A bacterial Asn-transamidosome composed of two GatCABs, one AspRS dimer and two tRNAAsns from P. aeruginosa was crystallized and the crystal diffracted to 3.73 Å resolution.
Keywords: transamidosome, aminoacyl-tRNA, AspRS, GatCAB, Asn-tRNAAsn, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Abstract
Most canonical aminoacyl-tRNAs are synthesized directly by their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), but glutaminyl-tRNAGln and asparaginyl-tRNAAsn are synthesized indirectly by two-step processes. These processes are catalyzed by the transamidosome, a large ribonucleoprotein particle composed of GatA, GatB, GatC, aaRS and tRNA. In this study, the Asn-transamidosome from Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reconstructed and crystallized by mixing purified GatCAB complex, AspRS and tRNAAsn. The crystal of the Asn-transamidosome belonged to space group P21, with unit-cell parameters a = 93.3, b = 186.0, c = 287.8 Å, β = 93.3°, and diffracted to 3.73 Å resolution. Preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis showed that the asymmetric unit contained two Asn-transamidosomes, each composed of two GatCABs, one AspRS dimer and two tRNAAsns, indicating that the construction of the current Asn-transamidosome differs from that of Thermus thermophilus.
1. Introduction
Accurate synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA is essential for translational fidelity. 17 of the 20 canonical aminoacyl-tRNAs are synthesized directly by aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), whereas glutaminyl-tRNA, asparaginyl-tRNA and cysteinyl-tRNA (Gln-tRNAGln, Asn-tRNAAsn and Cys-tRNACys, respectively) are synthesized indirectly by two-step processes in some bacteria and archaea (Wilcox & Nirenberg, 1968 ▶; Curnow et al., 1996 ▶; Sauerwald et al., 2005 ▶). In the case of Asn-tRNAAsn formation, aspartic acid (Asp) is first mischarged on tRNAAsn by non-discriminate AspRS, and Asp-tRNAAsn is then amidated to Asn-tRNAAsn by a heterotrimeric amidotransferase GatCAB composed of GatA, GatB and GatC (Curnow et al., 1996 ▶, 1997 ▶). During the two-step processes, GatCAB, AspRS and tRNAAsn assemble into a ribonucleoprotein particle designated the transamidosome (Bailly et al., 2007 ▶). A similar ribonucleoprotein particle is also formed for Gln-tRNAGln synthesis, in which GatCAB, GluRS and tRNAGln participate. Crystal structures of the Asn-transamidosome from Thermus thermophilus (Blaise et al., 2010 ▶) and the Gln-transamidosome from Thermotoga maritima (Ito & Yokoyama, 2010 ▶) have been reported, in which two GatCABs, two archaeal-type AspRS dimers and four tRNAAsns assembled in the Asn-transamidosome, whereas one GatCAB, one GluRS and one tRNAGln are present in the Gln-transamidosome.
Bacterial AspRSs commonly possess an additional ∼16 kDa insertion domain named the GAD domain within the catalytic domain compared with archaeal or eukaryotic counterparts (Wolf et al., 1999 ▶). Superposition of bacterial AspRS on the archaeal Asn-transamidosome causes steric hindrance between the GAD domain and GatCAB, suggesting that the presence of the GAD domain may cause marked structural changes. Furthermore, the precise function of the GAD domain is still unclear. The structure of the Asn-transamidosome may provide insight into the significance of the GAD domain.
In this study, we overexpressed, purified and crystallized the Asn-transamidosome from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results of preliminary X-ray crystallographic analyses showed that the crystal contained all five components of the Asn-transamidosome, i.e. GatA (51.9 kDa), GatB (53.1 kDa), GatC (10.5 kDa), AspRS (66.2 kDa) and tRNAAsn (24.7 kDa).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Expression and purification of proteins
The genes for the GatCAB operon and AspRS from P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Pa) were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA. The DNA fragments encoding PaGatCAB and PaAspRS were then cloned between NdeI and XhoI restriction sites in a modified pET-28b vector in which the thrombin site and extra residues upstream of the N-terminal His tag were deleted.
The plasmid carrying PaGatCAB was transformed into Escherichia coli strain B834 (DE3)-pRARE2 by electroporation, and a 3 l culture was grown in LB medium containing 25 µg ml−1 kanamycin and 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol at 310 K until the OD600 reached 0.6. The culture was then induced by the addition of isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 10 µM and shifted to 298 K for approximately 20 h before harvesting. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4500g for 25 min at 277 K and were resuspended in buffer A [50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (BME), 0.5 mg ml−1 lysozyme, 0.1 mg ml−1 DNase]. After sonication and centrifugation at 40 000g for 30 min, the His6-tagged protein was purified by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography using a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare). The column was washed with 15 mM imidazole and eluted with a 20–250 mM imidazole gradient in buffer B (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM BME). The collected fractions were then dialyzed against buffer C (25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM BME) and loaded onto a HiTrap Q HP column (GE Healthcare) which was eluted with a 0–800 mM NaCl gradient in buffer C. The collected fractions were diluted twice with buffer D (25 mM HEPES–NaOH pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol, 2 M ammonium sulfate, 1 mM BME), further purified using a HiTrap Phenyl column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a gradient of 1–0 M ammonium sulfate. Finally, the protein was loaded onto HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 pg (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer E (25 mM HEPES–NaOH pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT). The protein was concentrated to 27 mg ml−1 using an Amicon Ultra 30 000 MWCO (Millipore), flash-frozen and stored at 193 K.
As PaAspRS is toxic to the E. coli expression system, causing the depletion of free tRNAAsn by mischarging with Asp (Bernard et al., 2006 ▶), we used the co-expression method for preparing PaAspRS. A plasmid encoding PaAspRS was co-transformed into E. coli strain B834 (DE3)-pRARE2 by electroporation with a plasmid encoding GatCAB from Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) in pCDFDuet-1 vector without any tag. The culture was grown according to a method similar to that described for PaGatCAB with LB medium containing 25 µg ml−1 kanamycin, 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol and 50 µg ml−1 streptomycin. After sonication and centrifugation at 40 000g for 30 min, the His6-tagged protein was purified by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography on a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare). The sample was washed with 20 mM imidazole and eluted with a gradient of 20–250 mM imidazole in buffer B. The collected fractions were then diluted to 75 mM NaCl with buffer C, subjected to HiTrap Heparin HP column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a gradient of 75–800 mM NaCl in buffer C. Finally, the protein was loaded onto HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 pg (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer E. The protein was concentrated to 16 mg ml−1 using an Amicon Ultra 30 000 MWCO (Millipore), flash-frozen and stored at 193 K.
2.2. Preparation of tRNAAsn
PatRNAAsn was transcribed in vitro as described previously (Nakamura et al., 2006 ▶). The DNA oligonucleotides used to construct P. aeruginosa tRNAAsn were as follows: 5′-primer, TAATACGACT CACTATATCCGCGATAGCTCAGTC (forward); middle template, CACTATATCCGCGATAGCTCAGTCGGTAGAGCAAATGACTGTTAATCATTGGGTCCCTGGTTCGAGTCC (forward); 3′-primer, TGmGCTCCGCGACCTGGACTCGAACCAGGGAC (reverse); in which the T7 promoter sequence is shown in bold. Gm represents the 2′-O-methyl modification, which is used for manipulating the uniform 3′-end of transcribed products (Sherlin et al., 2001 ▶). Transcribed tRNAs were purified by denaturing urea–PAGE and extracted with an Elutrap Electroelution system (Whatman). Pooled tRNAs were precipitated with ethanol and resuspended in buffer F (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2). tRNAs were heated at 353 K for 5 min and then slowly cooled at room temperature over 5 min, purified using a Resource Q column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a gradient of 300–700 mM NaCl in buffer G (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 8 mM MgCl2). Pooled fractions were precipitated with ethanol and stored at 243 K.
2.3. Crystallization and data collection
Asn-transamidosome was prepared by mixing purified AspRS dimer, GatCAB and tRNAAsn at a final concentration of 4.8 µM each in buffer H (20 mM HEPES–NaOH pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol). For crystallization, 500 µl Asn-transamidosome solution was concentrated to 120 µl using an Amicon Ultra-0.5 Centrifugal Filter Device (Millipore).
Crystallization was carried out by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in 96-well plates at 293 K. Initial screening for the crystallization conditions of Asn-transamidosome was performed with The JCSG+ Suite and The PACT Suite (Qiagen) screening kits by mixing 1 µl of Asn-transamidosome solution with an equivalent volume of reservoir solution. In initial crystallization screening, microcrystals were obtained with reservoir solution No. 93 of The JCSG+ Suite consisting of 100 mM bis-tris pH 5.5, 200 mM lithium sulfate, 25%(w/v) PEG 3350. The crystallization conditions were optimized by changing the type of buffer, the pH and the precipitant concentration and adding various additives. Crystals of Asn-transamidosome which were suitable for diffraction experiments were obtained using additives in one week.
For the X-ray diffraction experiment, the crystals were soaked with cryoprotectant consisting of reservoir solution containing 15% glycerol before flash-cooling in a cryostream. Diffraction data were collected on beamline BL41XU of SPring-8 (Harima, Japan) (proposal Nos. 2011A1062 and 2011B1227). A total of 180 images were collected with 1.0° oscillation and 1 s exposure time per image. The data were indexed, integrated, scaled and merged using XDS (Kabsch, 2010 ▶). The statistics of data collection are summarized in Table 1 ▶.
Table 1. Statistics of data collection.
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| Beamline | BL41XU, SPring-8 |
| Detector | MX225HE |
| Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) | 320 |
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.0000 |
| No. of images | 180† |
| Oscillation range (°) | 0–180 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 48.89–3.73 (3.96–3.73) |
| Total No. of reflections | 281233 (35593) |
| No. of unique reflections | 94516 (13239) |
| Space group | P21 |
| Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) | a = 93.3, b = 186.0, c = 287.8, β = 93.3 |
| Completeness (%) | 92.7 (81.2) |
| R meas ‡ (%) | 22.7 (78.3) |
| Multiplicity | 2.98 (2.69) |
| 〈I/σ(I)〉 | 5.28 (1.71) |
| Mosaicity (°) | 0.514 |
| Wilson B factor (Å2) | 66.13 |
37 out of 180 frames were omitted in data processing.
R
meas =
, where 〈I(hkl)〉 and N(hkl) are the mean intensity of a set of equivalent reflections and the multiplicity, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
To overcome the problem of toxicity in overexpressing PaAspRS in E. coli, we expressed PaAspRS using a co-expression method with SaGatCAB. The Asn-transamidosome complex was reconstructed by mixing purified GatCAB, AspRS dimer and tRNAAsn in a 1:1:1 ratio. After optimization of crystallization, plate-like crystals measuring ∼0.4 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm were grown in the presence of 100 mM MES pH 6.0, 200 mM lithium sulfate, 25%(w/v) PEG 3350, 10 mM hexammine cobalt(III) chloride (Fig. 1 ▶). Diffraction data were collected to 3.73 Å resolution (Fig. 2 ▶) and the crystal belonged to space group P21, with unit-cell parameters a = 93.3, b = 186.0, c = 287.8 Å, β = 93.3°.
Figure 1.

Crystal of Asn-transamidosome from P. aeruginosa.
Figure 2.
X-ray diffraction image of an Asn-transamidosome crystal collected to 3.73 Å resolution.
The phases for the Asn-transamidosome complex were determined by the molecular-replacement method using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007 ▶). The coordinates of GatCAB from Staphylococcus aureus (PDB entry 2g5h; Nakamura et al., 2006 ▶), the AspRS dimer from E. coli (PDB entry 1eqr; Rees et al., 2000 ▶) and tRNAAsp from the AspRS–tRNAAsp complex from E. coli (PDB entry 1c0a; Eiler et al., 1999 ▶) were used as search models. Four solutions for GatCAB and two solutions for the AspRS dimer were successfully obtained with a final TFZ score of 28.9, although no solution was obtained for the tRNA molecules. The models of GatCAB and AspRS were subjected to rigid-body refinement using phenix.refine (Afonine et al., 2012 ▶) followed by several cycles of jelly-body refinement with local NCS restraints in REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011 ▶). The resultant 2F o − F c and F o − F c electron-density maps clearly showed four tRNA molecules, and models of tRNA (PDB entry 1c0a) were placed at each site (Fig. 3 ▶). Model building and refinement are currently in progress. The results of preliminary structural analysis showed that the crystal contains two Asn-transamidosomes composed of two GatCABs, one AspRS dimer and two tRNAAsns in an asymmetric unit, with a V M value of 3.02 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 59.2% (Matthews, 1968 ▶), indicating that the construction of the present Asn-transamidosome is different from that of Thermus thermophilus.
Figure 3.
2F o − F c electron-density map around the anticodon stem region of tRNAAsn contoured at 1.0σ (magenta). GatCAB (blue) and AspRS (yellow) are represented as ribbon models, while tRNA (grey) is shown as a stick model.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the beamline staff of SPring-8 for their help in data collection. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research in a Priority Area (B) (No. 21370041 to MY) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
References
- Afonine, P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Mustyakimov, M., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A., Zwart, P. H. & Adams, P. D. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 352–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Bailly, M., Blaise, M., Lorber, B., Becker, H. D. & Kern, D. (2007). Mol. Cell, 28, 228–239. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Bernard, D., Akochy, P. M., Beaulieu, D., Lapointe, J. & Roy, P. H. (2006). J. Bacteriol. 188, 269–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Blaise, M., Bailly, M., Frechin, M., Behrens, M. A., Fischer, F., Oliveira, C. L., Becker, H. D., Pedersen, J. S., Thirup, S. & Kern, D. (2010). EMBO J. 29, 3118–3129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Curnow, A. W., Hong, K., Yuan, R., Kim, Si, Martins, O., Winkler, W., Henkin, T. M. & Söll, D. (1997). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 11819–11826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Curnow, A. W., Ibba, M. & Söll, D. (1996). Nature (London), 382, 589–590. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Eiler, S., Dock-Bregeon, A.-C., Moulinier, L., Thierry, J.-C. & Moras, D. (1999). EMBO J. 18, 6532–6541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ito, T. & Yokoyama, S. (2010). Nature (London), 467, 612–616. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
- McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Nakamura, A., Yao, M., Chimnaronk, S., Sakai, N. & Tanaka, I. (2006). Science, 312, 1954–1958. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Rees, B., Webster, G., Delarue, M., Boeglin, M. & Moras, D. (2000). J. Mol. Biol. 299, 1157–1164. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Sauerwald, A., Zhu, W., Major, T. A., Roy, H., Palioura, S., Jahn, D., Whitman, W. B., Yates, J. R. III, Ibba, M. & Söll, D. (2005). Science, 307, 1969–1972. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Sherlin, L. D., Bullock, T. L., Nissan, T. A., Perona, J. J., Lariviere, F. J., Uhlenbeck, O. C. & Scaringe, S. A. (2001). RNA, 7, 1671–1678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wilcox, M. & Nirenberg, M. (1968). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 61, 229–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wolf, Y. I., Aravind, L., Grishin, N. V. & Koonin, E. V. (1999). Genome Res. 9, 689–710. [PubMed]


