Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Nov 14;3:3216. doi: 10.1038/srep03216

The selective transfer of patterned graphene

Xu-Dong Chen 1, Zhi-Bo Liu 1,a, Wen-Shuai Jiang 1, Xiao-Qing Yan 1,2, Fei Xing 1, Peng Wang 1, Yongsheng Chen 2, Jian-Guo Tian 1,b
PMCID: PMC3827613  PMID: 24225593

Abstract

We demonstrate a selective microcleaving graphene (MG) transfer technique for the transfer of graphene patterns and graphene devices onto chosen targets using a bilayer-polymer structure and femtosecond laser microfabrication. In the bilayer-polymer structure, the first layer is used to separate the target graphene from the other flakes, and the second layer transfers the patterned graphene to the chosen targets. This selective transfer technique, which exactly transfers the patterned graphene onto a chosen target, leaving the other flakes on the original substrate, provides an efficient route for the fabrication of MG for microdevices and flexible electronics and the optimization of graphene's performance. This method will facilitate the preparation of van der Waals heterostructures and enable the optimization of the performance of graphene hybrid devices.

Graphene is an emerging class of two-dimensional (2D) material with unique electrical properties1,2,3 and a wide range of potential practical applications4,5. In addition, graphene hybrid structures combined with other 2D materials, metal microstructures, silicon photonic crystal cavities, and waveguides have more extensive applications in van der Waals heterostructures6,7,8, hybrid graphene plasmonics5,9, hybrid optoelectronic devices10,11, and optical modulators12,13. Based on well-developed transfer methods14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is currently used in most of the graphene hybrid applications11,12,13,23. Although mechanical exfoliation of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite provides the highest-quality graphene1,2, the transfer of the desired microcleaving graphene (MG) to the structure at a specific position is a critical challenge, that limits the combination of MG with other structures.

Currently, only a few methods have been reported for the transfer of MG6. In the commonly used MG transfer method, all the graphene/graphite flakes obtained by microcleaving are transferred to new substrates with a layer of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)24. With this method, the unwanted graphene/graphite flakes are transferred to new substrates, along with the useful graphene. These unwanted graphene/graphite flakes and the irregular shape of the desired graphene may result in a number of issues: (1) the irregularly shaped graphene may deleteriously affect the performance of graphene hybrid device; (2) the flakes will inevitably contaminate the new substrates and may damage other samples and/or devices on the substrates; and (3) the flakes may hinder the integration of multiple graphene devices. Therefore, the development of a selective transfer technique that enables the exact transfer of the useful patterned graphene to a chosen target while the other flakes are retained on the original substrate is important. In particular, the preparation of van der Waals heterostructures by the stacking of different 2D crystals on top of each other6,7,8 requires that the crystals be transferred precisely while their beneficial qualities are maintained. If such a MG transfer technique is developed, we could replace CVD-grown graphene with MG in graphene-silicon photonic crystal cavity structures11,23 and graphene-based optical modulators12,13 and enhance the performance of these graphene hybrid optoelectronic devices.

In addition, the observation of a clear color contrast requires a SiO2/Si substrate with a specific SiO2 thickness1,25, which limits the fabrication of graphene devices on other types of substrates. The fabrication of samples and devices on other substrates is relevant for fundamental research and for the optimization of graphene's performance. In addition, the newly developed method should integrate graphene patterns or devices with a wider variety of substrate materials. Herein, we report a new technique for the selective transfer of MG patterns and devices onto chosen targets using a bilayer-polymer structure and femtosecond laser microfabrication. This selective transfer technique, which exactly transfers the patterned graphene onto a chosen target, leaving the other flakes on the original substrate, provides an efficient route for the fabrication of MG-based microdevices. A clean surface without any other flakes, with any desired shape for each staking layer, and with precise transfer achieved via this technique will facilitate the development of van der Waals heterostructures in electronics and devices6,8.

Results

Figure 1 illustrates the selective transfer process (for details, see Methods). The graphene patterns and devices were fabricated on SiO2/Si wafers, and a layer of positive photoresist was subsequently coated onto the wafers. After the exposure and development, the patterned graphene was separated from the other graphene/graphite flakes. The femtosecond laser was used to fabricate graphene patterns and expose the photoresist above the patterned graphene. Because of their ultra-short pulse and high energy, focused femtosecond lasers are widely used in microfabrication to fabricate patterns with high resolution. Direct-laser-writing optical lithography26,27 makes the exposure process more flexible, and the two-photon exposure can improve the resolution of the exposed patterns. The entire sample was subsequently exposed to a xenon lamp, and then a layer of PMMA was coated onto the sample as the transfer layer. As a support layer, PMMA is widely used in the transfer of CVD-grown graphene and carbon nanotubes14,20,28. In this work, PMMA was chosen as the transfer layer because of its relatively low viscosity and good wetting capability, which makes the PMMA solution conform well to nanoscale topography on SiO2/Si substrate29. The baked PMMA film makes full contact with the patterned graphene, enhancing the van der Waals interactions between the patterned graphene and PMMA film. The enhanced van der Waals interaction is usually larger than that between graphene and SiO2/Si substrate. Therefore, the patterned graphene was separated from the SiO2/Si substrate and attached to the PMMA layer when the photoresist was dissolved, leaving the unwanted flakes on the SiO2/Si substrate. Finally, the patterned graphene was precisely transferred to a chosen target with a micromanipulator mounted on an optical microscope and then the PMMA was dissolved in acetone for several times. After transferred, the sample was annealed in flowing H2/Ar gas at 350°C for 3 h to remove the residual photoresist and PMMA on graphene6,30. Figure S1 shows the AFM images of three few-layer graphene flakes transferred selectively onto flat SiO2/Si wafers before and after annealing. After the thermal annealing process, most of the residues were removed, and graphene was in better contact with the substrates31.

Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of the selective transfer process.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A femtosecond laser at 800 nm was used to fabricate the graphene patterns and expose the photoresist. The micromanipulator mounted on an optical microscope was used to position the graphene patterns on the chosen targets.

In order to demonstrate the detachment yield of the graphene from SiO2/Si substrate, 100 graphene sheets on 10 samples were transferred selectively to other substrates. 95 graphene sheets were detached from the original substrates and 93 sheets were transferred to other substrates successfully. Using this transfer method, high yields can up to 93%.

The selective transfer of the patterned graphene to the chosen target can be achieved with this method. A monolayer graphene was patterned and transferred to a chosen microcavity, as shown in Figure 2. Five cubic microcavities were fabricated on the SiO2/Si substrate, and the patterned graphene was precisely transferred onto the center cavity (Figure 2b), leaving the other flakes on the original substrate for reuse (Figure 2c). The morphological images of the patterned graphene transferred by the selective transfer technique were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The SEM image (Figure 2d) shows that the transferred graphene film is clean and has a relatively uniform morphology without any apparent defects. The AFM image (Figure 2e), which has few apparent residual, further reveals the high quality of the transferred graphene. To demonstrate the integrity of the graphene above the microcavity, a 2D- to G-band intensity ratio map is shown in Figure 2f32,33. The Raman spectra of the graphene above the microcavity have a higher 2D/G ratio and a much lower intensity compared to those of the surrounding graphene (Supplementary Figure S2). The Raman image shows that the graphene is present at every point above the microcavity, thereby indicating good integrity. The MG-microcavity structure can be used in selective molecular sieving34, and this selective transfer technique provides an approach to the fabrication of suspended graphene membranes34,35 that do not contain undesirable flakes.

Figure 2. Results of the selective transfer and precise location.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a-c), Optical images of (a) a monolayer MG patterned by femtosecond laser on a SiO2/Si wafer, (b) the patterned graphene located on a chosen microcavity obtained by selective transfer, and (c) the graphene/graphite flakes remaining on the original substrate. (d-f), The morphological images of the patterned graphene above the microcavity analyzed by (d) SEM, (e) AFM, and (f) Raman mapping with a 2D- to G-band intensity ratio.

The fabrication of graphene samples and devices on different types of substrates4,36 is relevant for fundamental research and the optimization of graphene's performance. The identification of graphene with a clear color contrast requires a SiO2/Si wafer with a specific SiO2 thickness1,25, which limits the fabrication of graphene devices on other types of substrates, such as quartz and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The transfer of as-fabricated micro/nano-patterns would facilitate the development of graphene-based, transparent, and flexible microelectronics and devices36,37. To demonstrate the pattern transfer, we fabricated graphene ribbons using a femtosecond laser and transferred them to other substrates. Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the graphene micro/nanoribbons on a SiO2/Si substrate after the selective transfer process. Graphene ribbons with various widths (100 nm ~ 2 μm) were well printed to the new substrate without distortion or fracture. The minimum resolution (~100 nm) was limited by the objective lens and the motorized stage used in the experiment. We performed further verification by transferring different graphene patterns with different thicknesses onto various substrates (Supplementary Figure S3). The successful transfer suggests that the newly developed method can integrate graphene patterns with a wide variety of substrate materials.

Figure 3. SEM images of the graphene micro/nanoribbons.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Monolayer MG micro/nanoribbons were fabricated and selectively transferred with high fidelity.

The fabrication of electronics and devices is complex1, and graphene may be contaminated or even damaged during the fabrication process. An alternative approach is to apply all the fabrication steps, such as lithography, deposition, and lift-off, prior to the selective transfer of the graphene films with designed shapes fabricated on SiO2/Si to the target position. Therefore, a graphene/electrodes structure can effectively avoid contamination and damage. A patterned monolayer graphene film was transferred selectively to as-fabricated Au electrodes on a SiO2/Si wafer to fabricate a graphene field-effect transistor (FET) (Figure 4a). The SEM image (Figure 4d) shows that the graphene was well transferred and precisely located on the Au electrodes. The Raman spectra of the monolayer graphene on the SiO2/Si (Figure 4e) and Au electrodes (Supplementary Figure S4) measured after the transfer process suggest that high-quality graphene was produced21,32. For comparison, we fabricated another graphene FET with an electrodes/graphene structure by depositing Au electrodes onto a graphene film. In this case, the graphene was found to be seriously contaminated (Supplementary Figure S5). Prior to each measurement, the samples were annealed at 200°C for 3 h in vacuum to remove water and air doped onto the graphene. Figure 4f shows the room-temperature transport characteristics of the two FETs after they were annealed. The FET fabricated with the selective transfer method generated a narrower curve compared to that of the other FET. In addition, the charge neutrality points of the FETs fabricated by the selective transfer and conventional methods were 7 V and 10 V, respectively. In comparison to the conventional FET, the FET fabricated via selective transfer exhibited better performance due to less contamination. To investigate the devices transfer process, the FET fabricated via the selective transfer technique on the SiO2/Si wafer was transferred to quartz using PMMA28. The optical images of the device on SiO2/Si, PMMA, and quartz (Figures 4a, b, and c) show that the device was transferred with high fidelity. Figure 4g shows the room-temperature current as a function of the voltage of the graphene device on SiO2/Si, PMMA, and quartz. The increase in the resistance was most likely caused by mechanical damage of the Au electrodes during the transfer process. With the newly developed method, more complex microdevices can be fabricated, such as an electrodes/graphene/hexagonal-boron-nitride (hBN)/electrodes/graphene structure.

Figure 4. The fabrication and transfer of the graphene FET with graphene/electrodes structure.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a-c), Optical images of the graphene device on (a) Si/SiO2, (b) PMMA, and (c) quartz. (d), SEM image of the patterned graphene transferred onto the Au electrodes to fabricate the device. (e), The Raman spectrum of the transferred graphene on a Si/SiO2 wafer. (f), The transfer characteristic curves of the two graphene FETs fabricated via the selective transfer and conventional methods. (g), The current as a function of the voltage for the graphene device fabricated by the selective transfer during the device transfer process.

Most microdevices are fabricated on rigid, flat, and smooth substrates1,2, such as SiO2/Si. However, interest in nonconventional substrates, such as soft plastics, has been increasing because of these substrates' potential applications in transparent, flexible, or foldable electronics36,37. After confirming that the selective transfer technique could be used to fabricate electronics and devices on a SiO2/Si wafer, we selected a PET film as the substrate for the fabrication of electronics via this method. We fabricated ITO electrodes on the PET film using photolithography (see Methods) and then transferred a patterned monolayer graphene film to connect the two ITO films (Figures 5a and b). The Raman spectrum (Figure 5c) of the graphene measured on the PET film demonstrates the high quality of the graphene used in the experiment32. The inset of Figure 5b shows the SEM image of the transferred graphene. The patterned graphene is attached to the ITO films on PET, connecting the two electrodes. For comparison, we fabricated three other devices in which the ITO electrodes were connected by CVD-grown monolayer graphene, multilayer MG, and ITO. The resistance of the four devices with different bending radii and flat-bent cycles are shown in Figures 5d and 5e, respectively. The current as a function of the voltage for the four devices measured during the bending test is shown in Supplementary Figure S6. The increase in the resistance was caused primarily by the ITO films while the devices were bent multiple times to achieve different radii of curvature. Whereas the resistance variation of the ITO films was eliminated, the resistance of the MG-based devices was nearly invariant (see insets of Figures 5d and e). The results of the bending test suggest that MG films were successfully attached to the PET/ITO films, and that the MG films exhibited better mechanical stability than CVD-grown graphene14.

Figure 5. Bending test of the PET/ITO/graphene flexible device fabricated by selective transfer.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) The configuration and (b) a photograph of the PET/ITO/graphene device. The inset in (b) is the SEM image of the transferred graphene connecting the two ITO films. (c), The Raman spectrum of the transferred graphene on PET. (d), The changes in the resistance of the four devices as a function of the bending radius. (e), Resistance of the devices with different flat-bent cycles. The insets in (d) and (e) show the results with the resistance variation of the ITO films removed from (d) and (e), respectively.

Discussion

The developed selective transfer technique provides an efficient route for the fabrication of MG-based microdevices and flexible electronics. In addition, the selective transfer technique can be readily incorporated into the process used to fabricate van der Waals heterostructures. In general, van der Waals heterostructures are fabricated by stacking different 2D crystals on top of each other with a “mechanical transfer process”6,7,8. However, with this method, the unwanted graphene/graphite flakes are transferred together with the useful graphene. The flakes inevitably contaminate the new substrates and damage other samples on the substrates. However, with our newly developed method, the selective transfer of 2D crystals with regular shapes can be achieved, and different 2D crystals can be positioned over each other with micrometer accuracy in a desired sequence. The transfer process, which is free of contaminants, enables the integration of multiple graphene devices. In addition, the regular shapes of the 2D crystals can improve the performance of van der Waals heterostructures. A clean surface without any other flakes, the ability to fabricate any desired shape for each staking layer, and the precise transfer obtained via this selective transfer technique will facilitate the development of van der Waals heterostructures in electronics and devices6,8.

In summary, we demonstrated a unique selective transfer technique using a photoresist/PMMA structure and femtosecond laser microfabrication to achieve the selective transfer of MG patterns onto chosen targets. With this method, as-fabricated graphene micro/nanoribbons were transferred onto different substrates, and graphene patterns were transferred onto different electrodes fabricated on various substrates. This method provides an efficient route for the fabrication of MG-based microdevices and flexible electronics and for the optimization of the performance of graphene device. We believe that this technique can also provide a feasible approach to the fabrication of van der Waals heterostructures with a clean surface, with any desired shape for each staking layer, and with precise positioning.

Methods

Materials

Silicon wafers coated in a 285-nm thermal oxide were purchased from Graphene-Supermarket (graphene-supermarket.com). The positive photoresist (AR-P 3510T) and developer (AR 300-26) were obtained from Allresist. The PMMA (average Mw~ 996,000 by GPC, crystalline) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The PET/ITO film (thickness: 0.125 mm, resistivity: 45±5 ohm/sq, transmittance >84%) was purchased from Zhuhai Kaivo Electronic Components.

Selective transfer process

Graphene patterns were fabricated using a focused femtosecond laser (~ 100 fs, 800 nm, 80 MHz) after the deposition and recognition of the MG on the SiO2/Si wafers. A layer of positive photoresist was spin-coated (3000 rpm, 30 s) onto the substrate, and the coated substrate was prebaked at 100°C for 2 min. An 800-nm femtosecond laser was used to expose the patterned graphene region via a two-photo exposure. The exposed photoresist was dissolved after development to reveal the patterned graphene. The entire sample was subsequently exposed using a 150 W xenon lamp for 4 min, and a layer of PMMA was spin-coated (2000 rpm, 30 s) onto the sample. The patterned graphene was attached to the PMMA layer, and the other graphene/graphite flakes were separated by the photoresist layer. The sample was rinsed in the developer to dissolve the photoresist layer. The PMMA membrane could be peeled from the SiO2/Si substrate when the photoresist was partially dissolved, and the unwanted flakes remained on the substrate. After being rinsed with deionized water, the PMMA membrane was lifted up by the new substrate. The position of the patterned graphene on the PMMA membrane was determined using a microscopy, and the patterned graphene was precisely aligned to the target position with a micromanipulator. The deionized water between the PMMA membrane and substrate protected the patterned graphene and substrate during the location process. After the deionized water was removed, the patterned graphene was attached to the target position. The sample was baked at 150°C for 15 min to evaporate the residual water and improve the contact between the patterned graphene and the substrate. After the graphene was transferred, the PMMA was dissolved in acetone, and the sample was subsequently annealed in flowing H2/Ar gas at 350°C for 3 h to remove the resist residues. Using this technique, we could position the graphene on a chosen target within a few micrometers.

Microcavity fabrication

Five squares with a side length of 15 μm were defined by femtosecond laser direct writing lithography on SiO2/Si. Then, a buffered oxide etch (BOE) solution was used to etch the squares into cubic microcavities with a depth of ~ 100 nm.

Device fabrication

The PET/ITO/graphene devices were fabricated using a combination of photolithography and the selective transfer process. The ITO film on PET (15 mm×20 mm) was divided into two equal portions by photolithography and etching. The width of the gap between the two ITO films was 3 μm. The rectangular graphene was subsequently transferred to the middle of the gap to connect the two ITO films. During the bending tests, indium-eutectic was used as a contact electrode to reduce contact resistance.

Characterization

The surface morphologies of graphene patterns and devices were investigated using optical microscopy (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-U), AFM (Nanoscope Dimension™ 3100) and SEM (LEO1530VP). Raman spectra were obtained using a RENISHAW RM2000 Raman system equipped with a 514 nm laser source and 50× objective lens. To obtain the Raman images, the samples were moved with a step size of 2 μm, and a Raman spectrum was recorded at each point. The measured region was 22×22 μm2. The transfer characteristic curve and current as a function of the voltage for the devices were measured using an Agilent 34401A Digit Multimeter and a Keithley 2400 SourceMeter.

Author Contributions

X.D.C. and Z.B.L. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. X.Q.Y., F.X., and Y.C. analyzed the data. P.W. and W.S.J. conceived and designed the experiments, and analyzed the data. X.D.C., Z.B.L. and J.G.T. co-wrote the paper. X.D.C., Z.B.L. and J.G.T. contributed to methodology development. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep03216-s1.pdf (700.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Chinese National Key Basic Research Special Fund (grant 2011CB922003) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 11174159).

References

  1. Novoselov K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Novoselov K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avouris P. Graphene: Electronic and Photonic Properties and Devices. Nano Lett. 10, 4285–4294 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Novoselov K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao Q. & Loh K. P. Graphene Photonics, Plasmonics, and Broadband Optoelectronic Devices. ACS Nano 6, 3677–3694 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 722–726 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geim A. K. & Grigorieva I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dean C. et al. Graphene based heterostructures. Solid State Commun. 152, 1275–1282 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. Grigorenko A. N. et al. Graphene plasmonics. Nat. Photon. 6, 749–758 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonaccorso F. et al. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photon. 4, 611–622 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. Gu T. et al. Regenerative oscillation and four-wave mixing in graphene optoelectronics. Nat. Photon. 6, 554–559 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu M. et al. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474, 64–67 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu M. et al. Double-Layer Graphene Optical Modulator. Nano Lett. 12, 1482–1485 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li X. et al. Transfer of Large-Area Graphene Films for High-Performance Transparent Conductive Electrodes. Nano Lett. 9, 4359–4363 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim K. S. et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457, 706–710 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee Y. et al. Wafer-Scale Synthesis and Transfer of Graphene Films. Nano Lett. 10, 490–493 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bae S. et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 574–578 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kulkarni A. et al. A Novel Method for Large Area Graphene Transfer on the Polymer Optical Fiber. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 12, 3918–3921 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kang J. et al. Efficient Transfer of Large-Area Graphene Films onto Rigid Substrates by Hot Pressing. ACS Nano 6, 5360–5365 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kang J. et al. Graphene transfer: key for applications. Nanoscale 4, 5527–5537 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen X.-D. et al. High-quality and efficient transfer of large-area graphene films onto different substrates. Carbon 56, 271–278 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. Song J. et al. A general method for transferring graphene onto soft surfaces. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 356–362 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Majumdar A. et al. Electrical Control of Silicon Photonic Crystal Cavity by Graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 515–518 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reina A. et al. Transferring and Identification of Single- and Few-Layer Graphene on Arbitrary Substrates. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 17741–17744 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Blake P. et al. Making graphene visible. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. Deubel M. et al. Direct laser writing of three-dimensional photonic-crystal templates for telecommunications. Nat Mater 3, 444–447 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fischer J. & Wegener M. Ultrafast Polymerization Inhibition by Stimulated Emission Depletion for Three-dimensional Nanolithography. Adv. Mater. 24, OP65–OP69 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thanh Q. N. et al. Transfer-Printing of As-Fabricated Carbon Nanotube Devices onto Various Substrates. Adv. Mater. 24, 4499–4504 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiao L. et al. Creation of Nanostructures with Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Mediated Nanotransfer Printing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 12612–12613 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hunt B. et al. Massive Dirac Fermions and Hofstadter Butterfly in a van der Waals Heterostructure. Science 340, 1427–1430 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu W. et al. Graphene-Veiled Gold Substrate for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. 25, 928–933 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ferrari A. C. et al. Raman Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nolen C. M. et al. High-Throughput Large-Area Automated Identification and Quality Control of Graphene and Few-Layer Graphene Films. ACS Nano 5, 914–922 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Koenig S. P. et al. Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 728–732 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Koenig S. P. et al. Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 543–546 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaltenbrunner M. et al. An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics. Nature 499, 458–463 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee S.-K. et al. All Graphene-Based Thin Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrates. Nano Lett. 12, 3472–3476 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep03216-s1.pdf (700.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES