Abstract
The plasma membrane contributes to formation of autophagosomes, the double-membrane vesicles that sequester cytosolic cargo and deliver it to lysosomes for degradation during autophagy. In this study, we have identified a regulatory role for connexins (Cx), main components of plasma membrane gap junctions, in autophagosome formation. We have found that plasma membrane-localised Cx proteins constitutively downregulate autophagy via a direct interaction with several autophagy-related proteins involved in the initial steps of autophagosome formation such as Atg16 and components of the PI3K autophagy initiation complex (Vps34, Beclin-1 and Vps15). On nutrient starvation, this inhibitory effect is released by the arrival of Atg14 to the Cx-Atg complex. This promotes the internalization of Cx-Atg along with Atg9, which is also recruited to the plasma membrane in response to starvation. Maturation of the Cx-containing pre-autophagosomes into autophagosomes leads to degradation of these endogenous inhibitors, allowing for sustained activation of autophagy.
Keywords: Autophagy, Connexins, Gap junctions, Lysosomes, Plasma membrane
Introduction
Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is responsible for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis through the continuous turnover of proteins and organelles in lysosomes1 and participates in the cellular response to stress by eliminating damaged cellular structures and mobilizing intracellular energy stores. Alterations in this catabolic pathway have been linked to a growing number of human pathologies including cardiovascular diseases, neurodegeneration, microbial infection and cancer2, 3.
The cytosolic material delivered to lysosomes for degradation by autophagy is first sequestered into double-membrane vesicles known as autophagosomes4. Organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum, the mitochondria, the Golgi apparatus, the nuclear envelope and the plasma membrane (PM) and recycling endosomes have been shown to contribute to the formation of the autophagosome membrane5–11. In fact, autophagosome biogenesis requires the sequential assembly of autophagy-related proteins (Atg) that organize into functional complexes which come from different subcellular locations4. The earlier events involve the arrival of two different kinase protein complexes, the Beclin-1-Vps34-Vps15-Atg14 and the ULK1-Atg13-FIP200 complexes, and of the integral membrane protein Atg912–14. Vps34-dependent phosphorylation of the lipids in specific intracellular membrane regions marks the site from where autophagosome membranes emerge and elongate through covalent conjugation of Atg5/Atg12/Atg16 and of LC3 with phosphatidylethanolamine (LC3-II)15. Although most of the proteins of the original donor membrane are excluded from the forming autophagosome, some of them may get incorporated into the limiting membrane of this organelle and undergo degradation through autophagy.
Autophagy contributes to the turnover of PM proteins16–18 including surface receptors and structural components such as connexins (Cx), the multispan transmembrane proteins that assemble to form PM gap junctions18–21. The recent discovery that the PM is a site of autophagosome biogenesis motivated us to analyze whether Cx are incorporated in the forming autophagosome. In this work, we have found that Cx are present in autophagosome precursor structures that form prior to the formation of the autophagosome limiting membrane. In fact, Cx interact with a subset of Atgs at the PM and contribute to negatively modulate basal autophagy. Cx elimination or internalization from the PM is enough to upregulate autophagosome biogenesis and autophagy even in nutrient-rich conditions. Our study identifies Cx the regulated association of Atg14 and Atg9 to pre-existing Cx-Atg complexes at the PM as the trigger that neutralizes the Cx inhibitory effect through their internalization and degradation via autophagy.
Results
Connexin 43 associates to pre-autophagosomal structures
Cx can be detected in autophagosomes during nutrient starvation that induces their rapid internalization and autophagic degradation18, 21 (Fig. 1a). We found an unusually high enrichment of Cx in autophagosomes that resembles the one of autophagosome structural proteins such as LC3-II (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). In addition, more than 80% of isolated autophagosomes co-stained for Cx (Supplementary Fig. 1b).
Co-staining for Atg16 (a marker for pre-autophagosomal structures) and LC3 (a marker of the limiting membrane and autophagosomes) in cells expressing GFP-Cx43 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1c) or stained for endogenous Cx43 (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1d, e) revealed the presence of this Cx in vesicles positive for both LC3 and Atg16, and also in Atg16-positive vesicles that did not stain for LC3. Cx43 did not colocalize under these conditions with Atg9 or Atg14, also involved in the early steps of autophagosome formation (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1d). Activation of autophagy by serum removal (Fig. 1b) or blockage of autophagosome degradation with an inhibitor of lysosomal proteolysis (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1d, e) both increased the amount of Cx43 in LC3 positive vesicles, but did not increase Cx43 colocalization with Atg16. Time-lapse microscopy and 3D reconstruction confirmed the presence of Atg16 at PM Cx-enriched gap junction (GJ) (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1f) that markedly increased when Cx43 internalization was blocked (i.e. Eps15 knock-down22 ; Fig 1e).
A pool of Atg16 co-immunoprecipitated with Cx43 and vice versa (Fig. 1f) even after activation of autophagy by serum removal (Fig. 1g). Clathrin, shown to bind Atg16 at the PM8 could also be detected in the Cx43 pull-downs albeit at lower levels than Atg16 (Fig. 1g). In contrast, LC3 was not retrieved with Cx43 (Fig. 1g), suggesting that although both proteins localize in autophagosomes, they do not interact in theses compartments. Atg16 and Cx43 interaction was still observed upon pharmacological (3-methyladenine treatment) or genetic (Atg5−/− cells) inhibition of autophagy (Fig. 1h, Supplementary Fig. 1g; efficacy of treatments is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Atg5 was not recovered as part of the Atg16-Cx43 complex (Supplementary Fig. 1h), suggesting that these two proteins interact before autophagy activation occurs. We found that Cx43 interacts at the Atg16 C-terminus (Fig. 1i) whereas Atg5 binds the Atg16 N-terminus (Supplementary Fig. 1i). Overall, we conclude that a fraction of Cx43 interacts with Atg16 before nucleation and limiting membrane elongation occurs.
Cx43 negatively modulates autophagy
To elucidate the functional relevance of the observed interaction of Cx43 with pre-autophagosome structures we used mouse osteoblasts (MOB) from wild type (Wt) and Cx43-null mice (Cx43−/−)23. Cells lacking Cx43 had higher: 1) number of LC3-positive puncta in nutrient-rich media (Fig. 2a) that further increased upon serum removal (Supplementary Fig. 2c); 2) number of GABARAP positive vesicles (Fig. 2a)24; 3) number of electron microscopic profiles compatible with autophagic vacuoles25 (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 2d); and 4) steady-state levels of LC3-II (Fig. 2c). Higher number of autophagic vesicles in Cx43−/− likely reflects increased biogenesis rather than reduced lysosomal clearance because the percentage of autophagosomes (pre-lysosomal fusion) and autophagolysosomes (post-lysosomal fusion) in these cells did not differ from Wt cells (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Furthermore, Cx43−/− cells displayed higher fluxes of LC3 (LC3-II accumulation upon lysosomal proteolysis inhibition) and higher increases in the levels of LC3-II at two different times upon proteolysis blockage (when any increase in LC3-II can only result from autophagosome synthesis) (Fig. 2c). Similar increases in autophagosome formation and autophagic flux in Cx43−/− cells were observed using the mCherry-GFP-LC3 reporter that allows tracking autophagosome/lysosome fusion as an increase in red fluorescence puncta (GFP fluorescence decreases at low pH)26 (Fig. 2d). Electron microscopy of Cx43+/− mice livers revealed a significant increase in the number and size of autophagic vacuoles (mostly autophagolysosomes) (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 2e, f) confirming that Cx43 deficit leads to constitutive autophagy activation also in vivo. Expression of GFP-Cx43 in Cx43−/− cells was enough to partially suppress the induction of basal autophagy (Fig. 2f, g) whereas overexpression of Cx43 in control MEFs consistently reduced autophagic flux (Supplementary Fig. 2g).
Overall these results support a previously unknown role of Cx43 as an endogenous negative regulator of autophagosome formation.
Cx43-dependent inhibition of autophagy does not require functional GJ communication
Because one of the key functions of PM Cx is their role in intracellular communication, we tried to recapitulate the upregulation of autophagy observed in Cx-deficient cells with the potent GJ inhibitor 18α glycyrrhetinic acid (GA)27 that disrupts Cx arrangement within GJ, without affecting PM localization28 (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Chemical inhibition of GJ function led to a discrete increase in the steady-state levels of LC3-II and LC3-positive puncta, but contrary to Cx ablation, autophagic flux was reduced (Fig. 3a, b). A similar effect was noted in Cx43−/− cells (Fig. 3a) suggesting that these changes were independent of Cx. Inhibition of GJ function did not change levels of Atg16-positive vesicles (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c) or Cx association with these pre-autophagosome structures (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Therefore, the constitutive inhibitory effect of Cx over autophagy may not depend on their role in intercellular communication.
Next, we analyzed whether induction of autophagy upon Cx43 depletion was related to its involvement in signal transduction29. Cx43−/− cells displayed reduced ERK and AMPK phosphorylation and enhanced GSK3 phosphorylation, previously described to be conducive to autophagy repression30–32, rather than to the autophagic activation observed in these cells (Supplementary Fig. 3e). The activity of the mTOR pathway, negative regulator of autophagy, and its down-regulation by rapamycin or serum removal were comparable in control and Cx43−/− cells (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Furthermore, both cell types displayed similar distribution and formation of ULK1-positive puncta (Supplementary Fig. 3g), in further support that autophagy upregulation was not a result of altered mTOR signaling. Therefore, our results support that autophagy upregulation was a primary consequence of the loss of the Cx43 protein rather than secondary to a reduction of its known cellular functions.
We next analyzed the impact of the phosphorylation state of Cx4333 on its inhibitory effect on autophagy. Inhibition of PKA, PKC or ERK, described to phosphorylate Cx4333, discretely enhanced autophagic activity but independently of the presence or not of Cx43 (Fig. 3c, d). In contrast, inhibition of Src lead to a robust induction of autophagy in control cells as described before34, but failed to further enhance autophagy in Cx43−/− cells (Fig. 3c, d). The stimulatory effect of rapamycin on Cx43−/− cells supported that the lack of effect of the Src inhibitor was not due to autophagy saturation. Although the two described Src phosphorylation sites are located in its C-terminus (Tyr247 and Tyr265), overexpression of the C-terminus alone was insufficient to repress autophagy in Cx43−/− cells and it could not be pulled down with Atg16 (Fig. 3e, f), suggesting that either the membrane location and/or other regions of this protein were required for autophagy inhibition. Expression of a GJ “functionally dead” C-terminus tagged Cx43 (Cx43-GFP) that localizes to the PM effectively reduced autophagy in these cells, further reinforcing that loss of GJ function was not behind the autophagy upregulation (Fig. 3e). A truncated version of GFP-Cx43 at residue 258 that lacks most of the C-terminus (ΔC) but preserves the proximal Src-phosphorylation site, repressed autophagy and could still be pulled down with Atg16 (Fig. 3e, g). However, the ability to repress autophagy was loss in a truncated Cx43 version only 13 residues shorter (truncate at residue 245) that lacks this proximal Src-phosphorylation site (Fig. 3e). In summary, these results support that the effect of Cx43 on autophagy does not depend on its role in GJ communication or signal transduction, but it requires the physical interaction of autophagy precursors, such as Atg16, with regions outside Cx43 C-terminus and a Src-dependent phosphorylation in the proximal tyrosine residue of the C-terminus.
Cx43 internalization abrogates its inhibitory effect on autophagy
To evaluate the consequences of physiological changes in the amount of Cx at the PM on autophagy, we induced acute internalization of GJ with either lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane) or tamoxifen (Tx)35, 36. Both drugs under conditions that do not compromise cell viability (Supplementary Fig. 4a) led to the expected internalization of Cx43 (Supplementary Fig. 4b) as well as higher LC3-II steady-state levels, number of LC3-positive compartments and LC3 flux (Fig. 4a–d). Similar treatments in Cx43−/− cells did not further activate autophagy (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4c show flux of exogenous or endogenous LC3, respectively).
Tx-induced internalization of Cx required active autophagy (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e), but this release of the Cx43 blockage of autophagy through its internalization may occur in response to specific stimuli, such as starvation but it could not be triggered by rapamycin (Supplementary Fig. 4f). Chemical-induced internalization of Cx43 coincided with an increase in the number of Atg16-positive pre-autophagic compartments (Fig. 4e, f) comparable to the one in Cx43-deficient cells (Fig. 4g, h). The internalized Cx43 colocalized with Atg16 vesicles both positive and negative for LC3 (Fig. 4f) but internalization led to reduced interaction between Atg16-Cx43 (Fig 4i) in further support that binding between both proteins occurs at the PM and that once in the pre-autophagosomal structures both proteins dissociate although they remain in the same compartment. All together, these results support that the presence of Cx43 at the PM is required for its inhibitory effect over autophagy and that degradation of this endogenous inhibitor through autophagy contributes to release its autophagic blockage.
Internalized Cx43 is targeted to recycling endosomes
We have previously shown that autophagy-induced internalization of Cx43 is mediated by clathrin in an Eps15-dependent manner18, but the endocytic compartments37 involved in this traffic are unknown. Since endosomal compartments contribute to the formation of pre-autophagosomal structures and are sites of confluence of Atg from different sources including PM10, 11, 38, we analyzed the endocytic route followed by Cx43 upon autophagy-induced internalization.
Immunofluorescence analysis after serum deprivation or lindane treatment did not reveal significant colocalization of Cx43 with early (EEA1) or late (Rab9) endosomal markers and only discrete co-staining with Rab7, involved in endosome and autophagosome maturation39 (Fig. 5a–c). Immunoblot analysis of purified Rab9-positive late endosomes demonstrated the presence of pre-autophagosome components in this fraction, such as Atg16 and LC3-II but almost complete absence of most Cx (Fig. 5d, e). Only during starvation, some Cx43 became visible in late endosomes (Fig. 5e) but at relatively low levels when compared to the amount in autophagosomes (Fig. 1a).
Cytosolic vesicles containing Cx43 internalized upon induction of autophagy were positive for transferrin (Fig. 5f–h), common marker of recycling endosomes, recently described as sites of arrival of autophagic precursors for autophagosome biogenesis11, 33. Interestingly, part of the Atg16 reaching this compartment has been shown to originate from the PM, suggesting that Cx43 and Atg16 travel together to recycle endosomes where they coincide with LC3 and additional autophagosome precursors.
Recruitment of Atg to Cx43-enriched plasma membrane regions upon autophagy induction
We next investigated if besides Atg16 other Atgs associated with Cx43. Immunoblot demonstrated the presence in isolated PMs of Atg16 along with multiple components of the class III phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase complex (PI3K) (initiation complex) both under fed and starvation conditions (Fig. 6a). The three main core proteins of this kinase complex, Vps34, Beclin-1 and Vps15 could be pulled down with Cx43 both in serum-supplemented cells and upon serum removal (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 5a). Rapamycin treatment (Supplementary Fig. 5b), Atg5-deficiency (Fig. 6c) or knock-down of Atg16 (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 5c) did not affect the PI3K-Cx43 interaction. The negative regulator of the Vps34 kinase activity, Rubicon40, 41 was not detected in the Cx-Atg complex (Fig. 6b) whereas its positive regulator Atg14 was only retrieved in the Cx43 pull downs upon serum removal (Fig. 6b). In fact, Atg14 content was higher in PM fractions isolated during nutrient deprivation (Fig. 6a) and Atg14 could be detected at Cx43-enriched regions of the PM under these conditions (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Fig. 5d). Video microscopy and 3D reconstruction confirmed the arrival of Atg14 and its mobilization along GJ during the first hour of serum removal (Fig. 6f). Contrary to Cx43, Atg14 was no present in autophagosomes (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 5e) and did not undergo lysosomal degradation (Supplementary Fig. 5d).
The serum-dependent association of Atg14 with Cx43 could not be triggered by rapamycin (Supplementary Fig. 5b), was independent of the presence of Atg16 (Fig. 6d), was preserved during chemically-induced Cx43 internalization (Fig. 4i) and even if late steps of autophagosome formation were compromised (i.e. Atg5−/− cells; Fig. 6g). Although the proximal Src-phosphorylation site was required for the inhibitory effect of Cx43 on autophagy (Fig. 3e), its elimination was not sufficient to promote Atg14-Cx43 association under basal conditions (Supplementary Fig. 5f). PM association of the PI3K complex is independent of Atg16, Atg5 or Atg7, but we confirmed its dependence on Cx43. Both biochemical analysis of isolated PMs (Fig. 6h) and image-based procedures (Fig. 6i) demonstrated a drastic reduction in levels of PI3K components in the PM of Cx43-deficient cells. In addition, contrary to the cytosolic redistribution of Atg14 observed in control cells upon serum removal, Atg14 remained confined in the Golgi under these conditions in Cx43-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. 5g).
Arrival of Atg14 to the Cx-Atg complex coincides with an increase of PI3P (the phospholipid product of Vps34 detected using a fluorescent-tagged FYVE domain)42 in the PM domains containing Cx43 (Fig. 6j). These findings are suggestive of autophagosome biogenesis from this PM location during starvation-induced autophagy.
Atg14 and Atg9 trigger Cx43 internalization and release its inhibitory effect on autophagy
Internalized Atg9 from the PM into the recycling endosome compartment, where it coincides with Atg16 to initiate autophagosome biogenesis, has been recently described11. We found that similar to Atg14, PM levels of Atg9 (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 6a) and its interaction with Cx43 (Fig. 7b) increased upon serum removal. Association of Atg9 with Cx43 was not disrupted, and in fact it was enhanced, if the later steps in autophagosome formation were inhibited (i.e. Atg7 knock-down is shown in Supplementary Fig. 6b), suggesting that the interaction of Atg9 with Cx43 occurs before autophagosome formation. Inhibition of the PI3K activity with 3-methlyadenine did not affect the association of Atg9 with Cx43 (Fig. 7c). Contrary to Atg14, PM arrival of Atg9 occurs independently of Cx43, and actually Cx43-deficient cells have higher Atg9 content in their PM (Fig. 7d and Supplementary Fig. 6c). Interestingly, interventions that prevent the internalization of Cx43 (i.e. Eps15 knock-down) increased the amount of Atg9 at PM (Fig. 7e) and bound to Cx43 (Supplementary Fig. 6d), suggesting that although recruitment of Atg9 to the PM does not require Cx43 (Fig. 7d), both proteins interact in this compartment prior to Cx43 internalization.
To further characterize the serum-dependent arrival of Atg14 and Atg9 to Cx43-Atg, we knocked them down separately (Supplementary Fig. 6e). Association of Atg14 and Atg9 with Cx43 was not interdependent, since Atg14 was still retrieved in the Cx43-pull downs in Atg9-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. 6f) and Atg9 retained its serum-dependent association with Cx43 in Atg14-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. 6g). However, depletion of either of them was sufficient to prevent serum-dependent (Fig. 7f, g) or chemically-induced (Fig. 7h and Supplementary Fig. 6h) internalization of Cx43 from the PM. We conclude that arrival of Atg14 and Atg9 to Cx43-enriched PM regions occurs independently but the temporal and spatial coincidence of both Atgs in these regions is required to trigger Cx43 internalization and the subsequent autophagic degradation of this endogenous autophagy inhibitor.
Conserved inhibitory effect of Cx on autophagy
Cx43 belongs to a family of transmembrane proteins with common structure but divergent intracytoplasmic loops and C-terminal tails43 (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Since other Cx are also highly enriched in autophagosomes (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a) and undergo degradation by autophagy18, 19, we analyzed the possible autophagy inhibitory effect of other Cx. Separate knock-down of Cx26, Cx32 or Cx43 present in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 7b) led in all cases to: i) increase in LC3-fluorescent puncta, ii) higher LC3-II steady-state levels, iii) enhanced LC3-II flux by immunoblot and by the mCherry-GFP-LC3 reporter, iv) high number of autophagolysosomes by electron microscopy and v) higher rates of “in bulk” autophagy (total rates of long half-life protein degradation) and of selective autophagy (oleic acid induced macrolipophagy is shown) (Fig. 8b–e and Supplementary Fig. 7c–f).
As in the case of Cx43, both recombinant expressed (Supplementary Fig. 7g) and endogenous Cx26 and Cx32 (Fig. 8f) also interact with Atg16. Overall, these results support that the inhibitory effect of Cx43 on autophagy and its interplay with Atg involved in autophagosome biogenesis is shared by other members of the connexin family.
Discussion
In this work, we describe a constitutive inhibitory effect of PM Cx on autophagosome biogenesis that can be suppressed by internalization and degradation of Cx by autophagy. By degrading these negative regulators, cells might assure maximal activation of autophagy in response to nutritional stress.
The inhibitory effect of Cx43 on autophagy seems independent of its function in intercellular communication and signaling because (i) the impact on autophagy of GJ blockage and Cx absence are opposite, (ii) forms of Cx inactive for these other functions (i.e. N-terminus GFP-tagged Cx4345) still inhibit autophagy and (iii) the C-terminus of Cx, essential for these other functions, is not required for autophagy inhibition. We propose that Cx act as negative regulators of autophagy under basal conditions by sequestering the initiation complex PI3K in an inactive status at the PM and by trapping a pool of the pre-autophagosomal protein Atg16 in this compartment (Supplementary Fig. 8). The presence of this reservoir of pre-assembled but inactive autophagy initiation complexes bound to Cx at the PM may eliminate the need for de novo synthesis of Atgs to initiate autophagosome biogenesis in conditions such as nutritional starvation when protein synthesis is reduced. Activation of the nucleation kinase activity upon recruitment of Atg14 and the coincident arrival of Atg9 to this location trigger Cx internalization and release of its inhibitory effect. Although inhibition of PI3K did not prevent Cx binding to either of the autophagosome precursors, Atg16 and Atg9, it blocked the internalization of this complex, suggesting that phosphorylation of PM lipids in the proximity of the Cx-Atg complex could promote conformational changes in this complex required for its internalization and subsequent maturation of the pre-autophagosomal structures into autophagosomes. Future studies are required to determine if one of these conformational changes also prevent Src-mediated phosphorylation of Cx43, required to sustain its inhibitory effect on autophagy. The fact that this phosphorylation has been linked to GJ closing45 opens the intriguing possibility that Cx43 not engaged in cellular communication but present at the PM are the ones involved in Atg sequestration in this compartment.
Although the presence of Cx in recycling endosomes could contribute to further recruitment of Atg precursors from different sources, we propose that Cx interacts with Atg16 and the PI3K complex at the PM before their trafficking to recycling endosomes as (i) we can detect these Atgs at Cx43-enriched regions of the PM, (ii) they remain at the PM when Cx internalization is blocked and (iii) they are no longer visible at the PM of Cx-deficient cells. Atg9 that normally resides in small cytoplasmic vesicles46, reaches the PM during starvation in a Cx- and PI3K-independent manner but it requires Cx for its internalization.
Although in our model we depict Atg16, Atg14/initiation complex and Atg9 all interacting with the same Cx complex (Supplementary Fig. 8), it is possible that each of these Atg binds to different molecules of Cx43 and that the ability of this structural membrane protein to multimerize contributes to bringing together the different parts of the autophagosome initiation complex. It is possible that Atg9 and Atg16 are part of Cx heterocomplexes and that disassembly of Cx during internalization may be responsible Atg9 and Atg16 segregating through different vesicles in their route from the PM to the recycling endosomes (Supplementary Fig. 8).
The identification of PM Cx as endogenous negative regulators of autophagy presents them now as possible targets to enhance autophagy activity under conditions when maximal activation of autophagy is needed.
Online Methods
Animals and cells
Adult (4–6 months) male Wistar rats and C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories) were used. Where indicated, animals were starved for 6h or 24h before organelle isolation by completely removing food but maintaining water supply ad libitum. Cx43+/− mice were generated as described before47. All animal procedures were conducted under an animal study protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from mice null for Atg5 (Atg−/−) were a generous gift of Dr. N. Mizushima (U. Tokyo, Japan). Mouse osteoblasts (MOBs) from Cx43−/− mice were generated as described before23. Normal rat kidney (NRK) cells and HeLa cells were from the American Type Culture Collection. All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Sigma) containing 10% FBS 50μg/ml penicillin, and 50μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C with 5% CO2. Knock-out of the proteins of interest (Atg5 and Cx43) was tested periodically (each 2–3 months) during the study and representative immunoblots for the absence of the proteins are included in the manuscript. All the cells lines were tested for mycoplasma contamination using DNA staining protocol with Hoechst 33258 dye. Serum removal was performed by thoroughly washing the cells with Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (Invitrogen) and placing them in serum-free medium. Where indicated, macroautophagy was inhibited by addition of 3-methyladenine (10mM) (Sigma) and lysosomal proteolysis was inhibited by addition of chloroquine (50μM) or with NH4Cl (20mM) and leupeptin (100μM) (Fisher BioReagents). The fluorometric CellTiter-Blue Assay from Promega was used as method for assessing cell viability upon tamoxifen and lindane treatments.
Chemicals and plasmids
Sources of chemicals and antibodies were as described previously3,6,9 and except where it stated differently they were used at dilution 1:1,000 (for immunoblot IB) and 1:200 (for immunofluorescence IF). The antibodies against Cx43 (#C6219; 1:2,000 IB), Cx32 (#C6344; 1:500 IB), flag (#F1804; 1:2,000 IF) and β-tubulin (#T8328) were from Sigma-Aldrich; against Vps34 (#382100; 1:500 IB), Cx43 (#138300 and #710700; 1:500 IB), Cx32 (#358900; 1:500 IB), and Cx26 (#335800 and #710500; 1:500 IB) from Invitrogen; against LAMP1 (#VAM-EN001) from Stressgen; against calnexin (#MA3-027; 1:10,000 IB) from Affinity Bioreagents; against GAPDH (#ab8245) and actin (#ab6276) from Abcam; against LC3 (#2775), ERK1/2 (#9101), P-ERK1/2 (#9102), mTOR (#2972), P-mTOR (Ser2448) (#2971), P-p70S6K (#9205), p70S6K (#9202), P-GSK3 (#9331), GSK3 (#5676), P-AMPK (#2531), AMPK (#2603) and Atg7 (#2631) from Cell Signaling Technology; against ULK1 (#NB110-74844), Atg9 (#NB100-56893;1:500 IB), Vps15 (#NBP1-304630), Eps15 (#NB110-74688), Atg5 (#NB110-53818) from Novus Biologicals; against Cx43 (#610061), e-cadherin (#610182), Beclin-1 (#612112; 1:2,000 IB), GM130 (#558712), EEA1 (#610456), BiP (#610987; 1:10,000 IB) and clathrin (#610499) from BD Biosciences, against LC3 (#M152-3 and #PM036), Atg16 (#PM040), Atg14 (#PD026) and Rubicon (#PD027) from MBL; against GABARAP (#sc-28938), Rab9 (#sc-28573) and Rab7 (#sc-10767; 1:500 IB) from Santa Cruz and against GRP94 (#SPA-850; 1:15,000 IB) from Assay Designs. The anti-GFP antibody peroxidase conjugated (#600-103-215) was from Rockland and the antibody against Na+/K+ ATPase was donated by Dr. W. J. Ball (University of Cincinnati, OH). The Atg16 constructs were generously donated by Dr. Rubinsztein (U. Cambridge, UK), GFP-Cx43 was a generous gift from Dr. Pereira (U. Coimbra, Portugal), and the C-terminus Cx43 tagged to flag and the mCherry-GFP-LC3 and pEGFP-Atg14 were from Addgene. SuperfolderGFP and EBFP2 plasmids were generously provided by the Fluorescent Protein Resource Center of Albert Einstein College of Medicine. N-terminal tagged full length Cx43 and ΔCT258 or ΔCT245 were inserted in the Sac1 linearized EGFP-C1 vector that contains the sequence for superfolderGFP or EBFP2 in place of the EGFP coding sequence using the following primers: N-terminal tagged Cx43 primers: common forward primer (CGGACTCAGATCTCGAGCTCAGATGGGTGACT GGAGTGCCTTG), full length Cx43 reverse primer (AGAATTCGAAGCTTGAGCTCT TAAATCTCCAGGTCATCAGGC), Δ CT258-Cx43 reverse primer (AGAATTCGAAGCTTGAGC TCTTATGATGGGCTCAGTGGGCCAG) and ΔCT245 reverse primer AGAATTCGAAGCTTGAGCTCTTAGCTTCTTC CCTTCACGCGATCC). Cx43-sfGFP with the removed stop codon was inserted in the Sac1 linearized sfGFP-N1 vector using the following primers: forward (TCGACGGTACCGCGGGCCCGGGCACCAATG GGTGACTGGAG) and reverse (GGTGGCGACCGGTGGATCCCGGGCGGAAATCTCCA GGTCATCAG). sfGFP-ATG16 was constructed by inserting the mouse ATG16L1 variant 3 sequence (Addgene 24302) in the Sac1 linearized sfGFP-N1 vector using the following primers: forward (CGGACTCAGA TCTCGAGCTCAGATGTCGTCGGGCCTGCGC) and reverse (AGAATTCGAAGCTTGAGC TCTCAAGGCTGTGCCCACAGCAC). pEGFP-2xFYVEHrs was donated by Dr. Jonathan M. Backer. Cx-Dendra2 construct were generously provided by Michael Davidson (Florida State University, FL). Tamoxifen, lindane and 18α glycyrrhetinic acid were from EMB Biosciences. Transferrin-594, FAST DiI, and secondary antibodies were from Life Technologies. The inhibitors of the kinase activity of PKC were from Promega, PKA from Enzo Life Science, ERK (U01256) from Cell Signaling and Src (AZD0530) from Selleck Chemicals.
Cell transfection and RNA interference
Cells were transfected with cDNA constructs using either Lipofectamine2000 or Optifect reagent (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For lentivirus-mediated shRNA transfer vector plasmids containing shRNA against Cx43, 32, 26 and Atg7, Atg14 and Eps15 were purchased from Sigma Mission Library and were against the following sequences: Cx26 (CCGGGAGAGATAAAGAACGAGTTTA); Cx32 (CCGGCTCACCTGAATACAAGCAGAA); Cx43 (CCGGCCCACCTTTGTGTCTTCCATA); Eps15 (CCGGCCTATGAGCATGGGATACAAA); Atg16 (CA ATGTGTAATGAGTGGACAT and AGCTTCAAATGATTTTGCA); Atg9A (CCACCGGCTTATCAAGTTTAT and GGCTTA TCAAGTTTATCTA); Atg14 (CCGTACACAAACAGCTTTCTA and GCTGAAGCAAACA ATATGTAA) and Atg7 (GATCCCCGCAGCTCATTGATAACCAT). Lentiviral particles were generated by co-transfection with the third-generation packaging constructs pMDLg/pRRE and pRSV-REV, and as envelope the G glycoprotein of the VSV (pMD2.G) into HEK293T cells as described before44.
Immunostaining and image analysis
Indirect immunofluorescence was performed following conventional procedures. Briefly, cells were grown on coverslips, fixed in either cold methanol or 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked and permeabilized (1% BSA, 2% New born calf serum, 0.01% Triton X-100), and then incubated with the primary and corresponding fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies as described48. Except otherwise noted, all slides were mounted for microscopy using Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech) containing DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) to highlight the nucleus. Images were collected using either ApoTome.2 system in an Axiovert 200 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a ×63 1.4 N.A. oil objective or a laser-scanning confocal microscope Leica SP5II AOBS (Leica) and prepared using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 software (Adobe Systems). For quantitative analysis, z-stack images of MEFs were merged in a single image, but in the case of MOB cells that are considerably flatter, a single image was taken at the section of the maximum nucleus diameter. The number of fluorescent cytosolic particles (puncta) per cell was determined using the Analyze Particles function of ImageJ (NIH) after applying a fixed threshold to all images. Percentage of colocalization was calculated using the JACoP plug-in in this software. All quantifications were done blindly. 3D reconstruction images were modeled as mixed rendering using the Inside4D module for AxioVision Rel. 4.8 after applying the Nyquist sampling criteria. Videomicroscopy and 3D reconstruction images were carried out in a Zeiss 510 LSCM microscope, 63x-Plan-Apochromat/1.40 Oil DIC objective, Dual-Channel, 405 and 489 nm laser illumination with 415–480 and 520–555 nm bandpass filters, respectively. All representative images include quantification in the same or next panel and the number of repetitions is indicated in the corresponding figure legends.
Autophagic measurements
Intracellular protein degradation was measured by metabolic labeling with [3H]leucine (NENPerkinElmer Life Sciences) for 48h at 37°C and chase of the radiolabeled amino acids released to the media at different times as described before49. Autophagic flux was measured by immunoblot as changes in levels of LC3-II upon inhibition of lysosomal proteolysis (net flux) and autophagosome formation as the increase in LC3-II levels at two consecutive times during lysosomal proteolysis inhibition50. Autophagosome content was evaluated as the number of fluorescent puncta after immunostaining with antibodies against endogenous LC3. Autophagic flux was also tested by transient transfection of the mCherry-GFP-LC3 plasmid. Quantification of the yellow and red puncta was performed by Green and Red Puncta Colocalization Macro for ImageJ (D. J. Swiwarski modified by R.K. Dagda).
Electron microscopy
Cultured cells and liver sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde in 100mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7.43, dehydrated and embedded in LR-White resin (LADD Research Industries). All grids were viewed on a JEOL 100CX II transmission electron microscope at 80kV. Morphometric analysis of transmitted electron micrographs was done blinded using ImageJ (NIH). Autophagic vacuoles were identified using standard criteria44 and were catalogued as autophagosomes or autophagolysosomes if they meet two or more for the following criteria: for autophagosomes they should have double membrane (completely or partially visible), absence of ribosomes in the outer membrane, luminal density comparable to the surrounding cytosol and identifiable organelles or regions of organelles in their lumen; for autophagolysosomes they should have similar size but less than 40% of membrane visible as double, luminal density lower than surrounding cytosol and luminal material no recognizable as specific organelles and/or amorphous material. Primary and secondary lysosomes (identified as single membrane vesicles of higher density and smaller average diameter) were excluded from the quantification. The term autophagic vacuole was used for those instances in which differentiation between autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes was not possible. Annotated micrographs were independently reviewed by two people and the average of their scoring was used for each micrograph. All representative images include quantification in the same figure or as supplementary figure and the number of repetitions is indicated in the corresponding figure legends.
Subcellular fractions
Plasma membrane, ER and Golgi fractions were isolated from rat liver using procedures described previously51. Autophagic vacuoles were isolated from mouse liver using discontinuous metrizamide density gradient as described previously52. Endosomal isolation was carried out as previously described53.
Immunoblot and immunoprecipitation
Cell lysates were prepared by solubilization in RIPA buffer (1% Triton-X 100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.15M NaCl, 0.01M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The solubilized fraction was recovered in the supernatant after centrifugation at 12,000g for 30min, and protein concentration was measured by the Lowry method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. Co-immunoprecipitation was done from cellular extracts solubilized in lysis buffer (190mM NaCl, 50mM Tris-HCl, 6mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, pH 8.3) as described18. After SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, the proteins recognized by the specific antibodies were visualized by chemiluminescence methods (Western Lightning; PerkinElmer) using peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Membranes were developed using the LAS-3000 Imaging System (Fujifilm) and densitometric quantification was performed in unsaturated images using ImageJ (NIH). To avoid interference of the IgG signal in the immunoprecipitates whenever possible pulldowns and immunoblots for the same protein were performed using different species antibodies. Thus, Cx were immunoprecipitated using mouse monoclonal antibodies and immunoblot of these fractions developed using rabbit polyclonal antibodies. Reblotting for proteins of different molecular weight was performed without stripping to minimize epitope damage. All representative images of immunoblot include quantification in the same or next panel or for those cases in which quantification is not required the number of repetitions is indicated in the corresponding figure legends.
Statistical analysis and determination of sample size
All numerical results are reported as mean +s.e.m and represent data from a minimum of three independent experiments. GraphPad InStat software (GraphPad) was used for analysis of statistical significance. If no indicated otherwise in the legend to the figures two-tailed Student’s t test for unpaired data was used to evaluate single comparisons between different experimental groups. As indicated in the legends to the figures, for multiple comparisons a one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used. Differences were considered statistically significant for a value of p < 0.05. All the experiments were performed at least 3 times and often in duplicate or triplicate in the same experiments. In all instances “n” refers to individual experiments. In the case of studies with animals, sample size was calculated as follows: 1) For the morphometric studies with livers of wild-type and heterozygous Cx43 mouse models, power analysis was performed to decide the number of animals required using as reference the previous differences in numbers of autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes that we have found in conditions such as aging or in models manipulating other autophagic pathways. Power analysis with the sample size utilized and a two-sided Type 1 error rate of 5% predicted >80% power to detect effects of 1.2 or greater in number, average size and ratio of different types of autophagic vacuoles; 2) for the studies of isolation of lysosomes and cell fractionation (including plasma membrane) the number of animal for preparation has been determined based on the average values of enrichment and recovery for the specific fraction using endogenous markers for each compartment. Power analysis with the sample size utilized and a two-sided Type 1 error rate of 5% predicted >80% power to detect effects of 2.1 or greater in levels of lysosomal components. None of the animals were excluded from the study and inclusion in a group was solely based on genotyping. There was not randomization as animals were not subjected to any specific treatment and group allocation was based on genotype. For those experiments in which an estimate of variation was possible based on previous studies or published work by others we have confirmed that the variance is similar between the control and experimental groups compared. For those instances in which previous information was not available (i.e. changes in autophagy markers in Cx deficient cells) we have compared with other conditions in which changes in cellular components (i.e. primary cilia) resulted in changes in autophagy.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Mizushima for providing the Atg5−/− MEFs, Dr. Mia M. Thi for the immortalized wild type and Cx43−/− osteoblasts cell lines, Antonio Diaz-Carretero for technical assistance on DNA preparations and cell culture and Dr. Kaushik and Dr. Hutten for critically reviewing this manuscript. This work was supported by grants NIH/NIA AG031782, AG038072 and DK041018 and the generous support of Robert and Renee Belfer.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper
Author Contributions
EB designed and performed most of the experiments, analyzed the data and contributed to writing the paper; AY provided technical assistance with immunoblot and immunofluorescence and revised the written manuscript; BP performed the electron microscopy studies and morphometric analysis; RS performed live confocal imaging; DS provided feedback in experiment design, interpretation of the data and revised the written manuscript; AMC coordinated the study, designed experiments, analyzed data and contributed to the writing and revision of the paper.
Competing Financial Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451:1069–1075. doi: 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469:323–335. doi: 10.1038/nature09782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:107–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Axe EL, et al. Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:685–701. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200803137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.English L, et al. Autophagy enhances the presentation of endogenous viral antigens on MHC class I molecules during HSV-1 infection. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:480–487. doi: 10.1038/ni.1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hailey DW, et al. Mitochondria supply membranes for autophagosome biogenesis during starvation. Cell. 2010;141:656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ravikumar B, Moreau K, Jahreiss L, Puri C, Rubinsztein D. Plasma membrane contributes to the formation of pre-autophagosomal structures. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:747–757. doi: 10.1038/ncb2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van der Vaart A, Griffith J, Reggiori F. Exit from the Golgi is required for the expansion of the autophagosomal phagophore in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:2270–2284. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-04-0345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Knaevelsrud H, et al. Membrane remodeling by the PX-BAR protein SNX18 promotes autophagosome formation. J Cell Biol. 2013;202:331–349. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201205129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Puri C, Renna M, Bento CF, Moreau K, Rubinsztein DC. Diverse autophagosome membrane sources coalesce in recycling endosomes. Cell. 2013;154:1285–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim J, et al. Differential regulation of distinct Vps34 complexes by AMPK in nutrient stress and autophagy. Cell. 2013;152:290–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reggiori F, Tooze SA. Autophagy regulation through Atg9 traffic. J Cell Biol. 2012;198:151–153. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201206119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mizushima N. The role of the Atg1/ULK1 complex in autophagy regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Suzuki K, Ohsumi Y. Current knowledge of the pre-autophagosomal structure (PAS) FEBS Lett. 2010;584:1280–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sanjuan MA, et al. Toll-like receptor signalling in macrophages links the autophagy pathway to phagocytosis. Nature. 2007;450:1253–1257. doi: 10.1038/nature06421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rowland AM, Richmond JE, Olsen JG, Hall DH, Bamber BA. Presynaptic terminals independently regulate synaptic clustering and autophagy of GABAA receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1711–1720. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2279-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bejarano E, et al. Autophagy modulates dynamics of connexins at the plasma membrane in a ubiquitin-dependent manner. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23:2156–2169. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-10-0844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lichtenstein A, Minogue PJ, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM. Autophagy: a pathway that contributes to connexin degradation. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:910–920. doi: 10.1242/jcs.073072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hesketh GG, et al. Ultrastructure and regulation of lateralized connexin43 in the failing heart. Circ Res. 2010;106:1153–1163. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.182147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fong JT, et al. Internalized gap junctions are degraded by autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8:794–811. doi: 10.4161/auto.19390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Girao H, Catarino S, Pereira P. Eps15 interacts with ubiquitinated Cx43 and mediates its internalization. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:3587–3597. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thi MM, Urban-Maldonado M, Spray DC, Suadicani SO. Characterization of hTERT-immortalized osteoblast cell lines generated from wild-type and connexin43-null mouse calvaria. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;299:C994–C1006. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00544.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weidberg H, et al. LC3 and GATE-16/GABARAP subfamilies are both essential yet act differently in autophagosome biogenesis. EMBO J. 2010;29:1792–1802. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Klionsky DJ, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8:445–544. doi: 10.4161/auto.19496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy. 2007;3:452–460. doi: 10.4161/auto.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shah US, Murray SA. Bimodal inhibition of connexin 43 gap junctions decreases ACTH-induced steroidogenesis and increases bovine adrenal cell population growth. The Journal of endocrinology. 2001;171:199–208. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1710199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goldberg GS, et al. Evidence that disruption of connexon particle arrangements in gap junction plaques is associated with inhibition of gap junctional communication by a glycyrrhetinic acid derivative. Exp Cell Res. 1996;222:48–53. doi: 10.1006/excr.1996.0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dbouk HA, Mroue RM, El-Sabban ME, Talhouk RS. Connexins: a myriad of functions extending beyond assembly of gap junction channels. Cell communication and signaling : CCS. 2009;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-7-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Turner MS, et al. Reversible connexin 43 dephosphorylation during hypoxia and reoxygenation is linked to cellular ATP levels. Circ Res. 2004;95:726–733. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000144805.11519.1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mureli S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells improve cardiac conduction by upregulation of connexin 43 through paracrine signaling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304:H600–609. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00533.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Plotkin LI, Manolagas SC, Bellido T. Transduction of cell survival signals by connexin-43 hemichannels. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:8648–8657. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108625200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Johnstone SR, Billaud M, Lohman AW, Taddeo EP, Isakson BE. Posttranslational modifications in connexins and pannexins. J Membr Biol. 2012;245:319–332. doi: 10.1007/s00232-012-9453-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wu Z, et al. Autophagy Blockade Sensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells towards Src Family Kinase Inhibitors. Genes & cancer. 2010;1:40–49. doi: 10.1177/1947601909358324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dahm L, Klugmann F, Gonzalez-Algaba A, Reuss B. Tamoxifen and raloxifene modulate gap junction coupling during early phases of retinoic acid-dependent neuronal differentiation of NTera2/D1 cells. Cell biology and toxicology. 2010;26:579–591. doi: 10.1007/s10565-010-9165-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Guan X, Ruch RJ. Gap junction endocytosis and lysosomal degradation of connexin43-P2 in WB-F344 rat liver epithelial cells treated with DDT and lindane. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:1791–1798. doi: 10.1093/carcin/17.9.1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johnson KE, et al. Phosphorylation on Ser-279 and Ser-282 of connexin43 regulates endocytosis and gap junction assembly in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:715–733. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-07-0537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Longatti A, et al. TBC1D14 regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11- and ULK1-positive recycling endosomes. J Cell Biol. 2012;197:659–675. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201111079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jager S, et al. Role for Rab7 in maturation of late autophagic vacuoles. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:4837–4848. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhong Y, et al. Distinct regulation of autophagic activity by Atg14L and Rubicon associated with Beclin 1-phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:468–476. doi: 10.1038/ncb1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Matsunaga K, et al. Two Beclin 1-binding proteins, Atg14L and Rubicon, reciprocally regulate autophagy at different stages. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:385–396. doi: 10.1038/ncb1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gillooly DJ, et al. Localization of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in yeast and mammalian cells. Embo J. 2000;19:4577–4588. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cruciani V, Mikalsen SO. The vertebrate connexin family. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:1125–1140. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5571-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Singh R, et al. Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature. 2009;458:1131–1135. doi: 10.1038/nature07976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lampe PD, Lau AF. The effects of connexin phosphorylation on gap junctional communication. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:1171–1186. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00264-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yamamoto H, et al. Atg9 vesicles are an important membrane source during early steps of autophagosome formation. J Cell Biol. 2012;198:219–233. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201202061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Reaume AG, et al. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995;267:1831–1834. doi: 10.1126/science.7892609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. Methods to monitor chaperone-mediated autophagy. Methods Enzymol. 2009;452:297–324. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03619-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Auteri JS, Okada A, Bochaki V, Dice JF. Regulation of intracellular protein degradation in IMR-90 human diploid fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 1983;115:159–166. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041150210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tanida I, Minematsu-Ikeguchi N, Ueno T, Kominami E. Lysosomal Turnover, but Not a Cellular Level, of Endogenous LC3 is a Marker for Autophagy. Autophagy. 2005;1:84–91. doi: 10.4161/auto.1.2.1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Slusarewicz P, Nilsson T, Hui N, Watson R, Warren G. Isolation of a matrix that binds medial Golgi enzymes. J Cell Biol. 1994;124:405–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Marzella L, Ahlberg J, Glaumann H. Isolation of autophagic vacuoles from rat liver: morphological and biochemical characterization. J Cell Biol. 1982;93:144–154. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Castellino F, Germain RN. Extensive trafficking of MHC class II-invariant chain complexes in the endocytic pathway and appearance of peptide-loaded class II in multiple compartments. Immunity. 1995;2:73–88. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90080-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.