Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2014 Sep;80(17):5304–5316. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01480-14

Iron Triggers λSo Prophage Induction and Release of Extracellular DNA in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 Biofilms

Lucas Binnenkade a,b, Laura Teichmann a, Kai M Thormann a,b,
Editor: A M Spormann
PMCID: PMC4136115  PMID: 24951794

Abstract

Prophages are ubiquitous elements within bacterial chromosomes and affect host physiology and ecology in multiple ways. We have previously demonstrated that phage-induced lysis is required for extracellular DNA (eDNA) release and normal biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Here, we investigated the regulatory mechanisms of prophage λSo spatiotemporal induction in biofilms. To this end, we used a functional fluorescence fusion to monitor λSo activation in various mutant backgrounds and in response to different physiological conditions. λSo induction occurred mainly in a subpopulation of filamentous cells in a strictly RecA-dependent manner, implicating oxidative stress-induced DNA damage as the major trigger. Accordingly, mutants affected in the oxidative stress response (ΔoxyR) or iron homeostasis (Δfur) displayed drastically increased levels of phage induction and abnormal biofilm formation, while planktonic cells were not or only marginally affected. To further investigate the role of oxidative stress, we performed a mutant screen and identified two independent amino acid substitutions in OxyR (T104N and L197P) that suppress induction of λSo by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). However, λSo induction was not suppressed in biofilms formed by both mutants, suggesting a minor role of intracellular H2O2 in this process. In contrast, addition of iron to biofilms strongly enhanced λSo induction and eDNA release, while both processes were significantly suppressed at low iron levels, strongly indicating that iron is the limiting factor. We conclude that uptake of iron during biofilm formation triggers λSo-mediated lysis of a subpopulation of cells, likely by an increase in iron-mediated DNA damage sensed by RecA.

INTRODUCTION

For the majority of bacteria, the predominant natural lifestyle is assumed to be within surface-associated communities enclosed in self-produced hydrated polymeric matrices, which are commonly referred to as biofilms (1). In comparison to the planktonic lifestyle, biofilm formation provides important advantages, such as elevated concentrations of nutrients in proximity to abiotic surfaces, enhanced genetic exchange, and increased tolerance toward antimicrobial agents, biocides, and host immune responses. Furthermore, living in biofilms protects cells from environmental perturbations causing physical stress, such as drought, UV light, pH gradients, and oxidative stress (2). The integrity and stability of biofilms depends on direct cell-cell and cell-surface interactions and on the extracellular matrix composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), a complex mixture of diverse exopolysaccharides, proteins (including cell appendages such as fimbriae, pili, and flagella), lipids, and extracellular DNA (eDNA) (3). eDNA was initially thought to be mainly residual debris of lysed cells; however, a number of recent studies clearly showed that this compound constitutes an important structural component of the biofilm matrix for many bacterial species (410). Additionally, eDNA can serve as a source of phosphorus, carbon, and nitrogen (11, 12), provide a genetic pool for horizontal gene transfer (13), exhibit antimicrobial activity (14), induce antibiotic resistance (14, 15), and facilitate twitching motility-mediated biofilm expansion (16). The origin of eDNA in biofilms has been a focus of numerous studies. So far, three different mechanisms that may allow DNA to be released from bacteria and to accumulate in the biofilm environment have been described: vesiculation (17, 18), secretion (1921), and cell lysis, which may be the most common source of eDNA in natural environments (5, 6, 22, 23).

As one common mechanism, bacterial cell lysis may occur through induction of prophages, which, either functional or cryptic, often reside stably in bacterial genomes and constitute substantial amounts of bacterial DNA. About 60 to 70% of all sequenced genomes contain prophages (reviewed in reference 24); however, despite this substantial abundance, little is known about their implication in host physiology and ecology. The presence of prophages can provide the host with fitness advantages such as increased growth rates, virulence, and resistance against antibiotics and environmental stress factors (25, 26). A number of studies on both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species have demonstrated the impact of prophages on biofilm development and cell lysis-mediated eDNA release (9, 2733). However, environmental signals and molecular mechanisms that control prophage induction/excision under biofilm conditions remain elusive for most species. The fact that most prophages in environmental isolates are inducible by DNA-damaging agents (24, 3437) indicates the existence of common physiological and molecular principles for the control of prophage induction, which might also apply during biofilm growth of the corresponding host bacteria.

We have recently investigated the role of prophage-induced lysis for biofilm formation of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, a Gram-negative facultatively anaerobic gammaproteobacterium. Members of this genus are often recognized for their capacity to utilize a broad variety of inorganic and organic compounds as alternative terminal electron acceptors under anaerobic conditions. S. oneidensis MR-1 harbors three prophages, LambdaSo (λSo), MuSo1, and MuSo2, of which λSo and MuSo2 are capable of forming infectious particles. Particularly, λSo contributes to cell lysis and eDNA accumulation under biofilm conditions, and accordingly, deletion of the λSo prophage results in strongly impaired biofilm formation of MR-1 (9).

In this study, we aimed to identify the molecular mechanisms and biofilm-specific signals that underlie λSo prophage induction and cell lysis in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. To monitor the spatiotemporal induction of prophage λSo under hydrodynamic biofilm conditions at the single-cell level, we constructed a reporter strain harboring a transcriptional fusion of the putative regulator of early λSo gene transcription (Cro) and the yellow fluorescent protein Venus (38). Using that strain, we characterized λSo prophage induction in various genetic backgrounds under different environmental conditions. Our results indicate that colonization of surfaces implies a conflict between high requirements for iron, iron-mediated DNA stress, prophage-induced lysis, and release of biofilm-promoting factors such as eDNA. We show that tight regulation of these partially antagonistic factors is required for successful biofilm formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth conditions and media.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are summarized in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Escherichia coli and S. oneidensis strains were routinely grown as described earlier (9). Biofilms of S. oneidensis were cultivated under hydrodynamic or static conditions in LM medium containing 0.5 mM or 15 mM lactate, respectively. FeCl2 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or desferrioxamine (DFO; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 20 μM when indicated. To artificially induce prophage expression and production, cells were either exposed to 1,200 J/m2 UVC radiation at 254 nm (39) or to mitomycin C (Carl-Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at a final concentration of 10 μg ml−1. To induce superoxide generation, planktonic cells were cultivated in LM medium until mid-logarithmic phase and then incubated with paraquat (methyl viologen dichloride hydrate; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) at a final concentration of 0.2 or 1 mM (40).

Vector and strain constructions.

Cloning of DNA fragments was carried out according to standard protocols (41) using appropriate kits (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and enzymes (New England BioLabs, Frankfurt, Germany; Fermentas, St Leon-Rot, Germany). S. oneidensis MR-1 strains constitutively expressing egfp or ecfp were constructed by using a modified Tn7 delivery system (9). In-frame deletions into S. oneidensis MR-1 were introduced essentially as reported earlier (42) using the suicide vector pNTPS-138-R6K and appropriate primer pairs (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). In-frame deletion mutants were complemented by reinsertion of the corresponding wild-type gene copy into the native locus (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This was also possible for the ΔrecA mutant, likely enabled by ectopic recA expression from the reintegration vector. Genome-integrated transcriptional fusions to venus were constructed in a similar manner, using pXVENC-2 as the template for the venus coding sequence and pNPTS-138-R6K for markerless insertion downstream of each gene of interest. An optimal ribosomal binding site (AGGAGGNNNNNN) was inserted upstream of each start codon (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). For plasmid-based promoter fusion studies, vector pBBR1-MCS5-TT-RBS-venus was constructed using pBBR1-MCS5-TT and pXVENC-2 as the template. A ribosomal binding site was inserted as elaborated above. Putative promoter regions were cloned into the multiple cloning site, and the resulting plasmid was introduced into S. oneidensis MR-1 by conjugation.

Total RNA extraction and RT-PCR.

For operon mapping of the putative lysis operon of prophage LambdaSo, total RNA was extracted from S. oneidensis MR-1 cells by using a hot-phenol method (43) as described previously (9). To induce transcription of the putative lysis operon, exponentially growing planktonic cultures were incubated with mitomycin C for 2 h, harvested by centrifugation (1 min at 13,000 × g and 4°C), and stored in liquid nitrogen. Residual contaminating DNA was removed by using the Turbo DNA-free kit (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quality of the RNA was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. The extracted total RNA was then applied as the template for random-primed first-strand cDNA synthesis using BioScript reverse transcriptase (RT; Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Operon mapping was carried out by PCR using the resulting cDNA as the template and appropriate primer pairs bracketing the gaps between the genes that were analyzed. A corresponding total RNA sample taken prior to the reverse transcriptase reaction served as a negative control, and chromosomal DNA served as a positive control. The PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.

qPCR.

S. oneidensis MR-1 cultures were grown in LB medium at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of approximately 1 and exposed to 2 mM H2O2 for 15 min. Directly before and after the H2O2 treatment, cells were harvested by centrifugation (1 min at 13,000 × g and 4°C) and stored immediately in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were carried out essentially as described for RT-PCR. The cDNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR; C1000 Thermal Cycler with the CFX96 Real-Time System; Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany) by using the Sybr green detection system, MicroAmp Optical 96-well reaction plates, and Optica adhesive covers (Applied Biosystems Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Primers used to determine the expression of the corresponding genes are summarized in Table S2 in the supplemental material. The cycle threshold (CT) was determined automatically by use of Real-Time CFX Manager 2.1 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH) after 40 cycles. All CT values were normalized separately to CT values obtained for the 16S rRNA and recA (SO_3430) genes of each sample. Primer efficiencies and relative expression values were determined according to Pfaffl (44). Each strain was assayed in biological duplicates in two independent experiments.

β-Galactosidase activity in culture supernatants.

Extracellular β-galactosidase activity of culture supernatants was determined as previously described (45). Exponentially growing planktonic cultures of S. oneidensis MR-1 were incubated with mitomycin C for 3 h. All strains harbored plasmid pME6031-PmotB-lacZ for constitutive cytoplasmic expression of β-galactosidase. To obtain cell-free supernatant, the samples were centrifuged at 2,500 × g for 5 min and subsequently filtered (0.2-μm filter). β-Galactosidase assays on supernatants were carried out in reaction tubes at 30°C according to standard protocols (46). The β-galactosidase activity was normalized to the OD600 of the culture prior to incubation with mitomycin C. Lysis assays were conducted in triplicate in at least two independent experiments.

Time-lapse analysis of phage-induced lysis.

Exponentially growing cultures of strain S2391 were exposed to UVC light and incubated at 30°C with agitation for 3 h. A 4-μl volume of propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) stock solution (1 mg ml−1) was added on top of agar pads and incubated for several minutes to be completely absorbed into the agar. Subsequently, 4 μl of the cell suspension (OD600, 0.5) was placed on the same agar pad (1% agarose in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 6.6 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4) and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy at 10-min intervals using an Axio Imager.M1 microscope (Zeiss, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Zeiss Plan Apochromate 100×/1.4 differential interference contrast microscopy (DIC) objective.

Determination of cell length.

Exponentially growing planktonic cultures of S. oneidensis MR-1 were incubated with mitomycin C at a final concentration of 10 μg ml−1 for 4 h. All cell suspensions were adjusted to an OD600 of 0.5, and 4 μl of each suspension was placed on an agar pad. Image acquisition was carried out by DIC using a Leica DMI6000B microscope equipped with a Leica HCX PlanApo 100×/1.4 to 0.7 oil objective. Cell lengths were determined for at least 800 cells per strain using ImageJ 1.47v software (National Institutes of Health, USA) from duplicates in two independent experiments.

Cultivation of biofilms. (i) Static conditions.

Biofilms were cultivated in petri dishes in LM medium as described earlier (9) and harvested by scraping and centrifugation in fresh medium. Cultivation of anaerobically grown biofilms was performed in glass bottles containing glass beads (5-mm diameter; Carl-Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). The glass beads were completely covered with LM medium containing 15 mM lactate. To remove oxygen from the medium, the bottles were stoppered, sealed, and flushed with nitrogen for several minutes with periodic shaking. Cells were adjusted to an OD600 of 0.05 and incubated at room temperature for 24 h. After removal of the supernatant, the cells were harvested by shaking in fresh medium.

(ii) Hydrodynamic conditions.

For image acquisition, biofilms were cultivated under hydrodynamic conditions in three-channel flow cells as previously described (9, 47). For eDNA staining, 7-hydroxy-9H-(1,3 dichloro-9,9-dimethylacridin-2-one (DDAO; Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to a final concentration of 4 μM for 1 h prior to microscopy. Microscopic visualization was performed at defined locations close to the inflow. If required, FeCl2 or desferrioxamine mesylate salt was added to the medium reservoir. For protein sampling, biofilm cells were cultivated in 50-ml syringes on glass beads under constant medium flow and harvested as described earlier (48).

CLSM and image acquisition.

Microscopic visualization of biofilms and image acquisition was performed using an inverted Leica TCS SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with 10×/0.3. Plan-Neofluar and 63×/1.2 W C-Apochromate objectives. CLSM images were processed using the Imaris software package (Bitplane AG, Zürich, Switzerland) and Adobe Photoshop. Image analysis (e.g., quantification of prophage induction) was conducted using ImageJ 1.47v software, including the LOCI Bio-Formats plugin. CLSM stacks were split into individual channels (cyan fluorescent protein [Cfp]/Venus/DDAO), and thresholds were adjusted adequately to remove noise. Total signal intensities (limited to the threshold range) were quantified by applying the area-multimeasurement tool on each stack. Cfp signals (constitutively expressed in all cells) were used as a reference to obtain a normalized signal-to-biomass ratio. Biofilm cultivation and measurements were conducted in triplicate in at least two independent experiments.

Chromosome staining.

Biofilm cells were harvested in LM medium and washed with PBS. Subsequently, the cells were resuspended in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X and incubated for 10 min on ice. The cells were then sedimented and resuspended in 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde solution containing 10 μg ml−1 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). After 15 min of incubation fluorescence microscopy, image acquisition was carried out using an Axio Imager.M1 microscope equipped with a Zeiss Plan Apochromate 100×/1.4 DIC objective.

Immunoblot analyses.

Protein lysates were prepared either from planktonic cells, statically grown biofilm cells, or biofilm cells grown under hydrodynamic conditions on glass beads. Cell suspensions were uniformly adjusted to an OD600 of 10 before lysis, and equal volumes of lysate were subsequently subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). For each analysis, one gel was prepared for subsequent Western blotting and one gel was stained with Roti-Blue (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) as a loading control (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). SDS-PAGE and immunoblot detection of phage λSo was carried out as described previously (9) using polyclonal antibodies raised against SO_2963 and secondary G-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany). Signals were detected using the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by exposition in the Fusion-SL chemiluminescence imager (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). Representative immunoblot patterns are presented here, but similar patterns were obtained from at least two biological replicates.

Isolation of H2O2-resistant mutants.

For the isolation and identification of an oxyR mutation that provides increased resistance against H2O2 in S. oneidensis MR-1, we used an approach similar to that described earlier for Xanthomonas campestris (49, 50). To avoid selection of mutations in prophage genomes that would reduce induction and/or lysis, we used the prophage-deficient strain S1419 as the template. In total, approximately 1.5 × 1010 cells in mid-exponential phase were transferred to LB agar plates (1.5 × 108 cells/plate) containing 2 mM H2O2 (Carl-Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). To verify that mutants retain resistance after nonselective growth, single colonies were cultivated overnight in plain LB and reinoculated in LB medium containing 10 mM H2O2. Mutated oxyR regions were sequenced, cloned into pNPTS-128-R6K, and reintroduced into strain S2991 and strain S2391 by markerless in-frame insertion. Resistance was confirmed by cultivation in LB containing 10 mM H2O2.

RESULTS

λSo prophage-mediated lysis is required for normal biofilm formation.

In a previous study, we demonstrated that an S. oneidensis MR-1 mutant devoid of prophage λSo was unable to cover the surface during later phases of biofilm development (24 h) and to form distinct three-dimensional structures (9). To further determine whether phage-mediated cell lysis is the major biofilm-promoting factor of λSo (and not additional factors encoded by the prophage), we deleted the prophage's putative lysis operon (SO_2966-SO_2974), which was identified by bioinformatic analyses and RT-PCR (see Fig. S3A and B in the supplemental material). The MR-1 mutant lacking this operon displayed a phenotype undistinguishable from that of a mutant lacking the whole λSo prophage with respect to cell lysis (as determined by extracellular β-galactosidase activity after prophage induction of strains constitutively expressing β-galactosidase) and biofilm formation under hydrodynamic conditions (see Fig. S3C to E in the supplemental material). We concluded that cell lysis is the major biofilm-promoting factor of the λSo prophage.

Biofilm conditions trigger λSo prophage induction.

To generate strains that allow monitoring of λSo induction at a single-cell level, the coding sequence for venus was inserted into the prophage λSo genome downstream of SO_2989 (encoding the putative transcriptional regulator Cro) by homologous recombination, resulting in strain Pλcro::venus (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). Additionally, the strain was provided with constitutively expressed ecfp at the Tn7 site for confocal laser scanning microscopy analyses. Analogous strains harboring transcriptional fusions to the putative λSo lysis promoter (PR′, upstream of gene SO_2974) and putative tail protein L (downstream of SO_2949) were similarly generated. Results obtained for these strains were congruent with those obtained for strain Pλcro::venus. Thus, within this study we will exclusively focus on strain Pλcro::venus.

To demonstrate that prophage induction in strain Pλcro::venus correlates with Venus fluorescence, cultures were exposed to UVC light or mitomycin C and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Approximately 2 h after exposure, a significant fraction of cells started to display filamentous growth and Venus fluorescence. To further determine whether phage induction is ultimately followed by cell lysis, a mitomycin C-treated culture of strain Pλcro::venus was immobilized on a propidium iodide-containing agar pad and analyzed by time-lapse microscopy (Fig. 1A). Single cells that were exhibiting a simultaneous loss of turgor pressure and Venus fluorescence in concert with sudden appearance of propidium iodide fluorescence, strongly indicative of cell lysis, were observed. The time interval between induction and lysis was highly variable, and induction did not necessarily result in complete lysis of the MR-1 population.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Determination of λSo prophage induction and eDNA release. (A) Visualization of λSo prophage-induced cell lysis by differential interference contrast microscopy (DIC) and detection of Venus fluorescence and propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence in cells of strain Pλcro::venus after UV exposure. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Relative λSo induction over time in biofilms formed by strain Pλcro::venus under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Total Venus signal intensities from CLSM images were normalized to total Cfp signal intensities to obtain an induction-to-biomass ratio. Black bars represent the mean values, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted each in triplicat. (C) DAPI staining of nucleoids (red) in filamentous biofilm cells of S. oneidensis MR-1. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Projections of CLSM images displaying the induction of prophage λSo (Venus fluorescence) and eDNA (stained with DDAO) in biofilms formed by the Cfp-tagged strains Pλcro::venus and Pλcro::venus ΔrecA under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells 24 h after the initial attachment. The lateral edge of each micrograph is 250 μm. (E) Distribution of total Cfp, Venus, and DDAO signal intensities (as percentage of maximal intensity of each channel) over the z axis (distance to surface) of CLSM images of biofilms formed by strain Pλcro::venus under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells 24 h after the initial attachment. Relative signal intensities are derived from the mean pixel values of triplicates in a representative experiment.

Based on these results, we concluded strain Pλcro::venus to be a useful tool to monitor spatiotemporal induction of the prophage λSo lytic cycle. To this end, biofilms of strain Pλcro::venus were cultivated under hydrodynamic conditions and visualized by CLSM over 48 h. Induction of prophage λSo peaked at around 24 h after initial attachment at the developmental transition phase prior to extensive three-dimensional growth (Fig. 1B). While only single cells produced Venus during the first hours at a degree comparable to spontaneous induction in planktonic cultures, a large subpopulation of mainly filamentous cells displayed increased fluorescence after 24 h. When S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms were treated with cell-impermeable DNA stain DDAO, similar stringlike structures appeared, a phenotype that has already been observed in previous studies (9). However, fluorescence signals of both structures did not colocalize, strongly implicating that the DDAO-stained stringlike structures represent dead cells after λSo-induced lysis. DAPI staining of filamentous cells isolated from biofilms revealed the presence of multiple chromosomes, indicating that the cell length of filamentous cells positively correlates with the amount of DNA per cell body (Fig. 1C). Analysis of the distribution of cells exhibiting Venus fluorescence along the z axis in 24-h-old biofilms revealed that signal intensities were strongest in a distance of approximately 1.5 to 2.5 μm to the glass surface at the top of the yet-thin cell layer, whereas the basal Cfp signal displayed its strongest fluorescence at a distance of 0 to 0.8 μm, representing the bottom layers of the biofilm. DDAO signals showed a pattern similar to that of Venus, indicating that induction of prophage λSo and cell lysis predominantly occur within the upper layers of the biofilm during this developmental stage. Along the x and y axes, signals were evenly distributed, except in densely packed micro- or macrocolonies, which mostly lacked venus-expressing filamentous cells or stringlike eDNA structures.

RecA controls λSo prophage induction and eDNA release in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms.

Since induction of the lytic cycle in Lambda-like phages is thought to occur via the RecA-mediated autocleavage of phage repressor cI in response to DNA-damaging agents, we hypothesized that prophage λSo induction might similarly be RecA dependent. Thus, we generated a recA in-frame deletion mutant in strain Pλcro::venus and examined the response of planktonic cultures to UV exposure. Fluorescence microscopy (data not shown) and immunoblot analysis verified that deletion of recA suppressed λSo induction and production (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, filamentous growth in response to DNA-damaging agents was largely suppressed by deletion of recA in S. oneidensis MR-1 (Fig. 2C).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Induction of prophage λSo and filamentous cell growth in ΔrecA deletion mutants. (A) λSo production in planktonic cells of the wild type (recA +) and ΔrecA deletion mutants (recA −) after UV exposure (+) or without UV exposure (−). Whole-cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by Western immunodetection of major capsid protein SO_2963. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (B) Production of phage λSo in biofilm cells of the wild type, strain Pλcro::venus, a ΔrecA deletion mutant, and the ΔλSo deletion mutant of prophage λSo. Biofilms were cultivated under static conditions in petri dishes for 24 h, and biofilm cells were harvested by scraping. Whole-cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot analysis of major capsid protein SO_2963. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (C) Cell length distribution of planktonic wild-type and ΔrecA deletion mutant cells of S. oneidensis MR-1 in response to mitomycin C. Black and gray bars (S. oneidensis MR-1 wild type and ΔrecA mutant, respectively) represent the mean values, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, of the percentages of each cell length obtained from two independent experiments conducted each in duplicate with at least 800 cells per strain. (D) Relative biomass (total Cfp signal compared to the wild type) of 24-h-old biofilms formed by strain Pλcro::venus and Pλcro::venus ΔrecA under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Bars represent the means of Cfp values (in percentages), with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted at least in duplicate. (E) Relative λSo induction of 24-h-old biofilms formed by strains Pλcro::venus and Pλcro::venus ΔrecA under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Total Venus signal intensities from CLSM images were normalized to total Cfp signal intensities to obtain an induction-to-biomass ratio. Black bars represent the mean values, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted each in duplicate. (F) eDNA levels as a measure of relative DDAO fluorescence in 24-h-old biofilms formed by strain Pλcro::venus and Pλcro::venus ΔrecA under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Total DDAO signal intensities from CLSM files were normalized to total Cfp signal intensities to obtain an eDNA-to-biomass ratio. Black bars represent the mean values, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted at least in duplicate.

To determine whether induction of prophage λSo in biofilms is also a RecA-dependent process, Pλcro::venus ΔrecA biofilms were grown under hydrodynamic conditions and analyzed by CLSM. No fluorescence of Venus above the background level was observed in any of the biofilm developmental stages (Fig. 1D and 2E). Accordingly, phage production in biofilm cells was suppressed, as confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 2B). Unexpectedly, the total biomass of Pλcro::venus ΔrecA biofilms (Cfp signal) was slightly increased in comparison to the wild type and did not phenocopy the ΔλSo strain (Fig. 2D; see also Fig. S3E in the supplemental material), possibly due to pleiotropic effects of the ΔrecA deletion. eDNA staining of 24-h-old biofilms formed by Pλcro::venus ΔrecA demonstrated that the relative signal intensity of DDAO was reduced at least 2.8-fold in comparison to strain Pλcro::venus, indicating that deletion of recA suppressed λSo-mediated eDNA release (Fig. 2F). In addition, significantly fewer stringlike structures were observed after DDAO staining of eDNA. From these data, we concluded that RecA-controlled induction of prophage λSo mediates cell lysis and eDNA release in a subpopulation of filamentous cells in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms, mainly at the developmental transition phase prior to extensive three-dimensional growth.

Regulation by OxyR and Fur affects λSo prophage induction.

In a previous study, we demonstrated that early surface-associated growth induces the expression of genes belonging to the putative OxyR (oxidative stress defense regulator) and Fur (ferric uptake regulator) regulons in S. oneidensis MR-1 (48). Based on these observations, we hypothesized that iron-mediated oxidative stress might generate DNA damage under biofilm conditions, which ultimately induces λSo via RecA.

To investigate the role of oxidative stress and intracellular iron levels for the induction of prophage λSo in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms, we generated in-frame deletion mutants of oxyR and fur. A recent study demonstrated that OxyR in S. oneidensis MR-1 is analogous to OxyR in Escherichia coli and mediates the response to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced stress by acting both as an activator and as a repressor of defense genes (51). Hence, oxyR mutants were expected to exhibit a partially impaired response to oxidative stress. Deletion of fur should result in an increase in intracellular iron levels, since Fur acts as a repressor of iron uptake genes in S. oneidensis MR-1 (52).

Immunoblot analysis of λSo in ΔoxyR and Δfur biofilm cells (static conditions) indicated increased levels of λSo production in both mutants compared to the wild type (Fig. 3A). To further investigate the impact of both mutations on λSo prophage induction during biofilm formation under hydrodynamic conditions, both mutations were introduced into strain Pλcro::venus. In both mutants, relative induction of λSo was severely increased throughout biofilm development during the first 24 h (approximately 6-fold for the ΔoxyR mutant and 12-fold for the Δfur mutant [Fig. 3B]). ΔoxyR mutants produced loosely packed and unstructured biofilms mostly consisting of filamentous cells; however, the total biofilm biomass was only slightly reduced 24 h after the initial attachment (Fig. 3C and D). The Δfur mutant was strongly defective in biofilm formation during all developmental phases tested, and the accumulated biomass ranged between 10 and 20% of that of the wild-type biofilms (Fig. 3C). Twenty-four-hour-old biofilms almost exclusively consisted of randomly oriented and loosely packed filamentous cells (Fig. 3D). Δfur mutants were also unable to produce densely packed macrocolonies under the conditions tested. Notably, under planktonic growth conditions in LB medium, the ΔoxyR mutant exhibited no growth defect and the Δfur mutant had only slightly reduced growth rates in late exponential phase (Fig. 3E). Our results indicate that surface-associated growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 strongly requires an inducible defense against oxidative stress and tight control of iron uptake. Deregulation of either process triggers λSo prophage induction to abnormal levels, resulting in defective biofilm formation.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Regulation by OxyR and Fur affects λSo prophage induction and biofilm development. (A) Detection of phage λSo by immunoblot analysis in biofilms formed by the wild type, the ΔoxyR deletion mutant, and the Δfur deletion mutant under static conditions in petri dishes. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (B) Relative induction of λSo prophage over time in biofilms formed by strains Pλcro::venus (black), Pλcro::venus ΔoxyR (dark gray), and Pλcro::venus Δfur (light gray) under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Bars represent the mean values of Venus/Cfp ratios, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted at least in duplicate. (C) Accumulation of biofilm biomass (Cfp signal) over time of strains Pλcro::venus, Pλcro::venus ΔoxyR, and Pλcro::venus Δfur under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Bars represent the mean values of total Cfp pixel values, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted at least in duplicate. (D) CLSM images of 24-h-old biofilms formed by strains Pλcro::venus, Pλcro::venus ΔoxyR, and Pλcro::venus Δfur under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells. Cfp fluorescence represents all cells, and Venus fluorescence indicates λSo prophage induction. (E) Planktonic growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 wild type, the ΔoxyR deletion mutant, and the Δfur deletion mutant in LB medium under aerobic conditions. Growth curves are derived from one representative experiment conducted in triplicate. Error bars represent standard deviations.

λSo induction in biofilms cannot be suppressed by an increase in cellular H2O2 turnover.

Since deregulation of the oxidative stress response in the ΔoxyR mutant and elevated uptake of iron in the Δfur mutant both increased the level of λSo prophage induction, the question arose as to whether elevated H2O2 levels might occur under biofilm conditions, resulting in Fenton-mediated DNA damage and λSo prophage induction. Accordingly, reduction or elimination of intracellular H2O2 by an increase in cellular turnover of H2O2 would be expected to indirectly reduce, or even suppress, RecA-mediated induction of prophage λSo. To explore the role of H2O2, we performed a mutant screening for the isolation of H2O2-resistant clones that possibly possess a constitutively active response to oxidative stress.

Of four isolated resistant clones, sequencing of oxyR genes revealed a single point mutation causing a T104N amino acid substitution in 3 isolates and another single point mutation causing an L197P substitution in 1 isolate (see Fig. S5A in the supplemental material). Reintroduction of both point mutations into the wild-type background revealed that both mutations individually provide S. oneidensis MR-1 with a strongly increased resistance (>20-fold) against H2O2 compared to the wild type and the ΔoxyR mutant (Fig. 4A). In plain LB medium, the mutants showed slightly reduced growth rates compared to the wild type (see Fig. S5B in the supplemental material). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed to better understand the effects of both amino acid substitutions in OxyR on the expression of potential target genes in the absence and the presence of H2O2. In both mutants (OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P), the expression of katB (SO_1070), dps (SO_1158), ahpC (SO_0958), and katG1 (SO_0725) was strongly induced, by factors ranging from 170 (dps in OxyRT104N) to 1,860 (katG1 in OxyRL197P), compared to the wild type, regardless of the presence or absence of H2O2 (Fig. 4B; see also Fig. S5C in the supplemental material). Transcript levels of tonB (SO_3670) were also examined to determine whether deletion of oxyR or expression of the OxyR variants OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P influences the expression of the Fur regulon. However, no differential expression of tonB was observed in the absence of H2O2 and only slight downregulation in the OxyR variants occurred in the presence of H2O2 (see Fig. S5C in the supplemental material). We conclude that resistance against H2O2 in strains expressing the OxyR variants OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P is conferred by constitutive overexpression of H2O2 defense genes and an increase in H2O2 turnover.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Induction of prophage λSo in biofilms is independent of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide. (A) Planktonic growth under aerobic conditions in LB medium containing 10 mM H2O2 of the S. oneidensis MR-1 wild type, the ΔoxyR deletion mutant, and mutant strains that harbor single amino acid substitution T104N or L197P in OxyR (OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P). As a reference, the growth curve of the wild type in the absence of H2O2 is also presented. Growth curves are derived from a representative experiment conducted in triplicate. Error bars represent standard deviations. (B) Expression, relative to the wild type, of katB (SO_1070), dps (SO_1158), ahpC (SO_0958), katG1 (SO_0725), and tonB (SO_3670) in the ΔoxyR and the OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P mutant strains, determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Bars represent the mean values of two independent experiments, each normalized to the 16S rRNA and recA housekeeping genes. Standard deviations are displayed as error bars. (C) Left three lanes (+ H2O2), immunoblot analysis of phage λSo production in planktonic cells of the wild type and the OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P mutants. Cells were cultivated in LB medium until mid-exponential phase and subjected to 2 mM H2O2 for 2 h. Right three lanes (Biofilm), immunoblot analysis of phage λSo production in biofilm cells of the wild type and the two OxyR mutants. Cells were harvested from 24-h-old biofilms formed on glass beads under hydrodynamic conditions. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (D) Immunoblot analysis of phage λSo production in wild-type biofilm cells harboring plasmid pBBR1-TT-Ptac-MSC5-sodB for constitutive overexpression of superoxide dismutase gene sodB. Cells were harvested from 24-h-old biofilms formed on glass beads under hydrodynamic conditions. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (E) Immunoblot analysis of phage λSo production in wild-type cells harvested from biofilms formed under oxic conditions (+ O2) on glass beads (constant medium flow) and cells harvested from biofilms formed under anoxic conditions (− O2; N2 headspace) on glass beads (static conditions). Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented.

To determine whether expression of the OxyR variant OxyRT104N or OxyRL197P suppresses λSo induction by H2O2, we performed immunoblot analysis on planktonic cultures treated with 2 mM H2O2. Our results demonstrate that λSo production was strongly reduced in both mutants compared to that of the wild type (Fig. 4C). Accordingly, cell morphologies of the mutants were unaffected by H2O2, while the wild type displayed filamentous cell morphologies (see Fig. S5D in the supplemental material).

To finally determine whether induction of prophage λSo is similarly suppressed under biofilm conditions, both oxyR mutations were individually introduced into strain Pλcro::venus. Surprisingly, λSo induction levels and biofilm morphologies of the mutants were indistinguishable from those of the wild type, as indicated by CLSM analyses (data not shown). Immunoblot analysis of phage λSo in biofilm cells cultivated under hydrodynamic conditions confirmed similar levels of phage λSo production in both mutants and the wild type, indicating that H2O2 is not a limiting factor for λSo induction in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms.

In addition to H2O2, we were intrigued by the question of whether elevated superoxide levels might influence λSo activation under biofilm conditions. However, addition of paraquat did not stimulate λSo production in planktonic cells, and overexpression of the Fe/Mn superoxide dismutase sodB gene (SO_2881) in biofilm cells did not suppress λSo production, indicating that superoxide has a rather minor role, if any, in λSo induction in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms (Fig. 4D; see also Fig. S6 in the supplemental material). We also tested a range of molecules (glutathione, ascorbic acid, N-acetyl-cysteine, l-proline, and l-cysteine) that might act as antioxidants and have previously been shown to suppress cellular oxidative stress, but none had any significant effect on phage induction during biofilm formation (data not shown). In contrast, cultivation of biofilms under anoxic conditions strongly decreased the level of λSo production in comparison to those grown aerobically, indicating that dioxygen plays an important role in the induction of λSo under hydrodynamic biofilm conditions (Fig. 4E). However, it has to be noted that the setup used for the cultivation of anaerobic biofilms differs considerably from that used for aerobic biofilms and therefore represents only a limited control.

From this set of experiments, we conclude that an inducible defense against reactive oxygen species is required for normal biofilm formation; however, neither increased H2O2 nor increased superoxide levels seem to represent a biofilm-specific stimulus of prophage λSo.

Availability of soluble iron controls the timing and level of λSo prophage induction and eDNA release.

We previously demonstrated that in S. oneidensis MR-1, genes of the Fur (ferric uptake regulator) regulon were strongly induced upon surface contact, indicating a high demand of iron during this phase. Addition of Fe2+ to S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms cultivated under hydrodynamic conditions significantly stimulated biofilm formation, while planktonic growth was not affected (48). Increased intracellular levels of free iron in concert with aerobic respiration have often been suggested to result in oxidative stress and DNA damage, a well-known stimulus for the RecA-mediated SOS response (for reviews, see references 53, 54, and 55). We thus hypothesized that iron might act as an indirect stimulus for λSo phage induction and eDNA release in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. To analyze this, biofilms of strain Pλcro::venus were cultivated in the presence of 20 μM Fe2+. After 12 h of incubation, Venus fluorescence as a measure of λSo prophage induction was increased in comparison to that of biofilms without additional iron but decreased after 24 h after initial attachment, indicating that addition of iron stimulated an earlier λSo induction (Fig. 5B). DDAO staining of 24-h-old biofilms revealed drastically increased levels of eDNA (9.5-fold) in comparison to biofilms grown without additional iron (Fig. 5A and C). The eDNA appeared as densely packed stringlike structures, probably representing filamentous multinucleated cell bodies that pervaded the entire biofilm except the area of microcolonies (Fig. 5A). In contrast, addition of desferrioxamine, a chelating agent for ferric and ferrous iron (56), reduced the relative signal intensities of both Venus and DDAO, indicating that decreasing the levels of available iron inhibits λSo phage induction and eDNA release. Accordingly, the presence of DDAO-stained stringlike structures was largely diminished. Suppression of λSo production by desferrioxamine in hydrodynamically grown biofilms was additionally verified by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 5D). Notably, the observed effect of iron on λSo induction appeared to be biofilm specific, since addition of Fe2+ to cells grown under planktonic conditions did not have any effect on λSo production (Fig. 5E).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Iron controls the level and timing of λSo prophage induction and eDNA release. (A) CLSM image projections of 24-h-old biofilms formed by strain Pλcro::venus under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells in the presence of 20 μM FeCl2 (Fe2+) or 20 μM iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). Cfp fluorescence represents all cells, and Venus fluorescence indicates λSo prophage induction. The biofilms were stained with DDAO to visualize eDNA. The lateral edge of each micrograph is 250 μm. (B) Relative induction of λSo prophage over time in biofilms formed by strain Pλcro::venus under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells in the presence of 20 μM Fe2+. Total Venus signal intensities from CLSM images were normalized to total Cfp signal intensities to obtain an induction-to-biomass ratio. Black bars represent the mean values with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted at least in duplicates. (C) eDNA levels as a measure of relative DDAO fluorescence in biofilms formed under hydrodynamic conditions in flow cells in the presence of 20 μM Fe2+ or 20 μM iron chelator DFO. Total DDAO signal intensities from CLSM files were normalized to total Cfp signal intensities to obtain an eDNA-to-biomass ratio. Black bars represent the mean values, with standard deviations displayed as error bars, obtained from two independent experiments conducted at least in duplicate. (D) Detection of phage λSo by immunoblot analysis in biofilms formed under hydrodynamic conditions on glass beads in the presence or absence of DFO. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (E) Detection of phage λSo by immunoblot analysis in wild-type cells cultivated under planktonic growth conditions in the absence or presence of 20 μM Fe2+. The cells were harvested during logarithmic growth phase. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented. (F and G) Detection of phage λSo by immunoblot analysis in biofilms formed by the wild type (F) and the Δfur deletion mutant (G) under static conditions in petri dishes in the presence of 20 μM and 100 μM Fe2+. Cell lysates of biofilm cells were subjected by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot analysis of major capsid protein SO_2963. Sample normalization was achieved by adjusting cell suspensions to the same OD600 and analysis of stained SDS-PAGE gels (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Representative immunoblot patterns from at least two independent experiments are presented.

The effect of iron was additionally investigated by immunoblot analysis in wild-type and Δfur biofilms grown under static conditions. In both strains, addition of ferrous iron increased the level of λSo production compared to the untreated controls. Moreover, addition of iron to Δfur biofilms had an additive effect, resulting in strongly increased levels of λSo production (Fig. 5F and G). These results suggested that the level of intracellular iron positively correlates with the degree of λSo production in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. Notably, addition of Fe2+ to biofilms formed by the OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P mutant strains also strongly increased the level of λSo production in comparison to the untreated controls, further indicating that iron and not H2O2 is the predominant factor for λSo induction in S. oneidensis biofilms (see Fig. S7 in the supplemental material).

From this set of experiments, we concluded that addition of Fe2+ to biofilms of S. oneidensis MR-1 stimulates λSo prophage induction and enhances the level of eDNA release, likely by an increase in oxidative stress and DNA damage. This hypothesis was further supported by monitoring dps (SO_1158) promoter activity during biofilm formation (see Fig. S8A in the supplemental material). Dps is predicted to be a ferritinlike protein that binds and oxidizes Fe2+ to protect DNA against oxidative damage (57, 58). While dps appeared to be actively expressed in almost all cells during the early phases of biofilm formation, reporter activity occurred solely in filamentous cells during later phases. In contrast, dps expression in planktonic cells was mostly below the detection limit of the reporter system.

DISCUSSION

The ubiquitous presence of prophages in bacterial genomes has numerous implications with respect to host physiology and ecology, which we are just beginning to understand. Since biofilms are the predominant form of bacterial existence, the question arises as to what extent prophages impact biofilm formation. For different species, including S. oneidensis MR-1, it has been suggested that prophage-induced lysis promotes biofilm formation, e.g., by the release of matrix components such as eDNA (9, 32, 33). To our knowledge, this is the first study in which high-resolution CLSM was utilized to elaborate the spatiotemporal induction of a prophage during biofilm formation at the single-cell level and to visualize the heterogeneity of this process within the biofilm community. Our results strongly suggest that in S. oneidensis MR-1, λSo induction occurs mainly in upper biofilm layers in a subpopulation of filamentous cells. We show that induction and, ultimately, cell lysis and eDNA accumulation are strictly controlled by RecA and likely correlate with intracellular iron levels. In addition, our study indicates that surface-associated growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 strongly requires a defense system against oxidative stress and tight control of iron uptake; however, levels of free intracellular iron and not hydrogen peroxide seem to limit induction and production of λSo on S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms.

Alternative pathways for the induction of lambdoid phages that exclude the RecA-mediated SOS response have been identified (59, 60). In contrast, our results strongly suggest that induction of prophage λSo is strictly RecA dependent in S. oneidensis MR-1, both in planktonic cultures and in biofilms. Unexpectedly, ΔrecA deletion mutants did not phenocopy ΔλSo deletion mutants with regard to biofilm biomass and biofilm architecture. We hypothesize that this effect is due to secondary effects of the ΔrecA mutation or due to the inability of ΔrecA mutants to repair double-strand breaks. As previously suggested, cell death might therefore occur more often in ΔrecA mutants during biofilm growth, resulting in S. oneidensis biofilms in the release of biofilm-promoting factors, which might partially complement the loss of λSo prophage-induced lysis (61).

We demonstrated that λSo induction is restricted mainly to filamentous cells, a commonly occurring but so far uncharacterized phenotypic variant in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms, indicating that these cells suffer from increased levels of DNA damage, the activating signal for RecA. Elongated cell morphologies in response to DNA damage had already been observed by Gates in the early 1930s (62). Later, they were shown to be a consequence of cell division inhibition while cellular growth proceeds, a process that is predominantly regulated by the RecA-mediated SOS response. In addition to gaining time for DNA repair, filamentation can also represent a fitness advantage in stressful environments (for a review, see reference 63). Notably, the occurrence of filamentous cells appears to be a rather common but so far not well understood phenomenon in microbial biofilms. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, cell elongation correlates with nutrient deprivation under aerobic conditions and is triggered by nitric oxide production during anaerobic respiration (64, 65), two processes that might increase DNA damage. Analogously, formation of knitted chains in Listeria monocytogenes biofilms is controlled by SOS response factor YneA in response to oxidative stress (66, 67). Filamentous cells were also observed in environmental biofilm communities attached to microbial fuel cells, indicating that elongated cell morphologies might play a role in naturally occurring mixed electrogenic communities (68). Correspondingly, artificially induced elongation of S. oneidensis MR-1 cells was shown to enhance microbe-electrode interactions in microbial fuel cells (69). However, it is still unclear whether filamentous growth itself is required for normal biofilm formation of S. oneidensis MR-1 or whether it occurs as a side effect of the SOS response prior to λSo-induced lysis and eDNA release.

We observed that induction of prophage λSo and eDNA accumulation correlated with levels of ferrous iron. We primarily utilized ferrous iron throughout this study; however, spontaneous oxidation will have produced significant fractions of ferric iron during the experiments, and thus a clear distinction between the effects of the two forms was not possible.

Iron is present in most living organisms, in which it plays important roles in key enzymatic reactions, and has been shown to affect biofilms of multiple bacterial species. However, the exact regulatory pathways and physiological roles of iron during biofilm formation remain mostly unknown and likely vary among the species. Iron limitation has been demonstrated to induce biofilm formation in Legionella pneumophila, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans (7072) but inhibits this process in E. coli, Vibrio cholerae, and P. aeruginosa (7375). High levels of iron disrupt P. aeruginosa biofilms, indicating that the effect occurs in a concentration-dependent fashion (76, 77). A recent study provides evidence that iron is implicated in the formation of S. oneidensis MR-1 pellicles (78). Generally, differential responses to iron levels may be a consequence of the organism's metabolic requirements, including the repertoire of iron metalloenzymes involved in specific metabolic pathways (73).

S. oneidensis MR-1 is capable of utilizing multiple organic and inorganic alternative terminal electron acceptors, and for this respiratory versatility S. oneidensis MR-1 requires a large array of iron-containing cytochromes (79). Thus, the ability to grow on diverse redox-active surfaces might account for a high demand for iron. In a recent study, we observed the induction of genes involved in iron uptake in response to early surface-associated growth (48). Accordingly, increased intracellular levels of free iron might generate DNA damage that ultimately induces λSo prophage induction. Expression profiles of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium suggest that the lag phase similarly involves transient accumulation of iron and oxidative stress (80). Cells in lag phase might therefore adapt their physiological status to new environmental conditions in a way similar to the response of cells during early surface contact. To gain more insights into the course of iron uptake during biofilm formation, we generated an episomal promoter fusion of the putative tonB (SO_3670) promoter and venus (see Fig. S8B in the supplemental material). Promoter activities as indicated by fluorescence were highest during the early phases of biofilm formation, suggesting that ferric iron uptake is repressed at later stages, potentially to control iron-induced oxidative damage. Accordingly, the level of λSo prophage induction decreases in later phases of biofilm development.

When S. oneidensis MR-1 attaches to mineral surfaces, reduction and solubilization of metal oxides likely result in locally increased ferrous iron concentrations (81). This would be expected to enhance λSo prophage induction and eDNA accumulation, as has been observed in the presence of additional ferrous iron in flow chamber biofilms in this study. Accordingly, genes belonging to prophage λSo were found to be induced during growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 on Fe nanoparticle-decorated anodes in microbial electrolysis cells, indicative of λSo prophage-mediated cell lysis (82).

Accumulation of eDNA during biofilm development might have beneficial effects in limiting λSo prophage induction by chelation of free iron in later phases (14). Oxygen and nutrient levels decrease within the depth of the biofilm; accordingly, λSo prophage induction and eDNA accumulation were observed to occur mainly in upper biofilm layers. In filamentous cells, the nutrient collection surface is enlarged while the surface-to-volume ratio remains similar (64). Hence, filamentous growth itself might indirectly contribute to an increase in intracellular iron levels in a positive-feedback loop, thereby triggering DNA damage and further filamentous growth. Furthermore, iron-induced DNA damage might be enhanced by the release of additional iron from iron-sulfur clusters that were damaged by oxidative stress (83). Hence, these two processes might in part elicit the observed heterogeneity in S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms.

Similar to Δfur, deletion of oxyR resulted in an increase in λSo prophage induction during biofilm formation, indicating that the OxyR-mediated response is involved, to some extent, in protecting biofilm cells against oxidative stress. It should be noted that the fur gene often belongs to the OxyR regulon (54). However, quantitative real-time RT-PCR analyses indicated that this is not the case in S. oneidensis MR-1. To explore the role of Fenton chemistry in the induction of λSo under biofilm conditions, we screened for mutations that trigger OxyR constitutively active to suppress H2O2-mediated induction of λSo, and we successfully isolated two mutants, OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P. Notably, the OxyR threonine residue at position 104 is highly conserved among proteobacteria and seems to represent a functional “on-switch” of OxyR by replacement by asparagine (see Fig. S5A in the supplemental material). Thus, we propose that substitution T104N may also be broadly applied for OxyR research in further studies.

In contrast to the general assumption that DNA lesions in the presence of ferrous iron are the result of Fenton-generated (hydroxyl) radicals, our data indicate that iron and not H2O2 levels appear to be limiting for prophage λSo induction in biofilms, since the level of λSo induction was unaffected in biofilms formed by the H2O2-resistant OxyR mutants (OxyRT104N and OxyRL197P). Previously, Flemmig and Arnhold observed Fe2+-induced DNA strand breaks in plasmid pBBR322 that were not mediated by H2O2 (84). Further, it has been suggested earlier that oxidation of biomolecules by ferrous iron and dioxygen without participation of H2O2 is more relevant under physiological conditions than oxidation by hydroxyl radicals generated by Fenton chemistry. A study of Fenton-mediated radical oxidations of biomolecules to those induced by iron-oxygen complexes strongly indicated that at physiological ratios of [O2]/[H2O2], which range between 103 and 105, detrimental effects of iron-oxygen complexes become predominant over Fenton-derived radicals (85). Accordingly, the presence of free iron and dioxygen was assumed to be sufficient for damaging biomolecules such as DNA (8486). Thus, based on these and our observations, we hypothesize that elevated iron uptake in the presence of oxygen might result in DNA damage without significant participation of Fenton chemistry, and ultimately in RecA-mediated λSo prophage induction and cell lysis in the upper layers of S. oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. However, further studies focusing on the effects of iron on the integrity chromosomal DNA in biofilm cells are required to explore the exact radical chemistry that might indirectly trigger λSo induction.

Notably, biofilm conditions have been reported to promote DNA double-strand breaks in various Gram-negative and Gram-positive species, generating genetic diversity that may help the community to adapt to varying environmental conditions or to generate antibiotic resistance (61, 66, 67, 87, 88). In these studies, the authors suggest oxidative stress to be responsible for the emergence of DNA lesions by a yet-unknown mechanism. Based on our observations, we hypothesize that intracellular iron levels might play a central role in these processes. Possibly, Fenton-independent iron-induced radical oxidation reactions may be a ubiquitous phenomenon with a so far underestimated and/or overlooked impact on microbial physiology and ecology. Our present study gives an example of the elaborate interplay between cellular requirements for iron, iron-induced DNA damage, prophage-induced lysis, and eDNA release during biofilm formation, which we expect to be similarly relevant for other bacterial species.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft and the International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology (IMPRS-MIC) at the MPI für terrestrische Mikrobiologie.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 20 June 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01480-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Costerton JW. 1995. Overview of microbial biofilms. J. Ind. Microbiol. 15:137–140. 10.1007/BF01569816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. 2004. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:95–108. 10.1038/nrmicro821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Flemming HC, Wingender J. 2010. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8:623–633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS. 2002. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295:1487. 10.1126/science.295.5559.1487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rice KC, Mann EE, Endres JL, Weiss EC, Cassat JE, Smeltzer MS, Bayles KW. 2007. The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:8113–8118. 10.1073/pnas.0610226104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas VC, Thurlow LR, Boyle D, Hancock LE. 2008. Regulation of autolysis-dependent extracellular DNA release by Enterococcus faecalis extracellular proteases influences biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 190:5690–5698. 10.1128/JB.00314-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Das T, Sharma PK, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Krom BP. 2010. Role of extracellular DNA in initial bacterial adhesion and surface aggregation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:3405–3408. 10.1128/AEM.03119-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Steichen CT, Cho C, Shao JQ, Apicella MA. 2011. The Neisseria gonorrhoeae biofilm matrix contains DNA, and an endogenous nuclease controls its incorporation. Infect. Immun. 79:1504–1511. 10.1128/IAI.01162-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gödeke J, Paul K, Lassak J, Thormann KM. 2011. Phage-induced lysis enhances biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ISME J. 5:613–626. 10.1038/ismej.2010.153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vilain S, Pretorius JM, Theron J, Brozel VS. 2009. DNA as an adhesin: Bacillus cereus requires extracellular DNA to form biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:2861–2868. 10.1128/AEM.01317-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pinchuk GE, Ammons C, Culley DE, Li SM, McLean JS, Romine MF, Nealson KH, Fredrickson JK, Beliaev AS. 2008. Utilization of DNA as a sole source of phosphorus, carbon, and energy by Shewanella spp.: ecological and physiological implications for dissimilatory metal reduction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:1198–1208. 10.1128/AEM.02026-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heun M, Binnenkade L, Kreienbaum M, Thormann KM. 2012. Functional specificity of extracellular nucleases of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:4400–4411. 10.1128/AEM.07895-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Molin S, Tolker-Nielsen T. 2003. Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14:255–261. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00036-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S. 2008. Extracellular DNA chelates cations and induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000213. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lewenza S. 2013. Extracellular DNA-induced antimicrobial peptide resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 4:21. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gloag ES, Turnbull L, Huang A, Vallotton P, Wang H, Nolan LM, Mililli L, Hunt C, Lu J, Osvath SR, Monahan LG, Cavaliere R, Charles IG, Wand MP, Gee ML, Prabhakar R, Whitchurch CB. 2013. Self-organization of bacterial biofilms is facilitated by extracellular DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110:11541–11546. 10.1073/pnas.1218898110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L, Klausen M, Webb JS, Kjelleberg S, Molin S, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T. 2006. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 59:1114–1128. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05008.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sahu PK, Iyer PS, Oak AM, Pardesi KR, Chopade BA. 2012. Characterization of eDNA from the clinical strain Acinetobacter baumannii AIIMS 7 and its role in biofilm formation. ScientificWorldJournal 2012:973436. 10.1100/2012/973436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hamilton HL, Dominguez NM, Schwartz KJ, Hackett KT, Dillard JP. 2005. Neisseria gonorrhoeae secretes chromosomal DNA via a novel type IV secretion system. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1704–1721. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04521.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barnes AM, Ballering KS, Leibman RS, Wells CL, Dunny GM. 2012. Enterococcus faecalis produces abundant extracellular structures containing DNA in the absence of cell lysis during early biofilm formation. mBio 3:e00193–12. 10.1128/mBio.00193-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zweig MA, Schork S, Koerdt A, Siewering K, Sternberg C, Thormann K, Albers SV, Molin S, van der Does C. 2013. Secreted single-stranded DNA is involved in the initial phase of biofilm formation by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Environ. Microbiol. 16:1040–1052. 10.1111/1462-2920.12291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lappann M, Claus H, van Alen T, Harmsen M, Elias J, Molin S, Vogel U. 2010. A dual role of extracellular DNA during biofilm formation of Neisseria meningitidis. Mol. Microbiol. 75:1355–1371. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07054.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao J, Wang Q, Li M, Heijstra BD, Wang S, Liang Q, Qi Q. 2013. Escherichia coli toxin gene hipA affects biofilm formation and DNA release. Microbiology 159:633–640. 10.1099/mic.0.063784-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paul JH. 2008. Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? ISME J. 2:579–589. 10.1038/ismej.2008.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang X, Kim Y, Ma Q, Hong SH, Pokusaeva K, Sturino JM, Wood TK. 2010. Cryptic prophages help bacteria cope with adverse environments. Nat. Commun. 1:147. 10.1038/ncomms1146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fortier LC, Sekulovic O. 2013. Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 4:354–365. 10.4161/viru.24498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hong SH, Wang X, Wood TK. 2010. Controlling biofilm formation, prophage excision and cell death by rewiring global regulator H-NS of Escherichia coli. Microb. Biotechnol. 3:344–356. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00164.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rice SA, Tan CH, Mikkelsen PJ, Kung V, Woo J, Tay M, Hauser A, McDougald D, Webb JS, Kjelleberg S. 2009. The biofilm life cycle and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are dependent on a filamentous prophage. ISME J. 3:271–282. 10.1038/ismej.2008.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Resch A, Fehrenbacher B, Eisele K, Schaller M, Gotz F. 2005. Phage release from biofilm and planktonic Staphylococcus aureus cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 252:89–96. 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.08.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang X, Kim Y, Wood TK. 2009. Control and benefits of CP4-57 prophage excision in Escherichia coli biofilms. ISME J. 3:1164–1179. 10.1038/ismej.2009.59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Webb JS, Thompson LS, James S, Charlton T, Tolker-Nielsen T, Koch B, Givskov M, Kjelleberg S. 2003. Cell death in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 185:4585–4592. 10.1128/JB.185.15.4585-4592.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petrova OE, Schurr JR, Schurr MJ, Sauer K. 2011. The novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa two-component regulator BfmR controls bacteriophage-mediated lysis and DNA release during biofilm development through PhdA. Mol. Microbiol. 81:767–783. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07733.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Carrolo M, Frias MJ, Pinto FR, Melo-Cristino J, Ramirez M. 2010. Prophage spontaneous activation promotes DNA release enhancing biofilm formation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS One 5:e15678. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jiang SC, Kellogg CA, Paul JH. 1998. Characterization of marine temperate phage-host systems isolated from Mamala Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:535–542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jiang SC, Paul JH. 1994. Seasonal and diel abundance of viruses and occurrence of lysogeny/bacteriocinogeny in the marine-environment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 104:163–172. 10.3354/meps104163 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stopar D, Cerne A, Zigman M, Poljsak-Prijatelj M, Turk V. 2004. Viral abundance and a high proportion of lysogens suggest that viruses are important members of the microbial community in the Gulf of Trieste. Microb. Ecol. 47:1–8. 10.1007/s00248-002-3009-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Leitet C, Riemann L, Hagstrom A. 2006. Plasmids and prophages in Baltic Sea bacterioplankton isolates. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 86:567–575. 10.1017/S0025315406013488 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ptashne M. 2004. A genetic switch: phage lambda revisited, vol 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qiu X, Sundin GW, Wu L, Zhou J, Tiedje JM. 2005. Comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 following exposure to UVC, UVB, and UVA radiation. J. Bacteriol. 187:3556–3564. 10.1128/JB.187.10.3556-3564.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bus JS, Gibson JE. 1984. Paraquat: model for oxidant-initiated toxicity. Environ. Health Perspect. 55:37–46. 10.1289/ehp.845537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lassak J, Henche AL, Binnenkade L, Thormann KM. 2010. ArcS, the cognate sensor kinase in an atypical Arc system of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:3263–3274. 10.1128/AEM.00512-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aiba H, Adhya S, de Crombrugghe B. 1981. Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J. Biol. Chem. 256:11905–11910 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45. 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Steinmoen H, Knutsen E, Havarstein LS. 2002. Induction of natural competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae triggers lysis and DNA release from a subfraction of the cell population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:7681–7686. 10.1073/pnas.112464599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miller JH. 1972. A short course in bacterial genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thormann KM, Saville RM, Shukla S, Pelletier DA, Spormann AM. 2004. Initial phases of biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J. Bacteriol. 186:8096–8104. 10.1128/JB.186.23.8096-8104.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gödeke J, Binnenkade L, Thormann KM. 2012. Transcriptome analysis of early surface-associated growth of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. PLoS One 7:e42160. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fuangthong M, Mongkolsuk S. 1997. Isolation and characterization of a multiple peroxide resistant mutant from Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 152:189–194. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10427.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mongkolsuk S, Whangsuk W, Fuangthong M, Loprasert S. 2000. Mutations in oxyR resulting in peroxide resistance in Xanthomonas campestris. J. Bacteriol. 182:3846–3849. 10.1128/JB.182.13.3846-3849.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jiang Y, Dong Y, Luo Q, Li N, Wu G, Gao H. 2014. Protection from oxidative stress relies mainly on derepression of OxyR-dependent KatB and Dps in Shewanella oneidensis. J. Bacteriol. 196:445–458. 10.1128/JB.01077-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wan XF, Verberkmoes NC, McCue LA, Stanek D, Connelly H, Hauser LJ, Wu L, Liu X, Yan T, Leaphart A, Hettich RL, Zhou J, Thompson DK. 2004. Transcriptomic and proteomic characterization of the Fur modulon in the metal-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis. J. Bacteriol. 186:8385–8400. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8385-8400.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schlacher K, Goodman MF. 2007. Lessons from 50 years of SOS DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:587–594. 10.1038/nrm2198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cornelis P, Wei Q, Andrews SC, Vinckx T. 2011. Iron homeostasis and management of oxidative stress response in bacteria. Metallomics 3:540–549. 10.1039/c1mt00022e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Imlay JA. 2013. The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: lessons from a model bacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11:443–454. 10.1038/nrmicro3032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Goodwin JF, Whitten CF. 1965. Chelation of ferrous sulphate solutions by desferrioxamine B. Nature 205:281–283. 10.1038/205281b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Grant RA, Filman DJ, Finkel SE, Kolter R, Hogle JM. 1998. The crystal structure of Dps, a ferritin homolog that binds and protects DNA. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:294–303. 10.1038/nsb0498-294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Almiron M, Link AJ, Furlong D, Kolter R. 1992. A novel DNA-binding protein with regulatory and protective roles in starved Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 6:2646–2654. 10.1101/gad.6.12b.2646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rozanov DV, D'Ari R, Sineoky SP. 1998. RecA-independent pathways of lambdoid prophage induction in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180:6306-6315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ghosh D, Roy K, Williamson KE, Srinivasiah S, Wommack KE, Radosevich M. 2009. Acyl-homoserine lactones can induce virus production in lysogenic bacteria: an alternative paradigm for prophage induction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7142–7152. 10.1128/AEM.00950-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Boles BR, Singh PK. 2008. Endogenous oxidative stress produces diversity and adaptability in biofilm communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:12503–12508. 10.1073/pnas.0801499105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gates FL. 1933. The reaction of individual bacteria to irradiation with ultraviolet light. Science 77:350. 10.1126/science.77.1997.350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Cegelski L, Hultgren SJ. 2008. Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6:162–168. 10.1038/nrmicro1820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Steinberger RE, Allen AR, Hansma HG, Holden PA. 2002. Elongation correlates with nutrient deprivation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-unsaturated biofilms. Microb. Ecol. 43:416–423. 10.1007/s00248-001-1063-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yoon MY, Lee KM, Park Y, Yoon SS. 2011. Contribution of cell elongation to the biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during anaerobic respiration. PLoS One 6:e16105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.van der Veen S, Abee T. 2011. Generation of variants in Listeria monocytogenes continuous-flow biofilms is dependent on radical-induced DNA damage and RecA-mediated repair. PLoS One 6:e28590. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.van der Veen S, Abee T. 2010. Dependence of continuous-flow biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e on SOS response factor YneA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:1992–1995. 10.1128/AEM.02680-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ishii S, Shimoyama T, Hotta Y, Watanabe K. 2008. Characterization of a filamentous biofilm community established in a cellulose-fed microbial fuel cell. BMC Microbiol. 8:6. 10.1186/1471-2180-8-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Patil SA, Gorecki K, Hagerhall C, Gorton L. 2013. Cisplatin-induced elongation of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 cells improves microbe-electrode interactions for use in microbial fuel cells. Energ. Environ. Sci. 6:2626–2630. 10.1039/c3ee41974f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Berlutti F, Ajello M, Bosso P, Morea C, Petrucca A, Antonini G, Valenti P. 2004. Both lactoferrin and iron influence aggregation and biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. Biometals 17:271–278. 10.1023/B:BIOM.0000027704.53859.d3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Johnson M, Cockayne A, Williams PH, Morrissey JA. 2005. Iron-responsive regulation of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus involves fur-dependent and fur-independent mechanisms. J. Bacteriol. 187:8211–8215. 10.1128/JB.187.23.8211-8215.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hindre T, Bruggemann H, Buchrieser C, Hechard Y. 2008. Transcriptional profiling of Legionella pneumophila biofilm cells and the influence of iron on biofilm formation. Microbiology 154:30–41. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/008698-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wu Y, Outten FW. 2009. IscR controls iron-dependent biofilm formation in Escherichia coli by regulating type I fimbria expression. J. Bacteriol. 191:1248–1257. 10.1128/JB.01086-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Banin E, Brady KM, Greenberg EP. 2006. Chelator-induced dispersal and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells in a biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:2064–2069. 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2064-2069.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Banin E, Vasil ML, Greenberg EP. 2005. Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:11076–11081. 10.1073/pnas.0504266102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Musk DJ, Banko DA, Hergenrother PJ. 2005. Iron salts perturb biofilm formation and disrupt existing biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chem. Biol. 12:789–796. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yang L, Barken KB, Skindersoe ME, Christensen AB, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T. 2007. Effects of iron on DNA release and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 153:1318–1328. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/004911-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yuan J, Chen Y, Zhou G, Chen H, Gao H. 2013. Investigation of roles of divalent cations in Shewanella oneidensis pellicle formation reveals unique impacts of insoluble iron. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1830:5248–5257. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.07.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Meyer TE, Tsapin AI, Vandenberghe I, de Smet L, Frishman D, Nealson KH, Cusanovich MA, van Beeumen JJ. 2004. Identification of 42 possible cytochrome C genes in the Shewanella oneidensis genome and characterization of six soluble cytochromes. OMICS 8:57–77. 10.1089/153623104773547499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rolfe MD, Rice CJ, Lucchini S, Pin C, Thompson A, Cameron ADS, Alston M, Stringer MF, Betts RP, Baranyi J, Peck MW, Hinton JCD. 2012. Lag phase is a distinct growth phase that prepares bacteria for exponential growth and involves transient metal accumulation. J. Bacteriol. 194:686–701. 10.1128/JB.06112-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lovley DR, Holmes DE, Nevin KP. 2004. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 49:219–286. 10.1016/S0065-2911(04)49005-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Xu S, Liu H, Fan Y, Schaller R, Jiao J, Chaplen F. 2012. Enhanced performance and mechanism study of microbial electrolysis cells using Fe nanoparticle-decorated anodes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93:871–880. 10.1007/s00253-011-3643-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jang S, Imlay JA. 2007. Micromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide disrupts metabolism by damaging iron-sulfur enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 282:929–937. 10.1074/jbc.M607646200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Flemmig J, Arnhold J. 2007. Ferrous ion-induced strand breaks in the DNA plasmid pBR322 are not mediated by hydrogen peroxide. Eur. Biophys. J. 36:377–384. 10.1007/s00249-006-0093-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Qian SY, Buettner GR. 1999. Iron and dioxygen chemistry is an important route to initiation of biological free radical oxidations: an electron paramagnetic resonance spin trapping study. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 26:1447–1456. 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00002-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Saran M, Michel C, Stettmaier K, Bors W. 2000. Arguments against the significance of the Fenton reaction contributing to signal pathways under in vivo conditions. Free Radic. Res. 33:567–579. 10.1080/10715760000301101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ryder VJ, Chopra I, O'Neill AJ. 2012. Increased mutability of Staphylococci in biofilms as a consequence of oxidative stress. PLoS One 7:e47695. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Driffield K, Miller K, Bostock JM, O'Neill AJ, Chopra I. 2008. Increased mutability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:1053–1056. 10.1093/jac/dkn044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES