Abstract
The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 2000 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12444/full.
Ligand-gated ion channels are one of the seven major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being G protein-coupled receptors, ion channels, catalytic receptors, nuclear hormone receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. A new landscape format has easy to use tables comparing related targets.
It is a condensed version of material contemporary to late 2013, which is presented in greater detail and constantly updated on the website www.guidetopharmacology.org, superseding data presented in previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in conjunction with NC-IUPHAR and provides the official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. It consolidates information previously curated and displayed separately in IUPHAR-DB and the Guide to Receptors and Channels, providing a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates.
An Introduction to Ligand-gated Ion Channels
Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs) are integral membrane proteins that contain a pore which allows the regulated flow of selected ions across the plasma membrane. Ion flux is passive and driven by the electrochemical gradient for the permeant ions. The channels are opened, or gated, by the binding of a neurotransmitter to an orthosteric site(s) that triggers a conformational change that results in the conducting state. Modulation of gating can occur by the binding of endogenous, or exogenous, modulators to allosteric sites. LGICs mediate fast synaptic transmission, on a millisecond time scale, in the nervous system and at the somatic neuromuscular junction. Such transmission involves the release of a neurotransmitter from a pre-synaptic neurone and the subsequent activation of post-synaptically located receptors that mediate a rapid, phasic, electrical signal (the excitatory, or inhibitory, post-synaptic potential). However, In addition to their traditional role in phasic neurotransmission, it is now established that some LGICs mediate a tonic form of neuronal regulation that results from the activation of extra-synaptic receptors by ambient levels of neurotransmitter. The expression of some LGICs by non-excitable cells is suggestive of additional functions.
By convention, the LGICs comprise the excitatory, cation-selective, nicotinic acetylcholine (Millar and Gotti, 2009; Changeux, 2010), 5-HT3 (Barnes et al., 2009; Walstab et al., 2010), ionotropic glutamate (Lodge, 2009; Traynelis et al., 2010) and P2X receptors (Jarvis and Khakh, 2009; Surprenant and North, 2009) and the inhibitory, anion-selective, GABAA (Olsen and Sieghart, 2008; Belelli et al., 2009) and glycine receptors (Lynch, 2009; Yevenes and Zeihofer, 2011). The nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-HT3, GABAA and glycine receptors (and an additional zinc-activated channel) are pentameric structures and are frequently referred to as the Cys-loop receptors due to the presence of a defining loop of residues formed by a disulphide bond in the extracellular domain of their constituent subunits (Miller and Smart, 2010; Thompson et al., 2010). However, the prokaryotic ancestors of these receptors contain no such loop and the term pentameric ligand-gated ion channel (pLGIC) is gaining acceptance in the literature (Hilf and Dutzler, 2009). The ionotropic glutamate and P2X receptors are tetrameric and trimeric structures, respectively. Multiple genes encode the subunits of LGICs and the majority of these receptors are heteromultimers. Such combinational diversity results, within each class of LGIC, in a wide range of receptors with differing pharmacological and biophysical properties and varying patterns of expression within the nervous system and other tissues. The LGICs thus present attractive targets for new therapeutic agents with improved discrimination between receptor isoforms and a reduced propensity for off-target effects. The development of novel, faster screening techniques for compounds acting on LGICs (Dunlop et al., 2008) will greatly aid in the development of such agents.
Acknowledgments
We wish to acknowledge the tremendous help provided by the Consultants to the Guides past and present (see list in the Overview, p. 1452). We are also extremely grateful for the financial contributions from the British Pharmacological Society, the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, the Wellcome Trust (099156/Z/12/Z]), which support the website and the University of Edinburgh, who host the guidetopharmacology.org website.
Conflict of interest
The authors state that there is no conflict of interest to disclose.
List of records presented
1584 5-HT3 receptors
1586 GABAA receptors
1590 Glycine receptors
1592 Ionotropic glutamate receptors
1597 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
1601 P2X receptors
1603 ZAC
5-HT3 receptors
Overview
The 5-HT3 receptor [nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptors 16 ] is a ligand-gated ion channel of the Cys-loop family that includes the zinc-activated channels, nicotinic acetylcholine, GABAA and strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors. The receptor exists as a pentamer of 4TM subunits that form an intrinsic cation selective channel 2. Five human 5-HT3 receptor subunits have been cloned and homo-oligomeric assemblies of 5-HT3A and hetero-oligomeric assemblies of 5-HT3A and 5-HT3B subunits have been characterised in detail. The 5-HT3C (HTR3C, Q8WXA8), 5-HT3D (HTR3D, Q70Z44) and 5-HT3E (HTR3E, A5X5Y0) subunits 22,32, like the 5-HT3B subunit, do not form functional homomers, but are reported to assemble with the 5-HT3A subunit to influence its functional expression rather than pharmacological profile 13,34,49. 5-HT3A, -C, -D, and -E subunits also interact with the chaperone RIC-3 which predominantly enhances the surface expression of homomeric 5-HT3A receptor 49. The co-expression of 5-HT3A and 5-HT3C-E subunits has been demonstrated in human colon 21. A recombinant hetero-oligomeric 5-HT3AB receptor has been reported to contain two copies of the 5-HT3A subunit and three copies of the 5-HT3B subunit in the order B-B-A-B-A 3, but this is inconsistent with recent reports which show at least one A-A interface 25,47. The 5-HT3B subunit imparts distinctive biophysical properties upon hetero-oligomeric 5-HT3AB versus homo-oligomeric 5-HT3A recombinant receptors 8,10,11,19,23,37,40, influences the potency of channel blockers, but generally has only a modest effect upon the apparent affinity of agonists, or the affinity of antagonists (5, but see 7,9,10) which may be explained by the orthosteric binding site residing at an interface formed between 5-HT3A subunits 25,47. However, 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors differ in their allosteric regulation by some general anaesthetic agents, small alcohols and indoles 17,38,39. The potential diversity of 5-HT3 receptors is increased by alternative splicing of the genes HTR3A and E 6,14,31,33,34. In addition, the use of tissue-specific promoters driving expression from different transcriptional start sites has been reported for the HTR3A, HTR3B, HTR3D and HTR3E genes, which could result in 5-HT3 subunits harbouring different N-termini 19,31,48. To date, inclusion of the 5-HT3A subunit appears imperative for 5-HT3 receptor function.
Channels
Nomenclature | 5-HT3A | 5-HT3AB |
Subunits | 5-HT3A (HTR3A, P46098) | 5-HT3A, 5-HT3B (HTR3B, O95264) |
Selective agonists (EC50) | SR57227A (∼4x10-7 M), meta-chlorphenylbiguanide (1.6x10-6 – 4x10-6 M) 4,8,24,28,29, 2-methyl-5-HT (2.5x10-6 – 3.1x10-6 M) 4,8,24,28, 1-phenylbiguanide (8x10-5 M) 4 | – |
Selective antagonists (IC50) | (S)-zacopride (Ki 1x10-9 M) 5, granisetron (Ki ∼1.5x10-9 – 2.5x10-9 M) 15,28, tropisetron (Ki 1.5x10-9 – 3x10-9 M) 24,28, ondansetron (Ki ∼5x10-9 – 1.5x10-8 M) 5,15,28 | – |
Channel Blockers (IC50) | picrotoxinin (1.1x10-5 M) 42, TMB-8 (1.176x10-5 M) 41, diltiazem (2.1x10-5 M) 42, bilobalide (4.7x10-4 M) 42, ginkgolide B (7.3x10-4 M) 42 | picrotoxinin (6.3x10-5 M) 43, bilobalide (3.1x10-3 M) 43, ginkgolide B (3.9x10-3 M) 43 |
Radioligands (Kd) | [3H]ramosetron (Antagonist) (1.5x10-10 M) 28, [3H]GR65630 (Antagonist) (2.56x10-9 – 4.8x10-10 M) 12,24, [3H]granisetron (Antagonist) (1.2x10-9 M) 5,15, [3H](S)-zacopride (Antagonist) (2x10-9 M) 35, [3H]LY278584 (Antagonist) (3.08x10-9 M) 1 | – |
Functional characteristics | γ = 0.4-0.8 pS [+ 5-HT3B, γ = 16 pS]; inwardly rectifying current [+ 5-HT3B, rectification reduced]; nH 2-3 [+ 5-HT3B 1-2]; relative permeability to divalent cations reduced by co-expression of the 5-HT3B subunit | γ = 0.4-0.8 pS [+ 5-HT3B, γ = 16 pS]; inwardly rectifying current [+ 5-HT3B, rectification reduced]; nH 2-3 [+ 5-HT3B 1-2]; relative permeability to divalent cations reduced by co-expression of the 5-HT3B subunit |
Comments
Although not a selective antagonist, methadone displays multimodal and subunit-dependent antagonism of 5-HT3 receptors 9. Similarly, TMB-8, diltiazem, picrotoxin, bilobalide and ginkgolide B are not selective for 5-HT3 receptors (e.g. 43). The anti-malarial drugs mefloquine and quinine exert a modestly more potent block of 5-HT3A versus 5-HT3AB receptor-mediated responses 46. Known better as a partial agonist of nicotinic acetylcholine α4β2 receptors, varenicline is also an agonist of the 5-HT3A receptor 26. Human 4,28, rat 18, mouse 27, guinea-pig 24 ferret 30 and canine 20 orthologues of the 5-HT3A receptor subunit have been cloned that exhibit intraspecies variations in receptor pharmacology. Notably, most ligands display significantly reduced affinities at the guinea-pig 5-HT3 receptor in comparison with other species. In addition to the agents listed in the table, native and recombinant 5-HT3 receptors are subject to allosteric modulation by extracellular divalent cations, alcohols, several general anaesthetics and 5-hydroxy- and halide-substituted indoles (see reviews 36,44,45,50).
GABAA receptors
Overview
The GABAA receptor is a ligand-gated ion channel of the Cys-loop family that includes the nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-HT3 and strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors. GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition within the CNS occurs by fast synaptic transmission, sustained tonic inhibition and temporally intermediate events that have been termed ‘GABAA, slow’ [9]. GABAA receptors exist as pentamers of 4TM subunits that form an intrinsic anion selective channel. Sequences of six α, three β, three γ, one δ, three ρ, one ε, one π and one θ GABAA receptor subunits (gene family ID ENSF00000000053) have been reported in mammals [36–37,42,44]. The π-subunit is restricted to reproductive tissue. Alternatively spliced versions of many subunits exist (e.g. α4- and α6- (both not functional) α5-, β2-, β3- and γ2), along with RNA editing of the α3 subunit [12]. The three ρ-subunits, (ρ1-3) function as either homo- or hetero-oligomeric assemblies [10,55]. Receptors formed from ρ-subunits, because of their distinctive pharmacology that includes insensitivity to bicuculline, benzodiazepines and barbiturates, have sometimes been termed GABAC receptors [55], but they are classified as GABAA receptors by NC-IUPHAR on the basis of structural and functional criteria [3,36–37].
Many GABAA receptor subtypes contain α-, β- and γ-subunits with the likely stoichiometry 2α.2β.1γ [26,36]. It is thought that the majority of GABAA receptors harbour a single type of α- and β -subunit variant. The α1β2γ2 hetero-oligomer constitutes the largest population of GABAA receptors in the CNS, followed by the α2β3γ2 and α3β3γ2 isoforms. Receptors that incorporate the α4- α5-or α6-subunit, or the β1-, γ1-, γ3-, δ-, ε- and θ-subunits, are less numerous, but they may nonetheless serve important functions. For example, extrasynaptically located receptors that contain α6- and δ-subunits in cerebellar granule cells, or an α4- and δ-subunit in dentate gyrus granule cells and thalamic neurones, mediate a tonic current that is important for neuronal excitability in response to ambient concentrations of GABA [4,13,32,40,45]. GABA binding occurs at the β+/α- subunit interface and the homologous γ+/α- subunits interface creates the benzodiazepine site. A second site for benzodiazepine binding has recently been postulated to occur at the α+/β- interface ([38]; reviewed by [43]). The particular α-and γ-subunit isoforms exhibit marked effects on recognition and/or efficacy at the benzodiazepine site. Thus, receptors incorporating either α4- or α6-subunits are not recognised by ‘classical’ benzodiazepines, such as flunitrazepam (but see 104). The trafficking, cell surface expression, internalisation and function of GABAA receptors and their subunits are discussed in detail in several recent reviews 61,70,81,101 but one point worthy of note is that receptors incorporating the γ2 subunit (except when associated with α5) cluster at the postsynaptic membrane (but may distribute dynamically between synaptic and extrasynaptic locations), whereas as those incorporating the d subunit appear to be exclusively extrasynaptic.
NC-IUPHAR 53,86 class GABAA receptors according to their subunit structure, pharmacology and receptor function. Currently, eleven native GABAA receptors are classed as conclusively identified (i.e., α1β2γ2, α1βγ2, α3βγ2, α4βγ2, α4β2δ, α4β3δ, α5βγ2, α6βγ2, α6β2δ, α6β3δ and ρ) with further receptor isoforms occurring with high probability, or only tentatively 86,87. It is beyond the scope of this Guide to discuss the pharmacology of individual GABAA receptor isoforms in detail; such information can be gleaned in the reviews 53,66,71,76,78,83,86,87,92 and 51,52. Agents that discriminate between α-subunit isoforms are noted in the table and additional agents that demonstrate selectivity between receptor isoforms, for example via β-subunit selectivity, are indicated in the text below. The distinctive agonist and antagonist pharmacology of ρ receptors is summarised in the table and additional aspects are reviewed in 60,72,84,105.
Subunits
Nomenclature | α1 | α2 | α3 | α4 | α5 | α6 |
HGNC, UniProt | GABRA1, P14867 | GABRA2, P47869 | GABRA3, P34903 | GABRA4, P48169 | GABRA5, P31644 | GABRA6, Q16445 |
Agonists | isoguvacine [GABA site] (Full agonist), isonipecotic acid [GABA site], muscimol [GABA site] (Full agonist), piperidine-4-sulphonic acid [GABA site] (Full agonist), THIP [GABA site] | |||||
Selective antagonists | bicuculline [GABA site], gabazine [GABA site] | |||||
Channel Blockers | picrotoxin, TBPS | |||||
Endogenous allosteric regulators | 5α-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one (Potentiation), tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (Potentiation), Zn2+ (Inhibition) | |||||
Allosteric Regulators [benzodiazepine site] | α3IA (Inverse agonist), α5IA (Inverse agonist), bretazenil (Full agonist), diazepam (Full agonist), DMCM (Inverse agonist), flumazenil (Antagonist), flunitrazepam (Full agonist), MRK016 (Inverse agonist), Ro154513 (Inverse agonist), Ro194603 (Inverse agonist), Ro4938581 (Inverse agonist), TP003 (Antagonist), TPA023 (Antagonist) | α3IA (Inverse agonist), α5IA (Inverse agonist), bretazenil (Full agonist), diazepam (Full agonist), DMCM (Inverse agonist), flumazenil (Antagonist), flunitrazepam (Full agonist), MRK016 (Inverse agonist), ocinaplon (Partial agonist), Ro154513 (Inverse agonist), Ro194603 (Inverse agonist), Ro4938581 (Inverse agonist), TP003 (Antagonist), ZK93426 (Antagonist) | α5IA (Inverse agonist), bretazenil (Full agonist), diazepam (Full agonist), DMCM (Inverse agonist), flumazenil (Antagonist), flunitrazepam (Full agonist), MRK016 (Inverse agonist), ocinaplon (Partial agonist), Ro154513 (Inverse agonist), Ro4938581 (Inverse agonist), ZK93426 (Antagonist) | flumazenil (Partial agonist, low affinity) | α3IA (Inverse agonist), bretazenil (Full agonist), diazepam (Full agonist), DMCM (Inverse agonist), flumazenil (Antagonist), flunitrazepam (Full agonist), ocinaplon (Partial agonist), Ro154513 (Inverse agonist), Ro194603 (Inverse agonist), TP003 (Antagonist), TPA023 (Antagonist), ZK93426 (Antagonist) | bretazenil (Full agonist), flumazenil (Partial agonist, low affinity) |
Selective allosteric regulators [benzodiazepine site] | indiplon (Full agonist, high affinity), L838417 (Antagonist), ocinaplon (Full agonist), zaleplon (Full agonist, high affinity), ZK93426 (Antagonist), zolpidem (Full agonist, high affinity) | L838417 (Partial agonist), TPA023 (Partial agonist, low efficacy) | α3IA (higher affinity), L838417 (Partial agonist), Ro194603 (Inverse agonist, higher affinity), TP003 (Partial agonist, high efficacy), TPA023 (Partial agonist, low efficacy) | bretazenil (Full agonist), Ro154513 (Full agonist) | α5IA (Inverse agonist), L655708 (Inverse agonist, high affinity), L838417 (Partial agonist), MRK016 (Inverse agonist), Ro4938581 (Inverse agonist, higher affinity), RY024 (Inverse agonist, high affinity) | Ro154513 (Full agonist) |
Radioligands (Kd) | [11C]flumazenil [benzodiazepine site], [18F]fluoroethylflumazenil [benzodiazepine site], [35S]TBPS [anion channel], [3H]CGS8216 [benzodiazepine site], [3H]flunitrazepam [benzodiazepine site], [3H]gabazine [GABA site], [3H]muscimol [GABA site], [3H]zolpidem [benzodiazepine site] | |||||
Comment | Zn2+ is an endogenous allosteric regulator and causes potent inhibition of receptors formed from binary combinations of α and β subunits, incorporation of a δ or γ subunit causes a modest, or pronounced, reduction in inhibitory potency, respectively 77 |
Comments
isonipectoic acid is a relatively high efficacy agonist at the GABA binding site of α4 and α6 subunits. Diazepam and flunitrazepam are not active at α4- or α6-subunits. [11C]flumazenil is a low affinity ligand at the benzodiazepine site of α4 and α6 subunits. [3H]Ro154513 selectively labels α4- and α6-subunit containing receptors in the presence of a saturating concentration of a ‘classical’ benzodiazepine (e.g. diazepam).
Nomenclature | β1 | β2 | β3 | γ1 | γ2 | γ3 |
HGNC, UniProt | GABRB1, P18505 | GABRB2, P47870 | GABRB3, P28472 | GABRG1, Q8NIC3 | GABRG2, P18507 | GABRG3, Q99928 |
Channel Blockers | picrotoxin, TBPS | |||||
Comment | Zn2+ is an endogenous allosteric regulator and causes potent inhibition of receptors formed from binary combinations of α and β subunits, incorporation of a δ or γ subunit causes a modest, or pronounced, reduction in inhibitory potency, respectively 77 |
Nomenclature | δ | ε | θ | π |
HGNC, UniProt | GABRD, O14764 | GABRE, P78334 | GABRQ, Q9UN88 | GABRP, O00591 |
Selective agonists | THIP [GABA site] (Full agonist) | – | – | – |
Channel Blockers | picrotoxin, TBPS | |||
Comment | Zn2+ is an endogenous allosteric regulator and causes potent inhibition of receptors formed from binary combinations of α and β subunits, incorporation of a δ or γ subunit causes a modest, or pronounced, reduction in inhibitory potency, respectively |
Nomenclature | ρ1 | ρ2 | ρ3 |
HGNC, UniProt | GABRR1, P24046 | GABRR2, P28476 | GABRR3, A8MPY1 |
Agonists | isoguvacine [GABA site] (Partial agonist), muscimol [GABA site] (Partial agonist) | ||
Selective agonists | 5-Me-IAA [GABA site] (Full agonist), (±)-cis-2-CAMP [GABA site] (Full agonist) | ||
Antagonists | isonipecotic acid [GABA site], piperidine-4-sulphonic acid [GABA site], THIP [GABA site] | ||
Selective antagonists | aza-THIP [GABA site], cis-3-ACPBPA [GABA site], trans-3-ACPBPA [GABA site], TPMPA [GABA site] | ||
Channel Blockers | picrotoxin, TBPS | ||
Comment | bicuculline is not active at these subunits |
Comments
The potency and efficacy of many GABA agonists vary between receptor GABAA receptor isoforms 66,73,78. For example, THIP (gaboxadol) is a partial agonist at receptors with the subunit composition α4β3γ2, but elicits currents in excess of those evoked by GABA at the α4β3δ receptor where GABA itself is a low efficacy agonist 56,58. The antagonists bicuculline and gabazine differ in their ability to suppress spontaneous openings of the GABAA receptor, the former being more effective 98. The presence of the γ subunit within the heterotrimeric complex reduces the potency and efficacy of agonists 96. The GABAA receptor contains distinct allosteric sites that bind barbiturates and endogenous (e.g., 5α-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one) and synthetic (e.g., alphaxalone) neuroactive steroids in a diastereo- or enantio-selective manner 55,68,69,100. Picrotoxinin and TBPS act at an allosteric site within the chloride channel pore to negatively regulate channel activity; negative allosteric regulation by γ-butyrolactone derivatives also involves the picrotoxinin site, whereas positive allosteric regulation by such compounds is proposed to occur at a distinct locus. Many intravenous (e.g., etomidate, propofol) and inhalational (e.g., halothane, isoflurane) anaesthetics and alcohols also exert a regulatory influence upon GABAA receptor activity 57,85. Specific amino acid residues within GABAA receptor α- and β-subunits that influence allosteric regulation by anaesthetic and non-anaesthetic compounds have been identified 67,69. Photoaffinity labelling of distinct amino acid residues within purified GABAA receptors by the etomidate derivative, [3H]azietomidate, has also been demonstrated 80 and this binding subject to positive allosteric regulation by anaesthetic steroids 79. An array of natural products including flavonoid and terpenoid compounds exert varied actions at GABAA receptors (reviewed in detail in 71).
In addition to the agents listed in the table, modulators of GABAA receptor activity that exhibit subunit dependent activity include: salicylidene salicylhydrazide [negative allosteric modulator selective for β1- versus β2-, or β3-subunit-containing receptors 99 ]; fragrent dioxane derivatives [positive allosteric modulators selective for β1- versus β2-, or β3-subunit-containing receptors 91 ]; loreclezole, etomidate, tracazolate, mefenamic acid, etifoxine, stiripentol, valerenic acid amide [positive allosteric modulators with selectivity for β2/β3- over β1-subunit-containing receptors 65,74,76 ]; tracazolate [intrinsic efficacy, i.e., potentiation, or inhibition, is dependent upon the identity of the γ1-3-, δ-, or ε-subunit co-assembed with α1- and β1-subunits 97 ]; amiloride [selective blockade of receptors containing an α6-subunit 64 ]; furosemide [selective blockade of receptors containing an α6-subunit co-assembled with β2/β3-, but not β1-subunit 76 ]; La3+ [potentiates responses mediated by α1β3γ2L receptors, weakly inhibits α6β3γ2L receptors, and strongly blocks α6β3δ and α4β3δ receptors 58,89 ]; ethanol [selectively potentiates responses mediated by α4β3δ and α6β3δ receptors versus receptors in which β2 replaces β3, or γ replaces δ 103, but see also 75 ]; DS1 and DS2 [selectively potentiate responses mediated by δ-subunit-containing receptors 102 ]. It should be noted that the apparent selectivity of some positive allosteric modulators (e.g., neurosteroids such as 5α-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one for δ-subunit-containing receptors (e.g., α1β3δ) may be a consequence of the unusually low efficacy of GABA at this receptor isoform 54,56.
Glycine receptors
Overview
The inhibitory glycine receptor [nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR sub-committee on glycine receptors] is a member of the Cys-loop superfamily of transmitter-gated ion channels that includes the zinc activated channels, GABAA, nicotinic acetylcholine and 5-HT3 receptors 121. The receptor is expressed either as a homo-pentamer of α subunits, or a complex now thought to harbour 2α and 3β subunits 107,111, that contain an intrinsic anion channel. Four differentially expressed isoforms of the α-subunit (α1-α4) and one variant of the β-subunit (β1, GLRB, P48167) have been identified by genomic and cDNA cloning. Further diversity originates from alternative splicing of the primary gene transcripts for α1 (α1INS and α1del), α2 (α2A and α2B), α3 (α3S and α3L) and β (βΔ7) subunits and by mRNA editing of the α2 and α3 subunit 109,124,128. Both α2 splicing and α3 mRNA editing can produce subunits (i.e., α2B and α3P185L) with enhanced agonist sensitivity. Predominantly, the mature form of the receptor contains α1 (or α3) and β subunits while the immature form is mostly composed of only α2 subunits. RNA transcripts encoding the α4-subunit have not been detected in adult humans. The N-terminal domain of the α-subunit contains both the agonist and strychnine binding sites that consist of several discontinuous regions of amino acids. Inclusion of the β-subunit in the pentameric glycine receptor contributes to agonist binding, reduces single channel conductance and alters pharmacology. The β-subunit also anchors the receptor, via an amphipathic sequence within the large intracellular loop region, to gephyrin. The latter is a cytoskeletal attachment protein that binds to a number of subsynaptic proteins involved in cytoskeletal structure and thus clusters and anchors hetero-oligomeric receptors to the synapse 116,117,126. G-protein βγ subunits enhance the open state probability of native and recombinant glycine receptors by association with domains within the large intracellular loop 135,136. Intracellular chloride concentration modulates the kinetics of native and recombinant glycine receptors 129. Intracellular Ca2+ appears to increase native and recombinant glycine receptor affinity, prolonging channel open events, by a mechanism that does not involve phosphorylation 110.
Subunits
Nomenclature | α1 | α2 | α3 |
HGNC, UniProt | GLRA1, P23415 | GLRA2, P23416 | GLRA3, O75311 |
Selective agonists (potency order) | glycine > β-alanine > taurine | glycine > β-alanine > taurine | glycine > β-alanine > taurine |
Selective antagonists (IC50) | HU-308 (weak inhibition), PMBA, strychnine, pregnenolone sulphate (Ki 1.9x10-6 M), tropisetron (Ki 8.4x10-5 M), ginkgolide X (7.6x10-7 M), nifedipine (3.3x10-6 M), bilobalide (2x10-5 M), colchicine (3.24x10-4 M) | PMBA, strychnine, pregnenolone sulphate (Ki 5.5x10-6 M), tropisetron (Ki 1.3x10-5 M), HU-210 (9x10-8 M), WIN55212-2 (2.2x10-7 M), HU-308 (1.1x10-6 M), ginkgolide X (2.8x10-6 M), bilobalide (8x10-6 M), colchicine (6.4x10-5 M), 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid (1.88x10-4 M) | strychnine, HU-210 (5x10-8 M), HU-308 (9.7x10-8 M), WIN55212-2 (9.7x10-8 M), (12E,20Z,18S)-8-hydroxyvariabilin (7x10-6 M), nifedipine (2.92x10-5 M) |
Channel Blockers (IC50) | cyanotriphenylborate (1.3x10-6 M), ginkgolide B (6x10-7 – 8x10-6 M), picrotin (5.2x10-6 M), picrotoxinin (5.1x10-6 M), picrotoxin (6.3x10-6 M) | picrotoxinin (4.1x10-7 M), picrotoxin (2.3x10-6 M), ginkgolide B (3.7x10-6 – 1.14x10-5 M), picrotin (1.31x10-5 M), cyanotriphenylborate (>2x10-5 M) | picrotoxin (block is weaker when β subunit is co-expressed), picrotoxinin (4.3x10-7 M), ginkgolide B (1.8x10-6 M), picrotin (6x10-6 M) |
Endogenous allosteric regulators | Extracellular H+ (Inhibition, endogenous), Zn2+ (Potentiation, endogenous; not affected by β subunit co-expression) (EC50 3.7x10-8 M), Cu2+ (Inhibition, endogenous; not affected by β subunit co-expression) (IC50 4x10-6 – 1.5x10-5 M), Zn2+ (Inhibition, endogenous) (IC50 1.5x10-5 M) | Zn2+ (Potentiation, endogenous; not affected by β subunit co-expression) (EC50 5.4x10-7 M), Cu2+ (Inhibition, endogenous) (IC50 1.7x10-5 M), Zn2+ (Inhibition, endogenous) (IC50 3.6x10-4 M) | Cu2+ (Inhibition, endogenous) (IC50 9x10-6 M), Zn2+ (Inhibition, endogenous) (IC50 1.5x10-4 M) |
Selective allosteric regulators | anandamide (Potentiation) (EC50 3.8x10-8 M), HU-210 (Potentiation) (EC50 2.7x10-7 M), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Potentiation, ∼1500% potentiation) (EC50 ∼3x10-6 M) | Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Potentiation, ∼230% potentiation) (EC50 ∼1x10-6 M) | Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Potentiation, ∼1500% potentiation) (EC50 ∼5x10-6 M) |
Radioligands (Kd) | [3H]strychnine | [3H]strychnine | [3H]strychnine |
Functional characteristics | γ = 86 pS (main state); (+ β = 44 pS) | γ = 111 pS (main state); (+ β = 54 pS) | γ = 105 pS (main state); (+ β = 48) |
Comments
Data in the table refer to homo-oligomeric assemblies of the α-subunit, significant changes introduced by co-expression of the β1 subunit are indicated in parenthesis. Not all glycine receptor ligands are listed within the table, but some that may be useful in distinguishing between glycine receptor isoforms are indicated (see detailed view pages for each subunit: α1, α2, α3, α4, β). pregnenolone sulphate, tropisetron and colchicine, for example, although not selective antagonists of glycine receptors, are included for this purpose. strychnine is a potent and selective competitive glycine receptor antagonist with affinities in the range 5–15 nM. RU5135 demonstrates comparable potency, but additionally blocks GABAA receptors. There are conflicting reports concerning the ability of cannabinoids to inhibit 119, or potentiate and at high concentrations activate 106,108,112,131,132 glycine receptors. Nonetheless, cannabinoid analogues may hold promise in distinguishing between glycine receptor subtypes 132. In addition, potentiation of glycine receptor activity by cannabinoids has been claimed to contribute to cannabis-induced analgesia relying on Ser296/307 (α1/α3) in M3 131. Several analogues of muscimol and piperidine act as agonists and antagonists of both glycine and GABAA receptors. picrotoxin acts as an allosteric inhibitor that appears to bind within the pore, and shows strong selectivity towards homomeric receptors. While its components, picrotoxinin and picrotin, have equal potencies at α1 receptors, their potencies at α2 and α3 receptors differ modestly and may allow some distinction between different receptor types 133. Binding of picrotoxin within the pore has been demonstrated in the crystal structure of the related C. elegans GluCl Cys-loop receptor 113. In addition to the compounds listed in the table, numerous agents act as allosteric regulators of glycine receptors (comprehensively reviewed in 118,120,130,137). Zn2+ acts through distinct binding sites of high- and low-affinity to allosterically enhance channel function at low (<10 μM) concentrations and inhibits responses at higher concentrations in a subunit selective manner 125. The effect of Zn2+ is somewhat mimicked by Ni2+. Endogenous Zn2+ is essential for normal glycinergic neurotransmission mediated by α1 subunit-containing receptors 114. Elevation of intracellular Ca2+ produces fast potentiation of glycine receptor-mediated responses. Dideoxyforskolin (4 μM) and tamoxifen (0.2–5 μM) both potentiate responses to low glycine concentrations (15 μM), but act as inhibitors at higher glycine concentrations (100 μM). Additional modulatory agents that enhance glycine receptor function include inhalational, and several intravenous general anaesthetics (e.g. minaxolone, propofol and pentobarbitone) and certain neurosteroids. ethanol and higher order n-alcohols also enhance glycine receptor function although whether this occurs by a direct allosteric action at the receptor 123, or through G protein βγ subunits 134 is debated. Recent crystal structures of the bacterial homologue, GLIC, have identified transmembrane binding pockets for both anaesthetics 127 and alcohols 115. Solvents inhaled as drugs of abuse (e.g. toluene, 1-1-1-trichloroethane) may act at sites that overlap with those recognising alcohols and volatile anaesthetics to produce potentiation of glycine receptor function. The function of glycine receptors formed as homomeric complexes of α1 or α2 subunits, or hetero-oligomers of α1/β or α2/β subunits, is differentially affected by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron (ICS 205-930) which may evoke potentiation (which may occur within the femtomolar range at the homomeric glycine α1 receptor), or inhibition, depending upon the subunit composition of the receptor and the concentrations of the modulator and glycine employed. Potentiation and inhibition by tropeines involves different binding modes 122. Additional tropeines, including atropine, modulate glycine receptor activity.
Ionotropic glutamate receptors
Overview
The ionotropic glutamate receptors comprise members of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate), AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid) and kainate receptor classes, named originally according to their preferred, synthetic, agonist 149,174,197. Receptor heterogeneity within each class arises from the homo-oligomeric, or hetero-oligomeric, assembly of distinct subunits into cation-selective tetramers. Each subunit of the tetrameric complex comprises an extracellular amino terminal domain (ATD), an extracellular ligand binding domain (LBD), three transmembrane domains composed of three membrane spans (M1, M3 and M4), a channel lining re-entrant ‘p-loop’ (M2) located between M1 and M3 and an intracellular carboxy- terminal domain (CTD) 166,169,177,181,197. The X-ray structure of a homomeric ionotropic glutamate receptor (GluA2 – see below) has recently been solved at 3.6Å resolution 194 and although providing the most complete structural information current available may not representative of the subunit arrangement of, for example, the heteromeric NMDA receptors 167. It is beyond the scope of this supplement to discuss the pharmacology of individual ionotropic glutamate receptor isoforms in detail; such information can be gleaned from 144,148,149,153,164,165,168,184–186,197,198. Agents that discriminate between subunit isoforms are, where appropriate, noted in the tables and additional compounds that distinguish between receptor isoforms are indicated in the text below.
The classification of glutamate receptor subunits has been recently been re-addressed by NC-IUPHAR 146. The scheme developed recommends a revised nomenclature for ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits that is adopted here.
AMPA and Kainate receptors
AMPA receptors assemble as homomers, or heteromers, that may be drawn from GluA1, GluA2, GluA3 and GluA4 subunits. Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) of class I (i.e. γ2, γ3, γ4 and γ8) act, with variable stoichiometry, as auxiliary subunits to AMPA receptors and influence their trafficking, single channel conductance gating and pharmacology (reviewed in 154,163,179,195). Functional kainate receptors can be expressed as homomers of GluK1, GluK2 or GluK3 subunits. GluK1-3 subunits are also capable of assembling into heterotetramers (e.g. GluK1/K2; 171,188,189). Two additional kainate receptor subunits, GluK4 and GluK5, when expressed individually, form high affinity binding sites for kainate, but lack function, but can form heteromers when expressed with GluK1-3 subunits (e.g. GluK2/K5; reviewed in 165,188,189). Kainate receptors may also exhibit ‘metabotropic’ functions 171,191. As found for AMPA receptors, kainate receptors are modulated by auxiliary subunits (Neto proteins, 172,188). An important function difference between AMPA and kainate receptors is that the latter require extracellular Na+ and Cl- for their activation 141,190. RNA encoding the GluA2 subunit undergoes extensive RNA editing in which the codon encoding a p-loop glutamine residue (Q) is converted to one encoding arginine (R). This Q/R site strongly influences the biophysical properties of the receptor. Recombinant AMPA receptors lacking RNA edited GluA2 subunits are: (1) permeable to Ca2+; (2) blocked by intracellular polyamines at depolarized potentials causing inward rectification (the latter being reduced by TARPs); (3) blocked by extracellular argiotoxin and Joro spider toxins and (4) demonstrate higher channel conductances than receptors containing the edited form of GluA2 162,192. GluK1 and GluK2, but not other kainate receptor subunits, are similarly edited and broadly similar functional characteristics apply to kainate receptors lacking either an RNA edited GluK1, or GluK2, subunit 171,188. Native AMPA and kainate receptors displaying differential channel conductances, Ca2+ permeabilites and sensitivity to block by intracellular polyamines have been identified 147,162,173. GluA1-4 can exist as two variants generated by alternative splicing (termed ‘flip’ and ‘flop’) that differ in their desensitization kinetics and their desensitization in the presence of cyclothiazide which stabilises the nondesensitized state. TARPs also stabilise the non-desensitized conformation of AMPA receptors and facilitate the action of cyclothiazide 179. Splice variants of GluK1-3 also exist which affects their trafficking 171,188.
Subunits
Nomenclature | GluA1 | GluA2 | GluA3 | GluA4 |
HGNC, UniProt | GRIA1, P42261 | GRIA2, P42262 | GRIA3, P42263 | GRIA4, P48058 |
Agonists | AMPA (Full agonist), (S)-5-fluorowillardiine (Full agonist) | |||
Selective antagonists | ATPO, GYKI53655, GYKI53784 (active isomer, non-competitive), LY293558, NBQX | |||
Channel Blockers | extracellular argiotoxin, extracellular joro toxin | extracellular argiotoxin | extracellular argiotoxin, extracellular joro toxin | extracellular argiotoxin, extracellular joro toxin |
Allosteric Regulators | aniracetam (Positive), CX516 (Positive), CX546 (Positive), cyclothiazide (Positive), IDRA-21 (Positive), LY392098 (Positive), LY404187 (Positive), LY503430 (Positive), piracetam (Positive), S18986 (Positive) | |||
Radioligands (Kd) | [3H]AMPA, [3H]CNQX | |||
Comment | piracetam and aniracetam are examples of pyrrolidinones. cyclothiazide, S18986, and IDRA-21 are examples of benzothiadiazides. CX516 and CX546 are examples of benzylpiperidines. LY392098, LY404187 and LY503430 are examples of biarylpropylsulfonamides. Also blocked by intracellular polyamines |
Nomenclature | GluK1 | GluK2 | GluK3 | GluK4 | GluK5 |
HGNC, UniProt | GRIK1, P39086 | GRIK2, Q13002 | GRIK3, Q13003 | GRIK4, Q16099 | GRIK5, Q16478 |
Agonists (EC50) | 8-deoxy-neodysiherbaine (Full agonist), ATPA (Full agonist), domoic acid (Full agonist), dysiherbaine (Full agonist), (S)-4-AHCP (Full agonist), (S)-5-iodowillardiine, kainate (Full agonist), LY339434 (Full agonist), SYM2081 (Full agonist) | domoic acid (Full agonist), dysiherbaine (Full agonist), kainate (Full agonist), SYM2081 (Full agonist) | dysiherbaine (Full agonist), kainate (Full agonist, low potency), SYM2081 (Full agonist) | domoic acid (Full agonist), dysiherbaine (Full agonist), kainate (Full agonist), SYM2081 (Full agonist) | domoic acid (Full agonist), dysiherbaine (Full agonist), kainate (Full agonist), SYM2081 (Full agonist) |
Selective antagonists (IC50) | 2,4-epi-neodysiherbaine, ACET, LY382884, LY466195, MSVIII-19, NS3763 (non-competitive), UBP302, UBP310 | 2,4-epi-neodysiherbaine | – | – | – |
Allosteric Regulators | concanavalin A (Positive) | concanavalin A (Positive) | – | – | – |
Radioligands (Kd) | [3H](2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate, [3H]kainate, [3H]UBP310 (2.1x10-8 M) 138 | [3H](2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate, [3H]kainate | [3H](2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate, [3H]kainate, [3H]UBP310 (5.6x10-7 M) 138 | [3H](2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate, [3H]kainate | [3H](2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate, [3H]kainate |
Comment | – | Intracellular polyamines are subtype selective channel blockers (GluK3 >> GluK2) | domoic acid and concanavalin A are inactive at the GluK3 subunit. Intracellular polyamines are subtype selective channel blockers (GluK3 >> GluK2) | – | – |
Comments
AMPA and Kainate receptors
All AMPA receptors are additionally activated by kainate (and domoic acid) with relatively low potency, (EC50 ∼ 100 μM). Inclusion of TARPs within the receptor complex increases the potency and maximal effect of kainate 163,179. AMPA is weak partial agonist at GluK1 and at heteromeric assemblies of GluK1/GluK2, GluK1/GluK5 and GluK2/GluK5 165. Quinoxalinediones such as CNQX and NBQX show limited selectivity between AMPA and kainate receptors. LY293558 also has kainate (GluK1) receptor activity as has GYKI53655 (GluK3 and GluK2/GluK3) 165. ATPO is a potent competitive antagonist of AMPA receptors, has a weaker antagonist action at kainate receptors comprising GluK1 subunits, but is devoid of activity at kainate receptors formed from GluK2 or GluK2/GluK5 subunits. The pharmacological activity of ATPO resides with the (S)-enantiomer. ACET and UBP310 may block GluK3, in addition to GluK1 138,187. (2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate (SYM2081) is equipotent in activating (and desensitising) GluK1 and GluK2 receptor isoforms and, via the induction of desensitisation at low concentrations, has been used as a functional antagonist of kainate receptors. Both (2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate and LY339434 have agonist activity at NMDA receptors. (2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate is also an inhibitor of the glutamate transporters EAAT1 and EAAT2.
Delta subunits
GluD1 (GRID1, Q9ULK0) and GluD2 (GRID2, O43424) comprise, on the basis of sequence homology, an ‘orphan’ class of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunit. They do not form a functional receptor when expressed solely, or in combination with other ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits, in transfected cells 199. However, GluD2 subunits bind D-serine and glycine and GluD2 subunits carrying the mutation A654T form a spontaneously open channel that is closed by D-serine 182.
NMDA receptors
NMDA receptors assemble as obligate heteromers that may be drawn from GluN1, GluN2A, GluN2B, GluN2C, GluN2D, GluN3A and GluN3B subunits. Alternative splicing can generate eight isoforms of GluN1 with differing pharmacological properties. Various splice variants of GluN2B, 2C, 2D and GluN3A have also been reported. Activation of NMDA receptors containing GluN1 and GluN2 subunits requires the binding of two agonists, glutamate to the S1 and S2 regions of the GluN2 subunit and glycine to S1 and S2 regions of the GluN1 subunit 145,152. The minimal requirement for efficient functional expression of NMDA receptors in vitro is a di-heteromeric assembly of GluN1 and at least one GluN2 subunit variant, as a dimer of heterodimers arrangement in the extracellular domain 157,167,177. However, more complex tri-heteromeric assemblies, incorporating multiple subtypes of GluN2 subunit, or GluN3 subunits, can be generated in vitro and occur in vivo. The NMDA receptor channel commonly has a high relative permeability to Ca2+ and is blocked, in a voltage-dependent manner, by Mg2+ such that at resting potentials the response is substantially inhibited.
Nomenclature | GluN1 | GluN2A | GluN2B | GluN2C |
HGNC, UniProt | GRIN1, Q05586 | GRIN2A, Q12879 | GRIN2B, Q13224 | GRIN2C, Q01098 |
Endogenous agonists | D-aspartate [glutamate site], D-serine [glycine site], glycine [glycine site], L-aspartate [glutamate site] | D-aspartate [glutamate site] (low potency), D-serine [glycine site] (low potency), glycine [glycine site] (low potency), L-aspartate [glutamate site] (low potency) | D-aspartate [glutamate site] (intermediate potency), D-serine [glycine site] (intermediate potency), glycine [glycine site] (intermediate potency), L-aspartate [glutamate site] (intermediate potency) | D-aspartate [glutamate site] (intermediate potency), D-serine [glycine site] (intermediate potency), glycine [glycine site] (intermediate potency), L-aspartate [glutamate site] (intermediate potency) |
Agonists | (+)-HA966 [glycine site] (Partial agonist), homoquinolinic acid [glutamate site] (Partial agonist), (RS)-(tetrazol-5-yl)glycine [glutamate site] (Full agonist), NMDA [glutamate site] (Full agonist) | (+)-HA966 [glycine site] (Partial agonist, low potency), homoquinolinic acid [glutamate site] (partial agonist), (RS)-(tetrazol-5-yl)glycine [glutamate site] (Full agonist, low potency), NMDA [glutamate site] (Full agonist, low potency) | (+)-HA966 [glycine site] (Partial agonist), homoquinolinic acid [glutamate site] (Full agonist, high potency), (RS)-(tetrazol-5-yl)glycine [glutamate site] (Full agonist, intermediate potency), NMDA [glutamate site] (Full agonist, intermediate potency) | homoquinolinic acid [glutamate site] (partial agonist), (RS)-(tetrazol-5-yl)glycine [glutamate site] (Full agonist, intermediate potency), NMDA [glutamate site] (Full agonist, intermediate potency) |
Selective antagonists | 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid [glycine site], GV196771A [glycine site], L689560 [glycine site], L701324 [glycine site] | 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid [glycine site], CGP37849 [glutamate site], CGS19755 [glutamate site], conantokin-G [glutamate site] (low potency), d-AP5 [glutamate site], d-CCPene [glutamate site] (high potency), GV196771A [glycine site], L689560 [glycine site], L701324 [glycine site], LY233053 [glutamate site], NVP-AAM077 [glutamate site] (high potency (human), but weakly selective for rat GluN2A versus GluN2B) 139,155,156,183, UBP141 [glutamate site] (low potency) 180 | 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid [glycine site], CGP37849 [glutamate site], CGS19755 [glutamate site], conantokin-G [glutamate site] (high potency), d-AP5 [glutamate site], d-CCPene [glutamate site] (high potency), GV196771A [glycine site], L689560 [glycine site], L701324 [glycine site], LY233053 [glutamate site], NVP-AAM077 [glutamate site] (low potency (human), but weakly selective for rat GluN2A versus GluN2B) 139,155,156,183, UBP141 [glutamate site] (low potency) 180 | 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid [glycine site], CGP37849 [glutamate site], CGS19755 [glutamate site], conantokin-G [glutamate site] (intermediate potency), d-AP5 [glutamate site], d-CCPene [glutamate site] (intermediate potency), GV196771A [glycine site], L689560 [glycine site], L701324 [glycine site], LY233053 [glutamate site], UBP141 [glutamate site] (intermediate potency) 180 |
Channel Blockers | – | amantidine (GluN2C = GluN2D ≥ GluN2B ≥ GluN2A), ketamine, memantine (GluN2C ≥ GluN2D ≥ GluN2B > GluN2A), Mg2+ (GluN2A = GluN2B > GluN2C = GluN2D), MK-801, N1-dansyl-spermine (GluN2A = GluN2B >> GluN2C = GluN2D), phencyclidine | ||
Radioligands (Kd) | [3H]CGP39653 [glutamate site], [3H]CGP61594 [glycine site] ([3H]CGP61594 is a photoaffinity ligand), [3H]CGS19755 [glutamate site], [3H]CPP [glutamate site], [3H]glycine [glycine site], [3H]L689560 [glycine site], [3H]MDL105519 [glycine site], [3H]MK-801 [cation channel] |
Nomenclature | GluN2D |
HGNC, UniProt | GRIN2D, O15399 |
Endogenous agonists | D-aspartate [glutamate site] (GluN2D > GluN2C = GluN2B > GluN2A), D-serine [glycine site] (GluN2D > GluN2C > GluN2B > GluN2A), glycine [glycine site] (GluN2D > GluN2C > GluN2B > GluN2A), L-aspartate [glutamate site] (GluN2D = GluN2B > GluN2C = GluN2A) |
Agonists | homoquinolinic acid [glutamate site] (Full agonist, GluN2B ≥ GluN2A ≥ GluN2D > GluN2C; partial agonist at GluN2A and GluN2C), (RS)-(tetrazol-5-yl)glycine [glutamate site] (Full agonist, GluN2D > GluN2C = GluN2B > GluN2A), NMDA [glutamate site] (Full agonist, GluN2D > GluN2C > GluN2B > GluN2A) |
Selective antagonists | 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid [glycine site], CGP37849 [glutamate site], CGS19755 [glutamate site], conantokin-G [glutamate site] (GluN2B > GluN2D = GluN2C = GluN2A), d-AP5 [glutamate site], d-CCPene [glutamate site] (GluN2A = GluN2B > GluN2C = GluN2D), GV196771A [glycine site], L689560 [glycine site], L701324 [glycine site], LY233053 [glutamate site], UBP141 [glutamate site] (GluN2D ≥ GluN2C > GluN2A ≥ GluN2B) 180 |
Channel Blockers | amantidine (GluN2C = GluN2D ≥ GluN2B ≥ GluN2A), ketamine, memantine (GluN2C ≥ GluN2D ≥ GluN2B > GluN2A), Mg2+ (GluN2A = GluN2B > GluN2C = GluN2D), MK-801, N1-dansyl-spermine (GluN2A = GluN2B >> GluN2C = GluN2D), phencyclidine |
Radioligands | [3H]CGP39653 [glutamate site], [3H]CGP61594 [glycine site] ([3H]CGP61594 is a photoaffinity ligand), [3H]CGS19755 [glutamate site], [3H]CPP [glutamate site], [3H]glycine [glycine site], [3H]L689560 [glycine site], [3H]MDL105519 [glycine site], [3H]MK-801 [cation channel] |
Comments
Potency orders unreferenced in the table are from 144,150,153,170,186,197. In addition to the glutamate and glycine binding sites documented in the table, physiologically important inhibitory modulatory sites exist for Mg2+, Zn2+, and protons 148,149,197. Voltage-independent inhibition by Zn2+ binding with high affinity within the ATD is highly subunit selective (GluN2A >> GluN2B > GluN2C ≥ GluN2D; 186,197). The receptor is also allosterically modulated, in both positive and negative directions, by endogenous neuroactive steroids in a subunit dependent manner 161,176. Tonic proton blockade of NMDA receptor function is alleviated by polyamines and the inclusion of exon 5 within GluN1 subunit splice variants, whereas the non-competitive antagonists ifenprodil and CP101606 (traxoprodil) increase the fraction of receptors blocked by protons at ambient concentration. Inclusion of exon 5 also abolishes potentiation by polyamines and inhibition by Zn2+ that occurs through binding in the ATD 196. Ifenprodil, CP101606, haloperidol, felbamate and Ro8-4304 discriminate between recombinant NMDA receptors assembled from GluN1 and either GluN2A, or GluN2B, subunits by acting as selective, non-competitive, antagonists of heterooligomers incorporating GluN2B through a binding site at the ATD GluN1/GluN2B subunit interface 167. LY233536 is a competitive antagonist that also displays selectivity for GluN2B over GluN2A subunit-containing receptors. Similarly, CGP61594 is a photoaffinity label that interacts selectively with receptors incorporating GluN2B versus GluN2A, GluN2D and, to a lesser extent, GluN2C subunits. TCN 201 and TCN 213 have recently been shown to block GluN2A NMDA receptors selectively by a mechanism that involves allosteric inhibition of glycine binding to the GluN1 site 140,151,159,178. In addition to influencing the pharmacological profile of the NMDA receptor, the identity of the GluN2 subunit co-assembled with GluN1 is an important determinant of biophysical properties that include sensitivity to block by Mg2+, single-channel conductance and maximal open probablity and channel deactivation time 148,152,158. Incorporation of the GluN3A subunit into tri-heteromers containing GluN1 and GluN2 subunits is associated with decreased single-channel conductance, reduced permeability to Ca2+ and decreased susceptibility to block by Mg2+ 142,160. Reduced permeability to Ca2+ has also been observed following the inclusion of GluN3B in tri-heteromers. The expression of GluN3A (GRIN3A, Q8TCUS), or GluN3B (GRIN3B, O60391), with GluN1 alone forms, in Xenopus laevis oocytes, a cation channel with unique properties that include activation by glycine (but not NMDA), lack of permeation by Ca2+ and resistance to blockade by Mg2+ and NMDA receptor antagonists 143. The function of heteromers composed of GluN1 and GluN3A is enhanced by Zn2+, or glycine site antagonists, binding to the GluN1 subunit 175. Zn2+ also directly activates such complexes. The co-expression of GluN1, GluN3A and GluN3B appears to be required to form glycine-activated receptors in mammalian cell hosts 193.
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Overview
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are members of the Cys-loop family of transmitter-gated ion channels that includes the GABAA, strychnine-sensitive glycine and 5-HT3 receptors 201,229,235,236,241. All nicotinic receptors are pentamers in which each of the five subunits contains four α-helical transmembrane domains. Genes (Ensembl family ID ENSF00000000049) encoding a total of 17 subunits (α1-10, β1-4, γ, δ and ε) have been identified 224. All subunits with the exception of α8 (present in avian species) have been identified in mammals. All α subunits possess two tandem cysteine residues near to the site involved in acetylcholine binding, and subunits not named α lack these residues 229. The orthosteric ligand binding site is formed by residues within at least three peptide domains on the α subunit (principal component), and three on the adjacent subunit (complementary component). nAChRs contain several allosteric modulatory sites. One such site, for positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) and allosteric agonists, has been proposed to reside within an intrasubunit cavity between the four transmembrane domains 215,243; see also 220). The high resolution crystal structure of the molluscan acetylcholine binding protein, a structural homologue of the extracellular binding domain of a nicotinic receptor pentamer, in complex with several nicotinic receptor ligands (e.g.208) and the crystal structure of the extracellular domain of the α1 subunit bound to α-bungarotoxin at 1.94 Å resolution 213, has revealed the orthosteric binding site in detail (reviewed in 209,224,234,235). Nicotinic receptors at the somatic neuromuscular junction of adult animals have the stoichiometry (α1)2β1δε, whereas an extrajunctional (α1)2β1γδ receptor predominates in embryonic and denervated skeletal muscle and other pathological states. Other nicotinic receptors are assembled as combinations of α(2-6) and &beta(2-4) subunits. For α2, α3, α4 and β2 and β4 subunits, pairwise combinations of α and β (e.g. α3β4 and α4β2) are sufficient to form a functional receptor in vitro, but far more complex isoforms may exist in vivo (reviewed in 217,218,229). There is strong evidence that the pairwise assembly of some α and β subunits can occur with variable stoichiometry [e.g. (α4)2(β2)2 or (α4)3(β2)2] which influences the biophysical and pharmacological properties of the receptor 229. α5 and β3 subunits lack function when expressed alone, or pairwise, but participate in the formation of functional hetero-oligomeric receptors when expressed as a third subunit with another α and β pair [e.g. α4α5αβ2, α4αβ2β3, α5α6β2, see 229 for further examples]. The α6 subunit can form a functional receptor when co-expressed with β4 in vitro, but more efficient expression ensues from incorporation of a third partner, such as β3 242. The α7, α8, and α9 subunits form functional homo-oligomers, but can also combine with a second subunit to constitute a hetero-oligomeric assembly (e.g. α7β2 and α9α10). For functional expression of the α10 subunit, co-assembly with α9 is necessary. The latter, along with the α10 subunit, appears to be largely confined to cochlear and vestibular hair cells. Comprehensive listings of nicotinic receptor subunit combinations identified from recombinant expression systems, or in vivo, are given in 229. In addition, numerous proteins interact with nicotinic ACh receptors modifying their assembly, trafficking to and from the cell surface, and activation by ACh (reviewed by 203,223,228).
The nicotinic receptor subcommittee of NC-IUPHAR has recommended a nomenclature and classification scheme for nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors based on the subunit composition of known, naturally- and/or heterologously-expressed nACh receptor subtypes 226. Headings for this table reflect abbreviations designating nACh receptor subtypes based on the predominant α subunit contained in that receptor subtype. An asterisk following the indicated α subunit denotes that other subunits are known to, or may, assemble with the indicated α subunit to form the designated nACh receptor subtype(s). Where subunit stoichiometries within a specific nACh receptor subtype are known, numbers of a particular subunit larger than 1 are indicated by a subscript following the subunit (enclosed in parentheses – see also 212).
Subunits
Nomenclature | α1* | α2* | α3* |
HGNC, UniProt | CHRNA1, P02708 | CHRNA2, Q15822 | CHRNA3, P32297 |
Commonly used antagonists | (α1)2β1γδ and (α1)2β1δε: α-bungarotoxin > pancuronium > vecuronium > rocuronium > (+)-tubocurarine (IC50 = 43 - 82 nM) | α2β2: DHβE (KB = 0.9 μM), (+)-tubocurarine (KB = 1.4 μM); α2β4: DHβE (KB = 3.6 μM), (+)-tubocurarine (KB = 4.2 μM) | α3β2: DHβE (KB = 1.6 μM, IC50 = 2.0 μM), (+)-tubocurarine (KB = 2.4 μM); α3β4: DHβE (KB = 19 μM, IC50 = 26 μM), (+)-tubocurarine (KB = 2.2 μM) |
Selective agonists | succinylcholine (Full agonist, selective for (α1)2β1γδ) | – | – |
Selective antagonists | α-bungarotoxin, α-conotoxin GI, α-conotoxin MI, pancuronium, waglerin-1 (selective for (α1)2β1δε) | – | α-conotoxin AuIB (α3β4), α-conotoxin-GIC (α3β2), α-conotoxin MII (α3β2), α-conotoxin PnIA (α3β2), α-conotoxin TxIA (α3β2) |
Selective channel blockers (IC50) | gallamine ((α1)2β1γδ and (α1)2β1δε) (∼1x10-6 M), mecamylamine ((α1)2β1δε) (∼1.5x10-6 M) | hexamethonium, mecamylamine | A-867744(α3β4) 227, hexamethonium (α3β2), hexamethonium (α3β4), NS1738(α3β4) 237, mecamylamine (α3β4) (3.9x10-7 M), mecamylamine (α3β2) (7.6x10-6 M) |
Selective allosteric regulators | – | LY2087101(Positive) 206 | – |
Radioligands (Kd) | [125I]α-bungarotoxin, [3H]α-bungarotoxin | [3H]cytisine, [125I]epibatidine (α2β2) (1x10-11 – 2.1x10-11 M - Rat), [3H]epibatidine (α2β2) (1x10-11 – 2.1x10-11 M - Rat), [125I]epibatidine (α2β4) (4.2x10-11 M), [3H]epibatidine (α2β4) (4.2x10-11 M), [125I]epibatidine (α2β4) (8.4x10-11 – 8.7x10-11 M - Rat), [3H]epibatidine (α2β4) (8.4x10-11 – 8.7x10-11 M - Rat) | [3H]cytisine, [125I]epibatidine (α3β2) (7x10-12 M), [3H]epibatidine (α3β2) (7x10-12 M), [125I]epibatidine (α3β2) (1.4x10-11 – 3.4x10-11 M - Rat), [3H]epibatidine (α3β2) (1.4x10-11 – 3.4x10-11 M - Rat), [125I]epibatidine (α3β4) (2.3x10-10 M), [3H]epibatidine (α3β4) (2.3x10-10 M), [125I]epibatidine (α3β4) (2.9x10-10 – 3.04x10-10 M - Rat), [3H]epibatidine (α3β4) (2.9x10-10 – 3.04x10-10 M - Rat) |
Functional characteristics | (α1)2βγδ: PCa/PNa = 0.16 - 0.2, Pf = 2.1 – 2.9%; (α1)2βδε: PCa/PNa = 0.65 – 1.38, Pf = 4.1 – 7.2% | α2β2: PCa/PNa ∼ 1.5 | α3β2: PCa/PNa = 1.5; α3β4: PCa/PNa = 0.78 - 1.1, Pf = 2.7 – 4.6% |
Nomenclature | α4* | α6* | α7* |
HGNC, UniProt | CHRNA4, P43681 | CHRNA6, Q15825 | CHRNA7, P36544 |
Commonly used antagonists | α4β2: DHβE (KB = 0.1 μM; IC50 = 0.08 - 0.9 μM), (+)-tubocurarine (KB = 3.2 μM, IC50 = 34 μM); α4β4: DHβE (KB = 0.01 μM, IC50 = 0.19 – 1.2 μM), (+)-tubocurarine (KB = 0.2 μM, IC50 = 50 μM) | α6/α3β2β3 chimera: DHβE (IC50 = 1.1 μM) | (α7)5: DHβE (IC50 = 8 - 20 μM); (α7)5: (+)-tubocurarine (IC50 = 3.1 μM) |
Selective agonists | TC-2403(Full agonist, α4β2) 232, TC-2559(Full agonist, α4β2) 211 | – | 4BP-TQS(Full agonist, 4BP-TQS is an allosteric agonist) 215, A-582941(Full agonist, (α7)5) 204, PHA-543613(Full agonist, (α7)5) 239, PHA-709829(Full agonist, (α7)5) 200, PNU-282987(Full agonist, (α7)5) 205, TC-5619(Full agonist, (α7)5) 219 |
Selective antagonists | – | α-conotoxin MII (α6β2*), α-conotoxin MII [H9A, L15A] (α6β2β3), α-conotoxin PIA (α6/α3β2β3 chimera) | α-bungarotoxin ((α7)5), α-conotoxin ArIB ((α7)5), α-conotoxin ImI ((α7)5), methyllycaconitine ((α7)5) |
Selective channel blockers (IC50) | A-867744(α4β2) 227, NS1738(α4β2) 237, mecamylamine (α4β4) (3.3x10-7 – 4.9x10-6 M), mecamylamine (α4β2) (3.6x10-6 – 4.1x10-6 M), hexamethonium (α4β2) (6.8x10-6 – 2.9x10-5 M), hexamethonium (α4β4) (9.1x10-5 M) | mecamylamine (α6/α3β2β3 chimera) (1.1x10-5 M), hexamethonium (α6/α3β2β3 chimera) (9.1x10-5 M) | mecamylamine ((α7)5) (1.56x10-5 M) |
Selective allosteric regulators | LY2087101(Positive, potentiates α4β2 and α4β4) 206, NS9283(Positive, α4β2 and α4β4) 225 | – | A-867744(Positive, (α7)5:Type 2; also blocks α3β4 and α4β2) 227, JNJ1930942 (Positive, (α7)5:Type 1/2) 214, LY2087101(Positive, (α7)5:Type 1) 206, NS1738(Positive, (α7)5:Type 1; also blocks α3β4 and α4β2) 237, PNU-120596(Positive, (α7)5:Type 2) 221 |
Radioligands (Kd) | [125I]epibatidine (α4β2) (1x10-11 – 3.3x10-11 M), [3H]epibatidine (α4β2) (1x10-11 – 3.3x10-11 M), [3H]cytisine (α4β2) (1x10-10 M - Rat), [3H]cytisine (α4β4) (1x10-10 M), [125I]epibatidine (α4β4) (1.87x10-10 M), [3H]epibatidine (α4β4) (1.87x10-10 M), [125I]epibatidine (α4β2) (3x10-10 – 4.6x10-10 M - Rat), [3H]epibatidine (α4β2) (3x10-10 – 4.6x10-10 M - Rat), [3H]nicotine (α4β2) (4x10-10 M - Rat), [3H]cytisine (α4β2) (4.3x10-10 – 6.3x10-10 M), [125I]epibatidine (α4β4) (8.5x10-10 – 9.4x10-10 M - Rat), [3H]epibatidine (α4β4) (8.5x10-10 – 9.4x10-10 M - Rat) | [125I]α-conotoxin MII, [3H]epibatidine (native α6β4*) (3.5x10-11 M - Chicken) | [3H]epibatidine ((α7)5) (6x10-13 M), [3H]A-585539(native α7) (7x10-11 M) 202, [3H]AZ11637326((α7)5) (2.3x10-10 M) 216, [125I]α-bungarotoxin ((α7)5) (7x10-10 – 5x10-9 M), [3H]α-bungarotoxin ((α7)5) (7x10-10 – 5x10-9 M), [3H]methyllycaconitine (native α7*) (1.9x10-9 M - Rat) |
Functional characteristics | α4β2: PCa/PNa = 1.65, Pf = 2.6 – 2.9%; α4β4: Pf = 1.5 – 3.0 % | – | PCa/PNa = 6.6-20, Pf = 8.8 - 11.4% |
Nomenclature | α8 (avian)* | α9* |
HGNC, UniProt | – | CHRNA9, Q9UGM1 |
Commonly used antagonists | (α8)5: α-bungarotoxin > atropine ≥ (+)-tubocurarine ≥ strychnine | (α9)5: α-bungarotoxin > methyllycaconitine > strychnine ∼ tropisetron > (+)-tubocurarine; α9α10: α-bungarotoxin > tropisetron = strychnine > (+)-tubocurarine |
Selective antagonists (IC50) | – | α-bungarotoxin (α9α10), α-bungarotoxin ((α9)5), α-conotoxin RgIA (α9α10), muscarine (α9α10), muscarine ((α9)5), nicotine (α9α10), nicotine ((α9)5), strychnine (α9α10), strychnine ((α9)5) |
Radioligands (Kd) | [3H]epibatidine ((α8)5) (2x10-10 M), [125I]α-bungarotoxin (native α8*) (5.5x10-9 M), [3H]α-bungarotoxin (native α8*) (5.5x10-9 M) | [125I]α-bungarotoxin, [3H]α-bungarotoxin, [3H]methyllycaconitine (α9α10) (7.5x10-9 M) |
Functional characteristics | – | (α9)5: PCa/PNa = 9; α9α10: PCa/PNa = 9, Pf = 22% |
Comments
Commonly used agonists of nACh receptors that display limited discrimination in functional assays between receptor subtypes include A-85380, cytisine, DMPP, epibatidine, nicotine and the natural transmitter, acetylcholine (ACh). A summary of their profile across differing receptors is provided in 218 and quantitative data across numerous assay systems are summarized in 222. Quantitative data presented in the table for commonly used antagonists and channel blockers for human receptors studied under voltage-clamp are from 207,210,230,231,233,240. Type I PAMs increase peak agonist-evoked responses but have little, or no, effect on the rate of desensitization of α7 nicotinic ACh receptors whereas type II PAMs also cause a large reduction in desensitization (reviewed in 238).
P2X receptors
Overview
P2X receptors (nomenclature as agreed by NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on P2X Receptors, 246,261) have a trimeric topology 257,260,270 with two putative TM domains, gating primarily Na+, K+ and Ca2+, exceptionally Cl-. The Nomenclature Subcommittee has recommended that for P2X receptors, structural criteria should be the initial criteria for nomenclature where possible. Functional P2X receptors exist as polymeric transmitter-gated channels; the native receptors may occur as either homopolymers (e.g. P2X1 in smooth muscle) or heteropolymers (e.g. P2X2:P2X3 in the nodose ganglion and P2X1:P2X5 in mouse cortical astrocytes, 265). P2X2, P2X4 and P2X7 receptors have been shown to form functional homopolymers which, in turn, activate pores permeable to low molecular weight solutes 276. The hemi-channel pannexin-1 has been implicated in the pore formation induced by P2X7 272, but not P2X2 245, receptor activation.
Subunits
Nomenclature | P2X1 | P2X2 | P2X3 | P2X4 | P2X5 | P2X6 | P2X7 |
HGNC, UniProt | P2RX1, P51575 | P2RX2, Q9UBL9 | P2RX3, P56373 | P2RX4, Q99571 | P2RX5, Q93086 | P2RX6, O15547 | P2RX7, Q99572 |
Agonists | αβ-meATP (Full agonist), BzATP (Full agonist), L-βγ-meATP (Full agonist) | – | αβ-meATP (Full agonist), BzATP (Full agonist) | – | – | – | – |
Antagonists (IC50) | TNP-ATP (∼1.3x10-9 M) 277, Ip5I (∼3.2x10-9 M), NF023 (∼2x10-7 M), NF449 (∼5x10-7 M) 259 | – | TNP-ATP (∼1.3x10-9 M) 277, AF353 (∼1x10-8 M) 253, A317491 (∼3.1x10-8 M) 256, RO3 (∼3.1x10-8 M) 251 | – | – | – | decavanadate (pA2 = 7.4) 269, A804598 (∼1x10-8 M), brilliant blue G (∼1x10-8 M) 258, A839977 (∼2x10-8 M) 248,250,254, A740003 (∼4x10-8 M), A438079 (∼1.25x10-7 M) 248 |
Selective allosteric regulators | MRS 2219 (Positive) 255 | – | – | ivermectin (Positive) (Rat) 262 | – | – | AZ11645373 (Negative) 267,275, chelerythrine (Negative) 273, ivermectin (Positive) 271, KN62 (Negative) 252,273 |
Comment | – | – | – | – | – | – | Effects of the allosteric modulators at P2X7 receptors are species-dependent |
Comments
A317491 and RO3 also block the P2X2:P2X3 heteromultimer 251,256. NF449, A317491 and RO3 are more than 10-fold selective for P2X1 and P2X3 receptors, respectively.
Agonists listed show selectivity within recombinant P2X receptors of ca. one order of magnitude. A804598, A839977, A740003 and A438079 are at least 10-fold selective for P2X7 receptors and show similar affinity across human and rodent receptors 248,250,254.
Several P2X receptors (particularly P2X1 and P2X3) may be inhibited by desensitisation using stable agonists (e.g. αβ-meATP); suramin and PPADS are non-selective antagonists at r & hP2X1–3,5 and hP2X4, but not rP2X4,6,7 244, and can also inhibit ATPase activity 247. Ip5I is inactive at rP2X2, an antagonist at rP2X3 (pIC50 5.6) and enhances agonist responses at rP2X4 263. Antagonist potency of NF023 at recombinant P2X2, P2X3 and P2X5 is two orders of magnitude lower than that at P2X1 receptors 274. The P2X7 receptor may be inhibited in a non-competitive manner by the protein kinase inhibitors KN62 and chelerythrine 273, while the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor GTPγS and the cyclic imide AZ11645373 show a species-dependent non-competitive action 249,267,268,275. The pH-sensitive dye used in culture media, phenol red, is also reported to inhibit P2X1 and P2X3 containing channels 264. Some recombinant P2X receptors expressed to high density bind [35S]ATPγS and [3H]αβ-meATP, although the latter can also bind to 5′-nucleotidase 266. [3H]A317491 and [3H]A804598 have been used as high affinity antagonist radioligands for P2X3 (and P2X2/3) and P2X7 receptors, respectively 250.
ZAC
Overview
The zinc-activated channel [ZAC, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee for the zinc activated channel] is a member of the Cys-loop family that includes the nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-HT3, GABAA and strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors 278,279. The channel is likely to exist as a homopentamer of 4TM subunits that form an intrinsic cation selective channel displaying constitutive activity that can be blocked by (+)-tubocurarine. ZAC is present in the human, chimpanzee, dog, cow and opossum genomes, but is functionally absent from mouse, or rat, genomes 278,279.
Subunits
Nomenclature | HGNC, UniProt | Endogenous agonists (EC50) | Selective antagonists (IC50) | Functional characteristics | Comment |
ZAC | ZACN, Q401N2 | Zn2+ (Selective) (5x10-4 M) 278 | (+)-tubocurarine (6.3x10-6 M) 278 | Outwardly rectifying current (both constitutive and evoked by Zn2+) | Although tabulated as an antagonist, it is possible that (+)-tubocurarine acts as a channel blocker |
Further reading
- Barnes NM. Hales TG. Lummis SCR. Peters JA. The 5-HT3 receptor – the relationship between structure and function. Neuropharmacology. 2013;56:273–284. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belelli D. Harrison NL. Maguire J. Macdonald RL. Walker MC. Cope DW. Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors: form, pharmacology, and function. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12757–12763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3340-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Changeux J-P. Allosteric receptors: from electric organ to cognition. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:1–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunlop J. Bowlby M. Peri R. Vasilyev D. Arias R. High-throughput electrophysiology: an emerging paradigm for ion channel screening and physiology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:358–368. doi: 10.1038/nrd2552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hilf RJ. Dutzler R. A prokaryotic perspective on pentameric ligand-gated ion channel structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009;19:418–424. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvis MF. Khakh BS. ATP-gated P2X cation-channels. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodge D. The history of the pharmacology and cloning of ionotropic glutamate receptors and the development of idiosyncratic nomenclure. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JW. Native glycine receptors and their physiological roles. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millar NS. Gotti C. Diversity of vertebrate nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller PS. Smart TG. Binding, activation and modulation of Cys-loop receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:161–174. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen RW. Sieghart W. International Union of Pharmacology. LXX. Subtypes of γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit composition, pharmacology, and function. Update. Pharmacol Rev. 2009;60:243–260. doi: 10.1124/pr.108.00505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Surprenant A. North RA. Signaling at purinergic P2X receptors. Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:333–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson AJ. Lester HA. Lummis SCR. The structural basis of function in Cys-loop receptors. Q Rev Biophys. 2010;43:449–499. doi: 10.1017/S0033583510000168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Traynelis SF. Wollmuth LP. McBain CJ. Menniti FS. Vance KM. Ogden KK, et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62:405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walstab J. Rappold G. Niesler B. 5-HT3 receptors: role in disease and target of drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;128:146–169. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yevenes GE. Zeihofer HU. Allosteric modulation of glycine receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:224–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01471.x. PM:21557733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Further reading
- Barnes NM. Hales TG. Lummis SC. Peters JA. The 5-HT3 receptor–the relationship between structure and function. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:273–284. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.003. [PMID:18761359] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoyer D. Clarke DE. Fozard JR. Hartig PR. Martin GR. Mylecharane EJ. Saxena PR. Humphrey PP. International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin) Pharmacol Rev. 1994;46:157–203. [PMID:7938165] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lummis SC. 5-HT(3) receptors. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40239–40245. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.406496. [PMID:23038271] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Machu TK. Therapeutics of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists: current uses and future directions. Pharmacol Ther. 2011;130:338–347. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.02.003. [PMID:21356241] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Modica MN. Pittalà V. Romeo G. Salerno L. Siracusa MA. Serotonin 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 ligands: an update of medicinal chemistry research in the last few years. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:334–362. doi: 10.2174/092986710790192730. [PMID:20015043] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niesler B. 5-HT(3) receptors: potential of individual isoforms for personalised therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011;11:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2011.01.011. [PMID:21345729] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rojas C. Slusher BS. Pharmacological mechanisms of 5-HT3 and tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonism to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;684:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.01.046. [PMID:22425650] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson AJ. Recent developments in 5-HT3 receptor pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.12.002. [PMID:23380247] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Further reading
- Atack JR. GABAA receptor alpha2/alpha3 subtype-selective modulators as potential nonsedating anxiolytics. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;2:331–360. doi: 10.1007/7854_2009_30. [PMID:21309116] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bali A. Jaggi AS. Multifunctional aspects of allopregnanolone in stress and related disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.09.005. [Epub ahead of print]. [PMID:24044974] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnard EA. Skolnick P. Olsen RW. Mohler H. Sieghart W. Biggio G. Braestrup C. Bateson AN. Langer SZ. International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev. 1998;50:291–313. [PMID:9647870] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belelli D. Harrison NL. Maguire J. Macdonald RL. Walker MC. Cope DW. Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors: form, pharmacology, and function. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12757–12763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3340-09.2009. [PMID:19828786] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonin RP. Orser BA. GABA(A) receptor subtypes underlying general anesthesia. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008;90:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.12.011. [PMID:18201756] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowery NG. Smart TG. GABA and glycine as neurotransmitters: a brief history. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147:S109–S119. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706443. [PMID:16402094] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Capogna M. Pearce RA. GABA A,slow: causes and consequences. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.10.005. [PMID:21145601] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galanopoulou AS. Mutations affecting GABAergic signaling in seizures and epilepsy. Pflugers Arch. 2010;460:505–523. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0816-2. [PMID:20352446] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herd MB. Belelli D. Lambert JJ. Neurosteroid modulation of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.03.007. [PMID:17531325] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hosie AM. Wilkins ME. Smart TG. Neurosteroid binding sites on GABA(A) receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.03.011. [PMID:17560657] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacob TC. Moss SJ. Jurd R. GABA(A) receptor trafficking and its role in the dynamic modulation of neuronal inhibition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:331–343. doi: 10.1038/nrn2370. [PMID:18382465] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston GA. Chebib M. Hanrahan JR. Mewett KN. Neurochemicals for the investigation of GABA(C) receptors. Neurochem Res. 2010;35:1970–1977. doi: 10.1007/s11064-010-0271-7. [PMID:20963487] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luscher B. Fuchs T. Kilpatrick CL. GABAA receptor trafficking-mediated plasticity of inhibitory synapses. Neuron. 2011;70:385–409. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.024. [PMID:21555068] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munro G. Ahring PK. Mirza NR. Developing analgesics by enhancing spinal inhibition after injury: GABAA receptor subtypes as novel targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.06.004. [PMID:19729210] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Möhler H. Molecular regulation of cognitive functions and developmental plasticity: impact of GABAA receptors. J Neurochem. 2007;102:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04454.x. [PMID:17394533] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ng CK. Kim HL. Gavande N. Yamamoto I. Kumar RJ. Mewett KN. Johnston GA. Hanrahan JR. Chebib M. Medicinal chemistry of ρ GABAC receptors. Future Med Chem. 2011;3:197–209. doi: 10.4155/fmc.10.286. [PMID:21428815] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nutt DJ. Stahl SM. Searching for perfect sleep: the continuing evolution of GABAA receptor modulators as hypnotics. J Psychopharmacol (Oxford) 2010;24:1601–1612. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106927. [PMID:19942638] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen RW. Li GD. GABA(A) receptors as molecular targets of general anesthetics: identification of binding sites provides clues to allosteric modulation. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:206–215. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9429-7. [PMID:21194017] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen RW. Sieghart W. International Union of Pharmacology. LXX. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors: classification on the basis of subunit composition, pharmacology, and function. Update. Pharmacol Rev. 2008;60:243–260. doi: 10.1124/pr.108.00505. [PMID:18790874] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen RW. Sieghart W. GABA A receptors: subtypes provide diversity of function and pharmacology. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.045. [PMID:18760291] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudolph U. Möhler H. GABA-based therapeutic approaches: GABAA receptor subtype functions. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2005.10.003. [PMID:16376150] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sigel E. Lüscher BP. A closer look at the high affinity benzodiazepine binding site on GABAA receptors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11:241–246. doi: 10.2174/156802611794863562. [PMID:21189125] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan KR. Rudolph U. Lüscher C. Hooked on benzodiazepines: GABAA receptor subtypes and addiction. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:188–197. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.01.004. [PMID:21353710] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veleiro AS. Burton G. Structure-activity relationships of neuroactive steroids acting on the GABAA receptor. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16:455–472. doi: 10.2174/092986709787315522. [PMID:19199916] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vithlani M. Terunuma M. Moss SJ. The dynamic modulation of GABA(A) receptor trafficking and its role in regulating the plasticity of inhibitory synapses. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:1009–1022. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2010. [PMID:21742794] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Further reading
- Callister RJ. Graham BA. Early history of glycine receptor biology in Mammalian spinal cord circuits. Front Mol Neurosci. 2010;3:13. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2010.00013. [PMID:20577630] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nys M. Kesters D. Ulens C. Structural insights into Cys-loop receptor function and ligand recognition. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.07.001. [Epub ahead of print]. [PMID:23850718] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaefer N. Langlhofer G. Kluck CJ. Villmann C. Glycine receptor mouse mutants - model systems for human hyperekplexia. Br J Pharmacol. 2013 doi: 10.1111/bph.12335. [Epub ahead of print]. [PMID:23941355] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sivilotti LG. What single-channel analysis tells us of the activation mechanism of ligand-gated channels: the case of the glycine receptor. J Physiol (Lond) 2010;588:45–58. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.178525. [PMID:19770192] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsetlin V. Kuzmin D. Kasheverov I. Assembly of nicotinic and other Cys-loop receptors. J Neurochem. 2011;116:734–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07060.x. [PMID:21214570] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu TL. Gong N. Glycine and glycine receptor signaling in hippocampal neurons: diversity, function and regulation. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91:349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.008. [PMID:20438799] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yevenes GE. Zeilhofer HU. Allosteric modulation of glycine receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:224–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01471.x. [PMID:21557733] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Further reading
- Collingridge GL. Olsen RW. Peters J. Spedding M. A nomenclature for ligand-gated ion channels. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063. [PMID:18655795] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Contractor A. Mulle C. Swanson GT. Kainate receptors coming of age: milestones of two decades of research. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.12.002. [PMID:21256604] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen KB. Yuan H. Traynelis SF. Structural aspects of AMPA receptor activation, desensitization and deactivation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17:281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.014. [PMID:17419047] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henson MA. Roberts AC. Pérez-Otaño I. Philpot BD. Influence of the NR3A subunit on NMDA receptor functions. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.004. [PMID:20097255] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson AC. Nicoll RA. The expanding social network of ionotropic glutamate receptors: TARPs and other transmembrane auxiliary subunits. Neuron. 2011;70:178–199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.007. [PMID:21521608] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jane DE. Tse H-W. Skifter DA. Christie JM. Monaghan DT. Endo M, editor; Kurachi Y, editor; Mishina M, editor; Springer, editor. Glutamate receptor ion channels: activators and inhibitors In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Pharmacology of Ionic Channel Function: Activators and Inhibitors. Edited by. 2009:415–478. [Google Scholar]
- Jane DE. Lodge D. Collingridge GL. Kainate receptors: pharmacology, function and therapeutic potential. Neuropharmacology. 2000;56:90–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.023. [PMID:18793656] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaczor AA. Matosiuk D. Molecular structure of ionotropic glutamate receptors. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:2608–2635. doi: 10.2174/092986710791859379. [PMID:20491632] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessels HW. Malinow R. Synaptic AMPA receptor plasticity and behavior. Neuron. 2009;61:340–350. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.015. [PMID:19217372] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kew JN. Kemp JA. Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor structure and pharmacology. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005;179:4–29. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2200-z. [PMID:15731895] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kloda A. Martinac B. Adams DJ. Polymodal regulation of NMDA receptor channels. Channels (Austin) 2007;1:334–343. doi: 10.4161/chan.5044. [PMID:18690040] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar J. Mayer ML. Functional insights from glutamate receptor ion channel structures. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:313–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183711. [PMID:22974439] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lerma J. Kainate receptor physiology. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2005.08.004. [PMID:16361114] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lerma J. Net(o) excitement for kainate receptors. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:808–810. doi: 10.1038/nn.2864. [PMID:21709676] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu SJ. Zukin RS. Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors in synaptic plasticity and neuronal death. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.006. [PMID:17275103] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodge D. The history of the pharmacology and cloning of ionotropic glutamate receptors and the development of idiosyncratic nomenclature. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.006. [PMID:18765242] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Low CM. Wee KS. New insights into the not-so-new NR3 subunits of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: localization, structure, and function. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;78:1–11. doi: 10.1124/mol.110.064006. [PMID:20363861] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer ML. Glutamate receptors at atomic resolution. Nature. 2006;440:456–462. doi: 10.1038/nature04709. [PMID:16554805] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Popescu GK. Modes of glutamate receptor gating. J Physiol (Lond) (Pt 1): 2012;590:73–91. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223750. [PMID:22106181] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegler Retchless B. Gao W. Johnson JW. A single GluN2 subunit residue controls NMDA receptor channel properties via intersubunit interaction. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:406–413. doi: 10.1038/nn.3025. , S1–S2. [PMID:22246434] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Traynelis SF. Wollmuth LP. McBain CJ. Menniti FS. Vance KM. Ogden KK. Hansen KB. Yuan H. Myers SJ. Dingledine R. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62:405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451. [PMID:20716669] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyllie DJ. Livesey MR. Hardingham GE. Influence of GluN2 subunit identity on NMDA receptor function. Neuropharmacology. 2013;74:4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.01.016. [PMID:23376022] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Further reading
- Albuquerque EX. Pereira EF. Alkondon M. Rogers SW. Mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:73–120. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2008. [PMID:19126755] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Araud T. Wonnacott S. Bertrand D. Associated proteins: The universal toolbox controlling ligand gated ion channel function. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;80:160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.03.017. [PMID:20346921] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arias HR. Positive and negative modulation of nicotinic receptors. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2010;80:153–203. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381264-3.00005-9. [PMID:21109220] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arneric SP. Holladay M. Williams M. Neuronal nicotinic receptors: a perspective on two decades of drug discovery research. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;74:1092–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.033. [PMID:17662959] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benowitz NL. Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction, smoking-induced disease, and therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;49:57–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094742. [PMID:18834313] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Changeux JP. Taly A. Nicotinic receptors, allosteric proteins and medicine. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.01.001. [PMID:18262468] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collingridge GL. Olsen RW. Peters J. Spedding M. A nomenclature for ligand-gated ion channels. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063. [PMID:18655795] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faghih R. Gopalakrishnan M. Briggs CA. Allosteric modulators of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Med Chem. 2008;51:701–712. doi: 10.1021/jm070256g. [PMID:18198823] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fucile S. Ca2+ permeability of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Cell Calcium. 2004;35:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2003.08.006. [PMID:14670366] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gotti C. Clementi F. Fornari A. Gaimarri A. Guiducci S. Manfredi I. Moretti M. Pedrazzi P. Pucci L. Zoli M. Structural and functional diversity of native brain neuronal nicotinic receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:703–711. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.024. [PMID:19481063] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones AK. Buckingham SD. Sattelle DB. Proteins interacting with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: expanding functional and therapeutic horizons. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:455–462. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.07.001. [PMID:20674046] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalamida D. Poulas K. Avramopoulou V. Fostieri E. Lagoumintzis G. Lazaridis K. Sideri A. Zouridakis M. Tzartos SJ. Muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Structure, function and pathogenicity. FEBS J. 2007;274:3799–3845. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05935.x. [PMID:17651090] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Letchworth SR. Whiteaker P. Progress and challenges in the study of α6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:862–872. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.022. [PMID:21736871] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lukas RJ. Changeux JP. Le Novère N. Albuquerque EX. Balfour DJ. Berg DK. Bertrand D. Chiappinelli VA. Clarke PB. Collins AC, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XX. Current status of the nomenclature for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:397–401. [PMID:10353988] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millar NS. Gotti C. Diversity of vertebrate nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.041. [PMID:18723036] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miwa JM. Freedman R. Lester HA. Neural systems governed by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: emerging hypotheses. Neuron. 2011;70:20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.014. [PMID:21482353] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandya A. Yakel JL. Allosteric modulators of the α4β2 subtype of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:952–958. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.04.020. [PMID:21596025] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taly A. Corringer PJ. Guedin D. Lestage P. Changeux JP. Nicotinic receptors: allosteric transitions and therapeutic targets in the nervous system. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:733–750. doi: 10.1038/nrd2927. [PMID:19721446] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsetlin V. Hucho F. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at atomic resolution. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:306–310. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.03.005. [PMID:19428299] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsetlin V. Kuzmin D. Kasheverov I. Assembly of nicotinic and other Cys-loop receptors. J Neurochem. 2011;116:734–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07060.x. [PMID:21214570] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsetlin V. Utkin Y. Kasheverov I. Polypeptide and peptide toxins, magnifying lenses for binding sites in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:720–731. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.032. [PMID:19501053] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J. Lukas RJ. Naturally-expressed nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:800–807. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.067. [PMID:21787755] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang KC. Jin GZ. Wu J. Mysterious alpha6-containing nAChRs: function, pharmacology, and pathophysiology. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;30:740–751. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.63. [PMID:19498417] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Further reading
- Browne LE. Cao L. Broomhead HE. Bragg L. Wilkinson WJ. North RA. P2X receptor channels show threefold symmetry in ionic charge selectivity and unitary conductance. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:17–18. doi: 10.1038/nn.2705. [PMID:21170052] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coddou C. Yan Z. Obsil T. Huidobro-Toro JP. Stojilkovic SS. Activation and regulation of purinergic P2X receptor channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:641–683. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.003129. [PMID:21737531] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collingridge GL. Olsen RW. Peters J. Spedding M. A nomenclature for ligand-gated ion channels. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063. [PMID:18655795] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaczmarek-Hájek K. Lörinczi E. Hausmann R. Nicke A. Molecular and functional properties of P2X receptors–recent progress and persisting challenges. Purinergic Signal. 2012;8:375–417. doi: 10.1007/s11302-012-9314-7. [PMID:22547202] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khakh BS. Burnstock G. Kennedy C. King BF. North RA. Séguéla P. Voigt M. Humphrey PP. International union of pharmacology. XXIV. Current status of the nomenclature and properties of P2X receptors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53:107–118. [PMID:11171941] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khakh BS. North RA. Neuromodulation by extracellular ATP and P2X receptors in the CNS. Neuron. 2012;76:51–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.024. [PMID:23040806] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- North RA. Jarvis MF. P2X receptors as drug targets. Mol Pharmacol. 2013;83:759–769. doi: 10.1124/mol.112.083758. [PMID:23253448] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
References
- 1.Abi-Dargham A, et al. J Neurochem. 1993;60:730–737. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03208.x. [PMID: 8419547 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barnes NM, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:273–284. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.003. [PMID: 18761359 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barrera NP, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:12595–12600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503253102. [PMID: 16116092 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Belelli D, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 1995;48:1054–1062. [PMID: 8848005 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brady CA, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2001;41:282–284. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00074-0. [PMID: 11489465 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brüss M, et al. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000;362:392–401. doi: 10.1007/s002100000342. [PMID: 11111833 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Das P, Dillon GH. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003;119:207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.09.003. [PMID: 14625088 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davies PA, et al. Nature. 1999;397:359–363. doi: 10.1038/16941. [PMID: 9950429 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Deeb TZ, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;75:908–917. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.053322. [PMID: 19131665 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dubin AE, et al. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:30799–30810. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30799. [PMID: 10521471 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanna MC, et al. J Neurochem. 2000;75:240–247. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750240.x. [PMID: 10854267 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hirata T, et al. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007;104:263–273. doi: 10.1254/jphs.fp0070620. [PMID: 17652911 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Holbrook JD, et al. J Neurochem. 2009;108:384–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05775.x. [PMID: 19012743 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hope AG, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;245:187–192. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(93)90128-v. [PMID: 7683998 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hope AG, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:1237–1245. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15529.x. [PMID: 8818349 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoyer D, et al. Pharmacol Rev. 1994;46:157–203. [PMID: 7938165 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hu XQ, Peoples RW. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:6826–6831. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707571200. [PMID: 18187416 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Isenberg KE, et al. Neuroreport. 1993;5:121–124. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199311180-00006. [PMID: 7509203 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jensen AA, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29:437–444. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2008.06.001. [PMID: 18597859 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jensen TN, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;538:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.03.050. [PMID: 16647053 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kapeller J, et al. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519:420–432. doi: 10.1002/cne.22525. [PMID: 21192076 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karnovsky AM, et al. Gene. 2003;319:137–148. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00803-5. [PMID: 14597179 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelley SP, et al. Nature. 2003;424:321–324. doi: 10.1038/nature01788. [PMID: 12867984 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lankiewicz S, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;53:202–212. doi: 10.1124/mol.53.2.202. [PMID: 9463477 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lochner M, Lummis SC. Biophys J. 2010;98:1494–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4313. [PMID: 20409468 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lummis SC, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;339:125–131. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.185306. [PMID: 21775477 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Maricq AV, et al. Science. 1991;254:432–437. doi: 10.1126/science.1718042. [PMID: 1718042 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miyake A, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 1995;48:407–416. [PMID: 7565620 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mochizuki S, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;369:125–132. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00058-8. [PMID: 10204690 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mochizuki S, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;399:97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00371-x. [PMID: 10884508 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Niesler B. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011;11:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2011.01.011. [PMID: 21345729 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Niesler B, et al. Gene. 2003;310:101–111. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00503-1. [PMID: 12801637 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Niesler B, et al. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9:501–504. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.5.501. [PMID: 18466097 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Niesler B, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72:8–17. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.032144. [PMID: 17392525 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Parker RM, et al. J Neurol Sci. 1996;144:119–127. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00211-0. [PMID: 8994113 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Parker RM, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1996;17:95–99. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(96)10003-1. [PMID: 8936343 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Peters JA, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005;26:587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2005.09.011. [PMID: 16194573 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rüsch D, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;321:1069–1074. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.118752. [PMID: 17360702 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Solt K, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;315:771–776. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.090621. [PMID: 16081679 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stewart A, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2003;44:214–223. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00376-3. [PMID: 12623220 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sun H, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;290:129–135. [PMID: 10381768 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thompson AJ, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;80:183–190. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.071415. [PMID: 21505038 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thompson AJ, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2011;60:488–495. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.11.003. [PMID: 21059362 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thompson AJ, Lummis SC. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:3615–3630. doi: 10.2174/138161206778522029. [PMID: 17073663 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thompson AJ, Lummis SC. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2007;11:527–540. doi: 10.1517/14728222.11.4.527. [PMID: 17373882 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thompson AJ, Lummis SC. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:1686–1696. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.34. [PMID: 18311193 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Thompson AJ, et al. J Physiol (Lond) 2011;589:4243–4257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.208439. [PMID: 21708905 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tzvetkov MV, et al. Gene. 2007;386:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.002. [PMID: 17010535 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Walstab J, et al. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:26956–26965. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.122838. [PMID: 20522555 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Walstab J, et al. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;128:146–169. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.07.001. [PMID: 20621123 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Atack JR. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2008;14:25–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2007.00034.x. [PMID: 18482097 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Atack JR. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;2:331–360. doi: 10.1007/7854_2009_30. [PMID: 21309116 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Barnard EA, et al. Pharmacol Rev. 1998;50:291–313. [PMID: 9647870 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Belelli D, et al. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12757–12763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3340-09.2009. [PMID: 19828786 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Belelli D, Lambert JJ. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:565–575. doi: 10.1038/nrn1703. [PMID: 15959466 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bianchi MT, Macdonald RL. J Neurosci. 2003;23:10934–10943. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10934.2003. [PMID: 14645489 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bonin RP, Orser BA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008;90:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.12.011. [PMID: 18201756 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brown N, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;136:965–974. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795. [PMID: 12145096 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Capogna M, Pearce RA. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.10.005. [PMID: 21145601 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chebib M. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004;31:800–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04083.x. [PMID: 15566397 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen ZW, Olsen RW. J Neurochem. 2007;100:279–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04206.x. [PMID: 17083446 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Daniel C, Ohman M. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:1399–1403. doi: 10.1042/BST0371399. [PMID: 19909284 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Farrant M, Nusser Z. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:215–229. doi: 10.1038/nrn1625. [PMID: 15738957 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fisher JL. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;61:1322–1328. doi: 10.1124/mol.61.6.1322. [PMID: 12021393 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fisher JL. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.004. [PMID: 18585399 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Frølund B, et al. Curr Top Med Chem. 2002;2:817–832. doi: 10.2174/1568026023393525. [PMID: 12171573 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hemmings HC, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005;26:503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2005.08.006. [PMID: 16126282 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Herd MB, et al. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.03.007. [PMID: 17531325 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hosie AM, et al. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.03.011. [PMID: 17560657 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jacob TC, et al. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:331–343. doi: 10.1038/nrn2370. [PMID: 18382465 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Johnston GA. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11:1867–1885. doi: 10.2174/1381612054021024. [PMID: 15974965 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Johnston GA, et al. Neurochem Res. 2010;35:1970–1977. doi: 10.1007/s11064-010-0271-7. [PMID: 20963487 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Karim N, et al. Amino Acids. 2013;44:1139–1149. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1456-y. [PMID: 23385381 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Khom S, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;161:65–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00865.x. [PMID: 20718740 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Korpi ER, et al. Alcohol. 2007;41:163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.03.007. [PMID: 17591542 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Korpi ER, et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;67:113–159. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00013-8. [PMID: 12126658 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Krishek BJ, et al. J Physiol (Lond) 1998;507:639–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.639bs.x. [PMID: 9508826 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Krogsgaard-Larsen P, et al. Chem Rec. 2002;2:419–430. doi: 10.1002/tcr.10040. [PMID: 12469353 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li GD, et al. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11771–11775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C900016200. [PMID: 19282280 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Li GD, et al. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11599–11605. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3467-06.2006. [PMID: 17093081 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Luscher B, et al. Neuron. 2011;70:385–409. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.024. [PMID: 21555068 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mody I, Pearce RA. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.07.002. [PMID: 15331240 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Möhler H. J Neurochem. 2007;102:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04454.x. [PMID: 17394533 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ng CK, et al. Future Med Chem. 2011;3:197–209. doi: 10.4155/fmc.10.286. [PMID: 21428815 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Olsen RW, Li GD. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:206–215. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9429-7. [PMID: 21194017 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Olsen RW, Sieghart W. Pharmacol Rev. 2008;60:243–260. doi: 10.1124/pr.108.00505. [PMID: 18790874 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Olsen RW, Sieghart W. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.045. [PMID: 18760291 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ramerstorfer J, et al. J Neurosci. 2011;31:870–877. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5012-10.2011. [PMID: 21248110 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Saxena NC, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 1997;51:328–335. doi: 10.1124/mol.51.2.328. [PMID: 9203639 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Semyanov A, et al. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.03.005. [PMID: 15111008 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sergeeva OA, et al. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:23985–23993. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.103309. [PMID: 20511229 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Sieghart W. Adv Pharmacol. 2006;54:231–263. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(06)54010-4. [PMID: 17175817 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sigel E. Lüscher BP. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11:241–241. doi: 10.2174/156802611794863562. [PMID: 21189125 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sigel E, Steinmann ME. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40224–40231. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.386664. [PMID: 23038269 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Smith SS. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:135. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00135. [PMID: 24027497 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Stórustovu SI, Ebert B. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;316:1351–1359. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.092403. [PMID: 16272218 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Thompson SA, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2002;43:662–668. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00162-4. [PMID: 12367611 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Thompson SA, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;127:1349–1358. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702687. [PMID: 10455284 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Thompson SA, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142:97–106. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705689. [PMID: 15100159 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Veleiro AS, Burton G. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16:455–472. doi: 10.2174/092986709787315522. [PMID: 19199916 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Vithlani M, et al. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:1009–1022. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2010. [PMID: 21742794 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wafford KA, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.004. [PMID: 18762200 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Wallner M, et al. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112:513–528. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.05.004. [PMID: 16814864 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.You H, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2010;59:527–533. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.07.011. [PMID: 20638393 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhang D, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:121–132. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01625-4. [PMID: 11239575 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ahrens J, et al. Pharmacology. 2009;83:217–222. doi: 10.1159/000201556. [PMID: 19204413 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Betz H, Laube B. J Neurochem. 2006;97:1600–1610. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03908.x. [PMID: 16805771 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Demir R, et al. Pharmacology. 2009;83:270–274. doi: 10.1159/000209291. [PMID: 19307742 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Eichler SA, et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:2848–2866. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00357.x. [PMID: 19210758 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Fucile S, et al. Neuron. 2000;28:571–583. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00134-3. [PMID: 11144365 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Grudzinska J, et al. Neuron. 2005;45:727–739. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.028. [PMID: 15748848 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hejazi N, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69:991–997. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.019174. [PMID: 16332990 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hibbs RE, Gouaux E. Nature. 2011;474:54–60. doi: 10.1038/nature10139. [PMID: 21572436 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Hirzel K, et al. Neuron. 2006;52:679–690. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.035. [PMID: 17114051 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Howard RJ, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12149–12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104480108. [PMID: 21730162 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Kirsch J. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;326:535–540. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0261-x. [PMID: 16807723 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Kneussel M. Loebrich S. Biol Cell. 2007;99:297–309. doi: 10.1042/BC20060120. [PMID: 17504238 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Laube B, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002;23:519–527. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(02)02138-7. [PMID: 12413807 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lozovaya N, et al. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7499–7506. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0977-05.2005. [PMID: 16107637 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Lynch JW. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:1051–1095. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2003. [PMID: 15383648 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lynch JW. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.034. [PMID: 18721822 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Maksay G, et al. J Neurochem. 2009;109:1725–1732. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06083.x. [PMID: 19383091 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Mascia MP, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:9305–9310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160128797. [PMID: 10908659 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Meier JC, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:736–744. doi: 10.1038/nn1467. [PMID: 15895087 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Miller PS, et al. J Physiol (Lond) 2005;566:657–670. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088575. [PMID: 15905212 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Moss SJ, Smart TG. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:240–250. doi: 10.1038/35067500. [PMID: 11283747 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Nury H, et al. Nature. 2011;469:428–431. doi: 10.1038/nature09647. [PMID: 21248852 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Oertel J, et al. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:2798–2807. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608941200. [PMID: 17145751 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Pitt SJ, et al. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11454–11467. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3890-08.2008. [PMID: 18987182 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Webb TI, Lynch JW. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:2350–2367. doi: 10.2174/138161207781368693. [PMID: 17692006 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Xiong W, et al. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:296–303. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.552. [PMID: 21460829 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Yang Z, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;76:1014–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.07.037. [PMID: 18755158 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Yang Z, et al. J Neurochem. 2007;103:580–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04850.x. [PMID: 17714449 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Yevenes GE, et al. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:30203–30213. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.134676. [PMID: 20647311 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Yevenes GE, et al. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:39300–39307. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608272200. [PMID: 17040914 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Yevenes GE, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:819–824. doi: 10.1038/nn1095. [PMID: 12858180 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Yevenes GE, Zeilhofer HU. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:224–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01471.x. [PMID: 21557733 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Atlason PT, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;78:1036–1045. doi: 10.1124/mol.110.067934. [PMID: 20837679 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Auberson YP, et al. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2002;12:1099–1102. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00074-4. [PMID: 11909726 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Bettini E, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;335:636–644. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.172544. [PMID: 20810618 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Bowie D. J Physiol (Lond) (Pt 1) 2010;588:67–81. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.178863. [PMID: 19822544 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Cavara NA, Hollmann M. Mol Neurobiol. 2008;38:16–26. doi: 10.1007/s12035-008-8029-9. [PMID: 18654865 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Chatterton JE, et al. Nature. 2002;415:793–798. doi: 10.1038/nature715. [PMID: 11823786 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Chen PE, et al. J Physiol (Lond) 2008;586:227–245. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.143172. [PMID: 17962328 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Chen PE, Wyllie DJ. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147:839–853. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706689. [PMID: 16474411 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Collingridge GL, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063. [PMID: 18655795 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Cull-Candy S, et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.012. [PMID: 16713244 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Cull-Candy SG, Leszkiewicz DN. Sci STKE. 2004;2004:re16. doi: 10.1126/stke.2552004re16. [PMID: 15494561 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Dingledine R, et al. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:7–61. [PMID: 10049997 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Dravid SM, et al. J Physiol (Lond) 2007;581:107–128. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124958. [PMID: 17303642 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Edman S, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2012;63:441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.04.027. [PMID: 22579927 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Erreger K, et al. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 2004;16:187–224. doi: 10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v16.i3.10. [PMID: 15701057 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Erreger K, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72:907–920. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.037333. [PMID: 17622578 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Esteban JA. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:S35–S43. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707525. [PMID: 18026130 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Feng B, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;141:508–516. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705644. [PMID: 14718249 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Frizelle PA, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;70:1022–1032. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.024042. [PMID: 16778008 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Furukawa H, et al. Nature. 2005;438:185–192. doi: 10.1038/nature04089. [PMID: 16281028 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Gielen M, et al. Nature. 2009;459:703–707. doi: 10.1038/nature07993. [PMID: 19404260 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Hansen KB, et al. J Neurosci. 2012;32:6197–6208. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5757-11.2012. [PMID: 22553026 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Henson MA, et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.004. [PMID: 20097255 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Horak M, et al. Neuroscience. 2006;137:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.058. [PMID: 16257494 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Isaac JT, et al. Neuron. 2007;54:859–871. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.001. [PMID: 17582328 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Jackson AC, Nicoll RA. Neuron. 2011;70:178–199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.007. [PMID: 21521608 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Jane DE. Glutamate receptor ion channels: activators and inhibitors. In: Endo M, Kurachi Y, Mishina M, et al., editors; Springer, editor. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Pharmacology of Ionic Channel Function: Activators and Inhibitors Edited by. 2000. 478 pp. 415. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Jane DE, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:90–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.023. [PMID: 18793656 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Kaczor AA. Matosiuk D. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:2608–2635. doi: 10.2174/092986710791859379. [PMID: 20491632 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Karakas E, et al. Nature. 2011;475:249–253. doi: 10.1038/nature10180. [PMID: 21677647 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Kew JN, Kemp JA. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005;179:4–29. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2200-z. [PMID: 15731895 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Kumar J, Mayer ML. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:313–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183711. [PMID: 22974439 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Kuner T, Schoepfer R. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3549–3558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-11-03549.1996. [PMID: 8642401 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Lerma J. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2005.08.004. [PMID: 16361114 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Lerma J. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:808–810. doi: 10.1038/nn.2864. [PMID: 21709676 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Liu SJ, Zukin RS. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.006. [PMID: 17275103 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Lodge D. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.006. [PMID: 18765242 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Madry C, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:12563–12568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805624105. [PMID: 18711142 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Malayev A, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;135:901–909. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704543. [PMID: 11861317 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Mayer ML. Nature. 2006;440:456–462. doi: 10.1038/nature04709. [PMID: 16554805 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.McKay S, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166:924–937. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01748.x. [PMID: 22022974 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Milstein AD, Nicoll RA. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2008.04.004. [PMID: 18514334 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Morley RM, et al. J Med Chem. 2005;48:2627–2637. doi: 10.1021/jm0492498. [PMID: 15801853 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Nakagawa T. Mol Neurobiol. 2010;42:161–184. doi: 10.1007/s12035-010-8149-x. [PMID: 21080238 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Naur P, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:14116–14121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703718104. [PMID: 17715062 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Neyton J, Paoletti P. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1331–1333. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5242-05.2006. [PMID: 16452656 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Paoletti P. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:1351–1365. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07628.x. [PMID: 21395862 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Paoletti P, et al. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:383–400. doi: 10.1038/nrn3504. [PMID: 23686171 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Paoletti P, Neyton J. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2007;7:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.08.011. [PMID: 17088105 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Perrais D, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.002. [PMID: 18761361 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Perrais D, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:516–522. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.08.004. [PMID: 20850188 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Pinheiro P, Mulle C. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;326:457–482. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0265-6. [PMID: 16847640 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Plested AJ. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011;717:93–113. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9557-5_9. [PMID: 21713670 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Rodríguez-Moreno A, Sihra TS. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:630–637. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.10.001. [PMID: 17981346 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Seeburg PH, Hartner J. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:279–283. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00062-x. [PMID: 12850211 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Smothers CT, Woodward JJ. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;322:739–748. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.123836. [PMID: 17502428 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Sobolevsky AI, et al. Nature. 2009;462:745–756. doi: 10.1038/nature08624. [PMID: 19946266 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Tomita S. Physiology (Bethesda) 2010;25:41–49. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00033.2009. [PMID: 20134027 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Traynelis SF, et al. J Neurosci. 1998;18:6163–6175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-16-06163.1998. [PMID: 9698310 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Traynelis SF, et al. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62:405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451. [PMID: 20716669 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Wyllie DJ, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2013;74:4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.01.016. [PMID: 23376022 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Yuzaki M. Neurosci Res. 2003;46:11–22. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(03)00036-1. [PMID: 12725908 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Acker BA, et al. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:3611–3615. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.04.070. [PMID: 18490160 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Albuquerque EX, et al. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:73–120. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2008. [PMID: 19126755 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Anderson DJ, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;324:179–187. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.130062. [PMID: 17959745 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Araud T, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;80:160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.03.017. [PMID: 20346921 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Bitner RS, et al. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10578–10587. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2444-07.2007. [PMID: 17898229 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Bodnar AL, et al. J Med Chem. 2005;48:905–908. doi: 10.1021/jm049363q. [PMID: 15715459 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Broad LM, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318:1108–1117. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.104505. [PMID: 16738207 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Buisson B, et al. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7880–7891. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-24-07880.1996. [PMID: 8987816 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Celie PH, et al. Neuron. 2004;41:907–914. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00115-1. [PMID: 15046723 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Changeux JP, Taly A. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.01.001. [PMID: 18262468 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Chavez-Noriega LE, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;280:346–356. [PMID: 8996215 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Chen Y, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2003;45:334–344. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(03)00189-8. [PMID: 12871651 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Collingridge GL, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063. [PMID: 18655795 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Dellisanti CD, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:953–962. doi: 10.1038/nn1942. [PMID: 17643119 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Dinklo T, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;336:560–574. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.173245. [PMID: 21084390 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Gill JK, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5867–5872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017975108. [PMID: 21436053 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Gordon JC, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;645:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.07.035. [PMID: 20674564 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Gotti C, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:703–711. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.024. [PMID: 19481063 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Gotti C, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27:482–491. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2006.07.004. [PMID: 16876883 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Hauser TA, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:803–812. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.030. [PMID: 19482012 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Hibbs RE, Gouaux E. Nature. 2011;474:54–60. doi: 10.1038/nature10139. [PMID: 21572436 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Hurst RS, et al. J Neurosci. 2005;25:4396–4405. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5269-04.2005. [PMID: 15858066 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Jensen AA, et al. J Med Chem. 2005;48:4705–4745. doi: 10.1021/jm040219e. [PMID: 16033252 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Jones AK, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:455–462. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.07.001. [PMID: 20674046 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Kalamida D, et al. FEBS J. 2007;274:3799–3845. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05935.x. [PMID: 17651090 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Lee CH, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:959–966. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.044. [PMID: 21763685 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Lukas RJ, et al. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:397–401. [PMID: 10353988 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Malysz J, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;330:257–267. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.151886. [PMID: 19389923 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Millar NS. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:S177–S183. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707661. [PMID: 18246096 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Millar NS, Gotti C. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.041. [PMID: 18723036 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Papke RL, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54:1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.03.010. [PMID: 18448138 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Papke RL, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;297:646–656. [PMID: 11303054 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Papke RL, et al. J Neurochem. 2000;75:204–216. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750204.x. [PMID: 10854263 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Paul M, et al. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:597–603. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00022. ; table of contents. [PMID: 11867382 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Rucktooa P, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:777–787. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.06.098. [PMID: 19576182 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Sine SM, Engel AG. Nature. 2006;440:448–455. doi: 10.1038/nature04708. [PMID: 16554804 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Taly A, et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:733–750. doi: 10.1038/nrd2927. [PMID: 19721446 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Timmermann DB, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;323:294–307. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.120436. [PMID: 17625074 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Williams DK, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:915–930. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.05.001. [PMID: 21575610 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Wishka DG, et al. J Med Chem. 2006;49:4425–4436. doi: 10.1021/jm0602413. [PMID: 16821801 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Wu J, et al. J Physiol (Lond) 2006;576:103–118. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114645. [PMID: 16825297 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Wu J, Lukas RJ. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:800–807. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.067. [PMID: 21787755 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Yang KC, et al. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;30:740–751. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.63. [PMID: 19498417 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Young GT, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:14686–14691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804372105. [PMID: 18791069 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Buell G, et al. EMBO J. 1996;15:55–62. [PMID: 8598206 ] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Chaumont S, Khakh BS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:12063–12068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803008105. [PMID: 18689682 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Collingridge GL, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063. [PMID: 18655795 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Crack BE, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1994;113:1432–1438. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb17157.x. [PMID: 7889301 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Donnelly-Roberts DL, Jarvis MF. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151:571–579. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707265. [PMID: 17471177 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Donnelly-Roberts DL, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;308:1053–1061. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.059600. [PMID: 14634045 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Donnelly-Roberts DL, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:1203–1214. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00233.x. [PMID: 19558545 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Ford AP, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147:S132–S143. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706637. [PMID: 16465177 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Gargett CE, Wiley JS. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120:1483–1490. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701081. [PMID: 9113369 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Gever JR, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1387–1398. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00796.x. [PMID: 20590629 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Honore P, et al. Behav Brain Res. 2009;204:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.05.018. [PMID: 19464323 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Jacobson KA, et al. J Med Chem. 1998;41:2201–2206. doi: 10.1021/jm980183o. [PMID: 9632352 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Jarvis MF, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:17179–17184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252537299. [PMID: 12482951 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Jiang LH, et al. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8903–8910. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08903.2003. [PMID: 14523092 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Jiang LH, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;58:82–88. [PMID: 10860929 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Kassack MU, et al. Eur J Med Chem. 2004;39:345–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2004.01.007. [PMID: 15072843 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Kawate T, et al. Nature. 2009;460:592–598. doi: 10.1038/nature08198. [PMID: 19641588 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Khakh BS, et al. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53:107–118. [PMID: 11171941 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Khakh BS, et al. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7289–7299. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-17-07289.1999. [PMID: 10460235 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.King BF, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:981–988. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702876. [PMID: 10556935 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.King BF, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2005;145:313–322. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706187. [PMID: 15778739 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Lalo U, et al. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5473–5480. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1149-08.2008. [PMID: 18495881 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Michel AD, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;115:767–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb14999.x. [PMID: 8548175 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Michel AD, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;156:1312–1325. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00135.x. [PMID: 19309360 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Michel AD, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;149:948–957. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706938. [PMID: 17031382 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Michel AD, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;534:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.01.009. [PMID: 16487507 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Nicke A, et al. EMBO J. 1998;17:3016–3028. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.11.3016. [PMID: 9606184 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Nörenberg W, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167:48–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01987.x. [PMID: 22506590 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. Purinergic Signal. 2009;5:129–137. doi: 10.1007/s11302-009-9141-7. [PMID: 19212823 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Shemon AN, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142:1015–1019. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705868. [PMID: 15210579 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Soto F, et al. Neuropharmacology. 1999;38:141–149. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00158-0. [PMID: 10193905 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Stokes L, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;149:880–887. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706933. [PMID: 17031385 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Surprenant A, North RA. Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:333–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100630. [PMID: 18851707 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Virginio C, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;53:969–973. [PMID: 9614197 ] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Davies PA, et al. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:712–717. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208814200. [PMID: 12381728 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Houtani T, et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;335:277–285. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.079. [PMID: 16083862 ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]