Abstract
(p)ppGpp responds to nutrient limitation through a global change in gene regulation patterns to increase survival. The stringent response has been implicated in the virulence of several pathogenic bacterial species. Haemophilus ducreyi, the causative agent of chancroid, has homologs of both relA and spoT, which primarily synthesize and hydrolyze (p)ppGpp in Escherichia coli. We constructed relA and relA spoT deletion mutants to assess the contribution of (p)ppGpp to H. ducreyi pathogenesis. Both the relA single mutant and the relA spoT double mutant failed to synthesize (p)ppGpp, suggesting that relA is the primary synthetase of (p)ppGpp in H. ducreyi. Compared to the parent strain, the double mutant was partially attenuated for pustule formation in human volunteers. The double mutant had several phenotypes that favored attenuation, including increased sensitivity to oxidative stress. The increased sensitivity to oxidative stress could be complemented in trans. However, the double mutant also exhibited phenotypes that favored virulence. When grown to the mid-log phase, the double mutant was significantly more resistant than its parent to being taken up by human macrophages and exhibited increased transcription of lspB, which is involved in resistance to phagocytosis. Additionally, compared to the parent, the double mutant also exhibited prolonged survival in the stationary phase. In E. coli, overexpression of DksA compensates for the loss of (p)ppGpp; the H. ducreyi double mutant expressed higher transcript levels of dksA than the parent strain. These data suggest that the partial attenuation of the double mutant is likely the net result of multiple conflicting phenotypes.
INTRODUCTION
Haemophilus ducreyi is the causative agent of chancroid, a sexually transmitted genital ulcer disease that is endemic in the developing world (1). Like other genital ulcer diseases, chancroid facilitates both the transmission and acquisition of HIV-1 (1). Due to a short duration of infectivity, H. ducreyi can be maintained only in populations with high sex partner change rates, such as commercial sex workers. As a result of syndromic management of genital ulcers, chancroid prevalence has declined in many areas of endemicity and the overall global prevalence of chancroid is now undefined (2). However, reports of chancroid persist from Africa and Asia, implying that these regions have reservoirs of infected sex workers (3–8).
In the South Pacific, H. ducreyi also causes a non-sexually transmitted skin ulceration syndrome that clinically resembles yaws due to Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue (9–13). In a recent prospective cohort study conducted in an area of yaws endemicity of Papua New Guinea, the prevalence of this syndrome is 3.2 cases per 100 persons; H. ducreyi DNA is detected in 60% of the ulcers and Treponema pallidum DNA is detected in 34%, suggesting that H. ducreyi is the major cause of this syndrome (9).
Although H. ducreyi is thought to be universally susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, and quinolones, reports of resistance to or treatment failures with these agents occurred in the early 1990s (14–16). Due to syndromic management, no new data on antimicrobial susceptibility have been available for nearly 20 years. Given the new epidemiological data and lack of information regarding its antimicrobial susceptibility, understanding the pathogenesis of H. ducreyi remains important for the development of alternative disease control strategies.
In order to study H. ducreyi pathogenesis, we developed a human inoculation model in which healthy adult volunteers are infected on the upper arm with H. ducreyi (17). The model mimics both the papular and pustular stages of natural infection. Importantly, in both natural and experimental infection, H. ducreyi is found within abscesses surrounded by macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (18). Within these abscesses, H. ducreyi encounters a variety of stresses, including antimicrobial peptides, an anaerobic environment, and reactive oxygen species (19).
When faced with stress, bacteria alter gene expression through the use of alternative sigma factors, two-component systems, and second messengers. Although these systems overlap, each system is optimized to respond to a particular stressor. The genome of H. ducreyi contains only two alternative sigma factors (RpoE and RpoH) and lacks RpoS, which usually plays a major role in stress tolerance and stationary-phase survival. Additionally, H. ducreyi has only one intact two-component system, CpxRA, which is dispensable for human infection (20). H. ducreyi contains homologs of relA and spoT, key components of the stringent response system; relA transcripts are upregulated during human infection (21).
The stringent response is usually induced by nutrient-limiting conditions. The response allows a global alteration in gene expression through guanosine pentaphosphate (pppGpp) and guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), collectively referred to here as (p)ppGpp. In response to amino acid limitation, RelA catalyzes the synthesis of (p)ppGpp. (p)ppGpp directly interacts with the β-subunit of the RNA polymerase, altering its activity (22, 23). Through its interaction with RNA polymerase, (p)ppGpp upregulates genes that are necessary for survival and increases use of alternative sigma factors. Simultaneously, genes that are not crucial for survival, such as those involved in protein synthesis and growth, are downregulated. Upon removal of the stressor, SpoT degrades (p)ppGpp to quench the response. Under certain conditions such as iron limitation, SpoT's limited (p)ppGpp synthetic capabilities also serve to initiate the stringent response (24). A mutant with deletions in both relA and spoT is generally incapable of initiating a stringent response; such strains are called (p)ppGpp null [(p)ppGpp0] mutants.
The stringent response is linked to the virulence of several pathogenic bacterial species. Legionella pneumophila (p)ppGpp0 mutants are defective in transmission between macrophages, a critical component of Legionella pathogenesis (25). (p)ppGpp0mutants of Yersinia pestis, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Borrelia burgdorferi are completely avirulent in animal models of infection (26–28). (p)ppGpp0 mutants of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Enterococcus faecalis are less virulent than their wild-type parents in their respective animal models of infection (29–32). However, the role of the stringent response in a bacterial pathogen has never been directly studied in humans.
To investigate the role of the stringent response in H. ducreyi pathogenesis, we constructed H. ducreyi ΔrelA and ΔrelAΔspoT mutants, the latter of which should be (p)ppGpp0. We compared the virulence of the double mutant to that of the parent strain in human inoculation experiments. We also compared both mutants to the parent strain in phagocytosis, serum killing, and oxidative stress tolerance assays. We found that the (p)ppGpp mutants had increased sensitivity to oxidative stress. Importantly, relA and spoT contributed to disease progression in human volunteers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. H. ducreyi strains were grown on chocolate agar plates supplemented with 1% IsoVitalex at 33°C with 5% CO2 or in gonococcal (GC) broth supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), 1% IsoVitalex, and 50 μg/ml hemin (Aldrich Chemical Co.) at 33°C. H. ducreyi 35000HP was grown to the mid-log phase (optical density at 660 nm [OD660] = 0.2), transition phase (OD660 = 0.3 to 0.35), and stationary phase (OD660 = 0.45 to 0.55); mutant strains were harvested when the OD660 of 35000HP was in the appropriate range for each phase of growth. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani media at 37°C, with the exception of strain DY380, which was maintained in low-salt broth or agar at 32°C and grown at 42°C for induction of the lambda red recombinase. When necessary, media were supplemented with kanamycin (20 μg/ml for H. ducreyi; 50 μg/ml for E. coli) or spectinomycin (200 μg/ml for H. ducreyi; 50 μg/ml for E. coli). For H. ducreyi strains containing a pACYC177 backbone, media were supplemented with 30 μg/ml kanamycin.
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
| Strain(s) or plasmid | Descriptiona | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli strains | ||
| DH5α, Top10, and HB101 | Strains used for general cloning procedures | Invitrogen |
| DY380 | DH10B derivative containing a defective λ prophage in which the red, bet, and gam genes are controlled by the temp-sensitive λcI857 repressor | 64 |
| H. ducreyi strains | ||
| 35000HP | Human-passaged variant of strain 35000 | 65 |
| 35000HPΔrelA | Unmarked, in-frame relA deletion mutant | This study |
| 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT | Unmarked, in-frame relA and spoT double-deletion mutant | This study |
| FX517 | 35000HPΔdsrA::cat insertion mutant | 44 |
| Plasmids | ||
| pCH1 | pCR-XL-TOPO containing the relA-coding region along with 0.5-kb flanking regions | This study |
| PCH11 | pCR-XL-TOPO containing the spoT-coding region along with 0.5-kb flanking regions | This study |
| pRSM2832 | Plasmid containing spectinomycin resistance cassette flanked by the FRT sites | 66 |
| pRSM2072 | H. ducreyi suicide vector | 33 |
| pRSM2975 | Plasmid containing the origin of replication and kanamycin resistance gene from pLS88, FLP recombinase gene from pFT-A, and a point mutation conferring a temp-sensitive phenotype in H. ducreyi | 42 |
| pACYC177 | Cloning vector, Kanr Ampr for complementation | New England Biolabs |
| pACYC184 | Cloning vector, Cmr Tetr | New England Biolabs |
| pCH30 | pACYC177 containing the cat promoter from pACYC184 followed by the 35000HP spoT gene in front of the 35000HP relA gene | This study |
Kanr, kanamycin resistance; Ampr, ampicillin resistance; Cmr and cat, chloramphenicol resistance and gene; Tetr, tetracycline resistance.
Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA was treated with Turbo DNA-free DNase (Ambion) and purified using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). The integrity and concentration of the RNA were determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and a NanoDrop ND2000 (Thermo Scientific), respectively. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using a Super Smart cDNA synthesis kit (Clontech).
RT-PCR and qRT-PCR were performed using a QuantiTect SYBR green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) in an ABI Prism 7000 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). All primer pairs (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) had greater than 95% amplification efficiency. Relative expression was calculated as [(EtargetΔCTtarget)/(EreferencceΔCTreference)], where E is the amplification efficiency, (10−1/slope), and ΔCT is the change in the cycle threshold. For normalization of expression levels of target genes, dnaE was amplified using primer pair P1 and P2.
Characterization of the relA and spoT genes.
The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) was used to identify putative homologues of relA and spoT in H. ducreyi (GenBank accession no. AE017143). RT-PCR was conducted to determine if relA or spoT was in an operon with surrounding genes. The relA-to-dxr intergenic region was amplified using primers P3 and P4. The intergenic regions around spoT were amplified using primers P5 and P6 for recG to rpoZ, P7 and P8 for rpoZ to spoT, and P9 and P10 for spoT to menB.
Construction and complementation of unmarked, in-frame relA single-deletion and relA spoT double-deletion mutants.
An unmarked, in-frame relA deletion mutant was constructed using the λ red and FLP recombinase method described previously (33, 34). To construct a relA deletion mutant, primers P11 and P12 were used to amplify the spectinomycin (spec) resistance cassette flanked by flippase recognition target (FRT) sites from pRSM2832. P11 included 47 bp upstream of relA and the ATG start codon. P12 included 21 bp at the 3′ end of relA, the stop codon, and 29 bp downstream of relA.
The coding region of relA, along with a 0.5-kb flanking region on either side of the gene, was amplified using primers P13 and P14. The product was cloned into pCR-XL-TOPO. The construct, designated pCH1, was then electroporated into E. coli DY380, which contains a temperature-sensitive λ red recombinase. The product from primers P11 and P12 was electroporated into the DY380 strain generated as described above. Following induction of the recombinase, the relA gene was replaced with the spec cassette with the exception of the start codon and the last 21 bp of the relA gene. The spec cassette containing the flanking regions was digested with SpeI and cloned into the pRSM2072 suicide vector. This construct was electroporated into strain 35000HP. Chocolate agar containing spectinomycin and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside was used to detect clones in which allelic exchange had occurred. PCR and sequence analysis confirmed the replacement of the relA gene with the spec cassette.
FLP recombinase was used to remove the spec cassette as described previously (33). PCR and sequence analysis confirmed deletion of relA. The final mutant was designated 35000HPΔrelA. Primers P15 and P16 were used to determine if relA affected expression of the downstream dxr gene using qRT-PCR; deletion of relA did not affect transcription of dxr (data not shown).
Using these methods, a spoT mutant was not recovered. As has been observed for other species, a spoT deletion mutant may be lethal in H. ducreyi due to unopposed ppGpp synthesis by relA (35). Therefore, we constructed a relA spoT double-deletion mutant by deleting spoT in the relA mutant exactly as described above, except that primers P17 and P18 were used to amplify the spec cassette and primers P19 and P20 were used to amplify the spoT coding and flanking regions, resulting in pCH11 (Table 1). After allele exchange and excision of the spec cassette, PCR and sequence analysis confirmed deletion of the spoT gene. The double mutant was designated 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT. To determine if deletion of spoT affected the expression of its menB downstream gene, qRT-PCR was performed using primers P21 and P22; deletion of spoT did not affect transcription of menB (data not shown).
To complement the relA spoT deletion mutant, the relA and spoT genes were expressed under the control of a constitutive chloramphenicol promoter from pACYC184 in the pACYC177 expression vector. Briefly, the spoT open reading frame (ORF), along with 21 bp of the upstream region and 22 bp of the downstream region, was amplified using primers P23 and P24. The relA open reading frame, along with 21 bp of the upstream region and a 45-bp downstream region, which includes the native transcription terminators, was amplified using primers P25 and P26. The chloramphenicol promoter was amplified from pACYC184 using primers P27 and P28. The PCR fragments were combined with BamHI-digested pACYC177 in a Gibson assembly reaction (36). Briefly, the three fragments were incubated at 50°C for 1 h in a reaction mixture (kindly provided by M. Goebl, Indiana University) that contained T5 exonuclease (Epicentre), Phusion Taq (New England BioLabs), and Taq DNA ligase (New England BioLabs). The final construct, designated pCH30, was confirmed by PCR and sequence analysis and electroporated into H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT to yield H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT(pCH30). As controls, H. ducreyi 35000HP and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT were also electroporated with pACYC177, and the resulting strains were designated H. ducreyi 35000HP(pACYC177) and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT(pACYC177), respectively.
Human inoculation experiments.
Human inoculation experiments were conducted according to the guidelines of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Indiana University. Healthy adult volunteers (6 females and 4 males; 7 African Americans, 1 Asian, and 2 European Americans; mean age ± standard deviation, 48 ± 9.17 years) over 21 years of age initially enrolled in the study. All volunteers gave written, informed consent for participation and HIV serology. Two volunteers were excluded due to underlying medical conditions, and two withdrew consent prior to the start of the trial. The procedures for the human inoculation experiments, including calculation of the estimated delivered dose (EDD), are described in detail elsewhere (17). Papule and pustule formation rates for parent and mutant inoculation sites were compared using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE) as previously described (37). Ninety-five-percent confidence intervals (95% CI) for papule and pustule formation rates were calculated using GEE-based sandwich standard errors.
To ensure that the inocula contained the correct strains and that there was no cross contamination of samples, colony hybridization was performed on colonies derived from the inocula, surface cultures, and biopsy specimens. Probes specific for relA, spoT, and dnaE were designed using primer pair P29 and P30, primer pair P31 and P32, and primer pair P1 and P2, respectively. A digoxigenin (DIG) DNA labeling kit (Roche Applied Sciences) was used to label the probes with digoxigenin, and detection was performed using the DIG Easy Hyb protocol from the manufacturer's instructions.
(p)ppGpp synthesis assay.
For detection of (p)ppGpp synthesis in H. ducreyi, we modified two published assays (38, 39). Briefly, H. ducreyi strains were grown in GC broth. At different phases of growth, the bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed in phosphate-limited RPMI medium (US Biological Life Sciences), and suspended (1 × 105 cells/ml) in phosphate-limited RPMI medium. Pilot experiments showed that there was no reduction in bacterial viability for up to 4 h in this media. For the labeling experiments, the bacteria were suspended in phosphate-limited RPMI media supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and KH232PO4 (PerkinElmer) (specific activity, 900 to 1,100 mCi/mmol) at 100 μCi/ml. The bacteria were incubated for 3 h, washed, and incubated for an additional 15 min in phosphate-limited RPMI medium. For extraction of (p)ppGpp, cells were treated with 40 mg/ml lysozyme–10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0) for 20 min and lysed on ice using 1% SDS (wt/vol) for 20 min. Finally, an equal volume of 13 M formic acid was added to the lysate, which was incubated on ice for 15 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation. A sample of the supernatant containing the extracted (p)ppGpp was spotted onto polyethyleneimine (PEI) cellulose thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (Sigma-Aldrich). (p)ppGpp was separated in 1.5 M H3PO4 (pH 3.4) buffer and detected using autoradiography. CTP, ATP, and GTP standards (Sigma-Aldrich) were detected using iodine staining.
Phenotypic comparisons.
Lipooligosaccharides (LOS) and outer membrane proteins (OMP) were isolated from H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT and analyzed as described previously (40, 41). Bactericidal assays were performed on plate-grown organisms as described previously (42). To determine the expression levels of OmpP2B, DsrA, and the peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein (PAL), Western blot analyses were performed using purified outer membranes and the blots were probed with antisera or monoclonal antibodies specific to each protein. The antisera for OmpP2B (kindly provided by A. Campagnari, State University of New York [SUNY]-Buffalo) and DsrA (kindly provided by C. Elkins, University of North Carolina) and the PAL monoclonal antibody were described elsewhere (41, 43–45).
To determine if the relA and spoT deletion affected the transcript levels of specific H. ducreyi genes, total RNA was extracted from mid-log- and stationary-phase H. ducreyi 35000HP and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT. qRT-PCR was performed using primer pair P33 and P34 to amplify cpxA, primer pair P35 and P36 to amplify lspB, primer pair P37 and P38 to amplify oxyR, primer pair P39 and P40 to amplify sodC, and primer pair P41 and P42 to amplify dksA.
Macrophage uptake assays.
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from leukopacks obtained from anonymous donors from the Central Indiana Regional Blood Center or from blood obtained from healthy volunteers. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with an IRB-approved protocol. PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll-Pacque Plus purification, and CD14+ cells were isolated (Miltenyi Biotech). The CD14+ cells were differentiated into monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in X-vivo 15 medium (Lonza) supplemented with 1% human AB serum (Invitrogen) for 5 days. The MDMs were harvested by centrifugation and seeded into 24-well tissue culture plates at 4 ×105 cells per well and grown for 24 h. H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT were grown to the mid-log and stationary phases and opsonized in 100% complement-replete normal human serum for 20 min at room temperature. After washes with Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) were performed, the MDMs were infected with bacteria at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1. The plates were centrifuged at 1,800 × g for 5 min to synchronize the infections and were incubated for 30 min at 35°C in 5% CO2. To kill extracellular bacteria, gentamicin (100 μg/ml) was added, and the MDMs were incubated for 30 min and washed with HBSS. The MDMs were lysed with 0.2% saponin at room temperature for 10 min, and the lysates were quantitatively cultured. The percentage of bacterial uptake was calculated as the ratio of bacteria within the lysed MDMs compared to the initial CFU.
Oxidative stress and heat shock assays.
Bacteria were treated either with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to mimic extracellular oxidative stress or with paraquat to mimic intracellular oxidative stress, as described previously (46). Briefly, H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT were grown to the mid-log or stationary phase and exposed to 0.2 mM and 2 mM H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich) or 0.2 mM and 2 mM paraquat (Sigma-Aldrich) with PBS at 33°C for 1 h and quantitatively cultured. To determine the effect of deletion of relA and spoT on the ability to survive heat shock, cells collected from the mid-log and stationary phases were incubated at 37°C for 1 h in PBS and quantitatively cultured. Percent survival was calculated as the ratio of recovered bacteria to the input CFU. An untreated control was utilized as a measure of viability. Due to growth issues with H. ducreyi strains containing the pACYC177 vector, for complementation assays, H. ducreyi 35000HP(pACYC177), 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT(pACYC177), and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT(pCH30) were grown only to the mid-log phase and harvested, and the assay was performed as described above.
Statistical analysis.
Stress, bactericidal, and macrophage uptake data were analyzed using a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test. RT-PCR and densitometry data were analyzed using a paired t test followed by Tukey's adjustment. An adjusted two-sided P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. For growth curve analysis, the data were log transformed before analysis to correct for the large amount of skewness in the distribution. They were then analyzed using repeated-measurement (mixed-model) ANOVA followed by pairwise analysis of the 3 strains at each time point. The tests were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Tukey method.
RESULTS
Characterization of the relA and spoT genomic loci.
The H. ducreyi homolog of relA (HD1185) is in the same orientation and 77 bp upstream of the dxr coding region, which is predicted to encode a DXP reductoisomerase (Fig. 1A). To examine whether relA and dxr were in an operon, we conducted RT-PCR on the intergenic regions between relA and dxr. Although RT-PCR confirmed that both the relA and dxr transcripts were present in the cDNA utilized for analysis (data not shown), the data suggested that relA had not been cotranscribed with dxr (Fig. 1B). The H. ducreyi spoT homolog (HD1924) is in a putative operon with the gene order recG → rpoZ → spoT → menB (Fig. 1C). The recG, rpoZ, and menB genes are predicted to encode an ATP-dependent DNA helicase, RNA polymerase omega chain, and dihydroxynaphthoic acid synthase, respectively. RT-PCR suggested that spoT is cotranscribed with rpoZ, menB, and recG (Fig. 1D).
FIG 1.

Chromosomal loci containing relA and spoT in H. ducreyi. (A) Genomic organization of relA locus in H. ducreyi. The small arrows indicate locations of intergenic primers used for RT-PCR analysis. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the relA-to-dxr intergenic region amplified by RT-PCR. Lane 1, RNA sample with reverse transcriptase; lane 2, RNA sample without reverse transcriptase control; lane 3, genomic DNA control; lane 4, no-template control. (C) Genomic organization of spoT locus in H. ducreyi. (D) Agarose gel electrophoresis of products amplified by RT-PCR. The intergenic regions of recG to rpoZ, rpoZ to spoT, and spoT to menB were examined. Lanes are as described for panel B. Products were of the expected sizes: relA to dxr, 515 bp; recG to rpoZ, 541 bp; rpoZ to spoT, 497 bp; spoT to menB, 222 bp.
Construction of relA and relA spoT deletion mutants.
To understand the role of (p)ppGpp in H. ducreyi pathogenesis, we constructed an unmarked, in-frame relA single-deletion mutant and an unmarked, in-frame relA spoT double-deletion mutant. PCR and sequence analysis confirmed that both the relA and spoT genes were deleted in H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT, with the exception of the start codon and the last 21 bp of the relA and spoT ORFs.
H. ducreyi synthesizes (p)ppGpp, and deletion of relA and spoT results in loss of (p)ppGpp synthesis.
To determine if H. ducreyi synthesizes (p)ppGpp, H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT were grown to the mid-log, transition, and stationary phases, harvested, and labeled with KH232PO4; (p)ppGpp was detected using autoradiography. This assay detects de novo (p)ppGpp synthesis only in the absence of induced stress. (p)ppGpp synthesis was detected in strain 35000HP grown to the mid-log and transition phases; maximal synthesis was detected in cells harvested from the transition phase (Fig. 2). Synthesis of (p)ppGpp was detected only variably in 35000HP harvested from the stationary phase (data not shown). We detected only one species of the molecule and were unable to distinguish between ppGpp and pppGpp. In both H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA and H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT collected from all phases of growth, synthesis of (p)ppGpp was not detected. Thus, under these growth conditions, both the relA single mutant and the relA spoT double mutant had a (p)ppGpp0 phenotype.
FIG 2.

De novo synthesis of (p)ppGpp in H. ducreyi. Bacteria were labeled with KH232PO4 in phosphate-limited RPMI medium plus 5% FBS. (p)ppGpp was extracted and detected by polyethylenimine cellulose thin-layer chromatography and autoradiography. Synthesis of (p)ppGpp was detected in cells harvested from the mid-log and transition phases of growth. Lanes 1, H. ducreyi 35000HP; lanes 2, H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA; lanes 3, H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT. The blot is representative of three independent experiments.
relA and spoT contribute to H. ducreyi virulence in human volunteers.
To determine if RelA and SpoT contribute to virulence in humans, we inoculated volunteers in four iterations with H. ducreyi 35000HP and with the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT mutant. In the first iteration, one volunteer was inoculated at three sites with an EDD of 157 CFU of H. ducreyi 35000HP and at three sites with an EDD of 24, 48, and 96 CFU of H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT. In the second iteration, three volunteers were each inoculated at three sites with an EDD of 74 CFU of H. ducreyi 35000HP and with the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT mutant at three sites with EDDs of 33, 66, and 132 CFU. In the third iteration, one volunteer was inoculated with an EDD of 49 CFU of H. ducreyi 35000HP at three sites and at EDDs of 21, 41, and 81 CFU of the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT mutant at three sites. In the final iteration, one volunteer was inoculated with an EDD of 81 CFU of H. ducreyi 35000HP at three sites and at three sites with EDDs of 35, 71, and 141 of the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT mutant. Overall, papules formed at 94% (95% CI, 84.5% to 99.9%) of the parent-inoculated sites and at 94% (95% CI, 84.5% to 99.9%) of the mutant-inoculated sites (P = 1.0) (Table 2). After 24 h of infection, the mean surface areas of the papules were 23.7 ± 24.4 mm2 at parent sites and 18.2 ± 22.4 mm2 at mutant sites (P = 0.36). Pustules formed at 72.2% (95% CI, 48.3% to 96.2%) of parent sites and 27.8% (95% CI, 0.1% to 56.2%) of mutant sites (P = <0.0001). Thus, the relA spoT mutant was partially attenuated for pustule formation in humans.
TABLE 2.
Response to inoculation of live H. ducreyi strains
| Volunteer (sex)a | Observation period (days) | Strainb | Dose (CFU)c | No. of initial papules | Final papule outcome |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. resolved | No. of pustules | |||||
| 433 (F) | 7 | P | 157 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| M | 24–96 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 436 (F) | 8 | P | 74 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| M | 33–132 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 437 (F) | 7 | P | 74 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| M | 33–132 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 438 (M) | 7 | P | 74 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| M | 33–132 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 439 (M) | 7 | P | 49 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| M | 21–81 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 440 (M) | 9 | P | 81 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| M | 35–141 | 3 | 2 | 0 | ||
Volunteer 433 was inoculated in the first iteration. Volunteers 436, 437, and 438 were inoculated in the second iteration. Volunteer 440 was inoculated in the third iteration. Volunteer 439 was inoculated in the fourth iteration. M, male; F, female.
P, parent H. ducreyi strain 35000HP; M, mutant H. ducreyi strain 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT.
Doses inoculated at 3 sites, except 24–96 (one dose each of 24, 48, and 96 CFU), 33–132 (one dose each of 33, 66, and 132 CFU), 21–81 (one dose each of 21, 41, and 81 CFU), and 35–141 (one dose each of 35, 71, and 141 CFU).
Three volunteers (436, 437, and 438) developed pustules at both mutant and parent sites. For each subject, one parent site and one mutant site were subjected to a biopsy procedure and the biopsy specimens were divided in half and semiquantitatively cultured or stained with hematoxylin-eosin and anti-CD3 antibodies as previously described (47). All samples contained micropustules in the epidermis and dermal CD3 cells (data not shown). Histopathologically, the pustules formed at mutant sites were indistinguishable from the pustules formed at parent sites.
All colonies recovered from the inocula, surface cultures, and biopsy specimens were tested for the presence of relA, spoT, and dnaE sequences by colony hybridization. The dnaE probe hybridized to all the colonies tested from both parent (n = 144) and mutant (n = 140) inocula, while the relA and spoT probes hybridized only to colonies from the parent inocula. At least one positive surface culture for H. ducreyi was obtained during follow-up visits from 39.9% of the parent inoculation sites and 16.7% of the mutant inoculation sites. The dnaE probe hybridized to colonies from both parent-inoculated sites (n = 280 colonies) and mutant-inoculated sites (n = 32 colonies), while the relA and spoT probes bound only to colonies from the parent sites. All 3 paired biopsy specimens of mutant and parent pustules yielded H. ducreyi. The dnaE probe hybridized to all parent (n = 108) and mutant (n = 101) colonies obtained from the biopsy specimens, while the relA and spoT probes hybridized only to colonies obtained from the parent biopsy specimens. There was no evidence of cross contamination between the inocula and mutant and parent inoculation sites.
Deletion of relA and spoT affects the growth and survival of H. ducreyi.
To determine the effect of the loss of (p)ppGpp on the growth and survival of H. ducreyi, we compared the growth of the mutant strains to the growth of the parent strain in broth culture. By quantitative culture, the strain results determined by time interaction analysis were significant (P = <0.0001), indicating that the differences between the parent strain and either mutant were not consistent over time. The growth of each mutant strain was not different from that of the parent strain from 0 to 16 h (Fig. 3), but both mutants survived longer than the parent strain in broth culture from 24 to 36 h (P = <0.0001), suggesting that the lack of production of (p)ppGpp enhanced survival in the stationary phase.
FIG 3.

Growth of H. ducreyi (p)ppGpp mutants. (A) Growth of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT measured by absorbance at OD660 over 48 h. The OD data are means ± standard deviations (SD) of the results of 3 independent experiments. (B) Growth of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT measured as CFU over 48 h. The CFU data are geometric means ± SD of the results of three independent experiments. ****, P ≤ 0.0001.
Deletion of relA alters the OMP profile of H. ducreyi.
As required by our clinical protocol, we investigated whether deletion of relA and spoT affected the expression of outer membrane components of H. ducreyi. LOS and OMP were prepared from H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT harvested from mid-log phase. The 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT strains had identical LOS profiles (data not shown). Analysis of OMP showed increased expression of a band that migrates between 40 to 45 kDa in both H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA (data not shown) and H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT compared to the parent strain (Fig. 4A). Preliminary tandem mass spectrometry experiments done on the excised band suggested that the overexpressed protein was OmpP2B, a putative porin previously described in H. ducreyi (data not shown) (43). Western blot analysis performed with an OmpP2B-specific antibody confirmed that the relA spoT mutant expressed more OmpP2B than the parent strain (Fig. 4B).
FIG 4.

Outer membrane protein expression by H. ducreyi harvested from the mid-log phase. (A) Purified outer membranes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. Arrows indicate protein bands selected for further analysis. Open arrow, OmpP2B; filled arrow, DsrA. Lane 1, H. ducreyi 35000HP; lane 2, H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT. (B) Western blot analysis of purified outer membrane proteins of H. ducreyi 35000HP and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT. Lysates were probed with OmpP2B-specific antibody. (C) Western blot analysis of purified outer membrane proteins of H. ducreyi 35000HP, H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT, and the dsrA mutant, FX517. Lysates were probed with DsrA-specific antibody. PAL monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3B9 was used to verify equivalent levels of loading. Lanes 1 and 2 are as described for panel A; lane 3, FX517.
By OMP profile analysis, the size of a band that migrates with the apparent molecular weight of DsrA, the major determinant of serum resistance, seemed to be decreased in both H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA (data not shown) and H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT relative to strain 35000HP (Fig. 4A). By Western blotting, the level of expression of DsrA in H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT was somewhat reduced compared to that in strain 35000HP (Fig. 4C). We harvested cells from the 3 strains collected at the mid-log, transition, and stationary phases of growth; Western blot and densitometry analysis showed that expression of DsrA was significantly reduced in both the single mutant (P = 0.05) and the double mutant (P = 0.043) compared to that in the parent strain in cells collected at mid-log phase but not in cells collected at the transition or stationary phase (all P values > 0.24) (Fig. S1A in the supplemental material and data not shown). In bactericidal assays using 50% normal human serum, H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT was as resistant to killing as the parent strain (see Fig. S1B). Thus, the reduction in DsrA expression in the mutant during the mid-log phase may not be biologically significant.
RelA and SpoT do not contribute to heat stress resistance.
In other organisms, (p)ppGpp induces expression of genes critical for responses to heat shock such as rpoH (48–50). H. ducreyi 35000HP grows optimally at 33°C (51). To determine if relA and spoT had a role in regulating responses to heat shock, we compared the survival of H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT to that of strain 35000HP after incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Percent survival rates were not significantly different among the strains (data not shown). Thus, RelA and SpoT did not contribute to H. ducreyi survival following heat shock.
Deletion of relA spoT decreased uptake of mid-log-phase-grown H. ducreyi by macrophages.
During both natural and experimental infection, H. ducreyi associates with neutrophils and macrophages but remains extracellular (18, 52). LspB is required for the secretion of LspA1 and LspA2, which are responsible for resistance to phagocytosis (53, 54). lspB and lspA2 are cotranscribed; LspB is maximally expressed and LspA1 and LspA2 are maximally secreted during the stationary phase. To determine the role of (p)ppGpp in resistance to phagocytosis, we compared rates of uptake by primary human macrophages of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT cells grown to the mid-log and stationary phases. No differences were found for the uptake of cells harvested at the stationary phase (Fig. 5A). However, compared to the parent strain, a significant reduction in the uptake of the ΔrelAΔspoT mutant (P = 0.0076) and a trend toward reduction in the uptake of the ΔrelA mutant (P = 0.052) were shown for cells harvested at the mid-log phase. Since the uptake of the mutants was growth phase dependent, we assessed if the mutants had altered transcript levels of lspB relative to the parent. By qRT-PCR, lspB expression was increased in cells grown to the mid-log phase for both H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA (2.51 ± 0.92, P = 0.027) and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT (2.14 ± 0.54, P = 0.029) (Fig. 5B). No differences in lspB expression were found among the three strains grown to stationary phase (Fig. 5B). Thus, the increased expression of lspB in the mutants grown to the mid-log phase may explain their reduced uptake by macrophages.
FIG 5.
Uptake of H. ducreyi by human macrophages. (A) Percent uptake of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT by human macrophages. Primary human CD14+ cells were differentiated into monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). MDMs were infected with opsonized H. ducreyi at an MOI of 10:1. After 30 min of incubation, gentamicin was added to kill extracellular bacteria. Percent uptake was calculated as [(geometric mean CFU of gentamicin-protected bacteria at 1 h/geometric mean CFU of input bacteria) × 100]. Data are means ± SD of the results determined with five independent donors. (B) Fold change in the expression of lspB in H. ducreyi 35000HPΔrelA and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT relative to 35000HP. Expression levels of genes were normalized to dnaE. The data represent the means ± SD of the results from three independent RNA samples. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.
RelA and SpoT are important for resistance to oxidative stress.
(p)ppGpp expression is critical for the survival of bacteria exposed to oxidative stress (30, 55, 56). We compared the survival rates of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT after incubation with either hydrogen peroxide or paraquat. When mid-log-phase or stationary-phase bacteria were incubated with 0.2 mM or 2 mM H2O2, both the relA and relA spoT mutants survived at significantly lower levels than the parent strain (Fig. 6A). When bacteria in either the mid-log phase or stationary phase were incubated with 0.2 mM or 2 mM paraquat, the relA and relA spoT mutants survived at significantly lower levels than the parent strain (Fig. 6C). Complementation of the relA spoT mutant in trans with plasmid pCH30 restored resistance to both 0.2 mM and 2 mM H2O2 (Fig. 6B) and 2 mM paraquat (Fig. 6D). Therefore, RelA and SpoT contribute to H. ducreyi survival under oxidative stress conditions.
FIG 6.
H. ducreyi survival after oxidative stress at the mid-log and stationary phases. (A) Percent survival of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT following incubation with 0.2 mM or 2 mM H2O2 for 1 h. (B) Percent survival of mid-log-phase H. ducreyi 35000HP (pACYC177), 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT (pACYC177), and the complemented 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT strain (pCH30) following incubation with 0.2 mM or 2 mM H2O2 for 1 h. (C) Percent survival of H. ducreyi 35000HP, 35000HPΔrelA, and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT following 1 h of incubation with 0.2 mM or 2 mM paraquat. (D) Percent survival of mid-log-phase H. ducreyi 35000HP (pACYC177), 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT (pACYC177), and 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT (pCH30) following incubation with 0.2 mM or 2 mM paraquat for 1 h. All percent survival values were calculated as [(geometric mean CFU after treatment/geometric mean before treatment) × 100]. The data are means ± SD of the results of four independent experiments. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001. NS, not significant.
Given that the relA spoT mutant was more sensitive to oxidative stress, we investigated whether (p)ppGpp regulated the expression of genes that encode putative oxidative stress-responsive proteins. The oxyR and sodC genes encode the hydrogen peroxide-inducible gene activator and periplasmic Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase, respectively. Compared to the parent strain, transcript levels of both oxyR and sodC were unchanged in the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT mutant (data not shown). Thus, the mechanism of (p)ppGpp-mediated resistance to oxidative stress is unclear.
Deletion of relA and spoT affects the expression of dksA.
DksA is an important cofactor of (p)ppGpp that helps stabilize the interaction of (p)ppGpp with RNA polymerase (57). As overexpression of dksA has been shown to compensate for the loss of (p)ppGpp in other bacteria, we sought to determine if loss of (p)ppGpp affected transcript levels of dksA. qRT-PCR showed that, compared to the wild-type strain results, dksA was significantly upregulated in the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT mutant harvested from the mid-log phase (4.31 ± 0.87, P = 0.0025) and the transition phase (5.33 ± 2.01, P = 0.03) of growth. No difference in the levels of dksA expression was found between the 35000HPΔrelAΔspoT and 35000HP strains grown to the stationary phase. Thus, loss of relA and spoT may be in part compensated by upregulation of dksA.
DISCUSSION
Many bacterial species sense and respond to nutrient stress by utilizing the stringent response, which is regulated by (p)ppGpp. During human infection, H. ducreyi is found in the hostile environment of an abscess. Whether H. ducreyi is nutritionally stressed in this environment is unknown. Nevertheless, here we showed that an H. ducreyi (p)ppGpp0 mutant is partially attenuated for virulence in human volunteers, suggesting that (p)ppGpp plays an important role in H. ducreyi pathogenesis.
The H. ducreyi RelA and SpoT proteins are 59% and 69% identical to their respective homologs in E. coli. In E. coli, RelA is a monofunctional enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of (p)ppGpp; SpoT is a bifunctional enzyme that primarily catalyzes hydrolysis of (p)ppGpp and has limited synthetic capabilities (58). We constructed a relA single-deletion mutant and a relA spoT double-deletion mutant in H. ducreyi but were unable to recover a spoT deletion mutant. In other organisms, expression of a (p)ppGpp synthase in the absence of a hydrolase leads to growth arrest and cell death; therefore, for many species, spoT is considered an essential gene (35, 59). In a radiolabeling-based de novo (p)ppGpp synthesis assay, both the H. ducreyi relA and relA spoT mutants were unable to synthesize (p)ppGpp. As there is no defined medium available for H. ducreyi, one limitation of our data is that we did not study (p)ppGpp synthesis in response to nutrient stress, which is usually used to enhance the synthetase activity of these enzymes. Given that deletion of relA alone was sufficient to abolish the ability of H. ducreyi to synthesize (p)ppGpp and that we were not able to construct a spoT mutant in the presence of relA, these data suggest that RelA is likely the primary (p)ppGpp synthetase and that SpoT is likely the primary (p)ppGpp hydrolase in H. ducreyi.
Recently, (p)ppGpp was shown to have a role in exponential growth (60). The H. ducreyi relA spoT mutant grown to the mid-log phase exhibited several phenotypes different from those of its parent that were not seen when the mutant was grown to stationary phase, including significantly reduced uptake by macrophages, increased transcript levels of lspB, increased transcript levels of dksA, reduction in the expression levels of DsrA, and upregulation in the expression levels of the porin OmpP2B. Given that many of the phenotypes associated with deletion of relA spoT were observed in cells grown to the mid-log phase but not in those grown to the stationary phase, these data suggest that (p)ppGpp likely plays a role in gene regulation during the exponential growth of H. ducreyi.
Since H. ducreyi colocalizes with macrophages and neutrophils during natural and experimental infection, the organism is likely exposed to reactive oxygen species from phagocytes (18, 61). In addition, H. ducreyi may be exposed to oxidative free radicals generated endogenously during metabolism. Both the relA single mutant and relA spoT double mutant showed increased sensitivity to H2O2- and paraquat-induced oxidative stress in vitro. Taken together, these data suggest that the attenuation of the (p)ppGpp0 mutant in humans may be in part due to increased sensitivity of the (p)ppGpp0 mutant to oxidative stress.
The relA spoT double mutant formed pustules at a rate significantly lower than the parent in human volunteers and met the criteria for partial attenuation in the model (17). Since OmpP2B is not required for pustule formation in humans (62), the increased expression of OmpP2B by the mutant likely had no effect on its virulence. The increased sensitivity to oxidative stress and the growth-phase-dependent reduction in the expression of DsrA favor attenuation of the mutant. However, the growth-phase-dependent upregulation of lspB transcripts, the decreased uptake by macrophages, and the increased longevity of the mutant in the stationary phase favor virulence. DksA phenotypically compensates for the loss of (p)ppGpp in a (p)ppGpp0 mutant in E. coli (63), and the increased transcript levels of dksA may have partially compensated for the loss of (p)ppGpp in the mutant and contributed to the partial attenuation of the mutant in vivo.
Another limitation of our study is that we examined the (p)ppGpp0 mutant for only a limited number of phenotypes that are usually associated with the virulence of H. ducreyi in human volunteers. Given the pleiotropic effects of ppGpp on gene transcription, it is likely that other factors played a role in the attenuation of the (p)ppGpp0 mutant. Nevertheless, our findings suggest an important role for (p)ppGpp in H. ducreyi virulence in humans. Our findings also highlight the underappreciated roles of (p)ppGpp in regulating phenotypes associated with exponential growth. Transcriptome analysis is under way to delineate the mechanisms underlying (p)ppGpp-mediated functions and its potential pleiotropic effects in H. ducreyi. Given that upregulation of dksA may partially compensate for the loss of ppGpp, it will be interesting to understand the role of DksA in H. ducreyi pathogenesis.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants AI27863 and AI27863S1 to S.M.S. from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and a Diversity Supplement (AI27863S2) to C.H. The human challenge trials were also supported by the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute and the Indiana Clinical Research Center (UL RR052761).
Mass spectrometry was performed by the Indiana University School of Medicine Proteomics Core Facility. We thank Mike Cashel for guidance with the (p)ppGpp assay, Julia Williams and Margaret Bauer for their thoughtful criticism of the manuscript, and the volunteers who participated in the trial.
We have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 9 June 2014
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01994-14.
REFERENCES
- 1.Spinola SM. 2008. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi, p 689–699 In Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, Piot P, Wasserheit JN, Corey L, Cohen MS, Watts DH. (ed), Sexually transmitted diseases, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steen R, Wi TE, Kamali A, Ndowa F. 2009. Control of sexually transmitted infections and prevention of HIV transmission: mending a fractured paradigm. Bull. World Health Organ. 87:858–865. 10.2471/BLT.08.059212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Phiri S, Zadrozny S, Weiss HA, Martinson F, Nyirenda N, Chen CY, Miller WC, Cohen MS, Mayaud P, Hoffman IF. 2013. Etiology of genital ulcer disease and association with HIV infection in Malawi. Sex. Transm. Dis. 40:923–928. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fayemiwo SA, Odaibo GN, Oni AA, Ajayi AA, Bakare RA, Olaleye DO. 2011. Genital ulcer diseases among HIV-infected female commercial sex workers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr. J. Med. Med. Sci. 40:39–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maan MA, Hussain F, Iqbal J, Akhtar SJ. 2011. Sexually transmitted infections in Pakistan. Ann. Saudi Med. 31:263–269. 10.4103/0256-4947.81541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhutto AM, Shah AH, Ahuja DK, Solangi AH, Shah SA. 2011. Pattern of sexually transmitted infections in males in interior Sindh: a 10-year-study. J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad 23:110–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weiss HA, Paz Bailey G, Phiri S, Gresenguet G, LeGoff J, Pepin J, Lewis DA, Belec L, Hoffman IF, Miller WC, Mayaud P. 2011. Episodic therapy for genital herpes in sub-Saharan Africa: a pooled analysis from three randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 6:e22601. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ray K, Bala M, Gupta SM, Khunger N, Puri P, Muralidhar S, Kumar J. 2006. Changing trends in sexually transmitted infections at a regional STD Centre in north India. Indian J. Med. Res. 124:559–568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mitjà O, Lukehart SA, Pokowas G, Moses P, Kapa A, Godornes C, Robson J, Cherian S, Houinei W, Kazadi W, Siba P, de Lazzari E, Bassat Q. 2014. Haemophilus ducreyi as a cause of skin ulcers in children from a yaws-endemic area of Papua New Guinea: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob. Health 2:e235–e241. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marckmann P, Hojbjerg T, von Eyben FE, Christensen I. 1989. Imported pedal chancroid: case report. Genitourin. Med. 65:126–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ussher JE, Wilson E, Campanella S, Taylor SL, Roberts SA. 2007. Haemophilus ducreyi causing chronic skin ulceration in children visiting Samoa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:e85–e87. 10.1086/515404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McBride WJ, Hannah RC, Le Cornec GM, Bletchly C. 2008. Cutaneous chancroid in a visitor from Vanuatu. Australas. J. Dermatol. 49:98–99. 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2008.00439.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peel TN, Bhatti D, De Boer JC, Stratov I, Spelman DW. 2010. Chronic cutaneous ulcers secondary to Haemophilus ducreyi infection. Med. J. Aust. 192:348–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schmid GP. 1999. Treatment of chancroid, 1997. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28(Suppl 1):S14–S20. 10.1086/514727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tyndall M, Malisa M, Plummer FA, Ombetti J, Ndinya-Achola JO, Ronald AR. 1993. Ceftriaxone no longer predictably cures chancroid in Kenya. J. Infect. Dis. 167:469–471. 10.1093/infdis/167.2.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Knapp JS, Back AF, Babst AF, Taylor D, Rice RJ. 1993. In vitro susceptibilities of isolates of Haemophilus ducreyi from Thailand and the United States to currently recommended and newer agents for treatment of chancroid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1552–1555. 10.1128/AAC.37.7.1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Janowicz DM, Ofner S, Katz BP, Spinola SM. 2009. Experimental infection of human volunteers with Haemophilus ducreyi: fifteen years of clinical data and experience. J. Infect. Dis. 199:1671–1679. 10.1086/598966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bauer ME, Goheen MP, Townsend CA, Spinola SM. 2001. Haemophilus ducreyi associates with phagocytes, collagen, and fibrin and remains extracellular throughout infection of human volunteers. Infect. Immun. 69:2549–2557. 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2549-2557.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hays RC, Mandell GL. 1974. pO2, pH, and redox potential of experimental abscesses. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 147:29–30. 10.3181/00379727-147-38275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Labandeira-Rey M, Dodd D, Fortney KR, Zwickl B, Katz BP, Janowicz DM, Spinola SM, Hansen EJ. 2011. A Haemophilus ducreyi cpxR deletion mutant is virulent in human volunteers. J. Infect. Dis. 203:1859–1865. 10.1093/infdis/jir190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bauer ME, Fortney KR, Harrison A, Janowicz DM, Munson RS, Jr, Spinola SM. 2008. Identification of Haemophilus ducreyi genes expressed during human infection. Microbiology 154:1152–1160. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/013953-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gentry DR, Cashel M. 1996. Mutational analysis of the Escherichia coli spoT gene identifies distinct but overlapping regions involved in ppGpp synthesis and degradation. Mol. Microbiol. 19:1373–1384. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chatterji D, Ojha AK. 2001. Revisiting the stringent response, ppGpp and starvation signaling. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:160–165. 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00182-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vinella D, Albrecht C, Cashel M, D'Ari R. 2005. Iron limitation induces SpoT-dependent accumulation of ppGpp in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 56:958–970. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dalebroux ZD, Edwards RL, Swanson MS. 2009. SpoT governs Legionella pneumophila differentiation in host macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 71:640–658. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Na HS, Kim HJ, Lee HC, Hong Y, Rhee JH, Choy HE. 2006. Immune response induced by Salmonella typhimurium defective in ppGpp synthesis. Vaccine 24:2027–2034. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sun W, Roland KL, Branger CG, Kuang X, Curtiss R., III 2009. The role of relA and spoT in Yersinia pestis KIM5 pathogenicity. PLoS One 4:e6720. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bugrysheva JV, Bryksin AV, Godfrey HP, Cabello FC. 2005. Borrelia burgdorferi rel is responsible for generation of guanosine-3′-diphosphate-5′-triphosphate and growth control. Infect. Immun. 73:4972–4981. 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4972-4981.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geiger T, Goerke C, Fritz M, Schafer T, Ohlsen K, Liebeke M, Lalk M, Wolz C. 2010. Role of the (p) ppGpp synthase RSH, a RelA/SpoT homolog, in stringent response and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 78:1873–1883. 10.1128/IAI.01439-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vogt SL, Green C, Stevens KM, Day B, Erickson DL, Woods DE, Storey DG. 2011. The stringent response is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in the rat lung agar bead and Drosophila melanogaster feeding models of infection. Infect. Immun. 79:4094–4104. 10.1128/IAI.00193-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dahl JL, Kraus CN, Boshoff HI, Doan B, Foley K, Avarbock D, Kaplan G, Mizrahi V, Rubin H, Barry CE., III 2003. The role of RelMtb-mediated adaptation to stationary phase in long-term persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:10026–10031. 10.1073/pnas.1631248100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abranches J, Martinez AR, Kajfasz JK, Chavez V, Garsin DA, Lemos JA. 2009. The molecular alarmone (p)ppGpp mediates stress responses, vancomycin tolerance, and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 191:2248–2256. 10.1128/JB.01726-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bozue JA, Tarantino L, Munson RS., Jr 1998. Facile construction of mutations in Haemophilus ducreyi using lacz as a counter-selectable marker. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 164:269–273. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Labandeira-Rey M, Brautigam CA, Hansen EJ. 2010. Characterization of the CpxRA regulon in Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 78:4779–4791. 10.1128/IAI.00678-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xiao H, Kalman M, Ikehara K, Zemel S, Glaser G, Cashel M. 1991. Residual guanosine 3′,5′-bispyrophosphate synthetic activity of relA null mutants can be eliminated by spoT null mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 266:5980–5990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, III, Smith HO. 2009. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6:343–345. 10.1038/nmeth.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spinola SM, Fortney KR, Katz BP, Latimer JL, Mock JR, Vakevainen M, Hansen EJ. 2003. Haemophilus ducreyi requires an intact flp gene cluster for virulence in humans. Infect. Immun. 71:7178–7182. 10.1128/IAI.71.12.7178-7182.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Concepcion MB, Nelson DR. 2003. Expression of spoT in Borrelia burgdorferi during serum starvation. J. Bacteriol. 185:444–452. 10.1128/JB.185.2.444-452.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gangaiah D, Liu Z, Arcos J, Kassem II, Sanad Y, Torrelles JB, Rajashekara G. 2010. Polyphosphate kinase 2: a novel determinant of stress responses and pathogenesis in Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS One 5:e12142. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Apicella MA, Griffiss JM, Schneider H. 1994. Isolation and characterization of lipopolysaccharides, lipooligosaccharides, and lipid A. Methods Enzymol. 235:242–252. 10.1016/0076-6879(94)35145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Spinola SM, Griffiths GE, Bogdan JA, Menegus MA. 1992. Characterization of an 18,000-molecular-weight outer membrane protein of Haemophilus ducreyi that contains a conserved surface-exposed epitope. Infect. Immun. 60:385–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Spinola SM, Fortney KR, Baker B, Janowicz DM, Zwickl B, Katz BP, Blick RJ, Munson RS., Jr 2010. Activation of the CpxRA system by deletion of cpxA impairs the ability of Haemophilus ducreyi to infect humans. Infect. Immun. 78:3898–3904. 10.1128/IAI.00432-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Prather DT, Bains M, Handcock REW, Filiatrault MJ, Campagnari AA. 2004. Differential expression of porins OmpP2A and OmpP2B of Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 72:6271–6278. 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6271-6278.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Elkins C, Morrow KJ, Olsen B. 2000. Serum resistance in Haemophilus ducreyi requires outer membrane protein DsrA. Infect. Immun. 68:1608–1619. 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1608-1619.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.White CD, Leduc I, Jeter C, Harris C, Elkins C. 2005. Haemophilus ducreyi outer membrane determinants, including DsrA, define two clonal populations. Infect. Immun. 73:2387–2399. 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2387-2399.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gangaiah D, Li W, Fortney KR, Janowicz DM, Ellinger S, Zwickl B, Katz BP, Spinola SM. 2013. Carbon storage regulator A contributes to the virulence of Haemophilus ducreyi in humans by multiple mechanisms. Infect. Immun. 81:608–617. 10.1128/IAI.01239-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Young RS, Fortney K, Haley JC, Hood AF, Campagnari AA, Wang J, Bozue JA, Munson RSJ, Spinola SM. 1999. Expression of sialylated or paragloboside-like lipooligosaccharides are not required for pustule formation by Haemophilus ducreyi in human volunteers. Infect. Immun. 67:6335–6340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tobe T, Kusukawa N, Yura T. 1987. Suppression of rpoH (htpR) mutations of Escherichia coli: heat shock response in suhA revertants. J. Bacteriol. 169:4128–4134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang QP, Kaguni JM. 1989. A novel sigma factor is involved in expression of the rpoH gene of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 171:4248–4253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Traxler MF, Summers SM, Nguyen HT, Zacharia VM, Hightower GA, Smith JT, Conway T. 2008. The global, ppGpp-mediated stringent response to amino acid starvation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 68:1128–1148. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06229.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sturm AW, Zanen HC. 1984. Characteristics of Haemophilus ducreyi in culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 19:672–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bauer ME, Spinola SM. 2000. Localization of Haemophilus ducreyi at the pustular stage of disease in the human model of infection. Infect. Immun. 68:2309–2314. 10.1128/IAI.68.4.2309-2314.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vakevainen M, Greenberg S, Hansen EJ. 2003. Inhibition of phagocytosis by Haemophilus ducreyi requires expression of the LspA1 and LspA2 proteins. Infect. Immun. 71:5994–6003. 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5994-6003.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ward CK, Mock JR, Hansen EJ. 2004. The LspB protein is involved in the secretion of the LspA1 and LspA2 proteins by Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 72:1874–1884. 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1874-1884.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Khakimova M, Ahlgren HG, Harrison JJ, English AM, Nguyen D. 2013. The stringent response controls catalases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and is required for hydrogen peroxide and antibiotic tolerance. J. Bacteriol. 195:2011–2020. 10.1128/JB.02061-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yan X, Zhao C, Budin-Verneuil A, Hartke A, Rince A, Gilmore MS, Auffray Y, Pichereau V. 2009. The (p)ppGpp synthetase RelA contributes to stress adaptation and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis V583. Microbiology 155:3226–3237. 10.1099/mic.0.026146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Perederina A, Svetlov V, Vassylyeva MN, Tahirov TH, Yokoyama S, Artsimovitch I, Vassylyev DG. 2004. Regulation through the secondary channel–structural framework for ppGpp-DksA synergism during transcription. Cell 118:297–309. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Potrykus K, Cashel M. 2008. (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62:35–51. 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Geiger T, Kastle B, Gratani FL, Goerke C, Wolz C. 2014. Two small (p)ppGpp synthases in Staphylococcus aureus mediate tolerance against cell envelope stress conditions. J. Bacteriol. 196:894–902. 10.1128/JB.01201-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gaca AO, Kajfasz JK, Miller JH, Liu K, Wang JD, Abranches J, Lemos JA. 2013. Basal levels of (p)ppGpp in Enterococcus faecalis: the magic beyond the stringent response. mBio 4:e00646-13. 10.1128/mBio.00646-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bauer ME, Townsend CA, Ronald AR, Spinola SM. 2006. Localization of Haemophilus ducreyi in naturally acquired chancroidal ulcers. Microbes Infect. 8:2465–2468. 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Janowicz D, Luke NR, Fortney KR, Katz BP, Campagnari AA, Spinola SM. 2006. Expression of OmpP2A and OmpP2B is not required for pustule formation by Haemophilus ducreyi in human volunteers. Microb. Pathog. 40:110–115. 10.1016/j.micpath.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Magnusson LU, Gummesson B, Joksimovic P, Farewell A, Nystrom T. 2007. Identical, independent, and opposing roles of ppGpp and DksA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 189:5193–5202. 10.1128/JB.00330-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, Court DL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. 2001. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 73:56–65. 10.1006/geno.2000.6451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Al-Tawfiq JA, Thornton AC, Katz BP, Fortney KR, Todd KD, Hood AF, Spinola SM. 1998. Standardization of the experimental model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection in human subjects. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1684–1687. 10.1086/314483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tracy E, Ye F, Baker BD, Munson RS., Jr 2008. Construction of nonpolar mutants in Haemophilus influenzae using FLP recombinase technology. BMC Mol. Biol. 9:101. 10.1186/1471-2199-9-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


