Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2014 Oct 23;5(10):e1483. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.385

SIRT1 and SIRT2 inhibition impairs pediatric soft tissue sarcoma growth

L Ma 1, W Maruwge 1, A Strambi 1, P D'Arcy 1, P Pellegrini 1, L Kis 1, A de Milito 1, S Lain 2, B Brodin 1,*
PMCID: PMC4237232  PMID: 25341037

Abstract

Sirtuins are NAD+ dependent deacetylases and/or ADP-ribosyl transferases active on histone and non-histone substrates. The first sirtuin was discovered as a transcriptional repressor of the mating-type-loci (Silent Information Regulator sir2) in the budding yeast, where it was shown to extend yeast lifespan. Seven mammalian sirtuins (SIRT1-7) have been now identified with distinct subcellular localization, enzymatic activities and substrates. These enzymes regulate cellular processes such as metabolism, cell survival, differentiation, DNA repair and they are implicated in the pathogenesis of solid tumors and leukemias. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of sirtuin expression, activity and inhibition in the survival of pediatric sarcoma cell lines.We have analyzed the expression of SIRT1 and SIRT2 in a series of pediatric sarcoma tumor cell lines and normal cells, and we have evaluated the activity of the sirtuin inhibitor and p53 activator tenovin-6 (Tv6) in synovial sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines. We show that SIRT1 is overexpressed in synovial sarcoma biopsies and cell lines in comparison with normal mesenchymal cells. Tv6 induced apoptosis as well as impaired autophagy flux. Using siRNA to knock down SIRT1 and SIRT2, we show that the expression of both proteins is crucial for the survival of rhabdomyosarcoma cells and that the loss of SIRT1 expression results in a decreased LC3II expression. Our results show that SIRT1 and SIRT2 expressions are crucial for the survival of synovial sarcomas and rhabdomyosarcomas, and demonstrate that the pharmacological inhibition of sirtuins impairs the autophagy process and induces tumor cell death.


Sirtuins are a family of deacetylases (class III histone deacetylases, HDACs) and ADP-ribosyl transferases with evolutionary conserved functions in cellular metabolism and chromatin regulation.1 The first sirtuin, silent information regulator (SIR2), was identified with a role in silencing the mating-type loci and prolonging lifespan of budding yeast.2 Aside from deacetylating histones, sirtuins are also active on non-histone substrates and differ from other histone deacetylases in that their activity is NAD+ dependent. As NAD+ is a key component in energy and signal-transduction pathways, sirtuin's activity is linked to cell metabolism but also with other cellular processes such as cell cycle DNA repair and transcription.

Seven sirtuins (SIRT1-7) have been identified in mammals, all of them sharing the NAD+ binding and catalytic domain, but targeting different substrates and distinct but not exclusive subcellular localizations. Some sirtuins are primarily in the nucleus (SIRT1, 2, 6 and 7), others in the cytoplasm (SIRT2) and a third group locates mostly in mitochondria (SIRT3, 4 5).3

SIRT1, 3 and 6 have been implicated in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism during cellular stress induced by calorie restriction, probably by sensing intracellular NAD+ levels. Sirtuins are also associated with cancer, as they deacetylate cancer-associated transcription factors. This was first demonstrated for SIRT1 that deacetylates lysine 382 of the p53 tumor suppressor protein (K382-p53), a post-translational modification that favors p53 degradation.4, 5, 6

SIRT1 is overexpressed in different tumor types such as acute myeloid leukemia, colon and prostate cancers, but this correlation is not found for bladder carcinoma, glioblastoma nor ovarian cancer.7 The oncogenic role of SIRT1 is controversial, as this sirtuin is also involved in the maintenance of DNA integrity. SIRT1 relocates at double- and single-strand break sites and deacetylates proteins involved in DNA repair such as Ku70,8 and the mutant mice have an impaired DNA damage response and are prone to develop tumors.9

Several studies support a role for SIRT2 as tumor suppressor protein. SIRT2 is downregulated in human gliomas8,10 and has been implicated in the maintenance of genomic integrity by releasing severely damaged cells from mitotic arrest, forcing them into apoptosis.

In the present study, we have analyzed the expression and activity of SIRT1 and SIRT2 in the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcomas, rhabdomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma can be of two histological subtypes; the embryonal subtype (ERMS) is genetically characterized by the loss of the short arm of chromosome 11. The alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is characterized by the chromosomal translocation that fuses the PAX3 or PAX7 genes with the gene encoding the transcription factor FOXO1/FKHR.

Synovial sarcoma is the second most frequent soft tissue sarcoma (STS) developing in children and young adults, and is genetically characterized by the translocation t(18;X) and subsequent expression of the SS18/SSX fusion gene. These tumors rarely carry inactivating mutations in the p53 gene, yet, p53 tumor suppressor function is damaged due to the ubiquitination and degradation of p53 induced by SS18/SSX.11

In the present paper, we have investigated the expression and activity of SIRT1 and SIRT2 in synovial sarcomas and rhabdomyosarcomas, and we evaluated the effects of sirtuin modulation with the small-molecule tenovin-6 and with SIRT1 and SIRT2 siRNA.

Results

SIRT1 is overexpressed in synovial sarcoma tumors and soft tissue sarcoma cell lines

We quantified SIRT1 and SIRT2 mRNA expression in 12 fresh frozen synovial sarcomas (SS), 7 sarcoma cell lines and 4 primary human mesenchymal cells (diploid fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells) using QRT-PCR. SIRT1 was expressed in all SS examined and in the SS cell lines Syo-1 and 1273-99. Overall, SIRT1 expression was higher in tumors than in normal mesenchymal cells, but this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 1b). We did not find differences in SIRT2 expression among the groups, although in general we observed that SIRT2 levels were lower than SIRT1 in most samples (Figures 1a and b). SIRT1 and SIRT2 mRNA expressions in the rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines RD, RH30 and RMS were the lowest among the samples examined.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sirtuin 1 is overexpressed in primary synovial sarcoma tumors compared with normal mesenchymal cells. (a) Quantitative expression of SIRT1 and SIRT2 was determined by QRT-PCR in RNA samples obtained from fresh frozen synovial sarcomas, synovial sarcoma cell lines (1273-99, Syo1, Bax) rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines (RD, RMS and RH30), a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) cell line (740728), in three different primary mesenchymal stem cells: MSC 1–3 and in human diploid fibroblasts hF. Relative expression denotes ΔCT values of SIRT1 or SIRT2 in relation to GAPDH. (b) Graphic presentation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 expression in grouped samples. Student's t-test showed no statistical difference among the groups (NS)

Pharmacological inhibition of SIRT1 and SIRT2 with tenovin-6 has antiproliferative effects in pediatric sarcoma cell lines

To investigate a possible role of sirtuins on soft tissue sarcoma growth, we tested the activity of the SIRT1and SIRT2 inhibitor tenovin-6 (Tv6) in seven pediatric soft tissue sarcoma cell lines including four synovial sarcomas (wild-type p53) and three rhabdomyosarcomas (mutated p53 gene). Tv6 treatment inhibited cell proliferation in all sarcoma cell lines tested independent on p53 status with IC50 ranging between 1.3 and 5.5 μM at 48 h as determined by using the Wst-1 assay (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1).

Table 1. Genetic markers, p53 status and histology of soft tissue sarcoma cell lines.

Sarcoma subtype Cell line Genetic arrangement P53gene status Tv6 IC50
SS K-SS1 SS18/SSX1 wt 2.7
  SYO-1 SS18/SSX2 wt 5.5
  BAX SS18/SSX2 wt 3.6
  1273/99* SS18/SSX2 wt 4
RMS RMS (a) PAX3/7-FOXO1 Mut 2.3
  RH30 (a) PAX3/7-FOXO1 Mut 1
  RD (e) 22q- Mut 3.5

Abbreviations: RMS, rhabdomyosarcomas; SS, synovial sarcomas. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (a); embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (e) and SV-40 transformed (*). The fusion gene type and the status of the p53 gene was determined using RT-PCR and dye terminator sequencing. IC50 were determined by exposing the cells to different concentrations of tenovin-6 and determining viability after 48 h using the Wst-1 assay (Supplementary Figure 1).

We then followed the activity of Tv6 in real time for 96 h in two synovial sarcomas (K-SS1 and Syo-1) and two rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines (RD and RMS). Figure 2a shows that Tv6 had a rapid and significant cytotoxic effect at 4 μM concentration in the four lines tested without affecting the viability of primary mesenchymal stem cells. It can be also observed that the activity of Tv6 is cell-type and time dependent. For example, the antiproliferative effect of Tv6 at 2 μM concentration was evident in RMS cells at 60 h.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The sirtuin inhibitor tenovin-6 inhibits cell proliferation and induces caspase 3/7 activity in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. (a) Cell proliferation curves of control and tenovin-6 (Tv6)-treated soft tissue sarcoma cell lines followed in real time over a 96-h period using the xCELLigence bioanalyzer. Cells were plated and allowed to form monolayers. The drug was added 24 h after plating (blue arrow). Cell index is a relative unit derived from changes in electrical impedance in a surface; in this case, impedance is proportional to cell confluence giving a quantitative rate of cell numbers. (b) Caspase 3/7 activity was measured in cells after 48 h treatment with Tv6. The fold change is relative to untreated control cells (value=1). Syo-1 and K-SS1: synovial sarcoma cell lines. RD: embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. RMS: alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. MSC: mesenchymal stem cells

To investigate whether apoptosis was triggered following Tv6 treatment, we quantified the activity of caspases 3 and 7 in treated and control cells. Whereas concentrations above the IC50 (8 μM) clearly induced apoptosis, doses within the IC50 range only induced slight increments in caspase 3/7 activity in KSS1, RD and RMS cell lines. In the Syo-1 cell line, apoptosis was observed at all concentrations tested. These results show that Tv6 induces apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2b).

Tenovin-6 impairs sirtuin deacetylating activity without targeting p53 acetylation

Tv6 was described as an activator of wild-type p53 and as SIRT1 and SIRT2 inhibitor.6 We therefore investigated whether the antiproliferative effect of Tv6 in synovial sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines was accompanied by the stabilization and reactivation of p53 and, whether this effect was associated with sirtuin activity. We verified the p53 status in the cell lines used in this study by sequencing the exon 5–11 of the p53 gene and we confirmed that all synovial sarcomas carry copies of wild-type p53 gene, whereas the alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas RMS and RH carry a mutation in exon 8 of p53 (Table 1). The embryonal rhabdomysarcoma cell line RD carries a mutated p53 gene as reported.12 Cell lines were exposed to Tv6 (2 μM) for 6 and 24 h, and the acetylation of K382-p53 was evaluated. Tv6 did not induce any change on SIRT1, SIRT2, p53 or K382-p53 expression in both cells with wild-type or mutant p53. Interestingly, expression of CDKN1A/p21, a known p53 target gene, was increased in all cell lines treated with Tv6 for 6 h (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Tenovin-6 induces p21 expression without affecting p53 acetylation at lysine 382. (a) Expression of p53 and acetylated p53 (Ac 382Kp53). Cells were incubated with 2 μM Tv6, and total protein extracts from the cells were collected after 6 and 24 h for western blot using specific antibodies and infrared conjugates (IR-dye conjugates), and visualized simultaneously using the Odyssey system. (b) CDKN1A/p21 expression in Tv6-treated and control cells determined by QRT-PCR. Relative expression in relation to GAPDH is shown

Altogether, these results indicate that, in synovial sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines, Tv6 inhibits proliferation and induces p21 without affecting p53 or K382p53 expression.

On the lack of effect of Tv6 on p53 response, in sarcoma cells, we questioned whether the enzymatic activity of sirtuins is compromised in Tv6-treated sarcoma cells. To answer this question we exposed two synovial sarcoma (Syo-1 and K-SS1) and two rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines (RMS and RD) to Tv6 for 6 h in the presence of HDAC inhibitors, and analyzed sirtuin enzymatic activity using a four-amino-acid (QPKK) acetylated peptide as substrate (see material and methods). Sarcoma cells treated with two different concentrations of Tv6 did not show any change in the overall SIRT1 or SIRT2 protein expression (Figure 4a). However, with the exception of RMS, sirtuin activity in either cytoplasmic or/and nuclear extracts was decreased in all cell lines exposed to Tv6. As control, we exposed the cells to the natural sirtuin inhibitor nicotinamide (NAM) and obtained similar results as Tv6. The inhibition of sirtuin activity by Tv6 was confirmed in an additional assay that uses an acetylated histone peptide as the sirtuin substrate (Figure 4c).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Tenovin-6 and Nicotinamide (NAM) impair sirtuin deacetylating activity. Synovial sarcoma cell lines (Syo1 and K-SS1) and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines (RD and RMS) were exposed to tenovin-6 (2 μM and 4 μM) for 24 h, and protein samples were collected to determine sirtuin expression and activity. (a) Western blots showing the expression of SIRT1 and SIRT2 proteins before (0 h) or after exposure to TV6. (b) Sirtuin enzymatic activity in sarcoma cell lines exposed to sirtuin inhibitors. Nuclear- and cytoplasmic-enriched fractions were obtained from control cells and from cells exposed to Tv6 or Nicotinamide (NAM) for 6 h in vivo. Sirtuin activity was determined using a luciferase-based assay that measures deacetylation of a p53-derived peptide (SIRT-GLo Assay, Promega) in the presence of the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin (TSA). The assay measures sirtuin activity using a four-amino-acid acetylated long peptide (QPKK) derived from amino-acid residues 317–320 of p53. The peptide has been conjugated to an aminoluciferin reporting molecule. Experiments were repeated at least three times. (c) Sirtuin enzymatic activity in Tv6-treated sarcoma cell lines using an acetylated histone peptide as substrate. The experiment was performed in the same conditions as in panel b, with the difference that sirtuin activity was determined using a colorimetric assay that measures deacetylation of a histone-derived peptide (Epigenase Universal SIRT Activity/Inhibition Assay, Epigentek) as described in Materials and Methods

SIRT1 and SIRT2 inhibition with tenovin-6 impairs autophagic flux

It has been recently shown that Tv6 dysregulates autophagy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells, suggesting that inhibition of the protective effects of authophagy induces CLL cell death following exposure to Tv6. To investigate whether a similar mechanism explains the response to Tv6 in sarcoma cells, we evaluated the autophagic flux in in two synovial sarcoma and two rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines after exposure to Tv6. First, we looked at the expression of the autophagy-associated protein LC3I and its conversion to the autophagosomal form LC3-II and observed that Tv6 induced a time-dependent accumulation of LC3-II in all cell lines indicating autophagosome accumulation (data not shown). However, as this increment could be the result of increased autophagosome biogenesis or decreased turnover of autolysosomes due to reduced lysosomal fusion and/or activity, we evaluated the expression of LC3II in cells treated with Tv6 in the presence or absence of Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), an inhibitor of vacuolar H-ATPase (V-ATPase), an enzyme that blocks acidification of organelles such as lysosomes. As shown in Figure 5a, treatment with Tv6 at 2 μM concentration for 24 h resulted in the accumulation of LC3-II in all the cell lines tested. Similarly, Baf1A induced LC3-II accumulation. However, the combination of both BafA1 and Tv6 treated did not show any additive effect on LC3-II levels. Quantitative analysis of the autophagic flux, expressed as the ratio of LC3-II signals in presence and absence of BafA1, showed a significant reduction of autophagic flux in the four sarcoma cell lines exposed to Tv6, although this was not statistically significant for RH cells. The analysis of SQSTM1 (p62), another autophagy substrate that binds LC3-II and is delivered to autolysosomes for degradation, supported the finding that Tv6 treatment has an inhibitory effect on the autophagic flux (Figure 5a).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Tenovin-6 impairs autophagic flux in soft tissue sarcoma cells. (a) Synovial sarcoma cell lines (Syo-1 and BAX) and two rhabdomyosarcomas (RD and RMS) were exposed to tenovin-6 (TV6) at 2 μM concentration (*4 μM for BAX), in the presence or absence of 50 nM bafilomycin A1 (BafA1). The expression of p62 and conversion of LC3-I to its lipidated form LC3-II was determined by western blot. (b) The authophagic flux was determined by quantifying LC3-II in relation to β-actin. Autophagic flux is expressed as the ratio between LC3-II signal in the presence versus absence of Bafilomycin A1. All experiments were performed three times. (c) Autophagy flux determined by immunofluorescence using the tandem probe RFP-GFP-LC3. RD cells were transfected with the tandem probe, and Tv6 (2 μM) was added to the cultures 24 h after transfection and incubated for additional 24 h. RD cells treated with 50 nM BafA1 for 4 h were used as control for autolysosome inhibition. Autophagosome formation is visualized as yellow speckles (RFP+/GFP+), whereas autolysosomes are visualized as red speckles (RFP+/GFP−). (d) Quantification of autophagosomes (yellow) and autolysosomes (red) from 10 individual cells derived from c. The experiment was repeated twice

These results were confirmed using the tandem probe RFP-GFP-LC3.13 Transfection of this construct into cells allows to distinguish autophagosomes (RFP+/GFP+, yellow dots) from autolysosomes (RFP+/GFP−, red dots), as GFP fluorescence is quenched at the acidic pH of the autolysosomes. The RFP-GFP-LC3 construct was transfected into the RD cell line that displayed the highest autophagy inhibition following Tv6 treatment. Cells were then exposed to 2 μM Tv6 for 24 h. RD cells treated with 50 nM BafA1 for 4 h were used as control. We observed that treatment with Tv6 induced an increment in the number (and likely the size) of RFP+/GFP+ (yellow) speckles, indicating accumulation of autophagosomes. As expected, treatment with BafA1 caused a similar accumulation of yellow dots as shown in Figures 5c and d.

Nutrient deprivation enhances the tumor antiproliferative effect of tenovin-6

Sirtuins, in particular SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6, have been implicated in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism during cellular stress induced by calorie restriction.3 With this in mind, we investigated the activity of Tv6 in nutrient-deprived conditions. Two representative sarcoma cell lines Syo-1 and RD were plated in cell culturing chambers and allowed to reach exponential growth. At this point, the medium was replaced with either normal or nutrient-deprived (glucose/essential amino-acid deficient) medium containing 2 μM Tv6 or vehicle, and cell proliferation was followed in real time as long as control starved cells remained viable. Figures 6a and c show that the antitumor growth effect of Tv6 was enhanced in starving nutrient-deprived conditions in both Syo-1 and RD cell lines. However, the response curves were different. In RD cells, the deleterious effects of nutrient deprivation were evident after 96 h, whereas Syo-1 cells were highly sensitive to starving conditions and a rapid drop in cell viability was observed within the first 10 h following nutrient deprivation. Yet, the effect of Tv6 activity in normal and nutrient-deprived conditions was evident in Syo1 cells. These results were confirmed in a similar experiment where cell viability was determined at 24 h using a chromogenic assay (Figures 6b and d).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Activity of tenovin-6 in normal and in nutrient-deprived conditions. Proliferation curves of RD (a) and Syo-1 (c) cells exposed to tenovin-6 (2 μM) in normal and nutrient-deprived medium (starved). Tv6 was added when cells reached exponential growth (arrow). Panels b and d show the viability of cells exposed to Tv6 in normal medium and starved conditions for 24 h measured using a colorimetric assay. See Materials and Methods

We did not observe any change in SIRT1 or SIRT2 protein expression in RD cells treated with Tv6 in normal or starvation conditions (Figure 6, RD cells).

siRNA knockdown of SIRT1 and SIRT2 impairs rhabdomyosarcoma cell growth and LC3 II expression

To this point, our results demonstrate that the enzymatic activity of sirtuins is compromised in soft tissue sarcoma cells exposed to the sirtuin inhibitor Tv6. To prove whether sirtuins are essential to sarcoma cell growth, we knocked down SIRT1 and SIRT2 in RD cells using a cocktail of four different siRNAs for each sirtuin to avoid off-target effects, and followed cell proliferation for 120 h. Figure 7 shows that the transcriptional silencing of both SIRT1 (Figure 7a) and SIRT2 (Figure 7b) impaired the proliferation of RD cells in a dose-dependent manner, whereas control siRNA-transfected cells proliferate up to 96 h. Interestingly, the response of RD cells to SIRT1 and SIRT2 depletion was evident at 48 h. At this time, sirtuin protein expression is clearly decreased (Figure 7c), and nutrient supply is most probably deficient in the cell culturing medium.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Sirt1 and Sirt2 expression is crucial for the survival of rhabdomyosarcoma cells. siRNA molecules targeting either SIRT1 (a) or SIRT2 (b) mRNA or control siRNA were reverse transfected into the rhabdomyosarcoma cell line RD at 12 and 25 nM concentrations, and cell proliferation was followed in the xCELLigence bioanalyzer for 120 h. sirT1 and sirT2, LC3II and p62 protein expression was determined by western blot using specific antibodies and is shown in c. 12, 25 and 50 denote nanomolar concentration siRNA

To investigate a possible association between SIRT1 or SIRT2 expression and autophagy, we determined the expression of the autophagy-associated proteins LC3II and p62 in SIRT1 and SIRT2 knocked down cells. Figure 7c shows that LC3 expression was decreased in SIRT1 knockdown cells, suggesting an association between SIRT1 and autophagy.

Tenovin-6 impairs rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft growth

Mice were inoculated subcutaneously with the rhabdomyosarcoma cell line RD and allowed to form palpable xenografts before treatment with Tv6 at a concentration of 25 mg/kg/day.

Figure 8a shows that Tv6 had an inhibitory effect on the growth of rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts, with data points becoming significant on the last day of treatment (P=0.054, Student's t-test, two-sided).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effect of TV6 on the growth of ERMS xenografts. The embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma cell line RD was xenografted in SCID mice until tumors were palpable. Mice, eight per group, were treated with Tv6 at a dose of 25 mg/kg/day, while control group were treated with vehicle. (a) Tumor volume was evaluated as described in Materials and Methods. The curve shows statistically significant differences between Tv6-treated and vehicle-treated groups (P=0.0154, Student's t-test, two sided), on the last day of treatment. (b) Excised tumors. (c) Hematoxilin/eosin staining and p53, sirT1 and sirT2 immunohistochemistry of a representative sample from control and Tv6- treated RD xenografts. SIRT1 shows cytoplasmic and nuclear staining with stronger staining in the nuclear compartment. SIRT2 staining is predominantly cytoplasmic staining with clear nucleolar accumulation of the protein. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 shows homogeneous strong nuclear staining in tumor cells from control and treated mice. Green arrow: mitotic cell. Red arrow: polynuclear giant cell

Microscopically, the hematoxylin and eosin staining showed a tumor composed of pleomorphic spindle cells with macronucleoli and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Multinucleated giant tumor cells were ocasionally observed (red arrow). Frequent mitosis was easily recognized (green arrow). No differences in the composition or mitotic activity were noted between the sections prepared from mice with or without treatment (Figure 8c).

SIRT1 staining showed cytoplasmic and nuclear staining with stronger staining in the nuclear compartment. SIRT2 staining showed predominantly cytoplasmic staining with clear nucleolar accumulation of the protein. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 showed homogeneous strong nuclear staining in tumor cells from control and treated mice.

In summary, no differences were noted in the staining intensity, intracellular distribution or percentage of positively stained cells for SIRT1, SIRT2 and p53 in tenovin-6-treated or untreated control tumors (Figure 8c).

Discussion

In the present study, we have explored the role of sirtuin expression and activity in the proliferation and survival of synovial sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines.

We found that SIRT1 is overexpressed in synovial sarcoma tumors and synovial sarcoma cell lines in comparison with normal mesenchymal cells. The levels of SIRT1 were also significantly higher than those of SIRT2 in almost all samples tested. Similarly, other reports have shown that SIRT1 is overexpressed in malignant epithelial tumors,13 breast cancer,14 prostate tumors,15 soft tissue sarcomas,16 cutaneous T-cell lymphomas17 and melanoma,18 and high SIRT1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in diffuse B-cell lymphomas,19 ovarian and breast cancers.13,14 The significance of SIRT1 expression in tumor oncogenesis is, however, controversial due to the dual role of this sirtuin: on one side a negative effect on p53 function5,20 and on the other side its involvement in the maintenance of DNA integrity. The SIRT1 knockout mouse model supports a tumor suppressor function for SIRT1,9 and, similar to other suppressor genes, SIRT1 is activated under cellular stress conditions, such as nutrient deprivation.

We found that the pharmacological inhibition of SIRT1 and SIRT2 with tenovin-6 effectively inhibited the proliferation of seven pediatric sarcoma cell lines at concentrations between 2 and 5 μM (Table 1). As this drug inhibits SIRT1 from deacetylating p53 at K382 in several tumor cells stabilizing p53 expression and reactivating its apoptotic function,4, 5, 6 we hypothesized that acetylation of K382-p53 could be as well compromised in Tv6-treated sarcoma cells; however, we found that the antiproliferative effect of Tv6 was independent of the p53 gene status (wild type or mutated), K382-p53 acetylation or apoptotic function. Similar results showing that Tv6 has antitumor activity independent on p53 gene status have been reported for chronic lymphocytic leukemia21 and gastric cancer models.22

Interestingly, the expression of the the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(cip1/waf1 CDKN1A), a p53 target gene, was increased in all cell lines exposed to Tv6. Several studies have shown that HDAC inhibitors activate p21 expression. This has been explained by an increased acetylation of histones surrounding the p21 promoter region.23 A similar mechanism could explain p21 upregulation by the class III HDAC (sirtuin) inhibitors. In addition, it was recently reported that tenovin analogs promote p21 expression but fail to increase p53 levels or transcription factor activity.6,24

The protein levels of SIRT1 and SIRT2 remained unchanged; however, sirtuin enzymatic activity was compromised in Tv6- and nicotinamide (NAM)-treated cells. This was demonstrated using two independent enzymatic assays using either a four-amino-acid acetylated peptide derived from the p53 sequence or a histone-derived peptide. It is unlikely that the size of this peptide mimics deacetylation of full-length p53.

Seven human sirtuins have been identified acting on a widespread number of substrates. We did some attempts to identify sirtuin substrates potentially modulated by Tv6 such as α-tubulin, FOXO1A and histone H4 (data not shown). The FOXO1 gene was particularly interesting since it is fused to either the PAX3 gene or the PAX7 gene in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, cytosolic FOXO1 has been associated with autophagy induction as it is deacetylated by SIRT2.25 However, we did not find changes in the acetylation of FOXO1A following Tv6 treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma cells (data not shown).

An interesting finding is that the cytotoxic effect of Tv6 is associated with a decreased sirtuin deacetylase activity and with an impaired autophagic flux. The effects of Tv6 on the autophagy flux was studied by two different methods: LC3II quantification and by using a RFP/GFP LC3 tandem probe that allows the microscopic visualization of autophagosomes and autolysosomes. Both methods showed that Tv6 induces a clear accumulation of autophagosomes. Similarly, McCallum and colleagues21 have reported that Tv6 dysregulates autophagy in CLL cells, although the association of autophagy with sirtuin activity was not investigated in this study.

Other reports have linked SIRT1 to the regulation of authophagy such as the studies that showed that sirT1 (−/−) mouse embryonic fibroblasts fail to activate autophagy in response to nutrient deprivation, and that SIRT1 directly interacts and deacetylates several authopagy-related proteins like Atg5, Atg7 and Atg8. The SIRT1 knockout mice undergo embryonic lethality, nevertheless the SIRT1 (−/+) mouse develops tumors when crossed with the p53 −/+ mouse.26 In embryonic stem cells, SIRT1 positively regulates autophagy, increases mitochondrial function and reduces oxidative stress, indicating that SIRT1 has a protective role under cellular stress conditions.25

Consistently, sirtuin inhibition studies with agents such as sirtinol, EX-527 and with siRNA have shown that SIRT1 inhibition impairs autophagy.27,28

Resveratrol, caloric restriction and oxidative stress induce autophagy and SIRT1 expression in tumor cell lines.29 In our study, autophagic cell death induced by sirtuin inhibition was enhanced in nutrient-deprived conditions, and the proliferation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 knockdown cells was only evident after 2 days in culture, a time point in which nutrient availability is limited in the culture media. These results support a protective role for SIRT1 in fast growing tumors in which blood supply, oxygen and nutrients become limited.

Using siRNA to knock down SIRT1 and SIRT2 expression, we demonstrated that SIRT1 and SIRT2 expression is crucial for the survival of sarcoma cells. We also showed that SIRT1-siRNA knocked out cells had a decreased expression of LC3-II, adding support to the association between SIRT1 and autophagy and suggesting that acetylation of the autophagy-related proteins such as atg 5, atg7 or atg8 could be affected as a consequence of SIRT1 inhibition with Tv6. Interestingly, p53 is both positive and negative regulator of autophagy and transactivates autophagy-associated genes in response to metabolic stress.30,31

In vivo, tenovin-6 decreased the growth of a fast growing embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) xenografts without affecting p53 or SIRT1 and SIRT2 expression. Tv6 has shown significant antitumor activity in vivo, alone or in combination with imatinib, in a chronic myeloid leukemia model.32 Possibly, the antitumor effect of Tv6 in solid tumors could be enhanced in combination with drugs inhibiting vascularization or inducing metabolic stress.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that SIRT1 and SIRT2 expression and activity are crucial for the survival of synovial sarcomas and rhabdomyosarcomas, and that SIRT1 and SIRT2 inhibition impairs the autophagy process inducing cell death.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines

Synovial sarcoma cell lines: SYO-1 (provided by Dr. A. Kawai), K-SS1 (established in our lab from a monophasic SS18/SSX1 synovial sarcoma biopsy); 1273-99 (obtained from Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna), Bax (from Institute Cancer Research, Sutton). Rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines: RMS and RH30 are alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, and RD is an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (all provided by J Shipley, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton). All cell lines were grown as adherent cultures and were passaged in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (High clone III, HyClone, Cramlington, UK).

Cell assays to determine the activity of tenovin-6 in vitro

Tenovin-6 was kindly provided by Lain S. For in vitro assays, a 10-mM stock was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), from which working solutions were freshly prepared to the desired concentrations. In all cytotoxicity assays, cells were plated and allowed to attach overnight before drug treatment.

Drug effect on cell proliferation was analyzed in real time over a period of 96–120 h using the xCELLigence cell analyzer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) that measures electrical impedance imposed by adherent cells and is expressed as a value relative to confluence (cell index). In this assay, the number of cells per well was optimized for each cell line to get logarithmic cell growth during 96 h.

IC50 was determined by using WST1 assay (Roche) based on the enzymatic digestion of tetrazolium salt by viable cells. In this assay cells were plated at ~30–50% confluence depending on the growth rate of each cell and to keep control untreated cells viable (see cell pictures in Supplementary Figure 1). Percentage of viability after drug administration was calculated in relation to untreated control. Each assay was repeated at least three times.

Apoptosis was determined in sarcoma cell lines exposed to different concentrations of Tv6 during 48 h by measuring caspase 3/7 activity using a luminescence assay (ApoTox Glow, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

To study the activity of tenovin-6 in nutrient-deprived conditions, cells were plated in xCELLigence chambers or 96-well plates and allowed to form monolayers. Once the cells reached exponential growth phase, Tv6 was added at the desired concentration in normal media or media depleted of glucose and essential amino acids (Earle's Balances Salt Solution (EBSS-media)) containing 2% FBS. The media of untreated controls was also replaced with fresh normal medium (control) or EBSS-2%FBS (control starved cells). Cell proliferation was followed in real time until control-starved cells stopped proliferating. Cell viability was also measured using an independent colorimetric assay based on the determination of alkaline phosphatase in alive cells.

Western blot and antibodies

Cells were seeded and incubated overnight to let them adhere. The next day cells were treated with tenovin-6 as specified in the text. Cells were then collected in loading buffer, containing 10% β-mercaptoethanol, sonicated, heated for 10 min at 70 °C. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on 4–12% gradient gels under denaturing conditions and proteins transferred onto PDVF or nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK). After blocking in 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich), the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies: p53 DO1 (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany), Acetyl K382p53 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), β-actin, SirT1 and sirT2 (Atlas Antibodies, Stockhom, Sweden), LC3-II and p62 (Cell Signaling Technology). After a series of washes in PBS/0.1% Tween20 (PBS-T), the membranes were incubated for 1 h with the secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Membranes were subsequently washed in PBS-T and developed using chemiluminescence western blotting detection reagents (Pierce Biotechnology).

When using the Oddisey system for western blot detection, we use nitrocellulose membranes western transfer and blocking buffer fron the manufacturer. For detection, we used infrared fluorescence IRDye secondary antibodies for the simultaneous detection of p53 and acetylated p53.

QRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In brief, 500 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA, using random hexameres and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gene expression analysis was performed in quadruplicates of each sample in a total volume of 20 μl using TaqMan probes: hs01009005(SIRT1) and hs00247263(SIRT2) (TaqMan, Life Technologies). Each assay was repeated three times.

Sirtuin activity in nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from tenovin-6-treated cells

For the quantitation of sirtuin activity, cells (~3 × 106) were cultured to 80% confluence and starved in serum-free media overnight before exposure to 4 μM TV6 in medium containing FBS, or only medium with FBS (control untreated cells) for 6 h. The cells were then scraped and collected in hypotonic buffer (containing 10mM Tris Ph 7.5, 10 mM NaCl and 1.5 mM MgCl2, protease and HDAC inhibitors), cryo-lyzed with three cycles of freezing (liquid nitrogen), and thawed and centrifuged at 8000 r.p.m. for 5 min to separate the cytoplasmic from the nuclear fractions. The nuclei containing pellets were washed in hypotonic buffer, resuspended in NP40 buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 50 mM Tris pH 8) and sonicated. Protein concentration in the subcellular extracts was determined before the determination of sirtuin activity using a standard Bradford method.

The enzymatic activity of sirtuins was quantitated in three independent experiments using two independent methods: SIRT-Glo Assay (Promega), which is a luminescent assay that measures the relative activity of sirtuins from purified enzyme sources. The system uses as a substrate an acetylated four-amino-acid peptide (QPKK) derived from amino-acid residues 317–320 of p53. The peptide has been conjugated to an aminoluciferin reporting molecule; sirtuin activity is therefore assessed by luminescence.

Sirtuin activity was also determined using a fluorometric assay Epigenase Universal SIRT Activity/Inhibition Assay (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA) that has been optimized for measuring sirtuin activity from nuclear extracts using a histone-derived substrate.

Authophagy studies

Autophagy flux was examined by quantifying the conversion of the cytosolic LC3I to the autophagosome membrane bound LC3II in the presence of bafilomycinA1 and by quantifying the number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in cells transfected with the tandem RFP/GFP-LC3II vector and exposed to tenovin-6 or BafA1.

Cells were plated in their standard medium and allowed to adhere overnight before the addition of tenovin-6 (2 μM) for 24 h. Bafilomycin 1A at 50 nM concentration (Sigma B1793) was added to the cell cultures 4 h before the end point of the experiment.

The protein lysates were sonicated and resolved in 4–12% polyacrilamide gels (Invitrogen), and western blot was performed to detect the expression of LC3I/LC3II and p62 using the following antibodies: p62 (BD Transduction Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA, 610833), LC3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2775) and β-actin (Sigma, A5441). HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (NA934V), and anti-mouse (NXA931) antibodies, ECL system (RPN2106) were from GE Healthcare (Pittsburgh, PA, USA).

A tandem RFP/GFP fluorescent-tagged LC3 plasmid was used to assess autophagosome maturation process as previously described.33 RD cells plated in round coverslips were transfected with 1 μg of tandem RFP/GFP plasmid and exposed to 2 μM tenovin-6, 24 h after transfection. BafA1 was added 4 h before the end point of the experiment (24 h after Tv6). The coverslips were removed from the medium,washed three times with PBS and fixed in freezer cold ethanol :acetone 1 : 1 for 15 min, dried and mounted in DAPI solution before visualization in a fluorescent light microscope.

SIRT1 and SIRT2 siRNA transfections

RD cells were reverse transfected with SIRT1-siRNA or SIRT2-siRNA molecules each consisting of four individual siRNAs targeting different sirtuin regions to avoid off-target effects (ON-TARGETplus Human SIRT1 (23411) siRNA and Human SIRT2 (22933)—SMARTpool) using DharmaFECT1 transfection reagent. Control cells were transfected with siGENOME non-targeting siRNA pool. We followed the manufacturer's recommendation for transfection optimization.

Activity of tenovin-6 in vivo

Animal studies were approved by the ethics committee Stockholms Norra Djurförsöksetiska Nämnd to B.B. (N80/11).

Fox Chase SCID mouse, CB17/lcr-PrkdcSCID/lcrCrl (~8 weeks old, 20–30 g) were inoculated subcutaneously in the right flank with 3 × 106 RD cells resuspended in 100 μl matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Mice, (eight per group) were treated with either tenovin-6 (Tv6) or placebo once tumors became palpable (approximately day 8 after inoculation). Both drug and placebo were delivered by subcutaneous introduction of a 21-day release pellet. The slow-release pellets maintained steady drug levels of 25 mg/kg/day during the 10-day course of the experiment.

Tumor dimensions were recorded twice per week. At the end point of the experiment, mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and each tumor was excised and fixed in formalin. Tumor volumes were calculated using the equation (l°—w2)/2, where l and w represent the largest and smallest dimensions at each measurement. The effect of drug treatment on tumor growth was analyzed statistically using two-sided Student's t-test.

Immunohistochemistry of the tumors was performed using standard methods using the following antibodies: p53 (DO-1, Calbiochem) sirT1 (Atlas Ab, HPA 052351) and sirT2 (Atlas Ab, HPA011165).

Glossary

SIRT1

sirtuin 1

SIRT2

sirtuin 2

HDAC

histone deacetylase

NAD+

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidized form)

ADP

adenosine diphosphate

LC3

Microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3

Tv6

tenovin 6

DMSO

dimethyl sulfoxide

SS

synovial sarcoma

RMS

rhabdomyosarcoma

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Disease website (http://www.nature.com/cddis)

Edited by GM Fimia

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1
Supplementary Figure 1 Legend

References

  1. 1Vaquero A. The conserved role of sirtuins in chromatin regulation. Int J Dev Biol 2009; 53: 303–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. 2Kaeberlein M, McVey M, Guarente L. The SIR2/3/4 complex and SIR2 alone promote longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two different mechanisms. Gene Dev 1999; 13: 2570–2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. 3North BJ, Verdin E. Sirtuins: Sir2-related NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. Genome Biol 2004; 5: 224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. 4Luo J, Nikolaev AY, Imai S, Chen D, Su F, Shiloh A et al. Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell 2001; 107: 137–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. 5Vaziri H, Dessain SK, Ng Eaton E, Imai SI, Frye RA, Pandita TK et al. hSIR2(SIRT1) functoins as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell 2001; 107: 149–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. 6Lain S, Hollick JJ, Campbell J, Staples OD, Higgins M, Aoubala M et al. Discovery, in vivo activity, and mechanism of action of a small-molecule p53 activator. Cancer Cell 2008; 13: 454–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. 7Yuan H, Su L, Chen WY. The emerging and diverse roles of sirtuins in cancer: a clinical perspective. Onco Targets Ther 2013; 6: 1399–1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. 8Jeong J, Juhn K, Lee H, Kim SH, Min BH, Lee KM et al. SIRT1 promotes DNA repair activity and deacetylation of Ku70. Exp Mol Med 2007; 39: 8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. 9Wang RH, Sengupta K, Li C, Kim HS, Cao L, Xiao C et al. Impaired DNA damage response, genome instability, and tumorigenesis in SIRT1 mutant mice. Cancer Cell 2008; 14: 312–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. 10Hiratsuka M. Proteomics-based identification of differentially expressed genes in human gliomas: down-regulation of SIRT2 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 309: 558–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. 11D'Arcy P, Maruwge W, Ryan BA, Brodin B. The oncoprotein SS18-SSX1 promotes p53 ubiquitination and degradation by enhancing HDM2 stability. Mol Cancer Res 2008; 6: 127–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. 12Felix CA, Kappel CC, Mitsudomi T, Nau MM, Tsokos M, Crouch GD et al. Frequency and Diversity of p53 Mutations in Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cncer Res 1992; 52: 2243–2247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. 13Jang KY, Kim KS, Hwang SH, Kwon KS, Kim KR, Park HS et al. Expression and prognostic significance of SIRT1 in ovarian epithelial tumours. Pathology 2009; 41: 366–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. 14Lee H, Kim KR, Noh SJ, Park HS, Kwon KS, Park BH et al. Expression of DBC1 and SIRT1 is associated with poor prognosis for breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2011; 42: 204–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. 15Jung-Hynes B, Nihal M, Zhong W, Ahmad N. Role of sirtuin histone deacetylase SIRT1 in prostate cancer. A target for prostate cancer management via its inhibition? J Biol Chem 2009; 2009: 3823–3832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. 16Dickson BC, Riddle ND, Brooks JS, Pasha TL, Zhang PJ. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1): a potential immunohistochemical marker and therapeutic target in soft tissue neoplasms with myoid differentiation. Hum Pathol 2013; 44: 1125–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. 17Nihal M, Ahmad N, Wood GS. SIRT1 is upregulated in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and its inhibition induces growth arrest and apoptosis. Cell Cycle 2014; 13: 632–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. 18Wilking MJ, Singh C, Nihal M, Zhong W, Ahmad N. SIRT1 deacetylase is overexpressed in human melanoma and its small molecule inhibition imparts anti-proliferative response via p53 activation. Arch Biochem Biophys 2014; pii: S0003-9861: 00124–00126. epub ahead of print; doi:doi:10.1016/j.abb.2014.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. 19Jang KY, Hwang SH, Kwon KS, Kim KR, Choi HN, Lee NR et al. SIRT1 expression is associated with poor prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 1523–1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. 20Vaziri H, Dessain SK, Ng Eaton E, Imai SI, Frye RA, Pandita TK et al. hSIR2SIRT1 functions as an NAD+-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell 2001; 107: 149–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. 21Groves MJ, Johnson CE, James J, Prescott AR, Cunningham J, Haydock S et al. p53 and cell cycle independent dysregulation of autophagy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Cancer 2013; 109: 2434–2444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. 22Hirai S, Endo S, Saito R, Hirose M, Ueno T, Suzuki H et al. Antitumor effects of a Sirtuin inhibitor, Tenovin-6, against gastric cancer cells via death receptor 5 up-regulation. PLoS One 2014; 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. 23Ocker M, Schneider-Stock R. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: signalling towards p21cip1/waf1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007; 39: 1367–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. 24McCarthy AR, Sachweh MC, Higgins M, Campbell J, Drummond CJ, van Leeuwen IM et al. Tenovin-D3, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of sirtuin SirT2, increases p21 (CDKN1A) expression in a p53-independent manner. Mol Cancer Ther 2013; 12: 352–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. 25Zhao Y, Yang J, Liao W, Liu X, Zhang H, Wang S et al. Cytosolic FoxO1 is essential for the induction of autophagy and tumour suppressor activity. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12: 665–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. 26Lee IH, Cao L, Mostoslavsky R, Lombard DB, Liu J, Bruns NE et al. A role for the NAD-dependent deacetylase Sirt1 in the regulation of autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 3374–3379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. 27Hwang JW, Chung S, Sundar IK, Yao H, Arunachalam G, McBurney MW et al. Cigarette smoke-induced autophagy is regulated by SIRT1-PARP-1-dependent mechanism: implication in pathogenesis of COPD. Arch Biochem Biophys 2010; 500: 203–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. 28Takeda-Watanabe A, Kitada M, Kanasaki K, Koya D. SIRT1 inactivation induces inflammation through the dysregulation of autophagy in human THP-1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 427: 191–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. 29Tang FNaBL, Sirtuins' modulation of autophagy. J Cell Physiol 2013; 228: 2262–2270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. 30Crighton D, Wilkinson S, Ryan KM. DRAM links autophagy to p53 and programmed cell death. Autophagy 2007; 3: 72–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. 31Kenzelmann Broz D, Attardi LD. TRP53 activates a global autophagy program to promote tumor suppression. Autophagy 2013; 9: 1440–1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. 32Li L, Wang L, Li L, Wang Z, Ho Y, McDonald T et al. Activation of p53 by SIRT1 inhibition enhances elimination of CML leukemia stem cells in combination with imatinib. Cancer Cell 2012; 21: 266–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. 33Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy 2007; 3: 452–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1
Supplementary Figure 1 Legend

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES