Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 17;5:4935. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5935

Small Molecule Bax Agonists for Cancer Therapy

Meiguo Xin 4,9,&, Rui Li 1,&, Maohua Xie 1,&, Dongkyoo Park 1, Taofeek K Owonikoko 2, Gabriel L Sica 3, Patrick E Corsino 5, Jia Zhou 6, Chunyong Ding 6, Mark A White 7, Andrew T Magis 8, Suresh S Ramalingam 2, Walter J Curran 1, Fadlo R Khuri 2, Xingming Deng 1,*
PMCID: PMC4172359  NIHMSID: NIHMS619999  PMID: 25230299

Abstract

Bax, a central death regulator, is required at the decisional stage of apoptosis. We recently identified serine 184 (S184) of Bax as a critical functional switch controlling its proapoptotic activity. Here, we employed the structural pocket around S184 as a docking site to screen the NCI library of small molecules using the UCSF-DOCK program suite. Three compounds, small molecule Bax agonists SMBA1, SMBA2 and SMBA3, induce conformational changes in Bax by blocking S184 phosphorylation, facilitating Bax insertion into mitochondrial membranes and forming Bax oligomers. The latter leads to cytochrome c release and apoptosis in human lung cancer cells, which occurs in a Bax- but not Bak-dependent fashion. SMBA1 potently suppresses lung tumor growth via apoptosis by selectively activating Bax in vivo without significant normal tissue toxicity. Development of Bax agonists as a new class of anti-cancer drugs offers a strategy for the treatment of lung cancer and other Bax-expressing malignancies.

Introduction

Bax is a major proapoptotic member of the Bcl2 family and a molecule required for cell death that is extensively expressed in both small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells1, 2, 3, suggesting that Bax may be a therapeutic target for lung cancer. Activation of the proapoptotic function of Bax likely occurs through several interdependent mechanisms that involve its translocation from the cytosol to mitochondria4, oligomerization and insertion into mitochondrial membranes following cellular stress5, 6, 7. Previous reports indicate that the proapoptotic activity of Bax can be regulated by phosphorylation, a post-translational modification2, 8, 9, 10, 11. We recently discovered that nicotine-induced Bax phosphorylation at S184 inactivates the proapoptotic function of Bax, leading to increased survival and/or chemoresistance of human lung cancer cells2. In contrast, protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) functions as a physiological Bax phosphatase which not only dephosphorylates Bax at S184, but also potently activates its proapoptotic function3. These findings suggest that the S184 phosphorylation site plays a key role in regulating the proapoptotic activity of Bax. The 3-D solution structure indicates that the S184 site is located in the hydrophobic C-terminal tail of Bax12, which regulates both the subcellular location of Bax and its ability to insert into mitochondrial membranes2, 3, 13. Mutagenesis analysis reveals that S184 is the major phosphorylation site for functional regulation of Bax activity14. Therefore, manipulation of the phosphorylation status of Bax at S184 may represent a novel strategy for cancer treatment.

The computational study of molecular recognition is an important strategy for structure-based drug discovery15. The DOCK program suite is composed of sphgen_cpp, grid and DOCK. The program “sphgen_cpp” generates sets of overlapping spheres that three-dimensionally describe the shape of a target pocket16. Spheres are initially constructed over the entire surface using the surface representation, and culled to describe only the pocket of interest15, 16. The program “grid” generates scoring grids derived from the electrostatic potentials of the protein atoms17, 18. Within the DOCK program suite, the program DOCK matches spheres (generated by sphgen cpp) with small molecule atoms and uses scoring grids (from grid) to evaluate small molecule orientations16, 17. DOCK also minimizes energy-based scores. We analyzed the 3-D solution structure of Bax protein (PDB ID: 1F16) using the UCSF DOCK 6.0 program suite as previously described13, 19. Intriguingly, we observed a promising structural pocket around the S184 residue in Bax protein that could be an ideal target for small molecule docking. This pocket allows us to manipulate the proapoptotic function of Bax as a new anticancer treatment strategy. Here we report the identification of three compounds named small molecule Bax agonists (i.e. SMBA1, SMBA2 nd SMBA3) that target S184 site of Bax, activate the proapoptotic function of Bax and potently repress lung tumor growth via induction of apoptosis. These compounds hold potential as an entirely new class of anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of cancers expressing Bax, including lung cancer.

Results

Effect of SMBAs that target S184 site of Bax on apoptosis

Phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of Bax at the S184 site negatively or positively regulates the proapoptotic function of Bax2, 3, 9, suggesting that the S184 site is an attractive target for structure-based drug screening (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Approximately 300,000 small molecules from the NCI database were docked into a structural pocket identified by the DOCK program suite, which is in close proximity to the S184 residue of Bax protein. After computational screening, 36 small compounds were found to bind to the S184 site of Bax with priority scores (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Lung cancer cells express significantly higher levels of endogenous Bax than normal small airway epithelial cells (SAEC) (Supplementary Fig. 1c), which suggests that Bax may be a good therapeutic target in human lung cancer. To test whether the 36 small molecules that target Bax at the S184 site induce apoptosis, H1299, A549 and SAEC cells were treated with the molecules (5 μM) for 48h. Compounds 17, 19 and 20 clearly displayed potent apoptotic effects on human lung cancer H1299 and A549 cells, when compared to the other tested small molecules (Supplementary Fig. 1d). We named these compounds small molecule Bax agonists (i.e. SMBAs: 17 (NSC408730) →SMBA1 (MW 315), 19 (NSC4436) → SMBA2 (MW 168), 20 (NSC5062) → SMBA3 (MW 308)). Importantly, SMBA1, SMBA2 and SMBA3 induced significantly less apoptosis in normal SAECs that express relatively low levels of Bax compared to H1299 or A549 lung cancer cells (Supplementary Fig. 1cd), indicating their relative selectivity against lung cancer cells.

The lead compounds SMBA1, 2 and 3 were also rescored using a molecular dynamics simulation with the all-atom AMBER force field implemented in DOCK 6.5, which is intended for re-scoring existing poses. The resulting AMBER scores showed favorable binding energies for all three compounds (SMBA1: −35.271080; SMBA2: −37.783943; SMBA3: −14.357678). To test whether the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to SMBA is associated with the phosphorylation status of Bax and/or the total cellular levels of Bax, expression levels of pBax (S184) and Bax in a panel of human lung cancer lines and their sensitivities to the lead compound SMBA1 were analyzed by Western blot and colony formation, respectively. Levels of pBax from Western blot bands were further quantified by ImageJ software as described20. Results indicate that human lung cancer cells expressing higher levels of pBax and/or total Bax (i.e. H292 and H1975) were more sensitive to SMBA1 at 5 μM (Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast, human lung cancer H460 cells expressing relatively lower levels of pBax and total Bax were less sensitive to SMBA1 (Supplementary Fig. 2). Interestingly, it seems that human lung cancer cells expressing higher levels of total Bax also contain relatively higher levels of pBax (i.e. H292 and H1975) (Supplementary Fig. 2). Based on our findings, we propose that the cytotoxicity of SMBA may be dependent on expression levels of pBax and/or total Bax in human lung cancer cells.

To test whether individual SMBA compounds form self-aggregates under the experimental conditions, a dynamic light scattering (DLS) aggregation assay was performed using increasing concentrations (1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 250, and 500 μM) of SMBA1, SMBA2 and SMBA3. Erlotinib, a drug commonly used to treat lung cancer21, was used for comparison. Intriguingly, no self-aggregation of SMBA1, SMBA2 or SMBA3 was observed at concentrations between 1 μM and 250 μM (Supplementary Fig. 3). For erlotinib, no self-aggregation was observed at concentrations lower than 100μM (Supplementary Fig. 3). Because the concentrations of SMBA1, 2 or 3 used to measure cytotoxicity in various lung cancer cells were 50 times lower than 250 μM, we can therefore exclude any pseudo-activity caused by aggregates in our system.

SMBA(s) binds to Bax and enhances apoptosis of cancer cells

Computational modeling analysis reveals that SMBA1, SMBA2 and SMBA3 are small molecules that dock at the S184 binding pocket of Bax (Fig. 1A). It has been demonstrated that Bax can heterodimerize with Bak via their BH3 domains to form Bax/Bak heterodimers22. The fluorescent Bak BH3 domain peptide (FAM-GQVGRQLAIIGDDINR) is able to bind to the Bax protein with high-affinity, thus SMBA(s) may compete with fluorescent Bak BH3 peptide for binding to Bax protein. We used the fluorescent Bak BH3 peptide to measure SMBA/Bax binding affinity in a competition fluorescence polarization assay as described23, 24, 25. Results indicate that SMBAs selectively bind to Bax protein with high affinities (SMBA1: Ki = 43.3 ± 3.25 nM; SMBA2: Ki = 57.2 ± 7.29 nM; SMBA3: Ki = 54.1 ± 9.77 nM) but fail to bind other Bcl2 family members, including Bcl2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, Bcl-w, Bfl-1/A1, Bid or Bak (Fig. 1b), indicating the specificity of their Bax binding. These findings suggest that SMBA compounds may be used preferably in those tumors that express elevated levels of Bax.

Figure 1. SMBA1~3 directly bind to the Bax protein but not other Bcl2 family members.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Structural modeling of SMBA1~3 in the S184 binding pocket in the c-terminus of Bax protein using the all-atom AMBER molecular mechanics force field. The PDB files of the modeled complex structures are shown by detailed all-atom views of the predicted interactions for all three compounds along with labels for each residue. (b) Fluorescent Bak BH3 domain peptide (3nM) was incubated with purified 6 nM of human Bax protein or other Bcl2 family member(s) in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations (i.e. 0~500nM) of SMBA1, SMBA2 or SMBA3 in the binding affinity assay buffer. Binding affinities were analyzed using a competition fluorescence polarization assay. The error bars indicate ± SD of three separate experiments.

Our previous findings demonstrated that nicotine can induce Bax phosphorylation at the S184 site2. Since SMBAs bind Bax at its S184 phosphorylation site, SMBAs may inhibit nicotine-induced Bax phosphorylation. To test this, A549 cells were metabolically labeled with 32P-orthophosphoric acid and treated with nicotine in the absence or presence of SMBA1, 2 or 3 (5μM) for 60 min. Results indicate that treatment of cells with SMBA1, 2 or 3 significantly suppresses nicotine-induced Bax phosphorylation (Fig. 2a). Functionally, nicotine can prolong survival of A549 cells following treatment with the therapeutic drug cisplatin, and this effect was abrogated after treatment with SMBA1, SMBA2 or SMBA3 (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the combination of SMBA and cisplatin additively induced apoptosis of human lung cancer cells (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2. SMBAs block Bax phosphorylation and enhance apoptosis.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) A549 cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphoric acid and treated with nicotine (1 μM) in the absence or presence of 5 μM of SMBA1, SMBA2 or SMBA3 for 60 min. Bax phosphorylation was determined by autoradiography (full blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 6) (b) A549 cells were treated with cisplatin (40 μM), SMBA(s) (5 μM) or in combination in the absence or presence of nicotine (1 μM) for 48h. Cell viability was analyzed by PI-Annexin-V staining with FACS analysis. The error bars indicate ± SD of three separate experiments.

SMBAs induce Bax mitochondrial insertion and Cyt c release

Bax is predominantly a cytosolic protein with only a small portion associated with the outer mitochondrial membranes in unstimulated cells4. In contrast, Cyt c is normally localized in mitochondria and can be released into the cytosol following cellular stress4. To test whether SMBA-induced inhibition of Bax phosphorylation promotes mitochondrial localization of Bax to initiate Cyt c release, A549 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SMBA1, 2 or 3 for 24 h. Bax and Cyt c were measured by immunofluorescence. In control cells, Bax displayed a diffuse localization in the cytoplasm while Cyt c exhibited a mitochondrial distribution as punctate staining (Fig. 3a). After SMBA treatment, Bax was visible as punctate mitochondrial staining while Cyt c became partially diffuse (Fig. 3a). These data suggest that SMBA 1, 2 and 3 facilitate Bax translocation to mitochondria and subsequently induce Cyt c release from mitochondria into the cytosol. It has been demonstrated that an alkali extraction approach can distinguish whether Bax protein only weakly associates with or is directly inserted into mitochondrial membranes4, 26. This approach was used to test whether SMBA can promote Bax insertion into mitochondrial membranes. A549 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SMBA(s) for 24h. Mitochondria were isolated, incubated in 0.1 m Na2CO3, pH 11.5, on ice for 30 min, and centrifuged at 200,000 × g to yield a mitochondrial pellet. The resulting alkali-extracted mitochondrial membrane pellet was resuspended in 1% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer. The alkali-resistant, integral Bax was analyzed by Western blot. Results reveal that treatment of cells with SMBA enhances Bax insertion into mitochondrial membranes in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3b). Prohibitin, an integral mitochondrial protein27, was not affected by this treatment (Fig. 3b). These data suggest that SMBA binding to S184 site promotes Bax insertion into mitochondrial membranes. Subcellular fractionation analysis provided additional evidence that treatment of cells with SMBA 1, 2 and 3 promotes Cyt c release (Fig. 3c).

Figure 3. SMBAs induce Bax insertion into mitochondrial membranes and Cyt c release.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) A549 cells were treated with 5 μM of SMBA1, 2 or 3 for 24 h. Bax and Cyt c were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. Images were merged using Openlab 3.1.5 software. Areas of co-localization are yellow. The length of scale bar is 10 μm. (b) A549 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SMBA1, 2 or 3 for 24h. Mitochondria were isolated, and alkali extraction of Bax was performed. The alkali-resistant (i.e. nonextractable) Bax was determined by Western blot using a Bax antibody (1:500 dilution). (c) A549 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SMBA1, 2 or 3 for 24h. Mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions were isolated. Levels of Cyt c in these two fractions were analyzed by Western blot (full blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 7).

Bax is a required target for SMBA induction of apoptosis

To test whether Bax is essential for SMBA induction of apoptosis, wild type (WT), Bax−/−, Bak−/− or Bax/Bak double knockout (DKO) MEF cells were treated with a high concentration of SMBA 1, 2 or 3 (i.e. 25 μM) for 24h. Apoptotic cells were stained with Annexin-V and PI and quantified by FACS as described previously28. Compared to WT and Bak−/− MEF cells, Bax−/− and DKO MEF cells exhibited significant resistance to SMBA1, 2 and 3 (Fig. 4a, b). These findings indicate that Bax but not Bak is a selective target through which SMBA induces apoptosis.

Figure 4. Bax is an essential for SMBA induction of apoptosis and Cyt c release.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Levels of Bax were analyzed by Western blot in wild type (WT), Bax−/−, Bak−/− or Bax/Bak double knockout (DKO) MEF cells. (b) WT, Bax−/−, Bak−/− or DKO MEF cells were treated with high concentration (25 μM) of SMBA 1, 2 or 3 for 24h. Cell viability was analyzed by PI- Annexin-V staining with FACS analysis. The error bars indicate ± SD of three separate experiments. (c) Mitochondria were isolated from wild type (WT), Bax−/−, Bak−/− or DKO MEF cells. The isolated mitochondria were then treated with lead compound SMBA1 (5μM) in mitochondrial bufferfor 30 min at 30°C. After centrifugation, Cyt c in supernatant fraction (i.e. Cyt c release) and actin in mitochondrial fraction were analyzed by Western blot (full blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 8).

Bax or Bak induces apoptosis by regulating permeability of the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) and escape of apoptogenic factors such as Cyt c29. To further test whether SMBA induces Cyt c release from mitochondria in a Bax but not Bak dependent fashion, mitochondria were isolated from WT, Bax−/−, Bak−/− or DKO MEF cells. The isolated mitochondria were treated with the lead compound SMBA1 (5μM) for 30 min at 30°C. After centrifugation at 13 000 ×g for 5 min, Cyt c in the supernatant (i.e. Cyt c release) was analyzed by Western blot. Results show that SMBA1 induced Cyt c release from the mitochondria isolated from WT and Bak−/− MEF cells but not from Bax−/− or DKO MEF cells, indicating that SMBA1 induces Cyt c release in a Bax- but not Bak-dependent fashion (Fig. 4c).

SMBAs induce Bax oligomerization in mitochondria

To test whether SMBAs affect the conformational change in Bax, we used the 6A7 monoclonal Bax antibody that can specifically detect the Bax conformational change14. The antibody 6A7, raised against a peptide comprising amino acids 13–19 of the Bax N terminus, is not able to bind the soluble form of Bax in healthy cells but can recognize Bax after the conformational change associated with membrane insertion that occurs in apoptotic cells30, 31. Recent studies demonstrate that the 6A7 Bax antibody only recognizes conformationally changed, active Bax3, 32. 6A7 antibody binding to Bax was measured by immunofluorescence. Cells were treated with SMBA 1, 2 or 3 (5μM) for 24 h, and incubated with prewarmed (37°C) growth medium containing MitoTracker for 30 min. Fixed cells were blocked with 10% mouse serum and then immunostained with the mouse monoclonal 6A7 primary and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibodies. Although the 6A7 Bax immunofluorescence was low or undetectable in untreated cells, it increased significantly in cells treated with SMBA 1, 2 or 3 (Fig. 5a). An immunoprecipitation (IP) experiment using 6A7 antibody revealed that SMBAs enhance the ability of Bax to bind to 6A7 antibody (Fig. 5b). A similar IP experiment using 6A7 antibody was also performed following incubation of purified Bax protein with SMBA(s) in a cell-free system. Results reveal that SMBA(s) can directly induce Bax conformational change in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 4). These findings suggest that SMBA binding to the S184 site may cause a conformational change that activates the proapoptotic function of Bax. To assess whether SMBAs affect the ability of membrane-inserted Bax to form oligomers in the mitochondrial membrane, a cross-linking study with Bis (maleimido) hexane (BMH) was carried out for measurement of Bax oligomerization. Intriguingly, treatment of A549 cells with SMBA 1, 2 or 3 (5μM) facilitated the formation of Bax dimers and trimers (Fig. 5c). The molecular sizes of these adducts were estimated to be multiples of ~21 kDa, suggesting the formation of Bax homo-oligomers in A549 cells.

Figure 5. SMBA(s) induces Bax conformational change and promotes its oligomerization.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) A549 cells were treated with 5 μM of SMBA1, 2 or 3 for 24 h. Cells were incubated with prewarmed (37 °C) growth medium containing MitoTracker (red) for 30 min. Cells were then washed with 1×PBS, fixed, permeabilized with ice-cold methanol and acetone, blocked with 10% mouse serum, and stained with mouse monoclonal 6A7 primary and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary (green) antibodies. Images were merged using Openlab 3.1.5 software. Areas of co-localization are yellow. The length of scale bar is 10 μm (b) A549 cells were treated with 5 μM of SMBA1, 2 or 3 for 24 h. A co-immunoprecipitation experiment was carried out using the 6A7 or full-length Bax antibody, respectively. Bax was analyzed by Western blot. (c) A549 cells were treated with SMBA1, 2 or 3 (5μM) for 24h. After treatment, mitochondria were isolated, followed by cross-linking using BMH. Bax was analyzed by Western blot. (d) First, mitochondria were isolated from A549 cells and then treated with SMBA1, 2 or 3 (5μM) in cross-linking buffer for 30 min at 30°C, followed by cross-linking using BMH. Bax was analyzed by Western blot (full blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 9).

To further test whether SMBAs directly activate Bax through formation of oligomers in the isolated mitochondria, cross linking studies with BHM were employed following direct treatment of the isolated mitochondria with SMBA1, 2 or 3 as described22, 33. Results indicate that direct treatment of isolated mitochondria with SMBA1, SMBA2 or SMBA3 resulted in formation of Bax dimers and trimers in mitochondria (Fig. 5d). The pattern of Bax oligomers is similar to that in the treated cells as above. These findings provide direct evidence that SMBAs can activate Bax through its oligomerization in isolated mitochondrial membranes.

SMBA1 suppresses tumor growth via apoptosis in vivo

To test the in vivo efficacy of SMBA, we used nude mice to produce subcutaneous (s.c.) lung tumor xenografts as described34, 35. Treatment of mice with increasing doses (i.e. 2mg~60mg/kg) of SMBA1 resulted in a dose-dependent repression of lung cancer in vivo (Fig. 6a). Since similar potency was observed in mice treated with 40mg/kg and 60mg/kg, this suggests that 40mg/kg may be a suitable dose for suppression of lung cancer growth in xenograft models. To test whether SMBA1-induced suppression of lung cancer occurs through apoptosis in lung tumor tissues, active caspase 3 was measured by IHC. Intriguingly, treatment of lung cancer xenograft mice with SMBA1 resulted in increased levels of active caspase 3 (Fig. 6b). No weight loss, no significant increase in ALT, AST and BUN or decrease in WBC, RBC, Hb and PLT were observed following SMBA1 treatment (Fig. 7a, b). Histopathology of harvested normal tissues (brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney and intestine) revealed no evidence of normal tissue toxicity (Fig. 7c).

Figure 6. SMBA suppresses lung cancer in vivo.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Nu/Nu mice with A549 lung cancer xenografts were treated with increasing doses of SMBA1 (2~60mg/kg/d) by i.p. for 10 days. Each group includes 8 mice. Tumor volume was measured once every 2 days. The error bars indicate ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed with two-sided unpaired student’s t-test. After 10 days, the mice were sacrificed and the tumors were removed and analyzed. (b) Active caspase 3 was analyzed in tumor tissues at the end of experiments by IHC staining. The length of scale bar is 10μm. The error bars indicate ± SD.

Figure 7. Analysis of SMBA toxicity in vivo.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) Body weight of mice was measured once every other day during treatment with increasing doses of SMBA1 (2~60mg/kg/d). The error bars indicate ± SD. (b) Blood analysis of mice after treatment with SMBA1. The error bars indicate ± SD. (c) H&E histology of various organs from mice after treatment with SMBA1. The length of scale bar is 50 μm

QD-IHF analysis of pBax and 6A7 Bax in tumor tissues

The QD-IHF technique is a valuable tool for simultaneous and concurrent detection of multiple biomarkers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues, thereby allowing for quantification of several biomarkers simultaneously on the same tissue slide36, 37, 38, 39. To confirm whether SMBA can convert Bax from its inactive (pS184 Bax) to active form (6A7 Bax), pBax and 6A7 Bax were simultaneously analyzed by QD-IHF on the same tissue slide using primary antibodies from different sources (i.e. pBax antibody from rabbit and 6A7 antibody from mouse) and QD-conjugated anti-rabbit [i.e. QD605 (red)] and anti-mouse [i.e. QD705 (green)] secondary antibodies with two different emission wavelengths. Both separated and combined QD images were obtained after determining the QD spectral library and unmixing the cubed image. Intriguingly, treatment of A549 xenograft mice with SMBA1 (40mg/kg/d) for 10 days resulted in decreased Bax phosphorylation (i.e. pS184 Bax) and increased Bax conformational change (i.e. 6A7 Bax) in tumor tissues (Supplementary Fig. 5). These findings suggest that treatment of mice with SMBA may induce the conversion of inactive Bax to the activated form and eventually lead to apoptosis in tumor tissues.

Bax is required for SMBA to repress lung cancer in vivo

We have previously established lung cancer A549 cells in which Bax was stably depleted by RNA interference using a vector-based gene silencing approach2, 40. The pSilencer™ 2.1-U6 hygromycin plasmids bearing the Bax hairpin siRNA insert were transfected into A549 cells. The stable clones persistently produce Bax siRNA to interfere with Bax expression in A549 cells. A549 cells expressing Bax siRNA displayed more than 99% reduction of Bax protein expression (Fig. 8a). To test whether Bax expression is essential for SMBAs antitumor activity in vivo, mice bearing lung cancer xenografts derived from A549 cells expressing Bax siRNA or control siRNA were treated with SMBA1 (40mg/kg/d) for 14 days. Results indicate that lung cancer xenografts derived from control A549 cells were sensitive to SMBA1, while xenografts derived from A549 cells expressing Bax siRNA were resistant (Fig. 8b). Intriguingly, increased active caspase 3 was observed in the control xenografts but not in the Bax siRNA-xenografts (Fig. 8c). These findings suggest that Bax expression is essential for SMBA1 suppression of lung cancer in vivo.

Figure 8. Bax is essential for SMBA suppression of lung cancer in xenograft models.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) Expression levels of Bax and Bak in A549 cells that persistently express Bax siRNA or control siRNA were analyzed by Western blot (full blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 10) (b) and (c) Mice with xenografts derived from A549 expressing Bax siRNA or control siRNA were treated with SMBA1 (40mg/kg) or vehicle for 14 days. Tumor volume and active caspase 3 in tumor tissues were analyzed. The length of scale bar is 10μm. The error bars indicate ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed with two-sided unpaired student’s t-test.

Discussion

Survival outcomes remain poor for lung cancer patients, in large part due to resistance to conventional therapeutic interventions41. Apoptotic induction in cancer cells is an established paradigm in cancer therapy. Bax has been identified as a promising prognostic indicator in patients with lung cancer42, suggesting that it could potentially also offer a therapeutic target in lung cancer patients. We recently identified that the S184 phosphorylation site in the c-terminal tail of Bax functionally controls the proapoptotic activity of Bax2, 3. Here we chose the S184 residue as a docking site for screening of small molecules and identified three compounds (i.e. SMBA1–3) that induce greater apoptosis in lung cancer cells than in normal cells (Supplementary Fig. 1). Using a competition fluorescence polarization assay, we found that all three SMBA compounds directly and tightly bind to purified Bax protein but not to other Bcl2 family members in vitro (Fig. 1b), indicating a selective Bax binding. Treatment of lung cancer cells with SMBA1, SMBA2 or SMBA3 inhibits Bax phosphorylation and promotes apoptosis of lung cancer cells (Fig. 2), suggesting that SMBAs may target the Bax phosphorylation site in cells.

Bax is found in both the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions in many cultured cells4, 30, 43. Alkali extraction studies in vitro have further demonstrated that most Bax is lost from mitochondrial membranes during this treatment, indicating that under normal conditions Bax is loosely attached to mitochondria4, 26, 44. SMBAs promote the “peripherally” associated mitochondrial Bax to insert into mitochondrial membranes leading to Bax membrane integration and Cyt c release (Fig. 3). The lead compound SMBA1 stimulates Cyt c release from mitochondria in a Bax but not Bak dependent fashion. Furthermore, Bax−/− and DKO MEF cells were significantly resistant to SMBAs at a high concentration (25 μM) while wild type and Bak−/− MEF cells were relatively sensitive (Fig. 4). Based on these findings, we propose that Bax, but not Bak, is a required target for SMBA-induced apoptosis.

Treatment of human lung cancer A549 cells with SMBA results in a conformational change detected by the 6A7 Bax antibody, which only recognizes active, conformationally changed Bax (Fig. 5a, b), suggesting that the binding of SMBA with Bax may result in exposure of the 6A7 epitope, which is normally hidden in its N-terminus. Immunofluorescence analysis using the 6A7 Bax antibody following treatment of cells with SMBA(s) exhibits punctate staining of Bax localized within mitochondria (Fig. 5a), indicating that the 6A7 epitope-specific conformational change resulting from SMBA/Bax binding enables Bax to bind to mitochondria. Using a chemical cross-linker approach, we found that treatment of either cells or isolated mitochondria with SMBA(s) facilitates the formation of Bax oligomers, including dimers and trimers (Fig. 5c, d). It has been demonstrated that Bax oligomers can form a pore size that is capable of transporting Cyt c45. In support of this, our findings indicate that SMBA-stimulated Bax oligomerization is associated with increased Cyt c release (Figs. 3 and 5). It is possible that the SMBA-activated Bax molecules may more efficiently form large structures (i.e. oligomers) in mitochondrial membranes to allow the passage of proteins at least of the size of Cyt c. These results reveal a novel mechanism by which SMBA(s) enhances the proapoptotic activity of Bax. Recently, a small molecule (BAM7) has been discovered to specifically activate Bax by targeting Bax at its trigger site46. Clearly, the mechanisms by which BAM7 and SMBA activate Bax are different. It remains unclear whether BAM7 has antitumor activity in vivo.

We also evaluated the antitumor activity of SMBA in lung cancer xenografts. The lead compound SMBA1 potently represses lung cancer in association with increased apoptosis in tumor tissues (Fig. 6). Intriguingly, SMBA1 has no significant effect in Bax deficient lung cancer xenografts (Fig. 8), indicating that Bax expression in the tumor is essential for SMBA suppression of tumor growth in vivo. Since no significant normal tissue toxicity in vivo was observed at the effective dose (Fig. 7), this suggests that SMBA(s) may have great potential to be developed as a new class of anti-cancer drug(s).

QD-based images showed that Bax activator SMBA1 can reduce levels of the inactive form of Bax (pS184 Bax) and enhance the activated form of Bax (i.e. 6A7 conformationally changed Bax) in tumor tissues (Supplementary Fig. 5). Based on findings from lung cancer xenografts and QD-IHF analysis, we propose that SMBA-induced suppression of lung cancer may result from selective activation of the proapoptotic function of Bax leading to increased apoptosis in tumors.

Significant effort has been devoted to targeting the native form of Bcl2 protein in solid malignancies and in hematological cancers. However, clinical trials of Bcl2-targeted agents (i.e. ABT-737, ABT-263, etc.) have been less successful than was anticipated47, 48. The development of previously unforeseen toxicity, such as thromobocytopenia, compromised efficacious dosing in clinical testing47. Our approach to targeting Bax may overcome these challenges because phosphorylated Bax is a biological gatekeeper of the pro-apoptotic function of this protein. Moreover, the S184 phosphorylation site is not shared with other Bcl2 family members, thereby minimizing the likelihood that SMBAs may affect other Bcl2 protein members with unwanted toxicity. This expectation is substantiated by the lack of normal tissue toxicity in mice treated with the efficacious dose of these agents in our xenograft experiments (Fig. 7).

In summary, we have discovered novel Bax activators (SMBA1–3) that specifically target the binding pocket at S184, cause Bax conformational change, and facilitate Bax homo-oligomerization leading to Bax activation and apoptosis in lung cancer cells. The lead compound SMBA1 has potent activity against lung cancer by selectively activating Bax in vivo. Based on our findings showing selective efficacy in lung cancer as pro-apoptotic agents without evidence of any surrounding normal tissue toxicity, SMBAs potentially represent a novel class of anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of lung cancer by specifically targeting Bax at the S184 binding pocket in its hydrophobic c-terminal tail.

Methods

Materials

All small molecules utilized were obtained from the NCI (http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/RequestCompounds). Nicotine and cisplatin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Primary anti-Bax, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse and rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Bax 6A7 and Cyt c antibodies were obtained from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). The phospho-specific S184 Bax (pBax) antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Active caspase 3 antibody was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Purified recombinant Bax protein was obtained from Novus (Littleton, CO). Protease inhibitor cocktail set I and digitonin were purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). Bis (maleimido) hexane (BMH) was purchased from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL). 32P-orthophosphate was purchased from MP Biomedicals (Irvine, CA). All reagents used were obtained from commercial sources unless otherwise stated.

Computational screening of small molecule Bax agonists

In order to identify potential Bax agonists, we employed a high throughput in silico molecular docking strategy using UCSF DOCK 6.0. Our computational screen was directed toward the solution structure of Bax (PDB ID: 1F16)12. We have created a subset of the NCI Developmental Therapeutics Library of approximately 300,000 small molecules that follow the Lipinski rules for ‘drug-like’ compounds49. These small molecules from the NCI/DTP database were docked into a structural pocket characterized by the Dock suite program SPHGEN_CPP which was in close proximity to residue S184 (i.e. a major phosphorylation site of Bax)2, 9, 14. The receptor structure was prepared using “Dock Prep” function in the UCSF Chimera software50. As part of the docking preparations, all water molecules were removed from the solution structure. Any incomplete side chains with missing atoms in the solution structure were replaced using the Dunbrack rotamer library51. Hydrogens were added to the entire receptor, and hydrogen bonds were identified where possible. Partial charges were calculated for the entire receptor with the AMBER module ANTECHAMBER using the Gasteiger method. The completed receptor was saved in MOL2 format, which is the input to the grid-based scoring function grid from the DOCK 6.0 package. Grid uses this structure to generate the scoring grids for electrostatic and vDW interactions with the docked ligands. The docking parameters included testing 1000 orientations of each input small molecule, followed by energy minimization. Scored compounds were then ranked based on total energy score, consisting of the non-bonded terms of the AMBER molecular mechanics force field.

To re-score the existing poses, a molecular dynamics simulation with the all-atom AMBER force field implemented in DOCK 6.5 was also employed. Rather than the flexible-ligand/rigid-receptor paradigm common to docking, the AMBER score in DOCK 6.5 allows distance-based receptor flexibility and full ligand flexibility. This simulation uses the Generalized Born implicit solvation model. The three molecules and the receptor protein were first parameterized using the “prepare_amber.pl” Perl script provided with DOCK 6.5. 100 cycles of minimization were then performed. 3000 steps of Langevin molecular dynamics were performed at a constant temperature of 300K. Finally, another 100 steps of minimization were performed and the total energy of the complex was evaluated. We allowed all atoms in the receptor molecule within 10 Angstroms of the ligand to move throughout this simulation, to simulate “induced fit” dynamics.

Cell lines and cell culture

Wild type, Bax−/−, Bax/Bak double knockout MEF cells were obtained from Dr. Douglas R. Green (St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN) and maintained in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. Bak−/− MEF cells, normal small airway epithelial cells (SAEC) and lung cancer cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). SAEC cells were cultured in small airway epithelial growth media (SAGM™ BulletKit®, ATCC). Lung cancer cell lines (i.e. H69, H82, H23, H292, H460, H157, H1299, H1975 and Calu-1) were maintained in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum. A549 cells were cultured in F-12K medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. These cell lines were employed for the described experiments without further authentication.

Mitochondrial isolation and Bax oligomerization assay

Digitonin-based mitochondrial isolation and Bax oligomerization analysis was carried out as described22, 33, 52. Briefly, 3 × 107 A549 cells were washed 3 times with cold 1× PBS and then incubated with permeabilization buffer (20mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.5, 100mM sucrose, 2.5mM MgCl2, 50mM KCl, 0.025% digitonin) with protease inhibitor cocktail set I for 5 min on ice. Supernatant and membrane pellet fractions were separated by centrifugation at 13 000× g for 5 min. Membrane fraction was treated with cross-linker BMH (0.5mM) in cross-linking buffer (20 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.0, 100 mM sucrose, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl) for 30–60min at room temperature. The reaction was quenched by addition of reducing sample buffer, boiled for 5 min and then subjected to SDS-PAGE gels and analyzed by Western blot using a Bax antibody (1: 500 dilution).

Lung cancer xenografts and treatments

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Emory University approved the animal experiments. 6-week-old male Nu/Nu nude mice were purchased from Harlan and housed under pathogen-free conditions in micro isolator cages. Xenografts were raised by injecting 5 × 106 of A549 cells in a balanced salt solution into subcutaneous tissue at the flank region of nude mice. The tumors were allowed to grow to an average volume of 230–250 mm3 prior to initiation of therapy as described34, 53. The mice bearing A549 xenografts were treated with vehicle control (i.e. 0.5% DMSO) or SMBA1 (2~60mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) once daily for 10 days. Tumor volume (V) was measured by caliper measurements once every two days and calculated with the formula: V=L×W2/2 (L: length; W: width) as described54. At the end of experiments, mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation. Harvested tumor tissues were used for further analysis.

Statistical analysis

Significant difference between two groups was analyzed with two-sided unpaired student’s t-test. Results were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad InStat 3 software (San Diego, CA)55.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NCI, National Institutes of Health grant R01CA136534, by Winship Inaugural Kennedy Seed Grant, and by Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute Clinical Innovator Award. Molecular graphics and analyses were performed with the UCSF Chimera package, which is developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (supported by NIGMS P41-GM103311). We thank Anthea Hammond for editing of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest

Authors’ Contributions

Conception and design: X. Deng, M. Xin, R. Li, D. Park, A. T. Magis, F.R. Khuri

Development of methodology: X. Deng, M. Xin, R. Li, D. Park, M. Xie, J. Zhou, M.A. White

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): R. Li, G. L. Sica, X. Deng

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): X. Deng, M. Xin, R. Li, Park D, M. Xie, M.A. White, A. T. Magis, P.E. Corsino

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: X. Deng, M. Xin, R. Li, M. Xie, A. T. Magis, T.K. Owonikoko, G. L. Sica, S. S. Ramalingam, W. J. Curran, F. R. Khuri, J. Zhou

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): AT. Magis, R. Li, X. Deng, W. J. Curran, F. R. Khuri, C. Ding, J. Zhou Study supervision: X. Deng

References

  • 1.Wei MC, Zong WX, Cheng EH, Lindsten T, Panoutsakopoulou V, Ross AJ, et al. Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: a requisite gateway to mitochondrial dysfunction and death. Science. 2001;292(5517):727–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1059108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xin M, Deng X. Nicotine inactivation of the proapoptotic function of Bax through phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(11):10781–10789. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500084200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xin M, Deng X. Protein phosphatase 2A enhances the proapoptotic function of Bax through dephosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(27):18859–18867. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512543200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goping IS, Gross A, Lavoie JN, Nguyen M, Jemmerson R, Roth K, et al. Regulated targeting of BAX to mitochondria. J Cell Biol. 1998;143(1):207–215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smaili SS, Hsu YT, Carvalho AC, Rosenstock TR, Sharpe JC, Youle RJ. Mitochondria, calcium and pro-apoptotic proteins as mediators in cell death signaling. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003;36(2):183–190. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000200004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nechushtan A, Smith CL, Lamensdorf I, Yoon SH, Youle RJ. Bax and Bak coalesce into novel mitochondria-associated clusters during apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 2001;153(6):1265–1276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mikhailov V, Mikhailova M, Pulkrabek DJ, Dong Z, Venkatachalam MA, Saikumar P. Bcl-2 prevents Bax oligomerization in the mitochondrial outer membrane. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(21):18361–18374. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100655200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xin M, Gao F, May WS, Flagg T, Deng X. Protein kinase Czeta abrogates the proapoptotic function of Bax through phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(29):21268–21277. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701613200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gardai SJ, Hildeman DA, Frankel SK, Whitlock BB, Frasch SC, Borregaard N, et al. Phosphorylation of Bax Ser184 by Akt regulates its activity and apoptosis in neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(20):21085–21095. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400063200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim BJ, Ryu SW, Song BJ. JNK- and p38 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of Bax leads to its activation and mitochondrial translocation and to apoptosis of human hepatoma HepG2 cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(30):21256–21265. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510644200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Linseman DA, Butts BD, Precht TA, Phelps RA, Le SS, Laessig TA, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta phosphorylates Bax and promotes its mitochondrial localization during neuronal apoptosis. J Neurosci. 2004;24(44):9993–10002. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2057-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Suzuki M, Youle RJ, Tjandra N. Structure of Bax: coregulation of dimer formation and intracellular localization. Cell. 2000;103(4):645–654. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nechushtan A, Smith CL, Hsu YT, Youle RJ. Conformation of the Bax C-terminus regulates subcellular location and cell death. EMBO J. 1999;18(9):2330–2341. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Q, Sun SY, Khuri F, Curran WJ, Deng X. Mono- or double-site phosphorylation distinctly regulates the proapoptotic function of Bax. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001;15(5):411–428. doi: 10.1023/a:1011115820450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol. 1982;161(2):269–288. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shoichet BK, Bodian DL, Kuntz ID. Molecular Docking Using Shape Descriptors. J Comput Chem. 1992;13(3):380–397. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meng EC, Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Automated Docking with Grid-Based Energy Evaluation. J Comput Chem. 1992;13(4):505–524. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ostrov DA, Magis AT, Wronski TJ, Chan EK, To ro EJ, Donatelli RE, et al. Identification of enoxacin as an inhibitor of osteoclast formation and bone resorption by structure-based virtual screening. J Med Chem. 2009;52(16):5144–5151. doi: 10.1021/jm900277z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Svejda B, Kidd M, Kazberouk A, Lawrence B, Pfragner R, Modlin IM. Limitations in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor therapy by mTor kinase inhibition reflect growth factor-mediated PI3K feedback loop activation via ERK1/2 and AKT. Cancer. 2011;117(18):4141–4154. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li R, Hu Z, Sun SY, Chen ZG, Owonikoko TK, Sica GL, et al. Niclosamide overcomes acquired resistance to erlotinib through suppression of STAT3 in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(10):2200–2212. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dewson G, Ma S, Frederick P, Hockings C, Tan I, Kratina T, et al. Bax dimerizes via a symmetric BH3:groove interface during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(4):661–670. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang JL, Liu D, Zhang ZJ, Shan S, Han X, Srinivasula SM, et al. Structure-based discovery of an organic compound that binds Bcl-2 protein and induces apoptosis of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(13):7124–7129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang H, Nimmer P, Rosenberg SH, Ng SC, Joseph M. Development of a high-throughput fluorescence polarization assay for Bcl-x(L) Anal Biochem. 2002;307(1):70–75. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(02)00028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bruncko M, Oost TK, Belli BA, Ding H, Joseph MK, Kunzer A, et al. Studies leading to potent, dual inhibitors of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. J Med Chem. 2007;50(4):641–662. doi: 10.1021/jm061152t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eskes R, Desagher S, Antonsson B, Martinou JC. Bid induces the oligomerization and insertion of Bax into the outer mitochondrial membrane. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(3):929–935. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.3.929-935.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ikonen E, Fiedler K, Parton RG, Simons K. Prohibitin, an antiproliferative protein, is localized to mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1995;358(3):273–277. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01444-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deng X, Xiao L, Lang W, Gao F, Ruvolo P, May WS., Jr Novel role for JNK as a stress-activated Bcl2 kinase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(26):23681–23688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100279200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dewson G, Kluck RM. Mechanisms by which Bak and Bax permeabilise mitochondria during apoptosis. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 16):2801–2808. doi: 10.1242/jcs.038166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hsu YT, Wolter KG, Youle RJ. Cytosol-to-membrane redistribution of Bax and Bcl-X(L) during apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(8):3668–3672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hsu YT, Youle RJ. Bax in murine thymus is a soluble monomeric protein that displays differential detergent-induced conformations. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(17):10777–10783. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sawada M, Sun W, Hayes P, Leskov K, Boothman DA, Matsuyama S. Ku70 suppresses the apoptotic translocation of Bax to mitochondria. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5(4):320–329. doi: 10.1038/ncb950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dewson G, Kratina T, Sim HW, Puthalakath H, Adams JM, Colman PM, et al. To trigger apoptosis, Bak exposes its BH3 domain and homodimerizes via BH3:groove interactions. Mol Cell. 2008;30(3):369–380. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oltersdorf T, Elmore SW, Shoemaker AR, Armstrong RC, Augeri DJ, Belli BA, et al. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Nature. 2005;435(7042):677–681. doi: 10.1038/nature03579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Puri N, Khramtsov A, Ahmed S, Nallasura V, Hetzel JT, Jagadeeswaran R, et al. A selective small molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PHA665752, inhibits tumorigenicity and angiogenesis in mouse lung cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 2007;67(8):3529–3534. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xing Y, Chaudry Q, Shen C, Kong KY, Zhau HE, Chung LW, et al. Bioconjugated quantum dots for multiplexed and quantitative immunohistochemistry. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(5):1152–1165. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu J, Muller S, Nannapaneni S, Pan L, Wang Y, Peng X, et al. Comparison of quantum dot technology with conventional immunohistochemistry in examining aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 as a potential biomarker for lymph node metastasis of head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang DH, Peng XH, Su L, Wang DS, Khuri FR, Shin DM, et al. Comparison and Optimization of Multiplexed Quantum Dot-Based Immunohistofluorescence. Nano Research. 2010;3(1):61–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Huang DH, Su L, Peng XH, Zhang H, Khuri FR, Shin DM, et al. Quantum dot-based quantification revealed differences in subcellular localization of EGFR and E-cadherin between EGFR-TKI sensitive and insensitive cancer cells. Nanotechnology. 2009;20(22):225102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/22/225102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Deng X, Gao F, Flagg T, Anderson J, May WS. Bcl2’s flexible loop domain regulates p53 binding and survival. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(12):4421–4434. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01647-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Groeger AM, Esposito V, Cassandro R, Baldi G, Rossiello L, De Luca L, et al. A model of BAX gene delivery to human lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2001;21(5):3627–3630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wolter KG, Hsu YT, Smith CL, Nechushtan A, Xi XG, Youle RJ. Movement of Bax from the cytosol to mitochondria during apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 1997;139(5):1281–1292. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.5.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Antonsson B, Montessuit S, Lauper S, Eskes R, Martinou JC. Bax oligomerization is required for channel-forming activity in liposomes and to trigger cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Biochem J. 2000;345(Pt 2):271–278. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saito M, Korsmeyer SJ, Schlesinger PH. BAX-dependent transport of cytochrome c reconstituted in pure liposomes. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(8):553–555. doi: 10.1038/35019596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gavathiotis E, Reyna DE, Bellairs JA, Leshchiner ES, Walensky LD. Direct and selective small-molecule activation of proapoptotic BAX. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8(7):639–645. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gandhi L, Camidge DR, Ribeiro de Oliveira M, Bonomi P, Gandara D, Khaira D, et al. Phase I study of Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel Bcl-2 family inhibitor, in patients with small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(7):909–916. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Baggstrom MQ, Qi Y, Koczywas M, Argiris A, Johnson EA, Millward MJ, et al. A phase II study of AT-101 (Gossypol) in chemotherapy-sensitive recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(10):1757–1760. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e2941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;46(1–3):3–26. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dunbrack RL., Jr Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2002;12(4):431–440. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00344-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Adrain C, Creagh EM, Martin SJ. Apoptosis-associated release of Smac/DIABLO from mitochondria requires active caspases and is blocked by Bcl-2. EMBO J. 2001;20(23):6627–6636. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu Y, Sun SY, Owonikoko TK, Sica GL, Curran WJ, Khuri FR, et al. Rapamycin induces Bad phosphorylation in association with its resistance to human lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(1):45–56. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu AW, Cai J, Zhao XL, Jiang TH, He TF, Fu HQ, et al. ShRNA-targeted MAP4K4 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(4):710–720. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang X, Hawk N, Yue P, Kauh J, Ramalingam SS, Fu H, et al. Overcoming mTOR inhibition-induced paradoxical activation of survival signaling pathways enhances mTOR inhibitors’ anticancer efficacy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7(12):1952–1958. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.12.6944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
NIHMS619999-supplement-1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

RESOURCES