Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2014 Jun;52(6):2248–2250. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00432-14

Ureaplasma parvum Prosthetic Joint Infection Detected by PCR

John J Farrell a,, Joshua A Larson b, Jeffrey W Akeson c, Kristin S Lowery d, Megan A Rounds d, Rangarajan Sampath d, Robert A Bonomo e,f, Robin Patel g
Editor: K C Carroll
PMCID: PMC4042745  PMID: 24671783

Abstract

We describe the first reported case of Ureaplasma parvum prosthetic joint infection (PJI) detected by PCR. Ureaplasma species do not possess a cell wall and are usually associated with colonization and infection of mucosal surfaces (not prosthetic material). U. parvum is a relatively new species name for certain serovars of Ureaplasma urealyticum, and PCR is useful for species determination. Our patient presented with late infection of his right total knee arthroplasty. Intraoperative fluid and tissue cultures and pre- and postoperative synovial fluid cultures were all negative. To discern the pathogen, we employed PCR coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS). Our patient's failure to respond to empirical antimicrobial treatment and our previous experience with PCR/ESI-MS in culture-negative cases of infection prompted us to use this approach over other diagnostic modalities. PCR/ESI-MS detected U. parvum in all samples. U. parvum-specific PCR testing was performed on all synovial fluid samples to confirm the U. parvum detection.

CASE REPORT

A morbidly obese, 75-year-old non-insulin-dependent diabetic man with a history of nonobstructing renal calculi (incidentally appreciated on serial imaging studies but not further evaluated or treated), hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, benign prostatic hypertrophy, right hemicolectomy for resection of cecal adenocarcinoma, anal stenosis with chronic laxative dependence, recent-onset atrial fibrillation, and degenerative arthritis of the right knee presented for evaluation of right knee pain and swelling 20 months following right total knee arthroplasty (TKA). He reported discomfort in the right knee of a 1-week duration associated with increased swelling. The patient denied fevers, chills, night sweats, dysuria or hematuria, flank pain, or any other symptoms of systemic infection. He denied a history of gout or trauma to the knee. He did not have any allergies to medications. He did not smoke and was not employed. He led a sedentary lifestyle and was unable to leave his house without a lift device and specialized transport vehicle; he had not been sexually active for several years. On examination, he was afebrile, and his vital signs were within normal limits. He weighed 148.5 kg (body mass index, 47). Examination was remarkable only for a moderate right knee effusion associated with tenderness to palpation; there was a well-healed anterior surgical incision over the joint. Complete blood count revealed 10,200 leukocytes/μl (77% neutrophils). Radiographically, the right TKA appeared well placed and well fixed. There was evidence of a large joint effusion, with no findings of prosthesis loosening or wear and no osseous abnormalities.

Arthrocentesis revealed cloudy synovial fluid with a leukocyte count of 83,792 cells/μl (99% neutrophils) and 50,000 red blood cells (RBCs)/μl. No organisms were appreciated on Gram stain, and aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal cultures of both synovial fluid and blood were all negative. Empirical antimicrobial treatment with vancomycin and cefepime was initiated, and irrigation and debridement of the right TKA were performed the following day. Intraoperatively, copious fluid was noted in the joint. Synovial fluid specimens were submitted for aerobic, anaerobic, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures. Polyethylene implants were removed, and after multiple irrigations with pulsatile lavage, the wound was sprinkled with 2 g of vancomycin powder, and new polyethylene implants were placed. On postoperative day 4, all cultures remained negative, and empirical antimicrobial treatment was changed to vancomycin and ertapenem. The following day, the patient was transferred to a skilled nursing facility to complete a 6-week course of vancomycin and ertapenem treatment.

Two weeks after hospital discharge, the right knee remained warm and swollen and the incision intact. Four weeks postoperatively, the right knee exam was unchanged; and C-reactive protein (CRP) blood tests obtained weekly following surgery did not demonstrate a trend toward normalization that would be expected in response to appropriate antimicrobial treatment (Table 1). A repeat arthrocentesis was performed. Gram stain and aerobic and anaerobic cultures of the synovial fluid were negative. Our prior experience with culture-negative infections prompted us perform PCR coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) on all surgical tissue and synovial fluid samples (1). On postoperative day 48, the CRP remained elevated; based on the results of Ureaplasma PCR and PCR/ESI-MS testing described below, the patient's antimicrobial therapy was changed to oral doxycycline. One month later, the infection appeared to have completely resolved. After almost 3 months of doxycycline treatment, our patient reported significant improvement in right TKA pain and swelling. A small effusion was appreciated on exam, and a final arthrocentesis was performed (Table 1). Ureaplasma prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are associated with significant morbidity, and relapse of infection has been described (1, 2). Due to our patient's multiple comorbidities, an extended course of doxycycline treatment is planned.

TABLE 1.

Culture versus Ureaplasma parvum PCR and PCR/ESI-MS results

Day Sample Gram stain result Culture result PCR/ESI-MS result PCR level (genome equivalents/well) U. parvum PCR result CRP level (mg/dl) Antimicrobial treatment (no. of days of treatment)
−1 Synovial fluid No organisms seen No growth U. parvum 340 Positive 8.27 None
Day of surgery Synovial fluid No organisms seen No growth U. parvum 366 8.83 Vancomycin (1)
Articular tissue No organisms seen No growth U. parvum 234 Cefepime (1)
PODa
    28 Synovial fluid No organisms seen No growth U. parvum 35 Positive 3.15 Vancomycin (29), ertapenem (24)
    48b 3.33 Vancomycin (49), ertapenem (44)
    132 Synovial fluid No organisms seen No growth No detection NAc Negative 1.97 Doxycycline (84)
a

POD, postoperative day.

b

On day 48, antibiotic treatment was changed to oral doxycycline based on the results of the PCR and PCR/ESI-MS testing.

c

NA, not available.

TKA infections can be devastating, with significant mortality and cost. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system has reported that between 0.5 and 1.4% of TKA surgeries are complicated by complex or deep joint infection, and up to 3% of patients experience some type of postoperative infectious complication (3). In a prospective study of TKA infections with 12 months of follow-up, Levent et al. identified obesity as a significant risk factor for infection following TKA, and pathogen detection by culture of synovial fluid was diminished by preoperative empirical antibiotic treatment (4).

Despite our best efforts to increase diagnostic yield, such as implant sonication, there remain cases of culture-negative PJI (5). In the selected cases of culture-negative PJI not responding to empirical antimicrobial treatment, detection of pathogens by using specialized microbiologic assays may be useful (68). PCR/ESI-MS has demonstrated the capacity to detect pathogens in clinical samples obtained following initiation of antimicrobial treatment (9).

PCR/ESI-MS does not depend on specific amplification of any one bacterial target. Multiple broad primer pairs used in the assay amplify >800 clinically relevant and diverse bacteria, one or more of which might be present in any given sample (10). Nine primer pairs used in eight wells (including one duplex) are targeted to broadly conserved bacterial loci, including four primer pairs that amplify segments of the 16S and 23S ribosomal genes (targeting all bacterial species) and five pairs targeting housekeeping genes (one pair each for rplB, tufB, and valS and two for rpoB) of specific subgroups of bacteria to provide species-level resolution (11). The broad ribosomal primer pairs used in the assay amplify all Ureaplasma species. The amplification products are analyzed in an unbiased manner using a mass spectrometer.

Despite antimicrobial treatment following surgical débridement with polyresin exchange, our patient's knee pain did not improve, and the CRP level remained elevated, prompting further testing of right knee fluid. Although our patient had a history of kidney stones, and Ureaplasma strains have a well-known association with urinary tract infection (UTI) in the setting of nephrolithiasis, our patient had no history of systemic bacterial infection (in general) or Ureaplasma infection (in particular). Furthermore, there is only one reported case of Ureaplasma PJI, a Ureaplasma urealyticum prosthetic hip infection (although Ureaplasma parvum has been reported in the setting of native joint polymicrobic infection in a profoundly immunocompromised patient) (1, 2).

Synovial fluid was submitted for testing by PCR/ESI-MS, as described by Kaleta et al. (10) PCR/ESI-MS detected U. parvum from synovial fluid obtained by arthrocentesis as well as fluid and tissue obtained in the operating room (OR) after empirical antibiotics had been administered (Table 1). U. parvum detection was confirmed by a U. parvum-specific qualitative PCR assay (7). PCR/ESI-MS again detected U. parvum in synovial fluid obtained on postoperative day 28, prior to initiation of antimicrobial treatment with doxycycline (Table 1), which was also confirmed by U. parvum-specific PCR (7). A decline in the level of detection of U. parvum by PCR/ESI-MS was noted in the synovial fluid specimen obtained on postoperative day 28, and following 2 months of oral doxycycline treatment, neither PCR/ESI-MS nor U. parvum-specific PCR detected U. parvum in synovial fluid from the right knee (Table 1). Finally, using the 16S rRNA primer pairs FDA-16S-4F (5′-TTGGAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTC-3′) and 16S-801R-2 (5′-GGCGTGGACTACCAGGGTATCT-3′) in a conventional PCR of DNA extracted from synovial fluid and articular tissue collected in the OR, a 760-bp PCR product was amplified and sequenced on an ABI machine: AGGATTAACGCTGGCGGCATGCCTAATACATGCAAATCGAACGAAGCCTTTTAGGCTTAGTGGTGAACGGGTGAGTAACACGTATCCAATCTACCCTTAAGTTGGGGATAACTAGTCGAAAGATTAGCTAATACCGAATAATAACATCAATATCGCATGAGAAGATGTAGAAAGTCGCTCTTTGTGGCGACGCTTTTGGATGAGGGTGCGACGTATCAGATAGTTGGTGAGGTAATGGCTCACCAAGTCAATGACGCGTAGCTGTACTGAGAGGTAGAACAGCCACAATGGGACTGAGACACGGCCCATACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAATTTTTCACAATGGGCGCAAGCCTTATGAAGCAATGCCGCGTGAACGATGAAGGTCTTATAGATTGTAAAGTTCTTTTATATGGGAAGAAACGCTAAGATAGGAAATGATTTTAGTTTGACTGTACCATTTGAATAAGTATCGGCTAACTATGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACATAGGATGCAAGCGTTATCCGGATTTACTGGGCGTAAAACGAGCGCAGGCGGGTTTGTAAGTTTGGTATTAAATCTAGATGCTTAACGTCTAGCTGTATCAAAAACTGTAAACCTAGAGTGTAGTAGGGAGTTGGGGAACTCCATGTGGAGCGGTAAAATGCGTAGATATATGGAAGAACACCGGTGGCGAAGGCGCCAACTTGGACTATCACTGACGCTTAGGCTCGAAAGTGTGGGGAGCAAATAGGAT. A homology search carried out by BLAST analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) confirmed the U. parvum 16S rRNA gene sequence (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

NCBI-BLAST results for preoperative synovial fluid specimens

GenBank sequence description GenBank sequence accession no. GenBank sequence length (bp) Identity, bp (%) No. (%) of gaps/total bp
U. parvum serovar 3 ATCC 700970 16S rRNA, complete genome NR_074176.1 1,466 760/760 (100) 0/760 (0)
U. parvum serovar 3 ATCC 27815 16S rRNA, complete genome NR_074762.1 1,531 760/760 (100) 0/760 (0)
U. parvum serovar 3 ATCC 27815 16S rRNA, partial sequence NR_027532.1 1,439 760/760 (100) 0/760 (0)

The implications of this case are clear: molecular methods capable of identifying unusual or unanticipated pathogens directly from specimens associated with prosthetic joints may provide an opportunity to direct antibiotic treatment against pathogens not responding to empirical antimicrobial treatment. PCR/ESI-MS may have a role as an adjunct to conventional diagnostic microbiologic methods in culture-negative PJIs, even for Ureaplasma spp., which can be readily cultured in appropriate media (e.g., A8 agar and 10B arginine broth), allowing for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

The 2013 clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management of PJIs do not include recommendations or suggestions for the role of molecular diagnostics in the approach to culture-negative PJIs (12). As diagnostic modalities such as PCR/ESI-MS and Ureaplasma-specific PCR are used more commonly, the detection of Ureaplasma spp. in PJIs may increase, thereby changing our approach to culture-negative infections and our understanding of syndromes caused by pathogens that are devoid of cell walls. The prevalence of PJIs caused by Ureaplasma spp. and the role of pathogen-specific PCR and/or PCR/ESI-MS in diagnosis and monitoring response to treatment versus more affordable methods, such as culture, that provide an opportunity for antimicrobial susceptibility testing need to be defined. Future prospective investigations, appropriately powered to analyze the diagnostic accuracy and utility of species-specific PCR and PCR/ESI-MS for PJI diagnosis, should be performed and guidelines updated to reflect these data.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

R.A.B. acknowledges support from the NIH under award no. R01AI072219, R01AI063517, and R01AI100560 and by funds and/or facilities provided by the Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the VISN 10 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Care Center (VISN 10) of the Department of Veterans Affairs. R.P. acknowledges support by the NIH under award no. R01AR056647.

R.P. thanks the outstanding staff of the Mayo Clinic Clinical Microbiology Laboratory for performing U. parvum PCR.

R. Sampath, M. A. Rounds, and K. S. Lowery are salaried employees of Ibis Biosciences, a division of Abbott.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 26 March 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.MacKenzie CR, Nischik N, Kram R, Krauspe R, Jäger M, Henrich B. 2010. Fatal outcome of a disseminated dual infection with drug-resistant Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma parvum originating from a septic arthritis in an immunocompromised patient. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 14(Suppl 3):e307–e309. 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.2253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sköldenberg OG, Rysinska AD, Neander G, Muren OH, Ahl TE. 2010. Ureaplasma urealyticum infection in total hip arthroplasty leading to revision. J. Arthroplasty 25:e11–e13. 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, Banerjee S, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell G, Dudeck MA, Pollock DA, Horan TC. 2009. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008. Am. J. Infect. Control 37:783–805. 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Levent T, Vandevelde D, Delobelle JM, Labourdette P, Létendard J, Lesage P, Lecocq P, Dufour M. 2010. Infection risk prevention following total knee arthroplasty. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 96:49–56. 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham SA, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Steckelberg JM, Uhl JR, Hanssen AD, Karau MJ, Schmidt SM, Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Mandrekar J, Patel R. 2012. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:3501–3508. 10.1128/JCM.00834-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mallard K, Schopfer K, Bodmer T. 2005. Development of real-time PCR for the differential detection and quantification of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum. J. Microbiol. Methods 60:13–19. 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cunningham SA, Mandrekar JN, Rosenblatt JE, Patel R. 2013. Rapid PCR detection of Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Ureaplasma parvum. Int. J. Bacteriol. 2013:168742. 10.1155/2013/168742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tande AJ, Cunningham SA, Raoult D, Sim FH, Berbari EF, Patel R. 2013. A case of Q fever prosthetic joint infection and description of an assay for detection of Coxiella burnetii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:66–69. 10.1128/JCM.02352-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Farrell JJ, Sampath R, Ecker DJ, Bonomo RA. 2013. Salvage microbiology: direct detection of pathogens from clinical specimens following initiation of antimicrobial treatment. PLoS One 8:e66349. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaleta EJ, Clark AE, Johnson DR, Gamage DC, Wysocki VH, Cherkaoui A, Wolk DM. 2011. Use of PCR coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for rapid identification of bacterial and yeast bloodstream pathogens from blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:345–353. 10.1128/JCM.00936-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ecker DJ, Massire C, Blyn LB, Hofstadler SA, Hannis JC, Eshoo MW, Hall TA, Sampath R. 2009. Molecular genotyping of microbes by multilocus PCR and mass spectrometry: a new tool for hospital infection control and public health surveillance. Methods Mol. Biol. 551:71–87. 10.1007/978-1-60327-999-4_7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR. 2013. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56:e1–e25. 10.1093/cid/cis803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES