Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Jun 10;53(31):8074–8078. doi: 10.1002/anie.201402525

A Surprising Chaotropic Anion-Induced Supramolecular Self-Assembly of Ionic Polymeric Micelles**

Yang Li 1, Yiguang Wang 1, Gang Huang 1, Xinpeng Ma 1, Jinming Gao 1,*
PMCID: PMC4126404  NIHMSID: NIHMS608035  PMID: 24916182

Abstract

Traditional micelle self-assembly is driven by the association of hydrophobic segments of amphiphilic molecules forming distinctive core-shell nanostructures in water. Here we report a surprising chaotropic anion-induced micellization of cationic ammonium-containing block copolymers. The resulting micelle nanoparticle consists of a large number of ion pairs (~60,000 in each hydrophobic core). Unlike chaotropic anions (e.g. ClO4), kosmotropic anions (e.g. SO42−) were not able to induce micelle formation. A positive cooperativity was observed during micellization, where only a 3-fold change in ClO4 concentration was necessary for micelle formation, similar to our previously reported ultra-pH responsive behaviour. This unique ion pair-containing micelle provides a useful model system to study the complex interplay of non-covalent interactions (e.g. electrostatic, van der Waals and hydrophobic forces) during micelle self-assembly. This may lead to new fundamental insights and strategies for the future design of cooperative systems in molecular sensing and drug delivery applications.

Keywords: micelle self-assembly, anti-Hofmeister effect, amphiphilic block copolymers, ion pairs


Responsive materials have received considerable attention for the construction of nanosystems that allow for highly selective recognition, catalysis, and transfer operations in a wide range of photonic, electronic and biological applications.[1] Various nanosystems that respond to changes in pH,[2] enzymatic expression,[3] redox,[4] temperature,[5] and light[6] have been successfully reported. The underlying science in the development of many of these responsive systems resides in the supramolecular self-assembly principles conceptualized over two decades ago by Whitesides and Lehn.[7] In contrast to covalent chemistry, supramolecular self-assembly engages a multitude of weak and reversible non-covalent interactions (e.g. electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonds, etc.) to achieve a thermodynamically stable nanostructure.[7a, 7c] This strategy has the advantage of reaching sizes (104–1010 Da) that are not easily achievable by covalent chemistry, and the resulting system often displays positive cooperativity compared to single molecular behaviours in solution.

Recently, our lab has established a series of tunable, ultra-pH sensitive micelle nanoparticles from different block copolymers (PEO-b-PR, where PEO is poly(ethylene oxide) and PR is the ionizable tertiary amine block).[2d, 2e, 8] At pH below the transition pH (pHt), micelles dissociate into unimers with protonated ammonium groups. At pH > pHt, the neutralized PR segments become hydrophobic and self-assemble into the micelle cores (left panel in Figure 1).[9] Hydrophobic micellization dramatically sharpens the pH transitions, where the fluorescence activation (on/off states) is narrowed to <0.25 pH unit, compared to 2 pH units for small molecular pH sensors.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Self-assembly of ionizable polymeric micelles by two independent mechanisms. The left panel shows the induction of micellization by pH increase, where the PR segments become neutralized and hydrophobic to drive micelle formation. Surprisingly, addition of chaotropic ions (CA, such as ClO4) at low pH also leads to micellization with ammonium PR segments (right panel). Structures of a series of PEO-b-PR copolymers (1–5) with different hydrophobic side chains are shown in the inset.

In this study, we report a serendipitous discovery of chaotropic anion-induced micellization of protonated PEO-b-PR copolymers at pH below pHt (right panel in Figure 1). Surprisingly, an anti-Hofmeister trend was observed, where chaotropic anions resulted in micellization but not the kosmotropic anions[10], in contrary to their effects in protein aggregation (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Chaotropic anions induce micelle self-assembly from PEO-b-PR copolymers with protonated PR segment, a reversed “salt-out” effect from their abilities to solubilize proteins (salt-in). (b) Illustration of FRET design to investigate CA-induced micelle self-assembly. Addition of CA results in micelle formation and efficient energy transfer from donor (TMR) to acceptor (Cy5) dyes. (c) Chaotropic anion-induced micelle self-assembly showing the anti-Hofmeister trend.

We first established a fluorescence energy resonance transfer (FRET) method to investigate the micelle self-assembly process. FRET is highly sensitive in detecting conformational and phase transitions of polymers/proteins because the energy transfer efficiency is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the donor-acceptor distance.[11] In our method, we conjugated block copolymers (1–5 in Figure 1 inset, Table S1)[12] with either a donor or acceptor dye. We chose PEO-b-poly(dipropylaminoethyl methacrylate) (3, pHt=6.1) as a model copolymer, and tetramethyl rhodamine (TMR, λexem = 545/580 nm)/Cy5 (λexem = 647/666 nm) as donor/acceptor, respectively.[13]

At pH 4, the tertiary amines in 3 (pHt = 6.1) were protonated and the resulting copolymers were soluble in water as dispersed cationic unimers. No FRET effect was observed due to the large distance between the unimers (therefore TMR and Cy5) in solution. Addition of chaotropic anions (e.g. ClO4, SCN or I) resulted in the decrease of fluorescence intensity from TMR and increase of emission intensity of Cy5 (Figure S1), indicating the formation of polymeric micelles. Micelle formation was hypothesized to bring TMR and Cy5 to close proximity within the micelle core, thereby dramatically increasing FRET efficiency (Figure 2b). In contrary, kosmotropic anions (e.g. SO42−, H2PO4) did not lead to any FRET transfer (Figure S2) even at concentrations close to their solubility limits (Table S2).

The FRET effects were quantified to compare different anions in their abilities to induce micellization (Figure 2c). FRET efficiency was normalized as (FA/FD)/(FA/FD)max, where FA and FD were the fluorescence intensity of TMR and Cy5 at different anion concentrations, respectively; (FA/FD)max was the maximum value of FA/FD (3.3) at high ClO4 concentrations. FRET efficiency was plotted as a function of concentration for different anions. Resultsdisplayed an anti-Hofmeister trend where chaotropic anions were able to induce unimer association (i.e. micellization) whereas the kosmotropic anions were not (Figure 2c). This is in contrary to the classical Hofmeister effect in protein solubilisation, where kosmotropic ions are known to induce protein aggregation in water but not the chaotropic ions.[14]

Copolymer 3 displayed different detection sensitivity toward the chaotropic anions. Data show FRET sensitivity followed the order of ClO4 > SCN > I > NO3. We define FC50 as the anion concentration that the FRET efficiency was at 50%. The values of FC50 were 11, 68 and 304 mM for ClO4, SCN, and I, respectively. For NO3, only weak FRET effect was observed at its saturation concentration (~3 M). More detailed examination shows that only 3-fold ClO4 concentration change (i.e. from 6 to 18 mM, Figure 2c) was necessary to increase FRET efficiency from 10% to 90%. This narrowed concentration dependence suggests an increased cooperative response similar to the ultra-pH response as reported previously.[2d, 2e, 8]

To further confirm chaotropic anion-induced micellization, we employed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to investigate the changes in morphology and hydrodynamic diameter during micelle transition, respectively. We used chloride anion (Cl) as a negative control. In the presence of 50 mM Cl, copolymer 3 stayed as a unimer at pH 5.0 (below its pHt at 6.1, Figure 3a). In contrast, copolymer 3 self-assembled into spherical micelles when Cl was replaced with ClO4 (Figure 3b). DLS analyses showed increase of hydrodynamic diameters from 7±2 to 26±3 nm when the anions were changed from Cl to ClO4, respectively (Figure 3). This size increase reflects the transition of copolymer 3 from unimer state to the micelle state, consistent with the FRET and TEM data. At pH 7.4, copolymer 3 was present as spherical micelles with hydrodynamic diameters at 27±2 and 28±3 nm in the presence of Cl and ClO4 anions, respectively (Figures S3S4). For non-ionizable amphiphilic block copolymers such as PEO-b-poly(D,L-lactic acid) (PEO-b-PLA), neither pH change nor ClO4 addition had any effects on the micelle state (Figure S5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

TEM and DLS analyses of micelle transition of copolymer 3 in the presence of Cl (a) and ClO4 anions (b) Concentrations of both anions were controlled at 50 mM (pH = 5.0). The scale bars are 100 nm in the TEM images.

We then studied the chaotropic anion-induced self-assembly in the presence of competing kosmotropic or borderline anions. Copolymer 3 was dissolved at pH 4 with different initial concentrations of competing SO42− or Cl. Then chaotropic anions ClO4 were added to induce micellization (Figures S6S9). Figure 4a shows the representative example of FRET efficiency as a function of ClO4 concentration. Addition of SO42− anions was able to decrease the sensitivity of ClO4 in micelle induction. We quantified the FC50 values to evaluate the effect of competing anions (Figure 4b). We observed an interesting bell curve as a function of the ionic strength of the competing anions. At low ionic strength (<0.1 M), addition of competing anions decreased the ability of ClO4 to induce micelle formation, consistent with their competition with the ammounium groups of the PR segment. At high ionic strength (>0.5 M) of SO42− or Cl, however, we observed an enhancement of ClO4 induced self-assembly. We attribute this effect to the more ordered bulk water structures at high kosmotropic ion concentrations, which makes the hydrophobic association during micelle self-assembly more favorable.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) ClO4-induced self-assembly of copolymer 3 in the presence of different concentrations of competing SO42− anions. (b) The FRET efficiency (FC50) from ClO4-induced self-assembly as a function of ionic strength of competing Cl and SO42− The anions. The solution pH was controlled at 4 in these studies.

Finally, we investigated the effect of hydrophobic strength of PR segment on chaotropic anion-induced micelleization (Figure 5a). We synthesized a series of PEO-b-PR copolymers (1–5 in Figure 1 inset) bearing different alkyl chain lengths from methyl to pentyl groups on the tertiary amines. Results showed a clear dependence of ClO4 -induced self-assembly on the hydrophobicity of the PR segment (Figure S10). With the least hydrophobic side chains (i.e. methyl in 1), no micellization was observed even at the highest ClO4 concentrations (1 M). In contrary, the most hydrophobic side chains (pentyl in 5) resulted in the most sensitive micellization induction by ClO4. The FC50 values were 2, 4, 35, 134 mM when the side chains were pentyl, butyl, propyl and ethyl groups, respectively (Figure 5a).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Hydrophobic strength of PR segment affects the ability of ClO4 in micelle induction. More hydrophobic PR segment (e.g. pentyl groups in 5) increases the ClO4 sensitivity to induce micelle formation. (b) An empirical model depicting two important contributing factors (hydrophobic alkyl chain length and chaotropic anions) on the self-assembly of ionic polymeric micelles.

Results from the above studies illustrate a highly unusual micelle self-assembly process from block copolymers with teriary ammonium groups induced by chaotropic anions. There are several unique features in the current nanosystem: first, chaotropic anions were able to form stable ion pairs with positively charged ammonium groups in the hydrophobic micelle core environment. Assuming majority of the ammonium groups are in the ionized state, this translates into ~60,000 ion pairs per micelle with an estimated core size of 14 nm (calculation based on 800 polymer chains per micelle[8b], 70–80 repeating units of amino group-containing monomers per polymer chain and PEO shell size of 6 nm[15]). Second, only chaotropic anions were able to induce micelle formation whereas the kosmotropic (SO42−) and borderline (Cl) anions did not pertain this ability. This trend appears to counter that in classical protein solublization studies. Third, the ability of chaotropic anions to induce micellization appears to show positive cooperativity similar to ultra-pH sensitive response. Our previous study showed fluorescence activation (10% to 90% response) occured within 0.25 pH unit (< 2-fold in [H+]). Current study show FRET transfer happened in a span of 3-fold [ClO4] change. Lastly, competition experiments with kosmotropic and borderline anions illustrated a bell curve behavior, which points to the complexity and subtle nature of the micelle self-assembly process in the current system.

We built an empirical model (Figure 5b) to depict the factors that contribute to the micelle self-assembly process. We hypothesize that the hydrophobic interactions from increasing alkyl chain lengths provide the dominant driving force for micelle formation. This is supported by the lack of micelle formaton when the side chain of the tertiary amines is methyl group (as indicated by the dashed line on the left arm of Figure 5b). Similarly, neutralized copolymer 1 did not form micelles at pH above its pHt.[2d] Meanwhile, anions also play a critical role in micellization. Kosmotropic anions, which are known to have strong hydration shells and weak polarization characteristics,[16] are energetically less favoralbe in the formation of ion pairs[17] and stabilization of ion pairs in the hydrophobic core. Chaotropic anions, with their strong polarizability and low energy cost at removing hydration sheath[18], allows for formation of stable ion pairs in the hydrophobic micelle core. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the thermodynamic contributions in enthalpy and entropy to the overall free energy of micelle phase transitions by the chaotropic anions.

In conclusion, we report a surprising micelle self-assembly process enabled by chaotropic anions with block copolymers containing hydrophobic, cationic ammonium groups. Unlike conventional micelles with simple hydrophobic cores, the current ionic micelles contain a large number of ion pairs in the core environment. The resulting micelles provide a good model system to study the fundamental process of supramolecular self-assembly through the interplay of non-covalent forces (e.g. electrostatic, van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions) in the aqueous environment. From the application standpoint, results from this study may also open up new opportunities of using stabilized ion-pair interactions for the delivery of charged drug molecules using tailored micelle systems.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Footnotes

**

This work is supported by the NIH (R01EB013149) and CPRIT (RP120094). We acknowledge the Simmons Cancer Center through an NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA142543).

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org.

References

  • 1.Stuart MA, Huck WT, Genzer J, Muller M, Ober C, Stamm M, Sukhorukov GB, Szleifer I, Tsukruk VV, Urban M, Winnik F, Zauscher S, Luzinov I, Minko S. Nat Mater. 2010;9:101–113. doi: 10.1038/nmat2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Lee ES, Na K, Bae YH. J Controlled Release. 2003;91:103–113. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bae Y, Fukushima S, Harada A, Kataoka K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:4640–4643. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lynn DM, Amiji MM, Langer R. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:1707–1710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zhou K, Wang Y, Huang X, Luby-Phelps K, Sumer BD, Gao J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:6109–6114. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Zhou K, Liu H, Zhang S, Huang X, Wang Y, Huang G, Sumer BD, Gao J. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:7803–7811. doi: 10.1021/ja300176w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Sun G, Cui H, Lin LY, Lee NS, Yang C, Neumann WL, Freskos JN, Shieh JJ, Dorshow RB, Wooley KL. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:8534–8543. doi: 10.1021/ja200182t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Wang C, Chen Q, Wang Z, Zhang X. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:8612–8615. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Olson ES, Jiang T, Aguilera TA, Nguyen QT, Ellies LG, Scadeng M, Tsien RY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:4311–4316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910283107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Bernardos A, Aznar E, Marcos MD, Martínez-Máñez R, Sancenón F, Soto J, Barat JM, Amorós P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:5884–5887. doi: 10.1002/anie.200900880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Andresen TL, Davidsen J, Begtrup M, Mouritsen OG, Jorgensen K. J Med Chem. 2004;47:1694–1703. doi: 10.1021/jm031029r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Li YL, Zhu L, Liu Z, Cheng R, Meng F, Cui JH, Ji SJ, Zhong Z. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:9914–9918. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Saito G, Swanson JA, Lee KD. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2003;55:199–215. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Shim MS, Bhang SH, Yoon K, Choi K, Xia Y. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:11899–11903. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Choi SW, Zhang Y, Xia Y. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:7904–7908. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Jeong B, Bae YH, Kim SW. J Controlled Release. 2000;63:155–163. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang Q, Clark CG, Wang M, Remsen EE, Wooley KL. Nano Lett. 2002;2:1051–1054. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Feigenbaum E, Diest K, Atwater HA. Nano Lett. 2010;10:2111–2116. doi: 10.1021/nl1006307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Volodkin DV, Skirtach AG, Möhwald H. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:1807–1809. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Skirtach AG, Muñoz Javier A, Kreft O, Köhler K, Piera Alberola A, Möhwald H, Parak WJ, Sukhorukov GB. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:4612–4617. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Sorrells JL, Shrestha R, Neumann WL, Wooley KL. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:8983–8986. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Whitesides GM, Mathias JP, Seto CT. Science. 1991;254:1312–1319. doi: 10.1126/science.1962191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lehn JM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1988;27:89–112. [Google Scholar]; c) Whitesides GM, Grzybowski B. Science. 2002;295:2418–2421. doi: 10.1126/science.1070821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Huang X, Huang G, Zhang S, Sagiyama K, Togao O, Ma X, Wang Y, Li Y, Soesbe TC, Sumer BD, Takahashi M, Sherry AD, Gao J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:8074–8078. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang Y, Zhou K, Huang G, Hensley C, Huang X, Ma X, Zhao T, Sumer BD, Deberardinis RJ, Gao J. Nat Mater. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nmat3819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Riess G. Prog Polym Sci. 2003;28:1107–1170. [Google Scholar]; b) Lee ES, Shin HJ, Na K, Bae YH. J Controlled Release. 2003;90:363–374. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00205-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Hu J, Zhang G, Ge Z, Liu S. Prog Polym Sci [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Zhang Y, Cremer PS. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2006;10:658–663. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Parsons DF, Bostrom M, Lo Nostro P, Ninham BW. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:12352–12367. doi: 10.1039/c1cp20538b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Kunz W, Lo Nostro P, Ninham BW. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;9:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Jares-Erijman EA, Jovin TM. Nat Biotech. 2003;21:1387–1395. doi: 10.1038/nbt896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sapsford KE, Berti L, Medintz IL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:4562–4589. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.a) Tsarevsky NV, Matyjaszewski K. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2270–2299. doi: 10.1021/cr050947p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ma Y, Tang Y, Billingham NC, Armes SP, Lewis AL, Lloyd AW, Salvage JP. Macromolecules. 2003;36:3475–3484. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.a) Ha T, Ting AY, Liang J, Caldwell WB, Deniz AA, Chemla DS, Schultz PG, Weiss S. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:893–898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Grunwell JR, Glass JL, Lacoste TD, Deniz AA, Chemla DS, Schultz PG. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:4295–4303. doi: 10.1021/ja0027620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.a) Hofmeister F. Archiv f experiment Pathol u Pharmakol. 1888;25:1–30. [Google Scholar]; b) Collins KD, Washabaugh MW. Q Rev Biophys. 1985;18:323–422. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang YY, Lai SK, Suk JS, Pace A, Cone R, Hanes J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:9726–9729. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.a) Leontidis E. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;7:81–91. [Google Scholar]; b) Merk V, Rehbock C, Becker F, Hagemann U, Nienhaus H, Barcikowski S. Langmuir. 2014;30:4213–4222. doi: 10.1021/la404556a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins KD. Biophys J. 1997;72:65–76. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78647-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.a) Underwood AL, Anacker EW. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1987;117:242–250. [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang Y, Cremer PS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15249–15253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907616106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES