Detection and Molecular Characterization of Two FAD3 Genes Controlling Linolenic Acid Content and Development of Allele-Specific Markers in Yellow Mustard (Sinapis alba)

Entang Tian; Fangqin Zeng; Kimberly MacKay; Vicky Roslinsky; Bifang Cheng

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097430

. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097430

Detection and Molecular Characterization of Two FAD3 Genes Controlling Linolenic Acid Content and Development of Allele-Specific Markers in Yellow Mustard (Sinapis alba)

Entang Tian ¹, Fangqin Zeng ¹, Kimberly MacKay ¹, Vicky Roslinsky ¹, Bifang Cheng ^1,^*

Editor: Xianlong Zhang²

PMCID: PMC4019595 PMID: 24823372

Abstract

Development of yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.) with superior quality traits (low erucic and linolenic acid contents, and low glucosinolate content) can make this species as a potential oilseed crop. We have recently isolated three inbred lines Y1127, Y514 and Y1035 with low (3.8%), medium (12.3%) and high (20.8%) linolenic acid (C18∶3) content, respectively, in this species. Inheritance studies detected two fatty acid desaturase 3 (FAD3) gene loci controlling the variation of C18∶3 content. QTL mapping revealed that the two FAD3 gene loci responsible for 73.0% and 23.4% of the total variation and were located on the linkage groups Sal02 and Sal10, respectively. The FAD3 gene on Sal02 was referred to as SalFAD3.LA1 and that on Sal10 as SalFAD3.LA2. The dominant and recessive alleles were designated as LA¹ and la¹ for SalFAD3.LA1, and LA² and la² for SalFAD3.LA2. Cloning and alignment of the coding and genomic DNA sequences revealed that the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes each contained 8 exons and 7 introns. LA¹ had a coding DNA sequence (CDS) of 1143 bp encoding a polypeptide of 380 amino acids, whereas la¹ was a loss-of-function allele due to an insertion of 584 bp in exon 3. Both LA² and la² had a CDS of 1152 bp encoding a polypeptide of 383 amino acids. Allele-specific markers for LA¹, la¹, LA² and la² co-segregated with the C18∶3 content in the F₂ populations and will be useful for improving fatty acid composition through marker assisted selection in yellow mustard breeding.

Introduction

Yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L., 2n = 24) is cultivated as an important condiment crop. It has many desirable agronomic traits such as resistance to cabbage aphids [1], flea beetles [2], [3] and blackleg diseases [4]. In addition, it is drought tolerant and resistant to pod shattering. Yellow mustard germplasm with canola quality (low erucic acid and low glucosinolate contents) was developed at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-Saskatoon Research Centre (AAFC-SRC) [5], which makes yellow mustard have the potential to become an alternative oilseed crop to canola B. napus, especially in semi-arid areas.

The oil quality of canola B. napus is determined by the proportion of the three major unsaturated fatty acids: oleic acid (C18∶1), linoleic acid (C18∶2) and linolenic acid (C18∶3). Traditional B. napus cultivars contain 9% C18∶3 of the total fatty acids [6]. The high level of linolenic acid in canola oil is undesirable since it shortens the shelf life and causes off-type flavour of the oil due to the three easily oxidized double bonds. A low linolenic acid mutant, containing 3–5% C18∶3, was produced by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) treatment of a high C18∶3 B. napus cv. Oro seed [7]. Current low C18∶3 canola cultivars have been developed using this low linolenic gene source.

Linolenic acid content is determined mainly by the embryonic genotype with some influence from temperature, maternal genotype and cytoplasm in B. napus [8]–[10]. QTL mapping identified two major QTLs, accounting for 25.2–28.8% and 52.4–62.7% of the C18∶3 variation, located on the linkage groups A4 and C4, respectively, in B. napus [11], [12]. It was reported that the low C18∶3 variant resulted from mutations of FAD3 genes in B. napus [11]–[13]. The FAD3 gene on A4 harboured a C to T substitution in exon 7, which when translated causes the wild type amino acid arginine to be replaced by cysteine. The FAD3 gene on C4 contained a G to A substitution in the 5′ splice site of intron 6 in the low C18∶3 B. napus line. FAD3 allele-specific markers based on the sequence variation were developed and proved to be useful for identification of different C18∶3 genotypes in canola B. napus [11], [12]. Yellow mustard accessions contain 6.9–12.4% linolenic acid of total fatty acids in the seed [14], [15]. Recently, inbred lines with high (18.5%), medium (13.8%) and low (3.8%) linolenic acid content, respectively, have been obtained through inbreeding of heterozygous open-pollinated plants in yellow mustard [16].

The low linolenic acid variant (3.8%) is a valuable gene source for breeding canola-quality yellow mustard with high stability oil (high oleic and low linolenic acids) as that of canola B. napus. The knowledge about genetic and molecular bases of the variation in C18∶3 content and development of FAD3 allele-specific markers will greatly facilitate the development of low linolenic canola-quality yellow mustard. The objectives of this study were: 1) to determine the inheritance and perform QTL mapping of the C18∶3 content; and 2) to clone the FAD3 genes and further develop allele-specific markers for marker assisted selection.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Linolenic acid contents of the three parental lines Y1127, Y514 and Y1035 are shown in Table 1. Y1127 is an S₄ inbred line produced by selfing of the low linolenic S₂ line Y158 for two generations and has a low C18∶3 content (average: 3.8%). Y514 is the doubled haploid line SaMD3 [17] and has a medium C18∶3 content (average: 12.3%). Y1035 is an S₄ inbred line and has a high C18∶3 content (average: 20.8%).

Table 1. Linolenic acid contents of the parental lines Y1127, Y514, Y1035 and F₁ seeds, and the mid-parental value in yellow mustard.

Genotype	Generation	Linolenic Acid Content^* (% of total fatty acids)
Y1127	S₄	3.8±0.7
Y514	DH	12.3±0.7
Y1035	S₄	20.8±0.8
Y1127×Y1035	F₁	13.7±1.3
Mid parent value		12.3
Y1127×Y514	F₁	8.9±0.7
Mid parent value		8.0
Y514×Y1035	F₁	15.3±0.7
Mid parent value		16.5

Open in a new tab

*: Linolenic acid content is expressed as mean value ± standard deviation.

The F₁ seeds of the three crosses Y1127 (low)×Y1035 (high), Y1127 (low)×Y514 (medium) and Y514 (medium)×Y1035 (high) were produced. To produce the BC₁ seeds, the F₁ plants of the three crosses were crossed as the female with the parental line with a lower C18∶3 content. All plants were raised under the same conditions in the greenhouse at AAFC-SRC.

Regional Linkage Mapping

Regional linkage mapping of the linolenic acid content was performed using intron length polymorphism (ILP) markers and bulked segregant analysis (BSA) [18]. A total of 1478 ILP primer pairs: 380 from Arabidopsis thaliana [19] and 1098 from B. napus [20] were used to screen the three parental lines for polymorphic markers. The high bulk was made by mixing equal amount of DNA from 10 F₂ plants with the highest C18∶3 content, while the low bulk was formed from 10 F₂ plants with the lowest C18∶3 content for each of the three crosses. The primers detecting polymorphic markers between the two bulks were subsequently used to genotype individual plants of the three F₂ populations. Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of the parental lines Y1127, Y514 and Y1035, F₁ and F₂ plants using a modified sodium dodecyl sulfate method [21]. Each PCR (20 µl) contained 1× standard PCR buffer (NEB), 1 U of Taq polymerase (NEB), 0.25 µM forward primer, 0.25 µM reverse primer, 100 µM each dNTP and 50 ng of genomic DNA in a total volume 20 µL. The PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 35 cycles consisting of 94°C (45 sec), 55°C (45 sec), 72°C (1 min) terminating with 72°C for 7 min. All PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels in 1× Tris-acetate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid buffer. Gels were visualized by staining in ethidium bromide and photographed on a digital gel documentation system.

The regional linkage map of C18∶3 content was constructed using JoinMap 4.0 [22] with a minimum LOD threshold of 4.0. QTL analysis of C18∶3 content was performed using the interval mapping method of MapQTL 6.0 [23]. A Chi-square test was used for evaluating the genetic model of C18∶3 content in the BC₁ and F₂ populations, and the ILP markers in the F₂ populations.

Cloning of the Coding Region of the FAD3 Gene

Primer pair No 1 (Table S1) was designed based on the conserved coding regions of the FAD3 genes in B. napus and A. thaliana. It was used to clone the coding DNA sequence (CDS) of the FAD3 gene in yellow mustard. Immature seeds at 22 days after pollination were collected from two individual plants from each of the parental lines. Total RNA was extracted from the immature seeds using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. 750 ng of RNA from each of the parental lines was used to prepare the cDNA using Qiagen’s Omniscript RT Kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Each PCR (20 µl) contained 1× PCR standard buffer (NEB), 100 µM of each dNTP, 0.25 µM of each forward and reverse primer, 1 U of Taq polymerase (NEB) and 50 ng of cDNA. Polymerase chain reaction was performed with an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C and 1 min at 72°C with a final extension cycle of 72°C for 10 min.

Cloning of the 5′ and 3′ Flanking Sequences and the Genomic DNA Sequences of the FAD3 Genes

Primer pairs No 2 and 3 (Table S1) were designed based on the 5′ coding sequences of the cloned SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes, respectively. They were used to clone the 5′ upstream sequences by PCR walking according to the protocol of Siebert et al. [24]. Primer No 4 (Table S1) was designed based on the 3′ coding sequences of the cloned SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes, and was used to clone the 3′ flanking sequence by PCR walking. Primer pairs No 5 and 6 (Table S1) were designed based on the 5′ flanking sequence and the 3′ flanking sequence of the cloned SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes, respectively, and were used to clone the genomic DNA sequences of SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes. The standard protocol from the Clontech kit (website: www.clontech.com, Protocol PT 3042, Version PR 03300) by Gwyneth Ingram and Karine Coenen was followed to facilitate the PCR walking.

DNA Sequencing

The expected PCR bands were cloned using the pGEM-T Vector System I (Promega) following the provided instructions. The plasmids were extracted using the QiaSpin Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced using the primer pairs No 7–11 (Table S1) at the Plant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council, Canada.

Phylogenetic Tree

The multiple alignments were performed using ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/). MEGA software (version 4.0) (http://www.megasoftware.net/index.html)[25] was used to construct a phylogenetic tree with the aligned protein sequences. The neighbor-joining method was used with the pairwise deletion option, poisson correction model, and the 1000 bootstrap replicates test.

Development of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Allele-specific Markers

The SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers were generated using primer pair No 12 (Table S1) which was designed based on the conserved flanking sequences of intron 3. The PCR reaction was performed with LongAmp Taq 2× Master Mix (NEB) following the manufacturer’s instructions with a 60°C annealing temperature.

Fatty Acid Analysis

Seed fatty acid composition was analyzed according to [26] with the following modification: the gas chromatography of the methyl esters was performed with a HP-INNOWax fused silica capillary column (0.25 mm by 0.5 m and 7.5 µm) (Agilent Technologies) at 250°C using hydrogen as the carrier gas. A minimum of 10 seeds from each of the parental lines and F₁ hybrids as well as 160 F₂ seeds of each of the three crosses were half-seed analyzed according to [27]. Ninety-six seeds from each of the BC₁ populations were analyzed using the single seed method.

Results

Linolenic Acid Content is Controlled by Two Gene Loci in Yellow Mustard

The C18∶3 content of the F₁ seeds was significantly higher than the mid-parent value in the crosses of Y1127 (low)×Y1035 (high) (t = 3.84, p<0.01) and Y1127 (low)×Y514 (medium) (t = 5.62, p<0.01) (Table 1, Figure 1 and 2), suggesting a partial dominance of the high/medium over low C18∶3 content. However, in the cross of Y514 (medium)×Y1035 (high) the F₁ seeds had significantly lower C18∶3 content (15.3%) than the mid-parent value of 16.5% (t = 6.98, p<0.01) (Table 1, Figure 3), indicating a partial dominance of the medium over high C18∶3 content.

The BC₁ seeds of (Y1127×Y1035)×Y1127 were classified into two groups: seeds with medium to high (5.4–19.1%) C18∶3 content and seeds with low (3.0–4.9%) C18∶3 content (Figure 1), fitting with a segregation ratio of 3∶1 (χ² = 2.00, p = 0.16). The F₂ seeds of Y1127×Y1035 ranged from 2.9% to 20.4% in C18∶3 content (Figure 1) with a segregation ratio of 15∶1 (seeds with 4.5–20.4% versus seeds with 2.9–4.3% C18∶3 content) (χ² = 3.07, p = 0.08). Therefore, the segregation patterns of C18∶3 content in the BC₁ and F₂ populations supported a digenic inheritance model in this cross.

The BC₁ seeds of (Y1127×Y514)×Y1127 showed a segregation ratio of 1∶1 (seeds with 2.7–5.2% versus seeds with 6.4–9.7% C18∶3 content) (Figure 2) (χ² = 3.38, p = 0.07), suggesting that the C18∶3 content was controlled by one gene locus in this cross. The F₂ seeds of Y1127×Y514 showed a continuous distribution ranging from 3.0% to 16.5% in the C18∶3 content (Figure 2). The BC₁ seeds of (Y514×Y1035)×Y514 and the F₂ seeds of Y514×Y1035 exhibited a continuous frequency distribution in the C18∶3 content (Figure 3). Therefore, it was not possible to classify the seeds into discrete groups.

Two QTLs Accounting for the Variation of C18∶3 Content are Mapped to Linkage Groups Sal02 and Sal10, Respectively

In the F₂ population of Y1127 (low)×Y1035 (high), eighteen ILP primer pairs were polymorphic between the high (16.6–20.4%) and low (2.9–4.0%) C18∶3 bulks and generated 18 markers (Table 2). The 18 markers were mapped to two linkage groups, each of which carried one QTL for the C18∶3 content (Figure 4). Based on the common ILP markers, the two linkage groups were revealed to be Sal02 and Sal10 of the constructed S. alba map [28]. One QTL (LOD = 45.43) accounting for 73.0% of the total variation of C18∶3 content was localized between BnapPIP685 and BnapPIP881 in Sal02 (Figure 4). The other QTL (LOD = 9.28) responsible for 23.4% of the total variation was located between BnapPIP1012 and BnapPIP363 in Sal10 (Figure 4). Together, the two QTLs explained 96.4% of the total variation for C18∶3 content in the F₂ population.

Table 2. Polymorphic ILP primers used for regional linkage mapping of C18∶3 content in the three F₂ populations of Y1127×Y1035, Y1127×Y514 and Y514×Y1035.

Primer Name	Locus Name	Y1127×Y1035		Y1127×Y514		Y514×Y1035
		marker type	χ2 Value^*	Marker type	χ2 Value	Marker type	χ2 Value
At2g22640	At2g22640	Codominant	χ² = 2.15	Codominant	χ² = 0.03		-
At2g31490	At2g31490	Codominant	χ² = 0.00	Codominant	χ² = 0.21		-
BnapPIP1236	BnapPIP1236	Dominant	χ² = 0.21	Dominant	χ² = 0.61		-
BnapPIP685	BnapPIP685	Dominant	χ² = 1.57	Dominant	χ² = 0.94		-
BnapPIP690	BnapPIP690	Dominant	χ² = 1.28	Dominant	χ² = 0.63		-
BnapPIP881	BnapPIP881	Codominant	χ² = 2.74	Codominant	χ² = 0.41		-
At2g40765	At2g40765	Codominant	χ² = 1.30	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 1.90
At3g43520	At3g43520	Codominant	χ² = 0.46	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 0.83
At3g57650	At3g57650	Codominant	χ² = 0.20	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 3.27
BnapPIP100	BnapPIP100	Dominant	χ² = 0.10	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 1.02
BnapPIP1012	BnapPIP1012	Dominant	χ² = 0.30	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 2.70
BnapPIP1153	BnapPIP1153	Codominant	χ² = 1.28	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 1.16
BnapPIP1488	BnapPIP1488	Dominant	χ² = 0.05	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 1.63
At2g25740	At2g25740	Codominant	χ² = 0.67	-	-	-	-
At2g37560	At2g37560	Codominant	χ² = 1.43	-	-	-	-
BnapPIP1505	BnapPIP1505	Codominant	χ² = 3.27	-	-	-	-
BnapPIP1616	BnapPIP1616	Codominant	χ² = 0.68	-	-	-	-
BnapPIP363	BnapPIP363	Dominant	χ² = 1.54	-	-	-	-
At2g22000	At2g22000	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 1.13	-	-
At3g58500	At3g58500	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 1.70	-	-
BnapPIP1002	BnapPIP1002	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 1.08	-	-
BnapPIP1464	BnapPIP1464	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 1.02	-	-
At2g43360	At2g43360a	-	-	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 0.68
	At2g43361b	-	-	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 0.33
BnapPIP1792	BnapPIP1792	-	-	-	-	Codominant	χ² = 0.53
BnapPIP216	BnapPIP216	-	-	-	-	Dominant	χ² = 0.47

Open in a new tab

*: Codominant markers: Expected Mendelian segregation of 1∶2∶1, χ2 (0.05, 2) = 5.99; Dominant marker: Expected Mendelian segregation of 3∶1, χ2 (0.05, 1) = 3.84.

A. The QTL in Sal02 was located between BnapPIP685 and BnapPIP881 in Y1127×Y1035 and Y1127×Y514. B. The QTL in Sal10 was located between BnapPIP1012 and BnapPIP363 in Y1127×Y1035, and between BnapPIP1012 and At3g43520 in Y514×Y1035. 1-LOD and 2-LOD supporting intervals of each C18∶3 QTL were marked by thick and thin bars, respectively. The *SalFAD3.LA1* and *SalFAD3.LA2* genes co-localized with their C18∶3 QTL peaks in the linkage groups Sal02 and Sal10.

In the F₂ population of Y1127 (low)×Y514 (medium), 10 polymorphic ILP primer pairs between the low (3.0–4.0%) and medium (14.5–16.5%) C18∶3 bulks produced 10 markers (Table 2). The 10 markers were all mapped to one linkage group corresponding to Sal02. The QTL (LOD = 46.53) was localized between BnapPIP685 and BnapPIP881 in the linkage group (Figure 4). In the F₂ population of Y514 (medium)×Y1035 (high), 11 markers were generated by 10 polymorphic primer pairs between the medium (10.4–11.6%) and high (16.7–19.2%) C18∶3 bulks. The 11 markers were mapped to the linkage group Sal10. The QTL (LOD = 6.09) was located between BnapPIP1012 and At3g43520 in Sal10 (Figure 4). The two FAD3 gene loci controlling the QTLs in Sal02 and Sal10 were referred to as SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2, respectively. The dominant and recessive alleles of the SalFAD3.LA1 gene were accordingly designated as LA¹ and la¹, while that of the SalFAD3.LA2 gene as LA² and la². Therefore, it could be inferred that the C18∶3 genotypes of Y1127 (low), Y514 (medium) and Y1035 (high) were la¹la¹la²la², LA¹LA¹la²la² and LA¹LA¹LA²LA², respectively.

The SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Genes are Cloned and Exhibit Differences in the Exon and Intron

The coding regions of the dominant alleles LA¹ and LA² were cloned from Y1035, while those of the recessive alleles, la¹ and la² from Y1127 using primer pair No 1 (Table S1). LA¹ had a coding DNA sequence (CDS) of 1143 bp encoding a polypeptide of 380 amino acids. la¹ had a CDS of 1171 bp. Sequence alignment with LA¹ indicated that la¹ harboured an indel involving a 64 bp insertion and a 36 bp deletion at position 412 (Figure 5 and Figure S1). A stop codon at the beginning of the 64 bp insertion might have resulted in the termination of protein translation after the 137^th amino acid residue. Therefore, la¹ is a loss-of-function allele. The 5′ flanking sequences from the translation start site were cloned for LA¹and la¹ using the primer pair No 2 (Table S1). The 5′ fragment of LA¹ was 1250 bp, while that of la¹ was 621 bp. A 435 bp 3′ flanking sequence from the translation stop codon was cloned for LA¹and la¹ using the primer pair No 4 (Table S1). The two alleles didn’t exhibit any differences in the cloned 3′ flanking sequences. The genomic DNA sequences of the LA¹ and la¹ were amplified using the primer pair No 5 (Table S1) which was designed based on the 5′ flanking sequence and the conserved 3′ flanking sequence specific to the candidate SalFAD3.LA1 gene. Comparison of the coding and genomic DNA sequences indicated that the candidate SalFAD3.LA1 gene contained 8 exons and 7 introns (Figure 5). Alignment of the genomic DNA sequences of LA¹ and la¹ revealed that la¹ had an insertion of 584 bp in the third exon. This insertion contained a new intron splicing site GT (Figure S4), which resulted in a 64 bp insertion and a 36 bp deletion (nucleotide 412–447) at position 412 in the CDS (Figure 5). The inserted fragment contained a 5 bp direct repeat (5′-AGAAC-3′) at each end, which is a typical LTR retroelement insertion site (Figure S4). In addition to differences in the CDS, LA¹ and la¹ exhibited variation in the length of the introns (Figure 5).

The black boxes represented the exons and the lines between the black boxes indicated the introns. The numbers on the top of black box of *LA¹* (*LA²*) indicated the beginning and ending of each exon of *LA¹* and *la¹* (*LA²* and *la²*). The number above each black line indicated the intron length. The nucleotide sequences of 9 bp deletion at position 45 of exon 1 of the alleles *LA¹* and *la¹*, and the 64 bp insertion and the 36 bp deletion at position 412 of exon 3 of *la¹* were displayed on the top. Allele specific markers were developed based on the variation in intron 3 of the *SalFAD3* alleles *LA¹*, *la¹*, *LA²* and *la²*.

Both LA² and la² had a CDS of 1152 bp encoding a polypeptide of 383 amino acids (Figure S1 and S5). Six point mutations at positions 567, 579, 666, 699, 777 and 1059 were observed in the CDS of la² when compared with that of LA², but did not lead to any amino acid changes. The 5′ flanking sequences from the translation start site were cloned for LA² and la² using the primer pair No 3 (Table S1). The 5′ flanking fragments of the two alleles were 444 nucleotides in length and were similar in sequence. A 435 bp 3′ flanking sequence from the translation stop codon was cloned for LA² and la² using the primer pair No 4 (Table S1). The two alleles didn’t show any differences in the cloned 3′ flanking sequences. The genomic DNA sequences of LA² and la² were cloned using primer pair No 6 (Table S1) which was designed based on the 5′ flanking sequence and the conserved 3′ flanking sequence specific to the candidate SalFAD3.LA2 gene (Figure S3). Comparison of the coding and genomic DNA sequences indicated that the candidate SalFAD3.LA2 gene also contained 8 exons and 7 introns (Figure 5). Variation in the length of the introns was observed between LA² and la² (Figure 5). For instance, the third intron of LA² was 530 bp, while that of la² was 1165 bp.

Sequence alignment of LA¹ and LA² indicated that LA¹ harboured a 9 bp deletion at position 46 (Figure 5 and Figure S1), which resulted in the loss of the three amino acids glycine-arginine-lysine at position 16. In addition, 77 point mutations were observed between LA¹ and LA² (Figure S1), of which 19 mutations led to amino acid changes (Figure S5). The candidate SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes exhibited differences in the cloned 5′ flanking sequences (Figure S2), but had the same 3′ flanking sequences. Variation in the length of the introns was observed among the four alleles LA¹, la¹, LA² and la² (Figure 5).

Phylogenetic analysis based on the polypeptide sequences encoded by LA¹ and LA² implied that SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3. LA2 genes in yellow mustard were clustered with FAD3 genes in Brassica species (Figure 6). The SalFAD3.LA1 gene was grouped together with the FAD3 genes of B. oleracea (Genbank accession No.AGH20189), the C genome in B. napus (BnaC.FAD3b, Genbank accession No.AFJ19037.1) and B. juncea (Genbank accession No.ADJ58020.1), whereas the SalFAD3. LA2 gene was in the same cluster with the FAD3 genes of B. rapa (BraA.FAD3a, BRAD accession No. Bra018348) and the A genome in B. napus (BnaA.FAD3a, Genbank accession No.AFJ19039.1).

Co-segregation of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Allele-specific Markers with C18∶3 Contents in the F₂ Populations

Primer pair 12 (Table S1) produced co-dominant markers of 742 bp, 510 bp, 626 bp and 1273 bp specific for LA¹, la¹, LA² and la², respectively, which co-segregated with the C18∶3 content in all of the F₂ populations. In the cross of Y1127 (low)×Y1035 (high), all of the nine possible genotypes were identified using the markers specific for LA¹, la¹, LA² and la² (Figure 7A; Table 3). The homozygous F₂ plants (LA¹LA¹LA²LA²) had a significantly higher C18∶3 content (average: 17.1%) than the heterozygous F₂ plants of LA¹la¹LA²LA² (average: 13.1%) (t = 6.12, p<0.01) and of LA¹LA¹LA²la² (average: 15.5%) (t = 2.23, p = 0.04) (Table 3). The homozygous F₂ plants of LA¹LA¹la²la² had a higher average C18∶3 content (14.0%) than those of la¹la¹LA²LA² (average: 9.1%) (t = 5.81, p<0.01). In the cross of Y1127 (low)×Y514 (medium), the three genotypes for C18∶3 content were differentiated with the markers specific for LA¹ and la¹ (Figure 7B; Table 3). The average C18∶3 content of the homozygous F₂ plants (LA¹LA¹la²la²) was 12.7%, which was significantly higher than the heterozygous F₂ plants (LA¹la¹la²la², average: 9.2%) (t = 5.02, p<0.01) (Table 3). In the cross of Y514 (medium)×Y1035 (high), the markers specific for LA² and la² distinguished the three C18∶3 genotypes (Figure 7C; Table 3). The homozygous F₂ plants (LA¹LA¹LA²LA²) had an average C18∶3 content of 15.8%, which was higher than the heterozygous F₂ plants (LA¹LA¹LA²la², average: 13.8%) (t = 2.23, p = 0.04) (Table 3). The SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes co-localized with the QTL peaks on Sal02 and Sal10, respectively (Figure 4). A new band was observed in the F₁ and F₂ plants with the heterozygote genotype of LA²la² (Figs. 7A and 7C).

M: DNA ladder. Y1127: Low C18∶3 line (*la¹la¹la²la²*). Y1035: high C18∶3 line (*LA¹LA¹LA²LA²*). A. F₁ (Y1127×Y1035): *LA¹la¹LA²la²*. Lane 1: *la¹la¹la²la²*; Lane 2: *LA¹LA¹la²la²*; Lane 3: *LA¹LA¹LA²LA²*; Lane 4: *LA¹la¹la²la²*; Lane 5: *LA¹LA¹LA²la²*; Lane 6: *LA¹la¹LA²la²*; Lane 7: *la¹la¹LA²LA²*; Lane 8: *LA¹la¹LA²LA²*; Lane 9: *la¹la¹LA²la²*. B. F₁ (Y1127×Y1035): *LA¹la¹la²la²*; Lane 1: *la¹la¹la²la²*; Lane 2: *LA¹LA¹la²la²*; Lane 3: *LA¹la¹la²la²*. C. F₁ (Y514×Y1035): *LA¹LA¹LA²la²*; Lane 1: *LA¹LA¹la²la²*; Lane 2: *LA¹LA¹LA²LA²*; Lane 3: *LA¹LA¹LA²la²*. * indicated new band. The different C18∶3 genotypes were identified using primer No 12 (SalFAD3 F and SalFAD3 R) (Table S1) designed based on the variation in intron 3 of the *SalFAD3* alleles *LA¹*, *la¹*, *LA²* and *la²*.

Table 3. Co-segregation of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers with C18∶3 contents in the F₂ populations of Y1127×Y1035, Y1127×Y514 and Y514×Y1035.

F₂ populations	Allele-specific Markers				Genotype	No. of Plants	C18∶3 Content (% of total fatty acids)
	LA¹	la¹	LA²	la²			Mean	Range
Y1127×Y1035	+	−	+	−	LA¹LA¹LA²LA²	9	17.1	15.4–20.4
	+	−	+	+	LA¹LA¹LA²la²	22	15.5	11.1–18.7
	+	−	−	+	LA¹LA¹ la²la²	5	14.0	10.0–16.0
	+	+	+	−	LA¹la¹LA²LA²	14	13.1	10.4–15.5
	+	+	+	+	LA¹la¹LA²la²	44	11.1	8.5–13.4
	+	+	−	+	LA¹la¹la²la²	20	10.2	8.3–12.5
	−	+	+	−	la¹la¹LA²LA²	12	9.1	7.7–10.6
	−	+	+	+	la¹la¹LA²la²	19	5.7	3.1–7.5
	−	+	−	+	la¹la¹la²la²	12	3.9	2.9–4.5
Y1127×Y514	+	−	−	+	LA¹LA¹ la²la²	36	12.7	8.6–16.5
	+	+	−	+	LA¹la¹la²la²	82	9.2	5.6–14.8
	−	+	−	+	la¹la¹la²la²	37	4.6	3.0–5.9
Y514×Y1035	+	−	+	−	LA¹LA¹LA²LA²	37	15.8	13.7–19.2
	+	−	+	+	LA¹LA¹LA²la²	90	13.8	10.1–16.0
	+	−	−	+	LA¹LA¹ la²la²	30	12.9	10.4–15.0

Open in a new tab

Discussion

The present paper reported on the inheritance and QTL mapping of C18∶3 content as well as molecular characterization of the FAD3 genes in yellow mustard. Linolenic acid content was controlled by the nuclear genotype of the embryo in yellow mustard as reported in B. napus [8]. Two nuclear gene loci were detected and functioned independently and additively to determine the total C18∶3 content in the seeds. However, maternal effects on the C18∶3 content couldn’t be ruled out since appropriate progeny tests were not performed in the present study. QTL analysis further revealed that the two gene loci SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 had a different magnitude of effect and together explained 96.4% of the total variation for C18∶3 content. The residual 3.6% variation of C18∶3 content beyond the two QTLs could be resulted from maternal and environmental effects. It has been reported that temperature, maternal genotype and cytoplasm have effects on C18∶3 content in B. napus [8]–[10]. The duplication of the FAD3 gene provides additional evidence that yellow mustard is a secondary polyploid species as revealed by molecular studies [29], [30]. The two linkage groups Sal02 and Sall0 containing the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes, did not share any common ILP markers, suggesting the occurrence of extensive genomic changes during the speciation of yellow mustard.

Molecular cloning and sequencing indicated that the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes contained 8 exons and 7 introns in yellow mustard, which is in agreement with that in B. napus [12] and A. thaliana (Locus: AT2G29980, TAIR) [31]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the naturally occurring C18∶3 variant in yellow mustard was different from that of the EMS-induced C18∶3 variant in B. napus and B. oleracea. The FAD3 gene with reduced C18∶3 content resulted from SNP mutations in B. napus [11], [12] and B. oleracea [32]. However, the recessive allele la¹ of the SalFAD3.LA1 gene was a loss-of-function mutant due to an insertion of 584 bp in exon 3. The inserted fragment contained a typical LTR retroelement insertion site (5′-AGAAC-3′) at each end, suggesting that the inserted fragment might be a remnant of a transposable element which had undergone a deletion following the insertion event. The recessive allele la² of the SalFAD3.LA2 gene was functional and had a CDS encoding the same polypeptide sequence when compared with the dominant allele LA². However, la² was different in intron sequence. It remains to be investigated why LA² and la² controlled a different C18∶3 content. The SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers proved to be useful for identification of different C18∶3 genotypes in the present study.

The phylogenetic analysis based on the polypeptide sequences indicated that the LA¹ and LA² genes in yellow mustard were clustered with the FAD3 genes in Brassica species and A. thaliana. Interestingly, LA¹ and LA² were clustered into different groups. LA¹ was grouped together with the FAD3 genes of B. oleracea and the C genome in B. napus, whereas LA² was in the same cluster with the FAD3 gene of B. rapa and the A genome in B. napus. In our study, the LA¹ gene controlled a higher C18∶3 content than the LA² gene. It was reported that the FAD3 gene of the C genome in B. napus also contributed more to the total C18∶3 content than that of the A genome [11], [12]. This suggested that the molecular divergence of the LA¹ and LA² genes occurred before the speciation of yellow mustard and Brassica species.

In conclusion, our study revealed the existence of two FAD3 gene loci contributing to the genetic variation of linolenic acid content in yellow mustard. The SalFAD3.LA1 gene was located in the linkage group Sal02, while the SalFAD3.LA2 gene in Sal10. We have cloned the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes and developed allele-specific markers for the detection of desirable genotypes, which will be valuable for marker assisted breeding in yellow mustard.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Alignment of the coding DNA sequences of the SalFAD3.LA1 alleles LA¹ , la¹ and the SalFAD3.LA2 alleles LA² and la² in yellow mustard. The nucleotide sequence alignment was carried out using ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalW2/).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(108.8KB, pdf)}

Figure S2

Alignment of the 5′ upstream sequences of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes in yellow mustard. UP-LA¹ and UP-la¹ represented the 5′ upstream sequences of the alleles LA¹ and la¹ of the SalFAD3.LA1 gene. UP-LA² and UP-la² indicated the 5′ upstream sequences of the alleles LA² and la² of the SalFAD3.LA2 gene. The nucleotide sequence alignment was carried out using ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(222KB, pdf)}

Figure S3

PCR amplification of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes. A. PCR amplification of the genomic DNA sequences of SalFAD3.LA1 gene using the primer pair No 5 (Table S1). Lanes 1–2: 4268 bp fragment of la¹ from Y1127; Lanes 3–6: 4534 bp fragment of LA¹ from Y1035. B. PCR amplification of the genomic DNA sequences of SalFAD3.LA2 gene using the primer pair No 6 (Table S1). Lanes 1–4: 4688 bp fragment of la² from Y1127; Lanes 5–6: 4042 bp fragment of LA² from Y1035.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(336.7KB, pdf)}

Figure S4

Nucleotide sequences of intron 3 and its flanking of SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 genes in yellow mustard. The sequence of exon 3 was underlined in red while that of exon 4 was lined in blue. The nucleotide sequence of the inserted fragment in exon 3 of la¹ was underlined in pink. The new intron splicing site GT in the inserted fragment was indicated in green rectangle box. The nucleotides in blue rectangle box indicated the inserted fragment that remained in the CDS of exon 3 of la¹. The nucleotides in red rectangle box indicated the 5 bp direct repeat (5′-AGAAC-3′). The first and the last nucleotides of intron 3 were indicated by arrowhead and arrow, respectively. The intron 3 of LA¹, la¹ LA², la² are 647 bp, 415 bp, 530 bp and 1165 bp in length, respectively.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(225.6KB, pdf)}

Figure S5

Amino acid sequences encoded by the SalFAD3.LA1 allele LA¹ and the SalFAD3.LA2 allele LA² of yellow mustard, AFJ19039.1 ( BraA.FAD3a ) and AFJ19037.1 ( BnaC.FAD3b ) of B. napus , AGH20189.1 of B. oleracea , ADJ58020.1 of B. juncea , Bra018348 of B. rapa , NP_180559.1 of A. thaliana . The amino acid sequence alignment was carried out by ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(159.6KB, pdf)}

Table S1

Primers used in this study.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(15.7KB, pdf)}

Funding Statement

The condiment yellow mustard breeding and research programs are supported by the Developing Innovative Agri-Products Initiative of the Growing Canadian Agri-Innovations Program (DIAP), Growing Forward II - Agri-Innovation Program (AIP-P027), Mustard 21 Canada Inc. and the Agriculture Development Fund (ADF) of Saskatchewan (grant No 20100032), Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Thompson KF (1963) Resistance to the cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) in Brassica plants. Nature 198: 209. [Google Scholar]
2. Bodnaryk RP, Lamb RJ (1991) Mechanisms of resistance to the flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze), in mustard seedlings, Sinapis alba L. Can J Plant Sci. 71: 13–20. [Google Scholar]
3.Elliott RH, Rakow GFW (1999) Resistance of brassica and sinapis species to flea beetles, phyllotreta cruciferae. in: proc. the 10^th international rapeseed congress. Camberra, Australia.
4.Gugel RK, Séguin-Swartz G (1997) Introgression of blackleg resistance from Sinapis alba into Brassica napus Brassica 97, int soc hortic sci symp brassicas/10^th crucifer genetics workshop, 23–27 Sept 1997, Rennes, France:Abst: p 222.
5. Raney JP, Rakow G, Olson T (1995) Development of low erucic, low glucosinolate Sinapis alba . In proceedings of the 9^th international rapeseed congress, Cambridge, United Kindom 2: 416–418. [Google Scholar]
6. Scarth R, Tang J (2006) Modification of Brassica oil using conventional and transgenic approaches. Crop Sci 46: 1225–1236. [Google Scholar]
7. Röbbelen G, Nitsch A (1975) Genetical and physiological investigations on mutants for polyenoic fatty acids in rapeseed, Brassica napus L. I. selection and description of new mutants. Z Pflanzenzucht 75: 92–105. [Google Scholar]
8. Pleines S, Friedt W (1989) Genetic control of linolenic acid concentration in seed oil of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 78: 793–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Rajcan I, Kasha KJ, Kott LS, Beversdorf WD (2002) Evaluation of cytoplasmic effects on agronomic and seed quality traits in two doubled haploid populations of Brassica napus L. Euphytica. 123: 401–409. [Google Scholar]
10. Baux A, Hebeisen T, Pellet D (2008) Effects of minimal temperatures on low-linolenic rapeseed oil fatty-acid composition. Eur J Agron 29: 102–107. [Google Scholar]
11. Hu X, Sullivan-Gilbert M, Gupta M, Thompson SA (2006) Mapping of the loci controlling oleic and linolenic acid contents and development of fad2 and fad3 allele-specific markers in canola (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 113: 497–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Yang Q, Fan C, Guo Z, Qin J, Wu J, et al. (2012) Identification of FAD2 and FAD3 genes in Brassica napus genome and development of allele-specific markers for high oleic and low linolenic acid contents. Theor Appl Genet 125(4): 715–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Mikolajczyk K, Dabert M, Karlowski WM, Spasibionek S, Nowakowska J, et al. (2010) Allele-specific SNP markers for the new low linolenic mutant genotype of winter oilseed rape. Plant Breeding 129: 502–507. [Google Scholar]
14. Ecker R, Yaniv Z (1993) Genetic control of fatty acid composition in seed oil of Sinapis alba L. Euphytica. 69: 45–49. [Google Scholar]
15. Katepa-Mupondwa F, Gugel RK, Raney JP (2006) Genetic diversity for agronomic, morphological and seed quality traits in Sinapis alba L. (yellow mustard). Can J Plant Sci 86: 1015–1025. [Google Scholar]
16. Cheng B, Williams DJ, Zhang Y (2012) Genetic variation in morphology, seed quality and self-(in)compatibility among the inbred lines developed from a population variety in outcrossing yellow mustard (Sinapis alba). Plants 1: 16–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Bundrock T (1998) Doubled haploidy in yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.
18. Michelmore R, Paran I, Kesseli RV (1991) Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 9828–9832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Panjabi P, Jagannath A, Bisht N, Padmaja K, Sharma S, et al. (2008) Comparative mapping of Brassica juncea and Arabidopsis thaliana using intron polymorphism (IP) markers: homoeologous relationships, diversification and evolution of the A, B and C brassica genomes. BMC Genomics 9: 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Yang L, Jin G, Zhao X, Zheng Y, Xu Z, et al. (2007) PIP: a database of potential intron polymorphism markers. Bioinformatics 23: 2174–2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Somers DJ, Friesen KRD, Rakow G (1998) Identification of molecular markers associated with linoleic acid desaturation in Brassica napus . Theor Appl Genet 96: 897–903. [Google Scholar]
22.Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap Version 4.0: Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
23.Van Ooijen JW (2009) MapQTL 6: Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations of diploid species. Kyazma BV: Wageningen, Netherlands.
24. Siebert PD, Chenchik A, Kellogg DE, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov SA (1995) An improved PCR method for walking in uncloned genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 1087–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5: 150–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Thies W (1971) Schnelle und einfache Analysen der Fettsäurezusammensetzung in einzelnen Rapskotyledonen I. Gaschromatographische und papierchromatographische Methoden. Z Pflanzenzücht 65: 181–202. [Google Scholar]
27. Downey RK, Harvey BL (1963) Methods of breeding for oil quality in rape. Can J Plant Sci 43: 271–275. [Google Scholar]
28. Javidfar F, Cheng BF (2013) Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL analysis of erucic acid content and glucosinolate components in yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.). BMC Plant Biology 13: 142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Lysak MA, Koch MA, Pecinka A, Schubert I (2005) Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. Genome Res 15: 516–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Nelson MN, Lydiate DJ (2006) New evidence from Sinapis alba L. for ancestral triplication in a crucifer genome. Genome 49: 230–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Nishiuchi T, Nishimura M, Arondel V, Iba K (1994) Genomic nucleotide sequence of a gene encoding a microsomal omega-3 fatty acid desaturase from Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Physiol 105: 767–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Rahman H, Singer S, Weselake R (2013) Development of low-linolenic acid Brassica oleracea lines through seed mutagenesis and molecular characterization of mutants. Theor Appl Genet 126: 1587–1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(108.8KB, pdf)}

Figure S2

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(222KB, pdf)}

Figure S3

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(336.7KB, pdf)}

Figure S4

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(225.6KB, pdf)}

Figure S5

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(159.6KB, pdf)}

Table S1

Primers used in this study.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(15.7KB, pdf)}

[pone.0097430-Thompson1] 1. Thompson KF (1963) Resistance to the cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) in Brassica plants. Nature 198: 209. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Bodnaryk1] 2. Bodnaryk RP, Lamb RJ (1991) Mechanisms of resistance to the flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze), in mustard seedlings, Sinapis alba L. Can J Plant Sci. 71: 13–20. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Elliott1] 3.Elliott RH, Rakow GFW (1999) Resistance of brassica and sinapis species to flea beetles, phyllotreta cruciferae. in: proc. the 10^th international rapeseed congress. Camberra, Australia.

[pone.0097430-Gugel1] 4.Gugel RK, Séguin-Swartz G (1997) Introgression of blackleg resistance from Sinapis alba into Brassica napus Brassica 97, int soc hortic sci symp brassicas/10^th crucifer genetics workshop, 23–27 Sept 1997, Rennes, France:Abst: p 222.

[pone.0097430-Raney1] 5. Raney JP, Rakow G, Olson T (1995) Development of low erucic, low glucosinolate Sinapis alba . In proceedings of the 9^th international rapeseed congress, Cambridge, United Kindom 2: 416–418. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Scarth1] 6. Scarth R, Tang J (2006) Modification of Brassica oil using conventional and transgenic approaches. Crop Sci 46: 1225–1236. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Rbbelen1] 7. Röbbelen G, Nitsch A (1975) Genetical and physiological investigations on mutants for polyenoic fatty acids in rapeseed, Brassica napus L. I. selection and description of new mutants. Z Pflanzenzucht 75: 92–105. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Pleines1] 8. Pleines S, Friedt W (1989) Genetic control of linolenic acid concentration in seed oil of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 78: 793–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Rajcan1] 9. Rajcan I, Kasha KJ, Kott LS, Beversdorf WD (2002) Evaluation of cytoplasmic effects on agronomic and seed quality traits in two doubled haploid populations of Brassica napus L. Euphytica. 123: 401–409. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Baux1] 10. Baux A, Hebeisen T, Pellet D (2008) Effects of minimal temperatures on low-linolenic rapeseed oil fatty-acid composition. Eur J Agron 29: 102–107. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Hu1] 11. Hu X, Sullivan-Gilbert M, Gupta M, Thompson SA (2006) Mapping of the loci controlling oleic and linolenic acid contents and development of fad2 and fad3 allele-specific markers in canola (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 113: 497–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Yang1] 12. Yang Q, Fan C, Guo Z, Qin J, Wu J, et al. (2012) Identification of FAD2 and FAD3 genes in Brassica napus genome and development of allele-specific markers for high oleic and low linolenic acid contents. Theor Appl Genet 125(4): 715–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Mikolajczyk1] 13. Mikolajczyk K, Dabert M, Karlowski WM, Spasibionek S, Nowakowska J, et al. (2010) Allele-specific SNP markers for the new low linolenic mutant genotype of winter oilseed rape. Plant Breeding 129: 502–507. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Ecker1] 14. Ecker R, Yaniv Z (1993) Genetic control of fatty acid composition in seed oil of Sinapis alba L. Euphytica. 69: 45–49. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-KatepaMupondwa1] 15. Katepa-Mupondwa F, Gugel RK, Raney JP (2006) Genetic diversity for agronomic, morphological and seed quality traits in Sinapis alba L. (yellow mustard). Can J Plant Sci 86: 1015–1025. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Cheng1] 16. Cheng B, Williams DJ, Zhang Y (2012) Genetic variation in morphology, seed quality and self-(in)compatibility among the inbred lines developed from a population variety in outcrossing yellow mustard (Sinapis alba). Plants 1: 16–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Bundrock1] 17.Bundrock T (1998) Doubled haploidy in yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.

[pone.0097430-Michelmore1] 18. Michelmore R, Paran I, Kesseli RV (1991) Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 9828–9832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Panjabi1] 19. Panjabi P, Jagannath A, Bisht N, Padmaja K, Sharma S, et al. (2008) Comparative mapping of Brassica juncea and Arabidopsis thaliana using intron polymorphism (IP) markers: homoeologous relationships, diversification and evolution of the A, B and C brassica genomes. BMC Genomics 9: 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Yang2] 20. Yang L, Jin G, Zhao X, Zheng Y, Xu Z, et al. (2007) PIP: a database of potential intron polymorphism markers. Bioinformatics 23: 2174–2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Somers1] 21. Somers DJ, Friesen KRD, Rakow G (1998) Identification of molecular markers associated with linoleic acid desaturation in Brassica napus . Theor Appl Genet 96: 897–903. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-VanOoijen1] 22.Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap Version 4.0: Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

[pone.0097430-VanOoijen2] 23.Van Ooijen JW (2009) MapQTL 6: Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations of diploid species. Kyazma BV: Wageningen, Netherlands.

[pone.0097430-Siebert1] 24. Siebert PD, Chenchik A, Kellogg DE, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov SA (1995) An improved PCR method for walking in uncloned genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 1087–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Kumar1] 25. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5: 150–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Thies1] 26. Thies W (1971) Schnelle und einfache Analysen der Fettsäurezusammensetzung in einzelnen Rapskotyledonen I. Gaschromatographische und papierchromatographische Methoden. Z Pflanzenzücht 65: 181–202. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Downey1] 27. Downey RK, Harvey BL (1963) Methods of breeding for oil quality in rape. Can J Plant Sci 43: 271–275. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Javidfar1] 28. Javidfar F, Cheng BF (2013) Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL analysis of erucic acid content and glucosinolate components in yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.). BMC Plant Biology 13: 142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Lysak1] 29. Lysak MA, Koch MA, Pecinka A, Schubert I (2005) Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. Genome Res 15: 516–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Nelson1] 30. Nelson MN, Lydiate DJ (2006) New evidence from Sinapis alba L. for ancestral triplication in a crucifer genome. Genome 49: 230–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Nishiuchi1] 31. Nishiuchi T, Nishimura M, Arondel V, Iba K (1994) Genomic nucleotide sequence of a gene encoding a microsomal omega-3 fatty acid desaturase from Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Physiol 105: 767–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0097430-Rahman1] 32. Rahman H, Singer S, Weselake R (2013) Development of low-linolenic acid Brassica oleracea lines through seed mutagenesis and molecular characterization of mutants. Theor Appl Genet 126: 1587–1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Detection and Molecular Characterization of Two FAD3 Genes Controlling Linolenic Acid Content and Development of Allele-Specific Markers in Yellow Mustard (Sinapis alba)

Entang Tian

Fangqin Zeng

Kimberly MacKay

Vicky Roslinsky

Bifang Cheng

Roles

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Table 1. Linolenic acid contents of the parental lines Y1127, Y514, Y1035 and F1 seeds, and the mid-parental value in yellow mustard.

Regional Linkage Mapping

Cloning of the Coding Region of the FAD3 Gene

Cloning of the 5′ and 3′ Flanking Sequences and the Genomic DNA Sequences of the FAD3 Genes

DNA Sequencing

Phylogenetic Tree

Development of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Allele-specific Markers

Fatty Acid Analysis

Results

Linolenic Acid Content is Controlled by Two Gene Loci in Yellow Mustard

Figure 1. Frequency distributions of linolenic acid contents in individual seeds of Y1127, Y1035, F1, (Y1127×Y1035)×Y1035 and F2 populations.

Figure 2. Frequency distributions of linolenic acid contents in individual seeds of Y1127, Y514, F1, (Y1127×Y514)×Y1127 and F2 populations.

Figure 3. Frequency distributions of linolenic acid contents in individual seeds of Y514, Y11035, F1, (Y514×Y1035)×Y514 and F2 populations.

Two QTLs Accounting for the Variation of C18∶3 Content are Mapped to Linkage Groups Sal02 and Sal10, Respectively

Table 2. Polymorphic ILP primers used for regional linkage mapping of C18∶3 content in the three F2 populations of Y1127×Y1035, Y1127×Y514 and Y514×Y1035.

Figure 4. Mapping QTLs controlling C18∶3 content.

The SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Genes are Cloned and Exhibit Differences in the Exon and Intron

Figure 5. Structure of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 alleles LA1, la1, LA2 and la2 in yellow mustard.

Figure 6. Phylogentic relationship based on the polypeptide sequences among the LA1 allele of the SalFAD3.LA1 gene, the LA2 allele of the SalFAD3.LA2 gene, and the FAD3 genes of Brassica species and Arabidopsis.

Co-segregation of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Allele-specific Markers with C18∶3 Contents in the F2 Populations

Figure 7. Identification of different C18∶3 genotypes based on the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers in the F2 populations of the three crosses Y1127×Y1035 (A), Y1127×Y514 (B) and Y514×Y1035 (C).

Table 3. Co-segregation of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers with C18∶3 contents in the F2 populations of Y1127×Y1035, Y1127×Y514 and Y514×Y1035.

Discussion

Supporting Information

Funding Statement

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

Table 1. Linolenic acid contents of the parental lines Y1127, Y514, Y1035 and F₁ seeds, and the mid-parental value in yellow mustard.

Figure 1. Frequency distributions of linolenic acid contents in individual seeds of Y1127, Y1035, F₁, (Y1127×Y1035)×Y1035 and F₂ populations.

Figure 2. Frequency distributions of linolenic acid contents in individual seeds of Y1127, Y514, F₁, (Y1127×Y514)×Y1127 and F₂ populations.

Figure 3. Frequency distributions of linolenic acid contents in individual seeds of Y514, Y11035, F₁, (Y514×Y1035)×Y514 and F₂ populations.

Table 2. Polymorphic ILP primers used for regional linkage mapping of C18∶3 content in the three F₂ populations of Y1127×Y1035, Y1127×Y514 and Y514×Y1035.

Figure 5. Structure of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 alleles LA¹, la¹, LA² and la² in yellow mustard.

Figure 6. Phylogentic relationship based on the polypeptide sequences among the LA¹ allele of the SalFAD3.LA1 gene, the LA² allele of the SalFAD3.LA2 gene, and the FAD3 genes of Brassica species and Arabidopsis.

Co-segregation of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 Allele-specific Markers with C18∶3 Contents in the F₂ Populations

Figure 7. Identification of different C18∶3 genotypes based on the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers in the F₂ populations of the three crosses Y1127×Y1035 (A), Y1127×Y514 (B) and Y514×Y1035 (C).

Table 3. Co-segregation of the SalFAD3.LA1 and SalFAD3.LA2 allele-specific markers with C18∶3 contents in the F₂ populations of Y1127×Y1035, Y1127×Y514 and Y514×Y1035.