Abstract
In long-term experiments with differentially salinized nutrient solutions, plants of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Walter failed at Na+ concentrations of 200 millimolar or more but tolerated K+ concentrations of that magnitude. The behavior of the wild, salt-tolerant Lycopersicon cheesmanii (Hook) C. H. Mull., accession number 1401, was diametrically different; it tolerated Na+ at 200 millimolar, but K+ at the same concentration proved toxic to it.
Short-term comparative studies on the absorption and translocation of Na+, K+, and Cl− of the two species were carried out using radioactive tracers with excised roots and whole plants. These studies showed that, under high salt conditions (50-100 millimolar NaCl), the tolerant 1401 freely accumulated Na+ in the shoot, while the salt-sensitive cultivar excluded it from the leaves, where it has been shown to be toxic.
In experiments where K+ was limiting, the salt-tolerant species could partially substitute Na+ for K+. Sodium stimulated growth even when K+ was present at adequate concentrations. The domestic cultivar could not substitute Na+ for K+ and showed no similar growth stimulation when Na+ was added in the presence of adequate K+. The salt-tolerant 1401 was more efficient in K+ absorption than was the domestic cultivar at both low and moderate ambient K+ concentrations.
The two species differed little in their chloride relations.
Full text
PDF![1308](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a599/426093/7a426f814ae4/plntphys00542-0104.png)
![1309](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a599/426093/cae445e8dd5a/plntphys00542-0105.png)
![1310](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a599/426093/69facbe21217/plntphys00542-0106.png)
![1311](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a599/426093/30ae65c5aa68/plntphys00542-0107.png)
![1312](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a599/426093/9805ef5b1f3a/plntphys00542-0108.png)
![1313](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a599/426093/40990763f3c2/plntphys00542-0109.png)
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Rush D. W., Epstein E. Genotypic Responses to Salinity: Differences between Salt-sensitive and Salt-tolerant Genotypes of the Tomato. Plant Physiol. 1976 Feb;57(2):162–166. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.2.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storey R., Jones R. G. Responses of Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica to Salinity. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jan;63(1):156–162. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]