Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):4509–4512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4509

Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.

F J Corrales 1, A R Fersht 1
PMCID: PMC39569  PMID: 8633099

Abstract

Free GroEL binds denatured proteins very tightly: it retards the folding of barnase 400-fold and catalyzes unfolding fluctuations in native barnase and its folding intermediate. GroEL undergoes an allosteric transition from its tight-binding T-state to a weaker binding R-state on the cooperative binding of nucleotides (ATP/ADP) and GroES. The preformed GroEL.GroES.nucleotide complex retards the folding of barnase by only a factor of 4, and the folding rate is much higher than the ATPase activity that releases GroES from the complex. Binding of GroES and nucleotides to a preformed GroEL.denatured-barnase complex forms an intermediately fast-folding complex. We propose the following mechanism for the molecular chaperone. Denatured proteins bind to the resting GroEL.GroES.nucleotide complex. Fast-folding proteins are ejected as native structures before ATP hydrolysis. Slow-folding proteins enter chaperoning cycles of annealing and folding after the initial ATP hydrolysis. This step causes transient release of GroES and formation of the GroEL.denatured-protein complexes with higher annealing potential. The intermediately fast-folding complex is formed on subsequent rebinding of GroES. The ATPase activity of GroEL.GroES is thus the gatekeeper that selects for initial entry of slow-folding proteins to the chaperone action and then pumps successive transitions from the faster-folding R-states to the tighter-binding/stronger annealing T-states. The molecular chaperone acts as a combination of folding cage and an annealing machine.

Full text

PDF
4511

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bochkareva E. S., Lissin N. M., Flynn G. C., Rothman J. E., Girshovich A. S. Positive cooperativity in the functioning of molecular chaperone GroEL. J Biol Chem. 1992 Apr 5;267(10):6796–6800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braig K., Adams P. D., Brünger A. T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Dec;2(12):1083–1094. doi: 10.1038/nsb1295-1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature. 1994 Oct 13;371(6498):578–586. doi: 10.1038/371578a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burston S. G., Ranson N. A., Clarke A. R. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J Mol Biol. 1995 May 26;249(1):138–152. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chandrasekhar G. N., Tilly K., Woolford C., Hendrix R., Georgopoulos C. Purification and properties of the groES morphogenetic protein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1986 Sep 15;261(26):12414–12419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen S., Roseman A. M., Hunter A. S., Wood S. P., Burston S. G., Ranson N. A., Clarke A. R., Saibil H. R. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 1994 Sep 15;371(6494):261–264. doi: 10.1038/371261a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Corrales F. J., Fersht A. R. The folding of GroEL-bound barnase as a model for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 6;92(12):5326–5330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Creighton T. E. Molecular chaperones. Unfolding protein folding. Nature. 1991 Jul 4;352(6330):17–18. doi: 10.1038/352017a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis R. J. Chaperoning nascent proteins. Nature. 1994 Jul 14;370(6485):96–97. doi: 10.1038/370096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis R. J., Hartl F. U. Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function. FASEB J. 1996 Jan;10(1):20–26. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis R. J. Molecular chaperones. Opening and closing the Anfinsen cage. Curr Biol. 1994 Jul 1;4(7):633–635. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00140-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis R. J., van der Vies S. M. Molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:321–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fersht A. R., Jakes R. Demonstration of two reaction pathways for the aminoacylation of tRNA. Application of the pulsed quenched flow technique. Biochemistry. 1975 Jul 29;14(15):3350–3356. doi: 10.1021/bi00686a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gill S. C., von Hippel P. H. Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. Anal Biochem. 1989 Nov 1;182(2):319–326. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90602-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gray T. E., Eder J., Bycroft M., Day A. G., Fersht A. R. Refolding of barnase mutants and pro-barnase in the presence and absence of GroEL. EMBO J. 1993 Nov;12(11):4145–4150. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06098.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gray T. E., Fersht A. R. Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES. FEBS Lett. 1991 Nov 4;292(1-2):254–258. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80878-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gray T. E., Fersht A. R. Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. J Mol Biol. 1993 Aug 20;232(4):1197–1207. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartl F. U., Hlodan R., Langer T. Molecular chaperones in protein folding: the art of avoiding sticky situations. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jan;19(1):20–25. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hartl F. U., Martin J. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995 Feb;5(1):92–102. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80014-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hayer-Hartl M. K., Martin J., Hartl F. U. Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding. Science. 1995 Aug 11;269(5225):836–841. doi: 10.1126/science.7638601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hubbard T. J., Sander C. The role of heat-shock and chaperone proteins in protein folding: possible molecular mechanisms. Protein Eng. 1991 Oct;4(7):711–717. doi: 10.1093/protein/4.7.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Itzhaki L. S., Otzen D. E., Fersht A. R. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 7;34(44):14581–14587. doi: 10.1021/bi00044a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jackson G. S., Staniforth R. A., Halsall D. J., Atkinson T., Holbrook J. J., Clarke A. R., Burston S. G. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 1993 Mar 16;32(10):2554–2563. doi: 10.1021/bi00061a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Landry S. J., Gierasch L. M. Polypeptide interactions with molecular chaperones and their relationship to in vivo protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:645–669. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lilie H., Buchner J. Interaction of GroEL with a highly structured folding intermediate: iterative binding cycles do not involve unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8100–8104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Loewenthal R., Sancho J., Fersht A. R. Fluorescence spectrum of barnase: contributions of three tryptophan residues and a histidine-related pH dependence. Biochemistry. 1991 Jul 9;30(27):6775–6779. doi: 10.1021/bi00241a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathews C. K. Biochemistry of deoxyribonucleic acid-defective amber mutants of bacteriophage T4. 3. Nucleotide pools. J Biol Chem. 1972 Nov 25;247(22):7430–7438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ranson N. A., Dunster N. J., Burston S. G., Clarke A. R. Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jul 28;250(5):581–586. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Saibil H. R. How chaperones tell wrong from right. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Dec;1(12):838–842. doi: 10.1038/nsb1294-838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmidt M., Rutkat K., Rachel R., Pfeifer G., Jaenicke R., Viitanen P., Lorimer G., Buchner J. Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science. 1994 Jul 29;265(5172):656–659. doi: 10.1126/science.7913554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Serrano L., Horovitz A., Avron B., Bycroft M., Fersht A. R. Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability by using double-mutant cycles. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 9;29(40):9343–9352. doi: 10.1021/bi00492a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 1994 Jul 29;265(5172):659–666. doi: 10.1126/science.7913555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Hydrolysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate by Escherichia coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium ion. Biochemistry. 1993 Aug 24;32(33):8560–8567. doi: 10.1021/bi00084a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weissman J. S., Hohl C. M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H. R., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 1995 Nov 17;83(4):577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90098-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weissman J. S., Kashi Y., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):693–702. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90533-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jan 26;255(3):356–361. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 1995 Apr 25;34(16):5303–5308. doi: 10.1021/bi00016a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196-->Ala. J Mol Biol. 1994 Oct 28;243(3):397–401. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zahn R., Axmann S. E., Rücknagel K. P., Jaeger E., Laminet A. A., Plückthun A. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. I. GroEL recognizes the signal sequences of beta-lactamase precursor. J Mol Biol. 1994 Sep 16;242(2):150–164. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zahn R., Perrett S., Stenberg G., Fersht A. R. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science. 1996 Feb 2;271(5249):642–645. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5249.642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES