Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteomics. 2013 Nov 9;96:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.041

Proteome of the porosome complex in human airway epithelia: Interaction with the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)

Xia Hou a,1, Kenneth T Lewis a,1, Qingtian Wu a,1, Sunxi Wang b, Xuequn Chen a, Amanda Flack a, Guangzhao Mao b, Douglas J Taatjes c, Fei Sun a, Bhanu P Jena a,b,*
PMCID: PMC3961139  NIHMSID: NIHMS558225  PMID: 24220302

Abstract

The surface of the airways is coated with a thin film of mucus composed primarily of mucin, which is under continuous motion via ciliary action. Mucin not only serves to lubricate the airways epithelia, but also functions as a trap for foreign particles and pathogens, thereby assisting in keeping the airways clean and free of particulate matter and infections. Altered mucin secretion especially increased mucin viscosity, results in mucin stagnation due to the inability of the cilia to propel them, leading to infections and diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Since porosomes have been demonstrated to be the secretory portals at the cell plasma membrane in cells, their presence, structure, and composition in the mucin-secreting human airway epithelial cell line Calu-3 expressing CF transmembrane receptor (CFTR), were investigated. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of Calu-3 cells demonstrates the presence of approximately 100 nm in diameter porosome openings at the plasma membrane surface. Electron microscopy confirms the AFM results, and tandem mass spectrometry and immunoanalysis performed on isolated Calu-3 porosomes, reveal the association of CFTR with the porosome complex. These new findings will facilitate understanding of CFTR–porosome interactions influencing mucous secretion, and provide critical insights into the etiology of CF disease.

Biological significance

In the present study, the porosome proteome in human airway epithelia has been determined. The interaction between the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the porosome complex in the human airway epithelia is further demonstrated. The possible regulation by CFTR on the quality of mucus secretion via the porosome complex at the cell plasma membrane is hypothesized. These new findings will facilitate understanding of CFTR–porosome interactions influencing mucous secretion, and provide critical insights into the etiology of CF disease.

Keywords: Human airway epithelia porosome, proteome, Porosome–CFTR interaction, Mucus secretion, Tandem mass spectrometry

1. Introduction

It is well established that cellular organelles called porosomes, are secretory portals present at the cell plasma membrane in neurons, exocrine, endocrine, and neuroendocrine cells, where membrane-bound secretory vesicles transiently dock and fuse to expel intravesicular contents from cells during secretion [110]. Porosomes have been immunoisolated from a number of cells, including the exocrine pancreas [5,6] and neurons [3]. The morphology, composition, and reconstitution of porosomes in the exocrine pancreas and in neurons are well documented [211], and the 3D contour map of the assembly of proteins within the structure has also been determined in great detail [10]. This new understanding of the secretory machinery in cells now provides a platform to address diseases resulting from secretory defects. In the current study, the structure and composition of the porosome in the mucin-secreting human airway epithelial cell line Calu-3 expressing cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane regulator (CFTR) were determined to better understand cystic fibrosis disease.

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is a plasma membrane chloride selective cyclic AMP-activated ion channel, localized at the apical membrane of secretory epithelial cells, including the conducting airways [12]. Besides mediating the secretion of Cl, CFTR also regulates several other transport proteins, including K+ channels, aquaporin water channels, anion exchangers, the membrane fusion protein syntaxin-1A, and sodium bicarbonate transporters [1325]. Accordingly, studies show that CFTR and its associated proteins are present in large macromolecular signaling complexes via scaffolding proteins containing PDZ domains [12,24,26]. In cells, a number of proteins contain a conserved 80–100 amino acid sequence, called the PDZ domain, that mediates protein–protein interactions by binding to short peptide sequences of target proteins [12]. PDZ is an acronym for the first letters of three proteins originally discovered to share this domain: postsynaptic density protein (PSD95), drosophila disk large tumor suppressor (Dlg1), and the zonula occludens-1 protein (zo-1) [26]. The C-terminus of CFTR in humans contains the sequence Asp-Thr-Arg-Leu, that mediates binding to several PDZ domain proteins [12]. In addition, CFTR has several other regions that mediate protein–protein interactions, such as a domain at its N-terminus that binds to syntaxin-1A and SNAP-23 [14,22]. CFTR also contains a protein phosphatase-2A (PP2A)-binding, and an AMP kinase (AMPK)-binding domain [12]. Similarly, CFTR has a regulatory domain that is a substrate to both protein kinases A (PKA) and C (PKC) [27]. These interactions facilitate CFTR to form large CFTR-associated macromolecular signaling complexes at the plasma membrane.

CF as a disease was first identified as cysts observed in the pancreas and the highly viscous mucus found in the lung of patients. However, since discovery that these observed defects are a result of a dysfunction of the CFTR chloride channel [28,29], there has been little progress in our understanding of the link between CFTR dysfunction and the secretion of such highly viscous mucin in the lung of CF patients [30]. The surface of the airways is coated with a thin film of mucous composed of essentially mucin, salt, proteases, antioxidants, and antibodies [30,31]. Mucin lubricates, traps foreign particles and pathogens, and assists in the clearance of foreign particles from the airways via ciliary transport [30,31]. The major composition of the mucus layer are mucins, which are large glycoprotein biopolymers, synthesized and secreted by specialized cells of the airway epithelium called goblet cells and submucosal mucus secreting cells [32,33]. Mucins are O-linked glycoproteins containing long stretches of polypeptides rich in serine and threonine residues, which serve as sites for the covalent attachment of a variety of O-glycans, many of which are sialylated or sulfated. Consequently, mucins are polyionic and typically 70% of their mass is represented by carbohydrate [31]. The glycan chains, which are usually clustered in the central domains of mucin, confer important structural and functional properties to the molecule such as hydration via ion and water binding, as well as confer resistance to proteases [31]. In addition to glycosylated domains, a subset of mucins possess cysteine-rich domains for disulfide-mediated polymerization; critical for gel formation. Hence, both hydration and disulfide-mediated polymerization are critical for regulating viscosity of the mucus layer. Therefore, a key property of mucus is its appropriate viscosity that enables its movement by the underlying cilia. Secretion of more viscous mucus disallows its proper transport, resulting in chronic and fatal airway disease such as CF [31].

Similar to other secretory cells that undergo secretory vesicle volume increase during secretion [3444], goblet cells of the airway epithelia that store mucin in a dehydrated state within membrane-bound secretory granules are no exception. Since vesicle swelling is a requirement for cell secretion [40], and both ion channels and water channels or aquaporins regulate this process [41,43], altered chloride transport would impair secretory vesicle hydration and optimal release. Furthermore, recent studies in mice lacking functional CFTR [30] showed that these animals secrete highly viscous mucous that adhered to the epithelium. Since CFTR is known to interact with syntaxin-1A, chloride channel CLC-3, and aquaporins [1325], which are components of the porosome complex [1,2,57,45], the possible interactions between CFTR and the porosome in goblet cells were hypothesized and tested in the present study. Results from the study demonstrate the presence of approximately 100 nm in size porosomes and microvilli at the surface of the plasma membrane in Calu-3 cells. Proteomic analysis of isolated porosomes using mass spectrometry demonstrates the presence of CFTR as well as several proteins found in the neuronal porosome complex, including Syntaxin-1A, actin, rabs, heterotrimeric G-protein, and the GTPase activating protein GAP. Immunoblot analysis of the isolated porosome complex, further confirms its association with CFTR, reflecting important implication in both normal mucus secretion in the airway epithelium in health, and in the impaired state in CF disease.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Calu-3 cell culture

Airway epithelial Calu-3 cells are derived from a human lung adenocarcinoma [46]. The cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) (Invitrogen) containing 15% fetal bovine serum. The cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

2.2. HEK cell culture and transfection for CFTR expression

HEK 293 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s (DMEM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. All cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Transfections involving co-expression were carried out at 2.5:1 plasmid molar ratio. Two days after transfection, the cells were harvested for use in the study.

2.3. Atomic force microscopy

Intact aldehyde-fixed Calu-3 cells grown on glass coverslips were used for imaging using the AFM. Cells were partially dehydrated by 10 min of air-drying at RT, and imaged using a modification of our previously published procedure [47]. A Nanoscope IIIa AFM from Digital Instruments (Santa Barbara, CA) was used for imaging. Images were obtained using the “tapping” mode in air, and aluminum coated silicon tips with a spring constant of 40 N m−1, and an imaging force of <200 pN, line frequencies of 1–2 Hz, with 256 lines per image, and constant image gains. The topographical dimensions of cellular structures were analyzed using the Nanoscope IIIa4.43r8 software supplied by Digital Instruments.

2.4. Electron microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy of Calu-3 cells was performed as described in a previously published procedure [47], on both resting and stimulated (10 μM forskolin for 10 min) Calu-3 cells. Briefly, resting and stimulated cells were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde/2% paraformaldehyde in ice-cold PBS for 24 h, washed, embedded in 2% SeaPrep agarose, followed by post-fixation for 1 h at 4 °C using 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Finally, the samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, through propylene oxide, and infiltrated and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Ultrathin sections were cut with a diamond knife, retrieved onto 200 mesh nickel thin-bar grids, and contrasted with alcoholic uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Grids were viewed with a JEOL 1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) operating at 60 or 80 kV, and digital images were acquired with an AMT-XR611 11 megapixel ccd camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Danvers, MA).

2.5. Immunoisolation of the porosome complex from Calu-3 cells

The establishment of continuity between the secretory vesicle membrane and the membrane at the porosome base requires the participation of specific membrane proteins called SNAREs. At the nerve terminal for example, target membrane proteins SNAP-25 and syntaxin, collectively called t-SNAREs present at the base of the neuronal porosome complex, and synaptic vesicle-associated protein v-SNARE, are involved in fusion of synaptic vesicles at the porosome base [9]. Both SNAP-25 and SNAP-23 are expressed in Calu-3 cells, and syntaxin-1A which interacts with SNAP-25 has also been reported with CFTR [14], SNAP-25 antibody was employed to immunoisolate porosomes from Calu-3 cells. To isolate the Calu-3 porosome complex, SNAP-25 specific antibody conjugated to protein A-sepharose® was utilized. For each immunoisolation, 1 mg of Triton–Lubrol-solubilized Calu-3 cells was used. The Triton/Lubrol solubilization buffer contained 0.5% Lubrol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM benzamidine, 5 mM Mg-ATP, and 5 mM EDTA in PBS at pH 7.5, supplemented with protease inhibitor mix (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Ten micrograms of SNAP-25 antibody conjugated to the protein A-sepharose® was incubated with 1 mg of the solubilized cells for 1 h at room temperature followed by three washes of 10 volumes of wash buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.5). The immunoprecipitated sample attached to the immunosepharose beads was eluted using low pH buffer (pH 3.5) to dissociate the porosome complex from the antibody bound to the bead, and the eluted sample was immediately returned to neutral pH in a total volume of 300 μl. Eighty microliters of the sample was aliquoted and resuspended in Laemmli [48] reducing sample preparation buffer, boiled for 2 min, and used for SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Two hundred microliters of the sample was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C for proteomics using mass spectrometry [11], and the remaining 20 μl was used for determining porosome size and charge using Zetasizer and zeta potential measurements [43].

2.6. Western blot analysis

Isolated Calu-3 porosomes in Laemmli buffer and 5 μg of total lysate of Calu-3 and HEK cells expressing CFTR also in Laemmli buffer were resolved in a 12.5% SDS-PAGE, followed by electrotransfer to either PVDF membrane or 0.2 mm nitrocellulose sheets. The membrane or nitrocellulose was incubated for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (5% nonfat milk in phosphate buffered saline or PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.02% NaN3) and immunoblotted for 2 h at room temperature with antibodies against CFTR (monoclonal antibody against CFTR #217 was from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Bethesda, MD), and porosome associated proteins syntaxin-1A, actin, SNAP-25, SNAP-23, Gαi3, and vimentin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), at a dilution of 1:1000 in blocking buffer. The immunoblotted nitrocellulose sheets were washed in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, prior to incubation for 1 h at room temperature in horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1:5000 in blocking buffer. The immunoblots were washed in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and processed for enhanced chemiluminescence and exposure to X-Omat-AR film. The exposed films were then developed and photographed.

2.7. Immunofluorescence microscopy

To determine the distribution of CFTR and the porosome-associated protein Gαi3 in Calu-3 cells, immunofluorescent studies were carried out according to published procedures [49]. To determine the position of the cell nucleus, cells were exposed to 50 μg/ml of the nuclear stain NucBlueLive Cell Stain (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Images were taken using an immunofluorescence FSX100 Olympus microscope.

2.8. Photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) on isolated porosomes from Calu-3 cells

Calu-3 porosome size was determined using photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS). PCS is a well-known technique for the measurement of mm to nm size particles and macromolecules. PCS measurements were performed in a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, UK). In a typical experiment, the size distribution of isolated porosomes was determined using built-in software provided by Malvern Instruments. Prior to determination of the porosome hydrodynamic radius, calibration of the instrument was performed using latex spheres of known size. In PCS, subtle fluctuations in the sample scattering intensity are correlated across microsecond time scales. The correlation function was calculated, from which the diffusion coefficient was determined. Using the Stokes–Einstein equation, hydrodynamics radius can be acquired from the diffusion coefficient. The intensity size distribution, which is obtained as a plot of the relative intensity of light scattered by particles in various size classes, is then calculated from a correlation function using built-in software.

2.9. Tryptic digestion of isolated Calu-3 porosomes; LC–MS/MS analysis and database search

For proteomics analysis, aliquots of purified Calu-3 porosomes were reduced, cysteine-blocked with 25 mM methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) and then digested with trypsin (1:10 w/w) overnight at 37 °C [5054]. Digested porosome sample was analyzed by nanoLC–MS/MS. The tryptic peptides were separated on a reversed-phase C18 column with a 90 min gradient using the Dionex Ultimate HPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Barrington, IL). Then the MS and MS/MS spectra were acquired on an Applied Biosystems QSTAR XL mass analyzer using information dependent acquisition mode. A MS scan was performed from m/z 400–1500 for 1 s followed by product ion scans on two most intense multiply charged ions. Peaklists were submitted to Mascot server to search against the NCBInr database for human sequences with methylthio (C) used as a fixed modification and oxidation (M), N-acetylation (protein N terminus) as variable modifications. Secondary analysis was next performed using Scaffold (Proteome Software, Portland, OR). Minimum protein identification probability was set at ≥95% with 2 unique peptides at 95% minimum peptide identification probability.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. AFM demonstrates that Calu-3 cells possess porosomes or secretory portals for mucus secretion at the cell plasma membrane

The AFM was instrumental in the discovery of the porosome nearly two decades ago, first in the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas [2,57], followed by chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla [45], GH secreting cells of the pituitary [1], at the nerve terminal in brain tissue [3,4,10,11,55], in astrocytes [56,57], β-cells of the endocrine pancreas [58], hair cells of the inner ear [59], and in RBL-2H3 and BMMC cells [60], among others. Similarly in the current study, AFM was utilized to image at high resolution the surface topology of aldehyde-fixed and semi-dry Calu-3 cells. It is nearly impossible to image live Calu-3 cells since the secreted mucous adheres to the cantilever tip. Hence aldehyde-fixed cells that confirm extra rigidity to the cell surface were used for imaging using the AFM. High resolution AFM micrographs (Fig. 1) of the surface topology of aldehyde-fixed and semi-dry Calu-3 cells demonstrate the presence of approximately 100 nm in diameter porosome openings (102.4 ± 3.0), and similar in diameter (96 ± 3.3) microvilli, at the cell plasma membrane. Nearly the entire cell surface exposed to the medium was found covered with the microvilli, making it extremely difficult to image at high resolution the interspersed porosome openings despite the fact that the AFM images the surface topology of the cell at nanometer resolution and in three dimensions. The presence of dense microvilli at the plasma membrane also precluded imaging any intracellular structures such as the nucleus or the cytoskeleton underlying the cell plasma membrane. However, in certain areas of the cell surface devoid of microvilli or porosome openings, cytoskeletal structures (Fig. 1B) underlying the cell plasma membrane were observed.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

AFM micrographs demonstrating the presence of microvilli and interspersed porosomes at plasma membrane in Calu-3 cells. Microvilli measuring on average 96 nm in thickness (mean ± SEM; 96 ± 3.3, n = 50) are densely packed at the cell plasma membrane exposed to the medium, and demonstrated both in low (A–C) and high (D–H) resolution AFM images. Interspersed among the microvilli are the 102 nm in diameter openings (mean ± SEM; 102 ± 3, n = 50) of possibly the secretory portals or porosomes shown in figure G (red and green arrowheads). Similarly, the microvilli shown in figure H (red and green arrowheads) demonstrate some that appear coiled around each other, possibly as a consequence of secreted mucus.

3.2. Electron microscopy confirms the presence of microvilli and porosomes at the plasma membrane of Calu-3 cells

To further determine the porosome structure in Calu-3 cells, TEM was performed. In confirmation with AFM studies, results from the TEM study demonstrate the presence of dense microvilli at the cell plasma membrane (Fig. 2A), with the occasional presence of porosome structures (Fig. 2B–D). The two main reasons for observing so few porosome structures at the cell plasma membrane in the TEM micrographs of Calu-3 cells are that TEM images are in two dimensions as opposed to 3D in AFM micrographs; and second, the likelihood of obtaining a sagittal section through a 100 nm porosome complex scattered at the cell plasma membrane would be extremely rare. However, careful examination of the electron micrographs demonstrates the presence of cup-shaped porosomes at the cell plasma membrane. In Fig. 2D, one porosome is seen which has undergone a sagittal section, and a neighboring porosome to the left that has undergone a sagittal section at its base. Additionally, Calu-3 cells demonstrate the presence of electron-dense secretory products at the mouth of the porosome complex opening to the outside.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Representative electron micrographs of Calu-3 cells in culture demonstrating the presence of microvilli (MV) and porosomes (P) at the cell plasma membrane. (A) Calu-3 cells demonstrating the presence of dense microvilli and porosomes at the cell plasma membrane. (B–D) Note the flask-shaped porosomes measuring nearly 100 nm in diameter (E) and from 200 to 300 nm in depth, with openings to the cell surface (red arrowhead). In (C), what appears to be mucus is found at the opening of the porosome to the cell exterior. Of the two porosomes depicted in (D), the one to the center appears to be sectioned right through the center of the organelle, whereas the porosome to the left appears to have been sectioned at its base. (E) Similar to the AFM images in Fig. 1, the microvilli measure on average 92 nm in diameter.

3.3. Immunoanalysis demonstrates the association of CFTR with the porosome complex in Calu-3 cells

Immunoisolated Calu-3 porosome complexes demonstrate a particle size of approximately 300 nm (Fig. 3A) using PCS. Furthermore as hypothesized, immunoblot analysis of the isolated Calu-3 porosome complex (Fig. 3B) demonstrates the co-association of CFTR with the porosome that contains among other proteins Gαi3, actin, and vimentin (Fig. 3C). Similarly, when CFTR was immunoisolated from solubilized Calu-3 cells, the porosome complex was also immunoisolated with CFTR, as demonstrated by the presence of porosome-associated proteins syntaxin-1A, SNAP-25, SNAP-23, actin, and vimentin (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) demonstrates the immunoisolated porosome complex from Calu-3 cells measuring on average 271.2 nm, and both immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis demonstrate the interaction of CFTR with the porosome complex in this cell. (A) PCS on isolated porosomes from Calu-3 cells demonstrates average size of 271.2 nm, and net charge of −14.4 mV. (B) Immunoblot analysis using CFTR-specific antibody of CFTR-expressing HEK cell proteins resolved using SDS-PAGE, followed by electrotransfer to nitrocellulose membrane, demonstrates the presence of a 180 kDa band representing CFTR (lane 1, positive control). SDS-PAGE resolved immunoisolated porosome complexes also demonstrate immunopositive for CFTR (lane 2). (C) Immunoblot analysis of the total Calu-3 cell homogenate (CH) and isolated porosome complex (P), demonstrates the presence of porosome proteins actin, Gαi3, and vimentin. Note the enriched presence of the proteins in the porosome complex. (D) Similarly, immunoisolated CFTR complex using the CFTR-specific antibody, results in pull-down of porosome associated proteins such as syntaxin-1A (present as 70 kDa t-/v-SNARE complex), SNAP-25 (present as 70 kDa t-/v-SNARE complex), SNAP-23 (present as 68 kDa t-/v-SNARE complex), and actin.

3.4. Mass spectrometry on the isolated Calu-3 porosome complex confirms the association of CFTR

Mass spectrometry on the immunoisolated porosome complex from Calu-3 cells (Table 1), demonstrates the presence of various porosome-associated proteins (Table 2) as well as CFTR. In addition to assisting in identifying the porosome proteome in Calu-3 cells, results from this mass spectrometry study further confirm the interaction between CFTR and the porosome complex in the cell determined using immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis (Fig. 3).

Table 1.

Major proteins identified in Calu-3 cell porosome proteome by LC–MS/MS and Western Blot [*] analysis. SNAP-25 immunoisolated porosome complexes were obtained using 1% Triton–Lubrol-solubilized Calu-3 cells.

Gene symbol MW Calu-3 cell porosome proteins identified using LC–MS/MS Calu-3 porosome proteins identified using western blots
ACTB 42 kDa Actin, cytoplasmic 1 *
VIME 54 kDa Vimentin
ANXA2 39 kDa Annexin 2A
FLNA 283 kDa Filamin-A
GNAI 40 kDa Guanine nucleotide binding protein G(i) alpha inhibiting activity *
TBB5 50 kDa Tubulin beta chain
TBA1A 50 kDa Tubulin alpha-1A chain
STX1A 33 kDa Syntaxin-1A *
PROF1 15 kDa Profilin-1
VDAC1 31 kDa Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1
EZRI 69 kDa Ezrin
SPTN1 285 kDa Spectrin alpha chain
SPTB2 275 kDa Spectrin beta chain
ANXA3 36 kDa Annexin A3
TAGL2 23 kDa Transgelin-2
VDAC3 31 kDa Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3
CLIC1 27 kDa Chloride intracellular channel protein 1
RAB1A 23 kDa Ras-related protein Rab-1A
RAB3C 26 kDa Ras-related protein Rab-3C
MYL6 17 kDa Myosin light polypeptide 6
MYH9 227 kDa Myosin-9
CALM 17 kDa Calmodulin
RTN4 130 kDa Reticulon-4
G3BP1 52 kDa Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1
ARF3 21 kDa ADP-ribosylation factor 3
MOES 68 kDa Moesin
COF1 19 kDa Cofilin-1
ASAP2 Arf-GAP with SH domain, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2
P4R3A Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4
RASA1 117 kDa Ras GTPase-activating protein 1
PTN14 136 kDa Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 14
CFTR 168 kDa Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
CLC3 85 kDa Chloride channel protein 3 *
SNP25 25 kDa Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 *

Table 2.

Porosome proteins common to both Calu-3 cells and neurons.

Gene symbol MW Some proteins common to Calu-3 porosome and the neuronal porosome complex
ACTB 42 kDa Actin, cytoplasmic 1
GNA 40 kDa Guanine nucleotide-binding G-protein subunit alpha
RAB3 25 kDa Ras-related protein Rab-3
RTN4 126 kDa Reticulon-4
SNP25 25 kDa Synaptosomal-associated protein 25
STX1A 33 kDa Syntaxin-1A
TBA1A 50 kDa Tubulin alpha-1A chain
Tubulin beta chain
Spectrin beta
GTPase activating protein
Myosin heavy polypeptide 1

3.5. Immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrates the interaction between CFTR and the porosome complex in Calu-3 cells

To further test the interaction between CFTR and the porosome in Calu-3 cells, double-labeling immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against CFTR and the porosome-associated GTP-binding protein Gαi3 protein was performed (Fig. 4). CFTR and Gαi3 immunoreactivity were found both at the cell plasma membrane and in the cytosol, especially the perinuclear region of the cell. On merger of the CFTR and the Gαi3 immunostained micrographs, it was evident that besides the presence of independent CFTR and Gαi3 immuno punctate regions, extensive co-distribution of both proteins is observed, including at the cell plasma membrane (Fig. 4). In the cytosol, the co-distribution of CFTR and Gαi3 protein may represent CFTR-carrying vesicles, and at the cell plasma membrane, the co-presence of CFTR with the porosome complex. At the level of resolution afforded by conventional wide-field fluorescence, the results support CFTR and Gαi3 proteins to co-distribute, further confirming results of the immunocolocalization of CFTR with the porosome-associated GTP-binding Gαi3 protein in Calu-3 cells (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrating the co-distribution of CFTR (green) with porosome-associated GTP-binding protein Gai3 (red) in Calu-3 cells. Note the punctate immunostaining for CFTR and Gai3-specific antibody in both the cytosol and the plasma membrane. To determine co-distribution of CFTR (green) with porosome-associated Gαi3 protein (red), the images are merged (Merge), expressing yellow at co-localization sites. The nucleus is labeled blue in the merged micrograph. Cells imaged using brightfield microscopy (BF) are demonstrated in the lower right micrograph. In the cytosol, the co-distribution of CFTR and Gai3 protein may represent CFTR-carrying vesicles, and at the cell plasma membrane, the co-presence of CFTR with the porosome complex, at the level of resolution afforded by conventional wide-field fluorescence.

In conclusion, we report for the first time that the human airway epithelial cell line Calu-3 known to express CFTR, possesses secretory portals at the cell plasma membrane called porosomes (Fig. 5). Determination of the Calu-3 cell porosome proteome demonstrates the presence of CFTR among other known porosome proteins. This new finding that porosomes in the human airway epithelia interact with CFTR will facilitate understanding of CFTR–porosome interactions influencing cellular secretion and provide critical insights into the etiology and treatment of CF disease. Further studies using CFTR knockout and siRNA [61] on mucin secretion will help establish the molecular mechanism of porosome–CFTR interaction in regulation of mucin secretion.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Schematic drawing showing interactions between the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the porosome complex at the cell plasma membrane in human airway epithelia. The possible regulation by CFTR on the quality of mucus secreted via the porosome complex, such as highly viscous mucus resulting from CFTR defects is hypothesized.

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from NSF (BPJ), NSF MRI (GM), WSU startup (XC), and NIH and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (FS). The authors thank Nicole Bishop for help in processing tissue for electron microscopy, Jin-Sook Lee for help in preparation of figures, and colleagues in the Jena laboratory for their in-depth discussions and suggestions.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests or conflicts.

References

  • 1.Cho SJ, Jeftinija K, Glavaski A, Jeftinija S, Jena BP, Anderson LL. Structure and dynamics of the fusion pores in live GH-secreting cells revealed using atomic force microscopy. Endocrinology. 2002;143:1144–8. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.3.8773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cho SJ, Quinn AS, Stromer MH, Dash S, Cho J, Taatjes DJ, et al. Structure and dynamics of the fusion pore in live cells. Cell Biol Int. 2002;26:35–42. doi: 10.1006/cbir.2001.0849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cho WJ, Jeremic A, Rognlien KT, Zhvania MG, Lazrishvili I, Tamar B, et al. Structure, isolation, composition and reconstitution of the neuronal fusion pore. Cell Biol Int. 2004;28:699–708. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cho WJ, Jeremic A, Jin H, Ren G, Jena BP. Neuronal fusion pore assembly requires membrane cholesterol. Cell Biol Int. 2007;31:1301–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jena BP, Cho SJ, Jeremic A, Stromer MH, Abu-Hamdah R. Structure and composition of the fusion pore. Biophys J. 2003;84:1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74949-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jeremic A, Kelly M, Cho SJ, Stromer MH, Jena BP. Reconstituted fusion pore. Biophys J. 2003;85:2035–43. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74631-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schneider SW, Sritharan KC, Geibel JP, Oberleithner H, Jena BP. Surface dynamics in living acinar cells imaged by atomic force microscopy: identification of plasma membrane structures involved in exocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:316–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jena BP. Molecular machinery and mechanism of cell secretion. Exp Biol Med. 2005;230:307–19. doi: 10.1177/153537020523000504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jena BP. Secretion machinery at the cell plasma membrane. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17:437–43. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cho WJ, Ren G, Jena BP. EM 3D contour maps provide protein assembly at the nanoscale within the neuronal porosome complex. J Microsc. 2008;232:106–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee J-S, Jeremic A, Shin L, Cho WJ, Chen X, Jena BP. Neuronal porosome proteome: molecular dynamics and architecture. J Proteome. 2012;75:3952–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guggino WB, Stanton BA. New insights into cystic fibrosis: molecular switches that regulate CFTR. Nat Rev. 2006;7:426–36. doi: 10.1038/nrm1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schwiebert EM, Egan ME, Hwang T-H, Fulmer SB, Allen SS, Cutting GR, et al. CFTR regulates outwardly rectifying chloride channels through an autocrine mechanism involving ATP. Cell. 1995;81:1063–73. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naren AP, Nelson DJ, Xie W, Jovov B, Tousson A, Pevsner J, et al. Regulation of CFTR chloride channels by syntaxin and Munc 18 isoforms. Nature. 1997;390:302–5. doi: 10.1038/36882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naren AP, Cobb B, Li C, Roy K, Nelson D, Heda GD, et al. A macromolecular complex of β2AR, CFTR and EBP50 is regulated by protein kinase A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:342–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135434100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stutts MJ, Rossier BC, Boucher RC. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator inverts protein kinase A-mediated regulation of epithelial sodium channel single channel kinetics. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:14037–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.22.14037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shumaker H, Amlal H, Frizzell R, Ulrich CD, Soleimani M. CFTR drives Na+-NHCO3-cotransport in pancreatic duct cells: a basis for defective HCO3-secretion in CF. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1999;276:C16–25. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1999.276.1.C16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ji HL, Chalfant ML, Jovo B, Lockhart JP, Parker SB, Fuller CM, et al. The cytosolic termini of the β- and γ-ENaC subunits are involved in the functional interactions between cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and epithelial sodium channel. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:27947–56. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002848200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jiang QS, Li J, Dubroff R, Ahn YJ, Foskett JK, Engelhardt J, et al. Epithelial sodium channels regulate cystic fibrosis trans-membrane conductance regulator chloride channels in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:13266–74. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun F, Hug MJ, Bradbury NA, Frizzell RA. Protein kinase A associates with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator via an interaction with ezrin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:14360–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheung KH, Leung CT, Leung GP, Wong PY. Synergistic effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and aquaporin-9 in the rat epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:1505–10. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ganeshan R, Di A, Nelson DJ, Quick MW, Kirk KL. The interaction between syntaxin 1A and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator Cl− channels is mechanistically distinct from syntaxin 1A–SNARE interactions. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:2876–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211790200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ko SBH, Zeng W, Dorwart MR, Lou X, Kim KH, Millen L, et al. Gating of CFTR by the STAS domain of SLC26 transporters. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:343–50. doi: 10.1038/ncb1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li C, Roy K, Dandridge K, Naren AP. Molecular assembly of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:24673–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400688200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yoo D, Flagg TP, Olsen O, Raghuram V, Foskett JK, Welling PA. Assembly and trafficking of a multiprotein ROMK (Kir 1. 1) channel complex by PDZ interactions. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:6863–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311599200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guggino WB. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator forms macromolecular complexes with PDZ domain scaffold proteins. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1:28–32. doi: 10.1513/pats.2306011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Riordan JR. Assembly of functional CFTR chloride channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:701–18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.032003.154107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quinton PM. Chloride impermeability in cystic fibrosis. Nature. 1983;301:421–2. doi: 10.1038/301421a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem BS, Alon N, Rozmahel R, Grzelczak Z, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science. 1989;245:1066–73. doi: 10.1126/science.2475911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gustafsson JK, Ermund A, Ambrot D, Johansson MEV, Nilsson HE, Thorell K, et al. Bicarbonate and functional CFTR channel are required for proper mucin secretion and link cystic fibrosis with its mucus phenotype. ScJ Exp Med. 2012;209:1263–72. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Knowles MR, Boucher RC. Mucus clearance as a primary innate defense mechanism for mammalian airways. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:571–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI15217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hovenberg HW, Davies JR, Carlstedt I. Different mucins are produced by the surface epithelium and the submucosa in human trachea: identification of MUC5AC as a major mucin from the goblet cells. Biochem J. 1996;318:319–24. doi: 10.1042/bj3180319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wickstrom C, Davies JR, Eriksen GV, Veerman EC, Carlstedt I. MUC5B is a major gel-forming, oligomeric mucin from human salivary gland, respiratory tract and endocervix: identification of glycoforms and C-terminal cleavage. Biochem J. 1998;334:685–93. doi: 10.1042/bj3340685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Finkelstein A, Zimmerberg J, Cohen FS. Osmotic swelling of vesicles: its role in the fusion of vesicles with planar phospholipid bilayer membranes and its possible role in exocytosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1986;48:163–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.48.030186.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Holz RW. The role of osmotic forces in exocytosis from adrenal chromaffin cells. Annu Rev Physiol. 1986;48:175–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.48.030186.001135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fernandez JM, Villalon M, Verdugo P. Reversible condensation of mast cell secretory products in vitro. Biophys J. 1991;59:1022–7. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82317-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Monck JR, Oberhauser AF, Alverez de Toledo G, Fernandez JM. Is swelling of the secretory granule matrix the force that dilates the exocytotic fusion pore? Biophys J. 1991;59:39–47. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82196-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jena BP, Schneider SW, Geibel JP, Webster P, Oberleithner H, Sritharan KC. Gi regulation of secretory vesicle swelling examined by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:13317–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cho S-J, Sattar AKM, Jeong E-H, Satchi M, Cho J, Dash S, et al. Aquaporin 1 regulates GTP-induced rapid gating of water in secretory vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:4720–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072083499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kelly M, Cho W-J, Jeremic A, Abu-Hamdah R, Jena BP. Vesicle swelling regulates content expulsion during secretion. Cell Biol Int. 2004;28:709–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2004.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kelly M, Abu-Hamdah R, Cho S-J, Ilie AL, Jena BP. Patch clamped single pancreatic zymogen granules: direct measurement of ion channel activities at the granule membrane. Pancreatology. 2005;5:443–9. doi: 10.1159/000086556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee J-S, Cho W-J, Shin L, Jena BP. Involvement of cholesterol in synaptic vesicle swelling. Exp Biol Med. 2010;235:470–7. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2010.009259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shin L, Basi N, Lee J-S, Cho W-J, Chen Z, Abu-Hamdah R, et al. Involvement of vH+-ATPase in synaptic vesicle swelling. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:95–101. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen Z-H, Lee J-S, Shin L, Cho W-J, Jena BP. Involvement of β-adrenergic receptor in synaptic vesicle swelling and implication in neurotransmitter release. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:572–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01026.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cho S-J, Wakade A, Pappas GD, Jena BP. New structure involved in transient membrane fusion and exocytosis. N Y Acad Sci Annal. 2002;971:254–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04471.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shen BQ, Finkbeiner WE, Wine JJ, Mrsny RJ, Widdicombe JH. Calu-3: a human airway epithelial cell line that shows cAMP-dependent Cl− secretion. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1994;266:L493–501. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1994.266.5.L493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang S, Lee J-S, Bishop N, Jeremic A, Cho WJ, Chen X, et al. 3D organization and function of the cell: Golgi budding and vesicle biogenesis to docking at the porosome complex. Histochem Cell Biol. 2012;137:703–18. doi: 10.1007/s00418-012-0948-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–5. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee J-S, Hou X, Bishop N, Wang S, Flack A, Cho WJ, et al. Aquaporin-assisted and ER-mediated mitochondrial fission: a hypothesis. Micron. 2013;47:50–8. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen X, Walker AK, Strahler JR, Simon ES, Tomanicek-Volk SL, Nelson BB, et al. Organellar proteomics: analysis of pancreatic zymogen granule membranes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:306–12. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500172-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen X, Ulintz P, Simon E, Williams JA, Andrews PC. Global topology analysis of pancreatic zymogen granule membranes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7:2323–36. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700575-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen X, Andrews PC. Quantitative proteomics analysis of pancreatic zymogen granule membrane. Membrane Proteomics Methods in Molecular Biology. 2009;527:327–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-310-7_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen X, Simon E, Xiang Y, Kachman M, Andrews PC, Wang Y. Quantitative proteomics analysis of cell cycle regulated Golgi disassembly and reassembly. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:7197–207. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.047084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen X, Sans D, Strahler JR, Michailidis G, Ernst SA, Andrews PC, et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis of Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum from normal and acute pancreatitis rat pancreas. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:885–96. doi: 10.1021/pr900784c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jeremic A, Cho W-J, Jena BP. Cholesterol is critical to the integrity of neuronal porosome/fusion pore. Ultramicroscopy. 2006;106:674–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cho W-J, Ren G, Lee J-S, Jeftinija K, Jeftinija S, Jena BP. Nanoscale three-dimensional contour map of protein assembly within the astrocyte porosome complex. Cell Biol Int. 2009;33:224–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lee J-S, Cho W-J, Jeftinija K, Jeftinija S, Jena BP. Porosome in astrocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:365–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00334.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jena BP. Discovery of the porosome: revealing the molecular mechanism of secretion and membrane fusion in cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2004;8:1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Drescher DG, Cho WJ, Drescher MJ. Identification of the porosome complex in the hair cell. Cell Biol Int Rep. 2011;18:31–4. doi: 10.1042/CBR20110005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhao D, Lulevich V, Liu F, Liu G. Applications of atomic force microscopy in biophysical chemistry. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:5971–82. doi: 10.1021/jp9114546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Monterisi S, Favia M, Guerra L, Cardone RA, Marzulli M, Reshkin SJ, et al. CFTR regulation in human airways epithelial cells requires integrity of the actin cytoskeleton and compartmentalized camp and PKA activity. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1106–17. doi: 10.1242/jcs.089086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES