Abstract
Escherichia coli Exonuclease IX (ExoIX), encoded by the xni gene, was the first identified member of a novel subfamily of ubiquitous flap endonucleases (FENs), which possess only one of the two catalytic metal-binding sites characteristic of other FENs. We have solved the first structure of one of these enzymes, that of ExoIX itself, at high resolution in DNA-bound and DNA-free forms. In the enzyme–DNA cocrystal, the single catalytic site binds two magnesium ions. The structures also reveal a binding site in the C-terminal domain where a potassium ion is directly coordinated by five main chain carbonyl groups, and we show this site is essential for DNA binding. This site resembles structurally and functionally the potassium sites in the human FEN1 and exonuclease 1 enzymes. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements and the crystal structures of the ExoIX:DNA complexes show that this potassium ion interacts directly with a phosphate diester in the substrate DNA.
INTRODUCTION
All cells require 5′-nuclease or flap endonuclease (FEN) activity for DNA replication and repair processes (1). For example, FEN activity is involved in the removal of RNA from Okazaki fragments, which are formed on the lagging-strand during semi-discontinuous DNA replication. Okazaki fragment synthesis requires a short RNA oligonucleotide primer. These can form a ‘flap’ of single-stranded nucleic acid when the DNA polymerase extending from an upstream primer carries out strand displacement synthesis. The unstable RNA must be removed to maintain genomic integrity, a process accomplished by a combination of ribonuclease H (RNAse H) and 5′ nuclease activities (2). Thus, an exonuclease is required to remove fully base-paired ribonucleotides at the 5′ end of the fragment, whereas an endonuclease is required should the 5′ end become displaced from the template strand and form a flap structure. FENs, Mg2+-dependant metalloenzymes that accomplish both these activities, comprise a group of proteins that are ubiquitously represented in all three superkingdoms of life (1). Structural studies have revealed a common FEN architecture, consisting of a central β-sheet flanked by α-helical domains [e.g. (3–10)]. The β-sheet carries many of the conserved acidic residues, which cluster at the centre of the enzyme forming the Cat1 and Cat2 metal-binding sites responsible for the catalytic activity of these enzymes (Supplementary Figure S1A) (11). These sites coordinate two divalent metal ions, which in prokaryotes have been observed to be separated by a distance of ∼8 Å. In Homo sapiens FEN homologue (hFEN1), Shen and coworkers suggested that one of the metal-binding sites (Cat1) is required for activating nucleophilic attack on the scissile phosphate diester bond, whereas the second site (Cat2) may stabilize the enzyme-substrate complex (12). In the bacteriophage T5 homologue, Cat1 is both essential and sufficient for structure-specific hydrolysis (flap cleavage) while both sites are required for 5′–3′ exonucleolytic activity (13). Kinetic analyses of a mutant engineered so as to lack two conserved aspartate groups in Cat2 suggests that this site is involved in substrate binding rather than chemical catalysis (14).
Steitz and coworkers (6) suggested that a two-metal-ion mechanism may operate in FENs, similar to that seen in the Klenow 3′–5′ proof-reading exonuclease (15) based on their structure of TaqPol (6). However, the deposited structure (1TAQ.pdb) contains only one bound divalent metal ion (Zn2+) and no DNA. This mechanism for phosphoryl transfer has been the subject of some controversy, given the large distance observed between the metals in prokaryotic FEN structures (16) but has received strong support from the hFEN1 and human exonuclease 1 (hExo1) structures. Both reveal pairs of metal ions in their Cat1 sites (Sm3+ in hFEN1 and Ba2+ and Mn2+ in hExo1) separated by ∼4 Å and coordinating a DNA phosphate group (9,10). However, it should be pointed out that none of these structures contained the biologically relevant metal cofactor ion magnesium; indeed, to date there are no published structures of a FEN enzyme with DNA and the in vivo cofactor Mg2+.
Above the active site is a region that plays important roles in substrate recognition and binding (17). Surprisingly, this region is highly variable structurally: it is an ordered helical arch in bacteriophage T5 exonuclease (T5FEN) but disordered in other FEN homologue structures such as bacteriophage T4 RNAse H and Thermus aquaticus (Taq) polymerase (6,7). The presence of the helical arch in T5FEN led to the proposal of a model of substrate binding in which the ssDNA 5′ arm of the flap threads through the hole formed by the arch (3). The structure of a T4 RNAse H mutant in complex with a pseudo-Y DNA molecule appears to support such a threading model, although the loop above the active site was not directly observed in the structure (4).
A helix-3-turn-helix (H3TH) or similar motif present in these proteins is also implicated in DNA binding (5). This is similar to the well-known helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motif (18), except that the hairpin region is significantly extended into a loop carrying two aspartate Cat2 ligands (19). The H3TH motif is present in all FEN structures determined to date, but the length of the turn region varies, and in hFEN1 and hExo1, it is an H2TH motif (9,10). The similarity of this motif to the HhH motif extends to the sequence level. The glycine-hydrophobic-glycine (GhG) sequence motif, which mediates protein:DNA interactions through the backbone amide groups of the HhH motif (20), is also present in many FENs, suggesting that the H3TH motif may interact with DNA in a similar manner (5). The first FEN structure with DNA bound in this region of the protein was that of T4 RNAse H in complex with a pseudo–Y substrate (4), but T4 RNAse H lacks the GhG sequence motif. However, the structures of human FEN1 (9) and hExo1 (10) have revealed these interactions and additionally show the presence of a K+ ion, which further stabilizes the interaction.
In prokaryotes, the essential FEN reaction can be performed by the N-terminal 5′-3′ exonuclease domain present on DNA polymerase I. For example, in bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (21) and Synechococcus elongatus (22), the FEN domain of DNA polymerase I (PolI) is essential, as they do not encode any other FEN genes. In contrast, archaea (5), eukaryotes (23), bacteriophages and some viruses (24,25) encode a separate FEN enzyme but lack FEN domains on their DNA polymerases.
Intriguingly, however, it is now clear that many eubacteria possess a second FEN-encoding gene (xni) in addition to their PolI FEN domain (26). In many of these, including Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, the second FEN possesses both the Cat1 and the Cat2 metal-binding sites discussed earlier in the text. However, a subset of genera, for example Erwinia, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Vibrio and Yersinia, encode a second FEN (designated ExoIX), which lacks the three aspartate residues that make up the Cat2 site (22,26) (Supplementary Figure S1B). Fukushima et al.(22) have clearly demonstrated that either ExoIX or the DNA pol I FEN-domain is essential for cell viability, as in E. coli and B. subtilis, null mutants in either the FEN-encoding domain of polA or xni were viable, whereas double-mutants were not (22).
Here, we present the crystal structures of wild-type E. coli ExoIX determined both in the presence and absence of potassium and of divalent metal ions, and with and without bound DNA. We show that in ExoIX, the Cat2 site is abolished, but a pair of oxo-bridged Mg2+ ions is observed in the Cat1 site, lending further support to the two-metal-ion hypothesis in this important class of FENs. Given the high degree of sequence and structure conservation at the Cat1 site in all bacterial FENs, our results suggest that other prokaryotic FENs may bind two Mg2+ ions in their Cat1 sites, and that the two-metal-ion mechanism is conserved across the phyla. Fluorescence anisotropy (FA) studies and co-crystallization with DNA oligomers show that ExoIX, like its eukaryotic counterparts, exhibits potassium-dependent DNA-binding via a K+ site situated in its H3TH motif region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
ExoIX expression and purification
The protein was overexpressed and purified as described by Hodskinson et al.(27). Subsequently, a potassium-free purification protocol was devised whereby the cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM DTT using sonication. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 43 700g for 20 min. The supernatant was then diluted 5-fold with 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM DTT and loaded onto a 20 ml heparin-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) column. The protein was eluted with a 0.1–0.5 M NaCl gradient over 150 ml. Fractions containing ExoIX were combined and concentrated to a volume of 1–1.5 ml. The sample was then diluted 10-fold with 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5) and applied to a 6 ml Resource-Q column through a 0.2 µm filter. The protein was then eluted by applying a salt gradient from 0 to 150 mM, NaCl in 60 ml and then 150 to 1000 mM in 30 ml, and fractions containing ExoIX were again pooled and concentrated. The protein was then applied to a HiLoad Superdex 200 size exclusion column equilibrated with 10 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) (pH 6.5), 250 mM NaCl. Fractions containing ExoIX were combined and concentrated to between 15 and 25 mg/ml for crystallization.
ExoIX crystallization
Crystal screens were undertaken using Hampton Research Crystal Screens 1 and 2, and the PEG/ion screen. Initial hits were optimized to produce crystals of diffraction quality. The first crystals were grown from 0.2 M sodium thiocyanate, 20% PEG 3350, 0.1 M MES at pH 6.5 at 17°C and belonged to the space group P1 with cell dimensions of a = 43.4 Å, b = 56.5 Å, c = 60.2 Å, α = 110.6°, β = 95.4°, γ = 95.1°, and diffracted to 2.0 Å resolution. Subsequently, a second crystal form was grown in space group P21 under similar conditions but in the presence of ZnCl2 with cell dimensions a = 53.5 Å, b = 38.3 Å, c = 59.7 Å, α, γ = 90.0°, β = 108.0°. Crystals of the K+-free protein were grown in 0.2 M sodium acetate trihydrate, 20% PEG 3350 and were in the space group C2 with cell dimensions a = 128.5 Å, b = 37.4 Å, c = 66.7 Å, α, γ = 90.0°, β = 117.7°.
ExoIX:DNA complex crystallization
Pure ExoIX and DNA were mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio in 10 mM MES (pH 6.0), 150 mM KCl, as this resulted in good DNA binding by the protein during FA measurements. Initial crystallization conditions were identified in the NeXtal PEGs screen and refined to 15% (w/v) PEG-3350 in the presence of 0.2 M magnesium acetate at 7°C.
Crystallographic data collection and processing
Crystals were cryoprotected (except for the K+-free set, which was collected at room temperature mounted in a capillary) and exposed to X-rays. For an in-house data collection, a MAR345 image plate was used mounted on a Micromax 007 with a copper rotating anode. High-resolution data were collected at station PX14.1 of the SRS Daresbury Laboratory on a Quantum Q4 CCD detector or later at beamlines I02 or I03 on a ADSC Q315 CCD detector at the Diamond synchrotron, as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Data processing was performed using MOSFLM in house (28), HKL2000 (29) at the Daresbury SRS and the CCP4 suite of programs (30). Procedures and statistics are given in Supplementary Table S1.
Structure solution
The initial structure was solved by multiple isomorphous replacement in the P1 crystal form (Supplementary Table S1). Two derivatives were used: mercury (two sites) and gold (four sites), to 2.5 and 2.8 Å, respectively, and phases were then improved by solvent flattening and phase extension to 2.0 Å resolution (30). The structure was built and refined (see Supplementary Table S1 for details) and subsequently used to solve the second native structure in space group P21 by molecular replacement using PHASER (31). The K+-free structure in space group C2, and the ExoIX:DNA complex structures in space group P21212 were solved by molecular replacement with PHASER (31) using the P21 structure as a search model. Model building was performed using TURBO (32) and COOT (33). REFMAC5 was used for structural refinement (34). Molecular diagrams were generated using Pymol (35) and CCP4MG (36). To calculate simulated annealing omit maps, the relevant atoms were removed from the model and three cycles of refinement were performed in phenix.refine (37) including Cartesian-simulated annealing after the second and last macro-cycles.
FA measurements
All oligonucleotides used during this work were purchased HPLC purified from Eurofins MWG Operon. The substrates shown in Supplementary Figure S2 were formed by annealing the oligos with one another by incubation at room temperature for 10 min. Annealing was confirmed by analysing the oligos on a 10% native polyacrylamide gel to observe a shift in the migration of the DNA relative to the unannealed oligos by UV shadowing.
FA measurements were performed at 25°C in triplicate with excitation and emission wavelengths of 495 and 515 nm, respectively, in a Carey Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer supplied with a Varian Manual Polarizer. The excitation and emission slit widths were set at 5 nm, and the instrument has excitation and emission monochromators with built-in filters on the monochromators to minimize light scattering and exclude stray light. All experiments were performed in 10 mM MES (pH 6.0) with the annealed oligo at 15 nM. The Bradford Assay was used to measure the ExoIX concentration before the experiment. The equation used to fit the data in Figure 2A–C was Anisotropy = FAfree + (FAbound-FAfree).[ExoiX]/(Kd + [ExoIX]), where FAfree is the FA of the unbound oligo, FAbound is the FA of the fully bound oligo and [ExoIX] is the ExoIX concentration. The equation was fitted to the data by non-linear regression using GraphPad Prism.
Preparation of ExoIX-Lys67Ala mutant
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out on a bacteriophage M13 derivative carrying the xni gene as described previously (27,38), subcloned into pJONEX4 expression vector and expressed and purified as described for the wild-type protein (27).
FEN activity of ExoIX
A flap oligonucleotide substrate (Supplementary Figure S2C) was prepared by annealing together two oligonucleotides each at 500 pM; 5′-fluorescein modified -dAAAACGCTGTCTCGCTGAAAGCGAGACAGCGAAAGACGC TCG T and 5′-dACGAGCGTCTTTA in 20 mM Tris (pH 8), 1 mM EDTA and 500 mM NaCl. The mixture was heated to 80°C for 5 min and then allowed to cool to ambient temperature over 60 min. Annealed products were stored at −20°C. Reactions were carried out using 50 pM annealed flap substrate in 25 mM potassium glycinate (pH 9.3), 100 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, with or without 10 mM MgCl2.
Electrostatic surface potential calculation
The electrostatic surface charge potential of ExoIX was calculated for a model in which unobserved side chains had been added in their most likely rotamers. The calculation was then carried out and visualized at ±5 kBT/e using the APBS plugin (39) for pymol (40).
RESULTS
Overall structure of ExoIX
The structure of ExoIX in the absence of DNA and of metal ions was determined by multiple isomorphous replacement in space group P1 at 2.0 Å. (see Supplementary Table S1). Later, a P21 crystal form, also at 2.0 Å resolution, was obtained and solved by molecular replacement using one of the two essentially identical molecules in the P1 structure as a search model. Discussion of the native form will focus on the structure determined in P21, unless otherwise stated, as it is more complete with more highly defined loop structures. The structure of ExoIX reveals a characteristic FEN fold with a central six-stranded mixed β-sheet surrounded by 10 α-helices, all linked by loops (Figure 1A and B).
Several other FEN structures have been reported, including T5FEN (3); the 5′ nuclease domain of Taq DNA polymerase I (6); the FEN-1 s of Methanococcus jannashii (41) and Archaeoglobus fulgidus (42); and the bacteriophage T4 RNAse H (4). Using the DALI server (43), these can be superimposed onto the structure of ExoIX with root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of 2.2 Å over 241 Cαs (Figure 1B); 3.0 Å over 212 Cαs; 3.8 Å over 198 Cαs; 4.1 Å over 211 Cαs; and 2.6 Å over 206 Cαs, respectively. The more distantly related hFEN1 (9) and hExo1 structures (10) can be superimposed with an RMSD of 4.0 Å over 219 amino acids and 3.7 Å over 217 amino acids, respectively, demonstrating the highly conserved nature of the FEN fold and active site.
As predicted by sequence comparisons ExoIX possesses only one of the two distinct metal-binding sites observed in other FENs (1). The structural superpositions show that the Cat1 site carboxylic acid residues Asp9, Asp50, Glu102, Asp104 and Asp127 superpose well on their respective counterparts Asp26, Asp68, Glu128, Asp130 and Asp153 in T5FEN (3) to form an essentially identical Cat1 site in ExoIX (Figure 1C). The Cat2 carboxylic acid side chains, however, are not present in ExoIX. The three aspartates that form this site in T5FEN (residues 155, 201 and 204) are replaced in ExoIX by Gly129, Ile174 and Ser177, respectively (Figure 1C). With the exception of the Ser177 hydroxyl and the side chain of Asp127 that lies at the boundary between Cat1 and Cat2, this produces a largely hydrophobic cavity, which would not be expected to bind metal ions in the same manner as the wider family of FENs.
A novel potassium site in ExoIX
In both the P1 and P21 ExoIX structures, a strong electron density peak was identified in the H3TH region of each protein chain. This density was directly octahedrally coordinated by the five main-chain carbonyl groups of Leu171, Ala172, Pro180, Val182 and Ile185, the sixth ligand being an ordered water molecule (Figure 1D). When the central peak was refined as a water molecule, it had a significantly lower B-factor than the surrounding protein, and therefore it was concluded that this must be a bound metal ion. Models were refined in parallel with K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and Zn2+ cations each in turn occupying this site. The best agreement between the refined metal atom B-factor and that of the surrounding protein was given by K+ followed by Ca2+. The coordinating bonds for the atom were relatively long (average 2.92 Å), which, combined with the octahedral coordination geometry, was highly characteristic of a bound K+ ion, whereas Ca2+ would be expected to have significantly shorter bond lengths of ∼2.4 Å (44).
To confirm its identification as K+, and to investigate whether the metal ion was only present for stabilization of the ExoIX structure or for some other reason, the protein was purified and crystallized in the absence of potassium-containing buffers (see ‘Materials and Methods’ solution). The protein crystallized in space group C2 and the structure was solved by molecular replacement to 2.45 Å resolution (Supplementary Table S1). The ion-binding site was found to be unoccupied, which strongly supported its earlier identification as a K+ site. The K+-free structure is similar to the K+ bound structures, superposing on the P21 native with an RMSD of 0.49 Å over all Cα atoms, suggesting that the K+ ion does not play a critical structural role in stabilizing the protein fold.
FA was used to investigate the effect of K+ on DNA binding to ExoIX. Initial experiments were performed using the oligomeric duplexes Dup1 and Dup2 (Supplementary Figure S2A and B). Plotting anisotropy against protein concentration (Figure 2A and B) for these substrates gave dissociation constants (Kd) of 0.8 ± 0.1 µM and 2.0 ± 0.3 µM for Dup1 and Dup2, respectively, in the absence of K+. In the presence of 50 mM KCl, ExoIX showed a significant increase in affinity for the Dup1 and Dup2 duplexes with Kds of 45 ± 9 nM and 190 ± 60 nM, respectively. The influence of K+ on binding of a flap substrate to ExoIX was assessed using the same technique (Figure 2C). The substrate Flap1 (Supplementary Figure S2C) was labelled with fluorescein at the end of the 5′ flap. No DNA binding could be observed with µM concentrations of protein in the absence of K+ (data not shown). In contrast, in the presence of K+, DNA binding was detected with a Kd of 75 ± 30 nM. K+ therefore appears to greatly enhance the binding of ExoIX to the Flap1 DNA. Interestingly, in the presence of both K+ and Mg2+, no binding was observed, which is attributed to the cleavage of the fluorescently labelled flap from the DNA molecule.
A gel-based assay confirms that wild-type ExoIX is able to degrade the Flap1 substrate (Supplementary Figure S2F) in the presence of Mg2+. Mutation of the active site residue Lys67 to alanine greatly reduced this activity, but did not abolish it as observed in the equivalent mutation (K83A) in the homologous T5 FEN (13). Although we previously reported a lack of FEN activity in ExoIX (27) on a variety of different substrates, these results now provide biochemical evidence that ExoIX is able to cleave a double-flap substrate.
Structure of the ExoIX:DNA complex
Co-crystallization with Flap1 was attempted, but instead crystals were obtained in which the Flap1 DNA had been processed into smaller fragments some of which then bound to the protein. The density for the backbone of double-stranded B-form DNA was clear, but the density for the bases was ambiguous, presumably corresponding to a sub-sequence of the original Flap1 averaged over a crystallographic 2-fold axis that relates the two strands. Two new DNA sequences for co-crystallization were designed to more ideally correspond to the oligonucleotide that could be observed in the ExoIX:Flap1 complex electron density map. These consisted of a 12-base or a 14-base palindromic sequence specifying eight base pairs and a four-base or a six-base 5′ overhang (Supplementary Figure S2D and E). These oligos (named 5ov4 and 5ov6, respectively), designed so their 2-fold symmetry would coincide with the crystallographic 2-fold axis, crystallized isomorphously with the original crystals of the ExoIX:Flap1 digestion product complex (Supplementary Table S1). The structures of the 5ov4 complex in the presence of Mg2+ and of Ca2+ were both determined at 1.5 Å resolution by molecular replacement using the ExoIX P21 native structure as the search model. Scaling and structure solution statistics are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Initial difference maps showed electron density for a short region of duplex DNA above the H3TH motif of ExoIX (Supplementary Figure S3A). This motif is involved in DNA binding in the FEN family of proteins (4,9,10) and also harbours the K+ site implicated in DNA binding in ExoIX as described earlier in the text. As it lay on the crystallographic 2-fold, a single strand of DNA was modelled in the asymmetric unit, the other strand being generated by crystallographic symmetry. Eight base pairs of duplex were observed approximating B-form DNA (Figure 2D). In the single-stranded overhang region, the bases remain stacked, and the backbone conformation continues to approximate to B form DNA. However, the chain becomes increasingly disordered, likely due to flexibility, as the 5′ end of the nucleotide approaches the active site region, and its density becomes poor ∼7 Å from the Cat1 site. The 5′-nt terminal interacts with arginine 16, a residue conserved in the eubacterial FEN domains.
Examination of the ExoIX:DNA interactions shows the central role played by the K+ ion, which ion-pairs with a phosphate group on the DNA backbone (Figure 2E). In addition, a number of hydrogen bonds are formed between the protein and nucleic acid. Most of the interactions are formed with one strand of the DNA, and nearly all of them are localized to the H3TH region of the protein where the K+ site is located, as shown schematically in Supplementary Figure S4. Six direct hydrogen bonds are formed between the protein and one of the DNA strands (the one modelled in the asymmetric unit). All are from the H3TH region of the protein, and two of these are provided by the main chain amide groups of Gly184 and Gly186 from the GhG motif, with the main chain carbonyl group of I185 (the central hydrophobic amino acid in the GhG motif) acting as one of the K+ ligands. Two further hydrogen bonds are formed by the side chains of T126 and R16 to a phosphate in the second strand of the DNA duplex (Supplementary Figure S4).
In addition to the specific hydrogen bonds described earlier in the text, the surface of ExoIX has an overall positive charge in this region (Figure 2F), which, together with the K+ ion, complements the negative charge of the DNA backbone.
The protein part of the Mg2+-bound ExoIX-DNA complex structure can be superimposed on the hFEN1 and hExo1 DNA complexes with RMSDs of 3.02 and 3.27 Å over 180 and 188 Cα positions, respectively. The core protein folds are well conserved, notably in the Cat1 site region and in the DNA-binding and K+-binding helix-turn-helix regions of hFEN1 (Figure 3) and hExo1, both of which are discussed later in the text. However, there are additional features present in the human enzymes not present in ExoIX. Notably, ExoIX lacks the additional C-terminal helices, which form the 3′ flap-binding pocket in hFEN1 and is therefore unlikely to bind the upstream region of a 5′ flap substrate in the same manner.
The key conserved YKXXR motif common to all bacterial and phage FENs is not present in the Taq polymerase structure (6). Superpositions of the structures of ExoIX and hFEN1 indicate that the arginine (Arg70) is equivalent to Arg100 in hFEN1; the side chain of the latter hydrogen bonds to the phosphate group after which cleavage takes place. Therefore, a similar role can be envisioned for Arg70 in ExoIX and the equivalent residues in all the bacterial and phage FENs.
Mg2+ and Ca2+ binding in the presence of DNA
In the ExoIX:DNA complex crystallized in the presence of Mg2+, two octahedrally coordinated metal ions were observed 2.5 Å apart, bridged by three probable hydroxyl groups (Figure 4A and B). One magnesium ion is octahedrally ligated by the OD1 atom of Asp104 and by five other oxygen ligands, three of which are shared with the second magnesium ion. This second magnesium has a further two oxygen ligands (Figure 4A and B), the sixth octahedral coordination position being unoccupied. The oxygen atoms around this pair of magnesium ions are hydrogen bonded to the side chains of Asp9, Asp50, Glu102, Asp104 and Asp127, which comprise the conserved Cat1 side chains (Figure 4B) and to Lys67 (equivalent to Lys83 in T5FEN and conserved in all prokaryotic FENs). Although the Cat2 site in ExoIX comprises a largely hydrophobic cavity, a cluster of four water molecules can be observed binding between aspartate and the serine side chains in the ExoIX:5ov4:Mg2+ complex structure.
ExoIX:5ov4-complex crystals were also grown in the presence of the inhibitory metal ion Ca2+. A single Ca2+ ion was ligated in a bi-dentate manner by Asp127 (equivalent to Asp171 in hExo1) and by four water molecules. Ca2+ binding has only been crystallographically observed in one other FEN:DNA complex, that of the hExo1 D173A inactive mutant (10) where the Ca2+ is coordinated by a different carboxylate side chain, hExo1 Asp152.
In both the ExoIX:5ov4:Mg2+ and ExoIX:5ov4:Ca2+ structures, there is evidence for partial displacement of K+ by Mg2+ and Ca2+, respectively. An additional electron density peak was observed adjacent to that of the K+ ion in both of these structures (Supplementary Figure S3D and E). Examination of the B-factors for the K+ ion suggested that it may not be present at full occupancy, and the new electron density peak was another metal ion. This was supported by the additional peak being more electron dense in the Ca2+ structure than in the Mg2+ structure, and the coordinating bond lengths being consistent with these metal ions, which are in the ranges 2.05–2.15 Å for Mg2+ and 2.35–2.45 Å for Ca2+(45).
Finally, it is of interest to compare the 5ov4:Mg2+ complex with the apo ExoIX enzyme. A superposition reveals few changes in protein structure as a result of DNA binding, with an RMSD of 0.84 Å over 244 Cα positions. There are some small local movements to contact the DNA. The largest change in structure is observed in the loop that links the helices of the H3TH motif. This moves ∼1 Å for Ser175 to H-bond with the DNA phosphate backbone. Other side chain movements that were observed include a 90° rotation of the Ser189 side chain and a 2.2 Å movement of Lys128, both of which H-bond to the phosphate backbone of the DNA. There are further side chain motions as a result of magnesium binding in the active site. Asp104 rotates to directly coordinate Mg2 (Figure 4A and B), whereas Glu102 also rotates such that its side chain is oriented towards the metal ions. This appears to be due to longer range charge–charge interactions with the metal, as no bridging water molecule was observed between the side chain and the metals, and the side chain oxygen were too far away to directly coordinate an Mg2+ ion. Other than these small changes, there are no large molecular motions that result from binding the 5ov4 oligonucleotide, though there may be further changes on binding a larger substrate not observed here.
DISCUSSION
As described earlier in the text, the structure of ExoIX reveals a typical FEN fold (Figure 1A) and superimposes (43) well with other FENs, most closely with T5FEN (3) with an RMS deviation of 2.2 Å over 241 Cαs (Figure 1B). Like many FENs, ExoIX has a flexible loop (residues 70–74) above the active site rather than a helical arch but this does not form a hole large enough for a single-stranded DNA to thread through. Indeed, in superpositions with the recent hFEN1 and hExo1 complex structures (9,10), the upper part of the loop clearly blocks the hole formed by the helical gateway. A conformational change would therefore be necessary if ExoIX were to use a threading mechanism as proposed for other members of the superfamily (9,46).
Comparisons of the ExoIX:DNA complex structures with the ExoIX structures determined in the absence of DNA revealed that there are only minor conformational changes in the protein on binding of DNA to the H3TH region. However, some of the residues in the H3TH motif undergo small movements to hydrogen bond to the phosphate backbone of the DNA. This is similar to the hFEN1 DNA complexes (9) and that of T4 RNase H in complex with a pseudo-Y substrate (4) in which no large structural re-arrangements were observed in this region compared with the native structures (7,8).
It is also of interest to consider the possible mode of DNA flap binding in ExoIX. Comparisons of the ExoIX:DNA complex structures determined here with other FEN:DNA complexes show that the duplex binds in a position broadly similar to the downstream duplex regions in the hExo1 (10), hFEN1 (9) and T4 RNase H (4) DNA complex structures. Figures 3A–C show the overall superpositions, based on the protein components only, of the DNA complexes of ExoIX on hFEN1 and hExo1. Compared with the two human enzymes, the DNA double helix in ExoIX is rotated by ∼5° about an axis through the active site region so as to approach the H3TH motif more closely (Figure 3A and C). As a result, equivalent DNA phosphates that are distal to the protein:DNA interface differ in position by up to 8 Å. Despite this, however, the DNA strands in regions close to the protein, namely the complementary strand at the top of the H3TH motif and the substrate strand in the active site region, superpose well to within 3 Å of each other. This difference in the angle of the DNA relative to the protein appears to be the result of the different conformation that the H3TH loop adopts in ExoIX compared with the corresponding H2TH motif in the human enzymes, and to differences in the K+ site, both discussed in more detail later in the text. This region in ExoIX then appears to steer the DNA towards the active site. Nevertheless, the convergence of the superposed DNA strands in the active site region indicates that the 5′ flap of a substrate will follow a similar path through the active site of ExoIX to those in the human enzymes.
It is also of interest to consider the K+ site and its role in DNA binding. A K+ site analogous to that observed in both hFEN1 and in one of three deposited structures of hExo1 (9,10) and also in the HhH motif of POLB (47) is also present in ExoIX. This can be occupied by K+ both in the presence and absence of DNA in ExoIX and plays a key role in DNA binding as demonstrated by the significant increase in affinity of ExoIX for both duplex and flap DNA observed in the presence of K+ (Figure 2A–C). In hFEN1, K+ is also reported to be necessary for DNA binding, and a K+ ion is observed in the H3TH motif of all three DNA complex structures (9). However, in the three hExo1:DNA complex structures, one has K+ in the equivalent position, one has Ba2+ and in the third, no metal ion is observed at this position (10). Nevertheless, this suggests that this feature can be expected to be common if not ubiquitous in members of this enzyme family.
In the native ExoIX structure, the K+ site is approximately octahedrally coordinated by five main chain carbonyl groups together with a water molecule (Figure 1D), which is replaced by a phosphate group in the DNA complexes (Figure 2E, Supplementary Figure S4). Apart from the well-known coordination of K+ by eight main chain carbonyl groups in the potassium channel (48), sites that are so heavily coordinated by main chain carbonyls do not appear to have been widely described. The H3TH motif of ExoIX appears better adapted to binding K+ than any other metal, as it provides five of the seven coordinating bonds through its main chain carbonyl groups with bond distances suitable for K+ binding (49), the other two being supplied by two oxygens from the same DNA phosphate group in the ExoIX:DNA complexes (Figure 2E, Supplementary Figure S4).
Using only the helices of the H3TH/H2TH motifs, ExoIX superposes on hFEN1 and hExo1 with RMSDs of 1.12 and 1.08 Å, respectively, over 25 α carbon positions. This superposition reveals two clear differences in this region between ExoIX and the human enzymes (Figure 3C). First, hFEN1 and hExo1 do not satisfy the K+ ions’ requirements as completely as ExoIX. Instead of the five coordinating main chain carbonyls found in ExoIX, hExo1 coordinates K+ with just two main chain carbonyls and one serine Oγ, whereas hFEN1 only provides one carbonyl to directly coordinate the K+, other coordination in the human enzymes presumably being provided by water molecules. This results in a difference in the position of the ion and also explains why these sites are not occupied in the absence of DNA in other structures. Second, the conformation of the loop connecting the helices is also different. In hFEN1 and hExo1, the loops are similar to each other and fall away from the DNA towards the helical gateway (Figure 3A and B), whereas in ExoIX, the contrasting conformation of the connecting loop allows the additional interactions with the K+ ion observed in ExoIX.
Thus, the site in ExoIX appears more specific for K+ than the site in hFEN1 as the ion is buried more deeply and more highly coordinated by the protein in ExoIX (Figure 3C). This likely explains why this site was occupied in native ExoIX, which has not been observed previously in any other non-DNA-bound FEN structure. Nevertheless, the K+ ion can still be removed without any adverse effects on the ExoIX structure as shown by our K+ free structure. In addition, the structures of the ExoIX:5ov4 complexes solved in the presence of high concentrations of Mg2+ and Ca2+ show these metal ions can partially displace K+ from this site, binding in a different position ∼1.5 Å from the K+-binding position (Supplementary Figure S3D and E), presumably because their coordination geometries cannot be correctly satisfied by the main chain carbonyl groups of the H3TH motif. This displacement of K+ as a result of Ca2+ binding in a different but mutually exclusive position may explain the weakening of DNA binding to ExoIX in the presence of Ca2+ with K+ observed in the solution FA studies (Figure 2C). It can therefore be concluded that K+ is the likely metal to be used by ExoIX for DNA binding in the cell where K+ concentrations can be as high as 200 mM (50). It is interesting in this connection to point out that ExoIX is the first structure of one of the family of xni-encoded FENs, all of which lack the Cat2 site. This site is conserved in all bacterial DNA polymerase I-FEN domains, and in all archaeal and eukaryotic FENs. It has been suggested that Cat2 may aid in DNA binding in hFEN1 (12), whereas Grasby and coworkers (14) have shown that Cat2 is involved in substrate binding in T5FEN. It is therefore tempting to suggest that the highly developed K+ site in ExoIX, which we have shown is essential for DNA binding, may have made the Cat2 site evolutionarily redundant for binding DNA in the xni FENs, and it is likely to be conserved in all the xni FENs. In contrast, the hExo1 K+ site is occupied in only one of the three published DNA complex structures (10), indicating that it is not obligatory, although it is occupied in all three published hFEN1:DNA complex structures (9).
In the active site, the ExoIX di-magnesium site also has mechanistic implications for the whole family of FENs. phosphoryl transfer reactions underpin the crucial processes of DNA replication, transcription and translation. Many of these essential enzymes catalyzing Phosphoryl transfer reactions require divalent metal ions for activity. Some nucleases such as homing endonucleases (51) and Holliday junction resolvases (52) bind only one metal ion in their active sites, which is sufficient for hydrolysis of the phosphodiester backbone. However, there is evidence that a two-metal-ion mechanism operates in many enzymes including the 3′–5′ exonuclease of DNA polymerase I (15), RNAse H (53), the type II and IA topoisomerases (54) and most recently hFEN1 (9) and hExo1 (10). These latter two structures reveal pairs of metal ions in their Cat1 sites (Sm3+ in hFEN1 and Ba2+ and Mn2+ in hExo1) separated by ∼4 Å and coordinating a DNA phosphate group (9,10). In hFEN1, the Sm3+ ions in Cat1 are also directly ligated by four carboxyl groups (9). However, in ExoIX, only one of the carboxyls (Asp104) directly coordinates the Mg2+ ions, whereas the others interact via water or hydroxyl groups (Figure 4A). This was also observed for the single Mg2+ ions in the Cat1 sites of Methanococcus jannaschii FEN (41) and in bacteriophage T4 RNaseH in the absence of DNA (7). It is not clear whether this indicates differences in the ligation of Mg2+ as opposed to Sm3+ or that these represent changes in the coordination shells of the ions in Cat1 as the DNA phosphate approaches.
In the proposed two-metal-ion mechanism, analogous to that seen in the 3′–5′ exonuclease of Klenow (15), the divalent ions are usually separated by 3.5–4 Å and flank the central phosphate diester (Figure 4C). An activated water molecule bound to the Mg2+ on the 5′ side of the scissile phosphate loses a proton, allowing formation of an O-P bond with concomitant breaking of the P-0 3′ bond. The leaving 3′ oxyanion may be stabilized by the second Mg2+ ion leading to release of 5′-phosphate and 3′-hydroxyl terminated products. Despite a large body of evidence in support of the two-metal-ion mechanism, there remains some controversy in the literature (16), and it has been suggested that the second metal ion, rather than being a necessity, may modulate the rate of cleavage as has been reported for some restriction enzymes (55). However, this is the first report of a crystal structure of a FEN with DNA and the biologically relevant cation Mg2+. Thus, the data reported here provide hard physical evidence supporting the two-metal-mechanism as well as providing the highest resolution yet reported of a FEN enzyme with or without DNA.
The ExoIX:5ov4:Mg2+ complex presented here reveals the presence of two magnesium ions bound in the Cat1 site with a separation of 2.5 Å, but there is no bridging phosphate group as the DNA molecule is too far away. The side chains and local structure defining the Cat1 site of ExoIX are highly conserved in other FENs (Supplementary Figure S1A and Figure 1B), and thus two metal ions may also be accommodated in the Cat1 site of these enzymes in the presence of DNA. This suggests a two-metal-ion mechanism of reaction can be performed in the Cat1 site with a third metal in the Cat2 site possibly involved in DNA binding in agreement with the observations of Feng et al. (13) and Syson et al. (56). This would explain how T5FEN can still function as an endonuclease even when the Cat2 site is compromised by mutation (13) and also the activity that we have observed here for ExoIX, which lacks nearly all of the Cat2 active site side chains typical of other FENs.
As the sequence of ExoIX shares 52% homology (32% identity) with the FEN domain of DNA polymerase I, our structural data provide a useful starting point from which to model this region of the PolI enzyme. Although the structure of the Taq polymerase FEN domain has been reported (1TAQ), as discussed earlier in the text, several key regions of this model were disordered, and although conserved aspartate residues in the PolI FEN domain are missing in ExoIX, our structure does include key conserved residues such as tyrosine, lysine and arginine present in the loop above the active site as well as the entire Cat1 site.
In conclusion, our high-resolution crystal structure determinations of native E. coli ExoIX and of ExoIX:DNA complexes have revealed the architecture of the first member of a widely distributed novel subfamily of FENs. They have a similar fold to other FENs but possess only one of the two canonical catalytic metal-binding sites characteristic of the FEN family. The observation of a novel K+-binding site coordinated by five main chain carbonyl oxygens from the H3TH motif is a key factor in DNA binding, in a manner reminiscent of that observed in hFEN1 (9) and hExo1 (10). However, the extent of the ion’s direct coordination by the protein is more extensive in ExoIX than in these related proteins, with five main chain carbonyls directly interacting with the ion compared with a single carbonyl oxygen in hFEN1, and two (together with one serine Oγ) in hExo1. FA experiments showed that binding of both duplex DNA and a flap substrate to ExoIX was significantly stronger in the presence of K+ than in its absence. The ExoIX:DNA complex structures also revealed direct interactions between the DNA phosphate backbone and the K+ ion bound to the H3TH motif of ExoIX, confirming its key functional role.
The structures presented also reveal that a pair of oxo-bridged magnesium ions binds in the Cat1 site of ExoIX in the presence of DNA. Given the conservation of the Cat1 site residues across the FEN family, this is likely to be the case in other FENs. These high-resolution crystal structures therefore lend firm support to the validity of the two-metal-ion mechanism for this family of enzymes.
ACCESSION NUMBERS
Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the P1 native, the P21 native, the C2 K+-free native, and the ExoIX:Flap1, ExoIX:5ov4:Mg2+, ExoIX:5ov4:Ca2+ and the ExoIX:5ov6 complexes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 3zd8, 3zd9, 3zdc, 3zda, 3zdb, 3zdc and 3zdd, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
FUNDING
BBSRC [50/D16001 and B19466] and BBSRC studentships (to G.R.H. and M.G.R.H.) and University of Sheffield studentships (to C.A.G. and C.S.F.); Diamond Light Source for access to beamlines I03 and I02 (BAG numbers MX300 and MX1218) that contributed to the results presented here. Funding for open access charge: University Publication Fund.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge use of beamline PX14.1 at the former Daresbury Synchrotron, and of Diamond beamlines I02 and I03 that contributed to the results presented here, and they thank the beamline scientists for their help. J.R.S. and P.J.A. designed research; C.A.G., G.R.H, C.S.F., M.R.G.H, J.Z. and S.E.S. performed research; C.A.G., G.R.H., J.R.S, J.Z., T.J.S. and P.J.A. analyzed data; and G.R.H., J.R.S and P.J.A. wrote the article.
REFERENCES
- 1.Liu Y, Kao HI, Bambara RA. Flap endonuclease 1: a central component of DNA metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004;73:589–615. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.012803.092453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sato A, Kanai A, Itaya M, Tomita M. Cooperative regulation for Okazaki fragment processing by RNase HII and FEN-1 purified from a hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrococcus furiosus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;309:247–252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ceska TA, Sayers JR, Stier G, Suck D. A helical arch allowing single-stranded DNA to thread through T5 5′-exonuclease. Nature. 1996;382:90–93. doi: 10.1038/382090a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Devos JM, Tomanicek SJ, Jones CE, Nossal NG, Mueser TC. Crystal structure of Bacteriophage T4 5′ nuclease in complex with a branched DNA reveals how Flap Endonuclease-1 family nucleases bind their substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:31713–31724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703209200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hosfield DJ, Mol CD, Shen BH, Tainer JA. Structure of the DNA repair and replication endonuclease and exonuclease FEN-1: Coupling DNA and PCNA binding to FEN-1 activity. Cell. 1998;95:135. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81789-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim Y, Eom SH, Wang JM, Lee DS, Suh SW, Steitz TA. Crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Nature. 1995;376:612–616. doi: 10.1038/376612a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mueser TC, Nossal NG, Hyde CC. Structure of bacteriophage-T4 RNase H, a 5′ to 3′ RNA-DNA and DNA-DNA exonuclease with sequence similarity to the RAD2 family of eukaryotic proteins. Cell. 1996;85:1101–1112. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81310-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sakurai S, Kitano K, Yamaguchi H, Hamada K, Okada K, Fukuda K, Uchida M, Ohtsuka E, Morioka H, Hakoshima T. Structural basis for recruitment of human flap endonuclease 1 to PCNA. EMBO J. 2005;24:683–693. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tsutakawa SE, Classen S, Chapados BR, Arvai AS, Finger LD, Guenther G, Tomlinson CG, Thompson P, Sarker AH, Shen BH, et al. Human Flap Endonuclease structures, DNA double-base flipping, and a unified understanding of the FEN1 superfamily. Cell. 2011;145:198–211. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Orans J, McSweeney EA, Iyer RR, Hast MA, Hellinga HW, Modrich P, Beese LS. Structures of human Exonuclease 1 DNA complexes suggest a unified mechanism for nuclease family. Cell. 2011;145:212–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhagwat M, Meara D, Nossal NG. Identification of residues of T4 RNase H required for catalysis and DNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:28531–28538. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shen B, Nolan JP, Sklar LA, Park MS. Functional analysis of point mutations in human flap endonuclease-1 active site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3332–3338. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.16.3332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Feng M, Patel D, Dervan JJ, Ceska T, Suck D, Haq I, Sayers JR. Roles of divalent metal ions in flap endonuclease–substrate interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:450–456. doi: 10.1038/nsmb754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tomlinson CG, Syson K, Sengerova B, Atack JM, Sayers JR, Swanson L, Tainer JA, Williams NH, Grasby JA. Neutralizing mutations of carboxylates that bind Metal 2 in T5 Flap Endonuclease result in an enzyme that still requires two metal ions. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:30878–30887. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.230391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Beese LS, Steitz TA. Structural basis for the 3′–5′ exonuclease activity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I: a two metal ion mechanism. EMBO J. 1991;10:25–33. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07917.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dupureur CM. One is enough: insights into the two–metal ion nuclease mechanism from global analysis and computational studies. Metallomics. 2010;2:609–620. doi: 10.1039/c0mt00013b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garforth SJ, Ceska TA, Suck D, Sayers JR. Mutagenesis of conserved lysine residues in bacteriophage T5 5′-3′ exonuclease suggests separate mechanisms of endo- and exonucleolytic cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:38–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.1.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Doherty AJ, Serpell LC, Ponting CP. The helix-hairpin-helix DNA-binding motif: a structural basis for non-sequence-specific recognition of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:2488–2497. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.13.2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Artymiuk PJ, Ceska TA, Suck D, Sayers JR. Prokaryotic 5′-3′ exonucleases share a common core structure with gamma-delta resolvase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4224–4229. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.21.4224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pelletier H, Sawaya MR, Wolfle W, Wilson SH, Kraut J. Crystal structures of human DNA polymerase beta complexed with DNA: Implications for catalytic mechanism, processivity, and fidelity. Biochemistry. 1996;35:12742–12761. doi: 10.1021/bi952955d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Diaz A, Lacks SA, Lopez P. The 5′ - 3′ exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase I is essential for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 1992;6:3009–3019. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fukushima S, Itaya M, Kato H, Ogasawara N, Yoshikawa H. Reassessment of the in vivo functions of DNA Polymerase I and RNase H in bacterial cell growth. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:8575–8583. doi: 10.1128/JB.00653-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Harrington JJ, Lieber MR. The characterization of a mammalian DNA structure-specific endonuclease. EMBO J. 1994;13:1235–1246. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06373.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Everly DN, Feng PH, Mian IS, Read GS. mRNA degradation by the virion host shutoff (Vhs) protein of herpes simplex virus: Genetic and biochemical evidence that Vhs is a nuclease. J. Virol. 2002;76:8560–8571. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.17.8560-8571.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sayers JR, Eckstein F. Properties of overexpressed Phage-T5 D15 exonuclease - similarities with Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I 5′-3′ exonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:18311–18317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Allen LM, Hodskinson MR, Sayers JR. Active site substitutions delineate distinct classes of eubacterial flap endonuclease. Biochem. J. 2009;418:285–292. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hodskinson MRG, Allen LM, Thomson DP, Sayers JR. Molecular interactions of Escherichia coli ExoIX and identification of its associated 3′-5′ exonuclease activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4094–4102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leslie AGW. Integration of macromolecular diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Cystallogr. 1999;55:1696–1702. doi: 10.1107/s090744499900846x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.CCP4. The CCP4 Suite - programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1994;50:760–763. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994003112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2005;61:458–464. doi: 10.1107/S0907444905001617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jones TA. Interactive computer graphics: FRODO. In: Wyckoff HW, Hirs CHW, Timasheff SN, editors. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 115. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985. pp. 157–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.DeLano WL. DeLano Scientific. 2002. San Carlos, CA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Potterton L, McNicholas S, Krissinel E, Gruber J, Cowtan K, Emsley P, Murshudov GN, Cohen S, Perrakis A, Noble M. Developments in the CCP4 molecular-graphics project. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2288–2294. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904023716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sayers JR, Krekel C, Eckstein F. Rapid high-efficeiency site-directed mutagenesis by the phosphorothiate approach. BioTechniques. 1992;13:592–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA. Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:10037–10041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181342398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.DeLano WL, Lam JW. PyMOL: A communications tool for computational models. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S. 2005;230:U1371–U1372. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hwang KY, Baek K, Kim HY, Cho Y. The crystal structure of flap endonuclease-1 from Methanococcus jannaschii. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998;5:707–713. doi: 10.1038/1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chapados BR, Hosfield DJ, Han S, Qiu J, Yelent B, Shen B, Tainer JA. Structural basis for FEN-1 substrate specificity and PCNA-mediated activation in DNA replication and repair. Cell. 2004;116:39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Holm L, Kaariainen S, Rosenstrom P, Schenkel A. Searching protein structure databases with DaliLite v.3. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2780–2781. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Harding MM. Small revisions to predicted distances around metal sites in proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006;62:678–682. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906014594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Harding MM. The architecture of metal coordination groups in proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:849–859. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904004081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Patel N, Atack JM, Finger LD, Exell JC, Thompson P, Tsutakawa S, Tainer JA, Williams DM, Grasby JA. Flap endonucleases pass 5 ‘-flaps through a flexible arch using a disorder-thread-order mechanism to confer specificity for free 5′-ends. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:4507–4519. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pelletier H, Sawaya MR. Characterization of the metal ion binding helix-hairpin-helix motifs in human DNA polymerase beta by X-ray structural analysis. Biochemistry. 1996;35:12778–12787. doi: 10.1021/bi960790i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhou YF, Morais-Cabral JH, Kaufman A, MacKinnon R. Chemistry of ion coordination and hydration revealed by a K+ channel-Fab complex at 2.0 Å resolution. Nature. 2001;414:43–48. doi: 10.1038/35102009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Harding MM. Metal-ligand geometry relevant to proteins and in proteins: sodium and potassium. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2002;58:872–874. doi: 10.1107/s0907444902003712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schultz SG, Solomon AK. Cation transport in Escherichia coli. I. Intracellular Na and K concentrations and net cation movement. J. Gen. Physiol. 1961;45:355–369. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stoddard BL. Homing endonuclease structure and function. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2005;38:49–95. doi: 10.1017/S0033583505004063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Biertumpfel C, Yang W, Suck D. Crystal structure of T4 endonuclease VII resolving a Holliday junction. Nature. 2007;449:616–620. doi: 10.1038/nature06152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nowotny M, Gaidamakov SA, Crouch RJ, Yang W. Crystal structures of RNase H bound to an RNA/DNA hybrid: substrate specificity and metal-dependent catalysis. Cell. 2005;121:1005–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schmidt BH, Burgin AB, Deweese JE, Osheroff N, Berger JM. A novel and unified two-metal mechanism for DNA cleavage by type II and IA topoisomerases. Nature. 2010;465:641–644. doi: 10.1038/nature08974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pingoud V, Wende W, Friedhoff P, Reuter M, Alves J, Jeltsch A, Mones L, Fuxreiter M, Pingoud A. On the divalent metal ion dependence of DNA cleavage by restriction endonucleases of the EcoRI Family. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;393:140–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Syson K, Tomlinson C, Chapados BR, Sayers JR, Tainer JA, Williams NH, Grasby JA. Three metal ions participate in the reaction catalyzed by T5 flap endonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:28741–28746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801264200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.