Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Lab Chip. 2013 Nov 7;13(21):4160–4163. doi: 10.1039/c3lc50571e

A novel approach to quantifying ciliary physiology: microfluidic mixing driven by a ciliated biological surface

Stephan Jonas a,b,*, Elaine Zhou a,c, Engin Deniz d, Brendan Huang c, Kenny Chandrasekera c, Dipankan Bhattacharya d, Yu Wu c, Rong Fan c, Thomas M Deserno b, Mustafa K Khokha d,e, Michael A Chomaa c,d,*
PMCID: PMC3856250  NIHMSID: NIHMS522046  PMID: 23970350

Abstract

From the lungs to the central nervous system, cilia-driven fluid flow plays a fundamental role in many facets of life. Yet, there are few quantitative methods for analysing the function of ciliated surfaces. Here, we report a novel microfluidic approach for quantifying the performance of a ciliated surface using mixing performance as an integrated readout.


Motile cilia are cellular projections that drive microfluidic flow across different biological surfaces. Cilia generate directional flow by executing a periodic, asymmetric beat pattern consisting of a forward power stroke and a return stroke1, 2. Cilia-driven fluid flow is critical to the normal functioning of several different organ systems, (e.g. cerebrospinal fluid flow in the central nervous system3, mucous transport in the respiratory system4). Defects in cilia driven-fluid flow lead to several different disease states including recurrent lung infections in primary ciliary dyskinesia and cystic fibrosis2, 4. Abnormal cilia-driven fluid flow also is implicated in the etiology of heterotaxy syndrome, a disease with left-right axis defects resulting in severe heart and other thoraco-abdominal defects5, 6. Nevertheless, quantification of cilia-driven fluid flow remains a challenge. The analysis of ciliary beat frequency or ciliary ultrastructure is limited in that it does not directly quantify physiological flow performance. Moreover, the patterning of a ciliary surface also can alter flow, even in the setting of otherwise normal cilia7. The canonical approach for quantifying cilia-driven fluid flow relies on flow velocimetry. Historically, most flow velocimetry approaches have been semi-quantitative because they employ microscopy methods that are not cross-sectional in nature, meaning that information was integrated across the optical axis of the microscope. More recent methods8-10 employ cross-sectional imaging to generate spatially resolved flow velocity measurements. These spatially resolved flow vector maps that quantitatively describe the flow field can be further processed to give one or several diagnostic readouts. Even though velocimetry is an active area of research, new kinds of diagnostic readouts might be of interest that directly exploit the microfluidic nature of cilia-driven fluid flow.

Prior work has recognized that cilia can drive microfluidic mixing11-15. Two general mechanisms have been demonstrated. First, cilia can drive near-field mixing through enhanced diffusion, that is, an apparent particle diffusivity measured near individual cilia that is larger than otherwise expected11, 14, 15. Enhanced near-field diffusion can occur in the setting of either uncoordinated11, 15 or coordinated ciliary beating14. Second, far-field directional flow driven by the coordinated beating of cilia can be exploited to drive mixing when the flow is confined to specifically designed geometries10, 11. Indeed, our prior work demonstrated that a biological ciliated surface can drive mixing-type flow patterns8. Such patterns are reminiscent of mixing driven by biomimetic cilia12, 13. This similarity inspired us to develop a new kind of quantitative readout for biological ciliary flow performance: microfluidic mixing efficiency. Our novel approach is to use a ciliated biological surface as a microfluidic “component” and to design microfluidic chips and imaging strategies to quantify the performance of that component. To that end, we designed a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chip to allow for the delivery of tracer dye into a chamber containing a ciliated surface. We used colour videomicroscopy on a consumer-grade DSLR camera (Canon EOS D5 Mark II) and a standard stereomicroscope microscope to capture cilia-driven dye mixing. We used two distinct image-processing strategies (Shannon information entropy and dye frontline tracking) to quantify mixing efficiency. Finally, we demonstrated our conceptually new approach by quantifying reduced cilia-driven mixing performance in the setting of increased fluid viscosity.

We chose Xenopus (tadpole) embryos as our animal model since they are an important model organism in vertebrate ciliary biology16. Like other amphibian embryos, the skin of Xenopus embryos is ciliated17 (Fig. 1) The ciliated skin drives flow that generates mixing in close proximity to the embryo (Fig. 1b-f). In our experiments, we only used morphologically normal embryos. Fig. 1d-e and Movie 1 show a Nieuwkoop-Faber (NF) stage 25 embryo in a transparent drop of physiological solution. The ciliated skin drives mixing of a red microsphere solution. There is surface flow in a head-to-tail direction with a tail-to-head recirculatory flow further away from the surface. Fig. 1f-g and Movie 2 show a NF stage 41 embryo in a yellow dye-coloured physiological solution. Here, cilia-driven flow drives mixing of a blue dye with a yellow dye, leading to a green colour readout.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of Xenopus embryo skin showing multiciliated cells. The dashed circle highlights a ciliated cell. (b) Higher magnification SEM of a multiciliated cell. (c) Schematic of the forward power stroke of an individual cilia, adapted from Ref. 2. The direction of the power stroke determines flow direction. (d-g) Qualitative demonstrations of cilia-driven microfluidic mixing. (d-e) show a NF stage 25 embryo in a drop of water. The ciliated skin drives mixing of red microspheres. There is surface flow in a head-to-tail direction as well as a tail-to-head recirculatory flow (arroheads; Movie 1). (f-g) show a NF stage 41 embryo in a yellow dye solution. Cilia-driven flow drives mixing of a blue dye with the yellow, leading to a green colour readout (Movie 2). h, head; t, tail.

While our initial mixing work demonstrated the principle of using a ciliated biological surface to drive microfluidic mixing, the approach of confining the surface in an arbitrary drop of fluid had significant limitations. Importantly, it was prohibitively difficult to generate the same drop shape between experiments and to manually deliver flow contrast agent in a reproducible manner using a micropipette. We therefore designed a microfluidic chip to overcome these limitations and to move from a qualitative demonstration to a quantitative assay. Using a do-it-yourself method18, an initial prototype was developed (Movie 3). Our final PDMS chip design is composed of two inflow channels, one outflow channel, and a suction channel (Fig. 2, Supplementary Information). The chip meets the following specifications: (i) controlled delivery of flow contrast agent; (ii) multiple inflow channels for contrast agent, drugs, and physiological solution; (iii) single outflow channel that enables coordinated, simultaneous inflow and outflow of mixing well fluid; (iv) gentle securing of ciliated embryos via suction; and (v) reusability of the well.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A schematic of the PDMS microfluidic chip.

Since the mixing chamber geometry influences mixing patterns, a cylindrical well was used. Given a typical embryo thickness of ~0.5 mm, a cylinder height of 1 mm completely immerses the embryo in physiological solution. At a height of 1 mm, there is insufficient distance between the ciliated surface and the air/water interface for a recirculatory mixing flow to form above the embryo. The well radius of 3 mm was set by the minimum distance between the embryo body and well wall needed to establish recirculatory mixing flow in the plane orthogonal to the optical axis of the imaging microscope. In our experience, this distance is approximately 1 body length8. That is, the chip is designed to generate mixing along the dorsal (back) and ventral (front/abdomen) aspects of the embryo. Note that, since recirculatory flow is expected only orthogonal to the optical axis, we expect to minimize dye concentration variability along the projection axis of our two-dimensional imaging.

Two methods for quantifying mixing efficiency are demonstrated: (i) Shannon information entropy, a measure of disorder in a digital signal that has been previously used in microfluidic mixing quantification19, and (ii) frontline tracking, a measure of time-varying geometric properties of the dye/fluid interface.

Mixing can be seen as a disordering or randomization process. Thus, Shannon information entropy20 H is a natural measurement of mixing performance. Shannon information entropy H is defined as H=−Σp(x)log2(p(x))], where p(x) is the probability density function describing a digital signal x that can exist in i∈{1,2,…,2N} states and N is the bit depth of the digital signal20. Hence, a random signal has maximum entropy H=N, while a signal composed of repeated elements has H=0 entropy. In our case, the signals x are extracted from a digital movie recording of the cilia-driven mixing. They can be defined locally (windowed) and globally over time and space (Fig. 3). In particular, the entropy can be calculated at an individual pixel over a specified time interval δt (temporal entropy) or over a spatial region of interest at a specific at a particular moment in time (spatial entropy). Windowed temporal entropy generates M entropy maps, where M=Δt/δt and Δt is the duration of a movie recording. These windowed temporal entropy maps (Fig. 4 and Movie 5) show the time evolution of cilia-driven mixing “hot spots” and “cold spots.” Time-varying spatial entropy naturally lends itself to integrated, quantitative measures of mixing performance. In particular, we found that the time duration of the curve upswing in 25% to 75% of maximum entropy (t25-75) can be used as a readout for cilia driven mixing efficiency. Here, shorter t25-75 times indicate more efficient cilia-driven mixing. We demonstrated t25-75 in a biologically relevant experiment. We compared t25-75 times in normal and 3× fluid viscosity in NF stage 30 embryos (n=20 embryos in 1× viscosity and n=18 embryos in 3× viscosity). One 1× viscosity experiment was excluded owing to an entropy curve that did not peak over the course of movie acquisition. Fluid viscosity was increased using high molecular weight dextran21. t25-75 times were significantly increased by tripling the fluid viscosity (p=9×10−5; Fig. 5), indicating that increased fluid viscosity decreases microfluidic mixing efficiency driven by the ciliated biological surface.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Classification of Shannon information entropy measurements.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Sample sequence of images and processing at different time points. Upper row shows raw images with superimposed frontline (dashed line; Movie 4). Lower row shows windowed temporal entropy over 5 seconds of mixing at these time points (Movie 5). NF stage 30.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Results of comparative analysis between normal and increased viscosity experiments. Error bars show standard error of the mean. t25-75 defines the time between 25% and 75% of maximum entropy.

Since there are different computational methods for quantifying mixing efficiency, we sought to demonstrate that our approach is robust to different methods. Thus, in addition to Shannon information entropy, we demonstrated frontline tracking. Frontline tracking was suggested by Khatavkar, et. al.12 as an alternate for quantifying mixing efficiency. Since microfluidic mixing can be thought of as stirring and diffusion, the efficiency of mixing is dependent on stirring performance22. One measure of stirring performance is the extent to which the interface (i.e. frontline) between two fluids (e.g. dye and transparent fluid) increases as a function of time. Here, we estimate the length of the interface between dye contrast agent and the transparent physiological solution in which the ciliated surface sits (Fig 4). The rationale is that diffusion gradients are maximised at interfaces, and that longer interfaces promote more efficient diffusion over a more spatially distributed extent in the mixing well. We also note that, while velocimetry quantifies steady-state features of a flow field, frontline tracking quantifies non-steady-state features of a mixing process.

A frontline tracking algorithm was designed with smoothing in curvature scale space (Supplementary Information). The same acquisitions for the above Shannon information entropy experiments were used for frontline tracking experiments (n=21 embryos in 1× viscosity and n=18 embryos in 3× viscosity). A threefold increase in viscosity resulted in statistically significantly shorter frontline lengths at 30 and 45 s after introduction of the dye (p=2×10−4 and p=4×10−4 for 30 and 45 s, respectively). Here, shorter (longer) frontline lengths at a particular time point indicate lower (higher) mixing efficiency, respectively. Frontline lengths at 60 s were not significantly different between the two viscosity groups. This lack of significance can be attributed to backfolding of recirculatory loops onto themselves. Backfolding abruptly decreases interfacial or frontline length (Fig. 4), indicating that frontline length is useful only during the initial stages of mixing after introduction of dye into the mixing well.

In sum, we have demonstrated a conceptually novel approach to quantifying the performance of a biological ciliated surface. Our approach uses a biological ciliated surface in a microfluidic assay supported by a specifically designed PDMS microfluidic chip and quantitative image analysis. The assay yields two distinct quantitative biomarkers that reflect the integrated performance of a biological ciliated surface. In addition to demonstrating that the mixing can be reliably quantified, we showed that impairment of directional flow by increased fluid viscosity also impairs mixing efficiency, thereby making a concrete connection between biologically-relevant functioning and mixing efficiency. Integrated performance as readout by a single readout measure is of particular interest in ciliary biology since many different kinds of defects can occur in a ciliated surface, ranging from ultrastructural defects in the ciliary molecular motor to the developmental patterning of the surface. A single readout measure may be useful when an experimental or clinical question relies on knowing whether performance is normal or abnormal but direct knowledge of flow velocity is not needed. Mixing performance may have future use in a genetic screen using ciliated Xenopus embryos. Clinically, mixing performance may have utility in the rapid assessment of ciliated biopsy specimens (e.g. nasal polyps, tracheal strip biopsy). Future work also will focus on (a) understanding how different defects at different size scales modify cilia-driven mixing performance and (b) extending the present work that uses 2D projection imaging to cross-sectional and 3D imaging. Lastly, our work may advance understanding the flow in the embryonic node. The node is a transient organ that is present during early embryonic development. The floor of the node is ciliated, and directional cilia-driven flow within a well-defined geometry establishes left-right body axis orientation5,6, 23. Using chips with custom geometries is a promising approach to elucidating relationships between flow geometry and cilia-driven fluid flow.

Supplementary Material

ESI
Movie 1
Download video file (5.1MB, mov)
Movie 2
Download video file (4.5MB, mov)
Movie 3
Download video file (5MB, mov)
Movie 4
Download video file (1.1MB, mov)
Movie 5
Download video file (466.6KB, mov)
Movie 6
Download video file (3.1MB, mov)

Acknowledgements

All research was conducted with Yale IACUC approval. RF acknowledges support from the Yale University New Faculty Startup fund and the use of equipment at Yale Nanofabrication Center and Yale Institute for Nanoscience and Quantum Engineering (YINQE). MKK acknowledges support by NIH grants 1R01DE018824 and 1R01DE018825. MAC acknowledges support through a K12 award from the Yale Child Health Research Center (5K12-HD001401-12).

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any supplementary information available should be included here]

references

  • 1.Purcell EM. Am J Phys. 1977;45:3–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Knowles MR, Boucher RC. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;109:571–577. doi: 10.1172/JCI15217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Breunig JJ, Arellano JI, Rakic P. Nature Neuroscience. 2010;13:654–655. doi: 10.1038/nn0610-654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baker K, Beales PL. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2009;151C:281–295. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brueckner M. Circulation. 2007;115:2793–2795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brueckner M. Circulation. 2012;125:2178–2180. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.103861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mitchell B, Jacobs R, Li J, Chien S, Kintner C. Nature. 2007;447:97–101. doi: 10.1038/nature05771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jonas S, Bhattacharya D, Khokha MK, Choma MA. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2011;2:2022–2034. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.002022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oldenburg AL, Chhetri RK, Hill DB, Button B. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2012;3:1978–1992. doi: 10.1364/BOE.3.001978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu L, Chu KK, Houser GH, Diephuis BJ, Li Y, Wilsterman EJ, Shastry S, Dierksen G, Birket SE, Mazur M, Byan-Parker S, Grizzle WE, Sorscher EJ, Rowe SM, Tearney GJ. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim MJ, Breuer KS. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2006;129:319–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khatavkar VV, Anderson PD, den Toonder JMJ, Meijer HEH. Physics of Fluids. 2007;19:083605. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.den Toonder J, Bos F, Broer D, Filippini L, Gillies M, de Goede J, Mol T, Reijme M, Talen W, Wilderbeek H, Khatavkar V, Anderson P. Lab on a Chip. 2008;8:533–541. doi: 10.1039/b717681c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shields AR, Fiser BL, Evans BA, Falvo MR, Washburn S, Superfine R. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:15670–15675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005127107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leptos KC, Guasto JS, Gollub JP, Pesci AI, Goldstein RE. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.198103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Werner ME, Mitchell BJ. Genesis. 2012;50:176–185. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Assheton R. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical. 1896;2:465–484. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yuen PK, Goral VN. Lab on a Chip. 2010;10:384–387. doi: 10.1039/b918089c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Camesasca M, Manas-Zloczower I, Kaufman M. J Micromech Microeng. 2005;15:2038–2044. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shannon CE. At&T Tech J. 1948;27:623–656. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gheber L, Korngreen A, Priel Z. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 1998;39:9–20. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)39:1<9::AID-CM2>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Squires TM, Quake SR. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2005;77:977–1026. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cartwright JHE, Piro N, Piro O, Tuval I. Developmental Dynamics. 2008;237:3477–3490. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI
Movie 1
Download video file (5.1MB, mov)
Movie 2
Download video file (4.5MB, mov)
Movie 3
Download video file (5MB, mov)
Movie 4
Download video file (1.1MB, mov)
Movie 5
Download video file (466.6KB, mov)
Movie 6
Download video file (3.1MB, mov)

RESOURCES