Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1995 May 15;14(10):2374–2384. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07232.x

A domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu A tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions.

J Y Yang 1, K Kim 1, M Jayaram 1, R M Harshey 1
PMCID: PMC398346  PMID: 7774595

Abstract

The functional configuration of Mu transposase (A protein) is its tetrameric form. We present here a model for the organization of a functional Mu A tetramer. Within the tetramer, assembly of each of the two active sites for Mu end cleavage requires amino acid contributions from the central and C-terminal domains (domains II and III respectively) of at least two Mu A monomers in a trans configuration. The Mu enhancer is likely to function in this assembly process by specifying the two monomers that provide their C-terminal domains for strand cleavage. The Mu B protein is not required in this step. Each of the two active sites for the strand transfer reaction is also organized by domain sharing (but in the reverse mode) between Mu A monomers; i.e. a donor of domain II (also the recipient of domain III) during cleavage is a recipient of domain II (and the donor of domain III) during strand transfer. The function of the Mu B protein (which is required at the strand transfer step) and that of the enhancer element may be analogous in that their interactions with Mu A (domain III and domain I alpha respectively) promote conformations of Mu A conducive to strand cleavage or strand transfer.

Full text

PDF
2384

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison R. G., Chaconas G. Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of mu DNA. A complex circuit of interactions involving the mu ends and the transpositional enhancer. J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 5;267(28):19963–19970. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker T. A., Kremenstova E., Luo L. Complete transposition requires four active monomers in the mu transposase tetramer. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2416–2428. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker T. A., Luo L. Identification of residues in the Mu transposase essential for catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 5;91(14):6654–6658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1003–1013. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90552-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi M., Savilahti H., Mizuuchi K. Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer. Cell. 1993 Aug 27;74(4):723–733. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90519-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bremer E., Silhavy T. J., Weinstock G. M. Transposition of lambda placMu is mediated by the A protein altered at its carboxy-terminal end. Gene. 1988 Nov 15;71(1):177–186. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bétermier M., Alazard R., Lefrère V., Chandler M. Functional domains of bacteriophage Mu transposase: properties of C-terminal deletions. Mol Microbiol. 1989 Sep;3(9):1159–1171. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen J. W., Lee J., Jayaram M. DNA cleavage in trans by the active site tyrosine during Flp recombination: switching protein partners before exchanging strands. Cell. 1992 May 15;69(4):647–658. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90228-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Engelman A., Bushman F. D., Craigie R. Identification of discrete functional domains of HIV-1 integrase and their organization within an active multimeric complex. EMBO J. 1993 Aug;12(8):3269–3275. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05996.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fayet O., Ramond P., Polard P., Prère M. F., Chandler M. Functional similarities between retroviruses and the IS3 family of bacterial insertion sequences? Mol Microbiol. 1990 Oct;4(10):1771–1777. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gill G. S., Hull R. C., Curtiss R., 3rd Mutator bacteriophage D108 and its DNA: an electron microscopic characterization. J Virol. 1981 Jan;37(1):420–430. doi: 10.1128/jvi.37.1.420-430.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harshey R. M., Getzoff E. D., Baldwin D. L., Miller J. L., Chaconas G. Primary structure of phage mu transposase: homology to mu repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(22):7676–7680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.22.7676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heichman K. A., Johnson R. C. The Hin invertasome: protein-mediated joining of distant recombination sites at the enhancer. Science. 1990 Aug 3;249(4968):511–517. doi: 10.1126/science.2166334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson R. C., Simon M. I. Hin-mediated site-specific recombination requires two 26 bp recombination sites and a 60 bp recombinational enhancer. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):781–791. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kahmann R., Rudt F., Koch C., Mertens G. G inversion in bacteriophage Mu DNA is stimulated by a site within the invertase gene and a host factor. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):771–780. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim K., Namgoong S. Y., Jayaram M., Harshey R. M. Step-arrest mutants of phage Mu transposase. Implications in DNA-protein assembly, Mu end cleavage, and strand transfer. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1472–1479. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kulkosky J., Jones K. S., Katz R. A., Mack J. P., Skalka A. M. Residues critical for retroviral integrative recombination in a region that is highly conserved among retroviral/retrotransposon integrases and bacterial insertion sequence transposases. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 May;12(5):2331–2338. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuo C. F., Zou A. H., Jayaram M., Getzoff E., Harshey R. DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1585–1591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07679.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lavoie B. D., Chaconas G. Site-specific HU binding in the Mu transpososome: conversion of a sequence-independent DNA-binding protein into a chemical nuclease. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12B):2510–2519. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12b.2510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lavoie B. D., Chan B. S., Allison R. G., Chaconas G. Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3051–3059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee J., Jayaram M. Mechanism of site-specific recombination. Logic of assembling recombinase catalytic site from fractional active sites. J Biol Chem. 1993 Aug 15;268(23):17564–17570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leung P. C., Harshey R. M. Two mutations of phage mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):189–199. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90561-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leung P. C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature. 1989 Apr 20;338(6217):656–658. doi: 10.1038/338656a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maxwell A., Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. B protein of bacteriophage mu is an ATPase that preferentially stimulates intermolecular DNA strand transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Feb;84(3):699–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.3.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mizuuchi K. Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1011–1051. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mizuuchi M., Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):303–311. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90104-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mizuuchi M., Weisberg R. A., Mizuuchi K. DNA sequence of the control region of phage D108: the N-terminal amino acid sequences of repressor and transposase are similar both in phage D108 and in its relative, phage Mu. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 May 12;14(9):3813–3825. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.9.3813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakayama C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Structural domains in phage Mu transposase: identification of the site-specific DNA-binding domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1809–1813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Namgoong S. Y., Jayaram M., Kim K., Harshey R. M. DNA-protein cooperativity in the assembly and stabilization of mu strand transfer complex. Relevance of DNA phasing and att site cleavage. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 13;238(4):514–527. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rådström P., Sköld O., Swedberg G., Flensburg J., Roy P. H., Sundström L. Transposon Tn5090 of plasmid R751, which carries an integron, is related to Tn7, Mu, and the retroelements. J Bacteriol. 1994 Jun;176(11):3257–3268. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.11.3257-3268.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Surette M. G., Buch S. J., Chaconas G. Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Surette M. G., Chaconas G. The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage. Cell. 1992 Mar 20;68(6):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90081-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Surette M. G., Harkness T., Chaconas G. Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations. J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 15;266(5):3118–3124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Surette M. G., Lavoie B. D., Chaconas G. Action at a distance in Mu DNA transposition: an enhancer-like element is the site of action of supercoiling relief activity by integration host factor (IHF). EMBO J. 1989 Nov;8(11):3483–3489. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08513.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Toussaint A., Faelen M., Desmet L., Allet B. The products of gene A of the related phages Mu and D108 differ in their specificities. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;190(1):70–79. doi: 10.1007/BF00330326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vogel J. L., Li Z. J., Howe M. M., Toussaint A., Higgins N. P. Temperature-sensitive mutations in the bacteriophage Mu c repressor locate a 63-amino-acid DNA-binding domain. J Bacteriol. 1991 Oct;173(20):6568–6577. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.20.6568-6577.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang Z., Harshey R. M. Crucial role for DNA supercoiling in Mu transposition: a kinetic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 18;91(2):699–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.2.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. van Gent D. C., Vink C., Groeneger A. A., Plasterk R. H. Complementation between HIV integrase proteins mutated in different domains. EMBO J. 1993 Aug;12(8):3261–3267. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05995.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES