Skip to main content
Journal of Women's Health logoLink to Journal of Women's Health
. 2014 Aug 1;23(8):649–656. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4484

Is Chronic Stress During Childhood Associated with Adult-Onset Vulvodynia?

Maheruh Khandker 1, Sonya S Brady 1, Elizabeth G Stewart 2, Bernard L Harlow 1,
PMCID: PMC4129923  PMID: 25046165

Abstract

Background: Vulvodynia is an unexplained chronic vulvar pain condition. Case-control studies provide opportunities to examine potential mechanisms by which vulvodynia may develop. Findings inform etiological models that can be tested in subsequent prospective studies.

Methods: A survey of interpersonal relationships and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders was administered to 215 case-control pairs of women with and without vulvodynia. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine associations between affect-based chronic stressors (i.e., living in fear of abuse, perceived abuse, and antecedent mood disorders) with vulvodynia. These associations were then examined among women with and without a history of childhood abuse.

Results: Among women with a history of severe childhood abuse, those with vulvodynia had three times the odds of living in fear of any abuse compared to women without vulvodynia (95% confidence interval: 1.0, 11.0), after adjustment for childhood poverty. Among women with no history of childhood abuse, those with vulvodynia had over six times the odds of antecedent mood disorder compared to women without vulvodynia (95% confidence interval: 1.9,19.6).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that affect-based chronic stressors may be important to the psychobiological mechanisms of vulvodynia. Prospective studies are recommended to test biopsychosocial models of the etiology of vulvodynia.

Introduction

Vulvodynia, an unexplained chronic vulvar pain condition, may now impact up to one in four women in the United States at some point in their lives.1 In a previous publication, we identified women from the general population suffering from this disorder: when compared with similarly aged controls, we observed a strong association between childhood victimization (physical and/or sexual abuse) and the onset of vulvodynia.2 Other negative experiences during childhood (i.e. living in fear of abuse, perceiving danger in one's home, school, or community) were also associated with the onset of vulvodynia.2 We further demonstrated that women with vulvodynia had a greater odds of meeting criteria for a mood disorder (depression and/or anxiety) than those without vulvodynia.3 These published findings are consistent with previous studies which show that women who have adverse childhood experiences are more likely than their non-exposed peers to develop physical and psychiatric problems throughout their lifespan.4–11

In the retrospective analyses that we present in this paper, we estimated the odds of childhood abuse (physical and/or sexual), odds other negative psychosocial experiences during childhood (i.e., living in fear of abuse, perceived danger), and history of mood disorder in relation to adult-onset vulvodynia within a larger population- and clinic-based sample of women than previously studied. In addition, we examined whether affect-based chronic stressors (i.e., living in fear of any abuse, perceived danger, and mood disorders) are associated with vulvodynia within subsets of women who have reported no childhood abuse, moderate abuse, or severe abuse. We conceptualize mood disorder as a chronic stressor because impairment in functioning over an extended period of time is part of its diagnostic criteria,12 and because mood disorder is associated with physiological dysregulation.13 We sought to determine whether the odds of affect-based chronic stressors differed among women with and without vulvodynia in the absence as opposed to the presence of childhood physical and/or sexual abuse.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by Human Subjects Research Committees at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the University of Minnesota. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating women.

Target population

Using Massachusetts Town Books (annual census publications that list residents by name, age, and address), 450 women ages 18–64 were randomly selected each month for 55 months from 3 ethnically diverse Boston neighborhoods and 6 suburban communities (defined geographically by ZIP code). Details pertaining to this sampling and screening protocol can be found elsewhere.14 A short questionnaire assessed whether women in the general population had experienced chronic vulvar pain (burning; knife-like sharp pain; or pain on contact during intercourse, at the time of tampon insertion, or during a pelvic exam) for 3 months or longer. After three mailings and telephone follow-up, 12,435 (67.2%) women completed the screening questionnaire (Fig. 1). The mean age of responders and non-responders was identical. Of 12,435 women who returned the questionnaire, 662 self-reported chronic vulvar pain and were eligible for further screening as potential vulvodynia cases. We excluded 1,851 women who reported chronic itching and/or other non-vulvodynia related symptoms. The remaining 9,922 women with no history of vulvar pain symptoms constituted the pool of eligible controls.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Flow chart of general population screening by which cases and controls were identified from the Boston Metropolitan area in the years 2000–2005. *An additional 56 cases from a clinic specializing in vulvovaginal disorders were included in the current analysis.

Selection of cases and controls

Women with symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of vulvodynia (n=662; see Fig. 1) were asked to participate in a telephone interview to rule out the presence of other diagnosable vulvar conditions (i.e., sexually transmitted diseases, yeast/bacterial infections, vulvar skin problems, etc.). Of these, 444 (67.1%) agreed to complete the telephone assessment, and 256 women were selected as eligible cases by our clinical expert coauthor (EGS).

A free pelvic examination that applied Friedrich's diagnostic criteria15 was offered to all eligible cases for diagnostic confirmation. For localized vulvodynia, cases were clinically confirmed by absence of signs or symptoms of known causes of vulvar pain and by the presence of pain on touch by a cotton swab in the vestibule. For generalized vulvodynia, cases were clinically confirmed by absence of signs or symptoms of known causes of vulvar pain and by the patient's description of burning, stinging, pain, or rawness with or without allodynia in the affected area. Localized and generalized cases of vulvodynia were combined.

Seventy-three cases (38%) from the general population agreed to the clinical examination and 56 (77%) were clinically confirmed as vulvodynia. The remaining 17 had no disorder (n=3), lichen sclerosis (n=2), vaginal infections (n=2), pelvic pain disorder (n=8), vaginismus (n=1), or irritable bowel syndrome (n=1) and were excluded. General population cases who did not agree to the clinical examination, but who were still interested in participating, remained enrolled in the study (n=121). To augment the number of vulvodynia cases, 65 additional women were enrolled from a clinic specializing in vulvovaginal disorders. Thus, our pool of cases comprised 121 clinically confirmed (56 from the general population and 65 from a vulvovaginal specialty clinic) and 121 nonclinically confirmed.

Of these 242 cases, 27 were excluded due to incomplete information regarding childhood abuse, psychosocial experiences, or psychiatric diagnoses, which were necessary for the current analyses. The resulting 215 cases consisted of 108 nonclinically confirmed and 107 clinically confirmed. All but two cases reported age at first onset of vulvar pain as 12 or later. Of the 9,922 women who self-reported no history of chronic vulvar pain symptoms, 520 women were contacted for interview (Fig. 1). For each case, we randomly selected a control within 5 years of age of the case from the same community. Once age-matched, a ‘‘reference age’’ was assigned to the control, identical to the age at first onset of chronic unexplained vulvar pain in her matched case. This reference age was used to assign mood and anxiety disorders as antecedent to the onset of vulvodynia in the case and a comparable time point in the matched control. A total of 215 matched controls were utilized in the current analyses.

Assessment of childhood abuse and negative psychosocial experiences

Childhood abuse, other negative psychosocial experiences (fear of abuse, perceived danger of abuse) and mood disorders (depression and anxiety) were assessed in the 215 cases and matched controls using a survey of interpersonal relationships16 and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition] Axis I Disorders (SCID).12 We adjusted for childhood poverty based on (1) whether the participant's family did not have enough money to pay for food, had to borrow money for medical expenses, did not have enough money to meet expenses, or received public assistance during the participant's childhood; (2) the work status of the primary wage earner; and (3) whether the home was owned when the participant was a child.

Childhood abuse was assessed using a 73-item questionnaire developed by researchers from Brown University, the Harvard School of Public Health, and Brigham and Women's Hospital.16 Items were derived from the Conflict Tactics Scale and the Pregnancy Abuse Assessment Screen,17,18 widely recognized as representing a broad spectrum of abuse.

Women selected the category that best described the frequency of exposure during childhood (defined to participants as younger than 12 years) using the responses “never,” “a few times or less,” or “more than a few times.” Physical abuse included the experience of being (1) pushed, grabbed, or shoved; (2) injured by objects thrown; (3) kicked, bit, or punched; (4) hit with a hand or fist; (5) choked or burned; or (6) physically attacked in some other way. We classified women “severely” physically abused if they (a) were ever choked, burned, or physically attacked, or (b) responded to any other item more than a few times. All other abuse was considered “moderate.” Women separately indicated whether they had lived in fear of events 1–6, above, and we used the same algorithm to classify women as living in moderate or severe fear of physical abuse. Sexual abuse was classified as being sexually assaulted never, a few times or less, or more than a few times. Women separately reported fear of sexual assault and fear of having to be sexual against her will. We considered women to be severely sexually abused or living in severe fear of sexual abuse if any item was answered “more than a few times.” Sexual abuse or fear of abuse a few times or less was considered moderate. The highest level of reported physical or sexual abuse (or feared abuse) was used to create two composite categorical variables: any abuse and fear of any abuse. We categorized the source of physical and/or sexual abuse as parent, other family, or nonfamily members. We also counted the number of listed perpetrators. Finally, we inquired whether respondents felt in danger at home, at school, or in their neighborhood during childhood.

Assessment of depression and anxiety

Psychiatric history was assessed using the SCID.12 The SCID is recognized as the “gold standard” in diagnosing major Axis I psychiatric disorders.12 For the purposes of this study, women were characterized as having a mood disorder if they met DSM criteria for major depressive disorder or dysthymia (chronic low levels of depression). Consistent with standard SCID procedures, participants were asked whether they had experienced “a two-week period of feeling depressed or down most of the day nearly every day,” or had “ever lost interest or pleasure in things that they usually enjoyed.” If subjects answered yes to either of these two screener questions, seven additional questions pertaining to sleeping habits, restlessness, fatigue, self-worth, ability to concentrate, appetite, and suicidal thoughts were administered. Age at first onset of each of these symptoms was assessed as well. If a participant responded affirmatively to five or more symptoms (including the screening questions), impairment was then assessed and if compromised, she was initially defined as having experienced major depression and assigned an age at first onset. New onset dysthymia was diagnosed according to DSM criteria as long as the participant met criteria for this disorder over a 2-year period.

Women with scores that indicated a history of panic, general anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, and/or agoraphobia were categorized as having an anxiety disorder. All interviewers were trained through in-person workshops that included video training procedures. Psychiatric colleagues with whom Dr. Harlow has worked for over 15 years in many of his ongoing studies initiated the training and were used to review SCIDs of subjects meeting DSM psychiatric criteria.

By utilizing the SCID, the age at first onset of depression and anxiety was established. Along with the reported age at first onset of vulvar pain, we were able to determine the temporal association between psychiatric disorders and vulvodynia. All cases and controls had complete information related to mood and anxiety disorders.

Statistical analysis

Conditional logistic regression was used to examine associations between affect-based chronic stressors (i.e., living in fear of abuse, perceived abuse, and antecedent mood disorders) with vulvodynia. Unconditional logistic regression tested whether the odds of affect-based chronic stressors (fear of any abuse, perceived danger of any abuse and antecedent mood disorder) differed between women with and without vulvodynia across strata of childhood abuse history. Poverty during childhood was included as a covariate in all conditional logistic regression models due to its potential association with vulvodynia onset, childhood abuse and mood disorder. To address the potential misclassification of the vulvodynia diagnosis, sensitivity analyses were performed in which analyses were repeated, restricting the sample only to clinically confirmed cases and their matched controls. We provide the sensitivity analysis odds ratios and confidence intervals for novel results and/or indicate whether this restriction changed any of our odds estimates.

Results

Women with and without vulvodynia were similar by age (due to matching), race, religion, education, work status of the main wage earner when the participant was a child, and childhood family home ownership (Table 1). Cases were slightly more likely than controls to report childhood poverty (20% versus 15%, respectively).

Table 1.

Study Population Demographics

  Cases (n=215) Controls (n=215)
Interview age
 <30 34.0% 34.0%
 30–39 28.4% 27.9%
 40–49 23.7% 24.7%
 ≥50 14.0% 13.5%
Reference agea
 <20 29.8% 30.7%
 20–24 25.1% 24.2%
 25–30 19.1% 20.0%
 >30 26.1% 25.1%
Race
 Caucasian 92.1% 87.0%
 Hispanic 4.2% 3.3%
 African American 1.9% 7.0%
 Other 1.9% 2.8%
Religion
 Catholic 51.2% 57.2%
 Jewish 14.9% 14.0%
 Protestant 15.8% 13.0%
 Other 18.1% 15.8%
Education
 Some college or less 23.7% 29.3%
 College graduate 44.7% 40.0%
 Graduate school 31.6% 30.7%
Main wage earnerb
 Owned business 56.3% 57.2%
 Worked 32.1% 28.4%
 Unemployed 8.4% 10.2%
 Other 1.9% 2.3%
 Unspecified 1.4% 1.9%
Family home ownership during childhood
 Yes 79.1% 77.7%
Childhood povertyc,d
 Yes 20% 14.9%
a

Age at first onset of vulvar pain symptoms for cases and matched reference age for controls to ensure comparable exposure assessments.

b

“Main wage earner” refers to the primary wage earner when participant was a child.

c

Childhood poverty was defined as on at least two occasions, participant's family did not have enough money to pay for food, had to borrow money for medical expenses, did not have enough money to meet expenses, or received public assistance.

d

Differences significant at p<0.05.

Women with vulvodynia had roughly three times the odds of experiencing any severe childhood abuse or living in severe fear of any abuse as a child compared to women with no vulvodynia (Table 2). This pattern of association was also observed for specific childhood abuse types (physical, sexual). Also, women with vulvodynia had twice the odds of identifying one or multiple perpetrators in comparison to women without vulvodynia. Women with vulvodynia were at two to three times the odds of reporting any feelings of danger, and as previously reported, 3 women with vulvodynia were at five times the odds of reporting antecedent depression and/or anxiety than women without vulvodynia (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5, 9.8). The magnitude of these associations remained largely unchanged when we restricted the analyses to the subgroup of clinically confirmed cases of vulvodynia and their matched controls.

Table 2.

Affect-Based Chronic Stressors and the Risk of Adult-Onset Vulvodynia

  Cases (n=215) Controls (n=215) Crude OR Adjusted OR [95% CI]a
Physical abuse
 None 31.1% 40.0% 1.0 1.0
 Moderate 47.0% 49.8% 1.2 1.2 [0.8, 2.0]
 Severe 21.9% 10.2% 2.5 2.4 [1.3, 4.4]
Fear of physical abuse
 None 59.4% 80.4% 1.0 1.0
 Moderate 25.4% 14.0% 2.1 2.1 [1.3, 3.5]
 Severe 14.6% 6.5% 2.9 3.0 [1.4, 6.2]
Sexual abuse
 None 87.0% 92.5% 1.0 1.0
 Moderate 8.4% 6.5% 1.4 1.4 [0.7, 2.9]
 Severe 4.7% 0.9% 9.3 9.7 [1.2, 79.1]
Fear of sexual abuse
 None 89.8% 94.0% 1.0 1.0
 Moderate 5.1% 5.1% 1.0 1.1 [0.4, 2.5]
 Severe 5.1% 0.9% b b
Any abusec
 None 28.8% 38.1% 1.0 1.0
 Moderate 47.9% 51.6% 1.2 1.2 [0.8, 1.8]
 Severe 23.3% 10.3% 2.7 2.9 [1.5, 4.8]
Lived in fear of any abusec,d
 None 58.1% 76.7% 1.0 1.0
 Moderate 25.6% 16.7% 1.8 1.8 [1.1, 2.9]
 Severe 16.3% 6.5% 3.4 3.5 [1.6, 7.2]
Perpetrator of any abusec
 No perpetrators 23.7% 35.8% 1.0 1.0
 Nonfamily 21.4% 12.6% 2.6 2.7 [1.4, 5.1]
 Other family 20.5% 14.9% 1.9 1.9 [1.1, 3.3]
 Parent 14.9% 10.7% 2.1 2.0 [1.0, 4.0]
 Not reported 19.5% 26.1% 1.1 1.1 [0.6, 1.0]
Number of perpetrator types of any abusec
 No perpetrators 23.7% 35.8% 1.0 1.0
 One perpetrators 37.7% 26.1% 2.1 2.0 [1.2, 3.3]
 Multiple perpetrators 19.1% 12.1% 2.4 2.4 [1.3, 4.5]
 Unknown sources 19.5% 26.1% 1.0 1.1 [0.6, 1.0]
Felt danger
 Any feelings of danger 33.5% 16.3% 2.5 2.5 [1.5, 4.0]
Felt danger
 In the home
  Yes 23.3% 11.6% 2.4 2.3 [1.4, 4.1]
 In neighborhood
  Yes 14.4% 7.9% 2.0 1.7 [0.8, 3.2]
 At school
  Yes 9.3% 3.3% 3.2 2.9 [1.1, 7.3]
Mood disorders
 Any diagnosis 26.1% 8.4% 4.8 4.9 [2.5, 9.8]
a

Adjusted for poverty during childhood.

b

Any childhood physical and/or sexual abuse.

c

Only four cases and three controls reported fear and no abuse.

d

Effect could not be estimated due to small cell counts for stratum.

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Across the subsets of women who experienced no childhood physical and/or sexual abuse, moderate abuse, or severe abuse, there was a gradient in the magnitude of the associations between vulvodynia and living in fear of any abuse as a child and vulvodynia and having a history of antecedent mood disorders (Table 3). A test for heterogeneity of these odds ratios was not significant and thus we cannot rule out chance as explaining these divergent odds ratios. Nevertheless, among women who reported no history of childhood abuse (physical and/or sexual), only a small proportion of women reported living in fear of abuse as a child and its association with vulvodynia was modest at best. In contrast, among women who reported a history of severe childhood abuse, abused women with vulvodynia had three times the odds of living in fear of any abuse as a child compared to abused women without vulvodynia (95% CI: 1.0, 11.0; sensitivity analysis: odds ratio [OR]=3.3; 95% CI: 0.9, 14.2).

Table 3.

Affect-Based Chronic Stressors, Mood Disorders, and the Risk of Vulvodynia Within Childhood Abuse Groups (n=430)

  No abusea Moderate abusea Severe abusea
  Cases (n=62) Controls (n=82) Adjusted OR [95% CI]b Cases (n=103) Controls (n=111) Adjusted OR [95% CI]b Cases (n=50) Controls (n=22) Adjusted OR [95% CI]b
Lived in fear of any abuse
 No fear 93.5% 96.3% 1.0 58.3% 71.2% 1.0 14.0% 31.8% 1.0
 Any fear 6.5% 3.7% 1.7 [0.4, 7.9] 41.7% 28.8% 1.8 [1.0, 3.2] 86.0% 68.2% 3.2 [1.0, 11.0]
Perceived danger
 No feelings of danger 88.7% 95.1% 1.0 68.0% 82.0% 1.0 36.0% 50.0% 1.0
 Feelings of danger 11.3% 4.9% 2.3 [0.7, 8.4] 32.0% 18.0% 2.2 [1.1, 4.2] 64.0% 50.0% 1.9 [0.6, 5.4]
Mood disorders
 No disorder 75.8% 95.1% 1.0 78.6% 91.9% 1.0 62.0% 77.3% 1.0
 Diagnosed disorder 24.2% 4.9% 6.1 [1.9, 19.6] 21.4% 8.1% 3.1 [1.3, 7.1] 38.0% 22.7% 2.4 [0.7, 7.9]
a

Any childhood physical and/or sexual abuse.

b

Adjusted for poverty during childhood.

The association between vulvodynia and mood disorders showed a different pattern across childhood abuse exposures. Among women who reported no history of childhood abuse (physical and/or sexual), nonabused women with vulvodynia had more than six times the odds of antecedent mood disorders compared with nonabused women without vulvodynia (95% CI: 1.9, 19.6; sensitivity analysis: OR=5.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 24.8). The magnitude of this association weakened to statistical nonsignificance among women with a history of severe abuse.

The observed associations of living in fear, perceived danger, and mood disorders with vulvodynia among women having experienced moderate abuse fell between those observed for women with no history of abuse and women with a history of severe abuse.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilize a large population-based and clinic-based sample of women to examine the associations between affect-based chronic stressors and vulvodynia within subsets of women who have experienced no childhood physical and/or sexual abuse, moderate abuse, or severe abuse. Two novel findings emerged. First, living in fear of abuse as a child and its association with vulvodynia may vary depending upon the severity of the victimization itself. Second, having a mood disorder may be associated with the development of vulvodynia in the absence of childhood abuse. Below, we consider each of these findings in the context of the broader literature on chronic stress and inflammation.

Among women who were more severely abused as children, living in fear of abuse was more strongly associated with vulvodynia than that observed in women reporting no history of childhood abuse. Fear of abuse and perceived danger are both appraisals of threat. However, within a population of women who were already severely abused as a child, those with vulvodynia had three times the odds of living in fear of abuse than women with no vulvar pain history. Fear is described as an emotional state that involves physiological arousal that motivates cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses directed towards alleviating the threat.19 Fear, rather than physical insult, may be a mechanism by which physical and sexual abuses are associated with vulvodynia. Chronic stress has been shown to dysregulate the body's hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) and immune systems, which play a significant role in the body's adaptation to stress.5,8–10,20–27 When these systems are overtaxed or managed ineffectively, pathophysiological processes may lead to inflammation in various parts of the body.20,27 In addition, psychiatric symptoms resulting from chronic stress and a heightened sense of vigilance or perceived danger may both overtax the body's HPAA and immune systems.5,22,23,27 A number of scientists have posited that vulvodynia may be the result of an altered immunoinflammatory response.2,3,28–31 If psychosocial risk factors associated with vulvodynia (e.g., childhood abuse) lead to a compromised immune system, this mechanistic pathway would be consistent with the broader, growing literature on the role of chronic stress in generating inflammation.32,33 Childhood fear of abuse could be conceptualized as a chronic stressor. Women who lived in fear as children may have ruminated about past instances of abuse and dreaded the possible reoccurrence of abuse. Rumination has been linked with endocrine and immunologic activation and dysregulation.34

Our second novel finding involved the association between mood disorders and the development of vulvodynia. Interestingly, having a history of mood disorder conferred a modest nonsignificant association with vulvodynia among women who reported severe childhood abuse. It is possible that physiological systems of these women were already “tested” by having to cope with severe childhood abuse.35,36 In contrast, having a mood disorder was significantly associated with the development of vulvodynia among women who reported no history of childhood abuse. The physiological systems of these women may not have been “tested” until women developed a mood disorder. Our findings, as well as the broader literature, support the conceptualization of mood disorder as a chronic stressor in terms of its potential for generating or exacerbating physiological dysregulation.

Although we observed that mood disorder was an antecedent factor associated with vulvodynia, we cannot rule out that both mood disorders and vulvodynia may occur through common immunoinflammatory mechanisms. Associations between depression and inflammation have been observed among adults in several community-based studies,37–40 and our epidemiological results have shown a number of inflammatory-related factors, such as infections and allergenic exposures, to be associated with vulvodynia as well. Lastly, it is also possible that a “third variable” explanation could account for the association between antecedent mood disorder and vulvodynia. Genetic propensity towards inflammation, for example, could influence both the likelihood of developing depression and vulvodynia.41

Our findings should be considered in light of the study's limitations. Some women may have inaccurately recalled the timing of abuse and details related to the kinds of abuse they experienced, which would lead to some misclassification. It is also possible that women with vulvodynia may have been more likely than women without vulvodynia to recall abuse, fear of abuse, and levels of severity. We can also not rule out that women with vulvar pain may have differentially recalled their psychiatric history compared to matched controls. However, structured clinical interviews such as the SCID contribute less recall bias than unstructured interviews and self-reported measures.42 Outcome misclassification is also possible. However, we performed sensitivity analyses to address possible misclassification of the vulvodynia diagnosis and observed similar results in analyses restricted to subgroups of clinically and nonclinically confirmed cases and their matched controls. Nevertheless, future studies should attempt to include only clinically confirmed cases. In addition, for 2 of the 215 cases we were not able to determine whether abuse was antecedent to the onset of vulvar pain. After restricting analyses to those 213 cases with age at vulvodynia onset of 12 or greater (and matched controls with the same reference age), the results remained the same. Combining generalized and localized vulvodynia could have possibly made it more difficult for us to detect associations between affect-based chronic stressors and vulvodynia. However, if affect-based chronic stressors are associated with only one type of vulvodynia, then combining the two types of vulvodynia would by definition weaken our results. Thus, our findings might be stronger than reported. Whether our findings are specific to a subtype of vulvodynia could certainly be examined in future research. Finally, more precise estimates may be obtained through studies utilizing a larger number of cases and controls, or conceivably, prospective studies of childhood trauma and indicators of vulvar pain onset. The heterogeneity of the odds ratios we observed across levels of childhood victimization did not reach statistical significance and thus we are cautious in our interpretation of these findings.

In summary, our findings suggest that affect-based chronic stressors may be important to the psychobiological mechanisms of vulvodynia. Specifically, living in fear of childhood abuse and coping with a mood disorder may contribute to the onset of vulvodynia. Prospective studies are recommended to inform the viability of this potential causal hypothesis. Understanding the different mechanisms by which vulvodynia may develop is critical to prevention. A better understanding of the mechanisms of vulvodynia may also assist health care providers in treating women who have been diagnosed with the condition. Women diagnosed with vulvodynia often desire information and struggle to explain their chronic pain to others.43 A promising area of future research is the utilization of biomarkers to investigate psychobiological mechanisms of inflammation in relation to the onset of vulvodynia. Biomarkers may conceivably be used to identify subsets of women who could benefit from specific treatments. Thus, developing and testing biopsychosocial models of the pathogenesis of vulvodynia holds great promise for the prevention and treatment of this highly prevalent chronic pain condition.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HD038428). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding sources.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Reed BD, Harlow SD, Sen A, et al. Prevalence and demographic characteristics of vulvodynia in a population-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:170.e1–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harlow BL, Stewart EG. Adult-onset vulvodynia in relation to childhood violence victimization. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:871–880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khandker M, Brady SS, Vitonis AF, Maclehose RF, Stewart EG, Harlow BL. The influence of depression and anxiety on risk of adult onset vulvodynia. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;10:1445–1451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barth J, Schumacher M, Herrmann-Lingen C. Depression as a risk factor for mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2004;66:802–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hemingway H, Shipley M, Mullen MJ, et al. Social and psychosocial influences on inflammatory markers and vascular function in civil servants (the Whitehall II study). Am J Cardiol 2003;92:984–987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Herbert TB, Cohen S. Depression and immunity: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 1993;113:472–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kendler KS, Kuhn JW, Prescott CA. Childhood sexual abuse, stressful life events and risk for major depression in women. Psychol Med 2004;34:1475–1482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McEwen BS. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;840:33–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller GE, Chen E. Life stress and diminished expression of genes encoding glucocorticoid receptor and beta2-adrenergic receptor in children with asthma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:5496–5501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miller GE, Rohleder N, Cole SW. Chronic interpersonal stress predicts activation of pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways 6 months later. Psychosom Med 2009;71:57–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Melle JP, de Jonge P, Spijkerman TA, et al. Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2004;66:814–822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB. Users guide to the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders. New York: Biometrics Research, 1996 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whooley MA. Depression and cardiovascular disease: healing the broken-hearted. JAMA 2006;295:2874–2881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harlow BL, Vitonis AF, Stewart EG. Influence of oral contraceptive use on the risk of adult-onset vulvodynia. J Reprod Med 2008;53:102–110 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Friedrich EG., Jr Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. J Reprod Med 1987; 32:110–114 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wise L, Zierler S, Krieger N, Harlow BL. Adult onset of major depressive disorder in relation to childhood and adolescent violence victimization: a case-control study. Lancet 2001;358:881–887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA 1992;267:3176–3178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Straus MA, Gelles RJ, Steinmetz SK. Behind closed doors: a survey of family violence in America. New York, NY: Doubleday, 1980 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ruiter RAC, Abraham C, Kok G. Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychol Health 2001;16:613–630 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cicchetti D. Allostatic load. Dev Psychopathol 2011;23:723–724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Oshri A. Interactive effects of corticotropin releasing hormone receptor 1, serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region, and child maltreatment on diurnal cortisol regulation and internalizing symptomatology. Dev Psychopathol 2011;23:1125–1138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP. Psychological stress, cytokine production, and severity of upper respiratory illness. Psychosom Med 1999;61:175–180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Essex MJ, Shirtcliff EA, Burk LR, et al. Influence of early life stress on later hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning and its covariation with mental health symptoms: A study of the allostatic process from childhood into adolescence. Dev Psychopathol 2011;23:1039–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ganzel BL, Morris PA, Wethington E. Allostasis and the human brain: Integrating models of stress from the social and life sciences. Psychol Rev 2010;117:134–174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med 1998;338:171–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Repetti RL, Robles TF, Reynolds B. Allostatic processes in the family. Dev Psychopathol 2011;23:921–938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weiss SJ. Neurobiological alterations associated with traumatic stress. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2007;43:114–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bornstein J, Cohen Y, Zarfati D, Sela S, Ophir E. Involvement of heparanase in the pathogenesis of localized vulvodynia. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2008;27:136–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gerber S, Bongiovanni AM, Ledger WJ, Witkin SS. A deficiency in interferon-alpha production in women with vulvar vestibulitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:361–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goetsch MF, Morgan TK, Korcheva VB, Li H, Peters D, Leclair CM. Histologic and receptor analysis of primary and secondary vestibulodynia and controls: A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:614..e1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harlow BL, He W, Nguyen RH. Allergic reactions and risk of vulvodynia. Ann Epidemiol 2009;19:771–777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miller GE, Chen E, Parker KJ. Psychological Stress in Childhood and Susceptibility to the Chronic Diseases of Aging; Moving Toward a Model of Behavioral and Biological Mechanism. Psych Bull 2011;137,959–997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Doyle WJ, Miller GE, et al. Chronic stress, glucocorticoid receptor resistance, inflammation and disease risk. Proc Natl Acad Sc U S A 2012;109:5995–5999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brosschot JF, Gerin W, Thayer JF. The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. J Psychosom Res 2006;60:113–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ingram RE. and Luxton DD. Vulnerability Stress Model. In: Hankin BL, Abela JRZ, eds. Development of psychopathology: A vulnerability perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005:32–46 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Monroe SM, Simons AD. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life-stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol Bull 1991;110:406–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bremmer MA, Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, et al. Inflammatory markers in late-life depression: Results from a population-based study. J Affect Disord 2008;106:249–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ford DE. and Erlinger TP. Depression and C-reactive protein in US adults: Data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1010–1014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kuo HK, Yen CJ, Chang CH, Kuo CK, Chen JH, Sorond F. Relation of C-reactive protein to stroke, cognitive disorders, and depression in the general population: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:371–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miller GE, Rohleder N, Stetler C, Kirschbaum C. Clinical depression and regulation of the inflammatory response during acute stress. Psychosom Med 2005;67:679–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dantzer R, O'Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9:46–56. Review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sanchez-Villegas A, Schlatter J, Ortuno F, et al. Validity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression among participants in a cohort study using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I). BMC Psychiatry 2008;8:43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gunter J. Vulvodynia: New thoughts on a devastating condition. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007;62:812–819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES