Abstract
Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC) is a rare malignancy with high local invasiveness. To date, there is no consensus on the imaging characteristics of NACC. To address this, we retrospectively reviewed 10 cases of NACC and summarized the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. MR images of 10 patients with histologically validated NACC were reviewed by two experienced radiologists. The location, shape, margin, signal intensity, lesion texture, contrast enhancement patterns, local invasion, and cervical lymphadenopathy of all tumors were evaluated. Clinical and pathologic records were also reviewed. No patients were positive for antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The imaging patterns of primary tumors were classified into two types as determined by location, shape, and margin. Of all patients, 7 had tumors with a type 1 imaging pattern and 3 had tumors with a type 2 imaging pattern. The 4 tubular NACCs were all homogeneous tumors, whereas 3 (60%) of 5 cribriform NACCs and the sole solid NACC were heterogeneous tumors with separations or central necrosis on MR images. Five patients had perineural infiltration and intracranial involvement, and only 2 had cervical lymphadenopathy. Based on these results, we conclude that NACC is a local, aggressive neoplasm that is often negative for EBV infection and associated with a low incidence of cervical lymphadenopathy. Furthermore, MRI features of NACC vary in locations and histological subtypes.
Keywords: Neoplasm of the nasopharynx, adenoid cystic carcinoma, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) was first described by Billroth in 1856 and deemed cylindroma. Since then, this type of cancer has been called many other names, but the term ACC has gained general acceptance in recent years. ACC is the most common malignancy of the submandibular and minor salivary glands, but it also occurs in other glandular tissues, such as lacrimal glands, Bartholin's glands, ceruminous glands of the external auditory canal, and glands of the esophagus, breast, prostate, and cervix. ACC accounts for less than 1% of all head and neck cancers and less than 10% of all salivary gland neoplasms, but it accounts for about 40% of all malignancies of the salivary glands[1]. Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC) is a rare malignancy of the nasopharynx, with primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma (including NACC) representing less than 0.48% of all nasopharyngeal malignancies[2].
We have noted in our daily clinical imaging practice that NACC can be easily misdiagnosed as nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (NSCC). Although a few previous studies have reported the imaging features of ACC in major salivary glands[3],[4], imaging literature on NACC is limited. Most previous reports regarding NACC described either the imaging features in a single case or the clinical experience[5],[6]. Clear consensus on the imaging characteristics of NACC has not been reached. In this study, we summarized the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in 10 patients with histologically validated NACC.
Patients and Methods
Patient information
Ten patients with histologically confirmed NACC were treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between November 2007 and February 2010. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The clinical records of these patients, including age, sex, clinical symptoms, nasopharyngeal fiberscope reports, laboratory examinations, treatments, and follow-up information, were reviewed. The diagnosis was made based on histological examinations of biopsy specimens collected from primary nasopharyngeal tumors. Three subtypes, tubular, cribriform, and solid, were classified according to the degree of cellular differentiation. All patients were restaged according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Imaging protocol
All patients underwent MRI scans of the nasopharynx and neck before treatment. MRI was performed using a 1.5 Tesla unit (Signa Horizon LX Highspeed or Signa Horizon DX Highspeed, General Electric Medical Systems, USA) with a head and neck combined coil. For all patients, the following sequences were obtained: non-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (T1WI) in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes; non-contrast-enhanced T2-weighted images (T2WI) in the axial plane; contrast-enhanced T1WI in the axial and sagittal planes; and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1WI in the coronal plane. Gadopentate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg of body weight) was administered by intravenous bolus injection for contrast-enhanced sequences.
The imaging sequences were performed with the parameters described here. Non-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) images in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes were obtained, with repetition time/echo time of 420-450 ms/minimum full, 2 excitations, a 22 cm field of view (FOV), a 320 × 224 frequency matrix, a 5.0 mm thick section, and a 1.0 mm intersection gap. Non-contrast-enhanced axial T2-weighted FSE images in the axial plane were obtained, with repetition time/echo time of 3200-3500 ms/85 ms, 2 excitations, a 22 cm FOV, a 320 × 224 frequency matrix, a 5.0 mm thick section, and a 1.0 mm intersection gap. Contrast enhanced T1-weighted images in the axial and sagittal planes and contrast enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images in the coronal plane were obtained, with repetition time/echo time of 320-350 ms/minimum full, 1 excitations, a 22 cm FOV, a 512 × 224 frequency matrix, a 5.0 mm thick section, and a 1.0 mm intersection gap.
Image assessment
Two experienced radiologists evaluated the MR images. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. All MR images were viewed on a picture archiving and communication system workstation monitor (Centricity RA1000 Workstation V.3.0, GE Healthcare).
MRI features of primary tumors
MRI features of primary tumors that were evaluated included location, shape, margin (clear or unclear), signal intensity (hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense compared to adjacent muscles), lesion texture (homogeneous or heterogeneous), and contrast enhancement patterns (homogeneous or heterogeneous; strong, moderate, or absent). Contrast enhancement patterns were considered strong if the degree of enhancement was similar to that of normal mucosa, moderate if the degree of enhancement was less than that of normal mucosa, and absent if the lesion showed no signal increase. The imaging patterns of primary tumors were classified into two types as determined by location, shape, and margins: type 1, an irregular neoplasm with unclear margin in one or several walls of the nasopharynx (Figure 1); and type 2, a regular neoplasm with clear margin (type 2a) (Figure 2) or an irregular neoplasm with unclear margin (type 2b) (Figure 3) in the parapharyngeal space.
Evaluation of local invasion on MRI
Tumor invasion of regional structures included involvement of the nasal concha, paranasal sinus, oropharynx, parapharyngeal space, spatia masseterica, pterygopalatine fossa, skull base bone, cranial nerves, and intracalvarium. Oropharynx involvement was defined as tumor involvement below the inferior border of the Axis[7]. Parapharyngeal involvement was defined as posterolateral infiltration of tumor beyond the pharyngobasilar fascia[7]. Skull base invasion was defined as the presence of low-intensity tissue in the high-signal bone marrow on non-contrast-echanced T1WI images and with enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI images. Infiltration of the cranial nerves was diagnosed by thickness of the cranial nerves and enlargement of the foramina nervosas.
MRI criteria of cervical lymphadenopathy
Regional lymphadenopathy was also evaluated. Cervical lymphadenopathy was subdivided into specific anatomic subsites according to imaging-based delineation of cervical lymph nodes[8]. The diagnosis of nodal involvement was made radiologically on the demonstration of one or more of the following criteria[9]: central necrosis, extracapsular neoplastic spread, and size (shortest axial diameter equal to or greater than 5 mm in the retropharyngeal region, 11 mm in the jugulodigastric region, and 10 mm in all other regions of the neck; or a group of three or more nodes that were borderline in size in all cervical regions).
Results
Clinical characteristics
Clinical characteristics of all 10 patients are summarized in Table 1. There were 7 men and 3 women aged from 25 to 67 years (median, 51 years). The most common clinical symptoms included tinnitus (n = 6), headache (n = 4), epistaxis (n = 4), and hearing loss (n = 3). The duration of disease was variable, ranging from 0.5 to 24 months (median, 7.5 months). Trigeminal paralysis was found in 3 patients. Nasopharyngoscopic examination revealed that 8 patients had protrusions and 2 had lumps or nodular tumors in one or several walls of the nasopharynx. Of the 8 patients with protrusions in the nasopharyngeal walls, 4 had smooth protrusion surfaces and 4 had unsmooth protrusion surfaces. No patients were positive for antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Of the 10 cases of NACC, 4 were tubular, 5 were cribriform, and 1 was solid (Figures 1–3); I was at stage II, 3 at stage III, and 6 at stage IV. Three patients had cervical lymphadenopathy, and the only one patient with solid ACC had lung metastasis (case 10). These patients were treated with radiotherapy (n = 6), chemoradiotherapy (n = 3), or surgical resection plus radiotherapy (n = 1). Only one patient (case 3) had local recurrence in 18 months after treatment. The follow-up time ranged from 8 to 35 months and all patients were alive at the time of this investigation.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 10 patients with Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC).
No | Age | Sex | Clinical symptoms | Duration of symptoms (months) | Mucosa changes | Nerve palsy | Antibody of EBV | Pathologic types | Stage | Treatment | Recurrence |
1 | 51 | M | Nasal obstruction; epistaxis; tinnitus in the right ear | 3 | Protrusion in the roof and posterior wall | V1,2,3(+) | (-) | Cribriform | T4N0M0 | Radiotherapy; adjuvant chemotherapy | No |
2 | 56 | F | Headache; bilateral tinnitus; pharyngalgia | 5 | Protrusion in the right wall | (-) | Tubular | T3N0M0 | Radiotherapy | No | |
3 | 67 | M | Nasal obstruction; epistaxis | 12 | Nodular tumour in the roof | (-) | Tubular | T3N0M0 | Radiotherapy | Yes; 1.5 years after treatment | |
4 | 40 | M | Epistaxis; bilateral hearing loss | 6 | Lump in the roof and posterior wall | (-) | Cribriform | T2bN0M0 | Surgical resection; radiotherapy | No | |
5 | 40 | M | Tinnitus in the right ear; headache | 1 | Protrusion in the right wall with smooth surface | (-) | Cribriform | T3N0M0 | Radiotherapy | No | |
6 | 38 | M | Tinnitus and hearing loss in the right ear | 2 | Protrusion in the right wall with smooth surface | (-) | Cribriform | T4N1M0 | Radiotherapy; adjuvant chemotherapy | No | |
7 | 54 | M | Tinnitus in the right ear; restriction of mouth opening | 24 | Protrusion in the roof and posterior wall | (-) | Tubular | T4N2M0 | Radiotherapy; adjuvant chemotherapy | No | |
8 | 51 | F | Headache; diplopia; facial anesthesia; hearing loss | 3 | Protrusion in the left wall | V1,2,3(+) | (-) | Cribriform | T4N1M0 | Radiotherapy | No |
9 | 64 | M | Epistaxis; pharyngalgia | 0.5 | Protrusion in the roof and posterior wall with smooth surface | (-) | Tubular | T4N0M0 | Radiotherapy | No | |
10 | 25 | F | Headache; tinnitus in the right ear; restriction of mouth opening | 18 | Protrusion in the right wall with smooth surface | V3(+) | (-) | Solid | T4N0M1 | Radiotherapy; adjuvant chemotherapy | No; with lung metastasis |
MM features of NACCs
Imaging types of NACC
MRI features of 10 patients with NACCs are listed in Table 2. Of 10 patients, 7 had tumors in one or several walls of the nasopharynx, and 3 had tumors in the parapharyngeal space. All 7 patients with tumors in the nasopharyngeal walls had irregular neoplasms with unclear margin. Of 3 patients with tumors in the parapharyngeal space, 2 had regular neoplasms with clear margin, 1 had an irregular neoplasm with unclear margin. According to these features, 7 tumors were classified into morphological type 1, and 3 were classified into type 2, which included type 2a (n = 2) and type 2b (n = 1). The 7 tumors classified as morphological type 1 included 3 tubular ACCs and 4 cribriform ACCs. The tumors classified as morphological type 2a were both cribriform ACCs, whereas the tumor classified as morphological type 2b was solid ACC.
Table 2. MR imaging features of 10 patients with NACC.
No | Imaging pattern | Location | Shape | Margin | T1WI | T2WI | Uniformity | Contrast enhancement pattern | Encroachment of adjacent structures | Skull base | Infiltration of cranial nerves and intracal. | Lymphade-nopathy |
1 | I | Right, roof, and posterior wall of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-intensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Homogeneous | Strong; homogeneous | Right nasal concha; right ethmoid sinus; right maxillary sinus; right parapharyngeal space; right spatia masseterica; right pterygopalatine fossa | (+) | Right V2,3(+); right trigeminal ganglion; mass in right temple and thickening of cerebral dura mater in right temporal pole | (-) |
2 | I | Right, roof, and posterior wall of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Homogeneous | Strong; homogeneous | (-) | (+) | (-) | (-) |
3 | I | Right, left, and roof of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Homogeneous | Strong; homogeneous | (-) | (+) | (-) | (-) |
4 | I | Right wall, right part of roof, and posterior wall of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Homogeneous | Strong; homogeneous | Right parapharyngeal space | (-) | (-) | (-) |
5 | I | Roof and posterior wall of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Heterogeneous; central necrosis | Strong; heterogeneous | Right parapharyngeal | (+) | (-) | (-) |
6 | IIa | Left parapharyngeal space | Regular; ovoid; 21 mm × 35 mm × 40 mm | Clear | Iso-tensity | Hyper-tensity | Heterogeneous; hypointensity separations | Strong; heterogeneous; absent in separations | Left parapharyngeal space; left spatia masseterica | (-) | (-) | (-) |
7 | I | Right, left roof, and posterior wall of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Homogeneous | Strong; homogeneous | Bilateral parapharyngeal spaces, soft palate, lateral wall of the oropharynx, right spatia masseterica, and bilateral pterygopalatine fossa | (+) | Left cavernous sinus; right foramen lacerum | Left level IIa, IIb |
8 | IIa | Left parapharyngeal space | Regular; ovoid; 34 mm × 51 mm × 54 mm | Clear | Iso-tensity | Hyper-tensity | Heterogeneous; hypointensity separations | Strong; heterogeneous; absent in separations | Left parapharyngeal space; sphenoidal sinus | (+) | Left V2,3(+); left trigeminal ganglion;left cavernous sinus | Left regional lymph node; left level IIa |
9 | I | Left, roof, and posterior wall of the nasopharynx | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | Slightly hyper-tensity | Homogeneous | Strong; homogeneous | Left parapharyngeal space; left spatia masseterica; left pterygopalatine fossa; left orbita; left wall of the oropharynx | (+) | (-) | |
10 | IIb | Right parapharyngeal space | Irregular | Unclear | Iso-tensity | slightly hyper-tensity | Heterogeneous separations | Strong; heterogeneous; absent in separations | Right parapharyngeal space; right spatia masseterica; right pterygopalatine fossa | (+) | Right V2,3(+); right cavernous sinus; muscular dystrophy in right masticatory muscles | (-) |
MRI signals of NACC
Six tumors had homogeneous texture with isointense signal on pre-contrast T1WI, slightly hyperintense signal on pre-contrast T2WI, and strong enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI. Of 4 tumors with heterogeneous texture, 3 (cases 6, 8, and 10) had separations that were hypointense signal on pre-contrast T2WI and without enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI, and 1 (case 5) had central necrosis. Notably, all the tubular NACCs were homogeneous tumors on MRI, and all heterogeneous tumors with separations or central necrosis were cribriform or solid NACCs.
Local invasion and cervical lymphadenopathy
Tumors in all 10 patients encroached into adjacent structures in the head and neck, including the parapharyngeal space (n = 8), skull base (n = 8), spatia masseterica (n = 5), pterygopalatine fossa (n = 4), paranasal sinus (n = 2), oropharynx (n = 2), nasal concha (n = 1), soft palate (n = 1), and orbit (n = 1) (Figures 1, 3, and 4). Five patients had intracranial involvement: 4 had tumors invaded through both the foramen rotundum and foramen ovale with thickened cranial nerves, 1 had tumors invaded through an enlarged foramen lacerum. Among these 5 patients, 2 had tubular tumors, 2 had cribriform tumors, and 1 had solid tumors. Two patients, one with a tubular tumor and the other with a cribriform tumor, had regional enlarged lymph nodes with a round or ovoid shape and without central necrosis or extracapsular neoplastic spread.
Discussion
ACC is the most common histological subtype of salivary gland malignancies, but it is very rare in the nasopharynx, with relatively few cases reported in the literature. To our knowledge, the current study is one of the largest retrospective studies summarizing the MRI features of NACC published to date. Our study indicated the following: (1) NACC was a local, aggressive neoplasm with negative laboratory test results for EBV infection and low incidence of cervical lymphadenopathy; (2) MRI features of NACC were various, depending on different locations and histiological subtypes; and (3) MRI was a valuable tool for diagnosis, tumor staging, and prognosis prediction of NACC.
Clinical characteristics of NACC
ACC predominantly occurs in adults, with a peak incidence in the fourth through sixth decades of life[10]. In accordance with the literature, the median age of patients with NACCs in this study was 51 years. Furthermore, ACC was reported to be more common in women in the literature[6],[10], but there was a male predominance for NACC in the present study. Similar to NSCCs, NACCs vary in presentation from an asymptomatic mass to severe ear and neurological symptoms, such as ear pain, fullness, tinnitus, glue ear, dizziness, hearing loss, facial pain, unilateral migraine-like headache, paresthesias, numbness, sensory loss across the trigeminal nerve course, and abducens or oculomotor nerve deficits[5]. In our patients, tinnitus, headache, epistaxis, and hearing loss were the most common clinical symptoms. Trigeminal paralysis was also found in 3 patients. In accordance with the previous report by Liu et al.[6], none of our patients tested positive for EBV antibodies, indicating that EBV had no close relationship to the incidence of NACC. Notably, unlike the appearance of patients with NPSCC, some patients with NACC had smooth mucosal surfaces, though with protrusions in the walls of nasopharynx. We hypothesize that this is partly because NACC originates in the minor salivary glands of the submucosal region of the nasopharyngeal cavity and/or parapharyngeal space. Tumors with invasion to the nasopharyngeal mucosa may have unsmooth mucosal surfaces, whereas tumors without invasion to mucosa may have smooth mucosal surfaces.
The three main histological patterns of ACC, tubular, cribriform, and solid[11], reflect various degrees of progression of cellular differentiation and aggressiveness of biological behavior. The tubular subtype is the most differentiated form and the second most frequent, and the cribriform subtype is less differentiated than the tubular subtype and the most common pattern. The least differentiated and thus the most malignant and aggressive form is the solid subtype, accounting for 10% of ACC cases[12]. In this study, significant correlation between these histological patterns and NACC prognosis could not be demonstrated because of the small number of cases and the short time of follow-up. However, the only patient with solid NACC in our series had lung metastasis at the first visit, which might suggest the aggressive propensity of the solid subtype.
The main therapy for NACC is surgical resection[13],[14]. Today, skull base surgery facilitates total resection of limited NACC lesions. The main problem is the high local recurrence rate due to invasion to the cranial nerves. Advanced tumors, especially those with skull base invasion and intracranial involvement, are difficult to resect completely. Neutron radiotherapy is also used to treat NACC. Buchholz et al.[15] reported that the local control rate of patients with head and neck ACC was approximately 100% for a 5-year period. In our study, 9 of 10 patients underwent radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy due to advanced tumor stage and high incidence of cranial nerve infiltration and intracranial involvement.
MM features of NACC
Accurate pretreatment imaging diagnosis and initial imaging evaluation of NACC are necessary not only in the selection of treatment strategies, but also in the guidance of surgical resection and definition of target volume in radiotherapy. In recent years, accumulated MRI data of nasopharyngeal tumors suggest that MRI is currently the best technique for achieving an accurate diagnosis and evaluation of nasopharyngeal neoplasm extension. Previous reports of MRI on head and neck ACC showed that MRI had advantages in the detection, display of the extent, and staging of tumors[3],[4]. NACC is a malignancy of the minor salivary glands, which exist in two areas of the nasopharynx: the submucosal regions of pharyngonasal cavity and the parapharyngeal space. In our patients, the tumors with a type 1 imaging pattern might originate in the former location, whereas the tumors with a type 2 imaging pattern might originate in the latter. On MR images, NACCs that originated in the submucosal minor salivary glands tended to be irregular lesions with unclear margin. On the contrary, those that originated in the minor salivary glands of the parapharyngeal space often had a regular shape and clear margin. Sigal et al.[3] found that signal intensity on the T2-weighted images correlated with the degree of cellularity of head and neck ACC. Tumors with high signal intensity corresponded to lesions with low cellularity, which was associated with the best prognosis. In contrast, lesions with low signal intensity correlated with dense cellularity and poor outcome. In our patients, all tubular NACCs appeared as lesions with homogeneous and slightly hyperintense signal, whereas 3 of 5 cribriform NACCs and the only solid NACC exhibited hypointense signal separations or central necrosis on T2-weighted images. Thus, these results likely corroborate the relationship between signal intensity and cellularity.
NACC has a high potential for local invasion. Similar to patients presenting with NSCC, local NACC spreads stepwise from proximal sites to more distal sites. The parapharyngeal space, skull base, and spatia masseterica were the most common sites invaded by NACC in our study. Sigal et al.[3] found that MR images might cause misdiagnosis of the severity of head and neck ACCs, especially in skull base invasion. Changes in signal intensity on MR images might be caused by direct extension of the tumor to the skull base but also by edematous changes.
ACC is well known for its propensity to spread through the nerves. In the present study, 40% (4/10) of patients with NACC had cranial nerve infiltration. Notably, only 3 had clinical nerve palsy. Several studies reported that neoplasms might exist in the nerves shown up on MR images but didn't produce symptoms for many years[4],[16]. There may be two reasons for this phenomenon. One is that tumors spread through the perineural space without involvement of nerve fiber. Misdiagnosis on MRI is also responsible for detection of more cranial nerve infiltration than pathologic examination. Inflammatory or edematous enlargement of the nerves may simulate neural extension of tumors on MR images. Nerve enlargement and contrast enhancement are suggestive of NACC, but perineural extension is not specific and may be seen in other neoplasms such as SCC, which is the most common neoplasm of the nasopharynx. In a previous study, Liang et al.[7] found that 26.4% of patients with NSCC had tumor infiltration in the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve.
NACC has a low incidence of cervical lymphadenopathy, accounting for only 20% (2/10) of the cases in the present study. Liu et al.[6] and Wang et al.[17] reported that the incidence of cervical metastasis in patients with NACC were 3.8% and 15%, respectively, which were much lower than other malignancies of the nasopharynx such as NSCC (64.7%–78.3%)[18],[19] and nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (71.6%)[20],[21].
NACC with a type 1 imaging pattern must be radiologically differentiated from inflammatory disease, such as nasopharyngeal adenoid hyperplasia, and other malignancies, including NSCC and nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Adenoid hyperplasia usually manifests as symmetrical thickening of the roof and posterior wall of the nasopharynx with homogeneous signal intensity on MR images and without deep invasion to adjacent tissues. In patients with NSCC, positive laboratory test results for EBV infection[22] and metastasis of regional lymph nodes are much more frequent than in patients with NACC. Diffuse and symmetrical tumors in the nasopharyngeal cavity without deep invasion, diffuse and bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, and involvement of palatine tonsils are the characteristics of patients with nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[20],[21]. In abstract, NACC with a type 2 imaging pattern must be differentiated from other tumors in the parapharygeal space, such as neurogenic tumors and pleomorphic adenoma of the minor salivary glands. However, because of their hypointense signal separations on T2-weighted images, strong ability for local invasion, and propensity for invading cranial nerves, this type of NACC is relatively easy to differentiate from those tumor types.
The limitations of this study included: (1) that because the disease is rare, the patient cohort was too small to draw definitive conclusions from; and (2) that although the current MRI methods employed in the study provided useful information, functional MRI, such as diffusion, perfusion, and MR spectroscopy, would provide additional insight into NACC. Studies of NACC with large sample size and functional imaging methods should be carried out in the future.
Conclusions
NACC is a local, aggressive neoplasm with negative laboratory test results for EBV infection and a low incidence of cervical lymphadenopathy. MRI is a valuable tool not only for diagnosis and tumor staging, but also for prognosis prediction of NACC.
References
- 1.Batsakis JG, Luna MA, El-Naggar A. Histopathologic grading of salivary gland neoplasms: III. Adenoid cystic carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99(12):1007–1009. doi: 10.1177/000348949009901215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.He J H, Zong YS, Luo R Z, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2003;22(7):753–757. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sigal R, Monnet O, de Baere T, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: evaluation with MR imaging and clinical-pathologic correlation in 27 patients. Radiology. 1992;184(1):95–101. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1319079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nemzek WR, Hecht S, Gandour-Edwards R, et al. Perineural spread of head and neck tumors: how accurate is MR imaging? Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19(4):701–706. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Papadas T, Chorianopoulos D, Mastronikolis N. Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: a rare nasopharyngeal tumor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007;11(1):55–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu TR, Yang AK, Guo X, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the nasopharynx: 27-year experience. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(11):1981–1988. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181801d23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liang SB, Sun Y, Liu LZ, et al. Extension of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma detected by magnetic resonance imaging: improvement of clinical target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(3):742–750. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gregoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK, et al. CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2003;69(3):227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kimura Y, Sumi M, Sakihama N, et al. MR imaging criteria for the prediction of extranodal spread of metastatic cancer in the neck. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(7):1355–1359. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rapidis AD, Givalos N, Gakiopoulou H, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Clinicopathological analysis of 23 patients and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(3):328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Perzin KH, Gullane P, Clairmont AC. Adenoid cystic carcinomas arising in salivary glands: a correlation of histologic features and clinical course. Cancer. 1978;42(1):265–282. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197807)42:1<265::aid-cncr2820420141>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: factors influencing survival. Am J Surg. 1979;138(4):579–583. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90423-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schramm VL, Jr, Imola MJ. Management of nasopharyngeal salivary gland malignancy. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(9):1533–1544. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200109000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qing J, Zhang Q, Wei MW, et al. Prognostic analysis of adenoid cystic carcinoma of major salivary glands of 64 cases. Ai Zheng. 2006;25(9):1138–1143. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buchholz TA, Shimotakahara SG, Weymuller EA, Jr, et al. Neutron radiotherapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(7):747–752. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880190043009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu L, Liang S, Li L, et al. Prognostic impact of magnetic resonance imaging-detected cranial nerve involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2009;115(9):1995–2003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang CC, See L, Hong J, et al. Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: five new cases and a literature review. J Otolaryngol. 1996;25(6):399–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mao YP, Liang SB, Liu LZ, et al. The N staging system in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with radiation therapy oncology group guidelines for lymph node levels based on magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(22):7497–7503. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu LZ, Zhang GY, Xie CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: patterns of spread. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(3):721–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.King AD, Lei KI, Richards PS, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the nasopharynx: CT and MR imaging. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(8):621–625. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00182-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu XW, Xie CM, Mo YX, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: are there differences? Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug 22; doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.066. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu Y, Fang Z, Liu L, et al. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in serum or plasma for nasopharyngeal cancer: a meta-analysis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2011;15(7–8):495–502. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]