Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12137–12141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12137

Multilocus DNA fingerprinting reveals high rate of heritable genetic mutation in herring gulls nesting in an industrialized urban site.

C L Yauk 1, J S Quinn 1
PMCID: PMC37956  PMID: 8901546

Abstract

Genotoxins, such as polycyclic aromatic compounds, are ubiquitous in urban and industrial environments. Our understanding of the role that these chemicals play in generating DNA sequence mutations is predominantly derived from laboratory studies with specific genotoxins or extracts of contaminants from environmental media. Most assays are not indicative of the germinal effects of exposure in situ to complex mixtures of common environmental mutagens. Using multilocus DNA fingerprinting, we found the mutation rate in herring gulls inhabiting a heavily industrialized urban harbor (Hamilton Harbour, Ontario) to be more than twice as high as three rural sites: Kent Island, Bay of Fundy; Chantry Island, Lake Huron; and Presqu'ile Provincial Park in Lake Ontario. Overall we found a mutation rate of 0.017 +/- 0.004 per offspring band in Hamilton, 0.006 +/- 0.002 at Kent Island, 0.002 +/- 0.002 from Chantry Island, and 0.004 +/- 0.002 from Presqu'ile Provincial Park. The mutation rate from the rural sites (pooled) was significantly lower than the rate observed in Hamilton Harbour (Fisher's exact test, two-tailed; P = 0.0006). These minisatellite DNA mutations may be important biomarkers for heritable genetic changes resulting from in situ exposure to environmental genotoxins in a free-living vertebrate species.

Full text

PDF
12137

Images in this article

12138Fig. 1
on p.12138

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R. J., Van Den Bussche R. A., Wright A. J., Wiggins L. E., Hamilton M. J., Reat E. P., Smith M. H., Lomakin M. D., Chesser R. K. High levels of genetic change in rodents of Chernobyl. Nature. 1996 Apr 25;380(6576):707–708. doi: 10.1038/380707a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buard J., Vergnaud G. Complex recombination events at the hypermutable minisatellite CEB1 (D2S90). EMBO J. 1994 Jul 1;13(13):3203–3210. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06619.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke T., Bruford M. W. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature. 1987 May 14;327(6118):149–152. doi: 10.1038/327149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burkhart J. G. Perspectives on molecular assays for measuring mutation in humans and rodents. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1995;25 (Suppl 26):88–101. doi: 10.1002/em.2850250613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole J., Green M. H., James S. E., Henderson L., Cole H. A further assessment of factors influencing measurements of thioguanine-resistant mutant frequency in circulating T-lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1988 Mar;204(3):493–507. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubrova Y. E., Jeffreys A. J., Malashenko A. M. Mouse minisatellite mutations induced by ionizing radiation. Nat Genet. 1993 Sep;5(1):92–94. doi: 10.1038/ng0993-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubrova Y. E., Nesterov V. N., Krouchinsky N. G., Ostapenko V. A., Neumann R., Neil D. L., Jeffreys A. J. Human minisatellite mutation rate after the Chernobyl accident. Nature. 1996 Apr 25;380(6576):683–686. doi: 10.1038/380683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galbraith D. A., Boag P. T., Gibbs H. L., White B. N. Sizing bands on autoradiograms: a study of precision for scoring DNA fingerprints. Electrophoresis. 1991 Feb-Mar;12(2-3):210–220. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150120218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Georges M., Lequarré A. S., Castelli M., Hanset R., Vassart G. DNA fingerprinting in domestic animals using four different minisatellite probes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1988;47(3):127–131. doi: 10.1159/000132529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J Mol Evol. 1991 Feb;32(2):128–144. doi: 10.1007/BF02515385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeffreys A. J., Royle N. J., Wilson V., Wong Z. Spontaneous mutation rates to new length alleles at tandem-repetitive hypervariable loci in human DNA. Nature. 1988 Mar 17;332(6161):278–281. doi: 10.1038/332278a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jeffreys A. J., Tamaki K., MacLeod A., Monckton D. G., Neil D. L., Armour J. A. Complex gene conversion events in germline mutation at human minisatellites. Nat Genet. 1994 Feb;6(2):136–145. doi: 10.1038/ng0294-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeffreys A. J., Turner M., Debenham P. The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 May;48(5):824–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeffreys A. J., Wilson V., Thein S. L. Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA. Nature. 1985 Jul 4;316(6023):76–79. doi: 10.1038/316076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kitazawa T., Kominami R., Tanaka R., Wakabayashi K., Nagao M. 2-Hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine induction of recombinational mutations in mammalian cell lines as detected by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Carcinog. 1994 Feb;9(2):67–70. doi: 10.1002/mc.2940090203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Päbo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6196–6200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kodaira M., Satoh C., Hiyama K., Toyama K. Lack of effects of atomic bomb radiation on genetic instability of tandem-repetitive elements in human germ cells. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Dec;57(6):1275–1283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kubota Y., Shimada A., Shima A. DNA alterations detected in the progeny of paternally irradiated Japanese medaka fish (Oryzias latipes). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):330–334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.1.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ledwith B. J., Joslyn D. J., Troilo P., Leander K. R., Clair J. H., Soper K. A., Manam S., Prahalada S., van Zwieten M. J., Nichols W. W. Induction of minisatellite DNA rearrangements by genotoxic carcinogens in mouse liver tumors. Carcinogenesis. 1995 May;16(5):1167–1172. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.5.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marvin C. H., Allan L., McCarry B. E., Bryant D. W. Chemico/biological investigation of contaminated sediment from the Hamilton Harbour area of western Lake Ontario. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1993;22(2):61–70. doi: 10.1002/em.2850220203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nürnberg P., Roewer L., Neitzel H., Sperling K., Pöpperl A., Hundrieser J., Pöche H., Epplen C., Zischler H., Epplen J. T. DNA fingerprinting with the oligonucleotide probe (CAC)5/(GTG)5: somatic stability and germline mutations. Hum Genet. 1989 Dec;84(1):75–78. doi: 10.1007/BF00210676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ogheri S., Rampazzo C., Celotti L. Mutagenic effects at hprt locus and in minisatellite sequences induced in V79 cells by treatments with UV and methyl-nitro-nitroso guanidine. Mutat Res. 1995 Dec;348(4):193–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(95)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sadamoto S., Suzuki S., Kamiya K., Kominami R., Dohi K., Niwa O. Radiation induction of germline mutation at a hypervariable mouse minisatellite locus. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994 May;65(5):549–557. doi: 10.1080/09553009414550641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shelby M. D., Bishop J. B., Mason J. M., Tindall K. R. Fertility, reproduction, and genetic disease: studies on the mutagenic effects of environmental agents on mammalian germ cells. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Apr;100:283–291. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93100283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vawter L., Brown W. M. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA comparisons reveal extreme rate variation in the molecular clock. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):194–196. doi: 10.1126/science.3018931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Westneat D. F., Noon W. A., Reeve H. K., Aquadro C. F. Improved hybridization conditions for DNA 'fingerprints' probed with M13. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 May 11;16(9):4161–4161. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.9.4161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wetton J. H., Carter R. E., Parkin D. T., Walters D. Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature. 1987 May 14;327(6118):147–149. doi: 10.1038/327147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolff R. K., Plaetke R., Jeffreys A. J., White R. Unequal crossingover between homologous chromosomes is not the major mechanism involved in the generation of new alleles at VNTR loci. Genomics. 1989 Aug;5(2):382–384. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90076-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES