Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1970 Jul;46(1):157–162. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.1.157

Effect of Ethylene on the Uptake, Distribution, and Metabolism of Indoleacetic Acid-1-14C and -2-14C and Naphthaleneacetic Acid-1-14C 1

Elmo M Beyer Jr a,2, Page W Morgan a
PMCID: PMC396551  PMID: 16657409

Abstract

The effect of ethylene on the uptake, distribution, and metabolism of indoleacetic acid (IAA)-1-14C, IAA-2-14C, and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)-1-14C in cotton stem sections (Gossypium hirsutum L., var. Stoneville 213) was studied. Stem sections excised from plants pretreated with ethylene for 15 hours transported significantly less 14C-IAA and 14C-NAA than control sections. Concomitant features of the reduction of 14C-IAA transport were an increase in decarboxylation and a trend toward a reduction in total uptake. With 14C-NAA, however, total uptake was significantly increased, and decarboxylation was unaffected.

14C-IAA was rapidly converted to indoleacetylaspartic acid and many other metabolites in both control and ethylene-pretreated stem sections. Following transport, similar amounts of 14C-IAA were recovered in the apical absorbing portion of the control and ethylene-pretreated sections. Significantly more 14C-IAA metabolites, however, were recovered in this region of the ethylene-pretreated sections.

Conversely, 14C-NAA was metabolized more slowly than 14C-IAA under identical experimental conditions, with the only major metabolite being naphthaleneacetylaspartic acid. Following transport the apical absorbing portion of ethylene-pretreated stem sections contained significantly more 14C-NAA than the controls. These results suggested that the disruption of auxin transport by ethylene cannot be explained in terms of a more rapid metabolism of auxin in the treated sections. The increased 14C-IAA metabolites in the absorbing portion of ethylene-pretreated sections appear to be the result, rather than the cause, of the ethylene-mediated disruption of IAA transport.

Full text

PDF
160

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AVon Abrams G. J., Pratt H. K. Effect of ethylene on the permeability of excised cantaloupe fruit tissue. Plant Physiol. 1967 Feb;42(2):299–301. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.2.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreae W. A., Good N. E. The Formation of Indoleacetylaspartic Acid in Pea Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1955 Jul;30(4):380–382. doi: 10.1104/pp.30.4.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bendaña F. E., Galston A. W., Kaur-Sawhney R., Penny P. J. Recovery of labeled ribonucleic acid following administration of labeled auxin to green pea stem sections. Plant Physiol. 1965 Nov;40(6):977–983. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.6.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beyer E. M., Morgan P. W. Ethylene modification of an auxin pulse in cotton stem sections. Plant Physiol. 1969 Dec;44(12):1690–1694. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.12.1690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burg S. P., Burg E. A. Inhibition of polar auxin transport by ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1967 Sep;42(9):1224–1228. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.9.1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Good N. E., Andreae W. A., Ysselstein M. W. Studies on 3-Indoleacetic Acid Metabolism. II. Some Products of the Metabolism of Exogenous Indoleacetic Acid in Plant Tissues. Plant Physiol. 1956 May;31(3):231–235. doi: 10.1104/pp.31.3.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCREADY C. C. A direct-plating method for the precise assay of carbon-14 in small liquid samples. Nature. 1958 May 17;181(4620):1406–1406. doi: 10.1038/1811406a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morgan P. W., Gausman H. W. Effects of ethylene on auxin transport. Plant Physiol. 1966 Jan;41(1):45–52. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Robinson B. J., Forman M., Addicott F. T. Auxin transport and conjugation in cotton explants. Plant Physiol. 1968 Aug;43(8):1321–1323. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.8.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwertner H. A., Morgan P. W. Role of IAA-Oxidase in Abscission Control in Cotton. Plant Physiol. 1966 Nov;41(9):1513–1519. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.9.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Siegel S. M., Galston A. W. Experimental Coupling of Indoleacetic Acid to Pea Root Protein In Vivo and In Vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Nov;39(11):1111–1118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.11.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Winter A., Thimann K. V. Bound indoleacetic Acid in Avena coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 1966 Feb;41(2):335–342. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES