Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1970 Apr;45(4):465–469. doi: 10.1104/pp.45.4.465

Some Factors Affecting the Hill Reaction Activity in Cotton Chloroplasts 1

Kenneth E Fry a
PMCID: PMC396433  PMID: 5427116

Abstract

A method of plant culture was developed for growing large leaves of glandless cotton on single stems. Chloroplasts isolated from these leaves actively reduced ferricyanide when assayed for the Hill reaction. Hill reaction activity increased 133% when the 0.5 m sucrose isolation medium was replaced with 10% (w/v) polyethylene glycol, both buffered at pH 7.6. The presence of 2 or 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in the sucrose buffer did not increase Hill activity. Ferricyanide reduction in the dark occurred in all assays, and the possibility of gossypol as the reductant is discussed. Half-life of the chloroplasts stored in 10% glycerol at −23 C was 23 days. The ammonium ion at 0.01 m enhanced Hill reaction activity up to 171%. Leaves containing chloroplasts with the highest Hill reaction activity were found near the 8th node below the apex. Leaf water potentials less than −28 bars reduced the activity about 50%. Daylight conditions during the winter months in the greenhouse reduced the activity about 30%.

Full text

PDF
465

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnon D. I. COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS. Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Killion D. D., Grooms S., Frans R. E. Oxidative and phosphorylative activities of mitochondria isolated from cotton hypocotyls. Plant Physiol. 1968 Dec;43(12):1996–2000. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.12.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Krogmann D. W., Jagendorf A. T., Avron M. Uncouplers of Spinach Chloroplast Photosynthetic Phosphorylation. Plant Physiol. 1959 May;34(3):272–277. doi: 10.1104/pp.34.3.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LYMAN C. M., BALIGA B. P., SLAY M. W. Reactions of proteins with gossypol. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959 Oct;84:486–497. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90610-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Miflin B. J., Hageman R. H. Demonstration of Photophosphorylation by Maize Chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1963 Jan;38(1):66–70. doi: 10.1104/pp.38.1.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Myers B. D., Throneberry G. O. Effect of gossypol on some oxidative respiratory enzymes. Plant Physiol. 1966 May;41(5):787–791. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.5.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SPIKES J. D., LUMRY R., EYRING H., WAYRYNEN R. E. Potential changes in suspensions of chloroplasts on illumination. Arch Biochem. 1950 Aug;28(1):48–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith F. H. Determination of gossypol in leaves and flower buds of Gossypium. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1967 Apr;44(4):267–269. doi: 10.1007/BF02639273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walker D. A. Correlation between Photosynthetic Activity and Membrane Integrity in Isolated Pea Chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1965 Nov;40(6):1157–1161. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.6.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Waring R. H., Cleary B. D. Plant moisture stress: evaluation by pressure bomb. Science. 1967 Mar 10;155(3767):1248–1254. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3767.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wasserman A. R., Fleischer S. The stabilization of chloroplast function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Jan 15;153(1):154–169. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(68)90156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Woolhouse H. W. The nature of senescence in plants. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1967;21:179–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES