transient nature of the increase in bone volume in male and the sustained increase in cancellous bone in female mice. The phenotype observed in conditional Notch1 and -2 null male mice and the late increase in bone resorption is similar to the one reported following the deletion of Notch1 and -2 in the limb bud (19). It is possible that Notch1 and -2 conditional null female mice did not exhibit the resorptive phenotype because of the inhibitory effect of estrogens on bone resorption (5355). The findings add credence to the necessity of an independent phenotypic analysis of mice of different sexes (43, 56). The in vivo phenotype described indicates that Notch1 and -2 are not only required for the previously reported role of Notch signaling in skeletal development but also required for postnatal bone remodeling, because the inactivation of Notch1 and -2 in osteocytes leads to an increase in cancellous bone (Fig. 5) (19).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Notch can suppress osteoblastogenesis, thereby inhibiting bone formation, and Notch inactivation results in an increase in bone mass due to an enhanced number of osteoblasts. Notch inhibits osteoclastogenesis; its inactivation results in an increase in osteoclast number and increased bone resorption. Overexpression of Notch in osteocytes has a prevalent impact in cells of the osteoclast lineage; Notch induces osteoprotegerin directly and through inhibition of sclerostin expression and enhancement of Wnt signaling. As a result, Notch decreases osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption and increases cancellous bone volume. In cortical bone, Notch causes increased bone formation possibly by inducing Wnt signaling, but the bone structure has a cancellous bone appearance.

In this study, we confirm earlier observations demonstrating an increase in bone mass following the activation of Notch1 preferentially in osteocytes (29). It is important to note that Notch operated by distinct mechanisms in different bone compartments (Fig. 5). In cancellous bone, resorption was suppressed, whereas in cortical bone, the number of osteoblasts and bone formation were increased. Despite a pronounced increase in bone mass, neither the mechanical nor the chemical properties of bone from Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice were affected. This is consistent with findings in other genetically modified mice displaying suppressed bone resorption. For example, Opg transgenic mice exhibit increased bone volume, but the mechanical properties of bone are not enhanced when compared with controls (57). The osteopetrotic phenotype observed following the preferential activation of Notch1 in osteocytes can be explained by an induction in Opg mRNA with a more modest change in Rankl expression, leading to an inhibition of bone resorption and decreased remodeling of cancellous bone. In fact, an osteopetrotic phenotype is also observed following the inactivation of Rank or Tnfsf11, encoding for Rankl, and the transgenic overexpression of Opg (13, 5759). An additional mechanism involved in the phenotype of Dmp1-Cre+/−;RosaNotch mice is the activation of Wnt signaling secondary to the suppression of the Wnt antagonists sclerostin and Dkk1 (60). This was documented by the demonstration of increased β-catenin in cells present in cancellous bone and the enhanced skeletal expression of the Wnt target gene Wisp1. Wnt signaling induces osteoblastogenesis, and alterations in this signaling pathway result in profound changes in bone mass, and its activation could explain the increased osteoblast number and bone formation observed in cortical bone (6163). In addition, Wnt has a less recognized but important inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, and the constitutive activation of β-catenin in the osteoblast and osteoclast lineages causes osteopetrosis (61, 62, 64). The inhibitory effect of Wnt signaling on bone resorption has been explained by an increase in Opg expression by cells of the osteoblastic lineage and by direct effects on osteoclast precursors independent of Opg (6567). Notch can induce Opg directly in cells of the osteoblastic lineage, possibly by regulating Opg transcription because Opg promoter regions contain multiple CSL (Rbpjκ) consensus sequences, and CSL is the component of the Notch transcription complex that binds to DNA (68). Therefore, the induction of Opg observed following the activation of Notch in osteocytes either could be a direct effect of Notch on Opg expression or could be secondary to enhanced Wnt signaling.

A limitation of the present work is that the expression of Dmp1, used to direct Cre and activate or inactivate Notch, is preferentially but not absolutely selective to osteocytes, and Dmp1 is also expressed by other cells, including terminally mature osteoblasts (69). However, activation of Notch in osteocytes resulted in a unique phenotype that is in contrast to the osteopenic phenotype observed following the activation of Notch in osteoblasts. Because the unloading of the skeleton is characterized by decreased bone formation and increased resorption, leading to bone loss, we postulated that the Notch activation in osteocytes would preserve the bone mass in a model of disuse osteoporosis (37, 39, 40). Microarchitectural and histomorphometric analyses revealed a decrease in trabecular bone volume and an increase in osteoclast surface in BtxA-paralyzed limbs of control mice but not of Notch-expressing mice. These results are congruent with those observed following the conditional inactivation of Tnfsf11 (encoding for Rankl) in osteocytes demonstrating a protective effect from bone loss in a murine tail suspension model (14). They also suggest that by inducing Opg and decreasing bone resorption, Notch can prevent bone loss in experimental models of disuse osteoporosis and possibly following skeletal unloading. In addition, the suppression of Wnt antagonist expression and enhanced cortical bone formation may contribute to the protective effect of Notch. Disuse osteoporosis carries a significant risk of fractures, and to prevent or correct the bone loss would prove highly beneficial to individuals afflicted by this disease. Exploring mechanisms responsible for the disease and ways to correct them should offer important information for the development of future therapies to prevent or ameliorate this type of osteoporosis. This report reveals a unique function of the Notch activation in osteocytes in controlling both cancellous and trabecular bone homeostasis, suggesting that Notch may play a role in mechanotransduction and skeletal adaptation. In support of this hypothesis, recently we found that fluid flow shear stress activates Notch signaling in the osteocytic cell line MLO-Y4.3

In conclusion, Notch activation preferentially in osteocytes leads to an induction of Opg expression and of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, with a consequent suppression of bone resorption in cancellous bone, and enhancement of bone formation in cortical bone. Notch may prevent the bone loss induced by immobilization.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Feng for Dmp1-Cre transgenic mice, F. Radtke for Notch1 and T. Gridley for Notch2 conditional mice, T. Iso for Hey1 and Hey2 cDNAs, C. Niehrs for Dkk1 cDNA, D. Srivastava for HeyL cDNA, R. Wu for Gapdh cDNA, Allison Kent and Mila Spevak for technical assistance, and Mary Yurczak for secretarial support.

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant DK045227 from NIDDK (to E. C.) and Grant AR063049 from NIAMS (to E. C.).

3

E. Canalis, unpublished observations.

2
The abbreviations used are:
NICD
Notch intracellular domain
μCT
microcomputed tomography
BtxA
botulinum toxin A.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Canalis E., Giustina A., Bilezikian J. P. (2007) Mechanisms of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 905–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Seeman E., Delmas P. D. (2006) Bone quality. The material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 2250–2261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Parfitt A. M. (2001) The bone remodeling compartment. A circulatory function for bone lining cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16, 1583–1585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bonewald L. F. (2011) The amazing osteocyte. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 229–238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tatsumi S., Ishii K., Amizuka N., Li M., Kobayashi T., Kohno K., Ito M., Takeshita S., Ikeda K. (2007) Targeted ablation of osteocytes induces osteoporosis with defective mechanotransduction. Cell Metab. 5, 464–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ozcivici E., Luu Y. K., Adler B., Qin Y. X., Rubin J., Judex S., Rubin C. T. (2010) Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 50–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Robling A. G., Niziolek P. J., Baldridge L. A., Condon K. W., Allen M. R., Alam I., Mantila S. M., Gluhak-Heinrich J., Bellido T. M., Harris S. E., Turner C. H. (2008) Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5866–5875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Leblanc A. D., Schneider V. S., Evans H. J., Engelbretson D. A., Krebs J. M. (1990) Bone mineral loss and recovery after 17 weeks of bed rest. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5, 843–850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wakley G. K., Portwood J. S., Turner R. T. (1992) Disuse osteopenia is accompanied by down-regulation of gene expression for bone proteins in growing rats. Am. J. Physiol. 263, E1029–E1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gross T. S., Rubin C. T. (1995) Uniformity of resorptive bone loss induced by disuse. J. Orthop. Res. 13, 708–714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Turner C. H., Pavalko F. M. (1998) Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress. The mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J. Orthop. Sci. 3, 346–355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kamel M. A., Picconi J. L., Lara-Castillo N., Johnson M. L. (2010) Activation of β-catenin signaling in MLO-Y4 osteocytic cells versus 2T3 osteoblastic cells by fluid flow shear stress and PGE2. Implications for the study of mechanosensation in bone. Bone 47, 872–881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nakashima T., Hayashi M., Fukunaga T., Kurata K., Oh-Hora M., Feng J. Q., Bonewald L. F., Kodama T., Wutz A., Wagner E. F., Penninger J. M., Takayanagi H. (2011) Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat. Med. 17, 1231–1234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Xiong J., Onal M., Jilka R. L., Weinstein R. S., Manolagas S. C., O'Brien C. A. (2011) Matrix-embedded cells control osteoclast formation. Nat. Med. 17, 1235–1241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zanotti S., Canalis E. (2010) Notch and the Skeleton. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 886–896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Fortini M. E. (2009) Notch signaling. The core pathway and its posttranslational regulation. Dev. Cell 16, 633–647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mumm J. S., Kopan R. (2000) Notch signaling. From the outside in. Dev. Biol. 228, 151–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sahlgren C., Lendahl U. (2006) Notch signaling and its integration with other signaling mechanisms. Regen. Med. 1, 195–205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hilton M. J., Tu X., Wu X., Bai S., Zhao H., Kobayashi T., Kronenberg H. M., Teitelbaum S. L., Ross F. P., Kopan R., Long F. (2008) Notch signaling maintains bone marrow mesenchymal progenitors by suppressing osteoblast differentiation. Nat. Med. 14, 306–314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zanotti S., Smerdel-Ramoya A., Stadmeyer L., Durant D., Radtke F., Canalis E. (2008) Notch inhibits osteoblast differentiation and causes osteopenia. Endocrinology 149, 3890–3899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Engin F., Yao Z., Yang T., Zhou G., Bertin T., Jiang M. M., Chen Y., Wang L., Zheng H., Sutton R. E., Boyce B. F., Lee B. (2008) Dimorphic effects of Notch signaling in bone homeostasis. Nat. Med. 14, 299–305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zanotti S., Canalis E. (2012) Notch regulation of bone development and remodeling and related skeletal disorders. Calcif. Tissue Int. 90, 69–75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kovall R. A. (2008) More complicated than it looks. Assembly of Notch pathway transcription complexes. Oncogene 27, 5099–5109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nam Y., Sliz P., Song L., Aster J. C., Blacklow S. C. (2006) Structural basis for cooperativity in recruitment of MAML coactivators to Notch transcription complexes. Cell 124, 973–983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Schroeter E. H., Kisslinger J. A., Kopan R. (1998) Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature 393, 382–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wilson J. J., Kovall R. A. (2006) Crystal structure of the CSL-Notch-Mastermind ternary complex bound to DNA. Cell 124, 985–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Pereira R. M., Delany A. M., Durant D., Canalis E. (2002) Cortisol regulates the expression of Notch in osteoblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 85, 252–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zanotti S., Smerdel-Ramoya A., Canalis E. (2011) Reciprocal regulation of Notch and nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT)c1 transactivation in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 4576–4588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Canalis E., Parker K., Feng J. Q., Zanotti S. (2013) Osteoblast lineage-specific effects of Notch activation in the skeleton. Endocrinology 154, 623–634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. McCright B., Lozier J., Gridley T. (2006) Generation of new Notch2 mutant alleles. Genesis 44, 29–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Radtke F., Wilson A., Stark G., Bauer M., van Meerwijk J., MacDonald H. R., Aguet M. (1999) Deficient T cell fate specification in mice with an induced inactivation of Notch1. Immunity 10, 547–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lu Y., Xie Y., Zhang S., Dusevich V., Bonewald L. F., Feng J. Q. (2007) DMP1-targeted Cre expression in odontoblasts and osteocytes. J Dent. Res 86, 320–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Murtaugh L. C., Stanger B. Z., Kwan K. M., Melton D. A. (2003) Notch signaling controls multiple steps of pancreatic differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 14920–14925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Stanger B. Z., Datar R., Murtaugh L. C., Melton D. A. (2005) Direct regulation of intestinal fate by Notch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12443–12448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Buchholz F., Ringrose L., Angrand P. O., Rossi F., Stewart A. F. (1996) Different thermostabilities of FLP and Cre recombinases. Implications for applied site-specific recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4256–4262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sauer B., Henderson N. (1988) Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 5166–5170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Grimston S. K., Goldberg D. B., Watkins M., Brodt M. D., Silva M. J., Civitelli R. (2011) Connexin43 deficiency reduces the sensitivity of cortical bone to the effects of muscle paralysis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 2151–2160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Manske S. L., Boyd S. K., Zernicke R. F. (2010) Muscle and bone follow similar temporal patterns of recovery from muscle-induced disuse due to botulinum toxin injection. Bone 46, 24–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Poliachik S. L., Bain S. D., Threet D., Huber P., Gross T. S. (2010) Transient muscle paralysis disrupts bone homeostasis by rapid degradation of bone morphology. Bone 46, 18–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Warner S. E., Sanford D. A., Becker B. A., Bain S. D., Srinivasan S., Gross T. S. (2006) Botox induced muscle paralysis rapidly degrades bone. Bone 38, 257–264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Aoki K. R. (2001) A comparison of the safety margins of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, B, and F in mice. Toxicon 39, 1815–1820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bouxsein M. L., Boyd S. K., Christiansen B. A., Guldberg R. E., Jepsen K. J., Müller R. (2010) Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 1468–1486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Glatt V., Canalis E., Stadmeyer L., Bouxsein M. L. (2007) Age-related changes in trabecular architecture differ in female and male C57BL/6J mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22, 1197–1207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Dempster D. W., Compston J. E., Drezner M. K., Glorieux F. H., Kanis J. A., Malluche H., Meunier P. J., Ott S. M., Recker R. R., Parfitt A. M. (2013) Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry. A 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 2–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Parfitt A. M., Drezner M. K., Glorieux F. H., Kanis J. A., Malluche H., Meunier P. J., Ott S. M., Recker R. R. (1987) Bone histomorphometry. Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2, 595–610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gourion-Arsiquaud S., Lukashova L., Power J., Loveridge N., Reeve J., Boskey A. L. (2013) Fourier transform infrared imaging of femoral neck bone. Reduced heterogeneity of mineral-to-matrix and carbonate-to-phosphate and more variable crystallinity in treatment-naive fracture cases compared with fracture-free controls. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 150–161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nazarenko I., Pires R., Lowe B., Obaidy M., Rashtchian A. (2002) Effect of primary and secondary structure of oligodeoxyribonucleotides on the fluorescent properties of conjugated dyes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 2089–2195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Nazarenko I., Lowe B., Darfler M., Ikonomi P., Schuster D., Rashtchian A. (2002) Multiplex quantitative PCR using self-quenched primers labeled with a single fluorophore. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Iso T., Sartorelli V., Chung G., Shichinohe T., Kedes L., Hamamori Y. (2001) HERP, a new primary target of Notch regulated by ligand binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6071–6079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Nakagawa O., Nakagawa M., Richardson J. A., Olson E. N., Srivastava D. (1999) HRT1, HRT2, and HRT3. A new subclass of bHLH transcription factors marking specific cardiac, somitic, and pharyngeal arch segments. Dev. Biol. 216, 72–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Glinka A., Wu W., Delius H., Monaghan A. P., Blumenstock C., Niehrs C. (1998) Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 391, 357–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Tso J. Y., Sun X. H., Kao T. H., Reece K. S., Wu R. (1985) Isolation and characterization of rat and human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNAs. Genomic complexity and molecular evolution of the gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 2485–2502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Khosla S. (2010) Update on estrogens and the skeleton. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 3569–3577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Shevde N. K., Bendixen A. C., Dienger K. M., Pike J. W. (2000) Estrogens suppress RANK ligand-induced osteoclast differentiation via a stromal cell independent mechanism involving c-Jun repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 7829–7834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Srivastava S., Toraldo G., Weitzmann M. N., Cenci S., Ross F. P., Pacifici R. (2001) Estrogen decreases osteoclast formation by down-regulating receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-induced JNK activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 8836–8840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Blaustein J. D. (2012) Animals have a sex, and so should titles and methods sections of articles in Endocrinology. Endocrinology 153, 2539–2540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ominsky M. S., Stolina M., Li X., Corbin T. J., Asuncion F. J., Barrero M., Niu Q. T., Dwyer D., Adamu S., Warmington K. S., Grisanti M., Tan H. L., Ke H. Z., Simonet W. S., Kostenuik P. J. (2009) One year of transgenic overexpression of osteoprotegerin in rats suppressed bone resorption and increased vertebral bone volume, density, and strength. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24, 1234–1246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Dougall W. C., Glaccum M., Charrier K., Rohrbach K., Brasel K., De Smedt T., Daro E., Smith J., Tometsko M. E., Maliszewski C. R., Armstrong A., Shen V., Bain S., Cosman D., Anderson D., Morrissey P. J., Peschon J. J., Schuh J. (1999) RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev. 13, 2412–2424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Simonet W. S., Lacey D. L., Dunstan C. R., Kelley M., Chang M. S., Lüthy R., Nguyen H. Q., Wooden S., Bennett L., Boone T., Shimamoto G., DeRose M., Elliott R., Colombero A., Tan H. L., Trail G., Sullivan J., Davy E., Bucay N., Renshaw-Gegg L., Hughes T. M., Hill D., Pattison W., Campbell P., Sander S., Van G., Tarpley J., Derby P., Lee R., Boyle W. J. (1997) Osteoprotegerin. A novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 89, 309–319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Ke H. Z., Richards W. G., Li X., Ominsky M. S. (2012) Sclerostin and dickkopf-1 as therapeutic targets in bone diseases. Endocr. Rev. 33, 747–783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Monroe D. G., McGee-Lawrence M. E., Oursler M. J., Westendorf J. J. (2012) Update on Wnt signaling in bone cell biology and bone disease. Gene 492, 1–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Glass D. A., 2nd, Bialek P., Ahn J. D., Starbuck M., Patel M. S., Clevers H., Taketo M. M., Long F., McMahon A. P., Lang R. A., Karsenty G. (2005) Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev. Cell 8, 751–764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Holmen S. L., Zylstra C. R., Mukherjee A., Sigler R. E., Faugere M. C., Bouxsein M. L., Deng L., Clemens T. L., Williams B. O. (2005) Essential role of β-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 21162–21168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wei W., Zeve D., Suh J. M., Wang X., Du Y., Zerwekh J. E., Dechow P. C., Graff J. M., Wan Y. (2011) Biphasic and dosage-dependent regulation of osteoclastogenesis by β-catenin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4706–4719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Albers J., Keller J., Baranowsky A., Beil F. T., Catala-Lehnen P., Schulze J., Amling M., Schinke T. (2013) Canonical Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclastogenesis independent of osteoprotegerin. J. Cell Biol. 200, 537–549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Chen J., Long F. (2013) β-Catenin promotes bone formation and suppresses bone resorption in postnatal growing mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 1160–1169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Sato M. M., Nakashima A., Nashimoto M., Yawaka Y., Tamura M. (2009) Bone morphogenetic protein-2 enhances Wnt/β-catenin signaling-induced osteoprotegerin expression. Genes Cells 14, 141–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Cartharius K., Frech K., Grote K., Klocke B., Haltmeier M., Klingenhoff A., Frisch M., Bayerlein M., Werner T. (2005) MatInspector and beyond. Promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 21, 2933–2942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kalajzic I., Matthews B. G., Torreggiani E., Harris M. A., Divieti Pajevic P., Harris S. E. (2013) In vitro and in vivo approaches to study osteocyte biology. Bone 54, 296–306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES