Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Open Select logoLink to Taylor & Francis Open Select
. 2014 Mar 25;5(1):1–9. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2014.899525

Association of genotypes with infection types and antifungal susceptibilities in Candida albicans as revealed by recent molecular typing strategies

Feng-Yan Bai 1,
PMCID: PMC3979442  PMID: 24772369

Abstract

Candida albicans is a commensal microorganism in the mucosa of healthy individuals, but is also the most common opportunistic fungal pathogen of humans. It causes from benign infections such as oral and vaginal candidiasis to fatal, systematic diseases in immunocompromised or critically ill patients. In addition to improved therapy, the rapid and accurate identification of the disease-causing strains is crucial for diagnosis, clinical treatment and epidemiological studies of candidiasis. A variety of methods for strain typing of C. albicans have been developed. The most commonly used methods with the focus on recently developed molecular typing or DNA-fingerprinting strategies and the recent findings in the association of specific and genetically similar genotypes with certain infection types and the correlation between azole susceptibilities and certain genotypes of C. albicans from China are reviewed.

Keywords: Candida albicans, candidiasis, molecular typing, molecular epidemiology

Introduction

Candida albicans is a dimorphic fungus which usually occurs as a commensal microorganism in the mucosa of humans. It can be found in the intestinal and urogenital tracts and the oral cavities of healthy individuals. The species is also the most common opportunistic fungal pathogen of humans. It causes from benign infections such as oral and vaginal candidiasis to fatal, systematic disease in immunocompromised or critically ill patients. Nearly three-quarters of all healthy women experience at least one episode of Candida vulvovaginitis during their lifetime and about 5–10% of women endure recurrent bouts of the disease (Sobel 2007). Due to the growing population over the last two to three decades of transiently or permanently immunocompromised patients, invasive infections caused by C. albicans have become an increasingly important clinical problem. It is recognized as the fourth leading cause of nosocomial infections (Pfaller et al. 1998; Edmond et al. 1999). As a result of the difficulties in the early accurate diagnosis of systemic candidiasis, a limited number of suitable and effective antifungal drugs and the increasing drug resistance of the etiologic agents, mortality rates from systemic candidiasis remain high (Gudlaugsson et al. 2003). Even mucosal infections caused by C. albicans, such as vaginal candidiasis, often constitute a management problem because of the high rate of recurrence. Fundamental issues with regard to diagnosis, epidemiology and pathogenesis of both mucosal and invasive candidiasis remain to be elucidated.

In addition to improved therapy, the rapid and accurate identification of the disease-causing strains is crucial for diagnosis, clinical treatment and epidemiological studies of candidiasis. A variety of methods for typing strains of C. albicans have been described. The most commonly used methods with the focus on recently developed molecular typing or DNA-fingerprinting strategies and the recent findings in the association of specific and genetically similar genotypes with certain infections and the correlation between azole susceptibilities and genotypes of C. albicans from China are discussed in this review.

Biotying based on phenotypic characters

The methods based on phenotypic characteristics, referred to as biotyping methods, were first employed for strain typing of C. albicans. Serotyping based on antigenic properties is one of the first biotyping strategies used to discriminate among C. albicans strains. This strategy was used to type strains for a few decades and three serotyping methods were established for C. albicans, including Hasenclever's antisera HSN1 and HSN2 (Hasenclever et al. 1961a, 1961b), the Iatron Candida Check factor 6 typing antiserum (IF6) (Poulain et al. 1985) and agglutination with the monoclonal antibody H9 (Brawner & Cutler 1989). However, the discriminatory power of these methods is limited. Separation of an entire species into a few groups does not provide meaningful resolution for the majority of epidemiological questions to be addressed. In addition, it was found that antigen expression could be affected by phase of growth and culture conditions, which placed in question the serotyping methodology (Poulain et al. 1985; Brawner 1991).

Odds and Abbott, in the early 1980s, developed a complex biotyping protocol for distinguishing among Candida species and among strains of a species based on a set of physiological assays (Odds & Abbott 1980, 1983). The assays testing for growth at pH 1.4; production of secreted acid proteinase; resistance to flucytosine, boric acid and safranin; assimilation of urea, sorbose and citrate; and sensitivity to high salt were originally developed for discriminating among species. Four additional assays, including resistance to tetrazolium salts, sodium periodate and cetrimide and growth on MacConkey agar, were then used as supplementary tests for discrimination among strains within a Candida species. The protocol was modified by Childress et al. (1989) to make it more amenable to general use. This biotyping strategy was effectively used in a number of epidemiological studies (Odds et al. 1987, 1989b; Korting et al. 1988; Poirier et al. 1990; Xu & Samaranayake 1995; Lipperheide et al. 1996). However, the system was found to have poor interlaboratory reproducibility (Odds et al. 1989a); the use of the biotyping method in clinical research is therefore limited.

In addition to the serotyping and biotyping methods mentioned above, a number of other typing methods based on phenotypic characters have been used for C. albicans strain discrimination, namely morphotyping, sugar-assimilation typing, killer yeast typing, resistotyping and drug-susceptibility typing (see Soll 2000). Although theoretically the phenotype reflects genetic background of an organism, biotyping methods have fundamental problems that limit their use in epidemiological investigation. First, results of the tests, even the expression of serotypes, can be easily affected by growth conditions (Poulain et al. 1985; Brawner & Cutler 1989). If the growth conditions and time of cell harvesting are not precisely controlled and duplicated among experiments and laboratories, intralaboratory and interlaboratory reproducibility of the results obtained from biotyping methods will be compromised. Second, a number of general phenotypes of C. albicans that affect a variety of phenotypic traits undergo spontaneous high-frequency switching (Slutsky et al. 1985; Soll 1992), which may result in phenotypic differences for the same strain grown under the same conditions.

Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis

Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) assesses isozyme or allozyme polymorphism by starch gel electrophoresis, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing under native conditions. The enzymes are visualized in the gels by specific enzyme-staining procedures. This method directly reflects allelic differences at defined loci. Any enzyme (protein) that can be selectively stained can be the target of analysis. If the protein bands are variable, they are considered to be alleles on the basis of mobility. Both alleles in a diploid can be observed; thus, the method can assess codominant markers in diploids for each locus. If enzymes are carefully selected, MLEE can discriminate among the gene products of different alleles for a number of loci. For instance, Pujol et al. (1997) tested 21 enzymes of C. albicans using MLEE on 29 isolates. Thirteen exhibited variability and were therefore used in the analysis. This study demonstrated further that if enough markers are used, MLEE will reveal microevolution within strains (Pujol et al. 1997). The technique has been effectively used to fingerprint C. albicans and a number of other Candida species (Taylor et al. 1999; Soll 2000). Although the enzyme patterns detected by MLEE are actually phenotypes, the protocol outperforms several popular DNA-fingerprinting methods in assessing genetic relatedness among strains.

The shortcomings of this method include: (1) it is relatively time-consuming, because at least 10 enzymes that provide variability among isolates must be analysed; (2) it assays the variability at protein level, so that much variation at the nucleotide level may go undetected because nucleotide substitutions do not necessarily change the amino-acid composition and (3) changes in amino-acid composition do not necessarily change the electrophoretic mobility of the protein and, as a consequence, alleles that are considered to be the same protein alleles from different individuals may represent different gene alleles.

Electrophoretic karyotyping

The numbers of chromosomes in the cell as well as deviations from the basic number provide useful information for genetics and systematics of organisms. The use of the information in fungi was hampered because of the difficulty in counting the chromosomal number in fungal cells by using cytological methods as usually used in higher plants and animals. The invention of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and other similar systems in the middle of 1980s partially resolved the problem (Schwartz & Cantor 1984). Chromosome-sized DNA fragments of the yeast genome can be readily separated according to size in a gel with the PFGE apparatus such as contour-clamped homogeneous electric field gel electrophoresis, and can be visualized by ethidium-bromide staining. The chromosomal numbers and genome sizes of many fungi have been estimated by using this method (Walz 1995). A striking discovery is that most fungal species have rather variable karyotypes among strains. The polymorphism has been observed in both asexual and sexual fungi and most likely results from both mitotic and meiotic processes. The phenomenon which is called chromosome length polymorphism has been employed for fingerprinting of yeast strains.

Electrophoretic karyotyping has been used extensively for C. albicans strain typing (see Soll 2000, for references). Sangeorzan et al. (1995) demonstrated that patterns generated by electrophoretic karyotyping were highly reproducible among experiments, relatively insensitive to preparation methods within the same laboratory, and unaffected by high-frequency phenotypic switching. Electrophoretic karyotyping has been shown to be the most powerful method for Saccharomces cerevisiae strain typing (Schuller et al. 2004); however, its discriminatory ability for C. albicans strains is limited because of the relatively lower chromosomal number and larger molecular sizes of individual chromosomes of the species. The protocol cannot distinguish chromosomal DNA molecules with slight differences in sizes. The discriminatory power of electrophoretic karyotyping as a fingerprinting method can be increased dramatically by digesting chromosome-length DNA with endonucleases prior to PFGE (Cormican et al. 1996; Pontieri et al. 1996). By increasing the complexity of the pattern in this way, electrophoretic karyotyping could serve as an effective fingerprinting system.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) is one of the first molecular methods used to assess genetic diversity or relatedness of strains within a pathogenic fungal species. RFLP analysis shows the DNA-sequence variation by electrophoretic-banding patterns of DNA samples which are digested by one or more restriction enzymes. Restriction enzymes recognize very specific sequences of nucleotides in DNA. DNAs from different individuals rarely have exactly the same array of restriction sites and distances between these sites. By cutting a DNA sample with a particular restriction enzyme, DNA fragments of different length are obtained. These fragments are separated by gel electrophoresis, resulting in a pattern of bands that is unique for the particular DNA being analysed. Any region of DNA (locus) can be used for RFLP analysis. Restriction patterns can be generated directly if the target exists in multiple copies, for example, mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) or nulear rDNA, or, more frequently, through two indirect approaches. First, the total nuclear DNA is subjected to gel electrophoresis after being digested with a particular restriction enzyme, transferred to a membrane by southern blotting and then hybridized with a radioisotope-labelled particular DNA probe; the banding pattern is finally visualized by radiography. The second approach called polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-RFLP is simpler: A specific gene or DNA fragment is amplified by PCR and then digested with particular restriction enzymes; the fragments are then separated by gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium-bromide staining.

RFLP analysis has been extensively applied to fingerprint strains and to assess population structure, mode of reproduction and microevolution of C. albicans and related species (Taylor et al. 1999; Soll 2000; Xu 2006). A variety of probes have been developed including singlegene probes, rDNA probes, mDNA probes and repetitive and complex DNA probes (Soll & Pujol 2003). DNA fingerprinting with the complex probe Ca3 has revealed five C. albicans clades with geographical specificity: clades I, II, III, SA and E. Clade SA is relatively specific to or highly enriched in South Africa; clade E is relatively specific to Europe; and clade II is absent in the Southwest USA and South America. The results of these studies also have identified clade-specific drug resistance. The majority of isolates within clade I are moderately or highly resistant to 5-fluorocytosine, while the great majority of isolates within the four other clades (II, III, SA, E) are not (Soll & Pujol 2003). These results showed the promising of RFLP analysis with complex DNA probes in assessing the population structure of C. albicans worldwide. However, the use of this method is limited by the complexity of analysis procedure, the need of radioisotopes and the difficulty in interlaboratory comparison. RFLP analysis without hybridization probes, especially PCR-RFLP is straightforward and easy to use without the requirement of special equipment. However, the discriminative power of the analysis is usually limited and sequence differences occurred outside the restriction sites cannot be detected, consequently, fragments with identical sizes do not necessarily have identical sequences.

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) or arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) analysis assays DNA sequence variation in PCR-priming regions. RAPD analysis uses one short PCR primer (ca. 10 bp) and a low annealing temperature to generate several fragments in one reaction. Nucleotide substitutions in the PCR-priming regions, particularly the 3′ ends, can prevent primer annealing and PCR amplification, resulting in the differences in PCR products. Amplicons are separated on an agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. RAPD is technically simple but its resolving power can be dramatically increased by increasing the number of oligonucleotide primers that provide variability among independent isolates. It often detects variation among isolates that are invariant with RFLP analysis, and thus it has evolved as the most popular method for DNA fingerprinting the infectious fungi, including C. albicans (for references see Taylor et al. 1999; Soll 2000; Xu 2006) and other Candida species. However, a number of shortcomings of RAPD analysis must be considered.

The main drawback of RAPD analysis is poor reproducibility. The problem may occur not only among laboratories but also within a laboratory over time. Almost every technical aspect of PCR can affect reproducibility of RAPD analysis. Another problem is that bands of equal electrophoretic mobility may not be homologous. Rieseberg (1996) demonstrated that a disturbingly large fraction (13%) of RAPD bands with equal mobility from hybrid plants were not homologous. Sequencing of the RAPD bands has been used to confirm their identity (Burt et al. 1996; Graser et al. 1996).

Microsatellite polymorphisms

In recent years, short tandem repeats or microsatellites have been increasingly used as molecular markers for population genetics and genotyping of different organisms. The technique exploits the hypervariability of DNA regions made of 10 to 20 or more tandem repeats of nucleotide couplets, triplets or quadruplets. Several polymorphic microsatellite loci have been identified in the genome of C. albicans and used in strain typing of the species (Table 1) (Bretagne et al. 1997; Metzgar et al. 1998; Botterel et al. 2001; Sampaio et al. 2003, 2005). The microsatellite loci EF3 (Bretagne et al. 1997), CDC3 and HIS3 (Botterel et al. 2001) locate near coding regions, while the loci ERK1, 2NF1, CCN2, CPH2 and EFG1 (Metzgar et al. 1998) locate inside coding regions. More recently, several microsatellite loci called CAI, CAIII, CAV, CAVI and CAVII located in coding or noncoding regions have been employed for strain typing of C. albicans (Sampaio et al. 2003, 2005). The polymorphisms of microsatellite loci are usually detected using GeneScan or alike analysis with an automatic DNA sequencer and quantitatively designated by either the total lengths of the alleles (Bretagne et al. 1997; Botterel et al. 2001) or the total number of repeat units in the alleles (Sampaio et al. 2003, 2005). The quantitative designation has the advantage in interlaboratory data sharing and comparisons and database construction.

Table 1.

Microsatellites in the genome of C. albicans that have been characterized for strain typing of the species.

Locus Chromosome Repetitive motif Primer sequence (5′→3′)
CDC3 1 (AGTA)n Fwd CAGATGATTTTTTGTATGAGAAGAA
Rev CAGTCACAAGATTAAAATGTTCAAG
EF3 5 (TTTC)n(TTC)n Fwd TTTCCTCTTCCTTTCATATAGAA
Rev GGATTCACTAGCAGCAGACA
HIS3 2 (ATTT)n Fwd TGGCAAAAATGATATTCCAA
Rev TACACTATGCCCCAAACACA
ERK1 (CAGGCT)n(CAAGCT)n(CAA)n Fwd CGACCACGTCATCAATAGAAATCG
(GCCGCA)n(CTT)n Rev CGTTGAATGAAACTTGACGAGGGG
CAI 4 (CAA)2CTG(CAA)n(CAG)n Fwd ATGCCATTGAGTGGAATTGG
Rev AGTGGCTTGTGTTGGGTTTT
CAIII 5 (GAA)n Fwd TTGGAATCACTTCACCAGGA
Rev TTTCCGTGGCATCAGTATCA
CAIV (ATT)n Fwd TGCCAAATCTTGAGATACAAGTG
Rev CTTGCTTCTCTTGCTTTAAATTG
CAV 3 (ATT)n Fwd TGCCAAATCTTGAGATACAAGTG
Rev CTTGCTTCTCTTGCTTTAAATTG
CAVI 2 (TAAA)n Fwd ACAATTAAAGAAATGGATTTTAGTCAG
Rev TGCTGGTGCTGCTGGTATTA
CAVII 1 (CAAAT)n Fwd GGGGATAGAAATGGCATCAA
Rev TGTGAAACAATTCTCTCCTTGC

The discriminatory power for C. albicans strain typing with the microsatellites located near or inside coding regions was between 0.77 (for CDC3) and 0.91 (for HIS3). A higher value (0.97) was obtained when combining three loci (CDC3, EF3 and HIS3) in a single multiplex amplification reaction (Botterel et al. 2001). Among the microsatellites used for C. albicans strain typing so far, the locus CAI located within the RLM1 gene which codes for a transcription factor from the MADS box family (Sampaio et al. 2009) appeared to be the most polymorphic one, exhibiting a discriminatory power of 0.97 alone (Sampaio et al. 2003, 2005). Sequence analysis has revealed three different levels of polymorphism in microsatellites, (1) the total lengths or the number of repeats, (2) the structure of the repeated region and (3) point mutations outside the repeated region (Sampaio et al. 2003). In addition to the high cost, sequencing of microsatellites of C. albicans is a complicated procedure, because C. albicans is a diploid organism and the microsatellite loci are mostly heterozygous, thus cannot be sequenced directly. GeneScan technique which accurately determines DNA-fragment sizes is therefore commonly used in microsatellite analysis of C. albicans. The method can only detect the first level of microsatellite polymorphism, but the second and third levels of variation may contribute to further differentiation of C. albicans strains.

Li and Bai (2007) investigated an alternative approach to reveal the polymorphisms of microsatellites by utilizing the technique of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), a technique initially developed for point mutation detection in human DNA (Orita et al. 1989a, 1989b). Strain typing of a panel of 76 independent clinical isolates by PCR-SSCP analysis of CAI achieved a discriminatory power of 0.99 (Li & Bai 2007). Sequence comparison showed the advantage of SSCP over GeneSan analysis in the detection of point mutations in the microsatellite. The study demonstrated that PCR-SSCP analysis can reveal the three different levels of polymorphism in microsatellites simultaneously, thus being a powerful and economical approach for rapid strain typing of C. albicans.

Multilocus sequence typing

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was initially developed for clone identification or strain typing of pathogenic bacteria (Maiden et al. 1998). The method analyses nucleotide polymorphisms of the sequences of approximately 500 bp internal fragments (loci) of housekeeping genes. For each locus, the different sequences present within a species are assigned as distinct alleles. The alleles at each of the sequenced loci define an allelic profile or sequence type of an isolate. Each isolate of a species can therefore be unambiguously characterized by a series of alleles at the housekeeping loci studied. The direct assignment of alleles based on nucleotide sequence polymorphisms of internal fragments from multiple housekeeping genes (usually six to eleven are required for bacteria) allows high levels of discrimination between isolates. A major advantage of MLST over other typing methods is that sequence data can be easily shared among laboratories in different countries and continents. Thus, permitting the establishment of one expanding online global database for each species concerned, and enabling exchange of molecular typing data via the Internet for global epidemiology (Maiden et al. 1998).

Before being formally called MLST, the method was used by mycologists to study basic evolutionary features of pathogenic fungi (Koufopanou et al. 1997; Xu et al. 2000; Anderson et al. 2001; Fisher et al. 2001). Bougnoux et al. (2002) examined the usefulness of MLST for characterization of clinical isolates of C. albicans. They sequenced the internal regions (loci) of six selected housekeeping genes of C. albicans and observed a wide variety of genotypes among the isolates studied. The high frequency of heterozygosity increased sequence diversity at each locus, thus allowed the identification of a greater number of genotypes or diploid sequence types (DSTs). The results showed that MLST is a highly discriminatory and reproducible method for unambiguous characterization of C. albicans. The method was then validated and optimized for C. albicans (Bougnoux et al. 2003; Tavanti et al. 2003), as a consequence, a set comprising the fragments of seven housekeeping genes CaAAT1a, CaACC1, CaADP1, CaMPIb, CaSYA1, CaVPS13 and CaZWF1b is recommended for MLST with C. albicans (Table 2). A central internet database (http://calbicans.mlst.net) has been set up for deposition and analysis of C. albicans MLST data from any global source.

Table 2.

A set of gene fragments recommended as an international standard for multilocus sequence typing of C. albicans.

Locus Gene product Chromosome Primer sequence (5′→3′) Amplicon sizes (bp)
AAT1a Asparate aminotransferase 2 Fwd ACTCAAGCTAGATTTTTGGC 478
Rev CAGCAACATGATTAGCCC
ACC1 Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase 3 Fwd GCAAGAGAAATTTTAATTCAATG 519
Rev TTCATCAACATCATCCAAGTG
ADP1 ATP-dependent permease 1 Fwd GAGCCAAGTATGAATGATTTG 537
Rev TTGATCAACAAACCCGATAAT
MPIb Mannose phosphate isomerase 2 Fwd ACCAGAAATGGCCATTGC 486
Rev GCAGCCATGCATTCAATTAT
SYA1 Alanyl-RNA synthetase 6 Fwd AGAAGAATTGTTGCTGTTACTG 543
Rev GTTACCTTTACCACCAGCTTT
VPS13 Vacuolar protein sorting protein 4 Fwd TCGTTGAGAGATAATCGACTT 741
Rev ACGGATGGATCTCCAGTCC
ZWF1b Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 Fwd GTTTCATTTGATCCTGAAGC 702
Rev GCCATTGATAAGTACCTGGAT

Robles et al. (2004) assessed the value of MLST relative to those of other DNA-fingerprinting tools including RAPD, MLEE and RFLP with Ca3 probe hybridization techniques for discriminating among strains of C. albicans. The results demonstrated that the discriminatory power of MLST (99.6%) was higher than those of the other three methods compared. MLST analysis of C. albicans isolates recovered from the digestive tract of individuals within different families revealed intrafamilial transmission and microevolutions of the species. The data showed frequent colonization of a subject or several members of the same family by genetically indistinguishable or genetically close isolates. The genetically close isolates differed by loss-of-heterozygosity events at one or several of the MLST loci, suggesting the high frequency of microevolutions of commensal diploid C. albicans through the loss of heterozygosity (Bougnoux et al. 2006; Odds et al. 2006). MLST on a panel of 416 isolates of C. albicans from separate sources recognized a population structure comprising four major clades and eight minor clades (Tavanti et al. 2005). The relationship between clades of isolates and their properties of clinical relevance was showed from the data obtained. Different clades of C. albicans may differ significantly in the proportions of isolates from blood, the oropharynx, the vagina and other sites. When a larger panel of C. albicans isolates (1391) was subjected for MLST analysis, the number of clades recognized increased to 17 (Odds et al. 2007). ABC types (based on the presence or absence of an intron in rDNA, McCullough et al. 1999) and geographical origins showed statistically significant variations among clades, but anatomical source and antifungal-susceptibility data were not significantly associated. Computational haplotype analysis of the gene fragments sequenced for MLST showed a high frequency of recombination events, which suggests that C. albicans isolates had mixed evolutionary histories resembling those of a sexually reproducing species (Odds et al. 2007). In addition to nucleic housekeeping genes, mitochondrial genes have been demonstrated to be promising targets for genotyping and population genetics of C. albicans (Wang et al. 2007).

Association of genotypes with infection types in C. albicans

Genotyping of C. albicans strains associated with different conditions of vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) using PCR-SSCP analysis of CAI revealed for the first time that most C. albicans strains causing VVC possessed specific genotypes and that the genotype distribution of C. albicans strains correlated with the severity of VVC (Fan et al. 2008). The result provides a new clue and approach to elucidating the infection source of VVC. The genotype distributions of C. albicans strains associated with VVC of women and balanoposthitis of men and strains from various extragenital sites were investigated further by using GeneScan analysis of CAI (Li et al. 2008). The result showed that the CAI genotypes of independent C. albicans strains isolated from extragenital sites were mostly of individual specificity. In contrast, strains associated with VVC were mainly concentrated to a few genotypes, with CAI genotypes 30–45 and 32–46 being the most common. The distribution frequencies of C. albicans strains with the two dominant genotypes were significantly correlated with the severity of VVC. A similar genotype-distribution pattern of C. albicans strains associated with balanoposthitis was also revealed.

MLST analysis of 199 independent Chinese C. albicans with the focus on the isolates associated with VVC of Chinese women and 221 vaginal isolates from other countries available from the consensus MLST database of C. albicans showed that the majority of the VVC (71.6%) and balanitis (92.3%) isolates from China were located in clade 1 of C. albicans; while only 40.6% of the vaginal isolates and 7.8% of the oral isolates from healthy volunteers were found in the same clade (Ge et al. 2012). Furthermore, 69.1% of the VVC and 84.5% of the balanitis isolates concentrated in a cluster of clade 1 with DST 79 as the primary founder. The isolates in this cluster possessed microsatellite genotypes CAI 30–45, CAI 32–46 and their close derivatives. Interestingly, a remarkable difference in genotype-distribution patterns between Chinese and non-Chinese vaginal isolates of C. albicans was observed. Only 11.3% of the non-Chinese vaginal isolates compared were located in the cluster concentrated with Chinese VVC isolates (Ge et al. 2012). The results suggest (1) the existence of vaginopathic C. albicans strains with enhanced virulence and tropism for the vagina; (2) the high possibility of sexual transmission of genital C. albicans infections; and (3) the significant role of strain differences in the etiology of VVC. The significant association of specific genotypes with genital infections suggests that the identification of genotypes is of diagnostic and therapeutic significance.

MLST analysis also showed that particular C. albicans strains exist in the digestive tract of dyspeptic patients from China (Gong et al. 2012). Species-diversity investigation of the yeasts from the oral and gastric mucosa swab samples from patients who presented dyspeptic symptoms or ulcer complaints and those from oral swab samples from healthy volunteers showed that C. albicans was isolated from 97.8% of the Candida-positive subjects in the dyspeptic group, but from only 56.3% in the healthy group (P = 0.001). MLST analysis of the dominant species C. albicans showed that DST1593 was the dominant genotype from the digestive tract of the dyspeptic group (60%, 27/45), but not the healthy group (14.8%, 4/27) (P = 0.001). The result implies a possible link between particular C. albicans strain genotypes and host microenvironments and a positive detection of particular C. albicans genotypes could signify susceptibility to dyspepsia (Gong et al. 2012).

Correlation between azole susceptibilities and genotypes in C. albicans

Antifungal-susceptibility testing using the Etest method revealed that the C. albicans isolates causing VVC in Chinese women were generally susceptible to fluconazole, amphotericin B, ketoconazole and flucytosine; however, 19.1% of the isolates could be interpreted as being resistant to itraconazole, in vitro. Interestingly, most of the itraconazole-resistant isolates belonged to a specific genotype as revealed by PCR-SSCP analysis of the CAI microsatellite (Liu et al. 2009). The relationship between susceptibilities to fluconazole and itraconazole and microsatellite CAI genotypes were further examined from a larger set of C. albicans isolates from the vagina and oral cavity of Chinese VVC patients and asymptomatic carriers (Ge et al. 2010). The CAI genotypes of these strains were identified using GeneScan analysis. Antifungal-susceptibility testing using the standard method (M27-A2) showed that the two dominant genotypes, CAI 30–45 and CAI 32–46 associated with vulvovaginitis showed significantly different azole-susceptibility patterns with strong statistical support. CAI 32–46 isolates were usually less susceptible to both fluconazole and itraconazole than CAI 30–45 isolates and than the oral isolates with other diversified CAI genotypes. Remarkably different mutation patterns in the azole target gene ERG11 were correspondingly observed among C. albicans isolates representing different genotypes and sources. Isolates with the same or similar CAI genotypes usually possessed identical or phylogenetically closely related ERG11 sequences. Loss of heterozygosity in ERG11 was observed in all the CAI 32–46 isolates but not in the CAI 30–45 isolates and most of the oral isolates sequenced. Compared with the ERG11 sequence of strain SC5314, two homozygous missense mutations (G487T and T916C) leading to two amino-acid changes (A114S and Y257H) in the Erg11p were found in CAI 32–46 isolates (Ge et al. 2010). The correlation between azole-susceptibility and C. albicans genotype may be of potential therapeutic significance.

Conclusion and perspective

Highly discriminative and portable molecular typing or DNA-fingerprinting methods have been developed for C. albicans in recent years and the application of these methods has resulted in interesting findings, including the association of genotypes with infection types; the possible link between particular strain types and host microenvironments and the correlation between azole susceptibilities and certain genotypes in C. albicans. It is interesting to note that the remarkable enrichment of certain MLST and CAI genotypes in the C. albicans population associated with urogenital infections has only been reported in China. The factors responsible for the extensive sharing of specific genotypes by the C. albicans isolates associated with VVC patients across China remain to be elucidated. Considering the factor that China is the only country in the world enforcing family-planning policy in recent decades, it will be interesting to investigate if the contraception or birth-control measures taken by Chinese women are responsible for the prevalence of the specific genotypes in vaginal isolates from China. The highly polymorphic microsatellite CAI is located within the RLM1 gene which codes for a transcription factor from the MADS box family, which regulates the expression of genes involved in the cell wall integrity pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The number of the trinucleotide (CAA) repeats in the CAI locus determines the number of glutamine repeats in the C-terminal of C. albicans Rlm1p. A recent study showed that increased number of glutamine repeats in Rlm1p enhances the resistance of C. albicans to stress agents (Sampaio et al. 2009). Interestingly, the dominant C. albicans strains causing genital infections in China usually possess much longer CAI alleles than those from the oral cavity and other sources (Li et al. 2008; Ge et al. 2012). Elucidation of the function of Rlm1p in C. albicans will probably help to explain the enrichment of C. albicans strains with specific CAI genotypes in the vagina of VVC patients.

Funding

The author's research on molecular typing and MLST of C. albicans was supported with [grant number 2013ZX10004612-003] from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and [grant number 30825002] from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

References

  1. Anderson JB, Wickens C, Khan M, Cowen LE, Federspiel N, Jones T, Kohn LM. Infrequent genetic exchange and recombination in the mitochondrial genome of Candida albicans. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:865–872. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.3.865-872.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Botterel F, Cesterke C, Costa C, Bretagne S. Analysis of microsatellite markers of Candida albicans used for rapid typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4076–4081. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4076-4081.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bougnoux ME, Diogo D, François N, Sendid B, Veirmeire S, Colombel JF, Bouchier C, Van Kruiningen H, d'Enfert C, Poulain D. Multilocus sequence typing reveals intrafamilial transmission and microevolutions of Candida albicans isolates from the human digestive tract. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1810–1820. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1810-1820.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bougnoux ME, Morand S, d'Enfert C. Usefulness of multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:1290–1297. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1290-1297.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bougnoux ME, Tavanti A, Bouchier C, Gow NA, Magnier A, Davidson AD, Maiden MC, D'Enfert C, Odds FC. Collaborative consensus for optimized multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5265–5266. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5265-5266.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brawner DL. Comparison between methods for serotyping of Candida albicans produces discrepencies in results. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1020–1025. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.1020-1025.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brawner DL, Cutler JE. Oral Candida albicans isolates from nonhospitalized normal carriers, immunocompetent hospitalized patients, and immunocompromised patients with or without acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1335–1341. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1335-1341.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bretagne S, Costa JM, Besmond C, Carsique R, Calderone R. Microsatellite polymorphism in the promoter sequence of the elongation factor 3 gene of Candida albicans as the basis for a typing system. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1777–1780. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.7.1777-1780.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burt A, Carter DA, Koenig GL, White TJ, Taylor JW. Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:770–773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Childress CM, Holder IA, Neely AN. Modifications of a Candida albicans biotyping system. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1392–1394. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1392-1394.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cormican MG, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA. DNA macrorestriction profiles and antifungal susceptibility of Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;25:83–87. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(96)00083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Edmond MB, Wallace SE, McClish DK, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:239–244. doi: 10.1086/520192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan SR, Bai FY, Liao QP, Liu ZH, Li J, Liu XP. Genotype distribution of Candida albicans strains associated with different conditions of vulvovaginal candidiasis, as revealed by microsatellite typing. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84:103–106. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.025700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher MC, Koenig GL, White TJ, San-Blas G, Negroni R, Alvarez IG, Wanke B, Taylor JW. Biogeographic range expansion into South America by Coccidioides immitis mirrors new world patterns of human migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98:4558–4562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071406098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ge SH, Wan Z, Li J, Xu J, Li RY, Bai FY. Correlation between azole susceptibilities, genotypes, and ERG11 mutations in Candida albicans isolates associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3126–3131. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00118-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ge SH, Xie J, Xu J, Li J, Li DM, Zong LL, Zheng YC, Bai FY. Prevalence of specific and phylogenetically closely related genotypes in the population of Candida albicans associated with genital candidiasis in China. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49:86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong YB, Zheng JL, Jin B, Zhuo DX, Huang ZQ, Qi H, Zhang W, Duan W, Fu JT, Wang CJ, et al. Particular Candida albicans strains in the digestive tract of dyspeptic patients, identified by multilocus sequence typing. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gräser Y, Volovsek M, Arrington J, Schonian G, Presber W, Mitchell TG, Vilgalys R. Molecular markers reveal that population structure of the human pathogen Candida albicans exhibits both clonality and recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:12473–12477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gudlaugsson O, Gillespie S, Lee K, Vande Berg J, Hu J, Messer S, Herwaldt L, Pfaller M, Diekema D. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1172–1177. doi: 10.1086/378745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasenclever HF, Mitchell WO. Antigenic studies of Candida I. Observations of two antigenic groups in Candida albicans. J Bacteriol. 1961a;82:570–573. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.4.570-573.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasenclever HF, Mitchell WO. Antigenic studies of Candida III. Comparative pathogenicity of Candida albicans group A, group B, and Candida stellatoidea. J Bacteriol. 1961b;82:578–581. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.4.578-581.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Korting HC, Ollert M, Georgii A, Fröschl M. In vitro susceptibilities and biotypes of Candida albicans isolates from the oral cavities of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2626–2631. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.12.2626-2631.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koufopanou V, Burt A, Taylor JW. Concordance of gene genealogies reveals reproductive isolation in the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94:5478–5482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li J, Bai FY. Single-strand conformation polymorphism of microsatellite for rapid strain typing of Candida albicans. Med Mycol. 2007;45:629–635. doi: 10.1080/13693780701530950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li J, Fan SR, Liu XP, Li DM, Nie ZH, Li F, Lin H, Huang WM, Zong LL, Jin JG, et al. Biased genotype distributions of Candida albicans strains associated with vulvovaginal candidosis and candidal balanoposthitis in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1119–1125. doi: 10.1086/592249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lipperheide V, Quindós G, Jiménez Y, Pontón J, Bagán-Sebastián JV, Aguirre JM. Candida biotypes in patients with oral leukoplakia and lichen planus. Mycopathologia. 1996;134:75–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00436868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu XP, Fan SR, Bai FY, Li J, Liao QP. Antifungal susceptibility and genotypes of Candida albicans strains from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Mycoses. 2009;52:24–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maiden MC, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russell JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, et al. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:3140–3145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McCullough M, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Molecular epidemiology of the global and temporal diversity of Candida albicans. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:1220–1225. doi: 10.1086/313455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Metzgar D, van Belkum A, Field D, Haubrich R, Wills C. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA and microsatellite genotyping of pre- and post- treatment isolates of Candida sp. from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients on different fluconazole regimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2308–2313. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.8.2308-2313.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Odds FC, Abbott AB. A simple system for the presumptive identification of Candida albicans and differentiation of strains within the species. Med Mycol. 1980;18:301–317. doi: 10.1080/00362178085380511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Odds FC, Abbott AB. Modification and extension of tests for differentiation of Candida species and strains. Med Mycol. 1983;21:79–81. doi: 10.1080/00362178385380111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Odds FC, Auger P, Krogh P, Neely AN, Segal E. Biotyping of Candida albicans: results of an international collaborative survey. J Clin Microbiol. 1989a;27:1506–1509. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1506-1509.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Odds FC, Bougnoux ME, Shaw DJ, Bain JM, Davidson AD, Diogo D, Jacobsen MD, Lecomte M, Li SY, Tavanti A, et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6:1041–1052. doi: 10.1128/EC.00041-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Odds FC, Davidson AD, Jacobsen MD, Tavanti A, Whyte JA, Kibbler CC, Ellis DH, Maiden MC, Shaw DJ, Gow NA. Candida albicans strain maintenance, replacement, and microvariation demonstrated by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3647–3658. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00934-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Odds FC, Palacio-Hernanz A, Cuadra J, Sanchez J. Disseminated Candida infection syndrome in heroin addicts – dominance of a single Candida albicans biotype. J Med Microbiol. 1987;23:275–277. doi: 10.1099/00222615-23-3-275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Odds FC, Webster CE, Fisk PG, Riley VC, Mayuranathan P, Simmons PD. Candida species and C. albicans biotypes in women attending clinics in genitourinary medicine. J Med Microbiol. 1989b;29:51–54. doi: 10.1099/00222615-29-1-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T. Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989a;86:2766–2770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Orita M, Suzuki Y, Sekiya T, Hayashi K. Rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics. 1989b;5:874–879. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Messer SA, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP. National surveillance of nosocomial blood stream infection due to Candida albicans: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibility in the SCOPE Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;31:327–332. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(97)00240-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Poirier S, Auger P, Joly J, Steben M. Interest of biotyping Candida albicans in chronic vulvovaginitis. Mycoses. 1990;33:24–28. doi: 10.1111/myc.1990.33.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pontieri E, Gregori L, Gennarelli M, Ceddia T, Novelli G, Dallapiccola B, De Bernardis F, Carruba G. Correlation of Sfil macrorestriction endonuclease fingerprint analysis of Candida parapsilosis isolates with source of isolation. J Med Microbiol. 1996;45:173–178. doi: 10.1099/00222615-45-3-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Poulain D, Hopwood V, Vernes A. Antigenic variability of Candida albicans. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1985;12:223–270. doi: 10.3109/10408418509104430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pujol C, Joly S, Lockhart S, Noel S, Tibayrenc M, Soll DR. Parity of MLEE, RAPD and Ca3 hybridization as fingerprinting methods for Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2348–2358. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2348-2358.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rieseberg LH. Homology among RAPD fragments in interspecific comparisons. Mol Ecol. 1996;5:99–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00295.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Robles JC, Koreen L, Park S, Perlin DS. Multilocus sequence typing is a reliable alternative method to DNA fingerprinting for discriminating among strains of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2480–2488. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2480-2488.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sampaio P, Gusmão L, Alves C, Pina-Vaz C, Amorim A, Pais C. Highly polymorphic microsatellite for identification of Candida albicans strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:552–557. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.552-557.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sampaio P, Gusmão L, Correia A, Alves C, Rodrigues AG, Pina-Vaz C, Amorim A, Pais C. New microsatellite multiplex PCR for Candida albicans strain typing reveals micro-evolutionary changes. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3869–3876. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3869-3876.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sampaio P1, Nogueira E, Loureiro AS, Delgado-Silva Y, Correia A, Pais C. Increased number of glutamine repeats in the C-terminal of Candida albicans Rlm1p enhances the resistance to stress agents. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 2009;96:395–404. doi: 10.1007/s10482-009-9352-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sangeorzan JA, Zervos MJ, Donabedian S, Kauffman CA. Validity of contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis as a typing system for Candida albicans. Mycoses. 1995;38:29–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schuller D, Valero E, Dequin S, Casal M. Survey of molecular methods for the typing of wine yeast strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;231:19–26. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00928-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schwartz DC, Cantor CR. Separation of yeast chromo-somesized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell. 1984;37:67–75. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Slutsky B, Buffo J, Soll DR. High-frequency switching of colony morphology in Candida albicans. Science. 1985;230:666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.3901258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sobel JD. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet. 2007;369:1961–1971. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60917-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Soll DR. High-frequency switching in Candida albicans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992;5:183–203. doi: 10.1128/cmr.5.2.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Soll DR. The ins and outs of dna fingerprinting the infectious fungi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:332–370. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.2.332-370.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Soll DR, Pujol C. Candida albicans clades. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;39:1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00242-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Fordyce MJ, Gow NA, Maiden MC, Odds FC. Population structure and properties of Candida albicans, as determined by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5601–5613. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5601-5613.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tavanti A, Gow NA, Senesi S, Maiden MC, Odds FC. Optimization and validation of multilocus sequence typing for Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3765–3776. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3765-3776.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Taylor JW, Geiser DM, Burt A, Koufopanou V. The evolutionary biology and population genetics underlying fungal strain typing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:126–146. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Walz M. Electrophoretic karyotyping. In: Kuck L, editor. The mycota II: genetics and biotechnology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1995. pp. 61–73. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang H, Guo H, Sun S, Xu J. Abundant sequence variation around the mitochondrial origin of replication in the human opportunistic yeast pathogen Candida albicans from a tropical island in China. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007;44:991–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Xu J. Fundamentals of fungal molecular population genetic analyses. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2006;8:75–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu J, Vilgalys R, Mitchell TG. Multiple gene genealogies reveal recent dispersion and hybridization in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Ecol. 2000;9:1471–1481. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xu YY, Samaranayake LP. Oral Candida albicans biotypes in Chinese patients with and without oral candidosis. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40:577–579. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)00196-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES