Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1970 Mar;19(3):401–408. doi: 10.1128/am.19.3.401-408.1970

Salmonellae in Fish Meal Plants: Relative Amounts of Contamination at Various Stages of Processing and a Method of Control

George K Morris 1, William T Martin 1, William H Shelton 1, Joy G Wells 1, Philip S Brachman 1
PMCID: PMC376700  PMID: 5462260

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that Menhaden fish meal, a common ingredient of animal feeds, is frequently contaminated with salmonellae. Animals that eat contaminated feed may become infected. If they, in turn, are eaten by humans, they may be a means by which salmonellae are introduced into the human population. Epidemiological studies of the fish-meal industry were carried out to determine the sources of salmonellae in fish meal and the factors affecting the persistence and survival of salmonellae during the processing of fish meal. Examination of 190 fish immediately after they came from the Gulf of Mexico revealed no salmonellae, but salmonellae were frequently isolated from samples of fish taken from the boats when they arrived at the plants. Salmonellae were also frequently isolated from dockside water at each of the plants. Approximately 50% of the samples taken in the raw fish processing areas were contaminated with salmonellae. The percentage of samples yielding salmonellae decreased progressively through the various sequences of processing, but more than 15% of the samples taken from the finished products were also positive. Salmonellae were isolated from the raw area of the plant most frequently while the plant was operating and less frequently when the plant was idle, whereas in the processing area of the plant the reverse was true. Salmonellae appeared to survive and multiply in the processing area of the plant while the plant was idle, which resulted in contamination of the first portion of each day's production. Salmonellae in the processed fish meal were reduced to nondetectable levels by reprocessing the first 45 min of each day's production.

Full text

PDF
408

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carlson V. L., Snoeyenbos G. H., McKie B. A., Smyser C. F. A comparison of incubation time and temperature for the isolation of salmonella. Avian Dis. 1967 May;11(2):217–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harvey R. W., Price T. H. Elevated temperature incubation of enrichment media for the isolation of salmonellas from heavily contaminated materials. J Hyg (Lond) 1968 Sep;66(3):377–381. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400041243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. JAMESON J. E. A discussion of the dynamics of Salmonella enrichment. J Hyg (Lond) 1962 Jun;60:193–207. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400039462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MOORE B., PERRY E. L., CHARD S. T. A survey by the sewage swab method of latent enteric infection in an urban area. J Hyg (Lond) 1952 Jun;50(2):137–156. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400019501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES