Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Dec;58(12):7595–7596. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03920-14

In Vitro Activity of AZD0914, a Novel DNA Gyrase Inhibitor, against Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae

Stephan A Kohlhoff a, Michael D Huband b, Margaret R Hammerschlag a,
PMCID: PMC4249501  PMID: 25288086

Abstract

The in vitro activities of AZD0914, levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline against 10 isolates each of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae were tested. For AZD0914, the MIC90s for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae were 0.25 μg/ml (range, 0.06 to 0.5 μg/ml) and 1 μg/ml (range, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml), respectively, and the minimal bactericidal concentrations at which 90% of the isolates were killed (MBC90s) were 0.5 μg/ml for C. trachomatis (range, 0.125 to 1 μg/ml) and 2 μg/ml for C. pneumoniae (range, 0.5 to 2 μg/ml).

TEXT

Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States, causing more than 1.4 million cases of cervicitis and urethritis each year (1). Chlamydia pneumoniae is a frequent cause of community-acquired respiratory infections, including pneumonia and bronchitis, in adults and children (2). Quinolones have excellent activity against a wide range of bacteria, including Chlamydia spp. (3). Antimicrobial activity of quinolones is mediated through inhibition of bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV activities, which then inhibit bacterial DNA synthesis (3). AZD0914 is a member of a new class of antibacterials which incorporates a novel spiropyrimidinetrione that also targets DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV through a novel mode of inhibition (4). AZD0914 has potent in vitro antibacterial activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant and multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (4, 5).

We compared the in vitro activity of AZD0914 to those of levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline against 10 isolates each of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae.

The isolates of C. trachomatis tested included seven standard isolates from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) [D-UW-57Cx (VR-878), E-BOUR (VR-348B), F-IC-CAL3 (VR-346), H-UW-43Cx (VR-879), I-UW-12Ur (VR-880), J-UW-36Cx (VR-886), and L2-434 (VR-902B)] and four clinical isolates [N18 (cervical), N19 (cervical), and 7015 (infant eye)]. The isolates of C. pneumoniae tested included four standard isolates from the ATCC [TW 183 (VR-2282), AR 39 (53592), CM-1 (VR-1360), and T 2043 (VR1355)] and six isolates from patients with community-acquired pneumonia, including isolates from bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and pneumonia from the United States (BAY 1, BAY13, BAL 18, BAL 19, BAL 37, and BAL 62).

AZD0914 (AstraZeneca), azithromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), levofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), and doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) were supplied as powders and solubilized according to the manufacturers' instructions. Drug suspensions were made fresh each time the assay was run. Susceptibility testing of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae was performed with HEp-2 cells grown in 96-well microtiter plates (6). Each well was inoculated with 0.2 ml of the test strain diluted to yield 104 inclusion-forming units per ml; the plates were centrifuged at 1,700 × g for 1 h and incubated at 35°C for 1 h. Wells were then aspirated and overlaid with medium containing 1 μg/ml of cycloheximide and serial 2-fold dilutions of the test drugs. After incubation at 35°C for 72 h, cultures were fixed and stained for inclusions with fluorescein-conjugated antibody to the chlamydial lipopolysaccharide genus-specific antigen (Pathfinder; Bio-Rad, Redmond, WA). The MIC was the lowest antimicrobial concentration at which no inclusions were seen. The minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined by aspirating the antibiotic-containing medium, washing the wells twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and adding antibiotic-free medium. The infected cells were frozen at −70°C, thawed, passed onto new cells, incubated for 72 h, and then fixed and stained as described above. The MBC was the lowest antimicrobial concentration that resulted in no inclusions after passage. All tests were run in duplicate.

The MICs and MBCs for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae are shown in Tables 1 and 2. For AZD0914, The MIC90s for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae were 0.25 μg/ml (range, 0.06 to 0.5 μg/ml) and 1 μg/ml (range, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml), respectively, and the minimal bactericidal concentrations at which 90% of the isolates were killed (MBC90s) were 0.5 μg/ml for C. trachomatis (range, 0.125 to 1 μg/ml) and 2 μg/ml for C. pneumoniae (range, 0.5 to 2 μg/ml).

TABLE 1.

Activities of AZD0914 and comparator antibacterials against 10 isolates of C. trachomatis

Drug MIC (μg/ml)
MBC (μg/ml)
Range 50% 90% Range 90%
AZD0914 0.06–0.5 0.125 0.25 0.125–1 0.5
Levofloxacin 0.125–0.5 0.25 0.25 0.125–1 0.5
Doxycycline 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.125 0.03–0.25 0.125
Azithromycin 0.004–0.03 0.008 0.015 0.008–0.03 0.015

TABLE 2.

Activities of AZD0914 and comparator antibacterials against 10 isolates of C. pneumoniae

Drug MIC (μg/ml)
MBC (μg/ml)
Range 50% 90% Range 90%
AZD0914 0.25–1 0.5 1 0.5–2 2
Levofloxacin 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.125–2 2
Doxycycline 0.06–0.125 0.125 0.125 0.25–0.5 0.5
Azithromycin 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06–0.25 0.25

The in vitro activity of AZD0914 against C. trachomatis was comparable to those of levofloxacin and doxycycline and 16-fold less than that of azithromycin, based on MIC90 values. The in vitro activity of AZD0914 against C. pneumoniae was comparable with that of levofloxacin, 4-fold less than that of doxycycline, and 16-fold less than that of azithromycin, based on MIC90 values. However, in vitro activity may not necessarily predict microbiologic efficacy in vivo against C. pneumoniae. For example, clarithromycin is 10- to 100-fold more active than erythromycin but was not more effective in the eradication of C. pneumoniae (7).

The in vitro activity of AZD0914 is comparable to those of several antibiotics with proven clinical efficacy against chlamydial infections (8). The results presented here suggest that AZD0914 may be effective for the treatment of infections due to C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae. Furthermore, the in vitro susceptibility testing protocol used for this study is the only one whose results have been shown to correlate with clinical outcome and microbiologic eradication for infections caused by C. pneumoniae (8, 9). Of special interest is the fact that AZD0914 has activity against both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae (including drug-resistant strains), which may allow treatment of infections with strains of both species with a single drug. The role of AZD0914 in the treatment of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae infections will ultimately depend on the results of clinical studies that assess microbiologic efficacy.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 6 October 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2011. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/surv2011.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hammerschlag MR, Kohlhoff SA, Apfalter PM. 2010. Chlamydia (Chlamydophila) pneumoniae, p 2467–2475 In Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. (ed), Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases, 7th ed, vol 1 Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hooper DC, Strahilevitz J. 2010. Quinolones: anti-infective therapy, p 487–490 In Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. (ed), Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases, 7th ed, vol 1 Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacobsson S, Golparian D, Alm RA, Huband M, Mueller J, Jensen JS, Ohnishi M, Unemo M. 2014. High in vitro activity of the novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914, a DNA gyrase inhibitor, against multidrug resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates suggests a new effective option for oral treatment of gonorrhea. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 58:5585–5588. 10.1128/AAC.03090-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huband MD, Otterson LG, Doig PC, Giacobbe RA, Patey SA, Gowravaram M, Basarab GS, Mueller JP. 2013. Benzisoxazoles: in vitro activity of new bacterial DNA gyrase/topoisomerase IV inhibitors against Gram-positive, fastidious Gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic bacterial isolates, poster F-1220. Abstr. 53rd Annu. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., Denver, CO, 10 to 13 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roblin PM, Dumornay W, Hammerschlag MR. 1992. Use of HEp-2 cells for improved isolation and passage of Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1968–1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Block SJ, Hedrick J, Hammerschlag MR, Cassell GH, Craft C. 1995. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: comparative efficacy and safety of clarithromycin vs. erythromycin ethylsuccinate. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 14:471–477. 10.1097/00006454-199506000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hammerschlag MR, Kohlhoff SA. 2012. Treatment of chlamydial infections. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 13:542–552. 10.1517/14656566.2012.658776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roblin PM, Hammerschlag MR. 1998. Microbiologic efficacy of azithromycin and susceptibilities to azithromycin of isolates of Chlamydia pneumoniae from adults and children with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:194–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES