Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2014 May 12;9:e29162. doi: 10.4161/psb.29162

Identification of bundle sheath cell fate factors provides new tools for C3-to-C4 engineering

Xiaorong Gao 1,2, Chaolun Wang 1, Hongchang Cui 1,*
PMCID: PMC4203720  PMID: 24819776

Abstract

Spatial compartmentation of the photosynthetic process between bundle sheath (BS) cells and mesophyll cells is one of the features that increase the productivity of C4 plants. To introduce C4 photosynthesis into C3 plants therefore calls for the identification of factors that control BS cell fate and promoter sequences that confer gene expression specifically in the BS and mesophyll cells. We recently demonstrated that 3 GRAS family transcription factors, SHORT-ROOT (SHR), SCARECROW (SCR) and SCR-LIKE 23 (SCL 23), are required for BS cell fate specification in Arabidopsis thaliana. Homologs to these genes are present in other plant species, C3 and C4, suggesting a conserved mechanism for BS cell fate specification. Interestingly, initially SCR and SCL23 are expressed uniformly in BS cells, but at later stages of leaf development SCR expression becomes restricted to the BS cells associated with the phloem, whereas SCL23 is preferentially expressed in the BS cells abutting the xylem. Characterization of the functions and expression patterns of SHR, SCR and SCL23 homologs in other plants, especially C3 crops, will not only advance the knowledge about BS cell development but also provide new tools for manipulating the number and physiology of BS cells, a critical prerequisite for C3-to-C4 engineering.

Keywords: SCARECROW, SHORT-ROOT, SCL23, Bundle sheath cell, C3-to-C4 engineering, Arabidopsis


Since the emergence of terrestrial plants, the global atmosphere has undergone many remarkable changes including CO2 depletion and increase in O2 concentration. As a result of acclimation, some flowering plants evolved C4 photosynthetic mechanisms, resulting in increase in carbon assimilation and reduction in photorespiration.1,2 Studies have shown that transferring the C4 pathway into C3 crops could increase water-use efficiency, reduce the need for fertilizer, and boost yields significantly, particularly in dry and hot environments.3 As a consequence, there has been considerable interest in C4 engineering to increase photosynthetic efficiency in C3 crops.4-6

Bundle sheath (BS) cells are a leaf cell type that forms a tightly packed layer surrounding the veins. In 2-cell C4 plants, the division of the photosynthetic process into the BS and mesophyll cells is one of the most significant features that make photosynthesis more efficient. Therefore, to achieve C4 photosynthesis in C3 plants requires a good understanding of the mechanisms that control BS cell fate and physiology.

BS cells are considered analogous to endodermis, because they both surround the veins.7 It is known that SHR and SCR are necessary for endodermis cell fate specification in root.8-10 It is therefore likely that these 2 genes also play a role in BS cell fate specification. Supporting this hypothesis, it has been shown that SCR is expressed specifically in the BS cells.11,12 SHR and SCR are also required for the formation of the starch sheath cell layer, which is also positioned around the vascular tissue in the hypocotyl and inflorescence stem.12 Although the mechanisms underlying BS cell fate specification remain elusive, it has been suggested that signals derived from the vascular tissue play a pivotal role in determining the position of the BS cell layer.13,14 SHR could be the signaling molecule, because it is expressed in the vascular tissue and the SHR protein moves into the neighboring cells.15,16 Taken together, these observations suggest that similar mechanisms are used to determine the cell fate of the endodermis, starch sheath and BS cells, in which SHR and SCR are central players.

To determine whether SHR and SCR control BS cell fate, we examined the cell pattern in the leaves of shr and scr mutants. As expected, the small, compact, and rectangular-shaped BS cell layer was missing in the shr mutant. However, the BS cells remained largely intact in the scr mutant. This surprising result has led to our further finding that SCL23, the closest paralog to SCR, was also required for BS cell fate determination. Another surprising finding is that the cell pattern in the shr and scr scl23 mutants was still normal, which suggests that SHR and SCR function differently in the leaves than in other organs. Remarkably, although SCR and SCL23 are expressed uniformly in the BS cells in young leaves and act redundantly in determining the BS cell fate, their expression and function become diverged at later stages of leaf development. While SCR is preferentially expressed in the phloem-associated BS cells and plays a role in sugar transport, SCL23 is more strongly expressed in the xylem-associated BS cells and is involved in mineral transport. This result also suggests that there are 2 types of BS cells with distinct functions.

In maize, mutations in SCR results in proliferation of BS cells as well as abnormal differentiation of BS chloroplasts.17 Because maize is a C4 monocot, whereas Arabidopsis is a C3 dicot, this result suggests different mechanism may be used in C3 and C4 plants in BS cell fate specification. However, multiple copies of homologs to SHR and SCR have been identified in other plants, including maize.18-20 It is therefore equally possible that BS cell fates are controlled by the same set of genes but individual homologs function differently or redundantly. To distinguish these possibilities, we need to identify and functionally characterize SHR, SCR and SCL23 homologs in other plants. Gene functional analysis with organisms with a large genome has been hindered by the lack of efficient gene targeting methods, but this has been changed with the development of several powerful genome-editing technologies, such as the TALENs method and the CRISPER-Cas system.21-25

Our identification of genes that control BS cell fate in Arabidopsis not only has advanced the understanding of the mechanisms underlying BS cell development, but also provides new tools for C3-to-C4 engineering. As transcription factors, these BS cell fate determination factors can be used to increase the number of BS cells, which is also critical to C4 photosynthesis. To introduce C4 photosynthesis into C3 crops, some genes involved in the Calvin-Benson cycle need to be silenced in mesophyll cells but expressed specifically in BS cells.26 Moreover, because the 2 populations of BS cells associated with the phloem or xylem have different functions, as suggested by our study, they need to be modified separately. This calls for cell-type specific promoters and the SCR and SCL23 promoters are the only regulatory sequences known so far that have such specificity. Unlike the BS cell-type specific promoters previously isolated, the promoters of SCR and SCL23 or their homologs are unlikely to be affected by cellular metabolites and thus expected to confer similar and robust expression pattern across species.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a set-up fund from Florida State University to H. C.

Cui H, Kong D, Liu X, Hao Y. SCARECROW, SCR-LIKE 23 and SHORT-ROOT control bundle sheath cell fate and function in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2014;78:319–27. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12470.

References

  • 1.Christin PA, Osborne CP, Chatelet DS, Columbus JT, Besnard G, Hodkinson TR, Garrison LM, Vorontsova MS, Edwards EJ. Anatomical enablers and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:1381–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216777110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:153–9. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sage RF. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. New Phytol. 2004;161:341–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00974.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hibberd JM, Sheehy JE, Langdale JA. Using C4 photosynthesis to increase the yield of rice-rationale and feasibility. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008;11:228–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu XG, Shan L, Wang Y, Quick WP. C4 rice - an ideal arena for systems biology research. J Integr Plant Biol. 2010;52:762–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.von Caemmerer S, Quick WP, Furbank RT. The development of C₄rice: current progress and future challenges. Science. 2012;336:1671–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1220177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Esau K. Plant Anatomy. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1953 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Benfey PN, Linstead PJ, Roberts K, Schiefelbein JW, Hauser MT, Aeschbacher RA. Root development in Arabidopsis: four mutants with dramatically altered root morphogenesis. Development. 1993;119:57–70. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.Supplement.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scheres B, Di Laurenzio L, Willemsen V, Hauser MT, Janmaat K, Weisbeek P, Benfey PN. Mutations affecting the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root display specific defects throughout the embryonic axis. Development. 1995;121:53–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy JE, Pysh L, Helariutta Y, Freshour G, Hahn MG, Feldmann KA, Benfey PN. The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell. 1996;86:423–33. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80115-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li P, Ponnala L, Gandotra N, Wang L, Si Y, Tausta SL, Kebrom TH, Provart N, Patel R, Myers CR, et al. The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1060–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wysocka-Diller JW, Helariutta Y, Fukaki H, Malamy JE, Benfey PN. Molecular analysis of SCARECROW function reveals a radial patterning mechanism common to root and shoot. Development. 2000;127:595–603. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.3.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Langdale JA, Nelson T. Spatial regulation of photosynthetic development in C4 plants. Trends Genet. 1991;7:191–6. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90435-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nelson T, Langdale JA. Developmental genetics of C4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1992;43:25–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.000325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heidstra R, Welch D, Scheres B. Mosaic analyses using marked activation and deletion clones dissect Arabidopsis SCARECROW action in asymmetric cell division. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1964–9. doi: 10.1101/gad.305504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cui H, Levesque MP, Vernoux T, Jung JW, Paquette AJ, Gallagher KL, Wang JY, Blilou I, Scheres B, Benfey PN. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism delimiting SHR movement defines a single layer of endodermis in plants. Science. 2007;316:421–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1139531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Slewinski TL, Anderson AA, Zhang C, Turgeon R. Scarecrow plays a role in establishing Kranz anatomy in maize leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:2030–7. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lim J, Helariutta Y, Specht CD, Jung J, Sims L, Bruce WB, Diehn S, Benfey PN. Molecular analysis of the SCARECROW gene in maize reveals a common basis for radial patterning in diverse meristems. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1307–18. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.8.1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sassa N, Matsushita Y, Nakamura T, Nyunoya H. The molecular characterization and in situ expression pattern of pea SCARECROW gene. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:385–94. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kamiya N, Itoh J, Morikami A, Nagato Y, Matsuoka M. The SCARECROW gene’s role in asymmetric cell divisions in rice plants. Plant J. 2003;36:45–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cermak T, Doyle EL, Christian M, Wang L, Zhang Y, Schmidt C, Baller JA, Somia NV, Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:e82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:390–2. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang Y, Zhang F, Li X, Baller JA, Qi Y, Starker CG, Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF. Transcription activator-like effector nucleases enable efficient plant genome engineering. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:20–7. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.205179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xie K, Yang Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Mol Plant. 2013;6:1975–83. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e188. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aubry S, Brown NJ, Hibberd JM. The role of proteins in C(3) plants prior to their recruitment into the C(4) pathway. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:3049–59. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES