Abstract
Small molecule multi-targeted CDK inhibitors (CDKIs) are of particular interest due to their potent antitumor activity independent of p53 gene alterations. P53 deletion is associated with a very poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM). In this regard, we tested the anti-MM activity of RGB-286638, an indenopyrazole-derived CDKI with Ki-nanomolar activity against transcriptional CDKs. We examined RGB-286638’s mode-of-action in MM cell lines with wild type (wt)-p53 and those expressing mutant p53. RGB-286638 treatment resulted in MM cytotoxicity in vitro associated with inhibition of MM tumor growth and prolonged survival in vivo. RGB-286638 displayed caspase-dependent apoptosis in both wt-p53 and mutant-p53 cells that was closely associated with the downregulation of RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and inhibition of transcription. RGB-286638-triggered p53 accumulation via nucleolar stress and loss of Mdm2, accompanied by induction of p53 DNA binding activity. Additionally, RGB-286638 mediated p53-independent activity, which was confirmed by cytotoxicity in p53-knockdown and p53-mutant cells. We also demonstrated downregulation of oncogenic miR-19, miR-92a-1, and miR-21. Our data provide the rationale for the development of transcriptional CDK inhibitors as therapeutic agents, which activate p53 in competent cells, while circumventing p53 deficiency through alternative p53-independent cell death mechanisms in p53-mutant/deleted cells.
Keywords: myeloma, p53, transcription, CDKs, apoptosis
INTRODUCTION
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are a family of protein kinases that, upon activation by their regulatory cyclin partners, coordinate two main cellular processes which are indispensable for the malignant cell phenotype: cell cycle and transcription1. CDK 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 are key regulators of cell cycle progression2. CDKs 4 and 6, complexed with cyclin D, initiate G1 phase-specific transcription by phosphorylating the Rb protein, while CDK2/cyclin A promotes DNA replication during S phase, and CDK1/cyclin B regulates mitosis. CDK 1, 2, 7, 8, 9 and 11 share important functions in mRNA transcription, and have all been implicated in the phosphorylation of the Ser residues at positions 2 (S2) and 5 (S5) of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) subunit essential to RNAPII transcriptional activity3. Unlike other CDKs, CDK9 appears to function exclusively on transcriptional regulation, phosphorylates both RNAPII S2 and S5, and is critical for transcription elongation of most protein coding genes, including key developmental and stimulus-responsive genes 4.
The rationale for targeting cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and/or cyclins in multiple myeloma (MM) originated from comprehensive cytogenetic studies suggesting that dysregulated and/or increased expression of cyclin D1, D2, or D3 occurs as an early, unifying event in MM pathogenesis, predisposing MM cells to proliferative stimuli5–7. In MM, specific inhibition of CDK4/6 by PD 0332991 has demonstrated only growth arrest8. Effective MM cytotoxicity was best achieved when multiple CDKs were inhibited concurrently, as with multi-targeted CDK inhibitors such as Seliciclib9, UCN-01, P276-0010, and AT751911. In addition to their effect against cell cycle specific cyclins and CDKs, these drugs target transcriptional CDKs, thereby resulting in inhibition/inactivation of RNAPII.
The primary events of RNAPII inactivation in cells are induction of p53 and decreased expression of a number of highly expressed anti-apoptotic proteins with a short half life such as Mcl-1, survivin, and XIAP12–14. This may result in both p53-dependent and -independent apoptosis. In MM, p53 deletion has been reported in 10% of newly diagnosed MM tumors, whereas the prevalence is much higher in advanced and extra-medullary tumors, and associates with a very poor prognosis15, 16. Hence, CDKIs with activity against transcriptional CDKs, which activate p53 in competent cells, while circumventing p53 deficiency through alternative p53-independent cell death mechanisms in p53-mutant/deleted cells, are particularly appealing for the treatment of MM.
We examined the anti-MM activity of RGB-286638, a novel compound of the indenopyrazole family of CDKIs with potent cellular activity against transcriptional-type CDKs in MM cells. RGB-286638 mediated RNAPII inhibition, induced p53 accumulation, and triggered cytotoxicity in both wild type (wt)- and mutated-p53 MM cell lines, prompting us to examine RGB-286638’s mechanism of action in MM cells expressing wt-p53 versus p53 deficient cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Culture
Dex-sensitive (MM.1S) and -resistant (MM.1R) cells were provided by Dr. Steven Rosen (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA); H929, RPMI8226, and U266 were obtained from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA); OPM1 plasma cell leukemia cells were provided by Dr. E. Thompson (University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA). All MM cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100g/mL streptomycin. Patient MM primary tumor cells were obtained from bone marrow (BM) aspirates in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and with the approval of the IRB of Massachusetts General Hospital. BM mononuclear cells were separated using Ficoll-Hipaque density sedimentation, and plasma cells were purified by positive selection with anti-CD138 magnetic activated cell separation microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA, USA). BM stroma cells (BMSCs) were generated from BM specimens from MM patients as described previously17. Blood samples collected from healthy volunteers were processed by Ficoll-Hipaque gradient to obtain peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
RGB-286638
Was obtained from Agennix USA Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA. For the in vitro experiments the drug was provided in 20mg/ml aqueous solution.
5,6-Dichloro-1—D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB)
DRB was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cell Viability Assay
Colorimetric assays were performed to assay drug activity at increasing concentrations of RGB-286638. Cells from 24- or 48-h cultures were pulsed with 10μL of 5mg/mL 3- (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) -2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide (MTT; Chemicon International Inc, Temecula, CA, USA) to each well, followed by incubation at 37°C for 4h, and addition of 100 μL isopropanol containing 0.04 HCl. Absorbance readings at a wavelength of 570nm (with correction using readings at 630nm) were taken on a spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicates.
Western Blotting
MM cells were treated with RGB-286638 and harvested; whole cell lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), as described previously10. Immunoblotting was performed using specific antibodies: anti-phosphorylated (p)-RNAPII S2, -p-RNAPII S5 and -RNAPII (8WG16) (Covance); anti-p-Rb S807/811, -p-Rb S780, -p-GSK3 α/β S21/9, -GSK3 β, -p-STAT3 S727, -STAT3, -p-GS S641, -p-TAK1 T184/187, -p-c-FMS T809, -p-p53 S15, -CDK1, -CDK4, -Cyclin D1, -CDK6, -Cyclin D3, -CDK2, -XIAP, -cleaved caspase 8, 9, and 3, -PARP (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA); as well as anti-p-ERK1/2, -Cyclin B1, -Cyclin E, -Cyclin A, -Mcl-1, -p53 (DO-1), -Mdm2 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Blots were re-probed with the anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotech), anti-tubulin, or -GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies for equal protein controls.
Cell Cycle Analysis
MM.1S cells (1 × 106) cultured in media alone, or with 50nM RGB-286638, were washed with ice-cold PBS, fixed with 100% ethanol for 1h at 4°C, and pretreated with RNase DNase free (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, USA) for 30min at 37°C. Cells were stained with PI (5g/mL; Sigma Chemical), and cell cycle profile was determined using the BD Diva software on BD LFR2 flow cytometer (San Jose, CA, USA). Analysis of the data was done using ModFit cell cycle analysis program.
Detection of Apoptosis
Apoptosis detection was performed with the annexin V-PI detection kit (Immunotech/Beckman Coulter). MM.1S cells (1 × 106) were exposed for 12–24h to RGB-286638 (50nM). Cells were then incubated with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15min. Annexin V+PI+ positive apoptotic cells were enumerated using BD LFR2 flow cytometer (San Jose, CA, USA).
MM Xenograft Murine Model
The in vivo anti-MM activity of RGB-286638 was evaluated in a previously established MM xenograft model10. RGB-286638 dosing solutions of 2 and 3 mg/ml in 5% dextrose/water (D5W) pH5.2, as well as D5W pH5.2 for vehicle control dosing group, were prepared and provided by Agennix AG. CB-17 severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA) were monitored in the Animal Research Facility at DFCI, and subjected to studies approved by the Animal Ethics Committee. Forty male 5–6 week old mice were irradiated (2 Gy [200 rad]) using cesium 137 (137Cs)-irradiator source); 24h after irradiation, 2.5 × 106 MM.1S cells were inoculated subcutaneously in the upper back. When tumor weight was approximately 100mg, mice were randomly assigned into 3 cohorts receiving daily IV tail vein injections for 5 consecutive days with either RGB-286638 30mg/kg (8 mice), 40mg/kg (9 mice), or control vehicle alone (10 mice). Animals were monitored for body weight and tumor volume by caliper measurements every alternate day. Tumor volume was estimated using the following formula: . Animals were euthanized in accordance with DFCI Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines by CO2 inhalation in the event of tumor size > 2cm or due to tumor ulceration. Survival was evaluated from the first day of treatment until death. Tumor growth was evaluated using caliper measurements from the first day of treatment until day of first sacrifice. Percentage tumor growth inhibition (TGI) was calculated as TGI on day X = 100 − T/C% on day X. Log10 cell kill was calculated by the formula .
RNA Synthesis Assay
Synthesis of RNA was evaluated by measuring the incorporation of [5′-3H]uridine (5μCi/ml) (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) into MM.1S, U266, OPM1 and RPMI cells, as described previously11. MM cells (2–3 × 103 cells/well) were incubated in 96-well culture plates alone or with BMSCs, with varying concentrations of RGB-286638 for 8 or 24 h at 37°C. [5′-3H]uridine was added (1 mCi (37 KBq) per well) prior to harvesting with the automatic cell harvester (Cambridge Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA), then counted using the LKB Betaplate scintillation counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). [5′-3H]uridine assays were performed in triplicate.
DNA Synthesis Assay
DNA synthesis was measured by tritiated thymidine uptake [3H-TdR] (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA) as previously described10, 18. MM.1S cells (2–3 × 103 cells/well) were incubated alone or with BMSCs in 96-well culture plates with varying concentrations of RGB-286638 for 24-, or 48-h at 37°C. Cells were pulsed with [3H-TdR] (0.5 mCi per well) during the last 8h of the end time point, harvested with an automatic cell harvester (Cambridge Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA), and counted by using the LKB Betaplate scintillation counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicates.
RNA Extraction
For miRNA expression profiling, MM.1S cells alone or in co-culture with BMSCs were incubated for 8h in control media or RGB-286638 (50nM). Similarly, MM.1S, OPM1, U266 and RPMI cells were cultured 8h in media alone or 50nM RGB-286638 for miRNA Specific Assays. Total RNA was extracted from MM cell pellets using mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Inc), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
miRNA Expression Profiling Using Human TaqMan Low Density Array Cards
miRNA expression profiling was performed on MM.1S cells cultured for 8h in control media or 50nM RGB-286638, with or without BMSCs. TaqMan® Low-Density Array (TLDA) using human miRNA version 2.0A and version 3.0B cards (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was applied to examine the global change in miRNA expression levels in MM.1S cells when co-cultured with BMSCs, with or without RGB-286638 treatment. A total of 756 mature miRNA updated in the Sanger miRBase v.15.0 were quantified, as previously described 19, 20. miRNAs with Ct values higher than 35 were excluded from the analysis. Normalization was carried out with the mean of RNU44 and RNU48. Relative quantification (RQ) of miRNA expression was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt Ct method using the ddCt program.
Real-Time PCR Detection and Quantification of Specific miRNA
To evaluate miR-19, miR-92a-1, and miR-21 expression in p53-wt MM.1S along with p53-mutated U266, RPMI, OPM1 cells with or without 8h RGB-286638 (50nM) treatment, we used target-specific TaqMan® MicroRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate relative changes in miRNA expression. The results were normalized to levels of miRNA endogenous control (RNU48-001006).
Nucleolar Segregation Analysis
Was performed using The Total Nuclear-ID™ Red/Green Nucleolar/Nuclear Detection Kit (Enzo Life Sciences International, Inc; Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA). Pre-treated with RGB-286638 (50nM) for 3h, MM.1S cells were then incubated with 100μL Dual Detection Reagent for 30 min at 37°C. Live stained cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy (60X magnification), using a standard FITC filter set for imaging the nucleolus, and a standard Texas Red filter set for the counterstained nucleus.
Sequence Specific P53 DNA Binding Assay
Detection of p53 sequence specific DNA binding activity was performed using the p53 Transcription Factor Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacture’s protocol. Nuclear proteins were isolated from MM.1S cells treated with 50nM RGB-286638 for 1, 4, and 8 h, using Nuclear Extraction Kit (Affymetrix Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Nuclear protein aliquots were added to the 96-well plate coated with specific double-stranded DNA sequence containing the p53 response element for overnight incubation. p53 in the nuclear extract was detected by addition of a specific primary antibody directed against p53. A secondary antibody conjugated to HRP was added to provide a sensitive colorimetric readout at 450 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicates.
NAD+/NADH Assay
NAD+/NADH quantification assay (BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA) was performed in MM.1S cultured with RGB-286638 (50nM). A total of 5 × 105 cells were used for the NAD+/NADH extraction. Duplicates of extracted samples (50μL) were transferred into a 96-well plate and incubated at RT for 5min with 100μL of NAD Cycling Mix, to allow the conversion of NAD+ to NADH. Extracted solution (200μL) from each sample was heated at 60°C for 30min for NAD+ decomposition. Duplicates of each NADH sample (50μL) were transferred to a 96-well plate, 10μL/well NADH developing solution was added; after 40min in the dark, the plate was read at 450nm wavelength on a microplate reader. The ratio of NAD+/NADH was calculated as follows: (NADt − NADH)/NADH.
Lentivirus-Mediated Knockdown of p53
Lentiviral particles expressing shRNA against human TP53 gene (clone name NM_000546.x-941s1c, targeted sequence CACCATCCACTACAACTACAT) were obtained from the Broad Institute (MIT, Boston, MA, USA) and transduced according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, supernatants containing shTP53 or empty vector lentiviral particles were added to exponentially growing MM.1S in media containing polybrene (8μg/ml). Fresh medium was supplemented at 24h after infection. The infectivity was determined after 72h by comparing the differential sensitivity to puromycin (2μg/ml) treatment between parental and transduced cells, as assessed by MTT assay.
RESULTS
RGB-286638 Demonstrated Potent Activity against Transcriptional CDKs in MM Cell Lines and Inhibited Myeloma Cell Growth in Vitro
To assess RGB-286638’s potential anti-MM activity, we first investigated the in vitro effects of RGB-286638 treatment in MM cell lines and primary tumor cells from MM patients. RGB-286638 is a novel compound of the indenopyrazole family of CDK inhibitors (Fig. 1A) that inhibited the kinase activity of cyclin T1-CDK9, cyclin B1-CDK1, cyclin E-CDK2, cyclin D1-CDK4, cyclin E-CDK3, and p35-CDK5 (IC50, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 nM, respectively), and was less potent against cyclin H-CDK7 and cyclin D3-CDK6, as demonstrated by in vitro kinase profiling21. Additionally, RGB-286638 inhibited several tyrosine and serine/threonine non-CDK enzymes, i.e. GSK-3β, TAK1, AMPK, Jak2, MEK1 (Table 1). We investigated the dose- and time-dependent effect of treatment with RGB-286638 (12.5–100nM) on the growth of human p53-wt (MM.1S, MM.1R, and H929) and p53-mutant (U266, OPM1, and RPMI) MM cells by MTT assay, assessing viability at 24 and 48 hours. The half-maximally effective concentrations (EC50) ranged between 20 and 70 nM at 48 hours. Dose-dependent differences in growth among p53-wt and -mutant cells were observed after 50nM treatment, with p53-wt MM.1S, MM.1R and H929 being slightly more sensitive to RGB-286638 treatment at 48h (Fig. 1B). Moreover, RGB-286638 demonstrated equimolar (50nM) activity in freshly isolated tumor cells from MM patients, while manifesting less cytotoxicity in healthy donor PBMCs (Suppl. Fig. S1). Next, we examined RGB-286638 (50nM) activity against transcriptional CDK7/9 and cell cycle-related CDK4/6 in MM cells based on phosphorylation of their RNAPII S2/S5 and Rb S780/S807/811 substrates, respectively. Using time- and dose-dependent (0–8h; 25–100nM) immunoblot analysis, we found that treatment with RGB-286638 resulted in rapid downregulation of p-RNAPII S2/S5 across all tested MM cell lines. RGB-286638 (50nM) reduced the phosphorylation of Rb at S807/811 in MM.1S and MM.1R cells, but had no effects on p-Rb S780.
Table 1. RGB-286638 Kinase Profiling.
CDKs | IC50 (nm) | non-CDKs | IC50 (nm) |
---|---|---|---|
K9/T1 | 1 | Fms | 1 |
K1/B1 | 2 | GSK-3β | 3 |
K2/E | 3 | TAK1 | 5 |
K4/D1 | 4 | JNK1a1/2 | 17/40 |
K3/E | 5 | C-src | 25 |
K5/p35 | 5 | AMPK | 41 |
K7/H | 44 | Jak2 | 50 |
K6/D3 | 55 | MEK1 | 54 |
Note: RGB-286638 multi-targeted kinase activity as measured by in vitro cell-free kinase assays.
Table 1 contains the IC50 kinase inhibition Ki (nM) of individual CDKs and selected tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases (determined in biochemical kinase assays).
We next evaluated the effects of RGB-286638 treatment on the activity of selective non-CDK enzymes (Suppl Fig. S2). Immunoblot analysis of MM cell lines treated with 50nM RGB-286638 revealed increased phosphorylation of the α subunit of GSK3 at Ser21, but decreased phosphorylation of β subunit at Ser9 (Fig. S2-A). Phosphorylated GS at S641, a downstream target of GSK3β, remained unchanged at 4–8h in all cell lines except U266, where it was decreased (Fig. S2-B). Next, 50nM RGB-286638 did not affect the phosphorylation of T184/187 residues in the activation loop of TAK1; c-FMS T809 phosphorylation was slightly reduced in MM.1R and OPM1 cells (Suppl. Fig. S2-C). We also evaluated RGB-286638 effects on JAK2 and MAPK signaling by examining p-STAT3 S727 and p-ERK1/2 in cells exposed to increasing concentrations of RGB-286638 for 4h (Fig. S2-A). RGB-286638 treatment did not affect STAT3 S727. Moreover, short exposure to RGB-286638 resulted in upregulated p-ERK1/2 in MM.1R, H929, and U266 cells.
RGB-286638-Induced Apoptosis in Vitro Translated to Anti-MM Activity in Vivo
We next examined the molecular mechanisms underlying RGB-286638-mediated cytotoxicity in p53-wt (MM.1S) and p53-mutant (U266) cells, specifically examining the effects on cell cycle related proteins, and apoptosis. Time-course immunoblot analysis revealed that 50nM RGB-286638 treatment decreased cyclins (A, B1, D1, and D3), CDK1, and CDK4 expression in MM.1S cells, and reduced cyclin A and D1 levels slightly in U266 cells within 8h (Fig. 2A). As expected, 50nM RGB-286638 reduced the expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and XIAP. Caspase-8, -9, -3 and PARP cleavage occurred within 4h in both MM.1S and U266 cell lines (Fig. 2B). DNA cell cycle analysis of MM.1S cells treated with RGB-286638 (50nM) revealed G1 and G2/M cell cycle arrest at 12h, followed by sub-G1 fraction at 24h (Fig. 2C). Apoptosis was confirmed by Annexin/PI staining, which demonstrated increased apoptotic MM cells, 25% and 45% at 12 and 24 hours, respectively (Fig. 2D). This in vitro RGB-286638-induced MM cytotoxicity translated into effective in vivo anti-MM activity in SCID mice xenografted MM.1S cells (Fig. 2E). Dose-finding studies (data not shown) with RGB-286638 identified 40mg/kg/day IV treatment as the maximum tolerated dose in SCID mice. Five days IV treatment with RGB-286638 significantly suppressed MM tumor growth, with maximum TGI (%) noted at day 14 following end of treatment at 85.06% and 86.34% in the 30 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg treated cohorts respectively. The log10 cell kill (LCK Td: 4.5 days) was 1.6 for both treated groups. RGB-286638 treatment was also associated with improved survival, evidenced by first death at day 24 in controls versus day 43 in both treated groups (Fig. 2E lower panel). No toxic deaths occurred during this study: maximum percentage of body weight (BW) loss was observed on day 5 (8.4%) at 30mg/kg dosage schedule, and on day 15 (9.9%) after 40 mg/kg dosing, with weight recovery in the following two weeks.
RGB-286638 Inhibited Transcription
We next investigated effects of RGB-286638 on transcription in MM.1S cells. Since RGB-286638 (50–100nM) reduced RNAPII phosphorylation by 2h (Fig. 3A), and since phosphorylation of the CTD of RNAPII by CDK9/cyclin T is required for transcriptional elongation 22, 23, we assessed the rate of RNA synthesis. Two hours of RGB-286638 (50nM or 100nM) treatment reduced RNA synthesis by 50% (Fig. 3A). Since the BM microenvironment induces transcription and proliferation in MM cells24, 25, we next examined the effect of treatment on the rate of RNA and DNA synthesis in MM.1S cells, alone or cultured with patient-derived BMSCs. Using RNA synthesis assay, we found that RGB-286638 reduced the total level of transcripts in BMSCs-stimulated MM.1S cells by ~50% at 8h, and ultimately blocked transcription at 24h (Fig. 3B), associated with marked (60%) reduction in DNA synthesis at 8h and complete block of MM.1S proliferation at 24h (Fig. 3C).
RGB-286638 Triggered Stabilization and Activation of p53
Since RGB-286638 inhibited transcription, and since transcriptional inhibitors can induce p53 accumulation via reduction in Mdm2 expression, we next examined effects of RGB-286638 on p53 and Mdm2 expression in MM cells. Time-course western blot analysis of p53-wt (MM.1S, MM.1R, H929) and p53-mutated (U266, OPM1, RPMI) MM cells treated with 50nM RGB-286638 showed decreased Mdm2 expression in all cell lines, associated with upregulated p-p53 S15 and p53 levels in p53-wt, but not in p53-mutated, cell lines (Fig. 4A). We next compared the effects of RGB-286638 to the previously described transcription inhibitor DRB on p53 and Mdm2 expression. Similar to RGB-286638, DRB (2h) significantly inhibited RNA synthesis in MM.1S cells (Suppl. Fig. S3). Western blot studies of MM.1S treated with increasing concentrations of RGB-286638 or DRB for 2h triggered p53 accumulation without affecting Mdm2 levels at doses that inhibited RNAPII phosphorylation and reduced transcription (Fig. 4B).
Previous studies linked nucleolar stress and transcriptional arrest to p53 accumulation. Specifically, transcriptional arrest due to RNA polymerase dephosphorylation triggers nucleolar reorganization and nucleolar segregation26. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that the nucleoli (green staining) of cells exposed to 3h RGB-286638 treatment formed numerous speckles of fluorescence spread all over the nucleus (red staining) suggesting nucleolar segregation (Fig. 4C). Re-localization of nucleolar compartments during segregation is an energy-dependent repositioning process27. We therefore investigated whether RGB-286638 treatment affected the status of nicotinamide nucleotides (NAD/NADH), markers of energy transforming processes. By NADt/NADH quantification assay RGB-286638 treatment resulted in 30% NADt/50% NADH depletion (Suppl. Fig. S4). Western blot analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from RGB-286638-treated MM.1S cells showed accumulation of p-p53 S15 and total p53 predominantly in the nuclear compartment (Fig. 4D).
We next examined whether p53 stabilization associated with p53 activation in RGB-286638-treated MM.1S cells. Increased p53 transcriptional activity via enhanced sequence specific DNA binding is essential to p53-dependent apoptosis28. P53 sequence specific DNA binding assay evidenced increased p53 DNA binding and transcriptional activation following 4h treatment with 50nM RGB-286638 in MM.1S cells (Fig. 4E). We confirmed this finding in p53-wt MM.1R cells as well (data not shown).
RGB-286638 Mediated p53-Independent Apoptosis in MM Cells
We next tested whether RGB-286638-induced cell death was independent of p53 pathway activation. Knockdown of p53 by p53-targeting shRNA lentiviral constructs rescued 14% cells from RGB-286638-induced cell death (Fig. 5A). No significant effect on p-RNAPII was observed, suggesting that RNAPII activity was independent of p53 status. P53-independent RGB-286638 activity was further validated by its cytotoxic effects in p53-mutated U266, OPM1, and RPMI MM cell lines. As measured by [5′-3H]uridine incorporation, 2h exposure to increasing doses of RGB-286638 reduced RNA synthesis in p53-mutated MM cell lines, with significant inhibition at 24h (Fig. 5B). As expected, western blot studies of p53-mutated U266, OPM1 and RPMI cells showed that RGB-286638 treatment consistently reduced Mcl-1 levels, which preceded PARP cleavage (Fig. 5C).
RGB-286638 Modulated miRNA Expression
RNAPII is a key regulator of miRNA synthesis, and RGB-286638 treatment resulted in early and potent inhibition of RNAPII activity. Moreover, recent studies suggest a strong correlation between dysregulated miRNA and high-risk myeloma29, 30. We therefore next examined the effect of the BMSC-MM cell interaction on miRNA. We performed TLDA-based miRNA expression profiling in MM.1S cells cultured for 8h with or without BMSCs, in the presence or absence of 50 nM RGB-286638. Our data demonstrated that RGB-286638 treatment modulated BMSCs-induced miRNA expression (Suppl Fig. S5). Among microarrays identified with significant RQ values, we selected miR-21-3p and miR-19a-5p, which have been associated with tumorigenesis in MM31–33. Both were decreased in MM.1S cells in culture with BMSCs after RGB-286638 treatment as confirmed by miR-21-3p and miR-19a-5p TaqMan Specific miRNA Assays (Fig. 6A).
We next tested the levels of miR-21 and two members of the oncogenic cluster miR-17-92 (miR-19a and miR-92a-1) in p53-mutated MM cells after RGB-286638 treatment. We assayed U266, OPM1, and RPMI cells exposed to RGB-286638 treatment (50nM for 8h) using the TaqMan Specific microRNA assay for miR-21-3p, miR-19a-5p, and miR-92a-1-5p. RGB-286638 treatment significantly reduced miR-21-3p, miR-19a-5p, and miR-92a-1-5p levels in U266 and OPM1 cells (Fig. 6B).
DISCUSSION
It is widely accepted that the diverse effects of CDK inhibitors are due to their activity against multiple CDKs involved in both cell cycle and transcription regulation. Although most clinically evaluated CDK inhibitors target several CDKs, it has been proposed that the induction of apoptosis arises primarily due to inhibition of transcriptional-type CDKs34. Inhibition of transcriptional CDKs, in particular CDK9, leads to the downregulation of transcriptionally inducible genes with short half-lives, including cell cycle regulators and anti-apoptotic factors35.
Our study found CDK9 to be among the primary targets of RGB-286638 mediating its pro-apoptotic activity in MM cells. In vitro kinase assays showed that RGB-286638 is a potent inhibitor of CDK 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9; as well as 44- and 55-fold less active against CDK 7 and 6, respectively. Kinase profiling of RGB-286638 identified additional inhibition of distinct serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinases, predicting modulation of GSK3, STAT3 and MAPK signaling. In MM cells, however, RGB-286638 demonstrated preferential inhibition of CDK9 over other targets. The IC50 of RGB-286638 inhibited MM cell proliferation (50–100 nM) and dephosphorylated RNAPII S2/S5, but did not STAT3 modulate phosphorylation of Rb, and ERK1/2 proteins. We noted that p-Rb S780 site, which is phosphorylated by several kinases including cyclin D-dependent kinases, was not affected by RGB-286638 treatment. Importantly, S807/811 phosphorylation of Rb was targeted by RGB-286638 in MM.1S and MM.1R cells. Recent evidence suggests that physical interaction between CDK9 and Rb is associated with CDK9-mediated phosphorylation of Rb on its C-terminus793–928 36; therefore, RGB-286638-mediated inhibition of p-Rb S807/811 may be triggered by inhibition of CDK9 activity. These findings, together with RGB-286638-induced transcriptional arrest and caspase-dependent apoptosis in MM cell lines, suggest that inhibition of transcriptional CDK, in particular CDK9, is the primary mechanism of action of RGB-286638 in MM cells.
Inhibition of RNAPII-mediated transcription was among the early cellular responses that we detected after RGB-286638 treatment. The blockade of RNA synthesis has been proposed to be an inducer of p53 accumulation12. In our study, RGB-286638 treatment increased p53 levels in MM cells in a manner similar to the transcriptional inhibitor DRB. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of inhibited RNAPII and blocked transcription leading to p53 protein stabilization remain unclear. An important trigger seems to be the reduction in Mdm2 mRNA and protein levels37. Normally, p53 expression is kept low mainly by interactions with its major regulator Mdm2, which serves as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for p53 and targets p53 for degradation via the 26S proteasome. Hence, depletion of Mdm2 inevitably leads to p53 stabilization and accumulation. We, however, found that RGB-286638-mediated RNAPII inhibition was associated with increased p53 expression before Mdm2 was downregulated, consistent with studies showing that blockade of transcription can induce nuclear accumulation of p53 without downregulation of Mdm2 levels38. Specifically, nucleolar fragmentation significantly reduces the levels of 45S precursor ribosomal RNA, leading to increased cellular levels of free ribosomal proteins, some of which (RPL5, RPL11, and RPL23) then bind to the central regulatory domain of Mdm2 protein and inhibit Mdm2-mediated p53 degradation39–41. Taken together with our findings that RGB-286638 treatment induced nucleolar fragmentation, we suggest that nucleolar stress and depletion of Mdm2, both mediated through transcriptional arrest, may contribute to p53 induction in MM cells.
The role of p53 induction in the apoptotic response to CDK inhibitors is controversial. In our study, RGB-286638-induced p53 nuclear accumulation associated with increased p53 DNA binding activity. Increased p53 transcriptional activity via enhanced sequence specific DNA binding is essential to p53-dependent apoptosis28. In fact, p53 knockdown rescued 14% cells from RGB-286638-mediated cell death, suggesting p53 played a role in RGB-286638 cytotoxicity. That may in part explain the observed differential response to RGB-286638 between p53-wt and p53-mutant cell lines.
Additionally, RGB-286638 displayed p53-independent cytotoxicity and caspase-dependent apoptosis induction in p53-mutant cells were closely associated with downregulation of RNAPII phosphorylation and inhibition of transcription. RNAPII’s control over miRNA transcription, together with recent findings that miR-19, miR-92a-1, and miR-21 miRNAs play a role in MM tumorigenesis, prompted us to examine effects of RGB-286638 on expression of these miRNAs. Our data shows downregulation of oncogenic miR-19, miR-92a-1, and miR-21 associated with reduced expression of Mcl-1 following RNAPII transcriptional arrest in U266 and OPM1 p53-mutant cells, suggesting a contributory effect to p53-independent MM cytotoxicity.
In conclusion, our data provide the rationale for the development of transcriptional CDK inhibitors as anti-MM agents that activate p53 in competent cells, while circumventing p53 deficiency through alternative p53-independent cell death mechanisms in p53-mutant/deleted cells.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Grant Support: CDA SPORE
NIH/NCI Grant# P50 CA100707
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Hannes Loferer is the Agennix AG employee. Other authors have no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose.
RGB-286638 compound was provided by Agennix USA Inc.
Supplementary information is available at Leukemia’s website http://www.nature.com/leu/index.html.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- 1.Malumbres M, Harlow E, Hunt T, Hunter T, Lahti JM, Manning G, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases: a family portrait. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(11):1275–6. doi: 10.1038/ncb1109-1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nature reviews Cancer. 2009;9(3):153–66. doi: 10.1038/nrc2602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pinhero R, Liaw P, Bertens K, Yankulov K. Three cyclin-dependent kinases preferentially phosphorylate different parts of the C-terminal domain of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II. European journal of biochemistry/FEBS. 2004;271(5):1004–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Romano G, Giordano A. Role of the cyclin-dependent kinase 9-related pathway in mammalian gene expression and human diseases. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex. 2008;7(23):3664–8. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.23.7122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM. Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(26):6333–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Canavese M, Santo L, Raje N. Cyclin dependent kinases in cancer: potential for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012;13(7):451–7. doi: 10.4161/cbt.19589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kramer A, Schultheis B, Bergmann J, Willer A, Hegenbart U, Ho AD, et al. Alterations of the cyclin D1/pRb/p16(INK4A) pathway in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2002;16(9):1844–51. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baughn LB, Di Liberto M, Wu K, Toogood PL, Louie T, Gottschalk R, et al. A novel orally active small molecule potently induces G1 arrest in primary myeloma cells and prevents tumor growth by specific inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6. Cancer research. 2006;66(15):7661–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raje N, Kumar S, Hideshima T, Roccaro A, Ishitsuka K, Yasui H, et al. Seliciclib (CYC202 or R-roscovitine), a small-molecule cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, mediates activity via down-regulation of Mcl-1 in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005;106(3):1042–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raje N, Hideshima T, Mukherjee S, Raab M, Vallet S, Chhetri S, et al. Preclinical activity of P276-00, a novel small-molecule cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23(5):961–70. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Santo L, Vallet S, Hideshima T, Cirstea D, Ikeda H, Pozzi S, et al. AT7519, A novel small molecule multi-cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma via GSK-3beta activation and RNA polymerase II inhibition. Oncogene. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ljungman M, Zhang F, Chen F, Rainbow AJ, McKay BC. Inhibition of RNA polymerase II as a trigger for the p53 response. Oncogene. 1999;18(3):583–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang S, Griffiths G, Midgley CA, Barnett AL, Cooper M, Grabarek J, et al. Discovery and characterization of 2-anilino-4- (thiazol-5-yl)pyrimidine transcriptional CDK inhibitors as anticancer agents. Chem Biol. 2010;17 (10):1111–21. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blagosklonny MV, Demidenko ZN, Fojo T. Inhibition of transcription results in accumulation of Wt p53 followed by delayed outburst of p53-inducible proteins: p53 as a sensor of transcriptional integrity. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex. 2002;1(1):67–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, Charbonnel C, Garban F, Hulin C, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood. 2007;109(8):3489–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jakubowiak AJ, Siegel DS, Martin T, Wang M, Vij R, Lonial S, et al. Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics receiving single-agent carfilzomib in the PX-171-003-A1 study. Leukemia. 2013 doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tai YT, Teoh G, Shima Y, Chauhan D, Treon SP, Raje N, et al. Isolation and characterization of human multiple myeloma cell enriched populations. Journal of immunological methods. 2000;235(1–2):11–9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(99)00199-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scullen T, Santo L, Vallet S, Fulciniti M, Eda H, Cirstea D, et al. Lenalidomide in combination with an activin A-neutralizing antibody: preclinical rationale for a novel anti-myeloma strategy. Leukemia. 2013 doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mestdagh P, Feys T, Bernard N, Guenther S, Chen C, Speleman F, et al. High-throughput stem-loop RT-qPCR miRNA expression profiling using minute amounts of input RNA. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36(21):e143. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen Y, Gelfond JA, McManus LM, Shireman PK. Reproducibility of quantitative RT-PCR array in miRNA expression profiling and comparison with microarray analysis. BMC genomics. 2009;10:407. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Bruijn P, Moghaddam-Helmantel IM, de Jonge MJ, Meyer T, Lam MH, Verweij J, et al. Validated bioanalytical method for the quantification of RGB-286638, a novel multi-targeted protein kinase inhibitor, in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography/tandem triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2009;50(5):977–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Palancade B, Bensaude O. Investigating RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) phosphorylation. European journal of biochemistry/FEBS. 2003;270(19):3859–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sims RJ, 3rd, Belotserkovskaya R, Reinberg D. Elongation by RNA polymerase II: the short and long of it. Genes & development. 2004;18 (20):2437–68. doi: 10.1101/gad.1235904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Podar K, Chauhan D, Anderson KC. Bone marrow microenvironment and the identification of new targets for myeloma therapy. Leukemia. 2009;23 (1):10–24. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van de Donk NW, Lokhorst HM, Bloem AC. Growth factors and antiapoptotic signaling pathways in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2005;19 (12):2177–85. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shav-Tal Y, Blechman J, Darzacq X, Montagna C, Dye BT, Patton JG, et al. Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(5):2395–413. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-11-0992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sirri V, Urcuqui-Inchima S, Roussel P, Hernandez-Verdun D. Nucleolus: the fascinating nuclear body. Histochemistry and cell biology. 2008;129(1):13–31. doi: 10.1007/s00418-007-0359-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chao C, Saito S, Kang J, Anderson CW, Appella E, Xu Y. p53 transcriptional activity is essential for p53-dependent apoptosis following DNA damage. The EMBO journal. 2000;19(18):4967–75. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.18.4967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pichiorri F, De Luca L, Aqeilan RI. MicroRNAs: new players in multiple myeloma. Frontiers in Genetics. 2011 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Corthals SL, Sun SM, Kuiper R, de Knegt Y, Broyl A, van der Holt B, et al. MicroRNA signatures characterize multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia. 2011;25(11):1784–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Loffler D, Brocke-Heidrich K, Pfeifer G, Stocsits C, Hackermuller J, Kretzschmar AK, et al. Interleukin-6 dependent survival of multiple myeloma cells involves the Stat3-mediated induction of microRNA-21 through a highly conserved enhancer. Blood. 2007;110(4):1330–3. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-081133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pichiorri F, Suh SS, Ladetto M, Kuehl M, Palumbo T, Drandi D, et al. MicroRNAs regulate critical genes associated with multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(35):12885–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806202105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kluiver J, Kroesen BJ, Poppema S, van den Berg A. The role of microRNAs in normal hematopoiesis and hematopoietic malignancies. Leukemia. 2006;20(11):1931–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Krystof V, Uldrijan S. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors as anticancer drugs. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11(3):291–302. doi: 10.2174/138945010790711950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Krystof V, Baumli S, Furst R. Perspective of cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) as a drug target. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(20):2883–90. doi: 10.2174/138161212800672750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Simone C, Bagella L, Bellan C, Giordano A. Physical interaction between pRb and cdk9/cyclinT2 complex. Oncogene. 2002;21(26):4158–65. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lu W, Chen L, Peng Y, Chen J. Activation of p53 by roscovitine-mediated suppression of MDM2 expression. Oncogene. 2001;20(25):3206–16. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.O’Hagan HM, Ljungman M. Nuclear accumulation of p53 following inhibition of transcription is not due to diminished levels of MDM2. Oncogene. 2004;23(32):5505–12. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dai MS, Lu H. Inhibition of MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation by ribosomal protein L5. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(43):44475–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403722200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang Y, Wolf GW, Bhat K, Jin A, Allio T, Burkhart WA, et al. Ribosomal protein L11 negatively regulates oncoprotein MDM2 and mediates a p53-dependent ribosomal-stress checkpoint pathway. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23(23):8902–12. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.23.8902-8912.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dai MS, Zeng SX, Jin Y, Sun XX, David L, Lu H. Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004;24(17):7654–68. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7654-7668.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.