Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Genetics logoLink to Frontiers in Genetics
. 2013 Oct 28;4:213. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00213

Sodium channel SCN8A (Nav1.6): properties and de novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathy and intellectual disability

Janelle E O'Brien 1, Miriam H Meisler 1,*
PMCID: PMC3809569  PMID: 24194747

Abstract

The sodium channel Nav1.6, encoded by the gene SCN8A, is one of the major voltage-gated channels in human brain. The sequences of sodium channels have been highly conserved during evolution, and minor changes in biophysical properties can have a major impact in vivo. Insight into the role of Nav1.6 has come from analysis of spontaneous and induced mutations of mouse Scn8a during the past 18 years. Only within the past year has the role of SCN8A in human disease become apparent from whole exome and genome sequences of patients with sporadic disease. Unique features of Nav1.6 include its contribution to persistent current, resurgent current, repetitive neuronal firing, and subcellular localization at the axon initial segment (AIS) and nodes of Ranvier. Loss of Nav1.6 activity results in reduced neuronal excitability, while gain-of-function mutations can increase neuronal excitability. Mouse Scn8a (med) mutants exhibit movement disorders including ataxia, tremor and dystonia. Thus far, more than ten human de novo mutations have been identified in patients with two types of disorders, epileptic encephalopathy and intellectual disability. We review these human mutations as well as the unique features of Nav1.6 that contribute to its role in determining neuronal excitability in vivo. A supplemental figure illustrating the positions of amino acid residues within the four domains and 24 transmembrane segments of Nav1.6 is provided to facilitate the location of novel mutations within the channel protein.

Keywords: voltage-gated sodium channels, epilepsy, intellectual disability, SCN8A, Nav1.6, neurogenetics, genetics, exomes

Introduction

SCN8A encodes one of the major voltage-gated sodium channels that regulate the initiation and propagation of action potentials in the nervous system. The sodium channel transmembrane proteins were first purified 30 years ago (Hartshorne and Catterall, 1981; Tamkun and Catterall, 1981) and cDNA clones were isolated shortly thereafter (Noda et al., 1986). The Scn8a gene, encoding the sodium channel Nav1.6, was identified in 1995 by positional cloning of the mouse neurological mutant motor endplate disease (med) (Burgess et al., 1995) and by isolation of a novel sodium channel cDNA from rat brain (Schaller et al., 1995). SCN8A is a member of the gene family comprised of nine evolutionarily related sodium channels with specific roles in neurons and in skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle (Lopreato et al., 2001; Meisler and Kearney, 2005; Meisler et al., 2010; Zakon et al., 2011; Zakon, 2012).

Human SCN8A was mapped to chromosome 12q13 in 1998 (Plummer et al., 1998). The role of SCN8A in human disease was initially investigated by screening for mutations in families segregating inherited disorders such as ataxia, dystonia, and tremor (Trudeau et al., 2006; Sharkey et al., 2009a). These analyses identified only one family with an inherited mutation of SCN8A (Trudeau et al., 2006). Recently, the ability to sequence the entire exome or genome from an individual patient has made it possible to identification of de novo mutations in patients who do not have a family history of disease (Bamshad et al., 2011; Doherty and Bamshad, 2012; Need et al., 2012; Rauch et al., 2012). Using this technology, more than ten mutations of SCN8A have been described during the past year, in patients with epileptic encephalopathy and intellectual disability. This rapid progress indicates that mutations of SCN8A are a previously unrecognized cause of these and possibly other neurological disorders. Here we describe the recently discovered patient mutations and review the unique features of Nav1.6 as a framework for understanding the pathological consequences of human mutations.

Mutations of SCN8A in patients with epileptic encephalopathy

The first de novo mutation in SCN8A was discovered in 2012 by whole genome sequencing of a child with an early onset, debilitating epileptic encephalopathy. The clinical picture included developmental delay, features of autism, intellectual disability and ataxia (Veeramah et al., 2012). Afebrile seizures began at 6 months of age, and by 5 years EEG recordings detected short bursts of frontocentrally predominant generalized spike-wave activity, and bifrontal and multifocal spikes. Neither the parents nor an unaffected sibling carried the de novo mutation, p.Asn1768Asp, that was detected in the patient. The biophysical properties of the mutant channel include increase in persistent sodium current, incomplete channel inactivation, and a depolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of steady-state fast-inactivation (Veeramah et al., 2012). Current tracings of cells transfected with mutant channels reveal as much as 20% of maximal current remaining after 100 ms, compared with only 1% in cells transfected with wild-type channel (Figure 1). The elevated persistent current increases the likelihood of premature firing of neurons after subthreshold depolarization. Transfection of mouse hippocampal neurons with the mutant cDNA resulted in increased spontaneous and induced firing characteristic of neuronal hyperexcitability, consistent with the dominant expression of seizures in the heterozygous patient. Increased persistent current is also a common feature of mutations in the channel SCN1A that cause the epileptic encephalopathy Dravet Syndrome (Meisler and Kearney, 2005). Increased activity of Nav1.6 has also been implicated in the seizure-prone Celf4−/− mouse mutant (Sun et al., 2013) and suggested in fibroblast-derived neurons from patients with Dravet syndrome (Liu et al., 2013).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Increased persistent current in SCN8A-p.Asn1768Asp mutant channel. Wildtype and mutant cDNAs were transiently transfected into the neuronal cell line ND7/23. At 100 ms after induction of an action potential, cells expressing the mutant cDNA had 20% persistent current compared with 1% in the wildtype. Cells were held at −120 mV, and a family of step depolarizations (−80 to +60 mV in 5 mV increments) were applied every 5 s. Insets show persistent inward currents (normalized by maximal transient peak currents) from WT and p.Asn1768Asp channels at the end of a 100 ms step depolarization to −80 mV (black, control) and +20 mV (red). [reprinted from Veeramah et al. (2012), with permission].

A second missense mutation, SCN8A-p.Leu1331Val, was identified by targeted resequencing of 65 candidate genes in 500 individuals with epileptic encephalopathy (Carvill et al., 2013). The proband presented with epileptic encephalopathy at 18 months of age, and the mutation was inherited from a mosaic father. Two additional mutations were identified in this study, p.Arg662Cys and p.Arg1872Gln, but family data regarding inheritance was not available (Carvill et al., 2013). The mutation, SCN8A-p.Arg223Gly, was recently identified in child that presented with epileptic encephalopathy at 6 months of age (Kovel et al., submitted). In a screen for de novo mutations in 264 patients with infantile spasms or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, the SCN8A mutation p.Leu876Gln was found in a child with Lennox-Gastaut (Epi4K Consortium and Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project, 2013). The locations of the epilepsy-associated mutations are indicated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Mutations of human SCN8A. The positions of twelve recently identified mutations of SCN8A are indicated on the backbone of the channel structure. The four homologous domains are labeled with the pore domains in green, the voltage-sensing transmembrane segments (S4) in blue, and the inactivation gate in red. Filled circles, mutations identified in patients with epilepsy. Open circles, mutations identified in patients with cognitive deficits. Unpublished mutations are shown in their approximate positions.

Mutations of SCN8A in intellectual disability

In 2006, we described the heterozygous loss-of-function mutation P1719RfsX1724 that segregated with cognitive deficits in a small family (Trudeau et al., 2006). Heterozygous children in this family were enrolled in special education classes, and heterozygous adults were unable to live independently. In 2012, Rauch and colleagues sequenced the exomes of 51 individuals with severe non-syndromic intellectual disability (Rauch et al., 2012). These patients were offspring of healthy, non-consanguineous parents and presented with intellectual disability, grossly normal motor function, and lack of syndrome-specific abnormality. The de novo missense variant p.Arg1617Gln in the voltage-sensing transmembrane segment of domain 4 of SCN8A was identified in one patient (Figure 2). Four additional de novo missense mutations in SCN8A have been discovered by exome sequencing of patients with intellectual disability (Figure 2). The limited functional data suggest that mutations causing increased channel activity are associated with seizures, while heterozygous loss-of-function of SCN8A predisposes to intellectual disability (Figure 2).

Mutations of Scn8a in the mouse

Over the past 18 years, fifteen mutant alleles of mouse Scn8a have been characterized. These include six spontaneous mutants, eight ENU-induced mutations, and one random transgene insertion (Figure 3) (Meisler et al., 2004). Several of these are null mutations with complete loss of Scn8a function. Homozygous null mice exhibit motor defects at 2 weeks of age, including ataxia and tremor, and do not survive beyond 3 weeks (Burgess et al., 1995; Kohrman et al., 1995). Homozygosity for severe hypomorphic alleles such as medJ and nmf58 is viable, but results in ataxia and tremor with progression to muscle weakness and dystonia. Homozygosity for five mildly hypomorphic alleles (medjo, jolting2J, tremorD, clth, 9J) results in tremor, ataxia and reduced body size. These observations suggest that mutations of human SCN8A may be found in the future in patients with movement disorders. Nav1.6 is expressed at a low level in cardiac myocytes, and null mice have prolonged cardiac action potentials, suggesting a possible role in cardiac arrythmias (Noujaim et al., 2012). Homozygous knockout of Scn8a in Purkinje cells results in impaired learning in Morris Water Maze and eyeblink conditioning tests (Woodruff-Pak et al., 2006).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Mutations of mouse Scn8a. Fourteen allelic mutations are shown on the channel backbone as described in Figure 2. Amino acids are numbered according to Genbank AF049617. Filled circles, null alleles; open circles, hypomorphic alleles.

Mice that are heterozygous for loss-of-function mutations exhibit minor abnormalities such as spike-wave discharges suggestive of absence epilepsy (Papale et al., 2009), disrupted sleep architecture (Papale et al., 2010), and behavioral deficits including anxiety (McKinney et al., 2008). Haploinsufficiency of Nav1.6 also reduces susceptibility to genetic- and chemically-induced seizures (Martin et al., 2007, 2010). Scn8amed/+ and Scn8amed−jo/+ heterozygotes have reduced susceptibility to flurothyl and kainic acid induced seizures, and the combination of one mutant allele of Scn8a with Nav1.1 heterozygous or homozygous null mice results in extended lifespan and reduced seizure susceptibility. These observations suggest that reduced expression of Scn8a protects against seizures by decreasing neuronal excitability.

Loss of Nav1.6 reduces neuronal excitability in mutant mice

Direct evidence for the in vivo role of Nav1.6 has been advanced by recordings from neurons from several different lines of Scn8a null and conditional null mice developed in our laboratory (Burgess et al., 1995; Levin and Meisler, 2004; Levin et al., 2006) (Table 1). Reduced repetitive firing is consistently observed in cerebellar Purkinje cells, granule neurons, trigeminal mesencephalic neurons, and retinal ganglion cells from Scn8a mutant mice (Raman and Bean, 1997; Raman et al., 1997; Van Wart and Matthews, 2006; Aman and Raman, 2007). Reduced persistent and resurgent current was observed in several types of neurons by multiple investigators (Table 1). In addition to induced firing, spontaneous firing is reduced in Purkinje neurons isolated from null mice (Khaliq et al., 2003). Overall, the work summarized in Table 1 demonstrates that Scn8a is a key determinant of neuronal excitability in vivo.

Table 1.

Reduced activity of neurons from Scn8a null mice.

Neuron Mutant mouse Neuronal activity References
1 Cerebellar Purkinje cells med-tg, med Reduced repetitive firing, reduced resurgent current (−70%), reduced transient current (−50%) Raman et al., 1997; Aman and Raman, 2007
2 Cerebellar granule cells Conditional knockout Reduced persistent current, reduced firing rate Osorio et al., 2010
3 Trigeminal-mesencephalic med Reduced repetitive firing reduced resurgent current (−40%), reduced persistent current (−75%), Enomoto et al., 2007
4 Retinal ganglion med-tg Reduced repetitive firing Van Wart and Matthews, 2006
5 Cerebellar nucleus med No significant changes Aman and Raman, 2007
6 DRG large and small diameter med-tg Reduced resurgent current (−100%) Cummins et al., 2005
7 Subthallamic med Reduced resurgent current, altered firing Do and Bean, 2004
8 Prefrontal cortical pyramidal med-tg Reduced resurgent current Maurice et al., 2001
9 Hippocampal CA1 med (Stock No. 003798) Reduced persistent, reduced resurgent, significant elevation of spike threshold, altered spike initiation, reduced spike gain Royeck et al., 2008
10 Motor neurons med-J Reduced conduction velocity Kearney et al., 2002
11 Globus pallidus neurons med-tg Impaired pacemaking, impaired capacity for fast spiking Mercer et al., 2007
Open in a new tab

Unique biophysical properties of Nav1.6

The role of Scn8a in regulating neuronal excitability may be related to three properties of Nav1.6: its role in persistent and resurgent current, its voltage dependence of activation, and its subcellular localization at the axon initial segment (AIS), the site of initiation of action potentials. Persistent current is a steady-state sodium current that persists after firing and is involved in action potential initiation at membrane voltages near the threshold of firing (Crill, 1996; Smith et al., 1998; Rush et al., 2005; Osorio et al., 2010). Persistent current is important for generation of repetitive firing in neurons such as cerebellar Purkinje cells. In cerebellar Purkinje cells isolated from Scn8a null mice, persistent current was reduced by 70% compared with wild-type littermates (Raman et al., 1997). In tsA-201 kidney cells, the persistent current generated by Nav1.6 is five-fold higher than that generated by Nav1.2 (Chen et al., 2008). The differences in magnitude of persistent current in different types of neurons suggests that this property is modulated by neuron-specific factors (Rush et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2008). Mutations that further increase Nav1.6 persistent current result in epileptogenesis (e.g., Figure 1) (Veeramah et al., 2012).

Resurgent current is a voltage- and time-dependent property in which depolarization after the initial action potential elicits a small, transient current (Hille, 2001). This rapidly reversible form of inactivation allows neurons to fire quickly and repetitively. Resurgent current is thought to contribute to spontaneous firing and multi-peaked action potentials in cerebellar Purkinje cells that are compromised in mutants lacking Nav1.6 (Raman and Bean, 1997; Raman et al., 1997). The β4 sodium channel subunit is involved in generating resurgent current in cerebellar Purkinje neurons and cerebellar granule cell neurons, but the blocking factor appears to vary by neuron type (Raman and Bean, 2001; Grieco et al., 2005; Bant and Raman, 2010).

In transfected DRG neurons, there is a 15 mV leftward shift in voltage dependence of fast activation of Nav1.6 compared to Nav1.2, meaning that Nav1.6 is more activated earlier during depolarization (Rush et al., 2005). Nav1.6 is also less likely to inactivate at higher stimulation frequencies (20–100 Hz) (Rush et al., 2005). In transfected HEK-tsA-201 cells, Nav1.6 displayed a more positive voltage dependence of slow inactivation, passing ~10% more current in the −35 to −25 mV range than Nav1.2 (Chen et al., 2008). These features of Nav1.6 contribute to the positive effect of Nav1.6 on neuronal excitability.

Nav1.6 in the axon initial segment

The AIS is the membrane domain at the proximal end of the axon in which sodium channels are highly concentrated, electrical signals from the soma and dendrites are summed, and the threshold for action potential initiation is lowest (Royeck et al., 2008). The channel composition of the AIS appears to determine the firing threshold for different types of neurons (Lorincz and Nusser, 2008). Nav1.6 is highly concentrated in the distal half of the AIS in many neurons, including cerebellar granule cells and cerebellar Purkinje cells (Van Wart and Matthews, 2006; Lorincz and Nusser, 2008; Royeck et al., 2008). In the absence of Nav1.6, there is relocation of Nav1.1 and Nav1.2 to occupy the distal AIS (Van Wart and Matthews, 2006; Xiao et al., 2013). Cultured hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells from Scn8a-null mice exhibit a 5 mV depolarizing (rightward) shift in the voltage dependence of activation, 60% reduction in persistent current, and 75% reduction in resurgent current (Royeck et al., 2008). This combination renders Scn8a null neurons less excitable than their wild type counterparts, as demonstrated by an 8 mV depolarizing shift in the spike threshold (Royeck et al., 2008).

In cortical pyramidal neurons, action potentials initiate at the distal part of the AIS, where sodium channel concentrations are highest (Van Wart et al., 2007; Kole and Stuart, 2008; Kole et al., 2008). The distal AIS in these cells contains predominantly Nav1.6, while the proximal AIS contains predominantly Nav1.2 (Hu et al., 2009). Step-depolarizations of patched neurons revealed that the activation threshold in the distal AIS was −55 mV, while the activation threshold in the proximal AIS closest to the soma was −43 mV (Hu et al., 2009), consistent with a role for Nav1.6 in lowering the threshold of action potential initiation.

Action potentials are primarily directed down the axon, away from the soma, but backpropagation into the soma occurs at low frequency (Hu et al., 2009). Current injection into the distal AIS does not produce backpropagation, while current injection at the proximal AIS leads to detectable action potentials in the soma (Hu et al., 2009). Thus, localization of Nav1.6 to the distal AIS is associated with a lower threshold for action potential initiation and direction of the action potential away from the soma. Overall, membranes containing Nav1.6 are more excitable than those containing only Nav1.1 and Nav1.2, and loss of Nav1.6 results in a higher threshold for initiation of action potentials (Van Wart and Matthews, 2006).

Molecular features of SCN8A

The SCN8A gene is located on human chromosome 12q13.13 (Plummer et al., 1998) and mouse distal chromosome 15 (Burgess et al., 1995). The 27 exons of SCN8A span 170 kb and encode a protein of 1980 residues (GenBank AF050736). The location of the amino acid residues within the 4 homologous domains and 24 transmembrane segments of Nav1.6 is shown in Figure S1. Nav1.6 protein is concentrated ~1,000-fold in two membrane domains, the AIS and the nodes of Ranvier of myelinated axons (Schaller and Caldwell, 2000; Boiko et al., 2001, 2003; Van Wart and Matthews, 2006; Van Wart et al., 2007; Lorincz and Nusser, 2008, 2010). Nav1.6 is also present at lower abundance in non-myelinated axons, neuronal soma, and dendrites (Krzemien et al., 2000; Lorincz and Nusser, 2010). The full-length SCN8A transcript is highly expressed throughout the brain, with concentration in the cerebellum and olfactory bulb of the rat (Schaller and Caldwell, 2000).

Transcriptional regulation of sodium channel genes is not well characterized. The transcription start sites for Scn8a are located in noncoding exons 70 kb upstream of the translation initiation site (Drews et al., 2005). Exon 1c is highly conserved through evolution and includes potential binding sites for neuronal transcription factors Pou6f1/Brn5, YY1, and REST/NRSF (Drews et al., 2007). Exon 1c and upstream sequences are sufficient to drive neuron-specific expression of LacZ in transgenic mice (Drews et al., 2007).

SCN8A contains two pairs of mutually exclusive, alternative coding exons whose splicing regulates channel function. Exons 5N/5A and 18N/18A encode the S3–S4 transmembrane segments of domain I and domain III, respectively (Plummer et al., 1997). Exon 18N contains an in-frame stop codon and is only expressed in non-neuronal cells (Plummer et al., 1997) including glia (O'Brien et al., 2012a). The neuronal splice factors RBFOX1 and RBFOX2 can activate inclusion of exon 18A in neurons, resulting in neuron-specific expression of the full length, active channel (Gehman et al., 2012; O'Brien et al., 2012a; Zubovic et al., 2012). Splice enhancers and silencers in exons 18A and 18N also contribute to temporal and spatial regulation (Zubovic et al., 2012). Alternative polyadenylation sites are located 4 and 6.5 kb downstream from the translation termination site of Scn8a, generating full-length coding transcripts of 9 and 12 kb (Drews et al., 2005). Transcripts with the shorter and longer 3′ UTR are equally represented in brain RNA and are not known to be associated with specific functions.

Pharmacology of Nav1.6

The pharmacology of compounds that target voltage-gated sodium channels has recently been reviewed (Eijkelkamp et al., 2012). The epileptic encephalopathies described in this review could in principle be treated with specific inhibitors of Nav1.6. However, the extensive sequence conservation among the neuronal and muscle sodium channels has made it difficult to develop drugs with specificity for a single channel. Two compounds with preferential effects on Nav1.6 have been described. The tetrodotoxin derivative 4,9-anhydrotetrodotoxin inactivates Nav1.6 expressed in Xenopus oocytes at concentrations that have minimal effects on six of the other channels (Rosker et al., 2007). The beta-scorpion toxin Cn2 also binds Nav1.6 specifically (Schiavon et al., 2006); this compound enhanced resurgent current inducing a hyperpolarizing shift in voltage dependence of channel activation in Purkinje slices, indicative of channel activation, while in HEK cells the effect was inhibitory. We have generated a mouse model of epileptic encephalopathy carrying the SCN8A-p.Asn1768Asp mutation that may be useful for future evaluation of drug specificity and effectiveness in vivo.

Protein interactions of Nav1.6

Voltage-gated sodium channels are components of large, multi-protein complexes that vary between neurons and at specific subcellular domains. The known sites of protein interaction with Nav1.6 are indicated in Figure 4. The N-terminus of Nav1.6 interacts with the light chain of microtubule-associated protein Map1b (Mtap1b), and co-transfection increases current density in transfected cells via increased trafficking of Nav1.6 to the cell surface (O'Brien et al., 2012b). Phosphorylation of Nav1.6 by the stress-activated MAP kinase p38 facilitates binding of E3 ubiquitin ligases and channel degradation (Sudol and Hunter, 2000; Zarrinpar and Lim, 2000; Gasser et al., 2010). Protein kinases PKA and PKC have only a small effect on channel activity (Chen et al., 2008). Ankyrin G binds to the first intracellular loop of Nav1.6 and other neuronal sodium channels (Srinivasan et al., 1988; Davis et al., 1996; Hill et al., 2008), and is essential for targeting and localization of Nav1.6 to nodes of Ranvier (Gasser et al., 2012).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Locations of protein interactions with Nav1.6. Filled circles represent binding sites that have been localized to specific residues of Nav1.6: Map1b (77–80), p38 (553), ankyrin (1089–1122), calmodulin (1902–1912), and Nedd4 (551–554 and 1943–1945). Open symbols, binding sites that have not been mapped to specific residues.

The intracellular fibroblast growth factors FGF11-FGF14 interact with Nav1.6 and other voltage-gated sodium channels (Wittmack et al., 2004; Laezza et al., 2009; Shakkottai et al., 2009; Xiao et al., 2013). FGF13 interacts with the C-terminus in an isoform-dependent manner (Wittmack et al., 2004), which may allow specific sub-populations of neurons to fine-tune firing properties via alternative splicing of FGF13. Fgf14 null mice develop ataxia and ~80% of their cerebellar Purkinje cells lack repetitive firing (Shakkottai et al., 2009). The abundance of Nav1.6 in the AIS is reduced in cerebellar Purkinje cells from Fgf14 null mice, suggesting that FGF14 plays a key role in the organization of a subunits in the AIS (Xiao et al., 2013).

The sodium channel subunits β1 to β4 are small single-transmembrane cell-adhesion molecule proteins that modulate current and surface expression of the α subunit (Patino and Isom, 2010). Studies of mice null for the β1 subunit (Scn1b−/−) suggest that interaction between β1 and Nav1.6 is required for function of Nav1.6 at the distal AIS (Brackenbury et al., 2010). The β4 subunit has been implicated in the generation of resurgent Nav1.6 current in Purkinje neurons (Grieco et al., 2005; Aman et al., 2009), but resurgent current was not generated by co-transfection of β4 and Nav1.6 in HEK cells (Chen et al., 2008; Aman et al., 2009).

The calcium responsive protein calmodulin binds the IQ motif located in the C-terminus of Nav1.6 (residues 1902–1912). Apo-calmodulin accelerates inactivation and Ca2+ increases excitability of Nav1.6 (Herzog et al., 2003). The E3 ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 also binds to the C-terminus of Scn8a at a PXY motif (residues 1943–1945), and the PXpS/pTP motif in the first cytoplasmic loop (residues 551–554) (Abriel et al., 2000; Sudol and Hunter, 2000; Fotia et al., 2004; Ingham et al., 2004; van Bemmelen et al., 2004; Rougier et al., 2005). Both sites are necessary for Nedd4 binding and internalization of Nav1.6 (Gasser et al., 2010). Ubiquitination of Nav1.6 by Nedd4 is thought to target Nav1.6 for degradation and may be part of the neuronal stress response.

These interactions are relevant to the genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders, since proteins that bind Nav1.6 may be considered candidate genes for the same disorders caused by mutations of Nav1.6. Further, common variants of the interacting proteins may act as modifiers of the severity of SCN8A mutations in patients (Meisler et al., 2010; Meisler and O'Brien, 2012).

Conclusion

Nav1.6 is a major sodium channel in human brain. The features of Nav1.6 that influence neuronal excitability include contributions to persistent and resurgent neuronal currents, low threshold for excitation, and concentration in the AIS. Mutations of Scn8a in the mouse result in movement disorders including ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. Within the past year, de novo mutations of human SCN8A detected by exome sequencing have revealed a role for Nav1.6 in epilepsy and intellectual disability. Hypoactivity and hyperactivity of Nav1.6 are both pathogenic, but with different outcomes: haploinsufficiency is associated with impaired cognition (Trudeau et al., 2006; McKinney et al., 2008; Rauch et al., 2012) while hyperactivity can result in epilepsy (Veeramah et al., 2012). Analysis of additional mutants in the near future should provide insight into structure-function relationships of Nav1.6 and the mechanisms of pathogenesis in neurological disease.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Our work on human and mouse SCN8A is supported by NIH grant R01 NS34509 to Miriam H. Meisler. Janelle E. O'Brien acknowledges support from NIH T32 GM007544 and the Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fgene.2013.00213/abstract

Figure S1

Amino acid sequence of human and mouse SCN8A. The predicted human amino acid sequence corresponds to the predominant transcript in adult brain containing exon 5A and exon 18A and using the upstream splice donor site of exon 10B. The approximate locations of transmembrane segments S1–S6 of domains I–IV of the protein are underlined. Human coding sequence, GenBank AF050736; mouse coding sequence, GenBank AF049617. ∇, exon borders; *, protein kinase A consensus sequence; arrow, tyrosine kinase consensus; dots, amino acid identity. Adapted from Plummer et al. (1998).

Click here for additional data file. (3.3MB, PDF)

References

  1. Abriel H., Kamynina E., Horisberger J. D., Staub O. (2000). Regulation of the cardiac voltage-gated Na+ channel (H1) by the ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4. FEBS Lett. 466, 377–380 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01098-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aman T. K., Raman I. M. (2007). Subunit dependence of Na channel slow inactivation and open channel block in cerebellar neurons. Biophys. J. 92, 1938–1951 10.1529/biophysj.106.093500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aman T. K., Grieco-Calub T. M., Chen C., Rusconi R., Slat E. A., Isom L. L., et al. (2009). Regulation of persistent Na current by interactions between beta subunits of voltage-gated Na channels. J. Neurosci. 29, 2027–2042 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4531-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamshad M. J., Ng S. B., Bigham A. W., Tabor H. K., Emond M. J., Nickerson D. A., et al. (2011). Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 745–755 10.1038/nrg3031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bant J. S., Raman I. M. (2010). Control of transient, resurgent, and persistent current by open-channel block by Na channel beta4 in cultured cerebellar granule neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 12357–12362 10.1073/pnas.1005633107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boiko T., Rasband M. N., Levinson S. R., Caldwell J. H., Mandel G., Trimmer J. S., et al. (2001). Compact myelin dictates the differential targeting of two sodium channel isoforms in the same axon. Neuron 30, 91–104 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00265-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boiko T., Van Wart A., Caldwell J. H., Levinson S. R., Trimmer J. S., Matthews G. (2003). Functional specialization of the axon initial segment by isoform-specific sodium channel targeting. J Neurosci 23, 2306–2313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brackenbury W. J., Calhoun J. D., Chen C., Miyazaki H., Nukina N., Oyama F., et al. (2010). Functional reciprocity between Na+ channel Nav1.6 and beta1 subunits in the coordinated regulation of excitability and neurite outgrowth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2283–2288 10.1073/pnas.0909434107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buchner D. A., Seburn K. L., Frankel W. N., Meisler M. H. (2004). Three ENU-induced neurological mutations in the pore loop of sodium channel Scn8a (Na(v)1.6) and a genetically linked retinal mutation, rd13. Mamm. Genome 15, 344–351 10.1007/s00335-004-2332-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchner D. A., Trudeau M., Meisler M. H. (2003). SCNM1, a putative RNA splicing factor that modifies disease severity in mice. Science 301, 967–969 10.1126/science.1086187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burgess D. L., Kohrman D. C., Galt J., Plummer N. W., Jones J. M., Spear B., et al. (1995). Mutation of a new sodium channel gene, Scn8a, in the mouse mutant ‘motor endplate disease’. Nat. Genet 10, 461–465 10.1038/ng0895-461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvill G. L., Heavin S. B., Yendle S. C., McMahon J. M., O'Roak B. J., Cook J., et al. (2013). Targeted resequencing in epileptic encephalopathies identifies de novo mutations in CHD2 and SYNGAP1. Nat. Genet. 45, 825–830 10.1038/ng.2646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen Y., Yu F. H., Sharp E. M., Beacham D., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2008). Functional properties and differential neuromodulation of Na(v)1.6 channels. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 38, 607–615 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crill W. E. (1996). Persistent sodium current in mammalian central neurons. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 58, 349–362 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.002025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cummins T. R., Dib-Hajj S. D., Herzog R. I., Waxman S. G. (2005). Nav1.6 channels generate resurgent sodium currents in spinal sensory neurons. FEBS Lett. 579, 2166–2170 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis J. Q., Lambert S., Bennett V. (1996). Molecular composition of the node of Ranvier: identification of ankyrin-binding cell adhesion molecules neurofascin (mucin+/third FNIII domain-) and NrCAM at nodal axon segments. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1355–1367 10.1083/jcb.135.5.1355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. De Repentigny Y., Cote P. D., Pool M., Bernier G., Girard S., Vidal S. M., et al. (2001). Pathological and genetic analysis of the degenerating muscle (dmu) mouse: a new allele of Scn8a. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1819–1827 10.1093/hmg/10.17.1819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Do M. T., Bean B. P. (2004). Sodium currents in subthalamic nucleus neurons from Nav1.6-null mice. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 726–733 10.1152/jn.00186.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Doherty D., Bamshad M. J. (2012). Exome sequencing to find rare variants causing neurologic diseases. Neurology 79, 396–397 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182617170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Drews V. L., Lieberman A. P., Meisler M. H. (2005). Multiple transcripts of sodium channel SCN8A (Na(V)1.6) with alternative 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions and initial characterization of the SCN8A promoter. Genomics 85, 245–257 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Drews V. L., Shi K., de Haan G., Meisler M. H. (2007). Identification of evolutionarily conserved, functional noncoding elements in the promoter region of the sodium channel gene SCN8A. Mamm. Genome 18, 723–731 10.1007/s00335-007-9059-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Eijkelkamp N., Linley J. E., Baker M. D., Minett M. S., Cregg R., Werdehausen R., et al. (2012). Neurological perspectives on voltage-gated sodium channels. Brain 135(Pt 9), 2585–2612 10.1093/brain/aws225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Enomoto A., Han J. M., Hsiao C. F., Chandler S. H. (2007). Sodium currents in mesencephalic trigeminal neurons from Nav1.6 null mice. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 710–719 10.1152/jn.00292.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Epi4K Consortium and Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project. Allen A. S., Berkovic S. F., Cossette P., Delanty N., Dlugos D., Eichler E. E., et al. (2013). De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies. Nature 501, 217–221 10.1038/nature12439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fotia A. B., Ekberg J., Adams D. J., Cook D. I., Poronnik P., Kumar S. (2004). Regulation of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels by the ubiquitin-protein ligases Nedd4 and Nedd4-2. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 28930–28935 10.1074/jbc.M402820200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gasser A., Cheng X., Gilmore E. S., Tyrrell L., Waxman S. G., Dib-Hajj S. D. (2010). Two Nedd4-binding motifs underlie modulation of sodium channel Nav1.6 by p38 MAPK. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 26149–26161 10.1074/jbc.M109.098681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gasser A., Ho T. S., Cheng X., Chang K. J., Waxman S. G., Rasband M. N., et al. (2012). An ankyrinG-binding motif is necessary and sufficient for targeting Nav1.6 sodium channels to axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier. J. Neurosci. 32, 7232–7243 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5434-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gehman L. T., Meera P., Stoilov P., Shiue L., O'Brien J. E., Meisler M. H., et al. (2012). The splicing regulator Rbfox2 is required for both cerebellar development and mature motor function. Genes Dev. 26, 445–460 10.1101/gad.182477.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Grieco T. M., Malhotra J. D., Chen C., Isom L. L., Raman I. M. (2005). Open-channel block by the cytoplasmic tail of sodium channel beta4 as a mechanism for resurgent sodium current. Neuron 45, 233–244 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hartshorne R. P., Catterall W. A. (1981). Purification of the saxitoxin receptor of the sodium channel from rat brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 4620–4624 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Herzog R. I., Liu C., Waxman S. G., Cummins T. R. (2003). Calmodulin binds to the C terminus of sodium channels Nav1.4 and Nav1.6 and differentially modulates their functional properties. J. Neurosci. 23, 8261–8270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hill A. S., Nishino A., Nakajo K., Zhang G., Fineman J. R., Selzer M. E., et al. (2008). Ion channel clustering at the axon initial segment and node of Ranvier evolved sequentially in early chordates. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000317 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hille B. (2001). Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes. Vol xviii 3rd Edn Sunderland, MA: Sinauer [Google Scholar]
  34. Hu W., Tian C., Li T., Yang M., Hou H., Shu Y. (2009). Distinct contributions of Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 996–1002 10.1038/nn.2359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ingham R. J., Gish G., Pawson T. (2004). The Nedd4 family of E3 ubiquitin ligases: functional diversity within a common modular architecture. Oncogene 23, 1972–1984 10.1038/sj.onc.1207436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kearney J. A., Buchner D. A., De Haan G., Adamska M., Levin S. I., Furay A. R., et al. (2002). Molecular and pathological effects of a modifier gene on deficiency of the sodium channel Scn8a (Na(v)1.6). Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2765–2775 10.1093/hmg/11.22.2765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Khaliq Z. M., Gouwens N. W., Raman I. M. (2003). The contribution of resurgent sodium current to high-frequency firing in Purkinje neurons: an experimental and modeling study. J. Neurosci. 23, 4899–4912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kohrman D. C., Harris J. B., Meisler M. H. (1996). Mutation detection in the med and medJ alleles of the sodium channel Scn8a. Unusual splicing due to a minor class AT-AC intron. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17576–17581 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kohrman D. C., Plummer N. W., Schuster T., Jones J. M., Jang W., Burgess D. L., et al. (1995). Insertional mutation of the motor endplate disease (med) locus on mouse chromosome 15. Genomics 26, 171–177 10.1016/0888-7543(95)80198-U [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kole M. H., Ilschner S. U., Kampa B. M., Williams S. R., Ruben P. C., Stuart G. J. (2008). Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 178–186 10.1038/nn2040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kole M. H., Stuart G. J. (2008). Is action potential threshold lowest in the axon? Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1253–1255 10.1038/nn.2203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Krzemien D. M., Schaller K. L., Levinson S. R., Caldwell J. H. (2000). Immunolocalization of sodium channel isoform NaCh6 in the nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 420, 70–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Laezza F., Lampert A., Kozel M. A., Gerber B. R., Rush A. M., Nerbonne J. M., et al. (2009). FGF14 N-terminal splice variants differentially modulate Nav1.2 and Nav1.6-encoded sodium channels. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 42, 90–101 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Levin S. I., Khaliq Z. M., Aman T. K., Grieco T. M., Kearney J. A., Raman I. M., et al. (2006). Impaired motor function in mice with cell-specific knockout of sodium channel Scn8a (NaV1.6) in cerebellar purkinje neurons and granule cells. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 785–793 10.1152/jn.01193.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Levin S. I., Meisler M. H. (2004). Floxed allele for conditional inactivation of the voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a (NaV1.6). Genesis 39, 234–239 10.1002/gene.20050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu Y., Lopez-Santiago L. F., Yuan Y., Jones J. M., Zhang H., O'Malley H. A., et al. (2013). Dravet Syndrome patient-derived neurons suggest a novel epilepsy mechanism. Ann. Neurol. 74, 128–139 10.1002/ana.23897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lopreato G. F., Lu Y., Southwell A., Atkinson N. S., Hillis D. M., Wilcox T. P., et al. (2001). Evolution and divergence of sodium channel genes in vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 7588–7592 10.1073/pnas.131171798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lorincz A., Nusser Z. (2008). Cell-type-dependent molecular composition of the axon initial segment. J. Neurosci. 28, 14329–14340 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4833-08.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lorincz A., Nusser Z. (2010). Molecular identity of dendritic voltage-gated sodium channels. Science 328, 906–909 10.1126/science.1187958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mackenzie F. E., Parker A., Parkinson N. J., Oliver P. L., Brooker D., Underhill P., et al. (2009). Analysis of the mouse mutant Cloth-ears shows a role for the voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a in peripheral neural hearing loss. Genes Brain Behav. 8, 699–713 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00514.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Martin M. S., Dutt K., Papale L. A., Dube C. M., Dutton S. B., de Haan G., et al. (2010). Altered function of the SCN1A voltage-gated sodium channel leads to gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic (GABAergic) interneuron abnormalities. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9823–9834 10.1074/jbc.M109.078568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Martin M. S., Tang B., Papale L. A., Yu F. H., Catterall W. A., Escayg A. (2007). The voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a is a genetic modifier of severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 2892–2899 10.1093/hmg/ddm248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Maurice N., Tkatch T., Meisler M., Sprunger L. K., Surmeier D. J. (2001). D1/D5 dopamine receptor activation differentially modulates rapidly inactivating and persistent sodium currents in prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci. 21, 2268–2277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. McKinney B. C., Chow C. Y., Meisler M. H., Murphy G. G. (2008). Exaggerated emotional behavior in mice heterozygous null for the sodium channel Scn8a (Nav1.6). Genes Brain Behav. 7, 629–638 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00399.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Meisler M. H., Kearney J. A. (2005). Sodium channel mutations in epilepsy and other neurological disorders. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 2010–2017 10.1172/JCI25466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Meisler M. H., O'Brien J. E. (2012). Gene interactions and modifiers in epilepsy, in Jasper's Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies [Internet], 4th Edn, eds Noebels J. L., Avoli M., Rogawski M. A., Olsen R. W., Delgado-Escueta A. V. (Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (US)). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Meisler M. H., O'Brien J. E., Sharkey L. M. (2010). Sodium channel gene family: epilepsy mutations, gene interactions and modifier effects. J. Physiol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 588(Pt 11), 1841–1848 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.188482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Meisler M. H., Plummer N. W., Burgess D. L., Buchner D. A., Sprunger L. K. (2004). Allelic mutations of the sodium channel SCN8A reveal multiple cellular and physiological functions. Genetica 122, 37–45 10.1007/s10709-004-1441-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mercer J. N., Chan C. S., Tkatch T., Held J., Surmeier D. J. (2007). Nav1.6 sodium channels are critical to pacemaking and fast spiking in globus pallidus neurons. J. Neurosci. 27, 13552–13566 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3430-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Need A. C., Shashi V., Hitomi Y., Schoch K., Shianna K. V., McDonald M. T., et al. (2012). Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. J. Med. Genet. 49, 353–361 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Noda M., Ikeda T., Kayano T., Suzuki H., Takeshima H., Kurasaki M., et al. (1986). Existence of distinct sodium channel messenger RNAs in rat brain. Nature 320, 188–192 10.1038/320188a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Noujaim S. F., Kaur K., Milstein M., Jones J. M., Furspan P., Jiang D., et al. (2012). A null mutation of the neuronal sodium channel NaV1.6 disrupts action potential propagation and excitation-contraction coupling in the mouse heart. FASEB J. 26, 63–72 10.1096/fj.10-179770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. O'Brien J. E., Drews V. L., Jones J. M., Dugas J. C., Barres B. A., Meisler M. H. (2012a). Rbfox proteins regulate alternative splicing of neuronal sodium channel SCN8A. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 49, 120–126 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. O'Brien J. E., Sharkey L. M., Vallianatos C. N., Han C., Blossom J. C., Yu T., et al. (2012b). Interaction of voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.6 (SCN8A) with microtubule-associated protein Map1b. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18459–18466 10.1074/jbc.M111.336024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Osorio N., Cathala L., Meisler M. H., Crest M., Magistretti J., Delmas P. (2010). Persistent Nav1.6 current at axon initial segments tunes spike timing of cerebellar granule cells. J. Physiol. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 588(Pt 4), 651–670 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.183798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Papale L. A., Beyer B., Jones J. M., Sharkey L. M., Tufik S., Epstein M., et al. (2009). Heterozygous mutations of the voltage-gated sodium channel SCN8A are associated with spike-wave discharges and absence epilepsy in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 1633–1641 10.1093/hmg/ddp081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Papale L. A., Paul K. N., Sawyer N. T., Manns J. R., Tufik S., Escayg A. (2010). Dysfunction of the Scn8a voltage-gated sodium channel alters sleep architecture, reduces diurnal corticosterone levels, and enhances spatial memory. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 16553–16561 10.1074/jbc.M109.090084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Patino G. A., Isom L. L. (2010). Electrophysiology and beyond: multiple roles of Na+ channel beta subunits in development and disease. Neurosci. Lett. 486, 53–59 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Plummer N. W., Galt J., Jones J. M., Burgess D. L., Sprunger L. K., Kohrman D. C., et al. (1998). Exon organization, coding sequence, physical mapping, and polymorphic intragenic markers for the human neuronal sodium channel gene SCN8A. Genomics 54, 287–296 10.1006/geno.1998.5550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Plummer N. W., McBurney M. W., Meisler M. H. (1997). Alternative splicing of the sodium channel SCN8A predicts a truncated two-domain protein in fetal brain and non-neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24008–24015 10.1074/jbc.272.38.24008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Raman I. M., Bean B. P. (1997). Resurgent sodium current and action potential formation in dissociated cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J. Neurosci. 17, 4517–4526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Raman I. M., Bean B. P. (2001). Inactivation and recovery of sodium currents in cerebellar Purkinje neurons: evidence for two mechanisms. Biophys. J. 80, 729–737 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76052-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Raman I. M., Sprunger L. K., Meisler M. H., Bean B. P. (1997). Altered subthreshold sodium currents and disrupted firing patterns in Purkinje neurons of Scn8a mutant mice. Neuron 19, 881–891 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80969-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rauch A., Wieczorek D., Graf E., Wieland T., Endele S., Schwarzmayr T., et al. (2012). Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: an exome sequencing study. Lancet 380, 1674–1682 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61480-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rosker C., Lohberger B., Hofer D., Steinecker B., Quasthoff S., Schreibmayer W. (2007). The TTX metabolite 4,9-anhydro-TTX is a highly specific blocker of the Na(v1.6) voltage-dependent sodium channel. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 293, C783–C789 10.1152/ajpcell.00070.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rougier J. S., van Bemmelen M. X., Bruce M. C., Jespersen T., Gavillet B., Apotheloz F., et al. (2005). Molecular determinants of voltage-gated sodium channel regulation by the Nedd4/Nedd4-like proteins. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 288, C692–C701 10.1152/ajpcell.00460.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Royeck M., Horstmann M. T., Remy S., Reitze M., Yaari Y., Beck H. (2008). Role of axonal NaV1.6 sodium channels in action potential initiation of CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 2361–2380 10.1152/jn.90332.2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rush A. M., Dib-Hajj S. D., Waxman S. G. (2005). Electrophysiological properties of two axonal sodium channels, Nav1.2 and Nav1.6, expressed in mouse spinal sensory neurones. J. Physiol. 564(Pt 3), 803–815 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.083089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schaller K. L., Caldwell J. H. (2000). Developmental and regional expression of sodium channel isoform NaCh6 in the rat central nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 420, 84–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Schaller K. L., Krzemien D. M., Yarowsky P. J., Krueger B. K., Caldwell J. H. (1995). A novel, abundant sodium channel expressed in neurons and glia. J. Neurosci. 15(5 Pt 1), 3231–3242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schiavon E., Sacco T., Cassulini R. R., Gurrola G., Tempia F., Possani L. D., et al. (2006). Resurgent current and voltage sensor trapping enhanced activation by a beta-scorpion toxin solely in Nav1.6 channel. Significance in mice Purkinje neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 20326–20337 10.1074/jbc.M600565200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shakkottai V. G., Xiao M., Xu L., Wong M., Nerbonne J. M., Ornitz D. M., et al. (2009). FGF14 regulates the intrinsic excitability of cerebellar Purkinje neurons. Neurobiol. Dis. 33, 81–88 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sharkey L. M., Jones J. M., Hedera P., Meisler M. H. (2009a). Evaluation of SCN8A as a candidate gene for autosomal dominant essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 15, 321–323 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sharkey L. M., Cheng X., Drews V., Buchner D. A., Jones J. M., Justice M. J., et al. (2009b). The ataxia3 mutation in the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of sodium channel Nav1.6 disrupts intracellular trafficking. J. Neurosci. 29, 2733–2741 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6026-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Smith M. R., Goldin A. L. (1999). A mutation that causes ataxia shifts the voltage-dependence of the Scn8a sodium channel. Neuroreport 10, 3027–3031 10.1097/00001756-199909290-00028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Smith M. R., Smith R. D., Plummer N. W., Meisler M. H., Goldin A. L. (1998). Functional analysis of the mouse Scn8a sodium channel. J. Neurosci. 18, 6093–6102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Srinivasan Y., Elmer L., Davis J., Bennett V., Angelides K. (1988). Ankyrin and spectrin associate with voltage-dependent sodium channels in brain. Nature 333, 177–180 10.1038/333177a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sudol M., Hunter T. (2000). NeW wrinkles for an old domain. Cell 103, 1001–1004 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00203-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sun W., Wagnon J. L., Mahaffey C. L., Briese M., Ule J., Frankel W. N. (2013). Aberrant sodium channel activity in the complex seizure disorder of Celf4 mutant mice. J. Physiol. Ann. Neurol. 591(Pt 1), 241–255 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Tamkun M. M., Catterall W. A. (1981). Reconstitution of the voltage-sensitive sodium channel of rat brain from solubilized components. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 11457–11463 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Thompson D., Ward-Bailey P. F., Donahue L. R., Bronson R. T., Soukup J., Davisson M. T. (2004). A remutation to Scn8a named jolting 2 Jackson. MGI Direct Data Submission. [Google Scholar]
  92. Timms H., Smart N. G., Beutler B. (2008). Record for “TremorD.” MGI Direct Data Submission. [Google Scholar]
  93. Trudeau M. M., Dalton J. C., Day J. W., Ranum L. P., Meisler M. H. (2006). Heterozygosity for a protein truncation mutation of sodium channel SCN8A in a patient with cerebellar atrophy, ataxia, and mental retardation. J. Med. Genet. 43, 527–530 10.1136/jmg.2005.035667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. van Bemmelen M. X., Rougier J. S., Gavillet B., Apotheloz F., Daidie D., Tateyama M., et al. (2004). Cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.5 is regulated by Nedd4-2 mediated ubiquitination. Circ. Res. 95, 284–91 10.1161/01.RES.0000136816.05109.89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Van Wart A., Matthews G. (2006). Impaired firing and cell-specific compensation in neurons lacking nav1.6 sodium channels. J. Neurosci. 26, 7172–7180 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1101-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Van Wart A., Trimmer J. S., Matthews G. (2007). Polarized distribution of ion channels within microdomains of the axon initial segment. J. Comp. Neurol. 500, 339–352 10.1002/cne.21173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Veeramah K. R., O'Brien J. E., Meisler M. H., Cheng X., Dib-Hajj S. D., Waxman S. G., et al. (2012). De Novo pathogenic SCN8A mutation identified by whole-genome sequencing of a family quartet affected by infantile epileptic encephalopathy and SUDEP. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 502–510 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wittmack E. K., Rush A. M., Craner M. J., Goldfarb M., Waxman S. G., Dib-Hajj S. D. (2004). Fibroblast growth factor homologous factor 2B: association with Nav1.6 and selective colocalization at nodes of Ranvier of dorsal root axons. J. Neurosci. 24, 6765–6775 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1628-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Woodruff-Pak D. S., Green J. T., Levin S. I., Meisler M. H. (2006). Inactivation of sodium channel Scn8A (Na-sub(v)1.6) in Purkinje neurons impairs learning in Morris water maze and delay but not trace eyeblink classical conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 120, 229–240 10.1037/0735-7044.120.2.229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Xiao M., Bosch M. K., Nerbonne J. M., Ornitz D. M. (2013). FGF14 localization and organization of the axon initial segment. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 56C, 393–403 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zakon H. H. (2012). Adaptive evolution of voltage-gated sodium channels: the first 800 million years. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(Suppl. 1), 10619–10625 10.1073/pnas.1201884109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zakon H. H., Jost M. C., Lu Y. (2011). Expansion of voltage-dependent Na+ channel gene family in early tetrapods coincided with the emergence of terrestriality and increased brain complexity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1415–1424 10.1093/molbev/msq325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zarrinpar A., Lim W. A. (2000). Converging on proline: the mechanism of WW domain peptide recognition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 611–613 10.1038/77891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zubovic L., Baralle M., Baralle F. E. (2012). Mutually exclusive splicing regulates the Nav 1.6 sodium channel function through a combinatorial mechanism that involves three distinct splicing regulatory elements and their ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6255–6269 10.1093/nar/gks249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Amino acid sequence of human and mouse SCN8A. The predicted human amino acid sequence corresponds to the predominant transcript in adult brain containing exon 5A and exon 18A and using the upstream splice donor site of exon 10B. The approximate locations of transmembrane segments S1–S6 of domains I–IV of the protein are underlined. Human coding sequence, GenBank AF050736; mouse coding sequence, GenBank AF049617. ∇, exon borders; *, protein kinase A consensus sequence; arrow, tyrosine kinase consensus; dots, amino acid identity. Adapted from Plummer et al. (1998).

Click here for additional data file. (3.3MB, PDF)

Articles from Frontiers in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES