Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Synthesis (Stuttg). 2013 Aug 15;45(22):3099–3102. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1338520

Substituted 2,2′-bipyridines by nickel-catalysis: 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine

Joseph A Buonomo 1, Daniel A Everson 1, Daniel J Weix 1,*
PMCID: PMC4160121  NIHMSID: NIHMS574434  PMID: 25221358

Abstract

A simple, ligand-free synthesis of the important bipyridyl ligand 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine is presented. 5,5′-bis(trifluoromethyl)-2,2′-bipyridine is also synthesized by the same protocol. The syntheses efficiently couple the parent 2-chlorpyridies by a nickel-catalyzed dimerization with manganese powder as the terminal reductant.

Keywords: nickel; 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine; pyridine; catalysis; reductive


Bipyridine ligands have long been used with transition-metals in both catalysis and materials applications, but their chemistry is less well studied than the more frequently employed mono- and bisphosphines.1 Among many recent applications, 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine (3a) has been found to be useful in the iridium-catalyzed C-H borylation reaction,2 a variety of nickel-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling reactions,3 the nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of tertiary alkyl bromides with organoboron reagents,4 the copper-mediated trifluoromethylation of aryl iodides,5 the manganese-catalyzed reduction of CO2,6 and in iridium dyes used in photocatalysis and OLED.7 At the same time that the utility of 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine has become increasingly evident, the ligand has become more difficult to obtain commercially.8 Aldrich, the sole supplier in the United States, was continually backordered for a period of 6 months in 2012. The limited availability prompted us to consider alternate synthetic routes and we present here our results with a nickel-catalyzed reductive homocoupling.

Of the methods reported for the synthesis of 3a (Figure 1), the most convenient is reported to be that of McGill, which heats a mixture of 4-tert-butylpyridine with sodamide at 145 °C to form 3a in 8-15% yield.9 The other reported method is the dehydrogenative coupling of 4-tert-butylpyridine catalyzed by either nickel10 or palladium11 at elevated temperature. Reported yields range from <10% up to 64% yield, but vary considerably. In our hands, the reported procedures were inconvenient because they often suffered from low conversions that required distillation of the remaining, valuable 4-tert-butylpyridine, and because the dehydrogenative conditions provided inconsistent yields. The limited availability of 3a may be related to the difficulties associated with these procedures.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Literature methods for the synthesis of 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine (3a).

A number of substituted bipyridines have been synthesized by the nickel12 or palladium13 catalyzed reductive homocouplings of 2-halogenated pyridines. Most of the methods require high catalyst loadings (up to 30 mol% nickel, up to 10 mol% palladium), ancillary ligands, and/or additives, such as Cp2ZrCl2.

We provide here a simple route to 3a that is reliable and scalable (Scheme 1). Reaction of 4-tert-butylpyridine with peracetic acid forms the N-oxide. This then reacts with POCl3 to form 4-tert-butyl-2-chloropyridine (2a).14 Dimerization of 2a is achieved by nickel catalysis (0.5 mol %) with manganese as the terminal reducing agent. No added ligand is required and purification is achieved by simple aqueous work-up and sublimation (Table 1). Additionally, 2-chloro-5-trifluoromethylpyrdine (2b) dimerized to form 3b in 70% yield. This bipyridine has been reported as a ligand in ruthenium dyes15 and for catalysis,16 but has not been extensively explored in either arena. Previous syntheses were lower yielding or required expensive palladium catalysts.17 Lastly, simple 2-chloropyridine (2c) dimerized in 86% yield with only 0.2 mol% nickel catalyst.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Improved and convenient synthesis of 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine (3a).

Table 1.

Nickel-catalyzed reductive dimerization of 2-chloropyridines.a

graphic file with name nihms-574434-t0003.jpg
Entry 3 Yield
(%)b
1 graphic file with name nihms-574434-t0004.jpg 90
2c graphic file with name nihms-574434-t0005.jpg 70
3d graphic file with name nihms-574434-t0006.jpg 86
a

Reaction conditions: 2a (4.99g, 29.4 mmol), NiBr2·3H2O (401 mg, 1.47 mmol), DMF (20 mL), and manganese powder (−325 mesh, 3.30 g, 60.0 mmol) were heated under argon for 20 h.

b

Yield of isolated and purified product.

c

Reaction run on 15.0 mmol scale with 2b.

d

Reaction run on 15.0 mmol scale with 2c with 0.2 mol% NiBr2·3H2O for 18 h.

Vital to the success of these new, ligand-free dimerization conditions is the use of manganese powder as the reducing agent. Replacing manganese with zinc dust results in quantitative hydrodehalogenation of the chloropyridine. If NiBr2•3H2O is not available, NiCl2•6H2O also formed product in similarly high yield. Reactions in toluene, butanol, acetone, or ethanol did not form product at all, but a reaction in 1:3 DMF:THF worked as well as a reaction in pure DMF. Finally, although nickel hydrate salts were effective pre-catalysts, reactions run in DMF from an open-bottle off the shelf (measured to be ~10000 ppm H2O) were half as fast as our standard reaction in dry DMF (85 ppm H2O).

Although no ligand is added to these reactions, the first turnover of the catalyst generates a suitable ligand for the coupling reaction. Reactions of halopyridines that do not form bidentate ligands, such as 3-bromopyridine, do not consume starting material unless an external ligand is added.

Mechanistically, we have not conducted any investigations, but we currently favor the disproportion mechanism proposed by Osakada and Yamamoto.18

We expect that this method will provide improved and reliable access to 3a. The low catalyst loading, ligand- and additive-free reaction conditions combined with high substrate concentrations makes this route particularly useful for large-scale laboratory experiments.

4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine [72914-19-3] (3a)19

On the benchtop, a 50 mL round bottom flask equipped with a 1/2 inch Teflon coated magnetic stir bar was charged with NiBr2·3H2O (401 mg, 1.47 mmol) and DMF (20.0 mL). The vessel was stoppered with a rubber septum and heated to 60 °C until a green homogenous solution resulted (approx. 20 min). Once homogeneity was achieved, the vessel was removed from the heat and allowed to cool to room temperature. Once at room temperature 4-tert-butyl-2-chloropyridine (2a) (4.99 g, 29.4 mmol) and manganese powder (−325 mesh, 3.30 g, 60.0 mmol) were added, and the vessel was resealed with the septum, purged with argon, and heated again to 60 °C for the duration of the reaction. Reaction progress was monitored by GC analysis of aliquots of crude reaction mixture. In general the reaction turns very dark brown or black in color when complete, and the color change is a reliable indicator for the reaction endpoint. Upon completion, the reaction was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ether (80 mL) and filtered through a short pad of celite (approx. 2 in × 2 in × 2 in) that had been wetted with ether to remove metal salts. The reaction vessel was washed with ether (2 × 40 mL) and the washes were then passed through the filter. The filtrate was transferred to a separatory funnel and washed with 1M sodium hydroxide (200 mL). A brown emulsion formed in the separatory funnel during the work-up that slowly separated. Care was taken to keep the brown emulsion with the organics. Once separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with additional ether (3 × 150 mL). The combined organic extracts and brown emulsion were washed with brine (500 mL). Again care was taken to keep the brown emulsion with the organics. The organics were dried with copious amounts of MgSO4. The solid drying agent was removed by filtration, ground into a fine powder and washed with additional ether (3 × 150 mL). The filtrate was evaporated to dryness to give 3a (3.57 g) as faintly yellow crystals in 90% yield. This material was judged analytically pure by NMR and combustion analysis. If necessary the product can be further purified by sublimation (140 °C, 300 mtorr). Analytical data reported below is for material that was not sublimed.

1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 8.60 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 8.41 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (dd, J = 5.2, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (s, 18H).

13C-NMR (126 MHz; CDCl3): δ 161.1, 156.7, 149.2, 120.8, 118.4, 35.1, 30.8.

Anal. Calc. for C18H24N2 requires: C, 80.55; H, 9.01; N, 10.44; found: C, 80.29; H, 9.12; N, 10.44%.

MP = 157 -158 °C (lit.19 = 159 -160 °C).

5,5′-Bis(trifluoromethyl)-2,2′-bipyridine [142946-80-3] (3b)15, 17

The procedure for 3a was followed on 15.0 mmol scale and with 1M ammonium hydroxide in place of 1M sodium hydroxide. The product was purified by sublimation (110 °C, 200 mtorr) to give 3b (1.54 g) as white solid in 70% yield.

1H-NMR (500 MHz; CDCl3): δ 8.96 (s, 2H), 8.62 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 8.08 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.8 Hz, 2H).

13C-NMR (126 MHz; CDCl3): δ 157.9, 146.47 (q, J = 4.3 Hz), 134.47 (q, J = 3.2 Hz), 127.31 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 123.67 (q, J = 272.8 Hz), 121.4.

19F-NMR (376 MHz; CDCl3): δ −0.1.

Anal. Calc. for C12H6F6N2 requires: C, 49.39; H, 2.07; N, 9.59; found: C, 49.60; H, 2.15; N, 9.59%.

MP = 128-130 °C (lit.17 = 124-126 °C (hexanes)).

2,2′-bipyridine [366-18-7] (3c)20

The procedure for 3a was followed on 15.0 mmol scale with 0.2 mol% nickel, and with 1M ammonium hydroxide in place of 1M sodium hydroxide. The product was purified by sublimation (95 °C, 100 mtorr) to give 3c (1.00 g) as white solid in 86% yield.

1H-NMR (500 MHz; CDCl3): δ 8.69 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 2H), 8.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.82 (td, J = 7.7, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (ddd, J = 7.4, 4.8, 1.0 Hz, 2H).

13C-NMR (126 MHz; CDCl3): δ 156.2, 149.2, 137.0, 123.8, 121.1.

Anal. Calc. for C10H8N2 requires: C, 76.90; H, 5.16; N, 17.94; found: C, 76.72; H, 5.08; N, 17.93%.

MP = 70-72 °C (lit.21 = 71-72 °C).

Supplementary Material

SI_001
SI_002

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the University of Rochester, the NIH (R01 GM097243), an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to DAE, and the NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates Program (CHE-1156340 for JAB). Analytical data were obtained from the CENTC Elemental Analysis Facility at the University of Rochester, funded by NSF CHE-0650456.

Footnotes

Supporting Information for this article is available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/toc/synthesis.

Primary Data for this article are available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/toc/synthesis and can be cited using the following DOI: (number will be inserted prior to online publication).

References

  • (1).(a) Marin V, Holder E, Hoogenboom R, Schubert US. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:618–635. doi: 10.1039/b610016c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kwong H-L, Yeung H-L, Yeung C-T, Lee W-S, Lee C-S, Wong W-L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007;251:2188–2222. [Google Scholar]; (c) Balzani V, Bergamini G, Marchioni F, Ceroni P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006;250:1254–1266. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).(a) Ishiyama T, Takagi J, Ishida K, Miyaura N, Anastasi NR, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;124:390. doi: 10.1021/ja0173019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mkhalid IAI, Barnard JH, Marder TB, Murphy JM, Hartwig JF. Chem. Rev. 2009;110:890. doi: 10.1021/cr900206p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Roosen PC, Kallepalli VA, Chattopadhyay B, Singleton DA, Maleczka RE, Smith MR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:11350–11353. doi: 10.1021/ja303443m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).(a) Everson DA, Shrestha R, Weix DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:920. doi: 10.1021/ja9093956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Everson DA, Jones BA, Weix DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:6146. doi: 10.1021/ja301769r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wotal AC, Weix DJ. Org. Lett. 2012;14:1476. doi: 10.1021/ol300217x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Everson DA, George DT, Weix DJ. Org. Synth. 2013;90:200. doi: 10.15227/orgsyn.090.0200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Shrestha R, Dorn SCM, Weix DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:751. doi: 10.1021/ja309176h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wang S, Qian Q, Gong H. Org. Lett. 2012;14:3352. doi: 10.1021/ol3013342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Yin H, Zhao C, You H, Lin K, Gong H. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:7034. doi: 10.1039/c2cc33232a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Zultanski SL, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:624. doi: 10.1021/ja311669p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Tomashenko OA, Escudero-Adán EC, Martínez Belmonte M, Grushin VV. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011;50:7655. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Smieja JM, Sampson MD, Grice KA, Benson EE, Froehlich JD, Kubiak CP. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52:2484–2491. doi: 10.1021/ic302391u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).(a) Slinker JD, Gorodetsky AA, Lowry MS, Wang J, Parker S, Rohl R, Bernhard S, Malliaras GG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:2763–2767. doi: 10.1021/ja0345221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lowry MS, Hudson WR, Pascal RA, Bernhard S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:14129–14135. doi: 10.1021/ja047156+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nagib DA, Scott ME, MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:10875–10877. doi: 10.1021/ja9053338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Nguyen JD, D’Amato EM, Narayanam JMR, Stephenson CRJ. Nat Chem. 2012;4:854–859. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Aldrich is the only large commercial supplier listed in the eMolecules or Scifinder databases. Aldrich has been frequently backordered on this ligand since the early spring of 2012, but when it is in stock it is $8-$10/g. Currently (6/13/13) it is listed as backordered until 7/31/13. Other, smaller, suppliers list prices of >$200/g.
  • (9).(a) McGill CK. US Pat., 4 267 335 1981; (b) Adams CJ, James SL, Liu X, Raithby PR, Yellowlees LJ. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000:63. [Google Scholar]; (c) Awad DJ, Schilde U, Strauch P. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2011;365:127. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).(a) Badger GM, Sasse WHF. J. Chem. Soc. 1956:616. [Google Scholar]; (b) Achar S, Scott JD, Vittal JJ, Puddephatt R. J. Organometallics. 1992;12:4592. [Google Scholar]; (c) Belser P, Zelewsky AV. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1980;63:1675. [Google Scholar]; (d) Dai S, Xu Y, Pan X, Shi C, Wang K. Chinese Pat., CN1443758 A 20030924
  • (11).(a) Rosevear PE, Sasse WHF. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1971;8:483. [Google Scholar]; (b) Belser P, Zelewsky AV. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1980;63:1675. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ben Hadda T, Le Bozec H. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1993;204:103. [Google Scholar]; (d) ref. 8d.
  • (12).Selected examples: Peng J, Liu X, Kishi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:2172–2175. de França KWR, Navarro M, Léonel É, Durandetti M, Nédélec J-Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:1838–1842. doi: 10.1021/jo016280y. Iyoda M, Otsuka H, Sato K, Nisato N, Oda M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990;63:80–87.
  • (13).Selected examples: Ram RN, Singh V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:7625–7628. Kuroboshi M, Waki Y, Tanaka H. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:3938–3942. doi: 10.1021/jo0207473. Penalva V, Hassan J, Lavenot L, Gozzi C, Lemaire M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2559–2560. Hassan J, Penalva V, Lavenot L, Gozzi C, Lemaire M. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:13793–13804.
  • (14).(a) Fu R, Bercaw JE, Labinger JA. Organometallics. 2011;30:6751–6765. doi: 10.1021/om200364w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Almirall SA, Vidal Juan B, Forns Berenguel MP, Castillo McQuade M, Erra Sola M, Mir Cepeda M. 2012 WO2012041476 (A1) [Google Scholar]
  • (15).McFarland SA, Lee FS, Cheng KAWY, Cozens FL, Schepp NP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:7065–7070. doi: 10.1021/ja0461872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Deng JZ, Paone DV, Ginnetti AT, Kurihara H, Dreher SD, Weissman SA, Stauffer SR, Burgey CS. Org. Lett. 2008;11:345–347. doi: 10.1021/ol802556f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Chan KS, Tse AKS. Synth. Commun. 1993;23:1929–1934. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).(a) Yamamoto T, Wakabayashi S, Osakada K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992;428:223–237. [Google Scholar]; (b) Osakada K, Yamamoto T. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000;198:379–399. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Awad DJ, Schilde U, Strauch P. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2011;365:127–132. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Kim S-H, Rieke RD. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:3135–3146. [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Zeng M, Du Y, Shao L, Qi C, Zhang X-M. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:2556–2563. doi: 10.1021/jo100089d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI_001
SI_002

RESOURCES