Abstract
E7 is an accessory protein that is not encoded by all papillomaviruses. The E7 amino terminus contains two regions of similarity to conserved regions 1 and 2 of the adenovirus E1A protein, which are also conserved in the simian vacuolating virus 40 large tumor antigen. The E7 carboxyl terminus consists of a zinc-binding motif, which is related to similar motifs in E6 proteins. E7 proteins play a central role in the human papillomavirus life cycle, reprogramming the cellular environment to be conducive to viral replication. E7 proteins encoded by the cancer-associated alpha human papillomaviruses have potent transforming activities, which together with E6, are necessary but not sufficient to render their host squamous epithelial cell tumorigenic. This article strives to provide a comprehensive summary of the published research studies on human papillomavirus E7 proteins.
Keywords: Viral life cycle, Regulation of transcription, Regulation of cell cycle checkpoints, Transformation, Viral oncology, Cervical cancer
Introduction
Unlike most review articles that are written from a particular perspective and evaluate the literature accordingly, this article lists and summarizes many of the countless research papers that have been published over the years focused on biochemical properties and biological activities of human papillomavirus (HPV) E7 proteins. The intent is to be comprehensive and to present information as unbiased as possible, rather than providing a critical assessment and synthesis of this literature. A number of excellent and comprehensive reviews on E7 have been published (Ghittoni et al., 2010; Klingelhutz and Roman, 2012; McLaughlin-Drubin et al., 2012; McLaughlin-Drubin and Munger, 2009; Moody and Laimins, 2010; Pim and Banks, 2010; Wise-Draper and Wells, 2008) and this article is to complement these reviews by providing unfiltered and undigested information. The goal is to empower investigators to connect to the primary literature so that they can apply their own filters and criteria to assess the “credibility” of the information in question. To maximize accessibility of the information, most of the information is organized and presented as tables.
The quality and usefulness of future versions of this article depends upon crowdsourcing: missing or misinterpreted information should be brought to the authors’ attention and will be corrected in revised versions of these tables and/or updated version of this article. The most effective and efficient way to communicate changes will be to prepare a Table or Figure in the same format as used here and send it as an attachment to E7PAVEreview@gmail.com.
The HPVs are divided into genera (e.g., alpha, beta, mu, and gamma), species (groupings of types within a genus) and types based on amino acid identity, with types being the most closely related (de Villiers et al., 2004). The alpha papillomaviruses cause mucosal and cutaneous disease while the beta, mu and gamma papillomaviruses cause cutaneous disease. Additionally, the alpha genus is divided into low-risk and high-risk types based on outcome of infection, with the former causing benign papillomas and the latter lesions that can progress to carcinomas (zur Hausen, 2002). This review is a compendium of the biochemical and biological activities of E7 proteins encoded by high-risk alpha papillomavirus types (HPV16 and 31 in genus 9; HPV18 in genus 7), the low-risk alpha papillomavirus types (HPV6 and 11 in genus 10); the beta types (HPV5, 8 and 20 in genus 1; HPV38 in genus 2; HPV49 in genus 3); a mu type (HPV1); and gamma types (HPV4 in genus 1 and HPV108 in genus 6).
Human papillomavirus E7 proteins
Amino acid sequences
HPV E7 proteins consist of approximately 100 amino acid residues. There are no cellular proteins that share extensive sequence similarities to E7, even though some E7 sequence motifs, most notably the LXCXE sequence, are also found in cellular proteins (Defeo-Jones et al., 1991). The amino terminus contains two regions of sequence similarity to the adenovirus (Ad) E1A proteins. Relative to Ad E1A, these E7 sequences correspond to a small portion of conserved region (CR) 1 and nearly the entire CR2 (Phelps et al., 1988). This sequence similarity extends to the simian vacuolating virus 40 large tumor antigen (SV40 T) (Fig. 1) (Figge and Smith, 1988) and provided a mechanistic explanation for the functional similarities between Ad E1A and HPV16 E7 that were discovered early on (Matlashewski et al., 1987; Phelps et al., 1988).
Fig. 1.
Sequence alignment of various HPV E7 proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the conserved sequence elements in a generic E7 protein. Conserved regions (CR) are shown as black boxes, variable sequences are shown in gray. (B) The HPV E7 amino terminus contains two sequence elements that are similar to CR1 and CR2 of the adenovirus type 5 E1A protein (Ad5 E1A) and related sequences in the simian vacuolating virus 40 large tumor antigen (SV40 T). The position of the highly conserved LXCXE motif in CR2 is shown. (C) The HPV E7 C-terminus contains two CXXC motifs that form a zinc-binding site. The one letter code for amino acid (aa) residues is used; X denotes any amino acid. Identical amino residues are highlighted by black boxes, amino acid residues with chemically similar side chains are marked with gray boxes. See text for details.
The CR1 and CR2 homology domains are conserved between different HPV E7 proteins and are separated by a non-conserved sequence of variable size and amino acid composition. The CR2 domain is followed by a second poorly conserved sequence followed by the conserved carboxyl terminal zinc-binding site, which consists of two CXXC domains separated by 29 to 30 amino acid residues (Barbosa et al., 1989; McIntyre et al., 1993) (Fig. 1).
Papillomavirus E6 proteins contain two copies of a similar zinc-binding motif. The HPV16 E7 C-terminal domain can be replaced with the zinc-binding domain derived from E6 without apparent loss of function (Mavromatis et al., 1997). It has been suggested that E6 and E7 might have evolved from a common ancestor (Cole and Danos, 1987; Van Doorslaer et al., 2009). Consistent with such a model, some papillomaviruses encode E7 but no E6 proteins (Ahola et al., 1986; Chen et al., 2007; Nobre et al., 2009) whereas other papillomaviruses encode E6 but no E7 proteins (Gottschling et al., 2011; Stevens et al., 2008a, 2008b). In some cases E7 proteins contain functional domains that in other papillomaviruses are encoded by the E6 proteins. The Rhesus monkey papillomavirus 1 (MmPV1), which causes anogenital tract lesions similar to alpha HPVs, for example, encodes an E7 protein with a C-terminal PDZ binding motif (XS/TXV), which is a hallmark of high-risk alpha HPV E6 proteins (Tomaic et al., 2009).
Some E7 proteins, including HPV16 E7 migrate slower on SDS polyacrylamide gels than predicted from their molecular mass. This is attributed to the high content of acidic amino acid residues, particularly within the CR1 and CR2 homology domains (Armstrong and Roman, 1992, 1993; Heck et al., 1992; Munger et al., 1991). Neutralization of the negative charges by chemical modification of free carboxyl groups by 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethyl-aminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC) restored electrophoretic migration of HPV16 E7 to the predicted molecular mass (Armstrong and Roman, 1993). In addition, the commonly used protease inhibitors, tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK) and tosyl-L-pheny-lalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), can chemically modify the conserved cysteine residue in the E7 CR2 homology domain (cysteine at residue 24, C24, in HPV16) causing slower migration on SDS polyacrylamide gels (Stoppler et al., 1996).
Excellent antibodies exist for detection of untagged HPV16 E7: the ED17 antibody recognizes an epitope near the LXCXE domain and will not detect a deletion of residues 21–24 (del 21–24) whereas the 8C9 antibody recognizes an epitope in the CR1 homology domain and will not detect the del 6–10 mutant (Psyrri et al., 2004). In addition, epitope tagging has been widely used. Amino-terminal tagging of HPV16 E7 can affect E7 stability and binding to cellular proteins such as p600 (UBR4) and such tagged forms can be transformation defective (Huh et al., 2005; Reinstein et al., 2000). In contrast, fusing epitopes to the C-terminus does not appear to affect biological activity (Huh et al., 2005). On occasion, an estrogen receptor derived tag (ER) that allows for conditional activation of E7 has been added to the C-terminus (Genovese et al., 2008; Smith-McCune et al., 1999).
Subcellular localization
Felix Wettstein’s group was the first to detect the HPV16 E7 protein in cervical carcinoma lines. They showed that HPV16 E7 localized to the soluble cytoplasmic fraction (Smotkin and Wettstein, 1987). Nuclear localization of E7 has also been reported (Greenfield et al., 1991; Guccione et al., 2002; Sato et al., 1989; Smith-McCune et al., 1999) and low-risk but not high-risk HPV E7 proteins can associate with PML bodies (Guccione et al., 2002). HPV16 E7 was also detected in the nucleolus (Zatsepina et al., 19 9 7 ).
Consistent with nuclear and cytoplasmic E7 pools and activities, the HPV16 E7 protein contains nuclear localization as well as nuclear export sequences and can shuttle between the two cellular compartments (Knapp et al., 2009). It enters the nucleus through nuclear pores using a RAN dependent pathway that does not depend on classical karyopherins. Nuclear import is independent of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRB) binding but the nuclear localization sequence has not been identified (Angeline et al., 2003). The HPV16 E7 nuclear export sequence has been mapped to amino acid residues 76–84, which are well conserved in HPV E7 proteins (Fig. 1) (Knapp et al., 2009). RAN dependent, karyopherin independent nuclear import has also been reported for HPV11 E7 and the C-terminal zinc-binding domain was necessary for nuclear transport (Piccioli et al., 2010).
Post-translational modifications
Phosphorylation
Early studies indicated that HPV16 is heavily phosphorylated on serine residues (Smotkin and Wettstein, 1987). The HPV16 E7 protein contains a consensus phosphorylation site for casein kinase II (CKII; EC 2.7.11.1) in the CR2 homology domain (Barbosa et al., 1990; Firzlaff et al., 1989). This motif is conserved in SV40 T and Ad E1A CR2 domains as well as in other alpha HPV E7 proteins (Fig. 1) and some cellular LXCXE domain containing proteins (Defeo-Jones et al., 1991). CKII phosphorylation was reported two times faster for HPV18 E7 than HPV16 E7, which in turn was two times faster than HPV6 E7 (Barbosa et al., 1990).
A complex of macrophage-inhibitory related factor protein (MRP) 8 and 14 functions as a CKII inhibitor and causes decreased CKII HPV16 E7 phosphorylation. MRP 8/14 levels were detectable in normal but not in HPV immortalized human keratinocytes with a concomitant four fold increase in CKII activity in HPV immortalized cells (Tugizov et al., 2005).
S-phase-specific phosphorylation of Serine 71 in the HPV16 E7 C-terminal domain has also been described but the kinase is unknown (Massimi and Banks, 2000). Although HPV16 E7 carrying a mutation at this site has been tested for altered biological activity, thus far only one assay has detected loss of function (see Table 9).
Table 9.
High-risk alpha HPV E7 C-terminal mutants; biological activities.
| HPV type | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | ||
| E46A | Retains ability to destabilize pRB, p107, p130 Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to bypass DNA damage checkpoints Retains ability to extend HFK lifespan |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| A50S | Retains ability to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996) |
| Retains ability to destabilize pRB Retains ability to transactivate the E2F–responsive cyclin A promoter Retains ability to induce DNA synthesis and block senescence in HPV E2-expressing HeLa cells Reduces ability to rescue E2-expressing HeLa cells from apoptosis or senescence |
Psyrri et al. (2004) | |
| Significantly reduces ability to induce tetrasomy in monolayer and raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| H51A | Retains ability to destabilize pRB Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to bypass DNA damage checkpoints |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| Y52A | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Reduces ability to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 52–56 (YNIVT) | Significantly reduces ability to abrogate Skip-mediated transcriptional transactivation | Prathapam et al. (2001) |
| Reduces inhibition of Miz-1-dependent p21CIP1 transcription | Morandell et al. (2012) | |
| del 52–57 (YNIVTF) | Fails to stimulate MPP2 (FOXM1)-dependent transcription | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) |
| N53D | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 54–61 (IVTFCCKC) | Retains ability to transactivate the AdE2 promoter Fails to transform permanent rodent cells |
Watanabe et al. (1990) |
| V55T | Increases ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| V55F56M84/AAA | Reduces protection of GSTP1 from inactivation through oxidation Reduces protection of cells from JNK-mediated apoptosis in response to UV |
Mileo et al. (2009) |
| F57A | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| C58C91/GG | Reduces ability to transform permanent rodent cells | Edmonds and Vousden (1989) |
| Retains ability to transactivate the B-myb promoter | Lam et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to abrogate p27KIP1-mediated inhibition of CDK2 | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to abrogate IRF-1 mediated transactivation | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to abrogate BRG-1-mediated repression of the c-fos promoter and BRG-1-induced flat cell formation in SW13 cells |
Lee et al. (2002a) | |
| Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| C59S | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| K60E | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| D62K | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| D62S63T64/AAA | Retains ability to destabilize pRB Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to bypass DNA damage checkpoints |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| S63D | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| T64D | Increases ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L65A | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L65R66L67/AAA | Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F | Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| del 65–72 (LRLCVQST) | Fails to stimulate MPP2 (FOXM1)-dependent transcription | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) |
| R66A | Retains ability to destabilize pRB Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to bypass DNA damage checkpoints |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| R66E | Increases ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L67R | Fails to bypass pRB-induced quiescence in SAOS2 cells | Brehm et al. (1999) |
| Fails to abrogate growth arrest induced by serum deprivation Fails to upregulate CDC25A promoter |
Nguyen et al. (2002) | |
| Fails to transactivate E2F–dependent promoters | Avvakumov et al. (2003) | |
| Fails to increase acetylation of histone H3 on E2F–regulated promoters | Zhang et al. (2004) | |
| Fails to abrogate PML IV-mediated senescence | Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to induce centriole overduplication Fails to increase PLK4 transcription |
Korzeniewski et al. (2011) | |
| Fails to increase HIF-1α-mediated transcription | Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| L67R in the context of the intact genome | Retains ability to immortalize HFKs Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal copies of viral genomes Retains ability to activate late viral transcription in differentiated cells May be compromised in ability to decrease pRB level and induce cell cycle proteins Fails to produce viral particles. |
Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| C68V69Q70/AAA | Retains ability to destabilize pRB, p107, p130 Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to abrogate pRB-induced flat SAOS2 cell morphology Fails to bypass DNA damage checkpoints Fails to extend HFK lifespan |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| Fails to inactivate p21CIP1 Fails to bypass differentiation-induced growth arrest |
Helt et al. (2002) | |
| Limited increase in FANCD2-containing alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT)-associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies (APBs) |
Spardy et al. (2008) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate E2F6-mediated transcriptional repression and decrease E2F6-PcG Complexes |
McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Retains ability to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| C68V69Q70/AAA in the context of the intact genome |
Retains ability to immortalize HFKs Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal copies of viral genomes Retains ability to activate late viral transcription in differentiated cells May be compromised in ability to decrease pRB level and induce cell cycle proteins Reduces ability to produce viral particles but particles are infectious. |
Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| V69A | Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| S71I | Retains ability to transform permanent rodent cells | Edmonds and Vousden (1989) |
| Retains ability to be phosphorylated by CKII | Barbosa et al. (1990) | |
| Retains ability to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996) | |
| Retains ability to destabilize pRB Retains ability to stabilize p53 Retains ability to abrogate cell death induced by confluence or serum deprivation |
Jones et al. (1997b) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate IRF-1-mediated transactivation | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate BRG-1-mediated repression of the c-fos promoter and BRG-1-induced flat cell formation in SW13 cells |
Lee et al. (2002a) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate pRB-induced flat SAOS2 cell morphology | Avvakumov et al. (2003) | |
| Retains increased acetylation of histone H3 on E2F–regulated promoters | Zhang et al. (2004) | |
| Significantly reduces ability to induce tetrasomy in monolayer and raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| T72D | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| T72H73V74/AAA | Retains ability to degrade pRB Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to override DNA damage checkpoints |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| H73E | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| V74T | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 75–77 (DIR) | Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to degrade pRB |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| I76A | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| R77A | Retains ability to degrade pRB Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to override DNA damage checkpoints |
Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| R77E | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L79A | Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 79–83 (LEDLL) | Fails to shift the equilibrium of M2 pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) to the less active, dimeric form | Zwerschke et al. (1999) |
| Fails to degrade IGFBP-3 and to abrogate IGFBP-3-mediated apoptosis | Mannhardt et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to activate acid α-glucosidase | Zwerschke et al. (2000) | |
| Retains the ability to destabilize pRB, p107, p130 Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F Retains ability to abrogate pRB-induced quiescence of SAOS2 cells Fails to bypass DNA damage checkpoints Fails to extend HFK lifespan |
Helt and Galloway (2001) | |
| Fails to inactivate p21CIP1 Fails to bypass differentiation-induced growth arrest |
Helt et al. (2002) | |
| Fails to inhibit TBP binding to DNA | Maldonado et al. (2002) | |
| Limits increase in FANCD2-containing alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT)-associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies (APBs) |
Spardy et al. (2008) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate E2F6-mediated transcriptional repression and decrease E2F6-PcG Complexes |
McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to induce disorganized metaphase phenotype (prometaphase delay) | Nguyen and Munger (2009) | |
| Retains ability to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| Reduces inhibition of Miz-1-dependent p21CIP1 transcription | Morandell et al. (2012) | |
| Fails to inhibit cyclin B degradation | Yu and Munger (2012) | |
| del 79–86 (LEDLLMGT) | Fails to stimulate MPP2 (FOXM1)-dependent transcription | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) |
| E80Q | Fails to repress MHC I expression | Heller et al. (2011) |
| E80D81/KK | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| E80E81/QQ | Gains ability to be polyaminated by TGase 2 | Jeon et al. (2003) |
| L82L83/RR | Fails to abrogate PML IV-mediated senescence Fails to disrupt PML IV:CBP-mediated p53 acetylation and p53-mediated transcription |
Bischof et al. (2005) |
| L82L83M84G85/AAAD | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| M84S | Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| G85A | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Fails to overcome cell cycle arrest |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| T86D | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L87A | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| I89V90/AA | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| C91G | Limits ability to transform permanent rodent cells | Edmonds and Vousden (1989) |
| Fails to immortalize HFKs | Jewers et al. (1992) | |
| Fails to enhance c-JUN-mediated transactivation | Antinore et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to abrogate BRCA1 inhibition of ER-α-mediated transcription | Zhang et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to abrogate PML IV-mediated senescence | Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| Reduces ability to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| C91G in context of intact genome | Fails to immortalize HFKs Reduces efficiency of immortalization of HFKs Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes Retains ability to produce late viral transcripts Reduces proliferation and retention of nuclei in organotypic rafts |
(Jewers et al. (1992), (Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| C91S | Fails to stimulate S4A proteasome subunit ATPase activity | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) |
| Retains ability to degrade pRB | Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
| Retains ability to induce abnormal centrosome duplication | Duensing and Munger (2003) | |
| Fails to abrogate E2F6-mediated transcriptional repression and decrease E2F6-PcG complexes | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to increase HIF-1α-mediated transcription | Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| C91S in context of intact genome | Retains ability to immortalize HFKs Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes Retains ability to decrease the level of pRB Retains ability to produce late viral transcripts in differentiated HFKs Reduces proliferation and retention of nuclei in organotypic rafts |
Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| del C91–94 (CPIC) | Substantially reduces ability to transactivate the AdE2 promoter |
Storey et al. (1990a), Watanabe et al. (1990) |
| P92A | Increases ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| I93T | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| Q96K97P98/EEA | Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Reduces pRB degradation |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| HPV31 | ||
| L67R in the context of the intact genome | Fails to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes Fails to extend life span |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| Fails to increase E2F2 transcription and to inhibit binding of HDAC 1/3 to E2F2 promoter in differentiated cells |
Longworth et al. (2005) | |
| C68V69Q70/AAA in the context of the intact genome |
Retains ability to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes Retains ability to extend life span. Limits ability to amplify viral DNA upon differentiation |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| S71C in context of intact genome | Retains ability to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes Retains ability to extend life span Retains ability to amplify HPV genomes upon differentiation |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| del 79–83 (LQELL) in the context of the intact genome |
Some reduction in the ability to stably maintain extrachromosomal copies of viral genomes Retains ability to extend life span Fails to amplify HPV genome upon differentiation |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| L82L83/RR in the context of the intact genome |
Retains ability to extend life span Somewhat reduces ability to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes Fails to amplify HPV genomes upon differentiation. |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| C91G in context of intact genome | Significant reduces ability to stably maintain extrachromosomal copies of viral genomes Fails to immortalize cells |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| HPV18 | ||
| C65S | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | McIntyre et al. (1993) |
| C65C98/SS | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | McIntyre et al. (1993) |
| del 65–68/98–101 (CCKC/ CPIC) | Fails to enhance c-myc dependent transcriptional transactivation | Wang et al. (2007) |
| Q87Q88/RR | Fails to be polyaminated by TGase 2 | Jeon et al. (2003) |
| C98S | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | McIntyre et al. (1993) |
BRK, baby rat kidney cells; HFK, primary human foreskin keratinocytes; UV, ultraviolet; SAOS2, pRB/p53 defective human osteosarcoma cell line (ATCC Number: HTB-85); SW13 human adrenal gland/cortex carcinoma line (ATCC Number CCL-105); TGase2, transglutaminase 2.
The HPV6 E7 protein can be in vitro phosphorylated by protein kinase C (PKC; EC 2.7.11.13) on threonine 7 in the CR1 homology domain. Even though this residue is well conserved amongst many HPV E7 proteins, the PKC recognition sequence [(R/K1–3/X2–0)-S/T-(X2–0/R/K1–3)] is not conserved and the high-risk HPV16 E7 is not PKC phosphorylated under similar experimental conditions (Armstrong and Roman, 1995). However, phosphorylation of HPV16 E7 at threonine residues 5 and 7 by dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A; EC 2.7.12.1) has been described and linked to increased E7 stability and transforming activity (Liang et al., 2008).
Ubiquitination
HPV16 E7 has a short half-life of less than 1 h (Smotkin and Wettstein, 1987) and is degraded by the proteasome. A lysine-less HPV16 E7 mutant was efficiently degraded through a ubiquitin dependent mechanism, suggesting that HPV16 E7 can be amino terminally ubiquitinated followed by proteasomal degradation (Reinstein et al., 2000). Ubiquitination of the HPV16 E7 protein by Ubch7 (UBE2L3) and a Cullin 1/Skp2-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase has also been described (Oh et al., 2004a). Amino terminal ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation has also been documented for HPV58 E7, which contains no lysine residues (Ben-Saadon et al., 2004). Studies with estrogen-receptor (ER) fused HPV E7 proteins showed that low-risk HPV6 and 11 E7 proteins are also ubiquitinated but have a somewhat longer metabolic half-life than similarly tagged high-risk HPV16 and 18 E7 proteins. Non-conserved HPV11 E7 lysine residues 39 and 43 were identified as targets for ubiquitin modification but their mutation to arginine residues caused decreased protein stability demonstrating that ubiquitin modification of these residues is not essential for rapid proteasomal degradation (Genovese et al., 2011).
Other modifications
HPV E7 proteins have been reported to associate with trans-glutaminase 2 (TGM2; EC 2.3.2.13). HPV18 E7, but not HPV16 E7, is polyaminated at glutamine residues 87 or 88 in the C-terminal domain. HPV18 E7 polyamination interferes with pRB binding and functional inactivation (Jeon et al., 2003).
Evidence for additional post-translational modification of HPV16 E7 is provided by the detection of three isoforms designated as E7a1 (17.5 kDa, IEP 4.68), E7a (17 kDa, IEP 6.18) and E7b (16 kDa, IEP 6.96). These isoforms show differential localization to the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments (Valdovinos-Torres et al., 2008).
HPV E7 structures
Early glycerol gradient sedimentation studies with HPV16 E7 expressed in cervical cancer lines provided evidence that HPV16 E7 was present in macromolecular complexes (Smotkin and Wettstein, 1987). HPV16 E7 forms a very stable extended structure (Alonso et al., 2002) even though the amino terminal CR1/CR2 homology sequences represent an intrinsically disordered domain (Garcia-Alai et al., 2007). E7 dimerization through the C-terminal zinc-binding domain was observed when the protein was expressed in Escherichia coli (McIntyre et al., 1993) or Saccharo-myces cerevisiae (Clemens et al., 1995; Todorovic et al., 2011). Detailed studies with purified recombinant HPV16 E7 showed that E7 can form tetramers (Clements et al., 2000) and higher order oligomers (Alonso et al., 2004), which may have chaperone activity (Alonso et al., 2006), although the dimeric form was predicted to be prevalent at physiological E7 concentrations (Clements et al., 2000). Multimerization does not inhibit pRB binding (Alonso et al., 2006; Clements et al., 2000). Metal substitution studies with the E7 C-terminal zinc-binding domain provided evidence for a compact, highly shielded zinc-thiolate complex as evidenced by luminescence of the Cu(I)–E7 derivative (Roth et al., 1992) similar to that observed with Cu(I)-metallothio-neins (Beltramini et al., 1989).
Three-dimensional structures of the zinc-binding C-terminal domains of HPV1 and HPV45 E7 have been reported (Liu et al., 2006; Ohlenschlager et al., 2006). The structure of the C-terminal HPV1 E7 domain encompasses amino acids 44–93 and was solved by X-ray crystallography. It forms a dimer with a unique zinc-binding fold that is not closely related to the E6 zinc-binding domain structure (Nomine et al., 2006). Many of the highly conserved amino acid residues in the C-terminal domain are surface exposed (Liu et al., 2006). The structure of the entire HPV45 E7 protein was solved by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). The amino terminal domain is unfolded and C-terminal zinc-binding domain is involved in dimer formation (Ohlenschlager et al., 2006). There is good general agreement between the two structures.
Biological activities of alpha HPV E7 proteins
Interest in the HPV E7 protein was driven by early observations that E6 and E7 were the only two high-risk alpha HPV genes that are consistently expressed in human cervical carcinoma derived cell lines. The high-risk alpha HPV E7 protein scored as the major transforming protein in “standard” rodent cell based transformation assays (morphological transformation of NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts and, similar to Ad E1A, cooperation with RAS to transform primary baby rat kidney cells). The recognition that E7 shares two blocks of sequence similarity with CR1 and CR2 of Ad E1A provided the biochemical framework for many of the following studies into “adenovirus E1A–like activities” of HPV E7 proteins.
The various biological activities that have been reported for high-risk and low-risk alpha HPV E7 proteins are listed in Table 1. While we have endeavored to indicate when a particular biochemical or biological activity is true for only one HPV type, the reader should be aware that a “+” in a column does not necessarily indicate similar modes of action for different viruses. For example, while both HPV16 and 18 E7 destabilize pRB, the mechanisms must be different (White et al., 2012); and although both HPV16 E7 and HPV6 E7 destabilize p130, there appear to be distinct mechanisms (Barrow-Laing et al., 2010). The reader is reminded to consult the primary literature to evaluate the experimental data in this Table.
Table 1.
Biological activities of alpha HPV E7.
| Biological process | High-risk HPV E7 (HPV16, 18, or 31) |
Low-risk HPV E7 (HPV6 or 11) |
References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viral replication | |||
| Maintains extrachromosomal HPV genomes | + (HPV31 only) |
+ |
Flores et al. (2000), McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2005), Oh et al. (2004b), Thomas et al. (1999) |
| Amplifies HPV genomes | + | ND | Flores et al. (2000) and McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2005) |
| Transformation | |||
| Transforms permanent rodent cells | + | − | Banks et al. (1990), Barbosa et al. (1990), Edmonds and Vousden (1989), Phelps et al. (1988), Vousden et al. (1988), Watanabe et al. (1990), Watanabe et al. (1992) |
| Transforms primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS |
+ | − | Banks et al. (1990), Chesters et al. (1990), Firzlaff et al. (1991), Jewers et al. (1992), Massimi et al. (2008), Phelps et al. (1988), Storey et al. (1990b) |
| Immortalizes primary human epithelial cells (often, but not always, in cooperation with E6) |
+ | < |
Halbert et al. (1991, 1992), Jewers et al. (1992), Melillo et al. (1994), Munger et al. (1989a), Sedman et al. (1991), Wazer et al. (1995) |
| G1/S control | |||
| Induces DNA synthesis | + | + | Banks et al. (1990), Morris et al. (1993), Watanabe et al. (1992) |
| Induces PCNA in suprabasal cells | + | < | Cheng et al. (1995) |
| Induces cell DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells | + | < | Cheng et al. (1995), Chien et al. (2000), Collins et al. (2005), Flores et al. (2000), Genovese et al. (2008) |
| Bypasses growth arrest | + | − | Demers et al. (1996), Helt and Galloway (2001), Nguyen et al. (2002), Ruesch and Laimins (1997), and Schulze et al. (1998) |
| Abrogates p27KIP1 inhibition of CDK2 activity | + | ND | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) |
| Mediates cyclin E/CDK2 phosphorylation of p107 | + | ND | McIntyre et al. (1996) |
| Abrogates p21CIP1 inhibition of CDK2 activity | + | < | Funk et al. (1997), Helt et al. (2002), Jones et al. (1997a) |
| Increases levels of p21CIP1 | + | − | Martin et al. (1998) |
| Abrogates C/EBPα-mediated growth arrest, independent of p21CIP1 |
+ | + | Muller et al. (1999) |
| Induces polα, and cyclin E in suprabasal cells | + | ND | Chien et al. (2000) |
| Abrogates p16INK4A-mediated G1 arrest | + | ND | Giarre et al. (2001) |
| Abrogates RAF-induced growth arrest by AKT-mediated mislocalization of p21CIP1 |
+ | ND | Westbrook et al. (2002) |
| Activates CDK2 complexes | + | + | He et al. (2003) |
| Increases expression of E2F2 | + | ND | Longworth et al. (2005) |
| Mislocalizes p27KIP1 to the cytoplasm | + | ND | Charette and McCance (2007) |
| Abrogates Miz-1-mediated transcription of p21CIP1 | + | − | (Morandell et al. (2012) |
| Mitotic processes | |||
| Abrogates mitotic spindle checkpoint | + | − | Thomas and Laimins (1998) |
| Causes multipolar mitoses/aberrant centrosome Duplication |
+ | − | Duensing et al. (2000), Duensing and Munger (2003) |
| Induces tetrasomy | + | − | Southern et al. (2004), Southern et al. (2001) |
| Induces anaphase bridges | + | ND | Duensing and Munger (2002) |
| Decreases recruitment of γ-tubulin from cytoplasm to Centrosomes |
+ | ND | Nguyen et al. (2007) |
| Disrupts NuMA/dynein network and induces prometaphase delay |
+ | + | Nguyen and Munger (2009) |
| Activates CHK2 | + | ND | Moody and Laimins (2009) |
| Promotes mitotic entry | + | ND | Spardy et al. (2009) |
| Abrogates postmitotic checkpoint | + | ND | Heilman et al. (2009) |
| Upregulates PLK4 transcription | + | − | Korzeniewski et al. (2011) |
| Prolongs G2 | + | ND | Banerjee et al. (2011) |
| Upregulates cytoplasmic cyclin B, hyperphosphorylates CDK1 and phosphorylates CDC25C in suprabasal cells (induces prolonged G2 phase in suprabasal cells) |
+ | + (only cyclin B analyzed |
Banerjee et al. (2011) |
| Engages mitotic spindle checkpoint | + | ND | Yu and Munger (2012) |
| Upregulates CDT1 | + | ND | Fan et al. (2013) |
| Cell death/survival | |||
| Induces cell death in response to confluence and/or serum deprivation |
+ | ND | Jones et al. (1997b) |
| Abrogates IGFBP-3-mediated apoptosis | + | ND | Mannhardt et al. (2000) |
| Activates PKB/AKT | + | + | Menges et al. (2006), Pim et al. (2005) |
| Abrogates Siva-1 mediated apoptosis | + | ND | Severino et al. (2007) |
| Disrupts Siva-1: Bcl-XL complex formation | + | ND | Severino et al. (2007) |
| Activates calpain | + | ND | Darnell et al. (2007) |
| Activates caspase 3 and 7 in differentiated cells | + | + | Moody et al. (2007) |
| Abrogates apoptosis through maintenance of activated GSTP1 |
+ | ND | Mileo et al. (2009) |
| Induces autophagy in HFKs in response to metabolic stress |
+ | ND | Zhou and Munger (2009) |
| DNA damage/repair | |||
| Induces double strand DNA breaks | + | Duensing and Munger (2002) | |
| Activates the FA pathway | + | − | Spardy et al. (2007) |
| Differentiation/senescence | |||
| Delays differentiation | + | + | Collins et al. (2005), Flores et al. (2000), Jones et al. (1997a), Zhang et al. (2006) |
| Abrogates pRB-induced flat cell morphology | + | ND | Brehm et al. (1999), Gonzalez et al. (2001), Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| Enhances C/EBPα-mediated differentiation | + | ND | Muller et al. (1999) |
| Abrogates senescence | + | + (PML-induced senescence |
Bischof et al. (2005), DeFilippis et al. (2003), Psyrri et al. (2004), Wise-Draper et al. (2005) |
| Upregulates senescence inhibitor, DEK | + | − | Wise-Draper et al. (2005) |
| Metabolism | |||
| Shifts the equilibrium of M2 pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) to the less active, dimeric form |
+ | ND | Zwerschke et al. (1999) |
| Activates allosteric acid α-glucosidase | + | ND | Zwerschke et al. (2000) |
| Increases intracellular alkalinization potentially due to increased activity of the Na+/H+ exchanger protein |
+ | ND | Reshkin et al. (2000) |
| Cytokine modulation | |||
| Abrogates TGF-β-mediated repression of the c-myc Promoter |
+ | ND | Pietenpol et al. (1990) |
| Abrogates TGF-β-mediated growth arrest | + | ND | Lee et al. (2002b), Pietenpol et al. (1990) |
| Disrupts the formation of the ISGF3 (STAT1, STAT2, IRF- 9) complex |
+ | ND | Barnard and McMillan (1999) |
| Inhibits cellular response to IFN-α | + | + | Barnard et al. (2000) |
| Abrogates IRF-1-mediated transactivation | + | + | Park et al. (2000), Perea et al. (2000) |
| Inhibits TNFα-mediated cell cycle arrest | + | ND | Basile et al. (2001), Boccardo et al. (2010) |
| Inhibits TNFα-mediated epithelial differentiation | + | ND | Basile et al. (2001) |
| Inhibits TNFα-induced apoptosis when protein synthesis is inhibited |
+ | ND | Basile et al. (2001), Thompson et al. (2001) |
| Inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis when protein synthesis is inhibited |
+ | ND | Basile et al. (2001) |
| Suppresses STAT-1 | + | − | Hong et al. (2011), Thomas et al. (2001) |
| Abrogates TGF-β-mediated activation of a SMAD- responsive promoter |
+ | + | Habig et al. (2006), Lee et al. (2002b) |
| Inhibits TNFα-induced NFκB activity | + | ND | Spitkovsky et al. (2002) Vandermark et al. (2012) |
| Increases expression of VEGF and IL-8 | + | ND | Walker et al. (2011) |
| Protein stability | |||
| Increases steady state level of p53 |
Demers et al. (1994b), Jones et al. (1997b), Seavey et al. (1999) |
||
| Destabilizes pRB | + | − |
Berezutskaya et al. (1997), Boyer et al. (1996) Demers et al. (1994a), Jones and Munger (1997) |
| Destabilizes p107 | + | − |
Gonzalez et al. (2001), Helt and Galloway (2001) Jones and Munger (1997) |
| Stimulates S4A proteasome subunit ATPase activity | + | ND | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) |
| Destabilizes p130 | + | + |
Genovese et al. (2008), Gonzalez et al. (2001), Helt and Galloway (2001), Zhang et al. (2006) |
| Targets IGFBP-3 for proteasomal degradation | + | ND | Santer et al. (2007) |
| Recruits pRB to a cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex that contains ZER1 |
+ (HPV16 only) |
− | Huh et al. (2007), White et al. (2012) |
| Destabilizes claspin | + | ND | Spardy et al. (2009) |
| Targets NHERF-1 for E6-mediated degradation | + | ND | Accardi et al. (2011) |
| Stabilizes HIF-1α | + | ND | Bodily et al. (2011b) |
| Stabilizes cyclin B during mitosis | + | ND | Yu and Munger (2012) |
| Transcription | |||
| Transactives AdE2 promoter through E2F | + | + |
Edmonds and Vousden (1989), Firzlaff et al. (1991), Phelps et al. (1992), Storey et al. (1990b), and Watanabe et al. (1990) |
| Disrupts pRB but not p107 E2F complexes | + | ND | Arroyo et al. (1993), Chellappan et al. (1992), Huang et al. (1993), Wu et al. (1993), Zerfass et al. (1995) |
| Upregulates p107/E2F–responsive B-myb promoter | + | + | Armstrong and Roman (1997), Lam et al. (1994) |
| Enhances c-jun-mediated transactivation | + | ND | Antinore et al. (1996) |
| Activates the c-fos promoter | + | − | Morozov et al. (1997) |
| Upregulates cyclin E promoter/mRNA | + | ND | Martin et al. (1998), Vogt et al. (1999) |
| Induces p14ARF | + | ND | Bates et al. (1998) |
| Stimulates M phase phosphoprotein 2 (MPP2)-mediated transcription |
+ | − | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) |
| Represses MHC I promoter | + | − | Georgopoulos et al. (2000), Li et al. (2009) |
| Represses TAP-1 and LMP-2 promoters | +HPV18 only | +HPV6; -HPV11 | Georgopoulos et al. (2000), and Heller et al. (2011) |
| Abrogates Skip-mediated transcriptional transactivation | + | ND | Prathapam et al. (2001) |
| Activates E2F1-dependent, pRB-independent transcription |
+ | < | Hwang et al. (2002) |
| Abrogates binding of SMAD to DNA | + | ND | Lee et al. (2002b) |
| Activates the p73 promoter | + | − | Brooks et al. (2002) |
| Upregulates the CDC25A promoter | + | ND | Nguyen et al. (2002) |
| Abrogates BRCA 1 inhibition of ER-α transcriptional activity |
+ | ND | Zhang et al. (2005) |
| Abrogates BRCA1 inhibition of E Box transcriptional activity |
+ | ND | Zhang et al. (2005) |
| Abrogates BRCA1 repression of hTERT | + | ND | Zhang et al. (2005) |
| Enhances c-myc dependent transcriptional Transactivation |
+ | − | Wang et al. (2007) |
| Represses TLR9 promoter | + | ND | Hasan et al. (2007) |
| Abrogates E2F6 mediated transcriptional repression | + | + | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) |
| Induces the hTERT promoter | + | ND | Liu et al. (2008) |
| Upregulates Nucleophosmin | + | ND | McCloskey et al. (2010) |
| Activates HIF-1-mediated transcription | + | ND | Bodily et al. (2011b) |
| Co-activation, epigenetic control | |||
| Abrogates BRG-1-mediated transcriptional repression of c-fos |
+ | ND | Lee et al. (2002a) |
| Abrogates p300 transcriptional co-activation function | + | < | Bernat et al. (2003) |
| Down-regulates steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1)- mediated transcription |
+ | + | Baldwin et al. (2006) |
| Relocalizes SRC-1 to the cytoplasm | |||
| Abrogates FHL2 co-activation of beta-catenin and Fos/ Jun -dependent promoters |
+ | ND | Campo-Fernandez et al. (2007) |
| Stimulates DNMT1 activity | + | ND | Burgers et al. (2007) |
| Decreases the number of E2F6-PcG complexes | + | ND | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) |
| Induces EZH2 | + | + | Holland et al. (2008) |
| Upregulates SIRT1 | + | ND | Allison et al. (2009) |
| Represses E-cadherin promoter through a DNMT-1- dependent mechanism |
+ | ND | Laurson et al. (2010) |
| Upregulates KDM6A/B | + | ND | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2011) |
| Induces p16INK4A expression through H3K27 demethylation |
+ | ND | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2011) |
| Modulation of cellular miR expression | |||
| Downregulates miR-203 | + | ND | Melar-New and Laimins (2010) |
| Induces miR-16-1 | + | ND | Zheng and Wang (2011) |
| Other activities | |||
| Increases levels of cyclin E throughout the cell cycle | + | ND | Martin et al. (1998) |
| Elevates levels of CDK activity | + | − | Martin et al. (1998) |
| Decreases polymerization of actin | + | ND | Rey et al. (2000) |
| Abrogates TAP-1-mediated ATP-dependent peptide transport into the ER |
ND | + | Vambutas et al. (2001) |
| Induces membrane type 1 metalloproteinase and activation of MMP2 |
+ | ND | Smola-Hess et al. (2005) |
| Inhibits NM23 expression/activities | + | ND | Mileo et al. (2006) |
| Enhances AKT-dependent HFK migration | + | ND | Charette and McCance (2007) |
| Upregulates MMP-9 activity | + | ND | Cardeal et al. (2012) |
FA, Fanconi anemia; H3K27, lysine 27 on histone H3; HFK, primary human foreskin keratinocytes; miR, micro-RNA; ND, not done; and PcG, polycomb group complex.
It is important to note that the oncogenic activities of the high-risk alpha HPV E7 proteins represent functions related to the viral life cycle and/or arise as a consequence of a specific replication strategy that these viruses have adopted to establish a long-term persistent infection and/or produce viral progeny. Although the papillomaviruses are thought to initially infect undifferentiated epithelial cells where the viral genome is maintained at a low copy number, the productive phase of the life cycle takes place in the differentiated compartment, where cells would have normally exited the cell cycle. Since papillo-maviruses are small and do not encode enzymes required for replication, the viruses must hijack cellular pathways if the virus is to propagate. Viral life cycle phenotypes observed when E7 expression is disrupted in the context of the intact genome are listed in Table 2. The main function of the HPV E7 proteins is generally thought to be to retain differentiating cells in a DNA synthesis competent state. However, for at least some of the viruses, E7 is also required for maintenance of the viral genome in undifferentiated cells. As seen in Table 1, E7 affects many cellular processes, running the gamut from cell cycle entry to cell death that would be pertinent to completion of the virus cycle. As will be seen in subsequent tables, E7 accomplishes this through direct or indirect interactions with an ever-expanding number of proteins. The relevance of those interactions to the virus life cycle remains, in many cases, to be established.
Table 2.
Loss of E7 expression through insertion of a translation termination linker: effects on the viral life cycle.
| HPV | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes in undifferentiated NIKS cells | Flores et al. (2000) |
| Fails to amplify viral DNA, induce unscheduled DNA synthesis, increase the level of expression of p53, p21CIP1, and mdm2, disrupt differentiation and induce apoptosis in differentiated NIKS cells |
Flores et al. (2000) | |
| Reduces expression of L1 | Flores et al. (2000) | |
| HPV18 | Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2005) |
| Fails to amplify HPV DNA and produce infectious virus | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2005) | |
| HPV31 | Retains ability to transiently replicate extrachromosomal HPV genomes | Thomas et al. (1999) |
| Fails to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes | Thomas et al. (1999) | |
| HPV11 | Fails to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes | Oh et al. (2004b) |
NIKS; spontaneously immortalized human foreskin keratinocytes (Allen-Hoffmann et al., 2000)
Experimental analyses of the viral life cycle generally involve studies with monolayer human primary keratinocytes induced to differentiate by the addition of calcium or suspension in methylcellu-lose. Alternatively, in vitro engineered skin-like organotypic structures are produced by growing confluent keratinocytes at the air-liquid interface on an artificial dermis or a reconstituted dermis to form a structure that recapitulates key aspects of epithelial differentiation and allows for viral genome amplification, late gene expression and production of viral progeny in differentiated layers of the epithelium. An important caveat, however, is that these in vitro models for skin differentiation have a very limited life span, i.e. even in the organotypic cultures, the skin-like structure is formed but then rapidly disintegrates. Hence these experimental systems do not truly mimic the “steady state” maintenance of squamous epithelia with continuous asymmetric division of basal epithelial cells (a) to maintain the basal layer and (b) to produce a continuous supply of differentiating cells to replace the terminally differentiated, denucleated squames that are continuously shed. Hence potential biological activities of E7 that may be related to long-term persistent infection cannot be studied.
Association of HPV E7 with cellular and viral proteins
The biochemical basis of the transforming activities of HPV E7 proteins initially was enigmatic since E7 lacked sequence motifs characteristic of enzymes or DNA binding transcription factors. However the observed functional and amino acid sequence similarity to Ad E1A, also known to lack intrinsic enzymatic or specific DNA binding activities, suggested similarities in the mechanisms of action of these two classes of viral proteins (Phelps et al., 1988). The Harlow and Branton groups published intriguing studies revealing that Ad E1A associated with specific cellular proteins and some of these proteins associated through CR1 and CR2 sequences that were known to be essential for cellular transformation (Egan et al., 1988; Harlow et al., 1986). The identification of the 110kd protein interacting with Ad E1A through CR2 sequences as the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product pRB, supported the concept that Ad E1A transforms cells through association with cellular proteins (Whyte et al., 1988). SV40 T (DeCaprio et al., 1988) and later the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein (Dyson et al., 1989) were also shown to associate with pRB through the conserved LXCXE sequence motif within CR2 (Fig. 1).
The similarities between HPV16 E7 and Ad E1A/SV40 T were further elucidated with the construction of chimeric proteins. The HPV16 E7 CR1 homology domain could functionally be replaced with the related Ad E1A or SV40 T domains (Brokaw et al., 1994). Interestingly, Ad E1A was able to functionally complement HPV16 E7 mutants in CR1 and CR2 and conversely HPV16 E7 was able to functionally complement a pRB binding defective CR2 Ad E1A mutant but was unable to complement a p300 binding defective Ad E1A mutant in CR1 (Davies and Vousden, 1992).
An early example of the functional significance of interaction of HPV16 E7 with pRB was the demonstration that an HPV16 E7 mutated in the CR2 pRB binding sequence could be complemented by E2F1 when cooperating with HPV16 E6 to immortalize HFKs; a mutation in either CR1 or the CR2 CKII site, could not be complemented (Melillo et al., 1994). The concept that Ad E1A, SV40 T and HPV16 E7 each exerts its biological activities through association with and functional reprogramming of host cellular regulatory proteins or protein complexes is now firmly established and a large number of cellular proteins have been reported to associate with HPV E7.
Table 3 lists these proteins together with the method that was originally used to discover a given interaction. There was no attempt to distinguish between direct and indirect interactions. Some proteins including E2F transcription factors and cyclin/ cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) complexes have been reported to interact both directly and indirectly with E7 and the criteria that different research groups use to classify a given interaction as “direct” or “indirect” are quite different. This table attempts to be comprehensive and unbiased. Readers will need to consult the primary literature to critically evaluate by their own criteria whether a given interaction may be biologically relevant or not.
Table 3.
Cellular Proteins Reported to be Associated with HPV E7.
| Gene name | Original name | Entrez Gene # | Method | High risk | Low risk | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actin filamentous (F-actin) |
GST | + | ND | Rey et al. (2000) | ||
| ATM | ATM | 472 | Co-IP | HPV31 | ND | Moody and Laimins (2009) |
| BRCA1 | BRCA1 | 672 | GST/Co-IP | + | ND | Zhang et al. (2005) |
| CAPN1 | Mu-Calpain | 823 | Co-IP | + | ND | Darnell et al. (2007) |
| CCNA1 | Cyclin A | 8900 | Peptide bdg, GST | + | ND | Dyson et al. (1992), McIntyre et al. (1996) |
| CCNE1 | Cyclin E | 898 | GST | + | ND | McIntyre et al. (1996) |
| CDK2 | CDK2 | 1017 | E7 peptide bdg; GST | + | + |
He et al. (2003), McIntyre et al. (1996), Nguyen and Munger (2008) |
| CDKN1A | p21CIP1 | 1026 | GST/Co-IP | + | </− | Funk et al. (1997) |
| CDKN1B | p27KIP1 | 1027 | YTH | + | < (GST) | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) |
| CENPC | CENP-C1 | 1060 | YTH | + | − | Yaginuma et al. (2012) |
| CHD4 | Mi2 | 1108 | GST, YTH, | + | ND | Brehm et al. (1999) |
| CHUK | IKK-α | 1147 | Co-IP | + | ND | Spitkovsky et al. (2002) |
| CUL1 | Cullin 1 | 8454 | GST | + | ND | Oh et al. (2004a) |
| CUL2 | Cullin 2 | 8453 | AP-MS | HPV16 only | − | Huh et al. (2007) |
| CUL3 | Cullin 3 | 8452 | AP-MS | + | + | White et al. (2012) |
| CSNK2 | Casein kinase II | Kinase assay | + | < | Barbosa et al. (1990), Firzlaff et al. (1989) | |
| DNAJA3 | hTid-1 | 9093 | YTH | + | < | Schilling et al. (1998) |
| DNMT1 | DNMT1 | 1786 | GST | + | ND | Burgers et al. (2007) |
| DYRK1A | DYRK1A | 1859 | Co-IP | + | ND | Liang et al. (2008) |
| E2F1 | E2F1 | 1869 | GST/ivT | + | < | Hwang et al. (2002) |
| E2F6 | E2F6 | 1876 | AP-MS | + | + | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) |
| ENC1 | Enc1 | 8507 | AP-MS | HPV18/45 only | − | White et al. (2012) |
| EP300 | p300 | 2033 | GST | + | < | Bernat et al. (2003) |
| FHL2 | FHL2 | 2274 | GST | + | ND | Campo-Fernandez et al. (2007) |
| FOXM1 | MPP2 | 2305 | YTH | + | ND | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) |
| GAA | Acid α-glucosidase | 2548 | YTH | + | ND | Zwerschke et al. (2000) |
| GSTP1 | GSTP1 | 2950 | GST | + | ND | Mileo et al. (2009) |
| HDAC1 | HDAC1 | 3065 | GST | + | ND | Brehm et al. (1999) |
| HDAC2 | HDAC2 | 3066 | GST | + | ND | Brehm et al. (1999) |
| HIF1A | HIF1a | 3091 | Co-IP | + | + | Bodily et al. (2011b) |
| HTRA1 | HtrA1/Prss11 | 5654 | Co-IP | + | ND | Clawson et al. (2008) |
| IGFBP3 | IGFBP-3 | 3486 | YTH | + | < | Mannhardt et al. (2000) |
| IKBKB | IKK- | 3551 | Co-IP | + | ND | Spitkovsky et al. (2002) |
| IRF1 | IRF-1 | 3659 | YTH | + | + | Park et al. (2000) |
| IRF9 | p48 | 10379 | GST | + | ND | Antonsson et al. (2006), Barnard and McMillan (1999) |
| JUN | c-jun | 3725 | GST; YTH | + | ND | Antinore et al. (1996) |
| KAT2B | pCAF | 8850 | YTH | + | + | Avvakumov et al. (2003), Huang and McCance (2002) |
| KCMF1 | KCMF1 | 56888 | AP-MS | + | + | White et al. (2012) |
| MYC | c-myc | 4609 | YTH | + | + | Wang et al. (2007) |
| NCOA1 | SRC1 | 8648 | Co-IP | + | + | Baldwin et al. (2006) |
| NME1 | NM23-H1 | 4830 | YTH | + | ND | Mileo et al. (2006) |
| NME2 | NM23-H2 | 4831 | YTH | + | ND | Mileo et al. (2006) |
| NUMA1 | NuMA | 4926 | Co-IP, GST | + | < | Nguyen and Munger (2009) |
| PKM | M2-PK | 5315 | YTH | + | − | Zwerschke et al. (1999) |
| PML | PML | 5371 | GST | + | + | Bischof et al. (2005) |
| PPP2R1/PPP2CA | PP2A | 5519/5515 | GST/ivT | + | + | Pim et al. (2005) |
| PSMC1 | S4, 26S proteasome | 5700 | YTH | + | ND | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) |
| RAN | Ran | 5901 | GST | + | ND | Angeline et al. (2003), De Luca et al. (2003) |
| RB1 | pRB | 5925 | Co-IP | + | < |
Berezutskaya et al. (1997), Boyer et al. (1996), Dyson et al. (1989), Firzlaff et al. (1991), Helt and Galloway (2001), Jones and Munger (1997), Munger et al. (1989b) |
| RBL1 | p107 | 5933 | Peptide bdg | + | < |
Dyson et al. (1992), Gonzalez et al. (2001), Helt and Galloway (2001), Zhang et al. (2006) |
| RBL2 | p130 | 5934 | Peptide bdg | + | < |
Dyson et al. (1992), Helt and Galloway (2001), Zhang et al. (2006) |
| SIVA1 | Siva-1 | 10572 | YTH | + | ND | Severino et al. (2007) |
| SMAD1 | SMAD-1 | 4086 | GST | + | + (HPV1, 8, 11) | Habig et al. (2006) |
| SMAD2 | SMAD-2 | 4087 | GST | + | + (HPV1, 8, 11) | Habig et al. (2006) |
| SMAD3 | SMAD-3 | 4088 | GST | + | + (HPV1, 8, 11) | Habig et al. (2006) |
| SMAD4 | SMAD-4 | 4089 | GST | + | + (HPV1, 8, 11) | Habig et al. (2006) |
| SMARCA4 | BRG-1 | 6597 | GST | + | − | Lee et al. (2002a) |
| SNW1 | Skip | 22983 | YTH | + | < | Prathapam et al. (2001) |
| TAF1C | TAF-110 | 9013 | GST | + | ND | Mazzarelli et al. (1995) |
| TAP1 | TAP1 | 6890 | Co-IP | + | + | Vambutas et al. (2001) |
| TGM2 | TGase2 | 7052 | YTH/GST | + | + | Jeon et al. (2003) |
| TBP | TBP | 6908 | GST | + | + | Mazzarelli et al. (1995) |
| TUBG1 | γ-tubulin | 7283 | Co-localization | + | ND | Nguyen et al. (2007) |
| UBR4 | p600 | 23352 | AP-MS | + | + | Huh et al. (2005) |
| ZBTB17 | Miz-1 | 7709 | YTH | + | + | Morandell et al. (2012) |
| ZER1 | ZER1 | 10444 | AP-MS | HPV16 only | − | White et al. (2012) |
AP-MS, affinity purification/mass spectrometry; bdg, binding; Co-IP, Co-immunoprecipitation; GST, Co-affinity purification through association with a glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein; ivT, in vitro translation; YTH, yeast two-hybrid.
In addition to the proteins listed in Table 3, a large number of other HPV E7-associated cellular proteins have been discovered by several groups who performed large-scale yeast two hybrid screens and/or characterized HPV E7-associated cellular protein complexes by immunoaffinity purification followed by mass spectrometry. Multiple methods exist to filter such data and to identify “high-confidence interactors”. These studies have been critically reviewed (White and Howley, 2013) and the primary data can be accessed in the form of supplementary tables with the respective publications (Rozenblatt-Rosen et al., 2012; White et al., 2012) and in Gulbahce et al., 2012 for the complete dataset of HPV16 E7 associated proteins in HeLa cells performed by Huh and colleagues (Huh et al., 2005). In the absence of further biological validation, these data are best viewed as “hypothesis-generating”.
HPV E7 proteins have also been reported to associate with viral proteins. In addition to forming homodimers and higher order complexes (see the section entitled HPV E7 structures), HPV E7 proteins can associate with HPV E2 proteins (Gammoh et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2012) and the Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Rep78 protein (Hermonat et al., 2000).
Mutations and phenotypes of alpha HPV E7s
One of the advantages of working with viral proteins is that it is straightforward to perform mutational genotype/phenotype analyses. Several groups performed extensive mutagenic analyses on HPV16 E7 mostly targeting residues conserved between HPV E7, Ad E1A and/or SV40 T, highly conserved residues in high-risk HPV E7’s and/or residues that were different in low-risk and high-risk HPV E7 proteins (Banks et al., 1990; Edmonds and Vousden, 1989; Phelps et al., 1992; Watanabe et al., 1990). A more recent large-scale mutagenic analysis of the C-terminal domain was inspired by the available 3 dimensional structure of E7 and targeted both predicted surface exposed and non-exposed residues (Todorovic et al., 2011).
An important caveat when interpreting phenotypes of E7 mutants concerns protein stability, conformation and localization. Very few studies have exhaustively addressed protein stability of the various mutants although many contemporary studies document steady state levels in a given assay. Concerns about stability and conformational alterations are somewhat ameliorated when a given mutant retains some E7 activity. As noted in the section entitled Amino acid sequences, studies with epitope tagged or other fusion proteins also have to be viewed with caution since fusing heterologous sequences to the E7 amino terminus can alter HPV16 E7 stability and function.
There is a further caveat when interpreting E7 mutant phenotypes. As will become clear in the subsequent tables, more than one protein binds to a particular amino acid sequence of E7. Therefore, it is not trivial to implicate a given protein as responsible for a specific function. Further experiments will be needed to establish the identity of the effector protein.
Mutations and phenotypes of high-risk alpha HPV E7 proteins
Tables 4–9 summarize biochemical (Tables 4, 6 and 8) and biological (Tables 5, 7 and 9) readouts, with high-risk alpha HPV E7 mutants in the CR1 homology domain (Tables 4 and 5), CR2 homology domain (Tables 6 and 7) and C-terminal zinc-binding domain (Tables 8 and 9), respectively. The location of the mutations is depicted in Figs. 2–4. The most comprehensive collection of mutations and their biochemical and biological studies exists for HPV16 E7. Therefore, studies with other high-risk alpha HPVs are listed when unique, informative mutants were tested or when results differ substantially from studies performed with HPV16 E7.
Table 4.
High-risk alpha HPV E7 CR1 mutants: biochemical properties.
| HPV type | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | ||
| H2P | Retains binding to pRB or p107 | Banks et al. (1990), Demers et al. (1996) |
| Retains binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) | |
| Retains binding to HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Retains binding to IGFBP-3 | Mannhardt et al. (2000) | |
| Retains binding to Skip | Prathapam et al. (2001) | |
| Fails to block binding of pRB to E2F | Helt and Galloway (2001) | |
| Reduces binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| Fails to bind p600 | Huh et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 complex | Huh et al. (2007) | |
| Retains binding to DNMT1 | Burgers et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to bind to FHL2 | Campo-Fernandez et al. (2007) | |
| del 3–5 (GDT) | Retains binding to pRB | Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 6–8 (PTL) | Retains binding to pRB | Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 6–10 (PTLHE) | Retains binding to pRB or p107 |
Brokaw et al. (1994), Demers et al. (1996), Munger et al. (1989b), Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Retains binding to S4 subunit of the proteasome | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) | |
| Retains binding to p21CIP1 | Jones et al. (1997a) | |
| Retains binding to HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Retains binding to E2F/cyclin A complex | Arroyo et al. (1993) | |
| Very limited binding to IRF-1 | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to bind p600 | Huh et al. (2005) | |
| Retains binding to E2F6 | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Retains binding to NuMA | Nguyen and Munger (2009) | |
| del 9–11 (HEY) | Retains binding to pRB | Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 12–14 (MLD) | Retains binding to pRB | Brokaw et al. (1994) |
Table 6.
High-risk HPV E7 CR2 mutants: biochemical activities.
| HPV tpye | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | ||
| del 15–17 (LQP) | Retains binding to pRB | Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 18–20 (ETT) | Reduces binding to pRB | Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| D21G | Substantially reduces binding to pRB | Heck et al. (1992) |
| D21S | Retains binding to pRB or p107 | Demers et al. (1996) |
| Retains binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) | |
| del 21–24 (DLYC) | Fails to bind pRB and p107 |
Demers et al. (1996), Jones et al. (1997b), Munger et al. (1989b), Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Fails to bind E2F/cyclin A complex | Arroyo et al. (1993) | |
| Retains binding to S4 subunit of the proteasome | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) | |
| Retains binding to hTid-1 | Schilling et al. (1998) | |
| Fails to bind IRF-1 | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Retains binding to E2F1 | Hwang et al. (2002) | |
| Retains binding to BRG-1 | Lee et al. (2002a) | |
| Retains binding to p600 | Huh et al. (2005) | |
| Retains binding to cullin 2 complex | Huh et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to binding γ-tubulin | Nguyen et al. (2007) | |
| Retains binding to CDK2 complexes in pRB family member knockout cells Reduces binding to CDK2 complexes in pRB family member proficient cells |
Nguyen and Munger (2008) | |
| Retains binding to E2F6 | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Retains binding to NuMA | Nguyen and Munger (2009) | |
| Fails to bind phosphorylated ATM | Moody and Laimins (2009) | |
| C24G | Substantially reduces binding to pRB and p107 | Demers et al. (1996) |
| Retains binding to c-jun | Antinore et al. (1996) | |
| Reduces binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) | |
| Retains binding to HDAC via Mi2β | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Retains binding to IGFBP-3 | Mannhardt et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to bind acid α-glucosidase | Zwerschke et al. (2000) | |
| Retains binding to p107 | Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
| Retains binding to Skip | Prathapam et al. (2001) | |
| Substantially reduces binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| Retains binding to PML IV | Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| Retains binding to DNMT1 | Burgers et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to bind γ-tubulin | Nguyen et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to bind FHL2 | Campo-Fernandez et al. (2007) | |
| Retains binding to Miz-1 | Morandell et al. (2012) | |
| C24S | Substantially reduces binding to pRB | Munger et al. (1989b), Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Retains binding to E2F/cyclin A complex | Arroyo et al. (1993) | |
| E26G | Fails to bind E2F/cyclin A complex | Arroyo et al. (1993) |
| Fails to bind pRB but retains binding to p107 | Demers et al. (1996) | |
| Reduces binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) | |
| Retains binding to γ-tubulin | Nguyen et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to bind HIF-1α | Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| E26Q | Substantially reduces binding to pRB | Munger et al. (1989b), Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Retains binding to S4 subunit of the proteasome | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) | |
| N29D30/PP | Retains binding to pRB | Giarre et al. (2001) |
| D30EEEEDE33–37/QQQQQQ | Reduces binding to pRB | Firzlaff et al. (1991) |
| S31R | Reduces binding to pRB | Barbosa et al. (1990) |
| S31S32/AA | Fails to bind F-actin | Rey et al. (2000) |
| S31S32/RP | Minimally reduces binding to pRB | Barbosa et al. (1990), Firzlaff et al. (1991), |
| S31S32/CC | Heck et al. (1992) | |
| S31S32/AA | ||
| S31S32/DD | ||
| S31S32/RP | Reduces binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) |
| S31S32/AA | ||
| S31S32/DD | Retains binding to HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) |
| S31S32/RP | Reduces binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) |
| Fails to bind Skip | Prathapam et al. (2001) | |
| Reduces binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| S31S32/GG | Reduces binding to pRB | Jones et al. (1997b) |
| del 31–32 (SS) | Retains binding to pRB | Phelps et al. (1992) |
| S32W | Minimally reduces binding to pRB | Barbosa et al. (1990) |
| E35D36/DH | Minimally reduces binding to pRB | Barbosa et al. (1990) |
| del 35–37 (EDE) | Retains binding to pRB | Munger et al. (1989b), Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Retains binding to E2F/cyclin A complex | Arroyo et al. (1993) | |
| Retains binding to p21CIP1 | Jones et al. (1997a) | |
| Retains binding to S4 subunit of the proteasome | Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) | |
| Retains binding to hTid-1 | Schilling et al. (1998) | |
| Retains binding to HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Retains binding to CDK2 complexes in pRB family member proficient or deficient cells |
Nguyen and Munger (2008) | |
| D36H | Retains binding to pRB | Demers et al. (1996) |
| HPV31 | ||
| del 22–26 (LHCYE) | Fails to bind pRB Retains binding to HDAC 1/2 |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| HPV18 | ||
| Point mutations in aa 25–32 (PxDLLCxE) | Fails to bind CENP-C | Yaginuma et al. (2012) |
| del 24–27 (DLLC); | Fails to bind pRB or p107 | Chien et al. (2000) |
| C27S | Fails to bind pRB and retains binding to p107 | Chien et al. (2000) |
| E35E36E37/QQQ | Retains binding to pRB and p107 | Chien et al. (2000) |
F-actin, filamentous actin.
Table 8.
High-risk alpha HPV E7 C-terminal mutants; biochemical activities.
| HPV type | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | ||
| E46A | Retains binding to p600 | Huh et al. (2005) |
| Retains binding to cullin 2 complex |
Huh et al. (2007) | |
| A50S | Retains binding to pRB | Demers et al. (1996) |
| Y52A | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Reduces binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| del 52–56 (YNIVT) | Fails to bind Skip | Prathapam et al. (2001) |
| Retains binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| Reduces binding to Miz-1 | Morandell et al. (2012) | |
| del 52–57 (YNIVTF) |
Reduces binding to hTid-1 | Schilling et al. (1998) |
| N53D | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 Reduces binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| V55T | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 Increases binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| V55F57M84/AAA | Reduces binding to GSTP1 | Mileo et al. (2009) |
| F57A | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Increases binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| C58C91/GG | Retains binding to pRB and p107 |
Demers et al. (1996) |
| Retains binding to p27KIP1 | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) | |
| Reduces binding to TBP | Phillips and Vousden (1997) | |
| Retains binding to IRF-1 | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to bind acid α-glucosidase | Zwerschke et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to bind BRG-1 | Lee et al. (2002a) | |
| Fails to bind TGase 2 | Jeon et al. (2003) | |
| Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| C59S | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Reduces binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| K60E | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| D62K | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Increases binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| S63D | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 Reduces binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| T64D | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Reduces binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| L65A | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L65R66L67/AAA | Retains binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) |
| R66E | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 Increases binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| L67R | Retains partial or full binding to | Avvakumov et al. (2003) |
| pRB | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Fails to bind HDAC and Mi2β | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Fails to bind pCAF | Avvakumov et al. (2003) | |
| Reduces binding to PML IV | Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| C68V69Q70/AAA | Retains binding to p600 | Huh et al. (2005) |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 complex | Huh et al. (2007) | |
| Retains binding to E2F6 | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| V69A | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| S71I | Retains binding to pRB and p107 | Demers et al. (1996), Jones et al. (1997b) |
| Retains binding to HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Retains binding to IRF-1 | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Retains binding to BRG-1 | Lee et al. (2002a) | |
| Retains binding to TGase 2 | Jeon et al. (2003) | |
| Retains binding to pCAF | Avvakumov et al. (2003) | |
| T72D | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| H73E | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012) |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| V74T | Retains ability to dimerize Increases binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2012, Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 75–77 (DIR) | Retains ability to degrade pRB | Helt and Galloway (2001) |
| Retains binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| I76A | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| R77E | Fails to dimerize Reduces binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 78–85 (TLEDLLMG) |
Reduces binding to hTid-1 | Schilling et al. (1998) |
| L79A | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| del 79–83 (LEDLL) | Fails to bind TBP | Massimi et al. (1997) |
| Fails to bind M2-PK | Zwerschke et al. (1999) | |
| Significantly reduces binding to IGFBP-3 |
Mannhardt et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to bind acid α-glucosidase | Zwerschke et al. (2000) | |
| Retains binding to p300 | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| Retains binding to p600 | Huh et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to bind FHL2 | Campo-Fernandez et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 complex | Huh et al. (2007) | |
| Retains binding to E2F6 | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to bind NuMA | Nguyen and Munger (2009) | |
| Reduces binding to Miz-1 | Morandell et al. (2012) | |
| E80D81/KK | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L82L83/RR | Fails to bind HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) |
| Reduces binding to PML IV | Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to bind DNMT1 | Burgers et al. (2007) | |
| L82L83M84G85/ AAAD |
Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| M84S | Retains ability to dimerize; Increases binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| G85A | Retains ability to dimerize; | Todorovic et al. (2012, |
| Reduces binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| T86D | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| L87A | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| I89V90/AA | Fails to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| C91G | Reduces dimerization | Todorovic et al. (2011) |
| Fails to bind c-jun | Antinore et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to bind HDAC | Brehm et al. (1999) | |
| Fails to bind BRCA1 | Zhang et al. (2005) | |
| Reduces binding to PML IV | Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| C91S | Fails to bind S4 subunit of the proteasome |
Berezutskaya and Bagchi (1997) |
| Significantly reduces binding to hTid-1 |
Schilling et al. (1998) | |
| Retains binding to p600 | Huh et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to bind cullin 2 complex | Huh et al. (2007) | |
| Fails to bind E2F6 | McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to bind NuMA | Nguyen and Munger (2009) | |
| Increases binding to HIF-1α | Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| del 91–94 (CPIC) | Significantly reduces binding to hTid-1 |
Schilling et al. (1998) |
| P92A | Retains ability to dimerize Increases binding to pRB |
Todorovic et al. (2012, 2011) |
| I93T | Retains ability to dimerize | Todorovic et al. (2012), |
| Increases binding to pRB | Todorovic et al. (2011) | |
| Q96K97P98/EEA | Retains ability to dimerize Reduces binding to Cullin 2 |
Todorovic et al. (2012, 2011) |
| HPV31 | ||
| L67R | Fails to bind HDAC 1/2/3 | Longworth and Laimins (2004, 2005) |
| Retains binding to phosphorylated ATM |
Moody and Laimins (2009) | |
| Increases binding to HIF-1α | Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| C68V69Q70/AAA | Retains binding to HDAC 1/2 and pRB |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| S71C | Retains binding to pRB and HDAC 1/2 |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| del 79–83 (LQELL) | Retains binding to HDAC 1/2 | Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| L82L83/RR | Retains binding to HDAC 1/2 | Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| G91G | Retains partial binding to HDAC 1/2 |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| HPV18 | ||
| C65S | Reduces binding to Zn2+ by 50% | McIntyre et al. (1993) |
| C65C98/SS | Fails to bind Zn2+ | McIntyre et al. (1993) |
| del 65–68/98–101 (CCKC/ CPWC) |
Fails to bind c-myc | Wang et al. (2007) |
| C98S | Reduces binding to Zn2+ by 50% | McIntyre et al. (1993) |
TGase 2, transglutaminase 2.
Table 5.
High-risk alpha HPV E7 CR1 mutants: biological activities.
| HPV type | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | ||
| H2D | Reduces transformation | Watanabe et al. (1990) |
| H2P | Reduces BRK immortalization, transformation | Banks et al. (1990) |
| Retains ability to transactivate the B-myb promoter | Lam et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, growth in suspension, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996), Schulze et al. (1998) | |
| Fails to destabilize pRB, p107, p130 |
Helt and Galloway (2001), Jones and Munger (1997) |
|
| Fails to increase Cyclin E levels | Martin et al. (1998) | |
| Fails to degrade IGFBP-3 and reduces ability to abrogate IGFBP-3-mediated apoptosis | Mannhardt et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to bypass pRB-induced quiescence in SAOS2 cells Fails to extend HFK lifespan |
Helt and Galloway (2001) | |
| Fails to induce tetrasomy in monolayer and raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| Fails to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| H2P in the context of the intact genome | Inefficient immortalization of HFKs Viral genomes may be extrachromosomal or integrated Retains ability to produce late transcripts Loss of differentiation-dependent reduction of pRB |
Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| del 3–5 (GDT) | Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS. Retains ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| D4R | Increases electrophoretic mobility of E7 protein | Armstrong and Roman (1992) |
| T5T7/DD | Greatly reduces phosphorylation by DYRK1A Enhances ability to promote cell proliferation |
Liang et al. (2008) |
| del 6–8 (PTL) | Substantially reduces transformation of primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS Retains ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 6–10 (PTLHE) | Substantially reduces transformation Reduces transactivation of AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994), Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Reduces ability to transactivate cAMP-dependent c-fos promoter | Morosov et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to induce apoptosis in confluent or serum deprived cells Fails to stabilize p53 |
Jones et al. (1997b) | |
| Fails to destabilize pRB |
Berezutskaya et al. (1997), Jones et al. (1997b) |
|
| Fails to increase Cyclin E levels | Martin et al. (1998) | |
| Retains ability to inhibit IFN-α activity | Barnard et al. (2000) | |
| Very limited ability to abrogate IRF-1-mediated transactivation | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Retains ability to block binding of pRB to E2F | Helt and Galloway (2001) | |
| Reduces ability to bypass pRB-induced flat SAOS2 phenotype | Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
| Retains ability to induce abnormal centrosome duplication | Duensing and Munger (2003) | |
| Fails to transactivate the E2F Fails to induce DNA synthesis in HPV E2 Fails to rescue HPV E2-expressing HeLa cells from senescence or apoptosis |
Psyrri et al. (2004) | |
| Fails to induce tetraploidy in monolayer and raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate E2F6-mediated transcriptional repression but fails to disrupt E2F6-polycomb complexes |
McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| del 6–10 (PTLHE) in thecontext of the intact genome |
Fails to delay HFK differentiation Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal copies of HPV genome in undifferentiated HFKs Reduces ability to induce E2F–responsive MCM7 promoter in suprabasal cells Reduces ability to induce cellular DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells |
Collins et al. (2005) |
| del 9–11 (HEY) | Reduces ability to transform primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS. Retains ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 12–14 (MLD) | Substantially reduces ability to transform primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS. Reduces ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| HPV31 | ||
| H2P in the context of the intact genome | Retains ability to transiently replicate extrachromosomal copies of viral genomes Loses ability to maintain extrachromosomal copies of the viral genome |
Thomas et al. (1999) |
| HPV18 | ||
| H2P | Retains ability to mediate cyclin E/cdk2 phosphorylation of p107 | McIntyre et al. (1996) |
BRK, baby rat kidney cells; cAMP, cyclic AMP; HFK, primary human foreskin keratinocytes; SAOS2, pRB/p53 defective human osteosarcoma cell line (ATCC Number: HTB-85)
Table 7.
High-risk alpha HPV E7 CR2 mutants: biological activities.
| HPV type | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|
| HPV16 | ||
| del 15–17 (LQP) | Substantially reduces transformation of primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS Reduces ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| del 18–20 (ETT) | Substantially reduces transformation of primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS Reduces ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Brokaw et al. (1994) |
| D21G | Substantially reduces transformation of primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS |
Heck et al. (1992) |
| D21S | Retains ability to transform permanent rodent cells | Edmonds and Vousden (1989) |
| Retains ability to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β |
Demers et al. (1996) | |
| Retains ability to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| del 21–24 (DLYC) | Fails to abrogate TGF-β repression of c-myc promoter | Pietenpol et al. (1990) |
| Substantially reduces ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter | Brokaw et al. (1994), Phelps et al. (1991, 1992), | |
| Substantially reduces transformation of primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS |
Brokaw et al. (1994), Phelps et al. (1992) | |
| Reduces ability to transactivate cAMP-dependent c-fos promoter | Morosov et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996), Helt and Galloway (2001) | |
| Fails to destabilize pRB, p107, p130 Fails to stabilize p53 |
Helt and Galloway (2001), Jones et al. (1997b) | |
| Fails to induce cell death in response to confluence or serum/growth factor deprivation |
Jones et al. (1997b) | |
| Reduces ability to inhibit p21CIP1 | Jones et al. (1997a) | |
| Fails to increase cyclin E levels | Martin et al. (1998) | |
| Fails to induce abnormal centrosome duplication/centriole synthesis | Duensing et al. (2000), Duensing and Munger>(2003), Korzeniewski et al. (2011) | |
| Fails to inhibit IFN-α activity | Barnard et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to abrogate IRF-1-mediated transactivation | Park et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to block binding of pRB to E2F Fails to extend HFK lifespan |
Helt and Galloway (2001) | |
| Fails to bypass pRB-induced flat SAOS2 phenotype | Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
| Fails to abrogate TGF-β activation of SMAD-responsive promoter, bind SMADs and inhibit binding of SMADs to DNA |
Lee et al. (2002b) | |
| Retains ability to activate E2F1-dependent, pRB-independent transcription | Hwang et al. (2002) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate BRG-1-mediated repression of the c-fos promoter and BRG-1-induced flat cell formation in SW13 cells |
Lee et al. (2002a) | |
| Retains ability to be imported into the nucleus via a RAN-dependent pathway | Angeline et al. (2003) | |
| Fails to rescue E2-expressing HeLa cells from apoptosis or senescence Fails to transactivate the E2F–responsive cyclin A promoter Fails to induce DNA synthesis in HPV E2-expressing HeLa cells |
Psyrri et al. (2004) | |
| Fails to induce tetrasomy in monolayer or raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate E2F6-mediated transcriptional repression and disrupt E2F6-polycomb complexes |
McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to transactivate the E2F–responsive polycomb group EZH2 histone methyltransferase gene |
Holland et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to increase expression of hTERT promoter | Liu et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to increase FANCD2-containing alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT)- associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies (APBs) |
Spardy et al. (2008) | |
| Retains disorganized metaphase phenotype (prometaphase delay) | Nguyen and Munger (2009) | |
| Fails to promote mitotic entry Fails to destabilize claspin |
Spardy et al. (2009) | |
| Fails to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| Retains ability to upregulate KDM6A/B histone H3 lysine 27-specific Demethylases |
McLaughlin-Drubin et al. (2011) | |
| Fails to increase PLK4 transcription | Korzeniewski et al. (2011) | |
| Fails to bind HIF-1α Retains ability to increase HIF-1α-mediated transcription |
Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| Fails to inhibit cyclin B degradation | Yu and Munger (2012) | |
| del 21–24 (DLYC) in the context of the intact genome |
Fails to induce E2F–responsive MCM7 promoter in suprabasal cells Fails to induce cellular DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal copies of HPV genome in undifferentiated HFKs Fails to delay HFK differentiation |
Collins et al. (2005) |
| Fails to immortalize HFKs | Bodily et al. (2011a) | |
| C24G | Fails to transform permanent rodent cells | Barbosa et al. (1990), Edmonds and Vousden (1989), Watanabe et al. (1990) |
| Substantially reduces ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter | Edmonds and Vousden (1989), Watanabe et al. (1990) | |
| Retains CKII phosphorylation | Barbosa et al. (1990) | |
| Fails to upregulate B-myb promoter | Lam et al. (1994) | |
| Not required for E7 nuclear localization | Fujikawa et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, serum starvation, DNA damage, or TGF-β |
Demers et al. (1996), Nguyen et al. (2002) | |
| Retains ability to enhance c-jun-mediated transactivation | Antinore et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, serum starvation, DNA damage, or TGF-β |
Demers et al. (1996), Nguyen et al. (2002) | |
| Retains ability to enhance c-jun-mediated transactivation | Antinore et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to destabilize pRB but retains ability to destabilize p107 | Gonzalez et al. (2001), Jones and Munger (1997) | |
| Fails to increase cyclin E levels | Martin et al. (1998) | |
| Retains ability to abrogate C/EBPα-mediated growth arrest and enhance C/EBPα mediated differentiation |
Muller et al. (1999) | |
| Fails to bypass pRB-induced flat SAOS2 phenotype | Brehm et al. (1999), Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
| Retains ability to degrade IGFBP-3 and to abrogate IGFBP-3-mediated apoptosis | Mannhardt et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to activate acid α-glucosidase | Zwerschke et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to induce intracellular alkalinization | Reshkin et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to transactivate the p73 promoter | Brooks et al. (2002) | |
| Fails to abrogate RAF-induced growth arrest and relocalize p21CIP1 | Westbrook et al. (2002) | |
| Fails to upregulate CDC25A promoter | Nguyen et al. (2002) | |
| Fails to activate AKT in undifferentiated and differentiated HFKs | Menges et al. (2006), Westbrook et al. (2002) | |
| Reduces ability to abrogate p300-mediated HPV E2 transactivation | Bernat et al. (2003) | |
| Retains ability to induce abnormal centrosome duplication | Duensing and Munger (2003) | |
| Fails to increase acetylation of histone H3 on E2F–regulated promoters | Zhang et al. (2004) | |
| Retains ability to induce tetrasomy in monolayer and raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| Fails to abrogate PML IV-mediated senescence Fails to disrupt PML IV:CBP-mediated p53 acetylation and p53-mediated Transcription |
Bischof et al. (2005) | |
| Fails to bind HIF-1α Retains ability to increase HIF-1α-mediated transcription |
Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| Retains inhibition of Miz-1-dependent p21CIP1 transcription | Morandell et al. (2012) | |
| C24G in the context of the intact genome |
Reduces ability to immortalize HFKs | Jewers et al. (1992) |
| Very inefficiently immortalizes HFKs Causes reduced levels of viral transcripts in undifferentiated HFKs Fails to produce late viral transcripts in differentiated HFKs Fails to decrease pRB levels in differentiated cells Fails to produce virus particles |
Bodily et al. (2011a) | |
| C24S | Fails to transform primary rodent cell in cooperation with RAS Substantially reduces ability to transactivate AdE2 promoter |
Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Reduces ability to transactivate cAMP-dependent c-fos promoter | Morosov et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to degrade pRB | Berezutskaya et al. (1997) | |
| E26G | Retains ability to upregulate B-myb promoter | Lam et al. (1994) |
| Not required for E7 nuclear localization | Fujikawa et al. (1994) | |
| Fails to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996) | |
| Fails to increase cyclin E levels | Martin et al. (1998) | |
| Fails to destabilize pRB Retains ability to destabilize p107 Fails to bypass pRB-induced flat SAOS2 phenotype |
Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
| Fails to transactivate the p73 promoter | Brooks et al. (2002) | |
| Retains ability to induce abnormal centrosome duplication | Duensing and Munger (2003) | |
| Fails to inhibit TNF-α-induced growth arrest | Boccardo et al. (2010) | |
| Retains ability to increase HIF-1α-mediated transcription | Bodily et al. (2011b) | |
| E26G in the context of the intact genome |
Retains ability to immortalize HFKs | Jewers et al. (1992) |
| Fails to immortalize HFKs | Bodily et al. (2011a) | |
| ND29/30PP | Fails to destabilize pRB | Giarre et al. (2001) |
| Fails to abrogate p16INK4A-mediated G1 arrest | Giarre et al. (2001) | |
| S31G | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Storey et al. (1990a) |
| S31R | Reduces ability to transform established rodent cells | Edmonds and Vousden (1989) |
| S31S32/RP | Fails to induce S phase proteins in differentiated HFKs | Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| S31S32/AA | ||
| S31S32/DD | ||
| Fails to be phosphorylated by CKII | Barbosa et al. (1990) | |
| S31S32/AA | Reduces transformation of established rodent cells | Barbosa et al. (1990) |
| S31S32/DD | Fails to be phosphorylated by CKII | Firzlaff et al. (1991) |
| Retains ability to transactivate the AdE2 promoter | Firzlaff et al. (1991) | |
| Fails to abrogate Skip-mediated transcriptional transactivation | Prathapam et al. (2001) | |
| S31S32/AA | Reduces transformation of primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Firzlaff et al. (1991), Heck et al. (1992) |
| Fails to abrogate C/EBPα-mediated growth arrest and to enhance C/EBPα- mediated differentiation |
Muller et al. (1999) | |
| S31S32/GG | Reduces ability to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation, DNA damage, or TGF-β |
Demers et al. (1996) |
| Reduces ability to destabilize pRB Reduces ability to stabilize p53 Reduces ability to induce cell death in response to confluence or serum deprivation |
Jones et al. (1997b) | |
| Reduces ability to transactivate the E2F Reduces ability to induce DNA synthesis in HPV E2 Reduces ability to rescue E2-expressing HeLa cells from apoptosis or senescence |
Psyrri et al. (2004) | |
| Fails to induce tetrasomy in monolayers but retains ability in raft cultures | Southern et al. (2004) | |
| Retains ability to immortalize HFKs | Bodily et al. (2011a) | |
| S31S32/AA or DD in the context of the intact genome |
Reduces ability to produce viral particles but particles are infectious | |
| S31S32/RP in the context of the | Loses cis element required for late viral gene expression | Bodily et al. (2011a) |
| Intact genome | Retains ability to support extrachromosomal replication of HPV genomes in monolayers Reduces ability to produce viral particles but particles are infectious |
|
| del 31–32 | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS | Phelps et al. (1992) |
| S32A | Somewhat reduces transformation | Barbosa et al. (1990), Storey et al. (1990a) |
| E35D36/DH | Retains ability to transform rodent cells | Edmonds and Vousden (1989) |
| Retains ability to be phosphorylated by CKII | Barbosa et al. (1990) | |
| del 35–37 (EDE) | Retains ability to transform primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS Substantially reduces CKII phosphorylation |
Phelps et al. (1992) |
| Reduces ability to transactivate cAMP-dependent c-fos promoter | Morosov et al. (1994) | |
| Retains ability to degrade pRB | Berezutskaya et al. (1997) | |
| D36H | Retains ability to bypass growth arrest induced by differentiation or TGF-β | Demers et al. (1996) |
| HPV31 | ||
| D21G in the context of the intact genome |
Retains ability to transiently replicate extrachromosomal HPV genomes Fails to maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes |
Thomas et al. (1999) |
| del 22–26 (LHCYE) in the context of the intact genome |
Somewhat reduces ability to stably maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes | Longworth and Laimins (2004) |
| Significantly reduces growth rate Fails to extend life span Fails to amplify HPV genomes upon differentiation |
Longworth and Laimins (2004) | |
| Fails to post-transcriptionally increase E2F2 in differentiated cells | Longworth et al. (2005) | |
| C24G in the context of the intact | Fails to transiently replicate extrachromosomal HPV genomes | Thomas et al. (1999) |
| genome | Fails to maintain extrachromosomal HPV genomes | |
| S31S32/AA in the context of the | Retains ability to transiently replicate extrachromosomal HPV genomes | Thomas et al. (1999) |
| Intact genome | Retains ability to maintain extrachromosomal copies of HPV genomes | |
| HPV18 | ||
| del 24–27 (DLLC) | Fails to mediate cyclin E/cdk2 phosphorylation of p107 | McIntyre et al. (1996) |
| Fails to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells Fails to induce polα mRNA Fails to upregulate PCNA or cyclin E, or p21CIP1 |
Chien et al. (2000) | |
| Fails to upregulate cytoplasmic cyclin B in suprabasal cells Fails to upregulate cytoplasmic inactive CDC25C in suprabasal cells |
Banerjee et al. (2011) | |
| C27G | Fails to mediate cyclin E/cdk2 phosphorylation of p107 | McIntyre et al. (1996) |
| C27S | Fails to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells Fails to induce polα mRNA Fails to upregulate PCNA or cyclin E, or p21CIP1 |
Chien et al. (2000) |
| S32S34/QQ | Fails to be phosphorylated by CKII Fails to upregulate PCNA, cyclin E, p21CIP1 |
Chien et al. (2000) |
| Reduces ability to target p130 for degradation Fails to induce suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to upregulate expression of cytoplasmic inactive CDC25C in suprabasal cells | Banerjee et al. (2011) | |
| E35E36E37/QQQ | Retains ability to increase polα mRNA Fails to induce PCNA, cyclin E, and p21CIP1 Fails to be phosphorylated by CKII Fails to induce suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Chien et al. (2000) |
| Reduces ability to target p130 for degradation | Genovese et al. (2008) | |
| Fails to upregulate cytoplasmic cyclin B in suprabasal cells | Banerjee et al. (2011) |
cAMP, cyclic AMP; HeLa, HPV18 positive human cervical adenocarcinoma line (ATCC Number CCL-2); HFK, primary human foreskin keratinocytes; SAOS2, pRB/p53 defective human osteosarcoma cell line (ATCC Number: HTB-85); SW13 human adrenal gland/cortex carcinoma line (ATCC Number CCL-105).
Fig. 2.
Schematic representation of the HPV E7 CR1 mutants described in Tables 4 and 5. Amino acid residues 1–14 of HPV16, 31 and 18 E7 are shown. The one letter code for amino acid (aa) residues is used. Black boxes denote deletions (del).
Fig. 4.
Schematic representation of the HPV E7 C-terminal mutants described in Tables 8 and 9. Amino acid residues 46–98 of HPV16 and HPV31 E7 and amino acid residues 53–105 of HPV18 E7 are shown. The positions of the CXXC motifs are indicated. The one letter code for amino acid (aa) residues is used; X denotes any amino acid. Black boxes denote deletions.
Mutations and phenotypes of high-risk alpha HPV E7 proteins
The low-risk HPV E7 proteins show generally no or decreased activity in most standard transformation assays. Hence these proteins were “natural transformation defective mutants”. Thus, in addition to standard mutagenic analyses, which are summarized in Table 10 and Fig. 5, some investigators have constructed chimeric high-risk/low-risk E7 proteins. Studies with HPV6/HPV16 chimeric E7 proteins showed that the C-termini could be swapped without causing dramatic alterations in transforming activity and that the amino terminus, particularly the CR1 homology domain, contained sequences that accounted for the unusual electrophoretic migration of HPV16 E7 (see the section entitled Amino acid sequences) whereas the CR2 homology domain appears to determine pRB binding efficiency and transformation (Heck et al., 1992; Munger et al., 1991; Pater et al., 1992). Such studies revealed that changing a conserved aspartate residue (D) in HPV16 E7 to a glycine (G) caused a dramatic decrease in pRB binding and transformation whereas mutation of the conserved corresponding G to a D converted HPV6 E7 into a transforming protein (Heck et al., 1992; Sang and Barbosa, 1992).
Table 10.
Low-risk alpha HPV mutants: biological and biochemical activities.
| HPV type and region |
Mutation | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPV6 | |||
| CR1 | H2R4H5/AAA | Retains binding to p130 Fails to destabilize p130 Fails to decrease/delay differentiation |
Zhang et al. (2006) |
| CR1 | R4D | Retains binding to pRB Retains ability to be phosphorylated by CKII |
Sang and Barbosa (1992) |
| CR1 | R4V6K9/DPH | Retains ability to transactivate the AdE2 promoter in BRKs and HFKs | Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| CR1/CR2 | R4V6K9G22H24/ DPHDY | Super transactivates (greater than HPV16 E7) the AdE2 and B-myb promoters in HFKs |
Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| CR1/CR2 | R4V6K9V37E39/DPHDI | Retains ability to transactivate the AdE2 promoter in BRKs and HFKs | Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| CR1/CR2 | CR1/CR2 | Gains transactivation ability comparable to HPV16 E7 on the | Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| R4V6K9G22H24V37E39/ DPHDYDI |
AdE2 promoter in BRKs and HFKs | ||
| CR1 | T7A | Retains ability to be phosphorylated by CKII Fails to be phosphorylated in vitro by PKC |
Armstrong and Roman (1995) |
| CR1/CR2 | T7G22H24/DDY | Super transactivates the AdE2 and B-myb promoters in HFKs | Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| CR1/CR2 | T7G22H24/ADY | Gains transactivation ability comparable to HPV16 E7 on the AdE2 and B-myb promoters in HFKs |
Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| CR1 | K9D10/AA | Retains binding to p130 Retains ability to destabilize p130 Retains ability to decrease/delay differentiation |
Zhang et al. (2006) |
| CR2 | G22D | Increases binding to pRB Retains ability to be phosphorylated by CKII Gains ability to transform permanent rodent cells |
Sang and Barbosa (1992) |
| Gains ability to destabilize pRB Increases binding to p107 Increases binding to p130 |
Zhang et al. (2006) | ||
| CR2 | G22D in context of chimeric E7 with HPV6 E7 N-terminus and HPV16 E7 C-terminus |
Increases binding to pRB Increases transformation of BRK cells in cooperation with RAS |
Heck et al. (1992) |
| CR2 | G22H24/DY | Gains transactivation ability comparable to HPV16 E7 on the AdE2 promoter in BRKs and HFKs |
Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| G22H24V37E39/DYDI | Gains transactivation ability comparable to HPV16 E7 on the AdE2 promoter in BRKs and HFKs |
Armstrong and Roman (1997) | |
| CR2 | C25A | Fails to bind p130 Fails to destabilize p130 Fails to decrease/delay differentiation |
Zhang et al. (2006) |
| CR2 | V30N | Retains binding to pRB Increases ability to be phosphorylated by CKII |
Sang and Barbosa (1992) |
| CR2 | D31A | Retains binding to p130 Retains ability to destabilize p130 Retains ability to decrease/delay differentiation |
Zhang et al. (2006) |
| CR2 | S32S33/AA | Fails to be phosphorylated by CKII Retains ability to be phosphorylated in vitro by PKC |
Armstrong and Roman (1995) |
| CR2 | V37D | Retains binding to pRB Increases ability to be phosphorylated by CKII |
Sang and Barbosa (1992) |
| CR2 | V37E39/DI | Retains ability to transactivate the AdE2 promoter in BRKs Loses ability to transactivate the same promoter in HFKs |
Armstrong and Roman (1997) |
| C-term | K49T | Somewhat increases ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| C-term | K49R | Somewhat increases ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| C-term | L67R | Retains binding to p130 Fails to destabilize p130 Fails to decrease/delay differentiation |
Zhang et al. (2006) |
| HPV11 | |||
| CR2 | G22D | Increases binding to p130 Reduces ability to destabilize p130 Somewhat increases ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| CR2 | G22K39K42/DEA | Gains increased ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis comparable to HPV16 E7 |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| CR2 | G22K39K42/DRR | Gains increased ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis comparable to HPV16 E7 |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| CR2 | del 22–25 (GLHC) | Fails to destabilize p130 Fails to induce suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2008) |
| CR2 | S32S33/NQ | Fails to be phosphorylated by CKII Reduces ability to destabilize p130 Fails to induce suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2008) |
| CR2/C-term | K39K42/EA | Somewhat increases ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| CR2/C-term | K39K42/RR | Somewhat increases ability to induce unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis Increases binding to and destabilization of p130 |
Genovese et al. (2011) |
| C-term | Q78T | Retains inability to repress MHC I expression | Heller et al. (2011) |
| C-term | Q78Q80/TE | Retains inability to repress MHC I expression | Heller et al. (2011) |
| C-term | Q78Q80N88/TEG | Partially gains ability to repress MHC I expression comparable to HPV16 E7 |
Heller et al. (2011) |
| C-term | Q80E | Retains inability to repress MHC I expression | Heller et al. (2011) |
| C-term | Q80N88/EG | Partially gains ability to repress MHC I expression | Heller et al. (2011) |
| C-term | N88G | Partially gains ability to repress MHC I expression | Heller et al. (2011) |
BRK, baby rat kidney cells; and HFK, primary human foreskin keratinocytes.
Fig. 5.
Schematic representation of the low-risk alpha HPV E7 mutants described in Table 10. A schematic structure of E7 is shown on top with CR1, CR2 and conserved C-terminal domains indicated in black and the non-conserved regions shown in gray. The positions of the LXCXE motif in CR2 and CXXC motifs in the C-terminus are indicated. The one letter code for amino acid (aa) residues is used; X denotes any amino acid. Black boxes denote deletions.
Chimeric HPV11/HPV16 E7 proteins were constructed to map key determinants of HPV16 E7 required to reduce major histo-compatibility complex class I (MHC I) expression. Such studies showed that the C-terminus of HPV16 E7 was responsible for negatively regulating MHC I transcription. A more detailed analysis documented a critical role for amino acids 78, 80, and 88 in the HPV16 E7 C-terminal domain (Heller et al., 2011).
Studies with alpha HPV E7 peptides
Studies with peptides yielded important insights into many aspects of HPV E7 biology and biochemistry. Early studies by Rawls and colleagues made use of synthetic versions of full length HPV16 E7 as well as isolated domains and allowed clean mapping of the ability to induce DNA synthesis, to transcriptionally activate the Ad E2 promoter, and to bind zinc ions (Rawls et al., 1990) (Table 11). A later study with smaller peptides encompassing the LXCXE domains provided information regarding the minimal domain necessary for pRB binding (Jones et al., 1990) (Table 11). Subsequently, the structure of the minimal peptide bound to a pRB fragment was solved (Lee et al., 1998). Many studies also took advantage of synthesizing E7 peptides as fusions in E. coli to identify E7 associated cellular proteins (see Table 3) or to rapidly map domains necessary for interactions of E7 with cellular proteins (Table 11).
Table 11.
Experiments with HPV16 E7 derived peptides.
| HPV16 E7 Peptide | E7 domain | Activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| aa 1–98 | CR1/CR2/C-term | Induces cellular DNA synthesis Activates the Ad E2 promoter Binds Zn2+ |
Rawls et al. (1990) |
| Overlapping 12-mers from aa 1–10 |
CR1 | Low efficiency binding to Siva-1 | Severino et al. (2007) |
| aa 1–17 | CR1 | Fails to bind p27KIP1 | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) |
| aa 1–36 | CR1/CR2 | Fails to bind DYRK1A | Liang et al. (2008) |
| aa 1–38 | CR1/CR2 | Fails to bind BRCA1 | Zhang et al. (2005) |
| aa 1–40 | CR1/CR2 | Fails to induce cellular DNA synthesis Fails to activate the Ad E2 promoter Fails to bind Zn2+ |
Rawls et al. (1990) |
| del 1–38 | CR1/CR2 | Binds p21CIP1 | Funk et al. (1997) |
| aa 2–32 | CR1/CR2 | Binds pRB, p107, p130 and cyclin A | Dyson et al. (1992) |
| aa 2–41 | Fails to bind MPP2 (FOXM1) | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) | |
| Fails to stimulate MPP2 (FOXM1)-dependent transcription | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) | ||
| del 9–48 | del in CR1/CR2 | Retains binding to cdk2 (via cyclin A) | He et al. (2003) |
| del 9–38 | del in CR1/CR2 | Loses ability to activate cdk2 | He et al. (2003) |
| Overlapping 12-mers from aa 10–30 |
CR1/CR2 | Fail to bind to Siva-1 | Severino et al. (2007) |
| aa 16–41 | CR2 | Localizes to nucleus, like full length E7 | Fujikawa et al. (1994) |
| aa 18–38 | CR2 | Fails to bind p27KIP1 | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) |
| aa 21–29 | CR2 | Minimal E7 peptide that inhibits E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| aa 20–29 D21N | CR2 | Fails to inhibit E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| aa 20–29 Y23F | CR2 | Fails to inhibit E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| aa 20–29C24S | CR2 | Fails to inhibit E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| aa 20–29 Y25F | CR2 | Fails to inhibit E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| aa 20–29 E26Q | CR2 | Fails to inhibit E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| aa 20–29 Q27N | CR2 | Retains ability to inhibit E7/pRB binding | Jones et al. (1990) |
| Overlapping 12-mers from aa 22–42 |
CR2 | Fails to bind to Siva-1 | Severino et al. (2007) |
| aa 25–36 | CR2 | Binds IRF-9 | Antonsson et al. (2006) |
| aa 16–98 | CR2/C-term | Severely defective for cellular DNA synthesis Severely defective for Ad E2 activation Binds Zn2+ |
Rawls et al. (1990) |
| aa31–98 | CR2/C-term | Necessary for disruption of pRB/E2F-1 complex |
Huang et al. (1993), Patrick et al. (1994), Wu et al. (1993) |
| Overlapping 12-mers from aa 37–69 |
C-term | Significant binding to Siva-1 | Severino et al. (2007) |
| aa 38–98 | C-term | Binds BRCA1 | Zhang et al. (2005) |
| C-term | Binds DYRK1A | Liang et al. (2008) | |
| aa 39–98 | C-term | Binds p27KIP1 | Zerfass-Thome et al. (1996) |
| aa 39–98 | C-term | Fails to induce cellular DNA synthesis Fails to transactivate the Ad E2 promoter Binds Zn2+ |
Rawls et al. (1990) |
| delta 40–98 | del C-term | Fails to bind p21CIP1 | Funk et al. (1997) |
| aa 42–98 | C-term | Binds MPP2 (FOXM1) | Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) |
| C-term | Retains the ability to stimulate MPP2 (FOXM1)-dependent Transcription |
Luscher-Firzlaff et al. (1999) | |
| aa 62–84 | C-term | Required for binding to DNMT1 | Burgers et al. (2007) |
| aa 67–98 | C-term | Fails to induce cellular DNA synthesis Fails to transactivate the Ad E2 promoter Binds Zn2+ |
Rawls et al. (1990) |
| Overlapping 12-mers from aa 70–84 | C-term | Fails to bind Siva-1 | Severino et al. (2007) |
| Overlapping 12-mers from aa 79–99 | C-term | Significant to maximal binding to Siva-1 | Severino et al. (2007) |
aa, amino acid residue.
Cutaneous HPV E7 proteins
Beta, mu and gamma HPVs are associated with infections of keratinized, cutaneous epithelia. A recent study however, identified a large number of beta and gamma HPVs in the oral mucosa, potentially suggesting that these cutaneous viruses may also colonize a mucosal niche (Bottalico et al., 2011).
Cutaneous HPVs have attracted less experimental attention than alpha HPVs because they are mostly associated with benign warts. Some beta HPVs associated warts, however, can undergo malignant progression to invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), particularly in chronically immuno-suppressed patients or in individuals affected by Epidermodys-plasia verruciformis (EV), a rare autosomal recessive genetic disease. EV-associated cancers were the first malignant tumors that were linked to HPV infections (reviewed in Pfister (2003)). Very few cell-based assays have been described to analyze the potential transforming activities of beta HPV E7 proteins. Table 12 lists biological and biochemical activities and a limited amount of mutational genotype/phenotype data for this group of viruses.
Table 12.
Biological and biochemical activities of E7 proteins encoded by cutaneous (beta, gamma, mu) HPVs.
| Genus | HPV type | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | |||
| Beta 1 | HPV5 E7 | Binds pRB with low efficiency Fails to transform established rodent cells Fails to immortalize primary rodent cells Weakly transforms primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS. |
Yamashita et al. (1993) |
| In organotypic raft cultures: Significantly delays/disrupts HFK differentiation in the presence of E6 |
Boxman et al. (2001) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Causes hyperkeratosis and papilla-like structures Moderately increases suprabasal proliferation Results in co-expression of Cyclin E and p16INK4A in suprabasal cells. |
Westphal et al. (2009) | ||
| Upregulates lipocalin-2 in primary adult keratinocyte monolayers and in differentiated layers of organotypic raft cultures. |
Akgul et al. (2011) | ||
| Reduces pRB levels | Buitrago-Perez et al. (2012) | ||
| HPV5 E7 del 26–29 (DLFC) | Fails to reduce pRB levels. | Buitrago-Perez et al. (2012) | |
| Beta 1 | HPV8 E7 | Fails to transform established rodent cells |
Schmitt et al. (1994), Yamashita et al. (1993) |
| Binds pRB with low efficiency Fails to immortalize primary rodent cells Very weakly transforms primary rodent cells in cooperation with RAS. |
Yamashita et al. (1993) | ||
| Weakly immortalizes primary human foreskin keratinocytes Modestly transactivates the AdE2 promoter |
Schmitt et al. (1994) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Causes hyperkeratinization and suprabasal PCNA expression Causes invasion of epidermal cells into artificial dermis. |
Akgul et al. (2005) | ||
| Upregulates MT-1-MMP expression and activates MMP-1, 2, 8 |
Akgul et al. (2005), Smola-Hess et al. (2005) |
||
| Binds SMADs Abrogates TGF-β-mediated transactivation |
Habig et al. (2006) | ||
| Reduces pRB levels Does not alter p53 or p21CIP1 levels Causes abnormal keratin expression Causes polyploidy |
Akgul et al. (2007) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Moderately increases suprabasal proliferation Results in co-expression of Cyclin E and p16INK4A in suprabasal cells. |
Westphal et al. (2009) | ||
| In organotypic raft and monolayer cultures: Upregulates lipocalin-2. | Akgul et al. (2011) | ||
| Binds C/EBPβ (GST/Co-IP) Inhibits C/EBPβ-mediated transactivation of CCL20 promoter in keratinocytes Inhibits Langerhans cell migration. |
Sperling et al. (2012) | ||
| HPV8 E7 del 79–83 (FQELL) |
Reduces binding to C/EBPβ Fails to inhibit C/EBPβ-mediated transactivation of CCL20 promoter |
Sperling et al. (2012) | |
| Beta 1 | HPV12 E7 | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | Massimi et al. (2008) |
| Beta 1 | HPV14 E7 | Binds, and in the presence of E6, destabilizes pRB Fails to activate E2F–responsive genes Fails to immortalize HFKs in the presence of E6 |
Cornet et al. (2012) |
| Beta 1 | HPV20 E7 | In organotypic raft cultures: Causes some delay/disruption of differentiation in the presence of E6 |
Boxman et al. (2001) |
| Binds pRB with low efficiency Fails to destabilize pRB Fails to abrogate NIH 3T3 growth arrest induced by serum deprivation |
Caldeira et al. (2003) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Moderately increases suprabasal proliferation; Fails to cause co-expression of cyclin E and p16INK4A in suprabasal cells |
Westphal et al. (2009) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Upregulates lipocalin-2 | Akgul et al. (2011) | ||
| Fails to activate NF-κB | Hussain et al. (2011) | ||
| Binds Iκκα (Co-IP) Attenuates NF-κB-mediated transcription |
Byg et al. (2012) | ||
| Beta 1 | HPV24 E7 | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | Massimi et al. (2008) |
| Binds pRB, and in the presence of E6, partially degrades pRB Causes modest, if any, increase in expression of E2F–responsive promoters, in the presence of E6 Fails to immortalize HFKs in the presence of E6. |
Cornet et al. (2012) | ||
| Beta 1 | HPV36 E7 | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | Massimi et al. (2008) |
| Binds pRB, and in the presence of E6, partially degrades pRB Causes modest, if any, increase in expression of E2F–responsive promoters, in the presence of E6 Fails to immortalize HFKs in the presence of E6. |
Cornet et al. (2012) | ||
| Beta 2 | HPV22 E7 | Binds, and in the presence of E6, destabilizes pRB Fails to activate E2F–responsive genes Fails to immortalize HFKs in the presence of E6 |
Cornet et al. (2012) |
| Beta 2 | HPV38 E7 | In organotypic raft cultures: Causes some delay/disruption of differentiation in the presence of E6 |
Boxman et al. (2001) |
| Extends life span of primary human fibroblasts and keratinocytes Binds to pRB with high efficiency Destabilizes pRB in NIH 3T3 and primary human fibroblasts Abrogates NIH 3T3 growth arrest induced by serum deprivation Induces anchorage independent growth in NIH 3T3 cells |
Caldeira et al. (2003) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Causes parakeratosis and altered expression of keratins Increases suprabasal proliferation Fails to cause co-expression of cyclin E and p16INK4A in suprabasal cells |
Westphal et al. (2009) | ||
| Upregulates lipocalin-2 in keratinocyte monolayers and in differentiated layers of organotypic raft cultures |
Akgul et al. (2011) | ||
| Binds to eEF1A (GST; Co-IP) Downregulates Rho activity Causes disruption of stress fibers (F-actin) dependent on CKII, MEK, ERK signaling and eEF1A binding |
Yue et al. (2011) | ||
| Binds pRB and enhances phospho-pRB levels in the presence of E6 Activates E2F–responsive genes in the presence of E6 Immortalizes HFKs in the presence of E6 |
Cornet et al. (2012) | ||
| Binds Iκκα (Co-IP) Attenuates NF-κB-mediated transcription |
Byg et al. (2012) | ||
| Beta 3 | HPV49 E7 | Fails to cooperate with RAS to transform primary rodent cells | Massimi et al. (2008) |
| Binds pRB and enhances phospho-pRB levels in the presence of E6 Activates E2F–responsive genes in the presence of E6 Immortalizes HFKs in the presence of E6. |
Cornet et al. (2012) | ||
| Gamma | |||
| Gamma 1 | HPV4 E7 | In organotypic raft cultures: Causes hyperkeratosis and altered expression of keratins Significantly increases suprabasal proliferation Fails to cause co-expression of cyclin E and p16INK4A in suprabasal cells |
Westphal et al. (2009) |
| Binds pRB through C-terminal sequences (aa 39–100) | Wang et al. (2010) | ||
| Upregulates lipocalin-2 in primary keratinocyte monolayers but not in differentiated layers of organotypic raft cultures |
Akgul et al. (2011) | ||
| Binds Iκκα (Co-IP) Attenuates NF-κB-mediated transcription |
Byg et al. (2012) | ||
| Gamma 6 | HPV108 E7 | In organotypic raft cultures: Causes a dysplastic phenotype | Nobre et al. (2009) |
| Mu | |||
| Mu 1 | HPV1 E7 | Binds pRB with high efficiency Transforms permanent rodent cells Fails to immortalize primary HFKs; Fails to transactivate the Ad E2 promoter |
Schmitt et al. (1994) |
| Inability to abrogate C/EBPα-mediated growth arrest | Muller et al. (1999) | ||
| Inhibits cellular response to IFN-α | Barnard et al. (2000) | ||
| Fails to destabilize pRB Only partially abrogates pRB-mediated senescence in SAOS2 cells |
Gonzalez et al. (2001) | ||
| Fails to abrogate p16INK4A-mediated G1 arrest | Giarre et al. (2001) | ||
| Fails to upregulate MT-1-MMP expression | Smola-Hess et al. (2005) | ||
| Binds SMADs Abrogates TGF-β-mediated transactivation |
Habig et al. (2006) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Destabilizes p130 Induces unscheduled DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells |
Genovese et al. (2008) | ||
| In organotypic raft cultures: Causes hyperkeratosis and dyskeratosis Significantly increases suprabasal proliferation Fails to cause co-expression of cyclin E and p16INK4A in suprabasal cells |
Westphal et al. (2009) | ||
| Upregulates lipocalin-2 in primary adult keratinocyte monolayers but not in differentiated layers of organotypic raft cultures. |
Akgul et al. (2011) | ||
| Binds to p300 with low efficiency | Fera and Marmorstein (2012) | ||
| HPV1 E7 P31P32PI35/SSE | Enhances binding to p130 Enhances destabilization of p130 in monolayer and cells induced to differentiate Increases induction of suprabasal DNA synthesis Gains ability to be phosphorylated by CKII |
Genovese et al. (2008) |
Co-IP, Co-immunoprecipitation; GST, Co-affinity purification through association with a glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein; NIH 3T3, immortalized murine fibroblasts; SAOS2, pRB/p53 defective human osteosarcoma cell line (ATCC Number: HTB-85).
Chimeras between the alpha HPV16 E7 and the mu HPV1 E7 have also been informative. While both E7 proteins bind pRB with high efficiency, only HPV16 E7 degrades it. Studies with chimeras revealed that the HPV16 E7 CR2 domain, in the background of HPV1 E7 could degrade pRB while swapping the HPV1 E7 CR2 domain into the HPV16 E7 background resulted in loss of ability to degrade pRB. Subsequent experiments narrowed the critical sequence to Q27LN29 in HPV16 E7 CR2 (compared to E29VPP32 in HPV1 E7—see Fig. 1) (Giarre et al., 2001).
Genetically engineered mouse models
Papillomaviruses are highly species specific and there are no infectious heterologous animal models for HPV life cycle and pathogen-esis studies. Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) with expression of alpha and beta HPV subgenomic fragments targeted to basal epithelia recapitulate key phenotypes of the diseases that these viruses can cause upon infection of the human host (Arbeit et al., 1996; Brake and Lambert, 2005; Schaper et al., 2005; Viarisio et al., 2011). GEMMs expressing HPV E7 in basal epithelial cells have not only validated results from cell-based experiments but in many cases have also provided novel insights (Balsitis et al., 2006, 2005, 2003; Schaeffer et al., 2004; Shin et al., 2009, 2012b). Of particular interest are studies that document that E7 is the major driver of GEMMs for HPV-associated cervical (Jabbar et al., 2009) and anal (Thomas et al., 2011) cancers. The results from such studies are summarized in Table 13.
Table 13.
Biological activities of HPV E7 in genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs).
| Expression site | Transgene | Phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eye | |||
| Lens-specific αA crystalline Promoter |
HPV16 E7 | Induces cell proliferation, decreases differentiation and apoptosis in the differentiated lens | Pan and Griep (1994) |
| HPV16 E7 | Crossed with E2F1−/− mice: Partial loss of ability to disrupt differentiation | McCaffrey et al. (1999) | |
| del 21–24 (DLYC) |
Fails to perturb development in the lens | Pan and Griep (1994) | |
| Retinal photoreceptor cell specific IRBP promoter |
HPV16 E7 | Induces p53-dependent apoptosis-mediated retinal degeneration | Howes et al. (1994) |
| Basal epithelial cells | |||
| Skin cancer model: Keratin K14 promoter in FVB mice | |||
| HPV16 E7 | Induces high incidence of squamous epithelial hyperplasia/delayed differentiation Induces low incidence of malignant skin tumors |
Herber et al. (1996) | |
| HPV16 E7 | Abrogates inhibition of DNA synthesis in response to ionizing radiation | Song et al. (1998) | |
| HPV16 E7 | Acts as a promoter of skin carcinogenesis | Song et al. (2000) | |
| HPV16 E7 | Deregulates Mmp2, 12, 14, 19 and 27 genes in E7 induced skin cancer. | Ibarra Sierra et al. (2012) | |
| HPV16 E7 | When crossed with Rb conditional knock out mice: Causes pRb-independent dysplasia and increased proliferation |
Balsitis et al. (2003) | |
| HPV16 E7 | When crossed with RbΔLXCXE knock in mice: Fails to cause epithelial hyperplasia, stimulate cellular DNA synthesis, abrogate DNA damage induced cell cycle arrest or upregulate p21Cip1 Retains ability to delay differentiation resulting in expansion of the spinous layer |
Balsitis et al. (2005) | |
| HPV16 E7 | When crossed with p53−/− mice: Retains ability to upregulate p21Cip1 but at a reduced level | Balsitis et al. (2005) | |
| HPV16 E7 | When crossed with p19Arf–/– mice: Retains ability to upregulate p21Cip1 and p53 | Balsitis et al. (2005) | |
| del 6–10 (PTLHE) |
Fails to cause epithelial hyperplasia and benign tumors | Gulliver et al. (1997) | |
| Fails to abrogate the DNA damage response to radiation | Song et al. (1998) | ||
| del 21–24 (DLYC) |
Fails to cause epithelial hyperplasia and benign tumors | Gulliver et al. (1997) | |
| Fails to abrogate the DNA damage response to radiation | Song et al. (1998) | ||
| Cervical carcinoma model: Keratin K14 promoter plus estrogen (0.05 mg/60 days) for 6 months in FVB mice | |||
| HPV16 E7 | Causes multifocal microinvasive cervical carcinomas, increases the number of centrosomes in premalignant lesions, and induces p53 In combination with E6 (which also increases the number of centrosomes but only causes low grade dysplasia), causes large, invasive cancers, and greater numbers of centrosomes/cell |
Riley et al. (2003) | |
| HPV16 E7 | Significantly deregulates Dmbt1, Gli1 and 17βHsd2 genes in E7 induced cervical carcinoma | Ibarra Sierra et al. (2012) | |
| HPV16 E7 | When crossed with RbΔLXCXE knock in mice: Fails to stimulate suprabasal DNA synthesis and abrogate DNA damage response to radiation Intermediate ability to up-regulate Mcm7 gene in suprabasal layers Retains ability to induce cervical carcinomas but without dysplasias |
Balsitis et al. (2006) | |
| HPV16 E7 | Increases expression of p21Cip1 in the suprabasal compartment When crossed with p21Cip1–/– mice: Increases the incidence of cervical disease relative to that seen in p21Cip1–/– mice, but incidence is comparable to that seen in p21Cip1 proficient mice. |
Shin et al. (2009) | |
| HPV16 E7 | When crossed with mice carrying a constitutively active β-catenin transgene: Causes higher incidence of cervical carcinomas than with either transgene alone |
Bulut et al. (2011) | |
| C68V69Q70/ AAA |
Reduces ability to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells Retains ability to degrade pRB family members and upregulate Mcm7 and p16Ink4a Fails to inactivate p21Cip1 and cause severe cervical disease |
Shin et al. (2009) | |
| Cervical carcinoma model: Keratin K5 or 14 promoter plus estrogen (0.05 mg/60 days) for 7–10 months in FVB mice | |||
| Repressible HPV16 E7 |
When repressed, results in reversion of the acute phenotype and of dysplasia/cancer, whether in the presence or absence of E6 |
Jabbar et al. (2009), Jabbar et al. (2012) |
|
| Cervical carcinoma model: Keratin K14 promoter in mixed genetic background | |||
| HPV16 E7 | 8 months estrogen (0.05 mg/60 days): Causes unscheduled DNA synthesis, high incidence of high grade dysplasia and low incidence of cancer In the absence of stromal but presence of epithelial ERα: Fails to cause unscheduled DNA synthesis, high grade dysplasia or cancer |
Chung et al. (2013) | |
| Cervical carcinoma model: Conditional knockout of all three Rb family members plus estrogen (0.05 mg/60 days) for 6 months in FVB mice | |||
| No transgene | Fails to recapitulate the E7-mediated cancer phenotype but does result in a high incidence of high grade dysplasia Partially recapitulates the E7-mediated induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis Totally recapitulates the E7-mediated abrogation of the DNA damage response |
Shin et al. (2012b) | |
| Head and Neck Cancer model: Keratin K14 promoter plus low dose 4-NQO in FVB mice | |||
| HPV16 E7 | Only partially degrades pRb Increases DNA synthesis in basal cells and induces unscheduled DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells Causes high incidence of carcinomas and increases expression of Mcm7 and p16Ink4a, similar to that seen when E6 is expressed along with E7 |
Strati and Lambert (2007) | |
| HPV16 E7 | Induces DNA damage foci When crossed with FancD−/− mice: Enhances induction of DNA damage foci and increases incidence of carcinomas |
Park et al. (2010) | |
| Head and Neck Cancer model: Conditional knockout of pRB plus low dose 4-NQO in FVB mice | |||
| No Transgene |
Fails to increase DNA synthesis in basal cells but does recapitulate the E7-mediated induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in suprabasal cells Causes only a low incidence of carcinomas but does recapitulate the E7-mediated increase in expression of Mcm7 and p16Ink4a, |
Strati and Lambert (2007) | |
| Head and Neck Cancer model: Knockout of pRB and p107 plus low dose 4-NQO in FVB mice | |||
| No Transgene |
Recapitulates the E7-mediated head and neck disease phenotype and increased expression of Mcm7, p16Ink4a and Ezh2 |
Shin et al. (2012a) | |
| Head and Neck Anal Cancer Model: Keratin K14 promoter plus DMBA in FVB mice | |||
| HPV16 E7 | Causes high incidence of anal cancer (mostly highly differentiated) with increased expression of Mcm7, p16Ink4a similar to that seen when E6 is expressed along with E7 Induces unscheduled suprabasal DNA synthesis, upregulates Mcm7, and abrogates radiation induced growth arrest, similar to that seen when E6 is expressed along with E7 |
Thomas et al. (2011) | |
DMBA, 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene; 4-NQO, 4-Nitroquinoline N-oxide; and mutations are all in the HPV16 E7 gene.
Fig. 3.
Schematic representation of the HPV E7 CR2 mutants described in Tables 6 and 7. Amino acid residues 15–39 of HPV16 and HPV31 E7 and amino acid residues 18–42 of HPV18 E7 are shown. The position of the LXCXE motif is indicated. The one letter code for amino acid (aa) residues is used; X denotes any amino acid. Black boxes denote deletions.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely apologize to those authors whose contributions we may have missed. Please submit such data to E7PAVEre-view@gmail.com so that it can be included in updated versions of this chapter. The work on HPV E7 biology and biochemistry in our laboratories has been supported over the years by Public Health Service grants CA081135, CA066980, and CA141583 (KM) and AI031494, AI49254, CA124314, AI078489 and VM-56 (AR).
References
- Accardi R, Rubino R, Scalise M, Gheit T, Shahzad N, Thomas M, Banks L, Indiveri C, Sylla BS, Cardone RA, Reshkin SJ, Tommasino M. E6 and E7 from human papillomavirus type 16 cooperate to target the PDZ protein Na/ H exchange regulatory factor 1. J. Virol. 2011;85:8208–8216. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00114-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahola H, Bergman P, Strom AC, Moreno-Lopez J, Pettersson U. Organization and expression of the transforming region from the European elk papillomavirus (EEPV) Gene. 1986;50:195–205. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90324-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akgul B, Bauer B, Zigrino P, Storey A, Mauch C, Pfister H. Upregulation of lipocalin-2 in human papillomavirus-positive keratinocytes and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. J. Gen. Virol. 2011;92:395–401. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.025064-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akgul B, Garcia-Escudero R, Ghali L, Pfister HJ, Fuchs PG, Navsaria H, Storey A. The E7 protein of cutaneous human papillomavirus type 8 causes invasion of human keratinocytes into the dermis in organotypic cultures of skin. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2216–2223. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akgul B, Ghali L, Davies D, Pfister H, Leigh IM, Storey A. HPV8 early genes modulate differentiation and cell cycle of primary human adult kerati-nocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 2007;16:590–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00569.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allen-Hoffmann BL, Schlosser SJ, Ivarie CA, Sattler CA, Meisner LF, O’Connor SL. Normal growth and differentiation in a spontaneously immortalized near-diploid human keratinocyte cell line, NIKS. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2000;114:444–455. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allison SJ, Jiang M, Milner J. Oncogenic viral protein HPV E7 up-regulates the SIRT1 longevity protein in human cervical cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2009;1:316–327. doi: 10.18632/aging.100028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonso LG, Garcia-Alai MM, Nadra AD, Lapena AN, Almeida FL, Gualfetti P, Prat-Gay GD. High-risk (HPV16) human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein is highly stable and extended, with conformational transitions that could explain its multiple cellular binding partners. Biochemistry. 2002;41:10510–10518. doi: 10.1021/bi025579n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonso LG, Garcia-Alai MM, Smal C, Centeno JM, Iacono R, Castano E, Gualfetti P, de Prat-Gay G. The HPV16 E7 viral oncoprotein self-assembles into defined spherical oligomers. Biochemistry. 2004;43:3310–3317. doi: 10.1021/bi036037o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonso LG, Smal C, Garcia-Alai MM, Chemes L, Salame M, de Prat-Gay G. Chaperone holdase activity of human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. Biochemistry. 2006;45:657–667. doi: 10.1021/bi0522549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angeline M, Merle E, Moroianu J. The E7 oncoprotein of high-risk human papillomavirus type 16 enters the nucleus via a nonclassical Ran-dependent pathway. Virology. 2003;317:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antinore MJ, Birrer MJ, Patel D, Nader L, McCance DJ. The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene product interacts with and trans-activates the AP1 family of transcription factors. EMBO J. 1996;15:1950–1960. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antonsson A, Payne E, Hengst K, McMillan NA. The human papilloma-virus type 16 E7 protein binds human interferon regulatory factor-9 via a novel PEST domain required for transformation. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2006;26:455–461. doi: 10.1089/jir.2006.26.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arbeit JM, Howley PM, Hanahan D. Chronic estrogen-induced cervical and vaginal squamous carcinogenesis in human papillomavirus type 16 transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:2930–2935. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong DJ, Roman A. Mutagenesis of human papillomavirus types 6 and 16 E7 open reading frames alters the electrophoretic mobility of the expressed proteins. J. Gen. Virol. 1992;73(Part 5):1275–1279. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-5-1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong DJ, Roman A. The anomalous electrophoretic behavior of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein is due to the high content of acidic amino acid residues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;192:1380–1387. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong DJ, Roman A. Human papillomavirus type 6 E7 protein is a substrate in vitro of protein kinase C. Biochem. J. 1995;312(Pt 3):667–670. doi: 10.1042/bj3120667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong DJ, Roman A. The relative ability of human papillomavirus type 6 and human papillomavirus type 16 E7 proteins to transactivate E2F–responsive elements is promoter- and cell-dependent. Virology. 1997;239:238–246. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arroyo M, Bagchi S, Raychaudhuri P. Association of the human papillo-mavirus type 16 E7 protein with the S-phase-specific E2F–cyclin A complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993;13:6537–6546. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avvakumov N, Torchia J, Mymryk JS. Interaction of the HPV E7 proteins with the pCAF acetyltransferase. Oncogene. 2003;22:3833–3841. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldwin A, Huh KW, Munger K. Human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein dysregulates steroid receptor coactivator 1 localization and function. J. Virol. 2006;80:6669–6677. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02497-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balsitis S, Dick F, Dyson N, Lambert PF. Critical roles for non-pRb targets of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 in cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9393–9400. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balsitis S, Dick F, Lee D, Farrell L, Hyde RK, Griep AE, Dyson N, Lambert PF. Examination of the pRb-dependent and pRb-independent functions of E7 in vivo. J. Virol. 2005;79:11392–11402. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11392-11402.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balsitis SJ, Sage J, Duensing S, Munger K, Jacks T, Lambert PF. Recapitulation of the effects of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncogene on mouse epithelium by somatic Rb deletion and detection of pRb-independent effects of E7 in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:9094–9103. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9094-9103.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banerjee NS, Wang HK, Broker TR, Chow LT. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E7 induces prolonged G2 following S phase reentry in differentiated human keratinocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:15473–15482. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.197574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banks L, Edmonds C, Vousden KH. Ability of the HPV16 E7 protein to bind RB and induce DNA synthesis is not sufficient for efficient transforming activity in NIH3T3 cells. Oncogene. 1990;5:1383–1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbosa MS, Edmonds C, Fisher C, Schiller JT, Lowy DR, Vousden KH. The region of the HPV E7 oncoprotein homologous to adenovirus E1a and Sv40 large T antigen contains separate domains for Rb binding and casein kinase II phosphorylation. EMBO J. 1990;9:153–160. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08091.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbosa MS, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Papillomavirus polypeptides E6 and E7 are zinc-binding proteins. J. Virol. 1989;63:1404–1407. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.3.1404-1407.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnard P, McMillan NA. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein abrogates signaling mediated by interferon-alpha. Virology. 1999;259:305–313. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnard P, Payne E, McMillan NA. The human papillomavirus E7 protein is able to inhibit the antiviral and anti-growth functions of interferon-alpha. Virology. 2000;277:411–419. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrow-Laing L, Chen W, Roman A. Low- and high-risk human papillo-mavirus E7 proteins regulate p130 differently. Virology. 2010;400:233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.01.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basile JR, Zacny V, Munger K. The cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha ) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand differentially modulate proliferation and apoptotic pathways in human keratinocytes expressing the human papillomavirus-16 E7 oncoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:22522–22528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010505200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bates S, Phillips AC, Clark PA, Stott F, Peters G, Ludwig RL, Vousden KH. p14ARF links the tumour suppressors RB and p53. Nature. 1998;395:124–125. doi: 10.1038/25867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beltramini M, Giacometti GM, Salvato B, Giacometti G, Munger K, Lerch K. Luminescence emission from Neurospora copper metallothionein. Time-resolved studies. Biochem. J. 1989;260:189–193. doi: 10.1042/bj2600189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Saadon R, Fajerman I, Ziv T, Hellman U, Schwartz AL, Ciechanover A. The tumor suppressor protein p16(INK4a) and the human papillomavirus oncoprotein-58 E7 are naturally occurring lysine-less proteins that are degraded by the ubiquitin system. Direct evidence for ubiquitination at the N-terminal residue. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:41414–41421. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407201200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berezutskaya E, Bagchi S. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein functionally interacts with the S4 subunit of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:30135–30140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berezutskaya E, Yu B, Morozov A, Raychaudhuri P, Bagchi S. Differential regulation of the pocket domains of the retinoblastoma family proteins by the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein. Cell Growth Differ. 1997;8:1277–1286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernat A, Avvakumov N, Mymryk JS, Banks L. Interaction between the HPV E7 oncoprotein and the transcriptional coactivator p300. Oncogene. 2003;22:7871–7881. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bischof O, Nacerddine K, Dejean A. Human papillomavirus oncoprotein E7 targets the promyelocytic leukemia protein and circumvents cellular senescence via the Rb and p53 tumor suppressor pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:1013–1024. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.3.1013-1024.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Boccardo E, Manzini Baldi CV, Carvalho AF, Rabachini T, Torres C, Barreta LA, Brentani H, Villa LL. Expression of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein alters keratinocytes expression profile in response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:521–531. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bodily JM, Mehta KP, Cruz L, Meyers C, Laimins LA. The E7 open reading frame acts in cis and in trans to mediate differentiation-dependent activities in the human papillomavirus type 16 life cycle. J. Virol. 2011a;85:8852–8862. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00664-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bodily JM, Mehta KP, Laimins LA. Human papillomavirus E7 enhances hypoxia-inducible factor 1-mediated transcription by inhibiting binding of histone deacetylases. Cancer Res. 2011b;71:1187–1195. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bottalico D, Chen Z, Dunne A, Ostoloza J, McKinney S, Sun C, Schlecht NF, Fatahzadeh M, Herrero R, Schiffman M, Burk RD. The oral cavity contains abundant known and novel human papillomaviruses from the Betapapillomavirus and Gammapapillomavirus genera. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;204:787–792. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boxman IL, Mulder LH, Noya F, de Waard V, Gibbs S, Broker TR, ten Kate F, Chow LT, ter Schegget J. Transduction of the E6 and E7 genes of epidermodysplasia-verruciformis-associated human papillomaviruses alters human keratinocyte growth and differentiation in organotypic cultures. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2001;117:1397–1404. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyer SN, Wazer DE, Band V. E7 protein of human papilloma virus-16 induces degradation of retinoblastoma protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4620–4624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brake T, Lambert PF. Estrogen contributes to the onset, persistence, and malignant progression of cervical cancer in a human papillomavirus-transgenic mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:2490–2495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409883102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brehm A, Nielsen SJ, Miska EA, McCance DJ, Reid JL, Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. The E7 oncoprotein associates with Mi2 and histone deacetylase activity to promote cell growth. EMBO J. 1999;18:2449–2458. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brokaw JL, Yee CL, Munger K. A mutational analysis of the amino terminal domain of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Virology. 1994;205:603–607. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks LA, Sullivan A, O’Nions J, Bell A, Dunne B, Tidy JA, Evans DJ, Osin P, Vousden KH, Gusterson B, Farrell PJ, Storey A, Gasco M, Sakai T, Crook T. E7 proteins from oncogenic human papillomavirus types transactivate p73: role in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br. J. Cancer. 2002;86:263–268. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buitrago-Perez A, Hachimi M, Duenas M, Lloveras B, Santos A, Holguin A, Duarte B, Santiago JL, Akgul B, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, Storey A, Ribas C, Larcher F, del Rio M, Paramio JM, Garcia-Escudero R. A humanized mouse model of HPV-associated pathology driven by E7 expression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bulut G, Fallen S, Beauchamp EM, Drebing LE, Sun J, Berry DL, Kallakury B, Crum CP, Toretsky JA, Schlegel R, Uren A. Beta-catenin accelerates human papilloma virus type-16 mediated cervical carcinogenesis in transgenic mice. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgers WA, Blanchon L, Pradhan S, de Launoit Y, Kouzarides T, Fuks F. Viral oncoproteins target the DNA methyltransferases. Oncogene. 2007;26:1650–1655. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byg LM, Vidlund J, Vasiljevic N, Clausen D, Forslund O, Norrild B. NF-kappaB signalling is attenuated by the E7 protein from cutaneous human papillomaviruses. Virus Res. 2012;169:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caldeira S, Zehbe I, Accardi R, Malanchi I, Dong W, Giarre M, de Villiers EM, Filotico R, Boukamp P, Tommasino M. The E6 and E7 proteins of the cutaneous human papillomavirus type 38 display transforming properties. J. Virol. 2003;77:2195–2206. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.3.2195-2206.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campo-Fernandez B, Morandell D, Santer FR, Zwerschke W, Jansen-Durr P. Identification of the FHL2 transcriptional coactivator as a new functional target of the E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16. J. Virol. 2007;81:1027–1032. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01699-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cardeal LB, Boccardo E, Termini L, Rabachini T, Andreoli MA, di Loreto C, Longatto Filho A, Villa LL, Maria-Engler SS. HPV16 oncoproteins induce MMPs/RECK-TIMP-2 imbalance in primary keratinocytes: possible implications in cervical carcinogenesis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charette ST, McCance DJ. The E7 protein from human papillomavirus type 16 enhances keratinocyte migration in an Akt-dependent manner. Oncogene. 2007;26:7386–7390. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chellappan S, Kraus VB, Kroger B, Munger K, Howley PM, Phelps WC, Nevins JR. Adenovirus E1A, simian virus 40 tumor antigen, and human papillomavirus E7 protein share the capacity to disrupt the interaction between transcription factor E2F and the retinoblastoma gene product. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:4549–4553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Desalle R, Burk RD. Human papillo-mavirus (HPV) types 101 and 103 isolated from cervicovaginal cells lack an E6 open reading frame (ORF) and are related to gamma-papillomaviruses. Virology. 2007;360:447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng S, Schmidt-Grimminger DC, Murant T, Broker TR, Chow LT. Differentiation-dependent up-regulation of the human papillomavirus E7 gene reactivates cellular DNA replication in suprabasal differentiated keratinocytes. Genes Dev. 1995;9:2335–2349. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.19.2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chesters PM, Vousden KH, Edmonds C, McCance DJ. Analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 open reading frame E7 immortalizing function in rat embryo fibroblast cells. J. Gen. Virol. 1990;71(Part 2):449–453. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-2-449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chien WM, Parker JN, Schmidt-Grimminger DC, Broker TR, Chow LT. Casein kinase II phosphorylation of the human papillomavirus-18 E7 protein is critical for promoting S-phase entry. Cell Growth Differ. 2000;11:425–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chung SH, Shin MK, Korach KS, Lambert PF. Requirement for stromal estrogen receptor alpha in cervical neoplasia. Horm Cancer. 2013;4:50–59. doi: 10.1007/s12672-012-0125-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clawson GA, Bui V, Xin P, Wang N, Pan W. Intracellular localization of the tumor suppressor HtrA1/Prss11 and its association with HPV16 E6 and E7 proteins. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008;105:81–88. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clemens KE, Brent R, Gyuris J, Munger K. Dimerization of the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein in vivo. Virology. 1995;214:289–293. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.9926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clements A, Johnston K, Mazzarelli JM, Ricciardi RP, Marmorstein R. Oligomerization properties of the viral oncoproteins adenovirus E1A and human papillomavirus E7 and their complexes with the retinoblastoma protein. Biochemistry. 2000;39:16033–16045. doi: 10.1021/bi002111g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole ST, Danos O. Nucleotide sequence and comparative analysis of the human papillomavirus type 18 genome. Phylogeny of papillomaviruses and repeated structure of the E6 and E7 gene products. J. Mol. Biol. 1987;193:599–608. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90343-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collins AS, Nakahara T, Do A, Lambert PF. Interactions with pocket proteins contribute to the role of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 in the papillomavirus life cycle. J. Virol. 2005;79:14769–14780. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.23.14769-14780.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornet I, Bouvard V, Campo MS, Thomas M, Banks L, Gissmann L, Lamartine J, Sylla BS, Accardi R, Tommasino M. Comparative analysis of transforming properties of E6 and E7 from different beta human papillomavirus types. J. Virol. 2012;86:2366–2370. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06579-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darnell GA, Schroder WA, Antalis TM, Lambley E, Major L, Gardner J, Birrell G, Cid-Arregui A, Suhrbier A. Human papillomavirus E7 requires the protease calpain to degrade the retinoblastoma protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:37492–37500. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706860200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies RC, Vousden KH. Functional analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 by complementation with adenovirus E1A mutants. J. Gen. Virol. 1992;73(Pt 8):2135–2139. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-8-2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Luca A, Mangiacasale R, Severino A, Malquori L, Baldi A, Palena A, Mileo AM, Lavia P, Paggi MG. E1A deregulates the centrosome cycle in a Ran GTPase-dependent manner. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1430–1437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Villiers EM, Fauquet C, Broker TR, Bernard HU, zur Hausen H. Classification of papillomaviruses. Virology. 2004;324:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeCaprio JA, Ludlow JW, Figge J, Shew JY, Huang CM, Lee WH, Marsilio E, Paucha E, Livingston DM. SV40 large tumor antigen forms a specific complex with the product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene. Cell. 1988;54:275–283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90559-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Defeo-Jones D, Huang PS, Jones RE, Haskell KM, Vuocolo GA, Hanobik MG, Huber HE, Oliff A. Cloning of cDNAs for cellular proteins that bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Nature. 1991;352:251–254. doi: 10.1038/352251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeFilippis RA, Goodwin EC, Wu L, DiMaio D. Endogenous human papillomavirus E6 and E7 proteins differentially regulate proliferation, senescence, and apoptosis in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. J. Virol. 2003;77:1551–1563. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.2.1551-1563.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demers GW, Espling E, Harry JB, Etscheid BG, Galloway DA. Abrogation of growth arrest signals by human papillomavirus type 16 E7 is mediated by sequences required for transformation. J. Virol. 1996;70:6862–6869. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.10.6862-6869.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demers GW, Foster SA, Halbert CL, Galloway DA. Growth arrest by induction of p53 in DNA damaged keratinocytes is bypassed by human papillomavirus 16 E7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994a;91:4382–4386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demers GW, Halbert CL, Galloway DA. Elevated wild-type p53 protein levels in human epithelial cell lines immortalized by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene. Virology. 1994b;198:169–174. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duensing S, Lee LY, Duensing A, Basile J, Piboonniyom S, Gonzalez S, Crum CP, Munger K. The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins cooperate to induce mitotic defects and genomic instability by uncoupling centrosome duplication from the cell division cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA. 2000;97:10002–10007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.170093297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duensing S, Munger K. The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins independently induce numerical and structural chromosome instability. Cancer Res. 2002;62:7075–7082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duensing S, Munger K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein can induce abnormal centrosome duplication through a mechanism independent of inactivation of retinoblastoma protein family members. J. Virol. 2003;77:12331–12335. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.22.12331-12335.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyson N, Guida P, Munger K, Harlow E. Homologous sequences in adenovirus E1A and human papillomavirus E7 proteins mediate interaction with the same set of cellular proteins. J. Virol. 1992;66:6893–6902. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.12.6893-6902.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyson N, Howley PM, Munger K, Harlow E. The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Science. 1989;243:934–937. doi: 10.1126/science.2537532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edmonds C, Vousden KH. A point mutational analysis of human papillo-mavirus type 16 E7 protein. J. Virol. 1989;63:2650–2656. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.6.2650-2656.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Egan C, Jelsma TN, Howe JA, Bayley ST, Ferguson B, Branton PE. Mapping of cellular protein-binding sites on the products of early-region 1A of human adenovirus type 5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1988;8:3955–3959. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan X, Liu Y, Heilman SA, Chen JJ. Human papillomavirus E7 induces rereplication in response to DNA damage. J. Virol. 2013;87:1200–1210. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02038-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fera D, Marmorstein R. Different regions of the HPV-E7 and Ad-E1A viral oncoproteins bind competitively but through distinct mechanisms to the CH1 transactivation domain of p300. Biochemistry. 2012;51:9524–9534. doi: 10.1021/bi3011863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Figge J, Smith TF. Cell-division sequence motif. Nature. 1988;334:109. doi: 10.1038/334109a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firzlaff JM, Galloway DA, Eisenman RN, Luscher B. The E7 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 is phosphorylated by casein kinase II. New Biol. 1989;1:44–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firzlaff JM, Luscher B, Eisenman RN. Negative charge at the casein kinase II phosphorylation site is important for transformation but not for Rb protein binding by the E7 protein of human papillomavirus type 16. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:5187–5191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flores ER, Allen-Hoffmann BL, Lee D, Lambert PF. The human papillo-mavirus type 16 E7 oncogene is required for the productive stage of the viral life cycle. J. Virol. 2000;74:6622–6631. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.14.6622-6631.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujikawa K, Furuse M, Uwabe K, Maki H, Yoshie O. Nuclear localization and transforming activity of human papillomavirus type 16 E7-beta-galactosidase fusion protein: characterization of the nuclear localization sequence. Virology. 1994;204:789–793. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funk JO, Waga S, Harry JB, Espling E, Stillman B, Galloway DA. Inhibition of CDK activity and PCNA-dependent DNA replication by p21 is blocked by interaction with the HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2090–2100. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.16.2090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gammoh N, Grm HS, Massimi P, Banks L. Regulation of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 activity through direct protein interaction with the E2 transcriptional activator. J. Virol. 2006;80:1787–1797. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.4.1787-1797.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Alai MM, Alonso LG, de Prat-Gay G. The N-terminal module of HPV16 E7 is an intrinsically disordered domain that confers conformational and recognition plasticity to the oncoprotein. Biochemistry. 2007;46:10405–10412. doi: 10.1021/bi7007917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genovese NJ, Banerjee NS, Broker TR, Chow LT. Casein kinase II motif-dependent phosphorylation of human papillomavirus E7 protein promotes p130 degradation and S-phase induction in differentiated human keratinocytes. J. Virol. 2008;82:4862–4873. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01202-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genovese NJ, Broker TR, Chow LT. Nonconserved lysine residues attenuate the biological function of the low-risk human papillomavirus E7 protein. J. Virol. 2011;85:5546–5554. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02166-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georgopoulos NT, Proffitt JL, Blair GE. Transcriptional regulation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I heavy chain, TAP1 and LMP2 genes by the human papillomavirus (HPV) type 6b, 16 and 18 E7 oncoproteins. Oncogene. 2000;19:4930–4935. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghittoni R, Accardi R, Hasan U, Gheit T, Sylla B, Tommasino M. The biological properties of E6 and E7 oncoproteins from human papillomaviruses. Virus Genes. 2010;40:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11262-009-0412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giarre M, Caldeira S, Malanchi I, Ciccolini F, Leao MJ, Tommasino M. Induction of pRb degradation by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein is essential to efficiently overcome p16INK4a–imposed G1 cell cycle arrest. J. Virol. 2001;75:4705–4712. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4705-4712.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez SL, Stremlau M, He X, Basile JR, Munger K. Degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein is important for functional inactivation and is separable from proteasomal degradation of E7. J. Virol. 2001;75:7583–7591. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7583-7591.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gottschling M, Bravo IG, Schulz E, Bracho MA, Deaville R, Jepson PD, Van Bressem MF, Stockfleth E, Nindl I. Modular organizations of novel cetacean papillomaviruses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011;59:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenfield I, Nickerson J, Penman S, Stanley M. Human papillomavirus 16 E7 protein is associated with the nuclear matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:11217–11221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guccione E, Massimi P, Bernat A, Banks L. Comparative analysis of the intracellular location of the high- and low-risk human papillomavirus onco-proteins. Virology. 2002;293:20–25. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gulbahce N, Yan H, Dricot A, Padi M, Byrdsong D, Franchi R, Lee DS, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Mar JC, Calderwood MA, Baldwin A, Zhao B, Santhanam B, Braun P, Simonis N, Huh KW, Hellner K, Grace M, Chen A, Rubio R, Marto JA, Christakis NA, Kieff E, Roth FP, Roecklein-Canfield J, Decaprio JA, Cusick ME, Quackenbush J, Hill DE, Munger K, Vidal M, Barabasi AL. Viral perturbations of host networks reflect disease etiology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012;8:e1002531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gulliver GA, Herber RL, Liem A, Lambert PF. Both conserved region 1 (CR1) and CR2 of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncogene are required for induction of epidermal hyperplasia and tumor formation in transgenic mice. J. Virol. 1997;71:5905–5914. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.8.5905-5914.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Habig M, Smola H, Dole VS, Derynck R, Pfister H, Smola-Hess S. E7 proteins from high- and low-risk human papillomaviruses bind to TGF-beta-regulated Smad proteins and inhibit their transcriptional activity. Arch. Virol. 2006;151:1961–1972. doi: 10.1007/s00705-006-0768-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halbert CL, Demers GW, Galloway DA. The E7 gene of human papillo-mavirus type 16 is sufficient for immortalization of human epithelial cells. J. Virol. 1991;65:473–478. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.1.473-478.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halbert CL, Demers GW, Galloway DA. The E6 and E7 genes of human papillomavirus type 6 have weak immortalizing activity in human epithelial cells. J. Virol. 1992;66:2125–2134. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.4.2125-2134.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harlow E, Whyte P, Franza BR, Jr, Schley C. Association of adenovirus early-region 1A proteins with cellular polypeptides. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986;6:1579–1589. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.5.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasan UA, Bates E, Takeshita F, Biliato A, Accardi R, Bouvard V, Mansour M, Vincent I, Gissmann L, Iftner T, Sideri M, Stubenrauch F, Tommasino M. TLR9 expression and function is abolished by the cervical cancer-associated human papillomavirus type 16. J. Immunol. 2007;178:3186–3197. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.3186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He W, Staples D, Smith C, Fisher C. Direct activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by human papillomavirus E7. J. Virol. 2003;77:10566–10574. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.19.10566-10574.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heck DV, Yee CL, Howley PM, Munger K. Efficiency of binding the retinoblastoma protein correlates with the transforming capacity of the E7 oncoproteins of the human papillomaviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:4442–4446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heilman SA, Nordberg JJ, Liu Y, Sluder G, Chen JJ. Abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint contributes to polyploidization in human papilloma-virus E7-expressing cells. J. Virol. 2009;83:2756–2764. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02149-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heller C, Weisser T, Mueller-Schickert A, Rufer E, Hoh A, Leonhardt RM, Knittler MR. Identification of key amino acid residues that determine the ability of high risk HPV16-E7 to dysregulate major histocompatibility complex class I expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:10983–10997. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.199190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helt AM, Funk JO, Galloway DA. Inactivation of both the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and p21 by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncopro-tein is necessary to inhibit cell cycle arrest in human epithelial cells. J. Virol. 2002;76:10559–10568. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.20.10559-10568.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helt AM, Galloway DA. Destabilization of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by human papillomavirus type 16 E7 is not sufficient to overcome cell cycle arrest in human keratinocytes. J. Virol. 2001;75:6737–6747. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.6737-6747.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herber R, Liem A, Pitot H, Lambert PF. Squamous epithelial hyperplasia and carcinoma in mice transgenic for the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncogene. J. Virol. 1996;70:1873–1881. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.3.1873-1881.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hermonat PL, Santin AD, Zhan D. Binding of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein and the adeno-associated virus Rep78 major regulatory protein in vitro and in yeast and the potential for downstream effects. J. Hum. Virol. 2000;3:113–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holland D, Hoppe-Seyler K, Schuller B, Lohrey C, Maroldt J, Durst M, Hoppe-Seyler F. Activation of the enhancer of zeste homologue 2 gene by the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9964–9972. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong S, Mehta KP, Laimins LA. Suppression of STAT-1 expression by human papillomaviruses is necessary for differentiation-dependent genome amplification and plasmid maintenance. J. Virol. 2011;85:9486–9494. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05007-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howes KA, Ransom N, Papermaster DS, Lasudry JG, Albert DM, Windle JJ. Apoptosis or retinoblastoma: alternative fates of photoreceptors expressing the HPV-16 E7 gene in the presence or absence of p53. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1300–1310. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.11.1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang PS, Patrick DR, Edwards G, Goodhart PJ, Huber HE, Miles L, Garsky VM, Oliff A, Heimbrook DC. Protein domains governing interactions between E2F, the retinoblastoma gene product, and human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993;13:953–960. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang SM, McCance DJ. Down regulation of the interleukin-8 promoter by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 through effects on CREB binding protein/p300 and P/CAF. J. Virol. 2002;76:8710–8721. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.17.8710-8721.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huh K, Zhou X, Hayakawa H, Cho JY, Libermann TA, Jin J, Harper JW, Munger K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein associates with the cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex, which contributes to degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J. Virol. 2007;81:9737–9747. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00881-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huh KW, DeMasi J, Ogawa H, Nakatani Y, Howley PM, Munger K. Association of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein with the 600-kDa retinoblastoma protein-associated factor, p600. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:11492–11497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505337102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hussain I, Fathallah I, Accardi R, Yue J, Saidj D, Shukla R, Hasan U, Gheit T, Niu Y, Tommasino M, Sylla BS. NF-kappaB protects human papillo-mavirus type 38 E6/E7-immortalized human keratinocytes against tumor necrosis factor alpha and UV-mediated apoptosis. J. Virol. 2011;85:9013–9022. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00002-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang SG, Lee D, Kim J, Seo T, Choe J. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 binds to E2F1 and activates E2F1-driven transcription in a retinoblastoma protein-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:2923–2930. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109113200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ibarra Sierra E, Diaz Chavez J, Cortes-Malagon EM, Uribe-Figueroa L, Hidalgo-Miranda A, Lambert PF, Gariglio P. Differential gene expression between skin and cervix induced by the E7 oncoprotein in a transgenic mouse model. Virology. 2012;433:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jabbar SF, Abrams L, Glick A, Lambert PF. Persistence of high-grade cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer requires the continuous expression of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncogene. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4407–4414. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jabbar SF, Park S, Schweizer J, Berard-Bergery M, Pitot HC, Lee D, Lambert PF. Cervical cancers require the continuous expression of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein even in the presence of the viral E6 oncoprotein. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4008–4016. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeon JH, Choi KH, Cho SY, Kim CW, Shin DM, Kwon JC, Song KY, Park SC, Kim IG. Transglutaminase 2 inhibits Rb binding of human papilloma-virus E7 by incorporating polyamine. EMBO J. 2003;22:5273–5282. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jewers RJ, Hildebrandt P, Ludlow JW, Kell B, McCance DJ. Regions of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein required for immortalization of human keratinocytes. J. Virol. 1992;66:1329–1335. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.3.1329-1335.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones DL, Alani RM, Munger K. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein can uncouple cellular differentiation and proliferation in human keratinocytes by abrogating p21Cip1-mediated inhibition of cdk2. Genes Dev. 1997a;11:2101–2111. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.16.2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones DL, Munger K. Analysis of the p53-mediated G1 growth arrest pathway in cells expressing the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. J. Virol. 1997;71:2905–2912. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.4.2905-2912.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones DL, Thompson DA, Munger K. Destabilization of the RB tumor suppressor protein and stabilization of p53 contribute to HPV type 16 E7-induced apoptosis. Virology. 1997b;239:97–107. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones RE, Wegrzyn RJ, Patrick DR, Balishin NL, Vuocolo GA, Riemen MW, Defeo-Jones D, Garsky VM, Heimbrook DC, Oliff A. Identification of HPV-16 E7 peptides that are potent antagonists of E7 binding to the retino-blastoma suppressor protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:12782–12785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klingelhutz AJ, Roman A. Cellular transformation by human papillomaviruses: lessons learned by comparing high- and low-risk viruses. Virology. 2012;424:77–98. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knapp AA, McManus PM, Bockstall K, Moroianu J. Identification of the nuclear localization and export signals of high risk HPV16 E7 oncoprotein. Virology. 2009;383:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.09.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korzeniewski N, Treat B, Duensing S. The HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein induces centriole multiplication through deregulation of Polo-like kinase 4 expression. Mol. Cancer. 2011;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lam EW, Morris JD, Davies R, Crook T, Watson RJ, Vousden KH. HPV16 E7 oncoprotein deregulates B-myb expression: correlation with targeting of p107/E2F complexes. EMBO J. 1994;13:871–878. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laurson J, Khan S, Chung R, Cross K, Raj K. Epigenetic repression of E-cadherin by human papillomavirus 16 E7 protein. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:918–926. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D, Lim C, Seo T, Kwon H, Min H, Choe J. The viral oncogene human papillomavirus E7 deregulates transcriptional silencing by Brm-related gene 1 via molecular interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2002a;277:48842–48848. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203583200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee DK, Kim BC, Kim IY, Cho EA, Satterwhite DJ, Kim SJ. The human papilloma virus E7 oncoprotein inhibits transforming growth factor-beta signaling by blocking binding of the Smad complex to its target sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 2002b;277:38557–38564. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206786200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JO, Russo AA, Pavletich NP. Structure of the retinoblastoma tumour-suppressor pocket domain bound to a peptide from HPV E7. Nature. 1998;391:859–865. doi: 10.1038/36038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Zhan T, Li C, Liu M, Wang QK. Repression of MHC class I transcription by HPV16E7 through interaction with a putative RXRbeta motif and NF-kappaB cytoplasmic sequestration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;388:383–388. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang YJ, Chang HS, Wang CY, Yu WC. DYRK1A stabilizes HPV16E7 oncoprotein through phosphorylation of the threonine 5 and threonine 7 residues. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2008;40:2431–2441. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Clements A, Zhao K, Marmorstein R. Structure of the human Papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein and its mechanism for inactivation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:578–586. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508455200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Roberts J, Dakic A, Zhang Y, Schlegel R. HPV E7 contributes to the telomerase activity of immortalized and tumorigenic cells and augments E6-induced hTERT promoter function. Virology. 2008;375:611–623. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longworth MS, Laimins LA. The binding of histone deacetylases and the integrity of zinc finger-like motifs of the E7 protein are essential for the life cycle of human papillomavirus type 31. J. Virol. 2004;78:3533–3541. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3533-3541.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longworth MS, Wilson R, Laimins LA. HPV31 E7 facilitates replication by activating E2F2 transcription through its interaction with HDACs. EMBO J. 2005;24:1821–1830. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luscher-Firzlaff JM, Westendorf JM, Zwicker J, Burkhardt H, Henriksson M, Muller R, Pirollet F, Luscher B. Interaction of the fork head domain transcription factor MPP2 with the human papilloma virus 16 E7 protein: enhancement of transformation and transactivation. Oncogene. 1999;18:5620–5630. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maldonado E, Cabrejos ME, Banks L, Allende JE. Human papillomavirus-16 E7 protein inhibits the DNA interaction of the TATA binding transcription factor. J. Cell. Biochem. 2002;85:663–669. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mannhardt B, Weinzimer SA, Wagner M, Fiedler M, Cohen P, Jansen-Durr P, Zwerschke W. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein binds and inactivates growth-inhibitory insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:6483–6495. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.17.6483-6495.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin LG, Demers GW, Galloway DA. Disruption of the G1/S transition in human papillomavirus type 16 E7-expressing human cells is associated with altered regulation of cyclin E. J. Virol. 1998;72:975–985. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.2.975-985.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massimi P, Banks L. Differential phosphorylation of the HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein during the cell cycle. Virology. 2000;276:388–394. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massimi P, Pim D, Banks L. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 binds to the conserved carboxy-terminal region of the TATA box binding protein and this contributes to E7 transforming activity. J. Gen. Virol. 1997;78(Pt 10):2607–2613. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-10-2607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massimi P, Thomas M, Bouvard V, Ruberto I, Campo MS, Tommasino M, Banks L. Comparative transforming potential of different human papillomaviruses associated with non-melanoma skin cancer. Virology. 2008;371:374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matlashewski G, Schneider J, Banks L, Jones N, Murray A, Crawford L. Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA cooperates with activated ras in transforming primary cells. EMBO J. 1987;6:1741–1746. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02426.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mavromatis KO, Jones DL, Mukherjee R, Yee C, Grace M, Munger K. The carboxyl-terminal zinc-binding domain of the human papillomavirus E7 protein can be functionally replaced by the homologous sequences of the E6 protein. Virus Res. 1997;52:109–118. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(97)00090-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mazzarelli JM, Atkins GB, Geisberg JV, Ricciardi RP. The viral oncopro-teins Ad5 E1A, HPV16 E7 and SV40 TAg bind a common region of the TBP-associated factor-110. Oncogene. 1995;11:1859–1864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCaffrey J, Yamasaki L, Dyson NJ, Harlow E, Griep AE. Disruption of retinoblastoma protein family function by human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein inhibits lens development in part through E2F-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:6458–6468. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.9.6458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCloskey R, Menges C, Friedman A, Patel D, McCance DJ. Human papillomavirus type 16 E6/E7 upregulation of nucleophosmin is important for proliferation and inhibition of differentiation. J. Virol. 2010;84:5131–5139. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01965-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntyre MC, Frattini MG, Grossman SR, Laimins LA. Human papillo-mavirus type 18 E7 protein requires intact Cys-X-X-Cys motifs for zinc binding, dimerization, and transformation but not for Rb binding. J. Virol. 1993;67:3142–3150. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.6.3142-3150.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntyre MC, Ruesch MN, Laimins LA. Human papillomavirus E7 oncoproteins bind a single form of cyclin E in a complex with cdk2 and p107. Virology. 1996;215:73–82. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Bromberg-White JL, Meyers C. The role of the human papillomavirus type 18 E7 oncoprotein during the complete viral life cycle. Virology. 2005;338:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Crum CP, Munger K. Human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein induces KDM6A and KDM6B histone demethylase expression and causes epigenetic reprogramming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:2130–2135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009933108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Huh KW, Munger K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein associates with E2F6. J. Virol. 2008;82:8695–8705. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00579-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Meyers J, Munger K. Cancer associated human papillomaviruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012;2:459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Munger K. The human papillomavirus E7 onco-protein. Virology. 2009;384:335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melar-New M, Laimins LA. Human papillomaviruses modulate expression of microRNA 203 upon epithelial differentiation to control levels of p63 proteins. J. Virol. 2010;84:5212–5221. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00078-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melillo RM, Helin K, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Positive and negative regulation of cell proliferation by E2F-1: influence of protein level and human papillomavirus oncoproteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:8241–8249. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menges CW, Baglia LA, Lapoint R, McCance DJ. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 up-regulates AKT activity through the retinoblastoma protein. Cancer Res. 2006;66:5555–5559. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mileo AM, Abbruzzese C, Mattarocci S, Bellacchio E, Pisano P, Federico A, Maresca V, Picardo M, Giorgi A, Maras B, Schinina ME, Paggi MG. Human papillomavirus-16 E7 interacts with glutathione S-transferase P1 and enhances its role in cell survival. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mileo AM, Piombino E, Severino A, Tritarelli A, Paggi MG, Lombardi D. Multiple interference of the human papillomavirus-16 E7 oncoprotein with the functional role of the metastasis suppressor Nm23-H1 protein. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2006;38:215–225. doi: 10.1007/s10863-006-9037-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moody CA, Fradet-Turcotte A, Archambault J, Laimins LA. Human papillomaviruses activate caspases upon epithelial differentiation to induce viral genome amplification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:19541–19546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707947104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moody CA, Laimins LA. Human papillomaviruses activate the ATM DNA damage pathway for viral genome amplification upon differentiation. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000605. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moody CA, Laimins LA. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins: pathways to transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2010;10:550–560. doi: 10.1038/nrc2886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morandell D, Kaiser A, Herold S, Rostek U, Lechner S, Mitterberger MC, Jansen-Durr P, Eilers M, Zwerschke W. The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein targets Myc-interacting zinc-finger protein-1. Virology. 2012;422:242–253. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morosov A, Phelps WC, Raychaudhuri P. Activation of the c-fos gene by the HPV16 oncoproteins depends upon the cAMP-response element at −60. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:18434–18440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morozov A, Shiyanov P, Barr E, Leiden JM, Raychaudhuri P. Accumulation of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein bypasses G1 arrest induced by serum deprivation and by the cell cycle inhibitor p21. J. Virol. 1997;71:3451–3457. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.5.3451-3457.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris JD, Crook T, Bandara LR, Davies R, LaThangue NB, Vousden KH. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 regulates E2F and contributes to mitogenic signalling. Oncogene. 1993;8:893–898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muller C, Alunni-Fabbroni M, Kowenz-Leutz E, Mo X, Tommasino M, Leutz A. Separation of C/EBPalpha-mediated proliferation arrest and differentiation pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:7276–7281. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munger K, Phelps WC, Bubb V, Howley PM, Schlegel R. The E6 and E7 genes of the human papillomavirus type 16 together are necessary and sufficient for transformation of primary human keratinocytes. J. Virol. 1989a;63:4417–4421. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.10.4417-4421.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munger K, Werness BA, Dyson N, Phelps WC, Harlow E, Howley PM. Complex formation of human papillomavirus E7 proteins with the retinoblas-toma tumor suppressor gene product. EMBO J. 1989b;8:4099–4105. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08594.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munger K, Yee CL, Phelps WC, Pietenpol JA, Moses HL, Howley PM. Biochemical and biological differences between E7 oncoproteins of the high-and low-risk human papillomavirus types are determined by amino-terminal sequences. J. Virol. 1991;65:3943–3948. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.7.3943-3948.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen CL, Eichwald C, Nibert ML, Munger K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein associates with the centrosomal component gamma-tubulin. J. Virol. 2007;81:13533–13543. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01669-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen CL, Munger K. Direct association of the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein with cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin E/CDK2 complexes. Virology. 2008;380:21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen CL, Munger K. Human papillomavirus Es7 protein deregulates mitosis via an association with nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1. J. Virol. 2009;83:1700–1707. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01971-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen DX, Westbrook TF, McCance DJ. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 maintains elevated levels of the cdc25A tyrosine phosphatase during deregulation of cell cycle arrest. J. Virol. 2002;76:619–632. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.619-632.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nobre RJ, Herraez-Hernandez E, Fei JW, Langbein L, Kaden S, Grone HJ, de Villiers EM. E7 oncoprotein of novel human papillomavirus type 108 lacking the E6 gene induces dysplasia in organotypic keratinocyte cultures. J. Virol. 2009;83:2907–2916. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02490-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nomine Y, Masson M, Charbonnier S, Zanier K, Ristriani T, Deryckere F, Sibler AP, Desplancq D, Atkinson RA, Weiss E, Orfanoudakis G, Kieffer B, Trave G. Structural and functional analysis of E6 oncoprotein: insights in the molecular pathways of human papillomavirus-mediated pathogenesis. Mol. Cell. 2006;21:665–678. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh KJ, Kalinina A, Wang J, Nakayama K, Nakayama KI, Bagchi S. The papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein is ubiquitinated by UbcH7 and Cullin 1- and Skp2-containing E3 ligase. J. Virol. 2004a;78:5338–5346. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5338-5346.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh ST, Longworth MS, Laimins LA. Roles of the E6 and E7 proteins in the life cycle of low-risk human papillomavirus type 11. J. Virol. 2004b;78:2620–2626. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.5.2620-2626.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohlenschlager O, Seiboth T, Zengerling H, Briese L, Marchanka A, Ramachan-dran R, Baum M, Korbas M, Meyer-Klaucke W, Durst M, Gorlach M. Solution structure of the partially folded high-risk human papilloma virus 45 oncoprotein E7. Oncogene. 2006;25:5953–5959. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan H, Griep AE. Altered cell cycle regulation in the lens of HPV-16 E6 or E7 transgenic mice: implications for tumor suppressor gene function in development. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1285–1299. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.11.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park JS, Kim EJ, Kwon HJ, Hwang ES, Namkoong SE, Um SJ. Inactivation of interferon regulatory factor-1 tumor suppressor protein by HPV E7 oncoprotein. Implication for the E7-mediated immune evasion mechanism in cervical carcinogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:6764–6769. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.6764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park JW, Pitot HC, Strati K, Spardy N, Duensing S, Grompe M, Lambert PF. Deficiencies in the Fanconi anemia DNA damage response pathway increase sensitivity to HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9959–9968. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pater MM, Nakshatri H, Kisaka C, Pater A. The first 124 nucleotides of the E7 coding sequences of HPV16 can render the HPV11 genome transformation competent. Virology. 1992;186:348–351. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patrick DR, Oliff A, Heimbrook DC. Identification of a novel retinoblas-toma gene product binding site on human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:6842–6850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perea SE, Massimi P, Banks L. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 impairs the activation of the interferon regulatory factor-1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2000;5:661–666. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.5.6.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfister H. Chapter 8: Human papillomavirus and skin cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2003:52–56. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phelps WC, Bagchi S, Barnes JA, Raychaudhuri P, Kraus V, Munger K, Howley PM, Nevins JR. Analysis of trans activation by human papillomavirus type 16 E7 and adenovirus 12S E1A suggests a common mechanism. J. Virol. 1991;65:6922–6930. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6922-6930.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phelps WC, Munger K, Yee CL, Barnes JA, Howley PM. Structure-function analysis of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. J. Virol. 1992;66:2418–2427. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.4.2418-2427.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phelps WC, Yee CL, Munger K, Howley PM. The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene encodes transactivation and transformation functions similar to those of adenovirus E1A. Cell. 1988;53:539–547. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90570-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips AC, Vousden KH. Analysis of the interaction between human papillomavirus type 16 E7 and the TATA-binding protein, TBP. J. Gen. Virol. 1997;78(Part 4):905–909. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-4-905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piccioli Z, McKee CH, Leszczynski A, Onder Z, Hannah EC, Mamoor S, Crosby L, Moroianu J. The nuclear localization of low risk HPV11 E7 protein mediated by its zinc binding domain is independent of nuclear import receptors. Virology. 2010;407:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.07.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pietenpol JA, Stein RW, Moran E, Yaciuk P, Schlegel R, Lyons RM, Pittelkow MR, Munger K, Howley PM, Moses HL. TGF-beta 1 inhibition of c-myc transcription and growth in keratinocytes is abrogated by viral transforming proteins with pRB binding domains. Cell. 1990;61:777–785. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90188-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pim D, Banks L. Interaction of viral oncoproteins with cellular target molecules: infection with high-risk vs low-risk human papillomaviruses. APMIS. 2010;118:471–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pim D, Massimi P, Dilworth SM, Banks L. Activation of the protein kinase B pathway by the HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein occurs through a mechanism involving interaction with PP2A. Oncogene. 2005;24:7830–7838. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prathapam T, Kuhne C, Banks L. The HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein binds Skip and suppresses its transcriptional activity. Oncogene. 2001;20:7677–7685. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Psyrri A, DeFilippis RA, Edwards AP, Yates KE, Manuelidis L, DiMaio D. Role of the retinoblastoma pathway in senescence triggered by repression of the human papillomavirus E7 protein in cervical carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3079–3086. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rawls JA, Pusztai R, Green M. Chemical synthesis of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein: autonomous protein domains for induction of cellular DNA synthesis and for trans activation. J. Virol. 1990;64:6121–6129. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.12.6121-6129.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reinstein E, Scheffner M, Oren M, Ciechanover A, Schwartz A. Degradation of the E7 human papillomavirus oncoprotein by the ubiquitin-proteasome system: targeting via ubiquitination of the N-terminal residue. Oncogene. 2000;19:5944–5950. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reshkin SJ, Bellizzi A, Caldeira S, Albarani V, Malanchi I, Poignee M, Alunni-Fabbroni M, Casavola V, Tommasino M. Na+/H+ exchanger-dependent intracellular alkalinization is an early event in malignant transformation and plays an essential role in the development of subsequent transformation-associated phenotypes. FASEB J. 2000;14:2185–2197. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0029com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rey O, Lee S, Baluda MA, Swee J, Ackerson B, Chiu R, Park NH. The E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 interacts with F-actin in vitro and in vivo. Virology. 2000;268:372–381. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.0175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riley RR, Duensing S, Brake T, Munger K, Lambert PF, Arbeit JM. Dissection of human papillomavirus E6 and E7 function in transgenic mouse models of cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4862–4871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth EJ, Kurz B, Liang L, Hansen CL, Dameron CT, Winge DR, Smotkin D. Metal thiolate coordination in the E7 proteins of human papilloma virus 16 and cottontail rabbit papilloma virus as expressed in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:16390–16395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Deo RC, Padi M, Adelmant G, Calderwood MA, Rolland T, Grace M, Dricot A, Askenazi M, Tavares M, Pevzner SJ, Abderazzaq F, Byrdsong D, Carvunis AR, Chen AA, Cheng J, Correll M, Duarte M, Fan C, Feltkamp MC, Ficarro SB, Franchi R, Garg BK, Gulbahce N, Hao T, Holthaus AM, James R, Korkhin A, Litovchick L, Mar JC, Pak TR, Rabello S, Rubio R, Shen Y, Singh S, Spangle JM, Tasan M, Wanamaker S, Webber JT, Roecklein-Canfield J, Johannsen E, Barabasi AL, Beroukhim R, Kieff E, Cusick ME, Hill DE, Munger K, Marto JA, Quackenbush J, Roth FP, DeCaprio JA, Vidal M. Interpreting cancer genomes using systematic host network perturbations by tumour virus proteins. Nature. 2012;487:491–495. doi: 10.1038/nature11288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruesch MN, Laimins LA. Initiation of DNA synthesis by human papillomavirus E7 oncoproteins is resistant to p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin E-cdk2 activity. J. Virol. 1997;71:5570–5578. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.7.5570-5578.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sang BC, Barbosa MS. Single amino acid substitutions in “low-risk” human papillomavirus (HPV) type 6 E7 protein enhance features characteristic of the “high-risk” HPV E7 oncoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:8063–8067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santer FR, Moser B, Spoden GA, Jansen-Durr P, Zwerschke W. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein inhibits apoptosis mediated by nuclear insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 by enhancing its ubiquitin/protea-some-dependent degradation. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:2511–2520. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato H, Watanabe S, Furuno A, Yoshiike K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein expressed in Escherichia coli and monkey COS-1 cells: immunofluorescence detection of the nuclear E7 protein. Virology. 1989;170:311–315. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90386-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaeffer AJ, Nguyen M, Liem A, Lee D, Montagna C, Lambert PF, Ried T, Difilippantonio MJ. E6 and E7 oncoproteins induce distinct patterns of chromosomal aneuploidy in skin tumors from transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2004;64:538–546. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaper ID, Marcuzzi GP, Weissenborn SJ, Kasper HU, Dries V, Smyth N, Fuchs P, Pfister H. Development of skin tumors in mice transgenic for early genes of human papillomavirus type 8. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1394–1400. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling B, De-Medina T, Syken J, Vidal M, Munger K. A novel human DnaJ protein, hTid-1, a homolog of the Drosophila tumor suppressor protein Tid56, can interact with the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Virology. 1998;247:74–85. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt A, Harry JB, Rapp B, Wettstein FO, Iftner T. Comparison of the properties of the E6 and E7 genes of low- and high-risk cutaneous papillomaviruses reveals strongly transforming and high Rb-binding activity for the E7 protein of the low-risk human papillomavirus type 1. J. Virol. 1994;68:7051–7059. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.11.7051-7059.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulze A, Mannhardt B, Zerfass-Thome K, Zwerschke W, Jansen-Durr P. Anchorage-independent transcription of the cyclin A gene induced by the E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16. J. Virol. 1998;72:2323–2334. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.3.2323-2334.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seavey SE, Holubar M, Saucedo LJ, Perry ME. The E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 stabilizes p53 through a mechanism independent of p19(ARF) J. Virol. 1999;73:7590–7598. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.9.7590-7598.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sedman SA, Barbosa MS, Vass WC, Hubbert NL, Haas JA, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. The full-length E6 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 has transforming and trans-activating activities and cooperates with E7 to immortalize keratinocytes in culture. J. Virol. 1991;65:4860–4866. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.9.4860-4866.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Severino A, Abbruzzese C, Manente L, Valderas AA, Mattarocci S, Federico A, Starace G, Chersi A, Mileo AM, Paggi MG. Human papillomavirus-16 E7 interacts with Siva-1 and modulates apoptosis in HaCaT human immortalized keratinocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007;212:118–125. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin MK, Balsitis S, Brake T, Lambert PF. Human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein overrides the tumor suppressor activity of p21Cip1 in cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5656–5663. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin MK, Pitot HC, Lambert PF. Pocket proteins suppress head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2012a;72:1280–1289. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin MK, Sage J, Lambert PF. Inactivating all three rb family pocket proteins is insufficient to initiate cervical cancer. Cancer Res. 2012b;72:5418–5427. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith-McCune K, Kalman D, Robbins C, Shivakumar S, Yuschenkoff L, Bishop JM. Intranuclear localization of human papillomavirus 16 E7 during transformation and preferential binding of E7 to the Rb family member p130. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:6999–7004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smola-Hess S, Pahne J, Mauch C, Zigrino P, Smola H, Pfister HJ. Expression of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase in papillomavirus-positive cells: role of the human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV8 E7 gene products. J. Gen. Virol. 2005;86:1291–1296. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80551-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smotkin D, Wettstein FO. The major human papillomavirus protein in cervical cancers is a cytoplasmic phosphoprotein. J. Virol. 1987;61:1686–1689. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.5.1686-1689.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song S, Gulliver GA, Lambert PF. Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncogenes abrogate radiation-induced DNA damage responses in vivo through p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:2290–2295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song S, Liem A, Miller JA, Lambert PF. Human papillomavirus types 16 E6 and E7 contribute differently to carcinogenesis. Virology. 2000;267:141–150. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southern SA, Lewis MH, Herrington CS. Induction of tetrasomy by human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein is independent of pRb binding and disruption of differentiation. Br. J. Cancer. 2004;90:1949–1954. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southern SA, Noya F, Meyers C, Broker TR, Chow LT, Herrington CS. Tetrasomy is induced by human papillomavirus type 18 E7 gene expression in keratinocyte raft cultures. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4858–4863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spardy N, Covella K, Cha E, Hoskins EE, Wells SI, Duensing A, Duensing S. Human papillomavirus 16 E7 oncoprotein attenuates DNA damage checkpoint control by increasing the proteolytic turnover of claspin. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7022–7029. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spardy N, Duensing A, Charles D, Haines N, Nakahara T, Lambert PF, Duensing S. The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein activates the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway and causes accelerated chromosomal instability in FA cells. J. Virol. 2007;81:13265–13270. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01121-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spardy N, Duensing A, Hoskins EE, Wells SI, Duensing S. HPV-16 E7 reveals a link between DNA replication stress, fanconi anemia D2 protein, and alternative lengthening of telomere-associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9954–9963. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sperling T, Oldak M, Walch-Ruckheim B, Wickenhauser C, Doorbar J, Pfister H, Malejczyk M, Majewski S, Keates AC, Smola S. Human papillomavirus type 8 interferes with a novel C/EBPbeta-mediated mechanism of keratinocyte CCL20 chemokine expression and Langerhans cell migration. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002833. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spitkovsky D, Hehner SP, Hofmann TG, Moller A, Schmitz ML. The human papillomavirus oncoprotein E7 attenuates NF-kappa B activation by targeting the Ikappa B kinase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:25576–25582. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201884200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens H, Rector A, Bertelsen MF, Leifsson PS, Van Ranst M. Novel papillomavirus isolated from the oral mucosa of a polar bear does not cluster with other papillomaviruses of carnivores. Vet. Microbiol. 2008a;129:108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.11.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens H, Rector A, Van Der Kroght K, Van Ranst M. Isolation and cloning of two variant papillomaviruses from domestic pigs: Sus scrofa papillomaviruses type 1 variants a and b. J. Gen. Virol. 2008b;89:2475–2481. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/003186-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoppler H, Stoppler MC, Adduci A, Koval D, Schlegel R. The serine protease inhibitors TLCK and TPCK react with the RB-binding core of HPV-18 E7 protein and abolish its RB-binding capability. Virology. 1996;217:542–553. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storey A, Almond N, Osborn K, Crawford L. Mutations of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene that affect transformation, transactivation and phosphorylation by the E7 protein. J. Gen. Virol. 1990a;71(Pt 4):965–970. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-4-965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storey A, Osborn K, Crawford L. Co-transformation by human papillo-mavirus types 6 and 11. J. Gen. Virol. 1990b;71(Pt 1):165–171. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-1-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strati K, Lambert PF. Role of Rb-dependent and Rb-independent functions of papillomavirus E7 oncogene in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11585–11593. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas JT, Hubert WG, Ruesch MN, Laimins LA. Human papillomavirus type 31 oncoproteins E6 and E7 are required for the maintenance of episomes during the viral life cycle in normal human keratinocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:8449–8454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas JT, Laimins LA. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins E6 and E7 independently abrogate the mitotic spindle checkpoint. J. Virol. 1998;72:1131–1137. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.2.1131-1137.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas JT, Oh ST, Terhune SS, Laimins LA. Cellular changes induced by low-risk human papillomavirus type 11 in keratinocytes that stably maintain viral episomes. J. Virol. 2001;75:7564–7571. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7564-7571.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas MK, Pitot HC, Liem A, Lambert PF. Dominant role of HPV16 E7 in anal carcinogenesis. Virology. 2011;421:114–118. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson DA, Zacny V, Belinsky GS, Classon M, Jones DL, Schlegel R, Munger K. The HPV E7 oncoprotein inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-mediated apoptosis in normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2001;20:3629–3640. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Todorovic B, Hung K, Massimi P, Avvakumov N, Dick FA, Shaw GS, Banks L, Mymryk JS. Conserved region 3 of human papillomavirus 16 E7 contributes to deregulation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J. Virol. 2012;86:13313–13323. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01637-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Todorovic B, Massimi P, Hung K, Shaw GS, Banks L, Mymryk JS. Systematic analysis of the amino Acid residues of human papillomavirus type 16 e7 conserved region 3 involved in dimerization and transformation. J. Virol. 2011;85:10048–10057. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00643-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomaic V, Gardiol D, Massimi P, Ozbun M, Myers M, Banks L. Human and primate tumour viruses use PDZ binding as an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of targeting cell polarity regulators. Oncogene. 2009;28:1–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tugizov S, Berline J, Herrera R, Penaranda ME, Nakagawa M, Palefsky J. Inhibition of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 phosphorylation by the S100 MRP-8/14 protein complex. J. Virol. 2005;79:1099–1112. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.2.1099-1112.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valdovinos-Torres H, Orozco-Morales M, Pedroza-Saavedra A, Padilla-Noriega L, Esquivel-Guadarrama F, Gutierrez-Xicotencatl L. Different Isoforms of HPV-16 E7 Protein are Present in Cytoplasm and Nucleus. Open Virol. J. 2008;2:15–23. doi: 10.2174/1874357900802010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vambutas A, DeVoti J, Pinn W, Steinberg BM, Bonagura VR. Interaction of human papillomavirus type 11 E7 protein with TAP-1 results in the reduction of ATP-dependent peptide transport. Clin. Immunol. 2001;101:94–99. doi: 10.1006/clim.2001.5094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Doorslaer K, Sidi AO, Zanier K, Rybin V, Deryckere F, Rector A, Burk RD, Lienau EK, van Ranst M, Trave G. Identification of unusual E6 and E7 proteins within avian papillomaviruses: cellular localization, biophysical characterization, and phylogenetic analysis. J. Virol. 2009;83:8759–8770. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01777-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vandermark ER, Deluca KA, Gardner CR, Marker DF, Schreiner CN, Strickland DA, Wilton KM, Mondal S, Woodworth CD. Human papillo-mavirus type 16 E6 and E 7 proteins alter NF-kB in cultured cervical epithelial cells and inhibition of NF-kB promotes cell growth and immortalization. Virology. 2012;425:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viarisio D, Mueller-Decker K, Kloz U, Aengeneyndt B, Kopp-Schneider A, Grone HJ, Gheit T, Flechtenmacher C, Gissmann L, Tommasino M. E6 and E7 from beta HPV38 cooperate with ultraviolet light in the development of actinic keratosis-like lesions and squamous cell carcinoma in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002125. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogt B, Zerfass-Thome K, Schulze A, Botz JW, Zwerschke W, Jansen-Durr P. Regulation of cyclin E gene expression by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. J. Gen. Virol. 1999;80(Pt 8):2103–2113. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-80-8-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vousden KH, Doniger J, DiPaolo JA, Lowy DR. The E7 open reading frame of human papillomavirus type 16 encodes a transforming gene. Oncogene Res. 1988;3:167–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker J, Smiley LC, Ingram D, Roman A. Expression of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 is sufficient to significantly increase expression of angiogenic factors but is not sufficient to induce endothelial cell migration. Virology. 2011;410:283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Zhou D, Prabhu A, Schlegel R, Yuan H. The canine papillomavirus and gamma HPV E7 proteins use an alternative domain to bind and destabilize the retinoblastoma protein. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001089. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X, Qi M, Yu X, Yuan Y, Zhao W. Type-specific interaction between human papillomavirus type 58 E2 protein and E7 protein inhibits E7-mediated oncogenicity. J. Gen. Virol. 2012;93:1563–1572. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.039354-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YW, Chang HS, Lin CH, Yu WC. HPV-18 E7 conjugates to c-Myc and mediates its transcriptional activity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2007;39:402–412. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe S, Kanda T, Sato H, Furuno A, Yoshiike K. Mutational analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 functions. J. Virol. 1990;64:207–214. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.1.207-214.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe S, Sato H, Komiyama N, Kanda T, Yoshiike K. The E7 functions of human papillomaviruses in rat 3Y1 cells. Virology. 1992;187:107–114. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90299-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wazer DE, Liu XL, Chu Q, Gao Q, Band V. Immortalization of distinct human mammary epithelial cell types by human papilloma virus 16 E6 or E7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:3687–3691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westbrook TF, Nguyen DX, Thrash BR, McCance DJ. E7 abolishes raf-induced arrest via mislocalization of p21(Cip1) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:7041–7052. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.20.7041-7052.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westphal K, Akgul B, Storey A, Nindl I. Cutaneous human papillomavirus E7 type-specific effects on differentiation and proliferation of organotypic skin cultures. Cell. Oncol. 2009;31:213–226. doi: 10.3233/CLO-2009-0476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White EA, Howley PM. Proteomic approaches to the study of papillomavirus-host interactions. Virology. 2013;435:57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White EA, Sowa ME, Tan MJ, Jeudy S, Hayes SD, Santha S, Munger K, Harper JW, Howley PM. Systematic identification of interactions between host cell proteins and E7 oncoproteins from diverse human papillo-maviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E260–E267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116776109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whyte P, Buchkovich KJ, Horowitz JM, Friend SH, Raybuck M, Weinberg RA, Harlow E. Association between an oncogene and an anti-oncogene: the adenovirus E1A proteins bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Nature. 1988;334:124–129. doi: 10.1038/334124a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise-Draper TM, Allen HV, Thobe MN, Jones EE, Habash KB, Munger K, Wells SI. The human DEK proto-oncogene is a senescence inhibitor and an upregulated target of high-risk human papillomavirus E7. J. Virol. 2005;79:14309–14317. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.22.14309-14317.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise-Draper TM, Wells SI. Papillomavirus E6 and E7 proteins and their cellular targets. Front. Biosci. 2008;13:1003–1017. doi: 10.2741/2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu EW, Clemens KE, Heck DV, Munger K. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein and the cellular transcription factor E2F bind to separate sites on the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein. J. Virol. 1993;67:2402–2407. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.4.2402-2407.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yaginuma Y, Eguchi A, Yoshimoto M, Ogawa K. The PxDLLCxE sequence in conserved region 2 of human papilloma virus 18 protein E7 is required for E7 binding to centromere protein C. Oncology. 2012;83:210–217. doi: 10.1159/000341360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita T, Segawa K, Fujinaga Y, Nishikawa T, Fujinaga K. Biological and biochemical activity of E7 genes of the cutaneous human papillomavirus type 5 and 8. Oncogene. 1993;8:2433–2441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y, Munger K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein engages but does not abrogate the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. Virology. 2012;432:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yue J, Shukla R, Accardi R, Zanella-Cleon I, Siouda M, Cros MP, Krutovskikh V, Hussain I, Niu Y, Hu S, Becchi M, Jurdic P, Tommasino M, Sylla BS. Cutaneous human papillomavirus type 38 E7 regulates actin cytoskeleton structure for increasing cell proliferation through CK2 and the eukaryotic elongation factor 1A. J. Virol. 2011;85:8477–8494. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02561-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zatsepina O, Braspenning J, Robberson D, Hajibagheri MA, Blight KJ, Ely S, Hibma M, Spitkovsky D, Trendelenburg M, Crawford L, Tommasino M. The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein is associated with the nucleolus in mammalian and yeast cells. Oncogene. 1997;14:1137–1145. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zerfass K, Levy LM, Cremonesi C, Ciccolini F, Jansen-Durr P, Crawford L, Ralston R, Tommasino M. Cell cycle-dependent disruption of E2F–p107 complexes by human papillomavirus type 16 E7. J. Gen. Virol. 1995;76(Pt 7):1815–1820. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-76-7-1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zerfass-Thome K, Zwerschke W, Mannhardt B, Tindle R, Botz JW, Jansen-Durr P. Inactivation of the cdk inhibitor p27KIP1 by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Oncogene. 1996;13:2323–2330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B, Chen W, Roman A. The E7 proteins of low- and high-risk human papillomaviruses share the ability to target the pRB family member p130 for degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:437–442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510012103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B, Laribee RN, Klemsz MJ, Roman A. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein increases acetylation of histone H3 in human foreskin keratino-cytes. Virology. 2004;329:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Fan S, Meng Q, Ma Y, Katiyar P, Schlegel R, Rosen EM. BRCA1 interaction with human papillomavirus oncoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33165–33177. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505124200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng ZM, Wang X. Regulation of cellular miRNA expression by human papillomaviruses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1809:668–677. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X, Munger K. Expression of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein induces an autophagy-related process and sensitizes normal human keratinocytes to cell death in response to growth factor deprivation. Virology. 2009;385:192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:342–350. doi: 10.1038/nrc798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwerschke W, Mannhardt B, Massimi P, Nauenburg S, Pim D, Nickel W, Banks L, Reuser AJ, Jansen-Durr P. Allosteric activation of acid alpha-glucosidase by the human papillomavirus E7 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:9534–9541. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwerschke W, Mazurek S, Massimi P, Banks L, Eigenbrodt E, Jansen-Durr P. Modulation of type M2 pyruvate kinase activity by the human papillo-mavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:1291–1296. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





