Abstract
Currently available methods to stably disperse iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) in aqueous solution need to be improved due to potential aggregation, reduction of superparamagnetism, and the use of toxic reagents. Herein, we present a facile strategy for aqueous transfer and dispersion of organic-synthesized IONPs using only polyethylene glycol (PEG), a biocompatible polymer. A library of PEG derivatives was screened, and it was determined that amine-functionalized six-armed PEG, 6(PEG-NH2), was the most effective dispersion agent. The 6(PEG-NH2)-modified IONPs (IONP-6PEG) were stable after extensive washing, exhibited high superparamagnetism, and could be used as a platform material for secondary surface functionalization with bioactive polymers. IONP-6PEG biofunctionalized with hyaluronic acid (IONP-6PEG-HA) was shown to specifically label mesenchymal stem cells and demonstrate MR contrast potential with high r2 relaxivity (442.7 s−1mM−1) compared to the commercially available Feridex (182.1 s−1mM−1).
Keywords: iron oxide nanoparticles, dispersion, PEG, surface functionalization, MRI
Magnetic nanoparticles are of interest in biomedical imaging because of their unique physical and chemical properties.1 In particular, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs), a negative contrast agent in MR imaging, have been utilized for various biomedical applications, such as cancer imaging, cellular labeling, and magnetofection.2–5 IONPs have been routinely synthesized by precipitation of iron salts in aqueous solution.6,7 Recently, thermal decomposition in organic solvents has been reported to produce monodisperse IONPs with precise control of superparamagnetism and size relative to those prepared from aqueous phase synthesis.2,4,8,9
In order to utilize monodisperse, organic-synthesized IONPs for biomedical imaging, they must be capable of stable dispersion in aqueous media.2–4 Numerous descriptions of phase transfer and stabilization of IONPs have been reported.4,10–14 Examples include the formation of core–shell nanoparticles with a thick shell layer of cross-linked dextran10 or silica11 and coating with surfactants [cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), citrate, etc.]4 and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based polymers including PEG-fatty acid,12 PEG-phospholipid,13 and poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) tri-block copolymer (Pluronic).14 However, significant challenges remain for these solutions, including nonbiodegradability and reduced superparamagnetism due to the thick shell or partially hydrophobic layer,10,11 use of toxic reagents,4,10 colloidal aggregations,3,4 and difficulty in the removal of polymeric micelles.12–14
In this study, we developed a facile route to produce well-dispersed IONPs in aqueous solution with high stability and bio-compatibility, using an amine-functionalized, star-shaped PEG derivative, followed by functionalization with bioactive polymer for cellular imaging (Figure 1). We hypothesized that PEGs with small end-functional groups could bind to the surface of IONPs and provide a thin, stable monolayer coating around them.15–17 The high hydrophilicity of PEG chains would render the particles soluble and stabilized in the aqueous media. Herein, we demonstrated that six-arm amine-functionalized PEG (6(PEG-NH2)) is a superior dispersion agent for the monodisperse IONPs, allowing successful IONP transfer and stabilization without the need of any additional reagents or incorporation of hydrophobic domains. IONPs modified by 6(PEG-NH2) (IONP-6PEG) have a thin PEG layer on the surface, show no apparent aggregation, and retain their original superparamagnetism. These particles are then amenable to bioconjugation, due to the presence of surface-exposed amine groups in 6(PEG-NH2). Hyaluronic acid modified IONP-6PEGs were used to label mesenchymal stem cells for MR imaging and cellular trafficking.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Monodisperse and superparamagnetic IONPs (10 nm in size) coated with oleic acid and dispersed in chloroform were prepared.8 For the transfer of the IONPs from an organic to an aqueous phase, a library of PEG derivatives was evaluated for potential utility as surface-modifying agents, with the goal of identifying structures that could facilitate effective transfer without the need of any additional chemical modification reactions. The PEG library included PEG derivatives with variations in structural configurations (linear, four-arm, and six-arm), molecular weights (1, 2, 3.4, 5, 10, 15 kDa, etc.), and small functional groups on the PEG end-groups (–NH2, –SH, –OH, –CH3, etc.) (Table S1). The PEG and the IONPs were co-dissolved in chloroform, dried under vacuum, and added with distilled water.15 The first visual indication of successful aqueous phase transfer of the IONPs was the apparent formation of a dispersion solution with a clear brown color. Several of the commercial PEG derivatives, including –NH2−, –COOH-, and –SH-functionalized PEGs and native diol PEGs (HO-PEG-OH) with molecular weight greater than 20 kDa, exhibited successful phase transfer of IONPs (Figure 1). After the phase transfer, the unbound PEG molecules dissolved in the IONP dispersion were removed by extensive washing, and the stability of the IONPs was examined by UV absorption measurement at 350 nm (Figure 2A). Absorption at 350 nm is known as a characteristic peak of IONPs, which has been widely used for their quantitative characterization.18,19 Substantial absorbance was measured for well-dispersed IONPs in an aqueous medium, but the poorly dispersed IONPs were aggregated and then precipitated, resulting in a clear supernatant. After washing, only the amine-functionalized PEGs with Mw larger than 5 kDa resulted in a stable dispersion. With increasing values of the Mw, the number of branched chains, and the number of functionalities, higher absorbance values could be attained. This indicates more efficient transfer and dispersion. Above all, six-arm amine-functionalized PEG (6(PEG-NH2)) showed the highest absorbance and efficient transfer. Size measurements by dynamic light scattering showed that the IONPs dispersed with 6(PEG-NH2) resulted in the smallest hydro-dynamic diameter (28.2 ± 7.4 nm), compared to ones stabilized by four-arm amine-functionalized PEG (4(PEG-NH2), 40.8 ± 8.5 nm) or amine-bifunctionalized PEG (H2N-PEG-NH2, 36.9 ± 12.4 nm), possibly due to the tighter, multivalent binding (Figure 2B). Zeta potential values showed that the IONPs stabilized by the amine bifunctional and multifunctional PEGs exhibited overall positive surface charges (2.5 ±1 to 12.8 ±2.7 mV), while ones dispersed with a methoxy-PEG with a mono-functional amine group (mPEG-NH2) were close to neutral (0.4 ± 2.6 mV) (Figure 2C). This evidenced the binding of amine groups to the IONP surface, with some portion of them projecting outward. The slight decrease in the zeta potential value of IONPs dispersed with 6(PEG-NH2) compared to that of 4(PEG-NH2) can be due to the denser shielding effect.20 According to these results, IONPs dispersed with 6(PEG-NH2) (IONP-6PEG) showed the most successful transfer and stabilization and were further characterized. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the amount of PEG on the IONP-6PEGs was about 25.2 w/w % of the total particle weight, as determined from the significant mass change at 381.7 °C due to decomposition of PEG (Figure S1A). A minor change observed at 253.6 °C represented oleic acid, which constituted 6.9 w/w % of the whole particle. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that IONP-6PEGs exhibited a large endothermic peak at 41.8 °C due to the crystallization of PEG (Figure S1B). The slight decrease in temperature (~9 °C) compared to the typical melting peak of PEG (50.9 °C) suggested that multiple amine groups of 6(PEG-NH2) were possibly intercalated by interacting with carboxylic acid groups in oleic acids.14 The IONP-6PEGs were also observed by TEM, which showed that IONP-6PEGs were well dispersed in the form of individual particles, in contrast to the IONPs dispersed with NH2-PEG-NH2, which were agglomerated (Figure 2D). The long-term stability of IONP-6PEGs in aqueous media was examined by monitoring the absorbance values at 350 nm. Figure 2E shows that ~90% of the total particles were well-dispersed in water for 25 days. It is well known that IONPs usually become unstable and easily aggregate in high salt conditions. The IONP-6PEGs showed significantly high stability in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, with over 80% of the particles stably dispersed for at least 20 days. DLS measurements in various salt concentrations and pHs also confirmed the high stability of IONP-6PEGs. Figure 2F, G show that IONP-6PEGs retained hydrodynamic diameters of 27–31 nm and existed as individual particles, even in high salt concentrations up to 2 w/v % and extreme pHs (pH 4 or 10). The above results all showed that 6(PEG-NH2) was immobilized on the IONP surface by the binding of amine groups, forming a thin polymeric coating layer. This allowed transfer and stable dispersion of the IONPs, while providing surface functionalities for further modification. The strong binding of the amine-functionalized PEGs might be due to direct Fe-nitrogen coordination on the IONP surface16,17,21 and/or ionic interactions between the carboxyl groups of oleic acids and amine groups of PEGs.14
With high colloidal stability and surface functionalities, the IONP-6PEGs could be chemically modified with various bioactive molecules. Biofunctional polymers such as hyaluronic acid (HA), heparin (hep), and chondroitin sulfate (CS) could be easily conjugated onto the surface of the IONP-6PEGs (IONP-6PEG-HA, IONP-6PEG-hep, and IONP-6PEG-CS). The carboxyl groups on the polysaccharides were reacted with the surface-exposed amine groups on the IONP-6PEGs by EDC/NHS chemistry. The presence of immobilized polysaccharides on the IONP-6PEGs was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Figure 3A). The peaks around 2892 and 1606 cm−1 refer to hydroxyl and carbonyl groups, which are abundant in the polysaccharides, demonstrating successful bioconjugation. Attempts to immobilize HA, heparin, and chondroitin sulfate in the absence of coupling reagents, EDC and NHS, resulted in unsuccessful surface immobilizations. Furthermore, the polysaccharides were not immobilized onto the surface of IONPs that were dispersed by linear mPEG-NH2, which would be due to the lack of surface-exposed amine groups. These results indicate that the polysaccharide immobilization occurs via formation of amide bonds by the coupling agents. The biofunctionalized IONP-6PEGs retained their appearance as a stable, dark brown colloid with no sign of aggregation or precipitation (Figure 3B). The hydrodynamic sizes were increased for the biofunctionalized IONP-6PEGs, ranging from 79 to 203 nm, probably due to (1) the presence of an additional layer of the high Mw polymer and/or (2) some extent of interparticle cross-linking (Figure S2A). The DLS sizes of IONP-6PEGs after polysaccharide functionalization were increased to ~75 nm for IONP-6PEG-HA, whereas the IONPs functionalized by heparin and chondroitin sulfate showed 150–200 nm sizes. This increase in size might be due to cluster formation of IONPs by chemical cross-linking between the particles. The polydispersity index of the sizes was also larger for functionalized IONP-6PEGs than before functionalization (~0.15) and even more for IONP-6PEG-hep (~0.39) and IONP-6PEG-CS (~0.31) compared to IONP-6PEG-HA (~0.2). The surface charges of the biofunctionalized IONP-6PEGs were slightly negative, ranging from −9.1 ± 1.5 to −3.1 ± 1.9 mV, further confirming the immobilization of the anionic polysaccharides on the surfaces (Figure S2B). The long-term stability of the biofunctionalized IONP-6PEGs was also examined (Figure 3C). All functionalized particles showed high stability in aqueous buffer solution, with 70–90% of the particles remaining well dispersed up to 25 days.
The magnetic properties of biofunctionalized IONP-6PEGs were investigated using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Figure 3D shows that IONP-6PEG and IONP-6PEG-HA exhibited little changes in superparamagnetic magnetization compared to as-synthesized IONPs. The saturated magnetization (Ms) values of IONP-6PEG and IONP-6PEG-HA were 89.4, and 79.0 emu/g, which were significantly higher than that of Feridex (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals), a commercial formulation of iron oxide nanoparticles (9.5 emu/g). These results revealed that the phase-transfer process and bioconjugation reaction produced aqueous IONPs with high superparamagnetism. According to previous reports, a coating layer comprising a completely hydrophilic polymer would be greatly advantageous compared to amphiphilic coatings, due to easy access of water protons to the particle surfaces, resulting in superior proton relaxivity.16
HA has been widely utilized for fabrication or modification of biomedical materials due to their wide interactions and functions on cells and tissues in the biological environment.22,23 In this study, we utilized HA as a functional moiety for targeted labeling of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The labeling efficiency of IONP-6PEG-HA on MSCs was investigated by confocal imaging and iron content quantification. It has been well known that most primary cells, such as endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and MSCs, exhibit extremely low uptake efficiency of small-particle materials.24 Figure S3A shows that IONP-6PEG-HA could efficiently label the MSCs, as can be seen by the green fluorescence within the cell interior. It has been reported that MSCs abundantly express CD44.25 The amount of cellular uptake was much higher for IONP-6PEG-HA (145.9 ± 15.2 ng Fe/105 cells) than IONP-6PEG (63 ± 12.3 ng Fe/105 cells), showing that the presence of HA on the surface greatly enhanced internalization of the particles (Figure S3B). When an excess of HA was added to the cells prior to IONP-6PEG-HA, the extent of cellular uptake was significantly decreased (53.8 ± 5.1 ng Fe/105 cells), showing that the free HA molecules prevented direct interactions between IONP-6PEG-HA and cell surfaces. This result suggests that the labeling of MSCs with IONP-HA might be due to CD44-mediated endocytosis. Feridex showed considerably lower cellular uptake (45.1 ± 3.9 ng Fe/105 cells) compared to IONP-6PEG-HA. HCT116 and HeLa cells, which are known to express high and normal levels of CD44, respectively, were also treated with IONP-6PEG-HA and observed by confocal microscopy. HCT116 cells showed much higher uptake levels, while HeLa cells showed moderate levels of uptake, giving further evidence for the specific interactions between IONP-6PEG-HAs and MSCs (Figure S4). The viability of MSCs treated with IONP-6PEG-HA was also assessed, which showed that over 95% of the MSCs treated at concentrations up to 50 μg Fe/mL were viable (Figure S3C, D). Treatment of IONP coated with CTAB as the control caused severe cytotoxicity due to the quaternary ammonium moiety of CTAB.26 These results show that IONP-6PEG-HA could efficiently and safely label the MSCs by a cell-specific receptor-mediated process. However, to unambiguously prove the CD44-mediated endocytosis process, further in-depth studies should be carried out.
Finally, the MSCs labeled with IONP-6PEG-HA were subjected to MR imaging using a 3.0 T MRI system. In vitro MRI of the MSCs labeled with IONP-6PEG-HA showed greatly enhanced negative T2 contrast, whereas the labeled MSCs in the presence of excess HA showed marginal enhancement due to the lower cellular uptake (Figure 4A). The T2 relaxation times for the cells treated with 1 μg/mL IONP-6PEG-HA, 2 μg/mL IONP-6PEG-HA, and 2 μg/mL IONP-6PEG-HA in the presence of excess HA, and Feridex were 57.8, 156.3, 277.8, and 454.5 ms, respectively. Assuming there were no changes in the r2 relaxivity during each step of surface modification, the values of the particles were obtained from normalization by the amount of particle uptake. The r2 relaxivity was 442.7 s−1 mM−1 for IONP-6PEG-HA, which is significantly higher than that of Feridex (182.1 s−1 mM−1) and comparable to the reported values.11,27 In fact, however, it is expected that the r2 relaxivity value of IONP-6PEG-HA would be slightly lower than IONP-6PEG, due to the surface-bound polymers preventing access of water molecules to the IONP surface.28,29 Finally, the IONP-6PEG-HA-labeled MSCs were subjected to MR imaging in vivo in a mouse model. The unlabeled MSCs were barely detected, whereas the IONP-6PEG-HA-labeled MSCs were clearly detected as dark spots in the subcutaneous region (Figure 4B). Labeling of therapeutic cells with magnetic nanoparticles and their subsequent administration in vivo can be advantageous in allowing trafficking of the cells and the curing processes by live imaging.25,30 Previous studies have reported difficulty in performing these tasks due to either low labeling efficiency for MRI detection or high toxicity of the magnetic material. Therefore, IONP-6PEG-HA, exhibiting high labeling efficiency, low cytotoxicity, and superior MRI contrast for MSCs, holds great promise as a labeling tool for cell therapeutics. Further in-depth studies on evaluation of cell viability after in vivo injection should be carried out for applications in in vivo tracking of therapeutic cells.
CONCLUSIONS
Herein, we developed a facile route for aqueous-phase dispersion and biofunctionalization of mono-disperse IONPs. A simple polymeric coating method allowed an easy organic-to-aqueous phase transfer of monodisperse IONPs. By screening a commercial library of PEG derivatives, 6(PEG-NH2) was shown to provide the most efficient transfer and stabilization of the IONPs. The current formulation method using 6(PEG-NH2) as a dispersion agent for IONPs was meritorious in producing well-dispersed IONPs with high colloidal stability, good superparamagnetism, and surface functionalities for further modifications. The aqueous-dispersed IONPs using 6(PEG-NH2) (IONP-6PEG) were conjugated with various bioactive molecules on the surface. IONP-6PEGs biofunctionalized with HA (IONP-6PEG-HA) was used as a labeling probe for human mesenchymal stem cells. IONP-6PEG-HA could efficiently label the MSCs with low toxicity and showed greatly enhanced MRI contrast in vitro as well as in vivo. We expect that the IONP stabilized by 6(PEG-NH2) can be widely utilized for practical applications as an imaging probe for various purposes in biomedical diagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized by a previous method.8 The synthetic procedure involved formation of an iron-oleate complex, which produces IONPs with an oleic acid coating on the surface of the IONPs. The library of PEG derivatives was obtained from Laysan Bio, Inc. (Arab, AL).
Instrumental Analyses
UV absorption of the IONPs was measured using Nanodrop (ND-1000, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements were performed using ZetaPlus (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a Philips CM20. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed using a TG209F3 (Netzcsh, Germany), and differential scanning calorimetry was done using a DSC204F1 (Netzsch, Germany). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was performed using an IFS66 V/S (Bruker Optiks, Germany).
Phase Transfer and Aqueous Dispersion of IONPs
A library of various end-functionalized PEGs was screened and examined as transfer agents for IONPs from organic to aqueous phase. In brief, 500 μL of 2 w/v % PEG in chloroform was added with 500 μL of 2 mg/mL IONPs in chloroform and dried under vacuum. For water dispersion, 500 μL of deionized distilled water (DDW) was added and inverted several times for thorough dispersion. If the dispersion appeared as a transparent, brown-colored solution with no sign of insoluble aggregates or precipitates, it was determined to be successfully transferred, and otherwise, not transferred. For purification of the surface-coated IONPs by removal of free PEGs in solution, the IONPs were extensively washed in DDW using centrifugal filters with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 100 000 (Amicon Ultra, Millipore) and/or dialysis (MWCO 1 000 000, SpectraPor, Spectrum Laboratories).
Biofunctionalization of Aqueous-Dispersed IONPs
Aqueous-dispersed IONPs were biofunctionalized by reacting with bioactive anionic polysaccharides. Briefly, 500 mg of hyaluronic acid (17 kDa, Lifecore Biomedical), heparin (12 kDa, Wako Chemical Industries), and chondroitin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in DDW and freeze-dried. For reaction with IONPs, 200 mg of hyaluronic acid, heparin, or chondriotin sulfate (500 μmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of DDW and added with 1.9 mg of 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) (50 μmol) and 2.4 mg of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (100 μmol). Then, 500 μL of 6(PEG-NH2)-coated and purified IONPs (5 mg) in DDW was slowly added to the reaction solution with magnetic stirring. For observing intracellular uptake by confocal microscopy, HA labeled with fluorescein was used for reaction instead of HA. Fluorescein-labeled HA was prepared by reacting 500 mg of HA (1 mmol) with 19.2 mg of EDC (0.1 mmol), 23 mg of NHS (0.1 mmol), and 3.5 mg of 5-aminofluorescein (0.01 mmol), followed by extensive dialysis (MWCO 5000) and freeze-drying. After 12 h, the reacted IONPs were extensively washed with DDW using Amicon filters (MWCO 100 000).
Cellular Labeling Using Biofunctionalized IONPs
Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells, HCT116, and HeLa cells were cultured in minimum essential medium-α (α-MEM), RPMI 1640, and Dulbecco’s modified essential medium (DMEM), respectively, all supplemented with 10 v/v % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. All reagents for cell culture were purchased from Gibco (Gaithersburg, MD). Each of the cells was seeded onto microscopic culture slides or T75 culture flasks. Twelve hours before treating with IONPs, the cells were preincubated in serum-free media or 1 w/v % solution of HA in serum-free media. Then IONPs were added to the cells at a final concentration of 2 μg/mL for 12 h. For microscopic observations, the treated cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline solution. For observing live and dead cells by confocal microscopy, cells were added to a solution of 2 μM calcein AM and 4 μM ethidium homodimer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and incubated for 30 min. To observe internalization of fluorescently labeled IONPs into cells, the cells were fixed in 4 w/v % paraformaldehyde solution and mounted with Vectashield containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for confocal microscopy (LSM710, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). To quantitatively assess cellular uptake, treated cells were trypsinized and washed, and iron content was measured either by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) or by Prussian blue staining and UV–visible spectrometry. For ICP-AES, cells were freeze-dried, treated with nitric acid, and diluted with DDW. For Prussian blue staining, cells were treated with 750 μL of 2 v/v % hydrochloride solution for 30 min and then with 250 μL of 2 w/v % potassium ferrocyanide solution for 15 min, and the absorbance at 711 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop). The amount of cellular uptake was calculated on the basis of a standard curve obtained with IONP dispersions. Cell viability was also quantitatively measured using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). To cells treated with IONPs was added a 0.1 volume of CCK-8 solution, the solution was incubated for 2 h, and the optical density at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (model 550, Biorad, Hercules, CA). The percentage of viable cells (%) was calculated on the basis of calibration from a standard curve for fresh, nontreated cells.
MR Imaging
MSCs labeled with the biofunctionalized IONPs were observed in vitro and in vivo using a 3.0 T MRI system (ISOL Tech., Korea) equipped with a customized quadrature radio-frequency coil of 9 cm diameter. For imaging in vitro, the labeled MSCs were fixed in gel phantoms made of 1 w/v % agarose, and the T2-weighted images were obtained by a spin–echo pulse sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE = 3000/100 ms, FOV = 100 × 100 mm2, matrix = 128 × 128, flip angle = 90°, average number = 2, voxel size = 0.78 × 0.78 × 2 mm3. T2 relaxation times of the labeled MSCs were obtained by calculation from a series of images using the same parameters but varying the TE value from 15 to 300 ms. r2 relaxivity was calculated by normalization of T2 relaxation times with concentrations of IONPs obtained from the amount of particle uptake and binding on cells, assuming that the density of Fe3O4 nanoparticles was 5 g/cm3.31 For in vivo MR imaging, the labeled MSCs (2 × 105, 100 μL) were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal side of nude mice, and after 1 day the T2-weighted images were obtained by a fast spin–echo sequence using the following parameters: TR/TE = 3000/100 ms, FOV = 100 × 100 mm2, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 2 mm, average number = 4, voxel size = 0.39 × 0.39 × 3 mm3. For both in vitro and in vivo MRI, three images were obtained for each sample and analyzed.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF, South Korea): Development of Medical Technology Program (2010-0028765; H.L.), World Class University Program (R31-2008-000-10071-0; H.L.), and Korea Biotech R&D Program (2010K001356; H.L.). We also thank Alnylam and Controlled Release of Macromolecules (EB000244; D.G.A.).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Table of commercial PEG library, TGA and DSC data, additional DLS and zeta potential measurements, confocal images of other labeled cell lines. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Cai W, Chen X. Nanoplatforms for Targeted Molecular Imaging in Living Subjects. Small. 2007;3:1840–1854. doi: 10.1002/smll.200700351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and Surface Engineering of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3995–4021. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McCarthy JR, Weissleder R. Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles for Targeted Imaging and Therapy. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2008;60:1241–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller RN. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem Rev. 2008;108:2064–2110. doi: 10.1021/cr068445e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sosnovik DE, Weissleder R. Emerging Concepts in Molecular MRI. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Petri-Fink A, Chastellain M, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Ferrari A, Hofmann H. Development of Functionalized Super-paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Interaction with Human Cancer Cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2685–2694. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matuszewski L, Persigehl T, Wall A, Schwindt W, Tombach B, Fobker M, Poremba C, Ebert W, Heindel W, Bremer C. Cell Tagging with Clinically Approved Iron Oxides: Feasibility and Effect of Lipofection, Particle Size, and Surface Coating on Labeling Efficiency. Radiology. 2005;235:155–161. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351040094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park J, An K, Hwang Y, Park JG, Noh HJ, Kim JY, Park JH, Hwang NM, Hyeon T. Ultra-Large-Scale Syntheses of Monodisperse Nanocrystals. Nat Mater. 2004;3:891–895. doi: 10.1038/nmat1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park J, Lee E, Hwang NM, Kang M, Kim SC, Hwang Y, Park JG, Noh HJ, Kim JY, Park, et al. One-Nanometer-Scale Size-Controlled Synthesis of Monodisperse Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:2872–2877. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kircher MF, Mahmood U, King RS, Weissleder R, Josephson L. A Multimodal Nanoparticle for Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative Optical Brain Tumor Delineation. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8122–8125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lu CW, Hung Y, Hsiao JK, Yao M, Chung TH, Lin YS, Wu SH, Hsu SC, Liu HM, Mou, et al. Bifunctional Magnetic Silica Nanoparticles for Highly Efficient Human Stem Cell Labeling. Nano Lett. 2007;7:149–154. doi: 10.1021/nl0624263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang J, Lee T, Lee J, Lim E, Hyung W, Lee C, Song YJ, Suh J, Yoon H, Huh, et al. Synthesis of Ultrasensitive Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents for Cancer Imaging Using PEG-Fatty Acid. Chem Mater. 2007;19:3870–3876. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nitin N, LaConte LEW, Zurkiya O, Hu X, Bao G. Functionalization and Peptide-Based Delivery of Magnetic Nanoparticles as an Intracellular MRI Contrast Agent. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2004;9:706–712. doi: 10.1007/s00775-004-0560-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qin J, Laurent S, Jo YS, Roch A, Mikhaylova M, Bhujwalla ZM, Muller RN, Muhammed M. A High-Performance Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2 Contrast Agent. Adv Mater. 2007;19:1874–1878. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Portet D, Denizot B, Rump E, Lejeune JJ, Jallet P. Nonpolymeric Coatings of Iron Oxide Colloids for Biological Use as Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;238:37–42. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.7500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duan H, Kuang M, Wang X, Wang YA, Mao H, Nie S. Reexamining the Effects of Particle Size and Surface Chemistry on the Magnetic Properties of Iron Oxide Nanocrystals: New Insights into Spin Disorder Proton Relaxivity. J Phys Chem. 2008;112:8127–8131. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang H, Lee M, Hogg MG, Dordick JS, Sharfstein ST. Gene Delivery in Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures by Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4:4733–4743. doi: 10.1021/nn9018812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim M, Chen Y, Liu Y, Peng X. Super-Stable, High-Quality Fe3O4 Dendron-Nanocrystals Dispersible in Both Organic and Aqueous Solutions. Adv Mater. 2005;17:1429–1432. doi: 10.1002/adma.200401991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mamedov A, Ostrander J, Aliev F, Kotov NA. Stratified Assemblies of Magnetite Nanoparticles and Montmorillonite Prepared by the Layer-by-Layer Assembly. Langmuir. 2000;16:3941–3949. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mok H, Bae KH, Ahn C, Park TG. PEGylated and MMP-2 Specifically DePEGylated Quantum Dots: Comparative Evaluation of Cellular Uptake. Langmuir. 2009;25:1645–1650. doi: 10.1021/la803542v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Salazar-Salinas K, Jauregui LA, Kubli-Garfias C, Seminario JM. Molecular Biosensor Based on a Coordinated Iron Complex. J Chem Phys. 2009;130:105–101. doi: 10.1063/1.3070235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morra M. Engineering of Biomaterials Surfaces by Hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:1205–1223. doi: 10.1021/bm049346i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee Y, Lee H, Kim YB, Kim J, Hyeon T, Park H, Messersmith PB, Park TG. Bioinspired Surface Immobilization of Hyaluronic Acid on Monodisperse Magnetite Nanocrystals for Targeted Cancer Imaging. Adv Mater. 2008;20:4154–4157. doi: 10.1002/adma.200800756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bulte JW, Douglas T, Witwer B, Zhang SC, Strable E, Lewis BK, Zywicke H, Miller B, van Gelderen P, Moskowitz, et al. Magnetodendrimers Allow Endosomal Magnetic Labeling and In Vivo Tracking of Stem Cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:1141–1147. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sackstein R, Merzaban JS, Cain DW, Dagia NM, Spencer JA, Lin CP, Wohlgemuth R. Ex Vivo Glycan Engineering of CD44 Programs Human Multipotent Me-senchymal Stromal Cell Trafficking to Bone. Nat Med. 2008;14:181–187. doi: 10.1038/nm1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tarantola M, Schneider D, Sunnick E, Adam H, Pierrat S, Rosman C, Breus V, Sonnichsen C, Basche T, Wegener J, et al. Cytotoxicity of Metal and Semiconductor Nano-particles Indicated by Cellular Micromotility. ACS Nano. 2009;3:213–222. doi: 10.1021/nn800721j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee J, Huh Y, Jun Y, Seo J, Jang J, Song H, Kim S, Cho E, Yoon H, Suh J, et al. Artificially Engineered Magnetic Nanoparticles for Ultra-Sensitive Molecular Imaging. Nat Med. 2007;13:95–99. doi: 10.1038/nm1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.LaConte LEW, Nitin N, Zurkiya O, Caruntu D, O’Connor CJ, Hu X, Bao G. Coating Thickness of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Affects R2 Relaxivity. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1634–1641. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duan H, Kuang M, Wang X, Wang YA, Mao H, Nie S. Reexamining the Effects of Particle Size and Surface Chemistry on the Magnetic Properties of Iron Oxide Nanocrystals: New Insights into Spin Disorder and Proton Relaxivity. J Phys Chem. 2008;112:8127–8131. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kraitchman DL, Heldman AW, Atalar E, Amado LC, Martin BJ, Pittenger MF, Hare JM, Bulte JWM. In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2003;107:2290–2293. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070931.62772.4E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bae KH, Kim YB, Lee Y, Hwang JY, Park HW, Park TG. Bio-inspired Synthesis and Characterization of Gadolinium-Labeled Magnetite Nanoparticles for Dual Contrast T1- and T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Bio-conjugate Chem. 2010;21:505–512. doi: 10.1021/bc900424u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.