Skip to main content
Eukaryotic Cell logoLink to Eukaryotic Cell
. 2013 Dec;12(12):1653–1663. doi: 10.1128/EC.00222-13

Expression of Functional Plasmodium falciparum Enzymes Using a Wheat Germ Cell-Free System

Devaraja G Mudeppa 1, Pradipsinh K Rathod 1,
PMCID: PMC3889570  PMID: 24123271

Abstract

One decade after the sequencing of the Plasmodium falciparum genome, 95% of malaria proteins in the genome cannot be expressed in traditional cell-based expression systems, and the targets of the best new leads for antimalarial drug discovery are either not known or not available in functional form. For a disease that kills up to 1 million people per year, routine expression of recombinant malaria proteins in functional form is needed both for the discovery of new therapeutics and for identification of targets of new drugs. We tested the general utility of cell-free systems for expressing malaria enzymes. Thirteen test enzyme sequences were reverse amplified from total RNA, cloned into a plant-like expression vector, and subjected to cell-free expression in a wheat germ system. Protein electrophoresis and autoradiography confirmed the synthesis of products of expected molecular masses. In rare problematic cases, truncated products were avoided by using synthetic genes carrying wheat codons. Scaled-up production generated 39 to 354 μg of soluble protein per 10 mg of translation lysate. Compared to rare proteins where cell-based systems do produce functional proteins, the cell-free yields are comparable or better. All 13 test products were enzymatically active, without failure. This general path to produce functional malaria proteins should now allow the community to access new tools, such as biologically active protein arrays, and lead to the discovery of new chemical functions, structures, and inhibitors of previously inaccessible malaria gene products.

INTRODUCTION

The contribution of enzymology to a major global health problem is severely limited by an unusual general problem with protein expression. Malaria is a major life-threatening disease (1, 2). It is estimated to cause up to 1 million deaths annually, mostly in African children under 5 years of age, out of approximately 247 million total clinical cases. In spite of intense efforts to control malaria, the emergence of resistant parasites poses a major challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to discover novel targets and novel knowledge-based strategies for controlling malaria.

Despite the availability of complete coding sequences of Plasmodium falciparum (3), after a decade, only a small fraction of malaria parasite gene products have been functionally annotated and even fewer have potent, target-selective inhibitors. The leading global antimalarial drug discovery enterprise, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV [http://www.mmv.org/research-development]), has about five advanced projects with defined targets, but only two of these projects have access to recombinant, functionally active, pure protein targets for lead improvement.

The lack of defined biochemical systems for malaria drug discovery is directly related to the lack of a reliable heterologous expression system for malaria proteins. Previous attempts to express recombinant malaria proteins showed that overexpression of malaria proteins is a general, challenging task. Conventional Escherichia coli cell-based protein expression systems successfully express recombinant proteins from many genomes (4, 5). Yet when similar systems were applied to the expression of P. falciparum proteins on a single gene or on a genome scale (6, 7), the success rates, even loosely defined merely as the ability to make visible new protein, were less than 5%. In contrast, corresponding genes from human counterparts (810) or even from other parasitic sources are often readily overexpressed (11).

Various ideas have been offered to explain the challenges of expressing malaria proteins in cell-based systems. These explanations include the high AT content of the malaria coding regions, internal start and stop sites, autologous feedback loops, and nonspecific nucleic acid binding (6, 12, 13). Efforts to overcome these potential issues, using tRNA augmentation, optimized codons, and alteration of host expression, have led to occasional successes (7, 1218) but no universal malaria protein expression strategy.

One potentially useful approach with predictable success is to conduct expression in an auxotrophic host cell, where survival of the host is dependent on successful expression of the desired malaria gene (6, 12, 19). Due to limited availability of appropriate knockout host cells and to the absence of information about the functions of new genes, this is also not a practical solution for future genome-wide protein expression. In addition, many different protein production protocols have to be tested for optimum expression of each desired protein, again making it difficult to select one general system for new malaria proteins.

In contrast to many of the challenges of cell-based systems, cell-free systems are both open and flexible (Table 1). Among the available options, the wheat germ system is robust, it quickly produces high yields, and it is scalable and cost-effective. Previously, we demonstrated the successful cell-free expression of very challenging parasite enzymes in fully functional form: P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (PfDHFR-TS) and Cryptosporidium parvum thymidine kinase (20, 21). The cell-free-produced DHFR-TS had all three known functions of native protein: DHFR catalytic activity, TS catalytic activity, and autologous RNA binding (20).

Table 1.

Main features of commonly used protein expression platforms

graphic file with name zek9990941970005.jpg

Since then, cell-free systems derived from wheat germ and E. coli have been used to express hundreds of malaria vaccine candidates and a few enzymes (2228), but the functional assessment of the protein products is mostly limited to autoradiograms, Western blots, and solubility.

With the ultimate goal of deriving a convenient, universal protocol for producing verifiable, functionally active malaria protein products, we selected 13 genes for expression tests, and we report on their expression in catalytically functional forms. The training set varied in terms of size, isoelectric point, and history of success in cell-based expression systems. We report an expression protocol which generates fully functional malaria proteins, without fail, in our test cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All chemicals, unless noted, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO. Salt-free-grade primers were obtained from Operon Biotechnologies(Huntsville, AL, USA). A Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis system (molecular-mass cutoff of 10 kDa) was from ThermoScientific (Rochester, NY, USA). All radiochemicals were from Moravek, Brea, CA. PCR premix was obtained from Bioline Inc., Taunton, MA.

Construction of genes.

DNA primers (Table 2) for all of the selected test case malaria genes were designed based on PlasmoDB sequences (http://plasmodb.org/plasmo/). cDNA strands were synthesized from P. falciparum total RNA by using random hexamer primers and a reverse transcription kit from Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, CA. Double-stranded DNAs were then amplified from cDNAs using sequence-specific primers (Table 2). A typical 50-μl PCR mixture contained 25 μl of PCR premix, 0.25 μM forward and reverse primer of each respective gene, and 5 μl of cDNA. The mix was subjected to 25 cycles as follows: 98°C for 1 min, 98°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 to 5 min, depending on the size of the gene. The PfDHFR-TS and green fluorescent protein (GFP) were constructed as described before (20).

Table 2.

List of all primers used to construct the malarial native gene test cases

Primer name Primer sequence (5′ to 3′)
dUTPn-Forward CTCATGCATTTAAAAATTGTATGTCTGAG
dUTPn-Reverse GGATCAATATTTATTATTCGATGTCG
SAHH-Forward CTCATGGTTGAAAATAAGAGCAAGGTCAAAG
SAHH-Reverse GGATTAATATCTGTATTCGTTACTCTTAAAGGG
ADA-Forward CTTATGAATTGTAAGAATATGGATAC
ADA-Reverse GGATCAAAAATATTTACTTATAATTTTATTTTTTAT
PNP-Forward CTCATGGATAATCTTTTACGCCATTTA
PNP-Reverse GGATTAGGCATATTTGGTTGCTAATTT
SHMT-Forward CTCATGTTTAACAACGACCCTTTGCAAAAATATG
SHMT-Reverse GGATTAGGCAAATGGTAAGTTTTTTGCCC
GAK-Forward CTCATGAGAATTGTATTATTTGGAG
GAK-reverse GGATCATTTTAATTTTTCATTTTTTCTGTA
OPRT-Forward CTCATGACGACGATAAAAGAGAATG
OPRT-Reverse GGATCATATCATCGACTGTATATC
DHOase-Forward CTCATGAAAAATTACTTTTATATTCCAATAG
DHOase-Reverse GGATTAAAACTTACTTACATAATGTATG
UdGly-Forward CTCATGAATAATCCAACAATTCAGAAAAC
Udgly-Reverse GGATTATTGGGGTAGCTCCCATTT
UdGly-Forward CTCATGAATAATCCAACAATTCAGAAAAC
Udgly-Reverse GGATTATTGGGGTAGCTCCCATTT
GTPCH-Forward CTCATGTATAAATATACGTCAATAAACAAATC
GTPCH-Reverse GGACTAATTTAAATTTTCCACAGAAG
DHFS-FPGS-Forward ATGGAAAAAAATCAAAATGATAAAAGTAACAAAAATG
DHFS-FPGS-Reverse TTAAACAAGAGATGGTTCATTCATAAAAATGG

Optimized codons for wheat system.

For some studies, malarial coding sequences were optimized to align with wheat codon usage and chemically synthesized (Geneart; Life Technologies). Synthetic codons of P. falciparum serine hydroxymethyltransferase (PfSHMT), PfDHFR-TS, and P. falciparum GTP cyclohydrolase I (PfGTPCH) were PCR amplified as before using gene-specific primers (Table 3).

Table 3.

List of all primers used to construct malarial synthetic gene test cases

Primer name Primer sequence (5′ to 3′)
SHMT-Forward CGAGATGTTCAACAACGACCC
SHMT-Reverse GCCGTCATCACGCGAATGG
DHFR-TS-Forward TCGAGATGGAGCAAGTCTGTG
DHFR-TS-Reverse GCCGTCATCACGCGGCCATGT
GTPCH-Forward CGAGATGTACAAGTACACCTC
GTPCH-Reverse GAGGTGTACTTGTACATCTCG

Cloning of genes into cell-free T-overhang vector.

An important component of developing a general method for expressing all malaria proteins was to have a streamlined, reliable cloning method. Cloning without using restriction enzymes was achieved by linearizing cell-free vector DNA and inserting a T overhang at the 3′ end. In a 50-μl reaction mixture, 10 μg of cell-free vector, 160 units of EcoRV, 5 μl of 10× NEB buffer 3, and 5 μg of bovine serum albumin (BSA) were added, and the mixture was incubated for 18 h at 37°C. After complete digestion of the vector DNA, the restriction enzyme was heat inactivated at 80°C for 30 min, followed by purification of DNA using a PCR cleanup kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). A T overhang was then inserted into linearized vector DNA (29). Briefly, in a 50-μl reaction mixture, 1.5 μg of linearized vector DNA, 5 μl of 10× PCR buffer, 2 mM dTTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 units of Extaq DNA polymerase, and 0.2 mg/ml BSA were incubated at 70°C. After 150 min, salts and proteins were removed from the T-overhang DNA using a PCR cleanup kit. Freshly amplified target genes were directly ligated into a T-overhang expression vector, followed by transformation into DH5α competent cells (Invitrogen) which were spread on ampicillin-containing LB agar plates for overnight growth. Malaria gene inserts in selected colonies were confirmed by colony PCR by first using vector-specific primers. To confirm the correct orientation of the gene, the colony PCR product was subjected to a second round of PCR (round II PCR) using a vector-specific and enzyme-specific primer combination. After full DNA sequences were confirmed, plasmids were isolated using a plasmid midikit (Qiagen, Inc., USA).

Wheat germ lysate preparation.

A wheat germ lysate preparation protocol was adapted from published work (30). Wheat seeds were cracked by hand mill. The germ fraction was separated from the cracked wheat by sequential sieving on 850-μm and 710-μm mesh. The portion retained on the 710-μm mesh was subjected to solvent separation using cyclohexane and carbon tetrachloride (vol/vol, 240:600). The solvent-floated germ fraction was collected and dried for 1 h in a fume hood.

Ten grams of solvent floated germs was stirred magnetically in 1 liter of deionized water for 10 min. Germs were then sonicated for 5 min in 0.5% Igepal-CA 630 (Sigma). Detergent contaminant was removed by magnetically stirring germs in 1 liter of deionized water twice for 10 min each. Finally, germs were rinsed with 40 mM HEPES-KOH buffer, pH 7.8. Buffer-rinsed germs were crushed with mortar and pestle. To the germ paste, 10 ml of cold buffer 1 (40 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.8, 100 mM potassium acetate, 2.5 mM magnesium acetate, 2 mM calcium chloride, 0.3 mM concentrations of 20 amino acids, and 5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]) was added, and the sample was ground. The ground germ slurry was then transferred to a fresh autoclaved centrifuge tube and spun for 30 min at 35,000 × g. After careful removal of the fat layer, the supernatant was spun again at 35,000 × g for another 30 min to repeat the fat removal step. The collected supernatant was then filtered using a Sephadex G25 column (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), preequilibrated with buffer 1. RNA in the lysate was quantitated by measuring absorbance at 260 nm, and protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method. The concentration of lysate was adjusted to 150 units per ml of lysate. Lysates were stored at −80°C in small aliquots. One unit of wheat germ lysate (175 μg of protein) produces 8 μg of GFP in 24 h in a 25-μl dialysis-based translation reaction volume at 26°C.

Cell-free transcription.

Cell-free transcription and translation reactions were carried out as reported previously (30). A typical transcription reaction was carried out in 100 μl with 10 μg of target gene carrying plasmid, 80 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.8, 16 mM magnesium acetate, 2 mM spermidine, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 40 units of RNase inhibitor (NEB), 130 units of SP6 RNA polymerase (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA), and 3 mM (each) GTP, ATP, CTP, and UTP. The transcription mixture was incubated at 37°C for 3 h. Pyrophosphate-induced precipitate in the transcription reaction was pelleted by spinning at 8,000 × g for 2 min. The mRNA in the supernatant was precipitated by adding 20 μl of 7.5 M ammonium acetate and 300 μl of ethanol. After 10 min on ice, the mixture was spun at 21,000 × g for 20 min; the pellet was then washed with 200 μl of 70% ethanol and spun at 21,000 × g for 2 min. The pellet was dried for 10 min and dissolved in 30 μl of autoclaved deionized water. Typical mRNA concentrations were in the range of 1 to 1.5 mg per ml of transcription product.

Cell-free translation.

The cell-free translation of the purified mRNA was carried out using a dialysis reaction method (31). A 100-μl reaction mixture contained 30 μl of mRNA (100 to 150 μg), 4 units of wheat germ lysate, 20 μg of creatine kinase, 40 units of RNase inhibitor, and 20 μl of 5× protein expression buffer (PEB) (1× PEB is 30 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.8, 100 mM potassium acetate, 2.7 mM magnesium acetate, 5 mM DTT, 0.4 mM spermidine, 0.3 mM concentrations of 20 amino acids, 1.2 mM ATP, 0.25 mM GTP, 16 mM creatine phosphate). The translation reaction mixture was poured into a Slide-A-Lyzer Mini 10-kDa dialysis unit and immersed in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube containing 1.2 ml of 1× PEB. After incubation at 26°C for 24 h, the malaria gene-translated lysate from the dialysis cup was collected and used for solubility analysis by spinning for 15 min at 20,000 × g and 4°C; the supernatant was used for further studies. For protein quantification experiments, [U-14C]leucine was set at 9.57 μM (0.25 μCi/ml), and nonlabeled leucine concentrations were set at 108 μM during translation. Incorporation of labeled leucine into newly translated protein was quantified by trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation assay (32).

For the autoradiogram experiments, a batch reaction method was used. Gel-filtrated transcripts (12 μg) served as templates for every 50-μl translation reaction mixture. The concentrations of 14C-labeled leucine and nonlabeled leucine were 153 μM (0.2 μCi/ml) and 84 μM, respectively. After a 4-h incubation at 26°C, the soluble fractions were prepared as mentioned earlier, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and exposed to a phosphorimager screen (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).

Enzyme assays.

In addition to assessing the expression of malaria proteins in cell-free expression systems by PAGE (see above), we tracked individual enzymatic activities corresponding to the predicted function of the P. falciparum gene to truly determine functional expression of each of the malaria proteins. For every assay, we looked at product formation as a function of time and as a function of expressed lysate. GFP-expressed lysate served as a positive control for the health of the translation system and as a negative control for expression of the target malaria enzyme. The enzymes assayed and their abbreviations are listed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Protein quantitation and functional analyses of malarial enzymes expressed in a wheat cell-free system

Gene idenifiera P. falciparum enzyme (abbreviation) Mass (kDa) pI Total synthesized protein (μg/mg lysate) Soluble protein (μg/mg lysate) Activity (nmol/min/mg lysate) Specific activity (μmol/min/mg)
Green fluorescent protein (GFP)c 26.8 5.8 44.4 43.7 NAd NA
PF3D7_1127100 dUTP nucleotide hydrolase (dUTPn)b 19.5 7.0 19 17.7 295.3 16.68
PF3D7_0520900 S-Adenosyl homocysteine hydrolase (SAHH) 53.8 5.7 25.9 25.5 78.6 3.08
PF3D7_1029600 Adenosine deaminase (ADA)b 42.5 5.4 13 12 450 37.5
PF3D7_0513300 Purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) 26.8 6.5 25.2 22.3 13.3 0.59
PF3D7_1023200 Orotidine-5[prime]-phosphate decarboxylase (OMPD) 37.8 7.7 40.2 35.4 285.7 8.07
PF3D7_0417200 Dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFR-TS) 71.7 7.2 27.6 17.8 3.4 0.19
PF3D7_1235600 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) 49.7 8.1 37 24.6 23.3 0.94
PF3D7_0415600 GTP:AMP phosphotransferase (GAK) 26.7 9.8 17.4 5.07 35.4 6.98
PF3D7_0512700 Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT) 33.0 7.4 31.8 10 35.7 3.57
PF3D7_1472900 Dihydroorotase (DHOase) 41.7 7.4 21.6 8 1.78 0.22
PF3D7_1415000 Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDgly)b 37.4 9.8 16 11.6 14.8 1.27
PF3D7_1224000 GTP cyclohydrolase (GTPCH) 45.8 9.9 5.2 3.9 2.18 0.56
PF3D7_1324800 Dihydrofolate synthase-folyl polyglutamate synthetase (DHFS-FPGS) 60.0 6.7 23.9 22.3 0.71 0.03
a

Gene identifiers are from PlamoDB.

b

Putative.

c

GFP was included as a control.

d

NA, not applicable.

dUTPH.

The release of phosphate from dUTP by the action of dUTP nucleotide hydrolase (dUTPH) and pyrophosphatase is based on capture of inorganic phosphate by malachite green and the resulting color change (33). To a 500-μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 100 μM dUTP, and 5 units of pyrophosphatase, various quantities of 20-fold dilutions of either dUTPH- or GFP-translated lysates were added, and the mixture was incubated at 25°C. At different time intervals, 100 μl of malachite green was added, and absorbance was monitored at 600 nm against the reaction buffer and pyrophosphatase blank. A standard calibration curve for various concentrations of inorganic phosphate was prepared as per the malachite green assay kit instructions (BioAssay Systems, Inc., Hayward, CA, USA).

SAHH.

Release of l-homocysteine from S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH) was monitored based on a colorimetric reaction with dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) (34). To a 500-μl assay reaction mixture containing 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, and 50 μM SAH, various quantities of 2-fold dilutions of S-adenosyl homocysteine hydrolase (SAHH)- and GFP-translated lysates were added, and the mixture was incubated at 25°C. At various time intervals, DTNB was added to a final concentration of 100 μM and monitored at 412 nm. Reaction mixture with DTNB and without lysate served as a blank.

ADA.

Deamination of adenosine was directly monitored by tracking changes in absorption at 265 nm (35). The 500-μl reaction mixture contained 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, and 2 mM DTT. Various quantities of adenosine deaminase (ADA)- and GFP-translated lysates were added, and the starting absorption was read at 265 nm. The deamination reaction was initiated by the addition of 100 μM adenosine, and the decrease in absorbance was monitored at 265 nm. The absorption coefficient for adenosine is 8,400 M−1.

PNP.

Release of the hypoxanthine base from the nucleoside substrate inosine was coupled to its oxidation of uric acid (36). To a 500-μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, 100 μM inosine, 2 mM DTT, and 1 unit of xanthine oxidase, various quantities of either purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP)-translated lysate or GFP-translated lysate were added. After an initial reading at 293 nm, the reaction was monitored by tracking the increase in absorbance at 293 nm. The absorption coefficient for uric acid at 293 nm is 12,900 M−1.

OMPD.

Decarboxylation of orotidine-5′-monophosphate (OMP) to UMP was monitored directly at 285 nm (37). The 500-μl reaction mixture contained 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 2 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM EDTA. Various quantities of either OMP decarboxylase (OMPD)-expressed or GFP-translated lysates were added, and initial absorption at 265 nm was recorded. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 200 μM OMP to the final concentration, and the decrease in absorbance was monitored at 285 nm. The absorption coefficient for OMP at 285 nm is 1,650 M−1.

DHFR-TS.

The more fragile thymidylate synthase reaction in the bifunctional parasite enzyme was followed by tracking the release of tritiated water from a 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridylate-labeled substrate (19). To a 75-μl reaction mixture containing 33 mM TES [N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid] buffer, pH 7.0, 113 μM tetrahydrofolate, 16 mM MgCl2, 0.7 mM EDTA, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 3.25 mM formaldehyde, 6.47 μM cold dUMP, and 0.196 μM 5-3H-labeled dUMP (2.66 μCi/ml), various quantities of 25-fold dilutions of DHFR-TS-translated or GFP-translated lysates were added, and the mixture was incubated at 26°C. At various time intervals, the reactions were stopped by the addition of 20 μl of stop solution (3 parts 2N TCA and 1 part 4.34 mM dUMP). Unreacted [5-3H]dUMP was then separated from tritiated water by absorption to 200 μl of 10% cold charcoal on ice for 15 min. The samples were then centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 × g, followed by the transfer of 120 μl of supernatant to scintillation vials to determine the release of radioactive water.

SHMT.

After the transfer of methylene from l-[3-3H]serine substrate to [3-3H]methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHF), the product was captured on positively charged DE81 filter paper (6, 38). To a 50-μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 2.6 mM tetrahydrofolate (THF), 0.25 mM pyridoxal phosphate, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.9 mM l-serine, 64 nM l-[3-3H]serine (2 nCi/ml), various quantities of newly expressed SHMT- or GFP-translated lysates were added and kept at 37°C. At various time intervals, 10 μl of reaction mixture was spotted onto DE81 filter papers, which were dried and washed in deionized water. The filters were dried again, and radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting.

GAK.

To track phosphorylation of [8-14C]AMP, the product [8-14C]ADP was identified by chromatography on positively charged polyethylenimine (PEI)-cellulose under acidic conditions. A 20-μl reaction mixture containing 110 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 60 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.25 μM FeSO4, 2 mM cold AMP, 97 μM [8-14C]AMP (5 μCi/ml), 1 mM GTP, and various quantities of GTP:AMP phosphotransferase (GAK)- or GFP-translated lysates was kept at 25°C. At various time intervals, 2 μl of sample was transferred to a PEI-cellulose thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate, followed by drying with hot air and separation in 0.375 M potassium phosphate solution, pH 3.5. The PEI-cellulose plate was then exposed to a phosphorimager, and an autoradiogram was developed.

OPRT.

Attachment of a phosphoribose from phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) to orotic acid can be monitored by direct increases in absorption at 295 nm (15). To a 500-μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM OMP, and 1 mM pyrophosphate, various quantities of orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT)- or GFP-translated lysate were added. Initial absorption was recorded at 295 nm, and the increase in absorbance was monitored. The absorption coefficient for this reaction at 295 nm is 3,670 M−1

DHOase.

The assay method exploits the difference in the mobilities of [2-14C]dihydroorotic acid and [U-14C]N-carbomoyl aspartate on a PEI-cellulose TLC plate (39). To a reaction mixture containing 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 1.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 0.2 mM ZnCl2, 5% glycerol, 2 mM DTT, and 30 μM [2-14C]dihydroorotate (DHO; 1.66 μCi/ml), various quantities of 14-fold dilutions of dihydroorotase (DHOase)- or GFP-translated lysate were added and kept at 37°C. At various time intervals, 2 μl of reaction mixture was spotted onto PEI-cellulose TLC plates. The chromatogram was developed in 0.5 M LiCl2 solution, pH 5.2. The PEI-cellulose plate was then exposed to a phosphorimager, and the autoradiogram was developed to quantitate product formation.

UDgly.

The uracil DNA glycosylase (UDgly) enzyme removes a uracil residue from DNA, and the assay exploits the hydrolytic sensitivity of the resulting abasic single-stranded DNA under alkaline conditions (40). The end labeling of oligonucleotide DNA substrate was achieved by standard protocol using [γ-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. To a 20-μl reaction mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA, 4 mM DTT, and 0.118 μM (14,000 cpm) 32P-labeled oligonucleotide (5′-TGGCGAAAGGGGGUTGTGCTGCAAGGCG-3′), various quantities of UDgly- or GFP-translated lysates were added, and the mixture was then incubated at 26°C. At various time intervals, the reaction was stopped by the addition of NaOH to a final concentration of 50 mM, the product was separated on a 12% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel, and an autoradiogram was developed.

GTPCH.

Conversion of the purine nucleotide GTP to a pteridine precursor was tracked based on a difference in the mobilities of GTP and formic acid on PEI-cellulose under acidic conditions. To a 20-μl reaction mixture containing 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 75 mM KCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 2 mM DTT, and 0.38 mM U-14C-labeled GTP (3.33 μCi/ml), various quantities of GTPCH- or GFP-translated lysates were added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C. At the end of 1 h, 2 μl of the reaction mixture was spotted on PEI-cellulose plates, followed by chromatography in a solvent with 0.375 M potassium monobasic acid, pH 3.5. The PEI-cellulose plate was then exposed to a phosphorimager, and the autoradiogram was developed to quantify product formation.

DHFS-FPGS.

In the folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) assay, the attachment of radioactive glutamic acid residues to tetrahydrofolate substrate was followed based on the difference in the mobilities of glutamic acid and polyglutamated tetrahydrofolate on PEI-cellulose (41). To a 20-μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 30 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 2.0 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 50 μM tetrahydrofolate, 2.85 mM cold l-glutamic acid, and 0.115 mM 14C-labeled l-glutamic acid (2.5 μCi/ml), various quantities of DHFS-FGPS- or GFP-translated lysates were added. After incubation at 37°C for various time intervals, the reaction was stopped by spotting 2 μl on PEI-cellulose TLC strips. The TLC plate was developed in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer containing 2% butanol and 0.5% β-mercaptoethanol, and the product was measured using a phosphorimager.

Autoradiography conversions.

The pixel count from visual assay data (for assay of GAK, DHOase, UDgly, GTPCH, and DHFS-FPGS) was quantified by ImageJ software and converted into activity by using equation 1:

Pixelcountforproduct×substrateconcentration(μM)×reactionvolume(liters)Pixelcountforsubstrate×reactiontime(min)×lysate(ml) (1)

RESULTS

Test panel for functional expression.

To test the general utility of wheat germ cell-free expression systems for producing functional malaria enzymes, we sought out 13 P. falciparum genes as test cases. The choices were based on our long-term interest (6, 13, 19, 20, 38, 4244) in studying nucleotide and DNA metabolism for malaria drug development. Enzymatic assays exist for the predicted functions of all of these proteins. The molecular masses of selected test cases ranged between 19 and 71 kDa, while the pI values ranged from 5 to 10. The selected proteins and their properties are shown in Table 4. To make sure our test system is truly versatile, we selected representatives of many enzymes which previously failed to express in the hands of other investigators and rare enzymes that do express well in traditional cell-based systems (7, 11). Some from the first group are of special interest because they have properties of good drug targets.

Expression plasmid.

The plasmid for expression of malaria proteins in wheat germ systems has an SP6 bacteriophage transcription promoter and a plant-like omega sequence for initiation of translation (30). These expression controls are orthogonal to the native E. coli gene expression system; malaria genes were successfully maintained for extensive periods without rearrangements or deletions driven by toxic effects of leaky expression.

Efficient cloning.

An important long-term goal of this project is to set the stage for efficient, high-throughput expression of many functional malaria proteins in parallel. To bypass potential genome annotation issues, all chosen genes were directly reverse amplified from total RNA of the parasite, and the PCR products were directly cloned into a T-overhang cell-free vector. The overall transformation efficiency for the desired gene was approximately 60%, with 50% of the inserts having the correct orientation (data not shown). The stability of the expression plasmids was verified through their repeated successful isolation from stock cultures and successful protein expression without any deletion or loss of function for the cell-free expression over 4 years (data not shown).

P. falciparum enzyme synthesis.

All selected P. falciparum enzymes were first generated in a batch reactor with radioactive leucine and a native malarial coding sequence (Fig. 1A). The majority of the proteins even at the first attempt generated clean, single, new protein products, attesting to the high quality of the wheat germ cell-free lysate and the lack of significant contamination from proteases and RNAses. There was good correlation between expected and observed masses of the translated enzymes (Fig. 1B). The exceptions were the SHMT products, which had some truncated proteins, and GTPCH, which had low expression. Experimental attempts to prevent the fragmentation of SHMT during translation using a protease inhibitor cocktail or by addition of an RNase inhibitor or the missing cofactor pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) did not improve the quality of the produced protein (data not shown). As discussed below, we found other generalizable ways to remove truncated products and improve yields of the two poorer-performing proteins.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Autoradiogram of P. falciparum enzymes expressed in a small-batch reaction using the wheat cell-free system. (A) Autoradiogram developed from 14 μg of batch-translated soluble fractions. Inset shows the low-level expression of a GTPCH-radiolabeled band. Lane M, molecular mass marker. (B) Correlation of expected and experimental molecular weights (MW) of newly expressed enzymes.

Comparison to wheat germ protein background.

Scaled-up cell-free protein expression was carried out from native P. falciparum coding sequences using a dialysis reaction method. The continuous addition of fresh translational substrates and removal of by-products as part of the dialysis procedure allowed the target protein to be produced continuously over a period of 24 h. The soluble proteins produced in the translated lysates were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and visualized directly by Coomassie staining (Fig. 2). Nine of the 13 test cases were directly and clearly visible on the Coomassie-stained gels. Quantification of the total and soluble expressed proteins was achieved by TCA precipitation of radiolabeled proteins (Table 4). Depending on the product, the dialysis reactor generated 23 to 248 μg of parasite soluble protein per 7 mg of translated lysate in a typical reaction mix.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Visible expression of nonradioactive P. falciparum enzymes in a scaled-up dialysis reaction method. Seven micrograms of soluble fraction of translated lysate was resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining. Based on the densitometry, the respective protein bands are indicated as visible (closed star) and not visible (open star).

Functional assays.

Direct assay for predicted enzymatic activity served as a measure of both intact production and correct folding of the proteins. Malaria proteins were expressed using scaled-up translated lysates (Fig. 3A to M). For every malaria enzyme expressed, GFP-translated lysate served as the control to determine the background activity from the wheat germ lysate.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Fig 3

Functional analysis of P. falciparum enzymes produced in a cell-free system. Enzyme activities were directly measured in scaled-up expressed translated lysates either by spectrophotometry (A to E and H), scintillation counting (F and G), or visible assays by polyacrylamide gel (K) and TLC (I, J, L, and M). In all cases, GFP-translated lysate served as a control when used at levels corresponding to the largest amount of lysate in experimental functional assays. In the case of the visible assays, the pixel counts for radioactive substrates and products were quantified by ImageJ and converted into moles of activity by using equation 1 (Materials and Methods). Visible assays are shown only for single concentrations (remaining data for the other two concentrations are not shown), but the quantified activity is shown for all three concentrations of translated lysates. In visible assays, substrate-alone reactions are represented as controls (C).

Individual assays were established for each of the malaria enzymes using a variety of analytical tools, including UV-visible spectrophotometry (dUTP, SAHH, ADA, PNP, OMPD, and ADA) (Fig. 3A to E and H), scintillation counting (DHFR-TS and SHMT) (Fig. 3F and G), TLC (GAK, DHOase, GTPCH, and DHFR-FPGS) (Fig. 3I, J, L, and M), and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (UDgly) (Fig. 3K). The GTPCH assay was developed in-house, but all other assays were adopted from previous reports. For most cell-free-expressed P. falciparum enzymes, three different concentrations of enzyme at three different time points were tested. However, for TLC and polyacrylamide gel based assays (Fig. 3I to M), data are shown only for single concentrations (remaining data for the other two concentrations are not shown). The pixel counts from visual data (Fig. 3I to M) were quantified by ImageJ and converted into activity by using equation 1. Specific activities were calculated using the quantity of enzymatic product generated from a known amount of total protein in the lysate (Table 4).

While most P. falciparum proteins expressed well in the cell-free system using native sequences from cDNA, one (SHMT) displayed truncated protein products, and another (GTPCH) showed low expression. To address these two issues, we optimized the coding sequences for wheat. Synthetic codons were generated for three of the test cases: SHMT, DHFR-TS, and GTPCH. As shown in the autoradiogram (Fig. 4), synthetic codons were advantageous since they not only eliminated premature termination of protein translation (Fig. 4A) but also improved expression of the proteins (Fig. 4B). These results show that while direct cloning gives ample activity for the discovery phase of large screening projects involving many malaria proteins, both the quality and quantity of some high-priority malaria recombinant proteins can be improved by optimizing the codons by designing away from the parasite sequences and toward the wheat germ codon usage preferences.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Optimized codons minimize the truncated products and improve expression levels in a wheat cell-free system. (A) Autoradiogram of native (N) and optimized (O) codons. (B) Protein quantitation of native and optimized codons translated in the dialysis reaction method.

Overall, the results convincingly show that it is possible to express all tested malaria proteins in functional form. In all cases, including those of the poorly soluble proteins, 1 to 50 μg of the translated lysate was sufficient to demonstrate enzymatic activity. The system is very well suited for parallel production of many proteins as well as scaled-up production of individual enzymes.

DISCUSSION

Historically, enzymology has helped us understand the action of several clinically important antimetabolites against malaria parasites; the species-selective action of pyrimethamine against malarial dihydrofolate reductase described by Ferone et al. was a seminal study in pharmacology (42). Broader species-specific nucleic acid-binding properties of this parasite enzyme (which limit its expression) may also contribute to the high value of this target (13, 43).

Even with these celebrated roles of enzymology in understanding antimalarials, there have been very few new enzyme targets or inhibitors that have led to the development of preclinical leads and clinical approval of new drugs (4446; also http://www.mmv.org/research-development). Leads based on natural products and high-throughput screening in cell-based assays continue to dominate the drug development pipeline for antimalarials (4749). Target validation often occurs through genetics (50), without strong high-end enzymology support.

Difficulties in expressing full-length functional malaria proteins vary. We have suggested that autologous feedback loops of malaria proteins (13, 20, 43) and the resulting potential nonspecific nucleic acid binding in closed heterologous expression systems (6, 13, 20, 43) limit protein expression in cells. The toxicity from leaky expression of malaria proteins can make it difficult for host cells to maintain expression plasmids in intact forms.

These ideas have emerged from 25 years of detailed study of the malaria drug target dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase. Until recently, it was difficult to express DHFR-TS protein in its complete form, and even this was possible only when the host E. coli was under genetic or pharmacological pressure to maintain the parasite enzyme in its functional form (12, 13, 19). We were pleasantly surprised at the ease with which a wheat germ cell-free system could express P. falciparum DHFR-TS protein, especially without any extraordinary efforts to maintain the full expression plasmid under genetic or pharmacological pressure during its construction or maintenance (20). Of course, there are no worries about the potential toxicity of the malaria protein to the wheat plant because protein production is completely uncoupled from the growth and viability of the organism. This motivated us to study whether wheat germ expression could offer a general solution to the expression of malaria enzymes in functional forms.

In the present study, 13 different genes coding for enzymes related to nucleotide, folate, and DNA metabolism from the P. falciparum genome were subjected to expression tests in the wheat germ system. All the malaria genes could be readily cloned and maintained in the plant expression plasmid. The lack of toxicity in E. coli is probably related to the tight suppression of gene expression from the orthogonal nature of the regulatory controls between E. coli and the wheat system. Even without codon alterations, every metabolic enzyme was produced as the major or only new product upon translation. Every enzyme expressed had catalytic activity, irrespective of the metabolic pathway, protein size, pI, or presence of low-complexity sequences involving repeated amino acids. This ability to directly clone genes from cDNA libraries to proteins opens up many new frontiers for parallel interrogation of enzymes from malaria parasites.

Although we observed clean expression of the majority of the test cases using native malarial sequences, partial truncation of SHMT and low expression of GTPCH suggested that the intrinsic nature of some malaria coding sequences can contribute to lower performance even in a cell-free system. These challenges were eliminated with newly designed genes using codon preferences for wheat and with removal of internal RNA structures. Recent low-cost chemical synthesis of genes makes it feasible to use wheat germ codon usage as a regular direct step for expression of any high-priority malaria protein.

The sequencing of the genomes for the major human malaria parasites P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax (3, 51) created much excitement for massive parallel inquiry into parasite biology, including possibly finding new drug targets. Indeed, there have been tremendous advances in exploiting parallel inquiry of DNA (3, 5254), RNA (5558), and even metabolites (59), but general ways to query proteins with known functions have remained elusive. Our systematic, successful study of 13 malaria enzymes in a wheat germ cell-free protein expression system may provide a universal solution for the expression of functional P. falciparum recombinant proteins. Now, there is realistic hope for producing large families of functional malaria proteins in parallel and perhaps all malaria enzymes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank John White for providing total RNA from P. falciparum 3D7 strains.

This work was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (AI093380 and AI099280). P.K.R. is Program Director of a U.S. NIH International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research (AI089688).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 11 October 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1.Murray CJ, Rosenfeld LC, Lim SS, Andrews KG, Foreman KJ, Haring D, Fullman N, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Lopez AD. 2012. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 379:413–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar A, Dua VK, Rathod PK. 2011. Malaria-attributed death rates in India. Lancet 377:991–992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, Hyman RW, Carlton JM, Pain A, Nelson KE, Bowman S, Paulsen IT, James K, Eisen JA, Rutherford K, Salzberg SL, Craig A, Kyes S, Chan MS, Nene V, Shallom SJ, Suh B, Peterson J, Angiuoli S, Pertea M, Allen J, Selengut J, Haft D, Mather MW, Vaidya AB, Martin DM, Fairlamb AH, Fraunholz MJ, Roos DS, Ralph SA, McFadden GI, Cummings LM, Subramanian GM, Mungall C, Venter JC, Carucci DJ, Hoffman SL, Newbold C, Davis RW, Fraser CM, Barrell B. 2002. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419:498–511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Esposito D, Chatterjee DK. 2006. Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17:353–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen R. 2012. Bacterial expression systems for recombinant protein production: E. coli and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 30:1102–1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pang CK, Hunter JH, Gujjar R, Podutoori R, Bowman J, Mudeppa DG, Rathod PK. 2009. Catalytic and ligand-binding characteristics of Plasmodium falciparum serine hydroxylmethyltransferase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 168:74–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mehlin C, Boni E, Buckner FS, Engel L, Feist T, Gelb MH, Haji L, Kim D, Liu C, Mueller N, Myler PJ, Reddy JT, Sampson JN, Subramanian E, Van Voorhis WC, Worthey E, Zucker F, Hol WG. 2006. Heterologous expression of proteins from Plasmodium falciparum: results from 1000 genes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 148:144–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Agrawal S, Kumar A, Srivastava V, Mishra BN. 2003. Cloning, expression, activity and folding studies of serine hydroxymethyltransferase: a target enzyme for cancer chemotherapy. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 6:67–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Suzuki T, Kurita H, Ichinose H. 2004. GTP cyclohydrolase I utilizes metal-free GTP as its substrate. Eur. J. Biochem. 271:349–355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Long SB, Hancock PJ, Kral AM, Hellinga HW, Beese LS. 2001. The crystal structure of human protein farnesyltransferase reveals the basis for inhibition by CaaX tetrapeptides and their mimetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:12948–12953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vedadi M, Lew J, Artz J, Amani M, Zhao Y, Dong A, Wasney GA, Gao M, Hills T, Brokx S, Qiu W, Sharma S, Diassiti A, Alam Z, Melone M, Mulichak A, Wernimont A, Bray J, Loppnau P, Plotnikova O, Newberry K, Sundararajan E, Houston S, Walker J, Tempel W, Bochkarev A, Kozieradzki I, Edwards A, Arrowsmith C, Roos D, Kain K, Hui R. 2007. Genome-scale protein expression and structural biology of Plasmodium falciparum and related apicomplexan organisms. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 151:100–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prapunwattana P, Sirawaraporn W, Yuthavong Y, Santi DV. 1996. Chemical synthesis of the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 83:93–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang K, Rathod PK. 2002. Divergent regulation of dihydrofolate reductase between malaria parasite and human host. Science 296:545–547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baca AM, Hol WG. 2000. Overcoming codon bias: a method for high-level overexpression of Plasmodium and other AT-rich parasite genes in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Parasitol. 30:113–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Krungkrai SR, Aoki S, Palacpac NM, Sato D, Mitamura T, Krungkrai J, Horii T. 2004. Human malaria parasite orotate phosphoribosyltransferase: functional expression, characterization of kinetic reaction mechanism and inhibition profile. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 134:245–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Withers-Martinez C, Saldanha JW, Ely B, Hackett F, O'Connor T, Blackman MJ. 2002. Expression of recombinant Plasmodium falciparum subtilisin-like protease-1 in insect cells. Characterization, comparison with the parasite protease, and homology modeling. J. Biol. Chem. 277:29698–29709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elliott JF, Albrecht GR, Gilladoga A, Handunnetti SM, Neequaye J, Lallinger G, Minjas JN, Howard RJ. 1990. Genes for Plasmodium falciparum surface antigens cloned by expression in COS cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:6363–6367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Birkholtz LM, Blatch G, Coetzer TL, Hoppe HC, Human E, Morris EJ, Ngcete Z, Oldfield L, Roth R, Shonhai A, Stephens L, Louw AI. 2008. Heterologous expression of plasmodial proteins for structural studies and functional annotation. Malar. J. 7:197. 10.1186/1475-2875-7-197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hekmat-Nejad M, Rathod PK. 1996. Kinetics of Plasmodium falciparum thymidylate synthase: interactions with high-affinity metabolites of 5-fluoroorotate and D1694. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1628–1632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mudeppa DG, Pang CK, Tsuboi T, Endo Y, Buckner FS, Varani G, Rathod PK. 2007. Cell-free production of functional Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 151:216–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun XE, Sharling L, Muthalagi M, Mudeppa DG, Pankiewicz KW, Felczak K, Rathod PK, Mead J, Striepen B, Hedstrom L. 2010. Prodrug activation by Cryptosporidium thymidine kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 285:15916–15922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tsuboi T, Takeo S, Iriko H, Jin L, Tsuchimochi M, Matsuda S, Han ET, Otsuki H, Kaneko O, Sattabongkot J, Udomsangpetch R, Sawasaki T, Torii M, Endo Y. 2008. Wheat germ cell-free system-based production of malaria proteins for discovery of novel vaccine candidates. Infect. Immun. 76:1702–1708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sudo A, Kato K, Kobayashi K, Tohya Y, Akashi H. 2008. Susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and its mammalian homologue to the inhibitors. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 160:138–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Doolan DL, Mu Y, Unal B. 2008. Profiling humoral immune responses to P. falciparum infection with protein microarrays. Proteomics 8:4680–4694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Takeo S, Hisamori D, Matsuda S, Vinetz J, Sattabongkot J, Tsuboi T. 2009. Enzymatic characterization of the Plasmodium vivax chitinase, a potential malaria transmission-blocking target. Parasitol. Int. 58:243–248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen JH, Jung JW, Wang Y, Ha KS, Lu F, Lim CS, Takeo S, Tsuboi T, Han ET. 2010. Immunoproteomics profiling of blood stage Plasmodium vivax infection by high-throughput screening assays. J. Proteome Res. 9:6479–6489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rui E, Fernandez-Becerra C, Takeo S, Sanz S, Lacerda MV, Tsuboi T, del Portillo HA. 2011. Plasmodium vivax: comparison of immunogenicity among proteins expressed in the cell-free systems of Escherichia coli and wheat germ by suspension array assays. Malar. J. 10:192. 10.1186/1475-2875-10-192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cardoso FC, Roddick JS, Groves P, Doolan DL. 2011. Evaluation of approaches to identify the targets of cellular immunity on a proteome-wide scale. PLoS One 6:e27666. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Marchuk D, Drumm M, Saulino A, Collins FS. 1991. Construction of T-vectors, a rapid and general system for direct cloning of unmodified PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sawasaki T, Gouda MD, Kawasaki T, Tsuboi T, Tozawa Y, Takai K, Endo Y. 2005. The wheat germ cell-free expression system: methods for high-throughput materialization of genetic information. Methods Mol. Biol. 310:131–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spirin AS, Baranov VI, Ryabova LA, Ovodov SY, Alakhov YB. 1988. A continuous cell-free translation system capable of producing polypeptides in high yield. Science 242:1162–1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mans RJ, Novolli GD. 1960. A convenient, rapid and sensitive method for measuring the incorporation of radioactive amino acids into protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3:540–543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoenig M, Lee RJ, Ferguson DC. 1989. A microtiter plate assay for inorganic phosphate. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 19:249–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lozada-Ramírez JD, Martínez-Martínez I, Sánchez-Ferrer A, García-Carmona F. 2006. A colorimetric assay for S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 67:131–140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaplan NO. 1955. Specific adenosine deaminase from intestine. Methods Enzymol. 2:473–480 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chaudhary K, Ting LM, Kim K, Roos DS. 2006. Toxoplasma gondii purine nucleoside phosphorylase biochemical characterization, inhibitor profiles, and comparison with the Plasmodium falciparum ortholog. J. Biol. Chem. 281:25652–25658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Krungkrai SR, Prapunwattana P, Horii T, Krungkrai J. 2004. Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and orotidine 5′-monophosphate decarboxylase exist as multienzyme complex in human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318:1012–1018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alfadhli S, Rathod PK. 2000. Gene organization of a Plasmodium falciparum serine hydroxymethyltransferase and its functional expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 110:283–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Christopherson RI, Yu ML, Jones ME. 1981. An overall radioassay for the first three reactions of de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. Anal. Biochem. 111:240–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Slupphaug G, Eftedal I, Kavli B, Bharati S, Helle NM, Haug T, Levine DW, Krokan HE. 1995. Properties of a recombinant human uracil-DNA glycosylase from the UNG gene and evidence that UNG encodes the major uracil-DNA glycosylase. Biochemistry 34:128–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Peters GJ, van der Wilt CL, Cloos J, Pinedo HM. 1993. Development of a simple folylpolyglutamate synthetase assay in tissues and cell lines. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 338:651–654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferone R, Burchall JJ, Hitchings GH. 1969. Plasmodium berghei dihydrofolate reductase. Isolation, properties, and inhibition by antifolates. Mol. Pharmacol. 5:49–59 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ganesan K, Ponmee N, Jiang L, Fowble JW, White J, Kamchonwongpaisan S, Yuthavong Y, Wilairat P, Rathod PK. 2008. A genetically hard-wired metabolic transcriptome in Plasmodium falciparum fails to mount protective responses to lethal antifolates. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000214. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Coteron JM, Marco M, Esquivias J, Deng X, White KL, White J, Koltun M, El Mazouni F, Kokkonda S, Katneni K, Bhamidipati R, Shackleford DM, Angulo-Barturen I, Ferrer SB, Jiménez-Díaz MB, Gamo FJ, Goldsmith EJ, Charman WN, Bathurst I, Floyd D, Matthews D, Burrows JN, Rathod PK, Charman SA, Phillips MA. 2011. Structure-guided lead optimization of triazolopyrimidine-ring substituents identifies potent Plasmodium falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors with clinical candidate potential. J. Med. Chem. 54:5540–5561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nilsen A, LaCrue AN, White KL, Forquer IP, Cross RM, Marfurt J, Mather MW, Delves MJ, Shackleford DM, Saenz FE, Morrisey JM, Steuten J, Mutka T, Li Y, Wirjanata G, Ryan E, Duffy S, Kelly JX, Sebayang BF, Zeeman AM, Noviyanti R, Sinden RE, Kocken CH, Price RN, Avery VM, Angulo-Barturen I, Jiménez-Díaz MB, Ferrer S, Herreros E, Sanz LM, Gamo FJ, Bathurst I, Burrows JN, Siegl P, Guy RK, Winter RW, Vaidya AB, Charman SA, Kyle DE, Manetsch R, Riscoe MK. 2013. Quinolone-3-diarylethers: a new class of antimalarial drug. Sci. Transl. Med. 5:177ra37. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yuthavong Y, Tarnchompoo B, Vilaivan T, Chitnumsub P, Kamchonwongpaisan S, Charman SA, McLennan DN, White KL, Vivas L, Bongard E, Thongphanchang C, Taweechai S, Vanichtanankul J, Rattanajak R, Arwon U, Fantauzzi P, Yuvaniyama J, Charman WN, Matthews D. 2012. Malarial dihydrofolate reductase as a paradigm for drug development against a resistance-compromised target. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:16823–16828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guiguemde WA, Shelat AA, Bouck D, Duffy S, Crowther GJ, Davis PH, Smithson DC, Connelly M, Clark J, Zhu F, Jiménez-Díaz MB, Martinez MS, Wilson EB, Tripathi AK, Gut J, Sharlow ER, Bathurst I, El Mazouni F, Fowble JW, Forquer I, McGinley PL, Castro S, Angulo-Barturen I, Ferrer S, Rosenthal PJ, Derisi JL, Sullivan DJ, Lazo JS, Roos DS, Riscoe MK, Phillips MA, Rathod PK, Van Voorhis WC, Avery VM, Guy RK. 2010. Chemical genetics of Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 465:311–315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gamo FJ, Sanz LM, Vidal J, de Cozar C, Alvarez E, Lavandera JL, Vanderwall DE, Green DV, Kumar V, Hasan S, Brown JR, Peishoff CE, Cardon LR, Garcia-Bustos JF. 2010. Thousands of chemical starting points for antimalarial lead identification. Nature 465:305–310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Meister S, Plouffe DM, Kuhen KL, Bonamy GM, Wu T, Barnes SW, Bopp SE, Borboa R, Bright AT, Che J, Cohen S, Dharia NV, Gagaring K, Gettayacamin M, Gordon P, Groessl T, Kato N, Lee MC, McNamara CW, Fidock DA, Nagle A, Nam TG, Richmond W, Roland J, Rottmann M, Zhou B, Froissard P, Glynne RJ, Mazier D, Sattabongkot J, Schultz PG, Tuntland T, Walker JR, Zhou Y, Chatterjee A, Diagana TT, Winzeler EA. 2011. Imaging of Plasmodium liver stages to drive next-generation antimalarial drug discovery. Science 334:1372–1377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Eastman RT, White J, Hucke O, Bauer K, Yokoyama K, Nallan L, Chakrabarti D, Verlinde CL, Gelb MH, Rathod PK, Van Voorhis WC. 2005. Resistance to a protein farnesyltransferase inhibitor in Plasmodium falciparum. J. Biol. Chem. 280:13554–13559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Carlton JM, Adams JH, Silva JC, Bidwell SL, Lorenzi H, Caler E, Crabtree J, Angiuoli SV, Merino EF, Amedeo P, Cheng Q, Coulson RM, Crabb BS, Del Portillo HA, Essien K, Feldblyum TV, Fernandez-Becerra C, Gilson PR, Gueye AH, Guo X, Kang'a S, Kooij TW, Korsinczky M, Meyer EV, Nene V, Paulsen I, White O, Ralph SA, Ren Q, Sargeant TJ, Salzberg SL, Stoeckert CJ, Sullivan SA, Yamamoto MM, Hoffman SL, Wortman JR, Gardner MJ, Galinski MR, Barnwell JW, Fraser-Liggett CM. 2008. Comparative genomics of the neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Nature 455:757–763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Miotto O, Almagro-Garcia J, Manske M, Macinnis B, Campino S, Rockett KA, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Anderson JM, Duong S, Nguon C, Chuor CM, Saunders D, Se Y, Lon C, Fukuda MM, Amenga-Etego L, Hodgson AV, Asoala V, Imwong M, Takala-Harrison S, Nosten F, Su XZ, Ringwald P, Ariey F, Dolecek C, Hien TT, Boni MF, Thai CQ, Amambua-Ngwa A, Conway DJ, Djimdé AA, Doumbo OK, Zongo I, Ouedraogo JB, Alcock D, Drury E, Auburn S, Koch O, Sanders M, Hubbart C, Maslen G, Ruano-Rubio V, Jyothi D, Miles A, O'Brien J, Gamble C, Oyola SO, Rayner JC, Newbold CI, Berriman M, Spencer CC, McVean G, Day NP, White NJ, Bethell D, Dondorp AM, Plowe CV, Fairhurst RM, Kwiatkowski DP. 2013. Multiple populations of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Cambodia. Nat. Genet. 45:648–655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Volkman SK, Sabeti PC, DeCaprio D, Neafsey DE, Schaffner SF, Milner DA, Jr, Daily JP, Sarr O, Ndiaye D, Ndir O, Mboup S, Duraisingh MT, Lukens A, Derr A, Stange-Thomann N, Waggoner S, Onofrio R, Ziaugra L, Mauceli E, Gnerre S, Jaffe DB, Zainoun J, Wiegand RC, Birren BW, Hartl DL, Galagan JE, Lander ES, Wirth DF. 2007. A genome-wide map of diversity in Plasmodium falciparum. Nat. Genet. 39:113–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guler JL, Freeman DL, Ahyong V, Patrapuvich R, White J, Gujjar R, Phillips MA, Derisi J, Rathod PK. 2013. Asexual populations of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, use a two-step genomic strategy to acquire accurate, beneficial DNA amplifications. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003375. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hayward RE, Derisi JL, Alfadhli S, Kaslow DC, Brown PO, Rathod PK. 2000. Shotgun DNA microarrays and stage-specific gene expression in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Mol. Microbiol. 35:6–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ben Mamoun C, Gluzman IY, Hott C, MacMillan SK, Amarakone AS, Anderson DL, Carlton JM, Dame JB, Chakrabarti D, Martin RK, Brownstein BH, Goldberg DE. 2001. Co-ordinated programme of gene expression during asexual intraerythrocytic development of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum revealed by microarray analysis. Mol. Microbiol. 39:26–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rathod PK, Ganesan K, Hayward RE, Bozdech Z, DeRisi JL. 2002. DNA microarrays for malaria. Trends Parasitol. 18:39–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Le Roch KG, Zhou Y, Blair PL, Grainger M, Moch JK, Haynes JD, De La Vega P, Holder AA, Batalov S, Carucci DJ, Winzeler EA. 2003. Discovery of gene function by expression profiling of the malaria parasite life cycle. Science 301:1503–1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Olszewski KL, Morrisey JM, Wilinski D, Burns JM, Vaidya AB, Rabinowitz JD, Llinás M. 2009. Host-parasite interactions revealed by Plasmodium falciparum metabolomics. Cell Host Microbe 5:191–199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eukaryotic Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES