Abstract
Background: Cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) has been extensively considered as an immunogenic and adjuvant protein, but its yield of expression is not satisfactory in many studies. The aim of this study was to compare the expression of native and mutant recombinant CTB (rCTB) in pQE vector. Methods: ctxB fragment from Vibrio cholerae O1 ATCC14035 containing the substitution of mutant ctxB for amino acid S128T was amplified by PCR and cloned in pGETM-T easy vector. It was then transformed to E. coli Top 10F' and cultured on LB agar plate containing ampicillin. Sequence analysis confirmed the mature ctxB gene sequence and the mutant one in both constructs which were further subcloned to pQE-30 vector. Both constructs were subsequently transformed to E. coli M15 (pREP4) for expression of mature and mutant rCTB. Results: SDS-PAGE analysis showed the maximum expression of rCTB in both systems at 5 hours after induction and Western-blot analysis confirmed the presence of rCTB in blotting membranes. The expression of mutant rCTB was much higher than mature rCTB, which may be the result of serine-to-threonine substitution at position 128 of mature rCTB amino acid sequence created by PCR mutagenesis. The mutant rCTB retained pentameric stability and its ability to bind to anti- cholera toxin IgG antibodies. Conclusion: Point mutation in ctxB sequence resulted in over-expression of rCTB, probably due to the increase of solubility of produced rCTB. Consequently, this expression system can be used to produce rCTB in high yield.
Key Words: Escherichia coli, Point mutation, Cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), Protein expression
INTRODUCTION
Cholera is a severe diarrheal disease which still remains as an epidemic or endemic threat in many parts of the world, particularly in developing countries [1]. Vibrio cholerae is classified into more than 200 serotypes on the basis of somatic antigens [2]. Seven cholera epidemics which are caused by only O1 and O139 serogroups have occurred, and its outbreaks continue to occur in Iran and other developing countries [3-5]. Cholera is mainly caused in countries with poor sanitations, and many attempts have been performed to develop an improved vaccine [6].
Cholera symptoms are mainly caused by cholera toxin [7], an 85-kDa protein. This protein is composed of two subunits: a single A subunit (cholera toxin A [CTA]) which is responsible for activation of adenylate cyclase in the intestinal cells, and B subunit (cholera toxin B [CTB], 11.6 kDa), which binds the respective holotoxin to its intestinal receptor (ganglioside GM1 [monosialotetrahexosylganglioside] [8, 9].
CTB has recently attracted many interests as an adjuvant for various other peptide or carbohydrate antigens [10, 11]. It comprises a transmucosal carrier delivery system for induction of oral tolerance when conjugated to antigens and allergens [7, 12]. When CTB is chemically or genetically conjugated to poor immunogenes, it can elicit serum and secretory antibodies against the fused antigens [13, 14]. Vaccination against cholera is a powerful prevention strategy, because it can provide long-term protective immunity [15-17]. Based on this realization, a variety of vaccines against cholera were developed that divided into two principal kinds, the killed and live attenuated Vibrio cholerae vaccines [6]. Various hosts have been used to develop a high-level expression system for producing recombinant CTB (rCTB), but most of these attempts were failed. The aim of this study was to evaluate two different strategies for expression of rCTB in pQE-30 vector and to compare the level of native and mutant ctxB gene expression using PCR mutagenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation and cloning of ctxB gene. Specific primers were designed according to ctxB sequence of V. cholerae O1 ATCC14035 obtained from NCBI and cutting sites of BspHI and XhoI were designed within forward and reverse primer sequences, respectively. Thrombin sequence was designed within the 5' terminal of reverse primer. PCR was performed using ctxB-F (5'GCG TCA TGA TTA AAT TAA AAT TTG GTG TTT TTT TTA CAG TTT TAC3')/ctxB-R (5'CGC CTC GAG GGA ACC GCG TGG CAC CAG ATT TGC CAT AGT AATTG 3') primers with the following program: denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, 25 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 58°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min (using genomic DNA of V. cholerae O1 ATCC14035 as DNA template). After amplification, the ctxB fragment was electrophoresed on 1% (wv-1) agarose gel (Fermentas, Burlington, Canada) and then purified and cloned in the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Canada). The construct was then transformed to Escherichia coli Top 10F' (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). White colonies on LB agar plate (100 µg l-1 ampicillin, 40 µg l-1 IPTG, and 30 µg -l X-gal) were selected and used for plasmid extraction using QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The ctxB sequence was confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequence analysis (Genfanavaran, Macrogen, Seoul, Korea) of extracted plasmids with SP6 and T7-promoter universal primers. The pGEM-T_ctxB construct was digested with BspHI and XhoI, and ctxB was subcloned to XhoI and NcoI digested pQE-30 (Qiagen, Canada). The construct was transformed to competent E. coli M15 (pREP4) (Qiagen, Canada).
Expression of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit . Transformed E. coli M15 (pREP4) cells (Qiagen, Canada) harboring pQE-ctxB construct were grown in LB medium containing ampicillin (100 µg l-1) and incubated at 37°C with shaking (200 rpm) until optimal density at 600 nm reached to 0.6-0.8. The IPTG (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was added to the culture at a final concentration of 1 mM. Additional 5-h incubation with shaking was carried out, and culture sampling was performed in each hour. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 ×g at 4°C for 20 min.
SDS-PAGE analysis and Western-blotting. The pellet of bacterial cells was lysed by 200 µl lysis buffer (25 mM TRIS-Cl and 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.6) for each sample following sonication. Lysed pellets were mixed with sample buffer, boiled for 10 min and electrophoresed on two separate SDS-PAGE gels (15% wv-1) under the same running conditions. One gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (1% wv-1), and the other one was subjected to blotting onto poly (vinylidene difluoride) membrane (Hi-bond Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Western-blot analysis was performed using 1:1000 dilution of rabbit polyclonal anti-cholera toxin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) in PBS and 1:10000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) in PBS as primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. The production of rCTB was detected with bound antibodies using a chemiluminescent substrate, electrophoresis chemiluminescent (Hi-bond Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and then exposed to Kodak X-OMAT Blue Autoradiography Film. The amount of expressed rCTB was evaluated using FireReader D56 software (UVI Tec, UK).
Over-expression of mutant recombinant cholera toxin B subunit . Mutant rCTB gene was design via replacing the 383th nucleotide of mature ctxB gene (guanine instead of cytosine). PCR reaction was carried out using ctxB-F (5'GCG TCA TGA TTA AAT TAA AAT TTG GTG TTT TTT TTA CAG TTT TAC3')/ctxB-R (5'CGC CTC GAG GGA ACC GCG TGG CAC CAG ATT TGC CAT AGT AATTG 3') primers. The base in bold in reverse primer sequence is the substitution base. Mutant ctxB fragment was cloned in pGEM and subcloned in pQE-30 for expression the mutant rCTB as described previously. Expression of this new mutant rCTB was analyzed with SDS-PAGE gel (15% wv-1) and confirmed by Western-blot analysis. The amount of produced mutant rCTB was evaluated using FireReader D56 software (UVI Tec, UK).
RESULTS
Amplification and cloning of ctxB. The expected PCR product, a single band of 390 bp for ctxB gene, was obtained (Fig. 1A). The recombinant pGEM-T-ctxB plasmid extracted from E. coli Top10 was digested with EcoRI. Two bands of 3,000 bp and 390 bp were obtained related to pGEM-T vector and ctxB gene, respectively (Fig. 1B). The pGEM-T-ctxB was double digested with BspHI and XhoI restriction enzymes; approximately a 390-bp band corresponding to ctxB was appeared in agarose gel (Fig. 1C). Finally, the ctxB sequences in pGEM-T-ctxB were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Fig. 1.
Agarose gel electrophoresis for detection of amplified DNA bands. A) Purification of amplified ctxB fragment from agarose gel. Lane 1, ctxB gene amplified with PCR from Vibrio cholerae and purified from agarose gel and lane 2, 100 bp DNA marker. B) Digested pGEM-T-ctxB plasmid with EcoRI restriction enzyme. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA size marker; lane 2, undigested pGEM-T containing ctxB fragment and lane 3, digested pGEM-T-ctxB plasmid with EcoRI restriction enzyme. C) pGEM-T-ctxB plasmid. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA size marker; lane 2, undigested pGEM-T-ctxB; lane 3, digested pGEM-T-ctxB with XhoI; lane 4, double digested pGEM-T-ctxB with XhoI and BspHI, single 390 bp band corresponded to ctxB gene and lane 5, 100 bp DNA marker.
Construction of mutant ctxB sequence. Mutant ctxB gene was produced using designed primers with a point mutation in reverse primer sequence, which belonged to 383th nucleotide of mature ctxB gene (cytosine was replaced with guanine in mutant ctxB gene). This point mutation finally produced threonine amino acid instead of serine in mutant rCTB protein. Both of these amino acids had polar, uncharged R group in their chemical structure (CH2OH for serine and CHOHCH3 for threonine). The sequence of mutant ctxB was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.
Expression of mature and mutant recombinant cholera toxin B subunit . Two constructs of pQE vector, one containing native ctxB fragment and the other containing mutant ctxB gene were transformed separately into E. coli M15 (pREP4). Time gradient was applied to recognize the best time for producing maximum amount of rCTB in both constructs. The best condition to produce rCTB in both constructs was determined at 37°C, 1 mM concentration of IPTG and 5 hours after induction (Fig. 2A and 2B). A major band of approximately 14.5 kDa corresponding to rCTB was observed on SDS-PAGE analysis of both constructs. Comparison of SDS-PAGE analysis of the two different constructs using FireReader D56 software (UVI Tec, UK) demonstrated that the expression of mutant rCTB was assessed to be approximately 80 mg l-1, while the expression of mature rCTB was about 7.8 mg l-1 (approximately 10 fold higher than mature rCTB in the same conditions) (Fig. 2A and 2B). Over-expression of mutant rCTB may be occurred due to replacement of serine for threonine in CTB protein structure via point mutation. Antigenicity of expressed proteins was confirmed by immunoblotting using anti- cholera toxin IgG. The over-expression of mutant rCTB in contrast with mature rCTB was observed after exposure protein bands on a blue autoradiography film (Fig. 3A and 3B).
Fig. 2.
Comparison of SDS-PAGE analysis of mature and mutated recombinant CTB in E. coli. A) SDS-PAGE analysis of expression of mature recombinant CTB in E. coli M15 (pREP4) using pQE_ctxB as expression vector. Lane 1, M15 (pREP4) containing pQE_ctxB before induction with IPTG; lane 2-6, indicate 1-5 hours after induction respectively; lane 7, protein size marker and lane 8 and 9, M15 (pREP4) containing pQE used as negative control. B) SDS-PAGE analysis of expression of mutant recombinant CTB in E. coli M15 (pREP4using pQE containing mutant ctxB gene as expression vector. Lane 1, M15 (pREP4) containing pQE_ctxB before induction with IPTG; lane 2-6, indicate 1-5 hours after induction respectively; lane 7, commercial CT (cholera toxin) used as positive control and lane 8 and 9, M15 (pREP4) containing pQE used as negative control
Fig. 3.

Western-blot analysis of mature and mutated recombinant CTB. A) Western-blot analysis of heated samples containing mature recombinant CTB probed with anti-CT antibody. Lane 1, expression of rCTB in M15 (pREP4) containing pQE-ctxB plasmid before induction with IPTG; lane 2-6, indicate 1-5 hours after induction respectively and lane 7, commercial CT used as positive control. B) Western-blot analysis of heated samples containing mutant recombinant CTB probed with anti-CT antibody. Lane 1, expression of rCTB in M15 (pREP4) containing pQE-ctxB plasmid before induction with IPTG; lane 2-6, indicate 1-5 hours after induction respectively and lane 7, commercial CT used as positive control
DISCUSSION
CTB has been extensively studied as an immunogen or adjuvant in intestinal and nasal mucosal sites [15, 18]. It has ability to deliver covalently attached antigens to the mucosal cells via binding to GM1 ganglioside receptor on the surface of epithelial cells [19, 20]. CTB was used as an adjuvant to increase the immune response level in many different vaccines specially vaccines against toxigenic Vibrio cholerae strains [21-23]. Many efforts have been performed to produce CTB in E. coli [24], Lactobacillus and Bacillus brevis [25, 26] or even Vibrio cholerae strains lacking the CTA gene [7]. Yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and plants (such as tomato, potato, and tobacco) have been also used to produce rCTB, but the amount of expressed protein is too low in former systems [27]. The sequence analysis of cholera toxin revealed a number of mutations at different positions on the genome sequence of both cholera toxin subunits across different serogroups. Some of these mutations are non-synonymous such as polar to non-polar or vice-versa. However, some other, especially at structurally related positions, may be important for understanding the pathogenesis of different serogroups or for improvement of recombinant cholera toxin proteins to produce vaccines against multiple serogroups [28]. The substitution of H18Y for T47I in CTB of El Tor strains was reported by Ansaruzzaman and colleagues [29]. Kumar et al. [30] reported a novel mutation from India at position 20 of CTB sequence (H20N) of the Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor biotype [30].
In the present study, rCTB was expressed in E. coli M15 (pREP4) using pQE-30 vector. The sequence of ctxB gene was manipulated by a point mutation on 383th nucleotide (guanine instead of cytosine) and consequently by serine-to-threonine substitution in mature CTB amino acids sequence at position 128. Moreover, the mutant retained pentameric stability and high affinity binding to anti- cholera toxin IgG used in Western-blot analysis. This nucleotide substitution was chosen because the subsequent substitution occurs between two amino acids which are in the same group with polar, uncharged R group in their chemical structure. Some properties of these two amino acids such as molecular weight and solubility are similar, therefore the expression of mutant rCTB without changing in conformation or biological properties could be guaranteed. It was illustrated that point mutation (serine-to-threonine substitution at position 128 on amino acid sequence of rCTB) caused over-expression of mutant rCTB (approximately 10 fold higher than mature rCTB). In addition, the expressed mutant rCTB retained pentameric stability and affinity to bind to anti- cholera toxin IgG. The over-expression of mutant rCTB in the present study may be probably due to the increase in the solubility of mutant protein via serine-to-threonine substitution and decrease in the amount of protein expressed as inclusion bodies.
Some different studies have investigated the effects of different mutations or manipulations of the CTB sequence. Merrite and colleagues [31] reported a point mutation at amino acid Gly(33) of the CTB sequence (Gly33Arg), which led to increase in the affinity of CTB to bind to receptors. In the study by Silva et al. [32], the substitution of G for A residue was performed by site-directed mutagenesis at 182th nucleotide of native CTB sequence, which ultimately resulted in the production of glutamate instead of glycine. This process abolished the biding of CTB to GM1 without affecting the expression level of CTB protein.
Arêas and colleagues [19] were designed a native ctxB protein sequence according to the codon usage of E. coli, Lactobacillus casei, and Salmonella typhimurium. They manipulated the ctxB coding sequence by substitution of some nucleotides for the purpose of an over-expression of CTB protein in pAE-ctxB system [19].
Aman and colleagues [33] reported the engineering and crystallographic structure of a mutant cholera toxin, with histidine-to-alanine substitution at position 57 in the B subunit. Although the mutant protein retained its pentameric stability and high affinity binding to GM1 ganglioside, its immunomodulatory activity was lost due to this substitution [33].
Our previously published data have indicated the pQE-ctxB construct as a highly efficient system to produce rCTB [34] and high affinity binding to GM1 ganglioside [35]. Some advantages of this construct are as follow: i) pQE30 contains the T5 promoter that is recognized by the E. coli host RNA polymerase. This promoter is under the control of lac operon, which can be induced by IPTG and is one of the powerful promoters to express target genes. ii) The recombinant proteins, which were expressed with extra 6xHis-tag sequence at C-terminus of proteins in pQE vector, enable us to use Ni+2-charged column chromatography to purify recombinant proteins. iii) The extra thrombin sequence, which was added to C-terminus of rCTB, can facilitate the separation of His-tag sequence from expressed protein.
In conclusion, pQE plasmid can express a high level of rCTB in E. coli M15 (pREP4) when S128T amino acid substitution was performed by PCR mutagenesis. E. coli still remains one of the most useful organisms to produce recombinant proteins compared to other bacteria, and this expression system can be used to produce rCTB in high yield with particular manipulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was funded by Iranian National Science Foundation grant no. 90007471.
References
- 1.Albert MJ, Siddique AK, Islam MS, Faruque AS, Ansaruzzaman M, Faruque SM, et al. Large outbreak of clinical cholera due to Vibrio cholerae non-O1 in Bangladesh. Lancet. 1993 Mar;341(8846):704. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90481-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Faruque SM, Albert MJ, Mekalanons JJ. Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Dec;62(4):1301–14. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.4.1301-1314.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kanungo S , Sah BK , Lopez AL , Sung JS, Paisley AM, Sur D. Cholera in India: an analysis of reports, 1997–2006. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Mar;88(3):185–91. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.073460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bakhshi B, Pourshafie MR. Assessing clonality of Vibrio cholerae strains isolated during four consecutive years (2004-2007) in Iran. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(4):256–62. doi: 10.1080/00365540902767049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bakhshi B, Pourshafie MR, Navabakbar F, Tavakoli A, Shahcheraghi F, Salehi M, et al. Comparison of distribution of virulence determinants in clinical and environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae. Iran Biomed J. 2008 Jul;12(3):159–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thungapathra M, Sharma C, Gupta N, Ghosh RK, Mukhopadhyay A, Koley H, et al. Construction of a recombinant live oral vaccine from a non-toxigenic strain of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype inaba biotype E1 Tor and assessment of its reactogenicity and immunogenicity in the rabbit model. Immunol Lett. 1999 Jun;68(2-3):219–27. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2478(99)00076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rudin A, Riise GC, Holmgren J. Antibody responses in the lower respiratory tract and male urogenital tract in humans after nasal and oral vaccination with cholera toxin B subunit. Infect Immun. 1999 Jun;67(6):2884–90. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.6.2884-2890.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Holmgren J. Actions of cholera toxin and the prevention and treatment of cholera. Nature. 1981 Jul;292(5822):413–17. doi: 10.1038/292413a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Holmgren J, Fredman P, Lindblad M, Svennerholm AM, Svennerholm L. Rabbit intestinal glycoprotein receptor for Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin lacking affinity for cholera toxin. Infect Immun. 1982 Nov;38(2):424–33. doi: 10.1128/iai.38.2.424-433.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de Aizpurua HJ, Russell-Jones GJ. Oral vaccination. Identification of classes of proteins that provoke an immune response upon oral feeding. J Exp Med.1988 Feb;167(2):440–51. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.2.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Glass RI, Holmgren J, Khan MR, Hossain KM, Huq MI, Greenough WB. A randomized, controlled trial of the toxin-blocking effects of B subunit in family members of patients with cholera. J Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;149(4):495–500. doi: 10.1093/infdis/149.4.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li TK, Fox BS. Cholera toxin B subunit binding to an antigen presenting cell directly co-stimulates cytokine Expression from a T cell clone. Int Immunol. 1996 Dec;8(12):1849–56. doi: 10.1093/intimm/8.12.1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gong Z, Long X, Pan L, Le Y, Liu Q, Wang S, et al. Cloning, expression, purification and characterization of the cholera toxin B subunit and triple glutamic acid decarboxylase epitopes fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2009 Aug;66(2):191–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harakuni T, Sugawa H, Komesu A, Tadano M, Arakawa T. Heteropentameric cholera toxin B subunit chimeric molecules genetically fused to a vaccine antigen induces systemic and mucosal immune responses: a potential new strategy to target recombinant vaccine antigens to mucosal immune systems. Infect Immun. 2005 Sep;73(9):5654–65. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.9.5654-5665.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miyata T, Harakuni T, Tsuboi T, Sattabongkot J, Kohama H, Tachibana M, et al. Plasmodium vivax ookinete surface protein Pvs25 linked to cholera toxin B subunit induces potent transmission-blocking immunity by intranasal as well as subcutaneous immunization. Infect Immun. 2010 Sep;78(9):3773–3782. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00306-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kenner JR, Coster TS, Taylor DN, Trofa AF, Barrera-Oro M, Hyman T, Adams JM, Beattie DT, Killeen KP, Spriggs DR. Peru-15, an improved live attenuated oral vaccine candidate for Vibrio cholerae O1. J Infect Dis. 1995 Oct;172(4):1126–29. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.4.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Taylor DN, Killeen KP, Hack DC, Kenner JR, Coster TS, Beattie DT, et al. Development of a live, oral, attenuated vaccine against El Tor cholera. J Infect Dis. 1994 Dec;170(6):1518–23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bergquist C, Johansson EL, Lagergard T, Holmgren J, Rudin A. Intranasal vaccination of humans with recombinant cholera toxin B subunit induces systemic and local antibody responses in the upper respiratory tract and the vagina. Infect Immun. 1997 Jul;65(7):2676–84. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.7.2676-2684.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arêas APM, Oliveira MLS, Ramos CRR, Sbrogio-Almeida ME, Raw I, Ho PL. Synthesis of cholera toxin B subunit gene: cloning and expression of a functional 6XHis-tagged protein in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2002 Aug;25(3):481–487. doi: 10.1016/s1046-5928(02)00026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bergerot I, Ploix C, Petersen J, Moulin V, Rask C, Fabien N, et al. A cholera toxoid-insulin conjugate as an oral vaccine against 486 spontaneous autoimmune diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997 Apr;94(9):4610–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fontana MR, Monaci E, Yanqing L, Guoming Q, Duan G, Rappuoli R, et al. IEM101, a naturally attenuated Vibrio cholerae strain, as carrier for genetically detoxified derivatives of cholera toxin. Vaccine. 2000 Aug;19(1):75–85. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ryan ET, Calderwood SB () Cholera vaccines. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):561–5. doi: 10.1086/313951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rijpkema SGT, Bik EM, Jansen WH, Gielen H, Versluis LF, Stouthamer AH, et al. Construction and analysis of a Vibrio cholerae delta-aminolevulinic acid auxotroph which confers protective immunity in a rabbit model. Infect Immun. 1992 Jun;60(6):2188–93. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.6.2188-2193.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.L'hoir C, Renard A, Martial JA. Expression in Escherichia coli of two mutated encoding the cholera toxin B subunit. Gene. 1990 Apr;89(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90204-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Slos P, Dutot P, Reymund J, Kleinpeter P, Prozzi D, Kieny MP, et al. Production of cholera toxin B subunit in Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Dec;169(1):29–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goto N, Maeyama J, Yasuda Y, Isaka M, Matano K, Kozuka S, et al. Safety evaluation of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit produced by Bacillus brevis as a mucosal adjuvant. Vaccine. 2000 Apr;18(20):2164–71. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00337-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arzanlou M, Rezaee A, Shahrokhi N, Hossini A, Yasuda Y, Tochikubo K, et al. Expression of cholera toxin B subunit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ann Microbiol. 2005;55(2):145–50. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shamini G, Ravichandran M, Sinnott JT, Somboonwit C, Sidhu HS, Shapshak P, et al. Structural inferences for Cholera toxin mutations in Vibrio cholerae. Bioinformation. 2011 Mar;6(1):1–9. doi: 10.6026/97320630006001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ansaruzzaman M, Bhuiyan NA, Nair BG, Sack DA, Lucas M, Deen JL, et al. Cholera in Mozambique, variant of Vibrio cholera. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;10(11):2057–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1011.040682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kumar P, Jain M, Goel AK, Bhadauria S, Sharma SK, Kamboj DV, et al. A large cholera outbreak due to a new cholera toxin variant of the Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor biotype in Orissa, Eastern India. J Med Microbiol. 2009 Feb;58(2):234–8. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.002089-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Merritt EA, Sarfaty S, Jobling MG, Chang T, Holmes RK, Hirst TR, et al. Structural studies of receptor binding by cholera toxin mutants. Protein Sci. 1997 Jul;6(7):1516–28. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Silva A, Fando R, Benitez JA. Overexpression of a mutant B subunit in toxigenic Vibrio cholerae diminishes production of active cholera toxin in vivo. Curr Microbiol. 1998 Oct;37(4):231–35. doi: 10.1007/s002849900370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aman AT, Fraser S, Merritt EA, Rodigherio C, Kenny M, Ahn M, et al. A mutant cholera toxin B subunit that binds GM1- ganglioside but lacks immunomodulatory or toxic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001 Jul;98(15):8536–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161273098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Boustanshenas M, Bakhshi B, Ghorbani M, Norouzian D. Comparison of two recombinant systems for expression of cholera toxin B subunit from Vibrio cholerae. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;31(1):10–14. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.108705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mina Boustanshenas, Bita Bakhshi, Masoud Ghorbani. Investigation of immunological responses against a native recombinant CTB-whole cell Vibrio cholerae vaccine in a rabbit model. J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Feb;114(2):509–15. doi: 10.1111/jam.12043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


