Abstract
The Ssp1 calmodulin kinase kinase (CaMKK) is necessary for stress-induced re-organization of the actin cytoskeleton and initiation of growth at the new cell end following division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In addition, it regulates AMP-activated kinase and functions in low glucose tolerance. ssp1− cells undergo mitotic delay at elevated temperatures and G2 arrest in the presence of additional stressors. Following hyperosmotic stress, Ssp1-GFP forms transient foci which accumulate at the cell membrane and form a band around the cell circumference, but not co-localizing with actin patches. Hyperosmolarity-induced localization to the cell membrane occurs concomitantly with a reduction of its interaction with the 14-3-3 protein Rad24, but not Rad25 which remains bound to Ssp1. The loss of rad24 in ssp1− cells reduces the severity of hyperosmotic stress response and relieves mitotic delay. Conversely, overexpression of rad24 exacerbates stress response and concomitant cell elongation. rad24− does not impair stress-induced localization of Ssp1 to the cell membrane, however this response is almost completely absent in cells overexpressing rad24.
Keywords: Ssp1, Rad24, 14-3-3, hyperosmotic stress, relocalization, pH
2. Introduction
Environmental stress causes massive changes to cell physiology, including major metabolic, cytoskeletal and transcriptional responses. Changes in osmolarity, temperature, reactive oxygen species and nutrient status stimulate conserved stress-activated Spc1 MAPK pathways [1–5]. In fission yeast, the Wak1 and Win1 [6,7], Wis1 [8,9] and Spc1 MAPK cascade [9,10] relays environmental signals to the nucleus. Phosphorylated Spc1 MAPK enters the nucleus and activates transcription factors, inducing stress response genes including gpd1 (glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and tps1 (trehalose-6-P synthase), increasing intracellular concentrations of glycerol and trehalose [10–13]. MAPK signalling impinges on the cell cycle via Srk1, which phosphorylates the mitotic activator Cdc25, inducing 14-3-3 dimer binding and nuclear export of Cdc25 thus reducing the opportunity to activate its CDK nuclear substrate, Cdc2 [14]. spc1− cells experience G2 delay under normal conditions and G2 arrest after osmotic or oxidative stress [9,15,16].
The CaMKK and CaMKI and CaMKV calcium–calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM)-dependent signalling cascade is highly conserved and involved in a number of important cellular processes including cell cycle and neuronal- and immune-cell function. CaMKKs phosphorylate and fully activate Ca2+/CaM-bound CaMKs as well as protein kinase B and AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) [17]. CaMKK activity is regulated by activating and inhibitory phosphorylation as well as Ca2+/CaM binding. CaMKKβ retains 50–70% constitutive activity but requires Ca2+/CaM binding for full activation [18].
The fission yeast CaMKK orthologue Ssp1 [19] was identified [20] in a screen for suppressors of the cell morphology mutants ppe1 [21] and sts5–7 [22], and independently as a pH and temperature sensitive loss of function cell-cycle mutant [23]. Ssp1 phosphorylates Ssp2, the catalytic subunit of AMPK [24,25] and is required for efficient growth in low glucose conditions [19]. AMPKs regulate energy homoeostasis and respond to glucose [26], playing a role directly or indirectly in coupling nutritional response to cell differentiation in fission yeast [24]. In budding yeast, glucose depletion and environmental stressors lead to the activation of AMPK homologue SNF1 via SAK1, TOS3 or ELM1 kinases [27,28]. AMPK negatively regulates glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenases GPD1 and GPD2. GPD1 is inhibited in high glucose by TORC2-dependent kinases and AMPK and activated upon glucose limitation. Cells rapidly adapt to hypertonicity through a rapid increase in GPD1 activity via reduction of TOR2C-YPK1/2-mediated phosphorylation, and transcriptionally also upregulate GDP1 within 60 min. When glucose is restricted, AMPK inhibits GPD2 to limit glycerol production [29]. ssp1− has a pleiotropic phenotype and is synthetically lethal with spc1− under conditions permissible for either single mutant [23]. At high temperatures, ssp1 mutants grow as monopolar cells with a reduced capacity for transient stress-activated dispersion of actin monomers, suggesting a role for Ssp1 in actin mobilization [20,23]. Loss of ssp1 disturbs growth polarity and increases cell morphology aberrations, for example branching [30]. At high temperatures, in the presence of low pH (3.5) or hyperosmolarity (0.6 M KCl), ssp1 mutants cannot proliferate; instead they complete DNA replication and arrest as highly elongated cells in G2 [20,23].
Although largely cytoplasmic in localization, several pools of Ssp1 exist in the cell, and following osmotic stress a portion localizes to the cell membrane or cortex. Here, we explore the physical interaction of the CaMKK Ssp1 with the 14-3-3 orthologues Rad24 and Rad25 and their relationship to the rapid movement of a portion of the Ssp1 cytoplasmic pool to the cell cortex following stress.
3. Results
3.1. rad24 deletion suppresses the cell-cycle phenotype of ssp1− cells at high temperatures
We identified the 14-3-3 homologues Rad24 and Rad25 [31] multiple times in a yeast two-hybrid screen using full-length Ssp1 as a bait protein (data not shown), corroborating previous mass spectrometry data [19]. 14-3-3 proteins inhibit CaMKKα in mammalian systems [32] and are directly linked to the control of cell-cycle progression by regulating the Cdc2/Cdc13 activator Cdc25 [33] and inhibitor Wee1 [34–36]. In fission yeast, neither 14-3-3 isoform is essential; however, the double deletion is lethal [31]. To test for the influence of Rad24 on the mitotic delay of ssp1− cells at high temperatures [20,23], ssp1− rad24− (Q4101; table 1) and ssp1− rad25− (Q4104) cells (YEA) were shifted from 30 to 36°C for 4 h (figure 1a). Loss of rad24 is epistatic with respect to the heat-stress-dependent cell elongation phenotype of ssp1− cells at 36°C. Loss of Rad25 has no effect, presumably owing to the small proportion of the rad25 14-3-3 isoform in the overall pool of 14-3-3 proteins (see figure 7d).
Table 1.
strain | genotype | source |
---|---|---|
Q1618 | URA4::lexAop-lacZ/8LEXA-ADE2::URA3 ura3-1/ura3-1 leu2-3/leu2-3 his 3-11/his3-11 trp1-1/trp1-1 ade2-1/ade2-1 can1-1/can1-1 | laboratory stock |
Q250 | wild-type (972 h-) | laboratory stock |
Q3677 | leu1-32 ura4-D18 | laboratory stock |
Q4101 | ssp1::ura4+ leu1-32 ura4-D18 | Toda laboratory |
Q1537 | ssp1::sup3-5 ade-6-704 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | laboratory stock |
Q4101 | ssp1::ura4+ rad24::ura4+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4102 | rad24::ura4+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 | Carr laboratory |
Q4103 | rad25::kanMX6 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study and Carr laboratory |
Q4104 | ssp1::ura4+ rad25::kanMX6 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4105 | pREP1-rad24GFP in ssp1::sup3-5 ade6-704 leu1-32 ura4-D18 | this study |
Q4106 | pREP1-rad24GFP in leu1-32 ura4-D18 | this study |
Q4107 | pIR2-22 (nmt1:GFP-ssp1) in leu1-32 ura4-D18 | this study and laboratory stock |
Q4108 | pIR2-22 in rad24 ::ura4+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-704 | lab stock |
Q4109 | nmt1:rad24-His6int ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4110 | nmt1:rad24-His6int nmt1:GFP-ssp1int ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4111 | nmt1:GFP-ssp1int ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q2016 | cdc25-GFPint ura4-D18 leu1-32 | laboratory stock |
Q4112 | cdc25-GFPint ssp1::sup3-5 ade6-704 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q3974 | cdc25-GFPint rad24::ura4+ leu1-32 ura4-D18 | laboratory stock |
Q4113 | cdc25-GFPint ssp1::sup3-5 rad24::ura4+ 5 ade6-704 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q300 | cdc25-22 leu1-32 ura4-D18 ade6-10 | laboratory stock |
Q1530 | cdc25-22 ssp1::sup3-5 ade6-704 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | laboratory stock |
Q4114 | ssp1-GFPint ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4115 | ssp1-GFPint rad25::ura4+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study and Carr laboratory |
Q4116 | ssp1-GFPint rad24 ::ura4+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study and Carr laboratory |
Q4117 | ssp1-CFPint arp3C-YFPint leu1-32 ura4-D18 | this study and Nolen |
Q4118 | ssp1-GFPint rad24-2HA-His6(ura4+)int leu1-32 ura4-D18 | this study and Russell laboratory |
Q4119 | ssp1-GFPint rad25-His6 ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4120 | ssp1-GFPint rad24-2HA-His6(ura4+)int rad25-His6 leu1-32 ura4-D18 | this study and Russell laboratory |
Q4121 | ssp1-GFPint rad25-His6 rad24::ura4+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4122 | nmt1:GFP-ssp1int ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4123 | ssp1-GFP:kanMX6int ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
Q4124 | pREP1-rad24-His6 in ssp1-GFP:kanMX6int ura4-D18 leu1-32 | this study |
3.2. Overproduction of Rad24 and Ssp1 results in an additive cell-cycle phenotype
Plasmid-borne rad24-GFP or GFP-ssp1 (pIR2-22) [23], both under control of the strong thiamine-repressible nmt1 promoter (OP-rad24-GFP and OP-GFP-ssp1), were expressed for 20 h in wild-type, ssp1− and rad24− cells, respectively (Q4105, Q4106, Q4107, Q4108) (figure 1b). In an otherwise wild-type background at 25°C, overproduction of Rad24 causes moderate cellular elongation, whereas overproduction of Ssp1 makes cells shorter [23]. Conversely, overproduction of Rad24 at 25°C in ssp1− cells leads to occasional branching, exacerbated at 35°C with extremely elongated cells often displaying aberrant branched morphology. The size reduction from OP-GFP-ssp1 is more conspicuous in rad24− cells, which become spherical. Overexpression of rad24 thus has an additive phenotype with ssp1−, exacerbating the cell elongation phenotype.
At 30°C, wild-type cells expressing a single chromosomally integrated copy of rad24-His6 under control of the nmt1 promoter (OP-rad24-His6int) (Q4109) are significantly longer (21.7±4.1 μm) than if expression is repressed (13.2±1.1 μm). By contrast, cells with single-copy expression of GFP-ssp1 under control of the nmt1 promoter (OP-ssp1-GFPint) (Q4111) are significantly shorter (12.9±1.0 μm) than if expression is repressed (13.9±1.2 μm). An intermediate size (19.2±2.4 μm) is found for cells co-overexpressing ssp1 and rad24 (Q4111), suggesting that these gene products antagonize each other in some way (figure 1c).
To compare growth rates, thiamine-repressed OP-GFP-ssp1int and/or OP-rad24-His6int cells were washed in EMM before plating diluted aliquots (EMM, EMM+ 1 M KCl and EMM pH 3.5; all ±thiamine) (figure 1d), followed by incubation for 5 days (30 or 37°C). At both temperatures, cells overexpressing rad24 displayed inhibited growth compared with cells overexpressing ssp1 or both rad24 and ssp1. Overexpression of rad24 negatively affects proliferation, resistance to hyperosmotic and low pH stress, and increases mitotic delay. Growth inhibition in OP-rad24-His6int cells was exacerbated by 1 M KCl (30 and 37°C) and OP-GFP-ssp1int did not alleviate this effect. Similar growth delay in rad24 overexpressing cells was evident on EMM pH 3.5 media (30 and 37°C) and was not ameliorated by ssp1 overexpression. Low pH conditions may affect nutritional status in these cells. Failure of CaMKK to activate AMPK [24] in cells with a drop in energy may consequently inhibit processes such as protein synthesis and growth, and affect downstream regulators.
3.3. Loss of ssp1 reduces the restrictive temperature for cdc25-22
The cdc25-22ts (Q300) allele at the restrictive temperature (36–36.5°C) arrests at the G2/M boundary as very elongated single cells [33,37,38]. The ssp1− background exacerbates the cell elongation phenotype of cdc25-22ts at semi-permissive temperatures (32°C) (figure 2a,b). As ssp1− cells are sensitive to KCl stress and Cdc25 is exported out of the nucleus within 10 min after KCl stress [39], we investigated the effect of ssp1− on the nuclear localization of Cdc25. We expressed single-copy, native promoter-integrated cdc25-GFP (cdc25-GFPint) [40] in rad24− ssp1− (Q4113) and ssp1− (Q3974) backgrounds at 25°C and shifted to 35°C for 4 h. The nuclear localization of Cdc25-GFP is independent of ssp1− and rad24− single and ssp1− rad24− double gene deletions in both conditions (figure 2c), suggesting that the loss of ssp1 does not interfere with the nuclear localization of Cdc25-GFP.
3.4. Deletion of rad24 overrides growth sensitivity after 0.6 M KCl stress in ssp1− cells
At high temperatures and in the presence of 0.6 M–1.5 M KCl or low pH (3.5), ssp1− cells arrest at the G2/M boundary (figure 3a) [23]. rad24− alleviates this arrest at high temperatures on YEA and in the presence of KCl. rad24− is therefore epistatic with respect to ssp1− cell-cycle arrest following 0.6 M KCl stress at 36°C. Proliferation at pH 3.5 at 36°C is not rescued and small cell size suggests a block to growth (figure 3, also see figure 1). Growth rate in ssp1− is markedly reduced at high temperatures as indicated by the small colony size in spot tests (figure 3b). The response of Ssp1 to 0.6 M KCl stress and to low pH probably occurs through different mechanisms.
3.5. At native expression levels Ssp1-GFP localizes to the cell membrane after KCl stress
GFP-Ssp1 localization was previously examined following strong overexpression (nmt1) from a multi-copy plasmid [20,23,41], however variations in cell shape, strength and duration of fluorescence signals in unperturbed and osmotically challenged cells were evident [23]. Cells overexpressing GFP-ssp1 often accumulate fluorescence at the cell membrane even when unperturbed. We expressed the chromosomal integrant ssp1-GFPint (ssp1::ura4+ ssp1-GFP LEU2) using the ssp1 native promoter. ssp1-GFPint cells grow similarly to wild-type under normal and stress conditions (YEA, YEA + 0.6 M KCl and EMM pH 3.5; 30 and 36°C) (figure 4a,b). To investigate the pattern and timing of re-localization of Ssp1-GFP at native expression levels following KCl stress ssp1-GFPint cells in mid-logarithmic growth were examined in a microfluidic flow chamber (Y2 microfluidic plate, CellASIC), allowing media changes without mechanical perturbation (ONIX Flow Control System, CellASIC). Fluorescence in unperturbed cells expressing ssp1-GFPint is largely cytoplasmic. Vacuoles are faintly discernible, suggesting that Ssp1-GFP levels are lower than those in the cytoplasm (figure 4c). After switching from YEA to YEA + 0.6 M KCl, cell shapes became more jagged and fission scars became more notable, with a slight decrease in cell volume. Reversal of this cell ‘shrivelling’ with the re-establishment of cell turgor depends upon glycerol synthesis and requires gpd1+ [42]. The nucleus appeared compressed and irregular in shape. Vacuolar areas became more conspicuous, with low fluorescence intensity similar to the nucleus. Within 2–3 min of 0.6 M KCl treatment, small areas of increased Ssp1-GFP fluorescence (foci) in the cytoplasm and near the cell walls and septum appeared. These foci brightened further and by 7 min, additional fluorescent foci along the cell membrane appeared, especially at the cell tips (figure 4c,d). Localization of Ssp1-GFP at the cell membrane started to decline by 20 min, decreased further by 34 min and was similar to cytoplasmic levels by 70 min. Cells accommodated to the increase in extracellular osmolytes, regaining volume and rod-shaped cell morphology at 23–34 min, indicating induction of gpd1+ and glycerol synthesis [42]. Surface plots of fluorescence intensity of cells at t = 0, t = 7, t = 34 and t = 70 min during 0.6 M KCl stress (figure 4d) highlights the formation of the small foci of fluorescence intensity in the stressed cells. The conspicuous placement of fluorescent foci, often on opposing sides along the cylindrical portion of the cell suggested that Ssp1-GFP localization to this area takes place not only as distinct foci, but instead as a ring. Although overall fluorescence declined, Ssp1-GFP protein levels stayed constant (figure 4e).
Expression of multi-copy GFP-ssp1 from the nmt1 promoter (Q4108) facilitated the capture of a multi-image Z-stack. In EMM + 1.5 M KCl (25°C), a band of foci formed around the circumference of the cell (figure 5a). This band was not visible in control cells. To determine whether Ssp1 co-localizes with actin patches, we co-expressed single-copy, integrated ssp1-CFP and arp3C-YFP [43] (Q4117) which co-localizes with cortical actin patches. Mid-logarithmic cells (YEA, 25°C) were treated with YEA or YEA + 0.6 M KCl. Projection images of deconvolved Arp3C-YFP (Slidebook; Z-stack) and single Ssp1-CFP images revealed that after 15 min of osmotic stress, the vast majority of actin patches in the cell membrane and/or cell wall area do not co-localize with the accumulated Ssp1-CFP at the cell membrane (figure 5b).
3.6. Loss of rad24 or rad25 does not affect localization of Ssp1-GFP after stress
To investigate how loss of 14-3-3 proteins affects the subcellular localization of Ssp1-GFP, we expressed ssp1-GFPint in rad24− (Q4116) or rad25− (Q4115) cells. In YEA (30°C), Ssp1-GFP in mid-logarithmic rad24− or rad25− cells was cytoplasmic and excluded from the nucleus. Ssp1-GFP accumulated along forming and formed septa, and along the cell membrane in a subset of cells. After osmotic stress (YEA, 0.6 M KCl) Ssp1-GFP promptly localized to areas near the cell membrane, forming foci of fluorescence as in rad24+ rad25+ cells (figure 6a), indicating that Ssp1-GFP localization to the cell membrane after 0.6 M KCl stress does not require rad24− or rad25−.
3.7. Ssp1-GFP co-immunoprecipitates with the 14-3-3 proteins Rad24-2HA-His6 and Rad25-His6
14-3-3 proteins are abundant in all cells, and in budding yeast interact with at least 271 proteins representing approximately 4.4% of the proteome [44] indicating that only a small amount of the total pool of 14-3-3 associates with any one protein at any given time. Only a portion of the total Ssp1-GFP present in the lysate immunoprecipitated in the Rad24-2HA-His6 pulldown. To test the relative binding of Rad24 or Rad25 to Ssp1-GFP, protein lysates were prepared from mid-logarithmically growing (YEA, 30°C) cells expressing single-copy ssp1-GFPint and either rad24-2HA-His6 (Q4118) or rad25-His6 (Q4119) integrated at their native promoters. Ssp1-GFP co-immunoprecipitates with Rad24 and Rad25 (figure 6b,c) and a portion of each of the Ssp1 and 14-3-3 pools co-immunoprecipitate.
In budding yeast, the deletion phenotype of the major 14-3-3 isoform BMH1 is complemented by overexpression of the minor isoform BMH2, suggesting that these proteins have similar binding partners [45]. To determine the relative amounts of Rad24 and Rad25 associating with Ssp1, we expressed ssp1-GFP rad24-2HA-His6 rad25-His6 (Q4120), where Rad24-2HA-His6 is distinguishable from Rad25-His6 by size owing to small differences in molecular weight as well as the presence of the 2HA. Rad24-2HA-His6 was present at approximately fivefold higher levels (ImageJ) compared with Rad25-His6 protein in the cell lysate (figure 6d) and a similar ratio of Rad24-2HA-His6 and Rad25-His6 co-precipitated with Ssp1-GFP.
Ssp1-GFP is a highly phosphorylated protein [19]. We can see doublet formation on gels (see immunoprecipitates; figure 6c) and can separate these bands by running the SDS-PAGE gel for an extended amount of time. The phosphorylation state of Ssp1-GFP will be discussed below.
3.8. Rad25-His6 and Ssp1-GFP physically interact in the absence of Rad24
For the previous co-immunoprecipitation studies, Rad24-2HA-His6 or Rad25-His6 proteins were co-expressed with Ssp1-GFP. We wanted to determine whether Rad25 associates with Ssp1-GFP only as part of a heterodimer with Rad24 or is able to bind Ssp1 as a Rad25–Rad25 homodimer in vivo. Immunoprecipitation of Ssp1-GFP and Rad25-His6 in rad24+ and rad24− (Q4121) cells showed that Rad25-His6 co-precipitates with Ssp1-GFP in the absence of Rad24 (figure 6e). We also found that Ssp1-GFP is less stable in a rad24− background (figure 6e,f).
3.9. Stress reduces the interaction between Ssp1-GFP and Rad24-2HA-His6
Harvesting cells by centrifugation at 4°C, followed by washes in ice-cold lysis buffer exposes cells to stressors, including increased gravitational forces and hypoxia. This is manifested by transient increased phosphorylation of MAPK Spc1 [46,47] and Atf1 [46]. Cells undergo a brief cell-cycle delay similar to but shorter than the delay after 0.6 M KCl [23,46] and there is a transient depolarization of actin [46]. Hypoxia in pelleted cells causes activation of hypoxia response genes via Sre1 [48,49]. Moderate thermal downshift (28–15°C) brings about phosphorylation of Spc1 and induction of the stress response genes ctt1, tps1 and ntp1 [46]. To minimize these stressors, cells were treated with pre-warmed YEA (30°C; ±KCl to 0.6 M KCl) for 15 min, then rapidly chilled to 0°C with frozen, crushed YEA (±0.6 M KCl) preceding centrifugation. Very low temperatures greatly delay Spc1 phosphorylation [46]. Ssp1-GFP localizes to the cell membrane after 15 min of 0.6 M KCl stress and activating phosphorylation of Spc1 MAPK is detected [10]. After KCl treatment approximately 10 times less Rad24-2HA-His6 co-immunoprecipitated with Ssp1-GFP in the KCl-treated immunoprecipitate than in the untreated controls (figure 7a), however we consistently failed to detect a decrease in the total amount of Rad25-His6 protein that co-immunoprecipitated with Ssp1-GFP (figure 7b). Ssp1-GFP binds Rad24-2HA-His6 and Rad25-His6 during unperturbed growth in vivo, however bound Rad24-2HA-His6 but not Rad25-His6 decreases substantially after 0.6 M KCl stress treatment relative to unperturbed conditions in vivo. The limitations of immunoblotting do not allow detection of very subtle changes in Rad25-His6 binding.
3.10. Overexpression of rad24 diminishes Ssp1-GFP localization to the cell membrane
Loss of either 14-3-3 homologue perturbs MAPK hyperosmolarity stress-dependent signalling in budding yeast [44]. BMH2 physically interacts with the NHA1 antiporter protein at the membrane in a HOG1-independent manner. Loss of BMH1 increases sensitivity to NaCl, KCl and LiCl without affecting plasma membrane potential [45]. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, MAPK activation after osmotic stress leads to phosphorylation of Cdc25 by Srk1, binding of 14-3-3 and Cdc25 nuclear export [14]. Loss of rad24 or rad25 does not prevent the stress-dependent localization of Ssp1-GFP to the cell membrane, nor does it increase sensitivity to temperature, low pH or KCl stress (figure 3a,b). Strong expression of multi-copy pREP1:rad24-His6 in ssp1-GFPint cells (Q4124) (EMM, 30°C) impairs Ssp1-GFP accumulation at the membrane after 1 M KCl treatment (figure 7c). In rad24+ cells expressing single-copy integrated GFP-ssp1 under control of the nmt1 promoter (Q4111), the majority accumulate GFP-Ssp1 at the membrane after KCl stress. This localization pattern is suppressed by co-overexpression of single-copy, integrated rad24-His6 under control of the nmt1 promoter, where this response is only detected in approximately 12% of the cell population (figure 7d).
3.11. The phosphorylation state of Ssp1 is not altered after 0.6 M KCl stress
Like all CaMKKs [18], Ssp1 is regulated by phosphorylation. Ssp1 has potential phosphorylation sites at Y58, S59, Y63, T82 and S94, where S59 and S94 were identified in phosphopeptides containing only one phosphorylatable Ser residue [19,50]. Ssp1 is dephosphorylatable in vitro [19]. We investigated whether stress response causes changes in Ssp1 phosphorylation. To preserve the phosphorylation state of Ssp1-GFP in unperturbed and KCl-stressed cells, we collected mid-logarithmically growing cells by gentle filtration [35,51] after 15 min treatment with pre-warmed YEA (±KCl to 0.6 M, 30°C). We detected a higher mobility band in extracts treated with Lambda phosphatase (no phosphatase inhibitors; figure 7e, lane 3). The faint upper band and strong lower band represent Ssp1-GFP protein in a partially phosphorylated and dephosphorylated state. The lower band is absent in the mock-treated extract (lane 2), confirming that it is not due to proteolysis. There was no bandshift evident in extracts prepared in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors in either perturbed or KCl-treated cells (lanes 4 and 5). Bands corresponded to the position of the phosphorylated bands produced by the control lysates. Ssp1-GFP thus appears to be phosphorylated in both unperturbed (YEA, collected on filter [52] and stressed with 0.6 M KCl) cells in vivo. We obtained similar results when lysates were extracted from Ssp1-GFP cells after mild temperature stress (36°C) (not shown). Our results confirm basal phosphorylation of Ssp1.
4. Discussion
Regulation of CaMKK occurs through Ca2+/CaM binding and inhibitory and activating changes in phosphorylation state. Additional inhibition takes place through 14-3-3 binding [17,32]. Here, we explore the interaction of CaMKK Ssp1 with 14-3-3 and their role in cell-cycle regulation and stress response.
4.1. Genetic interaction with 14-3-3 links CaMKK Ssp1 to cell-cycle control machinery
The CaMKK Ssp1 is a mitotic activator [20,23]. Its link to the cell-cycle machinery is supported by suppression of the ssp1− mitotic delay by rad24− and the elongation and arrest of ssp1− cells when overexpressing rad24. Mitotic advancement can be interpreted as an additive effect of high levels of CaMKK activity and loss of rad24 [31]. Human [53] and Xenopus [54] 14-3-3 binds to the mitotic inhibitor Wee1 to negatively regulate the cell cycle, through increasing Wee1 half-life, protein levels and kinase activity [53]. Fission yeast 14-3-3 may act similarly on Wee1, where increases in 14-3-3 contribute to G2/M delay. Ectopically augmented levels of the mitotic activator Ssp1 presumably titrates out some of the excess Rad24, reducing its effect on other binding partners. ssp1 overexpression by itself causes mitotic advance indicating a codominant relationship upon overexpression where Ssp1 and Rad24 work independently in an opposing manner. Fission yeast Cdk1 Y15 dephosphorylation by Cdc25 (and Pyp3) phosphatase and phosphorylation by Wee1 (and Mik1) kinase provide positive and negative regulation of cell-cycle progression, respectively [34,55–62]. Wee1 is negatively regulated by phosphorylation through the mitotic activators Cdr1 and Cdr2 kinases [58,63–68]. Ssp1 CaMKK involvement in mitotic control is demonstrated by the reduction of the restrictive temperature of cdc25-22 by the loss of ssp1. The negative additive effect on cell-cycle progression suggests that loss of Ssp1 further inhibits Cdk1, presumably via net increase in Y15 phosphorylation probably through impacting Wee1 kinase activity. Together, these findings support a role for CaMKKs in cell-cycle regulation.
4.2. CaMKK Ssp1 does not co-localize with actin patches at the cell membrane
At native expression levels, cytoplasmic Ssp1-GFP accumulates at the cell membrane after perturbation by either 0.6–1.2 M KCl or sorbitol [23]; however ssp1 is required for growth in the presence of KCl but not sorbitol. Similarly, although MAPK Pmk1 is activated by 1.2 M sorbitol, pmk1− cells are not sensitive to this hyperosmotic stress [69]. A small pool of Ssp1-GFP accumulates at the cell membrane, while the majority of the protein remains cytoplasmic. This does not support a previous model suggesting that Ssp1 directly localizes actin patches at the cell membrane to support areas of new growth [23]. We show that following hyperosmotic stress GFP-Ssp1 forms a band, while actin patches do not follow this pattern; Arp3C-YFP and Ssp1-CFP do not co-localize. The importance of the compartmentalization of Ssp1 at the membrane is not clear. The S. pombe cell wall is most vulnerable to rupture at the extensile tips and is sturdier in the cylindrical portion of the cell [70]. Ssp1 accumulates in areas corresponding to fission scars, which are less vulnerable to damage than the extensile tips [70]. Accumulation at the cell membrane following hyperosmotic stress is transient; however, Ssp1 is required for long-term cell survival under hyperosmotic conditions.
4.3. The role of 14-3-3 binding to CaMKK
At least some cytoplasmic Ssp1 is bound to Rad24 and Rad25 in unperturbed cells. After applying hyperosmotic stress, Ssp1 is released from 14-3-3 and Ssp1 accumulates at the cell membrane. Our data also show that Rad24 and Rad25 are dispensable for the translocation of Ssp1-GFP to the cell membrane. This response can be repressed in cells overexpressing Rad24 even when there is an excess of Ssp1-GFP.
14-3-3 proteins commonly act as cytoplasmic anchors, providing negative regulation of proteins through sequestration. In Drosophila melanogaster, 14-3-3 binds phosphorylated β-catenin antagonist Chibby (Cby), promoting cytoplasmic sequestration of the β-catenin–14-3-3–Cby complex [71]. In mammalian systems cytoplasmic Bax, a Bcl-2-related protein required for c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-dependent apoptosis, localizes to the mitochondria after stress stimuli, where it induces cytochrome c release. 14-3-3-bound Bax remains anchored in the cytoplasm [72]. Upon activation, JNK phosphorylates 14-3-3, Bax is released and translocates to the mitochondria, and apoptosis commences [73]. The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK-signalling cascade is also regulated by 14-3-3 proteins, which are thought to inhibit activation of plasma membrane-anchored Ras by sequestering its activator Raf-1 in the cytoplasm. This mechanism prevents cascade activation in resting cells [74]. The majority of Ras superfamily G proteins are kept in inactive (GDP-bound) or active (GTP-bound) forms by guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase-activating proteins, respectively. The atypical Rho GTPases Rnd1/2/3 are cell morphology regulators and constitutively bind GTP [75,76]. After phosphorylation by Rock1 kinase or protein kinase Cα (PKCα) [77,78], Rnd3 binds 14-3-3 and translocates from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm, its function inhibited via sequestration from its site of action [79]. In fission yeast, 14-3-3 proteins also regulate the localization of many proteins. For example, they associate with the primarily cytoplasmic Byr2, preventing binding to Ras1/GTP at the cell membrane during vegetative growth. Loss of 14-3-3 expedites Byr2 translocation [80]. Our data suggest that in fission yeast, 14-3-3 proteins may play a role in the negative regulation of Ssp1 translocation to the cell membrane.
Mammalian 14-3-3 isoforms require only their N-termini to dimerize. Dimerization greatly increases their thermostability and single recombinant isoforms form homodimers even if they function as heterodimers in vivo [81,82]. Particular isoforms in 14-3-3 heterodimers allow the interaction of proteins by bringing the two binding partners closer together ([82–84]; reviewed in [85–87]). The minor isoform Rad25, which associates with Ssp1, forms homodimers and binds Ssp1, at least in the absence of Rad24. A reduction in Rad24 binding to Ssp1 after osmotic stress could occur owing to a decrease in Rad24–Rad24 homodimer and/or Rad24–Rad25 heterodimer binding. Conversely, following hyperosmotic stress, Rad25–Rad25 homodimers remain bound to Ssp1-GFP. This suggests an interesting and distinct role for the minor 14-3-3 isoform in CaMKK regulation. Future studies will confirm whether the Rad24-bound pool is preferentially located in any particular part of the cell.
4.4. Increased stress sensitivity in cells overexpressing rad24 is alleviated by co-overexpression of CaMKK
Rad24 is a negative regulator of mitosis after DNA damage [88,89]. Overexpression of rad24 increases long-term sensitivity to stressors such as KCl and low pH, but sensitivity to high temperature is relieved to some extent by co-overexpression of ssp1. Association with 14-3-3 proteins inhibits CaMKK activity in mammalian systems [32,90], thus if Rad24 binding inhibits Ssp1 activity then augmenting levels of 14-3-3 would diminish Ssp1-mediated stress response. Ssp1-FLAG binds 14-3-3, but it is unclear whether this association affects CaMKK activity [19]. 14-3-3 proteins are involved in many pathways [91,92] and substantially increasing the Rad24 pool causes a complex response in terms of stress sensitivity. Both deletion and overexpression of 14-3-3 BMH1 increase chronological lifespan in nutrient-stressed budding yeast. Cells overexpressing BMH1 survive longer in the absence of additional stressors, probably because an increase in phosphorylated BMH1 S238 decreases the stress response required for longevity [93].
4.5. A role for 14-3-3 in CaMKK turnover
The absence of Rad24 increases Ssp1 turnover, suggesting a role for Rad24 in maintaining Ssp1 protein stability. rad24− cells do not display hypersensitivity to conditions where ssp1− cells are unable to proliferate, indicating that Ssp1 protein levels are maintained at sufficient levels. 14-3-3 proteins are involved in protein stabilization both directly and indirectly in other systems, for example by blocking access of ubiquitin ligases (reviewed in [85,86]). In mammalian systems, association with 14-3-3 prevents Wee1 degradation by masking a degradation motif required for normal Wee1 turnover [94]. Budding yeast 14-3-3 homologues BMH1, BMH2 and ACM1 form a stable complex with the APC/C activator CDH1/CDC20, keeping it inactived by acting as an APC pseudosubstrate [95,96].
Further studies will determine whether the interaction of 14-3-3 and Ssp1 has a direct or indirect effect on CaMKK catalytic function and whether 14-3-3 proteins play a role in the negative regulation of Ssp1 translocation to the cell membrane after stress.
5. Material and methods
5.1. Plasmid construction and chromosomal integration
All DNA amplification was performed by PCR with Expand High Fidelity Taq Polymerase (Roche). T4 ligase and restriction enzymes used were from Promega. For primers, see table 2.
Table 2.
primer | sequence |
---|---|
Ssp1intforw | 5′ gggggctgcagttgagttagcctactggattatcttat 3′ |
Ssp1intrev | 5′ ggggggtcgacgaattagttggtgtgaaggaatgctct 3′ |
Rad25HisForward | 5′ gggggctgcagcattgcagtagaa 3′ |
Rad25HisReverse | 5′ ggggggtcgactcagtggtgatgatggtgatgagctttaacagtgtcagtcg 3′ |
rad24OPforw | 5′ actgtcatatgtctactacttctcgtgaagatgct 3′ |
rad24OPrev | 5′ actgtgtcgactcagtggtgatgatggtgatgtgcgtccgccttgggctc 3′ |
SFrad24-f | 5′ gggggcatatgtctactacttctcgtgaagatgct 3′ |
SFrad24-r | 5′ ggggggtcgactttgcgtccgccttgggcgca 3′ |
KanShortForwTM | 5′ tctaactaccttttaca 3′ |
KanShortRevTM | 5′ tctattatgaatttcat 3′ |
KrnfFW-17 | 5′ agcttgtgatattgacg 3′ |
KrnfRV-17 | 5′ agcttagctacaaatcc 3′ |
pssp1-GFPint and pssp1-CFPint: the ssp1 gene (+1000 bp upstream sequence) was amplified from S. pombe genomic DNA [97] (primers Ssp1intforw and Ssp1intrev) adding PstI and SalI restriction sites. The nmt1 promoter was excised from the pREP1-GFP and pREP1-CFP vectors with PstI and SalI [41,98,99] and the ssp1 +1000 bp fragment was inserted, generating pssp1-GFPint and pssp1-CFPint. The plasmids were integrated into ssp1::ura4+ leu1-32 ura4-D18 and stable integrants were identified and tested by out-crossing to a ura4-D18 leu1-32 strain. Strains were tested for their ability to rescue the ssp1− phenotype, and normal subcellular localization was confirmed (see Results section).
pREP1-rad24-His6, pREP2-rad24-His6 and pREP1-rad24-GFP: the rad24 ORF was amplified with primers rad24OPforw and rad24OPrev, adding a C-terminal His6 tag, NdeI and SalI restriction sites or the primers SFrad24-f and SFrad24-r, adding NdeI and SalI restriction sites, respectively. The fragments were ligated into pREP1, pREP2 [41,98] and pREP1-GFP plasmids [99] forming pREP1-rad24-His6, pREP1-rad24-His6 and pREP1-rad24-GFP. Plasmids rescued rad24::ura4+. A single copy of pREP2-rad24-His6 was integrated into a leu1-32 ura4-D18 strain.
Integration of nmt1:GFP-ssp1: a single copy of the plasmid pIR2-22, containing GFP-ssp1 under control of the nmt1 promoter (pIR2-22) [23] was integrated into leu1-32 ura4-D18.
5.2. Targeted replacement of LEU2 and ura4 with kanMX6 in ssp1-GFPint and rad25::ura4+
A kanMX6 cassette with 80 bp sequence homology to LEU2 at the 5′ and 3′ ends was generated by PCR amplification using primers KanShortForwTM and KanShortRevTM and the pGEM-T (Promega) vector containing kanMX6. The kanMX6 cassette was transformed into ssp1-GFPint and plated on YEA (+0.1 mg ml−1 G418; Gibco) [100,101]. A kanMX6 cassette was amplified with KrnfFW-17 and KrnfRV-17 primers having homology to URA4 at the 5′ and 3′ ends and transformed into rad25::ura+ ura4-D18, producing rad25::kanMX6 ura4-D18.
5.3. Protein lysates
Lysates were prepared at 4°C unless otherwise indicated. Mid-logarithmic growth phase cells were harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 1876.9g), washed in ice-cold stop buffer [97], collected again by pulse centrifugation (13 051g) and frozen on dry ice. Lysis by mechanical disruption with glass beads (0.5 mm, BioSpec) and a bead beater (MiniBeadBeater-8 Cell Disruptor, BioSpec) in lysis buffer [102] or modified SUME buffer (1% SDS, 8 M urea, 10 mM MOPS pH 6.8, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM NaVO4; [103]) supplemented with complete protease inhibitor (EDTA-free, Roche) was alternated with rest periods in an ice-water slurry (0°C). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (13 051g) and protein concentration determined by Bio-Rad protein assay. Protein extracts were boiled in Laemmli buffer (200 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 40% glycerol, 3.34% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromophenol blue).
5.4. KCl treatment
Mid-logarithmic growth phase cells (1000–3000 ml, YEA, 30°C) were treated for 15 min with warm (30°C) YEA (control) or YEA + KCl to 0.6 M. Cells were chilled to 0°C within 1 min by the addition of frozen, crushed YEA or YEA + 0.6 M KCl and immediate immersion of flask into an ice-water/ethanol slurry.
5.5. Immunoprecipitation
Lysate preparation and immunoprecipitation were performed at 4°C. Cell cultures (YEA, 30°C) were harvested by centrifugation (9927.3g) and washed once in 10 ml ice-cold HB buffer [97] (pH 7.4; containing 2 mM DTT and Roche complete protease inhibitor (EDTA free), washed again and followed by mechanical disruption in ice-cold HB buffer. Lysates were centrifuged (35 4406g; 40 min) and incubated with 100 µl bed-volume Sepharose G beads (4 Fast Flow, GE Healthcare) for 1 h to remove non-specific binding proteins. Lysates were incubated overnight with 15 µl rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal serum (Invitrogen) or 15 µl mouse anti-His6 antibody (Roche) on a rotator. Control lysates did not contain antibodies. Lysates were incubated with 100 µl bed-volume Protein G Sepharose beads for 2 h. Beads were washed extensively with HB buffer and protein complexes eluted with 0.2 M glycine (pH 2.2) for 15 min and neutralized by addition of saturated Tris (pH 10). Supernatants were boiled with Laemmli buffer and analysed by immunoblotting.
5.6. Immunoblotting
Extracts and immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Perkin Elmer). Immunoprecipitated Ssp1-GFP protein was detected with monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (1 : 1000) (Roche). Co-immunoprecipitated Ssp1-GFP protein was detected with polyclonal anti-GFP serum (1 : 1000) (Invitrogen). Immunoprecipitated and co-immunoprecipitated Rad24-2HA-His6 and Rad25-His6 proteins were detected with monoclonal anti-His6 antibody (1 : 1000) (Roche; Genscript). Bands were visualized with goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1 : 2000) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and luminol-based ECL reagent (Perkin Elmer).
5.7. Reprobing of polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
PVDF membranes were stripped as described [104] and reprobed with polyclonal anti-PSTAIRE antibody (1 : 500) (Upstate Biotechnology).
5.8. Phosphatase treatments
Mid-logarithmic phase cells were treated with 30°C YEA or YEA + 0.6 M KCl for 15 min. To preserve phosphorylation state, cells were collected on microfibre filters (934-AH; Whatman) and washed with 5 ml ice-cold stop buffer [97] lysed in lysis buffer [97] (buffers contained 15 mM pNPP and 60 mM β-glycerophosphate). Cells collected by centrifugation were washed (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF) and lysed in phosphatase-inhibitor-free lysis buffer (modified from [97]) or washed and lysed with phosphatase-inhibitor-enriched buffers. Phosphatase-inhibitor-free protein (5 μg) was treated with 800 units of Lambda Protein Phosphatase (NEB) for 30 min at 30°C. Mock treatments did not contain phosphatase.
5.9. Microscopy
Images were captured by a high performance CCD (Cooke SensiCam) camera on a Leitz DMRB fluorescence microscope or a high performance CCD Hamamatsu Orca-ER camera on a Zeiss AxioImager.Z1 fluorescence microscope. Slidebook image analysis software (Intelligent Image Innovations) was used to perform cell measurements and to analyse Z-stacks.
Funding statement
This study was financially supported with the assistance of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, National Cancer Institute of Canada and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
References
- 1.Causton HC, et al. 2001. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 323–337. (doi:10.1091/mbc.12.2.323) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4241–4257. (doi:10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.O'Rourke SM, Herskowitz I, O'Shea EK. 2002. Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. Trends Genet. 18, 405–412. (doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02723-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gustin MC, Albertyn J, Alexander M, Davenport K. 1998. MAP kinase pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 1264–1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen D, Toone WM, Mata J, Lyne R, Burns G, Kivinen K, Brazma A, Jones N, Bahler J. 2003. Global transcriptional responses of fission yeast to environmental stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 214–229. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-08-0499) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shieh JC, Wilkinson MG, Buck V, Morgan BA, Makino K, Millar JB. 1997. The Mcs4 response regulator coordinately controls the stress-activated Wak1-Wis1-Sty1 MAP kinase pathway and fission yeast cell cycle. Genes Dev. 11, 1008–1022. (doi:10.1101/gad.11.8.1008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Samejima I, Mackie S, Fantes PA. 1997. Multiple modes of activation of the stress-responsive MAP kinase pathway in fission yeast. EMBO J. 16, 6162–6170. (doi:10.1093/emboj/16.20.6162) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Warbrick E, Fantes PA. 1991. The wis1 protein kinase is a dosage-dependent regulator of mitosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 10, 4291–4299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kato T, Okazaki K, Murakami H, Stettler S, Fantes PA, Okayama H. 1996. Stress signal, mediated by a Hogl-like MAP kinase, controls sexual development in fission yeast. FEBS Lett. 378, 207–212. (doi:10.1016/0014-5793(95)01442-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Degols G, Shiozaki K, Russell P. 1996. Activation and regulation of the Spc1 stress-activated protein kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2870–2877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shiozaki K, Russell P. 1996. Conjugation, meiosis, and the osmotic stress response are regulated by Spc1 kinase through Atf1 transcription factor in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 10, 2276–2288. (doi:10.1101/gad.10.18.2276) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Blázquez MA, Stucka R, Feldmann H, Gancedo C. 1994. Trehalose-6-P synthase is dispensable for growth on glucose but not for spore germination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Bacteriol. 176, 3895–3902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaits F, Degols G, Shiozaki K, Russell P. 1998. Phosphorylation and association with the transcription factor Atf1 regulate localization of Spc1/Sty1 stress-activated kinase in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 12, 1464–1473. (doi:10.1101/gad.12.10.1464) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.López-Avilés S, Grande M, González M, Helgesen AL, Alemany V, Sanchez-Piris M, Bachs O, Millar JBA, Aligue R. 2005. Inactivation of the Cdc25 phosphatase by the stress-activated Srk1 kinase in fission yeast. Mol. Cell 17, 49–59. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.043) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Millar JB, Buck V, Wilkinson MG. 1995. Pyp1 and Pyp2 PTPases dephosphorylate an osmosensing MAP kinase controlling cell size at division in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 9, 2117–2130. (doi:10.1101/gad.9.17.2117) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shiozaki K, Russell P. 1995. Cell-cycle control linked to extracellular environment by MAP kinase pathway in fission yeast. Nature 378, 739–743. (doi:10.1038/378739a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Racioppi L, Means AR. 2012. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2: roles in signaling and pathophysiology. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31 658–31 665. (doi:10.1074/jbc.R112.356485) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Skelding KA, Rostas JA. 2012. The role of molecular regulation and targeting in regulating calcium/calmodulin stimulated protein kinases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 740, 703–730. (doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2888-2_31) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hanyu Y, et al. 2009. Schizosaccharomyces pombe cell division cycle under limited glucose requires Ssp1 kinase, the putative CaMKK, and Sds23, a PP2A-related phosphatase inhibitor. Genes Cells 14, 539–554. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01290.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsusaka T, Hirata D, Yanagida M, Toda T. 1995. A novel protein kinase gene ssp1+ is required for alteration of growth polarity and actin localization in fission yeast. EMBO J. 14, 3325–3338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shimanuki M, Kinoshita N, Ohkura H, Yoshida T, Toda T, Yanagida M. 1993. Isolation and characterization of the fission yeast protein phosphatase gene ppe1+ involved in cell shape control and mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 303–313. (doi:10.1091/mbc.4.3.303) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Toda T, Niwa H, Nemoto T, Dhut S, Eddison M, Matsusaka T, Yanagida M, Hirata D. 1996. The fission yeast sts5+ gene is required for maintenance of growth polarity and functionally interacts with protein kinase C and an osmosensing MAP-kinase pathway. J. Cell. Sci. 109, 2331–2342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rupeš I, Jia Z, Young PG. 1999. Ssp1 promotes actin depolymerization and is involved in stress response and new end take-off control in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1495–1510. (doi:10.1091/mbc.10.5.1495) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Valbuena N, Moreno S. 2012. AMPK phosphorylation by Ssp1 is required for proper sexual differentiation in fission yeast. J. Cell. Sci. 125, 2655–2664. (doi:10.1242/jcs.098533) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matsuzawa T, Fujita Y, Tohda H, Takegawa K. 2012. Snf1-like protein kinase Ssp2 regulates glucose derepression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot. Cell 11, 159–167. (doi:10.1128/EC.05268-11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hardie DG. 2008. AMPK and raptor: matching cell growth to energy supply. Mol. Cell 30, 263–265. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hong SP, Leiper FC, Woods A, Carling D, Carlson M. 2003. Activation of yeast Snf1 and mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase by upstream kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8839–8843. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1533136100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sutherland CM, Hawley SA, McCartney RR, Leech A, Stark MJ, Schmidt MC, Hardie DG. 2003. Elm1p is one of three upstream kinases for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF1 complex. Curr. Biol. 13, 1299–1305. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00459-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee YJ, Jeschke GR, Roelants FM, Thorner J, Turk BE. 2012. Reciprocal phosphorylation of yeast glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenases in adaptation to distinct types of stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 4705–4717. (doi:10.1128/MCB.00897-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Robertson AM, Hagan IM. 2008. Stress-regulated kinase pathways in the recovery of tip growth and microtubule dynamics following osmotic stress in S. pombe. J. Cell. Sci. 121, 4055–4068. (doi:10.1242/jcs.034488) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ford J, Al-Khodairy F, Fotou E, Sheldrick K, Griffiths D, Carr A. 1994. 14-3-3 protein homologs required for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Science 265, 533–535. (doi:10.1126/science.8036497) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ichimura T, Taoka M, Hozumi Y, Goto K, Tokumitsu H. 2008. 14-3-3 proteins directly regulate Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase alpha through phosphorylation-dependent multisite binding. FEBS Lett. 582, 661–665. (doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2008.01.037) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Russell P, Nurse P. 1986. Cdc25+ functions as an inducer in the mitotic control of fission yeast. Cell 45, 145–153. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90546-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nurse P. 1975. Genetic control of cell size at cell division in yeast. Nature 256, 547–551. (doi:10.1038/256547a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fantes PA, Nurse P. 1978. Control of the timing of cell division in fission yeast: cell size mutants reveal a second control pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 115, 317–329. (doi:10.1016/0014-4827(78)90286-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.O'Connell MJ, Raleigh JM, Verkade HM, Nurse P. 1997. Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 16, 545–554. (doi:10.1093/emboj/16.3.545) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nurse P, Thuriaux P, Nasmyth K. 1976. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Gen. Genet. 146, 167–178. (doi:10.1007/BF00268085) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fantes P. 1979. Epistatic gene interactions in the control of division in fission yeast. Nature 279, 428–430. (doi:10.1038/279428a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.López-Aviles S, Lambea E, Moldon A, Grande M, Fajardo A, Rodriguez-Gabriel MA, Hidalgo E, Aligue R. 2008. Activation of Srk1 by the mitogen-activated protein kinase Sty1/Spc1 precedes its dissociation from the kinase and signals its degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 1670–1679. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0639) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chua G, Lingner C, Frazer C, Young PG. 2002. The sal3+ gene encodes an importin-beta implicated in the nuclear import of Cdc25 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 162, 689–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Basi G, Schmid E, Maundrell K. 1993. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1 promoter affect transcription efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene 123, 131–136. (doi:10.1016/0378-1119(93)90552-E) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Minc N, Boudaoud A, Chang F. 2009. Mechanical forces of fission yeast growth. Curr. Biol. 19, 1096–1101. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nolen BJ, Pollard TD. 2008. Structure and biochemical properties of fission yeast Arp2/3 complex lacking the Arp2 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26 490–26 498. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M802607200) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kakiuchi K, et al. 2007. Proteomic analysis of in vivo 14-3-3 interactions in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 46, 7781–7792. (doi:10.1021/bi700501t) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zahradka J, van Heusden GP, Sychrova H. 2012. Yeast 14-3-3 proteins participate in the regulation of cell cation homeostasis via interaction with Nha1 alkali-metal-cation/proton antiporter. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820, 849–858. (doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.03.013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Soto T, Nunez A, Madrid M, Vicente J, Gacto M, Cansado J. 2007. Transduction of centrifugation-induced gravity forces through mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Microbiology 153, 1519–1529. (doi:10.1099/mic.0.2006/004283-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shiozaki K, Shiozaki M, Russell P. 1998. Heat stress activates fission yeast Spc1/StyI MAPK by a MEKK-independent mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1339–1349. (doi:10.1091/mbc.9.6.1339) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Todd BL, Stewart EV, Burg JS, Hughes AL, Espenshade PJ. 2006. Sterol regulatory element binding protein is a principal regulator of anaerobic gene expression in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2817–2831. (doi:10.1128/MCB.26.7.2817-2831.2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hughes AL, Todd BL, Espenshade PJ. 2005. SREBP pathway responds to sterols and functions as an oxygen sensor in fission yeast. Cell 120, 831–842. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wilson-Grady JT, Villén J, Gygi SP. 2008. Phosphoproteome analysis of fission yeast. J. Proteome Res. 7, 1088–1097. (doi:10.1021/pr7006335) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Young PG, Fantes PA. 1987. Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutants affected in their division response to starvation. J. Cell. Sci. 88, 295–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fantes P, Nurse P. 1977. Control of cell size at division in fission yeast by a growth-modulated size control over nuclear division. Exp. Cell Res. 107, 377–386. (doi:10.1016/0014-4827(77)90359-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rothblum-Oviatt CJ, Ryan CE, Piwnica-Worms H. 2001. 14-3-3 binding regulates catalytic activity of human Wee1 kinase. Cell Growth Differ. 12, 581–589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee J, Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. 2001. Positive regulation of Wee1 by Chk1 and 14-3-3 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 551–563. (doi:10.1091/mbc.12.3.551) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nurse P, Bissett Y. 1981. Gene required in G1 for commitment to cell cycle and in G2 for control of mitosis in fission yeast. Nature 292, 558–560. (doi:10.1038/292558a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thuriaux P, Nurse P, Carter B. 1978. Mutants altered in the control co-ordinating cell division with cell growth in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Gen. Genet. 161, 215–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Piggott JR, Rai R, Carter BL. 1982. A bifunctional gene product involved in two phases of the yeast cell cycle. Nature 298, 391–393. (doi:10.1038/298391a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Russell P, Nurse P. 1987. Negative regulation of mitosis by wee1+, a gene encoding a protein kinase homolog. Cell 49, 559–567. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90458-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gould KL, Nurse P. 1989. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the fission yeast cdc2+ protein kinase regulates entry into mitosis. Nature 342, 39–45. (doi:10.1038/342039a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Featherstone C, Russell P. 1991. Fission yeast p107wee1 mitotic inhibitor is a tyrosine/serine kinase. Nature 349, 808–811. (doi:10.1038/349808a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lundgren K, Walworth N, Booher R, Dembski M, Kirschner M, Beach D. 1991. Mik1 and Wee1 cooperate in the inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylation of Cdc2. Cell 64, 1111–1122. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90266-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Parker LL, Atherton-Fessler S, Piwnica-Worms H. 1992. P107wee1 is a dual-specificity kinase that phosphorylates P34cdc2 on tyrosine 15. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2917–2921. (doi:10.1073/pnas.89.7.2917) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Feilotter H, Nurse P, Young PG. 1991. Genetic and molecular analysis of cdr1/nim1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 127, 309–318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Coleman TR, Tang Z, Dunphy WG. 1993. Negative regulation of the wee1 protein kinase by direct action of the nim1/cdr1 mitotic inducer. Cell 72, 919–929. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90580-J) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Parker LL, Walter SA, Young PG, Piwnica-Worms H. 1993. Phosphorylation and inactivation of the mitotic inhibitor Wee1 by the nim1/cdr1 kinase. Nature 363, 736–738. (doi:10.1038/363736a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wu L, Russell P. 1997. Roles of Wee1 and Nim1 protein kinases in regulating the switch from mitotic division to sexual development in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 10–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Breeding CS, Hudson J, Balasubramanian MK, Hemmingsen SM, Young PG, Gould KL. 1998. The cdr2+ gene encodes a regulator of G2/M progression and cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3399–3415. (doi:10.1091/mbc.9.12.3399) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kanoh J, Russell P. 1998. The protein kinase Cdr2, related to Nim1/Cdr1 mitotic inducer, regulates the onset of mitosis in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3321–3334. (doi:10.1091/mbc.9.12.3321) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Madrid M, Soto T, Khong HK, Franco A, Vicente J, Perez P, Gacto M, Cansado J. 2006. Stress-induced response, localization, and regulation of the Pmk1 cell integrity pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2033–2043. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M506467200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Piombo S, Calleja GB, Yoo BY, Johnson BF. 1998. Ruptured fission yeast walls: structural discontinuities related to the cell cycle. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 29, 263–279. (doi:10.1007/BF02737898) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Li FQ, Mofunanya A, Harris K, Takemaru K. 2008. Chibby cooperates with 14-3-3 to regulate beta-catenin subcellular distribution and signaling activity. J. Cell Biol. 181, 1141–1154. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200709091) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nomura M, Shimizu S, Sugiyama T, Narita M, Ito T, Matsuda H, Tsujimoto Y. 2003. 14-3-3 interacts directly with and negatively regulates pro-apoptotic Bax. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 2058–2065. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M207880200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tsuruta F, Sunayama J, Mori Y, Hattori S, Shimizu S, Tsujimoto Y, Yoshioka K, Masuyama N, Gotoh Y. 2004. JNK promotes Bax translocation to mitochondria through phosphorylation of 14-3-3 proteins. EMBO J. 23, 1889–1899. (doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600194) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Light Y, Paterson H, Marais R. 2002. 14-3-3 antagonizes Ras-mediated Raf-1 recruitment to the plasma membrane to maintain signaling fidelity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4984–4996. (doi:10.1128/MCB.22.14.4984-4996.2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Riou P, Villalonga P, Ridley AJ. 2010. Rnd proteins: multifunctional regulators of the cytoskeleton and cell cycle progression. Bioessays 32, 986–992. (doi:10.1002/bies.201000060) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Foster R, Hu KQ, Lu Y, Nolan KM, Thissen J, Settleman J. 1996. Identification of a novel human Rho protein with unusual properties: GTPase deficiency and in vivo farnesylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2689–2699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Madigan JP, et al. 2009. Regulation of Rnd3 localization and function by protein kinase C alpha-mediated phosphorylation. Biochem. J. 424, 153–161. (doi:10.1042/BJ20082377) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Riento K, Totty N, Villalonga P, Garg R, Guasch R, Ridley AJ. 2005. RhoE function is regulated by ROCK I-mediated phosphorylation. EMBO J. 24, 1170–1180. (doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600612) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Riou P, et al. 2013. 14-3-3 proteins interact with a hybrid prenyl-phosphorylation motif to inhibit G proteins. Cell 153, 640–653. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.044) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ozoe F, Kurokawa R, Kobayashi Y, Jeong HT, Tanaka K, Sen K, Nakagawa T, Matsuda H, Kawamukai M. 2002. The 14-3-3 proteins Rad24 and Rad25 negatively regulate Byr2 by affecting its localization in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 7105–7119. (doi:10.1128/MCB.22.20.7105-7119.2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Aitken A, Jones D, Soneji Y, Howell S. 1995. 14-3-3 proteins: biological function and domain structure. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23, 605–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jones DH, Ley S, Aitken A. 1995. Isoforms of 14-3-3 protein can form homo-and heterodimers in vivo and in vitro: implications for function as adapter proteins. FEBS Lett. 368, 55–58. (doi:10.1016/0014-5793(95)00598-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Shen YH, Godlewski J, Bronisz A, Zhu J, Comb MJ, Avruch J, Tzivion G. 2003. Significance of 14-3-3 self-dimerization for phosphorylation-dependent target binding. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4721–4733. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-12-0821) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tzivion G, Shen YH, Zhu J. 2001. 14-3-3 proteins: bringing new definitions to scaffolding. Oncogene 20, 6331–6338. (doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204777) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Aitken A. 2002. Functional specificity in 14-3-3 isoform interactions through dimer formation and phosphorylation: chromosome location of mammalian isoforms and variants. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 993–1010. (doi:10.1023/A:1021261931561) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Aitken A, Baxter H, Dubois T, Clokie S, Mackie S, Mitchell K, Peden A, Zemlickova E. 2002. Specificity of 14-3-3 isoform dimer interactions and phosphorylation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 30, 351–360. (doi:10.1042/BST0300351) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sluchanko NN, Gusev NB. 2010. 14-3-3 proteins and regulation of cytoskeleton. Biochemistry 75, 1528–1546. (doi:10.1134/S0006297910130031) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tallada VA, Daga RR, Palomeque C, Garzon A, Jimenez J. 2002. Genome-wide search of Schizosaccharomyces pombe genes causing overexpression-mediated cell cycle defects. Yeast 19, 1139–1151. (doi:10.1002/yea.902) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zeng Y, Piwnica-Worms H. 1999. DNA damage and replication checkpoints in fission yeast require nuclear exclusion of the Cdc25 phosphatase via 14-3-3 binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7410–7419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Davare MA, Saneyoshi T, Guire ES, Nygaard SC, Soderling TR. 2004. Inhibition of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase by protein 14-3-3. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 52 191–52 199. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M409873200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.van Hemert MJ, Steensma HY, van Heusden GP. 2001. 14-3-3 proteins: key regulators of cell division, signalling and apoptosis. Bioessays 23, 936–946. (doi:10.1002/bies.1134) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.van Heusden GP, Steensma HY. 2006. Yeast 14-3-3 proteins. Yeast 23, 159–171. (doi:10.1002/yea.1338) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang LY, Shiozaki K. 2006. The fission yeast stress MAPK cascade regulates the pmp3+ gene that encodes a highly conserved plasma membrane protein. FEBS Lett. 580, 2409–2413. (doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.065) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wang Y, Jacobs C, Hook KE, Duan H, Booher RN, Sun Y. 2000. Binding of 14-3-3beta to the carboxyl terminus of Wee1 increases Wee1 stability, kinase activity, and G2-M cell population. Cell Growth Differ. 11, 211–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Martinez JS, Jeong DE, Choi E, Billings BM, Hall MC. 2006. Acm1 is a negative regulator of the CDH1-dependent anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 9162–9176. (doi:10.1128/MCB.00603-06) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Dial JM, Petrotchenko EV, Borchers CH. 2007. Inhibition of APCCdh1 activity by Cdh1/Acm1/Bmh1 ternary complex formation. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 5237–5248. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M606589200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Meth. Enzymol. 194, 795–823. (doi:10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-L) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Maundrell K. 1993. Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123, 127–130. (doi:10.1016/0378-1119(93)90551-D) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Taricani L, Tejada ML, Young PG. 2002. The fission yeast ES2 homologue, Bis1, interacts with the Ish1 stress-responsive nuclear envelope protein. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 10 562–10 572. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M110686200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Chua G, Taricani L, Stangle W, Young PG. 2000. Insertional mutagenesis based on illegitimate recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, e53 (doi:10.1093/nar/28.11.e53) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bahler J, Nurse P. 2001. Fission yeast Pom1p kinase activity is cell cycle regulated and essential for cellular symmetry during growth and division. EMBO J. 20, 1064–1073. (doi:10.1093/emboj/20.5.1064) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Taricani L, Feilotter HE, Weaver C, Young PG. 2001. Expression of hsp16 in response to nucleotide depletion is regulated via the spc1 MAPK pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3030–3040. (doi:10.1093/nar/29.14.3030) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Gardner RG, Nelson ZW, Gottschling DE. 2005. Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120, 803–815. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hakki M, Geballe AP. 2005. Double-stranded RNA binding by human cytomegalovirus pTRS1. J. Virol. 79, 7311–7318. (doi:10.1128/JVI.79.12.7311-7318.2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]