Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2014 May 6;16(5):626–634. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0741-4

Oatp1 Enhances Bioluminescence by Acting as a Plasma Membrane Transporter for d-luciferin

P Stephen Patrick 1,2, Scott K Lyons 2, Tiago B Rodrigues 2, Kevin M Brindle 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC4161938  PMID: 24798747

Abstract

Purpose

Bioluminescence imaging is a powerful tool for studying gene expression and cell migration in intact living organisms. However, production of bioluminescence by cells transfected to express luciferase can be limited by the rate of plasma membrane transport of its substrate d-luciferin. We sought to identify a plasma membrane transporter for d-luciferin that could be expressed alongside luciferase to increase transmembrane flux of its substrate and thereby increase light output.

Procedures

Luciferase-expressing cells were transfected with a lentivirus encoding the rat reno-hepatic organic anion transporter protein, Oatp1, which was identified as a potential transporter for d-luciferin. Light output was compared between cells expressing luciferase and those also expressing Oatp1.

Results

In two cell lines and in mouse xenografts, co-expression of Oatp1 with luciferase increased light output by several fold, following addition of luciferin.

Conclusions

The increase in light output thus obtained will allow more sensitive detection of luciferase-expressing cells in vivo.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11307-014-0741-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Key words: Bioluminescence, Molecular imaging, Luciferase, Reporter gene, Oatp1

Introduction

Bioluminescence imaging is a versatile and widely available method for imaging gene expression and cell migration [1]. However, detection of cells expressing firefly luciferase in vivo is limited by scattering and absorption of the emitted light by proteins such as hemoglobin [2]. While this is less of a problem at relatively superficial body locations, it can reduce both the sensitivity and resolution with which internal organs and cell masses, such as early stage tumors, can be imaged [3]. Various modifications have been made to the luciferase reporter system to address this problem, including the following: red-shifted luciferases and luciferins, which show less light scattering [4–9], codon optimization to increase luciferase expression [10], and mutagenesis to increase enzyme stability [11] and activity [12]. However, with some exceptions [6, 10, 12], the majority of these strategies have not markedly increased light output in vivo.

Numerous studies have indicated that luciferin transport across the plasma membrane limits enzyme activity and hence light output. In an early study, light output of luciferase-expressing mammalian cells was increased by reducing the number of membranes that luciferin had to cross to reach the enzyme. This was achieved by removing the peroxisomal targeting sequence found in the native enzyme, thus localizing it to the cytoplasm [13–15]. However, despite this modification, the rate of luciferin transport across the plasma membrane still limited light output, with between 7 and 70 times more light produced by lysed bacterial and mammalian cells [16, 17]. Light output can also be increased by the addition of cell permeabilizing agents such as DMSO, which increase luciferin uptake [15]. Increasing the lipid solubility and membrane permeability of luciferin has also met with some success. For example, bioluminescent output in intact cells, but not lysed cells, was increased following incubation with a lipid-soluble ester derivative of luciferin [18]. However, the aqueous solubility of this substrate was much less than that of unmodified luciferin, reducing the practicality of delivering it in vivo. Amino-luciferin showed increased cell permeability in comparison to d-luciferin [19], resulting in a peak photon emission that was 25 % higher in vivo. However, the Vmax of luciferase for this substrate is up to ten times lower than for d-luciferin. Recent work has demonstrated that the cyclic alkylaminoluciferin, CycLuc1, produces several-fold more light than an equivalent dose of d-luciferin, providing greater sensitivity of detection in the brain, where d-luciferin uptake is low [20]. However, the ability of this substrate to give greater sensitivity than d-luciferin in other tissues, when the luciferin is used in its normal higher concentration range, remains to be evaluated since it is not yet widely available.

Luciferin uptake varies between different cell types in both plants and animals [21–24], and this has previously been explained by the existence of luciferin exporters [25, 26], though it could also be explained by the existence of as yet unidentified luciferin importers. A novel strategy to increase luciferin uptake, and hence light output in luciferase-expressing cells, would be to co-express a luciferin transporter together with luciferase. Although the existence of luciferin importer proteins has been inferred [27], to the authors’ knowledge, no importers of luciferin have been definitively identified. Bio-distribution studies have shown that luciferin concentrations are high in the liver and kidneys following intravenous and intraperitoneal injections in mice [21, 23], implying the presence of a protein or proteins that mediate luciferin uptake. The family of organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP), of which rat (Rattus norvegicus) Oatp1 (also known as Slc21a1, Slco1a1), was the first member to be identified [28, 29], has over 60 members, which are expressed predominantly in the liver and kidneys and are responsible for the removal of a broad range of organic molecules from the blood, including xenobiotics, hormones, and toxins [30–32]. Among Oatp1’s substrates and inhibitors are organic anions and cations, many of which are, like d-luciferin [33], cyclic, polycyclic, or heteropolycyclic carboxylic acids [30, 34, 35].

The observation that Oatp1 has a broad range of substrates, the correlation between the location of Oatp1 expression and high luciferin uptake, and the resemblance of d-luciferin to some known substrates of Oatp1 suggested to us that expression of this transporter might facilitate cellular luciferin entry and thus enhance bioluminescent output. We found recently, when investigating Oatp1 as a potential gene reporter for use with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [36], that Oatp1 expression increased bioluminescence from cells expressing luciferase in vivo. We show here that this can be explained by Oatp1-mediated uptake of d-luciferin, which significantly enhances the sensitivity of this widely used gene reporter system.

Materials and Methods

Vectors

LV-PGK-SO, comprising a sequence encoding mStrawberry [36], E2A (QCTNYALLKLAGDVESNPGP) [37], and Oatp1 (kindly provided by Dr Allan Wolkoff, [GenBank: NM_017111.1]), with a stop codon at the end of Oatp1, was cloned into the lentiviral transfer plasmid pBOBI (Inder M. Verma laboratory, Salk Institute, California) downstream of a PGK promoter [38]. The control vector (referred to as LV-PGK-ST) contained Timd2 [Genbank: NM_001161356.1] in place of the Oatp1 sequence. Replication defective vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) pseudotyped lentiviral vectors were produced [39] and purified [40] according to published protocols, using the transfer plasmids and three packaging plasmids (Inder M. Verma laboratory, Salk Institute, CA). Inducible plasmids were produced using a doxycycline responsive promoter (TRE3G) and the mStrawberry-E2A-Oatp sequence described above (referred to as pTRE3G-SO). Plasmid maps of these vectors are shown in additional files.

Cell Culture

Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293T) were acquired from Thermo Scientific (Loughborough, UK), Lewis Lung murine carcinoma (LL2) cells from the American Type Tissue Collection (ATCC, Teddington, UK), and HCT 116 cells from LGC Promochem. HEK 293T and LL2 cells were grown in DMEM (Invitrogen, UK), supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM l-glutamine and 0.1 mM MEM nonessential amino acids. HCT 116 cells were grown in McCoy's 5A media with Glutamax (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10 % FBS. Cells were mycoplasma tested upon receipt.

Cell Transfection and Transduction

Stable luciferase-expressing HEK 293T cells used to validate Oatp1 function were generated by transduction with a FIV-based vector [41] modified to encode a Luc2-YFP fusion protein (LHLY) under a CAGGS promoter and clones selected using hygromycin. LL2 cells were transfected with a pBluescript plasmid encoding luciferase under a CAGGS promoter. Stable Oatp1 (and control) expressing subclones were generated from the above by lentiviral transduction with LV-PGK-SO (and LV-PGK-ST) and dilution cloning. Transgene expression post-transduction was confirmed by Western blot and by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur II, BD Biosciences, CA, USA) or fluorescence imaging (IVIS 200 series camera; PerkinElmer) or by microscopy. The doxycycline-inducible mStrawberry-E2A-Oatp1 and luciferase-E2A-Oatp1 plasmids used for bioluminescence experiments in vitro were constructed using a modified TRE3G vector (Clontech) containing a puromycin resistance cassette for selection of stable clones.

Western Blots

Cells were extracted using M-Per reagent (Thermo Scientific) with Complete Mini Protease inhibitors (Roche), and protein concentration determined using the Bradford assay. Extracts were run on an SDS PAGE gel (NuPAGE, Invitrogen), transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and luciferase-YFP detected using polyclonal goat anti-luciferase antibody (g475A, Promega), at 1 in 25,000 dilution with incubation for 1 h at room temperature. For α-tubulin staining a monoclonal mouse anti-α-tubulin (T1799, Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 1 in 1,000 dilution with overnight incubation at 4 °C. For mStrawberry staining, rabbit polyclonal anti-RFP (ab34771, AbCam) was used at 1 in 10,000 dilution with overnight incubation at 4 °C. Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit (111-035-003), anti-goat (705-035-003-JIR), and anti-mouse (115-035-006-JIR) antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK) were used as the secondary antibodies at 1 in 10,000 dilution with an incubation time of 45 min at room temperature. All antibodies were diluted with 5 % w/v milk powder and 0.1 % Tween.

Imaging

Cells were grown to 70 % confluence in six-well tissue culture plates (Nunc, Thermo Scientific) and then imaged using an IVIS 200 series camera (PerkinElmer) with small binning, a 1 s exposure, and an F-stop between 1 and 4, immediately after addition of luciferin to the growth medium (10 to 150 μg/ml; PerkinElmer). The final cell counts per well were typically between 2 and 3 million. For time course experiments (Figs. 1c, d, 3c, and 4a), measurements were repeated every minute for 20 min after luciferin addition. The number of cells per well was counted using a Z2 Cell and Particle Counter (Beckman-Coulter). The bioluminescence, expressed as photons/s/cell, was calculated for each well by dividing the photon count at each time point by the cell count for that well and an average calculated for four wells per condition. Inhibition experiments were performed by pre-mixing growth medium with quinine, at a concentration of 1 mM, and replacing the standard growth medium with this medium 5 min prior to addition of luciferin. Cell extracts were obtained by suspending 2 × 107 cells in 1 ml of extraction buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.8, 1 mM dithiothreitol) [16], and freeze thawing three times on dry ice. The extract was mixed 2:1 with 3× assay buffer (25 mM glycylglycine buffer, pH 7.2, 5 mM ATP, and 15 mM MgSO4) [16] that had been premixed with luciferin. The number of photons per well was recorded at each time point using Living Image software (PerkinElmer). For imaging in vivo, xenograft-bearing mice were injected intraperitoneally with 150 mg/kg of luciferin and imaged every minute between 5 and 20 min post injection.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Oatp1 expression enhances bioluminescent output of luciferase-expressing cells. a HEK 293T cells expressing luciferase were transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing either Oatp1 or Timd2 (control) or were not transduced (control), 24 h before incubation with luciferin. Oatp1-expressing cells emitted significantly more light than control cells immediately after luciferin addition (1-s exposure time; n = 3, two-tailed T test). b Lewis lung carcinoma cells (LL2) expressing luciferase were transduced with lentiviral vectors, as described in (a). Clonal HEK 293T cells expressing Oatp1 produce more light than the luciferase-expressing cell population from which they were derived, for a period of 20 min following addition of luciferin at a concentration of c 36 μΜ and d 535 μM (n = 3, error bars show SD). e Western blot of protein extracts from the cells used in c and d, showing luciferase-YFP and RFP expression in control HEK 293T cells and HEK 293T cells transduced to express Oatp1. The presence of RFP indicates expression of the mStrawberry-Oatp1 transgene. sr steradian.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Oatp1 expression levels correlated linearly with enhancement of bioluminescence. HEK 293T cells expressing luciferase-YFP were transfected with a plasmid vector co-expressing mStrawberry and Oatp1 under the control of a doxycycline-inducible promoter (pTRE3G-SO). a Western blot showing induction of mStrawberry (RFP), and hence Oatp1, at increasing doxycycline concentrations. b The RFP band intensity on the western blot, when expressed as a ratio of the α-tubulin band intensity, showed a linear dependence on doxycycline concentration. c Enhancement of bioluminescence, following addition of luciferin (89 μM), was linearly dependent on the doxycycline concentration used to induce Oatp1 expression. d Enhancement of bioluminescence (c) versus Oatp1 expression (intensity of mStrawberry/α-tubulin on the Western blot (b)). All measurements were made 24 h after the addition of doxycycline to the cell culture medium.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Co-induction of luciferase and Oatp1 expression correlates with enhancement of bioluminescence. HEK 293T and HCT116 cells were transfected with a plasmid (pTRE3G-LO) expressing luciferase and Oatp1 from a doxycycline-inducible promoter. a Enhancement of bioluminescence, following addition of luciferin (89 μΜ), was dependent on the doxycycline concentration used to induce expression (n = 3, error bars show SD). Western blot showing induction of luciferase, and hence Oatp1, at increasing doxycycline concentrations in b HEK 293T cells and c HCT116 cells.

Doxycycline Induction

Doxycycline was prepared as a stock solution of 10 mg/ml in water, sterile filtered, and stored at 4 °C. An appropriate volume of the stock solution was added to growth medium 24 h prior to imaging, to produce the final concentrations indicated in Figs. 3 and 4. Imaging of these cells was performed as described above.

Statistical Analyses

Student’s T test and linear regression were performed using Excel (Microsoft) and Graphpad Prism (Graphpad Software Inc.) software. Unequal variance T tests were used when variance between groups were dissimilar. No blinding or randomization was used in any of the experiments, and no animals were excluded from analyses.

Animals

Female SCID mice were obtained from Charles River (UK) at ~20 g (2 to 3 months) each and used within a few months of acquisition. Animals were injected subcutaneously with 1 × 107 viable HEK 293T cells per flank and anesthetized using 2 % isoflurane in 75 % air/25 % O2 (flow rate 2 l/min) for bioluminescence and fluorescence imaging. Animal experiments were carried out under the authority of project and personal licenses issued by the Home Office, UK and were approved by the Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body.

Results

Oatp1 Expression Enhances Bioluminescence

A lentiviral vector (LV-PGK-SO) expressing the red fluorescent protein (RFP) mStrawberry and Oatp1 from the PGK promoter was constructed. The coding sequences of the two proteins were separated by an E2Asequence, which results in equimolar expression from the same transcript [42] (see Figure S1). Human embryonic kidney (HEK 293T) cells stably expressing a luciferase-YFP fusion protein [36], were transduced, at a multiplicity of infection of 2, with LV-PGK-SO, or with a control lentivirus, LV-PGK-ST, in which the coding sequence for Oatp1 was replaced with that of Timd2 [43]. Timd2 is a receptor that mediates H-ferritin endocytosis, and like Oatp1, is expressed on the plasma membrane in liver and kidney cells. Nontransduced cells were used as a further control. Expression of Oatp1, in cells transduced with LV-PGK-SO, and of Timd2, in cells transduced with LV-PGK-ST, was confirmed by observations of fluorescence from the co-expressed mStrawberry and by detection of mStrawberry on western blots. Cells expressing Oatp1 showed significantly higher initial rates of photon production per cell (three to sixfold), over a range of d-luciferin concentrations, when compared with cells expressing Timd2 or non-transduced cells (Fig. 1a), despite equivalent levels of luciferase expression. Comparison of cells expressing Timd2, non transduced cells and cells expressing Oatp1, using two-way ANOVA, showed that Oatp1 expression accounted for 57.8 % of the variation and d-luciferin concentration for 32.5 %, with 9.1 % interaction (p < 0.0001). In a comparison of the control groups, expression of Timd2 had no effect on light output (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.5526), with d-luciferin concentration accounting for 86 % of total variation (p < 0.0001) and Timd2 expression accounting for 0.04 %. The greatest increase in light output with Oatp1 expression, over sixfold, was observed at the lowest d-luciferin concentrations, the enhancement correlating negatively with d-luciferin concentration (Fig. 1a, b, c, d). Similar results were obtained with Lewis lung carcinoma (LL2) cells (Fig. 1b). There was a 4.5- to 6.2-fold increase in photon emission from LL2 cells expressing Oatp1, when compared to control cells. The enhancement again correlated negatively with d-luciferin concentration. Light output from Oatp1-expressing cells at 10 μg/ml of d-luciferin was 2.8× higher when compared to control cells incubated with 100 μg/ml (Fig. 1b). Quinine, an inhibitor of Oatp1 [35], decreased the light output of Oatp1-expressing HEK 293T cells to a level comparable with that of control cells incubated with the inhibitor (Fig. 1a).

Expression of Oatp1 led to sustained enhancement of bioluminescence following addition of 36 (10 μg/ml) (Fig. 1c) or 535 μΜ (150 μg/ml) luciferin (Fig. 1d) to luciferase-expressing HEK 293T cells that had been sub-cloned following transduction with the LV-PGK-SO vector. The usual burst kinetics associated with luciferase expression [16] were evident and were exaggerated by expression of Oatp1. Average light output from Oatp1-expressing cells was between 2.6- and 5.6-fold higher than control cells over the 20 min following luciferin addition. Expression of Oatp1 was confirmed by western blotting, which showed the presence of co-expressed mStrawberry (RFP). These blots also showed that luciferase-YFP was expressed equally in Oatp1-expressing and control cells (Fig. 1e).

Effect of Oatp1 Expression on the Kinetics of Photon Emission

Lineweaver-Burk plots of the initial rates of photon emission per cell (Fig. 2a, b) gave an apparent Km of luciferase for luciferin (Km (d-luciferin)) of 422 μM in control HEK 293T cells and 166 μM in cells expressing Oatp1. The Km in cell extracts was 57 μM. The apparent Km (d-luciferin) in LL2 cells was 114 μM in control cells and 71 μM in cells expressing Oatp1. Expression of Oatp1 increased Vmax in HEK 293T cells from 23,955 ± 5,791 to 58,770 ± 4,134 photons/s/cell (p < 0.05) and from 84 ± 4 photons/s/cell to 402 ± 17 photons/s/cell in LL2 cells (p < 0.01). These data confirm that cell uptake of luciferin is rate limiting for luciferase activity.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Effect of Oatp1 expression on the kinetics of photon production. Lineweaver-Burk plots showing the effects of Oatp1 expression and luciferin concentration on light output from a HEK 293T cells and b LL2 cells expressing luciferase-YFP. The data were taken from Fig. 1a, b.

Oatp1 Expression Correlates Linearly with Enhancement of Bioluminescence

The relationship between Oatp1 expression and enhancement of light output was further investigated in luciferase-YFP-expressing HEK 293T cells that had been stably transfected with a plasmid containing a doxycycline-inducible promoter driving expression of the mStrawberry-E2A-Oatp1 transgenes (pTRE3G-SO, see Supplementary Data File). There was a linear relationship between doxycycline concentration and an increase in Oatp1 expression, as determined from the levels of co-expressed mStrawberry on Western blots (Fig. 3a, b). Western blotting also showed that there was no change in the expression of luciferase-YFP with increasing doxycycline concentration (Fig. 3a). There was also a linear relationship between doxycycline concentration and enhancement of bioluminescence (Fig. 3c) and thus between bioluminescence enhancement and Oatp1 expression (Fig. 3d).

Similar experiments were performed in which both luciferase and Oatp1 were co-expressed from a doxycycline-inducible promoter (Fig. 4). HEK 293T and HCT116 cells were stably transfected with pTRE3G-LO (see Supplementary Data File), in which the luciferase and Oatp1 coding sequences were separated by an E2A sequence [37]. In both cell lines photon emission was correlated with the concentration of doxycycline used to induce gene expression (Fig. 4a). Induction of both luciferase and Oatp1 was confirmed by measurements of increased luciferase expression on Western blots (Fig. 4b, c). Increased light output appeared to correlate linearly with Oatp1 expression in HEK 293T cells; however, there was some evidence of nonlinearity in HCT116 cells (Fig. 4a). This may be due to variation in expression of luciferin exporter proteins of the ABCG2 or BCRP families [24, 25], or constitutive OATP1B3 expression in HCT116 cells [44].

Oatp1 Expression Increased Bioluminescence In Vivo

We have demonstrated previously that Oatp1 expression increases light output in vivo [36]. Control HEK 293 T cells (1 × 107) expressing luciferase-YFP (the same clone as used in Fig. 1) were implanted in the left flank of SCID mice, and 1 × 107 of the same cells, which had transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing Oatp1 and mStrawberry and then cloned (shown in Fig. 1c, d, e), were implanted in the right flank (n = 5). Animals were imaged every minute between 5 and 20 min following intraperitoneal injection of luciferin (150 mg/kg). A representative bioluminescence image from a mouse at day 15 post implantation is shown in Fig. 5a. Corresponding fluorescence images showed that luciferase-YFP was expressed equally in the contralateral xenografts. Light output from xenografts expressing Oatp1 in five different animals, averaged over 15 min following luciferin injection, was between ~5 and up to 20-fold higher than the corresponding contralateral control xenografts for up to 18 days post implantation of the cells (see Fig. 5b) [36]. Given the negative correlation between bioluminescence enhancement and d-luciferin concentration observed in the cell experiments this wide variation in enhancement observed in vivo may reflect differences in the delivery of luciferin to the tissue. The previous studies, in which we investigated the use of Oatp1 as a gene reporter for MRI and for SPECT, demonstrated that Oatp1 expression, at the levels used here, had no measureable effect on cell growth in vitro [36]. Additionally, the ability of HEK 293T cells to form xenografts and their subsequent growth in vivo was not influenced by Oatp1-expression. There was no significant difference in the weights of excised control and Oatp1-expressing HEK 293T xenografts 24 days after cell implantation (n = 5, two-tailed paired T test, p = 0.13) (see Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Oatp1 expression increases luciferase bioluminescence in vivo. a Representative mouse showing increased bioluminescence from the Oatp1-expressing HEK 293T xenograft (right flank), when compared with the control xenograft, expressing luciferase-YFP alone (left flank). YFP fluorescence demonstrated that luciferase was equally expressed in both xenografts. b Enhancement of light output of individual Oatp1-expressing xenografts relative to the contralateral control xenograft. Points show the ratio of the mean light output between 5 and 20 min following luciferin injection, for up to 18 days post cell implantation. Error bars show ± SD. At the 18 day time point, the light outputs of the Oatp1-expressing and control xenografts were normalized to the respective weights of the excised tissues at 24 days post cell implantation. Light output was significantly greater at all time points in Oatp1-expressing xenografts compared to control xenografts (n = 5, paired one-tailed T test), p < 0.05 for all time points. c Wet weight of excised control and Oatp1-expressing HEK 293 T xenografts 24 days after cell implantation.

Discussion

A major limitation of luciferase as a reporter gene has been identified as the rate of luciferin uptake into cells [15]. This has been addressed previously by lowering pH, so that luciferin becomes protonated and more membrane-soluble, or by adding DMSO to permeabilize the plasma membrane. However, these approaches damage cell viability [15] and cannot be used in vivo, in an intact animal. Another approach has been to develop synthetic luciferins with increased membrane permeability [20]. We have addressed this problem here by identifying a plasma membrane transporter for luciferin, which when expressed with luciferase enhances light output by several-fold. Our approach would also be compatible with other approaches that have been used to improve light output, such as codon optimization and red-shifting of the emitted spectrum [6, 10], as well as future gains in light output that might be achieved by directed evolution of the enzyme. However, it should be noted that the enhancement of light output will likely be influenced by a number of factors in addition to the levels of Oatp1 transgene expression, including luciferin concentration, the stage of xenograft development, and the endogenous levels of expression of luciferin importers, such as Oatp1 [29–32], and also exporters [25, 26].

The enhancement demonstrated here should facilitate bioluminescent detection of labeled cells in situations where bioluminescent output is low, for example, when there are few labeled cells or they are located at a greater tissue depth. For example, detection of the very earliest stages of tumorigenesis in mouse models of cancer following the implantation of small numbers of tumor stem cells or the early stages of autochthonous tumor development following the transformation of somatic cells using viral vectors [45]. Enhanced light output could also increase the sensitivity of detection of gene expression in regions where luciferin uptake is low, such as the brain [21, 23] and detection of luciferase expression when relatively weak promoters are used. The latter problem has been addressed previously by using a two-step transcriptional amplification (TSTA) system [46–48]. This system, together with the one described here, could further improve light output and the sensitivity of detection of weak promoter activation. Co-expression of Oatp1 could also be used to reduce the amount of luciferin required.

Bioluminescence measurements on tumor cells expressing luciferase in vivo have been used to assess response to new therapeutic drugs [49]. Since Oatp1 is known to transport a wide range of different molecules, its potential to transport the drug molecule under investigation would need to be considered when assessing the pharmacodynamic properties of the drug.

Conclusions

We demonstrated recently that, by transporting a clinically approved hepatotropic contrast agent, Oatp1 can be used as a gene reporter for MRI and that by exchanging the Gd3+ ion in this contrast agent for 111In, can be used with SPECT as well [36]. Together with its capability to increase luciferase-dependent bioluminescence, this makes Oatp1 a very versatile system for imaging gene expression in vivo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1 (1.4MB, pdf)

(PDF 1401 kb)

Acknowledgments

We thank Liz Mannion for help with producing the pTRE3G-SO vector. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK (CRUK) doctoral training grants (to P.S.P.) and a CRUK Programme Grant (17242) (to K.M.B.).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

P. Stephen Patrick, Email: psp23@cam.ac.uk.

Scott K. Lyons, Email: Scott.Lyons@cruk.cam.ac.uk

Kevin M. Brindle, Phone: +44 (0)1223 333674, Email: kmb1001@cam.ac.uk

References

  • 1.Dothager RS, Flentie K, Moss B, et al. Advances in bioluminescence imaging of live animal models. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Colin M, Moritz S, Schneider H, et al. Haemoglobin interferes with the ex vivo luciferase luminescence assay: consequence for detection of luciferase reporter gene expression in vivo. Gene Ther. 2000;7:1333–1336. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lyons SK, Patrick PS, Brindle KM. Imaging mouse cancer models in vivo using reporter transgenes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2013;2013:685–699. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top069864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shapiro E, Lu C, Baneyx F. A set of multicolored Photinus pyralis luciferase mutants for in vivo bioluminescence applications. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2005;18:581–587. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzi066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liang Y, Walczak P, Bulte JWM. Comparison of red-shifted firefly luciferase Ppy RE9 and conventional Luc2 as bioluminescence imaging reporter genes for in vivo imaging of stem cells. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:016004. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.1.016004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Caysa H, Jacob R, Müther N, et al. A redshifted codon-optimized firefly luciferase is a sensitive reporter for bioluminescence imaging. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2009;8:52–56. doi: 10.1039/b814566k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Takakura H, Kojima R, Urano Y, et al. Aminoluciferins as functional bioluminogenic substrates of firefly luciferase. Chem Asian J. 2011;6:1800–1810. doi: 10.1002/asia.201000873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reddy GR, Thompson WC, Miller SC. Robust light emission from cyclic alkylaminoluciferin substrates for firefly luciferase. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13586–13587. doi: 10.1021/ja104525m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conley NR, Dragulescu-Andrasi A, Rao J, Moerner WE. A selenium analogue of firefly D-luciferin with red-shifted bioluminescence emission. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51:3350–3353. doi: 10.1002/anie.201105653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rabinovich BA, Ye Y, Etto T, et al. Visualizing fewer than 10 mouse T cells with an enhanced firefly luciferase in immunocompetent mouse models of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:14342–14346. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804105105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Koksharov MI, Ugarova NN. Thermostabilization of firefly luciferase by in vivo directed evolution. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2011;24:835–844. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzr044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fujii H, Noda K, Asami Y, et al. Increase in bioluminescence intensity of firefly luciferase using genetic modification. Anal Biochem. 2007;366:131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gould SG, Keller GA, Subramani S. Identification of a peroxisomal targeting signal at the carboxy terminus of firefly luciferase. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:2923–2931. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.6.2923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keller GA, Gould S, Deluca M, Subramani S. Firefly luciferase is targeted to peroxisomes in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:3264–3268. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gould SJ, Subramani S. Firefly luciferase as a tool in molecular and cell biology. Anal Biochem. 1988;175:5–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90353-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.De Wet JR, Wood KV, DeLuca M, et al. Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:725–737. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.2.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ignowski JM, Schaffer DV. Kinetic analysis and modeling of firefly luciferase as a quantitative reporter gene in live mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;86:827–834. doi: 10.1002/bit.20059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Craig FF, Simmonds AC, Watmore D, et al. Membrane-permeable luciferin esters for assay of firefly luciferase in live intact cells. Biochem J. 1991;276(Pt 3):637–641. doi: 10.1042/bj2760637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shinde R, Perkins J, Contag CH. Luciferin derivatives for enhanced in vitro and in vivo bioluminescence assays. Biochemistry. 2006;45:11103–11112. doi: 10.1021/bi060475o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Evans MS, Chaurette JP, Adams ST, et al. A synthetic luciferin improves bioluminescence imaging in live mice. Nat Methods. 2014;11:393–395. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee K-H, Byun SS, Paik J-Y, et al. Cell uptake and tissue distribution of radioiodine labelled D-luciferin: implications for luciferase based gene imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:1003–1009. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200309000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schneider M, Ow DW, Howell SH. The in vivo pattern of firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1990;14:935–947. doi: 10.1007/BF00019391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berger F, Paulmurugan R, Bhaumik S, Gambhir SS. Uptake kinetics and biodistribution of 14C-D-luciferin–a radiolabeled substrate for the firefly luciferase catalyzed bioluminescence reaction: impact on bioluminescence based reporter gene imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2275–2285. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0870-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ow DW, De Wet JR, Helinski DR, et al. Transient and stable expression of the firefly luciferase gene in plant cells and transgenic plants. Science. 1986;234:856–859. doi: 10.1126/science.234.4778.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Y, Bressler JP, Neal J, et al. ABCG2/BCRP expression modulates D-Luciferin based bioluminescence imaging. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9389–9397. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang R, Vider J, Serganova I, Blasberg RG. ATP-binding cassette transporters modulate both coelenterazine- and D-luciferin-based bioluminescence imaging. Mol Imaging Off J Soc Mol Imaging. 2011;10:215–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang Y, Pullambhatla M, Laterra J, Pomper MG. Influence of bioluminescence imaging dynamics by D-luciferin uptake and efflux mechanisms. Mol Imaging. 2012;11:499–506. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jacquemin E, Hagenbuch B, Stieger B, et al. Expression cloning of a rat liver Na(+)-independent organic anion transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:133–137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bergwerk AJ, Shi X, Ford AC, et al. Immunologic distribution of an organic anion transport protein in rat liver and kidney. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:G231–G238. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1996.271.2.G231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim RB. Organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) transporter family and drug disposition. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003;33(Suppl 2):1–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.33.s2.5.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ. The superfamily of organic anion transporting polypeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1609:1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00633-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meier-Abt F, Mokrab Y, Mizuguchi K. Organic anion transporting polypeptides of the OATP/SLCO superfamily: identification of new members in nonmammalian species, comparative modeling and a potential transport mode. J Membr Biol. 2005;208:213–227. doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-7004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.White EH, McCapra F, Field GF, McElroy WD. The structure and synthesis of firefly luciferin. J Am Chem Soc. 1961;83:2402–2403. doi: 10.1021/ja01471a051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eckhardt U, Schroeder A, Stieger B, et al. Polyspecific substrate uptake by the hepatic organic anion transporter Oatp1 in stably transfected CHO cells. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:G1037–G1042. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1999.276.4.G1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shitara Y, Sugiyama D, Kusuhara H, et al. Comparative inhibitory effects of different compounds on rat oatpl (slc21a1)- and Oatp2 (Slc21a5)-mediated transport. Pharm Res. 2002;19:147–153. doi: 10.1023/A:1014264614637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patrick PS, Hammersley J, Loizou L, et al. Dual-modality gene reporter for in vivo imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:415–420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319000111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Szymczak AL, Workman CJ, Wang Y, et al. Correction of multi-gene deficiency in vivo using a single “self-cleaving” 2A peptide-based retroviral vector. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:589–594. doi: 10.1038/nbt957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Adra CN, Boer PH, McBurney MW. Cloning and expression of the mouse pgk-1 gene and the nucleotide sequence of its promoter. Gene. 1987;60:65–74. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90214-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tiscornia G, Singer O, Verma IM. Production and purification of lentiviral vectors. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:241–245. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kutner RH, Zhang X-Y, Reiser J. Production, concentration and titration of pseudotyped HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:495–505. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Curran MA, Kaiser SM, Achacoso PL, Nolan GP. Efficient transduction of nondividing cells by optimized feline immunodeficiency virus vectors. Mol Ther. 2000;1:31–38. doi: 10.1006/mthe.1999.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1567–1572. doi: 10.1038/nbt1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen TT, Li L, Chung D-H, et al. TIM-2 is expressed on B cells and in liver and kidney and is a receptor for H-ferritin endocytosis. J Exp Med. 2005;202:955–965. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee W, Belkhiri A, Lockhart A, et al. Overexpression of OATP1B3 confers apoptotic resistance in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:10315–10323. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodriguez E, Mannion L, D’Santos P, et al. Versatile and enhanced tumour modeling in mice via somatic cell transduction. J Pathol. 2014;232:449–457. doi: 10.1002/path.4313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Watanabe M, Ueki H, Ochiai K, et al. Advanced two-step transcriptional amplification as a novel method for cancer-specific gene expression and imaging. Oncol Rep. 2011;26:769–775. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jiang ZK, Sato M, Wei LH, et al. Androgen-independent molecular imaging vectors to detect castration-resistant and metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6250–6260. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen IY, Gheysens O, Li Z, et al. Noninvasive imaging of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α gene therapy for myocardial ischemia. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2013;24:279–288. doi: 10.1089/hgtb.2013.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.O’Farrell A, Shnyder S, Marston G, et al. Non-invasive molecular imaging for preclinical cancer therapeutic development. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;169:719–735. doi: 10.1111/bph.12155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (1.4MB, pdf)

(PDF 1401 kb)

Articles from Molecular Imaging and Biology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES