Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013 Oct 11;112:10.1016/j.pbb.2013.10.002. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.10.002

Serotonin 1A, 1B, and 7 receptors of the rat medial nucleus accumbens differentially regulate feeding, water intake, and locomotor activity

Kara A Clissold a, Eugene Choi a,b, Wayne E Pratt a,b,*
PMCID: PMC3851021  NIHMSID: NIHMS531493  PMID: 24125784

Abstract

Serotonin (5-HT) signaling has been widely implicated in the regulation of feeding behaviors in both humans and animal models. Recently, we reported that co-stimulation of 5-HT1&7 receptors of the anterior medial nucleus accumbens with the drug 5-CT caused a dose-dependent decrease in food intake, water intake, and locomotion in rats (Pratt et al., 2009). The current experiments sought to determine which of three serotonin receptor subtypes (5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, or 5-HT7) might be responsible for these consummatory and locomotor effects. Food-deprived rats were given 2-hr access to rat chow after stimulation of nucleus accumbens 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, or 5-HT7 receptors, or blockade of the 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors. Stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors with 8-OH-DPAT (at 0.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 microg/0.5 microl/side) caused a dose-dependent decrease in food and water intake, and reduced rearing behavior but not ambulation. In contrast, rats that received the 5-HT1B agonist CP 93129 (at 0.0, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 microg/0.5 microl/side) showed a significant dose-dependent decrease in water intake only; stimulation of 5-HT7 receptors (AS 19; at 0.0, 1.0, and 5.0 microg/0.5 microl/side) decreased ambulatory activity but did not affect food or water consumption. Blockade of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors had no lasting effects on measures of food consumption. These data suggest that the food intake, water intake, and locomotor effects seen after medial nucleus accumbens injections of 5-CT are due to actions on separate serotonin receptor subtypes, and contribute to growing evidence for selective roles of individual serotonin receptors within the nucleus accumbens on motivated behavior.

Keywords: Feeding, food intake, motivation, serotonin, serotonin receptors, nucleus accumbens, reward

1. Introduction

With the prevalence of obesity continuing to rise in both adult and child populations, and the average associated medical costs for obesity estimated to top $190 billion dollars a year within the United States alone (Cawley and Meyerhoefer, 2012, Finkelstein et al., 2009) there continues to be a significant need for the development of pharmacological interventions that reduce food consumption and promote weight loss. Although there has been limited success in developing such drug therapies, many of those that have been or are being prescribed to promote weight loss increase serotonergic tone peripherally and centrally. For example, both sibutramine (a 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake antagonist) and the combination treatment of phentermine and fenfluramine (fen-phen; which releases 5-HT, dopamine, and norepinephine directly through actions on the transporter protein) enhance serotonin at the synapse, and were used as anti-obesity agents until they were withdrawn from the market due to cardiovascular side effects (Glazer, 2001, Halford et al., 2007, Ioannides-Demos et al., 2006, Rothman and Baumann, 2009). These side effects (hypertension and cardiac valve pathology, respectively) were likely due to generalized enhancement of serotonin (5-HT) output, impacting peripheral sympathetic tone. With the recent FDA approval of lorcaserin (Belviq®), which is a selective agonist at the 5-HT2C receptor, there is reason to hope that targeted pharmacotherapy at individual 5-HT receptor subtypes will provide efficacy for weight loss treatment with fewer deleterious side effects.

Serotonergic agents affect appetite and food intake via actions upon brain motivational circuitry. For example, the injection of serotonin directly into medial hypothalamus (which regulates appetite in response to peripheral metabolic signals) reduces food intake and alters dietary preferences (Currie and Coscina, 1996, Leibowitz et al., 1990). Similar reductions of 4 feeding have been observed following more selective serotonin receptor stimulation of the 5-HT1A or 5-HT2C receptor subtypes within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (Lopez-Alonso et al., 2007). In the hindbrain, injection of the 5-HT2C/2A antagonist mesulergine into the fourth ventricle blocks the food intake inhibition normally observed following systemic mCPP treatment (a 5-HT2C/1B agonist) in Sprague-Dawley rats (Kaplan et al., 1998), and stimulation of 5-HT1B receptors in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons inhibits food intake (Lee et al., 1998, Simansky and Nicklous, 2002). Our laboratory and others have recently identified the nucleus accumbens as an additional region where serotonin signaling regulates food-directed motivation. Specifically, Jean et al. (2007) reported that the 5-HT4 receptor in the mouse nucleus accumbens is responsible for the hypophagic actions of systemic MDMA (Ecstasy) treatment. We have reported that stimulation of rat medial nucleus accumbens 5-HT6 receptors increases food intake and enhances appetitive motivation for sugar reinforcement (Pratt et al., 2009, Pratt et al., 2012). In contrast, nucleus accumbens 5-HT2C receptor agonism or blockade has little effect on food motivation. However, stimulation of 5-HT1-type/7 receptors with 5-CT robustly affected locomotor and feeding behavior in the rat by reducing rearing behavior (but not ambulation or total approaches to the food hopper), inhibiting both food and water intake across a 2-hr feeding test, and affecting lever pressing for sugar reward on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Together, these data suggest that there are separable effects for individual serotonin receptors within the ventral striatum in promoting food-seeking and consumption.

That 5-CT treatment of the nucleus accumbens altered food-motivated behavior suggests that at least one of the 5-HT1-type/7 receptors regulate feeding and/or locomotor (rearing) behavior. Prior experiments have implicated both the 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in regulating food intake (Bovetto and Richard, 1995, Currie et al., 1994, Dourish et al., 1986, Lee et al., 1998, Lee et al., 2002, Lee and Simansky, 1997, Lopez-Alonso et al., 2007, Schreiber et al., 2000). 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors tend to reduce neuronal activity through activation of G-protein gated K channels, and also inhibit intracellular adenylyl cyclase activity through actions on the Gi/Go G protein family (Hannon and Hoyer, 2008, Matthys et al., 2011, Sari, 2004). In contrast, 5-HT7 receptors increase intracellular adenylyl cyclase via the recruitment of Gs proteins. Although the 5-HT7 receptor has not been implicated in the regulation of food intake from systemic drug studies, it regulates the firing properties of striatal acetylcholine-containing neurons (Bonsi et al., 2007), which have been argued to impact food motivation and satiety processes within striatum (Hoebel et al., 2007, Pratt and Kelley, 2005). The current experiments were designed to determine the specificity by which the individual serotonin 1A, 1B, or 7 receptor subtypes may be responsible for the feeding and locomotor effects observed following 5-CT treatment of the medial nucleus accumbens.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animals

Forty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan, Madison, WI; 275-300 g at arrival) were dually housed in a colony room maintained at ∼21 °C with a 12-hr light–dark cycle (lights on at 7 a.m.). Animals were allowed to acclimate to housing conditions for no fewer than 5 days prior to surgical procedures. All experiments were conducted in accordance to NIH animal care guidelines and were approved by the Wake Forest University Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.2. Surgical Procedures and Food Restriction Parameters

Standard aseptic surgical procedures were used to implant indwelling stainless steel guide cannulas (23 gauge) bilaterally above the anterior medial nucleus accumbens (with the nose bar set at +5.0 mm above the interaural plane; 3.1 mm anterior and 1.0 mm lateral to bregma, 5.0 mm ventral to skull surface). Stylets were placed within the cannulas to maintain patency. After one week of recovery, rats were food restricted and gradually reduced to approximately 90% of their ad libitum body. This was done by reducing the daily ration of the rats to 8 g of standard rat chow across 5-6 days. Once the animals reached 90% body weight, each rat was provided sufficient chow on a daily basis (12-16 g each, in the home cage or during their 2 hr free access to the feeding chamber) to maintain their target weight. Water was available at all times.

2.3. Apparatus

For these experiments, food intake was monitored during 2-hr feeding sessions. Feeding chambers were constructed from clear acrylic, with internal dimensions of 42 cm wide, 30.5 cm deep and 33 cm tall. A water bottle was hung at one end of the chamber, and a food hopper was filled with standard rat chow and mounted on a food intake monitor (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT) at the opposite end of the chamber (head entry at 6.4 cm above the wire floor). Each food intake monitor consisted of a calibrated potentiometer which allowed for continuous monitoring of the mass/weight of the food hopper during the experimental sessions. Infra-red eyebeams were located along the floor at three locations (5 cm above the wire floor) to measure ambulation; four additional IR beams were placed at a height of 16 cm above the floor to index rearing behavior. IR beam interruption (including at a sensor at the entry to the food intake monitor) was continually recorded by Med-PC software (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT). The weights of the food hoppers were recorded by the computer at 10-sec intervals. A speaker maintained an ambient level of white noise at 65 dB in the experimental room.

2.4. Microinjections and behavioral testing

Rats received six days of habituation to the feeding chambers prior to pharmacological treatments. Each session consisted of 2 hrs of free access to rat chow and water. On the final two days of habituation, rats received mock injections to allow acclimation to microinfusion procedures, as previously described (Pratt et al., 2009). Experimental treatments began 48 hrs after the last mock infusion. During vehicle and drug infusions, injection cannulas (30 gauge) were lowered into the nucleus accumbens and 0.5 μl of solution was delivered (at a rate of 0.32 μl per minute) by a Harvard Apparatus (Holliston, MA) microinfusion pump. Injectors remained in place for one minute following drug delivery to allow for diffusion. After injectors were removed and stylets replaced, rats were immediately put into the feeding chambers. Dependent measures included the amount of chow eaten across the 2-hr period, the number of approaches to the food chamber, ambulation within the chamber (assessed as the number of non-consecutive beam breaks of the three IR beams distributed across the length of the chamber), number of rears recorded, and total water intake across the feeding session.

Within each experimental group, rats received six days of habituation (including the two mock injection days). Two days after the second mock injection day, drug injections began. Each rat within each experimental group (see below) received all doses of a single serotonin receptor agonist or antagonist in a randomized order over 3-4 infusion day. Rats were placed into the feeding chamber for a 2 hr test immediately following the drug injection. Each drug treatment was separated by a minimum of 48 hrs, to allow for wash-out of the drug. On days that rats were not run in the food intake chambers (in between drug injection days), each was weighed and provided with sufficient rat chow to maintain their 90% weight.

2.5. Drugs and Experimental Groups

Five individual experiments were conducted to examine the roles of nucleus accumbens 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT7 receptors on feeding and locomotion. Separate groups of animals received intra-accumbens infusions of vehicle (0.0 μg drug/0.5 μl/side) and the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-DPAT hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT; at 0.0, 2.0, 4.0 or 8.0 μg/0.5 μl/side; Experiment 1), the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100135 (at 0.0, 2.5, 5.0 & 10.0 μg/0.5 μl/side; Experiment 2), the 5-HT1B receptor agonist CP 93129 (at 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, or 4.0 μg/0.5μL/side; Experiment 3), the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist GR 55562 (at 0.0, 2.0, 5.0, or 10.0 μg/0.5 μl/side; Experiment 4), or the 5-HT7 receptor agonist AS 19 (0, 1.0, or 5.0 μg/0.5μL/side; Experiment 5). These experiments did not test the behavioral effects of 5-HT7 receptor antagonism, as we previously reported that medial nucleus accumbens 5-HT7 blockade with SB 269970 had no effect on food intake in an identical paradigm (Pratt et al., 2009). All drugs were obtained from Tocris Biosciences. The agents 8-OH-DPAT, CP 93129, and GR 55562 were dissolved in sterile saline. WAY 100135 and AS 19 were dissolved in sterile saline containing 10% and 50% dimethyl sulfoxide, respectively. WAY 100135 and CP 93129 drug solutions were pH-balanced to the vehicle solution; the remaining drugs required no adjustment. Concentrations for each agent were chosen based upon solubility and consistency with behaviorally-effective doses in other paradigms, when available (Egashira et al., 2006, Fletcher et al., 2002, Przegalinski et al., 2004).

2.6 Histology

Once the experiments were complete, rats were euthanized and the brains were collected for standard histological analysis. Brain sections were taken through the level of the nucleus accumbens and mounted for Nissl staining; placement of the injection sites was confirmed by light microscopy and charted with reference to (Paxinos and Watson, 1998). Six animals were excluded from further analysis due to either misplacement of the cannula or necrosis to the injection site. The results reported below represent data from animals whose injectors were bilaterally placed within the medial nucleus accumbens (Ns = 6-7 rats/group; see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Location of injector tips for animals included in the behavioral analyses. Column A shows placement of tips for rats receiving the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (filled circles) or the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100135 (open circles). Rats in B received the 5-HT1B agonist CP 93129 (filled circles) or the 5-HT1B antagonist GR 55562 (open circles). Column C represents the placements for animals receiving the 5-HT7 receptor agonist AS 19. The photomicrographs show a representative placement of the injection cannulas from each set of experiments. Drawings were adapted from The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 4th ed., G. Paxinos and C. Watson, Figures 10, 11, and 13, copyright 1998.

2.7 Data analysis

Food intake was assessed at 5-min intervals across each 2-hr session. Ambulation, rearing behavior, and head entry measures were binned across 30-min intervals for analysis. Data were analyzed utilizing two-way repeated measures ANOVAs for each independent variable as assessed across drug doses and time. Total water intake was determined across the feeding session, and analyzed with one-way repeated measures ANOVA across drug doses. For groups that had significant drug and/or drug × time interaction effects on food intake, ANOVAs were run comparing the main effects of drug dose at the time points of 30, 60, 90 and 120 min to further assess the consistency and time course of drug effects. Tukey’s HSD post-hoc analyses were conducted to compare behavior across vehicle and drug treatment days, as appropriate.

3. Results

3.1 5-HT1Areceptor manipulations

Stimulation, but not blockade, of medial nucleus accumbens 5-HT1A receptors reduced food and water intake in rats given 2-hr free access to food and water. As shown in Figure 2A, infusions of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT delayed the onset of feeding and decreased total food intake across the entire session (drug effect: F3,18 = 32.069, p < .001; drug × time interaction: F69,414 = 1.381, p = .031). Delivery of 8 μg 8-OH-DPAT/side significantly reduced food intake by 30 min into the test, and the inhibition of feeding lasted until the session’s end. This reduction in food intake was matched by a significant decline in total water intake at the same dose (F3,18 = 3.710, p = .031).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of medial nucleus accumbens stimulation or blockade of the 5-HT1A receptor on feeding, water intake, and locomotion. The 8 μg dose of the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT significantly reduced food and water intake across the 2-hr feeding session in food-restricted rats feeding on standard chow (A). Additionally, rearing behavior was reduced during the first 30 min for the 4.0 and 8.0 μg doses. Fewer food approaches were recorded during the first 30 min session following the highest 8-OH-DPAT treatment, though this was compensated for by an increase in head entries (compared to vehicle injections) during the second 30 min period. Ambulation was increased during the 60-90 min time frame for the 2.0 and 4.0 μg treatments of the agonist, though this did not interfere with feeding behavior. In contrast, antagonism of the 5-HT1A receptor with WAY 100135 had no effect on any of the behaviors measured here (B). *p < .05, **p < .01 for main drug effects; single and double crosses demark p < .05 and p < .01 for drug × time interaction effect, respectively. Stars above or within the bar graphs denote significant differences from the respective vehicle control injection, as assessed by Tukey’s HSD.

Although there was not a significant main effect of drug dose on total ambulation (F3,18 = 1.97, p = .16), rearing (F3,18 = 3.02, p = .057), or food approaches (F3,18 = 1.05, p = .39), there were significant time × drug dose interactions for each measure (ambulation: F9,54 = 3.21, p = .003; rears: F9,54 = 2.33, p = .027; food approaches: F9,54 = 8.32, p < .001). Figure 2A shows that both rearing and approaches to food were inhibited in the first 30 min of the session by the highest level of 5-HT1A receptor stimulation (8 μg 8-OH-DPAT/side). The initial suppression of food approaches observed in the first 30 minutes of the session were mirrored by a significant increase (compared to control injections) in the second 30-min bin, paralleling the food intake that was on the increase by 1 hr into the session. The significant time × drug interaction on ambulation was not driven by this highest drug dose, but was due to a transient but significant increase that occurred 60-90 minutes after the injection on the days that the rats received 2 or 4 μg 8-OH-DPAT/side.

As shown in Figure 1B, there were no effects of 5-HT1A receptor blockade upon measures of food intake, water intake, or locomotor measures (all ps for drug and time × drug interactions > .10).

3.2. 5-HT1B receptor manipulations

Activation of 5-HT1B receptors in the nucleus accumbens decreased water intake (F3,18 = 20.897, p < .001) but did not affect food consumption across the 2 hr test (Figure 2A; drug effect: F3,15 = .645, p = .598; drug × time interaction: F69,345 = .559, p = 1.0). There were no effects of CP 93129 treatment on ambulation, rearing, or approaches to the feeding chamber (all ps for drug and drug × time interaction effects > .10).

Blockade of the 5-HT1B receptor caused a significant drug × time interaction (F69,345 = 1.710, p = .001), but not a main effect of drug treatment (F3,15 = 2.233, p = .127) on food intake. As can be seen in Figure 3A, this effect was due to a decline in the rate of food consumption within the third 30-min segment of behavioral testing when the rats were treated with the 10 μg dose of the GR 55562. However, this effect was transient, as the rats ate comparable amounts of rat chow by the end of the session regardless of drug treatment; there were no effects of drug treatment on total food intake as assessed at 30, 60, 90, or 120 minutes into the 2-hr session. 5-HT1B antagonism at the highest dose also significantly reduced ambulatory behavior across the two hour session (main effect of drug: F3,15 = 3.70, p = .036; drug × time interaction: F9,45 = 0.92, p = .518). There were no significant effects of 5-HT1B receptor antagonism on water intake, rearing behavior, or the number of approaches to the food units (all ps for drug and drug × time interaction effects > .05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of medial nucleus accumbens stimulation or blockade of the 5-HT1B receptor on feeding, water intake, and locomotion. Although stimulation of the 5-HT1B receptor of the nucleus accumbens with CP 93129 had no effect on locomotor measures or the amount of rat chow eaten across a 2-hr feeding session, increasing amounts of the drug significantly and dose-dependently reduced water intake during the session (A). Blockade of the 5-HT1B receptor yielded a significant drug × time interaction (B); when treated with the highest dose of GR 55562, rats transiently paused feeding 1 hr into the feeding session, but ultimately caught up to the other treatment days by the end of the 2 hrs. A modest but significant decrease in ambulation was also evident following 5-HT1B receptor antagonism; GR 55562 caused no further effects on rearing, food approaches, or water intake across the session. Statistical symbols are as represented in Figure 2.

3.3 5-HT7 receptor stimulation

Stimulation of 5-HT7 receptors caused a modest but significant reduction of ambulatory activity (main effect of drug: F2,12 = 3.894, p = .050; time × drug interaction effect: F6,36 = 1.971, p = .096), with the highest dose significantly reducing ambulation as compared to vehicle injections. Despite this locomotor decline, and in contrast to the effects of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor stimulation, injection of AS 19 within the nucleus accumbens did not affect food or water consumption (2-hr food intake: drug effect: F2,12 = .444, p = .651; drug × time interaction: F46,276 = .548, p = .992; water intake: F2,12 = .022, p = .887). There were also no significant differences in rearing behavior or approaches to the food chamber following 5-HT7 receptor stimulation (all ps > .10).

4. Discussion

The current experiments were conducted to investigate the potentially independent roles of nucleus accumbens serotonin 1A, 1B, and 7 receptor subtypes in regulating food intake and locomotor activity in food-restricted rats. Pharmacological specificity of function was indeed observed across the three 5-HT receptor agonists utilized here. Specifically, activation of nucleus accumbens 5-HT1A receptors decreased food and water intake in food-deprived animals. Locomotor and ambulatory measures were also transiently impacted by 5-HT1A stimulation; the highest treatment reduced rearing and approaches to the food cup during the first 30 min, though food approaches increased in the second half of the first hour. Ambulation was significantly increased (in the 60-90 min time frame), but only for the intermediate doses that did not show significant changes in feeding behavior over time. Thus, it is unlikely that the food intake decline was secondary to increases in competing locomotor behavior, though an early suppression of rearing and food approaches at the high dose suggests that either a motivational or locomotor inhibition may have caused the initial delay in feeding behavior (see Tricklebank et al., 1984). This suggests a functional contrast with the effects of other neurotransmitter manipulations in the nucleus accumbens that block food intake; for instance, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor blockade decreases overall food intake in rats but increases their locomotor activity and total number of approaches to the food chamber (Pratt and Blackstone, 2009, Pratt and Kelley, 2004). In contrast to the effects of 5-HT1A receptor stimulation, 5-HT1B receptor agonism reduced water consumption without affecting feeding or locomotion. Stimulation of 5-HT7 receptors reduced ambulation within the food chambers (suggesting that the chosen doses were physiologically relevant) but had no effects on food or water intake. Previously, we reported that intra-accumbens injections of the 5-HT1/7 receptor agonist 5-CT dose-dependently decreased chow intake, water intake, and rearing behavior (Pratt et al., 2009). The current results suggest that the reported 5-CT-induced decrease in food intake and rearing behavior were most likely due to the effects of activation of the 5-HT1A receptor, while the dose-dependent decrease in water intake may have caused through actions of both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors.

In addition to assessing the effects of 5-HT receptor stimulation on food intake, two animal groups assessed the effects of blocking the 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor on feeding and locomotion. Antagonism of the 5-HT1A receptor was without effect on either consummatory or locomotor measures. Ambulation was modestly reduced across the 2 hr period following inhibition of 5-HT1B receptors at the highest dose. This 5-HT1B receptor antagonism also had a transient effect on food intake 60-90 min after the start of the feeding session, although total food consumption was equivalent to the vehicle condition by the end of the 2 hr session. This delayed effect of food intake may have been caused by alterations in satiety process, or could possibly have been due to diffusion of the drug away from the injection site over time. Future mapping experiments, assessing the role of these receptors across other regions of the striatum, will be necessary to determine if the behavioral impact of the current treatments are limited to the medial nucleus accumbens shell (similar to the hyperphagia caused by GABAA receptor stimulation that occurs selectively following medial shell treatment [Basso and Kelley, 1999]) or may also be effective within other regions of dorsal and ventral striatum (similar to mu-opioid receptor mediated hyperphagia within the striatum [Zhang and Kelley, 2000], or the hyperphagic effects of muscarinic receptor blockade, [Pratt and Kelley, 2004, 2005]). The medial aspects of the nucleus accumbens shell were targeted for these experiments because of its strong connections with hypothalamic feeding circuits (Kampe et al., 2009, Stratford and Kelley, 1999) and its known impact in promoting regulating both food intake and hedonic reactions to palatable diets (Pecina and Berridge, 2000, Pecina et al., 2006). The remainder of this discussion places the observed behavioral effects following manipulations of each receptor within the broader context of their known effects on food intake and motivation

4.1 5-HT1A receptors

Serotonin 1A receptors have long been known to regulate feeding behavior, both systemically and within raphe and hypothalamic nuclei. The effects of systemic 5-HT1A receptor stimulation depend upon the energy state of the animal. In the non-restricted animal, 5-HT1A activation increases food intake (Dourish et al., 1985, Ebenezer and Tite, 2003). Dourish and colleagues initially reported an increase of food intake in rats treated systemically with 8-OH-DPAT at doses below the threshold for eliciting serotonin-related stereotypical behavior (Dourish et al., 1985). These effects were argued to be due to activation of 5-HT1A autoreceptors within the raphe nuclei, reducing the influence that serotonin serves on satiety-promoting brain circuitry (Dourish et al., 1986). Consistent with this hypothesis, 8-OH-DPAT injections directly into the raphe nuclei also increase feeding behavior (Currie et al., 1994), though the precise mechanism of action remains unclear (Fletcher and Davies, 1990).

In food restricted rats, systemic treatment with 5-HT1A agonists inhibit feeding (Ebenezer, 1992, Ebenezer et al., 2007, Ebenezer and Tite, 2003). Furthermore, activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the hypothalamus advances satiety processes (Lopez-Alonso et al., 2007), suggesting that this receptor may post-synaptically inhibit feeding in neural circuits outside of the raphe nuclei. In the current experiments, we have shown for the first time that 5-HT1A receptor activation of the medial nucleus accumbens also inhibits feeding and drinking behavior in hungry rats offered free access to rat chow. This is consistent with the effect of systemic 5-HT1A receptor activation in deprived animals, as noted, and suggests that the nucleus accumbens and ventral striatum may be one neural locus of this 5-HT1A-receptor mediated hypophagia. Future studies will be necessary to determine if this food intake suppression is attenuated when nucleus accumbens-treated rats are offered food in a non-deprived state.

4.2 5-HT1B receptors

A number of previous reports have demonstrated an effect of systemic 5-HT1B receptor stimulation on feeding behavior. In general, systemic activation of 5-HT1B receptors causes a dose-dependent decrease in food intake through reductions in both meal size and meal duration (Bovetto and Richard, 1995, Lee et al., 2002, Lee and Simansky, 1997, Schreiber et al., 2000), and blockade of the 5-HT1B receptor reduces the anorectic effect of relatively non-selective serotonin agonists (Curzon, 1991, Simansky and Nicklous, 2002). Furthermore, 5-HT1B receptor activation potentiates the suppression of feeding that follows concurrent 5-HT2C receptor agonist treatment (Doslikova et al., 2013, Schreiber and De Vry, 2002). Consistent with a potential effect on food-directed motivation, 5-HT1B receptor stimulation also reduces the reinstatement of lever pressing for contingent reinforcement (Przegalinski et al., 2008)or in the presence of food-associated cues (Acosta et al., 2005).

Two prior reports that examined the impact of systemic 5-HT1B receptor agonism on food intake also noted a hypodipsic action following treatment which did not mirror the changes in feeding (Lee et al., 2002, Schreiber et al., 2000). Such findings suggest that the neuronal mechanisms underlying 5-HT1B-mediated hypophagia and hypodipsia may differ. Here, we report that stimulation of nucleus accumbens 5-HT1B receptors caused a significant dose-dependent hypodipsia, but did not impact food intake in food-restricted rats. Lee et al. (1998) previously demonstrated that 5-HT1B receptor stimulation of the parabrachial nucleus of the pons reduced food consumption without affecting water intake (Lee et al., 1998). Taken together, these data suggest that separate neuronal substrates regulate the impact of systemic 5-HT1B receptor activation on food and water ingestion, and suggest a unique role for nucleus accumbens 5-HT1B receptors in moderating water consumption separate from food intake.

4.3 5-HT7 receptors

Although 5-HT7 receptors exist in relatively low concentrations within the striatum, activation of those receptors has been shown to affect the firing characteristics of cholinergic interneurons of the striatum (Bonsi et al., 2007). Striatal acetylcholine has been implicated in the regulation of satiety and motivational processes relating to food-seeking and consumption (Baldo et al., 2013, Hoebel et al., 2007). However, neither 5-HT7 receptor stimulation (in these experiments) nor blockade (Pratt et al., 2009) of the medial nucleus accumbens significantly impacted food or water consumption, despite a significant reduction in ambulation following 5-HT7 receptor stimulation. These data are consistent with other examinations targeting the role of 5-HT7 receptor with regards to food motivation. For instance, Clemett and colleagues (1998) injected antisense oligonucleotides into the cerebral ventricles to knock down 5-HT7 receptors. Rats did not show differential feeding or body weight between groups receiving the antisense or mismatched oligonucleotides. Additionally, systemic blockade of 5-HT7 receptors (along with D2, 5-HT1A, and sigma receptors) with tiospirone influences lever-pressing for food reward only at levels that also induce catatonia (Arolfo and McMillen, 1999). At this point, there is no convincing evidence to link 5-HT7 receptors with the regulation of feeding or food motivation, either systemically or during the targeting of the medial nucleus accumbens.

4.4 Concluding remarks

As the differential expression and function of serotonin receptors within central and peripheral tissues has become better understood, selective 5-HT receptor agents are being explored not only to assist with weight loss, but also to treat mood disorders (such as depression), drug abuse, and cognitive decline (Mitchell and Neumaier, 2005, Nic Dhonnchadha and Cunningham, 2008, Rothman et al., 2008, Upton et al., 2008). Given these clinical implications, as well as the known roles of other neurotransmitters within the nucleus accumbens upon the regulation of food intake, incentive processes, and hedonic responses to palatable foods (Berridge et al., 2010, Kelley et al., 2005), it is of interest to determine how selective serotonin receptor signaling within mesolimbic pathways impacts motivated behavior. The current experiments present, for the first time, a characterization of the individual roles for the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT7 receptors of the medial nucleus accumbens on food and water intake and locomotion in the rat. The results suggest that the behavioral effects previously reported by our laboratory following similar treatments of the 5-HT1/7 receptor agonist 5-CT were caused by activation of both 5-HT1A & 1B, but not 5-HT7 receptors. These data add a novel contribution to the study of striatal neurotransmitters and motivated behavior, and suggest that activation of individual serotonin receptors within the medial nucleus accumbens have differential roles in directing motivated behavior.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of medial nucleus accumbens stimulation of the 5-HT7 receptor on feeding, water intake, and locomotion. Although treatment with AS 19 resulted in a significant inhibition of ambulatory behavior at the highest dose, there were no significant effects of drug treatment on food or water intake, the number of approaches to the food hopper, or on rearing behavior. Statistical symbols are as represented for Figure 2.

Highlights.

  • Individual serotonin receptors in the nucleus accumbens serve unique behavioral roles

  • Nucleus accumbens 5-HT1A receptor activation reduces food and water intake in the rat

  • 5-HT1B receptor stimulation inhibits water intake without affecting feeding

  • Nucleus accumbens 5-HT7 receptor stimulation does not affect consummatory behavior

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by R15 DA030618 and the Translational Science Center at Wake Forest University.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Kara A. Clissold, Email: kac64@duke.edu.

Eugene Choi, Email: choie5wfu@gmail.com.

Wayne E. Pratt, Email: prattwe@wfu.edu.

References

  1. Acosta JI, Boynton FA, Kirschner KF, Neisewander JL. Stimulation of 5-HT1B receptors decreases cocaine- and sucrose-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005;80:297–307. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arolfo MP, McMillen BA. Effects of amperozide and tiospirone, atypical antipsychotic 5-HT2 drugs, on food-reinforced behavior in rats. Physiol Behav. 1999;68:93–8. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldo BA, Pratt WE, Will MJ, Hanlon EC, Bakshi VP, Cador M. Principles of motivation revealed by the diverse functions of neuropharmacological and neuroanatomical substrates underlying feeding behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basso AM, Kelley AE. Feeding induced by GABA(A) receptor stimulation within the nucleus accumbens shell: regional mapping and characterization of macronutrient and taste preference. Behav Neurosci. 1999;113:324–36. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.113.2.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berridge KC, Ho CY, Richard JM, DiFeliceantonio AG. The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res. 2010;1350:43–64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonsi P, Cuomo D, Ding J, Sciamanna G, Ulrich S, Tscherter A, et al. Endogenous serotonin excites striatal cholinergic interneurons via the activation of 5-HT 2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 serotonin receptors: implications for extrapyramidal side effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:1840–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bovetto S, Richard D. Functional assessment of the 5-HT 1A-, 1B-, 2A/2C-, and 3-receptor subtypes on food intake and metabolic rate in rats. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R14–20. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1995.268.1.R14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ. 2012;31:219–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clemett DA, Cockett MI, Marsden CA, Fone KC. Antisense oligonucleotide-induced reduction in 5-hydroxytryptamine7 receptors in the rat hypothalamus without alteration in exploratory behaviour or neuroendocrine function. J Neurochem. 1998;71:1271–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71031271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Currie PJ, Coscina DV. Metergoline potentiates natural feeding and antagonizes the anorectic action of medical hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996;53:1023–8. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02097-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Currie PJ, Fletcher PJ, Coscina DV. Administration of 8-OH-DPAT into the midbrain raphe nuclei: effects on medial hypothalamic NE-induced feeding. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R1645–51. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.5.R1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Curzon G. Effects of tryptophan and of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtype agonists on feeding. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991;294:377–88. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5952-4_35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doslikova B, Garfield AS, Shaw J, Evans ML, Burdakov D, Billups B, et al. 5-HT2C receptor agonist anorectic efficacy potentiated by 5-HT1B receptor agonist coapplication: an effect mediated via increased proportion of pro-opiomelanocortin neurons activated. J Neurosci. 2013;33:9800–4. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4326-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dourish CT, Hutson PH, Curzon G. Characteristics of feeding induced by the serotonin agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) Brain Res Bull. 1985;15:377–84. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(85)90005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dourish CT, Hutson PH, Kennett GA, Curzon G. 8-OH-DPAT-induced hyperphagia: its neural basis and possible therapeutic relevance. Appetite. 1986;7(Suppl):127–40. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(86)80058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ebenezer IS. Effects of the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT on food intake in food-deprived rats. Neuroreport. 1992;3:1019–22. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199211000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ebenezer IS, Arkle MJ, Tite RM. 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin inhibits food intake in fasted rats by an action at 5-HT1A receptors. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2007;29:269–72. doi: 10.1358/mf.2007.29.4.1075362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ebenezer IS, Tite RM. Differential effects of the 5-HT1A agonist gepirone on food intake in rats may depend on their motivation to eat. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2003;25:727–31. doi: 10.1358/mf.2003.25.9.793341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Egashira N, Yano A, Ishigami N, Mishima K, Iwasaki K, Fujioka M, et al. Investigation of mechanisms mediating 8-OH-DPAT-induced impairment of spatial memory: involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal hippocampus in rats. Brain Res. 2006;1069:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Finkelstein EA, Trogdon JG, Cohen JW, Dietz W. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:w822–31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fletcher PJ, Azampanah A, Korth KM. Activation of 5-HT(1B) receptors in the nucleus accumbens reduces self-administration of amphetamine on a progressive ratio schedule. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002;71:717–25. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00717-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fletcher PJ, Davies M. A pharmacological analysis of the eating response induced by 8-OH-DPAT injected into the dorsal raphe nucleus reveals the involvement of a dopaminergic mechanism. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1990;100:188–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02244404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Glazer G. Long-term pharmacotherapy of obesity 2000: a review of efficacy and safety. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1814–24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.15.1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Halford JC, Harrold JA, Boyland EJ, Lawton CL, Blundell JE. Serotonergic drugs : effects on appetite expression and use for the treatment of obesity. Drugs. 2007;67:27–55. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hannon J, Hoyer D. Molecular biology of 5-HT receptors. Behav Brain Res. 2008;195:198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoebel BG, Avena NM, Rada P. Accumbens dopamine-acetylcholine balance in approach and avoidance. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2007;7:617–27. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ioannides-Demos LL, Proietto J, Tonkin AM, McNeil JJ. Safety of drug therapies used for weight loss and treatment of obesity. Drug Saf. 2006;29:277–302. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629040-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jean A, Conductier G, Manrique C, Bouras C, Berta P, Hen R, et al. Anorexia induced by activation of serotonin 5-HT4 receptors is mediated by increases in CART in the nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:16335–40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701471104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kampe J, Tschop MH, Hollis JH, Oldfield BJ. An anatomic basis for the communication of hypothalamic, cortical and mesolimbic circuitry in the regulation of energy balance. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:415–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaplan JM, Song S, Grill HJ. Serotonin receptors in the caudal brainstem are necessary and sufficient for the anorectic effect of peripherally administered mCPP. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998;137:43–9. doi: 10.1007/s002130050591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelley AE, Baldo BA, Pratt WE, Will MJ. Corticostriatal-hypothalamic circuitry and food motivation: integration of energy, action and reward. Physiol Behav. 2005;86:773–95. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee MD, Aloyo VJ, Fluharty SJ, Simansky KJ. Infusion of the serotonin1B (5-HT1B) agonist CP-93,129 into the parabrachial nucleus potently and selectively reduces food intake in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998;136:304–7. doi: 10.1007/s002130050570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee MD, Kennett GA, Dourish CT, Clifton PG. 5-HT1B receptors modulate components of satiety in the rat: behavioural and pharmacological analyses of the selective serotonin1B agonist CP-94,253. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002;164:49–60. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1162-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee MD, Simansky KJ. CP-94, 253: a selective serotonin1B (5-HT1B) agonist that promotes satiety. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997;131:264–70. doi: 10.1007/s002130050292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Leibowitz SF, Weiss GF, Suh JS. Medial hypothalamic nuclei mediate serotonin's inhibitory effect on feeding behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990;37:735–42. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90556-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lopez-Alonso VE, Mancilla-Diaz JM, Rito-Domingo M, Gonzalez-Hernandez B, Escartin-Perez RE. The effects of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptor agonists on behavioral satiety sequence in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2007;416:285–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Matthys A, Haegeman G, Van Craenenbroeck K, Vanhoenacker P. Role of the 5-HT7 receptor in the central nervous system: from current status to future perspectives. Mol Neurobiol. 2011;43:228–53. doi: 10.1007/s12035-011-8175-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitchell ES, Neumaier JF. 5-HT6 receptors: a novel target for cognitive enhancement. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;108:320–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nic Dhonnchadha BA, Cunningham KA. Serotonergic mechanisms in addiction-related memories. Behav Brain Res. 2008;195:39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4th. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pecina S, Berridge KC. Opioid site in nucleus accumbens shell mediates eating and hedonic 'liking' for food: map based on microinjection Fos plumes. Brain Res. 2000;863:71–86. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02102-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pecina S, Smith KS, Berridge KC. Hedonic hot spots in the brain. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:500–11. doi: 10.1177/1073858406293154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pratt WE, Blackstone K. Nucleus accumbens acetylcholine and food intake: decreased muscarinic tone reduces feeding but not food-seeking. Behav Brain Res. 2009;198:252–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pratt WE, Blackstone K, Connolly ME, Skelly MJ. Selective serotonin receptor stimulation of the medial nucleus accumbens causes differential effects on food intake and locomotion. Behav Neurosci. 2009;123:1046–57. doi: 10.1037/a0016882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pratt WE, Kelley AE. Nucleus accumbens acetylcholine regulates appetitive learning and motivation for food via activation of muscarinic receptors. Behav Neurosci. 2004;118:730–9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pratt WE, Kelley AE. Striatal muscarinic receptor antagonism reduces 24-h food intake in association with decreased preproenkephalin gene expression. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:3229–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pratt WE, Schall MA, Choi E. Selective serotonin receptor stimulation of the medial nucleus accumbens differentially affects appetitive motivation for food on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Neurosci Lett. 2012;511:84–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Przegalinski E, Golda A, Filip M. Effects of serotonin (5-HT)(1B) receptor ligands on cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2008;60:798–810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Przegalinski E, Papla I, Siwanowicz J, Filip M. Effects of 5-HT1B receptor ligands microinjected into the ventral tegmental area on the locomotor and sensitizating effects of cocaine in rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004;14:217–25. doi: 10.1016/S0924-977X(03)00106-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rothman RB, Baumann MH. Appetite suppressants, cardiac valve disease and combination pharmacotherapy. Am J Ther. 2009;16:354–64. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31817fde95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rothman RB, Blough BE, Baumann MH. Dopamine/serotonin releasers as medications for stimulant addictions. Prog Brain Res. 2008;172:385–406. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00919-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sari Y. Serotonin1B receptors: from protein to physiological function and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28:565–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schreiber R, De Vry J. Role of 5-hT2C receptors in the hypophagic effect of m-CPP, ORG 37684 and CP-94,253 in the rat. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002;26:441–9. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(01)00284-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schreiber R, Selbach K, Asmussen M, Hesse D, de Vry J. Effects of serotonin(1/2) receptor agonists on dark-phase food and water intake in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000;67:291–305. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00357-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Simansky KJ, Nicklous DM. Parabrachial infusion of D-fenfluramine reduces food intake. Blockade by the 5-HT(1B) antagonist SB-216641. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002;71:681–90. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00740-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stratford TR, Kelley AE. Evidence of a functional relationship between the nucleus accumbens shell and lateral hypothalamus subserving the control of feeding behavior. J Neurosci. 1999;19:11040–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-11040.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tricklebank MD, Forler C, Fozard JR. The involvement of subtypes of the 5-HT1 receptor and of catecholaminergic systems in the behavioural response to 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1984;106:271–82. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(84)90714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Upton N, Chuang TT, Hunter AJ, Virley DJ. 5-HT6 receptor antagonists as novel cognitive enhancing agents for Alzheimer's disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5:458–69. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang M, Kelley AE. Enhanced intake of high-fat food following striatal mu-opioid stimulation: microinjection mapping and fos expression. Neuroscience. 2000;99:267–77. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00198-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES