Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2014 Jun 23;(419):87–102. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.419.5739

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n., a new cave-dwelling blind spider species from the Aegean region of Turkey (Araneae, Nesticidae)

Carles Ribera 1, Mert Elverici 2, Kadir Boğaç Kunt 3, Recep Sulhi Özkütük 4
PMCID: PMC4109453  PMID: 25061362

Abstract Abstract

A new species of the troglobitic spider genus Typhlonesticus is described from specimens found in Keloğlan Cave (Denizli Province, Dodurgalar Town), Turkey. Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. is described on the basis of both sexes; and its phylogenetic relationships with closely related European genera and species are discussed based on morphological and molecular data (the cox1, rrnL and H3 genes). Three new combinations are proposed: Typhlonesticus idriacus (Roewer, 1931), comb. n., Typhlonesticus morisii (Brignoli, 1975) comb. n. and Typhlonesticus obcaecatus (Simon, 1907), comb. n. all ex Nesticus.

Keywords: Arachnida, taxonomy, description, caves, Anatolia, troglobiont

Introduction

Nesticids are medium-sized spiders common in underground ecosystems in the northern Mediterranean basin and many of them exhibit all the typical troglobite characters: depigmentation, anophthalmia and appendage lengthening. The following four genera have been recorded from this region: Aituaria Esyunin & Efimik, 1998; Carpathonesticus Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980; Nesticus Thorell, 1869 and Typhlonesticus Kulczyński, 1914, representing a total of 49 species. Two more genera occur in bordering regions: Canarionesticus Wunderlich, 1992, endemic to the Canarian archipelago and Nesticella Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980, broadly spread throughout the Asian continent. Nesticella mogera (Yaginuma, 1972) was recorded from the southeast of Caucasus (Marusik and Guseinov 2003), and in Europe has been cited in Berlin and Poland (Bielak-Bielecki and Rozwałka 2011) as an introduced species.

Most described species are well defined and illustrated, but the taxonomy of the group is not well established at the genus level, mainly in Carpathonesticus and Nesticus which show conspicous morphological variability in their genital organs, suggesting the existence of independent evolutionary lineages. This morphological variability was already pointed out by Lehtinen and Saaristo (1980) and López-Pancorbo and Ribera (2011).

The genus Typhlonesticus was described in 1914 and included two species, but a type species was not selected. Kratochvíl (1933) designated the type species, but incorrectly. His designation was corrected by Lehtinen and Saaristo (1980). Currently the genus comprises the single species Typhlonesticus absoloni (Kratochvíl, 1933), a species known from several caves in Montenegro (Platnick 2013). The phylogenetic affinities of this genus are unknown and it has been regarded by some authors as an aberrant species, “the most aberrant of Nesticini in regard to both female and male genital organs is Typhlonesticus, and its relationships to other genera remain obscure” (Lehtinen and Saaristo 1980) or “an old relict,... with a solitary position within the genus” (Deeleman-Reinhold 1974). However, Fage (1931) reported some morphological relationships with regard to Nesticus obcaecatus (la forme de l’epigyne rappelle un peu celle du N. obcaecatus de l’Espagne) and López-Pancorbo and Ribera (2011) pointed out the morphological affinities of the male and female copulatory organs between Typhlonesticus absoloni and Nesticus obcaecatus, Nesticus idriacus and Nesticus morisii.

An extensive survey of caves in Anatolia during the last 10 years has provided a high number of morphospecies, one of which, from Keloğlan Cave in the Denizli Province, shows a clear morphological similarity with Typhlonesticus absoloni. The discovery of this new species of Typhlonesticus has also led us to review some of the described Mediterranean species that show morphological similarity with Typhlonesticus absoloni, such as Nesticus obcaecatus from the Spanish Pyrenees, Nesticus morisii from Italy and Nesticus idriacus from Austria and Italy. In order to check the phylogenetic relationships among these species a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences was performed.

The aim of this paper is to describe a new species belonging to the genus Typhlonesticus and to propose three new combinations of the above mentioned species.

Material and methods

Molecular data

Taxonomic sampling. Representatives of Mediterranean Nesticus, Carpathonesticus and Typhlonesticus were included in the analysis. We could not include representatives of the genus Aituaria, the easternmost Mediterranean nesticid genus whose range extends from southern Urals to the northwest of Caucasus, due to lack of suitable material for molecular analysis. Sequences from Canarionesticus quadridentatus Wunderlich, 1992 from Canary Islands were used to root the tree. We have also included sequences of Typhlonesticus absoloni, Nesticus idriacus, Nesticus morisii and Nesticus obcaecatus Simon, to check the phylogenetic relationships of these species (see Appendix 1 for localities and GenBank accession numbers).

Sample storage and DNA extraction. For DNA studies, live specimens were collected in the field, fixed in 96% or absolute ethanol and stored at 4 °C. Total genomic DNA was extracted from legs or from the prosoma of a single specimen using the QIamp® DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The approximate concentration and purity of the DNA obtained were verified using 1% agarose/TBE gel electrophoresis.

PCR amplification and sequencing. Partial fragments of two mitochondrial (cytochrome oxidase I: cox1 and 16S rRNA: rrnL) and one nuclear (Histone 3: H3) genes were selectively amplified and sequenced using the primers and conditions shown in Appendix 2. The PCR reaction mixture contained a final concentration of 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTPs, 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Promega), with the supplied buffer, and 1.5–2.5 mM MgCl2 in a final volume of 25 μL. The PCR products were cycle-sequenced in both directions using the same PCR primers and the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed using an ABI 3700 automated sequencer at the Serveis Científico-Tècnics of the Universitat de Barcelona.

Alignment, genetic distances and phylogenetic analyses. Raw sequences were edited and assembled with GENEIOUS v4.6.5 (Drummond et al. 2009). The new sequences used in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers shown in Appendix 1. Alignment of the cox1 and H3 gene fragments was trivial due to the absence of length polymorphism. However, there were some length differences among the rrnL fragments, suggesting the occurrence of insertion/deletion events during the evolution of these sequences. Automatic alignment algorithms have been considered as superior to manual protocols due to their objectivity and repeatability (Giribet et al. 2002). The rrnL sequences were aligned using the online version of MAFFT, applying the Q-INS-i algorithm (Katoh and Toh 2008). The uncorrected genetic distances between the taxa were assessed using MEGA v5.0 (Tamura et al. 2011).

Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses of the combined data matrix corresponding to the three sequenced genes were conducted using the online version of RAxML (Stamatakis et al. 2008), independently applying the parameters of the Gamma model of rate heterogeneity for each partition. The online version obtains the bootstrap support values by means of 100 pseudoreplicates.

Taxonomy

The following abbreviations are used in the text and figures: E, T, ST, MA, TTA, p1, p2, P, vp, dp, co, id, fd, S, AUZM, CRBA. All measurements are in millimetres.

Specimens of Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. were collected using hand aspirators and placed directly into 96% ethanol in the field. Body colour descriptions are based on digital images taken in the cave environment. Photography was performed using a Nikon D100 camera equipped with a Nikon 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor lens and a Sigma EM-140 DG macro ring flash for Nikon SLR cameras.

The female vulva was removed and treated with 30% KOH prior to examination. After observation and drawings, the vulva was washed in distilled water and stored in 70% ethanol. The left male palp was drawn in all cases. We follow Coyle and McGarity (1992) for describing the paracymbium and Huber (1993) and Agnarsson et al. (2007) for other parts of the male and female copulatory organs.

Digital images of the palps and vulvae were taken with a Leica DFC295 digital camera attached to a Leica S8AP0 stereomicroscope, with 5–15 photographs taken in different focal planes and combined using image stacking software. Photographic images were edited using PHOTOSHOP CS2 and COREL-DRAW X3 was used to create the plates. For SEM micrographs, the male palps were dried at -30 °C and coated with a thin layer of gold using an Electron Microscopy sciences EMS 550X sputter coater. The materials were examined at an acceleration voltage of 12 kV using a ZEISS ULTRA PLUS Scanning Electron Microscope (University of Anadolu, Eskişehir, Turkey).

In addition of the new species we also examined the following material: Nesticus morisii (♀) from Sotterranei del Forte di Vernante, Vernante, Cuneo, Italy, 19.09.2007, leg. A. López-Pancorbo & M. Isaia; Nesticus idriacus (♂♀) from Grotte Pre Oreak, Nimis, Friuli. Italy, 15.09.2007, leg. A. López-Pancorbo; Nesticus obcaecatus (♂♀) from Cueva Del Molino de Aso, Boltaña, Prov. Huesca, Spain, 27.05.2004, leg. S. Carranza; and Typhlonesticus absoloni (♀) from Baba Tusha Cave, Trnovo, Virpazar Distr., Montenegro, 24.03.2006, leg. B. Petrov & S. Lazarov. Baba Tusha Cave is located about 10 km in a straight line from Grboćica pećina, in Krivośije (locus typicus of Typhlonesticus absoloni) and about 20 km away from Cetinsjska pećina, from which Deeleman-Reinhold (1974) illustrated both sexes of this species. For morphology of the male palps of Typhlonesticus absoloni and Nesticus morisii we rely on Kratochvíl (1939) and Deeleman-Reinhold (1974).

Results

Taxonomy: Family Nesticidae Simon, 1894: Genus Typhlonesticus Kulczyński, 1914

Type species. Nesticus absoloni Kratochvíl, 1933; see Lehtinen and Saaristo (1980).

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/E3A3721A-0E71-479B-9EA9-A31A47D6E8C6

Figs 2 –21

Figures 2–5.

Figures 2–5.

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. male palp. 2 ventral view 3 dorsal view 4 prolateral view 5 retrolateral view. Abbreviations: T = tegulum, MA = median apophysis, p1 = process 1 of TTA, p2 = process 2 of TTA, P = paracymbium, vp = ventral process of paracymbium, dp = dorsal process of paracymbium. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figures 6–9.

Figures 6–9.

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. male palp. 6 ventral view 7 dorsal view 8 retrolateral view 9 prolateral view. Abbreviations: T = tegulum, MA = median apophysis, p1 = process 1 of TTA, p2 = process 2 of TTA, vp = ventral process of paracymbium, dp = dorsal process of paracymbium. Scale bars 0.5 mm.

Figures 10–13.

Figures 10–13.

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. male palp. 10 nearly retrolateral view 11 ditto 12 nearly ventral view 13 ventral view. Abbreviations: E = embolus, T = tegulum, St = subtegulum, MA = median apophysis, p1 = process 1 of TTA, p2 = process 2 of TTA, P = paracymbium, vp = ventral process of paracymbium, dp = dorsal process of paracymbium.

Figures 14–17.

Figures 14–17.

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. epigyne and vulva. 14 epigyne ventral view 15 vulva ventral view, 16 ditto 17 vulva dorsal view. Abbreviations: co = copulatory orifice, id = insemination duct, fd = fertilization duct, S = spermatheca. Scale bars 14–15 0.25 mm 16–17 0.1 mm.

Figures 18–21.

Figures 18–21.

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. 18–19 male, prosoma 18 dorsal view 19 frontal view 20 male in the web 21 female.

Material examined.

Holotype ♂ (AUZM) Denizli Province, Acıpayam District, Dodurgalar Town, Keloğlan Cave (37°23'14.74"N, 29°34'18.29"E), 10.07.2011, leg. M. Elverici. Paratypes 1 ♂ 1 ♀ 9 juveniles (AUZM), 1 ♂ 1 ♀ (CRBA) same data as holotype.

Derivatio nominis.

The specific name is given in honour of the prominent Turkish biologist, Prof. Dr. Bayram Göçmen (University of Ege, İzmir, Turkey). Noun in apposition.

Diagnosis.

Males of the new species differ from Typhlonesticus absoloni by the shape and length of the tegulum, the shape of p1 and p2 processes, the arrangement of the embolus and the shape and arrangement of the paracymbial apophyses, mainly the ventral one, which is erected as a thin spine in Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n., whereas in Typhlonesticus absoloni it consists of a curved lamella. Females differ from Typhlonesticus absoloni by the shape of the epigyne and the position of the spermathecae. The dimension and orientation of the insemination and fertilization ducts are also diagnostic. In Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. the epigyne is scarcely sclerotized and the spermathecae and insemination ducts are visible through the tegument, moreover the spermathecae are nearly spherical and separated by a distance approximately equal to their diameter. In Typhlonesticus absoloni the epigyne is strongly sclerotized and the spermathecae are separated by almost twice their diameter. In Typhlonesticus absoloni the insemination and fertilization ducts are thicker and almost fill the entire genital area.

Male.

Coloration. Carapace whitish, slightly yellowish. Appendages and sternum slightly testaceous. Opisthosoma brownish, with many dark patches (Fig. 20). The specimens preserved in alcohol have a whitish opisthosoma, slightly greyer than the prosoma.

Prosoma. Carapace approximately circular in dorsal view. Cephalic region not differentiated from the rest of the carapace. Eyeless (Figs 18, 19).

Opisthosoma. Sub-elliptical in dorsal view.

Appendages. prolateral margin of the chelicerae with 3 teeth, the central slightly longer. Male palp (Figs 213). Paracymbium short, dorsal and ventral processes scarcely developed. The ventral process consists of a short and flattened lamella, curved towards the apex and prolonged into a thin spine. The ventral one consisting of a short laminar apophysis, apically curved toward to the ventral side. Distal, paradistal and dorsomedian paracymbial apophyses absent (Figs 2–3 and 57). Tegulum very prominent, consisting of a ventrally directed triangular apophysis. Small inconspicuous median apophysis located behind the tegulum (Figs 2, 4, 6, 8, 12). TTA with two well developed processes (p1 and p2): p1 is saddle-shaped, longer than wide, slightly curved in the middle and directed ventrally; p2 is in an apical position and ends with two convergent apical hooks running as a conductor for the embolus (Figs 2, 46, 8, 11, 13). Embolus filamentous following a semicircular course towards the apex and bordering the tegulum.

Measurements (holotype ♂): carapace length 1.15, width 0.88, opisthosoma length 1.60, width 0.84. Total length = 2.75.

Leg coxa troc. femur patella tibia meta. tarsus total
I 0.40 0.20 3.28 0.52 3.48 3.12 1.13 12.13
II 0.28 0.20 2.20 0.45 2.20 2.00 0.88 8.21
III 0.25 0.18 1.75 0.43 1.45 1.55 0.68 6.29
IV 0.30 0.20 2.42 0.40 2.15 1.95 0.89 8.31
Female.

All somatic characters as in male but slightly larger in size. Epigyne convex and prominent, without sclerotized plates (Fig. 14). The posterior edge is slightly sclerotized. Spermathecae and insemination ducts can be observed through the tegument. Vulva quite simple (Figs 15–17), consisting of two almost spherical spermathecae, insemination and fertilization ducts. Insemination duct coiled, forming two laps around the fertilization duct before reaching the spermatheca. Vulval pockets absent.

Measurements (paratype ♀): carapace length 1.20, width 1.00, opisthosoma length 2.04, width 1.28. Total length = 3.24.

Leg coxa troc. femur patella tibia meta. tarsus total
I 0.38 0.15 2.64 0.45 3.40 2.80 1.11 10.93
II 0.32 0.13 2.48 0.45 2.25 1.95 0.93 8.51
III 0.20 0.13 1.75 0.34 1.40 1.20 0.61 5.63
IV 0.37 0.14 2.52 0.42 2.36 1.88 0.97 8.66
Distribution.

Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. is only known from the type locality. This new species was previously identified as Nesticus morisii by Aydın Topçu and collaborators (2013). The cave is located at the northern part of the West Taurus karst region; on the east side of the Acıpayam polje, at the south eastern slope of the Karadağ hill, about 200 m above the polje level (MTA 1998). It is a fossil cave, almost horizontal and 145 m long with a roof height varying between 1–9 m with many calcite speleothem formations. It is one of the tourist caves in Turkey, open to public access since 2003, with formed tracks and fixed lighting that extend almost the full length of the cave. Specimens were collected or observed during 3 visits on 20.03.2011, 10.07.2011 and 16.10.2011. Adult specimens from both sexes were only collected in July, but also observed in October; while only subadults could be found in March. Specimens were abundant in the dark zone all along the cave, located on their webs build on the speleothem formations.

Molecular data.

Specimens, locality and sequences with corresponding GenBank accession numbers analyzed in the present study are listed in Appendix 1. The final concatenated dataset of the three partial genes sequences includes 13 terminals and 1807 aligned characters (cox1 = 1049, rrnL = 420 and H3 = 338). Primer fidelity across taxa was not always consistent in cox1, consequently some specimens have slightly truncated sequence lengths. Uncorrected cox1 genetic divergences among terminal taxa, and uncorrected genetic cox1 divergences within and between the analyzed genera are summarized in Appendices 3 and 4.

Figure 1 shows the ML tree inferred using the combined data matrix. The new species groups with Typhlonesticus absoloni, Nesticus morisii, Nesticus obcaecatus and Nesticus idriacus. These five species constitute a highly supported evolutionary lineage (bootstrap support = 100). The remaining species included in the analysis belong to the genera Nesticus and Carpathonesticus, which constitute independent and highly supported evolutionary lineages as well. Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. occupies a basal position in the Typhlonesticus clade, and is the sister species of the European representatives. Within this lineage the evolutionary relationships of the species are poorly supported (low bootstrap supports).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

ML tree inferred using the concatenated dataset of cox1, rrnL mtDNA and H3 nuDNA gene fragments. Numbers next to nodes correspond to bootstrap support values. The tree was rooted using Canarionesticus quadridentatus from the Canary Islands.

The mean uncorrected p-distances of cox1 between and within taxa analyzed (Appendices 34) show high values. The mean p-distance between genera ranges from 11.29% (Nesticus versus Carpathonesticus) to 17.19 (Typhlonesticus versus Carpathonesticus). Also, the average evolutionary divergence within the representatives of the three Mediterranean genera analyzed ranges from 6.43% (Carpathonesticus) to 11.11% (Typhlonesticus).

Discussion

This paper describes a new species belonging to the genus Typhlonesticus. The molecular phylogenetic analysis including representatives of Nesticus, Carpathonesticus and Typhlonesticus, all of them from the Mediterranean basin indicates that the new species lies with Typhlonesticus absoloni along with Nesticus morisii, Nesticus obcaecatus and Nesticus idriacus. These five species form a highly supported clade (bootstrap value = 100) suggesting that all of them constitute a well-defined evolutionary lineage. Accordingly, we propose the following new combinations:

Typhlonesticus idriacus (Roewer, 1931), comb. n., ex Nesticus

Typhlonesticus morisii (Brignoli, 1975), comb. n., ex Nesticus

Typhlonesticus obcaecatus (Simon, 1907), comb. n., ex Nesticus.

These new data increase significantly the distribution of the genus, which is spread throughout the northern Mediterranean, from the Iberian Peninsula to Turkey.

To date, the Typhlonesticus generic diagnosis has been based on a single species (Kratochvíl 1933; Deeleman-Reinhold 1974; Lehtinen and Saaristo 1980). Certainly, the five species that currently constitute this genus will allow a more comprehensive diagnosis. Unfortunately we have no males of Typhlonesticus absoloni nor of Typhlonesticus morisii (see material examined). Moreover, a molecular systematic study of all Mediterranean Nesticidae is currently being performed to test the validity of the current generic status. Therefore, we believe it appropriate to postpone an extensive generic redescription until a robust phylogenetic framework for Mediterranean nesticids has been established and until we can examine males of Typhlonesticus absoloni and Typhlonesticus morisii.

A very special trait of these species is that all of them have highly troglomorphic characters, such as the absence of eyes or reduced eye size and number (only six eyes in Typhlonesticus obcaecatus) and lack of body pigment. In addition, most of these species are known from a single or a small number of caves, and all of them have very narrow ranges. On other hand, the uncorrected genetic distances of cox1 between Typhlonesticus gocmeni n. sp., Typhlonesticus absoloni, Typhlonesticus morisii, Typhlonesticus obcaecatus and Typhlonesticus idriacus range between 10.03 to 12.19%. Assuming an average substitution rate for arthropod mitochondrial genes of between 2% (DeSalle et al. 1987) and 2.3% (Brower 1994) we can conclude that the origin of these species preceded the Pleistocene glacial cycles. These data alongside its phylogenetic uniqueness (basal position and a deep genetic distance from the other Mediterranean genera) suggest that these species constitute an indigenous, proper fauna of Southern Europe and the Middle East and should be considered as primitive wildlife relicts, representative of a tropical or subtropical climate fauna, that should be serious candidates for protection through conservation.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Typhlonesticus gocmeni

Acknowledegments

We express our warmest gratitude to Meltem Altunöz Hatipoğlu (Turkey) for cooperating and assisting during our surveys to Keloğlan Cave. We also thank to Mr. Bülent Erdem (Turkey) for providing some literature. All drawings presented in this paper belong to Dr. Mykola Kovblyuk (Ukraine). The English of the final draft was kindly checked by Dr. David Penney (United Kingdom). This research was partially supported by CGL2004 05771/BOS and CGL2006-13374/BOS projects from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain).

Appendix 1

Species included in the phylogenetic analysis and GenBank accession numbers for the cox1, rrnL and H3 partial sequences.

Species Locality cox1 rrnL H3
Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n. Keloğlan Cave. Dodurgalar Town, Acıpayam District. Denizli Province. Turkey, (37°23'14.74"N, 29°34'18.29"E) KF939310 KF939307 KF939313
Typhlonesticus absoloni (Kratochvíl, 1933) Baba Tusha Cv. Trnovo, Virpazar Distr., Montenegro, (N42°17'25,1'' / E019°02'10,8'' / 350m) KF417410 KF417397 KF417416
Typhlonesticus idriacus (Roewer, 1931) Grotte Pre Oreak, Nimis, Friuli. Italy KF939312
Typhlonesticus morisii (Brignoli, 1975) Sotterranei del Forte di Vernante, Vernante, Cuneo, Italy KF939311 KF939308
Typhlonesticus obcaecatus (Simon, 1907) Cueva del Molino de Aso, Boltaña, Prov. Huesca, Spain. KF939309 EU746437
Nesticus eremita Simon, 1879 Pishurka Cave. (=Paganetijeva Pécina), Korchula, KorchulaIsl., Croatia. (N 42°57,568; E 17°07,751 / 58m) KF417414 KF417400
Nesticus speluncarum Pavesi, 1873 Shpella e Dragoit, Gjirokastër, Albania KF417405 KF417421
Nesticus arenstorffi Kulczyński, 1914 Chora Pecina Cave. Crni nugli, Dragalsko polje, Gorno krivoshije, Shelakov dol, Risan Distr. Montenegro. (N42°35'36,5'' / E018°41'41,6'' / 750m) KF417407 KF417403 KF417422
Nesticus henderickxi Bosselaers, 1998 Kournas Cave. Kournas. Crete KF417409 KF417404
Carpathonesticus hungaricus (Chyzer, 1894) Pestera Cave. Liliecilor, Cheile Ampoitei Gorges, Romania. (46°08'21.7748"N, 23°23'39.8507"E) KF417412 KF417402 KF417419
Carpathonesticus lotriensis Weiss, 1983 Unnamed Cave in Lotrioara Valley, Lotrului Mountains, Sibiu, Romania. (45°34'45.8319" / 24°11'16.7493") KF417413 KF417399 KF417418
Carpathonesticus simoni (Fage, 1931) Unnamed Cave in Bisbrita Gorges, Stogu-Vinturarita Mts., Romania. (45°11'42.2789"N, 024°02'03.2702"E / 491m) KF417408 KF417398 KF417417
Canarionesticus quadridentatus Wunderlich, 1992 Cv. Felipe Reventón, Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Canary Islands. (28°21'00.7727"N, 016°42'17.1028"W / 595m) KF417411 KF417415

Appendix 2

Primers and conditions used in the present study.

Gene fragment Primer Or. Sequence (5'-3') PCR Conditions Reference
cox1 C1-J-1718 F GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTCC 94°(1'); 94°(30"), 45°(30"), 72°(80") × 35; 72°(4') Simon et al. 1994
C1-N-2191 R CCCGGTAAAATTAAAATATAAACTTC Simon et al. 1994
C1-J-2183 F CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG 94°(1'); 94°(30"), 45°(30"), 72°(80") × 35; 72°(4') Simon et al. 1994
C1-N-2776 R GGATAATCAGAATATCGTCGAGG Hedin and Maddison 2001
rrnL LR-N-13398 F CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT 94°(1'); 94°(30"), 45°(35"), 72°(80") × 35; 72°(4') Simon et al. 1994
LR-J-12864 R CTCCGGTTTGAACTCAGATCA Arnedo et al. 2001
H3 H3a F ATGGCTCGTACCAAGCAGACVGC 94°(1'); 94°(30"), 48°(30"), 72°(80") × 35; 72°(4') Colgan et al. 1998
H3a R ATATCCTTRGGCATRATRGTGAC Colgan et al. 1998

Appendix 3

Uncorrected genetic distances of cox 1 gene between terminal taxa.

Canarionesticus quadridentatus
Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n 0.1874
Typhlonesticus obcaecatus 0.2002 0.1003
Typhlonesticus obsoloni 0.1941 0.1090 0.0947
Typhlonesticus morisii 0.1953 0.1178 0.1078 0.1078
Typhlonesticus idriacus 0.2021 0.1219 0.1144 0.1194 0.1205
Carpathonesticus simoni 0.1798 0.1785 0.1639 0.1706 0.1898 0.1860
Carpathonesticus lotriensis 0.1791 0.1687 0.1604 0.1715 0.1847 0.1845 0.0471
Carpathonesticus hungaricus 0.1763 0.1530 0.1531 0.1608 0.1705 0.1822 0.0697 0.0775
Nesticus arenstorffi 0.1880 0.1476 0.1458 0.1601 0.1774 0.1791 0.1096 0.1093 0.1007
Nesticus henderickxi 0.1788 0.1504 0.1515 0.1548 0.1572 0.1798 0.1265 0.1202 0.1143 0.0905
Nesticus speluncarum 0.1657 0.1485 0,1540 0.1582 0.1595 0.1694 0.1176 0.1075 0.1143 0.0791 0.0992
Nesticus eremita 0.1723 0.1507 0.1508 0.1609 0.1700 0.1660 0.1140 0.1102 0.1105 0.0760 0.0925 0.0190

Appendix 4

Average evolutionary divergence between groups (below diagonal), standard error (above diagonal), and average evolutionary divergence within groups (d) and standard error (SE) of cox 1 over sequence pairs.

Canarionesticus 0.0107 0.0106 0.0104 d SE
Typhlonesticus 0.1958 0.0104 0.0086 0.1111 0.0065
Carpathonesticus 0.1784 0.1719 0.0091 0.0643 0.0083
Nesticus 0.1762 0.1596 0.1129 0.0768 0.0059

Citation

Ribera C, Elverici M, Kunt KB, Özkütük RS (2014) Typhlonesticus gocmeni sp. n., a new cave-dwelling blind spider species from the Aegean region of Turkey (Araneae, Nesticidae). ZooKeys 419: 87–102. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.419.5739

References

  1. Agnarsson I, Coddington JA, Knoflach B. (2007) Morphology and evolution of cobweb spider male genitalia (Araneae, Theridiidae). The Journal of Arachnology 35: 334–395 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnedo MA, Oromí P, Ribera C. (2001) Radiation of the spider genus Dysdera (Araneae, Dysderidae) in the Canary Islands: Cladistic assessment based on multiple data sets. Cladistics 17: 313–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00129.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Bielak-Bielecki P, Rozwałka R. (2011) Nesticella mogera (Yaginuma, 1972) (Araneae: Nesticidae) in Poland Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Szczecińskiego Acta Biologica 18: 137–141 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brower AVZ. (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the Butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 6491–6495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colgan DJ, McLauchlan A, Wilson GDF, Livingston SP, Edgecombe GD, Macaranas J, Cassis G, Gray MR. (1998) Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution. Australian Journal of Zoology 46: 419–437. doi: 10.1071/ZO98048 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyle FA, McGarity AC. (1992) Two new species of Nesticus spiders from the southern Appalachians (Araneae, Nesticidae). The Journal of Arachnology 19: 161–168 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deeleman-Reinhold CL. (1974) The cave spider fauna of Montenegro (Araneae). Glasnik Republĭckog Zavoda za Zaštitu Prirode i Prirodnjačkog Muzeja iu Titogradu 6: 9–33 [Google Scholar]
  8. DeSalle R, Freedman T, Prager EM, Wilson AC. (1987) Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. Journal of Molecular Evolution 26: 157–164. doi: 10.1007/BF02111289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Cheung M, Heled J, Kearse M, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Thierer T, Wilson A. (2009) Geneious v4.6.5. Available from http://www.geneious.com
  10. Fage L. (1931) Araneae, 5e série, précédée d’un essai sur l’évolution souterraine et son déterminisme. In Biospeologica, LV. Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et Générale 71: 91–291 [Google Scholar]
  11. Giribet G, Wheeler WC, Muona J. (2002) DNA multiple sequence alignments In: Wheeler WC. (Ed) Basel DNA Multiple Sequence Alignments, Birkhauser-Verlag, 107–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hedin MC, Maddison WP. (2001) A combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the jumping spider subfamily Dendryphantinae (Araneae: Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 386–403. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huber B. (1993) Genital mechanics and sexual selection in the spider Nesticus cellulanus (Araneae: Nesticidae). Canadian journal of zoology 71: 2437–2447. doi: 10.1139/z93-340 [Google Scholar]
  14. Katoh K, Toh H. (2008) Improved accuracy of multiple ncRNA alignment by incorporating structural information into a MAFFT-based framework. BMC Bioinformatics 9: . doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kratochvíl J. (1933) Evropské druhy celedi Nesticidae Dahl. Práce Moravské přírodovědecké společnosti 8(10): 1–69 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehtinen PT, Saaristo M. (1980) Spiders of the Orientral-Australian region. II Nesticidae. Annales Zoologici Fennici 17: 47–66 [Google Scholar]
  17. López-Pancorbo A, Ribera C. (2011) Nesticus baeticus sp. n., a new troglobitic spider species from south-west Europe (Araneae, Nesticidae). ZooKeys 89: 1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MTA (1998) Dodurgalar Cave (Dodurgalar-Acıpayam-Denizli) research report, architectural and electrification as-built project. Mineral Research & Exploration General Directorate; Ankara, 12 pp [in Turkish] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marusik YM, Guseinov EF. (2003) Spiders (Arachnida: Aranei) of Azerbaijan. 1. New family and genus records. Arthropoda Selecta 12(1): 29–46 [Google Scholar]
  20. Platnick NI. (2013) The world spider catalog, version 13.0. American Museum of Natural History, http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/index.html[accessed 15 March 2013] [Google Scholar]
  21. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651–701 [Google Scholar]
  22. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Topçu A, Seyyar O, Demircan N. (2013) A contribution to the cave spider fauna of Turkey (Araneae). Zoology in the Middle East 59: 91–92. doi: 10.1080/09397140.2013.795075 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Typhlonesticus gocmeni

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES