Abstract
βγ-Crystallin-type double clamp (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S motif is an established but sparsely investigated motif for Ca2+ binding. A βγ-crystallin domain is formed of two Greek key motifs, accommodating two Ca2+-binding sites. βγ-Crystallins make a separate class of Ca2+-binding proteins (CaBP), apparently a major group of CaBP in bacteria. Paralleling the diversity in βγ-crystallin domains, these motifs also show great diversity, both in structure and in function. Although the expression of some of them has been associated with stress, virulence, and adhesion, the functional implications of Ca2+ binding to βγ-crystallins in mediating biological processes are yet to be elucidated.
Keywords: Calcium, Calcium-binding Proteins, Crystallin, Protein Stability, Protein Structure, Beta Gamma-Crystallin, Greek Key Motif
Ca2+-binding Proteins: One Ligand, Many Motifs
Ca2+ binding, already a very abundant physiological process, has a repertoire of associated Ca2+-binding proteins (CaBP)4, including numerous proteins involved in signaling events (a few reviews, see Refs. 1–4). Ca2+-binding proteins are grouped according to the nature of their binding motifs. The well studied all-α-helical EF-hand motif and all-β-sheet-containing C2 domains, which possess diverse functions, predominate sensory CaBP (5–8). Many CaBP with extracellular EGF domains, β-propeller-like domains, and cadherins are also known (9–12). These independent structural units perform their Ca2+-dependent roles either as complete proteins or as modules in multidomain proteins.
The Ca2+-binding motif of the βγ-crystallin type is a recently established motif with a wide prevalence. Here, we lay out our understanding of this motif with respect to the geometry of binding sites, modes of Ca2+ coordination, and prediction of functional, disabled, or degenerate (nonfunctional) motifs. The well characterized founding members of the βγ-crystallin superfamily are lens β- and γ-crystallins, which are major constituents of the vertebrate eye lens, rendering it with a high refractive index and transparency (for reviews, see Refs. 13–18). As in the case of some other Ca2+-binding proteins (C2 domains, EGF domains, and cadherins), βγ-crystallins possess an all-β fold, made of strand exchanged Greek key motifs (19, 20).
The βγ-crystallin domain is an ancient protein fold, and several proteins across different domains of life are found to have this fold, a majority of them being expressed in bacterial species (15, 17, 21). Many βγ-crystallin domains have been studied in the recent past, and insights obtained from ion binding in these βγ-crystallins have led to the proposition that proteins of this superfamily possess a universal Ca2+-binding motif (22, 23). Notwithstanding that βγ-crystallins have been established as a superfamily of Ca2+-binding proteins, their involvement in the cellular Ca2+ metabolism or signaling is far from being recognized yet. We summarize a critical analysis of the Ca2+-binding motif present in this superfamily of proteins.
βγ-Crystallins and Ca2+ Binding: A Chronology
Although the very first non-lens protein belonging to the βγ-crystallin superfamily was Protein S from the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus (24), it took almost two decades to classify these proteins as a separate group of CaBP. In the absence of structural information, Protein S was earlier speculated to possess extensively modified EF-hand motifs (25). Weak binding of Ca2+ to lens β-crystallins was reported on the basis of equilibrium dialysis and interaction with the Ca2+ mimic dye Stains-all (26, 27). Another decade passed before Spherulin 3a, a protein from slime mold Physarum polycephalum that was predicted to be a single domain βγ-crystallin (28), was finally shown to bind Ca2+, with clues from Ca2+ binding to lens β-crystallin (29–31). Based on Ca2+ binding to a peptide corresponding to a Greek key motif of γ-crystallin (32), a proposition that βγ-crystallin-type Greek key could form the motif for Ca2+ binding was formulated. Concurrent structural studies shed light on the coordination pattern of Ca2+ binding to Spherulin 3a and Protein S (22, 33).
The recognition of βγ-crystallins as a distinct superfamily of Ca2+-binding proteins was still in its infancy. The factors responsible for this were: (i) undefined motif of Ca2+ binding, (ii) lack of information about the role of Ca2+ in protein functions, and (iii) no substantial addition of novel members to this superfamily. For a long time, this superfamily was considered a sparsely distributed family with only a few scattered members, although some more proteins (e.g. WmKT, SKLP, and SMPI) were identified based on structural similarity (34–36); these did not belong to the βγ-crystallins lineage and may have arisen from convergent evolution (37). With the advent of genomic sequence information, many members from diverse species (bacteria, archaea, and urochordate) were added to the superfamily and also confirmed to be Ca2+-binding proteins (22, 23, 38–43), leading to the recognition of a common motif for ion binding, and thus prompting the organization of these proteins as a separate set of Ca2+-binding proteins (23, 44).
Architecture of the βγ-Crystallin-type Ca2+-binding Motif
The domain topology of βγ-crystallins is based on a pair of Greek key motifs (19, 28). The Greek key motif, a terminology based on the pattern and supersecondary features observed in proteins, is a basic theme of many all-β proteins (45, 46). Greek keys are quite diverse in topology and hence were further classified as (4,0), (3,1), and (2,2) patterns, based on the arrangement and connectivity of strands (46). According to the above classification, proteins of the βγ-crystallin superfamily fall into the (3,1) category (47), where one strand (third strand, c and c′ of the respective Greek key motif) out of the four is shared by a partner motif (Fig. 1).
FIGURE 1.
a, graphic representation of a typical Ca2+-binding βγ-crystallin (Clostrillin) showing the overall domain organization (PDB ID: 3I9H). b, topology diagram showing the secondary structural arrangement of a βγ-crystallin where two Greek keys pair together by swapping their third β-strand. The (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S motifs are parts of the loops, running in opposite directions, which connect the third and fourth strands in respective Greek key motifs (c–d and c′–d′). c, each domain generally has two Ca2+-binding sites comprised mainly from β-hairpin and loop regions. d, schematic representation of two Ca2+-binding sites of a domain. Each Ca2+-binding site is formed by one residue from the β-hairpin via main chain coordination, two residues (one coordinates via the main chain and the other via the side chain) from the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch of the same Greek key, and one residue from the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch of the partner Greek key. Broken and continuous lines represent coordination via the main chain and side chains, respectively.
βγ-Crystallin-type Greek key motif has a distinct signature sequence of residues “(F/Y/W)XXXX(F/Y)XG” (28) in the β-hairpin loop between the first and the second strands (19) (Fig. 1). Along with this signature sequence, ∼24–30 residues downstream, a conserved Ser is located (on the fourth β-strand), which plays a structural role by stabilizing this β-hairpin (19, 20, 48). The third strand of each Greek key is swapped and becomes a part of the partner Greek key motif ((3,1) arrangement of β-strands) (Fig. 1b). The fourth strand folds back to the previous sheet via a connecting loop, which is variable in length and occasionally has a small helical segment. This loop (named loop1 in the first Greek key and loop2 in the second Greek key motif) occupies the top of the βγ-crystallin domain (Fig. 1c).
A βγ domain has two juxtaposed Ca2+ binding sites, which are mainly formed of the loops (loop1 and loop2) with an (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S sequence stretch, running in opposite directions in three-dimensional space, along with the residues from β-hairpins (22, 23, 33, 40) (Fig. 1, c and d). Thus, each Ca2+-binding site is formed by four residues located at three different regions in the primary sequence. The first Ca2+-binding site is formed via one residue from β-hairpin1, two residues from loop1, and one residue from loop2, and in a similar way, the second site is formed by one residue from β-hairpin2, two residues from loop2, and one residue from loop1 (22, 23) (Fig. 1d). This arrangement is common in the βγ domains studied structurally: Protein S (33), Spherulin 3a (22), Ci-βγ-crystallin (40), Clostrillin, Flavollin, M-crystallin (23, 41), and Geodin (42).
Coordination Geometry of the Ca2+-binding Site
In βγ-crystallins, the Ca2+ coordination number varies from five to eight, four being provided by protein ligands, the rest being satisfied by water molecules (22, 23, 33, 40, 42). The +x position of the coordination sphere is provided by the main chain carbonyl of the first X residue of (F/Y)XXXX(Y/F)XG stretch, which is next to the first conserved aromatic residue of β-hairpin1 (Fig. 2). The second coordination (+y position) is provided by the main chain carbonyl oxygen of the third residue and the third coordination (+z position) by the side chain oxygen of the fifth residue of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch of the same Greek key motif (22, 23, 40) (Fig. 2). The involvement of the Ser or Thr hydroxyl group to coordinate Ca2+ is distinctive to this motif as most Ca2+-binding sites do not involve these residues in Ca2+ ion coordination (49). The fourth coordination (−x position) is provided by the side chain oxygen of the second residue (mostly Asp or sometime Asn) of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch from the partner Greek key motif. The −y and −z positions are satisfied by water molecules.
FIGURE 2.
a, formation of a double clamp using two (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S motifs. b, Ca2+-binding sites of Clostrillin (PDB ID: 3I9H) showing the Ca2+ coordination sphere. Both sites of Clostrillin show a coordination of 7, but in the superfamily, it varies from 5 to 8. The first coordination at the +x position is via the main chain carbonyl oxygen coming from the β-hairpin. The second coordination at the +y position takes place via the main chain carbonyl oxygen of the third residue of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch. Although the third coordination at the +z position is from the hydroxyl oxygen of the side chain of the fifth residue of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch (usually a Ser residue but in this case it is Thr), the fourth coordination at the −x position is from the side chain carboxyl oxygen of the second residue of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S stretch that comes from the partner Greek key. The −y and −z positions are satisfied by water molecules.
Both sites of a domain exhibit similar or slightly altered coordination geometry. The coordination number is seven, with pentagonal bipyramidal geometry, but octahedral geometry (coordination number: 6) and square anti-prismatic (coordination number: 8) are also seen. A coordination number of five has also been observed in the first Ca2+ binding site of Protein S (33). The average coordination radius at each of these sites varies from 2.4 to 2.8 Å.
Preferred Residues in the Binding Motif and Their Significance
An analysis of >100 sequences of canonical motifs available demonstrated that the amino acid residues forming the (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S fingerprint vary in various proteins of the superfamily (44). The first residue of the fingerprint is involved in stabilizing the pocket through hydrogen bonding with the hydroxyl side chain of Ca2+ coordinating Ser/Thr and in some cases supports a water molecule present at the −y position. The second residue, also a polar amino acid (mostly Asp), directly coordinates Ca2+ by providing monodentate ligation at the −x position. These first two residues act in trans, i.e. the first two residues of loop1 of the first Greek key, become part of the second Ca2+-binding site and vice versa; thus, the motif gets its name as a “double clamp” motif (23) (Figs. 1 and 2). The third residue (X1) coordinates via main chain carbonyl oxygen and is generally a polar residue, but is variable in nature, thus providing variations in the microenvironment around the Ca2+-binding site. The nonligating fourth residue (X2) is generally hydrophobic. It forms a part of the hydrophobic core and may be an important player in relaying signals to the core; local conformational changes in the loop upon Ca2+ binding can thus affect the stability of the protein (23, 44). The fifth residue is usually Ser (or sometimes Thr), which coordinates via the hydroxyl oxygen and is a determinant for domain properties. The sixth nonligating residue is highly conserved structural Ser, which stabilizes the β-hairpin loop (48). The crystal structures of βγ-crystallin domains available in the Ca2+-bound form display a common theme of Ca2+ coordination that led to the proposition of a distinct motif for Ca2+ binding in the βγ-crystallin superfamily (Table 1), although some of these structures carry minor variations in this theme, which are discussed below.
TABLE 1.
A glance at βγ-crystallins with Ca2+ perspective

* Equilibration required about 8 weeks.
Deviations within the Common Theme of the Binding Sites
The second Ca2+-binding site of Ci-βγ-crystallin (Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID: 2BV2) from Ciona intestinalis is a minor exception to the theme described above (40). In this site, the protein molecule provides five coordinations, where the third residue (Glu-76) of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S fingerprint coordinates through the side chain oxygen at the −z position, in addition to the usual coordination by the main chain carbonyl oxygen at +y (Fig. 3a). Similarly, in the W39D mutant of Clostrillin, Asp-39 coordinates via the main chain carbonyl oxygen in addition to the side chain carboxyl oxygen, whereas in the wild type, only the main chain carbonyl of Trp-39 coordinates at the +y position (44). The pentagonal bipyramidal geometry with coordination number 7 is more prevalent in the βγ-crystallin superfamily, where three positions corresponding to −y1, −y2, and −z positions of the coordination sphere are occupied by water molecules (Fig. 2). However, the water molecules coordinating with Ca2+ vary in number, leading to different coordination geometries as well. In Geodin (from a marine sponge), only one Ca2+ bound to a C-terminal domain is observed as only one site is canonical (42), attesting to the prediction made by Clout et al. (22) applying fingerprint comparison. In selenomethionine derivatized crystal, the water molecules corresponding to −y1 and −y2 positions, as seen in underivatized crystals, have been replaced by hydroxyl oxygens of glycerol molecule without affecting the overall coordination geometry (Fig. 3b). Ci-βγ-crystallin is another example, where a water molecule at the first Ca2+-binding site (−z position) is replaced by the side chain carboxyl oxygen of Glu-7 from a symmetry-related molecule as an effect of crystal packing (Fig. 3c) (40). These examples suggest that the water molecules participating in Ca2+ coordination are not very strongly bound in βγ-crystallins and can be replaced by other suitable ligands, if conditions are favorable for their binding.
FIGURE 3.
a, the Ca2+-binding site of Ci-βγ-crystallin where Glu, the third residue of the (N/D)(N/D)XX(T/S)S fingerprint, coordinates with the side chain carboxyl oxygen at the −z position along with the main chain carbonyl oxygen at the +y position. b, the Ca2+-binding site of Geodin showing a glycerol molecule occupying the positions (−y) corresponding to the water molecule in the Ca2+ coordination sphere. c, the first Ca2+-binding site of Ci-βγ-crystallin where Glu-7 from a symmetry-related molecule occupies the +z position corresponding to the water molecule. d, a schematic diagram showing the pattern coordination and mode of Ca2+ ligation along with the primary sequence of the binding site. As in Fig. 1, the broken and continuous lines represent coordination via the main chain and side chain, respectively.
Signature Sequence and Identification of New Ca2+-binding βγ-Crystallins
With the growing number of protein sequences in databases, the (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S sequence fingerprint can be used to predict Ca2+-binding βγ-crystallins as with the consensus sequence of the EF-hand motif. The (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S fingerprint occurs twice in a domain due to the pairing of the two Greek key motifs. As two Greek key motifs participate in constructing a site, both should be taken into consideration for prediction (Fig. 3d). Only two residues use their side chains in coordinating Ca2+, and any change at these positions leads to either complete loss or reduction in Ca2+ binding ability. The first critical residue is Ser/Thr at the fifth position, and the second is Asp or Asn from the juxtaposed motif at the second position in the (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S fingerprint (Fig. 3d). As an example, in Clostrillin, at the first Ca2+-binding site, Thr from the motif NDWMTS ligates via the side chain hydroxyl oxygen at the +z position and Asp residue from the second motif NDKMTS coordinates via the side chain carboxyl oxygen at the −x position (Table 1). Similarly, for the second site, Thr from the motif NDKMTS would provide its side chain for coordination at the +z position, and the site would be completed by the side chain of the Asp residue coming from NDWMTS (23). Thus, both sites are well matched for binding Ca2+ (Table 1).
In the case of the first site of the C-terminal domain of Geodin, Lys from the first β-hairpin loop and Gly from the motif IGGVSS would coordinate via main chain, besides Ser at the fifth position in the motif (Table 1) (42). This site would bind Ca2+ only if the second residue of the second motif NDALKS is also favorable for ligation. It is Asp, and hence the first site in this protein is suitable for Ca2+ binding. At the second site, Lys occupies the fifth position in the motif NDALKS, which is not compatible. Also, the second residue of the partner motif IGGVSS is Gly, which, again, cannot provide its side chain for completing the site, and thus the second site of this domain would not bind Ca2+. This consensus sequence has aided into the identification of new members of this family.
Degeneracy of Motif: Constraints and Gains
Not all βγ-crystallins possess the canonical (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S fingerprint of ion binding. Most proteins of this family with functional Ca2+-binding motifs are from bacterial sources or lower eukaryotes (Table 1). The vertebrate homologues, such as lens βγ-crystallins, AIM1, Crybg3, and a few more diverged domains do not have the canonical sequence, and their binding sites are degenerated to an extent that Ca2+ binding is either very poor or lost (23, 43, 50–54). It is proposed that although Ca2+ binding might have been a vital need for ancestors of lens crystallins, most binding sites in lens βγ-crystallins were evolutionarily disabled to gain extra stability (52, 54) because high domain stability is an indispensable requirement of lenticular proteins (15, 55). It is, however, speculated that these βγ-crystallins may be involved in Ca2+-dependent functions in non-lenticular tissues as shown in brain and testes (56, 57).
The C-terminal domain of Geodin with one naturally disabled Ca2+-binding site (42) is unusual as most βγ domains have two juxtaposed Ca2+-binding sites. Nitrollin, a βγ-crystallin from the bacterium Nitrosospira multiformis, which is peculiar for its mode of domain swapping, does not bind Ca2+ due to the presence of Arg in place of conserved Ser along with other unfavorable residues (43). Thus, even bacterial homologues can have disabled sites. Substitution of Ser/Thr with Arg leads to the loss of Ca2+ binding in many homologous proteins, such as Protein S, Flavollin, and Clostrillin (24, 44). This leads to enhanced stability of the protein, which, in some cases, is comparable with stability gained upon Ca2+ binding (52).
Comparisons with Other Ca2+-binding Motifs
Multiple modules, EF-hands, C2 domains, and EGF domains, have purposes such as sensing and sequestration of Ca2+ (5, 7, 58, 59), and Ca2+ binding takes place at a specific motif forming continuous or discontinuous Ca2+-binding sites (60, 61). The EF-hand motif, an example of a continuous site, is the predominant class in CaBP. The EF-hand loop between the E and the F helices coordinates Ca2+ ion, usually with coordination numbers of 7 or 8 (6, 62–64). Non-EF-hand proteins utilize fewer protein ligands for coordinating Ca2+ (65). Unlike βγ-crystallins in which the ion is exposed to the solvent with 1–4 water molecules in direct coordination with Ca2+, the EF-hand bound Ca2+ is exposed to a single water molecule (Table 2). Similarly, in βγ-crystallins, fewer protein ligands (4) and more water (1–4) molecules are seen. The affinities of Ca2+ toward EF-hand proteins are moderate to very high with Kd values in the nanomolar range (6), whereas βγ-crystallins display affinities in the micromolar range (Table 1).
TABLE 2.
A comparative look at some major Ca2+-binding motifs

Unlike the EF-hand motifs, C2 domains are all-β conformational Ca2+ sensors and share the β-sandwich arrangement not akin to βγ-crystallins (Table 2) (7). C2 domain-containing synaptotagmins are major players in neurotransmitter exocytosis and are involved in Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding (66). The domains are incorporated in multiple proteins (such as phospholipases) for their Ca2+ sensing roles (67). The Ca2+-binding site is discontinuous and formed by mutually distant regions in the primary sequence of this domain (68) as is the case with βγ-crystallins. In the C2 domains, the Ca2+ ions are coordinated by a network of aspartate side chains in mono- or bidentate fashion with one aspartate involved in coordination with two Ca2+ ions (58, 69–71).
Minutiae of Ca2+ Binding and Origin of Domain Diversity
The affinity of Ca2+ for Ca2+-binding proteins ranges from intracellular nm to extracellular mm, depending on their spatiotemporal localization, which in turn reflects their functions. With the limited information available, it appears that most βγ-crystallins are extracellular or secretory proteins (72–78). βγ-Crystallins bind Ca2+ with affinities in the lower micromolar range (M-crystallin, 32 μm; Clostrillin, 4 μm; Flavollin, 30 μm; Protein S, 27 and 76 μm) (Table 1) (23, 24, 79). Ca2+ binding affinities of Ci-βγ-crystallin from C. intestinalis, DdCad-1, and Geodin have not been reported. Comparatively weak binding affinity is reported for βγ-crystallins from eukaryotic species (9 and 200 μm for Spherulin 3a, and 260 μm for amphibian EP37) (23, 30, 31). Although the affinity of these proteins ranges in μm, a clear-cut variation has been seen not only in different βγ-crystallin domains but also between two juxtaposed sites of the same domain.
The molecular determinants of affinity are not well understood in this domain. Either of the sites in a domain is interdependent as abrogating binding in one site attenuates the affinity of the juxtaposed site (44, 80). Nevertheless, it is not clear whether filling of Ca2+ at the two sites is simultaneous or sequential, cooperative or noncooperative. The microenvironment around a Ca2+-binding site affects its affinity toward Ca2+. Even a homologous replacement of the fifth residue of the motif between structurally very similar domains changes its affinity as well as domain properties (44, 52). Consequently, this motif acts as a tuning knob for such a high diversity in domain properties (52). All the proteins studied so far show little or no binding toward divalent Mg2+, confirming the Ca2+ specificity of these binding sites. Similar observations for ion selectivity have been made in C2 domains (81), whereas Mg2+ is known to bind functionally, at least in the resting state, to Ca2+/Mg2+-binding EF-hands (6). Mg2+ may bind even the Ca2+-specific (regulatory) EF-hands, although with very weak affinity, without affecting the overall conformation of the protein (6).
Prevalence of the βγ-Crystallin-type Ca2+-binding Protein Family
The advent of more genomic information has revealed a widespread occurrence of this superfamily and recruitment of βγ-crystallin domains in conjunction with domains of different functions. An analysis demonstrates that it exists in several hundred species (source: Pfam database, accession number PF00030). Three out of four protein sequences of βγ-crystallins from an invertebrate species Branchiostoma floridae (amphioxus) also possess Ca2+ binding fingerprints probably similar to that seen in Ci-βγ-crystallin from Ciona intestinalis (21). In a limited analysis of sequences, it was observed that the domain is recruited in serine proteases (Sorangium cellulosum), aspartate metalloproteases (Saccharophagus degradans), carbohydrate-binding glycosyl hydrolases (Flavobacterium johnsoniae and other bacterial species), and cell adhesion molecules (Dictyostelium discoideum). Isolated βγ-crystallins are also found as part of proteins from Vibrio cholerae, Maricaulis maris, Oceanicaulis alexandrii, and M. xanthus and in the archaeal species Methanosarcina acetivorans. Such extensive recruitment as modules in proteins of diverse functions clearly indicates some significant and widespread roles of these domains in protein function.
Ca2+ Binding and Domain Stabilization
CaBP, mostly those of the EF-hand family, undergo large conformational changes upon binding Ca2+. Contrary to this, βγ-crystallins generally do not undergo a drastic change in conformation upon binding Ca2+, suggesting that apo forms are conformationally not very flexible (e.g. Protein S, Spherulin 3a) (30, 82). This is attributed to thermodynamically robust domain architecture (reviewed in Ref. 17). Some individual domains of larger proteins from the pathogenic bacterium Yersinia pestis and the extremophilic Caulobacter crescentus and Hahella chejuensis are intrinsically unstructured (or partly unstructured) in the apo form and gain significant structure upon binding Ca2+ (38, 39, 83).
Although βγ domains do not undergo major structural change upon binding Ca2+, they assume a reduced hydrodynamic size and thermodynamically drift to a state of higher structural stabilization. Therefore, in some βγ-crystallins, Ca2+ plays the role of an extrinsic stabilizer. Within the superfamily, there exists a stability gradient across the domains and differences in the extent of gain in stability upon Ca2+ binding from very low (in Vibrillin) to very high (in Centillin) (Table 1) (52, 84). As noted in Y. pestis, βγ domain-containing proteins are differentially expressed in Ca2+-depleted avirulent strains (85, 86) and are unstructured in apo form (38), raising the prospective of their role in virulence via low calcium response.
Ca2+-dependent Functions: An Underexplored Arena
It is clear that the βγ-crystallin domain is widely spread. However, it has been difficult to assign functions in many βγ-crystallins studied so far (22, 23, 38, 41, 40, 83, 87, 88). Protein S of M. xanthus is expressed as a soluble protein and self-assembles as a multilayer spore coat in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Based on the observations that adjacent spores were fused to each other via a common Protein S layer, it was proposed that Protein S is involved in spore-spore interaction in the fruiting body (76). Spherulin 3a is another Ca2+-binding βγ-crystallin induced during stressful situations, but just like Protein S, its Ca2+-dependent functional implications in the physiological context have not yet emerged.
Ci-βγ-crystallin from C. intestinalis is localized in the otolith and thus might be involved in a primordial sensory system (40). It binds Ca2+ at both binding sites, but the Ca2+-dependent role of this single domain protein in the urochordate remains an enigma.
βγ-CAT from the skin of the frog Bombina maxima is implicated in several in vivo toxic effects on mammals (72, 89, 90). The βγ-Crystallin domain of this protein binds Ca2+ (its affinity has not been reported), and when red blood cells were treated with this protein, increased Ca2+ flux was observed that eventually resulted in hemolysis (73).
The cell adhesion molecule DdCad-1 from D. discoideum is involved in cell-cell adhesion in a Ca2+-dependent manner via dimer formation through two βγ-crystallin domains (91). During its transport, the protein is internalized in vacuoles in a Ca2+- and conformation-dependent manner (92, 93). The available functional information, although limited, suggests important roles played by this domain that remain yet to be explored.
Perspective
Although βγ-crystallins are distinct in terms of their Ca2+ binding properties with a well defined Ca2+-binding motif, the functions of many proteins in the protein sequence/structure databases are either uncertain or unknown. The loss of Ca2+ binding ability in recent homologues of βγ-crystallins (as in mammals) with persistence of their structural features is a useful paradigm for understanding the evolution of new protein functions. The functional aspect of these domains in isolation and with respect to Ca2+ binding still needs to be worked out in detail. This is particularly relevant in prokaryotes where the study of calcium sensing is still in the primitive stages, and except for a few proteins of the EF-hand superfamily (3, 94) and some proteins with orphan motifs for Ca2+ binding, there are no major classes of Ca2+-binding proteins identified. Recently, all-β-sheet bacterial immunoglobulin-like (Big) domains were shown to have Ca2+ binding ability; however, their Ca2+ coordination pattern is yet to be deciphered (95, 96).
In summary, the Ca2+ binding at the (N/D)(N/D)XX(S/T)S motif may serve as a domain stabilizer, and evolutionary imperatives may have replaced this stabilizing function of Ca2+ with an intrinsic stability of the domain. Although the motif has established its identity, the functional analysis of its members still remains to be addressed, which is a challenging yet imminent task considering the appearance of numerous new members.
Acknowledgments
We thank our long term collaborator Dr. R. Sankaranarayanan for support in our studies and Dr. Sushil Chandani for comments on our manuscript.
This work was supported in part by the CSIR XII five year network grant.
- CaBP
- Ca2+-binding proteins.
REFERENCES
- 1. Clapham D. E. (2007) Calcium signaling. Cell 131, 1047–1058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Burgoyne R. D. (2007) Neuronal calcium sensor proteins: Generating diversity in neuronal Ca2+ signaling. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 182–193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dominguez D. C. (2004) Calcium signalling in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 54, 291–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Marks A. R. (2013) Calcium cycling proteins and heart failure: mechanisms and therapeutics. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 46–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lewit-Bentley A., Réty S. (2000) EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 637–643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gifford J. L., Walsh M. P., Vogel H. J. (2007) Structures and metal-ion-binding properties of the Ca2+-binding helix-loop-helix EF-hand motifs. Biochem. J. 405, 199–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rizo J., Südhof T. C. (1998) C2-domains, structure and function of a universal Ca2+-binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15879–15882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Südhof T. C. (2012) Calcium control of neurotransmitter release. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a011353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Stenflo J., Stenberg Y., Muranyi A. (2000) Calcium-binding EGF-like modules in coagulation proteinases: Function of the calcium ion in module interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1477, 51–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fu S., Sun J., Qian L. (2008) Effect of Ca2+ on β-propeller phytases. Protein Pept. Lett. 15, 39–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Nagar B., Overduin M., Ikura M., Rini J. M. (1996) Structural basis of calcium-induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization. Nature 380, 360–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. van Roy F., Berx G. (2008) The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 65, 3756–3788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wistow G. J., Piatigorsky J. (1988) Lens crystallins: the evolution and expression of proteins for a highly specialized tissue. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 479–504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. van Rens G. L. M., de Jong W. W., Bloemendal H. (1992) A superfamily in the mammalian eye lens: the β/γ-crystallins. Mol. Biol. Rep. 16, 1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jaenicke R., Slingsby C. (2001) Lens crystallins and their microbial homologs: structure, stability, and function. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 36, 435–499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bhat S. P. (2003) Crystallins, genes and cataract. Prog. Drug Res. 60, 205–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bloemendal H., de Jong W., Jaenicke R., Lubsen N. H., Slingsby C., Tardieu A. (2004) Ageing and vision: structure, stability and function of lens crystallins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 86, 407–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Slingsby C., Wistow G. J., Clark A. R. (2013) Evolution of crystallins for a role in the vertebrate eye lens. Protein Sci. 22, 367–380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Blundell T., Lindley P., Miller L., Moss D., Slingsby C., Tickle I., Turnell B., Wistow G. (1981) The molecular structure and stability of the eye lens: x-ray analysis of γ-crystallin II. Nature 289, 771–777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wistow G., Turnell B., Summers L., Slingsby C., Moss D., Miller L., Lindley P., Blundell T. (1983) X-ray analysis of the eye lens protein γ-II crystallin at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 170, 175–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kappé G., Purkiss A. G., van Genesen S. T., Slingsby C., Lubsen N. H. (2010) Explosive expansion of βγ-crystallin genes in the ancestral vertebrate. J. Mol. Evol. 71, 219–230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Clout N. J., Kretschmar M., Jaenicke R., Slingsby C. (2001) Crystal structure of the calcium-loaded spherulin 3a dimer sheds light on the evolution of the eye lens βγ-crystallin domain fold. Structure 9, 115–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Aravind P., Mishra A., Suman S. K., Jobby M. K., Sankaranarayanan R., Sharma Y. (2009) βγ-Crystallin superfamily contains a universal motif for binding calcium. Biochemistry 48, 12180–12190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Teintze M., Inouye M., Inouye S. (1988) Characterization of calcium-binding sites in development-specific protein S of Myxococcus xanthus using site-specific mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 1199–1203 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Inouye S., Franceschini T., Inouye M. (1983) Structural similarities between the development-specific protein S from a gram-negative bacterium, Myxococcus xanthus, and calmodulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 6829–6833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sharma Y., Rao C. M., Narasu M. L., Rao S. C., Somasundaram T., Gopalakrishna A., Balasubramanian D. (1989) Calcium ion binding to δ- and to β-crystallins: the presence of the “EF-hand” motif in δ-crystallin that aids in calcium ion binding. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 12794–12799 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sharma Y., Rao C. M., Rao S. C., Krishna A. G., Somasundaram T., Balasubramanian D. (1989) Binding site conformation dictates the color of the dye Stains-all: a study of the binding of this dye to the eye lens proteins crystallins. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20923–20927 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wistow G. (1990) Evolution of a protein superfamily: relationships between vertebrate lens crystallins and microorganism dormancy proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 30, 140–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rosinke B., Renner C., Mayr E. M., Jaenicke R., Holak T. A. (1997) Ca2+-loaded spherulin 3a from Physarum polycephalum adopts the prototype γ-crystallin fold in aqueous solution. J. Mol. Biol. 271, 645–655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kretschmar M., Jaenicke R. (1999) Stability of a homo-dimeric Ca2+-binding member of the βγ-crystallin superfamily: DSC measurements on spherulin 3a from Physarum polycephalum. J. Mol. Biol. 291, 1147–1153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kretschmar M., Mayr E. M., Jaenicke R. (1999) Kinetic and thermodynamic stabilization of the βγ-crystallin homolog spherulin 3a from Physarum polycephalum by calcium binding. J. Mol. Biol. 289, 701–705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Rajini B., Shridas P., Sundari C. S., Muralidhar D., Chandani S., Thomas F., Sharma Y. (2001) Calcium binding properties of γ-crystallin: calcium ion binds at the Greek key βγ-crystallin fold. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 38464–38471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wenk M., Baumgartner R., Holak T. A., Huber R., Jaenicke R., Mayr E. M. (1999) The domains of protein S from Myxococcus xanthus: structure, stability and interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 286, 1533–1545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Antuch W., Güntert P., Wüthrich K. (1996) Ancestral βγ-crystallin precursor structure in a yeast killer toxin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 662–665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ohno A., Tate S., Seeram S. S., Hiraga K., Swindells M. B., Oda K., Kainosho M. (1998) NMR structure of the Streptomyces metalloproteinase inhibitor, SMPI, isolated from Streptomyces nigrescens TK-23: Another example of an ancestral βγ-crystallin precursor structure. J. Mol. Biol. 282, 421–433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ohki S. Y., Kariya E., Hiraga K., Wakamiya A., Isobe T., Oda K., Kainosho M. (2001) NMR structure of Streptomyces killer toxin-like protein, SKLP: further evidence for the wide distribution of single-domain βγ-crystallin superfamily proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 109–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Clout N. J., Slingsby C., Wistow G. J. (1997) Picture story. An eye on crystallins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jobby M. K., Sharma Y. (2005) Calcium-binding crystallins from Yersinia pestis: characterization of two single βγ-crystallin domains of a putative exported protein. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1209–1216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jobby M. K., Sharma Y. (2007) Calcium-binding to lens βB2- and βA3-crystallins suggests that all β-crystallins are calcium-binding proteins. FEBS J. 274, 4135–4147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Shimeld S. M., Purkiss A. G., Dirks R. P., Bateman O. A., Slingsby C., Lubsen N. H. (2005) Urochordate βγ-crystallin and the evolutionary origin of the vertebrate eye lens. Curr. Biol. 15, 1684–1689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Barnwal R. P., Jobby M. K., Devi K. M., Sharma Y., Chary K. V. (2009) Solution structure and calcium-binding properties of M-crystallin, a primordial βγ-crystallin from archaea. J. Mol. Biol. 386, 675–689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Vergara A., Grassi M., Sica F., Pizzo E., D'Alessio G., Mazzarella L., Merlino A. (2013) A novel interdomain interface in crystallins: structural characterization of the βγ-crystallin from Geodia cydonium at 0.99 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 960–967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Aravind P., Suman S. K., Mishra A., Sharma Y., Sankaranarayanan R. (2009) Three dimensional domain swapping in nitrollin, a single-domain βγ-crystallin from Nitrosospira multiformis, controls protein conformation and stability but not dimerization. J. Mol. Biol. 385, 163–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mishra A., Suman S. K., Srivastava S. S., Sankaranarayanan R., Sharma Y. (2012) Decoding the molecular design principles underlying Ca2+-binding to βγ-crystallin motifs. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 75–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Richardson J. S. (1976) Handedness of cross over connections in β sheets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 2619–2623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Richardson J. S. (1977) β-Sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins. Nature 268, 495–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hutchinson E. G., Thornton J. M. (1993) The Greek key motif: extraction, classification and analysis. Protein Eng. 6, 233–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Slingsby C., Norledge B., Simpson A., Bateman O. A., Wright G., Driessen H. P. C., Lindley P. F., Moss D. S., Bax B. (1997) X-ray diffraction and structure of crystallins. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 16, 3–29 [Google Scholar]
- 49. McPhalen C. A., Strynadka N. C. J., James M. N. G. (1991) Calcium-binding sites in proteins: a structural perspective. Adv. Protein Chem. 42, 77–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rajini B., Graham C., Wistow G., Sharma Y. (2003) Stability, homodimerization, and calcium-binding properties of a single, variant βγ-crystallin domain of the protein absent in melanoma 1 (AIM1). Biochemistry 42, 4552–4559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Aravind P., Wistow G., Sharma Y., Sankaranarayanan R. (2008) Exploring the limits of sequence and structure in a variant βγ-crystallin domain of the protein absent in melanoma-1 (AIM1). J. Mol. Biol. 381, 509–518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Suman S. K., Mishra A., Ravindra D., Yeramala L., Sharma Y. (2011) Evolutionary remodelling of the βγ-crystallins for domain stability at the cost of Ca2+-binding. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 43891–43901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Rajanikanth V., Srivastava S. S., Singh A. K., Rajyalakshmi M., Chandra K., Aravind P., Sankaranarayanan R., Sharma Y. (2012) Aggregation-prone near-native intermediate formation during unfolding of a structurally similar nonlenticular βγ-crystallin domain. Biochemistry 51, 8502–8513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Suman S. K., Mishra A., Yeramala L., Rastogi I. D., Sharma Y. (2013) Disability for function: Loss of Ca2+-binding is obligatory for fitness of mammalian βγ-crystallins. Biochemistry 52, 9047–9058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Mills I. A., Flaugh S. L., Kosinski-Collins M. S., King J. A. (2007) Folding and stability of the isolated Greek key domains of the long-lived human lens proteins γD-crystallin and γS-crystallin. Protein Sci. 16, 2427–2444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ganguly K., Favor J., Neuhäuser-Klaus A., Sandulache R., Puk O., Beckers J., Horsch M., Schädler S., Vogt Weisenhorn D., Wurst W., Graw J. (2008) Novel allele of Crybb2 in the mouse and its expression in the brain. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49, 1533–1541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sun M., Hölter S. M., Stepan J., Garrett L., Genius J., Kremmer E., Hrabě de., Angelis M., Wurst W., Lie D. C., Bally-Cuif L., Eder M., Rujescu D., Graw J. (2013) Crybb2 coding for βB2-crystallin affects sensorimotor gating and hippocampal function. Mamm. Genome 24, 333–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Nalefski E. A., Falke J. J. (1996) The C2 domain calcium-binding motif: structural and functional diversity. Protein Sci. 5, 2375–2390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wouters M. A., Rigoutsos I., Chu C. K., Feng L. L., Sparrow D. B., Dunwoodie S. L. (2005) Evolution of distinct EGF domains with specific functions. Protein Sci. 14, 1091–1103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Yang W., Lee H. W., Hellinga H., Yang J. J. (2002) Structural analysis, identification, and design of calcium-binding sites in proteins. Proteins 47, 344–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Pidcock E., Moore G. R. (2001) Structural characteristics of protein binding sites for calcium and lanthanide ions. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 6, 479–489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Kretsinger R. H., Nockolds C. E. (1973) Carp muscle calcium-binding protein. II. Structure determination and general description. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 3313–3326 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cates M. S., Berry M. B., Ho E. L., Li Q., Potter J. D., Phillips G. N., Jr. (1999) Metal-ion affinity and specificity in EF-hand proteins: coordination geometry and domain plasticity in parvalbumin. Structure 7, 1269–1278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Grabarek Z. (2006) Structural basis for diversity of the EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 359, 509–525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kirberger M., Wang X., Deng H., Yang W., Chen G., Yang J. J. (2008) Statistical analysis of structural characteristics of protein Ca2+ binding sites. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 13, 1169–1181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Chapman E. R. (2002) Synaptotagmin: a Ca2+ sensor that triggers exocytosis? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 498–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Yang J., McBride S., Mak D. O. D., Vardi N., Palczewski K., Haeseleer F., Foskett J. K. (2002) Identification of a family of calcium sensors as protein ligands of inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7711–7716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Sutton R. B., Davletov B. A., Berghuis A. M., Südhof T. C., Sprang S. R. (1995) Structure of the first C2 domain of synaptotagmin I: a novel Ca2+ phospholipid-binding fold. Cell 80, 929–938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Shao X., Davletov B. A., Sutton R. B., Südhof T. C., Rizo J. (1996) Bipartite Ca2+-binding motif in C2 domains of synaptotagmin and protein kinase C. Science 273, 248–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Ubach J., Zhang X., Shao X., Südhof T. C., Rizo J. (1998) Ca2+ binding to synaptotagmin: how many Ca2+ ions bind to the tip of a C2-domain? EMBO J. 17, 3921–3930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Cheng Y., Sequeira S. M., Malinina L., Tereshko V., Söllner T. H., Patel D. J. (2004) Crystallographic identification of Ca2+ and Sr2+ coordination sites in synaptotagmin I C2B domain. Protein Sci. 13, 2665–2672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gao Q., Xiang Y., Chen Z., Zeng L., Ma X., Zhang Y. (2011) βγ-CAT, a non-lens βγ-crystallin and trefoil factor complex, induces calcium-dependent platelet apoptosis. Thromb. Haemost. 105, 846–854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Gao Q., Xiang Y., Zeng L., Ma X. T., Lee W. H., Zhang Y. (2011) Characterization of the βγ-crystallin domains of βγ-CAT, a non-lens βγ-crystallin and trefoil factor complex, from the skin of the toad Bombina maxima. Biochimie 93, 1865–1872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Liu S. B., He Y. Y., Zhang Y., Lee W. H., Qian J. Q., Lai R., Jin Y. (2008) A novel non-lens βγ-crystallin and trefoil factor complex from amphibian skin and its functional implications. PLoS One 3, e1770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ogawa M., Takahashi T. C., Takabatake T., Takeshima K. (1998) Isolation and characterization of a gene expressed mainly in the gastric epithelium, a novel member of the ep37 family that belongs to the βγ-crystallin superfamily. Dev. Growth Differ. 40, 465–473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Inouye M., Inouye S., Zusman D. R. (1979) Gene expression during development of Myxococcus xanthus: pattern of protein synthesis. Dev. Biol. 68, 579–591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Inouye S., Inouye M., McKeever B., Sarma R. (1980) Preliminary crystallographic data for protein S, a development specific protein of Myxococcus xanthus. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 3713–3714 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Bernier F., Lemieux G., Pallotta D. (1987) Gene families encode the major encystment-specific proteins of Physarum polycephalum plasmodia. Gene 59, 265–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Wenk M., Mayr E. M. (1998) Myxococcus xanthus spore coat protein S, a stress-induced member of the βγ-crystallin superfamily, gains stability from binding of calcium ions. Eur. J. Biochem. 255, 604–610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Bagby S., Harvey T. S., Eagle S. G., Inouye S., Ikura M. (1994) Structural similarity of a developmentally regulated bacterial spore coat protein to βγ-crystallins of the vertebrate eye lens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 4308–4312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Nalefski E. A., Falke J. J. (2002) Cation charge and size selectivity of the C2 domain of cytosolic phospholipase A2. Biochemistry 41, 1109–1122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Wenk M., Jaenicke R. (1999) Calorimetric analysis of the Ca2+-binding βγ-crystallin homolog protein S from Myxococcus xanthus: intrinsic stability and mutual stabilization of domains. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 117–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Srivastava A. K., Sharma Y., Chary K. V. (2010) A natively unfolded βγ-crystallin domain from Hahella chejuensis. Biochemistry 49, 9746–9755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Suman S. K., Ravindra D., Sharma Y., Mishra A. (2013) Association properties and unfolding of a βγ-crystallin domain of a Vibrio-specific protein. PLoS One 8, e53610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Oyston P. C., Dorrell N., Williams K., Li S. R., Green M., Titball R. W., Wren B. W. (2000) The response regulator PhoP is important for survival under conditions of macrophage-induced stress and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Infect. Immun. 68, 3419–3425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Golubov A., Heesemann J., Rakin A. (2003) Uncovering genomic differences in human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 38, 107–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. de Jong W. W., Hendriks W., Mulders J. W., Bloemendal H. (1989) Evolution of eye lens crystallins: the stress connection. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14, 365–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Giancola C., Pizzo E., Di Maro A., Cubellis M. V., D'Alessio G. (2005) Preparation and characterization of geodin. A βγ-crystallin-type protein from a sponge. FEBS J. 272, 1023–1035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Qian J. Q., Liu S. B., He Y. Y., Lee W. H., Zhang Y. (2008) βγ-CAT, a non-lens βγ-crystallin and trefoil factor complex from amphibian skin secretions, caused endothelium-dependent myocardial depression in isolated rabbit hearts. Toxicon 52, 285–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Qian J. Q., Liu S. B., He Y. Y., Lee W. H., Zhang Y. (2008) Acute toxicity of βγ-CAT, a naturally existing non-lens βγ-crystallin and trefoil factor complex from frog Bombina maxima skin secretions. Toxicon 52, 22–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Lin Z., Sriskanthadevan S., Huang H., Siu C. H., Yang D. (2006) Solution structures of the adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 reveal new insights into Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 1016–1022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Sriskanthadevan S., Lee T., Lin Z., Yang D., Siu C. H. (2009) Cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 is imported into contractile vacuoles by membrane invagination in a Ca2+- and conformation-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 36377–36386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Sriskanthadevan S., Zhu Y., Manoharan K., Yang C., Siu C. H. (2011) The cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 regulates morphogenesis through differential spatiotemporal expression in Dictyostelium discoideum. Development 138, 2487–2497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Michiels J., Xi C., Verhaert J., Vanderleyden J. (2002) The functions of Ca2+ in bacteria: a role for EF-hand proteins? Trends Microbiol. 10, 87–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Lin Y.-P., Raman R., Sharma Y., Chang Y.-F. (2008) Calcium binds to Leptospiral immunoglobulin-like protein, LigB and modulates fibronectin-binding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 25140–25149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Raman R., Rajanikanth V., Palaniappan R. U. M., Lin Y.-P., He H., McDonough S. P., Sharma Y., Chang Y.-F. (2010) Big domains are novel Ca2+-binding modules: Evidences from Big domains of Leptospira immunoglobulin-like (Lig) proteins. PLoS One 5, e14377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



