Abstract
Reactive oxygen species are important components of the immune response. Hypochlorite (HOCl) is produced by neutrophils to kill invading microorganisms. The bactericidal activity of HOCl is due to proteome-wide unfolding and oxidation of proteins at cysteine and methionine residues. Escherichia coli cells are protected from HOCl-killing by the previously identified dodecameric transcription factor HypT (YjiE). Here, we aimed to unravel whether HOCl activates HypT directly or via a reaction product of HOCl with a cellular component. Bacterial viability assays and analysis of target gene regulation indicate that HypT is highly specific to activation by HOCl and that no reaction products of HOCl such as monochloramine, hydroxyl radicals, or methionine sulfoxide activate HypT in vivo. Surprisingly, purified HypT lost its DNA-binding activity upon incubation with HOCl or reaction products that oxidize HypT to form a disulfide-linked dimer, and regained DNA-binding activity upon reduction. Thus, we postulate that the cysteines in HypT contribute to control the DNA-binding activity of HypT in vitro. HypT contains five cysteine residues; a HypT mutant with all cysteines substituted by serine is aggregation-prone and forms tetramers in addition to the typical dodecamers. Using single and multiple cysteine-to-serine mutants, we identified Cys150 to be required for stability and Cys4 being important for oligomerization of HypT to dodecamers. Further, oxidation of Cys4 is responsible for the loss of DNA-binding of HypT upon oxidation in vitro. It appears that Cys4 oxidation upon conditions that are insufficient to stimulate the DNA-binding activity of HypT prevents unproductive interactions of HypT with DNA. Thus, Cys4 oxidation may be a check point in the activation process of HypT.
Introduction
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are formed as a by-product of aerobic respiration and are also generated by the immune system and mucosal barrier epithelia to fight bacterial infections [1]–[3]. An enhanced and uncontrolled overproduction of ROS by the enzyme myeloperoxidase in activated neutrophils is associated with many inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases [4]. The bactericidal activity of ROS is due to oxidative damage to macromolecules such as DNA, lipids, and proteins, and their accumulation leads to oxidative stress [5], [6]. The extent of damage depends on the type of ROS (for review see ref. [7]). Superoxide, redox-cycling drugs, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for example, oxidize iron-sulfur clusters [8], [9], thus inactivating iron-sulfur cluster containing enzymes [10], [11]. H2O2 also oxidizes cysteines and methionines in proteins, thereby mostly inactivating them [10], [12]–[15]. Cysteine residues can be oxidized to sulfenic, sulfinic and sulfonic acids, whereas the sulfur in methionine can be oxidized to generate methionine sulfoxide (Met-SO) or even methionine sulfone [5]. HOCl and chloramines, which are reaction products of HOCl with amine groups, in sharp contrast, are far more reactive and cause mostly non-selective oxidative damage on a proteome-wide scale. Both show high reactivity towards cysteine and methionine residues [5], as well as the ε-amine group of lysine residues [16]. HOCl causes proteome-wide cysteine and methionine oxidation and protein unfolding [17]–[19]. Hydroxyl radicals (HO•) are the most reactive oxygen species known. They are produced in a Fenton type reaction in the presence of H2O2 or HOCl and iron [20]. Their high cytotoxicity is derived from a high reactivity towards macromolecules causing extensive DNA damage and mutations as well as extensive damage to proteins [5], [6].
Despite the multifaceted effects of different ROS, they have in common that ROS-specific stress responses are activated. Such stress responses are reversibly activated and protect cells from the hazardous effects of the stress (for review see refs. [7], [21]–[23]). A number of proteins have been identified in the past that utilize cysteine thiols to regulate their own activity or play key roles in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. Examples are the oxidative stress transcription factors OxyR from E. coli and yeast Yap1, which employ H2O2-induced intramolecular disulfide bond formation to activate their function [24], [25]. The regulators HypR from Bacillus subtilis and NemR from E. coli undergo cysteine oxidation and confer protection against HOCl via the flavin oxidoreductase HypO [26] and de-repression of gloA and nemA [27]. A further example is the redox-regulated chaperone Hsp33, whose redox-sensing cysteines form a disulfide bond upon severe oxidative stress (such as HOCl stress or combined heat and H2O2 stress) and whose linker region becomes concomitantly unfolded to activate the chaperone function and prevent proteome-wide aggregation of cellular proteins [17], [28], [29]. Oxidoreductases, i.e. enzymes involved in oxidative protein folding and reduction, such as thioredoxin, glutaredoxin, Dsb proteins, and protein disulfide isomerase utilize cysteines in a Cys-X-X-Cys motif to form mixed disulfides with substrate proteins, thus altering their redox state [30]–[32]. Lastly, enzymes involved in the degradation of H2O2 and organic peroxides such as AhpC/AhpF (alkyl hydroperoxide reductase), Tpx (peroxiredoxin), and PprX (thiol-dependent peroxidase) employ cysteines as a redox sensor in regulating H2O2-mediated cell signaling and homeostasis [33]–[35]. The specific regulation of such redox-sensing proteins relies on the high reactivity of the involved cysteines towards oxidation. While ordinary cysteines are oxidized by H2O2 with a second order rate constant of 2 M−1 s−1 at neutral pH [36], redox-sensing thiols are quickly and efficiently oxidized with a rate constant of about 107 M−1 s−1 (e.g., OxyR [37], peroxiredoxins [38]).
Thus, cysteine thiols can function as central switch in regulating protein activity depending on the cellular condition. Given that the role of cysteines in the stability and function of proteins are such manifold, analyzing and understanding their oxidation state is important to understand their potential role in redox regulation. Here we addressed the question which ROS indeed activates the HOCl-specific transcription factor HypT and whether and how the cysteines contribute to the function of HypT. HypT is a LysR-type transcription factor and forms dodecameric, ring-like particles that dissociate in the presence of DNA to dimers and tetramers [39]. HypT is activated by methionine oxidation of three specific methionines (Met123, Met206, Met230) to Met-SO [40]. It regulates a number of genes, some of which are up-regulated (e.g., metN, metB) while others are repressed (e.g., fecD). HypT selectively confers HOCl resistance [39] indicating that HOCl is the activating ROS. Yet, this does not exclude that HOCl, upon entry into the cell, generates a reaction product with a cellular component that serves as the activating species. To pay attention to this possibility, we defined HOCl reaction products that are likely to occur upon HOCl treatment within the cell or in the LB medium used for viability experiments [39]. From all tested compounds, only HOCl activated HypT in vivo to confer resistance to E. coli cells and regulate target genes indicating that none of the reaction products is likely to serve as activating species for HypT. Despite selective activation in vivo, incubation of purified HypT with HOCl or some other ROS caused a loss of DNA-binding activity that correlated with intermolecular disulfide bond formation. To analyze the potential underlying regulatory mechanism, we generated point mutants in which the cysteines were replaced by serine, either individually or simultaneously. A mutant in which all cysteines were replaced by serine (HypT5C→S) retained DNA-binding activity but shows a substantially decreased thermal stability and forms tetramers in addition to the typical large oligomers. We found that while Cys150 is important for stability, Cys4 is important for oligomerization of HypT to dodecamers. The observed loss of DNA-binding activity upon oxidation in vitro is caused by oxidation of Cys4. Thus, it appears that oxidation of Cys4 prevents DNA-binding of HypT in the case that the oxidizing conditions are insufficient for HypT activation.
Materials and Methods
Generation of Mutants
Single and multiple point mutants of HypT were generated by site-directed mutagenesis and the correct sequence verified by DNA sequencing. HypT and mutants were produced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) gold cells for strong overexpression and protein purification purposes [39]. These strains contain pET11a-encoded genes: JC15 (hypT [39]), AD49 (hypTC4S), YLe261 (hypTC150S), YLe262 (hypTC178S), and AD51 (hypTC242S) or pET28a-encoded genes: AD76 (hypTC25S), YL20 (hypT 5C→S), YL11 (hypTquadrupleC4), YL5 (hypTquadrupleC25), AD63 (hypTquadrupleC150), YL18 (hypTquadrupleC178), and YL19 (hypTquadrupleC242). Resulting proteins carry a C-terminal (pET11a) or N-terminal His-tag (pET28a). For moderate overexpression and viability assays, HypT and mutants were produced from pJW2 [41] in E. coli C600 hypT::Cm cells (KMG214 [39]). Used strains are as follows: YLe143 (pJW2 [39]), KMG229 (hypT [39]), AD56 (hypTC4S), YLe231 (hypTC25S), AD60 (hypTC150S), YLe232 (hypTC178S), AD57 (hypTC242S), JW468 (hypT 5C→S), AD66 (hypTquadrupleC1), AD65 (hypTquadrupleC2), AD69 (hypTquadrupleC3), AD67 (hypTquadrupleC4), and AD68 (hypTquadrupleC5).
Analysis of Cellular Viability
For bacterial viability experiments with various ROS, E. coli C600 (wild-type) and C600 hypT − (KMG214, [39]) cells were cultivated in LB medium until an OD600 of 0.4–0.5 was reached. Then, cells were either serially diluted in LB medium (1∶10 dilutions) or washed twice with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.5 and resuspended in 5-fold the original volume. Diluted cells in LB medium were spotted onto LB agar plates containing 0 to 20 mM hydroxyurea (Sigma-Aldrich). Hydroxyurea generates hydroxyl radicals (HO•) within the cell [42] and was thus used as HO• donor. Phosphate buffer washed cells were distributed into 15 ml tubes (1 ml each) and then either HOCl (Sigma-Aldrich; final concentration 0 to 14 µM), monochloramine (NH2Cl, final concentration 0 to 16 µM), Met-SO (Sigma-Aldrich; final concentration 0 to 30 mM), or H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich; final concentration 0 to 30 mM) added. After 15 min stress treatment, 1 ml 5-fold concentrated LB medium was added; cells were serially diluted in LB medium (1∶30 dilutions) and spotted onto LB agar plates. The number of viable cells was counted and that of unstressed cells set to 100%. NH2Cl was generated by adding 1 mM HOCl under continuously mixing to 10 mM ammonium chloride solution buffered in 50 mM NaPi, pH 7.5. The concentration was determined by UV spectroscopy (extinction coefficient ε252nm = 429 M−1cm−1) and NH2Cl used immediately.
For viability assays with C600 hypT − cells carrying pJW2 (empty pBAD22 plasmid) or expressing wild-type hypT or mutants, cells were cultivated in LB medium supplemented with arabinose (0.1% w/v) and ampicillin (200 µg/ml). Cultures were diluted from overnight cultures such that an OD600 of 0.4–0.5 was reached after five doublings. The expression yield was very similar for wild-type hypT and all mutants as analyzed by western blot using HypT-specific antibodies (87–114% of wild-type). HOCl stress was performed in LB medium supplemented with 3.5 mM HOCl as described [39]. Samples were serially diluted in LB medium (1∶10 or 1∶30 dilutions) and spotted onto LB agar plates.
Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Phosphate buffer washed cells were left untreated or supplemented with either HOCl (final concentration 3 µM), NH2Cl (3 µM), hydroxyurea (100 mM), Met-SO (30 mM), or H2O2 (1 mM). qRT-PCR and sample preparation of stressed samples was performed as described [39]. Viability of cells during the time course of the experiment was 100%.
Generation of Single-copy yjiE::lacZ Reporter Fusions and Determination of β-galactosidase Activity
Construction of strains JG159 (E. coli C600 lacZ::Km) and JG160 (C600 lacZ::Km hypT::Cm), each containing the translational metN::lacZ reporter fusion, was performed as described previously [39] using a PCR fragment starting at 178 bp upstream and ending 31 bp downstream of the translational start site of metN (thus containing the metN promoter region) and phage λRS45. Phosphate buffer washed cells were left untreated or supplemented with either HOCl (final concentration 3 µM), NH2Cl (3 µM), hydroxyurea (100 mM), Met-SO (30 mM), or H2O2 (1 mM) for 15 min. β-galactosidase activity was assayed as described previously [39].
Production and Purification of HypT and Mutants
HypT and mutants were produced and purified via HisTrap chromatography as described previously [40]. Afterwards, proteins were desalted using PD10 columns (GE). Purified proteins were stored in storage buffer (10 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.5, 400 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol) and reduced (1 mM TCEP (tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine) or 1 mM DTT (dithiothreitol), 37°C, 1 h) prior to use as indicated. Experiments were performed in storage buffer unless otherwise indicated.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
EMSA was performed in storage buffer containing 158 bp AlexaFluor488-labeled hypT DNA at 20 nM, 1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM TCEP (in reduced samples), and 6 µM HypT (15 µl total volume). EMSA samples were incubated at 25°C for 20 min before adding 2 µl EMSA loading buffer (40 mM Tris pH 8.4, 4 mM EDTA, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 25% glycerol), separation on 6% TBE gels (Invitrogen) and visualization of DNA-protein complexes using ethidiumbromide or by fluorescence (Typhoon Imager 9200 (GE)).
Oxidation of HypT in vitro
HypT was reduced (10 mM DTT, 37°C, 2 h), DTT removed using PD10 columns, and then oxidized with either HOCl (final concentration 25 µM, 25°C, 30 min), NH2Cl (25 µM, 37°C, 1 h), H2O2 (1 mM, 37°C, 1 h), HO• (200 µM, 37°C, 1 h), or Met-SO (1 mM, 37°C, 1 h). HOCl and NH2Cl were quenched with methionine (2 mM final concentration) and H2O2 was quenched with catalase. Samples were buffer-exchanged prior to further analysis. HO• were generated by incubation of 1 mM Fe2+SO4 with 1 mM H2O2 (37°C, 1 h). HO• generation was analyzed and concentration determined using p-nitrosodimethylanilin (pNDA [43]); in the above reaction, HO• was generated quantitatively (1 mM). Additionally, the potency of generated HO• in damaging proteins was analyzed. BSA was incubated with Fe2+SO4, H2O2, or HOCl (final concentration 100 µM), or Fe2+SO4 plus H2O2 (100 µM each; 25°C, 30 min). HOCl and HO• (i.e., Fe2+SO4 plus H2O2) caused complete aggregation of BSA consistent with strong protein damage while Fe2+SO4 and H2O2 alone did not alter the solubility of BSA (data not shown).
Non-reducing SDS Gels and Western Blot
Purified and reduced HypT was treated with different ROS as described above. Samples were split and one half was used directly whereas the other half was treated with 1 mM TCEP (25°C, 1 h) in order to re-reduce the protein. SDS sample buffer (with or without β-mercaptoethanol) was added. KMG229 cells grown in LB medium with arabinose to an OD600 of 0.5 were treated with either HOCl (final concentration 3 µM and 8 µM), NH2Cl (3 µM, 8 µM), hydroxyurea (5 mM, 100 mM), Met-SO (5 mM, 30 mM), or H2O2 (5 mM, 30 mM) for 15 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in non-reducing sample buffer. Samples were separated on a neutral pH gradient SDS-gel (Serva) and blotted onto PVDF membrane followed by decoration with HypT-specific antibodies.
Analysis of Soluble and Insoluble Proteins
Expression cultures were harvested and resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 30 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml lysozyme, HP protease inhibitor (Serva)). Samples were quickly frozen/thawed four times followed by cell disruption using a bead mill (Retsch; 30 s−1, 3×2 min) and centrifugation (13,300 rpm, 4°C, 30 min). Soluble/insoluble proteins were analyzed by western blot. Protein bands were quantified using the ImageJ software. To analyze the in vitro solubility, proteins (1.5 µM) were incubated in 10 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.5, 5% (v/v) glycerol and NaCl added to a final concentration of 100 to 400 mM (37°C for 30 min). Then, soluble/insoluble proteins were separated by centrifugation (13,300 rpm, 4°C, 30 min) and analyzed on a neutral gel (Serva).
Circulardichroism (CD) Measurements
Far-UV CD-Spectra were recorded using a Jasco-J-715 spectrometer with 6 µM HypT ± TCEP (1 mM, 1 h). CD-Spectra were recorded from 205 to 260 nm at 37°C (20 nm/min), accumulating 6 spectra. To determine the thermal stability of proteins, samples were incubated from 20°C to 80°C (heating rate 20°C/h) and the CD signal was followed at 222 nm. Curves were fitted using a Boltzmann fit (y = A2+(A1–A2)/(1+e((x−x ° )/dx))).
Analytical Ultracentrifugation (aUC)
aUC analysis was performed as described [39], [40] using 4 to 10 µM protein, detecting absorbance at 280 nm. Values were corrected for buffer (10 mM NaH2PO4, 400 mM NaCl, 5% glycerin, pH 7.5). The oligomerization state was analyzed by the c(S) method provided with the SedFit software.
Mass Spectrometry (MS)
HypT at 0.2 mg/ml was treated with H2O2 (1 mM final concentration, 37°C, 1 h), remaining free thiols modified with iodo acetamide (iam, 1 mM final concentration, 37°C, 5 min), and samples denatured and trypsin or Glu-C digested as described [40]. As control, TCEP-reduced HypT was treated with iam (1 mM final concentration, 37°C, 5 min) to modify all cysteines. After digestion, the H2O2-treated samples were split, one half was reduced with DTT (3 mM final concentration, 37°C, 2 h) and the other half left untreated in order to detect potential disulfides between cysteines. Samples were desalted via C18 zip-tip (Millipore) and analyzed by MALDI mass spectrometry (Ultraflex TOF/TOF; Bruker Daltonics) using the reflector mode and linear mode enabling to detect masses up to 10,000. ESI-MS/MS analysis was performed as described [40] and evaluation of data was performed using the program MassMatrix (version 2.4.2; [44]). The settings were as follows: protease: trypsin; decoy database: none; fragmentation: CID; variable modifications: N-terminal acetylation, methionine oxidation, methionine sulfone; precursor ion tolerance: ±10 ppm; product ion tolerance: ±0.8 Da; cross link mode: exploratory. Fragment ions resulting from loss of water or ammonia are not included in the tables shown.
Results
HOCl but not Chloramines and Hydroxyl Radicals Activate HypT in vivo
HypT is a HOCl-specific transcription factor and confers HOCl resistance [39], [40]. To understand the activation of HypT in HOCl-stressed cells, we started to identify the activating species. There is evidence that HOCl can be directly transported into cells [45]. Nevertheless, HOCl potentially reacts with cellular components to generate a reaction product that may activate HypT. Further, previous experiments have been performed with E. coli cells stressed with HOCl in LB medium [39], [40]. Bacterial cells and also LB medium contain a variety of macromolecules that are vulnerable to oxidation by HOCl, most notably amine groups and sulfur containing amino acids [5], [46]. Thus, it seemed reasonable that not HOCl directly but a reaction product of HOCl with LB components causes HypT activation. One potential candidate is monochloramine that is generated quickly at physiological conditions upon reaction of amino groups with HOCl (kobs for α-amino groups: 5×105 M−1 s−1 [47]). Further, HOCl reacts with iron to form extremely reactive hydroxyl radicals (HO•) [47], making them a potential activator of HypT. Also the sulfur in methionine is quickly oxidized to form Met-SO (kobs: 4×107 M−1 s−1 (for HOCl) and 8×109 M−1 s−1 (for HO•) [5]). Therefore, we considered testing monochloramine (NH2Cl), HO•, Met-SO, and HOCl as HypT-activating ROS.
To test activation of HypT by different ROS, we first performed viability experiments with E. coli hypT + and hypT − cells (C600 and KMG214 [39]) in combination with qRT-PCR to analyze target gene regulation. For stress treatment with HOCl, NH2Cl, Met-SO, and H2O2, cells were washed with phosphate buffer to eliminate all LB compounds and enable determining the effective concentration of ROS in killing cells. For treatment with hydroxyurea (to generate intracellular HO•; [42]), cells were either diluted in LB medium and spotted onto hydroxyurea containing LB agar plates (viability assay) or hydroxyurea was added to liquid LB medium (qRT-PCR analysis) (see ref. [42]). H2O2 stress was performed as a control because it is known to generate intracellular HO• in a Fenton-type reaction that cause extensive DNA damage and compromise bacterial viability [6].
We expect wild-type cells (hypT +) to be more resistant to activating compounds than hypT − cells [39]. hypT + and hypT − cells were subjected to stress treatment with HOCl, NH2Cl, Met-SO, hydroxyurea, or H2O2 (Fig. 1A). HOCl was cytotoxic at 10 µM and generated a strong difference in viability between hypT + and hypT − cells, indicating that HOCl activated HypT. Activation of HypT was confirmed by qRT-PCR. MetN and MetB RNA levels were increased upon HOCl stress (maximum at 3 µM HOCl at which cells were 100% viable) in a HypT-dependent manner (Fig. 1B), even though to a lesser extent than observed in LB medium [39]. The cytotoxicity of NH2Cl was comparable to HOCl, but no difference in viability of hypT + and hypT − cells and no difference in MetN and MetB RNA levels (up to 8 µM NH2Cl) was detected indicating that NH2Cl does not activate HypT (Fig. 1A,B). Stress treatment with hydroxyurea was cytotoxic, yet, HO• do apparently not activate HypT because hypT + and hypT − cells showed an indistinguishable viability (Fig. 1A). Further, 100 mM hydroxyurea, at which induction of cell survival responses was demonstrated [42], caused a slight up-regulation of MetN and MetB RNA levels but in a HypT-independent manner (Fig. 1B). Met-SO did neither impair viability of E. coli cells nor significantly influence MetN and MetB RNA levels (Fig. 1A,B). Finally, H2O2 treatment for 15 min did not substantially influence viability and MetN and MetB RNA levels at the applied conditions, demonstrating that generated intracellular HO• are unlikely to cause the observed loss of viability upon HOCl stress. We conclude that HOCl activates HypT in the cell but that NH2Cl, HO•, and Met-SO do not activate the transcription factor. Further, we analyzed regulation of metN by the various ROS by measuring β-galactosidase activity of a translational metN-lacZ fusion. hypT + and hypT − cells carrying a chromosomal metN-lacZ fusion were challenged with ROS as described for qRT-PCR analysis. It should be noted that HOCl is known to inactivate β-galactosidase [48] but H2O2 and NH2Cl do not influence β-galactosidase activity [48], [49]. Accordingly, β-galactosidase activity decreased in our assay by 20% upon HOCl treatment instead of increasing as expected for metN from the above qRT-PCR experiments (Fig. 1C; see also [39], [48]). Thus, YjiE-dependent metN regulation upon HOCl stress, which showed a maximum at 3 µM in phosphate buffer (see Fig. 1B), could not be analyzed by β-galactosidase assay. However, β-galactosidase activity can be analyzed after treatment with other ROS. β-galactosidase activity did not change significantly upon stress treatment with NH2Cl, hydroxyurea, Met-SO, and H2O2, respectively (Fig. 1C). Since we can exclude a negative effect of H2O2 and NH2Cl on β-galactosidase activity [48], [49], we conclude that MetN translation is not influenced by the tested ROS. This demonstrates that NH2Cl, hydroxyurea, Met-SO, and H2O2 do not activate HypT, which confirms the data obtained by qRT-PCR.
Oxidation of HypT Leads to Loss of DNA-binding
Next, we analyzed the effect of HOCl, NH2Cl, HO•, Met-SO, and H2O2 on the DNA-binding activity of purified HypT. HypT was incubated with the respective ROS and then binding to AlexaFluor488-labeled hypT promoter DNA [39] was analyzed by EMSA. HypT forms DNA-protein complexes, thus shifting DNA to higher molecular weight. As analyzed by fluorescence anisotropy [39], the size of DNA:HypT complex depends on the activation state of HypT. HypT isolated from HOCl-stressed cells showed a strong and in vitro HOCl-oxidized HypT showed a very low fluorescence anisotropy signal compared to HypT purified from unstressed cells [39]. EMSA should enable us to visualize the effect of ROS on the general DNA-binding ability of HypT and to differentiate between HypT that is able to bind to DNA and HypT that does not bind to DNA independently of the activation state. Reduced HypT showed DNA-binding activity that was visible as a shift in molecular weight (Fig. 2A, left panel). Upon ROS treatment the DNA binding activity is expected to be altered; we expect a complete shift of DNA (i.e., no free DNA should remain), a complete loss of DNA binding, or a shift to higher molecular weights, if the DNA:HypT interaction is altered. We observed that upon incubation with HOCl, NH2Cl, and H2O2, HypT completely lost its DNA-binding activity and DNA remained completely detectable as unbound DNA (Fig. 2A). This was reversible upon reduction of ROS-treated HypT with TCEP suggesting that cysteine oxidation occurred upon such treatment (Fig. 2A). In the presence of HO• (generated from FeSO4 and H2O2) and Met-SO, however, HypT maintained nearly the same DNA-binding activity as reduced HypT (Fig. 2A); we observed a very similar shift of DNA to higher molecular weight and a very similar amount of remaining unbound DNA, indicating that HO• and Met-SO do not oxidize HypT’s cysteines.
To test for cysteine oxidation, we analyzed the above HypT samples on non-reducing SDS gels, which should visualize a potential disulfide-linked dimer at ca. 64 kDa. Treatment of HypT with HOCl, NH2Cl, and H2O2 resulted in almost complete formation of a disulfide-linked dimer that was mostly reduced upon TCEP treatment (Fig. 2B). Full reduction of HypT could be achieved by β-mercaptoethanol treatment and boiling the samples (data not shown). HypT treated with HO• and Met-SO, in contrast, did not form an intermolecular disulfide bond but remained detectable at ca. 33 kDa, corresponding to the monomer (Fig. 2B). We performed MS analysis to identify the cysteine residues involved in disulfide bond formation. HypT was treated with H2O2 (instead of HOCl to avoid unwanted side reactions), then free thiols were modified with iam, and samples were denatured and digested with trypsin or Glu-C. Afterwards, the sample was split and one half was treated with DTT while the other half was left non-reduced, thus preserving potential disulfide bonds. As control, HypT was reduced and then treated with iam. In the control sample as well as the reduced and non-reduced samples, we detected all five HypT cysteines in the iam-modified state, thus revealing that the modification procedure was successful (Fig. 2D). The import difference between the three samples, however, was that we detected a disulfide formed between two peptides containing Cys4 exclusively in the non-reduced sample (Fig. 2D). The corresponding mass for the Cys4-Cys4 disulfide was not detected in the DTT-treated samples but an increase in intensity of the mass corresponding to the peptide containing reduced Cys4. No other disulfides between any of the cysteines were detected. To confirm the presence of a Cys4-Cys4 disulfide, we analyzed HypT after H2O2 oxidation and trypsin digest by ESI-MS/MS analysis. Using the program MassMatrix [44], we detected the Cys4-Cys4 disulfide (Fig. 2E, fragmentation ions are given in Table 1). No fragmentation scans were obtained for any other potential disulfides. This confirms the presence of the Cys4-Cys4 peptide in the H2O2-treated, non-reduced sample and suggests that the disulfide-linked dimer observed upon oxidation of HypT is formed between two Cys4 thiols.
Table 1. Fragment ions of one Cys4 peptide of the Cys4-Cys4 peptide (according to MassMatrix).
aminoacid # | b+5 | b+4 | sequence | y+5 | y++ | y+ | aminoacid # |
1 | M | 626.88 | 14 | ||||
2 | D | 594.28 | 13 | ||||
3 | D | 571.27 | 12 | ||||
4 | 509.70 | C | 548.27 | 11 | |||
5 | G | 548.31 | 10 | ||||
6 | 541.72 | A | 9 | ||||
7 | 569.99 | I | 484.28 | 8 | |||
8 | 478.81 | 598.26 | L | 427.74 | 854.47 | 7 | |
9 | 506.22 | 632.52 | H | 371.20 | 741.39 | 6 | |
10 | 529.03 | 661.03 | N | 604.33 | 5 | ||
11 | 551.65 | 689.31 | I | 490.29 | 4 | ||
12 | 577.45 | 721.57 | E | 377.20 | 3 | ||
13 | 597.66 | T | 248.16 | 2 | |||
K | 1 |
To test whether disulfide-linked dimer formation also occurs in vivo, we treated hypT expressing cells with HOCl, NH2Cl, HO•, Met-SO, and H2O2 (similar to Fig. 1B). Similar to treatment of purified HypT, HOCl, NH2Cl, and H2O2 caused disulfide-linked dimer formation in cells (Fig. 2C). Yet, while HypT was completely present as disulfide-linked dimer upon HOCl, NH2Cl, and H2O2 treatment in vitro, dimer formation was only partial in vivo (Fig. 2C). This may suggest that complete disulfide bond formation occurs only in the absence of cellular reductases such as thioredoxin or glutaredoxin. Given that intermolecular disulfide bond formation occurs upon HOCl, NH2Cl, and H2O2 treatment both in vitro and in vivo but only HOCl-stressed cells show HypT-dependent increased viability and target gene regulation, it seems that disulfide-linked dimer formation and activation of HypT are two independent processes. HypT oxidation on cysteine residues is responsible for the loss of DNA-binding in vitro. Low DNA-binding of HOCl-treated HypT was observed before [39], yet, selective inactivation of HypT by cysteine oxidation seems counterintuitive. HypT contains five cysteines (at positions 4, 25, 150, 178, 242). Except Cys178, which is partially conserved, cysteine residues in HypT are variable (see alignment in [39]). Therefore, a role of cysteines in a redox-regulatory scheme as observed for the invariant cysteines in Hsp33 [50], OxyR [24], or peroxiredoxins [34] seems unlikely. If not redox-regulation in the classical sense, what else is the role of the cysteines in HypT?
Cysteines in HypT are Required for Activity in vivo and Stability
In order to directly analyze the role of the cysteines we generated a mutant where all five cysteines were replaced by serine (HypT5C→S) and analyzed its ability to confer HOCl resistance. HypT5C→S conferred the same low HOCl resistance as the strain carrying an empty pBAD vector indicating that the cysteines are required for the in vivo activity of HypT (Fig. 3A). Next, we purified HypT5C→S and compared its functional and biophysical properties to that of HypT. Both, HypT and HypT5C→S were able to bind to DNA as analyzed by EMSA suggesting that the cysteines are not essential for the DNA-binding activity (Fig. 3B). HypT5C→S and HypT showed a slightly different extent of α-helices according to CD analysis, indicating that the substitution of the cysteines caused detectable changes in secondary structure (Fig. 3C). Further, the thermal stability of HypT5C→S was greatly reduced compared to HypT. According to the thermal transition analysis by CD following the change in signal at 222 nm, HypT5C→S showed an 8.5°C lower midpoint of transition compared to HypT (50.5°C vs. 59.0°C; Fig. 3D). The reduced stability of HypT5C→S became also apparent when its aggregation propensity was determined in dependence of the salt concentration. While the wild-type protein remained soluble even at low salt concentrations (100 mM NaCl; Fig. 3E, left panel), HypT5C→S showed pronounced aggregation that negatively correlated with the salt concentration. HypT5C→S aggregated almost completely during incubation at 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 3E, right panel). Differences between HypT5C→S and HypT were even stronger pronounced when we analyzed their oligomerization state by aUC. We observed that deletion of the cysteines drastically altered the sedimentation behavior of HypT. While the wild-type protein sedimented with 11.4 S, which corresponds to a dodecamer [39], HypT5C→S sedimented with 6.7 S and 10.0 S (Fig. 3F). The two species likely correspond to a tetramer and a decamer or a dodecamer with slightly different shape compared to the wild-type protein. Thus, the cysteines apparently play an important role in the activity in vivo, likely by overall stabilizing HypT and its oligomeric structure.
Cysteine 150 is Required for Stability of HypT in vivo
To analyze the individual role of cysteines in HypT, we generated single mutants in which one cysteine was replaced by serine (i.e., HypTC4S, HypTC25S, HypTC150S, HypTC178S, HypTC242S), and quadruple mutants in which four cysteines were replaced by serine simultaneously thus leaving one cysteine in HypT intact (i.e., quadrupleC4, quadrupleC25, quadrupleC150, quadrupleC178, quadrupleC242). First, we analyzed the ability of the mutants to confer HOCl resistance to hypT − cells. The expression level was similar for all mutants (see materials and methods). All single mutants conferred wild-type-like HOCl resistance (Fig. 4A, left panel). The quadruple mutants, in contrast, showed control-like or significantly less HOCl resistance than wild-type HypT and thus seem to be comparably inactive as HypT5C→S (Fig. 4A, right panel). Given the reduced stability of HypT5C→S in vitro, we analyzed the amount of soluble HypT or mutant protein in unstressed cells by western blot (Fig. 4B). We quantified the band intensities, set that of wild-type HypT to 100% and related all other values to that. The single mutants HypTC4S, HypTC25S, HypTC178S, and HypTC242S showed a wild-type-like amount of soluble protein (Fig. 4B). However, the soluble protein amount of HypT5C→S, the single mutant HypTC150S, and all quadruple mutants was much lower than that of wild-type HypT (54–67% of HypT; Fig. 4B). This shows that either substitution of the single Cys150 or simultaneous substitution of more than one cysteine causes reduced solubility of HypT. Based on the observation that the HypTC150S mutant conferred wild-type-like HOCl resistance (see Fig. 4A) but HypT5C→S-like solubility, we conclude that the solubility alone does not account for the low HOCl resistance conferred by HypT5C→S.
In order to better visualize differences in solubility, we overexpressed hypT mutants in BL21(DE3) cells as used for purification purposes and isolated soluble proteins (please note that HypT levels are about five thousand times the HypT level in wild-type cells [39]). We quantified the band intensities from SDS-gels or western blots, set that of HypT to 100% and related all other values to that (Fig. 4C). Similar to the experiments described above, HypT5C→S showed 50% reduced solubility compared to HypT. Further in line, mutants where Cys150 was replaced by serine (i.e., HypTC150S, all quadruple mutants except quadrupleC150) showed reduced solubility (48–73% of HypT). Mutants, however, where Cys150 was still present (i.e., HypTC4S, HypTC25S, HypTC178S, HypTC242S, quadrupleC150) showed wild-type-like or even increased solubility (Fig. 4C). Thus, Cys150 is important for the solubility of HypT in cell lysates.
Given the reduced solubility in cell lysates of some HypT mutants, we next purified the single and quadruple mutants and analyzed their stability and aggregation propensity in vitro. The thermal stability of the purified proteins was analyzed by CD and the thermal transition midpoint (TM) calculated (Table 2). Mutants where Cys150 was still present (i.e., quadrupleC150, all single mutants except HypTC150S) showed thermal stabilities similar to HypT with TM values above 57°C. Mutants, however, where Cys150 was replaced by serine (i.e., HypTC150S, all quadruple mutants except quadrupleC150) showed thermal stabilities similar to HypT5C→S with TM values below 54°C (Table 2). Thus, Cys150 is not only important for the solubility of HypT in cell lysates but also for the thermal stability of HypT in vitro. We conclude that the C150S mutation is most likely the reason for the reduced solubility and stability of the HypT5C→S mutant.
Table 2. Thermal stability of HypT and mutants as analyzed by CD.
Mutant | TM [°C] |
Wild-type HypT | 59.0 |
HypT5C→S | 50.5 |
HypTC4S | 60.8 |
HypTC25S | 58.8 |
HypTC150S | 54.3 |
HypTC178S | 59.7 |
HypTC242S | 57.9 |
HypTquadrupleC4 | 50.0 |
HypTquadrupleC25 | 51.0 |
HypTquadrupleC150 | 57.3 |
HypTquadrupleC178 | 50.2 |
HypTquadrupleC242 | 52.5 |
Cys4 is Required for HypT Oligomerization to Dodecamers
To further elucidate the role of cysteines in HypT, we next analyzed the oligomerization state of the mutant proteins (Table 3). HypT sedimented with 11.4 S, which corresponds to a dodecamer [39]. The single mutants HypTC25S, HypTC150S, HypTC178S, and HypTC242S sedimented with 10 to 11 S. This corresponds to a decamer or, more likely, a dodecamer with slightly different hydrodynamic radius compared to HypT. Interestingly, HypTC4S formed two species that sedimented with 6.9 S and 10.0 S. This is very similar to HypT5C→S and the quadruple mutants lacking Cys4 (quadrupleC25, quadrupleC178, and quadrupleC242). In contrast, when Cys4 was present as sole cysteine (i.e., quadrupleC4) the protein sedimented with 11.4 S, just like HypT. Thus, substitution of Cys4 causes the HypT5C→S-like oligomerization state of HypT. Of note, quadrupleC150 sedimented reproducibly as one small species with 7.4 S, this may reflect its decreased stability (Table 3).
Table 3. Sedimentation values of HypT and mutants as analyzed by aUC.
Mutant | s value | s value |
species 1 | species 2 | |
HypT | – | 11.4 |
HypT5C→S | 6.7 (40%)* | 10.0 (60%) |
HypTC4S | 6.9 (44%) | 10.0 (56%) |
HypTC25S | – | 10.1 |
HypTC150S | – | 10.5 |
HypTC178S | – | 10.9 |
HypTC242S | – | 9.9 |
HypTquadrupleC4 | – | 11.4 |
HypTquadrupleC25 | 6.5 (30%) | 10.2 (70%) |
HypTquadrupleC150 | 7.4 | – |
HypTquadrupleC178 | 6.2 (25%) | 9.1 (75%) |
HypTquadrupleC242 | 7.1 (29%) | 10.7 (71%) |
Values in brackets represent the ratio of the two species in percent.
Oxidation of Cys4 Causes Loss of DNA-binding Activity
Next we analyzed the DNA-binding activity in the reduced and H2O2-oxidized state and disulfide-linked dimer formation of the single and quadruple mutants. We chose H2O2 because it preferentially reacts with cysteine residues in contrast to HOCl that also reacts with other amino acids and may generate unwanted side effects. This should enable us to directly test which cysteine in HypT becomes oxidized in vitro. HypT and all mutants were able to bind to DNA and showed formation of DNA-protein complexes under reducing conditions (Fig. 5, TCEP-treated samples). This confirms that cysteines are per se not essential for DNA-binding activity of HypT. Upon H2O2 treatment, however, HypT lost its DNA-binding activity and formed disulfide-linked dimers while HypT5C→S retained DNA-binding activity and was detectable as a single band at ca. 33 kDa (data not shown and Fig. 5A, B). Importantly, mutants lacking Cys4 retained their DNA-binding activity while mutants carrying Cys4 lost DNA-binding activity upon oxidation (Fig. 5A). Coinciding, mutants lacking Cys4 were predominantly detectable as monomer while mutants containing Cys4 formed disulfide-linked dimers upon oxidation (Fig. 5B). The presence of the Cys4-Cys4 disulfide in quadrupleC4 was confirmed by ESI-MS/MS (data not shown). The absence of disulfides in mutants lacking Cys4 was confirmed by MS analysis, similar to the procedure described for HypT (data not shown). Taken together, the data demonstrates that Cys4 is responsible for intermolecular disulfide bond formation and concomitant loss of DNA-binding activity in vitro.
Discussion
HypT is an oxidative stress transcription factor whose activity depends on the oxidative conditions in vitro and in vivo. HypT is activated by methionine oxidation to Met-SO [40]. It confers resistance specifically to HOCl-treated E. coli cells but not to H2O2-, and diamide-stressed cells [39], nor to NH2Cl-, hydroxyurea-, or Met-SO-stressed cells. It was surprising that neither NH2Cl nor HO• activates HypT. Both ROS are highly reactive. They cause, similar to HOCl, complete aggregation of BSA upon treatment in vitro (see materials and methods) and decrease bacterial viability and could thus be expected to, at least partially, facilitate HypT activation. We conclude that HypT is a very specific and fine-tuned molecule. In vitro, however, several oxidative conditions (HOCl, NH2Cl and H2O2) diminish the DNA-binding activity of HypT. This was unexpected and hampered the identification of the HypT activating ROS in vitro. In vivo, however, we observed only partial disulfide bond formation, likely because cellular reductases such as thioredoxin, which are up-regulated upon HOCl stress [39], maintain HypT cysteines reduced. So far, we are only able to activate HypT in vitro when the cysteines were artificially and reversibly blocked before treatment with HOCl [40]. Since S-thiolation of HypT cysteines was not detected [40] this may indicate that cellular reductases are important to keep HypT in a state where specific methionine oxidation occurs and thiol oxidation is prevented. S-thiolations such as S-glutathionylation [51] and proteome-wide S-bacillithiolation [52], [53] are important reversible modifications upon oxidative stress to protect cysteines, especially active site cysteines, from over-oxidation.
We observed a loss of DNA-binding activity upon HOCl, H2O2, or NH2Cl treatment in vitro that correlated with intermolecular disulfide bond formation in HypT. HypT contains five cysteines, of which only one is partially conserved. Thus, the cysteines would not be expected to play an important role in HypT function and are not the typical redox sensors as described for OxyR, Hsp33, peroxiredoxins, NemR, OhrR, and HypR [24], [26], [27], [34], [50], [54]. Cysteines in HypT are not essential for DNA-binding in vitro as the HypT mutant lacking all cysteines was able to bind to DNA. But cysteines are important for HypT to confer stability and HOCl resistance, even though no individual cysteine was identified to be required for in vivo activity. Nevertheless, we determined distinct roles for two of the cysteines in HypT: Cys4 is important for HypT oligomerization to dodecamers and its oxidation leads to loss of DNA-binding while Cys150 is essential for HypT stability. We conclude that the decreased stability and in vivo activity of HypT5C→S is derived from the combined substitution of Cys4 and Cys150.
The activity and stability of many proteins relies on cysteines and formation of correct disulfide bonds (e.g., redox-regulated proteins discussed above, proinsulin [55], and lysozyme [56]). Cysteine substitutions are known to destabilize proteins or affect their folding in case the cysteines are engaged in a disulfide bond (e.g., bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, BPTI [57]). Vice versa, proteins can be stabilized by introducing a cysteine and enabling disulfide bond formation (e.g., onconase [58]). However, the protein stability may also be altered by cysteine substitution when cysteines are not involved in a disulfide bond. In the case of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase, substitution of one nonessential cysteine residue by serine resulted in severely reduced stability and higher propensity to dissociation [59]. In rhodanese, mutation of all cysteines that are not required for activity to serine diminished the stability of the enzyme while maintaining its activity [60]. For HypT, it seems likely that replacement of Cys4 and Cys150 by serine leads to altered intra- or intermolecular contacts in HypT, thus, destabilizing the HypT overall structure and oligomer, respectively. This assumption is supported by the modeled structure of HypT, which was generated using the structure prediction software Phyre 2 (Fig. 6A; [61]). There, Cys4 seems to be solvent exposed in a flexible loop in the N-terminal domain and Cys150 seems to be buried in the core of HypT. Substitution of Cys150 by the polar serine may disturb interactions within the core and thus cause loss of stability. In vitro, oxidation of Cys4 leads to intermolecular disulfide bond formation and may cause structural changes in the nearby DNA-binding domain, which may block access of the DNA (see working model in Fig. 6B, C). The situation seems to be different in vivo, given the presence of thiol reductases, even though also here partial disulfide bond formation occurred. The situation seems also to be different in vitro when cysteines were reversibly protected from oxidation by S-glutathionylation; this allows for HOCl-mediated methionine oxidation and, upon subsequent reduction of cysteines, high DNA-binding activity [40]. In both such cases, conformational changes may be restricted to the C-terminal domain, allowing for specific methionine oxidation, or conformational changes may occur in the whole HypT molecule and are likely required to bring the DNA-binding domain in the correct position for efficient DNA-binding (Fig. 6B, C). Cys4 may serve as a check point: upon oxidative stress that is insufficient to stimulate HypT DNA-binding (i.e., oxidation in vitro), Cys4 becomes oxidized and inhibits DNA-binding to avoid unnecessary regulation of target genes (Fig. 6B, C). This bears some resemblance to the redox-regulated Hsp33, whose chaperone function is activated upon exposure to combined oxidative and unfolding conditions [17], [28]. Either oxidation of cysteine residues or sole unfolding are not sufficient for activation, indicating their simultaneous occurrence as check point to ensure activation upon exactly the stress conditions that require Hsp33 activity [28]. Temporary oxidation and inactivation of HypT shows also some similarities to the peroxiredoxin Tpx1 (thioredoxin peroxidase). Tpx1 degrades peroxides by forming a disulfide bond that is reduced by thioredoxin, yet, Tpx1 is also highly sensitive to peroxide-induced hyperoxidation and inactivation. Hyperoxidation is critical to avoid interaction with thioredoxin, which is thus able to repair oxidized proteins and maintain cell survival [33]. Reversible inactivation of HypT upon certain oxidative stress conditions bears even further resemblance to the temporary inactivation of the chaperone DnaK upon oxidative heat stress [41]. There, DnaK looses its chaperone activity due to loss of cellular ATP, concomitant ATP-depletion of the ATP-dependent DnaK, and heat-induced unfolding of the ATPase domain. This serves to prevent unnecessary and unproductive further ATP hydrolysis by DnaK under non-permissive folding conditions [41].
Taken together, transient oxidation-induced inactivation of HypT may be advantageous to ensure cell survival upon non-specific oxidative stress conditions. This may either be required to ensure lack of HypT-mediated gene regulation or to ensure access of other stress-related factors or transcription factors to specific DNA regions.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Johannes Buchner, Stefan Gleiter, Thomas Kriehuber, and all members of the Buchner and Winter labs for discussion, Dr. Yan Le for generating mutants, Helmut Krause for MS analysis, and Stefanie Mak and Andrea Steiner for technical assistance.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the Emmy-Noether Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant number: WI 3200/1-1) and the Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich. AD, JG and KMG were supported by the Elitenetzwerk Bayern, JP was supported by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes, MK was supported by SFB1035. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Ha EM, Oh CT, Bae YS, Lee WJ (2005) A direct role for dual oxidase in Drosophila gut immunity. Science 310: 847–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Winterbourn CC, Hampton MB, Livesey JH, Kettle AJ (2006) Modeling the reactions of superoxide and myeloperoxidase in the neutrophil phagosome: implications for microbial killing. J Biol Chem 281: 39860–39869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Roos D, Winterbourn CC (2002) Immunology Lethal weapons. Science 296: 669–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Markesbery WR (1997) Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic Biol Med 23: 134–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Davies M J (2005) The oxidative environment and protein damage. Biochim Biophys Acta 1703: 93–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Imlay JA, Chin SM, Linn S (1988) Toxic DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction in vivo and in vitro. Science 240: 640–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Imlay JA (2008) Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 755–776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Greenberg JT, Monach P, Chou JH, Josephy PD, Demple B (1990) Positive control of a global antioxidant defense regulon activated by superoxide-generating agents in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 6181–6185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gu M, Imlay JA (2011) The SoxRS response of Escherichia coli is directly activated by redox-cycling drugs rather than by superoxide. Mol Microbiol 79: 1136–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Flint DH, Tuminello JF, Emptage MH (1993) The inactivation of Fe-S cluster containing hydro-lyases by superoxide. J Biol Chem 268: 22369–22376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gardner PR (1997) Superoxide-driven aconitase FE-S center cycling. Biosci Rep 17: 33–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Anjem A, Imlay JA (2012) Mononuclear iron enzymes are primary targets of hydrogen peroxide stress. J Biol Chem 287: 15544–15556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Weber H, Engelmann S, Becher D, Hecker M (2004) Oxidative stress triggers thiol oxidation in the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 52: 133–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Leichert LI, Jakob U (2004) Protein thiol modifications visualized in vivo. PLoS Biol 2: e333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Luo S, Levine RL (2009) Methionine in proteins defends against oxidative stress. FASEB J 23: 464–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sivey JD, Howell SC, Bean DJ, McCurry DL, Mitch WA, et al. (2013) Role of lysine during protein modification by HOCl and HOBr: halogen-transfer agent or sacrificial antioxidant? Biochemistry 52: 1260–1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Winter J, Ilbert M, Graf PC, Ozcelik D, Jakob U (2008) Bleach activates a redox-regulated chaperone by oxidative protein unfolding. Cell 135: 691–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rosen H, Klebanoff SJ, Wang Y, Brot N, Heinecke JW, et al. (2009) Methionine oxidation contributes to bacterial killing by the myeloperoxidase system of neutrophils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18686–18691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Leichert LI, Gehrke F, Gudiseva HV, Blackwell T, Ilbert M, et al. (2008) Quantifing changes in the thiol redox proteome upon oxidative stress in vivo Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105: 8197–8202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Candeias LP, Stratford MR, Wardman P (1994) Formation of hydroxyl radicals on reaction of hypochlorous acid with ferrocyanide, a model iron(II) complex. Free Radic Res 20: 241–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kiley PJ, Storz G (2004) Exploiting thiol modifications. PLoS Biol 2: e400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Antelmann H, Helmann JD (2011) Thiol-based redox switches and gene regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal 14: 1049–1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kumsta C, Jakob U (2009) Redox-regulated chaperones. Biochemistry 48: 4666–4676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Choi H, Kim S, Mukhopadhyay P, Cho S, Woo J, et al. (2001) Structural basis of the redox switch in the OxyR transcription factor. Cell 105: 103–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Delaunay A, Pflieger D, Barrault MB, Vinh J, Toledano MB (2002) A thiol peroxidase is an H2O2 receptor and redox-transducer in gene activation. Cell 111: 471–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Palm GJ, Khanh CB, Waack P, Gronau K, Becher D, et al. (2012) Structural insights into the redox-switch mechanism of the MarR/DUF24-type regulator HypR. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 4178–4192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gray MJ, Wholey WY, Parker BW, Kim M, Jakob U (2013) NemR is a Bleach-Sensing Transcription Factor. J Biol Chem 288: 13789–13798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ilbert M, Horst J, Ahrens S, Winter J, Graf PC, et al. (2007) The redox-switch domain of Hsp33 functions as dual stress sensor. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 556–563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Reichmann D, Xu Y, Cremers CM, Ilbert M, Mittelman R, et al. (2012) Order out of disorder: working cycle of an intrinsically unfolded chaperone. Cell 148: 947–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Depuydt M, Messens J, Collet JF (2011) How proteins form disulfide bonds. Antioxid Redox Signal 15: 49–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gleiter S, Bardwell JC (2008) Disulfide bond isomerization in prokaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783: 530–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hatahet F, Ruddock LW (2009) Protein disulfide isomerase: a critical evaluation of its function in disulfide bond formation. Antioxid Redox Signal 11: 2807–2850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Day AM, Brown JD, Taylor SR, Rand JD, Morgan BA, et al. (2012) Inactivation of a peroxiredoxin by hydrogen peroxide is critical for thioredoxin-mediated repair of oxidized proteins and cell survival. Mol Cell 45: 398–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Poole LB (2005) Bacterial defenses against oxidants: mechanistic features of cysteine-based peroxidases and their flavoprotein reductases. Arch Biochem Biophys 433: 240–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cho SH, Parsonage D, Thurston C, Dutton RJ, Poole LB, et al. (2012) A new family of membrane electron transporters and its substrates, including a new cell envelope peroxiredoxin, reveal a broadened reductive capacity of the oxidative bacterial cell envelope. MBio 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36. Winterbourn CC, Metodiewa D (1999) Reactivity of biologically important thiol compounds with superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Biol Med 27: 322–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Aslund F, Zheng M, Beckwith J, Storz G (1999) Regulation of the OxyR transcription factor by hydrogen peroxide and the cellular thiol-disulfide status. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 6161–6165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Parsonage D, Youngblood DS, Sarma GN, Wood ZA, Karplus PA, et al. (2005) Analysis of the link between enzymatic activity and oligomeric state in AhpC, a bacterial peroxiredoxin. Biochemistry 44: 10583–10592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gebendorfer KM, Drazic A, Le Y, Gundlach J, Bepperling A, et al. (2012) Identification of a hypochlorite-specific transcription factor from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 287: 6892–6903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Drazic A, Miura H, Peschek J, Le Y, Bach NC, et al. (2013) Methionine oxidation activates a transcription factor in response to oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 9493–9498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Winter J, Linke K, Jatzek A, Jakob U (2005) Severe oxidative stress causes inactivation of DnaK and activation of the redox-regulated chaperone Hsp33. Mol Cell 17: 381–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Davies BW, Kohanski MA, Simmons LA, Winkler JA, Collins JJ, et al. (2009) Hydroxyurea induces hydroxyl radical-mediated cell death in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell 36: 845–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bors W, Michel C, Saran M (1979) On the nature of biochemically generated hydroxyl radicals Studies using the bleaching of p-nitrosodimethylaniline as a direct assay method. Eur J Biochem 95: 621–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Xu H, Freitas MA (2009) MassMatrix: a database search program for rapid characterization of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 9: 1548–1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Morales EH, Calderon IL, Collao B, Gil F, Porwollik S, et al. (2012) Hypochlorous acid and hydrogen peroxide-induced negative regulation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ompW by the response regulator ArcA. BMC Microbiol 12: 63–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Pattison DI, Davies MJ (2001) Absolute rate constants for the reaction of hypochlorous acid with protein side chains and peptide bonds. Chem Res Toxicol 14: 1453–1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Folkes LK, Candeias LP, Wardman P (1995) Kinetics and mechanisms of hypochlorous acid reactions. Arch Biochem Biophys 323: 120–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Albrich JM, Gilbaugh JH III, Callahan KB, Hurst JK (1986) Effects of the putative neutrophil-generated toxin, hypochlorous acid, on membrane permeability and transport systems of Escherichia coli. J Clin Invest 78: 177–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Christman MF, Storz G, Ames B N (1989) OxyR, a positive regulator of hydrogen peroxide-inducible genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, is homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 3484–3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Jakob U, Muse W, Eser M, Bardwell JC (1999) Chaperone activity with a redox switch. Cell 96: 341–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hondorp ER, Matthews RG (2004) Oxidative stress inactivates cobalamin-independent methionine synthase (MetE) in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol 2: e336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Chi BK, Gronau K, Mader U, Hessling B, Becher D, et al. (2011) S-Bacillithiolation Protects Against Hypochlorite Stress in Bacillus subtilis as Revealed by Transcriptomics and Redox Proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 10: M111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Chi BK, Roberts AA, Huyen TT, Basell K, Becher D, et al. (2013) S-bacillithiolation protects conserved and essential proteins against hypochlorite stress in firmicutes bacteria. Antioxid Redox Signal 18: 1273–1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lee JW, Soonsanga S, Helmann JD (2007) A complex thiolate switch regulates the Bacillus subtilis organic peroxide sensor OhrR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 8743–8748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Winter J, Gleiter S, Klappa P, Lilie H (2011) Protein disulfide isomerase isomerizes non-native disulfide bonds in human proinsulin independent of its peptide-binding activity. Protein Sci 20: 588–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Saxena VP, Wetlaufer DB (1970) Formation of three-dimensional structure in proteins. I. Rapid nonenzymic reactivation of reduced lysozyme. Biochemistry 9: 5015–5023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Foit L, Mueller-Schickert A, Mamathambika BS, Gleiter S, Klaska CL, et al. (2011) Genetic selection for enhanced folding in vivo targets the Cys14-Cys38 disulfide bond in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Antioxid Redox Signal 14: 973–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Schulenburg C, Weininger U, Neumann P, Meiselbach H, Stubbs MT, et al. (2010) Impact of the C-terminal disulfide bond on the folding and stability of onconase. Chembiochem 11: 978–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Gonzalez-Segura L, Velasco-Garcia R, Rudino-Pinera E, Mujica-Jimenez C, Munoz-Clares RA (2005) Site-directed mutagenesis and homology modeling indicate an important role of cysteine 439 in the stability of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochimie 87: 1056–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kaur Y, Ybarra J, Horowitz PM (2004) Active rhodanese lacking nonessential sulfhydryl groups has increased hydrophobic exposure not observed in wild-type enzyme. Protein J 23: 255–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ (2009) Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 4: 363–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]