Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2013 Sep 3;16(6):1729–1740. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12243

Phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural yeast populations subject to environmental stress

Sara L Holland 1, Tom Reader 1, Paul S Dyer 1, Simon V Avery 1,*
PMCID: PMC4231229  PMID: 24000788

Abstract

Populations of genetically uniform microorganisms exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity, where individual cells have varying phenotypes. Such phenotypes include fitness-determining traits. Phenotypic heterogeneity has been linked to increased population-level fitness in laboratory studies, but its adaptive significance for wild microorganisms in the natural environment is unknown. Here, we addressed this by testing heterogeneity in yeast isolates from diverse environmental sites, each polluted with a different principal contaminant, as well as from corresponding control locations. We found that cell-to-cell heterogeneity (in resistance to the appropriate principal pollutant) was prevalent in the wild yeast isolates. Moreover, isolates with the highest heterogeneity were consistently observed in the polluted environments, indicating that heterogeneity is positively related to survival in adverse conditions in the wild. This relationship with survival was stronger than for the property of mean resistance (IC50) of an isolate. Therefore, heterogeneity could be the major determinant of microbial survival in adverse conditions. Indeed, growth assays indicated that isolates with high heterogeneities had a significant competitive advantage during stress. Analysis of yeasts after cultivation for ≥ 500 generations additionally showed that high heterogeneity evolved as a heritable trait during stress. The results showed that environmental stress selects for wild microorganisms with high levels of phenotypic heterogeneity.

Introduction

Individual cells of genetically uniform populations can exhibit marked heterogeneity despite being isogenic. This is evident in effectively any cell phenotype, including virulence of pathogenic organisms (Halliwell et al., 2012; Stewart and Cookson, 2012), cell differentiation and reprogramming (Mirouze et al., 2011; Buganim et al., 2012), and resistance to antibiotics (Balaban et al., 2004; Wakamoto et al., 2013) and other stressors (Kale and Jazwinski, 1996; Sumner et al., 2012; Bishop et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2007; Levy et al., 2012). Studies in recent years have shown that variation in gene expression between such isogenic cells is the principal basis for heterogeneity. These differences in gene expression may have a deterministic basis, particularly for genes regulated by the cell cycle, biological rhythms, growth rate or cell aging, which typically vary across a cell population (Avery, 2006; Carlquist et al., 2012; Levy et al., 2012; Ryall et al., 2012). In addition, the role of stochastic events that culminate in phenotypic diversification has been widely investigated (Raj and van Oudenaarden, 2008). The processes of gene transcription and translation may contribute to such variation or ‘noise’ in gene expression, for example through bursting events that have been described in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Elowitz et al., 2002; Ozbudak et al., 2002; Raser and O'Shea, 2004; Blake et al., 2006; Cai et al., 2006; Carey et al., 2013). Large-scale analysis of expression noise in yeast has indicated that proteins that are essential and/or have house-keeping roles are characterized by low expression variation between cells, whereas noise is higher in proteins whose expression may be transiently important, such as stress response genes (Bar-Even et al., 2006; Newman et al., 2006; Lehner, 2008). Gene promoter sequences that can determine the level of noise in gene expression in prokaryotes and eukaryotes have been identified (Raser and O'Shea, 2004; Blake et al., 2006; Freed et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010; Hornung et al., 2012; Silander et al., 2012; Carey et al., 2013).

Consistent with the apparent evolution of higher levels of expression noise in stress response genes (Newman et al., 2006), it has been widely suggested that phenotypic heterogeneity can confer fitness advantages to populations of single-cell organisms. In a similar manner to genotypic diversity (Reed and Frankham, 2003; Markert et al., 2010), phenotypic heterogeneity may create subpopulations that are pre-equipped to survive future changes in their environmental niche or other perturbations. As single-cell phenotypes determined by variable gene expression are not heritable, unlike genotypic or prion-based variants (Halfmann et al., 2012), phenotypic heterogeneity is predicted to offer particular advantages in dynamic environments subject to intermittent stress. Such predictions have been tested under laboratory conditions with populations of bacterial or yeast cells, with results showing that dynamic phenotypic heterogeneity is especially favoured in rapidly changing systems (Thattai and van Oudenaarden, 2004; Acar et al., 2008; Gaal et al., 2010). Furthermore, model organisms manipulated to express greater heterogeneity outcompeted less heterogeneous cell populations under varying selective conditions (Blake et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2007).

One fundamental question that remains unanswered is the extent to which the insights gained above from laboratory investigations reflect what actually happens with populations in the natural environment. This major gap in our knowledge, recognized in recent papers (Ackermann, 2013; Hsieh et al., 2013), is important both to assess the significance of phenotypic heterogeneity in nature and because much work on heterogeneity is justified on the basis of its likely importance in natural systems. Here, we set out to address this question by determining and comparing the levels of heterogeneity of wild yeast populations, as representative microorganisms, from stressed (polluted) versus unstressed environmental sites. Our major conclusion is that non-genotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural environments subject to environmental stress and is a key determinant of survival in such adverse conditions.

Results

Organisms from the study sites

In order to test the hypothesis that phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in stressed wild environments, yeasts were isolated from unpolluted and polluted locations at three environmental sites, as detailed in the Methods section. To exclude possible species-specific effects, we compared isolates of the same species at polluted and control locations from each site. Accordingly, we collected and analyzed isolates of the most abundant yeast species at each site. Cryptococcus podzolicus was the principal yeast isolated at Site 1, from sediments of pools that were either affected or not by copper contamination. Multiple independent non-clonal isolates of C. podzolicus were collected from the polluted and control locations, as we corroborated by the random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses. Candida sake was the principal yeast found at Site 2, and multiple independent isolates were obtained from sediments of streams near a lead-mine outflow. Finally, Sporobolomyces roseus was the principal yeast isolated at Site 3, from leaf surfaces near a coking plant, which produces airborne sulphur dioxide. As for Sites 1 and 2, all isolates of the species were confirmed to be independent and non-clonal based on RAPD analyses.

Phenotypic heterogeneity exists in the wild yeast isolates, and differs between those from polluted and unpolluted habitats

Cell-to-cell heterogeneity is typically measured in relation to a specific phenotype. Here, the phenotype was cellular resistance to the known principal contaminant at the environmental site from which each isolate was obtained. This was appropriate because these contaminants were expected to be primary selective agents at the study sites, and possible selection for increased heterogeneity was the focus of our study. The gradients of dose-response plots (kill curves) provide a convenient measure of cell-to-cell heterogeneity, where the heterogeneity relates to single-cell stress resistances within genetically uniform cultures (Sumner et al., 2012; Bishop et al., 2007) (Fig. 1). All of the isolates studied here produced a graded decline in colony formation (viability) during culture on agar with increasing concentration of the relevant stressor, similar to those illustrated in Fig. 1. This indicated variation in the stressor doses at which individual cells lost viability, showing that the property of phenotypic heterogeneity is prevalent in wild microbial isolates. Therefore, phenotypic heterogeneity is not restricted to model laboratory organisms. Throughout this study, we routinely corroborated that the differing phenotypes of individual cells were not due to any genetic variation in the relevant culture, as ‘resistant’ or ‘sensitive’ colonies reverted to cultures of cells with mixed phenotypes following subculture in non-selective conditions. That is, the individual-cell phenotypes were transient and not heritable (Fig. S1) (Smith et al., 2007). In the following description of results, isolates with high heterogeneity values are those with relatively shallow gradients at the 50% viability (IC50) point in dose-response plots, whereas isolates with low heterogeneity are those with relatively steep gradients (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Analysis of heterogeneity. Sample data for C. sake isolates from control and Pb-polluted locations. The plots show triplicate independent experiments for each of two example isolates: (A) The least heterogeneous isolate, D1-9, isolated from the control location. (B) The most heterogeneous isolate, D14-7, isolated from the Pb-polluted location. As described in the Methods section, heterogeneity in the relevant stress-resistance phenotype (Pb resistance in this example) was determined from the gradients of the slopes at the point where there was 50% inhibition of colony formation. IC50 was determined from the stressor concentration determined to give 50% inhibition of colony formation.

Considering Site 1, a total of 16 independent isolates of C. podzolicus were collected at the control and Cu-polluted locations at this site. These were subsequently assayed for heterogeneity and IC50 following exposure to a range of Cu concentrations (IC50 refers to the Cu concentration required to inhibit colony formation by 50% of the cells for each isolate, giving an index of mean or culture-averaged resistance in cell populations). Five of the six most heterogeneous isolates found at the site were from the polluted location, and the least heterogeneous isolates were from the control location (Fig. 2A). This trend was reflected by a ∼ 60% lower mean value for heterogeneity across isolates from the non-polluted versus the polluted location, and the effect was significant (P = 0.0416). The mean IC50 across isolates from the polluted location was slightly (14%) greater than that of the control isolates (P = 0.0165) (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Heterogeneity of C. podzolicus isolates near a Cu-polluted mine site. Independent isolates of C. podzolicus obtained from control (□) or Cu-polluted (▪) locations at Site 1 were spread plated to MYP agar supplemented with different Cu(NO3)2 concentrations. Colonies were enumerated after 14 days, and dose-response curves were constructed. Heterogeneity was determined from the gradients of the slopes (A), and IC50 from the Cu concentration that inhibited colony formation by 50% (B). Note that a high negative value (e.g. −4) indicates a steep gradient and low heterogeneity, whereas a low negative value (e.g. −1) indicates a shallow gradient and high heterogeneity. Data for each isolate are means from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Isolates are presented in the same order in (A) and (B). The panels on the right show mean values ± SEM of the individual isolate data, which are presented in the left and centre panels. * P < 0.05.

Considering Site 2, a total of 25 independent isolates of C. sake were collected from the control and Pb-polluted locations at this site. Similar to the trend seen at Site 1, the five least heterogeneous isolates from the control location were all less heterogeneous than any of the isolates from the polluted location (Fig. 3A). Accordingly, the mean heterogeneity was ∼ 42% lower for the control isolates, although the difference was not significant in this case (P = 0.0695). In contrast to heterogeneity, the mean IC50 across isolates from the polluted location was only marginally (< 2%) greater than that across isolates from the control location. The difference was not significant (P = 0.276) (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Heterogeneity of C. sake isolates near a Pb-polluted mine site. Independent isolates of C. sake obtained from control (□) or Pb-polluted (▪) locations at Site 2 were spread plated to MYP agar supplemented with different Pb(NO3)2 concentrations. Colonies were enumerated after 14 days, and dose-response curves were constructed. Heterogeneity (A) and IC50 (B) determinations were as described in the legend to Fig. 2.

Yeast populations from the above sites were likely to have been in situ in the sediments from which they were isolated for many years. This should encompass hundreds or thousands of cell generations, providing ample opportunity for adaption to pollutants via mutation and selection. To test whether the evidence for increased heterogeneity among pollutant-adapted yeasts may be borne out also in more transient populations, yeasts at Site 3 were sampled from the phylloplane. A total of 21 isolates of S. roseus were collected from deciduous tree leaves across the control and polluted locations of Site 3. The results with these isolates were similar to observations from the first two sites: When tested against the principal local pollutant (SO2, which acts via the formation of bisulphite), the most heterogeneous isolates were from the polluted location at Site 3, and vice versa (Fig. 4A). Accordingly, the mean heterogeneity across control S. roseus isolates was significantly lower than that across isolates from the SO2-polluted location (P = 0.045). In contrast, the mean IC50 did not differ significantly between the two locations (P = 0.244) (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Heterogeneity of S. roseus isolates near an SO2-polluted coking plant site. Independent isolates of S. roseus obtained from control (□) or SO2-polluted (▪) locations at Site 3 were spread plated to MYP agar supplemented with different concentrations of sodium metabisulphite (Na2S2O5), which reproduces the toxic action of SO2 (Wellburn, 1994). Colonies were enumerated after 14 days, and dose-response curves were constructed. Heterogeneity (A) and IC50 (B) determinations were as described in the legend to Fig. 2. * P < 0.05.

Environmental stress promotes evolution of phenotypic heterogeneity

The above data indicated that an increase in phenotypic heterogeneity may be selected as a trait in yeasts from diverse polluted environments. Furthermore, this increase in heterogeneity appeared to be a more strongly selected property than mean stressor resistance (IC50). We also concluded that heterogeneity and IC50 are not interdependent phenotypes: Heterogeneity and IC50 were not significantly correlated across the isolates from five of the six test locations (P > 0.05) (the one exception, at the Site 3 polluted location, rested on a single outlying data point; excluding this point gave P = 0.922) (Fig. S2).

To explain why yeasts with greater heterogeneity predominated in polluted habitats, the first hypothesis we tested was that pre-existing yeasts with high levels of phenotypic heterogeneity might be selected at the expense of low-heterogeneity yeasts after the onset of stress. Isolates from Site 2 were used to test this, as C. sake proved particularly amenable to laboratory culture. Isolates with varying heterogeneities from the control (unpolluted) location at Site 2 were cultured in the absence or presence of lead nitrate for approximately three days. The final OD600 values were used as measures of each isolate's relative fitness. Isolates with the higher heterogeneity generally appeared to fare slightly better in the presence of Pb, and the reverse trend was apparent in the absence of Pb (Fig. 5A). Indeed, comparison of these relative trends by analysis of covariance indicated that heterogeneity was significantly more advantageous to growth in the presence of Pb compared with the absence of Pb (P = 0.026, one-tailed). This relative advantage of heterogeneity was even more significant (P = 0.001), when tested in the same way as above, with C. sake isolates from the Pb-polluted location (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Relationship between heterogeneity and growth in the presence of stressor. Candida sake isolates obtained from the control (A) or polluted (B) locations at Site 2, with differing heterogeneities (Fig. 3), were cultured for 3 days with daily subculture to fresh medium in unsupplemented (○) or 15 μM Pb(NO3)2-supplemented (•) MYP broth. Relative growth of each isolate was determined as OD600 after 3 days. Independent biological replicates (×2) for each of the tested isolates are shown for each condition. Plots are model fits from analysis of covariance.

The second hypothesis we tested to help explain why more heterogeneous isolates predominated in polluted habitats was that yeasts evolved increased phenotypic heterogeneity during long-term stress. Gene promoter sequences that affect noise of gene expression have been identified previously, consistent with heterogeneity being an evolvable trait (Raser and O'Shea, 2004; Blake et al., 2006; Freed et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010; Carlquist et al., 2012; Hornung et al., 2012; Silander et al., 2012). To test the hypothesis, C. sake isolates from the unpolluted location at Site 2 were cultured for ≥ 500 generations in the presence of 30 μM lead nitrate before being re-examined for heterogeneity. The levels of heterogeneity of each of the 12 tested organisms were increased following this long-term incubation with Pb (Fig. 6A). The mean heterogeneity of the organisms was increased by ∼3.6-fold (P = 0.00088, one-tailed) after ≥ 500 generations (Fig. 6B). To rule out the possibility that this change in heterogeneity was related to some parameter(s) of long-term laboratory cultivation other than the presence of Pb, parallel control incubations were performed in which isolates were cultivated for ≥ 500 generations under identical conditions but without Pb. The mean heterogeneity of these organisms did not change significantly during the course of the experiment (P = 0.317), and was significantly lower than for the plus-Pb-grown organisms (P = 0.029) (Fig. 6B). We had already demonstrated above that heterogeneity and IC50 are not interdependent phenotypes in isolates from the wild. Here, the mean IC50 values for the organisms before (3.52 μM) and after (3.76 μM) long-term incubation with Pb were not altered significantly (P = 0.125). Therefore, the increased heterogeneity after 500 generations arose independently of any significant change in IC50.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Evolution of heterogeneity during long-term stress.A. Candida sake isolates obtained from the control location at Site 2 (Fig. 3), with differing basal heterogeneities (□), were subcultured daily to MYP broth supplemented with 30 μM Pb(NO3)2 for ≥ 500 generations, before heterogeneity (of Pb resistance) for each was assayed again (▪).B. Mean values ± SEM of the data from (A) and from a parallel control experiment where the isolates were cultured for ≥ 500 generations in unsupplemented MYP broth. The phenotypes evolved after ≥ 500 generations were heritably stable (see main text). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01.

To substantiate that the increased-heterogeneity phenotypes (Fig. 6) were stable, the heritability of heterogeneity was tested in four of the yeasts that developed the largest heterogeneity differences between plus-Pb and minus-Pb control incubations during the 500-generation experiment. After culturing in the absence of Pb for ∼ 25 generations, the mean heterogeneity of the yeasts originating from the plus-Pb incubations remained greater than that of the control yeasts (GLMM: chi-squared = 8.741, df = 1, P = 0.003). There was no overall change in heterogeneity during the 25 generations (chi-squared = 1.924, df = 1, P = 0.164) and no change in the difference in heterogeneity between the two sets of four yeasts during this period (chi-squared = 1.072, df = 1, P = 0.301). Therefore, the relatively high heterogeneity that evolved in the presence of Pb during the 500-generation experiment was retained after 25 generations in the absence of Pb, implying that this phenotypic heterogeneity was a heritable trait.

Discussion

It has been widely suggested that heterogeneity among individual cells of genetically uniform populations confers a survival advantage during environmental perturbation. This idea has been supported by computer simulations and laboratory studies with model organisms, including bacteria and the yeast S. cerevisiae (Thattai and van Oudenaarden, 2004; Blake et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2007; Gaal et al., 2010), but crucially has not previously been tested with wild microorganisms in natural habitats. The present study provided three key insights to this phenomenon as outlined below.

First, it was shown that phenotypic heterogeneity is prevalent in the wild yeasts that we studied: C. podzolicus, C. sake and S. roseus. These comprise both ascomycete and basidiomycete yeasts, suggesting that this phenomenon is likely to be widespread in the fungal taxa. Cryptococcus podzolicus is a frequently isolated soil yeast that may grow in the rhizosphere of a number of plant species; C. sake is found in diverse habitats, including plants (tree sap, vegetables) and in natural fermentations; S. roseus is one of the most common phylloplane yeasts in many temperate geographical locations worldwide (Kurtzman et al., 2010).

Second, we found that isolates with the highest phenotypic heterogeneities were consistently recovered from the various polluted environments visited during the study. By contrast, isolates with the lowest heterogeneities were found at matched control (unpolluted) locations. Consistent with these observations, laboratory growth tests demonstrated that isolates of C. sake with higher heterogeneity exhibited greater relative fitness in the presence of lead (the relevant environmental stressor) than isolates with lower heterogeneity. This indication that heterogeneity relates positively to survival in adverse conditions in the wild is a key finding. It provides evidence from the natural environment to support the hypothesis that phenotypic heterogeneity confers an advantage during environmental perturbation (Thattai and van Oudenaarden, 2004; Blake et al., 2006; Bishop et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2007; Acar et al., 2008; Gaal et al., 2010). It is also important because traditional measurements of mean (culture-averaged) resistance of an organism to a stressor, e.g. IC50, are widely used to indicate selection of resistant organisms in polluted environments (Bishop et al., 2007; Adamo et al., 2012). However, our results indicated that heterogeneity and IC50 values are not related, and that heterogeneity can also be a significant indicator of an organism's ability to persist in a polluted habitat.

Third, the laboratory evolution experiments with C. sake showed that increased heterogeneity is a trait that can be selected for during long-term environmental stress of wild microbial isolates. As mentioned above, there has been accumulating evidence with laboratory microorganisms of various genetic bases for phenotypic heterogeneity, for example through TATA box sequence changes in gene promoters (Raser and O'Shea, 2004; Blake et al., 2006; Newman et al., 2006; Freed et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010; Hornung et al., 2012; Silander et al., 2012; Carey et al., 2013). The finding from the present evolution experiments, in conjunction with a competitive advantage of isolates with higher pre-existing heterogeneity, implies that both mechanisms may account for the observed occupation of polluted environments by high-heterogeneity yeasts in the wild.

The advantages conferred by heterogeneity during stress appear to be counterbalanced by a fitness cost under standard growth conditions. In our assays, there was a small negative correlation between growth and heterogeneity when isolates were grown without stressors, consistent with findings elsewhere (Wang and Zhang, 2011). The extant level of phenotypic heterogeneity in a genetically uniform population is likely to be balanced between such costs (under standard conditions) and benefits (during stress). Accordingly, phenotypic heterogeneity can be considered a bet-hedging strategy (Beaumont et al., 2009; Levy et al., 2012). The long-term balance between costs and benefits of heterogeneity depends on the future instability of the habitat, with instability favouring the trait of heterogeneity. Consequently, environments subject to frequent perturbations will, our results indicate, select for organisms with increased heterogeneity. An alternative possibility could be that high heterogeneity is the common or default phenotype, with low heterogeneity evolving under constant non-stress conditions. However, our experimental evolution assays did show that increased heterogeneity evolved in wild isolates under stress in the laboratory. Quantitative empirical support for bet hedging has been judged to be lacking (Simons, 2009); the environmental selection of heterogeneity observed in the present study provides evidence that helps address this issue.

As depicted in Fig. 7, the slight fitness advantage of heterogeneous organisms during stress, observed in this study with Pb stress, would be expected to cause high-heterogeneity organisms to outcompete low-heterogeneity organisms over a number of cell generations. Previous laboratory studies have yielded similar conclusions, particularly where the stress is fluctuating or intermittent (Thattai and van Oudenaarden, 2004; Acar et al., 2008; Gaal et al., 2010). By comparison, the pollutants at the various environmental sites sampled here might be thought to give more constant exposure. However, there would be intermittent dilution by rainfall, in addition to changes in direction and intensity of the wind (affecting SO2 deposition). In conjunction with fluctuations in pollutant discharges at the mine or coking-plant sources visited here, there will inevitably have been fluctuations in the intensity of stress to which the native yeast isolates were exposed. Even in the case of our evolution assays, the stress exerted by the Pb supplement would be expected to change during the course of each batch culture because of changes in cell density and parameters that affect metal bioavailability, such as pH and dissolved O2 (Hughes and Poole, 1991; Gadd, 1993). Our study harnesses fluctuations in environmental stress that are not directly controlled by a researcher but that occur naturally. Accordingly, it provides a realistic portrayal of the impact of heterogeneity as it applies to populations under natural conditions. It should be noted that heterogeneity can also be expected to provide some advantage where an environment becomes subject to more constant environmental stress (Fig. 7). It seems less likely that selection for heterogeneity would be greater than for mean stress resistance under such constant conditions, although we cannot discount that the trait of heterogeneity may offer a larger mutational target in cells, i.e. it could be ‘easier’ to evolve heterogeneity.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Schematic showing how the selective pressure of stress favours heterogeneous organisms. Three example strains are illustrated, with the same mean resistances to a given stress (approximating to the peaks in the histograms) but with different heterogeneities (reflected by histogram width). In the low-heterogeneity strain, 12.5% of cells fall above the survival threshold at the indicated stressor dose, whereas the medium- and high-heterogeneity strains comprise 25% and 37.5% survivors at the same dose respectively. For clarity in this example, each round of stress application is followed by a recovery period (of three generations) during which resistant survivors re-seed heterogeneous populations. The scheme illustrates how each successive round of stress followed by recovery amplifies the relative numbers of cells in the more heterogeneous populations. This faster outgrowth of the heterogeneous strains is the same process that will favour any higher heterogeneity mutants that may spontaneously arise in the populations, ultimately leading to increased heterogeneity that is heritably stable.

As mentioned above, the present evidence suggests that outcompetition by heterogeneous organisms can at least partly explain the apparent real-life situation in which polluted habitats favour organisms with high heterogeneity (Fig. 7). The relative importance of outcompetition by organisms with pre-existing high heterogeneity, versus longer-term evolution of heterogeneity by mutation, may be especially great in transiently populated habitats; in such cases, like the deciduous phylloplane of Site 3, there will be a shorter window of opportunity for evolution to occur. A further observation is that the advantage of heterogeneity during laboratory growth under Pb stress was less marked with isolates from the unpolluted location than from the Pb-polluted location. Given that the pre-existing heterogeneity trait of each isolate was heritably stable, this suggests that condition (e.g. Pb-polluted versus unpolluted locations) may affect the nature of heterogeneity that evolves over time in the wild, with resultant heterogeneity phenotypes being ‘tuned’ to a relevant selective agent(s). It is also thought that there is tuning of the rate at which cells switch between phenotypes to the frequency of environmental change (Acar et al., 2008).

The wild yeast isolates from this study provide a novel and unique resource. Their diverse heterogeneities offer the opportunity to understand further how the environment can shape this important trait. At present, the molecular bases for inter-strain variation in cell-to-cell heterogeneity arising in natural ecosystems are not known. Existing knowledge of the genetic (i.e. evolvable) drivers of heterogeneity is based on laboratory studies with model organisms. Several heterogeneously expressed resistance genes that contribute significantly to the gradients of response plots to different stressors have been identified in S. cerevisiae (Sumner et al., 2012; Bishop et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2007). In these cases, deterministic parameters like cell cycle and age- or rhythm-dependent gene regulation were important for the heterogeneity. The occurrence of prion-like proteins in wild yeasts has suggested a further potential driver of heterogeneity, as prion-dependent mistranslation or transcriptional repression can generate cell diversity (Halfmann et al., 2012; Holmes et al., 2013). However, this seems unlikely to be important with the present yeast isolates because prion-dependent, single-cell phenotypes tend to be heritable, and curing guanidine hydrochloride-susceptible prions from our isolates did not alter their heterogeneities (A. Porquier, S. L. Holland and S. V. Avery, unpublished data).

Our results indicate that non-genotypic heterogeneity is an important trait for organisms in the natural environment, contributing to their competitiveness. Evolution and selection are key processes that appear to drive increased heterogeneity among yeasts experiencing adverse conditions. We infer that such cell-to-cell heterogeneity makes a key contribution to intra-species diversity (and associated fitness) of wild populations, which is complementary to that attributable to genotypic diversity. A recent report highlighted the negative impact of human activities on genotypic diversity in natural environments, with an increased risk of ecosystem collapse (MacDougall et al., 2013). According to the new findings of the present study, pollution arising from human activities has the opposite effect on non-genotypic heterogeneity, increasing the diversity among individual organisms. It is tempting to suggest that such responses might help buffer the reported impact of anthropogenic disturbances on genotypic diversity, helping sustain the integrity of natural ecosystems.

Experimental procedures

Study sites

Samples were collected from three sites between 2009 and 2011, each comprising a polluted location and nearby non-polluted (control) location. Records of pollutant levels were available for each location and site. Site 1 comprised a copper-polluted location at the edge of a pool at the abandoned Devon Great Consols mine complex, Devon, UK (UK Ordnance Survey: map coordinates SX426733 N50:32:52 W4:13:25) and a similar off-site control location ∼20 km north of the mine complex (UK Ordnance Survey: map coordinates SX418901 N50:68:69 W4:24:03) (Langdon et al., 2001; Kille et al., 2013). Site 2 comprised a lead-polluted location (UK Ordnance Survey: Map coordinates SN865938 N52:31:50 W3:40:22) and a corresponding control location ∼ 2 km upstream (UK Ordnance Survey: map coordinates SN853939 N52:31:51 W3:4:26). The two locations were downstream and upstream, respectively, of the effluent discharging from the Dylife mine in Wales, UK (Atkins, 2008). Site 3 comprised a sulphur dioxide-polluted location (UK Ordnance Survey: map coordinates. SE929411 N53:35:44 W00:35:49) and a nearby (∼ 2 km) control location (UK Ordnance Survey: map coordinates SE918087 N53:34:01 W00:36:54) close to the coking plant at Corus Steelworks, near Scunthorpe, UK (http://www.nlincs.aeat.com).

Yeast sampling and identification

Sediment or soil samples were collected from Sites 1 and 2 in sterile 50 ml tubes. Within 6 h of sampling, the sediments were vortexed in sterile water and plated at different dilutions on MYP agar [malt extract (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA) 7 gl−1, yeast extract (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK) 0.5 gl−1, soytone (BD Bacto, New Jersey, USA) 2.5 gl−1, agar (Sigma) 15 gl−1], supplemented with chloramphenicol (100 mgl−1) (Holland et al., 2011). At Site 3, leaves were picked from a variety of tree species and transported aseptically to the laboratory. Leaves were either pressed directly to MYP, agar as outlined previously (Inacio et al., 2005), or vortexed with sterile water before spread-plating wash samples to MYP agar. After incubation at room temperature for 4 days, individual yeast colonies were subcultured onto fresh MYP agar to enable further characterization.

For identification purposes, the internal transcribed spacer regions (regions 1 and 2, and the intervening 5.8S rDNA sequence) were amplified from isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and digested, as described previously (Esteve-Zarzoso et al., 1999). Digestion products were subsequently compared, enabling similar species to be grouped prior to purification of PCR products by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation and sequencing of representative isolates. Sequencing was carried out as described previously (Holland et al., 2011), and sequence data were compared against existing databases with the blast programme (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information, and the Wu-Blast programme at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/sss/wublast/. Next, DNA was extracted from individual isolates (Hoffman and Winston, 1987), and RAPD-PCR fingerprinting was performed to assess clonality of isolates, using primers OPW08, OPW09, OPAX2, OPW04 (Site 1); OPAJ03, OPW05, OPW06 (Site 2); or OPAJ01, OPAJ03, OPA05, OPAX20, OPW10 (Site 3), as described previously (O'Gorman et al., 2009).

Determination of heterogeneity and IC50 values

Yeasts were cultured overnight in MYP broth, then subcultured to fresh medium and incubated for a further 6 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and suspended to ∼ 3000 cells ml−1 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), before spread plating ∼ 200 colony forming units (CFUs) to MYP agar supplemented with stressors, as specified. CFUs were enumerated after 14 days of incubation at room temperature. Experiments were repeated on three independent days, with plating in triplicate for each isolate and condition on each day. Percentage viability within each experiment was determined with reference to mean CFUs on control (minus stressor) plates.

To model the effect of stressor concentration (x) on viability (y), a three-parameter version of the Weibull survival equation was applied. This was a modified version of the four-parameter Weibull equation (Crawley, 2007): y = a − bexp(−cxd), where a is the upper asymptote of the survival curve, b is the drop in viability between the upper asymptote and the y intercept, c is a rate constant, and d alters the steepness of the central part of the curve from a shallow s-shape at low values to a steep step-function at high values. We modified this function by reflecting about the y axis, such that maximum viability occurs at x = 0. We also set b = a to allow the asymptote to vary while ensuring that zero viability is reached at high stressor concentrations. For each isolate on each independent day of analysis in each experiment, three parameters describing the model fit (a, c and d) were extracted, and the IC50 calculated as the concentration of the stressor at which viability was 50%. The Weibull equation for each isolate on each day was then differentiated to find the slope of the curve [a measure of heterogeneity (Sumner et al., 2012; Bishop et al., 2007)] at the IC50 of the stressor. Note that the s-shaped survival curves (Fig. 1) result from differences in the concentrations of environmental stressor that are sufficient to kill individual cells, which in turn are caused by continuous variation among cells in a hypothetical resistance trait. The shape of the distribution of this trait will determine the exact shape of the survival curve. For example, if the trait is normally distributed, the resultant survival curve will be equivalent to the cumulative probability density function of the normal distribution, with a slope that is determined by the trait's standard deviation. For our data, in the absence of any specific information about the shape of the underlying trait distribution, we fitted the most parsimonious mathematical function to the survival data and calculated the gradient of this function at IC50 as a direct proxy for the variance (i.e. heterogeneity). These gradients and IC50 values were compared for yeast isolates from polluted versus unpolluted locations at each of the three sites, using a linear mixed-effects model with type of location (polluted versus unpolluted) as a fixed factor and isolate as a random factor (to account for the fact that each isolate was tested on more than one day). The tests were one-tailed as the a priori hypotheses were that isolates from polluted locations would have more heterogeneous resistance to the stressor as well as higher IC50 than those from unpolluted locations. All analyses were conducted in R version 2.15.0 (R-Core-Team, 2013). Weibull models were fitted using the nls (non-linear least squares regression) package.

Growth and evolution experiments

To compare growth in broth culture during exposure to lead as a representative stressor, isolates with different heterogeneities from Site 2 were cultured to exponential phase, as described above. Cells were then subcultured to fresh MYP broth, either supplemented or not with 15 μM Pb(NO3)2, and incubated with shaking in a BioTek Powerwave XS microplate spectrophotometer (Winooski, Vermont, USA) as described previously (Alhebshi et al., 2012). After 24 h, cells were subcultured to the same fresh medium with subsequent incubation for a further 24 h, and this was repeated to give a final growth duration of 3 days. Final OD600 values after 3 days of incubation in the presence or absence of Pb were used to assess relative growth.

For evolution experiments, isolates isolated from the unpolluted location at Site 2 were subcultured daily to MYP broth supplemented with 0 or 30 μM Pb(NO3)2 and incubated as above for a total of 60 days, representing ≥ 500 generations (Ferea et al., 1999; Dunham et al., 2002). Heterogeneity in the Pb resistance of each culture was re-assayed, as described above, after the ≥ 500 generation incubation. The heritability of heterogeneity in evolved cultures was assayed after incubation in the absence of Pb for ∼25 generations before retesting Pb resistance.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (NE/E005969/1). We thank Josh Coley and Antoine Porquier for assistance with certain experiments, and Peter Crittenden and Malcolm Stratford for helpful discussions.

Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site:

Fig. S1. Sample data illustrating non-heritability of individual-cell stress resistance of wild yeast isolates. The examples are C. sake isolates collected near a lead-mine outflow (i.e. Site 2, which gave the least significant effect of stressor on selection for heterogeneity). Resistant colonies of each isolate that grew at 1.5 mM Pb(NO3)2 were picked then grown in the absence of Pb, before re-assaying resistance at 1.5 mM Pb(NO3)2. The figures shows percentage colony formation in this re-assay of cultures originating from the ‘resistant’ colonies (▪), versus the same assay for naïve cultures of the isolates, not previously selected by Pb-resistance (□).

emi0016-1729-sd1.tif (2.1MB, tif)

Fig. S2. Heterogeneity and IC50 are not correlated. Scatter plots are presented for heterogeneity versus IC50 values of every isolate investigated from the six locations. The P-values presented are for correlations across the isolates from each location.

emi0016-1729-sd2.tif (3.5MB, tif)

References

  1. Acar M, Mettetal JT. van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat Genet. 2008;40:471–475. doi: 10.1038/ng.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackermann M. Microbial individuality in the natural environment. ISME J. 2013;7:465–467. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adamo GM, Brocca S, Passolunghi S, Salvato B. Lotti M. Laboratory evolution of copper tolerant yeast strains. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11 doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-1. Art. 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alhebshi A, Sideri TC, Holland SL. Avery SV. The essential iron-sulfur protein Rli1 is an important target accounting for inhibition of cell growth by reactive oxygen species. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23:3582–3590. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-05-0413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkins Metal mine monitoring project 2006/07 Dylife mine site monitoring summary report. 2008. Environment Agency Wales, 5049222 4 Dylife summary.
  6. Avery SV. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:577–587. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L. Leibler S. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science. 2004;305:1622–1625. doi: 10.1126/science.1099390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bar-Even A, Paulsson J, Maheshri N, Carmi M, O'Shea E, Pilpel Y. Barkai N. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat Genet. 2006;38:636–643. doi: 10.1038/ng1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beaumont HJE, Gallie J, Kost C, Ferguson GC. Rainey PB. Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature. 2009;462:90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature08504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishop AL, Rab FA, Sumner ER. Avery SV. Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in ‘stress-sensitive’ yeast populations. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:507–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blake WJ, Balazsi G, Kohanski MA, Isaacs FJ, Murphy KF, Kuang Y, et al. Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. Mol Cell. 2006;24:853–865. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Cheng AW, Itskovich E, Markoulaki S, Ganz K, et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell. 2012;150:1209–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cai L, Friedman N. Xie XS. Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature. 2006;440:358–362. doi: 10.1038/nature04599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carey LB, van Dijk D, Sloot PMA, Kaandorp JA. Segal E. Promoter sequence determines the relationship between expression level and noise. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlquist M, Fernandes RL, Helmark S, Heins AL, Lundin L, Sorensen SJ, et al. Physiological heterogeneities in microbial populations and implications for physical stress tolerance. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11 doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-94. Art. 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Crawley MJ. The R Book. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T, Adams J, Brown PO, Rosenzweig F. Botstein D. Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:16144–16149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.242624799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED. Swain PS. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science. 2002;297:1183–1186. doi: 10.1126/science.1070919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Esteve-Zarzoso B, Belloch C, Uruburu F. Querol A. Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49:329–337. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-1-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferea TL, Botstein D, Brown PO. Rosenzweig RF. Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9721–9726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Freed NE, Silander OK, Stecher B, Bohm A, Hardt WD. Ackermann M. A simple screen to identify promoters conferring high levels of phenotypic noise. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaal B, Pitchford JW. Wood AJ. Exact results for the evolution of stochastic switching in variable asymmetric environments. Genetics. 2010;184:1113–1119. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.113431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gadd GM. Interactions of fungi with toxic metals. New Phytol. 1993;124:25–60. [Google Scholar]
  24. Halfmann R, Jarosz DF, Jones SK, Chang A, Lancaster AK. Lindquist S. Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts. Nature. 2012;482:363–368. doi: 10.1038/nature10875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliwell SC, Smith MCA, Muston P, Holland SL. Avery SV. Heterogeneous expression of the virulence-related adhesin Epa1 between individual cells and strains of the pathogen Candida glabrata. Euk Cell. 2012;11:141–150. doi: 10.1128/EC.05232-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoffman CS. Winston F. A 10-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57:267–272. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Holland SL, Dyer PS, Bond CJ, James SA, Roberts IN. Avery SV. Candida argentea sp. nov., a copper and silver resistant yeast species. Fungal Biol. 2011;115:909–918. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Holmes DL, Lancaster AK, Lindquist S. Halfmann R. Heritable remodeling of yeast multicellularity by an environmentally responsive prion. Cell. 2013;153:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hornung G, Bar-Ziv R, Rosin D, Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS, Oren M. Barkai N. Noise-mean relationship in mutated promoters. Genome Res. 2012;22:2409–2417. doi: 10.1101/gr.139378.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hsieh Y-Y, Hung P-H. Leu J-Y. Hsp90 regulates nongenetic variation in response to environmental stress. Mol Cell. 2013;50:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hughes MN. Poole RK. Metal speciation and microbial growth – the hard (and soft) facts. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137:725–734. [Google Scholar]
  32. Inacio J, Portugal L, Spencer-Martins I. Fonseca A. Phylloplane yeasts from Portugal: seven novel anamorphic species in the Tremellales lineage of the Hymenomycetes (Basidiomycota) producing orange-coloured colonies. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5:1167–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kale SP. Jazwinski SM. Differential response to UV stress and DNA damage during the yeast replicative life span. Devel Genet. 1996;18:154–160. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:2<154::AID-DVG8>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kille P, Andre J, Anderson C, Ang HN, Bruford MW, Bundy JG, et al. DNA sequence variation and methylation in an arsenic tolerant earthworm population. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;57:524–532. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, editors; Boekhout T, editor. The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. 5th edn. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Langdon CJ, Piearce TG, Meharg AA. Semple KT. Resistance to copper toxicity in populations of the earthworms Lumbricus rubellus and Dendrodrilus rubidus from contaminated mine wastes. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001;20:2336–2341. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(2001)020<2336:rtctip>2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lehner B. Selection to minimise noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression. Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4 doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.11. Art. 170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Levy SF, Ziv N. Siegal ML. Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li JJ, Min RQ, Vizeacoumar FJ, Jin K, Xin XF. Zhang ZL. Exploiting the determinants of stochastic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genome-wide prediction of expression noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:10472–10477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914302107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. MacDougall AS, McCann KS, Gellner G. Turkington R. Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse. Nature. 2013;494:86–89. doi: 10.1038/nature11869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Markert JA, Champlin DM, Gutjahr-Gobell R, Grear JS, Kuhn A, McGreevy TJ, et al. Population genetic diversity and fitness in multiple environments. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-205. Art. 205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mirouze N, Prepiak P. Dubnau D. Fluctuations in spo0A transcription control rare developmental transitions in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Newman JRS, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL. Weissman JS. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature. 2006;441:840–846. doi: 10.1038/nature04785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. O'Gorman CM, Fuller HT. Dyer PS. Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature. 2009;457:471–474. doi: 10.1038/nature07528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD. van Oudenaarden A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet. 2002;31:69–73. doi: 10.1038/ng869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Raj A. van Oudenaarden A. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and Its consequences. Cell. 2008;135:216–226. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Raser JM. O'Shea EK. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science. 2004;304:1811–1814. doi: 10.1126/science.1098641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. R-Core-Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. [WWW document]. URL http://www.R-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  49. Reed DH. Frankham R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:230–237. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ryall B, Eydallin G. Ferenci T. Culture history and population heterogeneity as determinants of bacterial adaptation: the adaptomics of a single environmental transition. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:597–625. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05028-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Silander OK, Nikolic N, Zaslaver A, Bren A, Kikoin I, Alon U. Ackermann M. A genome-wide analysis of promoter-mediated phenotypic noise in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Simons AM. Fluctuating natural selection accounts for the evolution of diversification bet hedging. Proc Roy Soc B - Biol Sci. 2009;276:1987–1992. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith MCA, Sumner ER. Avery SV. Glutathione and Gts1p drive beneficial variability in the cadmium resistances of individual yeast cells. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66:699–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05951.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stewart MK. Cookson BT. Non-genetic diversity shapes infectious capacity and host resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:461–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sumner ER, Avery AM, Houghton JE, Robins RA. Avery SV. Cell cycle- and age-dependent activation of Sod1p drives the formation of stress resistant cell subpopulations within clonal yeast cultures. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50:857–870. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Thattai M. van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics. 2004;167:523–530. doi: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wakamoto Y, Dhar N, Chait R, Schneider K, Signorino-Gelo F, Leibler S. McKinney JD. Dynamic persistence of antibiotic-stressed mycobacteria. Science. 2013;339:91–95. doi: 10.1126/science.1229858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang Z. Zhang JZ. Impact of gene expression noise on organismal fitness and the efficacy of natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E67–E76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100059108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wellburn A. Air Pollution and Climate Change: The Biological Impact. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Sample data illustrating non-heritability of individual-cell stress resistance of wild yeast isolates. The examples are C. sake isolates collected near a lead-mine outflow (i.e. Site 2, which gave the least significant effect of stressor on selection for heterogeneity). Resistant colonies of each isolate that grew at 1.5 mM Pb(NO3)2 were picked then grown in the absence of Pb, before re-assaying resistance at 1.5 mM Pb(NO3)2. The figures shows percentage colony formation in this re-assay of cultures originating from the ‘resistant’ colonies (▪), versus the same assay for naïve cultures of the isolates, not previously selected by Pb-resistance (□).

emi0016-1729-sd1.tif (2.1MB, tif)

Fig. S2. Heterogeneity and IC50 are not correlated. Scatter plots are presented for heterogeneity versus IC50 values of every isolate investigated from the six locations. The P-values presented are for correlations across the isolates from each location.

emi0016-1729-sd2.tif (3.5MB, tif)

Articles from Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES